ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING Writing Rubric Checklist: 1. Paragraph contains a strong purpose statement that: (__/10 pts) Introduces main idea/topic of paragraph Contains a main idea/topic that is true to the text (accurate!) Is clear and concise Includes title and author 2. Paragraph contains well-chosen evidence to support claims: (__/30 pts) 2-3 relevant supporting quotes provided Quotes used require inferential analysis Context provided prior to quotes Transitions between evidence Quotes are properly embedded Properly formatted citation included Developed analysis of selected evidence: (__/40 pts) Analysis connects back to purpose statement/main idea Writer explains quote in support of main idea Analysis is roughly twice as long as evidence 3. ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ 4. Strong concluding statement/clincher that summarizes the claims made in the paragraph: (__/10 pts) Summarizes main ideas of paragraph in a new and interesting way ____ Ties back to purpose statement ____ ____ Attention to grammar and mechanics (__/8 pts) Proper punctuation, spelling, and capitalization Maintain present tense No personal pronouns (I, you, we, us) 5. 6. Typed (size 12 font) and double-spaced (__/2 pts) Total: ___/100 COMMENTS: ____ ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING Writing Rubric Checklist: 1. Paragraph contains a strong purpose statement that: Introduces main idea/topic of paragraph Contains a main idea/topic that is true to the text (accurate!) Is clear and concise Includes title and author Paragraph contains well-chosen evidence to support claims: 2-3 relevant supporting quotes provided Quotes used require inferential analysis Context provided prior to quotes Transitions between evidence Quotes are properly embedded Properly formatted citation included ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Developed analysis of selected evidence: Analysis connects back to purpose statement/main idea Writer explains quote in support of main idea Analysis is roughly twice as long as evidence ____ ____ ____ 2. 3. 4. Strong concluding statement/clincher that summarizes the claims made in the paragraph: Summarizes main ideas of paragraph in a new and interesting way ____ Ties back to purpose statement ____ ____ Attention to grammar and mechanics Proper punctuation, spelling, and capitalization Maintain present tense No personal pronouns (I, you, we, us) Typed (size 12 font) and double-spaced ____ 5. 6. ____ ____ ____ ____ COMMENTS: Writing Rubric – Key Words Defined: Thesis: how the argument is presented to the reader; the main point of your argument articulated in a single sentence. Central Idea: the main idea in a piece of writing that is revealed over the course of your essay/writing assignment. NOTE: The central idea is the “concept” of your writing assignments; the thesis is the central idea expressed in a single statement . Claim: a point about a topic that supports your thesis; the assertion as something as true. Argument: A stance or position on a topic; claim + how or why? How or why?: a preview of your evidence and analysis. Developing: A bleak mood is developed in Guy de Maupassant’s “The Necklace." Proficient: A bleak mood is developed in Guy de Maupassant’s “The Necklace” because of the word choice. Exemplary: The uninviting word choice and hopeless imagery in Guy de Maupassant’s “The Necklace” creates a bleak mood. Useful Context: details with a purpose with your claim in mind; necessary background information from the text. Sufficiently: varied and relevant to your claim. (Sufficient = “enough”) Inference: a conclusion reached on the basis of evidence and reasoning. Examine: explaining your inferences in detail (“For example, the fact that George takes his hat off reveals….”) Logical: a thoughtful and intentional order to the presentation of your claims; often chronological. Sophisticated: shows close reading and awareness of interaction of subtleties. (subtle details/aspects of the text) Embedded: taking the quotation and gracefully incorporating into the context allowing for analysis to be emphasized. ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING RUBRIC: Exemplary (4) (Voice, Initiative and Ownership) C Proficient + E I N D *is original or sophisticated. T E R A A L T H E S I S Proficient + E V I D E N C E Proficient + A N A L Y S I S Proficient + O R G A N I Z E D Proficient + C O N C L U S I O N * is articulate and fully maps the argument’s organization. * often embedded into writer’s sentences, with no excess, allowing for analysis to be emphasized. Proficient (3) * an accurate argument that can be defended by evidence. Developing (2) * an argument, but may be inaccurate. * may be contradicted by the text Beginning (1) * not an argument or lacks the need to be argued. * clearly expresses a * expresses an full argument (a incomplete argument claim + HOW or WHY?). * does not express an argument *may simply quote or summarize the text or plot. * introduced with useful context. * sufficiently supports the claim. * requires inference. * not introduced * irrelevant to specific claims. * excessive * introduced, but without useful context. * is insufficient to support claim or does not require inference. * Citation Missing / Format *sophisticated examination. * may use additional details or information to further develop argument. * concisely and articulately phrased * Claims are distinct, not overlapping. * Transitions address previous claims to create a cohesive structure. * examines evidence in support of claim and overall argument. * hints at the connection between evidence and claim or argument. *The reader must infer the author’s reasoning. * only summarizes evidence and/or does not connect evidence to claim or argument. * Claims logically prove the thesis. * Claims have a logical order. *Transitions between claims are present. * Claims are mostly relevant to the thesis. * Claims are not yet in a logical order. *Transitions are unsuccessful. * Claims are not related to thesis. *Transitions not clearly present. * reinforces or broadens the main idea of the thesis. * a simple restatement of thesis or veers offtopic.