Possible Research Paper Topics Here are a few crucial things to remember when researching for and writing your paper: Remember that these are theological papers; therefore you should not spend your whole paper interpreting a couple Scripture passages. Also, do not fill your paper with biblical quotations. Most often a biblical reference will suffice for a biblical quotation; therefore, biblical quotations should be relegated to the footnotes (or left out) unless they are substantial for your argument. Lastly, please remember that theology is more than doing a word study on a topic mentioned in the Bible. One of the best ways to do theology is through dialogue. That is, discuss the issue you want to address by critiquing/conversing with two or more theologians whose views differ from each other. This will cause you to think more deeply and critically, rather than possibly turning your brain off and simply finding a theologian whom you agree with in everything she/he says. Dialoguing with theologians whom you both agree and disagree with will make you understand the issues more clearly and, therefore, sharpen your own understanding and faith. These are only suggested topics and readings to get you started. You do not have to use these titles or even these readings, but you are welcome to use them. The questions given after the topics are not outlines for your paper and would likely be poor outlines. Make sure you clearly present your thesis statement (be specific, don’t generalize) and that your whole paper is somehow working to support your thesis (this includes considering ideas opposed to your thesis). I welcome the opportunity to discuss your paper with you. 1. Theological Heresy Paper Choose one heresy that is discussed in your textbook. Consider the following questions (and others you find appropriate): What is this heresy? When did this heresy arise in history? Why did the heretics make this assertion? Why did the Church at that time label this belief a heresy? What theological issues are at stake/ what are some of the theological implications of this heresy? What are the orthodox beliefs that contrast with this heresy? 2. Historical Theology Paper Doctrine/theology always arises in a historical context. Choose a time period/person and a doctrine to study. Discuss (among other relevant issues): Who were some of the key players? What were/are the theological issues discussed/at stake and how were they resolved? What problems made this/these theologian(s) address this issue? What is your own take on this theological issue? 3. Theological Traditions Paper Choose a topic and compare and contrast two theological traditions on the topic (e.g., Roman Catholics and Baptists on Baptism). Be sure you clearly describe each theological position and the theological reasons for it. You should also make clear what your own position is on the theological issue under discussion. 4. A General Theological Research Paper or a Theological Response Paper Choose one of the paper topics below. You may wish to start with my suggested reading and focus on the broad issue, creating your own dialogue and thesis, or you may wish to make your paper a response to one of the readings that are listed with a * . If you do a response paper, be sure to clearly describe the position you are critiquing before you critique it (both strengths and weaknesses). 1 CHURCH -“Models of the Church” –Is there one appropriate structure for the Church? -Start with M. Volf, After His Likeness (* ch 6). -“The Trinitarian Basis for Christian Mission” –Why do mission? What is the goal?, etc. -Start with J. Thompson, ch 4 “The Triune God and Mission” in his Modern Trinitarian Perspectives. JESUS -“Spirit Christology” – How does Jesus’ relationship with the Spirit affect one’s Christology? What implications might it have for Christian living? -Start with *C. Pinnock, ch 3 “Spirit and Christology” in his Flame of Love. -“Kenotic Christology” – What are some of the implications that Jesus was truly God and yet truly human? Can we speak of a ‘kenosis’ of God? -Start with R. Aldwinckle, ch 7 “Kenosis or Divine Self Limitation” in his More Than Man. SALVATION -“Interpreting the Meaning of the Cross” – What did the cross achieve? Explore and critique one of the atonement theories (moral influence, penal substitution/satisfaction, Christ the Victor). -Start with H. Boersma, Violence, Hospitality, and the Cross or G. Aulén, Christus Victor. -“Who does God Elect?” (or something else from TULIP) -Start with Why I am not an Arminian or Why I am not a Calvinist. ESCHATOLOGY -“When Will Jesus Return?” –Explore the significance of either the rapture or millenium debates. What significance do they have? What factors lead to the various interpretations regarding this idea (or one interpretation of it)? -Start with (* any chapter) The Millennium: Four Views, or Three Views on the Millennium or C. C. Hill, “Appendix: Not Left Behind” in his In God’s Time: The Bible and the Future. -“Is Hell Eternal?” –What is the nature of hell? What are the theological or practical implications? -Start with W. Crockett (ed., * any chapter), For Views on Hell. 5. Contemporary/Pastoral Theological Issues Paper Choose one of the topics below. You may wish to start with my suggested reading and focus on the broad issue creating your own dialogue and thesis, or you may wish to make your paper a response to one of the readings that are listed with a *. Begin by describing what theological issues are at stake and how this is the case (e.g., soteriology, doctrine of God, etc.). In your paper you will likely want to include various proposals that might be possible and how/why you would critique or agree with these possible proposals. You should conclude with (and your thesis statement should be) your own theological response to this issue. SALVATION -“Can Babies Be ‘Saved’?” –How have theologians discussed infant salvation? What doctrines are important in this discussion? -Start with *T. Tiessen, “Can Infants be Saved?” ch 10 in his Who Can be Saved?. 2 -“Christ and the Other Religions” –Is it possible to be saved by Christ but be a part of another religion? -Start with Okholm and Phillips (ed., * any chapter), Four View on Salvation in a Pluralistic World. “The Cross and Violence.” –Does the central place that the cross plays in Christian soteriology (i.e., we are saved through violence) perpetuate violence in society or in the Christian community? What role does violence have in salvation? -Start with H. Boersma, Violence, Hospitality, and the Cross and M. Volf, Exclusion and Embrace. CHURCH -“Theological Reasons For/Against the Ordination of Women”-What are the theological arguments people make in favor of or against the ordination of women? Evaluate and critique these, making clear which side of the debate you fall on and why. -There are now at least 3 ‘views’ books on women in ministry. (be careful that your paper remains a theology paper) ESCHATOLOGY -“A Theological Evaluation of the Left Behind Series” -Begin by outlining the theology implicit/explicit in the Left Behind books. Critique this theology (or one aspect of the theologies) using theological resources and arguments. -there are a number of articles/essays written responding to these books, but do not neglect the books that provide the substance of any critique; i.e., works on eschatology in general. LAST WORDS:1 -Do not use no double negative. -Verbs has to agree with their subjects. -Make each pronoun agree with their antecedent. -Do not write run on sentences since they are hard to follow and understand for those who are reading your thoughts and seeking to gain from your insights born of experience and careful reflection in this academic endeavor we rightfully treasure highly, as well we should. -About them sentence fragments. -Ones apostrophe's should be used correctly. -Don't use contractions in a formal essay. -Please sure be to grammar check. -Corect speling iz eesencheal. Withot it yure righting iz hard to reed and givs the empresheeon that yu do not no wat yu ar doeeng. -Do not trust your spelling checker, even if you think: “It plane lee marks four my revue miss steaks aye can knot sea. Weather eye am wrong oar write, it shows me strait a weigh.” (MSWord did not correct any of these words.) 1 Adopted from and quoting Prof. James Peterson of McMaster Divinity College (never forget to footnote your source, even if you don’t quote them word for word!) 3