CASE STUDY: CONFLICT IN FADAMA COMMUNITIES By AJUWON S. S. Introduction National Fadama Development Project “Fadama” is Hausa name for irrigable lands or flood plains and low-lying areas underlined by shallow aquifers. They are found along Nigerian rivers. The National Fadama Development Project phase one was implemented between 1992 and 1999 and was adjudged successful. This success has culminated into the Federal Government of Nigeria requesting for the second phase of Fadama project. The objective of the second phase has been defined as to sustainably increase the incomes of fadama users --- those who depend directly or indirectly on fadama resources (farmers, pastoralists, fishers, hunters, gatherers and service providers) – through empowering communities to take charge of their own development agenda and by reducing conflict among fadama resources users. In the past, fadama farming was not common in West Africa, they were mainly used for grazing and fishing but as human population increased during the 20th century, a greater use of fadama for food production was inevitable. As farmers take up more of the river – bank for farming, they come into conflict with the other users, especially the pastoralist and fisherfolk, whereas the pastoralists have been coming to the river for many years to feed their animal with grasses. When they arrive and find the grazing field covered by tomatoes and other crops they become very angry. On the other hand, the farmers who are often desperate to feed their families during the dry season regard the herders as dangerous and intrusive. Too often there are fights and people are sometimes killed, properties lost, etc. TYPES OF CONFLICTS The types of conflicts faced in fadama communities vary from one community to another depending on the type of user groups being found in the fadama communities. However, the conflicts can be classified under three major categories viz : 1. Conflict within community over access rights 2. Conflict between community over access rights 3. Citizen versus the authorities Conflict within community over access rights q) Farmer-farmer : The farmers in question claim land for fadama farming. One is taking off water upstream for irrigation and thereby impeding the flow of water to the farmer downstream preventing him from fadama farming activities. This may lead to comflict between the two farmers. b) Fisher-Fisher: Setting of dumbe nets or using other illegal techniques to catch fish or stealing of fish from individually owned ponds within the fadama creates conflicts between fishermen. c) Herder –Herder: The agro-pastoralist/semi-nomadic pastoralist and nomadic compete for grazing when dry season is severe and pasture is insufficient. 2) Conflict between Communities over Access Right a) Farmer-Pastoralist: Cattle may enter farm land and eat crops or graze crop residue without the permission of the farmer. Farmers may also cultivate across stock routes or riverine grazing area thereby disturbing the passage of cattle to grazing reserve or field. b) Fisher-Pastoralist: Herder destroy fishing gear in the pond in the fadama area. Fisherfolk also block livestock river crossing places. c) Pastoralist-migrant gatherers: Pastoralist cut browse for feeding animals to the detriment of the gatherers and this results in minor conflict between them. 3) Citizen versus the authorities a) Gatherers seek wild resources (potash, fuelwood,etc.) in National parks b) Farmers take water from the main channels c) Authorities take off water upstream and cut off water from farmers d) Hunters poach birds and animals in National park e) Fishermen fish in National parks f ) Pastoralists go into National Parks or reserves to graze or browse The degree of conflict between these different resources users ranges from insignificant to extremely tense but conflict between pastoralists and farmers far outweighs all other types of resource conflict in frequency and importance. CASE STUDIES There were various cases of conflict in both Northern and Southern NFDP States in Nigeria. There is a significant variability in social, economic, ecological parameters both within and between States. However, conflict is usually greatest where populations are most dense and competition for Fadama land highest, but the degree of severity defers from State to State. The following are the experiences in some of the states during the implementation of Fadama-I: 2 Case Study 1:Bauchi State Bauchi State is one of the States that benefited from the National Fadama Development Project– I. It lies within the North east pastoral corridor in Nigeria. Conflict Status Between 1996 and 2002 there were 28 incidence of Farmer-Pastoralist conflicts and also 4 cases of farmer-fishermen conflicts. Because of these incessant conflicts especially farmer-pastoralists conflicts in the State, the state government decided to set up a committee to look into the matter. The observations of the committee are as indicated below: Observations of the Committee (1) Conflicts between the farmers and pastoralists have been occurring almost annually in the last five decades. (2) Before the advent of the aggressive Udawa and Bokoloji pastoralists, conflicts were minor in scope and their occurrence were minimised through the use of Fulani elders (jauro/ardo). (3) The newly emerged militants pastoralists (Udawa and Bokoloji) introduced a violent and fatal dimension to conflict. (4) Unlike the other group, Udawa and Bokoloji do not pay traditional homage or inform the local leaders when they arrive. (5) The Udawa and Bokoloji pastoralists are young, militant, heavily armed with guns and arrows; and (6) Some local godfathers and bandits protect them. Effect of the Conflict in the State (1) Between 1994 and 2002, 28 villages were affected and recorded loss of lives, crops, livestock and properties. (2) Between 1995 and 1997, in 8 out of the 28 villages affected, it was reported that 31 farmers, 66 pastoralists and 4 policemen were killed. Also 44 farmers and 2 pastoralists were injured (BSADP 1997). In addition to the above, there were burning of settlements, destruction of irrigation facilities and fear of vengeance on both parties. 3 The prominent conflict–prone areas are communities located on the major interstate livestock routes such as Gamawa, Zaki, Ita/Gadan, Jamare, Misau, Kirfi and Kuddu Local Government Areas. Case Study 2:Gombe State It lies within the North east pastoral corridor in Nigeria. Conflict Status There were 11 reported cases of Farmer-Pastoralist conflict between 1996 and 2002. The conflicts were more pronounced in the central and southern senatorial districts of the State. . There are two broad groups of herdsmen in the State. They are local/indigenous herdsmen and the Bokoloji and Udawa nomads. The former live peacefully while the latter which arrives in the State between October and January from Katsina or Niger/Chad are virulent. – This second group are more prone to dispute with the farmers over farm produce and crop residues. Causes of Conflict - The major cause of conflict is the crisis in Chad. - Miscreants under the disguise of Nigerian uniformed officials (soldiers, immigration police, custom, etc) come with sophisticated weapon to steal cattle, money, etc. - The conflict is also caused by non-development of grazing reserves. Only 10% of the available grazing reserves are functional and most of the land earmarked as grazing reserves, stock routes and watering points for the pastoralists have been encroached by the farmers. Effect of the Conflict Between 1997 and 2002 a woman was abducted for some days and another was amputated, 366 people were seriously injured, two herdsmen were apprehended by the police, 20 people lost their lives, a number of cattle were killed and some houses were burnt. Also some valuable were lost, rainy season crops were prematurely harvested and there were delays in starting dry season farming as a result of the conflicts. Case Study 3: KOGI STATE It lies within the North Central pastoral corridor in Nigeria. CONFLICT STATUS The State has witnessed serious cases of conflicts, particularly between the farmers and the pastoralists which led to loss of lives and properties. In some instances due to seriousness of such conflicts , pastoralists were prevented 4 entry or forced out of some areas in the state. For instance in 2002 pastoralists were driven out of Bassa Local Government Area after serious encounter with the farmers. Between 1996 and 2002 forty nine (49) cases of farmer-pastoralists conflicts were reported while there was only one (1) case of pastoralist – fisherman conflict. CAUSES OF CONFLICTS Droughts and erratic rainfall patterns have reduced river flow in flood plains and this has resulted in the concentration of crop and livestock production in the fadama. - For the Fulani pastoralists, upland gazing areas are in a poor state and cannot support large number of livestock over time, hence they move to the fadama in search of alternative pasture and watering points, especially in the dry season. - Development intervention in the state such as the NFDP have encouraged expansion of cultivation into areas that were formerly left fallow and used for livestock grazing. EFFECT OF THE CONFLICT IN THE STATE. Between 1996 and 2002, 27 persons were injured and 17 persons lost their lives. Crops estimated at over N1m were reported damaged. CASE STUDY 4: KEBBI STATE. It lies within the North West pastoral corridor in Nigeria. CAUSES OF CONFLICT - The Fulani/herdsman/pastoralists view the NFDP as a threat to their dry season grazing activities as the project is located in the fadama that was hitherto meant for grazing purpose. - Encroachment and the poor state of grazing reserves. - The belief by the pastoralists that deliberate damage of crops will lead to prosperity for them and their cattle that year. EFFECT OF THE CONFLICT IN THE STATE. There were losses of lives, properties, animals, farm produce and fadama equipment. 5 CASE STUDY 5 :IMO STATE It lies within the South east of Nigeria. CONFLICT STATUS Between 1996 and 2002 forty seven (47) farmer-pastoralist, twenty six (26) farmer-fishermen, thirty (30) farmers-hunters and 29 pastoralist-fishermen conflict cases were reported. . The conflict in Imo State is not particularly linked to flooded land by rivers. There is high rainfall in the State and the riverine land provides a valuable communal (free) resource, which is currently very much under-utilized compared to upland, which may need to be leased. Causes of Conflict (1) Cultural differences between the communities and the herders, crop damage, passing near settlements and attempting to settle on fallow lands are part of the offences that could cause conflict. (2) Major conflict occurs when communities raid and make away with some cattle of the herders. (3) Absence of stock routes leading to watering point and lack of designated grazing areas. Effect of the conflicts - There were losses of lives, properties, animals and farm produce. Between 1996 and 2002, nineteen (19) people died and forty two (42) persons were injured. 191 animals valued at N233,000 and crops worth over N334,000 were destroyed during the conflict. - The pastoralists live in fear of attacks on their cattle and themselves. 6 CONSENSUS BUILDING: FADAMA EXAMPLE AJUWON S. S. INTRODUCTION The use and management of common property resources (CPR) by many stakeholder in Fadama lands is shrouded by lack of defined security and proper rights by users. There is also limited equal access and transparency in the use of fadama lands. Conflict management or consensus building mechanism in the use of CPR is also not effectively implemented by the responsible authorities and this has been a source of continuous conflict among stakeholders. This has in effect undermined the efforts of government of Nigeria in implementing rural development initiatives for improved productivity in a sustainable way. Consequently. One area of focus under Fadama II is to improve conflict management mechanism in order to raise rural productivity and income. For a quick understanding of the topic, we will consider it under the following three questions: (1) What are the causes of conflict within the fadama communities? (2) What are the effect of the conflict on the communities? And (3) What are the conflict management mechanism currently in place and the NFDP II strategy to improve on them? Lesson Learnt Under Fadama-I During the implementation of Fadama-I some lessons learned with respect to conflict situation include: crop encroachment, impeded passage of trek routes and fadama feed resources of pastoralists. These led to sporadic outbreaks of conflict in a few areas partly because the project failed to take into account the interest, and concerns of the other resource users of fadama space other than that of the farmers. Consequently under Fadama-II, the government is now committed to fostering active participation of all key stakeholders in the formulation and implementation of conflict management interventions at the community level. What are the causes of conflict within the Fadama Communities? 1) Factors Identified Leading to Major Conflicts The following were identified as part of the causes of major conflicts: i. Refusal to allow the pastoralists free access to fadama pasture and water (this involves damage to crops and blockages of cattle and water points); 7 ii. Insistence of farmers to protect the vegetative stages of crops from damages; and iii. Deliberate destructions of tubewells and washbores by the migrating pastoralists due to problem of access to fadama resources. Other causes of the Conflicts Some other causes of the conflicts are as follows: (1) Land tenure and land use practices. Land is traditionally held on a collective basis. It was therefore used by communities and individuals on first-come first-served by virtue of being member of the community. On this premise, the use of fadama was not based on ownership and some fadama areas were even reserved for use by the pastoralists who would spontaneously settle on them and utilise the fadama resources. However, over the years, there had been a complex interaction between ownership rights and use rights. In most States, increasing pressure on land has decreased the importance of communal rights but enhanced the significance of individual ownership of land. Nevertheless, the pastoralists continue to regard land, pasture and water as God-given free resources to which they should have unlimited access. The constraints inherent in the differing perception of land by farmers and pastoralists therefore tend to be a major source of conflict. (2) Non-observation of rules and regulations. Both farmers and pastoralists flout the dry season farming and grazing rules. Some farmers deliberately leave part of their harvest on the farm to lure pastoralists in attempt to get compensation that would be more than the actual worth of the crops. Some pastoralists also are no longer paying the traditional homage or inform local rulers when they arrive the village. In some cases also the authority of traditional rulers have been eroded and rendered them effective. (3) Inadequacy of the existing grazing reserves. Due to population pressure on land, some grazing reserves have been encroached for farming activities, land speculation for building and government development intervention 8 (4) Poor State of the existing grazing reserves. Virtually all the grazing reserves are poorly developed and bare with little or no traces of grass on them. This is principally due to over-grazing, poor management and poor facilities. Consequently, the pastoralists move downward to the middle belt and Southern States for valuable sources of fodder in spite of regular open clash with various communities and trypanosomiasis infestation. (5) Blockage and reduction in size of stock routes. In most States, stock routes have been blocked by the farmers individuals with buildings and government development purposes to the detriment of the pastoralists, and watering points for livestock are now converted to sources of irrigation water to the discomfort of the pastoralists. This blockage of local cattle routes leading to watering points and increased activities in the fadama are major sources of conflict between pastoralists and the farmers. (6) Commercialisation of Crop residue. Both agro-pastoralists and pastoralists intensively use crop residues during the dry season. The commercialisation of these crops residues now is a contributory factor to the conflict. (7) Limited use of improved pasture and feeds. Limited use is made of improved pasture and feeds due to nonavailability and knowledge of how to grow and manage grasses, land tenure and the traditional preference for transhumance. (8) Poor land and soil conservation measures. Desert encroachment and excessive salinity of the soil limit livestock production potential in some areas. Also total cultivable land is shrinking due to land degradation resulting from deforestation, erosion, desertification, etc. These problems have limited the areas of operations of the farmers and pastoralists hence result in heightened conflict. (9) Traditional beliefs and practices. It is claimed that the pastoralists sometimes engage in deliberate destruction of crops and properties because of the belief that such acts are essential for stock growth/expansion and household prosperity. Although bush burning is used by the cultivators for various benefits, pastoralists see this as a deliberate attempt by the farmers to deny their animals access 9 to pasture. Similarly, wood cutting for commercial purposes by the sedentary people also reduces the quantities of fodder and consequently irritates the pastoralists. 2) WHAT ARE THE EFFECTS OF THE CONFLICTS ON THE COMMUNITIES? Effects of the conflicts on the fadama communities The effect of the conflict on the communities is very serious. It has even led to displacement of some communities. Some of the effects are enumerated below: the death of farmers, pastoralists and other settlers. 3) - destructions of crops (field or harvested), irrigation facilities, and heavy loss of properties and animals. - feeling of insecurity and fear among farmers and pastoralists every time the migration period arrives. - inability to pay back fadama loans. - reduction in productivity on both sides of farmers and pastoralists. - alteration of the pattern of social relationships in the affected communities and also there is a considerable mutual distrust among the various parties to the disputes: the farmers, pastoralists, traditional rulers and government law enforcement agencies that mediate in the disputes. WHAT ARE THE CONFLICT MANAGEMENT MECHANISM CURRENTLY IN PLACE AND THE NFDP II STRATEGY TO IMPROVE ON THEM? Conflict Management Mechanism in place Basically there are three categories of institution through which the people settle their disputes. These are (i) Traditional authorities, (ii) Police and court, and (iii) Local and State governments. Traditional authority In the rural setting, there is hierarchy of village elders, ward heads, village heads and districts heads who intervene to resolve disputes. However, if the dispute is very serious a more senior leader is involved in the settlement of the problem. But the shortcoming with the traditional authorities is that their interest in these matters varies from one village to another. Some respond immediately by setting up court like procedures with witnesses, site inspection 10 and independent assessment of costs. Others make arbitrary judgements and people occasionally accuse them of corruption. There are some more forward looking village heads who have established pre-emptive measures to forestall conflict e.g in Bauchi and Yobe States. They have established what they call hospitality committee. Police and court These institutions have bad reputations among rural communities therefore they are used as last resort. Local and State governments They set up committees to settle conflicts that may arise within their jurisdictions. However, in recent times their staff are often in conflict with the traditional rulers over who owns power in a region. However, the two tiers of government are of tremendous assistance in setting up committees that see to the settling of conflicts in their regions. Below are some strategies operating in some NFDP States Bauchi State Conflict Resolution Strategy (1) Minor conflicts are settled through traditional arbitrations by ward/village heads, district heads and emirs or by the parties involved e.g There are more forward looking village heads in the state who have established what is called Hospitality Committee. These are local residents appointed by the village head to go and meet with Fulani that are coming to an area or who are setting up camp. Most of these are transhumants who have already visited the area in previous years which makes meetings easy to arrange. But problems can arise when a new group of herders comes to the area. The committee tries to establish grand rules with the Fulani, so that if crop damage or other disputes occur, then both sides have accepted an agreed procedure. They also have an indigenous version of a Resource User Agreement, essentially demarcating land where grazing is acceptable and warning of the herders from potential farm land. (2) State conflict resolution committee are also set up, comprising representatives from the Department of Local Government, State Security Services, the Police, farmers and Miyetti Allah (Pastoralists association) with the Director General of the Department of Local Government as the chairman. (3) Similar committees are formed at the Local Government and district levels. 11 (4) The committees use radio programmes (Hausa and Fufulde) to enlighten and educate the farmers and pastoralists about the need for peaceful co-existence. (5) The committees are also involved in direct settlement of disputes through the assistance of law enforcement agencies. Despite all this, the stakeholders have one complaint or the other as indicated below: Complaints of Fadama Farmers, Pastoralists and Traditional Rulers (1) Farmers complained that: the local godfathers and bandits who aid the Udawas are known by the police yet nothing is done to them. (2) Government is slow to respond to conflicts and lack preventive measures to forestall future occurrence of conflicts, and not provide relief to victims of conflicts or their families. (3) Law enforcement agents favour the pastoralists because they are protected by their organization, Myetti Allah and are wealthy to offer gratification. The pastoralists also complained that: (a) the courts award compensation for destructions caused by their animals but do little or nothing to protect cattle routes and grazing land from being converted to farms. (b) they are maltreated and exploited by people because of their ignorance of law and low social standing. Traditional Rulers They also complained that their power and authority have been eroded and this was a major contribution to conflict and major obstacle to peaceful conflict resolution. OBSERVATIONS - Both the farmers and pastoralists seemed to take the law into their hands because there were lack of respect for law, inadequate legal instrument to deal with conflict situations and non-enforcement of law and traditional rules and regulations. - The government was not addressing the real issues which is the right and obligations of the various land users e.g. Bauchi has a total of 64 12 grazing reserves but only 10 of them are gazetted, 21 have not been surveyed and demarcated and the total hectarage covered is only 213,550 ha less than 50% of the grazing land requirement stipulated by the National Policy on Agriculture. - The grazing reserves and stock routes are heavily encroached. They also lack adequate pasture, water and other facilities. Gombe State Conflict Resolution Strategy The State government on the 30th of December 1996 signed into law “Farmers and Herdsmen (Prevention and Settlement of Disputes) Edict”. In the Edict, State and Local Government Committees were established with defined membership and specific functions and responsibilities. The state committee was inaugurated on the 10th of July 1997. Some of the activities they already embarked upon are as follows: i) Organization of public enlightenment campaign programmes in Hausa and Fufulde by way of discussion forum, drama, jingles and using local musicians. ii) Visitation to the LGAs and identification of entry points of the nomads, advised communities to evacuate their farm produce on time, and advised farmers to exercise restraints in dealing with the foreign nomads in order to avoid crisis. iii) Advised the farmers to refrain from encroaching areas designated as grazing or forest reserves, stock routes and watering points; and iv) The production of a map of all established grazing and forest reserves and stock routes for the purpose of retrieval of already encroached land and gazetting them. - Enforcement of the Edict that no herdsman shall graze his animals on a farm land where there is farm produce or remains of farm produce. - Other arbitration channels include traditional rulers, district/village heads, elders and leaders of farmers and fulani headsmen Miyetti Allah. It was reported that any resolution of conflicts by this traditional systems were usually enduring. 13 JIGAWA STATE CONFLICT RESOLUTION STRATEGY. - As in other states, the government set up a technical committee in 1994 to study the various dimensions of the conflict in the state. Upon receiving the committee’s report the government issued a white paper in which it accepted the recommendations of the committee. - Based on the recommendations of the technical committee, the government set up another committee called Retrieval Committee, which was headed by the commissioner for Agriculture and Natural resources. The committee was to; (a) retrieve all encroached grazing and forest reserves and stock routes. (b) make peace and settle land disputes. (c) A technical committee under it was to deal with conflicts at the local government levels. - - Security committees were also established at the state and local government levels to make peace and settle farmer/pastoralist conflicts. In addition, there were traditional processes for settling disputes in the communities. The court and the police were also often used, even though the farmers and pastoralists expressed their dissatisfaction with the roles of the police, courts and some of the traditional rulers in conflict resolution. KEBBI STATE. CONFLICT RESOLUTION STRATEGY Some of the villages in the State have employed traditional method to settle conflict among the Fadama users. For example, in Yauri; on the installation of the emir of the community, he has helped to form more than thirty professional and tribal associations. Each association could freely elect its own chairperson. The different chairs elected one representative as member to the Emirate Council. A conflict resolution mechanism was set up at three levels: Low level committee, comprising of village head, Fulani and farmer leaders. They can resolve the issue at their level, mostly by mediation and payment of compensation. Middle level committee, comprising District Head, Sarkin Fulani and branch chair of the Farmers Association. Very few issues pass this level without being resolved. Even if the issue is with the police or court, the committee can achieve an out-of-court settlement. High level committee, comprising His Royal Highness the Emir of Yauri, the Galadima (who also represents the chairs of Associations) and other 14 members of the Emirate Council. The verdict here is final and the conflicting parties must adhere to it. Since the establishment of this mechanism, farmers, fisherfolk and pastoralists have been living peacefully with one another. The committees are multi-purpose and it resolves all forms of conflict, not just farmer-herder issues. In addressing the farmer-pastoralist conflicts, the state government has also set up two committees namely Committee on Re-demarcation of grazing Reserves and Committee on Farmers/cattle Rearers’ Dispute. The Terms of Reference for the committee on Re-demarcation of Grazing Reserve are as follows: i ensure that Local Government Committees on the Re-demarcation of Grazing Reserves are properly composed with representatives from the farmers, cattle rearers and traditional rulers; ii physically visit all the reserves proposed by the local governments and do the actual demarcation after considering all professional implications; and iii. pursue the Ministry of Justice to get legal backing for establishment of the reserves recommended after the approval of the State Executive Council. The recommendations of the committee are as follows: i. to reduce farmer/pastoralist disputes both the State and LGAs should survey, demarcate, beacon and gazette all the existing grazing reserves and stock routes. The Fulani living in these grazing area should be provided with legal grazing rights and title to the land where they reside; ii. both the State and the LGAs should carry out grazing reserves development and improvement activities annually. These activities will include pasture improvement and water development (such as little earth dam, hand-pumps, and boreholes) inside these grazing areas so as to boost livestock production in the state and encourage settlement of the Fulani in the different areas of the grazing reserves; and iii. the state government should pass a law against all kinds of illegal farming and encroachment in gazetted grazing areas and stock-routes. All the recognized current illegal farming encroachment into these grazing areas and all the trespassing activities inside or at the boundary of the grazing areas should be stopped. The committee on Farmers/Cattle Rearers’ Dispute was to identify the causes of the recurring farmers/cattle rearers disputes in the State and recommend 15 appropriate measures to the government to minimize the reoccurrence of such disputes. Apart from these committees, the ADP through their public enlightenment campaign has been settling disputes within the NFDP fadama areas. There were also traditional committees set up in some areas in the State to settle conflicts. These committees are at three levels (low, middle and high). The intervention of each depends on the severity of the conflicts. Women opinion leaders were also involved in the arbitration by pacifying their husbands, making them to realize that mostly women and children are prime targets during the conflicts Conclusion It may be concluded that most of the conflicts arise from competition over the use of land, water and grazing resources. This has to do with a combination of factors principally resulting from a deficiency in the overall national agricultural development strategy. This is manifested in the erosion of the land use rights of the grazing resources, slow uptake of agricultural technology especially livestock production and management practices and poor land and soil conservation measures. While NFDP may not have originated the crisis, it is unquestionable that its implementation has fuelled the problem. In all the strategies, it was observed that the traditional method of settling the conflict is the most effective of all the methods. Lastly, with the Community-Driven Development (CDD) approach in which all the stakeholders will be involved in every stage of the project cycle including the preparation of the Local Development Plans (LDPs), it is hoped that every conflict on fadama resource use will be reduced if not totally wiped out. 16