BILLIONS SERVED
1 of 2
Malnutrition
Annual income spent on food
Sweden
Russia
13.1%
15.3%
Latvia
Lithuania
11.4%
UK
Ireland 8.9%
9.1%
7.5%
Netherlands
11.4%
19.2%
22.9%
Ukraine
Poland
13.4%
6.8%
Georgia
44%
14.4%
14.2%
S Korea
Taiwan
48.5%
24.1%
*includes nonalcoholic
beverages
Jordan
40.8%
23.7%
Vietnam
Pakistan
38.5%
45.4%
9%
Philippines
Thailand
37%
24.9%
Kenya
Venezuela
44.9%
29.3%
Colombia
26.3%
Qatar
Saudi Arabia UAE
43.8%
25.9%
14.5%
12.8%
Algeria
Costa Rica
12.3%
Iran
Bahrain
38.3%
40.3%
Hong
Kong
Kuwait
14.6%
Egypt
15.3%
33.9%
Azerbaijan
Turkey
17.8%
Morocco
35.6%
India
Malaysia
35.8%
14.2%
Nigeria
27.7%
40.1%
Ecuador
NUTRITIONAL STUNTING (2003–2008)
SOURCE: WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
China*
19%
BosniaHerzegovina Greece
35.8%
Guatemala
20-30%
28.7%
Israel
29.5%
not in survey
14.4%
Bulgaria
Tunisia
Dominican
Republic
10-20%
35.7%
24.5%
24.1%
> 40%
Turkmenistan
31.9%
Croatia
31.3%
Mexico
5-10%
Japan
Macedonia
16.6%
26.1%
30-40%
34.2%
Hungary
14.6%
< 5%
Uzbekistan
42.1%
Romania
15.9%
Italy
35.4%
Belarus
Austria
Slovakia
Switzer17.2%
Portugal Spain land 10.3%11.1%
Slovenia
US
Kazakhstan
42.2%
20.4%
Germany
Belgium11.4% Czech
13.1%
Republic
France
13.4%
15.7%
29.1%
Estonia
Denmark
Canada
12.1%
11.6%
Norway
(% OF HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTIVE EXPENDITURES)
SOURCE: USDA/ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE, 2008
(% OF CHILDREN UNDER 5 YEARS OF AGE)
Finland
Singapore
8.1%
19.9%
Brazil
Peru
24.6%
29.1%
28.4%
S Africa
Chile
23.4%
Argentina
20.3%
Uruguay
18.7%
44.1%
A map of the world based on food costs as a percentage of income
compared with incidence of juvenile malnutrition.
Cameroon
38.5%
Bolivia
Indonesia
20.1%
The size of the country represents the percentage spent on food.
The darker the color, the higher the rate of malnutrition.
Australia
10.6%
New
Zealand
12.1%
BILLIONS SERVED
2 of 2
World population growth
Illustration transcribed from the video
“The Seventh Billion”—The Economist;
Data source: United Nations
9b
n
10
5
10
annual
0
increases in 5
0
millions*
0
population
increase in
billions
0
7 bn
0
children
per
woman
19
19 60
5
194 0
0
1930
1920
1910
0
190
6 bn
4
8
n
5b
*averaged by decade
2 bn
3
bn
n
4b
90
17 00
18 0
181
1820
1830
1840
18
18 50
18 60
70
80
18 90
18
20
20 50
4
203 0
0
2020
2010
2000
0
199 0
8
19 70
19
8 bn
n
1b
The first billion was the hardest. But starting in the 1950s, billions
and billions more people arrived. As fertility rates decline, the world
population could peak at 9 billion or so. But that’s 9 billion or so
mouths to feed.