WHY ARE THERE NEGATIVE NUMBERS? NEGATIVE NUMBERS ARE NECESSARY TO DESCRIBE VALUES ON A SCALE THAT GOES BELOW ZERO. Consider the following situations Temperatures falling below 0˚C on a thermometer Elevators in a building that have floors below ground level Bank statements that show funds spent and funds deposited Coordinates on a grid with all four quadrants Bookkeeping for businesses If negative numbers didn’t exist, how would these be represented? So…Why do negative numbers “get bigger?” Look at the number line showing negative numbers, they seem to get 'bigger'. However, as the negative number gets bigger, the value gets lower. -10 is a larger number than -5, so it is further below zero. As you travel to the left on a number line the values of the numbers are less. when did the concept of negative numbers come into play? • In 200 BCE the Chinese used number rods to represent positive (red) and negative (black) numbers. However they did not accept negative numbers as solutions to problems. • In the 7th century, Brahmagupta used the idea of positive and negative numbers to represent fortunes and debts. He is accredited for setting the rules for dividing integers. • The western world could not accept negative numbers. As late as the 1500’s Europeans said “Zero signifies ‘nothing’, and it’s impossible for anything to be less than nothing.” • By publishing the solution to cubic equations In the sixteenth century, Girolamo Cardano helped negative gain acceptance. However, he called them “ficticious”. • Finally in the 19th century Caspar Wessel, Jean Argand, Augustus De morgan, George Peacock, William Hamilton and others began working of the “logic” of algebra and the definition of negative numbers became clearer. • Now negative numbers are built into mathematical models, Physical science, engineering and the commercial world. Why is a negative multiplied or divided by a positive a negative? • First let’s remember that Multiplication is repeated addition and division is the inverse of multiplication. • If we want to multiply 3(4), we are adding 3 sets of 4 giving us 12. So if we multiply 3(-4), we are adding 3 sets of -4 giving us -12. This can be shown by drawing out the symbols. - - - - - - - - - - - - = -12 • When multiplying -3(4), we need to think of this as “take away” 3 sets of 4. This leaves just the negatives so the answer is -12. To show this, we need to have sets of positive and negatives which when paired are zero. A positive plus a negative is zero. Without the pairs we would have nothing to take away. + + + + + + + + + + + + - --- ---- ---- Why is a negative multiplied or divided by a negative positive? • Think back to when we multiplied -3(4) and got -12 because we took away 3 sets of positive 4. We can show -3(-4) is the same way. We will again start with pairs of zeros. Now instead of taking away 3 sets of positive 4, we will take away 3 sets of -4 leaving us with 12 positives. + + + + + + + + + + + + -­‐ -­‐ -­‐ -­‐ -­‐ -­‐ -­‐ -­‐ -­‐ -­‐ -­‐ -­‐ -­‐-­‐ -­‐-­‐ -­‐-­‐ BIBLIOGRAPHY http://www.bbc.co.uk/skillswise/numbers/wholenumbers/whatarenumbers/negativenumbers/facts heet.shtml http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_and_non-negative_numbers http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath298.htm http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/sets/select/dm_pos_neg.html http://www.und.edu/instruct/lgeller/negnum.html http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/57864.html http://nrich.maths.org/public/viewer.php?obj_id=5961 http://www.basic-mathematics.com/history-of-negative-numbers.html http://www.ma.utexas.edu/users/mks/326K/Negnos.html Seife, Charles. ZERO,The Biography of a Dangerous Idea. New York, NY. Penguin Books, 2000. Coyner, Elizabeth, Brockhoff,Beverly. CPM Educational Program 2002. Foundations for Algebra: Year 1. Sacramento, CA. Ellerman, David P. The mathematics of double entry bookkeeping. Math. Mag. 58 (1985), no. 4, 226--233. (Reviewer: D. J. Struik.) SC: 90C99 (01A99 20G99), MR: 87a:90151.