1
Supplementary Table 1
1
2
Strong effects of ionizing radiation from Chernobyl on mutation rates
3
4
5
Anders Pape Møller 1 & Timothy A. Mousseau2
6
7
1
8
9
10
11
12
13
Laboratoire d'Ecologie, Systématique et Evolution, CNRS UMR 8079, Université Paris-Sud,
Bâtiment 362, F-91405 Orsay Cedex, France.
2
Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia SC 29208, USA.
2
14
Supplementary Table 1. Studies used in the meta-analysis of ionizing radiation
15
and mutation rates.
16
17
1.
Abramov, V. I., Fedorenko, O. M., Shevchenko, V. A. Genetic consequences
18
of radioactive contamination for populations of Arabidopsis. Science of the
19
Total Environment 112, 19-28 (1992).
20
2.
Aghajanyan, A., Suskov, I. Transgenerational genomic instability in children
21
of irradiated parents as a result of the Chernobyl Nuclear Accident. Mutation
22
Research 671, 52-57 (2009).
23
3.
Aghajanyan, A. V., Suskov, I. I. Genomic instability in children born after the
24
Chernobyl Nuclear Accident (in vivo and in vitro studies). Russian Journal of
25
Genetics 46, 740-749 (2010).
26
4.
Alexanin, S. S., Slozina, N. M., Neronova, E. G., Makarova, N. V.
27
Chromosomal aberrations and sickness rates in Chernobyl clean-up workers
28
in the years following the accident. Health Physics 98, 258-260 (2010).
29
5.
Baker, R. J., Dewoody, J. A., Wright, A. J., Chesser, R. K. On the Utility of
30
Heteroplasmy in Genotoxicity Studies: An Example from Chornobyl.
31
Ecotoxicology 8, 301-309 (1999).
32
6.
Chernobyl accident. Obzor Literary 51-54 (1993).
33
34
35
Bochkov, N. P. Analytical review of cytogenetic investigations after
7.
Chubinishvili, A. T. The status of natural populations of the Rana esculenta complex in response to anthropogenic influences: a morphogenetic approach.
3
36
Advances in Amphibian Research in the Former Soviet Union 2, 117-124
37
(1997).
38
8.
accident. Nature 380, 683-686 (1996).
39
40
Dubrova, Y. E. et al. Human minisatellite mutation rate after the Chernobyl
9.
Dubrova, Y. E. et al. Further evidence for elevated human minisatellite
41
mutation rate in Belarus eight years after the Chernobyl accident. Mutation
42
Research 381, 267-278 (1997).
43
10.
Dubrova, Y. E., Plumb, M., Brown, J., Jeffreys, A. J. Radiation-induced
44
germline instability at minisatellite loci. International Journal of Radiation
45
Biology 74, 689-696 (1998).
46
11.
Dubrova, Y. E., Grant, G., Chumak, A. A., Stezhka, V. A., Karakasian, A. N.
47
Elevated minisatellite mutation rate in the post-Chernobyl families from
48
Ukraine. The American Journal of Human Genetics 71, 801-809 (2002).
49
12.
Ellegren, H., Lindgren, G., Primmer, C. R., Møller, A. P. Fitness loss and
50
germline mutations in barn swallows breeding in Chernobyl. Nature 389,
51
593-596 (1997).
52
13.
Geraskin, S. A. A critical analysis of the current concepts and approaches to
53
assessing the biological action of low doses of ionizing radiation.
54
Radiatsionnaia Biologiia, Radioecologiia 35, 563-71 (1995).
55
14.
Geraskin, S. A. et al. Genetic consequences of radioactive contamination by
56
the Chernobyl fallout to agricultural crops. Journal of Environmental
57
Radioactivity 66, 155-169 (2003).
4
58
15.
Goncharova, R. I., Ryabokon, N. I. Dynamics of Cytogenetic Injuries in
59
Natural Populations of Bank Vole in the Republic of Belarus. Radiatsii
60
ProtADD Dosimetry 62, 37-40 (1995).
61
16.
Goncharova, R. I., Ryabokon, N. I. Results of Long-term Genetic Monitoring
62
of Animal Populations Chronically Irradiated in the Radiocontaminated
63
Areas. KURRI KR 21, 194-202 (1998).
64
17.
Goncharova, R. I., Ryabokon, N. I., Smolich, I. I. Biological effects of low-
65
dose chronic irradiation in somatic cells of small mammals. Risk analysis:
66
facing the new millennium. Proceedings of the 9th annual conference 710-
67
714 (1999).
68
18.
Gudkov, D., Shevtsova, N., Dzyubenko, O., Kuzmenko, M., Nazarov, A.
69
Radiation Risk Estimates in Normal and Emergency Situations. 9, 69-76
70
(Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2006).
71
19.
Kalchenko, V. A., Rubanovich, A. V. Genetical effects in gametes of Pinus
72
sylvestris L. induced in the Chernobyl accident. Genetika 29, 1205-1212
73
(1993).
74
20.
Kalchenko, V. A., Fedotov, I. S. Genetic Effects of Acute and Chronic
75
Ionizing Irradiation on Pinus sylvestris L. Inhabiting the Chernobyl
76
Meltdown Area. Russian Journal of Genetics 37, 341-350 (2001).
77
78
21.
Khandogina, E. K. Study of genetic control of radiosensitivity. Genetika 46,
293-301 (2010).
5
79
22.
Kodaira, M. et al. No evidence of increased mutation rates at microsatellite
80
loci in offspring of A-bomb survivors. Radiation Research 173, 205-213
81
(2010).
82
23.
Kordium, E. L., Sidorenko, P. G. [The results of the cytogenetic monitoring
83
of the species of angiosperm plants growing in the area of the radionuclide
84
contamination after the accident at the Chernobyl Atomic Electric Power
85
Station]. Tsitologiia i Genetika 31, 39-46 (1997).
86
24.
mutation rate after Chernobyl. Nature 407, 583-584 (2000).
87
88
Kovalchuk, O., Dubrova, Y. E., Arkhipov, A., Hohn, B., Kovalchuk, I. Wheat
25.
Krysanov, E. Y., Dmitriev, S. G., Nadzhafova, R. S. Cytogenetic
89
homeostasis. Consequences of the Chernobyl Catastrophe: Environmental
90
Health 77-83 (1996).
91
26.
Kuchma, O., Vornam, B., Finkeldey, R. Mutation rates in Scots pine (Pinus
92
sylvestris L.) from the Chernobyl exclusion zone evaluated with amplified
93
fragment-length polymorphisms (AFLPs) and microsatellite markers.
94
Mutation Research 725, 29-35 (2011).
95
27.
Maznik, N. A., Vinnikov, V. A. Time-effect relationship for unstable
96
chromosome exchange levels in Chernobyl clean-up workers. Tsitologiia i
97
Genetika 38, 14-22 (2004).
98
99
100
28.
Møller, A. P., Mousseau, T. A., de Lope, F., Saino, N. Elevated frequency of
abnormalities in barn swallows from Chernobyl. Biology Letters 3, 414-417
(2007).
6
101
29.
from Chernobyl. Journal of Animal Ecology 74, 1102-1111 (2005).
102
103
Møller, A. P. et al. Condition, reproduction and survival of barn swallows
30.
Neronova, E., Slozina, N., Nikiforov, A. Chromosome alterations in cleanup
104
workers sampled years after the Chernobyl accident. Radiation Research 160,
105
46-51 (2003).
106
31.
Pomerantseva, M. D. et al. Genetic monitoring of house mice from regions
107
polluted by radionuclides as the result of the Chernobyl catastrophe.
108
Consequences of the Chernobyl Catastrophe: Environmental Health 127-143
109
(1996).
110
32.
Pomerantseva, M. D., Ramaiya, L. K., Chekhovich, A. V. Genetic disorders
111
in house mouse germ cells after the Chernobyl catastrophe. Mutation
112
Research 381, 97-103 (1997).
113
33.
Ragon, M., Restoux, G., Moreira, D., Møller, A. P., López-García, P.
114
Sunlight-Exposed Biofilm Microbial Communities Are Naturally Resistant to
115
Chernobyl Ionizing-Radiation Levels. PLoS ONE 6, 17 (2011).
116
34.
Ryabokon, N. I., Goncharova, R. I. Transgenerational accumulation of
117
radiation damage in small mammals chronically exposed to Chernobyl
118
fallout. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 45, 167-177 (2006).
119
35.
Shevchenko, V. A., Pechkurenkov, V. L. & Abramov, V. I. Radiation
120
Genetics of Natural Populations: The Genetic Consequences of the Kyshtym
121
accident. (Nauka, Moscow, 1992).
122
123
36.
Shevchenko, V. V., Grinikh, L. I., Shevchenko, V. A. The cytogenetic effects
in natural populations of Crepis tectorum exposed to chronic irradiation in the
7
124
region of the Chernobyl Atomic Electric Power Station. An analysis of the
125
frequency of chromosome aberrations and karyotype changes in the 3rd and
126
4th. Radiatsionnaia Biologiia, Radioecologiia 35, 695-701 (1995).
127
37.
Shevchenko, V. A., Abramov, V. I., Kal’chenko, V. A., Fedotov, I. S.,
128
Rubanovich, A. V. The genetic sequelae for plant populations of radioactive
129
environmental pollution in connection with the Chernobyl accident.
130
Radiatsionnaia Biologiia, Radioecologiia 36, 531-45 (1996).
131
38.
Stepanova, E. I., Misharina, J. A. Cytogenetical effects in peripheral blood
132
lymphocytes among children in remote terms after prenatal irradiation.
133
International Journal of Radiation Medicine 3, 118-122 (2001).
134
39.
Chernobyl. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 15, 1057-1063 (1996).
135
136
Sugg, D. W. et al. DNA damage and radiocesium in channel catfish from
40.
Tsyusko, O. V., Smith, M. H., Oleksyk, T. K., Goryanaya, J., Glenn, T. C.
137
Genetics of cattails in radioactively contaminated areas around Chornobyl.
138
Molecular Ecology 15, 2611-2625 (2006).
139
41.
Weinberg, H. S. et al. Very high mutation rate in offspring of Chernobyl
140
accident liquidators. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London - Series B
141
Biological Sciences 268, 1001-1005 (2001).
142
42.
Wickliffe, J. K. et al. Exposure to chronic, low-dose rate gamma-radiation at
143
Chornobyl does not induce point mutations in Big Blue mice. Environmental
144
and Molecular Mutagenesis 42, 11-18 (2003).
8
145
43.
Wickliffe, J. K. et al. Mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy in laboratory mice
146
experimentally enclosed in the radioactive Chernobyl environment. Radiation
147
Research 159, 458-464 (2003).
148
44.
Zainullin, V. G., Shevchenko, V. A., Mjasnjankina, E. N., Generalova, M. V.,
149
Rakin, A. O. The mutation frequency of Drosophila melanogaster
150
populations living under conditions of increased background radiation due to
151
the Chernobyl accident. Science of the Total Environment 112, 37-44 (1992).
152
45. Ziablitskaia, E. I., Geras’kin, S. A., Udalova, A. A., Spirin, E. V. An analysis
153
of the genetic sequelae of the contamination of winter rye crops by the
154
radioactive fallout from the Chernobyl Atomic Electric Power Station.
155
Radiatsionnaia Biologiia, Radioecologiia 36, 498-505 (1996).