ENG1DB Poetry Analysis Test Sample Responses Below are some sample student responses from our in-class work and our PRACTICE Poetry Analysis Test that exemplify effective poetry analysis and critical thinking skills. Consider that some of these responses may still need work. What are the positive aspects of each response and what are some areas that still require improvement? Use these examples to help you structure your own responses on the actual Poetry Analysis Test (this will be written on Wednesday November 13th). A Sample Response for “The Road Not Taken” by Robert Frost (in-class work): What is the tone of the poem? Explain thoughtfully. Support your observations with direct quotations from the poem. The most interesting aspect of Robert Frost’s poem, “The Road Not Taken” is that it uses a speaker with an ironic and remorseful tone to shape its central message, which is not as obvious as it initially seems. Although, by the end of the poem, it reads as if the speaker has taken the road “less travelled by”, and therefore is speaking in a wise tone, in reality, there is no road less travelled by in the poem, and the speaker is anticipating a future lie that he/she must tell in order to make it appear that they have taken this “less travelled” road (Frost 19). As a result, the tone of the poem is far more insecure than anything else. This is clearly proven in the poem when the speaker says, “I shall be telling this with a sigh/Somewhere ages and ages hence:/Two roads diverged in a wood, and I,/I took the one less travelled by,/And that has made all the difference” (Frost 1620). The “sigh” is the key here, because the speaker will not even believe this lie himself, which reinforces the speaker’s remorseful tone (he/she knows that he/she actually did not take the less travelled path, but that he/she is only telling himself that as a comfort) (Frost 16). Somewhere in the back of his/her mind will remain the image of yellow woods and two equally leafy paths, neither of them less travelled, which is proven in the poem when it reads, “Then took the other, as just as fair,/And having perhaps the better claim/Because it was grassy and wanted wear,/Though as for that the passing there/Had worn them really about the same,/And both that morning equally lay/In leaves no step had trodden black” (Frost 6-12). These paths in the woods are forks in the road, which serve as wonderful metaphors that represent the decisions and crises that humans must face within their lifetimes. These two roads are also meant to symbolize the conflict between a person’s free will and their fate, but the irony is that the two roads are actually the same; there was no better choice, which reinforces the ironic tone of the poem. A Sample Response for “The Child Who Walks Backwards” by Lorna Crozia (in-class work): Identify and explain the purpose and effect of two literary devices (examples of figurative language) used in this poem. In Lorna Crozia’s poem, “The Child Who Walks Backwards”, she uses figurative language expertly in order to explore the horrors of child abuse. One clear example of a meaningful simile used in the poem to exemplify the violence that is being inflicted upon the neighbour child is seen when the speaker states, “…plummet like a wounded bird/down the flight of stairs” (Crozia 9-10). The comparison that is made between the child and a wounded bird effectively indicates that the child is already injured before they fall down the stairs, in addition to emphasizing the innocence and helplessness of the child. Also, the diction in this poem is vivid and purposeful, proven with Crozia’s use of the word “plummet”, which reinforces the force and momentum behind the child’s fall; this fall was not an accident (Crozia 9). Next, Crozia uses a powerful metaphor in the poem in order to highlight the fact that the neighbour child’s injuries have not been caused because of his/her accident prone nature, but instead, that the child is being savagely abused at home. This metaphor is seen when the speaker says, “This child who climbed my maple/with the sureness of a cat,” to once again emphasize the fact that the child’s described injuries were not caused by accident (Crozia 11-12). This metaphor is particularly poignant because it provides the reader with a brief glimpse into a moment of childlike behaviour that has been tainted by the abuse the child is forced to endure. Many children will climb trees, and play outside, and this cat-like, youthful agility is meant to contrast the wounded bird simile mentioned in the previous lines. Consequently, both the simile and the metaphor are used to prove that the child has been harmed intentionally by his mother. A Sample Response for “If” by Rudyard Kipling (Practice Textual Analysis Test): The poet uses several examples of personification in this poem. Identify what he is personifying and explain the effect of giving these particular inanimate things human characteristics. Rudyard Kipling thoughtfully employs personification in his poem, “If”, when he assigns human attributes to intangible concepts and inanimate things like “dreams”, “Triumph”, “Disaster”, “heart”, “nerve”, and “sinew” (Kipling 9, 11, 21). Kipling uses this personification in order to reinforce his message of resilience and perseverance in the poem. To personify “dreams” by warning the reader not to “make dreams your master” and to personify “Triumph” and “Disaster” by advising the reader to “treat those two impostors just the same”, the speaker is positioning these potential challenges and opposing forces as something that can be fought against, therefore giving the individual the power to shape his/her own destiny (Kipling 9, 11, 12). In addition, although “heart”, “nerves”, and “sinew” compose the human body, one can make the argument that they do not work alone, and therefore, a case can be made for the fact that they are personified in this poem (Kipling 21). By telling the reader to allow these parts of their body to “serve your turn long after they are gone,/And so hold on when there is nothing in you/Except the Will which says to them: "Hold on!", it makes it seem that the heart, nerves, and sinew are working independently from the body to ensure that the person survives, and ultimately, enables them to persevere against all odds (Kipling 22-24). As a result, this personification adds strength and determination to the poem. Tone Descriptors Used by You for “If”: Which are most effective? Which are not effective at all? Consider this! - Passionate Encouraging Helpful Instructive Strong-willed Firm Compassionate Understanding Inspirational Motivational Determined Caring Empathetic Positive - Uplifting Advising Wise Informative Reassuring Supportive Persistent Thoughtful Happy Calming Proud Dramatic Angry Depressing Superior What is the central theme of the poem? Let’s discuss! How would you write this information in a clear, concise paragraph? Remember that this question is worth 10 marks on the test!