POLICY NO: DP&ED 3 - CL TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY Date Resolved By Council: 27 November 2000 Commencement Date: 27 November 2000 Review Date: Ongoing Responsible Department: Planning & Economic Development This policy has been authorised and is included on Council’s Website. Peter Brown Chief Executive Officer April 2003 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 2 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 2 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ................................................................................. 6 2.1 2.2 3 COMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT .............................................................. 6 STATE GOVERNMENT .................................................................................. 9 TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES POLICY STATEMENTS .......................... 10 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 4 OBJECTIVES.................................................................................................. 2 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................. 2 IMPORTANCE OF INFRASTRUCTURE ......................................................... 3 COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ......................................................................... 4 HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT ................................................................... 4 AIM ............................................................................................................... 10 PLANNING PERMITS ................................................................................... 10 COUNCIL OWNED LAND ............................................................................. 12 URBAN CHARACTER & AMENITY ............................................................... 14 AERIAL CABLING ......................................................................................... 19 CO-LOCATION OF FACILITIES ................................................................... 20 REDUNDANT INFRASTRUCTURE .............................................................. 17 ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS (EMFS)......................................................... 18 LOW IMPACT FACILITIES POLICY STATEMENTS ............................................ 19 APPENDIX I E xt r a c t f r o m C l a u s e 6 ( 2 ) o f D i vi s i o n 3 o f S c h e d u l e 3 o f t h e Telecommunications Act 1997 28 APPENDIX 2 E xt r a c t o f S e c t i o n s 4 2 & 4 6 t o 5 1 ( i n c l u s i ve ) o f t h e Telecommunications Act 1997 29 APPENDIX 3 C h e c k l i s t f o r A p p l i c a t i o n s F o r P l a n n i n g A p p r o va l 35 APPENDIX 4 Application for Low-Impact Telecommunication Facilities 37 ____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Objectives The objectives of this policy document are to: Provide a consistent approach to the decision making process in relation to all requests for consent to make a planning permit application to construct a building or construct or carry out works for a telecommunications facility on Council owned land. Provide a consistent approach to the decision making process in relation to all applications for planning permits to construct a building or construct or carry out works for a telecommunications facility. Consider all of the relevant issues prior to determining any application for a planning permit, including the effect of the proposal on adjacent land, the principles for the design, siting, construction and operation of a telecommunications facility set out in A Code of Practice for Telecommunications Facilities in Victoria, and the purpose of the zone or overlay. Encourage the siting of telecommunications facilities in appropriate locations within the municipality. Establish guidelines to encourage the siting and design of "low-impact" telecommunications facilities in a manner that results in the minimal impact on the local amenity. 1.2 Background The modernisation of the telecommunications industry has resulted in an influx of new infrastructure requirements in Moreland. The growth of the mobile (cell) telephone networks and cable (pay) television has led to an increase in demand for additional telecommunications facilities, including: transmission towers, antennae, cables, poles, satellite dish and associated structures (e.g. roadside cabinets, pillars and equipment sheds). This in turn has led to increasing community concern over the proliferation of telecommunications infrastructure and the resulting impacts upon urban amenity, environmental quality and the potential for public health and safety issues with regard to electromagnetic fields. In response to these concerns and the wider community interest in public amenity, the council has prepared this policy to guide the development of the telecommunications industry in Moreland. ____________________________________________________________________________ 2 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ Formed in 1994 following the amalgamation of the former Cities of Brunswick, Coburg and Broadmeadows, Moreland City Council has a long history with the issues surrounding telecommunications facilities. Coburg and Brunswick were key members of the successful coalition that succeeded in stopping the proposed overhead Brunswick to Richmond High Voltage Powerline, persuading the State government of the day and the power companies of the benefits of relocating the lines underground. This commitment continues today and is reflected in the policies of the new council, including the Relocating Overhead Cables Strategy and the Strategy for Reducing Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields. Moreland City Council is also a member of the Cables Down Under Coalition. 1.3 Importance Of Infrastructure The Commonwealth Government has established a legislative and policy framework to ensure that there is consistency across the nation in the provision of telecommunications infrastructure. This has led to many facilities being exempted from state legislation (including the need to obtain a planning permit). Council is mindful of the importance of new technology and infrastructure, particularly in regard to the provision of an effective state wide telecommunications network. The Moreland City Plan sets the Council's strategic direction for urban development and states that it is the Council’s aim: To ensure the provision of safe, effective and reliable telecommunications services. Moreover, the Moreland City Plan recognises the importance of new telecommunications infrastructure being developed in a manner that respects the environmental, economic and social considerations of the City: Environmental Perspective The design and management of telecommunications facilities have environmental implications for the use of natural resource, greenhouse emissions, visual amenity, pollution control and landscape disturbance. Economic Perspective Telecommunications facilities are important in sustaining residential, commercial and industrial urban development. Substantial costs are involved in upgrading and maintaining existing infrastructure. Such costs must have regard to environmentally sustainable objectives. Changes in technology, particularly telecommunications, will continue to have major impacts on competitiveness. Social Perspective Telecommunications facilities are essential elements that enable social interaction, promote community safety and create comfortable living environments. Poorly managed infrastructure has implications for our health, safety and quality of life. ____________________________________________________________________________ 3 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ 1.4 Council Consideration The Council’s role in the decision making process concerning the installation and use of telecommunications facilities falls into three (3) categories: Responsible Authority: As Responsible Authority, the Council is charged with administering the Moreland Planning Scheme; where a planning permit is required, the Council as Responsible Authority must give consideration to those matters specified in the planning scheme, the Planning and Environment Act 1987 and the Code of Practice for Telecommunications Facilities in Victoria March 1999. Public Land Manager: In the case of public land vested in the authority of the Council, the Council as public land manager has a duty to ensure the responsible management of the land and protection of its assets. Additionally, Council must consent to any application for a planning permit being made to install telecommunications facilities on public land that it manages and must be notified of any low-impact facility activity to be carried out on its land. Local Governance: In addition to the above, as a democratically elected body, the Council has an obligation to represent and meet the needs of the local community. 1.5 How To Use This Document This document must be read in conjunction with the Telecommunications Code of Practice 1997 (Commonwealth), Moreland Planning Scheme and the incorporated document: A Code of Practice for Telecommunications Facilities in Victoria March 1999. Where there is any inconsistency, the Commonwealth legislation prevails. Local planning policy cannot introduce more stringent requirements than those set out in the State Government Code of Practice. 1.5.1 Planning Permit Required This document is to provide a clear statement of the Council's policy in assessing applications for planning permits to construct a building or construct or carry out works for a telecommunications facility. The following Chapter (Legislative Framework) summarises the legislation requirements that specify when a planning permit is required to construct a building or construct or carry out works for a telecommunications facility. Chapter 3 provides details on the Council's policy in terms of the issues pertaining to telecommunications facilities. Applicants should read it prior to submitting any application. 1.5.2 No Planning Permit Required Chapter 4 outlines the Council's policy on the preferred design, location and type of facilities that do not require a planning permit. It is envisaged that Council can reach agreement with the telecommunications carriers to ensure that new facilities are provided in a manner that is sympathetic to the local urban environment. ____________________________________________________________________________ 4 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK 2.1 Commonwealth Government The Commonwealth instruments for guiding the development and regulation of the national telecommunications industry are the: Telecommunications Act 1997 Telecommunications (Low-impact Facilities) Determination 1997 Telecommunications Code of Practice 1997 2.1.1 Telecommunications Act 1997 The primary purpose of the Telecommunications Act 1997 (the Act) is to provide a regulatory framework that promotes: (a) The long term interests of end-users of carriage services or of services provided by means of carriage services; and (b) The efficiency and international competitiveness of the Australian telecommunications industry. The secondary objective of the Act relating specifically to siting, design and location of telecommunications facilities is: (i) To promote the placement of lines underground, taking into account economic and technical issues, where placing such lines is supported by the affected community. Under the Act, telecommunications carriers are exempted from State planning laws in three instances: Firstly, there are exemptions for inspection of land, maintenance of facilities, installation of low impact facilities, subscriber connections and temporary defence facilities. These exemptions are detailed in the Telecommunications (Low Impact Facilities) Determination 1997 and are subject to the Telecommunications Code of Practice 1997. Secondly, there is a limited case-by-case appeals process to cover the installation of facilities in situations of national significance. Thirdly, there will be continuation of some specific powers and immunities from the previous Telecommunications Act 1991. ____________________________________________________________________________ 5 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ The Act also requires telecommunications carriers to co-locate mobile facilities on radiocommunications towers and sites and facilities in ducts, unless it is not feasible to do so. Currently there is no definition of "co-location". A proposed amendment to the Telecommunications (Low-impact Facilities) Determination 1997 seeks to rectify this omission to: "... Describe one or more facilities as 'co-located' with an original facility (defined below) if the addition to the original facility is located physically on or within the infrastructure of that original facility. Further, any addition of this type to an original facility constitutes co-location, irrespective of whether or not the addition is to the carrier's own facility or the facility of another carrier. A colocated facility is not a second facility located in proximity to an original facility. An original facility only includes Any facility in place at the time this variation to the Determination takes effect; or Any such facility installed after this variation takes effect by means other that co-location. 2.1.2 Telecommunications (Low-impact Facilities) Determination 1997 The Telecommunications (Low-impact Facilities) Determination 1997 contains a list of the telecommunications facilities and activities that are deemed to be essential to maintaining telecommunications networks but are unlikely to cause significant community disruption during their installation or operation. The list includes radio communications facilities, underground and above ground housings, underground cable facilities and payphones, which are limited by general size and location conditions. In response to a number of definitional problems creating uncertainty with stakeholders as to whether particular telecommunications facilities were being installed in compliance with the regulatory arrangements, the Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts directed that a review of the Telecommunications (Low-impact Facilities) Determination 1997 be undertaken to clarify the objectives of the Determination. The Determination was amended in August 1999 as a result. ____________________________________________________________________________ 6 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ 2.1.3 Telecommunications Code of Practice 1997 The Telecommunications Code of Practice 1997 regulates the telecommunications facilities that remain under Commonwealth jurisdiction, including: The Inspection of Land; Subscriber Connections; Low-impact Facilities; Temporary Defence Facilities; and the Maintenance of Facilities. The Code of Practice covers the following requirements under each activity:1 Carrier Conduct (Parts 2 and 3); Notification to the Nature Conservation Director, Heritage Chairperson and Environment Secretary (Part 4 except for Subscriber connection where it is Part 6); and Notification to Landowner and Occupier (Part 5, except for Subscriber connection where it is Part 7). In each Chapter, Part 2 repeats (for ease of reader reference) relevant general conduct provisions, from Part 1 of Schedule 3 to the Act. The main features of Part 2 of the Code are: Carriers are required to do as little damage as practicable and undertake restoration of land; Carriers are to comply with relevant industry standards and international agreements; Carriers are to maintain records; Carriers must take all reasonable steps to co-locate and cooperate with other carriers and public utilities for installation activities. The main feature of the notification to the Nature Conservation Director, Heritage Chairperson and Environment Secretary section is to ensure that: The carriers must notify the Nature Conservation Director, Heritage Chairperson and Environment Secretary at least 10 days before the commencement of an activity where it is to be undertaken on, or have an effect on, a designated area; 1 Telecommunications Code of Practice 1997 - Explanatory Statement ____________________________________________________________________________ 7 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ The main features of the notification to landowner and occupier section are that: 2.2 Carriers must notify landowners and occupiers at least 10 business days before engaging in an activity (for low-impact facilities, managers of public land are treated as a landowner or occupier and must also be notified); The landowner or occupier has the opportunity to object to the activity and the carrier is required to resolve the objection by agreement; If there is an objection, then the objection can be referred to the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsmen. State Government 2.2.1 A Code of Practice for Telecommunications in Victoria 1999 The State Government has produced A Code of Practice for Telecommunications Facilities in Victoria March 1999 which is an incorporated document in all planning schemes in the state. The purpose of the Code of Practice is to: 2.2.2 Set out the circumstances and requirements under which land may be developed for a telecommunications facility without the need for a planning permit. Set out the principles for the design, siting, construction and operation of a telecommunications facility, which a responsible authority must consider when deciding on an application for a planning permit. Victorian Planning Provisions - State Planning Policy Framework Clause 18-13 of all planning schemes in Victoria sets out the State Government Policy in relation to telecommunications facilities. The objective of this policy is: To recognise the importance of telecommunications to all aspect of modern life and the essential and beneficial contribution of modern telecommunications facilities to local communities and the State and national economy. Clause 18.13-2 outlines the general implementation of this policy: ____________________________________________________________________________ 8 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ Planning decision should recognise that telecommunications is an essential utility service and, in particular, should: Facilitate the upgrading telecommunications facilities. Ensure that modern telecommunications facilities are widely accessible to business, industry and the community. Facilitate the orderly growth of telecommunications by recognising that new communications technology needs to meet the continuous and growing demand for better communications and multi-media facilities in business, domestic, entertainment and community services. Reflect the economic contribution of telecommunications through improvements in business and industrial technology, rapid communication, and helping business and industry remain competitive and provide increased employment opportunities. and maintenance of Planning schemes should not prohibit the use of land for a telecommunications facility in any zone. Planning decisions should reflect a reasonable balance between the provision of important telecommunications services and the need to protect the environment from adverse impacts arising from telecommunications infrastructure. Planning decisions should reflect the national implications of a telecommunications network and the need for consistency in infrastructure design and placement. A Code of Practice for Telecommunications Facilities in Victoria should be used in the consideration of applications for the use and development of telecommunications facilities and sites. 2.2.3 When is a Planning Permit Required? The permit provisions for the installation and operation of telecommunications facilities are provided for under Clause 52.192 of the State section of the planning scheme, which reads: A permit is required to construct a building or construct or carry out works for a Telecommunications facility. This does not apply to: Buildings and works associated with: A low-impact facility as described in the Telecommunications (Low-impact) Facilities Determination 1997. The inspection and maintenance of a telecommunications facility as defined in the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cwth). ____________________________________________________________________________ 9 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. A facility authorised by a Facilities Installation Permit issued under the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cwth). A temporary defence facility. The connection of a building, structure, caravan or mobile home to a Telecommunications line forming part of a Telecommunications network. Any Telecommunications facility described in A Code of Practice for Telecommunications Facilities in Victoria which complies with the requirements of the Code. Buildings and works associated with activities which are: Authorised under Clause 6(2) of Division 3 of Schedule 3 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cwth) (attached as Appendix I). Carried out by bodies listed in Sections 46 to 51 (inclusive) of the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cwth) pursuant to legislation applying to those bodies (attached as Appendix 2). TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES POLICY STATEMENTS 3.1 Aim Council seeks to ensure that the installation and operation of telecommunications facilities in Moreland does not detract from the local amenity nor lead to any detrimental environmental, health, social or economic effects on the local community. 3.2 Planning Permits 3.2.1 General Considerations All applications to construct a building or construct or carry out works for a telecommunications facility will be assessed on the merits of the individual case. In assessing an application for a planning permit, the Council, as Responsible Authority, is obliged to give consideration to: Provisions under Section 60 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987: All objections and other submissions which it has received and which have not been withdrawn; and Any decision and comments of a referral authority which it has received; and ____________________________________________________________________________ 10 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ Any significant effects which the responsible authority considers the use or development may have on the environment or which the responsible authority considers the environment may have on the use or development; and If the circumstances appear to so require, may consider— Any significant social and economic effects of the use or development for which the application is made; and Any strategic plan, policy statement, code or guideline which has been adopted by a Minister, government department, public authority or municipal council; and Any amendment to the planning scheme which has been adopted by a planning authority; and Any other relevant matter. Provisions under Clause 65 of the Moreland Planning Scheme: The matters set out in Section 60 of the Act The State Planning Policy Framework and the Local Planning Policy Framework, including the Municipal Strategic Statement and local planning policies The purpose of the zone, overlay or other provision. Any matter required to be considered in the zone, overlay or other provision. The orderly planning of the area. The effect on the amenity of the area. The proximity of the land to any public land. Factors likely to cause or contribute to land degradation, salinity or reduce water quality. Whether the proposed development is designed to maintain or improve the quality of stormwater within and exiting the site. The extent and character of native vegetation and the likelihood of its destruction. Whether native vegetation is to be or can be protected, planted or allowed to regenerate. The degree of flood, erosion or fire hazard associated with the location of the land and The use, development or management of the land so as to minimise any such hazard. ____________________________________________________________________________ 11 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ Provisions under Clause 52.19-6 of the Moreland Planning Scheme: 3.2.2 The principles for the design, siting, construction and operation of a Telecommunications facility set out in A Code of Practice for Telecommunications Facilities in Victoria. The effect of the proposal on adjacent land. If the Telecommunications facility is located in an Environmental Significance Overlay, a Vegetation Protection Overlay, a Significant Landscape Overlay, a Heritage Overlay, a Design and Development Overlay or an Erosion Management Overlay, the decision guidelines in those overlays and the schedules to those overlays. Policy Issues In addition to the above, Council will take the following specific considerations into account when assessing any application for a planning permit to construct a building or construct or carry out works for a telecommunications facility: urban character and amenity, aerial lines, co-location of facilities, removal of redundant facilities and electromagnetic fields (EMFs). The following policy statements will address these issues in detail. 3.3 Council Owned Land 3.3.1 Policy Basis Council reserves and areas of open space tend to be preferred locations for the installation of telecommunications towers and other larger telecommunications facilities. Clause 52.19-3 of the Moreland Planning Scheme (Land in Public Ownership) requires that: An application for a permit on land in a public land zone by a person other than the relevant public land manager, must be accompanied by the written consent of the public land manager, indicating that the public land manager consents generally or conditionally either: To the application for permit being made. To the application for permit being made and to the proposed use or development. Council needs to establish a consistent approach to deal with such requests to make a planning permit application with respect to installing telecommunications facilities on its land. ____________________________________________________________________________ 12 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ 3.3.2 3.3.3 Objectives To provide a consistent approach to the decision making process in relation to requests for consent to make a planning permit application for the installation of telecommunications facilities on Council owned/managed land. To ensure that the use of Council land is not prejudiced by the installation and or use of telecommunications facilities. To ensure that telecommunications facilities are established in appropriate locations that will not detract from the amenity and or use of the surrounding land. Policy It is policy that in considering any request for a permit application being made to construct a building or construct or carry out works for a telecommunications facility on public land within a public land zone, the Council will have regard to the following matters: The application must be accompanied by the material set out in Appendix 4. The need for the facility and any alternatives to supply that need, including viable and practicable alternative locations that would result in the proposed facility being more compatible to surrounding landuse, scale and character. The impact of the proposed facility on the primary use of the land. Whether the proposed facility will conflict with the use of the land for a public purpose. The impact of the proposed facility on Council’s ability to utilise the site. The proposed location of the facility on the land. The community benefit of the proposal. The community return from the provision of additional community infrastructure. Details of proposed and actual electromagnetic field (EMF) readings and proposed measures to be taken to fulfil the principles of prudent avoidance. Details of any infrastructure that would be made redundant by the installation of the new facilities and the undertaking to remove the redundant infrastructure. Infrastructure specifications including compliance with best practice and the commitment of the telecommunications carrier to install “latest available” technology specifications to minimise the impact of the proposal. ____________________________________________________________________________ 13 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ Any strategic review undertaken to identify appropriate reserves and open spaces for the location of high impact telecommunications facilities. Any strategy or policy that the Council as public land manager must consider, including the Moreland Open Space Strategy and the Moreland Leisure Plan. Views of the general public on applications where there is potential for significant detriment from applications in a public use zone Following the consideration of the foregoing matters, the Council may consent generally or conditionally or may refuse to consent to the application being made. Consent, whether general or conditional to an application being made does not imply consent to the grant of a planning permit. Council may require the Carrier to enter into a commercial lease for the use of the land associated with the proposal. 3.4 Urban Character & Amenity 3.4.1 Policy Basis The Moreland City Plan identifies the need to generate a greater feeling of attractiveness in the municipality and therefore increase its appeal as a place to live, work and visit. A significant component of this aim is the preservation of the existing urban amenity of the City while ensuring new developments and infrastructure provision makes a positive response to the surrounding urban character. It is noted that the need to develop an extensive and reliable telecommunications network will lead to increased pressures to locate new facilities in all areas of the municipality. Council is committed to enabling such telecommunications coverage in a manner that is conducive to protecting the amenity of the City’s residents. 3.4.2 Objectives To ensure that the provision of new telecommunications facilities are respectful to the amenity of the existing neighbourhood. To encourage innovative designs which make use of best practice principles to make a positive contribution to the character of the area. To minimise the removal and excessive lopping of existing vegetation and street trees. To promote the inclusion of urban design elements, street furniture, public art, street trees and landscaping to soften the impact of new infrastructure programs. ____________________________________________________________________________ 14 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ 3.4.3 Policy It is policy that the following matters are taken into account when considering applications to construct a building or construct or carry out of works for a telecommunications facility or changes to an existing facility: 3.5 The objectives of the Moreland Urban Character Statement. The location of the proposed facility and its relation to the urban character value of the area, including the protection of significant views and vistas in the public realm. Details of how the proposed facility will respond to the existing geometry and materials of the underlying character of the area. The technical specifications of the proposed facility and their compliance with best practice principles. The use of "latest available" technology to ensure that facilities are designed and sited so as to minimise their visual intrusion. The impact of the proposed facility on existing vegetation and street trees. Details of any landscaping or other screening devices that are associated with the proposed facility. Details of any landscaping measures, public art, street furniture or other screening devices associated with the proposed facility. The proximity of the proposed facility to residential properties. The existence of open space in the vicinity of the proposed facility and the impact on the amenity and primary use of the open space. The existence of viable and practicable alternative locations that would result in the proposed facility being more compatible to surrounding landuse, scale and character. Aerial Cabling 3.5.1 Policy Basis The existence of above ground infrastructure such as overhead cabling results in a significant detraction from the local amenity. The Moreland City Plan 2000 has a stated commitment to the phasing out of overhead cables. Moreover, the Council has recently adopted a Relocating Overhead Cables Strategy and a Strategy for Reducing Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields. Moreland city Council is a member of the Cables Down Under Coalition. The foregoing initiatives have identified the significant benefits regarding the undergrounding of aerial cabling. Additionally, it is a stated objective of the Telecommunications Act 1997 to promote the placement of lines underground. The approval of new aerial cabling would be contradictory to the Council's efforts to have existing cables relocated underground. ____________________________________________________________________________ 15 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ 3.5.2 3.5.3 Objectives To further the Council's broader objective of relocating existing aerial cables underground. To restrict the proliferation of new aerial cabling within the municipality. Policy It is policy that Council will encourage the relocation of aerial cabling underground. It is policy that the following matters are taken into account when considering applications to construct a building or construct or carry out works for overhead cabling: The recommendations contained in the Strategy for Reducing Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields. The objectives of the Relocating Overhead Cables Strategy. The viability of placing cables underground. The impact of the proposal on any program in place to relocate existing cables underground. 3.6 Co-Location Of Facilities 3.6.1 Policy Basis The proliferation of new telecommunications infrastructure in some areas may lead to a detrimental cumulative impact on amenity of the local area and may result in excessive public exposure to electromagnetic fields. 3.6.2 Objectives To limit the impact of a cumulative build up of telecommunications facilities on the local amenity. To ensure that the cumulative build up of telecommunications facilities does not result in excessive public exposure to electromagnetic fields. To maximise the opportunity for co-locating facilities within the municipality. ____________________________________________________________________________ 16 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ 3.6.3 Policy It is policy that when considering applications to construct a building or construct or carry out of works for a telecommunications facility or changes to an existing facility, Council will take into consideration the following: The location, number and type of existing telecommunications facilities within close proximity to the subject site. The cumulative measurement of electromagnetic fields (EMFs). The opportunities for co-locating telecommunications facilities. The opportunities for co-locating telecommunications facilities with other infrastructure elements, including: street lighting, advertising signs, traffic lights and poles. 3.7 Redundant Infrastructure 3.7.1 Policy Basis The competitive nature of the telecommunications industry will lead to the introduction of new carriers and the inevitable decline of others. Coupled with the dynamics of infrastructure provision, there is potential for a resulting proliferation of redundant telecommunications facilities within the municipality. It is considered that where new infrastructure results in a net decrease in the number of facilities required, the carrier should undertake to remove all redundant facilities. 3.7.2 3.7.3 Objectives To protect the urban environment from the proliferation of redundant telecommunications facilities. To encourage the use of new technology to reduce the number and scale of telecommunications facilities. To eliminate any infrastructure made redundant by the introduction of new technology. To ensure that infrastructure made redundant by the collapse of a carrier's business is either utilised by another carrier or removed. Policy It is policy that the following matters are taken into account when considering applications to construct a building or construct or carry out of works for a telecommunications facility or changes to an existing facility: The potential to reduce the number of facilities. The levels of technology available to reduce the necessity for new infrastructure. ____________________________________________________________________________ 17 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ 3.8 The potential to remove other infrastructure made redundant from the location of the proposed new facility. The availability of existing infrastructure to meet the infrastructure requirements of the carrier. Any commitment made by the carrier to remove infrastructure made redundant either by new technology or the collapse of the carrier's business. Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) 3.8.1 Policy Basis Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) result from the flow of current along wires and cables and are generated deliberately in the case of radiowaves from a broadcast transmitter. Specialised equipment and the reading given in milligauss (mG) can measure the strength of EMFs.2 Recognising that there is significant uncertainty about electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and human health, Council has adopted a Strategy for Reducing Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields, which promotes a policy of "prudent avoidance" and sets a goal of progressively reducing ambient residential exposure to electromagnetic fields. It is noted that there is considerable debate as to what constitutes a safe level of exposure to electromagnetic fields with some research advocating a level that is substantially lower than the Australian Standard (AS/NZS 2772.1:1999) and the World Health Organisation Standard (currently measured at 1000mG). It is recognised that as Responsible Authority, Council cannot apply a local policy specifying electromagnetic field requirements that are more stringent than the Australian Standard3. 3.8.2 Objectives To ensure that the principle of prudent avoidance is applied with the aim of reducing electromagnetic field levels in Moreland. To encourage the renewal and or relocation of telecommunications facilities to reduce public exposures to electromagnetic fields. To encourage the siting and design of new telecommunications facilities and technologies to reduce public exposure to electromagnetic fields. To protect sensitive areas and land uses from excessive exposure to electromagnetic fields. 2 A.H. Doull & R. Lamb Moreland City Council Background Issues to Reducing Public Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields September 1998. 3 A Code of Practice for Telecommunications in Victoria March 1999 & refer to Connell Wagner Pty Ltd v Port Phillip City Council, Birrell & Ors (Appeal no. 1998/11530) ____________________________________________________________________________ 18 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ 3.8.3 Policy It is policy that applicants be requested to provide a report with any application for a permit to construct a building or construct or carry out works for a telecommunications facility or changes to an existing facility, addressing as a minimum the following: The measures to be taken and documented to fulfil the principles of prudent avoidance and to minimise public exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs). Projected electromagnetic field levels at 5, 10, 50, 100, 150, 300, 500 and 1000 metres from the site for the frequency allocated to them. On completion of construction and conditioning of the facility, a subsequent reading will be required at these ranges. Details of the cumulative electromagnetic field levels and impact of any existing facility within close proximity to the proposed site. It is policy that the following matters are taken into account when considering applications to construct a building or construct or carry out works for a telecommunications facility or changes to an existing facility: 4. The information contained in any report submitted in response to the foregoing policy statement. The recommendations contained within Council’s Strategy for Reducing Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields. The location of the proposed facility in relation to children’s facilities (including schools, pre-schools, childcare centres). The location of the proposed facility in relation to elderly citizens' facilities (including nursing homes, special accommodation homes and senior citizens' centres). The proximity of the proposed facility to residential properties. The existence of open space in the vicinity of the proposed facility and the impact on the amenity and primary use of the open space. LOW IMPACT FACILITIES POLICY STATEMENTS 4.1.1 Policy Basis The installation of low-impact facilities on Council owned land tends to be concentrated on footpaths and include underground ducting, installation of aerials and cabinets. The Telecommunications Code of Practice 1997 (Commonwealth) requires that Council, as public land manager, must be notified of the installation of low impact facilities erected on its land (Clause 4.24: Notice to owner and occupier of land). This clause provides that the carrier is required to give at minimum ten (10) business days written notice unless an agreement is reached on alternative notification arrangements subject to Clause 4.28 of the Code. ____________________________________________________________________________ 19 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ Currently, the Council's Design Services Unit or Engineering Services Branch assess all notifications to install low-impact facilities on Council owned land, which include the following: Hauling of new cable in existing conduits; Installing new pits and pillars on existing lines/conduit; Replacing existing conduits with new conduit; Extending conduit on existing alignment to serve new properties. There are a number of issues that the Council needs to consider in assessing the installation of low-impact facilities on its land, viz: Reinstatement The quality of any reinstatement works to roads, footpaths and nature strips needs to comply with the Council's standards so as to provide optimum community safety and prevent any potential liability action against the Council. Asset Stewardship External organisations undertaking works that involve the Council's assets may prejudice the on-going responsibility of the Council to ensure serviceability and maintenance of street infrastructure, street trees and footpaths. Siting The siting of new infrastructure (including radio dish/antenna, pillars and cabinets) needs to consider the provision for clear access and lines of vision for pedestrians and cyclists and not be detrimental to the effective management of traffic. Community information Knowing what is happening in the municipality helps Council to serve its community better. Accordingly, Council needs to be aware of what works are being undertaken by external contractors/organisations so that it is in a position to provide accurate information to the community that it serves. There have been examples in the past of "bogus contractors" taking advantage of members of the community. Co-ordination of Works It is in the best interests of all parties if works can be co-ordinated so as to avoid unnecessary repetition, particularly where the works involve substantial disruption to community services (i.e. road closures and resurfacing). ____________________________________________________________________________ 20 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ Urban Design Street infrastructure needs to be designed and located so as to avoid clutter and to ensure that urban design themes are maintained to enhance the amenity of the urban environment. Cumulative Effect The effect of locating a number of low-impact facilities in one location may in fact render the collective infrastructure anything but low-impact. Redundant Infrastructure Council has a duty to ensure that its streets are not cluttered with excessive and redundant infrastructure. All street infrastructure needs to be recorded and monitored so that street audits can identify redundant structures for removal. Response Time Council is mindful of the telecommunications carriers being desirous of reduced lead times with regard to the notification periods required under the Code. Moreover, the notification of the installation of low impact facilities on Council owned land is a laborious and time-consuming function of the Council. It is recognised that there is opportunity for streamlining the referral process to benefit all parties. Such agreement could be formalised in a memorandum of understanding between the stakeholders to address the foregoing issues. 4.1.2 Objectives To provide a consistent approach to the decision making process in relation to all notifications to construct a building or construct or carry out works for low-impact telecommunications facilities on Council owned land. To consider all of the relevant issues prior to responding to notifications to construct a building or construct or carry out works for low-impact telecommunications facilities on Council owned land. To ensure that the siting and location of low-impact telecommunications facilities does not adversely affect the Council's assets. To encourage the siting of low-impact telecommunications facilities in appropriate locations within the municipality. To establish guidelines to encourage the siting and design of "lowimpact" telecommunications facilities in a manner that results in the minimal impact on the local amenity. To streamline the process of responding to notifications to construct a building or construct or carry out works for low-impact telecommunications facilities on Council owned land. ____________________________________________________________________________ 21 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ 4.1.3 Policy It is policy that in considering any notice served under Clause 17 of Schedule 3 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 regarding the installation of low-impact facilities, Council will have regard to the following matters: The location of the proposed facility and its relationship to the existing streetscape elements. The location of the proposed facility and its impact on traffic management. The design and location of the proposed facility and its relationship to existing urban design themes. The potential to rationalise the number and type of facilities. The availability of existing infrastructure and the potential to co-locate facilities. The potential to co-ordinate activities within the Council work program or that of other carriers and or service authorities. It is policy that Council will seek to enter into an agreement with the telecommunications carriers to streamline the referral process with the aims of: Addressing the issues outlined within the foregoing section 4.1.1 Policy Basis; Reducing lead times; and Establishing siting and design guidelines for low-impact telecommunications facilities to ensure that there is minimal impact on the local amenity. Establishing siting and design guidelines for low-impact telecommunications facilities to ensure that there is minimal impact on the local community. ____________________________________________________________________________ 22 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ APPENDIX I E X TR AC T F R O M C L AU S E 6 ( 2 ) O F D I V I S I O N 3 O F S C H E D U L E 3 O F TH E TE L E C O M M U N I C ATI O N S AC T 1 9 9 7 The following is an extract from Clause 6: 6 Installation Of Facilities (1) A carrier may, for purposes connected with the supply of a carriage service, carry out the installation of a facility if: (a) The carrier is authorised to do so by a facility installation permit; or (b) The facility is a low-impact facility (as defined by subclause (3)); or (c) The facility is a temporary facility for use by, or on behalf of, a defence organisation for defence purposes; or (d) All of the following conditions are satisfied in relation to the installation concerned: (i) The installation occurs before 1 July 2000; (ii) The installation is carried out for the sole purpose of connecting a building, structure, caravan or mobile home to a line that forms part of a telecommunications network; (iii) The whole or a part of the network was in existence at the end of 30 June 1997. Note: (2) If the installation of a facility is not authorised by this clause, the installation may require the approval of an administrative authority under a law of a State or Territory. If subclause (1) authorises a carrier to carry out a particular activity, the carrier may, for purposes in connection with the carrying out of that activity: (a) Enter on, and occupy, any land; and (b) On, over or under the land, do anything necessary or desirable for those purposes, including, for example: Note: (i) Constructing, erecting and placing any plant, machinery, equipment and goods; and (ii) Felling and lopping trees and clearing and removing other vegetation and undergrowth; and (iii) Making cuttings and excavations; and (iv) Restoring the surface of the land and, for that purpose, removing and disposing of soil, vegetation and other material; and (v) Erecting temporary workshops, sheds and other buildings; and (vi) Levelling the surface of the land and making roads. Information correct at time of publication – reference may need to be made to any subsequent amendments to the Telecommunications Act 1997. ____________________________________________________________________________ 23 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ APPENDIX 2 E x t r a c t o f S e c t i o n s 4 2 & 4 6 t o 5 1 ( i n c l u s i ve ) o f t h e Te l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n s Ac t 1 9 9 7 T h e f o l l o wi n g i s a n e xt r a c t o f S e c t i o n 4 2 . 42 Network Unit Not To Be Used Without Carrier Licence Or Nominated Carrier Declaration (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Note: If there is only one owner of a network unit, the owner of the network unit must not use the unit, either alone or jointly with one or more other persons, to supply a carriage service to the public, unless: (a) The owner holds a carrier licence; or (b) A nominated carrier declaration is in force in relation to the unit. If there is only one owner of a network unit, the owner of the network unit must not allow or permit another person to use the unit to supply a carriage service to the public unless: (a) The owner holds a carrier licence; or (b) A nominated carrier declaration is in force in relation to the unit. If there are 2 or more owners of a network unit, an owner of the network unit must not use the unit, either alone or jointly with one or more other persons, to supply a carriage service to the public, unless: (a) The owner holds a carrier licence; or (b) A nominated carrier declaration is in force in relation to the unit. If there are 2 or more owners of a network unit, an owner of the network unit must not, either alone or together with one or more other owners, allow or permit another person to use the unit to supply a carriage service to the public unless: (a) The owner holds a carrier licence; or (b) A nominated carrier declaration is in force in relation to the unit. A person who intentionally or recklessly contravenes subsection (1), (2), (3) or (4) is guilty of an offence punishable on conviction by a fine not exceeding 20,000 penalty units. See also sections 4AA and 4B of the Crimes Act 1914. ____________________________________________________________________________ 24 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ T h e f o l l o wi n g i s a n e xt r a c t o f S e c t i o n s 4 6 t o 5 1 ( i n c l u s i ve ) 46 Exemption—Intelligence Operations Section 42 does not apply to a network unit that is used wholly or principally: 47 (a) By the Australian Secret Intelligence Service; or (b) By the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation. Exemption—Transport Authorities [see Note 2] (1) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if the sole use of the unit is use by Airservices Australia to carry communications necessary or desirable for the workings of aviation services. (2) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if the sole use of the unit is use by the Australian National Railways Commission to carry communications necessary or desirable for the workings of train services. (3) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if the sole use of the unit is use by a State or Territory transport authority to carry communications necessary or desirable for the workings of any or all of the following services: (a) Train services of a kind provided by the authority; (b) Bus or other road services of a kind provided by the authority; (c) Tram services of a kind provided by the authority. (4) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if the sole use of the unit is use by a rail corporation to carry communications necessary or desirable for the workings of train services. (5) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if: (6) (a) The principal use of the unit is use by Airservices Australia to carry communications necessary or desirable for the workings of aviation services; and (b) The remaining use of the unit is use by one or more carriers, or by one or more exempt network-users, to supply carriage services and/or content services. Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if: (a) The principal use of the unit is use by the Australian National Railways Commission to carry communications necessary or desirable for the workings of train services; and (b) The remaining use of the unit is use by one or more carriers, or by one or more exempt network-users, to supply carriage services and/or content services. ____________________________________________________________________________ 25 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ (7) Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if: (a) (b) (8) (9) The principal use of the unit is use by a State or Territory transport authority to carry communications necessary or desirable for the workings of any or all of the following services: (i) Train services of a kind provided by the authority; (ii) Bus or other road services of a kind provided by the authority; (iii) Tram services of a kind provided by the authority; and The remaining use of the unit is use by one or more carriers, or by one or more exempt network-users, to supply carriage services and/or content services. Section 42 does not apply to a network unit if: (a) The principal use of the unit is use by a rail corporation to carry communications necessary or desirable for the workings of train services; and (b) The remaining use of the unit is use by one or more carriers, or by one or more exempt network-users, to supply carriage services and/or content services. In this section: Rail Corporation means a body corporate that manages or operates either or both of the following: 48 (a) Rail transport services; (b) Rail transport infrastructure. Exemption—Broadcasting Services (1) If: (a) (b) (c) The sole use of a network unit is use to carry communications that are necessary or desirable for either or both of the following purposes: (i) The supply of broadcasting services to the public; (ii) The supply of a secondary carriage service by means of the main carrier signal of a primary broadcasting service; and The unit does not consist of, or include, a facility used to carry communications between: (i) The head end of a cable transmission system; and (ii) The equipment used by an end-user to receive a broadcasting service; and The unit does not consist of a broadcasting transmitter transmitting a signal of a broadcasting service to its intended audience; section 42 does not apply to the unit. ____________________________________________________________________________ 26 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ (2) If: (a) (b) The principal use of a network unit is use to carry communications that are necessary or desirable for either or both of the following purposes: (i) The supply of broadcasting services to the public; (ii) The supply of a secondary carriage service by means of the main carrier signal of a primary broadcasting service; and The unit does not consist of, or include, a facility used to carry communications between: (i) The head end of a cable transmission system; and (ii) The equipment used by an end-user to receive a broadcasting service; and (c) The unit does not consist of a broadcasting transmitter transmitting a signal of a broadcasting service to its intended audience; and (d) The remaining use of the unit is use by one or more carriers, or by one or more exempt network-users, to supply carriage services and/or content services; section 42 does not apply to the unit. (3) If the sole use of a line link is use for the purpose of a re-transmission of a kind mentioned in paragraph 212(1)(a) or (b) of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992, section 42 of this Act does not apply to the line link. (4) If: (5) (a) The principal use of a line link is use for the purpose of a re-transmission of a kind mentioned in paragraph 212(1)(a) or (b) of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992; and (b) The remaining use of the line link is use by one or more carriers, or by one or more exempt network-users, to supply carriage services and/or content services; section 42 of this Act does not apply to the line link. In this section: Broadcasting transmitter means a radiocommunications transmitter used, or for use, to deliver a broadcasting service. Head end of a cable transmission system means a facility that: (a) Is connected to a line link; and (b) Is used, or for use, in connection with the delivery of a broadcasting service; and (c) Processes signals for delivery by the line link to end-users having equipment appropriate for receiving the service. ____________________________________________________________________________ 27 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ 49 Exemption—Electricity Supply Bodies (1) (2) If the sole use of a network unit is use by an electricity supply body to carry communications necessary or desirable for: (a) Managing the generation, transmission, distribution or supply of electricity; or (b) Charging for the supply of electricity; section 42 does not apply to the unit. If: (a) (b) (3) The principal use of a network unit is use by an electricity supply body to carry communications necessary or desirable for: (i) Managing the generation, transmission, distribution or supply of electricity; or (ii) Charging for the supply of electricity; and The remaining use of the unit is use by one or more carriers, or by one or more exempt network-users, to supply carriage services and/or content services; section 42 does not apply to the unit. In this section: Electricity supply body means an authority, or a body corporate, that carries on a business, or performs a function, of: 50 (a) Generating, transmitting, distributing or supplying electricity; or (b) Managing the generation, transmission, distribution or supply of electricity. Exemption—line links authorised by or under previous laws (1) (2) If: (a) A line link consists of facilities in relation to which an authorisation was in force under paragraph 13(1)(a) of the Telecommunications Act 1975 immediately before the repeal of that Act; and (b) The sole use of the line link is use as provided in, and in accordance with any conditions specified in, the authorisation; section 42 of this Act does not apply to the line link. If: (a) A line link consists of facilities in relation to which an authorisation was in force under paragraph 13(1)(a) of the Telecommunications Act 1975 immediately before the repeal of that Act; and (b) The principal use of the line link is use as provided in, and in accordance with any conditions specified in, the authorisation; and (c) The remaining use of the line link is use by one or more carriers, or by one or more exempt network-users, to supply carriage services and/or content services; section 42 of this Act does not apply to the line link. ____________________________________________________________________________ 28 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) If a line link consists of facilities that: (a) Were installed before the repeal of section 45 of the Telecommunications Act 1989; and (b) Immediately before that repeal, were permitted by that section to be maintained and operated; section 42 of this Act does not apply to the line link. If: (a) a line link consists of facilities in relation to which an authorisation was in force under section 46 of the Telecommunications Act 1989 immediately before the repeal of that Act; and (b) the sole use of the line link is use as provided in, and in accordance with any conditions specified in, the authorisation; section 42 of this Act does not apply to the line link. If: (a) a line link consists of facilities in relation to which an authorisation was in force under section 46 of the Telecommunications Act 1989 immediately before the repeal of that Act; and (b) the principal use of the line link is use as provided in, and in accordance with any conditions specified in, the authorisation; and (c) the remaining use of the line link is use by one or more carriers, or by one or more exempt network-users, to supply carriage services and/or content services; section 42 of this Act does not apply to the line link. If: (a) a line link consists of facilities in relation to which an authorisation was in force under section 108 of the Telecommunications Act 1991 immediately before the repeal of that Act; and (b) the sole use of the line link is use as provided in, and in accordance with any conditions specified in, the authorisation; section 42 of this Act does not apply to the line link. If: (a) a line link consists of facilities in relation to which an authorisation was in force under section 108 of the Telecommunications Act 1991 immediately before the repeal of that Act; and (b) the principal use of the line link is use as provided in, and in accordance with any conditions specified in, the authorisation; and (c) the remaining use of the line link is use by one or more carriers, or by one or more exempt network-users, to supply carriage services and/or content services; section 42 of this Act does not apply to the line link. ____________________________________________________________________________ 29 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ 51 Exemption—Ministerial Determination (1) The Minister may, by written instrument, determine that section 42 does not apply in relation to: (a) a specified network unit; or (b) a specified person; or (c) a specified use of a network unit. (2) A determination under this section may be unconditional or subject to such conditions (if any) as are specified in the determination. (3) A determination under this section has effect accordingly. (4) A determination under this section is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Note: Information correct at time of publication – reference may need to be made to any subsequent amendments to the Telecommunications Act 1997. ____________________________________________________________________________ 30 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ APPENDIX 3 C h e c k l i s t f o r Ap p l i c a t i o n s F o r P l a n n i n g Ap p r o va l An application for permit must be accompanied by the following information in accordance with Clause 52.19-5 of the Moreland Planning Scheme: A site analysis and design response explaining how the proposed facility addresses the principles for the design, siting, construction and operation of telecommunications facilities and the requirements in A Code of Practice for Telecommunications Facilities in Victoria. Site boundaries and dimensions. The purpose and location of all buildings and works required in construction of the facility. The location of all existing buildings and works to be retained and demolished. The location of all proposed buildings and works including dimensions, elevations, materials, colours and finishes. The location and use of all buildings on adjoining properties. The location of all adjoining streets and access ways. Australian Height Datum levels. Natural drainage lines, watercourses, coastal dunes, beach systems and wetlands. Proposals for the rehabilitation of the land on which development is to occur. Roads and Parking areas. Materials, landscaping, external lighting, colour and reflectivity. In addition to the above, the Applicant is requested to submit the following information: A report addressing as a minimum the following: The measures to be taken to fulfil the principles of prudent avoidance and to minimise public exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs). Projected electromagnetic field (EMF) levels at 5, 10, 50, 100, 150, 300, 500 and 1000 metres from the site for the frequency allocated to them. On completion of construction and conditioning of the facility, a subsequent reading will be required at these ranges. Details of the cumulative electromagnetic field (EMF) levels and impact of any existing facility within close proximity to the proposed site. Details of proposed equipment, including statement that proposed facility is the latest design and technology being employed by the applicant. NOTE: Any background information including photographs of the site and surrounding properties, photographs of proposed equipment will be of assistance in processing applications. ____________________________________________________________________________ 31 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ APPENDIX 4 DRAFT APPLICATION FACILITY FOR LOW-IMPACT TELECOMMUNICATION The following information must be provided to Council before consideration of the use and construction of a telecommunication facility on Council owned or managed land. DATE: LOCATION SOUGHT: PROVIDER NAME: CONTACT DETAILS: Relevant contact person: Address: Phone Number: Facsimile Number: YOUR REFERENCE: Section A 1. Please provide your location plan drawn to a scale of 1:100 and in context of the surrounding locality. The plan must be in sufficient detail to accurately identify the distance to the nearest habitable buildings and must clearly identify its location. 2. Please provide a list of the proposed telecommunication facilities including the following: Type of facility (Please tick) Panel antenna Omni-directional antenna Radio communications dish Other facilities not noted (Please list) ____________________________________________________________________________ 32 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ Dimensions of Facility Height Width Length Diameter Number of Facilities of Each Type If the facility is to be attached to a structure, a description of the structure and its protrusion from the structure is required. Please note below. 3. Describe the course and means by which power and communication will be brought to the site, e.g. location and extent of any underground or overhead cabling. What are your intended routes of access for plant and equipment? 4. What is your proposed timeframe of works? Section B 5. In addition to the submission of the above plans and information the following must be completed. 1. Commonwealth Legislation Is the proposed telecommunication facility to be co-located? If not, why is it not feasible to co-locate? ____________________________________________________________________________ 33 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. State Legislation Is the proposed telecommunication facility deemed to be a low-impact facility? If yes, which of the following is relevant? (Please tick) Telecommunications (Low Impact Facilities) Determination 1997 OR A Code of Practice for Telecommunications in Victoria Please fill out the appropriate Part A or Part B below: PART A – TELECOMMUNICATIONS (LOW IMPACT FACILITIES) DETERMINATION 1997 What is the designated area-type of the proposed facility in accordance with Part 2 – Areas of the Telecommunications (Low Impact Facilities) Determination 1997? (Please tick) Commercial Area Industrial Area Residential Area Rural Area Area of Environmental Significance Please note that the zoning of the subject land and the overlay controls pursuant to the Moreland Planning Scheme will assist in the determination of the land use type. If the following zoning or overlay applies to the subject land, the land is considered to be an area of environmental significance: Environmental Significance Overlay (ESO) Heritage Overlay (HO) If the facilities are deemed to be low-impact under the Low Impact Determination, please identify the corresponding Item Number in accordance with the Schedule in Part 3 – Low impact facilities. (Eg. Item 2, Part 1 – radio facilities, proposed panel antenna that is (a) flush mounted to an existing structure and (b) colour-matched to its background, and lies within a rural area) If more than 1 facility is proposed please complete the above for all facilities. If you require additional space please attach separate sheet to application. ____________________________________________________________________________ 34 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ PART B - A CODE OF PRACTICE FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES IN VICTORIA How does the proposed construction and operation for the telecommunication facilities address Part 4 Principles for the Design, Siting, Construction and Operation of Telecommunications Facilities? Please complete the table below: PRINCIPLE 1 Assessment A Telecommunication Facility Should Be Sited To Minimise Visual Impact. On, or in the vicinity of a heritage place, a telecommunication facility should be sited and designed with external colours, finishes and scale sympathetic to those of the heritage place. A heritage place is a heritage place listed in the planning schedule to the Heritage Overlay in the planning scheme. A telecommunication facility mounted on a building should be integrated with the design and appearance of the building. Equipment associated with the telecommunication facility should be screened or housed to reduce its visibility. The relevant officer of the responsible authority should be consulted before any street tree is pruned, lopped, destroyed or removed. A telecommunication facility should be located so as to minimise any interruption to a significant view of a heritage place, a landmark, a streetscape, vista or a panorama, whether viewed from public or private land. ____________________________________________________________________________ 35 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ PRINCIPLE 2 Assessment Telecommunication Facilities Should Be Co-Located Wherever Practical Wherever practical, telecommunication lines should be located within an existing underground conduit or duct. Overhead lines and antennae should be attached to existing utility poles, towers or other radiocommunications equipment to minimise unnecessary clutter. PRINCIPLE 3 Assessment Health standards for exposure to radio emissions will be met. A telecommunication facility must be designed and installed so that the maximum human exposure levels to radio frequency emissions comply with Australian Standard AS/NZS 2772.1:1999. PRINCIPLE 4 Assessment Disturbance and risk relating to sitting and construction should be minimised. Construction activity and site location should comply with State environment protection policies and best practice environmental management guidelines Soil erosion during construction and soil instability during operation should be minimised in accordance with any relevant policy or guideline issued by the Environment Protection Authority. ____________________________________________________________________________ 36 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ Construction should be carried out in a safe and effective manner in accordance with relevant requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1985. Obstruction or danger to pedestrians or vehicles caused by the location of the facility, construction activity or materials used in construction should be minimised. Where practical, construction should be carried out during times that cause minimum disruption to adjoining properties and public access. Traffic control measures should be taken during construction in accordance with Australian Standard AS1742.3-1996 Manual of Uniform Control Devices. Open trenching should be guarded in accordance with Australian Standard Section 93.080 – Road Engineering AS 1165 – 1982 – Traffic hazard warning lamps. Disturbance to flora and fauna should be minimised during construction and vegetation replaced to the satisfaction of the land owner or responsible authority at the conclusion of the work. Street furniture, paving or other existing facilities removed or damaged during construction should be reinstated (at the telecommunication carrier’s expense) to at least the same condition as that which existed prior to the telecommunication facility being installed. ____________________________________________________________________________ 37 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Do the proposed telecommunication facilities correspond with a description in section 5 of the Code of Practice, and if so, which description? (e.g. Section 5.1A microcell) 3. How are the listed requirements met by the proposal? Following submission of the above information and completion of the relevant tables, your application will be referred to Council’s planning department for assessment. If the facility is not deemed to be a low impact facility pursuant to the Telecommunication (Low Impact) Facilities Determination 1997 or A Code of Practice for Telecommunication Facilities in Victoria, you will be notified, and required to apply for a planning permit in accordance with clause 52.19 of the Moreland Planning Scheme. In addition to the above, Council must access whether it is appropriate for the telecommunications facility to be located on Council owned or managed land. This assessment is in accordance with Moreland City Council Telecommunications Policy 2000. Please complete the following: Objectives The need for the facility and any alternatives to supply that need, including viable and practicable alternative locations that would result in the proposed facility being more compatible to surrounding land use, scale and character. The impact of the proposed facility on the primary use of the land. Whether the proposed facility will conflict with the use of the land for a public purpose. Assessment ____________________________________________________________________________ 38 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ The impact of the proposed facility on Council’s ability to utilise the site. The proposed location of the facility on the land. The community benefit of the proposal. The community return from the provision of additional community infrastructure. Details of proposed and actual electromagnetic field (EMF) readings and proposed measures to be taken to fulfil the principles of prudent avoidance. Details of any infrastructure that would be made redundant by the installation of the new facilities and the undertaking to remove the redundant infrastructure . Infrastructure specifications including compliance with best practice and the commitment of the telecommunication carrier to install “latest available” technology specifications to minimise the impact of the proposal. Any strategic review undertaken to identify appropriate reserves and open spaces for the location of high impact telecommunication facilities. ____________________________________________________________________________ 39 ____________________________________________________________________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY ____________________________________________________________________________ Any strategy or policy that the Council (as public land manager) must consider, including the Moreland Open Space Strategy and the Moreland Leisure Plan. Applicant’s Signature …………………………………. Dated: 1. To be completed by Moreland City Council APPROVED BY: DATE: COMMENTS: ____________________________________________________________________________ 40