ACC 260 Accounting Ethics: Keeping it
Clean
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ACC-260/ACC-260-Complete-Class.
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ACC 260 Week 1 CheckPoint ETHICS IN
THE ACCOUNTING PROFESSION
CheckPoint: Ethics in the Accounting Profession
· Resource: Business & Professional Ethics
· Answer questions 13 and 14 on p. 25 of the text.
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ACC-260/ACC-260-Week-1-CheckPoint-ETHICS-IN-THEACCOUNTING-PROFESSION
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ACC 260 Week 1 DQ 1 And DQ 2
ACC 260 Week 1 DQ 1
Read the Where Were the Accountants? Ethics Case on pp. 36-37 (Ch. 1)
of the text. Answer the question as if you were Sam. Respond to your
classmates as if you were Norm. How helpful are your classmates’
responses?
ACC 260 Week 1 DQ 2
Many methods are used to maintain high ethical standards in the
accounting profession, including government regulations, ethics course
requirements in schools, and professional societies or associations that
maintain codes of ethics. What method do you think accounting
professionals find most effective or beneficial? What method do you
think would be most effective for ensuring high ethical standards in the
accounting profession? Explain your answers.
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ACC-260/ACC-260-Week-1-DQ-1-And-DQ-2
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ACC 260 WEEK 2 ASSIGNMENT THE
ENRON AND WORLDCOM SCANDALS
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ACC-260/ACC-260-WEEK-2-ASSIGNMENT-THE-ENRON-ANDWORLDCOM-SCANDALS
Assignment: The Enron and WorldCom Scandals
· Resource: Business & Professional Ethics
· Review the accounts of the Enron and WorldCom scandals in Ch. 2 of the
text:
o Enron’s Questionable Transactions on pp. 96-107
o WorldCom: The Final Catalyst on pp. 114-118
· Answer the following questions using complete sentences:
o Enron: 1, 3, 5, 6, and 9 on pp. 106-107
o WorldCom: 1, 3, 4, and 5 on p. 118
· Post your answers as an attachment. Clearly label the case and question
number for each of your responses.
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ACC 260 WEEK 2 CHECKPOINT
UNETHICAL PRACTICES OF ARTHUR
ANDERSEN
CheckPoint: Unethical Practices of Arthur Andersen
· Resource: Business & Professional Ethics
· Read the Arthur Andersen’s Troubles Ethics Case on pp. 107-113 (Ch. 2)
of the text.
· Answer questions 1, 3, and 4 on p. 113 in 200 to 300 words. When
responding to question 3, focus solely on the Enron case.
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ACC-260/ACC-260-WEEK-2-CHECKPOINT-UNETHICAL-PRACTICESOF-ARTHUR-ANDERSEN
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ACC 260 Week 3 DQ 1 And DQ 2
Week 3 DQ 1
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) is a piece of legislation that affects many
corporations. Do you think SOX is really necessary? Explain your answer.
Week 3 DQ 2
What are the three most important improvements in the governance
structure that could result from SOX?
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ACC-260/ACC-260-Week-3-DQ-1-And-DQ-2
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ACC 260 WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT CRITIQUING PHILOSOPHICAL
APPROACHES TO ETHICAL DECISION
MAKING
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ACC-260/ACC-260-WEEK-4-ASSIGNMENT-CRITIQUINGPHILOSOPHICAL-APPROACHES-TO-ETHICAL-DECISION-MAKING
Assignment: Critiquing Philosophical Approaches to Ethical Decision
Making
Although there are many different methods by which to determine an
appropriate ethical course of action in a situation, not every method is
effective in all situations. Not all ethical frameworks are equally useful.
Beyond knowing how to use a particular ethical framework, the ability
to evaluate a framework for appropriateness is also beneficial.
· Resource: Appendix B
· Review each of the responses you wrote in Appendix B.
· Write a 900- to 1,350-word paper in which you critique each of the
philosophical approaches for each of the scenarios in Appendix B.
Evaluate whether or not the course of action you chose for the
Philosophical Approaches to Ethical Decision Making CheckPoint really
is ethical and whether or not the reasoning for that course of action
makes sense. Ask yourself the following questions:
o Is the course of action really the most ethical choice?
o If so, are these the best reasons for making this choice? Explain.
o If not, why? What is a better choice?
o What reasons are there for believing this alternative is more ethical?
· Format your paper according to APA guidelines, including any
references to the textbook or other sources.
· Post your completed paper as an attachment.
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ACC 260 WEEK 4 CHECKPOINT APPENDIX
B PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHES TO
ETHICAL DECISION MAKING
CheckPoint: Philosophical Approaches to Ethical Decision Making
· Resource: Appendix B
· Complete the matrix in Appendix B.
· Post your completed matrix as an attachment.
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ACC-260/ACC-260-WEEK-4-CHECKPOINT-APPENDIX-BPHILOSOPHICAL-APPROACHES-TO-ETHICAL-DECISION-MAKING
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ACC 260 WEEK 5 CHECKPOINT
APPROACHES TO STAKEHOLDER IMPACT
ANALYSIS
CheckPoint: Approaches to Stakeholder Impact Analysis
· Resources: Appendix B
· Describe how you might conduct a stakeholder impact analysis of
Scenario 1 of Appendix B using each of the stakeholder impact analysis
approaches: moral standards, 5-question, and Pastin’s approach. Note:
You are not required to analyze the impact on each stakeholder.
· Post your description in 200 to 300 words.
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ACC-260/ACC-260-WEEK-5-CHECKPOINT-APPROACHES-TOSTAKEHOLDER-IMPACT-ANALYSIS
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ACC 260 Week 5 DQ 1 And DQ 2
Week 5 DQ 1
Answer question 5 on p. 354 (Ch. 5) of the text. Explain your answer.
Week 5 DQ 2
Answer question 5 on p. 354 (Ch. 5) of the text. Explain your answer.
In what circumstances would each approach to stakeholder impact
analysis (moral standards, five-question, and Pastin’s approach) be most
useful? Summarize the approaches and describe when each would be
most or least useful.
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ACC-260/ACC-260-Week-5-DQ-1-And-DQ-2
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ACC 260 WEEK 6 ASSIGNMENT
PRESENTATION OF THE CEOS POSITION
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ACC-260/ACC-260-WEEK-6-ASSIGNMENT-PRESENTATION-OF-THECEOS-POSITION
Assignment: Presentation of the CEO’s Position
· Resource: Appendix C
· Review the anonymous stakeholder presentations your instructor has
posted. There is likely to be repetition among the presentations from the
same group, so mentally synthesize the presentations into four
positions, one for each group. You might find it helpful to take notes.
· Complete the Stakeholder Analysis Table found in Appendix C based on
your synthesis.
· Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper in which you assume the role of
Kardell’s CEO. As CEO, critically examine each stakeholder position in
light of the facts of the case.
· Consider the strengths and weaknesses of each stakeholder position,
especially how their desires for action could impact the company’s
profitability. Then, select a course of action from the following list:
o Deny any link between the company and the sonox detected in the
river and refuse to study the issue further.
o Agree to continue collecting data and investigating the issue further
without admitting the mill is the source of sonox.
o Assume there is a link between the sonox and the company and take
immediate steps to upgrade the plant to prevent future spillages.
· Provide an argument in support of your decision. Support your decision
with evidence and logic (not your personal opinion). An important part
of your grade on this assignment is demonstrating your ability to think
critically: to suspend judgment while gathering evidence and consulting
the various stakeholders’ positions, to analyze each position, to consider
the impact of different courses of action, and then to make a decision
and support it with evidence and logic.
· Ignore the actual outcome of the case provided in the text. The details
given in the book regarding the outcome of the case should not be
referenced in your paper nor influence your decision.
· Format your paper according to APA guidelines, including any
references to the textbook or other sources.
· Post your completed Stakeholder Analysis Table and paper as
attachments.
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ACC 260 WEEK 6 CHECKPOINT
PRESENTATION OF THE STAKEHOLDERS
POSITIONS
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ACC-260/ACC-260-WEEK-6-CHECKPOINT-PRESENTATION-OF-THESTAKEHOLDERS-POSITIONS
CheckPoint: Presentation of the Stakeholders’ Positions
· Resource: Business & Professional Ethics
· Read The Kardell Paper Co. Ethics Case on pp. 371-372 (Ch. 5) of the
text.
· Your instructor will divide the group into four discussion clusters, each
representing one of the Kardell stakeholder groups: Kardell employees
(the union), Kardell investors, the city of Riverside and residents, and
Kardell legal counsel.
· Discuss within your group how best to represent your position and
desires. The discussion could provide you with ideas for how to be
persuasive and how to communicate the potential impact of Kardell’s
actions on your stakeholder group. You are not required to discuss, but
are encouraged to take advantage of the opportunity.
· Prepare, individually, a presentation that represents your assigned
stakeholder group’s concerns and wishes for the company. Compose
your presentation as though you were to deliver it to the entire board of
directors of the Kardell Paper Co.
· Write your presentation in 200 to 300 words using Microsoft® Word.
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ACC 260 Week 7 DQ 1 And DQ 2
Week 7 DQ 1
Answer questions 4 and 5 on p. 264 (Ch. 4) of the text. Provide a
hypothetical example to illustrate your answer to question 4. Explain
your answers thoroughly.
Week 7 DQ 2
What role might an accounting professional play in ethical corporate
decision making? Should an accounting professional play a role even
when he or she is not the final decision maker? Explain your answer.
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ACC-260/ACC-260-Week-7-DQ-1-And-DQ-2
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ACC 260 WEEK 8 ASSIGNMENT FULLY
APPLYING A DECISION-MAKING
FRAMEWORK
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ACC-260/ACC-260-WEEK-8-ASSIGNMENT-FULLY-APPLYING-ADECISION-MAKING-FRAMEWORK
Assignment: Fully Applying a Decision-Making Framework
· Resource: Business & Professional Ethics
· Read the Locker Room Talk Ethics Case on p. 284 (Ch. 4) of the text.
· Analyze the case using stakeholder impact analysis and the
philosophical approaches to ethical decision making.
· Explain what you think Albert should do in a 700- to 1,050-word paper.
· Organize your paper using the following section outlines. Review the
questions for each section to help you analyze the case and frame your
paper. (Do not explicitly answer these questions within the body of your
paper.)
o Introduction
· What is the ethical dilemma in the case?
· What events led to the dilemma?
· When describing the dilemma, did you mistakenly propose a solution?
o Stakeholders Involved
· Have you identified stakeholders?
· What is their stake in the case?
· Have you described every stakeholder in an objective, unbiased way?
o Course of Action
· Have you clearly stated the course of action Albert should take?
· What reasons support your decision?
· What philosophical approach did you use to reach your decision?
· What are the weaknesses of your argument? Have you addressed
counterarguments?
o Stakeholder Impact
· How do you think each stakeholder will be impacted by your decision?
· Are there potential impacts on stakeholders that are difficult to
anticipate? Have you identified them?
o Conclusion
· Do you present new evidence or analysis in the conclusion? Would it be
more appropriate in another section of the paper?
· Have you summarized the dilemma, your decision, and the potential
impact on stakeholders?
· Format your paper according to APA guidelines, including any
references to the textbook or other sources.
· Post your completed paper as an attachment.
· Note: An important part of your grade on this assignment is
demonstrating your ability to think critically: to suspend judgment while
gathering evidence and consulting the various stakeholders’ positions,
to analyze each position, to consider the impact of different courses of
action, and then to make a decision and support it with evidence and
logic.
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ACC 260 WEEK 8 CHECKPOINT BRIEFLY
APPLYING A DECISION-MAKING
FRAMEWORK
CheckPoint: Briefly Applying a Decision-Making Framework
· Resource: Business & Professional Ethics
· Answer the three questions following the Management Choice Ethics
Case on p. 288 (Ch. 4) of the text.
· Describe what Sue should do and the decision-making approach that
supports such action when responding to question 3. The steps
summarized in Figure 5.5 on p. 353 (Ch. 5) may help guide your answer
to question 3. Justify your decision based on the impact it would have on
the stakeholders involved in the situation using terminology and
concepts from Ch. 5.
· Post your response in 200 to 300 words.
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ACC-260/ACC-260-WEEK-8-CHECKPOINT-BRIEFLY-APPLYING-ADECISION-MAKING-FRAMEWORK
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ACC 260 Week 9 Capstone DQ
Is an accounting professional guaranteed to act ethically just because he
or she has completed a course in ethics? Explain your answer. Having
nearly reached the end of this course, what do you think you have
learned that will help you to act ethically in your future profession?
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ACC-260/ACC-260-Week-9-Capstone-DQ
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ACC 260 WEEK 9 FINAL PROJECT SOLVING
ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN THE ACCOUNTING
PROFESSION
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ACC-260/ACC-260-WEEK-9-FINAL-PROJECT-SOLVING-ETHICALDILEMMAS-IN-THE-ACCOUNTING-PROFESSION
Final Project: Solving Ethical Dilemmas in the Accounting Profession
· Resources: Appendix A, Appendix C, and Business & Professional Ethics
· Read the Dilemma of an Accountant Ethics Case on pp. 285-287 (Ch. 4)
of your text.
· Analyze the case using stakeholder impact analysis and the
philosophical approaches to ethical decision making.
· Complete a stakeholder impact analysis using the table in Appendix C
as a template. Adapt the table to suit your needs.
· Compose a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper explaining the course of action
Dan should take.
· Organize your paper using the following section outlines. Within each
section below are questions and prompts that may help you analyze the
case. You do not have to explicitly answer these questions or address
each of the prompts, but they may be of benefit to you as you organize
your thoughts.
o Introduction
· What is the ethical dilemma in the case?
· What events led to the dilemma?
· When describing the dilemma, did you mistakenly propose a solution?
o Stakeholders Involved
· Have you identified stakeholders?
· What is their stake in the case?
· Have you described every stakeholder in an objective, unbiased way?
o Course of Action
· Have you clearly stated the course of action Dan should take?
· What reasons support your decision?
· What philosophical approach did you use to reach your decision?
· What are the weaknesses of your argument? Have you addressed
counterarguments?
o Stakeholder Impact
· How do you think each stakeholder will be impacted by your decision?
· Are there potential impacts on stakeholders that are difficult to
anticipate? Have you identified them?
o Conclusion
· Do you present new evidence or analysis in the conclusion? Would it be
more appropriate in another section of the paper?
· Have you summarized the dilemma, your decision, and the potential
impact on stakeholders?
· Think critically about the case, and write persuasively. A portion of
your grade will be determined by your demonstration of critical
thinking: suspending judgment while gathering evidence and consulting
the various stakeholders’ positions, analyzing each position, considering
the impact of different courses of action, and then making a decision and
supporting it with evidence and logic.
· Format your paper according to APA guidelines, including any
references to the textbook or other sources.
· Post your completed Stakeholder Analysis Table and paper as
attachments.
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com