RESEARCH-INFORMED TEACHING CURRICULUM DESIGN The following guidelines are based upon a framework for developing a research-based curriculum, presented by Blackmore and Fraser (2003). Four elements are identified as being important in the design of a research-based curriculum: Outcomes: including research outcomes in the curriculum (e.g. modules designed around the research interests of staff); Process: using research-process-based methods of teaching and learning (e.g. problem-based learning); Tools: learning to use the tools of research (e.g. bibliographic searching, field skills, quantitative analysis etc.); Context: developing an inclusive research context and culture (e.g. students assisting with staff research, student and staff research seminars etc.). (adapted from: Blackmore and Fraser, 2003). The following components of a research-informed teaching curriculum design ‘toolkit’ are based upon these four elements and the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education (Chickering and Gamson, 1987). For each principle a selection of features (above the solid black line) and possible consequences (below the black line) of a curriculum that addresses varying levels of that particular principle are displayed. Teachers may be able to identify where they are currently located on this continuum and look to the next level to see what sort of changes to curriculum design may be required to address that particular principal to a greater extent. Dr P. R. Porter, Learning and Teaching Institute, University of Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB, United Kingdom. p.r.porter@herts.ac.uk References Blackmore, P. and Fraser, M., 2003. Research and teaching: making the link. In: Blackwell, R. and Blackmore, P. (eds) Towards strategic staff development in higher education. Maidenhead: SRHE and Open University Press, 131-141. Chickering, A. W. and Gamson, Z. F., 1987. Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, 39(7), 3-7. Jenkins A., Healey, M. and Zetter, R., 2007. Linking teaching and research in departments and disciplines York: The Higher Education Academy. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/ourwork/teachingandresearch/Linking TeachingandResearch_April07 Good Practice in Research-Informed Teaching: Include outcomes of recent research in the curriculum Students have a right to expect that their curriculum is fully informed by recent research in their chosen area of study and, to a certain extent, research and integration of research into the curriculum is what defines us as a University, irrespective of whether teaching staff are ‘research active’. Student reading centred upon text books that are dated. Student reading centred upon journal articles that are dated. No discussion of recent research in lectures, tutorials, seminars, online materials etc. Limited Students are unlikely to view their chosen subject as dynamic and important which may have knock-on impacts for student enthusiasm, effort and interest. Subject-specific knowledge will be limited and/or dated with implications for employability/suitability for postgraduate study. Understanding may be incorrect (i.e. advances in understanding and knowledge are not being conveyed to the student). Students may feel they are being cheated if they feel their curriculum is presenting dated research material. Students are referred to textbooks that incorporate recent research findings. Students are referred to websites that present recent research findings. Students are referred to recent peer-reviewed journal papers on a regular basis. Tutorials and seminars consider new publications/findings. Strong emphasis on backing up text-book research material and online material with recent peer-reviewed journal reading. Staff integrate their own recent research into their teaching. Flagging newly published material on Studynet/VLE. Some Lots Students may lack the detailed research and subject knowledge that reading primary sources (i.e. peer-reviewed journal papers) provides. Students are fully up to date with the latest research findings in their subject area and therefore well equipped to confidently enter the world of employment or postgraduate study in their chosen area. Students feel they have received ‘value for money’ from their undergraduate education. Students feel they are part of a dynamic subject area with resultant impacts on enthusiasm, effort and interest levels. Student confidence is maintained through being taught by a researchactive member of staff. Good Practice in Research-Informed Teaching: Develop an understanding of the history and role of research in the discipline It is important that students have some awareness of how research has developed in their chosen subject area. Not only does this provide an important context in terms of showing the relevance of material being taught, but it provides students with a level of methodological knowledge and demonstrates that knowledge is constantly evolving and developing and that they have a part to play in that evolution and development. Students are not presented with a history of research development in their subject area. Students are not taught how key workers in their subject have undertaken research. Limited Students may be less inclined to pursue their own research careers if they are not aware of how research is undertaken or why research in their field is important (historically and in the present). Students may be unaware of the importance of their discipline if they are not made aware of the historical development of research in their subject area. Students are presented with a history of research/subject development, but little guidance on how past workers have carried out research (or vice versa). The latest research in the field is presented within its historical context. Students are taught about how research is organised and funded in their discipline. Students learn in detail how research is conducted in their discipline. Some Lots Students will lack a basic understanding of how scholars and academics undertake research, which may have knockon negative impacts when students come to undertake their own research (e.g. dissertations). Students see the realworld application of their subject of study, which can be strongly motivational. Those students who may be considering research careers have a good understanding of the research process in their discipline. Students appreciate the historical relevance and practical application of their discipline which can maintain enthusiasm. Students will become aware as to how they may seek funding for their own research (e.g. student fieldwork/labwork grants etc.) Good Practice in Research-Informed Teaching: Engage students in discipline-specific research processes Students need to learn and practice the skills required for them to undertake research in their chosen subject area. Not only is this important for subsequent employment and/or postgraduate study, but is important in maintaining student enthusiasm and interest as the practical applications of their subject of study become more apparent. Only generic research methods teaching is provided-no disciplinespecific research methods teaching is undertaken. Limited Students are ill-equipped to undertake any form of research associated with their discipline and future work that may require this (e.g. individual research projects) is likely to suffer as a result. Students will not see the real-world application and relevance of theoretical subjects studied and engagement with the subject is likely to be limited as a result. Students are taught (but do not practice) research methods specific to the discipline. Discipline-specific research activities are built into the curriculum e.g. students work with real-world data and practice real-world research skills and collect/generate and analyse their own research data/information. Students are taught how to use the specific research tools of their discipline (e.g. questionnaires, field equipment, laboratory equipment etc.) Students assist staff with research projects. Some Without practicing methods, active learning is limited and the ability of students to undertake discipline specific research work (that may be required during study or subsequent employment) suffers. Potentially valuable transferrable skills are not practised. Lots Students appreciate the value of their work and can appreciate the realworld application of their skills. A sense of ‘ownership’ of work is gained if students collect and analyse their own data/information. Students gain confidence in their analytical abilities and gain valuable subject-specific and transferrable research skills. Working with academic staff breaks down the ‘them and us’ barrier that may exist and helps foster a healthy and mutually beneficial relationship between staff and student. Good Practice in Research-Informed Teaching: Engage students in generic research processes & skills By attaining a suite of generic research skills students are learning to become enquiring and analytical, skills that are becoming increasingly demanded of students upon graduation (Jenkins et al., 2007). Generic research training also provides a suite of valuable transferrable skills. Limited generic research training is offered e.g. a basic range of statistical techniques. Limited Students are unlikely to feel confident in applying these skills to real-world scenarios or to appreciate the real-world relevance. Enthusiasm and interest is likely to be limited if the practical applications are not highlighted. Students may feel incapable or ill-equipped to undertake research. Analytical and decisionmaking skills are likely to be limited. A range of generic research skills are taught, but not practiced or assessed (e.g. students are taught how to give a presentation, but never actually do one). A full range of generic research skills are taught, practiced and assessed and the real-world application is highlighted. Students apply generic research skills in practicals, lectures, workshops etc. Students apply generic research skills to their own data/information. Some Lots Students have no means of assessing their knowledge development or improving their knowledge if no means of applying or assessing knowledge and understanding is provided. Active learning is discouraged; the students become the audience rather than participants. Knowledge of the practical application of research skills is likely to be limited. Students are able to enhance their knowledge and understanding by effectively assessing and analysing information/data. Students appreciate the practical application of theoretical subjects which motivates learning. Students take ownership of knowledge they have generated. Valuable transferrable skills are gained. Students become participants, not just observers. Students are likely to have enhanced decisionmaking and analytical abilities. Good Practice in Research-Informed Teaching: Fosters an environment where research is encouraged, promoted and valued Fostering a ‘research-rich’ environment enthuses and motivates students and is invaluable in helping to break down the ‘them and us’ barriers that may exist between teaching staff and students. Research is neither promoted nor valued and/or teaching and research are treated as separate entities. Research active staff do not undertake teaching. Limited Students leave university without having developed enquiring minds or any extensive knowledge of the practical application of their subject of study. Staff-student interaction is more limited than it might otherwise be. Students miss out on opportunities to both undertake research during their education and to progress onto research-based careers (e.g. postgraduate study) upon graduation. Reporting of student research (e.g. research seminars) forms a significant part of the assessment process. Only internal staff present research seminars. Research seminars from internal and external academic staff. Journal ‘clubs’ and student research seminars. Promotion of student research grants and awards. Publication of student work in internal and external journals. Engagement with the wider learned community e.g. visits to scholarly institutions. Engagement of students with staff research. Some Lots Students may be unaware of wider research being carried out in their field of study; knowledge may be limited as a result. Students do not get the opportunity to integrate with the wider research community. Students may come to resent research if the burden of assessment is present throughout the research process. Students feel that their work is important and valued. Valuable transferrable skills (e.g. presentation skills) are gained. Students become aware of wider research areas, generate new ideas for research and get to meet researchers from their chosen field of study. Subject-specific knowledge and enthusiasm are enhanced. Students become full participants in the research process. ‘Them and us’ barriers between staff and students are broken down. The overall student learning experience is enhanced (e.g. awards given for overseas fieldwork). Good Practice in Research-Informed Teaching: Engage students in enquiry-based activities Here, students learn the importance of identifying where knowledge may be limited and thereby find ways in which to enhance knowledge (Blackmore and Fraser, 2003). Enquiry-based activities also allow teamwork skills to be developed and students move from being the audience to become participants in their learning. The information transmission model is used extensively. Research focussed projects are undertaken, but the enquiry/fact finding elements are limited and/or the scenario has no realworld validity. Group and individual problem/enquiry based exercises are used throughout the curriculum. Limited Some Lots Student learning is hindered by the lack of active learning and/or group activity. A lack of group/cooperative work limits development of interpersonal skills. Students fail to appreciate the real-world relevance of the subjects they are studying; enthusiasm and interest levels may reduce as a result. Active learning is more limited than it could be. Students become participants and engage to a greater extent with their subject of study. The real-world relevance of specific disciplines is explicitly demonstrated. Students get to put research skills into practice in a realistic scenario. Knowledge is shared between students. Students become full participants in their learning. Transferrable skills are gained e.g. analytical thinking, problem solving ability etc. Good Practice in Research-Informed Teaching: Draw on pedagogic research to enhance teaching and research links The seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education, as defined by Chickering and Gamson (1987) can and should be applied to the design of a research-based curriculum, just as they should in other areas of our teaching. Continual curriculum development in the light of the results of sound pedagogic research is arguably pivotal to all that we do. No attempt made to draw on pedagogic research to inform the research elements of the curriculum. Limited Knowledge and understanding are likely to be limited at best; student learning is being undermined. Student engagement and enthusiasm are likely to be limited. Workshops and seminars are attended, but little attempt made to integrate experience gained into teaching. Case studies/examples of good practice that demonstrate effective linkage of teaching and research are used to define and develop the curriculum. Approaches are used that are based on wellestablished knowledge of how people learn. General pedagogic principles of ‘good practice’ in undergraduate education are applied to both the design of the research elements within the curriculum and the manner of delivery of research related teaching material. Some Lots Valuable time is used learning new techniques/practices, but neither staff, nor students benefit. Knowledge and understanding are maximised. Student engagement and knowledge retention are maximised.