Expository Writing 101: NW/PC
Susan Nowicki
Assignment #1
Reading: Mary Kaldor, “Beyond Militarism, Arms Races, and Arms
Control” (382-399)
Rough Draft: 5 pages
Due Date: Wednesday, September 8
(Bring 3 copies of assignment to class this day.)
Final Draft: 5 pages
Due Date: Monday, September 13
In “Beyond Militarism, Arms Races and Arms Control,” Mary Kaldor challenges that “if
September 11 had not happened, the American military-industrial complex might have
had to invent it” (389). In the year 2004, the United States as “the last nation state,”
(390) asserts still the politics of “might equals right” in terms of its containment policies
and military agendas. However, in today’s climate of globalization, Kaldor counters,
nations must acknowledge an arching layer of global justice (above and beyond local and
international warring factions) if they plan on existence into the next century.
How could the U.S. have responded otherwise to the events of September 11 in
terms of its position in the global community and as the world’s “last nation state”?
Address the tension between these poles, if any. You can allude to Kaldor’s take on
U.S. action in the aftermath of 9/11 as a frame for your work, but your response should
then continue beyond.
_______________________________________________________________________
Formatting:
 One-inch margins all around
 12-point font in Times New Roman script
 Double spacing
 Page numbers
 Heading on page 1, single spaced in upper-left corner with:
Your name
My name
Course and Section number
Paper number (rough or final draft)
Date
 Stapled in upper-left corner
Expository Writing 101: NW/PC
Susan Nowicki
Assignment #2
Reading: Eric Schlosser, “Global Realization” (524-549)
Rough Draft: 4 pages [FOR THIS ROUGH DRAFT ASSIGNMENT, PLEASE INDICATE
YOUR ESSAY’S THESIS OR PROJECT IN BOLD TYPE.]
Due Date: Wednesday, September 22
(Bring 3 copies of assignment to class this day)
Final Draft: 5 pages
Due Date: Wednesday, September 29
Forms and Symbols
In Eric Schlosser’s “Global Realization,” the journalist highlights the presence of archetypal
symbols and architecture throughout the landscape of his study and refers to many of these forms
as modern. For example, we read of Plauen’s modern Bauhaus-designed synagogue destroyed in
Hitler’s Germany; we learn from anthropologist Yunxiang Yan how the golden arches of
McDonald’s symbolize “’Americana and the promise of modernization’” and according to
Schlosser, how fast food chains have become “totems of Western economic
development…[ultimately representative of] the avant-garde of American franchising” (529).
Similarly the World Trade Center, designed by Japanese architect Minoru Yamasaki in the 1970s
and destroyed by terrorists on September 11, 2001, was a modern icon representative of the
United States powerful and dominating position in the global arena of trade and finance.
As both Schlosser and Kaldor have indicated, America’s globalizing forces, whether militaristic,
economic or as symbolized by twin towers and clowns, have spurred emotional responses
worldwide with some resulting in the most tragic of circumstances. Reflecting back on the
content of both Kaldor’s and Schlosser’s essays, what and how do archetypal symbols or
forms work to help or hinder the cause of globalization and international peacekeeping
efforts? HOW MIGHT SCHLOSSER AND KALDOR TRADEMARK GLOBALIZATION,
ACCORDINGLY?
______________________________________________________
Formatting:
 One-inch margins all around
 12-point font in Times New Roman script
 Double spacing
 Page numbers
 Heading on page 1, single spaced in upper-left corner with:
Your name
My name
Course and Section number
Paper number (rough or final draft)
Date
 Stapled in upper-left corner
Things to review, i.e. never deny “the obvious:” What’s an archetype? What’s a symbol?
How do they function? Are they concrete objects, ideas or both?
Expository Writing 101: NW/PC
Susan Nowicki
Assignment #3
Reading: Amy Chua, “Why They Hate Us: America as a Global Market Dominant
Minority,” (handout).
Rough Draft: 4 pages Due Date: Monday, October 4 (Bring 3 copies of draft to class.)
Final Draft: 5 pages
Due Date: Monday, October 11
U.S. Globalization Practices: a Timeline to Terror?
In your reading and critical reflection upon Mary Kaldor’s “Beyond Militarism, Arms
Races, and Arms Control;” Eric Schlosser’s “Global Realization” and Amy Chua’s “Why
They Hate Us,” a short history of U.S. globalization is suggested. Mary Kaldor’s essay
outlines U.S. global practices from a militaristic and diplomatic perspective; Eric
Schlosser traces the effects of U.S. economic globalization via the fast food industry and
Amy Chua examines a worldwide response to terrorist violence launched in reaction to
U.S. global market dominance. This selection of readings appears to set up a historical
trajectory detailing the rise of aggressive U.S. global practices and their imminent
consequences as realized in the bombing of the World Trade Center on September 11,
2001.
As your essay assignment, briefly outline the history of U.S. globalization practices
as articulated by Kaldor, Schlosser and Chua, (no more than 3 paragraphs and
without borrowing from the question) and then postulate how the historical record
as related by these three authors possibly belies a “straight” path from U.S.
globalizing practices to worldwide hate of America. In other words, why might they
like us?
***I am interested in gauging your reading comprehension levels here as well as ability
to recognize potential loopholes in arguments and alternative interpretative views. The
caveat remains, though, that all your investigative reading results in a project
wedded to textual evidence and not sidebar opinion!
Formatting:
 One-inch margins all around
 12-point font in Times New Roman script
 Double spacing
 Text citations in accordance with MLA guidelines
 Page numbers
 Heading on page 1, single spaced in upper-left corner with:
Your name
My name
Course and Section number
Paper number (rough or final draft)
Date

Stapled in upper-left corner