Research Article On the Spectral Properties of the Weighted Mean

advertisement
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
International Journal of Analysis
Volume 2014, Article ID 786437, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/786437
Research Article
On the Spectral Properties of the Weighted Mean Difference
Operator 𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ) over the Sequence Space β„“1
P. Baliarsingh1 and S. Dutta2
1
Department of Mathematics, School of Applied Sciences, KIIT University,
Bhubaneswar 751024, India
2
Department of Mathematics, Utkal University, Vanivihar,
Bhubaneswar 751004, India
Correspondence should be addressed to P. Baliarsingh; pb.math10@gmail.com
Received 21 December 2013; Accepted 30 April 2014; Published 16 June 2014
Academic Editor: Baruch Cahlon
Copyright © 2014 P. Baliarsingh and S. Dutta. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly
cited.
In the present work the generalized weighted mean difference operator 𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ) has been introduced by combining the generalized
weighted mean and difference operator under certain special cases of sequences 𝑒 = (π‘’π‘˜ ) and V = (Vπ‘˜ ). For any two sequences 𝑒 and
V of either constant or strictly decreasing real numbers satisfying certain conditions the difference operator 𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ) is defined by
π‘˜
(𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ)π‘₯)π‘˜ = ∑𝑖=0 π‘’π‘˜ V𝑖 (π‘₯𝑖 − π‘₯𝑖−1 ) with π‘₯π‘˜ = 0 for all π‘˜ < 0. Furthermore, we compute the spectrum and the fine spectrum of the
operator 𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ) over the sequence space β„“1 . In fact, we determine the spectrum, the point spectrum, the residual spectrum, and
the continuous spectrum of this operator on the sequence space β„“1 .
1. Introduction, Preliminaries, and Definitions
Let 𝑒 = (π‘’π‘˜ ) and V = (Vπ‘˜ ) be two bounded sequences of either
constant or strictly decreasing positive real numbers such that
π‘’π‘˜ =ΜΈ 0 and Vπ‘˜ =ΜΈ 0 for all π‘˜, and
lim π‘’π‘˜ = 𝑒,
π‘˜σ³¨€→∞
󡄨󡄨 V − V 󡄨󡄨
󡄨
π‘˜+1 󡄨󡄨
lim 󡄨󡄨󡄨 π‘˜
󡄨=1
π‘˜σ³¨€→∞ 󡄨󡄨 Vπ‘˜−1 − Vπ‘˜ 󡄨󡄨󡄨
(1)
(for strictly decreasing sequence) .
(2)
By β„“1 and 𝑏V𝑝 , we denote the spaces of all absolutely
summable and p-bounded variation series, respectively. Also,
by β„“∞ , 𝑐, and 𝑐0 , we denote the spaces of all bounded, convergent, and null sequences, respectively. The main perception
of this paper is to introduce the weighted mean difference
operator 𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ) as follows.
Let π‘₯ = (π‘₯π‘˜ ) be any sequence in β„“1 , and we define the
weighted mean difference transform 𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ)π‘₯ of π‘₯ by
π‘˜
(𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ) π‘₯)π‘˜ = ∑π‘’π‘˜ V𝑖 (π‘₯𝑖 − π‘₯𝑖−1 )
𝑖=0
(π‘˜ ∈ N0 ) ,
(3)
where N0 denotes the set of nonnegative integers and we
assume throughout that any term with negative subscript is
zero. Instead of writing (3), the operator 𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ) can be
expressed as a lower triangular matrix (π‘”π‘›π‘˜ ), where
π‘”π‘›π‘˜
π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜ ,
{
{
{
= {π‘’π‘˜ (Vπ‘˜ − Vπ‘˜+1 ) ,
{
{
{0,
(π‘˜ = 𝑛) ,
(0 ≤ π‘˜ ≤ 𝑛 − 1) ,
(4)
(π‘˜ > 0) .
Equivalently, in componentwise the triangle (π‘”π‘›π‘˜ ) can be
represented by
2
International Journal of Analysis
𝑒0 V0
𝑒1 (V0 − V1 )
0
𝑒1 V1
0
0
0
0
(
𝑒2 V2
0
(π‘”π‘›π‘˜ ) = (𝑒2 (V0 − V1 ) 𝑒2 (V1 − V2 )
𝑒3 (V0 − V1 ) 𝑒3 (V1 − V2 ) 𝑒3 (V2 − V3 ) 𝑒3 V3
..
..
..
..
.
.
.
.
(
The main objective of this paper is to determine the spectrum of the operator 𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ) over the basic sequence space
β„“1 . The operator 𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ) has been studied by Polat et al.
[1] in detail by introducing the difference sequence spaces
β„“∞ (𝑒, V; Δ), 𝑐0 (𝑒, V; Δ), and 𝑐(𝑒, V; Δ). In the existing literature
several researchers have been actively engaged in finding
the spectrum and fine spectrum of different bounded linear
operators over various sequence spaces. The spectrum of
weighted mean operator has been studied by Rhoades [2],
whereas that of the difference operator Δ over the sequence
spaces ℓ𝑝 for 0 < 𝑝 < 1 and 𝑐, 𝑐0 has been studied by Altay and
Başar [3, 4]. Kayaduman and Furkan [5] have determined the
fine spectrum of the difference operator Δ over the sequence
spaces β„“1 and 𝑏V𝑝 and on generalizing these results, Srivastava
and Kumar [6, 7] have determined the fine spectrum of the
operator Δ ] over the sequence spaces β„“1 and 𝑐0 , where (]π‘˜ ) is
a sequence of either constant or strictly deceasing sequence of
reals satisfying certain conditions. Dutta and Baliarsingh [8–
10] have computed the spectrum of the operator Δπ‘Ÿ] (π‘Ÿ ∈ N0 )
and Δ2 over the sequence spaces β„“1 , 𝑐0 , and 𝑐0 , respectively.
The fine spectrum of the generalized difference operators
𝐡(π‘Ÿ, 𝑠) and 𝐡(π‘Ÿ, 𝑠, 𝑑) over the sequence spaces ℓ𝑝 , 𝑏V𝑝 and β„“1 ,
𝑏V has been studied by BilgicΜ§ and Furkan [11, 12], respectively.
Recently, the spectrum of some particular limitation matrices
in certain sequence spaces has been studied by [13–15] and
many others.
Let 𝑋 and π‘Œ be Banach spaces and 𝑇 : 𝑋 󳨀→ π‘Œ be a
bounded linear operator. By R(𝑇), we denote the range of 𝑇;
that is,
R (𝑇) = {𝑦 ∈ π‘Œ : 𝑦 = 𝑇π‘₯; π‘₯ ∈ 𝑋} .
0 ⋅⋅⋅ )
).
0 ⋅⋅⋅
..
. d )
(5)
concerned with those properties. We are interested in the
set of all πœ†’s in the complex plane such that π‘‡πœ†−1 exists/π‘‡πœ†−1
is bounded/domain of π‘‡πœ†−1 is dense in 𝑋. Now, we state the
following results which are essential for our investigation.
Definition 1 (see [16, page 371]). Let 𝑋 =ΜΈ {0} be normed linear
space over the complex field and 𝑇 : 𝐷(𝑇) 󳨀→ 𝑋 be a linear
operator with domain 𝐷(𝑇) ⊆ 𝑋. A regular value of 𝑇 is a
complex number πœ† such that
(R1) π‘‡πœ†−1 exists;
(R2) π‘‡πœ†−1 is bounded;
(R3) π‘‡πœ†−1 is defined on a set which is dense in 𝑋.
The resolvent set 𝜌(𝑇, 𝑋) of 𝑇 is the set of all regular
values of 𝑇. Its complement 𝜎(𝑇, 𝑋) = C \ 𝜌(𝑇, 𝑋) in the
complex plane C is called the spectrum of 𝑇. Furthermore,
the spectrum 𝜌(𝑇, 𝑋) is partitioned into three disjoint sets as
follows.
(I) Point Spectrum πœŽπ‘ (𝑇, 𝑋). It is the set of all πœ† ∈ C such
that (R1) does not hold. The elements of πœŽπ‘ (𝑇, 𝑋) are
called eigen values of 𝑇.
(II) Continuous Spectrum πœŽπ‘ (𝑇, 𝑋). It is the set of all πœ† ∈ C
such that (R1) holds and satisfies (R3) but does not
satisfy (R2).
(III) Residual Spectrum πœŽπ‘Ÿ (𝑇, 𝑋). It is the set of all πœ† ∈
C such that (R1) holds but does not satisfy (R3).
Condition (R2) may or may not hold.
(6)
By 𝐡(𝑋), we denote the set of all bounded linear operators
on 𝑋 into itself. If 𝑋 is any Banach space and 𝑇 ∈ 𝐡(𝑋) then
the adjoint 𝑇∗ of 𝑇 is a bounded linear operator on the dual
𝑋∗ of 𝑋 defined by (𝑇∗ πœ™)(π‘₯) = πœ™(𝑇π‘₯) for all πœ™ ∈ 𝑋∗ and
π‘₯ ∈ 𝑋 with ‖𝑇‖ = ‖𝑇∗ β€–.
Let 𝑋 =ΜΈ {0} be a normed linear space over the complex
field and 𝑇 : 𝐷(𝑇) 󳨀→ 𝑋 be a linear operator, where 𝐷(𝑇)
denotes the domain of 𝑇. With 𝑇, for a complex number πœ†, we
associate an operator π‘‡πœ† = (𝑇 − πœ†πΌ), where 𝐼 is called identity
operator on 𝐷(𝑇) and if π‘‡πœ† has an inverse, we denote it by
π‘‡πœ†−1 , that is,
π‘‡πœ†−1 = (𝑇 − πœ†πΌ)−1
0 ⋅⋅⋅
0 ⋅⋅⋅
(7)
and is called the resolvent operator of 𝑇. Many properties
of π‘‡πœ† and π‘‡πœ†−1 depend on πœ† and the spectral theory is
Goldberg’s Classification of the Operator π‘‡πœ† (see [17], page 58–
71). Let 𝑋 be a Banach space and π‘‡πœ† = (𝑇−πœ†πΌ) ∈ 𝐡(𝑋), where
πœ† is a complex number. Again, let 𝑅(π‘‡πœ† ) and π‘‡πœ†−1 denote the
range and inverse of the operator π‘‡πœ† , respectively. Then the
following possibilities may occur:
(A) 𝑅(π‘‡πœ† ) = 𝑋;
(B) 𝑅(π‘‡πœ† ) =ΜΈ 𝑅(π‘‡πœ† ) = 𝑋;
(C) 𝑅(π‘‡πœ† ) =ΜΈ 𝑋
and
(1) π‘‡πœ† is injective and π‘‡πœ†−1 is continuous;
(2) π‘‡πœ† is injective and π‘‡πœ†−1 is discontinuous;
(3) π‘‡πœ† is not injective.
International Journal of Analysis
3
Taking permutations (A), (B), (C) and (1), (2), (3), we get
nine different states. These are labelled by 𝐴 1 , 𝐴 2 , 𝐴 3 , 𝐡1 , 𝐡2 ,
𝐡3 , 𝐢1 , 𝐢2 , and 𝐢3 . If πœ† is a complex number such that π‘‡πœ† ∈
𝐴 1 or π‘‡πœ† ∈ 𝐡1 , then πœ† is in the resolvent set 𝜌(𝑇, 𝑋) of 𝑇
on 𝑋. The other classifications give rise to the fine spectrum
of 𝑇. We use πœ† ∈ 𝐡2 𝜎(𝑇, 𝑋) which means the operator π‘‡πœ† ∈
𝐡2 , that is, 𝑅(π‘‡πœ† ) =ΜΈ 𝑅(π‘‡πœ† ) = 𝑋 and π‘‡πœ† is injective but π‘‡πœ†−1 is
discontinuous; similarly are the others.
Lemma 2 (see [17, page 59]). A linear operator 𝑇 has a dense
range if and only if the adjoint 𝑇∗ is one to one.
Lemma 3 (see [17, page 60]). The adjoint operator 𝑇∗ is onto
if and and only if 𝑇 has a bounded inverse.
Let 𝑃, 𝑄 be two nonempty subsets of the space 𝑀 of all
real or complex sequences and let 𝐴 = (π‘Žπ‘›π‘˜ ) be an infinite
matrix of complex numbers π‘Žπ‘›π‘˜ , where 𝑛, π‘˜ ∈ N0 . For every
π‘₯ = (π‘₯π‘˜ ) ∈ 𝑃, we write
𝐴 𝑛 (π‘₯) = ∑π‘Žπ‘›π‘˜ π‘₯π‘˜
(𝑛 ∈ N) .
π‘˜
Lemma 4 (see [18, page 126]). The matrix 𝐴 = (π‘Žπ‘›π‘˜ ) gives rise
to a bounded linear operator 𝑇 ∈ 𝐡(β„“1 ) from β„“1 to itself if and
only if the supremum β„“1 norms of the columns of 𝐴 is bounded.
Lemma 5 (see [19], Theorem 2). If π‘Žπ‘˜ (0) =ΜΈ 0 for all π‘˜ ∈ N0 ,
then the inverse of the difference operator 𝐡(π‘Ž[π‘š]) is given by
a lower triangular Toeplitz matrix 𝐢 = (π‘π‘›π‘˜ ) as follows:
1
,
(π‘˜ = 𝑛) ,
{
{
{
π‘Ž
(0)
𝑛
{
{
{
{ (−1)𝑛−π‘˜
{
{
{
π‘π‘›π‘˜ = { ∏𝑛𝑗=π‘˜ π‘Žπ‘— (0)
{
{
{
{
(π‘˜)
{
{
×𝐷𝑛−π‘˜
(π‘Ž [π‘š]) , (0 ≤ π‘˜ ≤ 𝑛 − 1) ,
{
{
{
(π‘˜ > 𝑛) ,
{0,
(𝑛, π‘˜ ∈ N0 ) ,
(8)
The sequence 𝐴π‘₯ = (𝐴 𝑛 (π‘₯)), if it exists, is called the
transformation of π‘₯ by the matrix 𝐴. Infinite matrix 𝐴 ∈
(𝑃, 𝑄) if and only if 𝐴π‘₯ ∈ 𝑄 whenever π‘₯ ∈ 𝑃.
where (𝐡(π‘Ž[π‘š])π‘₯)π‘˜ = π‘Žπ‘˜ (0)π‘₯π‘˜ + π‘Žπ‘˜−1 (1)π‘₯π‘˜−1 + ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ +
π‘Žπ‘˜−π‘š (π‘š)π‘₯π‘˜−π‘š , (π‘˜ ∈ N0 ) and
󡄨󡄨 π‘Ž (1)
π‘Žπ‘˜+1 (0)
0
⋅⋅⋅
0
0
⋅⋅⋅
0 󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨 π‘˜
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨 π‘Žπ‘˜ (2)
π‘Žπ‘˜+1 (1)
π‘Žπ‘˜+2 (0)
⋅⋅⋅
0
0
⋅⋅⋅
0 󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨
󡄨󡄨󡄨 .
..
..
..
..
..
..
.. 󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨 ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
. 󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨
⋅⋅⋅
π‘Žπ‘š−1 (1) π‘Žπ‘š (0) ⋅ ⋅ ⋅
0 󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨 .
𝐷𝑛(π‘˜) (π‘Ž [π‘š]) = σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Žπ‘˜ (π‘š) π‘Žπ‘˜+1 (π‘š − 1) π‘Žπ‘˜+2 (π‘š − 2)
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨 0
⋅⋅⋅
π‘Žπ‘š−1 (2) π‘Žπ‘š (1) ⋅ ⋅ ⋅
0 󡄨󡄨󡄨
π‘Žπ‘˜+1 (π‘š) π‘Žπ‘˜+2 (π‘š − 1)
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨 ..
..
..
..
..
..
.. 󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨 .
.
.
.
.
.
d
. 󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨 0
⋅⋅⋅
⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ π‘Žπ‘›−1 (1)󡄨󡄨󡄨
0
⋅⋅⋅
π‘Žπ‘›−π‘š (π‘š)
2. The Spectrum of the Operator 𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ)
over the Sequence β„“1
In this section, we compute the spectrum, the point spectrum,
the continuous spectrum, and the residual spectrum of the
difference matrix 𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ) on the sequence space β„“1 .
Theorem 6. The operator 𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ) : β„“1 󳨀→ β„“1 is a linear
operator and
(10)
(i) If (π‘’π‘˜ ) is a strictly decreasing sequence and (Vπ‘˜ ) is a
constant sequence of positive reals (say Vπ‘˜ = V for all
π‘˜), then
‖𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ)β€–(β„“1 :β„“1 ) = 𝑒0 V.
(12)
(ii) If (π‘’π‘˜ ) and (Vπ‘˜ ) are strictly decreasing sequences of
positive reals, then
‖𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ)β€–(β„“1 :β„“1 ) = 𝑒0 V0 .
(13)
(iii) If (π‘’π‘˜ ) and (Vπ‘˜ ) are constant sequences of positive
reals, then
𝑛−1
󡄨 󡄨
󡄨
󡄨 󡄨 󡄨
‖𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ)β€–(β„“1 :β„“1 ) = sup 󡄨󡄨󡄨𝑒𝑛 󡄨󡄨󡄨 ( ∑ 󡄨󡄨󡄨Vπ‘˜ − Vπ‘˜+1 󡄨󡄨󡄨 + 󡄨󡄨󡄨V𝑛 󡄨󡄨󡄨) .
𝑛
(9)
‖𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ)β€–(β„“1 :β„“1 ) = 𝑒V.
π‘˜=0
(11)
Proof. Proof of this theorem follows from Lemma 4 and in
particular cases.
(14)
(iv) If (π‘’π‘˜ ) is a constant sequence and (Vπ‘˜ ) is a strictly
decreasing sequence of positive reals, then
‖𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ)β€–(β„“1 :β„“1 ) = 𝑒V0 .
(15)
4
International Journal of Analysis
Theorem 7. The spectrum of 𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ) over the sequence space
β„“1 is given by
Proof. The proof is divided into four parts as follows.
Let (π‘’π‘˜ ) and (Vπ‘˜ ) be two bounded sequences of positive
reals satisfying (1) and (2) and πœ† ∈ C such that |(πœ† −
π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜+1 )/(πœ† − π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜ )| < 1 for all π‘˜ ∈ N0 ; then (𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ) − πœ†πΌ)
is a triangle and hence has an inverse, that is,
󡄨󡄨 πœ† − 𝑒 V 󡄨󡄨
󡄨
π‘˜ π‘˜+1 󡄨󡄨
𝜎 (𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ) , β„“1 ) = {πœ† ∈ C : 󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨 ≥ 1; (π‘˜ ∈ N0 )} .
󡄨󡄨 πœ† − π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜ 󡄨󡄨󡄨
(16)
(𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ) − πœ†πΌ)−1
1
0
𝑒0 V0 − πœ†
0
0
(
(
𝑒 (V − V1 )
1
(
− 11 0
0
0
(
(
𝑒
V
∏𝑗=0 (𝑒𝑗 V𝑗 − πœ†)
1 1−πœ†
(
(
(
=(
𝑒 (V − V2 )
𝑒2 (V0 − V1 ) (πœ† − 𝑒1 V2 )
1
(
− 22 1
0
(
2
𝑒
V
(
(𝑒
V
−
πœ†)
(𝑒
V
−
πœ†)
∏
∏
2 2−πœ†
𝑗
𝑗
𝑗
𝑗
𝑗=0
𝑗=1
(
(
(
( 𝑒3 (V0 − V1 ) (πœ† − 𝑒1 V2 ) (πœ† − 𝑒2 V3 ) 𝑒3 (V1 − V2 ) (πœ† − 𝑒2 V3 )
𝑒 (V − V3 )
1
(−
− 33 2
3
3
∏𝑗=0 (𝑒𝑗 V𝑗 − πœ†)
∏𝑗=1 (𝑒𝑗 V𝑗 − πœ†)
∏𝑗=2 (𝑒𝑗 V𝑗 − πœ†) 𝑒3 V3 − πœ†
..
..
..
..
.
.
.
.
(
⋅⋅⋅
⋅⋅⋅
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
).
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
d
)
⋅⋅⋅
⋅⋅⋅
(17)
In general, by using Lemma 5, we observe that
󡄨󡄨𝑒 (V − V ) (𝑒 V − πœ†)
0
󡄨󡄨 π‘˜+1 π‘˜
π‘˜+1
π‘˜+1 π‘˜+1
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨𝑒 (V − V ) 𝑒 (V − V ) (𝑒 V − πœ†)
󡄨󡄨 π‘˜+2 π‘˜
π‘˜+1
π‘˜+2 π‘˜+1
π‘˜+2
π‘˜+2 π‘˜+2
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
(π‘˜)
𝐷𝑛 (𝑒, V, πœ†) = σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘’π‘˜+3 (Vπ‘˜ − Vπ‘˜+1 ) π‘’π‘˜+3 (Vπ‘˜+1 − Vπ‘˜+2 ) π‘’π‘˜+3 (Vπ‘˜+2 − Vπ‘˜+3 )
󡄨󡄨
..
..
..
󡄨󡄨󡄨
.
.
.
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨 𝑒𝑛 (Vπ‘˜ − Vπ‘˜+1 ) 𝑒𝑛 (Vπ‘˜+1 − Vπ‘˜+2 ) 𝑒𝑛 (Vπ‘˜+2 − Vπ‘˜+3 )
= (Vπ‘˜ − Vπ‘˜+1 ) (Vπ‘˜+1 − Vπ‘˜+2 ) ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ 𝑒𝑛 (V𝑛−1 − V𝑛 ) × (π‘’π‘˜+1 −
× (π‘’π‘˜+2 −
((𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ) − πœ†πΌ)−1 )𝑛,π‘˜
𝑛−1 (πœ† − 𝑒 V
(Vπ‘˜ − Vπ‘˜+1 ) 𝑒𝑛
𝑗 𝑗+1 )
.
∏
(π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜ − πœ†) (𝑒𝑛 V𝑛 − πœ†) 𝑗=π‘˜+1 (𝑒𝑗 V𝑗 − πœ†)
By using Lemma 4, we obtain that
0
⋅⋅⋅
0
⋅⋅⋅
0
d
..
.
⋅ ⋅ ⋅ 𝑒𝑛 (V𝑛−1 − V𝑛 )
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨
(π‘’π‘˜+1 Vπ‘˜+1 − πœ†)
)
(Vπ‘˜+1 − Vπ‘˜+2 )
(π‘’π‘˜+2 Vπ‘˜+2 − πœ†)
(𝑒 V − πœ†)
) × ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ × (𝑒𝑛−1 − 𝑛−1 𝑛−1
).
(Vπ‘˜+2 − Vπ‘˜+3 )
(V𝑛−1 − V𝑛 )
Therefore, for all 𝑛 = π‘˜, ((𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ) − πœ†πΌ)−1 )𝑛,π‘˜ = 1/(𝑒𝑛 V𝑛 − πœ†),
for all π‘˜ > 𝑛, ((𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ) − πœ†πΌ)−1 )𝑛,π‘˜ = 0, and for all 0 ≤ π‘˜ < 𝑛
one can deduce that
=
⋅⋅⋅
(19)
σ΅„©
σ΅„©σ΅„©
σ΅„©σ΅„©(𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ) − πœ†πΌ)−1 σ΅„©σ΅„©σ΅„©
σ΅„©(β„“1 :β„“1 )
σ΅„©
𝑛 󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨
= sup ∑ 󡄨󡄨󡄨((𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ) − πœ†πΌ)−1 )𝑛,π‘˜ 󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨
󡄨
𝑛
π‘˜=0
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨 𝑛−1 󡄨󡄨󡄨
(Vπ‘˜ − Vπ‘˜+1 ) 𝑒𝑛
1
󡄨
󡄨󡄨
≤ sup (󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨 + ∑ 󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨 𝑒𝑛 V𝑛 − πœ† 󡄨󡄨 π‘˜=0 󡄨󡄨 (π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜ − πœ†) (𝑒𝑛 V𝑛 − πœ†)
𝑛
󡄨
(πœ† − 𝑒𝑗 V𝑗+1 ) 󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨)
×∏
󡄨󡄨
𝑗=π‘˜+1 (𝑒𝑗 V𝑗 − πœ†) 󡄨󡄨
𝑛−1
(18)
International Journal of Analysis
5
󡄨
𝑛−1 󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
1
󡄨󡄨 (Vπ‘˜ − Vπ‘˜+1 ) 𝑒𝑛 󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨
󡄨󡄨
(1
+
= sup 󡄨󡄨󡄨
∑
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
𝑛 󡄨󡄨 𝑒𝑛 V𝑛 − πœ† 󡄨󡄨
󡄨 (π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜ − πœ†) 󡄨󡄨󡄨
π‘˜=0 󡄨
󡄨󡄨
𝑛−1 󡄨󡄨󡄨 (πœ† − 𝑒 V
󡄨
𝑗 𝑗+1 ) 󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨)
× ∏ 󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
󡄨
𝑗=π‘˜+1 󡄨󡄨 (𝑒𝑗 V𝑗 − πœ†) 󡄨󡄨
󡄨
𝑛−1 󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨 𝑒
󡄨󡄨
1
󡄨 (Vπ‘˜ − Vπ‘˜+1 ) 󡄨󡄨󡄨 𝑛−1 󡄨󡄨 󡄨󡄨
󡄨
󡄨󡄨
𝑛
󡄨󡄨 ∏ σ΅„¨π‘Ÿπœ† 󡄨)
≤ sup 󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨 ( 󡄨󡄨 󡄨󡄨 + ∑ 󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨
𝑛 󡄨󡄨 𝑒𝑛 V𝑛 − πœ† 󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨𝑒𝑛 󡄨󡄨 π‘˜=0 󡄨󡄨 (π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜ − πœ†) 󡄨󡄨󡄨 𝑗=π‘˜+1 󡄨 󡄨
󡄨󡄨 𝑄 𝑒 󡄨󡄨
1
1 𝑛−1󡄨󡄨 󡄨󡄨𝑛−π‘˜−1
󡄨
󡄨
≤ sup 󡄨󡄨󡄨 πœ† 𝑛 󡄨󡄨󡄨 ( 󡄨󡄨
+
)
󡄨
󡄨
σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿπœ† 󡄨󡄨󡄨 ∑ σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿπœ† 󡄨󡄨
𝑛 󡄨󡄨 𝑒𝑛 V𝑛 − πœ† 󡄨󡄨 σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘„πœ† 𝑒𝑛 󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨 󡄨 π‘˜=0
󡄨 󡄨𝑛−1
󡄨󡄨 𝑄 𝑒 󡄨󡄨
1 − σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿπœ† 󡄨󡄨󡄨
1
1
󡄨
󡄨
+
(
= sup 󡄨󡄨󡄨 πœ† 𝑛 󡄨󡄨󡄨 [ 󡄨󡄨
󡄨 󡄨󡄨 󡄨󡄨
󡄨 󡄨 )] < ∞.
𝑛 󡄨󡄨 𝑒𝑛 V𝑛 − πœ† 󡄨󡄨 σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘„πœ† 𝑒𝑛 󡄨󡄨󡄨
1 − σ΅„¨σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿπœ† 󡄨󡄨󡄨
σ΅„¨σ΅„¨π‘Ÿπœ† 󡄨󡄨
(20)
For simplicity, we write π‘„πœ† = supπ‘˜ ((Vπ‘˜ − Vπ‘˜+1 )/(π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜ − πœ†)) and
π‘Ÿπœ† = sup𝑗 ((πœ† − 𝑒𝑗 V𝑗+1 )/(𝑒𝑗 V𝑗 − πœ†)). Since (π‘’π‘˜ ) and (Vπ‘˜ ) are two
bounded sequences of positive reals, the quantity π‘„πœ† is finite.
As per the assumption, πœ† ∈ C and |(πœ†−π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜+1 )/(πœ†−π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜ )| < 1
for all π‘˜ ∈ N0 . Therefore, |π‘Ÿπœ† | < 1. Now, we consider the four
possible cases of the sequences (π‘’π‘˜ ) and (Vπ‘˜ ).
Case 1. If (π‘’π‘˜ ) and (Vπ‘˜ ) are strictly decreasing sequences
of positive reals, then from the above relation we have
(𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ) − πœ†πΌ)−1 ∈ (β„“1 : β„“1 ). Thus,
󡄨󡄨󡄨 πœ† − π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜+1 󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨 ≥ 1; (π‘˜ ∈ N0 )} .
𝜎 (𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ) , β„“1 ) ⊆ {πœ† ∈ C : 󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨
󡄨󡄨 πœ† − π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜ 󡄨󡄨
(21)
Conversely, consider πœ† =ΜΈ π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜ and |(πœ†−π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜+1 )/(πœ†−π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜ )| ≥ 1
for all π‘˜ ∈ N0 , and clearly (𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ) − πœ†πΌ) is a triangle and
hence (𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ) − πœ†πΌ)−1 exists, but β€– (𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ) − πœ†πΌ)−1 β€–(β„“1 :β„“1 )
is not finite. Again, for πœ† = π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜ , the matrix (𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ) −
π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜ 𝐼)(π‘˜ ∈ N0 ) is not invertible. Thus,
󡄨󡄨 πœ† − 𝑒 V 󡄨󡄨
󡄨
π‘˜ π‘˜+1 󡄨󡄨
{πœ† ∈ C : 󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨 ≥ 1; (π‘˜ ∈ N0 )} ⊆ 𝜎 (𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ) , β„“1 ) .
󡄨󡄨 πœ† − π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜ 󡄨󡄨󡄨
(22)
Since 𝑄 = 0, β€–(𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ) − πœ†πΌ)−1 β€–(β„“1 :β„“1 ) = sup𝑛 |1/(𝑒𝑛 V − πœ†)| <
∞ and the rest part of the proof is similar to that of Case 1.
Case 3. If (π‘’π‘˜ ) and (Vπ‘˜ ) are constant sequences of positive
reals, then the proof is similar to that of Case 2 and only the
difference is β€–(𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ) − πœ†πΌ)−1 β€–(β„“1 :β„“1 ) = |1/𝑒V − πœ†| < ∞.
Case 4. If (π‘’π‘˜ ) is constant sequence and (Vπ‘˜ ) is strictly
decreasing sequence of positive reals, then the proof is similar
to that of Case 1.
Theorem 8. The point spectrum of the operator 𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ) over
β„“1 is given by
π‘’π‘˜ V,
πœŽπ‘ (𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ) , β„“1 ) = {
0,
(𝑖𝑓 (Vπ‘˜ ) 𝑖𝑠 π‘Ž π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘ π‘’π‘žπ‘’π‘’π‘›π‘π‘’)
(π‘œπ‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘€π‘–π‘ π‘’) .
(24)
Proof. Suppose π‘₯ ∈ β„“1 and consider the system of linear
equations 𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ)π‘₯ = πœ†π‘₯ for π‘₯ =ΜΈ 0 = {0, 0, 0, . . .} in β„“1 ,
𝑒0 V0 π‘₯0 = πœ†π‘₯0
𝑒1 (V0 − V1 ) π‘₯0 + 𝑒1 V1 π‘₯1 = πœ†π‘₯1
𝑒2 (V0 − V1 ) π‘₯0 + 𝑒2 (V1 − V2 ) π‘₯1 + 𝑒2 V2 π‘₯2 = πœ†π‘₯2
..
.
𝑒𝑛 (V0 − V1 ) π‘₯0 + 𝑒𝑛 (V1 − V2 ) π‘₯1 + ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ + 𝑒𝑛 V𝑛 π‘₯𝑛 = πœ†π‘₯𝑛
..
.
(25)
On solving the system of (25), we obtain that πœ† = 𝑒0 V0
whenever π‘₯0 =ΜΈ 0 and
π‘₯1 =
𝑒1 (V0 − V1 )
π‘₯
𝑒0 V0 − 𝑒1 V1 0
Combining (21) and (22) we complete the proof for this
case.
π‘₯2 =
𝑒2 (V0 − V1 ) (𝑒0 V0 − 𝑒1 V2 )
π‘₯ and in general
(𝑒0 V0 − 𝑒1 V1 ) (𝑒0 V0 − 𝑒2 V2 ) 0
Case 2. If (π‘’π‘˜ ) is a strictly decreasing sequence and (Vπ‘˜ ) is a
constant sequence of positive reals, then
π‘₯𝑛 =
𝑒𝑛 (V0 − V1 ) 𝑛−1 𝑒0 V0 − 𝑒𝑗 V𝑗+1
π‘₯.
∏
𝑒0 V0 − 𝑒𝑛 V𝑛 𝑗=1 𝑒0 V0 − 𝑒𝑗 V𝑗 0
(𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ) − πœ†πΌ)−1
1
𝑒0 V − πœ†
(
(
(
=(
(
(
(
(
(26)
Now, we have the following cases.
0
0
0
⋅⋅⋅
0
1
𝑒1 V − πœ†
0
0
0
0
1
𝑒2 V − πœ†
0
0
0
0
⋅ ⋅ ⋅)
)
)
⋅ ⋅ ⋅)
).
)
)
⋅⋅⋅
..
.
..
.
..
.
1
𝑒3 V − πœ†
..
.
d)
(23)
Case 1. If (π‘’π‘˜ ) and (Vπ‘˜ ) are strictly decreasing sequences
of positive reals, then we need to show that |(𝑒0 V0 −
𝑒𝑗 V𝑗+1 )/(𝑒0 V0 − 𝑒𝑗 V𝑗 )| ≥ 1. Suppose, for the contrary, if
|(𝑒0 V0 − 𝑒𝑗 V𝑗+1 )/(𝑒0 V0 − 𝑒𝑗 V𝑗 )| < 1, then V𝑗+1 > V𝑗 which
contradicts the fact that (Vπ‘˜ ) is strictly decreasing sequence.
Therefore, π‘₯ ∉ β„“1 and hence πœŽπ‘ (𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ), β„“1 ) = 0.
Case 2. If (π‘’π‘˜ ) is a strictly decreasing and (Vπ‘˜ ) is a constant sequence of positive reals, then for all π‘˜ ∈ N0 ,
πœ† = π‘’π‘˜ V is an eigen value corresponding to the eigen
6
International Journal of Analysis
vector π‘₯ = {0, 0, . . . , 0, 1, 0, . . .} whose π‘˜th entry is 1. Thus,
πœŽπ‘ (𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ), β„“1 ) = π‘’π‘˜ V.
Case 3. If (π‘’π‘˜ ) and (Vπ‘˜ ) are constant sequences of positive
reals, then the proof is similar to that of Case 2 and
πœŽπ‘ (𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ), β„“1 ) = 𝑒V.
Case 4. If (π‘’π‘˜ ) is a constant and (Vπ‘˜ ) is a strictly decreasing
sequence of positive reals, then the proof is similar to that of
Case 1.
Theorem 9. The point spectrum of the dual operator
(𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ))∗ over the sequence space β„“1∗ β‰Š β„“∞ is given by
(𝑖𝑓 (Vπ‘˜ ) 𝑖𝑠 π‘Ž π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘ π‘’π‘žπ‘’π‘’π‘›π‘π‘’)
𝑒 V,
{
{ π‘˜
󡄨󡄨 πœ† − 𝑒 V 󡄨󡄨
πœŽπ‘ ((𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ))∗ , β„“∞ ) = {
π‘˜ π‘˜+1 󡄨󡄨
{{πœ† ∈ C : 󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨 πœ† − 𝑒 V 󡄨󡄨󡄨 > 1; (π‘˜ ∈ N0 )} , (π‘œπ‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘€π‘–π‘ π‘’) .
󡄨
{
π‘˜ π‘˜ 󡄨
Proof. Consider (𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ))∗ 𝑓 = πœ†π‘“ and 0 =ΜΈ 𝑓 ∈ β„“1 , and then
the system of equations
Vπ‘˜ − Vπ‘˜+1 (πœ† − π‘’π‘˜−1 Vπ‘˜−1 )
(
𝑓 − π‘’π‘˜ π‘“π‘˜ ) .
πœ† − π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜
(Vπ‘˜−1 − Vπ‘˜ ) π‘˜−1
(31)
Therefore, by using ratio text, it is observed that
𝑒1 V1 𝑓1 + (V1 − V2 ) 𝑒2 𝑓2 + (V1 − V2 ) 𝑒3 𝑓3 + ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ = πœ†π‘“1
󡄨󡄨 (V − V ) (πœ† − 𝑒 V ) 󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨 𝑓 󡄨󡄨
󡄨
󡄨
󡄨
π‘˜+1
π‘˜−1 π‘˜−1 󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨 .
lim 󡄨󡄨󡄨 π‘˜ 󡄨󡄨󡄨 = lim 󡄨󡄨󡄨󡄨 π‘˜
π‘˜σ³¨€→∞ 󡄨󡄨 π‘“π‘˜−1 󡄨󡄨
π‘˜σ³¨€→∞ 󡄨󡄨 (Vπ‘˜−1 − Vπ‘˜ ) (πœ† − π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜+1 ) 󡄨󡄨󡄨
Now, we have the following cases.
𝑒2 V2 𝑓2 + (V2 − V3 ) 𝑒3 𝑓3 + (V2 − V3 ) 𝑒4 𝑓4 + ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ = πœ†π‘“2
..
.
(32)
Case 1. If (π‘’π‘˜ ) and (Vπ‘˜ ) are strictly decreasing sequences
of positive reals, then by using (2), we conclude that
limπ‘˜σ³¨€→∞ |π‘“π‘˜ /π‘“π‘˜−1 | < 1 if and only if |(πœ† − π‘’π‘˜−1 Vπ‘˜−1 )/(πœ† −
π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜+1 )| < 1 for all π‘˜ ≥ 1. Therefore, πœŽπ‘ ((𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ))∗ , β„“∞ ) =
{πœ† ∈ C : |(πœ† − π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜+1 )/(πœ† − π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜ )| > 1; (π‘˜ ∈ N0 )}.
π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜ π‘“π‘˜ + (Vπ‘˜ − Vπ‘˜+1 ) π‘’π‘˜+1 π‘“π‘˜+1 + (Vπ‘˜ − Vπ‘˜+1 ) π‘’π‘˜+1 π‘“π‘˜+1
+ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ = πœ†π‘“π‘˜
..
.
(28)
From the system of linear equations (28), we obtain that
π‘“π‘˜−1 =
Combining (29) and (30), we have
π‘“π‘˜ =
𝑒0 V0 𝑓0 + (V0 − V1 ) 𝑒1 𝑓1 + (V0 − V1 ) 𝑒2 𝑓2 + ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ = πœ†π‘“0
(27)
Vπ‘˜−1 − Vπ‘˜
(𝑒 𝑓 + π‘’π‘˜+1 π‘“π‘˜+1 + π‘’π‘˜+2 π‘“π‘˜+2 + ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ) ,
πœ† − π‘’π‘˜−1 Vπ‘˜−1 π‘˜ π‘˜
(29)
V − Vπ‘˜+1
(𝑒 𝑓 + π‘’π‘˜+2 π‘“π‘˜+2 + π‘’π‘˜+3 π‘“π‘˜+3 + ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ )
π‘“π‘˜ = π‘˜
πœ† − π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜ π‘˜+1 π‘˜+1
(π‘˜ ≥ 1) .
(30)
Case 2. If (π‘’π‘˜ ) is a strictly decreasing and (Vπ‘˜ ) is a constant
sequence of positive reals, then from the system of (28), we
observe that for all π‘˜ ∈ N0 , πœ† = π‘’π‘˜ V is an eigen value
corresponding to the eigen vector 𝑓 = {0, 0, . . . , 0, 1, 0, . . .}
whose π‘˜th entry is 1. Thus, πœŽπ‘ ((𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ))∗ , β„“∞ ) = π‘’π‘˜ V.
Case 3. If (π‘’π‘˜ ) and (Vπ‘˜ ) are constant sequences of positive
reals, then the proof is similar to that of Case 2.
Case 4. If (π‘’π‘˜ ) is a constant and (Vπ‘˜ ) is a strictly decreasing
sequence of positive reals, then the proof is similar to that of
Case 1.
Theorem 10. The residual spectrum of the operator 𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ)
over the sequence space β„“1 is given by
0,
{
{
󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨
πœŽπ‘Ÿ (𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ) , β„“1 ) = {
{{πœ† ∈ C : 󡄨󡄨󡄨 πœ† − π‘’π‘˜ Vπ‘˜+1 󡄨󡄨󡄨 > 1; (π‘˜ ∈ N0 )} ,
󡄨󡄨 πœ† − 𝑒 V 󡄨󡄨
󡄨
{
π‘˜ π‘˜ 󡄨
Proof. Proof follows from Lemma 2 and Theorems 8 and 9.
(𝑖𝑓 (Vπ‘˜ ) 𝑖𝑠 π‘Ž π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘ π‘’π‘žπ‘’π‘’π‘›π‘π‘’)
(π‘œπ‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘€π‘–π‘ π‘’) .
(33)
Theorem 11. The continuous spectrum of the operator
𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ) over the sequence space β„“1 is given by
International Journal of Analysis
7
0,
(𝑖𝑓 (Vπ‘˜ ) 𝑖𝑠 π‘Ž π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘ π‘’π‘žπ‘’π‘’π‘›π‘π‘’)
{
{
󡄨󡄨 πœ† − 𝑒 V 󡄨󡄨
πœŽπ‘ (𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ) , β„“1 ) = {
π‘˜ π‘˜+1 󡄨󡄨
{{πœ† ∈ C : 󡄨󡄨󡄨
󡄨󡄨 πœ† − 𝑒 V 󡄨󡄨󡄨 = 1; (π‘˜ ∈ N0 )} , (π‘œπ‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘€π‘–π‘ π‘’) .
󡄨
{
π‘˜ π‘˜ 󡄨
Proof. The proof of this theorem follows from Theorems 7, 8,
and 10 and along with the fact that
[10]
𝜎 (𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ) , β„“1 )
= πœŽπ‘ (𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ) , β„“1 ) ∪ πœŽπ‘Ÿ (𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ) , β„“1 )
(35)
[11]
∪ πœŽπ‘ (𝐺 (𝑒, V; Δ) , β„“1 ) .
3. Conclusion
In this work, the authors have determined the spectrum of
the generalized weighted mean difference operator 𝐺(𝑒, V; Δ)
over the Banach space β„“1 .
[12]
[13]
[14]
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests
regarding the publication of this paper.
[15]
References
[16]
[1] H. Polat, V. Karakaya, and N. SΜ§imsΜ§ek, “Difference sequence
spaces derived by using a generalized weighted mean,” Applied
Mathematics Letters, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 608–614, 2011.
[2] B. E. Rhoades, “The fine spectra for weighted mean operators,”
Pacific Journal of Mathematics, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 219–230, 1983.
[3] B. Altay and F. BasΜ§ar, “The fine spectrum and the matrix
domain of the difference operator 󳡻 on the sequence space 𝑙𝑝 ,
(0 < 𝑝 < 1),” Communications in Mathematical Analysis, vol. 2,
no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2007.
[4] B. Altay and F. BasΜ§ar, “On the fine spectrum of the difference
operator 󳡻 on 𝑐0 and 𝑐,” Information Sciences, vol. 168, no. 1–4,
pp. 217–224, 2004.
[5] K. Kayaduman and H. Furkan, “The fine spectra of the
difference operator 󳡻 over the sequence spaces 𝑙1 and 𝑏V ,”
International Mathematical Forum, vol. 1, no. 21–24, pp. 1153–
1160, 2006.
[6] P. D. Srivastava and S. Kumar, “Fine spectrum of the generalized
difference operator 󳡻V on sequence space 𝑙1 ,” Thai Journal of
Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 221–233, 2010.
[7] P. D. Srivastava and S. Kumar, “On the fine spectrum of the
generalized difference operator 󳡻V over the sequence space 𝑐0 ,”
Communications in Mathematical Analysis, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 8–
21, 2009.
[8] S. Dutta and P. Baliarsingh, “On the fine spectra of the
generalized rth difference operator σ³΅»π‘ŸV on the sequence space
𝑙1 ,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 219, no. 4, pp.
1776–1784, 2012.
[9] S. Dutta and P. Baliarsingh, “On the spectrum of 2-nd order
generalized difference operator 󳡻2 over the sequence space 𝑐0 ,”
[17]
[18]
[19]
(34)
Boletim da Sociedade Paranaense de Matemática. 3rd Série, vol.
31, no. 2, pp. 235–244, 2013.
S. Dutta and P. Baliarsingh, “On a spectral classification of the
operator σ³΅»π‘ŸV over thesequence space 𝑐0 ,” Proceeding of National
Academy of Sciences, India A, Physical Science. In press.
H. BilgicΜ§ and H. Furkan, “On the fine spectrum of the generalized difference operator 𝐡 (π‘Ÿ, 𝑠) over the sequence spaces 𝑙𝑝
and 𝑏V𝑝 , (1 < 𝑝 < ∞),” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods &
Applications, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 499–506, 2008.
H. BilgicΜ§ and H. Furkan, “On the fine spectrum of the operator
𝐡 (π‘Ÿ, 𝑠, 𝑑) over the sequence spaces 𝑙1 and 𝑏V,” Mathematical and
Computer Modelling, vol. 45, no. 7-8, pp. 883–891, 2007.
F. Başar, Summability Theory and Its Applications, Bentham
Science Publishers, e-books, Mono-graphs, Istanbul, Turkey,
2012.
S. Dutta and P. Baliarsingh, “Some spectral aspects of the
operator Δπ‘ŸV over the sequence spaces 𝑙𝑝 and 𝑏V𝑝 (1 < 𝑝 < ∞),”
Chinese Journal of Mathematics, vol. 2013, Article ID 286748, 10
pages, 2013.
S. Dutta and P. Baliarsingh, “On the spectrum of difference
operator σ³΅»π‘Žπ‘ over the sequence spaces 𝑙𝑝 and 𝑏V𝑝 (1 < 𝑝 < ∞),”
Mathematical Sciences Letters, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 115–120, 2014.
E. Kreyszig, Introductory Functional Analysis with Applications,
John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1978.
S. Goldberg, Unbounded Linear Operators, Dover, New York,
NY, USA, 1985.
A. Wilansky, Summability through Functional Analysis, vol. 85
of North-Holland Mathematics Studies, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1984.
S. Dutta and P. Baliarsingh, “On some Toeplitz matrices and
their inversions,” Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society.
In press.
Advances in
Operations Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Advances in
Decision Sciences
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Journal of
Applied Mathematics
Algebra
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Journal of
Probability and Statistics
Volume 2014
The Scientific
World Journal
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
International Journal of
Differential Equations
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Volume 2014
Submit your manuscripts at
http://www.hindawi.com
International Journal of
Advances in
Combinatorics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Mathematical Physics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Journal of
Complex Analysis
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
International
Journal of
Mathematics and
Mathematical
Sciences
Mathematical Problems
in Engineering
Journal of
Mathematics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Discrete Mathematics
Journal of
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Discrete Dynamics in
Nature and Society
Journal of
Function Spaces
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Abstract and
Applied Analysis
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
International Journal of
Journal of
Stochastic Analysis
Optimization
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
Volume 2014
Download