European Environment Agency Contract Number 3403/B2009/EEA.53788 GENERAL SUPPORT TO THE FORWARDLOOKING ASSESSMENT COMPONENT OF THE EUROPEAN STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND OUTLOOK REPORT (SOER 2010 PART A) Background Paper on Urbanisation and Consumption Final Version June 2010 Contact BIO Intelligence Service Shailendra Mudgal Leonardo Mazza + 33 1 53 90 11 80 shailendra.mudgal@biois.com leonardo.mazza@biois.com Project Team BIO Intelligence Service Mr. Shailendra Mudgal Ms. Tanja Münchmeyer Mr. Leonardo Mazza Mr. Kurt Muehmel Disclaimer This report contains the research conducted by the authors and is not to be perceived as the opinion of the European Environment Agency. 2 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 Contents 0. Summary: Mega-trends Urbanisation and changes in consumption patterns ................. 5 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 7 1.1. What is this report about? ................................................................................................................... 7 1.2. Why is it important? ............................................................................................................................. 8 1.3. What is the starting point of this report? ............................................................................................. 9 1.4. How is this report structured? ........................................................................................................... 10 2. Conceptual note on mega-trends and their analysis ..................................................... 11 3. Trends drivers and uncertainties ................................................................................... 12 3.1. Background ........................................................................................................................................ 12 3.2. Mega-trend I: Urbanisation ................................................................................................................ 16 3.2.1. Mega-trend summary .........................................................................................................................................16 3.2.2. Key trends...........................................................................................................................................................17 3.2.3. Key drivers ..........................................................................................................................................................27 3.2.4. Key uncertainties ................................................................................................................................................35 3.3. Mega-trend II: Changes in lifestyle and consumption patterns ......................................................... 39 3.3.1. Mega-trend summary .........................................................................................................................................39 3.3.2. Key trends...........................................................................................................................................................40 3.3.3. Key drivers ..........................................................................................................................................................48 3.3.4. Key uncertainties ................................................................................................................................................56 4. 4.1. Impacts ......................................................................................................................... 59 Potential environmental impacts on Europe ...................................................................................... 59 4.1.1. Indirect impacts on Europe ................................................................................................................................59 4.1.2. Direct impacts on Europe ...................................................................................................................................63 4.2. Potential economic and social impacts .............................................................................................. 65 4.2.1. Global resource supply and prices ......................................................................................................................65 4.2.2. Demand for fossil fuels .......................................................................................................................................66 4.2.3. Increased and more visible inequality ................................................................................................................66 5. 5.1. Policy Implications ........................................................................................................ 67 Possible implications for European environmental policy ................................................................. 67 5.1.1. Compensating for policies elsewhere .................................................................................................................67 5.1.2. Europe as an environmental trendsetter............................................................................................................67 5.1.3. Influencing demand to promote sustainable consumption and production ......................................................68 5.2. Possible implications for other European policy areas ....................................................................... 68 5.2.1. Economic policy to influence production methods ............................................................................................68 5.2.2. Ensuring European competitiveness ..................................................................................................................69 5.2.3. Trendsetting in urban planning ..........................................................................................................................70 5.2.4. Technological leapfrogging .................................................................................................................................71 6. References .................................................................................................................... 72 June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 3 This page is left intentionally blank 4 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 0. SUMMARY: MEGA-TRENDS URBANISATION AND CHANGES IN CONSUMPTION PATTERNS The European Environment Agency is conducting an analysis of long-term global megatrends and their environmental implications for Europe up to 2050 as part of the forthcoming European State of the Environment and Outlook Report 2010. This analysis focuses on a sample of xx mega-trends across the social, technological, economic, environmental and political dimensions of global change. This background report presents the analysis for two of the xx megatrends, namely rapid global urbanisation and consumption changes. (note: we have not defined the final title for the latter megatrend yet). Mega-trend “rapid global urbanisation” Approximately 3.5 billion people presently live in urban settlements worldwide, representing about half of the global population. By 2050, this figure is projected to increase by nearly 3 billion, reaching 6.4 billion in 2050, accounting for close to 70% of the world population. The urban areas of the world are expected to absorb literally all the population growth over the next four decades while at the same time drawing in some of the rural population. In general, this trend is strongest in emerging economies. China and India are noteworthy in this regard. These two countries are projected to account together for about a third of the increase in the urban population in the coming decades.1 By 2025, China will be more urbanised than the world average and by 2050, the urban population of China is expected to exceed 1 billion. Megatrend “changes in lifestyle and consumption patterns” China is expected to become the world’s largest economy between 2025 and 2035. China and India belong to the fastest growing consumer markets and are on a path similar to Western levels of energy and resource consumption. Total urban consumption in China is expected to increase annually at a rate of 8.6% between 2005 and 2025. As the Chinese and Indian economies are growing, there has been a striking increase in household incomes, particularly in China. It has been estimated that, since 1985, extreme poverty in China has been cut by half. That said, trends showing income growth based on aggregate data often mask deep inequalities in the distribution of wealth among the urban and rural populations. June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 5 Key drivers Increasing incomes The rapid increase in incomes worldwide, driven by continuing economic growth, is associated with and related to both the process of urbanisation as well as changes in lifestyle and consumption patterns. However, disagreement remains on the exact nature of the relationship between increasing incomes, urbanisation, and changing consumption patterns and if the changes in consumption are a result of urbanisation or simply increasing incomes. Population growth in urban and rural areas Fundamentally, the most significant drivers for both urbanisation and the increase in the aggregate level of consumption remains the exponential population growth in rural and urban areas. While rural population growth leads to migratory pressure towards cities, natural increase (the growth of already-urban populations) remains the principle driver of urban population growth worldwide. Key uncertainties Domestic and international policies The nature and impacts of the trends towards urbanisation and changes in lifestyle and consumption patterns will depend, to a large extent, on the choices of policy-makers in developing countries, as well as the potential implementation of international policy frameworks worldwide. Properly managed urbanisation can lead to considerable efficiency gains in the provision of infrastructure and basic services, thereby lessening environmental impact and increasing human well-being. International environmental and climate policy frameworks could impact the rate of economic growth as well as the technologies used in the continued development of these countries, both of which would affect the environmental impact of these trends. Population growth While the rates of population growth are relatively steady and predictable, given the sizes of the populations in question, even small deviations from projections would significantly impact the absolute size of the population and, thus, the rate of urbanisation and the scale of consumption and its ensuing environmental impact. The rate of population growth is, in turn, influenced by policy decisions and other socio-cultural and economic factors in China and India, introducing a layer of uncertainty. 6 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. WHAT IS THIS REPORT ABOUT? This report analyses two interrelated yet distinct global megatrends, namely rapid urbanisation and changes in consumption patterns in emerging economies. Much of the analysis is illustrated with concrete case study information from China and India. This perspective has been chosen for two reasons: (i) India, and particularly China, are the motive force behind much of the political and economic rise of Asia, which will be host to the majority of future urbanisation and (ii) the sheer size of their populations amplifies the impact of even small per capita changes, that boost changes in consumption patterns and overall market and growth patterns. Many changes have swept over the planet during the last 50 years and the stark increase in global urban population is one of the most important.2 This process is in a complex relationship with rising incomes, leading to significant changes in consumption patterns worldwide. Extremely rapid urbanisation within the last few decades can be observed in both China and India: from 1978 to 2004, the Chinese rate of urbanisation went from about 18% with an urban population of 170 million to about 40% with an urban population of 540 million inhabitants.3 At present, approximately 307 million Indians live in nearly 3,700 towns and cities spread across the country. This is about 30% of its population, in sharp contrast to only 60 million (15%) who lived in urban areas in 1947 when the country became independent4. Importantly, rise in incomes has led to a strong expansion of a global middle-income class with different consumption and spending habits. Globally, shifts in spending power towards middle-income economies and middle-income people have been observed in the past. They are assumed to continue over the coming decades, as the focus of spending in many of the emerging economies continues to change from basic to more discretionary goods.5 According to one estimate, Brazil, Russia, India and China together could match the G7 share of global GDP by 2040-2050.6 But a number of critical uncertainties are embedded in these outlooks, one of which is the degree to which Asia will integrate further into the global economy. Again China and India are of key influence. Although both countries have a population exceeding one billion, they differ greatly with respect to their political organisation, average income level, extent of urbanisation, and per capita consumption. Since the 1980s, economic growth has been twice as rapid in China as in India. To a certain extent, India may follow a development path similar to the one witnessed for China, with important implications for the local and global environment, though India’s current emphasis on the June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 7 service sector over heavy industry means that there are also limitations to the extent to which parallels can be drawn. 1.2. WHY IS IT IMPORTANT? Global consumption of goods and services, as measured by the economic transfers associated with the related transactions, has grown dramatically over the past five decades, up 28% from the $23.9 trillion spent in 1996 and up sixfold from the $4.9 trillion spent in 1960 (in 2008 US dollars). Some of this increase comes from the growth in population, but human numbers only grew by a factor of 2.2 between 1960 and 2006. Thus consumption expenditures per person still almost tripled.7 Because of the sheer scale of the urbanisation processes worldwide, and in China and India in particular, urban centres more than ever have particular relevance to any discussion of sustainable development: much of the world’s middle- and upper-income groups live and work in urban centres, and it is their demand for goods and services that underpin most of the rural and urban resource consumption and waste outputs from production worldwide.8 The scale of resource use and waste generation arising from production and consumption located in urban centres has major implications for broad ecological sustainability.9 While shifting technologies and stabilising population are essential in creating future sustainable societies, neither will succeed without considerable changes in consumption patterns. A thorough analysis of the different drivers behind the mega-trends towards increasing urbanisation and changing consumption patterns is necessary if a good understanding of the policy implications of these trends from a European perspective is to be developed. To better estimate how consumerism will evolve it is also necessary to better grasp what part culture plays in it. This is particularly true since human behaviour is guided primarily by the cultural systems people are born into. Again, a focus on India and China will deliver valuable insights. The form consumerism takes in different cultures is not without consequences for global sustainability and the more success and happiness will be defined through how much a person consumes the further away societies will move away from the overarching objective of sustainable development.10 Rising incomes in emerging economies is likely to result in more and more spending on discretionary goods and less and less on basic goods. In today’s world of almost 7 billion people, future increases of global resource demand increasingly meet environmental constraints. Demand for energy, food and water is projected to grow rapidly, hand in hand with rising incomes. By 2025, China will have overtaken the US to become the world’s biggest consumer market, with India as the third-largest.11 If India’s overall economic growth remains on a long-term path of 7 to 8%, as most economists expect, absolute levels of consumption will reach very high levels in the near future.12 Beyond the immediate local and global environmental impacts, the shifts in consumption patterns in China and India will also have important economic implications such as on the prices of agricultural commodities and increased competition for fossil fuels and shrinking reserves of mineral resources. Moreover, they will significantly influence global social and cultural trends. 8 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 The interrelated processes of globalisation, increasing incomes, urbanisation and changing consumption patterns are making the world more connected and more vulnerable to new threats. Take, for example, increasing air travel to and from Asia. Beyond the increasing greenhouse gas emissions of the flights themselves, the increased contact between people from different regions and continents can increase and accelerate the spread of infectious diseases as was seen in the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. That said, it is important to recall that of the megatrends of urbanisation and changes in consumption patterns need not necessarily result in a dire world and may indeed help in avoiding that outcome. The nature of the impacts depends to a large extent on policy and choices and decisions at the individual and corporate levels. While increased air travel may spread diseases, it also facilitates cultural exchange, understanding and learning which can contribute to the emergence of a more stable and peaceful world order. Increasing incomes means lifting larger segments of population out of poverty, providing better supply of basic needs such as adequate sources of nourishment, sanitation, housing or health-care and better education and information. If adequately managed, urbanisation has the potential to lead to efficiency gains in the provision of infrastructure and basic services, leading to a reduction of overall environmental impacts. Urbanisation and consumption patterns changes are key drivers of global resource demand and environmental change. Europe is a resource scarce continent and it is highly dependent on resource imports. Some of its neighbour regions, such as the Middle East and North Africa, are very vulnerable to sources of instability global environmental change and economic and/or political disruptions. The way urbanisation and in particular changes in global consumption patterns develop has thus strong multiple knock-on effects, in terms of increasing or decreasing global resource exploitation and competition or increasing global environmental change. 1.3. WHAT IS THE STARTING POINT OF THIS REPORT? It is important to recall that the process of development and the associated economic and demographic growth in developing countries does not occur in a vacuum. Indeed, it is often demand for products in developed countries which is driving the economic growth in these countries in general, and China in particular. For example, more than 50% of all electronic products manufactured in China are shipped to the United States, Europe or Japan. While these products leave the country, the emissions remain behind. About 50% of the emission growth in China from 2002 to 2005 was triggered by export production and 60% of these commodities were exported to the West.13 (link to EEA Namea work findings?) Today, the daily average resource use of a European is 43 kilograms, compared to an American average use of 65 kilograms, 14 rates which are considered to be well beyond the carrying capacity of the Earth.15 The exploitation and conversion of sub-soil and natural resources has put increasing pressure on Earth’s systems and in the process has dramatically disrupted the ecological systems on which humanity and countless other June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 9 species depend. The 2005 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment indicated that some 60% of ecosystem services — climate regulation, the provision of fresh water, waste treatment, food from fisheries, and many other services — were being degraded or used unsustainably.16 China and India are the world’s fastest growing consumer markets.17 Yet the daily average resource use of a Chinese is xx kg and of an Indian is xx kg. As the consumption patterns of larger segments of population start to approximate the consumption patterns in the developed world, one might expect a continuously increasing resource demand together with rising environmental impacts. Yet there is also evidence that some of the trends observed might be divergent.18 1.4. HOW IS THIS REPORT STRUCTURED? The report is structured as follows: Chapter 2 provides a conceptual discussion about mega-trends and their analysis. This is followed by a discussion about the global megatrends in urbanisation and consumption, their drivers and key uncertainties in Chapter 3. This discussion is introduced by an overview of each megatrend and its drivers in form of a table structured according to the STEEP (Social, technological, environmental, economic and political) framework. Chapter 4 then presents an overview of potential impacts of urbanisation and consumption, with a primary focus on the environment. Finally, questions surrounding potential implications for European environmental and other policy-making are raised in Chapter 5. An important caveat needs to be made: both mega-trends present complex phenomena, in particular when viewed from a global perspective. The analysis presented in this report does not aim to deliver a comprehensive and representative analysis but rather tries to showcase some of the main developments and discuss their strategic implications. 10 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 2. CONCEPTUAL NOTE ON MEGA-TRENDS AND THEIR ANALYSIS To be provided by EEA. RE uncertainties: Strategic Development Forum - Group ”Knowledge” Knowledge” Further clarification of Key Terms Situation State and dates of knowledge Examples of action Risk ‘Known ’ impacts; ‘known ’ probabilities e.g. asbestos Prevention: action taken to reduce known hazards e.g. eliminate exposure to asbestos dust U ncertainty ‘Known ’ impacts; ‘unknown ’ probabilities e.g. antibiotics in animal feed and associated human resistance to those antibiotics ‘Unknown’ impacts and therefore ‘unknown’ probabilities eg the ‘surprises’ of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), pre 1974. Precautionary prevention: action taken to reduce exposure to potential hazards Ignorance Precaution: action taken to anticipate, identify and reduce the impact of ‘surprises’ Source: ‘Late Lessons’, page 192 June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 11 3. TRENDS DRIVERS AND UNCERTAINTIES 3.1. BACKGROUND The two mega-trends of rapid urbanisation and changing consumption patterns towards discretionary goods are evident worldwide. Yet they are more pronounced in rapidly developing countries which are undergoing a host of significant and rapid changes at a much faster rate than did European and North American countries during their development in the 18th and 19th centuries.19 Strong economic growth since the 1990s is a common trend in a number of developing countries (Figure 1, page 13). The drivers of this increasing wealth are part of a complex matrix of social, economic and political variables. While the complexity of the various influences makes it difficult to determine clear lines of causation with currently available data, urbanisation and changes in consumption patterns are both deeply associated with and related to this global trend towards increasing wealth. Due to this increasing wealth, many of the new city-dwellers are likely to enjoy a level of material well-being considerably beyond that of their forbearers. In fact, despite remaining urban and rural poverty in certain segments of the societies, the rise of a middle-class in those countries means that we are currently observing a rapid rise of a global consumer society, driven in particular by developments in the BRIC countries and most notably China and India.20 As illustrated in Figure 2, most of the absolute growth in urban populations has taken place in “less developed regions”, a set of countries which are often broadly described as “emerging economies”, or those regions of the world that are experiencing a rapid economic growth under conditions of limited or partial industrialisationi. The leading emerging economies are an increasingly dominant force in global economic, social and environmental affairs. Emerging economies represent the world’s largest potential markets and are the source both of much of the world’s natural and human resources as well as major sustainability challenges. While many sustainability issues are relevant in both developed and emerging economies, the way they play out frequently differs. China and India are currently the major players among emerging economies, e.g. China alone contributed nearly 27% to global economic growth in 2007.21 That said, given the diversity within the group labelled “emerging economies”, it is difficult to derive general conclusions. i China, given its high rate of industrialisation, is an exception to this convention. 12 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 Figure 1: GDP growth per capita (PPP) in selected developing countries, 1980-2013, current international dollarsii (figures post-2008 based on IMF estimations) Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2009 ii The international dollar is a hypothetical unit of currency that has the same purchasing power that the U.S. dollar had in the United States at a given point in time. It shows how much a local currency unit is worth within the country’s borders and is used to make comparisons both between countries and over time. It is used by the IMF and the World Bank in certain studies. June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 13 Figure 2: Urban population growth in more and less developed regions, 1950-2010 Source: United Nations: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2007 Revision Population Database 14 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 Table 1: Main drivers influencing urbanisation and changing consumption patterns Social Rapid Urbanisation Changes in Consumption Patterns - High birth rates in rural and urban areas - Population growth - Rebalancing of values - Changing consumption preferences - Shifts in demographic composition - Longevity Technological - Mechanisation of agriculture - Medical progress - Innovation - Spread of radios, televisions and the Internet in rural areas (exposure to media stimulating consumerism) STEEP categories of drivers - Population displacements due to dam constructions Economic - Increasing incomes - Increasing incomes - Poverty induced rural-urban migration - Shift of industrial production from developed countries to developing countries - Market liberalisation and free trade - Multinational companies entering the Chinese and Indian market - Foreign Direct Investment - Marketing and advertising - Availability of new financing options Environmental - Changes in agricultural productivity - Climate change - Scarcity of agricultural land Political - Industrial policy - Land-use policy - Absence of well developed state pension system - Absence of well developed health care system - Pollution might increase demand for bottled water and imported products more generally - Loss of arable land to fossil fuel extraction - Development of a state pension/health care system and the resulting changes in household savings rates - State policy to develop the consumer market - Economic policy choices - Legacy of past policies June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 15 3.2. MEGA-TREND I: URBANISATION 3.2.1. MEGA-TREND SUMMARY In many emerging economies, there are still large differences between the life-styles and spending patterns of people in urban and rural areas. People in rural areas tend to have lower average incomes and more conservative spending habits than those in urban areas. At the individual level, urbanisation offers unique chances for improvement in the quality of life and environmental protection if urban development is governed effectively. At the macro-economic level, Cities are important for facilitating economic growth, increasing productivity and rising incomes.22 However, rural-urban migrations often happen in an unplanned and unregulated way. Informal settlements and slums which currently house more than 1 billion urban dwellers are of particular environmental concern as they are often not connected to even basic sanitation systems and other critical infrastructure.23 The increase in the world urban population is largely concentrated in less developed countries; China and India alone are projected to account together for about a third of the increase in the urban population in the coming decades. Higher fertility levels in these countries relative to developed countries, both in urban and rural areas, and the limited amount of arable land are likely to remain the main cause of rural-urban migration during the next decades but the phenomenon could be exacerbated by several additional factors, in particular: further mechanisation of agriculture, climate change induced migration, increasing integration of China and India into the world economy with a widening gap in average income between rural areas and urban areas, all making a move to urban centres even more attractive to rural dwellers. While the rate of growth in cities is expected to slow (but not stop) in the coming decades, the rapid expansion of cities over the past half-century leaves a massive, newly-urban population, fundamentally changing the makeup of countries worldwide. Furthermore, the scale and rate of this transition will pose significant challenges to local and international structures and institutions. Finally, the transition towards a more urban global society is likely to be long-lasting and difficult to reverse. In many cases, the built environment of these countries is being heavily modified and the infrastructure that is being developed will influence the course of the continued development for decades, if not centuries, to come. 16 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 3.2.2. KEY TRENDS Growing urban populations In the 1950s, just over one-half of the population of the developed countries and just under one-third of the population of the entire world lived in urban areas. At that time, there were about 733 million people living in urban areas worldwide and eighty-three cities in the world that could boast a million or more residents. Continued urbanisation over the last 50 years has resulted in a situation where close to half of the world’s population now lives in urban areas. In general, this trend towards greater urbanisation is occurring more quickly and with the greatest absolute impact in less developed regions (Figure 2 [page 14] and Figure 3) Figure 3: Urban annual growth rate in regions grouped by their development status Source: United Nations: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2007 Revision Population Database Over the last 20 years many urban areas have experienced dramatic growth as a result of rapid population growth while, at the same time, the world’s economy has been transformed by a combination of rapid technological and political changes. Many cities, particularly those in developing countries that have enjoyed robust economic growth, have expanded significantly over the past 25 years, in some cases more than quadrupling in size. Today, approximately 3.5 billion people now live in urban settlements. 24 That said, the annual rate of population growth in urban areas has been decreasing in less developed regions (Figure 3) and are on track to converge with the lower rates currently observed in more developed regions. While this slowing of the urbanisation process may lessen some of the impacts of this urbanisation as the process occurs at a more June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 17 manageable rate, the absolute number of urban inhabitants in less developed regions (Figure 2, page 14) will remain significant. Figure 4 shows the trend towards increasingly urban populations in several major developing countries worldwide. The variability between the countries is substantial; for example, Brazil has reached an urbanisation rate of nearly 90% while India has only recently reached 30%. What is common between all of the countries, however, is the upward trend towards increasingly urban populations. Whether the very large populations of China and India will reach urbanisation rates similar to those of Brazil or Mexico is a matter of considerable uncertainty with significant potential impacts for the local and global environments. As shown in Figure 5, even at relatively low rates of urbanisation, the absolute size of the urban populations in China and India are much larger than those in other developing countries. Figure 4: Urban population as a percentage of total population in selected developing countries, 1950-2010 Source: United Nations: World Urbanization Prospects Database, 2007 Revision 18 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 Figure 5: Urban population in selected developing countries, 1950-2010 Source: United Nations: World Urbanization Prospects Database, 2007 Revision Regardless of future uncertainty, the changes in the relative and absolute sizes of the Chinese and Indian urban populations which have taken place since 1950 have been dramatic. Figure 6 shows this transformation in comparison to the global trend — a trend of which India and China have been major drivers. This increase represents an increase in the absolute population of Chinese cities by a factor of approximately 8.5. In India, the absolute population of urban areas has increased by a factor of approximately 6 (Figure 7).25 June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 19 Figure 6: Share of China’s and India’s populations living in urban areas, 1950-2000 Source: United Nations: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2007 Revision Population Database Figure 7: Growth of urban populations (1950-2010) in China and India Source: United Nations: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2007 Revision Population Database 20 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 Size of cities While much of the current debate on sustainable cities focuses on the formidable problems for the world’s largest urban agglomerations, the majority of all urban dwellers globally continue to reside in far smaller urban settlements.26 Today’s mega-citiesiii account for 4% of the world’s population and 9% of all urban inhabitants. That said, this trend is more specific to developing countries: eight of the ten largest cities and urban agglomerations worldwide are in developing countries. China is rather close to this world average with 11% of its urban inhabitants residing in one of 7 mega-cities. India, on the other hand, has far more of its urban populations concentrated in the largest cities with 23% of its urban population residing in one of 8 mega-cities.27 At the global level, urban populations may generally move away from the largest settlements in the future, favouring small- to medium-sized cities instead28. Yet the UN Population Division data shows that this trend is not expected to be borne out in China ( iii “Megacities“ are defined as urban areas with more than 5 million inhabitants. June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 21 Figure 8) and particularly not in India (Figure 9). Nearly one quarter of the urban population in India presently resides in cities of 5 million or more, a figure which is expected to remain steady through the projection period, until 2025 (Figure 11, page 24). In China, this figure is expected to continue its slow increase, passing from the current 11% of the population to 14% in 2025 (Figure 10, page 24). The growth in the size of mega-cities in developing countries is particularly important given that even a modest growth rate in a large city can mean a large absolute increase in population. That is to say, a 2% annual increase in the population of Mumbai (with its approximately 20 million inhabitants) will mean a much larger increase in the absolute number of city-dwellers than a 10% annual increase in a smaller city.29 22 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 Figure 8: Distribution of urban population in China by city size, 2010 Source: United Nations: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2007 Revision Population Database Figure 9: Distribution of urban population in India by city size, 2010 Source: United Nations: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2007 Revision Population Database June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 23 Figure 10: Chinese population living in cities of 5 million or more, 1950-2010 Source: United Nations: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2007 Revision Population Database Figure 11: Indian population living in cities of 5 million or more, 1950-2010 Source: United Nations: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2007 Revision Population Database 24 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 Future Outlook World population has grown exponentially in the 20th century from around 1.6 billion in 1900 to around 6.7 billion in 2007, with each additional billion people being added more rapidly than the last billion people. Between 2007 and 2050, the world population is expected to increase significantly. As the future world population is subject to considerable uncertainty, the United Nations Population Division publishes low-, medium-, and highgrowth scenarios. The global population in 2050 is predicted to be 8.4 billion, 9.1 billion and 10.5 billion, according to the low-, medium- and high-growth scenarios respectively. While the UN Population Division does not calculate multiple scenarios for its urbanisation figures, they estimate that the population living in urban areas is projected to increase by 3.1 billion, passing from 3.3 billion in 2007 to 6.4 billion in 2050.iv Thus, the urban areas of the world are expected to absorb virtually all the population growth expected over the next four decades under all growth scenarios while at the same time drawing in some of the rural population. 30 Figure 12: Estimated and projected size of the world’s urban and rural populations, 19502050 Source: United Nations: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2007 Revision Population Database Looking forward to 2050, developing countries are expected to see their rate of urbanisation converge at a very high level (Figure 13). While not all developing countries iv The UN Population Division does not publish multiple scenarios for its urbanisation figures. June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 25 will have identical rates of urbanisation by this date, the UN projections suggest an upper limit of urbanisation towards which these developing countries will continually progress. Figure 13: Urban population as a percentage of total population in selected developing countries, 2010-2050 Source: United Nations: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2007 Revision Population Database Among the developing countries, India and China stand out as a result of their sheer size. Between 2007 and 2025, the urban areas of China are expected to gain 261 million inhabitants while the urban areas of India are expected to increase by 197 million, accounting together for 35% of the global increase in urban population.31 By 2025, China will be more urbanised than the world average (Figure 14) and by 2050, the urban population of China is expected to exceed 1 billion (Figure 5, page 19).32 26 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 Figure 14: Projected share of China’s and India’s populations living in urban areas, 20002050 Source: United Nations: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2007 Revision Population Database 3.2.3. KEY DRIVERS High fertility levels, population growth, and demographic changes One of the principal drivers behind the rising levels of urbanisation throughout the past few decades has been population growth in rural and urban areas (see SOER Background Paper I: Demographics and Migration for further discussion on this subject). A high fertility rate in cities, primarily among the poorest populations, is the main driving factor for growing urban populations in most countries worldwide. This trend is particularly reflected in India where 51% to 65% of urban growth between 1961 and 2001 was a result of this phenomenon.33 In rural areas of India and China, for example, high fertility levels combined with a limited amount of land available for farming and the progressive mechanisation of agriculture has led and will continue to lead to a population surplus in rural areas which will most likely flow into urban areas, which are often seen by the rural poor as offering better June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 27 employment opportunities. In recent years, however, the fertility rate in China and India has fallen, as summarised in Table 2. Table 2: Birth rates in China and India 1990-1995 2005-2010 China 2.0 1.8 India 3.9 2.8 Source: United Nations Development Programme: Human Development Report 2009 In India, this decrease in the birth rate has been a result of increasing income levels and literacy rates among women.34 China, on the other hand, has enforced a more interventionist child control policy. The most significant decrease in China’s fertility rate, however, occurred immediately prior to 1990 when the one-child policy was introduced. At present, China’s family planning policies are largely based on the use of economic incentives instead of forced abortion/sterilisation, a model which is expected to continue to be effective in maintaining the current fertility rate.35 The contribution of population growth to urbanisation in China is projected to decrease over the next few decades, especially since the average number of births per woman has now fallen below the replacement level of about 2.1. children per woman. That said, even at low fertility rates, the large cohort of the fertile population is reaching its peak around 2010 which will likely lead to a large number of births in the coming decades before slowing definitively (Figure 15). 28 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 Figure 15: Size of the Chinese population by age group, 1950-2050 Source: Hellig, G.K. 2004 IIASA36 In China, it is expected that rapid urban development coupled with surplus population in rural areas generated by gradually increasing productivity in the countryside will act together to boost the mobile population by approximately 240 million additional inhabitants in the next 20 years.37 In addition, while older persons still live predominantly in rural areas, it is expected that this situation will be reversed before 2020, further contributing to a fall in the average household size and fuelling housing development as the elderly move out of family homesteads into individual urban apartments.38 Ageing in China is thus an increasingly urban phenomenon as the elderly follow their children to urban centres, a trend which is representative of developments in other regions of the world as well. The tradition that children support their parents in old age survives, but many young people have left the countryside for the city. A growing number of elderly people are following them, in search of a way to live. They do not always find it: In China, the city of Wei Hai is building homes for some 10,000 “abandoned elderly” who have no direct family support.39 (see SOER Background Paper I: Demographics and Migration for further discussion of the ageing process) Other driving forces presented below, such as mechanisation of agriculture, however, will ensure that rural-urban migration remains a significant driver of urbanisation in China. In June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 29 comparison, urban and rural population growth in India is likely to remain a more important driver of an increasingly urban population, most probably until they have stabilised near the replacement level which, in that country, is presently estimated to be 2.34 children per mother as a result of a higher rate of infant and child mortality relative to European countries.40 Poverty induced rural-urban migration Poverty induced rural-urban migration has been an important global driver of urbanisation and is likely to continue in the future, although with varying relevance. With a comparably high fertility rate and lower level or urbanisation, India, for example, is likely to witness increased migratory pressures in the years to come which, in combination with the other drivers, can be expected to lead to a consistently high level of rural-urban migration. One of the features of Indian urbanisation to date is that it is partly a product of demographic explosion in urban and rural areas, combined with poverty induced rural-urban migration. As urbanisation in India largely occurs more as a result of rural push rather than urban pull, it leads to massive growth of slums which is often followed by misery, poverty, unemployment, exploitation, inequalities, and degradation in the quality of urban life.41 Socio-economically disadvantaged populations within cities, often consigned to segregated areas generically called “slums”, are not a uniquely modern phenomenon. The difference today is one of scale. Slum dwellers of the new millennium are no longer a few thousand in a few cities of a rapidly industrializing continent. They include one out of every three city dwellers, a billion people, a sixth of the world’s population.42 Over 90% of slum dwellers today are in the developing world. South Asia has the largest share, followed by Eastern Asia, sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. China and India together have 37% of the world’s slums. In sub-Saharan Africa, urbanization has become virtually synonymous with slum growth; 72% of the region’s urban population lives under slum conditions, compared to 56% in South Asia. The slum population of sub-Saharan Africa almost doubled in 15 years, reaching nearly 200 million in 2005.43 Land-use policy The competition for land and the disputes about land ownership and user rights is gaining relevance across the globe. The acquisition of land adjacent to cities and the simultaneous incorporation of populations living there is an important driver of urbanisation, particularly in China, yet it is not often fully acknowledged. For example, in China, about 120 million people have been added to the urban population between 1990 and 2005. This number is higher than the estimated 103 million people who migrated from rural to urban areas (accounting for 32% of the population increase). It is estimated to account for close to 40% of the increase in urban population during that period. Over the past five years, however, this pattern has been disrupted. As land values increase due to a variety of factorsv, a large v Some competing demands for land, all contributing towards the increase in land value, include the raising of cash crops, growing biofuel feedstock, growing feed for livestock to satisfy increasing demand for meat, conservation uses such as afforestation and biodiversity protection, and the growth of cities themselves. 30 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 number of cities are running out of land to cheaply expand into and national government policy has made land acquisitions more difficult.44 Concurrently, the Chinese government has recently expanded land-use rights of farmers, allowing them to lease their land for the first time.45 While this may allow urban areas to expand more easily, easing some of the difficulties mentioned in the previous paragraph, this will also likely increase the wealth of those farmers who lease their land. It is possible that this could further increase the rate of urbanisation as the former rural inhabitants seek to spend their newfound wealth in cities on goods and services which are not available in the countryside. Economic liberalisation Processes of economic liberalisation lead to industrial restructuring of the economies which often decreases the relevance of the agricultural sector. As a consequence developments of industries and services are fostering urban growth as they are increasingly concentrated in urban areas. India’s development since 1991 is illustrative. Some of the elements of this strategy for further integrating the country into the global economy have accelerated rural to urban migration and boosted urban growth during the 1990s and the following decades. This policy was based on the assumption that there would be a massive inflow of capital both from within and outside the country resulting in rapid development of infrastructure and economic growth. This would likely give impetus to the process of urbanisation in the country since much of the economic growth and consequent growth in employment would be within or around the existing urban centres.46 Critics of this new development strategy have pointed out that the opening of the economy might destabilise the agrarian economy, resulting in high unemployment and massive exodus from rural areas which would lead to even more rapid growth of population in urban centres.47 This would occur as a result of trade liberalisation measures which tend to encourage the development of export-oriented cash crop agriculture while inviting cheap imports of basic food products, thereby depressing prices for domestic produce. This leads to marginalisation, displacement, loss of land and greater poverty among small farmers who are thus led to seek wage-paying employment. 48 The role of demand originating in Europe and other developed countries cannot be ignored in this process. As demand for cheaper manufactured goods in developed countries increases, manufacturers seek low-cost production facilities in developing countries. The process of economic liberalisation allows for the relocation of production facilities to developing countries, which respond to the increased demand by increasing output and drawing ever more rural inhabitants to these new economic opportunities in the cities. While China has been the centre of much of this production in recent decades, there is no reason that this will not shift to other regions — e.g. Latin America and/or Africa — should the Chinese economy realign towards increased value-added production and services, thereby increasing the cost of basic manufacturing. June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 31 Changes in agricultural productivity Agricultural productivity has seen continuous growth throughout the past decades.49 This is due in part to an increased use in fertilisers and pesticides but also to further mechanisation of agriculture more generally. These trends will likely result in smaller workforces needed in the rural areas to achieve increasing levels of agricultural yields.50 While yields still increase in absolute terms, against a backdrop of global population growth, arable land per person declined globally by roughly 40 %, from 0.43 ha in 1962 to 0.26 ha in 1998.51 Looking ahead, the rate of growth of agricultural production is expected to fall to 1.5 % per year between now and 2030, compared with 2.3 % per year since 1961.52 For example, certain regions in India and China are expected to witness decreases in productivity of agricultural land due to soil erosion and other, possible changes in climatic conditions related to global climate change. While certain regions may see increased agricultural production, the disruption caused by the changes are likely to further push parts of the population in India and China living in rural areas into larger cities, thus contributing to further urbanisation of these countries. Climate change Rural inhabitants are particularly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change as they tend to depend heavily on activities and resources which are especially sensitive to such changes, e.g. arable farming, animal husbandry and light industry reliant on local resources.53 As temperatures increase and/or rainfall patterns change, regions which currently offer favourable conditions for such climate-sensitive activities might see their productivity decline, at least in specific areas.54 Migration pressure from regions affected by such changes, leading to rural-urban migration, are likely to increase, possibly further contributing to the growth of urban areas . Infrastructure development The displacement of rural residents by major infrastructure development projects will continue to be a driver of migration towards cities. A prime example is hydroelectric dam construction in China. During the period of the 1950s and 1960s more dams were built than ever before in China’s history and about 7.8 million people were moved to make way for these water control works.55 More recently, the Three Gorges Dam has been a major driver for migration towards cities with Chinese officials stating that “at least 4 million people from the Three Gorges Reservoir area are to be relocated to cities in the next 10 to 15 years”.56 Technological innovation The growth of cities acts as a driver for innovation and economic growth if it is well managed, education is promoted, and the economic activity generates revenues which can be invested into R&D (thereby fuelling further growth) by both private and public entities. In fact, as cities can more efficiently provide services such as education and health care,57 such positive urbanisation is in turn likely to drive further urbanisation: as cities benefit 32 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 disproportionately from the fruits of innovation it generates, it will drive further rural residents to search for a better life and higher income in urban areas. Technological developments in the health sector will shape urbanisation and are projected to increase life expectancy significantly, particularly in India, as the latest medical developments become available and spending on health care increases.58 The increase in the life span is likely to result in more single person households as the number of elderly people increases, thus resulting in less dense settlements, further driving the expansion of cities. In addition, as will be illustrated in Section 3.3.3, “Key drivers” of the consumption trend, this population group is likely to consume differently. The urbanisation trend is likely to be influenced by technological progress which will lead to increased use of contraception as women’s access to education and the labour market increases.59 Increased access to contraception both increases life expectancy of women and should reduce the number of children per woman. This driver may be self-reinforcing as living in cities will afford women greater access to these health services. Demographic trends are subject to considerable uncertainty, however, as will be discussed in Section 3.2.4, “Key uncertainties”. Changes in the way countries source their energy will impact the rate and scale of urbanisation. While the ongoing extraction of coal and other fossil fuels has a distinct impact on the rural environment, further driving urbanisation, the opportunity to leapfrog polluting, fossil fuel-based electricity production technologies in favour of cleaner, and often decentralised, renewable energy technologies could slow this trend if the impact on the rural environment is reduced and if rural quality of life can be increased (e.g. through the provision of electricity via decentralised renewable energy systems). If and when this technological transition will take place, however, is dependent on many factors and is further discussed in section 3.2.4, “Key uncertainties”. Absence of state pension and health care The absence of a well-developed state pension and health care systems in many developing countries will continue to fuel both population increase and urbanisation, in particular in India. Children will remain oftentimes essential to ensure secure their parents’ income and security in old age.60 In addition, rural families will often be encouraged to send some of their children to work in urban centres, in the hope that they will be able to secure higher incomes for the family so as to be able to save sufficient amounts of money to hedge against unforeseen medical expenses and to secure a decent standard of living in old age. Other policies A whole range of policies have direct and indirect impacts on urbanisation. For example, protectionist policies, put in place to protect infant industries have been introduced both in China and India and contributed to the development of certain industries, pulling workforce out of rural areas and leading to the development of urban centres around these industrial activities in the 1970s and 1980s. One policy, however, which has led to June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 33 the rapid growth of several coastal cities in China is the exemption of duty in specific coastal cities to attract foreign direct investment. These cities tend to grow very fast and to absorb many of the urban poor leaving rural areas to earn their living in activities linked to the development of industrial activity. Interlinkages between driving forces Strong interlinkages exist between many of the previously discussed driving forces which influence the relative impact of each. These interlinkages are evidence of the complexity of the causal relationships between the various drivers and contribute to the uncertainty of future predictions on the rate and absolute size of urbanisation. Of particular note is the influence of several drivers on increasing rural poverty and the associated rural-urban migration. High fertility rates in rural areas with lower income and education levels lead to growing rural populations which, in turn, increases rural unemployment. This combination of drivers is likely to result in a further increase of poverty induced rural-urban migration and therefore further growth of cities in China and India. Rural unemployment has been a particularly burning problem in India and its severity increased in the period following economic reforms, which took place in the early 1990s.61 If continuing economic liberalisation contributes to the destabilisation of the rural agrarian economy, as sometimes assumed62, this could further increase poverty induced rural-urban migration as rural inhabitants can no longer rely on their traditional profession to ensure the necessary quality of life. While these migrants may be able to find — and may even be more likely to find — higher value employment in an urban area, their movement will entail a disruptive transition at both the personal and societal levels. Indeed, the fact that China has successfully pulled large portions of its society out of poverty while, at the same time, sustaining rapid urbanisation, suggests that these trends are not only compatible but also mutually reinforcing. In contrast to the effects of persistently high fertility rates, especially in rural areas, it must be noted that fertility rates tend to decrease with increasing levels of wealth. Population is not simply controlled by a country’s economic development, however. Often the fertility rate of a population is also decided by other factors such as tradition, religion, or other cultural beliefs, and the population of a country greatly affects its economy in turn.63 Increasing incomes combined with changing lifestyles/patterns of consumption can influence many of the previously discussed drivers. For example, the increased energy use of urban inhabitants will increase the demand for greater domestic energy production, which could have environmental, economic and social consequences as a result of the damming of rivers, the extraction of fossil fuels, and the displacement of food crops by biofuel feedstocks. As these impacts would essentially be felt in rural areas, further increasing rural-urban migration, the process of urbanisation itself may lead to ever greater urbanisation. 34 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 Increased agricultural productivity as a result the increased use of fertilisers, pesticides, machinery and/or improved techniques in general will demand a reduction of the agricultural labour force from historic levels. This could contribute to increased rural unemployment, thereby increasing rural poverty induced migratory pressure towards urban areas. 3.2.4. KEY UNCERTAINTIES General uncertainty is increased as a result of the constant possibility of low-probability, high-impact events — e.g. major wars, natural disasters, and economic upheavals. These events could influence the relative impact of the various drivers and could potentially alter, or even reverse, these mega-trends. While the probability and potential impact of such events is particularly difficult to predict, given that they may fundamentally change the direction and degree of current mega-trends, they must not be entirely ignored. High fertility rate and population growth The development of demographic trends cannot be predicted. The experiences of countries which have undergone a similar socio-economic transition cannot reliably be used as an indicator for the transition of other countries as much depends on the specific economic and political context in which the transition is occurring. Indeed, the experience of China (which is further along in its demographic and economic transition) will likely not be useful in predicting similar trends in India as particular Chinese policies (e.g. population control) which have been fundamentally important in defining that country’s development will most likely not be reflected in India. Introducing even further uncertainty, the possible abandonment of China’s “one-child policy” pursued by the government could result in a temporary surge of natality levels, both in rural and urban areas. As discussed earlier, however, it appears unlikely that the abandonment of such coercive policies would have a major impact on Chinese fertility rates as economic incentives seem sufficient to discourage parents from having more than one to two children, especially in urban areas (see SOER Background Paper I: Demographics and Migration for further discussion of the uncertainty of future fertility rates). The natural increase of urban populations will be influenced by the social development of the urban poor and, in particular, the availability contraception and family planning facilities which is, in turn, influenced by the rate of urbanisation, as discussed in the previous section. These processes will largely be determined by social and political policy which is dependent on the decisions of policy-makers. Furthermore, decisions on urban land-use and the density of new cities may limit the space available to families, thereby putting further downward pressure on urban fertility rates. Of course, it cannot be forgotten that the sizes of future urban populations will be greatly influenced by the total global population. This figure, however, is subject to considerable uncertainty, as shown in Table 2 (page 28). As such, predictions of the size of future urban populations must be understood to be subject to even greater levels of uncertainty. June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 35 Land-use policy and urban planning How cities will be governed is going to affect and shape urbanisation. Well-planned urbanisation, where urban sprawl is avoided and the construction of dense cities and high quality urban spaces is allowed, can result in important efficiency gains, for example with regard to efficient waste collection, recycling and transport systems. A certain number of gains from an environmental perspective could therefore offset a whole range of adverse environmental impacts resulting from increased urban populations and increased per capita consumption levels. The extent to which urbanisation will be managed centrally or in a decentralised way, the inclusion of the larger public in the resolution of environmental problems, the successful implementation of plans for urban development, and the integration of urban design with local cultural traditions are aspects which may allow urban growth to take place in a less environmentally harmful way than is currently projected. Box 1: Masdar City: Urban planning for zero-impact Masdar City is a planned, urban development being planned and built 17 km outside of central Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates. Aiming to become a centre of “cleantech“ innovation, a primary objective of the development is to achieve near-zero environmental impact through the use of intelligent urban planning, bio-climatic architecture, and custom-designed transportation, energy, water, and waste infrastructure. Once completed in 2016, the city is expected to use 80% less water than a convention city, achieve 0% landfill of waste, and zero net greenhouse gas emissions. This advanced infrastructure comes at a cost, however, with the current total estimated to be 16.4 billion Euros. Sources: Masdar City. “Our Aims“. http://www.masdarcity.ae/en/index.aspx Deutsche Welle. “Built on sand: Masdar City to become eco-city of the future“. 21 April 2010. http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,5488979,00.html Poverty induced rural-urban migration The degree to which poverty induced rural-urban migration will play out is far from certain. It depends to a large extent on policy decisions, but also contextual environmental factors such as soil or water quality. Decreasing environmental quality can foster migration but also policies to counteract the negative impacts and increase attractiveness of rural regions. The capacity of cities to absorb the influx of rural migrants and to allow these individuals to achieve a better quality of life, which goes hand in hand with a level of consumption that ensures that basic necessities are covered, will largely depend on the economic activity 36 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 and, therefore, also the extent to which the economy will be integrated in the world economy and attract foreign direct investment. In addition, redistribution of the wealth generated through that economic activity and opportunities for education of children will be important factors which are likely to influence the extent to which cities remain attractive for rural migrants, thus influencing the rate at which urbanisation progresses in developing countries. At present, the incentive to relocate to an urban area is, in many cases, very strong. For example, in China, cash transfer proportional to current income is given to all individuals over 55 years old as a form of pension. This transfer currently reaches 90% of urban inhabitants but only 20-25% of rural inhabitants and migrants.64 Whether these rapidly cities will be able to sustain this higher level of wealth redistribution remains as a significant uncertainty. Climate change Rural-urban migration flows will also depend on the extent to which urban and rural regions in developing countries will be affected by climate change impacts, which is still subject to a high level of uncertainty. For example, in China, the way in which the potential for reduced agricultural outputs in rural areas will balance against the potential for increased flooding in coastal cities within individual migrant choices is very difficult to predict. More generally, the impact of climate change on human populations is difficult to predict given the complexity of climate science and its relationship to individual migrant decisions (see SOER Background Paper on Demographics and Migration).65 Economic liberalisation Ongoing processes of economic liberalisation, whereby government regulations and restrictions on the economy are systematically reduced or eliminated, may alter the value of land and labour which could, in turn, change the migratory decisions of certain rural populations. While, at present, it is often profitable to convert agricultural land into urban land, an increased demand for cash crops could increase the value of the land and the labour of the rural inhabitant.66 Furthermore, the loss of agricultural land, either as a result land-use changes (urbanisation) or environmental degradation, would tend to increase the value of the remaining land. Country-specific uncertainties also need to be taken into account. China’s economic growth over the previous decades, for example, has been largely based on the development of the manufacturing sector and special economic areas. As such, the trend in rural-urban migration has been typified by the growth of very large, coastal urban areas. In contrast, economic growth in India in the coming decades will more likely be based on the development of the service sector which does not require the concentration of labour and facilities in a limited number of locations near shipping and transportation hubs, as does manufacturing. As such, the future urbanisation of India may result in a more multipolar socio-economic landscape where economic and population centres are spread out within the country, in contrast to the concentration of the Chinese urban population and economic activity in relatively few major cities mainly in coastal areas. Finally, in Mexico, June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 37 following the implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), manufacturing centres and the corollary urban agglomerations were concentrated along the border with the United States,67 a distribution similar to that seen in China. Technological innovation Technological progress, especially in the health sector, will not generally and automatically perpetuate the positive trends with regard to falling infant mortality and higher life expectancy in China and India. In fact, access to health care will be a determining factor as certain groups will benefit from the technological improvements in the field of health, while others may not. Whether or not broad access to good quality health care for the general population will be provided will affect demographic trends in the long run. Furthermore, the lack of access to quality health care in rural areas may be another driver for rural-urban migration in the long-term for certain households. One of the elements which makes basing forecasts even more imperfect is the rate at which technological leapfrogging will take place, be it as a result of foreign direct investment (FDI), within the context of a global climate scheme, or as a result of domestic innovation. Any of these processes would create conditions for cleaner technologies to be transferred to India and China, for example, allowing them to leapfrog a polluting development path by making a facilitated transition to alternative sources of power generation. Domestic innovation in response to global competition, and, to a lesser extent, international policy instruments such as the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and FDI, have already contributed to greening Indian energy policy by enhancing renewable energy deployment through domestic development, technology transfer and by instilling a political re-orientation through norms diffusion.68 Uncertain future energy mix of the countries, and the related technological development, is a considerable source of uncertainty for urbanisation and is related to several of the drivers. For example, the increasing mechanisation of agriculture will result in the reduced use of human and animal labour as a primary source of energy. As a result, human food and animal fodder will be displaced by liquid fuels for farm implements as the primary fuel for these activities. The ultimate source of the liquid fuel remains uncertain. The mining of fossil fuels could have significant environmental impacts in rural areas, further driving urbanisation. Concurrently, the large-scale of production of biofuel feedstocks would upset the current balance of agricultural production which could, in turn, alter the value of agricultural land and labour, influencing the migratory decisions of rural farmers69. The development of certain energy and transportation and communication technologies could result in reduced migratory pressure towards urban areas as they could increase the economic opportunities and standard of living in rural areas. For example, the further development of decentralized energy production systems, such as the solar home systems distributed in India by Grameen Shakti, could provide rural inhabitants with basic services such as lighting and water pumping, as well as increased opportunities for incomegenerating activities, further decreasing migratory pressure towards urban areas. Similarly, the development of high-speed rail networks in China and India could reduce migratory 38 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 pressure towards urban areas as rural and near-urban residents would gain easier access to the economic opportunities and activities of the urban centres. 3.3. MEGA-TREND II: CHANGES IN LIFESTYLE AND CONSUMPTION PATTERNS 3.3.1. MEGA-TREND SUMMARY Consumerism is integrated into our economic system, as well as in our cultural and political systems. The global economic system, and indirectly the political systems and societies across the globe, are currently reliant on increasing consumption levels to fuel ever-greater economic growth. We are observing the rise of a global consumer society, particularly driven by developing countries heading towards Western standards of energy and resource consumption — despite remaining poverty in certain parts of the urban and rural populations.70 The most direct and significant result of economic growth in emerging countries is an important increase in spending power and a corollary increase in quality of life for an increasingly larger share of the population.71 The mushrooming of the middle classes in emerging economies is a critical factor: since 2000, 600 million people have reached middle class status and an estimated 70 million further people will join their global ranks annually.72 By 2010, the middle class in China and India will outnumber the entire population of the US. 73 Table 3 summarizes the expected growth in the middle class in regions around the world where the rise of Asia Pacific mirrors the decline in North America and Europe. Table 3: Middle class growth (in millions and %) in different regions of the world Source: Kharas, Homi. (2010) The emerging middle class in developing countries. OECD Development Centre. The strongest driving forces certainly are economic, with social, environmental, and political drivers playing critical roles. Western companies have and will continue to significantly increase their investments and business operations in emerging markets, thereby increasing both incomes and demand for their products. In fact, as millions of deprived households will move into the middle class, they will begin to be able to afford products and services beyond their immediate needs for food and clothing. Shifts in cultural values with regards to personal finances might underpin this process.74 June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 39 In China and India, the sheer size amplifies the impact of even small per capita changes. For example, in the case of urban populations of these countries, when expressed as a percentage of the total population (as in Figure 4, page 18), it would appear that China and India are lagging behind the other countries, but when expressed in absolute terms (as in Figure 5, page 19), the significance of the countries becomes immediately apparent (see also Figure 16 for an illustration of these dynamics in the context of energy consumption). 3.3.2. KEY TRENDS Rising incomes and changing life-styles directly impact the consumption of material and energy resources. While direct data on total per capita consumption is difficult to obtain, per capita GDP and per capita energy consumption can serve as rough proxies. Considering these measures, GDP per capita in Mexico currently stands at $14,000 (current international dollars), compared to $6,800 in China and $3,000 in India (Figure 1, page 13). As for per capita energy consumption, the trends are similar. In South Africa, per capita energy consumption stood at 2,722 kilograms of oil equivalent (kgoe) in 2005 whereas for India, it was 491 kgoe (Figure 16). The trend in per capita energy consumption has been increasing slowly in several developing countries since 1980, with China experiencing a marked increase since 2002 (Figure 17). Figure 16: Per capita and total energy consumption in selected developing countries Source: World Resources Institute, EarthTrends, 2007 40 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 Figure 17: Per capita energy consumption in selected developing countries, 1980-2006 Source: United States Energy Information Administration, International Energy Annual 2006 (Updated December 2008) The terms “consumer class” and “middle class” can be defined in various ways, according to both social and economic metrics. McKinsey defines the middle class as households with annual income levels ranging from about US$23,500 to US$117,500 in purchasing power parity (PPP) for the purposes of their study75; the OECD defines the middle class as households with daily expenditures between US$10 and US$100 per person in purchasing power parity terms (respectively, these figures become US$14,600 and US$146,000 annually for a household of four)76. This choice is explained as follows: The lower bound is chosen with reference to the average poverty line in Portugal and Italy, the two advanced European countries with the strictest definition of poverty. The poverty line for a family of four in these countries is USD14 533 (USD9.95 per day per capita in 2005 purchasing power parity terms). The upper bound is chosen as twice the median income of Luxemburg, the richest advanced country. Defined in this way, the global middle class excludes those who are considered poor in the poorest advanced countries and those who are considered rich in the richest advanced country. 77 These levels of income, however, are well beyond the point where households start to see an uptick in consumption.78 Even at annual per capita income levels as low $2,500 (PPP), many households have access to basic lighting and a fan. As incomes reach about $5,000 per year PPP, access to television becomes standard and access to hot water heaters grows. By $8,000 a year PPP, most people have an array of consumer goods, from washing machines and DVD players to kitchen appliances and computers. As incomes rise further, air conditioning and air travel become common.79 June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 41 While China and India’s current per capita consumption and the accompanying emission levels are very low relative to Europe (Figure 18) — and must, in many cases, be increased to allow the populations to meet their basic needs — the rapid economic growth of these countries and the spread of unsustainable consumption patterns will increasingly represent a growing pressure on the environment. Indeed, the long-term policy objectives of emerging countries — and the international community more generally80 — is to ensure that all individuals are at least in a position to fulfil their basic needs. It can thus be expected that in the long run, population growth will lead to higher levels of material consumption and therefore an increase in environmental pressures. Per capita Carbon Footprints Figure 18: Per capita carbon footprints in tonnes CO2 equivalent 20 15 10 5 Source: Hubacek, 2010 42 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A l Ru ra Ch ina Ur ba n ia Ind Ch ina Br az il Tu rk ey e Uk ra in nd Po la Ru ss ia Sp ain Ja pa n UK US 0 (Various sources) June 2010 Box 2: Vehicle ownership patterns in China and India Vehicle ownership patterns also illustrate the impact of changing consumption patterns in emerging countries such as China and India. In India, passenger car ownership nearly tripled from 2.5 per 1000 people in 1987 to 7.2 per 1000 people in 2002. China had some 27.5 million passenger vehicles and 79 million motorcycles in use by 2004. The growing trend in vehicle ownership affects urban air quality, which has clear consequences for human health. This growth, combined with the size of the populations of the two countries, can lead to shocking statistics. For example, if Chinese per capita levels of car ownership and fuel consumption reached those of the United States, the production of 850 million new cars and twice the amount of world oil output would be required. These newly-added cars would emit as much CO2 as the rest of the world’s transportation systems combined. Such estimates must be kept in perspective. While there is expected to be a dramatic increase in vehicle ownership in developing countries, even when projected to 2050, per capita rates of ownership in most developing countries will remain well below present-day rates in developed countries (Figure 19). Additionally, it is likely that the vehicles purchased in China would be smaller and more fuel efficient than those in the United States as fuel efficiency standards are already more strict in China than those in the United States. Also, it is possible that the average distance travelled by car in China would be shorter than in the United States as China is currently expanding its extensive rail network — infrastructure which is largely absent in the United States. Sources: UNSD (2005). UN Statistics Division Transport Statistics Database, UN Statistical Yearbook. United Nations, New York, NY (in GEO Data Portal) CSB (1987-2004). China Statistical Yearbook 1987-2004 (in Chinese). China Statistical Bureau China Statistics Press, Beijing June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 43 Figure 19: Projected growth in personal motorized vehicle growth Source: World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2004) Mobility 2030: Meeting the challenges to sustainability. The Sustainable Mobility Project. The social and economic diversity of developing countries also means that the effects of the described economic, social and cultural changes are likely to play out quite differently among them and that consumption patterns might vary. China and India, like many developing countries, are on a path similar to Western levels of energy and resource consumption, however the scale of these two countries put them in a class of their own.81 For instance, the IEA expects 53% of the increased energy demand by 2030 to come from China and India. Both countries should witness important increases in oil imports.82 As China’s and India’s economy have grown, there has been a striking increase in household incomes, particularly in China. It has been estimated that, since 1985, extreme poverty in China has been cut by half. China’s investment- and exportdriven economy has been able to absorb these relatively low-skill migrants, shifting them from the agricultural into the manufacturing economy, where both their wages and skill levels have risen. It is important to note, however, that trends showing income growth based on aggregate data often mask deep inequalities in the distribution of wealth among the population. This inequality is far from an exclusively rural problem, even in urban areas there is growing evidence that large segments of the population are missing out on the economic advances being made. Furthermore, the concentration of populations and the proximity of people from very different income groups can make the inequality more palpable, promoting inter-class tension and negatively impacting the well-being of the lower classes.83 The rapid growth will also have a major social impact, as traditional family and social structures centred on a rural agrarian economy break down with the increased urbanisation and population shifts to cities and towns. The economic growth and the 44 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 spread of unsustainable consumption patterns in developing countries will increasingly represent a growing pressure on the environment and the social fabric of these countries. The diversity of these countries also means that the effects of the described economic, social, and cultural changes are likely to play out quite differently among these countries and that consumption patterns might vary. A prime example of a significant change in consumption patterns can be seen in per capita meat consumption (Figure 20). In China, in 25 years (between 1980 and 2005), meat consumption has increased by 334%, approaching the absolute level seen in developed countries. Over the same period, however, Indians have, on average, increased their meat consumption by only 38%, a disparity which is certainly influenced by the significant differences in socio-religious attitudes towards meat consumption. It must be noted, however, that given the very low absolute level of meat consumption in India and the country’s large population, there is a significant risk of a major increase in total meat consumption if there is even a minor change in the availability of supporting infrastructure (e.g. refrigeration) or socio-religious customs. Figure 20: Meat consumption per capita in India and China, 1980-2005 Source: FAO, State of Food and Agriculture, 2009 Future Developments/Outlook Large emerging economies have shown a steady growth in both population and economic activity, resulting in changing consumption patterns. Among these countries, China demands special attention: it is expected to become the world’s largest economy between 2025 and 2035.84 Its rapid economic development is influencing global patterns of resource production and consumption, with both environmental and geopolitical consequences.85 In China, the near-term consumption growth will be driven by a combination of rising percapita incomes and population growth. Total urban consumption in China will increase annually at a rate of 8.6% during the period from 2005 to 2025.86 Companies have shifted June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 45 from seeing emerging markets as a cheap source of labour and production to a major source of new consumers. By 2025, China will have overtaken the US to become the world’s biggest consumer market.87 If India’s overall economic growth remains on a longterm path of 7 to 8%, as most economists expect, real consumption will grow fourfold between 2007 and 2025. It is therefore currently attracting worldwide interest among marketers. The attractiveness of India is based on its infrastructure, its well-developed legal system, and its large number of well-educated doctors, engineers, and other skilled professionals needed for growth of a thriving middle class. While in 2007, its consumer market ranked 12th globally, by 2015 it will rank eighth and be almost as large as Italy’s with an aggregate value of nearly $750 billion. By 2025, India’s market will be the fifth largest in the world, surpassing Germany.88 In turn, local innovation in developing countries, partly driven by urbanisation, might lead to the development of products which are more in line with the local consumer’s needs and expectations, therefore leading to increase in consumption, in particular by the poor who are less prone to spend their income on expensive imported goods.89 Changing lifestylesvi and consumption patterns have been a common feature of most emerging economies. As incomes increase, the populations of emerging countries have improved their standard of leaving, moving from poverty to the ability to meet their basic needs. Today, many parts of these populations are approaching “well to do lifestyles” and disposable income is spent, as in Western societies, on high nutrient food, comfortable livings, health care and other quality services.90 Additionally, globalisation and economic integration are giving more consumers access to more products and services. Ultimately, a multitude of factors, ranging from international policy frameworks to local infrastructure, will influence consumption choices which will, in turn, largely determine what impact economic growth will have on the environment.91 Significant economic and lifestyle changes that have taken place in China have led the Chinese to require more but also different types of energy. People directly consume energy for lighting, cooking and other daily uses. But they also aspire to a “higher-quality life” by purchasing fashionable goods and services, such as houses with air conditioning and other modern electrical household appliances.92 All these products and services consume energy during their production processes and use. China’s cities were estimated to represent 75% of the country’s total primary energy demand in 2006. Given that Chinese cities are more energy intensive per capita than rural areas, urban population growth in China will have significant implications for the national energy system and global energy markets. vi Introducing the lifestyle concept into the debate allows one to (a) contextualise consumption processes in socio-economic and cultural regards, and (b) to differentiate in modern consumption societies between different social groups that allows (c) for differentiated accounting of the environmental impacts. This is much in line with some sociological approaches to consumption and has been suggested by economists that try to better understand modern consumption processes (Reussig et al.). 46 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 Box 3: Changing households in China: Housing and appliances Many rural households have rebuilt and extended their bungalows by using building materials such as concrete, bricks, and tiles in place of marl and wood. At the same time, average per capita living space expanded from 8.1 m2 to 24.2 m2. Before 1978, per capita net living space for urban residents was only 3.6 m2 in urban China, mainly because of restriction on private house ownership. A new Housing Reform Policy introduced in the early 1980s encouraged commercialisation of the housing sector and private ownership allowing people to buy their own apartments. Meanwhile, the government, state owned enterprises, domestic private companies, and overseas developers invested significant funds into the urban housing development. As a result, city dwellers started to move from previously tiny bungalows or apartments to new multi-storey apartment blocks; thus effectively increasing per capita net living space. The more spacious living places allow and encourage consumers to buy and store more household appliances and other durable goods. For example, since the 1980s, urban residents spent increasing amounts on large durable furniture (e.g. wardrobes, beds and sofas). Also, in the late 1980s and 1990s, the connection of a larger number of households to the electrical grid helped increase the sales for household electrical appliances (e.g. refrigerators and colour TVs). Another example is the penetration rate of air conditioners, previously a sign of affluence, which increased significantly to about 30 sets per 100 households. The popularisation of household electronics enormously boosted the production of household appliances. Source: Hubacek K., D. Guan, J. Barrett and T. Wiedmann (2009) Environmental implications of urbanisation and lifestyle change in China: Ecological and Water Footprints Journal of Cleaner Production 17(14) 1241-1248 While cities are centres of consumption, marketers are already working on ways of reaching rural consumers in developing countries.93 Furthermore, urban lifestyles tend to spread to rural areas: in the West, most rural areas are already “urbanised” in terms of lifestyle–though the rural inhabitants most often commute further in order to maintain this lifestyle, leading to higher overall consumption. June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 47 3.3.3. KEY DRIVERS Population growth One of the primary drivers for increases in aggregate consumption levels worldwide will be the expected increase in the global population, largely as a result of the expected population growth in developing countries. As the populations of these countries, and of China and India in particular (Figure 21), continue to increase through at least 2030, the greater number of people will consume greater quantities of goods and services. That said, the relationship between increased population and increased consumption is not necessarily linear and is dependent on the level of income and consumption of the individual. This important interaction is further discussed in the section “Interlinkages of driving forces”. Figure 21: Projected total population, 2000-2050 Source: United Nations: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2007 Revision Population Database Increasing incomes Increasing incomes lift people out of poverty and enable them to spend on non-essential items. This development should increase as employment rates and income potential continues to increase in developing countries worldwide. Given their current absolute sizes of their populations, combined with their expected growth in the coming decades, India and China merit special mention. Indeed, by 2050, the middle classes of these two 48 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 countries together are expected to account for approximately 50% of global middle class consumption, up from approximately 5% today (Figure 22). Figure 22: Shares of global middle class consumption, 2000-2050 Source: Kharas, Homi. (2010) The emerging middle class in developing countries. OECD Development Centre. Increasing incomes should continue to affect consumption in China as overall growth and the restructuring of the Chinese economy is expected to lead to continued rapid income growth and the rise of a large middle class as millions of people move from the country to the city and begin earning middle-class wages.94 Following a series of reforms beginning in the early 1990s, India has enjoyed over a decade of strong and accelerating growth (Figure 23). As India’s economy has grown, so too has the spending power of its citizens. Real average household income has roughly doubled over the past two decades. As individuals have elected to translate their rising wealth into increased incomes rather than greater leisure time, greater consumption and the emergence of India’s middle class have followed.95 Increasing incomes — and to a lesser degree, greater choice available to consumers in urban markets — have impacted the composition of nutritional intake in India and China as demand for non-grain food products and animal products (such as dairy and poultry) are increasing their share in the daily consumption. This has important future implications for land use and land value, as well as the demand for food and water (see Section 4.1.1.4).96 June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 49 Figure 23: Trend in per capita GDP growth, 1980-2013, in current international dollars, PPP (logarithmic scale) Source: International Monetary Fund: World Economic Outlook Database: April 2009 Edition How the increasing incomes of the citizens of developing countries worldwide will be translated into changes in consumption can be inferred, to a certain degree, by observing this evolution which has already taken place in other countries. The historical pattern in India shows that, as income rise, consumers tend to spend proportionally less on basic necessities and more on discretionary items. As millions of deprived households will move into the middle class, they will begin to be able to afford products and services beyond their immediate needs for food and clothing. For families already in the middle class and further consolidating their status, aspirations might include a cell phone, a television or private schooling for children. Discretionary spending has increased from 25% of total spending in 1985 to 52% in 2005 and is expected to reach 70% by 2025.97 In absolute terms, aggregated consumption is expected to quadruple over this time frame (Figure 24).98 In India, it is estimated that income growth will be the most significant driver of increasing consumption, far outweighing population growth or any change in savings behaviour. 80% of consumption growth is expected to come from rising income, while 16% of the increase will be due to growth in the number of households. Only 4% will come from changes in the savings rates of Indians. As incomes grow, the class structure of consumption will change significantly as well. Consumption today is still dominated by the poor, which control about 75% of spending. By 2025, however, the rich and the middle class will come to dominate, controlling 59% of India’s consumption power. As a result, Indian spending patterns are 50 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 forecasted to evolve, with basic necessities such as food and apparel declining in relative importance, and categories such as communications and health care growing rapidly.99 Figure 24: Evolution of Household Expenditure in India 1985-2025 (Trillion Indian rupees) Source: McKinsey Global Institute Rebalancing of cultural values The move from rural areas to urban areas tends to speed up the process of lifestyle changes of the newly urban population as the migration presents individuals to a greater economic choice, especially when the migrants dispose of higher incomes. The integrated cultural, economic and political system of consumerism encourages individuals to establish their place in society through the purchase of material possessions and the lifestyle choice they make. This consumerism can be inconspicuous or conspicuous. In the case of the former, the goal of consumption is to satisfy one’s internal needs and desires. In contrast, the objective of conspicuous consumption is to cultivate an identity, an image and prestige vis-à-vis other individuals and groups. As social, cultural, and familial norms and values have a significant impact on consumer choices and the level of sustainability of the consumption, making a sustainable lifestyle prestigious and the object of conspicuous consumption will allow followers to be solicited into it more easily.100 Conflicting motivations and desires exist within the attitudes of citizens of developing countries towards consumption and savings, as in many cultures. Taking the example of China, it is recognised as a nation of savers with recent savings rates in large cities often as high as 50%. Historically low and variable incomes, combined with the absence of government-supported health and retirement insurance, have resulted in most household funds being devoted to basic necessities and savings. In contrast, mianzi, or “face”, is a concept of central importance in China. Mianzi is a sort of prestige and reputation which is developed over the course of a lifetime. As mianzi is influenced by the individual’s level of June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 51 wealth, position and power, conspicuous consumption holds a key place in traditional Chinese culture as a means to develop mianzi. In fact, this conspicuous consumption is not limited to the leisure class but can be found in all groups, throughout the Chinese socioeconomic spectrum.101 The future balance of these competing cultural values for frugality and conspicuous consumption will certainly be influenced by the ongoing trends of urbanisation and globalisation. The combination of expanding populations and a fixed land resources mean that the young person’s traditional opportunities for social advancement — inheriting the family plot or apprenticing in a father’s trade — can no longer be taken for granted. As such, in the search for self-fulfilment and identity development, preference may be given to conspicuous consumption over frugality.102 Furthermore, domestic and international media play a driving role in stimulating consumerism. As Western social values reach Eastern populations and urban social values reach rural populations, further emphasis is likely to be given to conspicuous consumption over frugality. 103 China has already experienced major changes in its cultural and social value systems. While the country is still primarily regarded as a collectivist society, in which people maintain strong ties to their family, group, or country, and stress harmonious and cohesive relationships,104 recent research has revealed that young generations living in coastal areas are pursuing individualistic values of ambition, success, pleasure, and wealth as well as traditional collectivistic values of humility, harmony, and tradition.105 Today, it appears that no significant cultural barrier to the uptake of the western consumer culture should be expected in China. China’s emerging middle class will aspire to driving a car, consuming branded goods, and enjoying the other privileges of higher income. The transformation of urban China from necessary to discretionary consumption is already happening at a much faster pace than it did in other countries as South Korea. For several years, urban Chinese consumers have spent less of their total income on basics necessities than did South Koreans at similar point in their country’s economic development. One explanation for the accelerated pace of change in China is that the country experienced decades of being a planned economy with limited choice, and this has left Chinese consumers eager to consume in a manner that had been restricted in the past.106 Changing preferences Significant shifts in consumer spending will be seen in many consumption categories as the values and preferences of consumers change. For example, in India, food, beverages and tobacco will witness the most significant drop in its relative share of household spending. The average Indian household currently spends 42% of its consumption budget on this category, but this is set to decline to 25% by 2025. This decline will be largely driven by a dramatic growth in overall consumption rather than a slowdown in food demand (in fact, consumption of food per capita is expected to grow almost three times as fast as it has in the past). High priorities are the “economically enabling” categories that either boost current productivity or facilitate future participation in economic activity — namely health, education, transportation, and communication.107 While the share of household spending 52 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 on housing and household products will remain low relative to countries such as Germany and Brazil at about 3% of annual spending (due to the availability of low-cost labour and repairs), the absolute amount of this spending is expected to grow, though at a lower rate than aggregate consumption growth across the country. This is due to the lack of the infrastructure in India (e.g., water, electricity) required by the various appliances and products. 108 Demographic changes Many developing countries have experienced large shifts in demographic composition over the past century and are expected to continue changing in the future. In general, households are likely to become older and smaller as populations age and preferences shift away from living with the extended family. In China, accompanying the demographic shifts that have resulted from the one-child policy will be a further fall in urban household sizes from 2.96 people today to 2.35 by 2025. This will be driven by various factors. First, as incomes rise, it makes it possible for children to move away from their families, which they might not have been able to afford in the past. Second, the skewed male-female distribution in China’s demographics (China has 114 males to 100 females) will mean more households of single men over time.109 As the buying habits of single-person households tend to differ from those of families, this will likely be a cause for further changes in consumption patterns. Life expectancy at birth is likely to further increase in developing countries as a result of the spread of better technologies and medicine as better health care progressively becomes affordable to a growing middle class. This increasing life expectancy will result in a larger overall population in both countries, and as a more generous pension system progressively develops, in a non-negligible increase in the demand for goods and services targeted at the elderly. It is forecasted that the share of household spending on health care in India will nearly double from 7% in 2005 to 13% in 2025.110 China is expected to exhibit a similar trend with household spending on health care growing from 7.4% in 2004 to 14% in 2025. For reference, the 2005 figures for Germany, South Korea, and the United States are 4%, 9% and 19%, respectively. 111 The phenomenon of youth bulges (see SOER Background Paper I: Demographics and Migration for further discussion on this subject), i.e. a disproportionate concentration of people in the 15-to-29 year-old age group, suggests that the consumption patterns of these younger groups may become the dominant patterns of consumption in developing countries in the coming decades as this cohort ages and becomes the main consumers in each country. As the consumption of this age group tends to be very different from that of other age groups, it is likely that this phenomenon will lead to significant changes in overall consumption patterns. Marketing and advertising Marketing and advertising help create demand and are a necessary part of the growth paradigm; they are meant to ensure that individuals remain “dissatisfied consumers”, and thus continue to add to their material consumption. As such, marketing will clearly be an June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 53 important business tool to drive consumption. Global advertising expenditures reached $643 billion in 2008, and in developing countries they are growing at 10% or more per year.112 Multinational companies have identified the 4 billion people earning less than US$1,500 (purchasing power parity) annually as the “bottom of the pyramid”; a vast source of untapped potential for profits. Strategies have been developed to best encourage consumption within this demographic, focusing on low-margin, high-volume products. In certain cases, the products developed for these populations may be compatible with sustainable development goals. For example, to limit the total cost of ice cream, a multinational corporation in India developed a technology to safely transport ice cream in unrefrigerated trucks, reducing the overall energy footprint of the final product.113 This, however, is simply evidence of a momentary alignment between the distinct goals of profit maximisation and sustainable development and does not represent a shift in the primary goals of the corporations. International economic policy Developing countries worldwide have generally been undergoing a process of economic liberalisation since the 1980s, with an intensification of the process occurring in the 1990s. The nature of this process of liberalisation is typified by what has come to be known as the “Washington Consensus” which included an emphasis on universal and uniform trade liberalisation. In this context, “universal” implies that all developing countries are to follow the same trade policy regime irrespective of their levels of development and trade capacities. “Uniform” implies that all sectors and industries are to be subject to the same tariff rates-preferably zero rate, or low rate.114 These changes in the economic orientation of developing countries towards the global marketplace have had direct and indirect impacts on the socio-economic landscapes of the countries. In developing countries, lifestyle changes have been driven by the liberalisation of economies which are progressively opening up to the world and are being increasingly seen by companies as potentially lucrative markets. Companies from both developed and developing countries are planning to significantly increase their business operations in emerging markets in the next few years. Asia is said to be an important emerging market for European producers to continue on a growth path: businesses are promoting increased material consumption in the new markets and companies are actively developing consumer markets in developing countries as Western markets are becoming saturated. In addition, foreign direct investment can be seen as an indirect source for the spread of both Western values and the Western lifestyle and consumption patterns, not the least because the goods which are produced in the factories in these areas, although mostly destined at markets in the developed world, will often find their way into local markets. National economic policy The economic policy that developing countries choose to promote within their borders can have a significant impact on consumption patterns as well. China, like a number of other 54 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 Asian economies, has aggressively pursued a policy of investment-led growth. It has mobilised the savings of its population to build its industrial base, particularly in the export sector, and develop its infrastructure. This investment led approach, however, has created imbalances in both the Chinese and the world economy, ranging from the current low levels of per capita consumption, to a heavy reliance on exports for growth, to an diminution of the foreign direct investment available for other countries. Since December 2004, China’s top political leadership has made it an express policy to encourage increased levels of per capita consumption over time. The government has taken action, such as raising the minimum wage, de-regulating the retail market, and creating the “Golden Week” holidays, to encourage consumption growth. This can be expected to result in a faster increase of aggregate consumption with in the upcoming decades. In addition, this consumption is likely to be more evenly spread as a larger share of the population will have discretionary income at its disposal as over the next 20 years. By 2025, China’s urban households will be spread widely across the income spectrum, with greatly reduced number of poor households. The development of financing options and increased access to credit such as instalment payments might also drive consumption.115 This could also apply to a limited extent to microcredit, although in this context loans are meant to be used for investment rather than for consumption. Interlinkages between driving forces The multiple driving forces are in many cases deeply integrated and mutually reinforcing, often leading to positive feedback cycles which lead to ever greater changes in lifestyles and consumption patterns. Of central importance is the interplay between growing populations and rising average incomes. While a growing population could simply consume more of the same products and services as it had previously, a population wherein the average per capita income rises will not only increase its overall consumption but will change the types of products and services as well. Furthermore, given the sizes of the populations of India and China, even small increases in per capita income and consumption levels can have significant impact on the total level of consumption. Thus, while the current per capita levels of income and consumption in India and China remain small relative to Europe and the United States (Figure 23, page 50), the growth of the Chinese and Indian middle classes could have considerable impact on the global environment (see Section 4.1.2.). The recent increases in per capita income in India and China are linked to the economic liberalisation policies of the respective governments. As the Chinese government has pursued an open-door policy of trade development, it has witnessed the rapid development of its manufacturing sector. This increased economic activity has been the June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 55 primary driver of the increase in per capita GDP from $252vii in 1980, to an estimated $9,710 by 2013.116 Policies encouraging economic liberalisation have opened the Chinese and Indian markets to the influences of global brands and advertising. These newly available products and services help fuel the changing preferences of the Chinese and Indian consumers and may accelerate an ongoing rebalancing of traditional values. While the competing values of frugality and mianzi-driven conspicuous consumption have traditionally co-existed within Chinese culture, the appearance of global luxury brands and the related marketing will continue to drive a transition towards increased consumption. Social values are thus linked to and influenced by the economic policy decisions of the central government. While the government may not always intend to change social values through its policy decisions, in some cases this goal is explicit. The expressed objective of China’s current political leadership to encourage increased levels of per capita consumption, demonstrating that domestic economic policy can be used as a tool to drive changes in social values. While the exact nature of the interlinkages between increasing incomes, urbanisation, and changing consumption patterns remain unclear (see Section 3.3.4 for discussion of this uncertainty), these processes are typically observed to occur concurrently and there is evidence that they are deeply inter-related. More data is required, however, to more completely understand the influences at work. 3.3.4. KEY UNCERTAINTIES Population growth and demographic changes The continued population growth in developing countries has a major impact on aggregate consumption levels. As mentioned before, in relation with urbanisation, though they may remain quite steady, demographic trends cannot be predicted, especially since the specificities of certain policies — for example, Chinese population control policy — do not for easy comparison between countries. Introducing even further uncertainty in the case of China, the possible abandonment of China’s “one-child policy” pursued by the government could result in a temporary surge of natality levels, both in rural and urban areas. What the environmental impacts of a growing consumer class will be will largely depend on the size of the consumer class and its consumption patterns. The larger the consumer class and the more this consumption will rest on a material base, the higher adverse environmental impacts are expected to be. Given the primacy of population size in determining the absolute level of consumption, even small changes in what is otherwise a rather steady trend can have major impacts on absolute consumption levels. vii 56 These figures are presented in purchasing power parity in current international dollars (see Footnote ii). European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 Technological progress, especially in the health sector, will not automatically perpetuate the positive trends with regard to falling infant mortality and higher life expectancy in developing countries. In fact, access to health care will be a determining factor as certain groups will benefit from the technological improvements in the field of health, while others may not. Whether or not broad access to good quality health care for the larger masses will increasingly be provided in developing countries will affect demographic trends in the long run. Urbanisation The degree to which urbanisation influences changes in consumption patterns remains the subject of debate among scholars. When attempting to understand the drivers of consumption change, the key challenge is separating the effect of increasing incomes — which is a significant driver for both urbanisation and changing consumption patterns — from the process of urbanisation itself. Furthermore, in certain cases, urbanisation may lead to a reduction in consumption of certain resources as well-planned cities can provide services more efficiently than rural settlements.117 The influence of these factors on increasing per capita meat consumption illustrates the disagreement. The UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization argues that, in addition to independent of increasing incomes, urbanisation is an important factor in changing consumption habits, as urban inhabitants typically consume more food outside the home and larger amounts of pre-cooked, fast and convenience foods than do people in rural areas. The overall effect is an increase in meat consumption, independent of the effect of increasing incomes.118 This change in consumption could also result from and/or be reinforced by easier access to supermarkets and other convenient shopping options in urban areas. In contrast, the complexity and contingency of the interrelations between income growth, urbanisation and changing consumption cannot be ignored. For example, studies have concluded that household expenditure on meat depends more on income than it does on whether the household lives in a city or not.119 Rebalancing of cultural values Although Western lifestyle patterns have so far proved to be very attractive to the emerging middle classes in developing countries simply assuming that the spread of Western lifestyle patterns will continue to spread in a linear way, not encountering cultural obstacles or institutional barriers would overly simplify the picture. The strength of the Western lifestyle as a model primarily lied in its claim for uncontested supremacy and absence of moral connotations. Increasingly, the consensus around the Western lifestyle and consumption patterns has eroded and these are contested both in Western countries themselves and increasingly in developing countries which are affected by the environmental consequences of past and present unsustainable consumption patterns of the industrialised world. The economic system which is constructed around this lifestyle is also increasingly contested and has proved very vulnerable in the global economic and financial crises which hit the world in 2008/2009. An economic paradigm shift organising the most important world economies around stability and sustainability rather than profit June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 57 maximisation and consumption could, through changes of fundamental parameters, have important implications on the kind of goods produced and the way in which they are produced. Economic policy The extent to which the consumer class will grow will depend both on the evolution of the global economy and in particular the progress of the trade liberalisation agenda and the economic and political choices that governments in developing countries will make, especially with regard to redistribution of wealth and investment in education for the larger masses. Environmental degradation and environmental policy The extent to which environmental and natural resource constraints limit might be a factor in potentially impacting the growth of the global consumer class and slow urbanisation should not be underestimated. Rising prices for certain commodities as certain resources become increasingly scarce may actually offset gains made through economies of scale and result in a more limited rise in purchasing power of consumers in developing countries. In addition, as adverse environmental impacts become monetised and the use of market based instruments raises the price of the products with the most harmful environmental impacts, affordable substitutes, generating less adverse environmental impacts over their life-cycle, might emerge on the market. As these substitutes are not available yet it is difficult to factor these into an equation to predict how future consumption patterns in China and India will play out in the decades to come. An internationally binding agreement on GHG emissions and allowing for technology transfers might also have important implications for the way developing countries will develop but when and if such an agreement will enter into force and what the terms will be is an aspect which can only be predicted to a limited extent. Even once such an agreement is in place issues such as commitment to achieving targets and monitoring would further maintain an important level of uncertainty. 58 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 4. IMPACTS As demonstrated in the previous section, the inter-related processes of globalisation, rising incomes and urbanisation, together with a range of other drivers, will have a significant impact in terms of lifestyle changes and consumption patterns in emerging countries. In addition, the process of urbanisation itself will have a direct impact on the production and consumption of commodities destined for this newly built environment (e.g. concrete and steel). Hand in hand with expanding cities and rising incomes, demand for energy, services, goods and the associated production of waste and pollution are projected to grow rapidly. These trends are projected to have important environmental implications both locally and globally. Moderate UN scenarios suggest that if current population and consumption trends continue, by the middle of the next decade we will need the equivalent of two Earths to support mankind.120 It is important to note, however, that consumption patterns in industrialised countries would however be largely responsible for this as average per capita consumption levels are currently much higher in industrialised countries than in emerging countries such as India or China.121 4.1. POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ON EUROPE In this section, the potential direct and indirect impacts on Europe resulting from the two interrelated trends of urbanisation and changing consumption patterns in developing countries are explored. 4.1.1. INDIRECT IMPACTS ON EUROPE While increased consumption is certainly a cause for local environmental impact, these impacts are not necessarily a result of urbanisation per se, but rather a result of increasing economic activity (which is concentrated in cities) and high levels of poverty (which persist in cities, despite higher aggregate wealth). Indeed, urbanisation can lead to reduced environmental impacts as certain services (e.g. energy, water and transportation) can be provided more efficiently in well-planned cities.122 While these impacts may be felt most acutely in the developing countries where the transitions in urbanisation and changing consumption patterns are underway, as a result of the interconnectedness of ecosystems, economies, and political systems, they will also likely have indirect impacts on Europe as well. A particular challenge for urban planners in developing countries is the fact that multiple environmental issues tend to arrive earlier in the development process (i.e., at lower income levels) and more simultaneously relative to the processes observed during the development of European and North American countries. This phenomenon, referred to as “time-space telescoping” has the effect of forcing policy-makers in developing countries to June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 59 face more issues at the same time with fewer resources than did their American and European counterparts at the equivalent point in their development.123 4.1.1.1 Waste generation In many developing countries, sewage systems are far better at meeting the needs of upper- and middle-class neighbourhoods than they are of servicing poorer neighbourhoods, particularly unregulated neighbourhoods on the urban periphery. These are, however, the neighbourhoods which grow most rapidly, especially in India, where rural urban migration of poor rural dwellers is still a stronger driver of urbanisation than in China, for example. In India, per capita waste generation increases by 1.3% per year directly as a result of increasing consumption. With an urban population increasing between 3 to 3.5% per year, waste generation is expected to increase by approximately 5% annually.124 Hence, improving public sanitation is a major urban environmental challenge that needs to be addressed in many large and middle-sized cities in developing countries. Currently, all too often, failure to collect garbage as well as inadequate waste management and recycling policies and practices results in many cities being inundated in their own waste.125 Major cities in India such as New Delhi have been reported to run out of landfill sites to dump the city’s garbage.126 While the consequences of ill-managed waste generation and treatment are felt most severely in the developing countries themselves, there is a risk to the European environment in that the increase in the quantity of landfilled waste in developing countries must be seen as being a additional source contributing to greenhouse gas emissions, thus offsetting efforts to reduce the generation of such gases to mitigate global warming. 4.1.1.2 Water pollution and coastal degradation Demographic processes such as population growth, age distribution, urbanisation and migration create some of the greatest pressures on water resources quantity and quality. These demographic processes directly affect water availability and quality through increased water demands and consumption and through pollution resulting from water use.127 The water quality both in rivers and coastal areas is likely to fall steadily as the fast growing cities in India and China discharge ever increasing amounts of untreated water and waste into water bodies, threatening water quality and aquatic ecosystems. 128 A direct, local environmental impact of coastal urban areas and increased aquaculture is offshore water pollution. In these areas, large-scale development results in excessive nutrient inputs from municipal and industrial waste. Eutrophication contributes to the creation of dead zones, areas of water with low or no dissolved oxygen. Fish cannot survive, and aquatic ecosystems are destroyed.129 At the same time, in other areas, intensive aquaculture to meet both the local demand in seafood of the growing urban population and supply the global markets is degrading coastal regions and harming fragile mangrove ecosystems. This increased pressure on the fisheries of developed countries may result in additional 60 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 pressure on already-stressed European fisheries as global demand for seafood continues to increase. Water pollution and use is likely to become a severe challenge, in particular in proximity of megacities. In the North of China, large urban areas will need national water-transfer projects to meet their increasing needs and will increasingly be competing with the rising water consumption in agriculture. Local governments already relentlessly search for new water sources and massively build up infrastructure to deliver them, particularly in midsized cities.130 In the northern part of China, where there is a huge demand for water for agriculture and industry, the once-mighty Yellow River has, in the past, ceased to flow. To address this problem, many northern cities have started to charge substantial prices for water and for releasing polluted wastewater into the environment.131 Nevertheless, pollution currently remains severe. Today, 59% of China’s river water is already below international portable standards, and if the amount of wastewater generated relative to GDP stays at today’s level in midsized and smaller cities, urban water pollution could increase by a factor of almost five.132 The deterioration of the quality of inland waters contributes to a further deterioration of the water quality in coastal areas, with the consequences on the global environment highlighted in above. 4.1.1.3 Air pollution A growing trend in vehicle ownership combined with severe congestion in many large cities in China and India will also continue to adversely affect urban air quality, which has clear consequences for human health. China, for instance, which has witnessed a 15% annual increase in the number of cars in several cities, has reported 3 million deaths from urban air pollution over two years.133 Concentrations of carbon monoxide, lead, and suspended particulate matter in many large cities in India and China greatly exceed World Health Organization guidelines. Air pollution, in particular NOX, could reach critical levels in larger cities. Among the greatest environmental health concerns are exposure to fine particulate matter and to lead which contributes to learning disability in young children.134 Beyond these severe local impacts, evidence is beginning to be collected that shows that non-GHG air pollution which originates in Asia can have an impact on the global atmosphere, potentially affecting both climate and agriculture in Europe and worldwide.135 4.1.1.4 Rising demand for land / land-use changes Land-use changes in China and India will often be an indirect impact of the urbanisation and changing consumption mega-trends. The increasing car ownership will not only result in an increase in GHG emissions and deterioration of air quality in large urban centres, it will also increase the demand for associated infrastructure such as roads, parking lots and motorways; it has been estimated that, in some Chinese regions, more than 10% of the surface could be built over by housing and infrastructure by 2025.136 In China and India, private ownership of cars has not only become more affordable, town planning and June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 61 infrastructure development has, in some cases, changed to incorporate expectations of individual car ownership. The development of associated infrastructure is likely to have important environmental impacts with regard to habitats and ecosystems in particular through the fragmentation of ecosystems. In addition, urban sprawl increases the pressure on the habitats and ecosystems in the periphery of the cities. The pressures of rapid urbanisation in China will intensify and the estimated addition of more than 350 million urban residents over the next 20 years will require unprecedented construction. This will result in extensive urban sprawl, further intensive land development, and extreme congestion. Pressure will continue to bear down on the availability of arable land, which could decline by as much as 20% in the worst-case scenario. At the same time larger cities will face crippling congestion pressures (Shanghai’s traffic could outstrip its projected road capacity threefold by 2025). There will be intense tension between the loss of arable land on one hand and cities’ dependency on land sales for revenues to finance urban development on the other hand.137 In addition, changing diets increase the demand for crops and meat,138 thus leading to an increased pressure to convert forests into agricultural land.139 This could affect the provision of the diversity of services which such natural and semi-natural ecosystems presently provide to rural inhabitants, thus covering a number of their subsistence needs. As livestock is already the world’s greatest user of land resources, further demand for meat and other animal products will have a major impact on land use in China and India. Indeed, much of the land required for animal production is not directly used for the animals themselves, but for growing the crops to feed the animals. At present, most of the world’s feed-crop production occurs in OECD countries, but some developing countries are rapidly expanding their production of feed crops, some of which is exported to the OECD countries to serve as animal feed. Intensive feed-crop production can lead to severe land degradation, water pollution and biodiversity losses, while expanding arable land into natural ecosystems often has serious ecological consequences, including the loss of biodiversity and of ecosystem services such as water regulation and erosion control. While increases in grain production have been mostly achieved through intensification on existing areas, much of the rapid increase in soybean production has been achieved through expansion of cropping into natural habitats. Meeting future demand for livestock products will, however, require further improvements in livestock and land productivity as well as expanding feed production area, at the expense of pastureland and natural habitats.140 This increased competition for land and agricultural resources in developing countries risks impacts in Europe and around the world. The stability of global production systems may be threatened, potentially increasing demand in European agricultural resources, thus making a decrease in the intensity of European agriculture difficult. 4.1.1.5 Reduced environmental impact in developed countries The increasing environmental impacts felt locally in developing countries discussed above are largely mirrored by reduced environmental impact in developed countries which have seen much of their manufacturing and other heavily polluting industries relocated to 62 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 developing countries.141 While this will have a positive impact on the environment in developed countries, the effects of the concentration of highly polluting industries in developing countries can have devastating consequences for the local environment and human health. Furthermore, the net environmental effect at the global level may be quite negative as relatively efficient production technologies used in developed countries are supplanted by less efficient and more polluting technologies in developing countries. 4.1.2. DIRECT IMPACTS ON EUROPE 4.1.2.1 Rising greenhouse gas emissions Urban centres in developing countries, where often the middle- and upper-income groups are concentrated, are inevitably also the sites for the generation of a high proportion of greenhouse gases. In addition, many of the greenhouse gases generated outside urban centres are linked to urban-based demands — such as the greenhouse gases generated by fossil-fuel power stations, oil wells, and farms that are outside urban boundaries but where the electricity, oil, and farm products are destined for urban producers or consumers. The cases of India and China are illustrative in this regard. Results show that urbanisation leads to a substantial increase in projected emissions, while ageing leads to a decrease. The net effect of demographic change is nevertheless to increase projected emissions from China by 45% by the end of the century, and from India, by 25-55%.142 One major factor also contributing to this is a trend towards greater mobility e.g. increasing levels of flying, driving and train travel among a growing part of the population. The richest 1% of Indians (10 million people), who earn more than US$24,500 (purchasing power parity) per year, are now each responsible for more than 5 tonnes of CO2 emissions annually — still just a fifth of American per capita emissions (Figure 18, page 42) but twice the average level of 2.5 tons per person needed to keep temperatures under 2° Celsius. Even the 151 million Indians earning more than $6,500 per person PPP are living above the threshold of 2.5 tonnes per person, while the 156 million Indians earning $5,000 are nearing it, producing 2.2 tonnes per person.143 In addition, continuing trends towards increased meat consumption will further increase the emission of greenhouse gases, in particular through the methane emissions of cattle and the deforestation cattle rearing might require. 4.1.2.2 Rising demand for biofuels and pressure on forest and water resources Comment: Cross check environmental & economic mega-trends assessment The emerging biofuels market in globally and, in particular, India and China, is a new and significant source of demand for some agricultural commodities such as sugar, maize, cassava, oilseeds and palm oil. These commodities, which have predominantly been used as food, are now being grown as feedstock for producing biofuels. Significant increases in the price of crude oil allow them to become viable substitutes in certain important countries that have the capacity to use them. This possibility is increasingly leading to the June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 63 implementation of public policies to support the biofuels sector, which further encourages the demand for such feedstock.144 This rise in demand for biofuels is also likely to lead to more pressure on forested areas in Europe and throughout the world, which could face the threat to be replaced by agricultural land to grow biofuels. In addition, the cultivation of biofuels in China and India could trigger water crises in both countries.145 4.1.2.3 Rising demand for energy: coal extraction and nuclear power plants Comment: Cross check environmental & economic mega-trends assessment Developing countries, like developed countries, will witness a steady increase in fossil fuel consumption and in China, coal extraction is projected to remain important to cover energy needs.146 World carbon dioxide emissions are projected to rise from 29.0 billion metric tons in 2006 to 33.1 billion metric tonnes in 2015 and 40.4 billion metric tonnes in 2030 — an increase of 39% over the projection period. With strong economic growth and continued heavy reliance on fossil fuels expected for most of the non-OECD economies, much of the increase in carbon dioxide emissions is projected to occur among the developing, non-OECD nations. 147 Nuclear generation is projected to increase by 8.9% per year in China and by 9.9% per year in India from 2006 to 2030.148 This will raise the problem of secure storage of nuclear waste. 4.1.2.4 Increasing pressure on renewable resources Comment: Cross check environmental & economic mega-trends assessment India and China are partly responsible for increasing demands on the forests, fisheries and farmland of many developing countries as an indirect result of India and China’s changing consumption patterns and increasing populations.149 To take one example, Chinese rubber imports shot up to consume 23% of world supply in 2003, overtaking the US as the biggest consumer of natural rubber in the world. This has resulted in acquisition of land for rubber production in countries neighbouring China, for example Laos and Myanmar.150 Since 2004 in Ethiopia, Ghana, Madagascar, Mali and Sudan, 2.5 million hectares of land have been acquired by foreign governments and corporations for the purpose of agricultural exploitation. China and India have been major players in this process and the FAO argues that population growth, increasing urbanisation rates (which expand the share of the world’s population that depends on food purchases) and changing diets (particularly growth in meat consumption by middle classes in large industrialising countries) appear among the factors pushing up global demand for food and resources, driving these countries to seek available resources elsewhere.151 These trends together will increase pressure on renewable resources in Europe, risking further environmental degradation. 64 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 4.1.2.5 Rising demand for mineral resources Comment: Cross check environmental & economic mega-trends assessment Adverse environmental impacts of mineral resource extraction are likely to increase across the globe. As a number of these resources, in particular rare metals, become more scarce, more irreversible changes to the earth’s surface and its landscape can be expected as increasing amounts of land need to be displaced to retrieve metals and minerals from the ground. Beyond the increased profitability of the exploitation of lower-grade ores resulting from the declining availability of certain raw materials, technological progress will facilitate access and exploitation of lower-grade ores. This will imply that larger areas will have to be cleared of natural vegetation and higher amounts of mining waste will be generated in the course of progressing mineral resource use, thus increasing the risk of interference with natural systems.152 This increasing demand for mineral resources will likely have similar effects on the European environment as increasing competition for land and renewable resources. That is to say, as demand for these resources increases, pressure on these resources in Europe will increase as well. 4.2. POTENTIAL ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL IMPACTS 4.2.1. GLOBAL RESOURCE SUPPLY AND PRICES (this needs to be cross/checked with the economics and environmental mega-trend assessments) As demand for resources increases in China and India, it is likely that prices for various commodities will generally increase as a direct result. Indeed, rising incomes in India and China and the resulting increase in demand for meat (see Section 3.2.2.1) was one of the causes of the price spike for foodstuffs in 2007-2008.153 As a result of increased demand for various resources such as biofuels, grains, and animal products, competition for various potential land uses is increasing in China and India. As developed countries begin to import more of these basic resources from China and India, their vulnerability to price variation in the Chinese, Indian and global markets will increase. Agricultural commodity prices rose sharply in 2006 and continued to rise even more sharply in 2007. According to the FAO, one of the main reasons is the economic development and income growth in important emerging countries which has been gradually changing the structure of demand for food commodities (especially in China and India). Diversifying diets are moving away from starchy foods towards more meat and dairy products, which is intensifying demand for feed grains and strengthening the linkages between different food commodities.154 June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 65 4.2.2. DEMAND FOR FOSSIL FUELS Increased demand for fossil fuels might result in rising prices for fossil fuels and the exploitation of oil fields whose exploitation was previously unprofitable. India’s oil requirement has doubled since 1992. China, which was oil-sufficient in the mid-1990s, was the second largest oil importer in 2004. Meanwhile, India and China have purchased large quantities of shares in oil companies around the world.155 4.2.3. INCREASED AND MORE VISIBLE INEQUALITY As cities are drivers for economic activity, they provide fertile ground for wealth creation. As certain segments of the society succeed in generating wealth, other groups do not, setting the stage for significant economic inequality. The proximity between social classes in cities aggravates this process as the inequality becomes more visible, especially to those lacking the luxuries that their neighbours enjoy. The daily living conditions of the urban poor have been strongly correlated with social exclusion and inequality. This inequality can heighten the potential for the emergence of conflict, crime or violence.156 66 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 5. POLICY IMPLICATIONS The trends, drivers and impacts discussed above raise some key questions about the appropriate European policy response. This section will present some of those key questions and will reflect on the most likely responses to them. 5.1. POSSIBLE IMPLICATIONS FOR EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY 5.1.1. COMPENSATING FOR POLICIES ELSEWHERE Given the current positions of the Chinese and Indian government towards global policy frameworks to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, Europe may choose to enact policies to compensate for other countries’ lack of action on climate change and other issues. This raises several significant questions: Should European environmental policy that targets the protection of the global commons be stricter to compensate for more lax policies in China, India, and elsewhere in the developing world? Would the real impact of such policies be sufficient to offset the emissions from China, India and other developing countries? Should such policies be enacted, what would the costs to Europe be? Should European policy-makers choose this path, then community strategies aiming to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases and other pollutants would need to be made significantly stricter and be accompanied by the necessary monitoring and verification mechanisms. 5.1.2. EUROPE AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL TRENDSETTER Rather than attempting to compensate for the lax environmental policies found elsewhere, European policy-makers could attempt to influence policy-making in China, India, and other developing countries by demonstrating that the sustainable and profitable use of natural resources is possible. Key questions regarding this approach include: Would the European experience with such policies be sufficiently successful to incite policy-makers in China, India, and other developing countries to follow suit and enact similar policies? June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 67 Could the European policies be convincingly and effectively translated into similar policies in China, India, and other developing countries? To successfully realise this approach, European policy-makers would need to adapt existing and/or enact new policies promoting sustainable resource use and ensuring that sufficient data is collected to be able to later demonstrate that such policies are compatible with economic growth. 5.1.3. INFLUENCING DEMAND TO PROMOTE SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION While Europe cannot directly regulate production practices in China, India, and other developing countries, as one of the main demand centres for goods produced in these countries, Europe can potentially influence the types of products and production processes demanded by European consumers. Key questions regarding this approach include: Can European policy instruments be used to influence consumer demand at levels sufficient to influence production practices in China, India and elsewhere? Which policy instruments would be most effective in influencing consumer choice? Would certain policy instruments, such as labels concerning a product’s process and production methods, be permitted under current WTO regulations?viii The appropriate policy instrument(s) for such an approach would necessarily require evaluation to ensure their efficacy and legality, in line with the questions outlined above. 5.2. POSSIBLE IMPLICATIONS FOR OTHER EUROPEAN POLICY AREAS 5.2.1. ECONOMIC POLICY TO INFLUENCE PRODUCTION METHODS Rather than attempting to influence production methods in China, India, and other developing countries by modifying consumer demand as discussed in Section 5.1.3, European policy-makers could attempt to influence such production methods through economic policies such as import duties levied on products originating from polluting processes and production methods. Many of the same questions raised in Section 5.1.3 are relevant to this approach as well, namely: Could such policies be effective at influencing production methods? viii For more discussion on this topic, see Vranes, Erich, Climate Labelling and the WTO: The 2010 EU Ecolabelling Programme as a Test Case Under WTO Law (March 9, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1567432 68 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 Would such policies adversely affect the strategic relationship with the concerned countries? Would such policies conform to WTO regulations? Would introducing a carbon tax at the EU border, beyond protecting European industries from lower production costs in countries with lower environmental standards, provide an incentive to emerging countries to upscale their efforts to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions? While the policy instruments for such an approach (tariffs, taxes, and duties) are well known, they would likely need to be carefully adapted to ensure that they are both effective and acceptable to both intergovernmental organisations as well as developing and developed trade partners. 5.2.2. ENSURING EUROPEAN COMPETITIVENESS China and India are building new infrastructure based on advanced, efficient technologies which may put Europe and its dated infrastructure at a competitive disadvantage (Box 4) While the usefulness of competitiveness as a concept in a non-zero sum international environment has been questioned,157 European policy-makers would be mistaken not to question the state of their economic and social infrastructure relative to what is emerging in Asia. Key questions in this regard include: Is “competitiveness” the correct concept to use in this analysis? Does the infrastructure being built in China and India pose a threat to the competitiveness of European economies? Would upgrading European infrastructure bring sufficient benefits to justify the cost? Does advanced and efficient infrastructure in China and India bring any benefits to Europe, for example, in terms of lower-cost goods and services and/or more efficient and less environmentally harmful means of production? If so, should the development of advanced infrastructure be pursued jointly? June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 69 Box 4: Advanced infrastructure and competitiveness The development of cities in China and India is taking place within the context of advanced technologies in various fields which were not available at the time when European and North American countries were undergoing their development processes. As such, China and India are in the process of constructing much of their infrastructure on more efficient technologies, particularly in the areas of transportation and communications. This may give these countries a comparative advantage in the coming years as they reap the benefits of this advanced infrastructure while developed countries will be forced to cope with outdated and expensive-to-change technologies. Source: Friedman, Thomas. 2006. The World is Flat: Expanded and Updated Edition. Farrar, Straus and Giroux; New York. Should policy-makers decide that the disparity between the infrastructure of China and India and that of Europe constitute a real threat to Europe’s economy, then investment in and upgrading Europe’s key economic infrastructure would likely be the most appropriate solution. Where to target the investment, how to raise the funds, and which technologies to use would remain as key considerations. 5.2.3. TRENDSETTING IN URBAN PLANNING The Johannesburg Plan of Implementation of Agenda 21 clearly defines the role of developed countries as trend-setters, urging them to take the lead in accelerating the shift towards sustainable systems of production and consumption.158 Though it has not yet been a perfect model of sustainable urban development, Europe could lead by example in urban planning and land management as well. Questions regarding this response include: Could — and should — successful European urban planning and land-use policies be reproduced in China and India given the different socio-economic contexts? How would effective policies be highlighted and communicated to Chinese and Indian policy-makers? Would it be beneficial to include Chinese and Indian urban planners and policymakers in the policy development process to facilitate the building of their capacities? At what level of policy would this sort of trendsetting be most effective; regional, national, local? Could “town-twinning” be a useful approach? 70 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 The success of this approach would require successful European policies which could be reproduced in China and India; clear communication between European, Chinese and Indian policy makers to ensure that the goals and methods of the approach are met; and capacity building where necessary to ensure that Chinese and Indian policy-makers are able to successfully implement the model policies. 5.2.4. TECHNOLOGICAL LEAPFROGGING It is of common interest to see that China and India avoid the “dirty” development process which presently developed countries underwent in the 19th and 20th centuries. A global governance framework accompanying leapfrogging of emerging countries in key sectors could contribute to the slowdown of the trends of adverse impacts on the environment of the increased affluence in emerging economies. This would require broad international support which Europe could help to establish. Some key questions regarding this approach include: What would the structure of such a framework be? Would it be organised under the auspices of an existing organisation or elsewhere? How would such a framework be integrated into existing efforts to promote clean development, such as the CDM? How would concerns over intellectual property rights be addressed to encourage the cooperation of technology developers? Determining the appropriate policy instrument to accomplish such technological leapfrogging would require careful evaluation of the existing structures and international agreements to identify the most effective approach. Given Europe’s advanced R&D capacities, it could take a leading role in such a framework June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 71 6. REFERENCES 1 UN (2008) World Urbanization Prospects – The 2007 Revision, Executive Summary: http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wup2007/2007WUP_ExecSum_web.pdf 2 UNFPA (2007) State of world population – Unleashing the Potetnial of Urban Growth: http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2007/english/introduction.html 3 Yan Song and Chengri Ding (eds.) (2007) Urbanisation in China: Critical Issues in An Era of Rapid Growth, Cambridge (MA), Licoln Institute of Land Policy, 302 p. 4 United Nations: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2007 Revision Population Database 5 Wilson and Dragusanu 2008 6 NIC 2008 7 Worldwatch Institute (2010) State of the World – Transforming cultures: From consumerism to sustainability: http://www.worldwatch.org/files/pdf/Chapter%201.pdf 8 McGranahan G., Satterthwaite D.(2003) Urban Centers: An Assessment of Sustainability, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, November 2003, Vol. 28, Pages 2436-274 9 McGranahan G., Satterthwaite D. (2003) Urban Centers: An Assessment of Sustainability, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, November 2003, Vol. 28, Pages 2436-274 10 Worldwatch Institute (2010) State of the World – Transforming cultures: From consumerism to sustainability: http://www.worldwatch.org/files/pdf/Chapter%201.pdf 11 Accenture 12 Accenture 13 Guan, D., G. P. Peters, et al. (2009). “Journey to world top emitter: An analysis of the driving forces of China’s recent CO2 emissions surge.“ Geophysical Research Letters 14 Don Rogich, Amy Cassara, Iddo Wernick and Marta Miranda, 2008 Material flows in the United States, A physical Accounting of the U.S. Industrial Economy, Washington DC, World Resources Institute 15 Global Footprint Network (2009): http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/world_footprint/ 16 UN (2005) Millennium Ecosystem Assessment : http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/index.aspx 17 Euromonitor 2008 18 Peter J. Marcotullio, Eric Williams and Julian D. Marshall, (2005) “Faster, sooner, and more simultaneously: How recent road and aviation transportation CO2 emission trends in developing countries differ from historic trends in the United States of America,“ Journal of Environment and Development, 14(1): 125-148, and supplement, pp. E14-E18 19 Peter J. Marcotullio, Eric Williams and Julian D. Marshall, (2005) “Faster, sooner, and more simultaneously: How recent road and aviation transportation CO2 emission trends in developing countries differ from historic trends in the United States of America,“ Journal of Environment and Development, 14(1): 125-148, and supplement, pp. E14-E18 20 Reisswig F., Lotze-Campen H., Gerlinger K., Changing Global Lifestyle and Consumption Patterns: The Case of Energy and Food 21 Ernst and Young Online, 2009: http://www.ey.com/GL/en/Issues/Business-environment/Global-megatrends2009, last accessed August 27, 2009 72 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 22 Quigley 2008 23 UN Habitat 2007 24 United Nations: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2007 Revision Population Database 25 United Nations Population Division (2007) World Urbanization Prospects : The 2007 Revision Population Database: http://esa.un.org/unup/ 26 Cohen B. (2006) Urbanization in developing countries : Current trends, future projections, and key challenges for sustainability, Technology in Society 28 (2006) 63-80 27 United Nations: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2007 Revision Population Database 28 Satterthwaite, D. 2006. Outside the Large Cities: The Demographic Importance of Small Urban Centres and Large Villages in Africa, Asia and Latin America, p. 1. Human Settlements Discussion Paper. No. Urban03. London: International Institute for Environment and Development. 29 UNFPA (2007) State of world population 2007 – Unleashing the Potential of Urban Growth: http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2007/english/notes/notes_for_indicators1.html 30 UN (2008) World Urbanization Prospects, The 2007 Revision: http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wup2007/2007WUP_ExecSum_web.pdf 31 UN (2008) World Urbanization Prospects, The 2007 Revision: http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wup2007/2007WUP_ExecSum_web.pdf 32 United Nations: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2007 Revision Population Database 33 UNFPA (2007) State of world population 2007 – Unleashing the Potential of Urban Growth: http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2007/english/notes/notes_for_indicators1.html 34 Dyson, Thomas. (2002) On the Future of Human Fertility in India. Expert Group Meeting on Completing the Fertility Transition. United Nations Population Division. http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/completingfertility/RevisedDysonpaper.PDF 35 Head-Jones A. (2004) The Economics of Chinese Birth Planning 36Heilig, G.K. (2004) Can China Feed Itself? A system for evaluating policy options. IIASA. Last accessed 24 March 2010. http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Research/SRD/ChinaFood/index_s.htm 37 McKinsey&Company (2008) Preparing for China’s urban billion 38 Guzman, J. M. 2006. “Urbanization and Ageing in Developing Countries.“ 39 UNFPA (2007) State of world population, Chapter 2: The Changing Demographics of Growing Cities: http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2007/english/chapter_2/changing_demographics.html 40 Engleman, Robert and Elizabeth Leahy. (2006) How Many Children Does It Take to Replace Their Parents? Variation in Replacement Fertility as an Indicator of Child Survival and Gender Status. Prepared for Population Association of American 2006 Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, California, March 30-April 1, 2006. paa2006.princeton.edu/download.aspx?submissionId=60125 41 Datta, Pranati (2006) Urbanisation in India, European Population Conference 21-24 June, 2006 42 UNFPA (2007) State of world population 2007 – Unleashing the Potential of Urban Growth: http://mirror.undp.org/Mongolia/unfpa/SWOP_2007_ENG.pdf 43 UNFPA (2007) State of world population 2007 – Unleashing the Potential of Urban Growth: http://mirror.undp.org/Mongolia/unfpa/SWOP_2007_ENG.pdf 44 McKinsey&Company (2008) Preparing for China’s urban billion 45 McKinsey&Company (2008) Preparing for China’s urban billion 46 Kundu, A. ( 2000 ) “ Globalising Gujarat : Urbanisation, Employment and Poverty “ Economic and Political Weekly, August 26 – Sept. 2, pp. 3172-3182 47 Bhagat R. B. (XXXX) Urbanisation in India: A Demographic Reappraisal June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 73 48 Sharma, Devinder. (XXXX) Agricultural Trade and Development: The Indian Experience of Liberalisation and Agriculture. www.utsydney.cn/transformingcultures/pdfs/ds_liberalisation_2.pdf 49 Carter, Colin A., Chen, Jing, & Chu, Baojin. (1999). Agricultural Productivity Growth in China: Farm Level versus National Measurement . UC Davis: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, UCD. Retrieved from: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/51j0k8kv 50 Andzio-Bika H., Wei L. (2005) Agricultural productivity growth and technology progress in developing country agriculture: case study in China, Journal of Zheijang University Science 51 FAO 2008 52 FAO 2009a 53 Hunter, Lori M. (2007) “Climate Change, Rural Vulnerabilities, and Migration“. Population Reference Bureau. http://www.prb.org/Articles/2007/ClimateChangeinRuralAreas.aspx 54 Chavas D. Izaurralde C. Thomason A., Gao X. (2009) Long-term climate change impacts on agricultural productivity in eastern China 55 Heming, LI; Waley, Paul; and Rees, Phil. (2001) “Reservoir resettlement in China: past experience and the three Gorges Dam“ The Geographical Journal, Sept, 2001 http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go2454/is_3_167/ai_n28877904/?tag=content;col1 56 Gleick, Peter. (2008) “Water Brief 3: Three Gorges Dam Project, Yangtze River, China“. The World’s Water 2008-2009: The Biennial Report on Freshwater Resources. Island Press. www.worldwater.org/data20082009/WB03.pdf 57 UNFPA (2007) State of world population 2007 – Unleashing the Potential of Urban Growth: http://mirror.undp.org/Mongolia/unfpa/SWOP_2007_ENG.pdf 58 UNFPA (2007) State of world population 2007 – Unleashing the Potential of Urban Growth: http://mirror.undp.org/Mongolia/unfpa/SWOP_2007_ENG.pdf 59 UNFPA (2007) State of world population 2007 – Unleashing the Potential of Urban Growth Growth: http://mirror.undp.org/Mongolia/unfpa/SWOP_2007_ENG.pdf 60 Rizzo, Giuseppe (2009) Fertility and pension systems: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/13167/ 61 Joshi G.V., Lobo N., Pub M. (2003) Rural-Urban Migration and Rural Unemployment in India 62 Sharma, Devinder. (XXXX) Agricultural Trade and Development: The Indian Experience of Liberalisation and Agriculture. www.utsydney.cn/transformingcultures/pdfs/ds_liberalisation_2.pdf 63 Head-Jones Austin (2004) The Economics of Chinese Birth Planning 64 Baldacci, Emanuell et al. (2010) IMF Working Paper: Public expenditures on social programs and household consumption in China. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2010/wp1069.pdf 65 Brown, Oli. (2007) “Climate change and forced migration: Observations, projections and implications.“ Human Development Report 2007/2008. UNDP. http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr20072008/papers/brown_oli.pdf 66 Sharma, Devinder. (XXXX) Agricultural Trade and Development: The Indian Experience of Liberalisation and Agriculture. www.utsydney.cn/transformingcultures/pdfs/ds_liberalisation_2.pdf 67 Venable, Anthony J. (2003) Spatial disparities in developing countries: Cities, regions, and international trade. Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science. http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp0593.pdf 68 Benecke, G. (2009) “Greening Energy Politics in India: Assessing Contributions of the Clean Development Mechanism in the Wind Energy Sector“ Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA’s 50th Annual convention “Exploring the past, Anticipating the future“, New York. 69 de Nie, D. et al. (2009) Indirect effects of bioenergy – Effects on landscapes and livelihoods. IEA ExCO 63 Proceedings of the Workshop on Indirect effects of bio energy. http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/iucn_paper_indirect_effects_of_bioenergy_final_2.pdf 74 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 70 Reisswig F., Lotze-Campen H., Gerlinger K., Changing Global Lifestyle and Consumption Patterns: The Case of Energy and Food 71Hubacek K., Guan D., Barua A. (2007) Changing lifestyles and consumption patterns in developing countries: A scenario analysis for China and India, Futures, Volume 39, Issue 9, November 2007, Pages 1084-1096 72 Ernst and Young Online, 2009: http://www.ey.com/GL/en/Issues/Business-environment/Global-megatrends2009, last accessed August 27, 2009 73 Accenture 74 Weber, I. (2001). Shanghai youths’ strategic mobilization of individualistic values: Constructing cultural identity in the age of spiritual civilization. Intercultural Communication Studies, 10, 23–46. 75 McKinsey Global Institute (2007) The ‘Bird of Gold’: The Rise of India’s Consumer Market 76 Kharas, Homi. (2010) The emerging middle class in developing countries. OECD Development Centre. 77 Kharas, Homi. (2010) The emerging middle class in developing countries. OECD Development Centre. 78 McKinsey Global Institute (2007) The ‘Bird of Gold’: The Rise of India’s Consumer Market 79 Ananthapadmanabhan G., Srinivas K., and Vinuta Gopal, Hiding Behind the Poor (Bangalore: Greenpeace India Society, October 2007): http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/india/press/reports/hiding-behind-the-poor.pdf 80 UN, Millenium Development Goals: End Poverty 2015, Make it happen: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/ 81 Reisswig F., Lotze-Campen H., Gerlinger K., Changing Global Lifestyle and Consumption Patterns: The Case of Energy and Food 82 IEA, World Energy Outlook 2009 Fact Sheet: http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/docs/weo2009/fact_sheets_WEO_2009.pdf 83 UNFPA (2007) State of world population 2007 – Unleashing the Potential of Urban Growth: http://mirror.undp.org/Mongolia/unfpa/SWOP_2007_ENG.pdf 84 UNEP Online, GEO 4, 2009: http://www.unep.org/geo/geo4/report/GEO-4_Report_Full_en.pdf, last accessed August 28, 2009 85 Grumbine, R. (2007) China’s emergence and the prospects for global sustainability. In BioScience 57 (3):249255 86 McKinsey Global Institute (2006) From ‘Made in China’ to ‘Sold in China’ : The rise of the Chinese urban consumer 87 Accenture 88 McKinsey Global Institute (2007) The ‘Bird of Gold’: The Rise of India’s Consumer Market 89 Prahalad, C. K. and Stuart L. Hart (2002) The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid. Strategy+Business, First Quarter 2002, Issue 26 90 Hubacek, K., Guan D., Barrett J., Wiedmann T. (2009) Environmental implications of urbanisation and lifestyle change in China: Ecological and Water Footprints, Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 17, Issue 14, pp.12411248 91 Hubacek K., Guan D., Barua A. (2007) Changing lifestyles and consumption patterns in developing countries: A scenario analysis for China and India, Futures, Volume 39, Issue 9, November 2007, Pages 1084-1096 92 Hubacek, K., Guan D., Barrett J., Wiedmann T. (2009) Environmental implications of urbanisation and lifestyle change in China: Ecological and Water Footprints, Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 17, Issue 14, pp.12411248 93 Prahalad, C. K. and Stuart L. Hart (2002) The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid. Strategy+Business, First Quarter 2002, Issue 26 94 McKinsey Global Institute (2006) From ‘Made in China’ to ‘Sold in China’ : The rise of the Chinese urban consumer June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 75 95 McKinsey Global Institute (2007) The ‘Bird of Gold’: The Rise of India’s Consumer Market 96 Amarasinghe U., Shah T., Singh O.P. (No Date), Changing consumption patterns: Implications on food and water demand in India 97 McKinsey Global Institute (2007) The ‘Bird of Gold’: The Rise of India’s Consumer Market 98 McKinsey Global Institute (2007) The ‘Bird of Gold’: The Rise of India’s Consumer Market 99 McKinsey Global Institute (2007) The ‘Bird of Gold’: The Rise of India’s Consumer Market 100 Mont O., Power K. (2010) Understanding factors that shape consumption 101 Wang, C.L., Lin X. (2009) Migration of Chinese Consumption Values: Traditions, Modernization, and cultural Renaissance, Journal of Business Ethics (2009) 88:399-409 102 Stearns, N.Consumerism in World History: The Global Transformation of Desire (New York: Routledge, 2001), 103 Stearns, N.Consumerism in World History: The Global Transformation of Desire (New York: Routledge, 2001), 104 Xiao G., Kim J.O. (2009) The Investigation of Chinese Consumer Values, Consumption Values, Life Satisfaction, and Consumption Behaviors, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 26(7): 610-624 (July 2009) 105 Weber, I. (2001). Shanghai youths’ strategic mobilization of individualistic values: Constructing cultural identity in the age of spiritual civilization. Intercultural Communication Studies, 10, 23–46. 106 McKinsey Global Institute (2006) From ‘Made in China’ to ‘Sold in China’ : The rise of the Chinese urban consumer 107 McKinsey Global Institute (2007) The ‘Bird of Gold’: The Rise of India’s Consumer Market 108 McKinsey Global Institute (2007) The ‘Bird of Gold’: The Rise of India’s Consumer Market 109 McKinsey Global Institute (2006) From ‘Made in China’ to ‘Sold in China’ : The rise of the Chinese urban consumer 110 McKinsey Global Institute (2007) The ‘Bird of Gold’: The Rise of India’s Consumer Market 111 McKinsey Global Institute (2007) The ‘Bird of Gold’: The Rise of India’s Consumer Market 112 Worldwatch Institute (2010) State of the World – Transforming cultures: From consumerism to sustainability: http://www.worldwatch.org/files/pdf/Chapter%201.pdf 113 Prahalad, C. K. and Stuart L. Hart (2002) The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid. Strategy+Business, First Quarter 2002, Issue 26 114 Shafaedin, S.M. (2005) Trade liberalization and economic reform in developing countries: Structural change or de-industrialization? Discussion Paper No. 179; United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/osgdp20053_en.pdf 115 Lizabeth Cohen, A Consumer’s Republic: The Politics of Mass Consumption in Postwar America (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2003), pp. 123–24; Gardner, Assadourian, and Sarin, op. cit. note 10, p. 15. 116 International Monetary Fund (2008). World Economic Outlook Database: October 2008 Edition. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2008/02/weodata/index.aspx 117UNFPA (2007) State of world population 2007 – Unleashing the Potential of Urban Growth: http://mirror.undp.org/Mongolia/unfpa/SWOP_2007_ENG.pdf 118 FAO. 2009. State of Food and Agriculture. http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/i0680e/i0680e00.htm 119 Stage, J., J. Stage, and G. McGranahan. 2009. “Is urbanization contributing to higher food prices?“ London: IIED and UNFPA 120 Global Footprint Network (2009): http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/world_footprint/ 121 Living Planet 2008 http://assets.panda.org/downloads/living_planet_report_2008.pdf 122 UNFPA (2007) State of world population 2007 – Unleashing the Potential of Urban Growth: http://mirror.undp.org/Mongolia/unfpa/SWOP_2007_ENG.pdf 76 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010 123 Peter J. Marcotullio, (2005) “Time-space telescoping and urban environmental transitions in the Asia Pacific,“ UNU-IAS Report, Yokohama: UNU-IAS 124 http://ec.europa.eu/environment/international_issues/presentations/solid_waste_mgt_india.ppt 125 Cohen B. (2006) Urbanization in developing countries : Current trends, future projections, and key challenges for sustainability, Technology in Society 28 (2006) 63-80 126 The Times of India (21 June 2002) City running out of landfill sites: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/City-running-out-of-landfill-sites/articleshow/13698226.cms 127 UN World Water Development Report (2009) Water in a changing world, Chapter 2 : Demographic, economic and social drivers : http://www.unesco.org/water/wwap/wwdr/wwdr3/pdf/12_WWDR3_ch_2.pdf 128 Cohen B. (2006) Urbanization in developing countries : Current trends, future projections, and key challenges for sustainability, Technology in Society 28 (2006) 63-80 129 UN (2007) Global Environment Outlook, Chapter 1 – Encyclopaedia of Earth: http://www.eoearth.org/article/Global_Environment_Outlook_(GEO-4)~_Chapter_1 130 McKinsey Global Institute (2008) Preparing for China’s urban billion: http://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/reports/pdfs/China_Urban_Billion/China_urban_billion_full_report.pdf 131 Hargroves K., Smith M. (2006) Chapter 16: Tomorrow’s Mega-cities: How will they Develop? in The Natural Advantage of Nations – Business Opportunities, Innovation and Governance in the 21st Century, Earthscan 132 McKinsey Global Institute (2008) Preparing for China’s urban billion: http://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/reports/pdfs/China_Urban_Billion/China_urban_billion_full_report.pdf 133 Hargroves K., Smith M. (2006) Chapter 16: Tomorrow’s Mega-cities: How will they Develop? in The Natural Advantage of Nations – Business Opportunities, Innovation and Governance in the 21st Century, Earthscan 134 Cohen B. (2006) Urbanization in developing countries : Current trends, future projections, and key challenges for sustainability, Technology in Society 28 (2006) 63-80 135 UNEP and C4 (2002). The Asian Brown Cloud: Climate and Other Environmental Impacts UNEP, Nairobi. http://www.rrcap.unep.org/issues/air/impactstudy/index.cfm 136 Hubacek, Klaus and Laixiang Sun (2001). “A Scenario Analysis of China’s Land Use Change: Incorporating Biophysical Information into Input-Output Modeling.“ Structural Change and Economic Dynamics Vol. 12/4, pp. 367-397. 137 McKinsey Global Institute (2008) Preparing for China’s urban billion: http://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/reports/pdfs/China_Urban_Billion/China_urban_billion_full_report.pdf 138 Ray R. (2007) Changes in Food Consumption and the Implication for Food Security and Undernourishment: India in the 1990s 139 Jha C.S., Dutt C.B.S., Bawa K.S. (2000) Deforestation and land use changes in Western Ghats, India: http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/jul252000/Jha.pdf 140 FAO. 2009. State of Food and Agriculture. http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/i0680e/i0680e00.htm 141 Baek, J.; Cho, Y. S.; and Koo, W. W. The Environmental Consequences of Globalization: A Country-Specific Time-Series Analysis. Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL, July 27-29, 2008. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/6510/2/497478.pdf 142 Dalton M., Kian L. Pachauri S., O’Neill B. (2007) Demographic Change and Future Carbon Emissions in China and India, draft presented at the Population Association of America Annual Meeting, New York, NY, 2007 143 Ananthapadmanabhan G., Srinivas K., and Vinuta Gopal, Hiding Behind the Poor (Bangalore: Greenpeace India Society, October 2007): http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/india/press/reports/hiding-behind-the-poor.pdf 144 FAO (2008) Growing demand on agriculture and rising prices of commodities : http://www.fao.org/ES/ESC/common/ecg/538/en/RisingPricesIFAD.pdf June 2010 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A 77 145 Rastogi A. (2007) Rise in biofuel demand could trigger food, water crisis, in Science and Environment online: http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/News_Room/pdf/Down_to_Earth__Rise_in_biofuel_demand_could_trigger_food_ water_crisis.pdf 146 McKinsey Global Institute (2008) Preparing for China’s urban billion: http://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/reports/pdfs/China_Urban_Billion/China_urban_billion_full_report.pdf 147 EIA, International Energy Outlook 2009: http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/highlights.html 148 EIA, International Energy Outlook 2009: http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/highlights.html 149 Worldwatch Institute (2006) State of the World: http://www.globalenvision.org/library/23/975 150 Cotula, L.; Vermeulen, S.; Leonard, R.; and Keeley, J. 2009. Land grab or development opportunity? Agricultural investment and international land deals in Africa. IIED/FAO/IFAD, London/Rome. http://www.ifad.org/pub/land/land_grab.pdf 151 Cotula, L.; Vermeulen, S.; Leonard, R.; and Keeley, J. 2009. Land grab or development opportunity? Agricultural investment and international land deals in Africa. IIED/FAO/IFAD, London/Rome. http://www.ifad.org/pub/land/land_grab.pdf 152 Bringezu S and Bleischwitz R. (2009) Sustaianble Resource Management – Global Trends, Visions and Policies, Greenleaf publishing 153 Stage, J., J. Stage, and G. McGranahan. 2009. “Is urbanization contributing to higher food prices?“ London: IIED and UNFPA 154 FAO (2008) Growing demand on agriculture and rising prices of commodities : http://www.fao.org/ES/ESC/common/ecg/538/en/RisingPricesIFAD.pdf 155 The Worldwatch Institute (2006) State of the World 156 UNFPA (2007) State of world population 2007 – Unleashing the Potential of Urban Growth: http://mirror.undp.org/Mongolia/unfpa/SWOP_2007_ENG.pdf 157 Krugman, Paul. 1994. Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession. Foreign Affairs; March/April 1994. 158 Johannesburg Plan of Implementaion (2002) Chapter III, paragraph 14. 78 European Environment Agency General support to framing the forward-looking assessment component of the SOER 2010 Part A June 2010