Brave New World Aldous Huxley Dystopia Characters: 1. Bernard Marx – Is the central protagonist up until the visit to the Reservation. Embodies the theme of conformity, as he is not the standard of his class and does everything within his power to make up for it. Though he does not necessarily agree with certain elements of the “Brave New World,” Bernard still does his absolute best to fit in, become that which is acceptable in his society. Uses John as a means to gain acceptance. Wants to “go out” with Lenina. He and Helmholtz converse back and forth as to the faults of the society in which they live in. He and Mustapha Mond share but a few exchanges, though both involve the discussion of the incompatibility of truth and happiness. Oh, and no one really likes the small-for-his-size, assert-my authority-to-make-up-for-it Bernard. 2. John the Savage – The central protagonist once they visit his Reservation, John acts as the means to question the society of their “Brave New World.” All he ever read was Shakespeare, and that is what his emotions reflect. From the love/lust for Lenina down to his tragic suicide, John confuses Shakespeare for reality, which causes a whole other host of problems. He furthers mainly Helmholtz’s questioning of the A.F. society by introducing his “savage” elements into the collective intelligence. With “parents” being a bad word, the backwards thinking of John ultimately leads to the relocation of Helmholtz and Bernard, as they probe too deeply into that which keeps the society running smoothly. 3. Lenina – Though not a crucial character to the story, it is on Bernard’s and her date where the Savage is discovered. She also acts as John’s love interest/dilemma throughout his plight with the realities of the “Brave New World.” Supposedly quite pretty, she is the woman that all the guys are after. She ends up letting John sleep with her, rather, wanting him too, but John’s thoughts on love are more… monogamous than that of the BNW and so she, in a way, leads to his ultimate self-destruction. (Strumpet scene) 4. Helmholtz Watson – Helmholtz is not the most fully developed character, but he basically embodies everything that Bernard wants to be. Tall, smart, strong, Helmholtz gets any girl he wants and is well liked by everyone. He is, however, discontented with the current way of life. He and Bernard chatter back and forth as to what real happiness is, not just soma and Feelies, but true, lasting happiness. 5. Mustapha Mond – A more mysterious character, Mustapha Mond is the head honcho in the A.F. society. Ironically enough, he was a scientist who questioned the order of things as well. He however chose to maintain the happiness as opposed to finding truth. In doing so, he ended up with the job of controlling all that the general public sees, reads, hears, everything that must be censored, to maintain balance and happiness of course. Setting: Some 600 years into the future, a totalitarian state located in Europe A.F. (After Ford) is the B.C./A.D. used The resulting society is one based on “science,” but the actual science is very limited The physical Where is not so important as the When and Why, as the setting actually sets up the themes, not just the physical location Plays a very important part in setting up the “Happiness is Incompatible with Truth” debate, as everything is censored, monitored, controlled, and everyone is “happy.” Memorable Quotes: “Sixty-two thousand four hundred repetitions make one truth.” -Displays the efforts taken to make every person conform to the “norm” of the society into which he or she is to be decanted. “But I don't want comfort. I want God.” -John’s refusal of soma and his simultaneous subconscious rejection of the “Brave New World” for his old ways of belief in Gods of “savagery.” “All of the advantages of Christianity and alcohol; none of their defects.” -One of the first descriptions of soma in the novel, it is immediately compared, and is made greater than the two most consoling things in modern-day society: religion and alcohol. Plot Passages: “And if ever, by some unlucky chance, anything unpleasant should somehow happen, why, there's always soma to give you a holiday from the facts. And there's always soma to calm your anger, to reconcile you to your enemies, to make you patient and long-suffering. In the past you could only accomplish these things by making a great effort and after years of hard moral training. Now, you swallow two or three half-gramme tablets, and there you are. Anybody can be virtuous now. You can carry at least half your morality about in a bottle. Christianity without tears—that's what soma is.” -This passage explains the deeper purpose of soma, the drug is the cure-all for any problems that may arise. Anything and everything can be solved with a couple of tablets of the drug. “‘And that,’ put in the director sententiously, ‘that is the secret of happiness and virtue – liking what you’ve got to do. All conditioning aims at that: making people like their inescapable social destiny.” -Curtly and compactly explains the aim of all the decanting and the conditioning of the people they are literally creating, and indirectly the main goal of the society itself. To create entire classes of people where all that they know, all that they do, is that which “brings them joy”, sums up the “Brave New World” in but two sentences. "Alpha children wear grey. They work much harder than we do, because they're so frightfully clever. I'm awfully glad I'm a Beta, because I don't work so hard. And then we are much better than the Gammas and Deltas. Gammas are stupid. They all wear green, and Delta children wear khaki. Oh no, I don't want to play with Delta children. And Epsilons are still worse. They're too stupid to be able to read or write. Besides they wear black, which is such a beastly color. I'm so glad I'm a Beta." - One of the many subconscious reiterations, this particular quote gives those who listen to and repeat it the sense that they are the best class, whether they actually believe it or not, it is to be engrained into them that they should be glad to be their particular class. (Happiness is Incompatible with Truth) “Mother, monogamy, romance. High spurts the fountain; fierce and foamy the wild jet. The urge has but a single outlet. My love, my baby. No wonder those poor pre-moderns were mad and wicked and miserable. Their world didn't allow them to take things easily, didn't allow them to be sane, virtuous, happy. What with mothers and lovers, what with the prohibitions they were not conditioned to obey, what with the temptations and the lonely remorses, what with all the diseases and the endless isolating pain, what with the uncertainties and the poverty—they were forced to feel strongly. And feeling strongly (and strongly, what was more, in solitude, in hopelessly individual isolation), how could they be stable?” - Within this paragraph the justification of the censorship of “strong feelings” is made clear, as they are simply unstable. In order to have a stable society, there cannot be any unstable people, and therefore, no unstable emotion.