PT- J|
AU- Su YM; Hsu PY; Pai NY|
AF- Su Yu-Min; Hsu, Ping-Yu; Pai, Ning-Yao|
TI- An approach to discover and recommend cross-domain bridge-keywords in
document banks|
SO- ELECTRONIC LIBRARY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Databases; Data handling; Information retrieval; Cluster analysis|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; CLASSIFICATION;
NETWORKS; SCIENCE; SEARCH; SPACE|
AB- Purpose - The co-word analysis method is commonly used to clusterrelated keywords into the same keyword domain. In other words,
traditional co-word analysis cannot cluster the same keywords into more
than one keyword domain, and disregards the multi-domain property of
keywords. The purpose of this paper is to propose an innovative keyword
co-citation approach called "Complete Keyword Pair (CKP) method", which
groups complete keyword sets of reference papers into clusters, and thus
finds keywords belonging to more than one keyword domain, namely bridgekeywords Design/methodology/approach - The approach regards complete
author keywords of a paper as a complete keyword set to compute the
relations among keywords. Any two complete keyword sets whose
corresponding papers are co-referenced by the same paper are recorded as
a CKP. A clustering method is performed with the correlation matrix
computed from the frequency counts of the CKPs, for clustering the
complete keyword sets. Since keywords may be involved in more than one
complete keyword set, the same keywords may end up appearing in different
clusters Findings - Results of this study show that the CKP method can
discover bridge-keywords with average precision of 80 per cent in the
Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery citation bank during
2000-2006 when compared against the benchmark of Association for
Computing Machinery Computing Classification System Originality/value Traditional co-word analysis focuses on co-occurrence of keywords, and
therefore, cannot cluster the same keywords into more than one keyword
domain. The CKP approach considers complete author keyword sets of
reference papers to discover bridge-keywords. Therefore, the keyword
recommendation system based on CKP can recommend keywords across multiple
keyword domains via the bridge-keywords|
C1- [Hsu, Ping-Yu] Natl Cent Univ, Dept Business Adm, Tao Yuan, Taiwan;
[Su, Yu-Min] Natl Chengchi Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Taipei 11623, Taiwan;
[Pai, Ning-Yao] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Informat Management, Hsinchu,
Taiwan|
RP- Hsu, PY, Natl Cent Univ, Dept Business Adm, Tao Yuan, Taiwan|
EM- pyhsu@mgt.ncu.edu.tw|
CD- *ASS COMP MACH, 2009, ACM COMP CLASS SYST; *ASS COMP MACH, 2009, ACM
PORT; AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; AVANCINI H, 2004,
P67, P IADIS C APPL COMP; CHANG CC, 2006, V24, P307, ELECTRON LIBR; CHEN
HC, 1992, V22, P885, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB; CHEN HC, 1997, V48, P17, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; DING Y, 2000, P28, P 6 INT SOC KNOWL OR; EGGHE L, 1990,
INTRO INFORMETRICS Q; EOM SB, 1996, V16, P315, DECIS SUPPORT SYST; FUHR
N, 2001, RECOMMENDATION COLLA; GAO X, 2006, V4, INT J ELECT BUS;
HARUECHAIYASAK C, 2005, V27, P298, INT J COMPUTER APPL; HE Y, 2000, V38,
P491, INFORM PROCESSING MA; JOHNSON AG, 1988, STATISTICS; KITAMURA Y,
1999, V10, P206, GENOME INFORM; LIANG TP, 2007, V45, P401, DECIS SUPPORT
SYST; LIAO SH, 2007, V32, P1, EXPERT SYST APPL; LORENCE D, 2006, V2,
P263, INT J ELECT HEALTHCA; MATSUO Y, 2004, V13, P157, INT J ARTIFICIAL
INT; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; NICHOLS DM, 1997,
CSEG297 LANC U COMP; ROUSSINOV D, 2003, V35, P149, DECIS SUPPORT SYST;
SCHATZ BR, 1996, P126, P 1 ACM INT C DIG LI; SHIRI AA, 2002, V29, P1,
KNOWL ORGAN; TANAKA M, 2000, V11, P73, GENOME INFORMATICS; VILLARROEL M,
2002, V20, P306, ELECTRON LIBR; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITTAKER J,
1989, V19, P473, SOC STUD SCI; YANG C, 2007, V25, P234, ELECTRON LIBR;
YANG Y, 2005, V1, P40, J COMPUTER SCI|
NR- 32|
TC- 0|
PU- EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED|
PI- BINGLEY|
PA- HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND|
SN- 0264-0473|
J9- ELECTRON LIBR|
JI- Electron. Libr|
PY- 2010|
VL- 28|
IS- 5|
BP- 669|
EP- 687|
DI- 10.1108/02640471011081951|
PG- 19|
SC- Information Science & Library Science|
GA- 697PG|
JN- ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, 2010, V28, N5, P669-687|
UT- ISI:000285526700004 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Jank DA|
AF- Jank David A|
TI- Toward a Unifying Ontology for Human-Information Interaction|
SO- CANADIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND LIBRARY SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE
DES SCIENCES DE L INFORMATION ET DE BIBLIOTHECONOMIE|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- human-information interaction; information seeking behavior;
ontology; taxonomy; relationship theory|
ID- COCITATION ANALYSIS; DOMAIN ANALYSIS; ONLINE; ATTITUDES; SCIENCE;
CONTEXT; MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; BEHAVIOR; SEEKING|
AB- Research agendas in human-information interaction (HII) are often
varied and thematically divergent. Through the interdisciplinary lens of
information studies, a more convergent view of HII scholarship emerges.
The purpose of this paper is twofold: to provide a summary of
dissertation research that taxonomically documents the divergent
scholarship in human-information interaction, and to construct a unifying
ontology of HII discourse, using bibliometric techniques, that may serve
as a map of the research front of human-information interaction for the
information scientist|
C1- Long Isl Univ, Palmer Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Greenvale, NY 11548
USA|
RP- Jank, DA, Long Isl Univ, Palmer Sch Lib & Informat Sci, CW Post
Campus, Greenvale, NY 11548 USA|
EM- david.jank@liu.edu|
CD- AJZEN I, 2005, UNDERSTANDING ATTITU; ANDERSON WT, 1994, V11, P447,
PSYCHOL MARKET; ARAYA AA, 1997, V3, P2, PHILOS TECHNOLOGY; BAEV KV, 1998,
BIOL NEURAL NETWORKS; BAJAJ A, 1998, V33, P213, INFORM MANAGE; BARKER P,
2008, V45, P127, INNOV EDUC TEACH INT; BARTHES R, 1975, PLAISIR TEXTE;
BATES MJ, 1987, P6, ASIS 87 P 50 ANN M A; BATES MJ, 1989, V13, P407,
ONLINE REV; BECHTEL W, 2001, P152, PHILOS NEUROSCIENCES; BEGHTOL C, 1986,
V42, P84, J DOC; BEGHTOL C, 2003, V30, P64, KNOWL ORGAN; BENEFER R, 2007,
V49, P210, ED TRAINING; BESSER H, 1997, P153, WIRED MUSEUM EMERGIN;
BICKMORE T, 2004, V12, P293, T COMPUTER HUMAN INT; BRIER S, 2006, V1,
LIBREAS LIB IDEAS; CACIOPPO JT, 2002, V57, P819, AM PSYCHOL; CHANDLER R,
2002, V7, 1 MONDAY; CHEN AP, 2005, V3681, P318, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT;
CHEN XY, 2006, PEER RELATIONSHIPS C; CHI L, 2005, V9, P53, J KNOWLEDGE
MANAGEME; COOPER J, 1993, P174, MUSEUMS INTERACTIVE; CRAMER KM, 1999,
V46, P381, J COUNS PSYCHOL; DEEB KK, 2006, P157, 2006 INT S COLL;
DELGUSTE C, 1996, V14, P26, MUSE; DUTTABERGMAN MJ, 2004, V6, ARTN e15, J
MED INTERNET RES; FANO RM, 1961, TRANSMISSION INFORM; FODOR JA, 1993,
PSYCHOSEMANTICS PROB; FRENCH JC, 1999, V5, D LIB MAGAZINE; GERBER BS,
2001, V3, ARTN e15, J MED INTERNET RES; GIACOPPO A, 2001, CHARM CHOOSING
HUMAN; GRUENFELD, 1993, V24, P383, SMALL GR RES; HARMAN K, 2005, V1, P67,
INTERDISCIPLINARY J; HEATHMAN DJ, 1991, V23, P25, IND COMMER TRAIN;
HEMINGWAY CJ, 1998, P275, INFORM SYSTEMS CURRE; HJORLAND B, 2002, V58,
P422, J DOC; HJORLAND B, 2005, P339, THEORIES INFORM BEHA; HJORLAND B,
2007, V58, P1448, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; HOFER BK, 2004, V39, P43, EDUC
PSYCHOL; HONG D, 2005, P81, UBIPCMM 2005 P 1 INT; HUNTER J, 2003, V13,
P49, IEEE T CIRC SYST VID; INKPEN AC, 2005, V30, P146, ACAD MANAGE REV;
INSEL TR, 2004, V27, P697, ANNU REV NEUROSCI; JANK D, 2003, P1175, ENCY
LIB INFORM SCI; JANK D, 2004, 9 GREAT LAK INF SCI; JANK D, 2006, ALISE
2006 ANN C SAN; JANK D, 2010, THESIS LONG ISLAND U; JOHNSON RA, 2002,
V24, P422, WESTERN J NURS RES; KARI J, 2007, V58, P1131, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; KASPER J, 2006, V62, P56, PATIENT EDUC COUNS; KENSINGER, 2004, V42,
P791, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA; KRAUT RE, 2003, P325, HCI MODELS THEORIES;
KUHLTHAU CC, 1991, V42, P361, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; LAMB R, 2003, V54,
P97, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEAFGREN J, 2002, DEGREES EXPLICITNESS;
MARKRAM H, 1998, V70, P101, NEUROBIOL LEARN MEM; MARTY PF, 2003, V37,
P259, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; MAZZIERI M, 2007, P58, INT WORKSH EM SEM ON;
MCCAIN KW, 1995, V46, P306, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MILLER JG, 1971, V16,
P302, BEHAV SCI; MURRAY AJ, 2006, V36, P231, VINE; NICOLAOU AI, 2006,
V17, P332, INFORM SYST RES; PARIS SG, 2002, PERSPECTIVES OBJECT; PREECE
J, 2002, INTERACTION DESIGN H; RALSTON JD, 2007, V14, P798, J AM MED
INFORM ASSN; RICHARDSON W, 2008, V67, P40, INDEPENDENT SCH; RIOUX K,
2005, P169, THEORIES INFORM BEHA; ROBINSON L, 2007, V9, P93, NEW MEDIA
SOC; ROZANSKI EP, 2003, P 4 C INF TECHN CURR; SAKURAI Y, 1999, V23, P785,
NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R; SALZER MS, 2003, V19, P511, COMPUT HUM BEHAV;
SHAPIRO ER, 2003, V2, P227, ORG SOCIAL DYNAMICS; SHORTLIFFE EH, 1994, V1,
P76, J AM MED INFORM ASSN; SPECTOR JM, 2000, V31, P528, SIMULATION
GAMING; SPINK A, 2006, V57, P25, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; STARKY AB, 1999,
V2, P15, AM J PASTORAL COUNSE; STEENBEEK HW, 2007, V27, P1, DEV REV;
SUGIMOTO CR, 2008, V59, P1441, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; SUNDAR SS, 2007,
V58, P366, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; TENNIS JT, 2003, V30, P191, KNOWL ORGAN;
TERENZIANI P, 2002, V18, P336, COMPUT INTELL; TILLETT BB, 1991, V35,
P150, LIBR RESOUR TECH SER; TRANT J, 2006, V12, P83, NEW REV HYPERMEDIA
M; TYNJALA P, 2005, V17, P318, J WORKPLACE LEARNING; VANBENTHEM J, 2009,
V38, P491, J PHILOS LOGIC; VINOGRADOV, 2006, V31, P896, NEUROIMAGE;
WAGNER GD, 2004, V28, P383, J EUROPEAN IND TRAIN; WERE G, 2003, V8, P25,
J MAT CULT; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD,
2001, V52, P87, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WILEY DA, 2002, INSTRUCTIONAL USE
LE; WILSON EV, 2004, V11, P241, J AM MED INFORM ASSN; YOUNG KS, 2005, V8,
P172, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV|
NR- 93|
TC- 0|
PU- CANADIAN ASSOC INFORMATION SCIENCE|
PI- OTTAWA|
PA- PO BOX 6174, STATION J, OTTAWA, ONTARIO K2A 1T2, CANADA|
SN- 1195-096X|
J9- CAN J INFORM LIB SCI|
JI- Can. J. Inf. Libr. Sci.-Rev. Can. Sci. Inf. Bibl|
PD- DEC|
PY- 2010|
VL- 34|
IS- 4|
BP- 403|
EP- 432|
PG- 30|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 699PV|
JN- CANADIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND LIBRARY SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE
DES SCIENCES DE L INFORMATION ET DE BIBLIOTHECONOMIE, 2010, V34, N4,
P403-432|
UT- ISI:000285676200003 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Raghuram S; Tuertscher P; Garud R|
AF- Raghuram Sumita; Tuertscher, Philipp; Garud, Raghu|
TI- Mapping the Field of Virtual Work: A Cocitation Analysis|
SO- INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- virtual work; virtual teams; bibliometric analysis|
ID- SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; ELECTRONIC MAIL; AT-HOME; COLLABORATION;
COMMUNICATION; ORGANIZATION; TEAMS; IDENTIFICATION; PATTERNS; CONTEXT|
AB- Interest in the area of virtual work continues to increase with
articles being written from different disciplinary perspectives-e. g.,
information systems (IS), management, psychology, and transportation In
this paper, we map research on virtual work to (a) understand the
intellectual base from which this field has emerged, (b) explore how this
field has evolved over time, and (c) identify clusters of research themes
that have emerged over time and the relationships between them
Specifically, we use cocitation analysis of research published in all
social science disciplines to map the field at three points in time-1995,
2000, and 2006. Our results show that the field has grown from 9 research
clusters in 1995 to 16 in 2006. A comparison across these maps suggests
that research in the cluster of "virtual teams" has gained significance
even as research in some earlier clusters such as "urban planning and
transportation" has lost ground. Our longitudinal analysis identifies
relevant concepts, theories, and methodologies that have emerged in the
field of virtual work. This analysis can help interested researchers
identify how they may want to contribute to the field of virtual work-by
adding to popular clusters, by enriching emerging smaller clusters, or by
acting as bridges across clusters|
C1- [Raghuram, Sumita] Penn State Univ, Dept Labor Studies & Employment
Relat, University Pk, PA 16802 USA; [Tuertscher, Philipp] Vienna Univ
Econ & Business, Inst Entrepreneurship & Innovat, A-1090 Vienna, Austria;
[Garud, Raghu] Penn State Univ, Smeal Coll Business, University Pk, PA
16802 USA|
RP- Raghuram, S, Penn State Univ, Dept Labor Studies & Employment Relat,
University Pk, PA 16802 USA|
EM- raghuram@psu.edu philipp.tuertscher@wu-wien.ac.at rgarud@psu.edu|
CD- *TEL ADV GROUP, 2007, TEL TRENDL 2006; BAILEY DE, 2002, V23, P383, J
ORGAN BEHAV; BANKER RD, 2006, V17, P352, INFORM SYST RES; BARUCH Y, 2001,
V3, P113, INT J MANAG REV; BELL BS, 2002, V27, P14, GROUP ORGAN MANAGE;
BIANCONI G, 2001, V86, P5632, PHYS REV LETT; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; BRIGGS RO, 2006, V22, P7, J MANAGE INFORM SYST; CASCIO
WF, 2000, V14, P81, ACAD MANAGE EXEC; CHEN CM, 2006, V57, P359, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; CHIDAMBARAM L, 1996, V20, P143, MIS QUART; COOPER H, 2003,
V129, P3, PSYCHOL BULL; CRAMTON CD, 2001, V12, P346, ORGAN SCI; CRANE D,
1969, V34, P335, AM SOCIOL REV; DAFT RL, 1986, V32, P554, MANAGE SCI;
DESANCTIS G, 1984, V7, P133, INFORM MANAGE; DESANCTIS G, 1994, V5, P121,
ORGAN SCI; FIOL CM, 2005, V16, P19, ORGAN SCI; FJERMESTAD J, 2000, V17,
P115, J MANAGE INFORM SYST; GAJENDRAN RS, 2007, V92, P1524, J APPL
PSYCHOL; GARFIELD E, 1983, V6, P580, ESSAYS INFORM SCI; GARFIELD E, 1992,
V19, P321, SCI PUBL POLICY; GLASER BG, 1967, DISCOVERY GROUNDED T; GMUR
M, 2003, V57, P27, SCIENTOMETRICS; GOLDEN TD, 2006, V27, P319, J ORGAN
BEHAV; HACKMAN JR, 1976, V16, P250, ORGAN BEHAV HUM PERF; HANDY C, 1995,
V73, P40, HARVARD BUS REV; HANDY SL, 1995, V61, P99, J AM PLANN ASSOC;
JARVENPAA SL, 1998, V14, P29, J MANAGE INFORM SYST; JARVENPAA SL, 1999,
V10, P791, ORGAN SCI; KARUGA GG, 2007, V19, P115, COMM ASS INFORM SYST;
KRAUT RE, 1989, V39, P19, J COMMUN; KURLAND NB, 1999, V10, P500, ORGAN
SCI; LATOUR B, 1979, LAB LIFE SOCIAL CONS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V60,
P159, SCIENTOMETRICS; LIPNACK J, 1997, VIRTUAL TEAMS REACHI; MAHMASSANI
HS, 1993, V1413, P31, TRANSPORT RES REC; MAJCHRZAK A, 2005, V16, P9,
INFORM SYST RES; MANE KK, 2004, V101, P5287, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; MARKUS
ML, 1994, V5, P502, ORGAN SCI; MAZNEVSKI ML, 2000, P5, ORGAN SCI; MCCAIN
KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MOKHTARIAN PL, 1991, V1305,
P273, TRANSPORT RES REC; MOKHTARIAN PL, 1991, V18, P319, TRANSPORTATION;
MOKHTARIAN PL, 1994, V26, P749, ENVIRON PLANN A; MOKHTARIAN PL, 1998,
V35, P215, URBAN STUD; NEWMAN MEJ, 2001, V64, ARTN 25102, PHYS REV E;
NILLES JM, 1991, V18, P411, TRANSPORTATION; OH W, 2006, V22, P266, J
MANAGEMENT INFORM; OLSON MH, 1984, V40, P97, J SOC ISSUES; OSAREH F,
1996, V46, P149, LIBRI; PENDYALA RM, 1991, V18, P383, TRANSPORTATION;
PETERS HPF, 1995, V46, P9, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; POGGIE G, 1965, V16,
P283, BRIT J SOCIOL; RAGHURAM S, 2001, V27, P383, J MANAGE; SALOMON IM,
1984, V25, P15, CHANGE; SCHILDT HA, 2005, SITKIS BIBLIOMETRIC; SCHILDT
HA, 2006, V30, P399, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; SCHILDT HA, 2006, V67, P143,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SCHNEIDER JW, 2006, V68, P573, SCIENTOMETRICS; SHAMIR B,
1985, V10, P455, ACAD MANAGE REV; SHUMATE M, 2006, V11, J COMPUT-MEDIAT
COMM; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1974, V4,
P17, SCI STUD; SMALL H, 1980, V2, P277, SCIENTOMETRICS; SPROULL L, 1986,
V32, P1492, MANAGE SCI; STANEK DM, 1998, V57, P53, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC;
STAR SL, 1989, V19, P387, SOC STUD SCI; STOKOLS D, 2005, V28, P202, AM J
PREV MED S2; THATCHER SMB, 2006, V31, P1076, ACAD MANAGE REV; TOWNSEND
AM, 1998, V12, P17, ACAD MANAGEMENT EXEC; VENKATESH A, 1992, V38, P1687,
MANAGE SCI; WALTHER JB, 1992, V19, P52, COMMUN RES; WALTHER JB, 1995, V6,
P186, ORGAN SCI; WATTS DJ, 1998, V393, P440, NATURE; WHORF BL, 1956,
LANGUAGE THOUGHT REA; WIESENFELD BM, 1999, V10, P777, ORGAN SCI|
NR- 77|
TC- 0|
PU- INFORMS|
PI- HANOVER|
PA- 7240 PARKWAY DR, STE 310, HANOVER, MD 21076-1344 USA|
SN- 1047-7047|
J9- INF SYSTEMS RES|
JI- Inf. Syst. Res|
PD- DEC|
PY- 2010|
VL- 21|
IS- 4|
BP- 983|
EP- 999|
DI- 10.1287/isre.1080.0227|
PG- 17|
SC- Information Science & Library Science; Management|
GA- 695OZ|
JN- INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2010, V21, N4, P983-999|
UT- ISI:000285383200023 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Scott SD; Profetto-McGrath J; Estabrooks CA; Winther C; Wallin L;
Lavis JN|
AF- Scott Shannon D; Profetto-McGrath, Joanne; Estabrooks, Carole A;
Winther, Connie; Wallin, Lars; Lavis, John N|
TI- Mapping the Knowledge Utilization Field in Nursing from 1945 to 2004:
A Bibliometric Analysis|
SO- WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- bibliometrics; nursing research; knowledge utilization; cocitation|
ID- SCIENCE POLICY; TRANSLATION; COLLABORATION; CITATIONS; IMPACT|
AB- Background: The field of knowledge utilization has been hampered by
several issues including: the synonymous use of multiple terms with
little attempt at definition precision; an overexamination of knowledge
utilization as product, rather than a process; and a lack of progress to
cross disciplinary boundaries to advance knowledge development. In order
to address the challenges and current knowledge gaps in the knowledge
utilization field in nursing, a comprehensive picture of the current
state of the field is required Methods: Bibliometric analyses were used
to map knowledge utilization literature in nursing as an international
field of study, and to identify the structure of its scientific community
Findings: Analyses of bibliographic data for 433 articles from the period
1945-2004 demonstrated three trends: (1) there has been significant
recent growth and interest in this field, (2) the structure of the
scientific knowledge utilization community is evolving, and (3) the Web
of Science does not index the majority of journals where this literature
is published Conclusions: In order to enhance the accessibility and
profile of this literature, and nursing's scientific literature at large,
we encourage the International Academy of Nursing Editors to work
collaboratively to increase the number of journals indexed in the Web of
Science|
C1- [Scott, Shannon D.; Profetto-McGrath, Joanne; Estabrooks, Carole A.]
Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada; [Winther,
Connie] Univ Alberta, CARE Program Integrat Hlth & Healing, Dept Pediat,
Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada; [Wallin, Lars] Karolinska Inst, Dept
Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Div Nursing, Stockholm, Sweden; [Lavis, John
N.] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada|
RP- Scott, SD, Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing, 3rd Floor,Clin Sci Bldg,
Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada|
EM- shannon.scott@nurs.ualberta.ca|
FU- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [67228]; Social
Sciences & Humanities Research Council [410-2004-0592]; CIHR ; Alberta
Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR) FX This work was
supported by grants-in-aid from the Canadian Institutes of Health
Research (CIHR) (MOP No. 67228) and the Social Sciences & Humanities
Research Council (grant No. 410-2004-0592). Dr. Scott received her
doctoral and postdoctoral funding from CIHR and the Alberta Heritage
Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR) during the early conduct of this
study. Dr. Wallin received postdoctoral fellowship funding from CIHR and
AHFMR during the early conduct of this study. Drs. Estabrooks and Lavis
receive career support from CIHR. The authors would like to acknowledge
Kelly Negrin who assisted us with editing the final manuscript. Address
correspondence to Dr. Shannon D Scott, Faculty of Nursing, 3rd Floor,
Clinical Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada,
T6G 2G3; shannon.scott@nurs.ualberta.ca|
CD- BACKER TE, 1991, V12, P225, KNOWLEDGE; BAYER AE, 1990, V41, P444, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; CHUBIN DE, 1987, V9, P254, KNOWLEDGE CREATION D; CRANE
D, 1972, INVISIBLE COLL DIFFU; DIES RR, 1983, P1, ADV GROUP PSYCHOTHER;
DIODATO V, 1994, DICT BIBLIOMETRICS; ESTABROOKS CA, 1998, V30, P15,
CANADIAN J NURSING R; ESTABROOKS CA, 1999, V31, P53, CANADIAN J NURSING
R; ESTABROOKS CA, 2004, V53, P293, NURS RES; ESTABROOKS CA, 2004, P242,
USING KNOWLEDGE EVID; ESTABROOKS CA, 2004, V1, P88, WORLDV EVID-BASED NU;
ESTABROOKS CA, 2006, V26, P25, J CONTIN EDUC HEALTH; ESTABROOKS CA, 2007,
V56, S4, NURS RES S; ESTABROOKS CA, 2008, V3, NIL1, IMPLEMENT SCI; FUNK
SG, 1991, V4, P39, APPLIED NURSING RES; GANNON F, 2000, V1, P293, EMBO
REP; GARFIELD E, 1972, V178, P471, SCIENCE; GARFIELD E, 1993, V18, P14,
CAN J INFORM LIB SCI; GEISLER E, 2000, METRICS SCI TECHNOLO; GRAHAM ID,
2006, V26, P13, J CONTIN EDUC HEALTH; HAVELOCK RG, 1971, PLANNING
INNOVATION; HORSLEY JA, 1983, USING RES IMPROVE NU; HUBERMAN M, 1994, V7,
P13, KNOWLEDGE POLICY; KETEFIAN S, 1975, V24, P89, NURS RES; MAHESWARAPPA
BS, 1997, P1, BIBLIOMETRIC STUDIES; MELIN G, 1996, V36, P363,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MELIN G, 1998, V49, P43, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MERTON RK,
1986, LITTLE SCI BIG SCI; NEWTON MS, 2007, V2, ARTN 1, IMPLEMENT SCI; OH
CH, 1997, V10, P3, KNOWLEDGE POLICY INT; OKUBO Y, 1997, STTI WORKING
PAPER S; ONEILL AL, 2000, V49, P224, NURS RES; PARDO C, 2001, V35, P933,
J ADV NURS; PLOS MED ED, 2006, V3, E291, PLOS MED; PRICE DJD, 1965, V149,
P510, SCIENCE; ROGERS EM, 1965, BIBLIO DIFFUSION INN; SACKETT DL, 1996,
V312, P71, BRIT MED J; SEGLEN PO, 1997, V314, P497, BRIT MED J; SHORE HL,
1972, V68, P36, CANADIAN NURSE; STETLER CB, 1976, V24, P559, NURS
OUTLOOK; STETLER CB, 1994, V42, P15, NURS OUTLOOK; STETLER CB, 1998, V28,
P45, J NURS ADMIN; TITLER MG, 2010, V24, P35, RES THEORY NURSING P;
TRAYNOR M, 2001, V34, P212, J ADV NURS; WALLIN L, 2009, V46, P576, INT J
NURS STUD; WOODS NF, 2010, V24, P9, RES THEORY NURSING P; WOOLF SH, 2008,
V299, P211, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC|
NR- 47|
TC- 0|
PU- WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC|
PI- MALDEN|
PA- COMMERCE PLACE, 350 MAIN ST, MALDEN 02148, MA USA|
SN- 1545-102X|
J9- WORLDVIEWS EVID-BASED NURS|
JI- Worldviews Evid.-Based Nurs|
PY- 2010|
VL- 7|
IS- 4|
BP- 226|
EP- 237|
DI- 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2010.00197.x|
PG- 12|
SC- Nursing|
GA- 690NC|
JN- WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2010, V7, N4, P226-237|
UT- ISI:000285010500005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Waaijer CJF; van Bochove CA; van Eck NJ|
AF- Waaijer Cathelijn J. F; van Bochove, Cornelis A; van Eck, Nees Jan|
TI- On the map: Nature and Science editorials|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Bibliometrics; Classification; Editorials; Full-text; Mapping;
VOSviewer|
ID- INFORMATION-SCIENCE; COCITATION ANALYSIS|
AB- Bibliometric mapping of scientific articles based on keywords and
technical terms in abstracts is now frequently used to chart scientific
fields. In contrast, no significant mapping has been applied to the full
texts of non-specialist documents. Editorials in Nature and Science are
such non-specialist documents, reflecting the views of the two most read
scientific journals on science, technology and policy issues. We use the
VOSviewer mapping software to chart the topics of these editorials. A
term map and a document map are constructed and clusters are
distinguished in both of them. The validity of the document clustering is
verified by a manual analysis of a sample of the editorials. This
analysis confirms the homogeneity of the clusters obtained by mapping and
augments the latter with further detail. As a result, the analysis
provides reliable information on the distribution of the editorials over
topics, and on differences between the journals The most striking
difference is that Nature devotes more attention to internal science
policy issues and Science more to the political influence of scientists|
C1- [Waaijer, Cathelijn J. F.; van Bochove, Cornelis A.; van Eck, Nees
Jan] Leiden Univ, Ctr Sci & Technol Studies, Leiden, Netherlands|
RP- van Bochove, CA, Leiden Univ, Ctr Sci & Technol Studies, Leiden,
Netherlands|
EM- c.j.f.waaijer@lumc.nl cbochove@cwts.leidenuniv.nl
ecknjpvan@cwts.leidenuniv.nl|
CD- ASTROM F, 2007, V58, P947, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BORNER K, 2003, V37,
P179, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; JANSSENS F, 2006, V42, P1614, INFORM PROCESS
MANAG; KLAVANS R, 2006, V68, P475, SCIENTOMETRICS; LUUKKONEN T, 1993,
V28, P15, SCIENTOMETRICS; MCCAIN KW, 1991, V42, P290, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; NOYONS ECM, 1998, V49, P68, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PETERS HPF, 1991,
V20, P235, SCIENTOMETRICS; PETERS HPF, 1993, V22, P23, RES POLICY; VANECK
NJ, COMPARISION 2 UNPUB; VANECK NJ, SCIENTOMETR IN PRESS; VANECK NJ,
2007, V15, P625, INT J UNCERTAIN FUZZ; VANECK NJ, 2009, V60, P1635, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; VANECK NJ, 2010, V82, P581, SCIENTOMETRICS; VOUTILAINEN
A, 1993, P48, P WORKSH VER LARG CO; WAAIJER CJF, 2010, V463, P157,
NATURE; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; ZHU SF, 2009,
V45, P555, INFORM PROCESS MANAG|
NR- 18|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- JAN|
PY- 2011|
VL- 86|
IS- 1|
BP- 99|
EP- 112|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-010-0205-9|
PG- 14|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 688XC|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2011, V86, N1, P99-112|
UT- ISI:000284888600008 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Xiao HG|
AF- Xiao Honggen|
TI- RESEARCH ASSOCIATIONS AS NETWORK FACILITATORS: A SNAPSHOT OF THE
TRAVEL AND TOURISM RESEARCH ASSOCIATION|
SO- JOURNAL OF TRAVEL & TOURISM MARKETING|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Knowledge network; social network; scientific community; applied
research; Travel and Tourism Research Association|
ID- PROFESSIONAL-ASSOCIATIONS; MARKET-RESEARCH; ORGANIZATIONAL
COMMITMENT; KNOWLEDGE; SCIENCE; TRUST; COCITATION; DYNAMICS|
AB- This article presents a discussion on research associations as
facilitators of knowledge networks in a community of tourism research and
marketing professionals. The Travel and Tourism Research Association was
selected for a case study to examine factors, attitudes, and behaviors in
relation to professional networking of its members. Perceptions of
knowledge networks, and of the association as a network facilitator, are
discussed in the contexts of social networks and capacity-building of a
scientific community. While the observations are made of a small sample
from a single association, results of the study have potential
implications for understanding and nurturing professional networks in an
applied research community|
C1- Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Sch Hotel & Tourism Management, Kowloon,
Hong Kong, Peoples R China|
RP- Xiao, HG, Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Sch Hotel & Tourism Management,
Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China|
EM- hmhgxiao@polyu.edu.hk|
CD- *COUNC AUSTR U TOU, 2005, 15 INT RES C COUNC A; *TRAV TOUR RES ASS,
2004, TTRA STRAT PLAN 2004; *TRAV TOUR RES ASS, 2007, TTRA INT MEMB SURV;
ARCODIA C, 2003, P29, ADV CONVENTION EXHIB; AYAL I, 1986, V19, P51, LONG
RANGE PLANN; BABBIE E, 1986, PRACTICE SOCIAL RES; BHATTACHARYA CB, 1998,
V26, P31, J ACAD MARKET SCI; BLAKEMAN P, 2005, TRAV TOUR RES ASS TT;
BRONSON J, 2001, V11, P1, J TRAVEL TOUR MARK; BRYMAN A, 2008, SOCIAL RES
METHODS; CAPLAN N, 1979, V22, P459, AM BEHAV SCI; COLLINS HM, 1974, V4,
P165, SCI STUD; CRANE D, 1972, INVISIBLE COLL DIFFU; CROSETTO G, 1997,
V3, P28, INT TRADE FORUM; DALE C, 2003, V9, P109, J VACATION MARKETING;
DANN GMS, 1997, V18, P251, TOURISM MANAGE; DESHPANDE R, 1982, V19, P14, J
MARKETING RES; DESHPANDE R, 1983, V4, P561, KNOWLEDGE CREATION D;
ENNAMORATO M, 2003, KEY FINDINGS TTRA CA; FRECHTLING D, 2004, V43, P100,
J TRAVEL RES; GEDDIE MW, 2002, V13, P19, J TRAVEL TOUR MARK; GRABURN NHH,
1991, V18, P1, ANN TOURISM RES; GRANOVET.MS, 1973, V78, P1360, AM J
SOCIOL; GRUEN TW, 2000, V64, P34, J MARKETING; GUNDLACH GT, 1995, V59,
P78, J MARKETING; HAGSTROM W, 1965, SCI COMMUNITY; HOLLINSHEAD K, 2006,
V31, P43, TOURISM RECREATION R; IMBER JB, 1999, V36, P5, SOCIETY; ISRAEL
J, 1972, BUILDING ORG SOC; IVES W, 1998, V1, P269, J KNOWLEDGE MANAGEME;
KADUSHIN C, 1968, V33, P685, AM SOCIOL REV; KLOSS L, 1999, V10, P71,
NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT; KUHN TS, 1974, P459, STRUCTURE SCI THEORI; LANFANT
MF, 1989, V16, P591, ANN TOURISM RES; LARSEN D, 2007, P5, ATTRACTION TTRA
SPR; LEE JS, 2008, V29, P331, TOURISM MANAGE; LEVY DA, 1993, V119, P233,
GENETIC SOCIAL GEN P; MARCH JG, 2004, V1, P5, MANAGEMENT ORG REV; MARSDEN
P, 1998, V2, P171, J MEMETICS EVOLUTION; MERTON RK, 1957, V22, P635, AM
SOCIOL REV; MONEY B, 2000, V9, P1, J TRAVEL TOUR MARK; MOORMAN C, 1992,
V29, P314, J MARKETING RES; MOORMAN C, 1993, V57, P81, J MARKETING;
MORGAN RM, 1994, V58, P20, J MARKETING; MULKAY MJ, 1977, P93, SCI
TECHNOLOGY SOC C; MULLINS NC, 1972, V10, P51, MINERVA; OPPERMANN M, 1997,
V24, P178, ANN TOURISM RES; POLANYI M, 1962, V1, P54, MINERVA; PORTER LW,
1974, V59, P603, J APPL PSYCHOL; PRICE D, 1963, LITTLE SCI BIG SCI;
REAGAN MD, 1967, V155, P1383, SCIENCE; REID L, 1998, P174, REVIVING
ENGINES MAK; RODENHAUSER P, 1999, V26, P417, ADM POLICY MENT HLTH; RUF B,
2007, TTRACCESS TRAVEL SEP; SCOTT N, 2006, KNOWLEDGE SHARING QU; SCOTT N,
2008, NETWORK ANAL TOURISM; SENGE P, 1990, 5 DISCIPLINE ART PRA; SHEEHAN
LR, 2005, V32, P711, ANN TOURISM RES; SHELDON PJ, 1989, V16, P492, ANN
TOURISM RES; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMITH SLJ,
1994, P165, REVITALIZING CANADIA; STEERS RM, 1977, V22, P46, ADM SCI Q;
USDIKEN B, 1995, V16, P503, ORGAN STUD; WEISS C, 1979, V29, P426, PUBLIC
ADMIN REV; WENGER E, 1998, COMMUNITIES PRACTICE; WINGENS M, 1990, V12,
P27, KNOWLEDGE CREATION D; XIAO H, 2007, V34, P310, ANN TOURISM RES; XIAO
H, 2008, V35, P62, ANN TOURISM RES; YIN R, 2003, CASE STUDY RES DESIG|
NR- 69|
TC- 0|
PU- ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD|
PIPASNJ9JIPYVLISBPEPDIPGSCGAJNUT-
ABINGDON|
4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXFORDSHIRE, ENGLAND|
1054-8408|
J TRAVEL TOUR MARK|
J. Travel Tour. Mark|
2010|
27|
3|
269|
286|
10.1080/10548401003744693|
18|
Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism|
688CZ|
JOURNAL OF TRAVEL & TOURISM MARKETING, 2010, V27, N3, P269-286|
ISI:000284828700004 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Al U; Soydal I; Yalcin H|
AF- Al Umut; Soydal, Irem; Yalcin, Haydar|
TI- An Evaluation of the Bibliometric Features of bilig|
SO- BILIG|
LA- Turkish|
DT- Article|
DE- bilig; bibliometrics co-citation analysis; social network analysis|
ID- SOCIAL-SCIENCE PUBLICATIONS; NETWORK ANALYSIS; OUTPUT|
AB- bilig has been indexed by the Social Sciences Citation Index since
2008 This study examines bilig and the bibliometric features of its
Publications in citation Indexes The following research questions are
addressed 1) What are the institutional affiliations of the authors of
the publications? 2) Is multiple authorship a prevalent feature of the
publications? 3) Which types of sources (books, journal articles, etc)
get cited more often in the publications? 4) What are the most frequently
cited journals in bilig? 5) What is the rate of literature obsolescence
in bilig? Moreover, this,study examines the relationships among the cited
authors in bilig by using social network analysis method In conclusion,
it is found that almost all of the publications are written in Turkish An
important part of the contributors is affiliated with Gazi, Hacettepe and
Baskent Universities Books receive 65% of all citations in Wig Half of
the sources cited in bilig have been published in the last 16 years|
C1- [Al, Umut; Soydal, Irem] Dr Hacettepe Univ, Fac Letters, Dept
Informat Management, Ankara, Turkey; [Yalcin, Haydar] Hacettepe Univ Lib,
Ankara, Turkey|
RP- Al, U, Dr Hacettepe Univ, Fac Letters, Dept Informat Management,
Ankara, Turkey|
CD- *AHM YES U, 2010, BIL; *THOMS REUT, 2010, SOC SCI CIT IND AR S;
*ULAKBIM, 2010, ISI WEB SCI WOSDA IN; AL U, 2004, V5, P19, BILGI DUNYASI;
AL U, 2006, V57, P1011, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; AL U, 2007, V21, P142, TURK
KUTUPHANEALIGI; AL U, 2008, THESIS ANKARA HACETT; AL U, 2009, V10, P231,
BILGI DUN YASI; BIRINCI HG, 2008, V9, P348, BILGI DUNYASI; CAWKELL T,
2001, P149, CENTURY SCI PUBLISHI; CHEN CM, 2006, V57, P359, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; FREEMAN LC, 2004, DEV SOCIAL NETWORK A; GARFIELD E, 1988, V22,
P3, CURRENT CONTENTS; GARFIELD E, 1994, THOMSON REUTERS IMPA; GULGOZ S,
2002, V55, P103, SCIENTOMETRICS; GURSAKAL N, 2009, SOSYAL AG ANAL; HIRSCH
JE, 2005, V102, P16569, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; LAWANI SM, 1981, V31, P294,
LIBRI; ORBAY M, 2007, V8, P1, BIBLIOS; OTTE E, 2002, V28, P441, J INF
SCI; PRITCHARD A, 1969, V25, P348, J DOC; SCOTT J, 1988, V22, P109,
SOCIOLOGY; TONTA Y, 1997, V12, P67, TURK PSIKOL DERG; UZUN A, 1998, V30,
P169, INT INF LIBR REV; VONDERDENKEL A, 1999, TURKIYEDE SOSYAL BIL; WHITE
EC, 1985, V76, P35, SPEC LIBR; YALCIN H, 2010, V22, P205, MILLI FOLKLOR|
NR- 27|
TC- 0|
PU- AHMET YESEVI UNIV|
PI- BAHCELIEVLER|
PA- MUTEVELLI HEYET BASKANLIGI, TASKENT CADDESI 10 SOK NU 30,
BAHCELIEVLER, ANKARA 06490, TURKEY|
SN- 1301-0549|
J9- BILIG|
JI- Bilig|
PD- FAL|
PY- 2010|
IS- 55|
BP- 1|
EP- 20|
PG- 20|
SC- Area Studies|
GA- 683ZN|
JN- BILIG, 2010, V27, N55, P1-20|
UT- ISI:000284516900001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Vargas-Quesada B; de Moya-Anegon F; Chinchilla-Rodriguez Z; GonzalezMolina A|
AF- Vargas-Quesada Benjamin; de Moya-Anegon, Felix; Chinchilla-Rodriguez,
Zaida; Gonzalez-Molina, Antonio|
TI- Showing the essential science structure of a scientific domain and
its evolution|
SO- INFORMATION VISUALIZATION|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- information visualization; ISI categories cocitation; scientific
domains; network visualization; network evolution; pathfinder network|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; ITEM SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION; INFORMATIONSCIENCE; PATHFINDER NETWORKS; DIGITAL LIBRARIES; CITATION ANALYSIS;
INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; KNOWLEDGE DOMAINS; MAPPING SCIENCE; WORD
ANALYSIS|
AB- Category cocitation and its representation through social networks is
proving to be a very adequate technique for the visualization and
analysis of great scientific domains. Its combination with pathfinder
networks using pruning values r=infinity and q=n-1 makes manifest the
essence of research in the domain represented, or what we might call the
'most salient structure'. The possible loss of structural information,
caused by aggressive pruning in peripheral areas of the networks, is
overcome by creating heliocentric maps for each category The depictions
obtained with this procedure become tools of great usefulness in view of
their capacity to reveal the evolution of a given scientific domain over
time, to show differences and similarities between different domains, and
to suggest possible new lines for development. This article presents the
scientogram of the United States for the year 2002, identifying its
essential structure. We also show the scientograms of China for the years
1990 and 2002, in order to study its particular national evolution.
Finally, we try to detect patterns and tendencies in the three
scientograms that would allow one to predict or flag the evolution of a
scientific domain. Information Visualization (2010) 9, 288-300.
doi:10.1057/ivs.2009.33; published online 24 December 2009|
C1- [Vargas-Quesada, Benjamin] Univ Granada, Commun & Informat Sci Fac,
Colegio Maximo Cartuja, E-18071 Granada, Spain; [Vargas-Quesada,
Benjamin; Gonzalez-Molina, Antonio] CSIC, Unidad Asociada Grp SCImago,
Granada 18071, Spain; [de Moya-Anegon, Felix; Chinchilla-Rodriguez,
Zaida] CSIC CCHS IPP, Madrid 28037, Spain|
RP- Vargas-Quesada, B, Univ Granada, Commun & Informat Sci Fac, Colegio
Maximo Cartuja, E-18071 Granada, Spain|
EM- benjamin@ugr.es|
CD- AARONSON S, 1975, V6, P22, MOSAIC; BORNER K, 2003, V37, P179, ANNU
REV INFORM SCI; BOTE VPG, 2002, V38, P79, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; BOYACK
KW, 2003, V54, P447, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BOYACK KW, 2005, V64, P351,
SCIENTOMETRICS; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BRAAM RR,
1991, V42, P252, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BRANDENBURG FJ, 1996, V1027, P76,
LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; BUTER RK, 2001, V51, P55, SCIENTOMETRICS;
BUZYDLOWSKI JW, 2002, V2539, P133, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; CHEN C, 2003,
P67, IEEE S INF VIS; CHEN C, 2004, CITESPACE VISUALIZIN; CHEN CM, 1998,
V10, P107, INTERACT COMPUT; CHEN CM, 1998, V9, P267, J VISUAL LANG
COMPUT; CHEN CM, 1999, V35, P401, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; CHEN CM, 2001,
V34, P65, COMPUTER; CHEN CM, 2001, V52, P315, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CHEN
CM, 2003, V54, P435, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; COHEN JD, 1997, V4, P197, ACM
T COMPUT-HUM INT; DING Y, 1999, V25, P67, J INFORM SCI; DING Y, 2001,
V37, P801, INFORMATION PROCESSI; EADES P, 1984, V42, P149, C NUMERANTIUM;
FOWLER RH, 1990, P165, PATHFINDER ASS NETWO; GARFIELD E, 1963, V14, P289,
AM DOC; GARFIELD E, 1964, USE CITATION DATA WR; GARFIELD E, 1981, V42,
P5, CURRENT CONTENTS; GARFIELD E, 1984, V7, P3, CURRENT COMMENTS;
GARFIELD E, 1988, V11, P3, CURR CONTENTS; GARFIELD E, 1998, 150 ANN M
AAAS PHIL; GLANZEL W, 1999, V44, P427, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W, 1999,
V46, P431, SCIENTOMETRICS; GRIFFITH BC, 1974, V4, P339, SCI STUD;
HJORLAND B, 1995, V46, P400, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; KAMADA T, 1989, V31,
P7, INFORM PROCESS LETT; KLAVANS R, 2006, V57, P251, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; KLAVANS R, 2006, V68, P475, SCIENTOMETRICS; KREMPEL L, 1999, P36, P
SECT STAT GRAPH AL; KRUSKAL JB, 1978, MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCA; LEYDESDORFF
L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2007, V71,
P391, SCIENTOMETRICS; LIN X, 1991, P262, P 14 ANN INT ACM SIG; LIN X,
2003, V39, P689, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; MERTON RK, 2000, WEB KNOWLEDGE
FESTSC; MORRIS SA, 2003, V54, P413, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MOYAANEGON F,
2004, V61, P129, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOYAANEGON F, 2005, V41, P1520, INFORM
PROCESSING MA; NOYONS E, 2001, V50, P83, SCIENTOMETRICS; NOYONS ECM,
1999, V50, P115, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PRICE DJD, 1965, V149, P510,
SCIENCE; SAMOYLENKO I, 2006, V57, P1461, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
SCHVANEVELDT RW, 1990, PATHFINDER ASS NETWO; SEIDEN LS, 1989, V59, P72,
LIB Q; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; SMALL H, 1981, V17, P39,
INFORMATION PROCESSI; SMALL H, 1985, V11, P147, J INFORM SCI; SMALL H,
1985, V7, P391, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1985, V8, P321, SCIENTOMETRICS;
SMALL H, 1989, V26, P5, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1994, V30, P229,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1999, V50, P799, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H,
2000, WEB KNOWLEDGE FESTSC; SMALL H, 2003, V54, P394, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; VANRAAN AFJ, 1993, V26, P169, SCIENTOMETRICS; VARGASQUESADA B, 2005,
THESIS U GRANADA; VARGASQUESADA B, 2007, VISUALIZING STRUCTUR; WHITE HD,
1997, V32, P99, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, P57, P 5 INT ISKO C WURZB; WHITE HD, 2000,
P475, ASIST MONOGR SER; WHITE HD, 2000, P25, IEEE INFOR VIS; WHITE HD,
2003, V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 71|
TC- 0|
PU- PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD|
PI- BASINGSTOKE|
PA- BRUNEL RD BLDG, HOUNDMILLS, BASINGSTOKE RG21 6XS, HANTS, ENGLAND|
SN- 1473-8716|
J9- INF VIS|
JI- Inf. Vis|
PD- WIN|
PY- 2010|
VL- 9|
IS- 4|
BP- 288|
EP- 300|
DI- 10.1057/ivs.2009.33|
PG- 13|
SC- Computer Science, Software Engineering|
GA- 683GS|
JN- INFORMATION VISUALIZATION, 2010, V9, N4, P288-300|
UT- ISI:000284461700006 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Shen YC; Lin GTR; Tzeng GH|
AF- Shen Yung-Chi; Lin, Grace T. R; Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung|
TI- Combined DEMATEL techniques with novel MCDM for the organic light
emitting diode technology selection|
SO- EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- DEMATEL; Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM); Analytic network
process (ANP); Fuzzy Delphi method; Patent co-citation (PCA); Technology
selection; Organic light emitting diode (OLED)|
ID- RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT-SELECTION; FUZZY DELPHI METHOD; PATENT ANALYSIS; INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY; CLUSTER-ANALYSIS; DECISION-MAKING; MANAGEMENT; MODEL|
AB- This research aims to propose a hybrid process concerning the
economic and industrial prospects along with critical technology streams
toward a more effective selection on new technology. The integration of
fuzzy Delphi method, the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory
(DEMATEL) technique, and the analytic network process (ANP) is employed
to construct a technology selection model regarding the economic and
industrial prospects. On the other hand, the patent co-citation approach
(PCA) is applied to objectively draw key technology fields as technology
alternatives for the technology selection model from patent data. The
emerging organic light emitting diode (OLED) display technology is used
as a case in order to verify the applicability of proposed a novel hybrid
MCDM method for the best technology selection The result of this hybrid
process can help top managers of technology-based companies or policy
makers of governments to more objectively and effectively determine
future research and development direction. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All
rights reserved|
C1- [Shen, Yung-Chi; Lin, Grace T. R.] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Inst
Management Technol, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan; [Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung] Kainan
Univ, Dept Business & Entrepreneurial Management, Luchu 338, Taoyuan
County, Taiwan; [Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung] Kainan Univ, Dept Banking & Finance,
Luchu 338, Taoyuan County, Taiwan|
RP- Shen, YC, Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Management Technol, 1001 Ta
Hsueh Rd, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan|
EM- syc.mt96g@nctu.edu.tw gtrl@faculty.nctu.edu.tw
ghtzeng@mail.knu.edu.tw|
CD- ABRAHAM BP, 2001, V21, P245, TECHNOVATION; ARBEL A, 1999, V4, P387, J
VAC SCI TECHNOL; BAKER NR, 1974, V21, P165, IEEE T ENG MANAGE EM; BAKOS
Y, 1998, COMPUTER REVOLUTION; BANULS VA, 2007, V74, P750, TECHNOL
FORECAST SOC; BANULS VA, 2008, V28, P103, TECHNOVATION; BERRY MMJ, 1994,
V24, P341, R&D MANAGE; BROOKS KW, 1979, V53, P377, N CENTRAL ASS Q;
CANTWELL J, 1992, TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMEN; CHANG PT, 2000, V112, P511, FUZZY
SET SYST; CHANG SB, 2009, V76, P107, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC; CHEN CH, 2005,
ORGANIC ELECTROLUMIN; CHEN CH, 2007, OLED MAT DEVICES DRE; CHEN HH, 2008,
V59, P242, COMPUT IND; CLARK KB, 1989, V67, P94, HARVARD BUS REV; COCHRAN
SW, 1983, V2, P111, J HUMAN SCI; COLDRICK S, 2005, V25, P185,
TECHNOVATION; CYPHERT FR, 1971, V52, P272, PHI DELTA KAPPAN; DAILEY AL,
1990, V14, P129, COMMUNITY JUNIOR COL; DAIM TU, 2006, V73, P981, TECHNOL
FORECAST SOC; DALKEY N, 1963, V9, P458, MANAGE SCI; DELBECQ AL, 1975,
GROUP TECHNIQUES PRO; DUSSAUGE P, 1992, STRATEGIC TECHNOLOGY;
EFSTATHIADES A, 2000, V20, P93, TECHNOVATION; ERDOGMUS S, 2005, V28,
P391, EVAL PROGRAM PLANN; ERDOGMUS S, 2006, V10, P269, RENEW SUST ENERG
REV; FONTELA E, 1976, DEMATEL OBSERVER DEM; GABUS A, 1973, 1 DEMATEL BATT
GEN R; GREENBERG E, 1995, CHANGE MANAGEMENT SU; GREGORY MJ, 1995, V209,
P347, P I MECH ENG B-J ENG; HACKETT PG, 1990, V31, P97, SLOAN MANAGE REV;
HUANG CC, 2008, V36, P1038, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S; HUANG CY, 2007, V27,
P744, TECHNOVATION; HUANG GQ, 1999, V19, P21, INT J OPER PROD MAN; HWANG
CL, 1987, GROUP DECISION MAKIN; ISHIKAWA A, 1993, V55, P241, FUZZY SET
SYST; JAFFE AB, 1986, V76, P984, AM ECON REV; JAFFE AB, 2002, PATENTS
CITATIONS IN; KENGPOL A, 2006, V101, P159, INT J PROD ECON; KHALIL TM,
2000, MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOG; KLIR GJ, 1988, FUZZY SETS UNCERTAIN; KOSTOFF
RN, 2001, V48, P132, IEEE T ENG MANAGE; LAI KK, 2005, V41, P313, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG; LAMB M, 1997, M PORTL INT C MAN EN; LEE H, 2009, V36,
P894, EXPERT SYST APPL; LEE JW, 2001, V19, P111, INT J PROJECT MANAGE;
LEE TR, 2006, V5, P105, ELECTRON COMMER R A; LEE WS, 2009, V36, P6421,
EXPERT SYST APPL 2; LEE YG, 2007, V27, P57, TECHNOVATION; LEI DT, 2000,
V19, P699, INT J TECHNOL MANAGE; LIBERATORE MJ, 1983, V29, P962, MANAGE
SCI; LIN CL, 2009, V36, P9683, EXPERT SYST APPL; LIOU JJH, 2008, V14,
P20, J AIR TRANSP MANAG; LIU SJ, 1997, V13, P661, INT J TECHNOL MANAGE;
MARTORELLA P, 1991, V19, P83, THEOR RES SOC EDUC; MCNAMARA P, 1999, V10,
P291, BRIT J MANAGE; MEADE LM, 1999, V37, P241, INT J PROD RES; MOGEE ME,
1997, TECHN TRANSF SOC ANN; MORONE J, 1989, V31, P91, CALIF MANAGE REV;
MURRY JW, 1995, V18, P423, REV HIGH EDUC; NIEMIRA MP, 2004, V20, P573,
INT J FORECASTING; ODA T, 2008, V20, P217, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG; OSBORNE
J, 2003, V40, P692, J RES SCI TEACH; PHAAL R, 2001, V21, P1116, INT J
OPER PROD MAN; PIIPO P, 1990, CONSULTING INNOVATIO; PORTER AL, 1995, V49,
P237, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC; RONDE P, 2001, V30, P1041, RES POLICY; RONDE
P, 2003, V70, P419, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC; SAATY TL, 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY
PROCE; SAATY TL, 1996, DECISION MAKING DEPE; SCHMIDT RL, 1992, V39, P189,
IEEE T ENG MANAGE; SCHRODER R, 1999, V19, P1270, INT J OPER PROD MAN;
SEYEDHOSSEINI SM, 2006, V91, P872, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE; SHARABCHIEV JT,
1989, V15, P127, SCIENTOMETRICS; SHEHABUDDEEN N, 2006, V26, P324,
TECHNOVATION; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; STACEY GS,
1990, V5, P389, INT J TECHNOL MANAGE; STEENSMA K, 1999, V10, P1, J HIGH
TECHNOLOGY MA; TORKKELI M, 2002, V77, P271, INT J PROD ECON; TZENG GH,
2007, V32, P1028, EXPERT SYST APPL; UHL NP, 1983, V37, P81, NEW
DIRECTIONS I RES; VANZOLINGEN SJ, 2003, V70, P317, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC;
VERSPAGEN B, 1997, V9, P47, EC SYSTEMS RES; WEI WL, 2008, V19, P15, J ENG
DESIGN; WEY WM, 2008, V35, P122, ENVIRON PLANN B; WHITMAN N, 1990, V29,
P377, J NURS EDUC; WU WW, 2008, V35, P828, EXPERT SYST APPL; YANG YPO,
2009, V8, P267, INT J INF TECH DECIS; YAP CM, 1993, V13, P449,
TECHNOVATION; YU OS, 1998, INTRO TECHNOLOGICAL|
NR- 90|
TC- 0|
PU- PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD|
PI- OXFORD|
PA- THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND|
SN- 0957-4174|
J9- EXPERT SYST APPL|
JI- Expert Syst. Appl|
PD- MAR|
PY- 2011|
VL- 38|
IS- 3|
BP- 1468|
EP- 1481|
DI- 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.056|
PG- 14|
SC- Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence; Engineering, Electrical &
Electronic; Operations Research & Management Science|
GA- 688PJ|
JN- EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, V38, N3, P1468-1481|
UT- ISI:000284863200024 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Taylor H; Dillon S; Van Wingen M|
AF- Taylor Hazel; Dillon, Stuart; Van Wingen, Melinda|
TI- FOCUS AND DIVERSITY IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH: MEETING THE DUAL
DEMANDS OF A HEALTHY APPLIED DISCIPLINE|
SO- MIS QUARTERLY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- IS discipline; IS research; author co-citation analysis; focus;
diversity|
ID- COCITATION ANALYSIS; IDENTITY CRISIS; MANAGEMENT; MIS; RELEVANCE;
RETHINKING; KNOWLEDGE; AGENDA; STATE; CORE|
AB- Drawing on sociology of science foundations, we argue that, in order
to survive and prosper, healthy applied disciplines must meet the dual
demands of academic and practitioner audiences by demonstrating both
focus and diversity in their research. First, we use this concomitant
modality to explain why previous studies into the structure of the
Information Systems discipline have reported contradictory results, with
some finding a focused field while others conclude that the field is
diverse. In support of our argument, we then present the results of a
longitudinal, author co-citation analysis, looking across the full range
of journals in which IS research is published. Our results suggest that
the IS field has sustained a focus on research within three subfields
over a 20-year period from 1986 to 2005: (I) a thematic miscellany of
research on development, implementation, and use of systems in various
application domains; (2) IS strategy and business outcomes; and (3) group
work and decision support. At the same time, the field has demonstrated
considerable diversity within and around these core subfields, with
researchers responding flexibly to the rapidly changing field by
investigating these areas with new paradigms and in new contexts, and by
exploring new topics including inter-business and Internet applications,
computer-supported collaborative work, virtual teams, and knowledge
management. Finally, we demonstrate that, over the 20-year period from
1986 to 2005, the discipline has shifted from fragmented adhocracy to a
polycentric state, which is particularly appropriate to an applied
discipline such as IS that must address the dual demands of focus and
diversity in a rapidly changing technological context|
C1- [Taylor, Hazel] Univ Washington, Informat Sch, Seattle, WA 98195 USA;
[Dillon, Stuart] Univ Waikato, Management Syst Dept, Hamilton 3240, New
Zealand; [Van Wingen, Melinda] Everett Publ Lib, Everett, WA 98201 USA|
RP- Taylor, H, Univ Washington, Informat Sch, Box 352840, Seattle, WA
98195 USA|
EM- hztaylor@u.washington.edu stuart@waikato.ac.nz
mvanwingen@ci.everett.wa.us|
CD- ADAM F, 2000, V5, INFORM RES; AGARWAL R, 2005, V29, P381, MIS QUART;
AKSNES DW, 2006, V57, P169, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ALAVI M, 1992, V8, P45,
J MANAGE INFORM SYST; BANVILLE C, 1989, V32, P48, COMMUN ACM; BENBASAT I,
1996, V7, P389, INFORM SYST RES; BENBASAT I, 1999, V23, P3, MIS QUART;
BENBASAT I, 2003, V27, P183, MIS QUART; CHUA C, 2002, V3, P145, J ASSOC
INF SYST; CULNAN MJ, 1986, V32, P156, MANAGE SCI; CULNAN MJ, 1986, V10,
P289, MIS QUART; CULNAN MJ, 1987, V11, P341, MIS QUART; DAVENPORT TH,
1999, V23, P19, MIS QUART; DAVIS GB, 1999, V1, P195, INFORMATION SYSTEMS;
DEARDEN J, 1972, V50, P90, HARVARD BUS REV; DESANCTIS G, 2003, V4, P360,
J ASSOC INF SYST; ETZKOWITZ H, 2000, V29, P109, RES POLICY; FUCHS S,
1993, V71, P933, SOC FORCES; GALLIERS RD, 2003, V4, P337, J ASSOC INF
SYST; GIBBONS M, 1994, NEW PRODUCTION KNOWL; GILL G, 2009, V33, P217, MIS
QUART; GROVER V, 2006, V7, P270, J ASSOC INF SYST; HESSELS LK, 2008, V37,
P740, RES POLICY; HIRSCHHEIM R, 1996, V6, P1, INFORM; HIRSCHHEIM R, 2003,
V4, P237, INFORM SYST; HORLICKJONES T, 2004, V36, P441, FUTURES; HUFF AS,
2001, V12, S49, BRIT J MANAGE; IVES B, 1980, V26, P910, MANAGE SCI; IVES
B, 2004, V5, P108, J ASSOC INF SYST; KEEN PGW, 1980, P9, P 1 INT C INF
SYST P; KING JL, 2004, V28, P539, MIS QUART; KLEIN HK, 2008, V32, P675,
MIS QUART; LARSEN TJ, 2005, V15, P357, INFORM SYST J; LYYTINEN K, 2004,
V5, P220, J ASSOC INF SYST; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; NOLAN RL, 1980, V4, P1, MIS Q; NOWOTNY H, 2001, RETHINKING SCI
KNOWL; ORLIKOWSKI WJ, 2001, V12, P121, INFORM SYST RES; PETTIGREW AM,
2001, V12, S61, BRIT J MANAGE; ROBEY D, 1994, V25, P6, DECISION LINE;
ROBEY D, 1996, V7, P400, INFORM SYST RES; ROBEY D, 2003, V4, P352, J AIS;
ROBINSON J, 2008, V40, P70, FUTURES; SIDOROVA A, 2008, V32, P467, MIS
QUART; SWANSON EB, 1993, V4, P299, INFORMATION SYSTEMS; TEO TSH, 2007,
V20, P518, COMMUNICATIONS ASS I; TRANFIELD D, 1998, V9, P341, BRIT J
MANAGE; VESSEY I, 2002, V19, P129, J MANAGE INFORM SYST; WEBER R, 2003,
V27, R3, MIS QUART; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
WHITLEY R, 1984, INTELLECTUAL SOCIAL; WHITLEY R, 1984, V21, P331, J
MANAGE STUD; WHITLEY R, 2000, INTELLECTUAL SOCIAL; WICKSON F, 2006, V38,
P1046, FUTURES|
NR- 54|
TC- 0|
PU- SOC INFORM MANAGE-MIS RES CENT|
PI- MINNEAPOLIS|
PA- UNIV MINNESOTA-SCH MANAGEMENT 271 19TH AVE SOUTH, MINNEAPOLIS, MN
55455 USA|
SN- 0276-7783|
J9- MIS QUART|
JI- MIS Q|
PD- DEC|
PY- 2010|
VL- 34|
IS- 4|
BP- 647|
EP- 667|
PG- 21|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science; Management|
GA- 678NT|
JN- MIS QUARTERLY, 2010, V34, N4, P647-667|
UT- ISI:000284086900002 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Boyack KW; Klavans R|
AF- Boyack Kevin W; Klavans, Richard|
TI- Co-Citation Analysis, Bibliographic Coupling, and Direct Citation:
Which Citation Approach Represents the Research Front Most Accurately?|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- COMBINING FULL-TEXT; SCIENCE; DOCUMENTS; CLASSIFICATION; MAPS|
AB- In the past several years studies have started to appear comparing
the accuracies of various science mapping approaches. These studies
primarily compare the cluster solutions resulting from different
similarity approaches, and give varying results. In this study we compare
the accuracies of cluster solutions of a large corpus of 2,153,769 recent
articles from the biomedical literature (2004-2008) using four similarity
approaches: co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, direct
citation, and a bibliographic coupling-based citation-text hybrid
approach. Each of the four approaches can be considered a way to
represent the research front in biomedicine, and each is able to
successfully cluster over 92% of the corpus. Accuracies are compared
using two metrics-within-cluster textual coherence as defined by the
Jensen-Shannon divergence, and a concentration measure based on the
grant-to-article linkages indexed in MEDLINE. Of the three pure citationbased approaches, bibliographic coupling slightly outperforms co-citation
analysis using both accuracy measures; direct citation is the least
accurate mapping approach by far. The hybrid approach improves upon the
bibliographic coupling results in all respects. We consider the results
of this study to be robust given the very large size of the corpus, and
the specificity of the accuracy measures used|
C1- [Boyack, Kevin W.] SciTech Strategies Inc, Albuquerque, NM 87122 USA;
[Klavans, Richard] SciTech Strategies Inc, Berwyn, PA 19312 USA|
RP- Boyack, KW, SciTech Strategies Inc, Albuquerque, NM 87122 USA|
EM- kboyack@mapofscience.com rklavans@mapofscience.com|
FU- NIH [HHSN268200900053C]|
FX- This work was supported by NIH SBIR Contract HHSN268200900053C.
Russell Duhon, Indiana University, extracted words from the titles and
abstracts of documents in the corpus for use in the hybrid approach. We
also acknowledge insightful comments and suggestions from the reviewers
of the original manuscript|
CD- AHLGREN P, 2008, V76, P273, SCIENTOMETRICS; AHLGREN P, 2009, V3, P49,
J INFORMETR; AHLGREN P, 2009, V83, P862, SCIENTOMETRICS; BOYACK KW, 2005,
V64, P351, SCIENTOMETRICS; BOYACK KW, 2009, V79, P27, SCIENTOMETRICS;
BOYACK KW, 2009, V83, P730, SCIENTOMETRICS; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; CALADO P, 2006, V57, P208, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CAO
MD, 2005, V3809, P143, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; COUTO T, 2006, P75, OP INF
HOR; GLENISSON P, 2005, V41, P1548, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; GLENISSON P,
2005, V63, P163, SCIENTOMETRICS; GROSSE I, 2002, V65, PHYS REV E;
JANSSENS F, 2006, INT C MULT INF SCI T; JANSSENS F, 2009, V45, P683,
INFORM PROCESS MANAG; JARNEVING B, 2005, V65, P245, SCIENTOMETRICS;
JARNEVING B, 2007, V1, P287, J INFORMETR; JARNEVING B, 2007, V1, P338, J
INFORMETR; KESSLER MM, 1963, V14, P10, AM DOC; KLAVANS R, 2006, V57,
P251, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; KLAVANS R, 2006, V68, P475, SCIENTOMETRICS;
KLAVANS R, 2010, V82, P539, SCIENTOMETRICS; LIN JH, 1991, V37, P145, IEEE
T INFORM THEORY; LIU XH, 2010, V61, P1105, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
MARSHAKOVA IV, 1973, V6, P3, SCI TECHNICAL INFORM; MARTIN S, 2011, C VIS
DAT AN SAN FRA; SANDSTROM U, 2009, 6321 SWED EPA; SHIBATA N, 2008, V28,
P758, TECHNOVATION; SHIBATA N, 2009, V60, P571, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
SIMS GE, 2009, V106, P2677, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; SMALL H, 1973, V24,
P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1985, V11, P147, J INFORM SCI; SMALL
H, 1997, V38, P275, SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 33|
TC- 0|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- DEC|
PY- 2010|
VL- 61|
IS- 12|
BP- 2389|
EP- 2404|
DI- 10.1002/asi.21419|
PG- 16|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 680KP|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2010, V61, N12, P2389-2404|
UT- ISI:000284231100002 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- van Eck NJ; Waltman L; Dekker R; van den Berg J|
AF- van Eck Nees Jan; Waltman, Ludo; Dekker, Rommert; van den Berg, Jan|
TI- A Comparison of Two Techniques for Bibliometric Mapping:
Multidimensional Scaling and VOS|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE FIELD;
INFORMATION-SCIENCE; PATHFINDER NETWORKS; SIMILARITY MEASURES;
COOCCURRENCE DATA; MAPS; REPRESENTATIONS; COLLABORATION; VISUALIZATION|
AB- VOS is a new mapping technique that can serve as an alternative to
the well-known technique of multidimensional scaling (MDS). We present an
extensive comparison between the use of MDS and the use of VOS for
constructing bibliometric maps. In our theoretical analysis, we show the
mathematical relation between the two techniques. In our empirical
analysis, we use the techniques for constructing maps of authors,
journals, and keywords. Two commonly used approaches to bibliometric
mapping, both based on MDS, turn out to produce maps that suffer from
artifacts. Maps constructed using VOS turn out not to have this problem.
We conclude that in general maps constructed using VOS provide a more
satisfactory representation of a dataset than maps constructed using
well-known MDS approaches|
C1- [van Eck, Nees Jan; Waltman, Ludo] Leiden Univ, Ctr Sci & Technol
Studies, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands; [van Eck, Nees Jan; Waltman,
Ludo; Dekker, Rommert] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Econ, Inst Econometr,
NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands; [van den Berg, Jan] Delft Univ
Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Sect ICT, NL-2600 AA Delft,
Netherlands|
RP- van Eck, NJ, Leiden Univ, Ctr Sci & Technol Studies, NL-2300 RA
Leiden, Netherlands|
EM- ecknjpvan@cwts.leidenuniv.nl waltmanlr@cwts.leidenuniv.nl
rdekker@ese.eur.nl j.vandenberg@tudelft.nl|
CD- AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ASTROM F, 2007,
V58, P947, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BELKIN M, 2003, V15, P1373, NEURAL
COMPUT; BLATT EM, 2009, V80, P387, SCIENTOMETRICS; BORG I, 2005, MODERN
MULTIDIMENSIO; BORNER K, 2003, V37, P179, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; BOYACK KW,
2005, V64, P351, SCIENTOMETRICS; BUJA A, 1994, V22, P406, ANN STAT; CHEN
CM, 2010, V61, P1386, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; COX TF, 2001,
MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCA; DAVIDSON GS, 1998, V11, P259, J INTELL INF SYST;
DELEEUW J, 1984, V49, P391, PSYCHOMETRIKA; DEROOIJ M, 2005, V70, P99,
PSYCHOMETRIKA; FRUCHTERMAN TMJ, 1991, V21, P1129, SOFTWARE PRACT EXPER;
GRIFFITH BC, 1974, V4, P339, SCI STUD; HEIMERIKS G, 2003, V58, P391,
SCIENTOMETRICS; KAMADA T, 1989, V31, P7, INFORM PROCESS LETT; KLAVANS R,
2006, V68, P475, SCIENTOMETRICS; MARTINMERINO M, 2004, V3316, P860, LECT
NOTES COMPUT SC; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN
KW, 1991, V42, P290, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; NOLL M, 2002, V2569, P14, LECT
NOTES ARTIF INT; PERSSON O, 1994, V45, P31, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PETERS
HPF, 1993, V22, P23, RES POLICY; PETERS HPF, 1993, V22, P47, RES POLICY;
RIP A, 1984, V6, P381, SCIENTOMETRICS; SAMMON JW, 1969, V18, P401, IEEE T
COMPUT; SCHNEIDER JW, 2009, V80, P105, SCIENTOMETRICS; SCHVANEVELDT RW,
1988, V15, P337, COMPUT MATH APPL; SCHVANEVELDT RW, 1990, PATHFINDER ASS
NETWO; SMALL H, 1985, V11, P147, J INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1985, V8, P321,
SCIENTOMETRICS; STEVENS SS, 1946, V103, P677, SCIENCE; TIJSSEN RJW, 1989,
V15, P283, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANECK NJ, 2006, V1, P6, IEEE COMPUT INTELL M;
VANECK NJ, 2007, V15, P625, INT J UNCERTAIN FUZZ; VANECK NJ, 2007, P299,
ST CLASS DAT ANAL; VANECK NJ, 2008, V59, P1653, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
VANECK NJ, 2009, V60, P1635, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; VANECK NJ, 2010, V82,
P581, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANECK NJ, 2010, V84, P523, SCIENTOMETRICS; WAAIJER
CJF, SCIENTOMETR IN PRESS; WAAIJER CJF, 2010, V463, P157, NATURE; WALTMAN
L, 2007, V58, P1701, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WALTMAN L, 2010, V4, P629, J
INFORMETR; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD,
1997, V32, P99, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ZHAO DZ,
2008, V59, P2070, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ZHAO DZ, 2008, V59, P916, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; ZHAO DZ, 2008, V2, P229, J INFORMETR; ZITT M, 2000, V47,
P627, SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 53|
TC- 0|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- DEC|
PY- 2010|
VL- 61|
IS- 12|
BP- 2405|
EP- 2416|
DI- 10.1002/asi.21421|
PG- 12|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 680KP|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2010, V61, N12, P2405-2416|
UT- ISI:000284231100003 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Lin TY; Wang YC; Tsai CL|
AF- Lin Tsai-Yuan; Wang, Yi-Chou; Tsai, Chung-Lin|
TI- TRENDING AND MAPPING THE INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR
STUDIES: A STUDY OF THE SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY JOURNAL|
SO- SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- network of knowledge; invisible network of knowledge; social
behavior; citation; cocitation|
ID- CITATION; MAP|
AB- Our aim in this research was to map the intellectual structure of
social behavior studies in the past 27 years, by comparing works from two
specific periods 1982-1995 and 1996-2008. A model of an invisible network
of knowledge was used in this study to identify the most important
studies, the most influential scholars, and the correlations among these
publications. The results of this research help in perceiving the network
that records the academic movement of social behavior, and will
facilitate access for researchers to the literature in this field|
C1- [Lin, Tsai-Yuan; Wang, Yi-Chou] Chang Jung Christian Univ, Grad Sch
Business & Operat Management, Tainan 704, Taiwan; [Lin, Tsai-Yuan] Hsing
Kuo Univ, Dept Business Adm, Tainan, Taiwan; [Tsai, Chung-Lin] Natl Cheng
Kung Univ, Dept Business Adm, Tainan 70101, Taiwan|
RP- Wang, YC, Chang Jung Christian Univ, Grad Sch Business & Operat
Management, 17,Alley 26,Line 442,Kai Yuan Rd, Tainan 704, Taiwan|
EM- yichou@hotmail.com|
CD- CHANDY PR, 1994, V25, P715, J INT BUS STUD; CHUBIN DE, 1984, V35,
P360, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; CRONIN B, 1984, CITATION PROCESS ROL; DUAN CH,
2007, INVISIBLE NETWORK KN; ETEMAD H, 1998, P25, P PICMET IEEE C PORT;
ETEMAD H, 2003, V20, P5, SMALL BUS ECON; GARFIELD E, 1979, CITATION
INDEXING IT; HOLSAPPLE CW, 2009, V52, P117, COMMUN ACM; KUHN TS, 1962,
STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; LATOUR B, 1987, SCI ACTION FOLLOW SC; MERTON R,
1979, CITATION INDEXING IT; PERITZ BC, 1992, V43, P448, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; PRICE DJ, 1963, LITTLE SCI BIG SCI; SMALL HG, 1978, V8, P327, SOC
STUD SCI; SNYDER H, 1998, V24, P431, J INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1983, V34,
P307, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; ZHENZHONG M, 2007, INVISIBLE NETWORK KN;
ZUCCALA A, 2006, V57, P1486, J AM SOC INFORM SCI|
NR- 18|
TC- 0|
PU- SOC PERSONALITY RES INC|
PI- PALMERSTON NORTH|
PA- P O BOX 1539, PALMERSTON NORTH 5330, NEW ZEALAND|
SN- 0301-2212|
J9- SOC BEHAV PERSONAL|
JI- Soc. Behav. Pers|
PY- 2010|
VL- 38|
IS- 9|
BP- 1229|
EP- 1242|
DI- 10.2224/sbp.2010.38.9.1229|
PG- 14|
SC- Psychology, Social|
GA- 670DF|
JN- SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2010, V38, N9, P1229-1242|
UT- ISI:000283400700008 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Lee PC; Su HN; Chan TY|
AF- Lee Pei-Chun; Su, Hsin-Ning; Chan, Te-Yi|
TI- Assessment of ontology-based knowledge network formation by VectorSpace Model|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Social network; Knowledge network; Keyword; Cut-off value; Network
formation; Vector-Space Model|
ID- CO-WORD ANALYSIS; COCITATION ANALYSIS; SCIENTOMETRICS; RETRIEVAL;
STRENGTH; SYSTEM; FIELD; MAPS; TOOL|
AB- This study proposes an empirical way for determining probability of
network tie formation between network actors. In social network analysis,
it is a usual problem that information for determining whether or not a
network tie should be formed is missing for some network actors, and thus
network can only be partially constructed due to unavailability of
information. This methodology proposed in this study is based on network
actors' similarities calculations by Vector-Space Model to calculate how
possible network ties can be formed. Also, a threshold value of
similarity for deciding whether or not a network tie should be generated
is suggested in this study. Four ontology-based knowledge networks, with
journal paper or research project as network actors, constructed
previously are selected as the targets of this empirical study: (1)
Technology Foresight Paper Network: 181 papers and 547 keywords, (2)
Regional Innovation System Paper Network: 431 papers and 1165 keywords,
(3) Global Sci-Tech Policy Paper Network: 548 papers and 1705 keywords,
(4) Taiwan's Sci-Tech Policy Project Network: 143 research projects and
213 keywords. The four empirical investigations allow a cut-off threshold
value calculated by Vector-Space Model to be suggested for deciding the
formation of network ties when network linkage information is
unavailable|
C1- [Lee, Pei-Chun; Su, Hsin-Ning; Chan, Te-Yi] Sci & Technol Policy Res
& Informat Ctr, Natl Appl Res Labs, Taipei 106, Taiwan; [Lee, Pei-Chun]
Univ Sussex, Freeman Ctr, SPRU Sci & Technol Policy Res, Brighton BN1
9QE, E Sussex, England; [Lee, Pei-Chun] Natl Chengchi Univ, Grad Inst
Technol & Innovat Management, Taipei 116, Taiwan|
RP- Su, HN, Sci & Technol Policy Res & Informat Ctr, Natl Appl Res Labs,
14 F,106 Sec 2,He Ping E Rd, Taipei 106, Taiwan|
EM- hnsu@mail.stpi.org.tw|
CD- *NAT SCI COUNC, 2009, GOV RES B; BARABASI AL, 1999, V286, P509,
SCIENCE; BRASS DJ, 1992, P191, NETWORKS ORG STRUCTU; CALLON M, 1991, V22,
P155, SCIENTOMETRICS; CAMBROSIO A, 1993, V27, P119, SCIENTOMETRICS;
CAVENAGO D, 2009, C EUR GROUP PUBL ADM; CHANDRASEKARAN B, 1999, V14, P20,
IEEE INTELL SYST APP; CLARKE A, 2007, V17, P24, EUR J PUBLIC HEAL S1;
COULTER N, 1998, V49, P1206, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; FREEMAN LC, 1979, V1,
P215, SOC NETWORKS; GRANOVET.MS, 1973, V78, P1360, AM J SOCIOL;
GRANOVETTER MS, 1970, THESIS HARVARD U BOS; LEE S, 2009, V76, P769,
TECHNOL FORECAST SOC; LEE SY, 2009, P 2009 ANN C CHIN SO; LIAO LJ, 2005,
V31, P407, J INF SCI; MARSDEN PV, 1984, V63, P482, SOC FORCES;
MARSHAKOVASHAIKEVICH I, 2005, V41, P1534, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; MOTTER
AE, 2002, V65, ARTN 065102, PHYS REV E 2; NECHES R, 1991, V12, P36, AI
MAG; NOHRIA N, 1992, NETWORKS ORG STRUCTU; NOYONS ECM, 1994, V30, P157,
SCIENTOMETRICS; NOYONS ECM, 1998, V49, P68, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PIRRO G,
2010, V69, P444, DATA KNOWL ENG; RAGHAVAN VV, 1986, V37, P279, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; RIP A, 1984, V6, P381, SCIENTOMETRICS; SALTON G, 1975, V18,
P620, COMMUN ACM; SALTON G, 1983, INTRO MODERN INFORM; SALTON G, 1988,
V24, P513, INFORMATION PROCESSI; SCHILDT HA, 2006, V30, P399, ENTREP
THEORY PRACT; SCHILDT HA, 2006, V67, P143, SCIENTOMETRICS; SOKAL RR,
1958, V38, P1409, KANSAS U SCI B; SU HN, 2009, 2009 ANN C CHIN SOC; SU
HN, 2009, AC MAN CHIC IL US; SU HN, 2009, PORTL INT C MAN ENG; VANRAAN
AFJ, 1993, V26, P169, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANRIJSBERGEN CJ, 1979, INFORM
RETRIEVAL; WASSERMAN S, 1994, ADV SOCIAL NETWORK A; WATTS DJ, 1998, V393,
P440, NATURE; WATTS DJ, 2003, 6 DEGREES SCI CONNEC; WELLMAN B, 1988, P1,
SOCIAL STRUCTURES NE; WENG SS, 2008, V34, P1857, EXPERT SYST APPL; YOON
B, 2004, V15, P37, J HIGH TECHNOLOGY MA; YOON B, 2008, KEYWORD BASED
KNOWLE; ZHANG Y, 2009, V36, P5436, EXPERT SYST APPL 1|
NR- 44|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- DEC|
PY- 2010|
VL- 85|
IS- 3|
BP- 689|
EP- 703|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-010-0267-8|
PG- 15|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 666DA|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, V85, N3, P689-703|
UT- ISI:000283090300005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Vanz SAD; Stumpf IRC|
AF- de Souza Vanz Samile Andrea; Chitto Stumpf, Ida Regina|
TI- PROCEDURES AND TOOLS APPLIED TO BIBLIOMETRIC STUDIES|
SO- INFORMACAO & SOCIEDADE-ESTUDOS|
LA- Portuguese|
DT- Article|
DE- Bibliometrics; Scientometrics; Quantitative analysis; Bibexcel;
Similarities measures|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION;
SIMILARITY MEASURES; SALTONS COSINE; JACCARD INDEX; PEARSONS R;
INFORMATION; SCIENCE; BRAZIL|
AB- Discusses the process of scientific prodution evaluation and the
necessary development of indicators for this purpose. Presents sources
for data collection for development of scientific production indicators
and presents the procedures for cleaning/standardization and organization
of bibliometric data. Describes free softwares for bibliometric analysis
and the importance of using relative indicators Discusses some procedures
adopted by the international scientific community for multivariate
analysis of bibliometric data|
C1- [de Souza Vanz, Samile Andrea; Chitto Stumpf, Ida Regina] Univ Fed
Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Ciencias Informacao, BR-90046900 Porto Alegre,
RS, Brazil; [Chitto Stumpf, Ida Regina] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul,
Programa Posgrad Comunicacao & Informacao, BR-90046900 Porto Alegre, RS,
Brazil|
RP- Vanz, SAD, Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Ciencias Informacao, BR90046900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil|
EM- samilevanz@terra.com.br irstumpf@ufrgs.br|
CD- AHLGREN P, 2006, V54, P1616, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BENSMAN SJ, 2004,
V55, P935, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ECK NJ, 2008, V59, P1653, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; EGGHE L, 2009, V60, P1027, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; GLANZEL W,
2003, V56, P357, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W, 2006, V67, P67,
SCIENTOMETRICS; HAMERS L, 1989, V25, P315, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; HOU H,
2008, V75, P189, SCIENTOMETRICS; LETA J, 2006, V67, P87, SCIENTOMETRICS;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2003, V58, P445, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2005, V56,
P769, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2008, V59, P77, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LIMA RA,
2007, V12, P50, PERSPECTIVAS CIENCIA; LUUKKONEN T, 1992, V17, P101, SCI
TECHNOL; LUUKKONEN T, 1993, V28, P15, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOURA AMM, 2009,
P269, THESIS U FEDERAL RIO; MUGNAINI R, 2004, V33, P123, CI INF; PERSSON
O, 2009, P9, CELEBRATING SCHOLARL; SANCHO R, 1990, V13, P842, REV
ESPANOLA DOCUMEN; SPINAK E, 1998, V27, P141, CIENCIA INFORM BRASI; VELHO
L, 1986, P22, CADERNOS USP SAO PAU; VILAN JL, 2008, V13, P2, PERSPECT
CIENC INF; WALTMAN L, 2007, V58, P1701, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITE HD,
2003, V54, P1250, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ZIMBA HF, 2004, V5, ARTN 4,
DATAGRAMAZERO RIO JA|
NR- 26|
TC- 0|
PU- UNIV FED PARAIBA CCSA|
PI- JOAO PESSOA PB|
PA- CIDADE UNIV, PROG POS-GRAD CIENC INFORM, JOAO PESSOA PB, 58 059-900,
BRAZIL|
SN- 0104-0146|
J9- INF SOC-ESTUD|
JI- Inf. Soc.-Estud|
PY- 2010|
VL- 20|
IS- 2|
BP- 67|
EP- 75|
PG- 9|
SC- Information Science & Library Science|
GA- 669DY|
JN- INFORMACAO & SOCIEDADE-ESTUDOS, 2010, V20, N2, P67-75|
UT- ISI:000283327800006 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Merkl M; Ulbrich SE; Otzdorff C; Herbach N; Wanke R; Wolf E; Handler
J; Bauersachs S|
AF- Merkl M; Ulbrich, S. E; Otzdorff, C; Herbach, N; Wanke, R; Wolf, E;
Handler, J; Bauersachs, S|
TI- Microarray Analysis of Equine Endometrium at Days 8 and 12 of
Pregnancy|
SO- BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- embryo-maternal communication; equus caballus; female reproductive
tract; gene regulation; horse; pregnancy; steroid hormones; uterus|
ID- INDUCED TRANSCRIPTOME CHANGES; BOVINE MAMMARY-GLAND; GROWTH-FACTOR;
GENE-EXPRESSION; ESTROUS-CYCLE; STROMAL CELLS; CONCEPTUS ELONGATION;
CANDIDATE GENES; HORSE EMBRYOS; PONY MARES|
AB- Establishment and maintenance of pregnancy in equids is only
partially understood. To provide new insights into early events of this
process, we performed a systematic analysis of transcriptome changes in
the endometrium at Days 8 and 12 of pregnancy. Endometrial biopsy samples
from pregnant and nonpregnant stages were taken from the same mares
Composition of the collected biopsy samples was analyzed using
quantitative stereological techniques to determine proportions of surface
and glandular epithelium and blood vessels. Microarray analysis did not
reveal detectable changes in gene expression at Day 8, whereas at Day 12
of pregnancy 374 differentially expressed genes were identified, 332 with
higher and 42 with lower transcript levels in pregnant endometrium.
Expression of selected genes was validated by quantitative real-time RTPCR. Gene set enrichment analysis, functional annotation clustering, and
cocitation analysis were performed to characterize the genes
differentially expressed in Day 12 pregnant endometrium. Many known
estrogen-induced genes and genes involved in regulation of estrogen
signaling were found, but also genes known to be regulated by
progesterone and prostaglandin E2. Additionally, differential expression
of a number of genes related to angiogenesis and vascular remodeling
suggests an important role of this process Furthermore, genes that
probably have conserved functions across species, such as CRYAB, ERRFI1,
FGF9, IGFBP2, NR2F2, STC1, and TNFSF10, were identified. This study
revealed the potential target genes and pathways of conceptus-derived
estrogens, progesterone, and prostaglandin E2 in the equine endometrium
probably involved in the early events of establishment and maintenance of
pregnancy in the mare|
C1- [Merkl, M.; Wolf, E.; Bauersachs, S.] Univ Munich, Lab Funct Genome
Anal LAFUGA, Gene Ctr, D-81377 Munich, Germany; [Merkl, M.; Handler, J.]
Univ Munich, Ctr Clin Vet Med, Clin Horses, D-81377 Munich, Germany;
[Otzdorff, C.] Univ Munich, Ctr Clin Vet Med, Clin Small Anim Surg &
Gynecol, D-81377 Munich, Germany; [Herbach, N.; Wanke, R.] Univ Munich,
Ctr Clin Vet Med, Inst Vet Pathol, D-81377 Munich, Germany; [Ulbrich, S.
E.] Tech Univ Munich, D-8050 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany; [Handler,
J.] Free Univ Berlin, Clin Horses, Fac Vet Med, Berlin, Germany|
RP- Bauersachs, S, Univ Munich, Lab Funct Genome Anal LAFUGA, Gene Ctr,
Feodor Lynen Str 25, D-81377 Munich, Germany|
EM- bsachs@lmb.uni-muenchen.de|
FU- German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) [1029]; German
Research Foundation (DFG) FX Supported by the German Ministry for
Education and Research (BMBF, FUGATO-plus, COMPENDIUM) and the German
Research Foundation (DFG, Research Training Unit 1029 Functional Genome
Research in Veterinary Medicine). The data discussed in this publication
have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO,
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and are accessible through GEO Series
accession number GSE21046|
CD- ALLEN WR, 2001, V121, P513, REPRODUCTION; BATTUT I, 1997, V25, P60,
EQUINE VET J S; BAUERSACHS S, 2006, V132, P319, REPRODUCTION; BAUERSACHS
S, 2009, V106, P5681, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; BAZER FW, 2009, V138, P195,
REPRODUCTION; BETTERIDGE KJ, 1982, V135, P191, J ANAT; BETTERIDGE KJ,
2000, V60, P691, ANIM REPROD SCI; BETTERIDGE KJ, 2007, V68, S9,
THERIOGENOLOGY S1; BOERBOOM D, 2004, V70, P391, BIOL REPROD; BOQUEST AC,
2005, V16, P1131, MOL BIOL CELL; BURGHARDT RC, 2009, V137, P567,
REPRODUCTION; BUSTIN SA, 2009, V55, P611, CLIN CHEM; CHOI SJ, 1997, V47,
P457, THERIOGENOLOGY; CHOI Y, 2009, V81, P1122, BIOL REPROD; CHU K, 1997,
V19, P163, J MOL ENDOCRINOL; CHUANG PC, 2006, V26, P8281, MOL CELL BIOL;
COCHET M, 2009, V433, P88, GENE; DELALAMO MMR, 2008, V107, P94, ANIM
REPROD SCI; DENNIS G, 2003, V4, P3, GENOME BIOL; DONOFRIO G, 2008, V6,
ARTN 65, REPROD BIOL ENDOCRIN; EALY AD, 2010, V117, P99, ANIM REPROD SCI;
FLUHR H, 2009, V92, P1420, FERTIL STERIL; FOSTER CD, 2010, V67, P585,
PEDIATR RES; FRIJTERS R, 2008, V36, W406, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES S; FUJIWARA
K, 2006, V259, P373, J INTERN MED; GINTHER OJ, 1983, V19, P603,
THERIOGENOLOGY; GINTHER OJ, 1983, V19, P613, THERIOGENOLOGY; GIUDICE LC,
1991, V6, P632, HUM REPROD; GIUDICE LC, 1999, V44, P165, J REPROD MED S;
GOFF AK, 1987, V35, P253, J REPROD FERTIL S; GOFF AK, 1993, V10, P229,
DOMEST ANIM ENDOCRIN; HARADA M, 2006, V290, E268, AM J PHYSIOL-ENDOC M;
HERRLER A, 2000, V62, P1804, BIOL REPROD; HERSHMAN L, 1979, P395, J
REPROD FERTIL SUPP; HUBER W, 2002, V18, P96, BIOINFORMATICS; IRUELAARISPE
ML, 2004, V36, P1070, INT J BIOCHEM CELL B; KIM TH, 2010, V82, P706, BIOL
REPROD; KLEIN C, 2006, V74, P253, BIOL REPROD; KLEIN C, 2010, V83, P102,
BIOL REPROD; KURIHARA I, 2007, V3, P1053, ARTN e102, PLOS GENET;
KUTSUKAKE M, 2010, V77, P265, MOL REPROD DEV; KWON YS, 2007, V104, P4852,
P NATL ACAD SCI USA; LEITH GS, 1985, V24, P701, THERIOGENOLOGY; LI RW,
2006, V27, P42, PHYSIOL GENOMICS; LI RW, 2008, V8, P55, FUNCT INTEGR
GENOMIC; LIN CY, 2007, V3, P867, ARTN e87, PLOS GENET; LIVAK KJ, 2001,
V25, P402, METHODS; MACINTYRE DA, 2008, V149, P245, ENDOCRINOLOGY;
MATSUMOTO H, 2008, V14, P485, MOL HUM REPROD; MIRKIN S, 2005, V20, P2104,
HUM REPROD; MITKO K, 2008, V135, P225, REPRODUCTION; ORIOL JG, 1993, V34,
P255, MOL REPROD DEV; OSTRUP E, 2010, V83, P277, BIOL REPROD; PETIT FG,
2007, V104, P6293, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; RIESEWIJK A, 2003, V9, P253, MOL
HUM REPROD; SATTERFIELD MC, 2009, V39, P85, PHYSIOL GENOMICS; SHARP DC,
1989, V37, P101, J REPROD FERT S; SHARP DC, 1997, V109, P137, J REPROD
FERTIL; SHARP DC, 2000, V60, P679, ANIM REPROD SCI; SILVA LA, 2005, V72,
P755, BIOL REPROD; SIMMONS RM, 2009, V150, P4295, ENDOCRINOLOGY; SMITH
JL, 2008, V73, P1160, STEROIDS; SONG G, 2006, V74, P913, BIOL REPROD;
SONG G, 2009, V150, P936, ENDOCRINOLOGY; STARBUCK GR, 1998, V113, P173, J
REPROD FERTIL; STOUT TAE, 1999, V116, P315, J REPROD FERTIL; STOUT TAE,
2001, V17, P579, PFERDEHEILKUNDE; SUBRAMANIAN A, 2005, V102, P15545, P
NATL ACAD SCI USA; TAKAMOTO N, 2005, V19, P2299, MOL ENDOCRINOL; TAYADE
C, 2007, V82, P877, J LEUKOCYTE BIOL; TROTT JF, 2009, V202, P153, J
ENDOCRINOL; TSAI SJ, 2002, V143, P2715, ENDOCRINOLOGY; TUSHER VG, 2001,
V98, P5116, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; ULBRICH SE, 2009, V138, P371,
REPRODUCTION; WACLAWIK A, 2009, V150, P3823, ENDOCRINOLOGY; WATSON ED,
1989, V87, P331, J REPROD FERTIL; WOLF E, 2003, V38, P276, REPROD DOMEST
ANIM; WOODFIN A, 2007, V27, P2514, ARTERIOSCL THROM VAS; XIAO LJ, 2006,
V131, P1137, REPRODUCTION; YANG ZM, 1997, V56, P368, BIOL REPROD; ZAVY
MT, 1984, V115, P214, ENDOCRINOLOGY; ZHANG J, 1997, V3, P735, MOL HUM
REPROD|
NR- 82|
TC- 0|
PU- SOC STUDY REPRODUCTION|
PI- MADISON|
PA- 1603 MONROE ST, MADISON, WI 53711-2021 USA|
SN- 0006-3363|
J9- BIOL REPROD|
JI- Biol. Reprod|
PD- NOV|
PY- 2010|
VL- 83|
IS- 5|
BP- 874|
EP- 886|
DIPGSCGAJNUT-
10.1095/biolreprod.110.085233|
13|
Reproductive Biology|
670CQ|
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2010, V83, N5, P874-886|
ISI:000283398900024 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Ajiferuke I; Lu K; Wolfram D|
AF- Ajiferuke Isola; Lu, Kun; Wolfram, Dietmar|
TI- A Comparison of Citer and Citation-Based Measure Outcomes for
Multiple Disciplines|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; CITING BEHAVIOR; IMAGE-MAKERS; SCIENCE;
INDEXES; DOCUMENTATION; COCITATION; IDENTITY; AUTHORS; COUNTS|
AB- Author research impact was examined based on citer analysis (the
number of citers as opposed to the number of citations) for 90 highly
cited authors grouped into three broad subject areas. Citer-based outcome
measures were also compared with more traditional citation-based measures
for levels of association. The authors found that there are significant
differences in citer-based outcomes among the three broad subject areas
examined and that there is a high degree of correlation between citer and
citation-based measures for all measures compared, except for two
outcomes calculated for the social sciences. Citer-based measures do
produce slightly different rankings of authors based on citer counts when
compared to more traditional citation counts Examples are provided.
Citation measures may not adequately address the influence, or reach, of
an author because citations usually do not address the origin of the
citation beyond self-citations|
C1- [Ajiferuke, Isola] Univ Western Ontario, Fac Informat & Media
Studies, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada; [Lu, Kun; Wolfram, Dietmar] Univ
Wisconsin, Sch Informat Studies, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA|
RP- Ajiferuke, I, Univ Western Ontario, Fac Informat & Media Studies,
London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada|
EM- iajiferu@uwo.ca kunlu@uwm.edu dwolfram@uwm.edu|
FU- Thomson Reuters FX This research was supported by a Thomson Reuters
Citation Analysis Research Grant. We thank Thomson Reuters for additional
data access and support. We thank Courtney Kennedy for providing research
assistance and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions|
CD- AJIFERUKE I, 2010, V83, P623, SCIENTOMETRICS; BARILAN J, 2006, V42,
P1553, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; BORNMANN L, 2008, V64, P45, J DOC; BROOKS
TA, 1985, V36, P223, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; COSTAS R, 2007, V1, P193, J
INFORMETR; COSTAS R, 2010, V82, P517, SCIENTOMETRICS; CRONIN B, 1994,
V45, P61, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; CRONIN B, 2001, V52, P558, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; CRONIN B, 2002, V54, P31, SCIENTOMETRICS; DIEKS D, 1976, V6,
P247, SOC STUD SCI; GARFIELD E, 1955, V122, P108, SCIENCE; GARFIELD E,
1963, V14, P195, AM DOC; GARFIELD E, 1965, P189, STAT ASS METHODS MEC;
HIRSCH JE, 2005, V102, P16569, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; KATSAROS D, 2009,
V60, P1051, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; KVAM PH, 2007, NONPARAMETRIC STAT A;
LINDSEY D, 1989, V15, P189, SCIENTOMETRICS; MACROBERTS MH, 1989, V40,
P342, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MACROBERTS MH, 2010, V61, P1, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; MARSHAKOVA IV, 1973, V6, P3, SCI TECHNICAL INFORM; MOED HF, 2005,
CITATION ANAL RES EV; PHELAN TJ, 1999, V45, P117, SCIENTOMETRICS; SHAPIRO
FR, 1992, V43, P337, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; SMITH LC, 1981, V30, P83, LIBR TRENDS; SNYDER H, 1998,
V48, P431, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SWANSON DR, 1986, V56, P103, LIBR QUART;
SWARNA T, 2008, V13, P49, MALAYS J LIBR INF SC; WHITE HD, 1998, V49,
P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2000, P475, ASIST MONOGR SER; WHITE
HD, 2001, V52, P87, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITE MD, 1997, V67, P122, LIBR
QUART|
NR- 32|
TC- 0|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- OCT|
PY- 2010|
VL- 61|
IS- 10|
BP- 2086|
EP- 2096|
DI- 10.1002/asi.21383|
PG- 11|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 662AP|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2010, V61, N10, P2086-2096|
UT- ISI:000282778400010 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Chen TT; Yen DC|
AF- Chen Tsung Teng; Yen, David C|
TI- CociteSeer: a system to visualize large cocitation networks|
SO- ELECTRONIC LIBRARY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Referencing; Information management; Software tools|
ID- INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; GRAPH VISUALIZATION;
AUTHOR COCITATION; SCIENCE|
AB- Purpose - The paper's aim is to document the development of a novel
tool to address the inadequacies of existing cocitation visualization
tools Design/methodology/approach - The paper demonstrates the visualized
effects of this tool and supplements the results with a case study that
utilizes a large data set to explore the cross-field studies among
different computer science fields Findings - The tool displays cocitation
graphs with latent visual cues and allows direct manipulation of the
visualized graphs. The tool also facilitates the exploration of the
relationships between articles in the graphs Research
limitations/implications - The indirect cocitation relationships are
vividly visualized by the citation network itself The context lost by the
conventional cocitation network may be preserved. Instead of being linked
by explicit lines, the implicit cocitation relationships are shown by the
closeness among the cocited nodes Practical implications - The preserved
context of a cocitation network may facilitate the exploration of latent
cross-field studies. The cocitation visualization tool demonstrates that
the context of the cocitation graph is preserved by using the citation
network itself to reveal cocitation relationships Originality/value - The
cocitation relationships are implied by the closeness among cocited nodes
in a citation graph. The paper documents this novel approach which has
not been seen before|
C1- [Chen, Tsung Teng] Natl Taipei Univ, Grad Inst Informat Management,
Taipei, Taiwan; [Yen, David C.] Miami Univ, Dept DSC & MIS, Oxford, OH
45056 USA|
RP- Chen, TT, Natl Taipei Univ, Grad Inst Informat Management, Taipei,
Taiwan|
EM- misttc@mail.ntpu.edu.tw|
CD- ABELLO J, 2006, V12, P669, IEEE T VIS COMPUT GR; BATAGELJ V, 2003, 9
INT S; BERGSTROM P, 2006, P 2006 S INT VIS INF; BERTSCHINGER E, 1998,
V36, P599, ANNU REV ASTRON ASTR; BILGIC M, 2006, IEEE S VIS AN SCI TE;
BOLLACKER KD, 1998, P 2 INT C AUT AG; BOLLEN J, 2009, V4, ARTN e4803,
PLOS ONE; BRODY T, 2003, RES ADV TECHNOLOGY D; CARD SK, 1999, READINGS
INFORM VISU; CHEN CM, 2001, V34, P65, COMPUTER; CHEN CM, 2006, V57, P359,
J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CHEN TT, 2005, P 9 INT C INF VIS IV; CHEN TT, 2007,
P INF VIS 11 INT C V; ELMQVIST N, 2004, 200405 CS CHALM U TE; HEER J,
2005, P SIGCHI C HUM FACT; HERMAN I, 2000, V6, P24, IEEE T VIS COMPUT GR;
KAMADA T, 1989, V31, P7, INFORM PROCESS LETT; KOHONEN T, 2001, SELF ORG
MAPS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LIN X, 2003,
V39, P689, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; NOEL S, 2002, P 6 INT C INF VIS IV;
PRICE DJD, 1965, V149, P510, SCIENCE; SCHVANEVELDT RW, 1990, PATHFINDER
ASSOCIATI; SHNEIDERMAN B, 1996, P 1996 IEEE S VIS LA; SHNEIDERMAN B,
2006, V12, P733, IEEE T VIS COMPUT GR; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; SMALL HG, 1977, V7, P139, SOC STUD SCI; WHITE HD, 1981, V32,
P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI|
NR- 28|
TC- 0|
PU- EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED|
PI- BINGLEY|
PA- HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND|
SN- 0264-0473|
J9- ELECTRON LIBR|
JI- Electron. Libr|
PY- 2010|
VL- 28|
IS- 4|
BP- 477|
EP- 491|
DI- 10.1108/02640471011033602|
PG- 15|
SC- Information Science & Library Science|
GA- 662ZI|
JN- ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, 2010, V28, N4, P477-491|
UT- ISI:000282852400001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Waltman L; van Eck NJ; Noyons ECM|
AF- Waltman Ludo; van Eck, Nees Jan; Noyons, Ed C. M|
TI- A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric
networks|
SO- JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Bibliometric map; Clustering; Mapping; Unified approach|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; PATHFINDER NETWORKS; COMMUNITY DETECTION;
SCIENCE; RESOLUTION; MAPS|
AB- In the analysis of bibliometric networks, researchers often use
mapping and clustering techniques in a combined fashion. Typically,
however, mapping and clustering techniques that are used together rely on
very different ideas and assumptions. We propose a unified approach to
mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. We show that the VOS
mapping technique and a weighted and parameterized variant of modularitybased clustering can both be derived from the same underlying principle.
We illustrate our proposed approach by producing a combined mapping and
clustering of the most frequently cited publications that appeared in the
field of information science in the period 1999-2008. (C) 2010 Elsevier
Ltd. All rights reserved|
C1- [Waltman, Ludo; van Eck, Nees Jan; Noyons, Ed C. M.] Leiden Univ, Ctr
Sci & Technol Studies, Leiden, Netherlands|
RP- Waltman, L, Leiden Univ, Ctr Sci & Technol Studies, Leiden,
Netherlands|
EM- waltmanlr@cwts.leidenuniv.nl ecknjpvan@cwts.leidenuniv.nl
noyons@cwts.leidenuniv.nl|
CD- ASTROM F, 2007, V58, P947, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BORG I, 2005, MODERN
MULTIDIMENSIO; BOYACK KW, 2005, V64, P351, SCIENTOMETRICS; CHEN CM, 1999,
V35, P401, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; CHEN CM, 2010, V61, P1386, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; CHEN P, 2010, V4, P278, J INFORMETR; DEMOYAANEGON F, 2007, V58,
P2167, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; FORTUNATO S, 2007, V104, P36, P NATL ACAD
SCI USA; FORTUNATO S, 2010, V486, P75, PHYS REP; FRUCHTERMAN TMJ, 1991,
V21, P1129, SOFTWARE PRACT EXPER; HEIMO T, 2008, ARTN P08007, J STAT
MECH-THEO AUG; KAMADA T, 1989, V31, P7, INFORM PROCESS LETT; KLAVANS R,
2006, V68, P475, SCIENTOMETRICS; KUMPULA JM, 2007, V56, P41, EUR PHYS J
B; LAMBIOTTE R, 2009, V3, P180, J INFORMETR; LEYDESDORFF L, 2009, V60,
P348, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; NEWMAN MEJ, 2004, V69, ARTN 066133, PHYS REV E 2; NEWMAN MEJ, 2004,
V70, ARTN 056131, PHYS REV E 2; NEWMAN MEJ, 2004, V69, ARTN 026113, PHYS
REV E; NOACK A, 2009, V79, ARTN 026102, PHYS REV E 2; NOYONS ECM, 1999,
V46, P591, SCIENTOMETRICS; NOYONS ECM, 1999, THESIS LEIDEN U; NOYONS ECM,
2009, V79, P261, SCIENTOMETRICS; PETERS HPF, 1993, V22, P47, RES POLICY;
REICHARDT J, 2006, V74, ARTN 016110, PHYS REV E 2; SCHUBERT A, 2010, V83,
P589, SCIENTOMETRICS; SCHVANEVELDT RW, 1988, V15, P337, COMPUT MATH APPL;
SMALL H, 1985, V8, P321, SCIENTOMETRICS; TAKEDA Y, 2009, V78, P543,
SCIENTOMETRICS; VAN E, COMPARISON TWO TECHN; VANECK NJ, 2007, P299, ST
CLASS DAT ANAL; VANECK NJ, 2009, V60, P1635, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
WALLACE ML, 2009, V60, P240, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITE HD, 1981, V32,
P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V327, P1972, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ZHANG L, 2010, V4,
P185, J INFORMETR; ZHAO DZ, 2008, V59, P916, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 39|
TC- 1|
PU- ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV|
PIPASNJ9JIPDPYVLISBPEPDIPGSCGAJNUT-
AMSTERDAM|
PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS|
1751-1577|
J INFORMETR|
J. Informetr|
OCT|
2010|
4|
4|
629|
635|
10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002|
7|
Information Science & Library Science|
647KA|
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2010, V4, N4, P629-635|
ISI:000281616200017 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Sillanpaa A; Koivula T|
AF- Sillanpaa Antti; Koivula, Tommi|
TI- Mapping Conflict Research: A Bibliometric Study of Contemporary
Scientific Discourses|
SO- INTERNATIONAL STUDIES PERSPECTIVES|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- conflict research; citation analysis; bibliometrics; scientific
discourse|
ID- INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT; ECONOMIC INTERDEPENDENCE; COCITATION
ANALYSIS; DOMESTIC CONFLICT; CITATION ANALYSIS; LIBERAL PEACE; CIVIL-WAR;
DEMOCRACY; DISPUTES; TRADE|
AB- This paper employs bibliometric methods to map the structure of
conflict research. Citation information is restructured by means of
cluster and network analyses for the purpose of identifying the different
discourses and fields contributing to conflict research. The data are
derived from more than 1,300 articles published in 40 high-quality
journals between 2000 and 2006. Four main discourses are identified
within the field, and it is concluded that Democratic Peace Theory
constitutes a powerful discursive core of contemporary conflict research,
affecting most other discourses as well. It is suggested that instead of
systemic foci, contemporary conflict research is dominated by the
investigation of dyadic forms of interaction and that, somewhat
surprisingly, the substantive focus of the most frequently cited research
has remained on interstate war. The study intends to help researchers to
be sensitive to gaps and focal points in contemporary research, and
promote further discussion about the current state of the field. Applied
approach provides academics, students, and practitioners with a usable
and transparent procedure for structuring discourses and communicating
about them further|
CD- ANDERSON B, 1983, IMAGINED COMMUNITIES; AXELROD R, 1984, EVOLUTION
COOPERATIO; BARBIERI K, 1996, V33, P29, J PEACE RES; BECK N, 1998, V42,
P1260, AM J POLIT SCI; BORGATRI SP, 2002, UCINET 6 0 VERSION 1; BRECHER
M, 1997, STUDY CRISIS; BRENER SA, 1992, V36, P309, J CONFLICT RESOLUT;
BROWN LD, 1996, V21, P723, ACCOUNT ORG SOC; CAWKELL AE, 1976, V2, P543,
ESSAYS INFORM SCI; CHERNOFF F, 2009, V9, P90, INT STUDIES PERSPECT;
COLLIER P, 1998, V50, P563, OXFORD ECON PAP; COLLIER P, 2003, BREAKING
CONFLICT TR; CULNAN MJ, 1980, V11, P341, MIS Q; DEMESQUITA BB, 1992, WAR
REASON DOMESTIC; DEMESQUITA BB, 1995, V89, P841, AM POLIT SCI REV;
DEUTSCH KW, 1957, POLITICAL COMMUNITY; DIEHL PF, 2000, WAR PEACE INT
RIVALR; DIXON WJ, 1994, V88, P1, AM POLIT SCI REV; DOYLE MW, 1986, V80,
P1151, AM POLIT SCI REV; ELLINGSEN T, 2000, V44, P228, J CONFLICT
RESOLUT; FEARON JD, 1994, V88, P577, AM POLIT SCI REV; FEARON JD, 1995,
V49, P379, INT ORGAN; GARFIELD E, 1955, V122, P108, SCIENCE; GARFIELD E,
1964, USE CITATION DATA WR; GARFIELD E, 1978, METRIC SCI ADVENT SC;
GARTZKE E, 2001, V55, P391, INT ORGAN; GELPI C, 1997, V41, P255, J
CONFLICT RESOLUT; GILPIN R, 1981, WAR CHANGE WORLD POL; GMUR M, 2003,
V57, P27, SCIENTOMETRICS; GOEMANS HE, 2000, WAR PUNISHMENT CAUSE; GURR
TR, 1993, MINORITIES RISK; GURR TR, 1994, V38, P347, INT STUD QUART;
HOLLIS M, 1990, EXPLAINING UNDERSTAN; HUNTINGTON SP, 1993, V72, P22,
FOREIGN AFF; HUNTINGTON SP, 1996, CLASH CIVILIZATIONS; HUTH PK, 1996,
STANDING YOUR GROUND; JACKSON PT, 2009, V9, P99, INT STUDIES PERSPECT;
JAGGERS K, 1995, V32, P469, J PEACE RES; JERVIS R, 1976, PERCEPTION
MISPERCEP; JONES DM, 1996, V15, P163, CONFLICT MANAG PEACE; KANT I, 1795,
ZUM EWIGEN FRIEDEN P; KORNPROBST M, 2009, V11, P87, INT STUD REV; KUGLER
J, 1996, PARITY WAR; KUHN T, 1962, STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; LAKE DA, 1992,
V86, P24, AM POLIT SCI REV; LEVY J, 1989, HDB WAR STUDIES; LUNDBERG J,
2006, THESIS MED MANAGEMEN; MACROBERTS MH, 1989, V40, P342, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; MANSFIELD ED, 1995, V20, P5, INT SECURITY; MAOZ Z, 1993, V87,
P624, AM POLIT SCI REV; MCCAIN KW, 1986, V56, P258, LIBR QUART; MIDLARSKY
M, 2000, V2, HDB WAR STUDIES; MORGAN TC, 1991, V35, P187, J CONFLICT
RESOLUT; MORGENTHAU H, 1948, POLITICS NATIONS STR; MORROW JD, 1989, V33,
P941, AM J POLIT SCI; MORROW JD, 1998, V92, P649, AM POLIT SCI REV;
MUELLER J, 1973, WAR PRESIDENTS PUBLI; OLIVER AL, 1998, V19, P549, ORGAN
STUD; ONEAL JR, 1996, V33, P11, J PEACE RES; ONEAL JR, 1997, V41, P267,
INT STUD QUART; ONEAL JR, 1999, V36, P423, J PEACE RES; ORGANSKI AFK,
1980, WAR LEDGER; OSAREH F, 1996, V46, P217, LIBRI; OSTROM CW, 1986, V80,
P541, AM POLIT SCI REV; PARVINEN PM, 2003, THESIS HELSINKI U TE; POLACHEK
SW, 1980, V24, P55, J CONFLICT RESOLUT; RAPOPORT A, 1968, ON WAR;
RATNATUNGA J, 1997, V12, P197, J BUS VENTURING; REITERD, 2002,
DEMOCRACIES WAR; RUSSETT B, 1998, V52, P441, INT ORGAN; RUSSETT BM, 1993,
TRIANGULATING PEACE; RUSSETT BM, 2001, TRIANGULATING PEACE; SCHELLING T,
1960, STRATEGY CONFLICT; SCHILDT, 2004, SITKIS ALPHA; SIGNORINO CS, 1999,
V93, P279, AM POLIT SCI REV; SILLANPAA A, 2006, THESIS HELSINKI U TE;
SINGER JD, 1961, V14, P77, WORLD POLIT; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1980, V2, P277, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL HG, 1978,
V8, P327, SOC STUD SCI; SMITH A, 1996, V40, P133, INT STUD QUART;
VANBELLE D, 2009, V9, P106, INT STUDIES PERSPECT; VANBELLE DA, 2006, V7,
P287, INT STUDIES PERSPECT; VASQUEZ JA, 1993, WAR PUZZLE; WAGNER RH,
2000, V44, P469, AM J POLIT SCI; WALT SM, 1987, ORIGINS ALLIANCES; WALTER
BF, 1997, V51, P335, INT ORGAN; WALTER BF, 2002, COMMITTING PEACE SUC;
WALTZ K, 1979, THEO INT POLITICS; WEINSTOCK M, 1971, ENCY LIB INFORM SCI;
WENDT A, 1999, SOCIAL THEORY INT PO|
NR- 91|
TC- 0|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1528-3577|
J9JIPDPYVLISBPEPPGSCGAJNUT-
INST STUD PERSPECT|
Int. Stud. Perspect|
MAY|
2010|
11|
2|
148|
171|
24|
International Relations|
647UP|
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES PERSPECTIVES, 2010, V11, N2, P148-171|
ISI:000281645300004 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Gingras Y|
AF- Gingras Yves|
TI- Mapping the structure of the intellectual field using citation and
co-citation analysis of correspondences|
SO- HISTORY OF EUROPEAN IDEAS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Republic of letters; Citation analysis; Co-citation analysis;
Mersenne; Oldenburg; Darwin; Mapping; Intellectual networks;
Correspondences|
ID- INVISIBLE-COLLEGES; NETWORKS; 17TH-CENTURY|
AB- This article uses the methods of citation and network analysis to map
the global structure of the intellectual field and its development over
time. Through the case study of Mersenne's, Oldenburg's and Darwin's
correspondences, we show how looking at letters as a corpus of data can
provide a global representation of the evolving conversation going on in
the Republic of Letters and in intellectual and scientific fields
Aggregating general correspondences in electronic format offers a global
portrait of the evolving composition of the intellectual and scientific
scene, its changing foci of interests and the fortune of the intellectual
discussions as expressed in cited persons in the letters Such tools help
replace a purely metaphoric use of the term "network" by a visible map of
the intellectual relations between people on which well defined
calculations of the centrality of the positions of different actors can
be made as well as their evolution over time These techniques provide
welcome additions to the tool kit of scholars in an age where the
computer and the web offer new ways of mapping and mining the rich store
of information contained in intellectual correspondences. (C) 2010
Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved|
C1- Univ Quebec, Dept Hist, CIRST, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada|
RP- Gingras, Y, Univ Quebec, Dept Hist, CIRST, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8,
Canada|
EM- gingras.yves@uqam.ca|
CD- BATAGELJ V, 2003, P77, GRAPH DRAWING SOFTWA; BORGATTI SP, 2002,
NETDRAW GRAPH VISUAL; BORGATTI SP, 2002, UCINET WINDOWS SOFTW; BORNER K,
2003, V37, P179, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; BOTS H, 1993, V178, P119, 17
SIECLE; BRUNET P, 1931, INTRO THEORIES NEWTO; DIBON P, 1976, P31, REV
SYNTHESE
81; EGGHE L, 2005, POWER LAWS INFORM PR; FREEMAN LC, 1979,
V1, P215, SOC NETWORKS; GARFIELD E, 1979, P81, CITATION INDEXING; GINGRAS
Y, 2007, P314, P 11 INT C INT SOC S; GINGRAS Y, 2010, V43, P159, J HIST
BIOL; GMUR M, 2003, V57, P27, SCIENTOMETRICS; HALL MB, 2002, H OLDENBURG
SHAPING; HATCH RA, 1998, P19, SCI UNBOUND; HUNTER M, 2003, V24, P805,
STUD HIST PHILOS M P; KRONICK DA, 2001, V71, P28, LIBR QUART; MARTIN U,
1987, V2, P95, 17 CENTURY; MELANCON B, 1998, PENSER LETT; NELLEN HJM,
1990, V17, P9, LIAS; NELLEN HJM, 1993, V178, P87, 17 SIECLE; OLIVEIRA JG,
2005, V437, P1251, NATURE; PEARL J, 1984, V20, P106, RENAISSANCE REFORM;
RUSNOCK A, 1999, V32, P155, BRIT J HIST SCI 2; SMALL HG, 1977, V7, P139,
SOC STUD SCI; WALLACE ML, 2009, V60, P240, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 26|
TC- 0|
PU- PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD|
PI- OXFORD|
PA- THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND|
SN- 0191-6599|
J9- HIST EUR IDEA|
JI- Hist. European Ideas|
PD- SEP|
PY- 2010|
VL- 36|
IS- 3|
BP- 330|
EP- 339|
DI- 10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2010.04.002|
PG- 10|
SC- Philosophy|
GA- 643WW|
JN- HISTORY OF EUROPEAN IDEAS, 2010, V36, N3, P330-339|
UT- ISI:000281331900006 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Gingras Y|
AF- Gingras Yves|
TI- The Transformation of Physics from 1900 to 1945|
SO- PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Bibliometrics; co-citation networks; history of physics 1900-1945|
AB- Historians of science have analyzed in detail the conceptual
transformations that gave physics its modern character in the first half
of the twentieth century. Rarely provided in these narratives, however,
is a feeling for the global scene of the physics community How many
publishing physicists were there around 1900? How many in 1925 or 1939?
Did most physicists publish as single authors or in teams, and how did
they compare with chemists or mathematicians in terms of scientific
collaborations? What are the links between these disciplines? I propose
to undertake such a global analysis of the trends that can be captured
through a bibliometric analysis of hundreds of thousands of scientific
papers and the more than one million references in them|
C1- Univ Quebec, Dept Hist, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada|
RP- Gingras, Y, Univ Quebec, Dept Hist, Casse Postale 8888,Succ Ctr
Ville, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada|
EM- gingras.yves@uqam.ca|
CD- FORMAN P, 1975, V5, P185, HIST STUDIES PHYS SC; GINGRAS Y, 2007,
P314, P 11 INT C INT SOC S; KEVLES DJ, 1977, PHYSICISTS HIST SCI; KEVLES
DJ, 1995, PHYSICISTS HIST SCI; PARSHALL KH, 2002, MATH UNBOUND EVOLUTI;
WALLACE ML, 2009, V60, P240, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WEART SR, 1979, P295,
SCI AM CONTEXT NEW P|
NR- 7|
TC- 0|
PU- BIRKHAUSER VERLAG AG|
PI- BASEL|
PA- VIADUKSTRASSE 40-44, PO BOX 133, CH-4010 BASEL, SWITZERLAND|
SN- 1422-6944|
J9- PHYS PERSPECT|
JI- Phys. Perspect|
PD- SEP|
PY- 2010|
VL- 12|
IS- 3|
BP- 248|
EP- 265|
DI- 10.1007/s00016-010-0017-6|
PG- 18|
SC- History & Philosophy Of Science|
GA- 642ZC|
JN- PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE, 2010, V12, N3, P248-265|
UT- ISI:000281259500002 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Schultz LI; Joutz FL|
AF- Schultz Laura I; Joutz, Frederick L|
TI- Methods for identifying emerging General Purpose Technologies: a case
study of nanotechnologies|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- General purpose nanotechnology; Citation analysis; Nanotechnologies|
ID- SCIENCE; FIELD; PATENTS; TERMS|
AB- Nanotechnology is an emerging field of science with the potential to
generate new and enhance existing products and transform the production
process. US patent data is used to track the emergence of
nanotechnologies since 1978. The nanotechnologies that have undergone the
most development are identified using patent citation data and cocitation
patterns of patents are examined to define clusters of related
nanotechnologies. The potential for economic impact of the emerging
nanotechnologies is assessed using a generality index|
C1- [Schultz, Laura I.] SUNY Albany, Coll Nanoscale Sci & Engn, Albany,
NY 12203 USA; [Joutz, Frederick L.] George Washington Univ, Dept Econ,
Washington, DC 20052 USA|
RP- Schultz, LI, SUNY Albany, Coll Nanoscale Sci & Engn, 255 Fuller Rd,
Albany, NY 12203 USA|
EM- LSchultz@uamail.albany.edu Bmark@gwu.edu|
CD- *LUX RES, 2004, NAN REP; *NAT SCI FDN, 2010, V1, 1001 NSB NAT SCI
FDN; *NAT SCI FDN, 2010, V2, 1001A NSB NAT SCI FD; BASSECOULARD E, 2007,
V70, P859, SCIENTOMETRICS; BOOKER R, 2005, NANOTECHNOLOGY DUMMI; HALL B,
2004, NBER WORKING PAPERS; HELPMAN E, 1998, P85, GEN PURPOSE TECHNOLO;
HUANG C, 2010, J TECHNOLOGY TRANSFE; HUANG Z, 2003, V5, P333, J NANOPART
RES; HULLMANN A, 2003, V58, P507, SCIENTOMETRICS; HULLMANN A, 2007, V70,
P739, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2007, V70, P693, SCIENTOMETRICS;
MEYER M, 1998, V42, P195, SCIENTOMETRICS; MEYER M, 2007, V70, P779,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MOGOUTOV A, 2007, V36, P893, RES POLICY; PORTER AL, 2008,
V10, P715, J NANOPART RES; ROCO M, 2001, SOCIETAL IMPLICATION; SMALL H,
1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; TRAJTENBERG M, 1997, V5, P19, EC
INNOVATION NEW TE; WONG PK, 2007, V70, P715, SCIENTOMETRICS; YOUTIE J,
2008, V33, P315, J TECHNOL TRANSFER|
NR- 21|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- OCT|
PY- 2010|
VL- 85|
IS- 1|
BP- 155|
EP- 170|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-010-0160-5|
PG- 16|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 639CC|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, V85, N1, P155-170|
UT- ISI:000280947400012 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Rafols I; Porter AL; Leydesdorff L|
AF- Rafols Ismael; Porter, Alan L; Leydesdorff, Loet|
TI- Science Overlay Maps: A New Tool for Research Policy and Library
Management|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- JOURNAL-CITATION-REPORTS; SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS; COCITATION ANALYSIS;
CROSS-DISCIPLINARY; WORD ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGY; INTERDISCIPLINARITY;
INDICATORS; INNOVATION; EMERGENCE|
AB- We present a novel approach to visually locate bodies of research
within the sciences, both at each moment of time and dynamically. This
article describes how this approach fits with other efforts to locally
and globally map scientific outputs. We then show how these science
overlay maps help benchmarking, explore collaborations, and track
temporal changes, using examples of universities, corporations, funding
agencies, and research topics. We address their conditions of application
and discuss advantages, downsides, and limitations. Overlay maps
especially help investigate the increasing number of scientific
developments and organizations that do not fit within traditional
disciplinary categories. We make these tools available online to enable
researchers to explore the ongoing sociocognitive transformations of
science and technology systems|
C1- [Rafols, Ismael] Univ Sussex, SPRU Sci & Technol Policy Res, Brighton
BN1 9QE, E Sussex, England; [Porter, Alan L.] Georgia Inst Technol,
Technol Policy & Assessment Ctr, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA; [Leydesdorff,
Loet] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res ASCoR, NL-1012 CX
Amsterdam, Netherlands|
RP- Rafols, I, Univ Sussex, SPRU Sci & Technol Policy Res, Brighton BN1
9QE, E Sussex, England|
EM- i.rafols@sussex.ac.uk alan.porter@isye.gatech.edu
loet@leydesdorff.net|
FU- US National Science Foundation [0830207]; EU [225546]|
FX- We are very grateful to Ziyo Wang for her enthusiastic design of the
interactive Web pages. We are indebted to K. Boyack, R. Klavans, F. de
Moya-Anegon, E. Noyons, B. Vargas-Quesada, A. Stirling, and M. Zitt for
insights and discussions. Alan R Porter and Ismael Rafols acknowledge
support from the US National Science Foundation (Award no. 0830207,
"Measuring and Tracking Research Knowledge Integration,"
http://idr.gatech.edu/). The findings and observations contained in this
paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views
of the National Science Foundation. Ismael Rafols is partially supported
by the EU FP7 project FRIDA, grant 225546|
CD- 2009, ECONOMIST
1009; *NAS KECK CTR, 2009, DAT FED RES DEV INV;
ABBOT A, 2001, CHAOS DISCIPLINES; BALABAN AT, 2006, V69, P615,
SCIENTOMETRICS; BAPTESTE E, 2009, V4, P1, BIOL DIRECT; BASSECOULARD E,
1999, V44, P323, SCIENTOMETRICS; BENSMAN SJ, 2007, V41, P93, ANNU REV
INFORM SCI; BENSMAN SJ, 2009, V60, P1097, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BOLLEN J,
2009, V4, ARTN e4803, PLOS ONE; BORDONS M, 2004, P437, HDB QUANTITATIVE
SCI; BORNER K, 2003, V37, P179, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; BOURKE P, 1998, V26,
P711, RES POLICY; BOWKER GC, 2000, SORTING THINGS OUT C; BOYACK KW, 2002,
V53, P764, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BOYACK KW, 2005, V64, P351,
SCIENTOMETRICS; BOYACK KW, 2009, V79, P27, SCIENTOMETRICS; BOYACK KW,
2009, V79, P45, SCIENTOMETRICS; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P252, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; CALLON M,
1986, MAPPING DYNAMICS SCI; CAMBROSIO A, 2006, V42, P3140, EUR J CANCER;
CUMMINGS JN, 2005, V35, P733, SOC STUD SCI; DUPRE J, 1993, DISORDER
THINGS META; ETZKOWITZ H, 2000, V29, P109, RES POLICY; GALISON P, 1996,
DISUNITY SCI BOUNDAR; GARFIELD E, 1987, V1, P1, CURR CONTENTS; GIBBONS M,
1994, NEW PRODUCTION KNOWL; GLASER J, 2007, P101, CHANGING GOVERNANCE;
HESSELS LK, 2008, V37, P740, RES POLICY; HICKS D, 1987, V17, P295, SOC
STUD SCI; HUANG L, J BUSINESS IN PRESS; IRVINE J, 1985, V316, P587,
NATURE; JANSSENS F, 2009, V45, P683, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; KAMADA T,
1989, V31, P7, INFORM PROCESS LETT; KATZ JS, 1999, V28, P501, RES POLICY;
KISS IZ, 2010, V4, P74, J INFORMETR; KLAVANS R, SCIENTOMETR IN PRESS;
KLAVANS R, 2008, V75, P239, SCIENTOMETRICS; KLAVANS R, 2009, V60, P455, J
AM SOC INF SCI TEC; KLEIN JT, 2000, P3, PRACTISING INTERDISC; KNORRCETINA
K, 1999, EPISTEMIC CULTURES S; LAUDEL G, 2009, INT SOC SCI INF C RI;
LENOIR T, 1997, I SCI CULTURAL PRODU; LEYDESDORFF L, 1987, V11, P291,
SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 1988, V15, P149, SCI PUBL POLICY;
LEYDESDORFF L, 1989, V18, P209, RES POLICY; LEYDESDORFF L, 1994, V23,
P217, RES POLICY; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1470, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P601, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L,
2007, V58, P1303, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2009, V60, P348, J
AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2010, INDICATORS INT UNPUB; LLERENA P,
2004, P69, RETHINKING RATIONALE; LUCIOARIAS D, 2007, V70, P603,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MARTIN BR, 1996, V36, P343, SCIENTOMETRICS; MATURANA HR,
1984, TREE KNOWLEDGE; MORILLO F, 2003, V54, P1237, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
MOYAANEGON F, 2004, V61, P129, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOYAANEGON F, 2007, V58,
P2167, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; NEURATH O, 1932, V3, P204, ERKENNTNIS;
NOOTEBOOM B, 2007, V36, P1016, RES POLICY; NOYONS E, 2001, V50, P83,
SCIENTOMETRICS; NOYONS ECM, 1998, V49, P68, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; NOYONS
ECM, 1999, V50, P115, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; NOYONS ECM, 2004, P237, HDB
QUANTITATIVE SCI; PORTER AL, 2007, V72, P117, SCIENTOMETRICS; PORTER AL,
2009, V4, P534, NAT NANOTECHNOL; PORTER AL, 2009, V81, P719,
SCIENTOMETRICS; PRICE DD, 1984, V13, P3, RES POLICY; PRICE DJD, 1965,
V149, P510, SCIENCE; PUDOVKIN AI, 2002, V53, P1113, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
RAFOLS I, 2007, V20, P395, INNOVATION-ABINGDON; RAFOLS I, 2007, V70,
P633, SCIENTOMETRICS; RAFOLS I, 2009, V60, P1823, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
RAFOLS I, 2010, V82, P263, SCIENTOMETRICS; RAFOLS I, 2010, SUPRAMOLECULAR
CHEM; RINIA EJ, 2002, V54, P347, SCIENTOMETRICS; RIP A, 1997, V38, P7,
SCIENTOMETRICS; ROESSNER D, 2000, V9, P125, RES EVALUAT; ROSVALL M, 2009,
V5, E8694, PLOS ONE; SHINN T, 2005, CONTROVERSES SCI SOC; SMALL H, 1973,
V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; SMALL
H, 1985, V7, P391, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1985, V8, P321,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1999, V50, P799, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL HG,
1977, V7, P139, SOC STUD SCI; STIRLING A, 2007, V4, P707, J R SOC
INTERFACE; STIRLING A, 2008, V33, P262, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL; STUDER KE,
1980, CANC MISSION SOCIAL; TIJSSEN R, 1987, V11, P347, SCIENTOMETRICS;
VANDENBERGH JCJM, 2008, V68, P565, J ECON BEHAV ORGAN; VANDENDAELE W,
1979, GEPLANTE FORSCHUNG V; VANDERHOEK A, 1996, V46, P415, CZECH J PHYS
S1; VANLEEUWEN T, 2000, V9, P183, RES EVALUAT; VANRAAN AFJ, 2002, V31,
P611, RES POLICY; WAGNER CS, J INFORM IN PRESS; WEINGART P, 2000,
PRACTISING INTERDISC; WEINGART P, 2000, P25, PRACTISING INTERDISC; WHITE
HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITLEY R, 2000, INTELLECTUAL
SOCIAL; WOOLGAR S, 1991, V18, P319, SCI PUBL POLICY; ZITT M, 1994, V30,
P333, SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 103|
TC- 0|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- SEP|
PY- 2010|
VL- 61|
IS- 9|
BP- 1871|
EP- 1887|
DI- 10.1002/asi.21368|
PG- 17|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 639XW|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2010, V61, N9, P1871-1887|
UT- ISI:000281011400011 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Nykiforuk CIJ; Osler GE; Viehbeck S|
AF- Nykiforuk Candace I. J; Osler, Gillian E; Viehbeck, Sarah|
TI- The evolution of smoke-free spaces policy literature: A bibliometric
analysis|
SO- HEALTH POLICY|
LA- English|
DT- Review|
DE- Tobacco smoke pollution; Health policy; Bibliometrics|
ID- LATIN-AMERICA|
AB- Objectives: This paper describes patterns in the international
published literature regarding smoke-free spaces policy through a
bibliometric analysis of journals, articles and authors from 1990 to 2009
Methods: Secondary data from a recent systematic literature review were
analyzed. Bibliometric techniques included statistical analysis of
publication counts and co-citation analysis. Findings were generated
through calculations of frequencies of journals. authors, and articles
published per year. Analysis was conducted for five policy-relevant
domains: public place, schools, private space, workplace, and tobacco
industry tactics Results: Of the 5656 total articles examined, scientific
articles written for the public place and workplace domains far
outweighed those for schools, private spaces, and tobacco industry. This
bibliometric analysis indicated that publication patterns aligned with
patterns of policy activity and increasing sophistication in the
evolution of smoke-free spaces policy development. This finding held for
analyses by article. journal, and author over all years. The analysis
also revealed relatively high numbers of unique authors publishing on
smoke-free spaces policy each year Conclusions: This study identified
patterns regarding the publication of scientific articles, by varying
journals and authors, and illustrated sub-field priorities both recently
and for the entire 20-year period examined. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland
Ltd. All rights reserved|
C1- [Nykiforuk, Candace I. J.; Osler, Gillian E.] Univ Alberta, Ctr Hlth
Promot Studies, Edmonton, AB T6G 2T4, Canada; [Viehbeck, Sarah] Univ
Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada|
RP- Nykiforuk, CIJ, Univ Alberta, Ctr Hlth Promot Studies, 5-10 Univ
Terrace,8303-112 St, Edmonton, AB T6G 2T4, Canada|
EM- candace.nykiforuk@ualberta.ca|
CD- *CTCRI, 2006, BETT SOL COMPL PROBL; *OFF ATT GEN, MAST SETTL AGR;
*ONT MED ASS, 2003, OMA POS PAP DUT PROT; *WHO, 2005, WHO FRAM CONV TOB
CO; ALMEIDAFILHO N, 2003, V93, P2037, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH; BAYER AE, 1982,
V44, P527, J MARRIAGE FAM; ESTABROOKS CA, 2004, V53, P293, NURS RES;
MACIASCHAPULA CA, 1998, V41, P41, SCIENTOMETRICS; NYKIFORUK C, SMOKE FREE
IN PRESS; NYKIFORUK CIJ, 2008, V16, P64, HEALTH SOC CARE COMM|
NR- 10|
TC- 0|
PU- ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD|
PI- CLARE|
PA- ELSEVIER HOUSE, BROOKVALE PLAZA, EAST PARK SHANNON, CO, CLARE, 00000,
IRELAND|
SN- 0168-8510|
J9- HEALTH POLICY|
JI- Health Policy|
PDPYVLISBPEPDIPGSCGAJNUT-
SEP|
2010|
97|
1|
1|
7|
10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.03.001|
7|
Health Care Sciences & Services; Health Policy & Services|
639RQ|
HEALTH POLICY, 2010, V97, N1, P1-7|
ISI:000280992600001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Mustafee N; Katsaliaki K; Taylor SJE|
AF- Mustafee Navonil; Katsaliaki, Korina; Taylor, Simon J. E|
TI- Profiling Literature in Healthcare Simulation|
SO- SIMULATION-TRANSACTIONS OF THE SOCIETY FOR MODELING AND SIMULATION
INTERNATIONAL|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- simulation research; healthcare research; profiling research; cocitation analysis|
ID- DISCRETE-EVENT SIMULATION; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; PUBLIC-HEALTH;
INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; IMPACT; TIME; COCITATION;
EMERGENCY; KNOWLEDGE|
AB- The publications that relate to the application of simulation to
healthcare have steadily increased over the years. These publications are
scattered amongst various journals that belong to several subject
categories, including operational research, health economics and
pharmacokinetics. The simulation techniques that are applied to the study
of healthcare problems are also various. The aim of this study,
therefore, is to review healthcare simulation literature that have been
published between 1970 and 2007 in high-quality journals belonging to
various subject categories and that report on the application of four
simulation techniques, namely, Monte Carlo simulation, discrete-event
simulation, system dynamics and agent-based simulation. Arguably, journal
impact factor is fundamental in assessing the quality of publications.
Thus, the 201 publications selected for review have been queried from the
ISI Web of Science (R) bibliographic database of high-impact research
journals. Through a review of healthcare simulation literature the
following three objectives have been realized: (a) papers have been
categorized under the different simulation techniques, and the healthcare
problems that each technique is employed to investigate are identified;
(b) variables such as authors, article citations, etc., within our
dataset of healthcare papers have been profiled; (c) turning point
(strategically important) papers and authors have been identified through
co-citation analysis of references cited by the papers in our dataset.
The above objectives have been realized by devising and then employing a
methodology for profiling literature. It is expected that this review
paper will help the readers gain a broader understanding of research in
healthcare simulation|
C1- [Mustafee, Navonil] Swansea Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Swansea SA2
8PP, W Glam, Wales; [Katsaliaki, Korina] Int Hellen Univ, Sch Econ &
Business Adm, Thessaloniki, Greece; [Taylor, Simon J. E.] Brunel Univ,
Sch Informat Syst Comp & Math, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England|
RP- Mustafee, N, Swansea Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Singleton Pk, Swansea
SA2 8PP, W Glam, Wales|
EM- navonil.mustafee@gmail.com k.katsaliaki@ihu.edu.gr
simon.taylor@brunel.ac.uk|
CD- ABBOTT RG, 2006, V12, P617, ARTIF LIFE; AHMAD S, 2005, V75, P74,
HEALTH POLICY; ANTONIJEVIC B, 2007, V45, P2279, FOOD CHEM TOXICOL;
ARBOLEDA CA, 2007, V21, P302, J PERFORM CONSTR FAC; ATUN RA, 2007, V81,
P207, HEALTH POLICY; AVISON DE, 2008, V18, P5, INFORM SYST J; BABAD H,
2002, V5, P269, HLTH CARE MANAG SCI; BARTON P, 2004, V9, P110, J HEALTH
SERV RES PO; BAYER AE, 1990, V41, P444, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BOULOS MNK,
2006, V39, P160, J BIOMED INFORM; BRAILSFORD S, 2003, V150, P19, EUR J
OPER RES; BRAILSFORD SC, 2004, V55, P34, J OPER RES SOC; BROOKS RJ, 2001,
SIMULATION INVENTORY; CARO JJ, 2006, V22, P1171, CURR MED RES OPIN;
CHARLES BG, 2001, V40, P395, CLIN PHARMACOKINET; CHEN C, 2007, P189, P
ISSI MADR; CHEN CM, 2004, V101, P5303, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; CLAVER E,
2000, V37, P181, INFORM MANAGE; DAVIES R, 1994, V22, P123, OMEGA-INT J
MANAGE S; DAVIES R, 2002, V19, P762, DIABETIC MED; DEADMAN PJ, 1999, V56,
P159, J ENVIRON MANAGE; DUGUAY C, 2007, V83, P311, SIMUL-T SOC MOD SIM;
DWIVEDI YK, 2008, V17, P678, EUR J INFORM SYST; DWIVEDI YK, 2009, V11,
P87, INFORM SYST FRONT; ELDABI T, 2000, V51, P465, J OPER RES SOC; ELDABI
T, 2007, V58, P262, J OPER RES SOC; EVEBORN P, 2006, V171, P962, EUR J
OPER RES; FABRE MA, 2007, V96, P3444, J PHARM SCI-US; FEVEILE H, 2006,
V367, P112, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON; FONE D, 2003, V25, P325, J PUBLIC HEALTH
MED; HAMED MM, 1999, V8, P285, J SOIL CONTAM; HARPER PR, 2005, V33, P141,
OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S; HOMER JB, 2006, V96, P452, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH;
HUANG ES, 2007, V42, P2174, HEALTH SERV RES 1; HUPERT N, 2002, V22, S17,
MED DECIS MAKING S; JUN JB, 1999, V50, P109, J OPER RES SOC; KAHN JM,
2007, V131, P68, CHEST; KATSALIAKI K, 2007, V58, P219, J OPER RES SOC;
KLEINSCHMIDT I, 2006, V11, P1047, TROP MED INT HEALTH; LAW AM, 2000,
SIMULATION MODELLING; LEE D, 2007, V63, P1253, BIOMETRICS; MARA DD, 2007,
V5, P39, J WATER HEALTH; MCCAIN KW, 1991, V42, P290, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
MURPHY KM, 2003, P41, INMEASURING GAINS ME; NANCE RE, 1971, V18, P59,
MANAGE SCI; NIEUWENHUIJSEN M, 2006, V32, P996, ENVIRON INT; PALVIA P,
2007, V44, P1, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER; PAUL R, 1997, P67, COMPUTERS
COMMUNICAT; PIDD M, 2004, COMPUTER SIMULATION; PIDD M, 2004, SYSTEMS
MODELLING TH; POWER D, 2002, DECISION SUPPORT SYS; ROYSTON P, 1999, V28,
P964, INT J EPIDEMIOL; RUBINSTEIN RY, 1981, SIMULATION MONTE CAR; STERMAN
JD, 2001, V43, P8, CALIF MANAGE REV; TAYLOR KS, 1998, V3, P226, J HLTH
SERVICES RES; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD,
1989, V24, P119, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; WIERZBICKI AP, 2007, V176, P610,
EUR J OPER RES|
NR- 58|
TC- 0|
PU- SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD|
PI- LONDON|
PA- 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND|
SN- 0037-5497|
J9- SIMUL-TRANS SOC MODEL SIMUL I|
JI- Simul.-Trans. Soc. Model. Simul. Int|
PD- AUG|
PY- 2010|
VL- 86|
IS- 8-9|
BP- 543|
EP- 558|
DI- 10.1177/0037549709359090|
PG- 16|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Computer Science,
Software Engineering|
GA- 636TQ|
JN- SIMULATION-TRANSACTIONS OF THE SOCIETY FOR MODELING AND SIMULATION
INTERNATIONAL, 2010, V86, N8-9, P543-558|
UT- ISI:000280765600006 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Sugimoto CR; McCain KW|
AF- Sugimoto Cassidy R; McCain, Katherine W|
TI- Visualizing changes over time: A history of information retrieval
through the lens of descriptor tri-occurrence mapping|
SO- JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- bibliometrics; information retrieval|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; CO-WORD ANALYSIS; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE;
SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; CITATION ANALYSIS; SCIENCE; ONLINE; DOCUMENTS;
NETWORKS; IMAGE|
AB- This study provides an historical analysis of the discipline of
information retrieval (IR) for three time periods: 1980-1984, 1990-1994
and 2000-2004. This analysis is done through the use of a novel
bibliometric technique called tri-occurrence analysis, in which the
descriptor 'information retrieval' is used as a filter term within the
traditional technique of co-occurrence analysis. The resulting data is
visualized by means of Pathfinder Network analysis. The findings provide
evidence of an evolution in the IR landscape over the three decades from
an emphasis on systems-, storage- and education-related research in the
1980s to database-, user interface- and information service-related
research in the 1990s and to web-related research in the 2000s. This work
provides additional validation of the use of tri-occurrence analysis as a
useful bibliometric technique|
C1- [Sugimoto, Cassidy R.] Indiana Univ, Bloomington, IN USA; [McCain,
Katherine W.] Drexel Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA|
RP- Sugimoto, CR, 1320 E 10th St,LI029, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA|
EM- sugimoto@indiana.edu|
CD- *NWB TEAM, 2006, NETW WORKB TOOL; ASTROM F, 2007, V58, P947, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; BOURNE CP, 2003, HIST ONLINE INFORM S; CALLON M, 1983, V22,
P191, SOC SCI INFORM; CHRISTENSEN FH, 1996, V37, P39, SCIENTOMETRICS;
DING Y, 1999, V30, P367, INT INF LIBR REV; DING Y, 1999, V25, P67, J
INFORM SCI; DING Y, 2000, V47, P55, SCIENTOMETRICS; DING Y, 2001, V37,
P817, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; ENSER P, 2008, V34, P531, J INF SCI; HAHN TB,
1996, V32, P33, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; HARMAN DK, 2008, V40, P113, ANNU
REV INFORM SCI; HEALEY P, 1986, V15, P233, RES POLICY; JONES KS, 1981,
INFORM RETRIEVAL EXP; JONES KS, 1997, READINGS INFORM RETR; KANDO N,
1991, V29, P29, LIB INFORM SCI; KOENIG MED, 1992, V28, P433, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG; LESK M, 1995, 5 UDT INT FED LIB AS; LEYDESDORFF L, 1988,
P105, INFORMETRICS 87 88; LYNCH MF, 1987, V13, P221, J INF SCI; MARION
LS, 2001, V52, P297, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MARION LS, 2002, V39, P3, P
ASIST ANNU; MARION LS, 2004, THESIS DREXEL; MARKEY K, 2007, V58, P1071, J
AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MARKEY K, 2007, V58, P1123, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
MCCAIN KW, 1988, V39, P428, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1989, V40,
P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 2008, P 2008 ASIS T ANN M; MCCAIN
KW, 2009, V60, P1301, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MIZZARO S, 1997, V48, P810, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; MORRIS TA, 2001, THESIS DREXEL; PAO ML, 1986, P341, P
7 NAT ONL M INF TO; ROBERTSON S, 2008, V34, P439, J INF SCI; ROWLEY J,
1994, V20, P108, J INF SCI; RUTHVEN I, 2008, V42, P43, ANNU REV INFORM
SCI; SAVAGEKNEPSHIELD PA, 1999, V50, P1067, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H,
1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL HG, 1974, V10, P393,
INFORMATION STORAGE; SMALL HG, 1978, V8, P327, SOC STUD SCI; SMEATON AF,
2003, V37, P49, ACM SIGIR FORUM; WHITE HD, 1981, P261, CONCEPTS JUDGEMENT
D; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P16, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1981, V32,
P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1986, V5, P93, INFORM TECHNOL LIBR;
WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54,
P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITTAKER J, 1989, V19, P473, SOC STUD SCI|
NR- 47|
TC- 0|
PU- SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD|
PI- LONDON|
PA- 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND|
SN- 0165-5515|
J9- J INFORM SCI|
JI- J. Inf. Sci|
PD- AUG|
PY- 2010|
VL- 36|
IS- 4|
BP- 481|
EP- 493|
DI- 10.1177/0165551510369992|
PG- 13|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 636BR|
JN- JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2010, V36, N4, P481-493|
UT- ISI:000280703400004 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Couto T; Ziviani N; Calado P; Cristo M; Goncalves M; de Moura ES;
Brandao W|
AF- Couto T; Ziviani, N; Calado, P; Cristo, M; Goncalves, M; de Moura, E.
S; Brandao, W|
TI- Classifying documents with link-based bibliometric measures|
SO- INFORMATION RETRIEVAL|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Text classification; Links; Web directories; Digital libraries|
ID- RETRIEVAL; WEB; CLASSIFICATION; INFORMATION; COCITATION; MODEL|
AB- Automatic document classification can be used to organize documents
in a digital library, construct on-line directories, improve the
precision of web searching, or help the interactions between user and
search engines. In this paper we explore how linkage information inherent
to different document collections can be used to enhance the
effectiveness of classification algorithms. We have experimented with
three link-based bibliometric measures, co-citation, bibliographic
coupling and Amsler, on three different document collections: a digital
library of computer science papers, a web directory and an on-line
encyclopedia. Results show that both hyperlink and citation information
can be used to learn reliable and effective classifiers based on a kNN
classifier. In one of the test collections used, we obtained improvements
of up to 69.8% of macro-averaged F (1) over the traditional text-based
kNN classifier, considered as the baseline measure in our experiments. We
also present alternative ways of combining bibliometric based classifiers
with text based classifiers Finally, we conducted studies to analyze the
situation in which the bibliometric-based classifiers failed and show
that in such cases it is hard to reach consensus regarding the correct
classes, even for human judges|
C1- [de Moura, E. S.] Univ Fed Amazonas, Dept Comp Sci, Manaus, Amazonas,
Brazil; [Cristo, M.] FUCAPI Anal Res & Tech Innovat Ctr, Manaus,
Amazonas, Brazil; [Calado, P.] IST INESC ID, Lisbon, Portugal; [Couto,
T.; Ziviani, N.; Goncalves, M.; Brandao, W.] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept
Comp Sci, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil|
RP- de Moura, ES, Univ Fed Amazonas, Dept Comp Sci, Manaus, Amazonas,
Brazil|
EM- thierson@dcc.ufmg.br nivio@dcc.ufmg.br pavel.calado@tagus.ist.utl.pt
marco.cristo@fucapi.br mgoncalv@dcc.ufmg.br edleno@dcc.ufam.edu.br
wladmir@dcc.ufmg.br|
FU- Brazilian National Institute of Science and Technology [MCT/CNPq
573871/2008-6]; FCT IR-BASE [POSC/EIA/58194/2004]|
FX- This work was supported by the Brazilian National Institute of
Science and Technology for the Web (Grant MCT/CNPq 573871/2008-6),
Project FCT IR-BASE (Grant POSC/EIA/58194/2004), Project InfoWeb
(MCT/CNPq/CT-INFO 550874/2007-0), Project InWeb (Grant 573871/2008-6
CNPq) Project 5S-VQ (Grant MCT/-CNPq/-CT-INFO 55.1013/2005-2), CNPq Grant
305237/02-0 (Nivio Ziviani), CNPq Grant 302209/2007-7 (Edleno S. de
Moura) and CNPq Grant 301043/2006-0 (Marcos Andre Goncalves), Project
SIRIAA (Grant MCT/-CNPq/-CT-Amazonia 55.3126/2005-9)|
CD- *ACM, 1998, ACM COMP CLASS SYST; ALMIND TC, 1997, V53, P4004, J DOC;
AMSLER R, 1972, APPL CITATION BASED; ANGELOVA R, 2006, P485, ACM SIGIR C
RES DEV; BICHTELER J, 1980, V31, P278, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BRIN S, 1998,
P107, P 7 INT WORLD WID WE; CALADO P, 2003, P394, P 12 INT C INF KNOWL;
CALADO P, 2006, V57, P208, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CHAKRABARTI S, 1998,
P307, P ACM SIGMOD INT C M; CHANG C, 2001, LIBSVM LIB SUPPORT V; COCHRAN
WG, 1977, SAMPLING TECHNIQUES; COHN D, 2001, V13, P430, ADV NEUR IN;
COUTO T, 2006, P75, P 6 ACM IEEE CS JOIN; CRISTO M, 2003, V2857, P43,
LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; DEAN J, 1999, V31, P1467, COMPUT NETW; EGGHE L,
1990, INTRO INFORMETRICS Q; FISHER M, 2003, P41, P ECIR 03 25 EUR C I;
FURNKRANZ J, 1999, P487, P 3 S INT DAT AN IDA; GARFIELD E, 1972, V178,
P471, SCIENCE; GLOVER EJ, 2002, P 11 INT WORLD WID W; GOVERT N, 1999,
P475, P 8 INT C INF KNOWL; HAWKING D, 2001, P61, 10 TEXT RETR C TREC;
JOACHIMS T, 1998, P137, P 10 EUR C MACH LEAR; JOACHIMS T, 2001, P250, P
18 INT C MACH LEAR; KESSLER MM, 1963, V14, P10, AM DOC; KLEINBERG JM,
1999, V46, P604, J ACM; KUMAR R, 1999, V31, P1481, COMPUT NETW; LARSON
RR, 1996, P71, ANN M AMERICAN SOC I; LAWRENCE S, 1999, P392, P 3 INT C
AUT AG; LI X, 2007, P419, P 7 ACM JOINT C DIG; MARSHAKOVA IV, 1973, V6,
P3, SCI TECHNICAL INFORM; MITCHELL T, 1997, MACHINE LEARNING; MOED HF,
2005, CITATION ANAL RES EV; OH HJ, 2000, P264, P 23 ANN INT ACM SIG; QI
X, 2006, P228, P 15 ACM INT C INF K; QIN J, 2000, V51, P166, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; SAERENS M, 2002, V14, P21, NEURAL COMPUT; SALTON G, 1963,
V10, P440, J ACM; SALTON G, 1988, V24, P513, INFORMATION PROCESSI;
SEBASTIANI F, 2002, V34, P47, ACM COMPUT SURV; SHEN D, 2006, P643, P WWW
2006; SLATTERY S, 2000, P17, P 17TH INT C MACHINE; SMALL H, 1973, V24,
P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMITH AG, 2004, V9, INFORM RES; SUN A, 2002,
P96, P 4 INT WORKSH WEB I; TERVEEN L, 1999, V6, P67, ACM T COMPUTER
HUMAN; TURTLE H, 1991, V9, P187, ACM T INFORM SYST; VELOSO A, 2006, P218,
P 15TH ACM INT C INF; WILCOXON F, 1945, V1, P80, BIOMETRICS; WITTEN IH,
2005, DATA MINING PRACTICA; YANG Y, 1994, P13, P 17 ANN INT ACM SIG; YANG
Y, 1999, P42, P 22 ANN INT ACM SIG; YANG YM, 2002, V18, P219, J INTELL
INF SYST; ZHANG B, 2005, P 14TH ACM INT C INF|
NR- 54|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 1386-4564|
J9- INF RETR|
JI- Inf. Retr|
PD- AUG|
PY- 2010|
VL- 13|
IS- 4|
BP- 315|
EP- 345|
DI- 10.1007/s10791-009-9119-7|
PG- 31|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems|
GA- 634JW|
JN- INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, 2010, V13, N4, P315-345|
UT- ISI:000280578100001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Di Stefano G; Peteraf M; Verona G|
AF- Di Stefano Giada; Peteraf, Margaret; Verona, Gianmario|
TI- Dynamic capabilities deconstructed: a bibliographic investigation
into the origins, development, and future directions of the research
domain|
SO- INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; GUEST EDITORS INTRODUCTION; STRATEGICMANAGEMENT; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; MULTINATIONAL-ENTERPRISES;
INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE; AUTHOR COCITATION; CITATION ANALYSIS; FIRM
PERFORMANCE; SPECIAL-ISSUE|
AB- This article uses co-citation analysis to explore the structure of
the Dynamic Capabilities research domain, to better understand its
origins, current state of development, and future directions. Co-citation
analysis reveals the field's 'invisible colleges' and research
directions. We find evidence of commonalities as well as polarizing
differences among understandings across this research domain, suggesting
opportunities and challenges for future research|
C1- [Di Stefano, Giada; Verona, Gianmario] Bocconi Univ, I-20136 Milan,
Italy; [Peteraf, Margaret] Tuck Sch Business Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755
USA|
RP- Di Stefano, G, Bocconi Univ, Via Roentgen 1, I-20136 Milan, Italy|
EM- giada.distefano@unibocconi.it margaret.a.peteraf@tuck.dartmouth.edu
gianmario.verona@unibocconi.it|
CD- ACEDO FJ, 2006, V27, P621, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; ADNER R, 2003, V24,
P1011, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; AGARWAL R, 2004, V47, P501, ACAD MANAGE J;
AMIT R, 2001, V22, P493, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; ARAGONCORREA JA, 2003, V28,
P71, ACAD MANAGE REV; BAUMGARTNER H, 2003, V67, P123, J MARKETING; BECKER
MC, 2004, V13, P643, IND CORP CHANGE; BENNER MJ, 2003, V28, P238, ACAD
MANAGE REV; BROWN LD, 1985, V23, P84, J ACCOUNTING RES; CARPENTER MA,
2001, V44, P493, ACAD MANAGE J; CRANE D, 1972, INVISIBLE COLL DIFFU;
DANNEELS E, 2002, V23, P1095, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; DEEDS DL, 2000, V15,
P211, J BUS VENTURING; DUNNING JH, 2010, V19, P1225, IND CORP CHANGE;
DUTTON JE, 1997, V18, P407, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; EASTERBYSMITH M, 2009,
V20, S1, BRIT J MANAGE; EISENHARDT KM, 2000, V21, P1105, STRATEGIC MANAGE
J; FUJIMOTO T, 2000, P244, NATURE DYNAMICS ORG; GALUNIC DC, 2001, V44,
P1229, ACAD MANAGE J; GARTNER WB, 2006, V30, P321, ENTREP THEORY PRACT;
HELFAT CE, 1997, V18, P339, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; HELFAT CE, 2000, V21,
P955, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; HELFAT CE, 2003, V24, P997, STRATEG MANAGE J;
HELFAT CE, 2007, DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; HITT MA, 2001, V22, P479,
STRATEGIC MANAGE J; IRELAND RD, 2003, V29, P963, J MANAGE; JACOBIDES MG,
2005, V26, P395, STRATEG MANAGE J; JARZABKOWSKI P, 2004, V25, P529, ORGAN
STUD; KAY NM, 2010, V19, P1205, IND CORP CHANGE; KING AA, 2002, V48,
P171, MANAGE SCI; KNIGHT GA, 2004, V35, P124, J INT BUS STUD; KRUSKAL JB,
1978, MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCA; LOVALLO D, STRATEGIC M IN PRESS; LUO YD,
2002, V13, P48, ORGAN SCI; MADHOK A, 2002, V23, P535, STRATEGIC MANAGE J;
MAHONEY JT, 1995, V33, P91, J BUS RES; MAHONEY JT, 2001, V27, P651, J
MANAGE; MAKADOK R, 2001, V22, P387, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; MCCAIN KW, 1990,
V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MILLER D, 2003, V24, P961, STRATEGIC
MANAGE J; NERUR SP, 2008, V29, P319, STRATEG MANAGE J; PITELIS CN, 2010,
V19, P1247, IND CORP CHANGE; PODSAKOFF PM, 2005, V26, P473, STRATEGIC
MANAGE J; RAMOSRODRIGUEZ AR, 2004, V25, P981, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; RINDOVA
VP, 2001, V44, P1263, ACAD MANAGE J; ROMME AGL, 2010, V19, P1271, IND
CORP CHANGE; ROSENBLOOM RS, 2000, V21, P1083, STRATEGIC MANAGE J;
ROWLANDS I, 1999, V44, P533, SCIENTOMETRICS; RUGMAN AM, 2002, V23, P769,
STRATEGIC MANAGE J; TEECE D, 1994, V3, P537, IND CORP CHANGE; TEECE DJ,
1997, V18, P509, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; TEECE DJ, 2000, V33, P35, LONG RANGE
PLANN; TEECE DJ, 2007, V28, P1319, STRATEG MANAGE J; UHLENBRUCK K, 2003,
V40, P257, J MANAGE STUD; VEERBEK A, 2002, V4, P179, INT J MANAG REV;
VOHORA A, 2004, V33, P147, RES POLICY; WERNERFELT B, 1984, V5, P171,
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P326, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WILLIAMSON OE, 1975,
MARKETS HIERARCHIES; WINTER SG, 2003, V33, P91, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT;
WRIGHT PM, 2001, V27, P701, J MANAGE; ZAHRA SA, 2002, V27, P185, ACAD
MANAGE REV; ZOLLO M, 2002, V13, P339, ORGAN SCI; ZOLLO M, 2004, V25,
P1233, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; ZOTT C, 2003, V24, P97, STRATEGIC MANAGE J|
NR- 66|
TC- 6|
PU- OXFORD UNIV PRESS|
PI- OXFORD|
PA- GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND|
SN- 0960-6491|
J9JIPDPYVLISBPEPDIPGSCGAJNUT-
IND CORP CHANGE|
Ind. Corp. Change|
AUG|
2010|
19|
4|
1187|
1204|
10.1093/icc/dtq027|
18|
Business; Economics; Management|
633WG|
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2010, V19, N4, P1187-1204|
ISI:000280536900008 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Hofer KM; Smejkal AE; Bilgin FZ; Wuehrer GA|
AF- Hofer Katharina Maria; Smejkal, Angela Elisabeth; Bilgin, F. Zeynep;
Wuehrer, Gerhard A|
TI- Conference proceedings as a matter of bibliometric studies: the
Academy of International Business 2006-2008|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Conference proceedings; International business; Methodology;
Scientometrics; Content analysis; Theory development|
ID- FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; CO-WORD ANALYSIS; EMERGING ECONOMIES;
GLOBALIZATION; INFORMATION; FIELD; COCITATION; COUNTRIES; RANKING;
SCIENCE|
AB- This study does a bibliometric analysis based on keywords of
conference proceedings. Scientometric investigations of conference
proceedings are a new and innovative, not very common approach. The
studies and papers presented may be interpreted as early indicators of
scientific development. The Academy of International Business (AIB) was
chosen for being the leading organization for studies in international
business with contributions covering a 3-year period (2006-2008). The
study presents the general structure of current scholarly interest in
international business studies, clusters the keywords and reflects
details on the focused research areas of the papers analyzed. The
bibliometric analysis indicates three clusters: the core, the semiperiphery and the periphery. The five most occurring keywords were found
to be multinational enterprise, emerging markets, foreign direct
investment, internationalization and knowledge management in descending
order. The analyses focus on concepts building the core (in total ten
keywords), the semi-periphery which is coined by performance and related
topics (60 keywords) and the periphery of the studies with governance and
specific facets of it (199 keywords)|
C1- [Hofer, Katharina Maria; Smejkal, Angela Elisabeth; Wuehrer, Gerhard
A.] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Dept Retailing Sales & Mkt, A-4040 Linz,
Austria; [Bilgin, F. Zeynep] Marmara Univ, Istanbul, Turkey|
RP- Hofer, KM, Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Dept Retailing Sales & Mkt,
Altenbergerstr 69, A-4040 Linz, Austria|
EM- katharina.hofer@jku.at|
CD- 2006, MCKINSEY Q
MAR; BARTELS FL, 2005, IWPS 002 05 2005 OUT;
BILGIN FZ, 2004, P9, DRIVERS GLOBAL BUSIN; BORGATTI SP, 2002, UCINET 6 0
WINDOWS S; BORNER K, 2003, V37, P179, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; BUCKLEY PJ,
2002, V33, P365, J INT BUS STUD; BUCKLEY PJ, 2005, P1, WHAT IS INT
BUSINESS; BUCKLEY PJ, 2006, P77, MULTINATIONAL ENTERP; BUTLER L, 2006,
V66, P327, SCIENTOMETRICS; CHANDRA R, 1997, V6, P387, INT BUSINESS REV;
CHANG CH, 2006, V15, P338, PLASMA SOURCES SCI T; CHEN C, 2003, MAPPING
SCI FRONTIER; CZINKOTA MR, 2009, MANAGEMENT INT R SPR; DANIELS JD, 2000,
V10, P7, ADV INT MAR; DAWAR N, 2002, V35, P457, LONG RANGE PLANN;
DEBAKKER FGA, 2005, V44, P283, BUS SOC; DENOOY W, 2005, EXPLORATORY
SOCIAL N; DING Y, 2001, V37, P817, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; DUBOIS FL, 2000,
V31, P689, J INT BUS STUD; EVERITT BS, 2001, CLUSTER ANAL; FAN CS, 2007,
V96, P253, ECON LETT; GAERTLER M, 2007, P115, LARGE SCALE STRUCTUR;
GLAENZEL W, 2006, V68, P457, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLOBERMAN S, 2006, V6, P431,
INT FINANCE REVIEW; GUGLER P, 2006, V16, P528, INT BUSINESS REV; HANNEMAN
RA, 2005, INTRO SOCIAL NETWORK; KOBRIN SJ, 2005, P38, WHAT IS INT
BUSINESS; KRACKHARDT D, 1988, V51, P123, SOC PSYCHOL QUART; KWOK CCY,
2002, V33, P571, J INT BUS STUD; LEONIDOU C, 2008, ENV MARKETING STRATE;
LEVY B, 2007, V16, P594, INT BUS REV; LEYDESDORFF L, 2001, CHALLENGE
SCIENTOMET; LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V55, P991, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L,
2009, V60, P1327, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LISEE C, 2008, V59, P1776, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; NOORBAKHSH F, 2001, V29, P1593, WORLD DEV; NOYONS ECM,
1999, BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING; PENG MW, 2004, V35, P99, J INT BUS STUD; REHN
R, 2006, P11, BIBLIOMETRIC HDB KAR; ROKAYA M, 2008, V44, P738, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG; ROTH C, 2006, V69, P429, SCIENTOMETRICS; RUGMAN AM, 2007,
V25, P333, EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; STIGLITZ JE, 2004, V26, P465, J POLICY MODEL; STREMERSCH S, 2005,
V24, P585, MARKET SCI; VANECK NJ, 2007, V15, P625, INT J UNCERTAIN FUZZ;
WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WOO YH, 2006, V3981,
P224, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; YAMIN M, 2009, V44, P144, J WORLD BUS; YAPRAK
A, 2000, V10, P1, ADV INT MAR|
NR- 51|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- SEP|
PY- 2010|
VL- 84|
IS- 3|
BP- 845|
EP- 862|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-010-0216-6|
PG- 18|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 630LK|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, V84, N3, P845-862|
UT- ISI:000280274400021 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Ma ZZ|
AF- Ma Zhenzhong|
TI- The Status of Contemporary Business Ethics Research: Present and
Future|
SO- JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- business ethics; citation analysis; corporate social responsibility;
ethical decision making; knowledge network|
ID- CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; DECISION-MAKING; FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE; AUTHOR COCITATION; MANAGEMENT; MODEL; LINK|
AB- This study provides a general overview of contemporary business
ethics research of the last 10 years (1997-2006) and discusses potential
future research directions in business ethics based on the overview Using
citation and co-citation analysis, this study examined the citation data
of journal articles, books, and other publications collected in the
Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), wherein key research themes in
business ethics studies in 1997-2006 and correlations between these
themes were explored. The results show that major research themes in
business ethics have shifted in the last decade from research on ethical
decision making and on the relationship between corporate social
responsibility and corporate performance to research on stakeholder
theory in business ethics and on the relationship between consumer
behavior and corporate social responsibility. The results of this study
help map the invisible network of knowledge production in business ethics
research and provide important insights on future business ethics
research|
C1- Univ Windsor, Odette Sch Business, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada|
RP- Ma, ZZ, Univ Windsor, Odette Sch Business, 401 Sunset Ave, Windsor,
ON N9B 3P4, Canada|
EM- maz@uwindsor.ca|
CD- AUPPERLE KE, 1985, V28, P446, ACAD MANAGE J; BORGATTI SP, 2002,
UCINET WINDOWS SOFTW; BROWN TJ, 1997, V61, P68, J MARKETING; CARROLL AB,
1979, V4, P497, ACAD MANAGE REV; CARROLL AB, 1999, V38, P268, BUS SOC;
DEGEORGE RT, 1987, V6, P201, J BUS ETHICS; DONALDSON T, 1994, V19, P252,
ACAD MANAGE REV; DONALDSON T, 1995, V20, P65, ACAD MANAGE REV; DUBINSKY
AJ, 1989, V19, P83, J BUS RES; FERRELL OC, 1985, V49, P87, J MARKETING;
FREEMAN RE, 1984, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT; FREEMAN RE, 1994, V4, P414,
BUSINESS ETHICS Q; FRIEDMAN M, 1970, NY TIMES MAGAZI 0913; FRITZSCHE DJ,
1991, V10, P841, J BUS ETHICS; GARFIELD E, 1979, CITATION INDEXING IT;
GLENN JR, 1993, V12, P835, J BUS ETHICS; GRIFFIN JJ, 1997, V36, P5, BUS
SOC; HOFSTEDE G, 2001, CULTURES CONSEQUENCE; HOLSAPPLE CW, 1993, V25,
P231, INFORM MANAGE; HOSMER LT, 1995, V20, P379, ACAD MANAGE REV; HUNT
SD, 1986, V6, P5, J MACROMARKETING; KUHN T, 1962, STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU;
MA Z, 2007, V19, P234, INT J CONFL MANAGE; MARGOLIS JD, 2001, PEOPLE
PROFITS SEARC; MARGOLIS JD, 2003, V48, P268, ADMIN SCI QUART; MATTEN D,
2005, V30, P166, ACAD MANAGE REV; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; MCGUIRE JB, 1988, V31, P854, ACAD MANAGE J; MCWILLIAMS A,
2001, V26, P117, ACAD MANAGE REV; MERTON R, 1979, CITATION INDEXING IT;
MITCHELL RK, 1997, V22, P853, ACAD MANAGE REV; ORLITZKY M, 2003, V24,
P403, ORGAN STUD; ORLITZKY M, 2005, V7, P37, U AUCKLAND BUSINESS;
PILKINGTON A, 2006, V26, P288, TECHNOVATION; PRICE DJ, 1963, LITTLE SCI
BIG SCI; RAWLS J, 1971, THEORY JUSTICE; ROBERTSON CJ, 2008, V80, P745, J
BUS ETHICS; SEN S, 2001, V38, P225, J MARKETING RES; SMALL H, 1993, V26,
P5, SCIENTOMETRICS; STARK A, 1993, V71, P38, HARVARD BUS REV; TREVINO LK,
1986, V11, P601, ACAD MANAGE REV; WADDOCK SA, 1997, V18, P303, STRATEGIC
MANAGE J; WALSTROM KA, 2000, V38, P59, INFORM MANAGE; WHITE HD, 1981,
V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; WOOD DJ, 1991, V16, P691, ACAD MANAGE REV|
NR- 46|
TC- 1|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0167-4544|
J9- J BUS ETHICS|
JI- J. Bus. Ethics|
PD- DEC|
PY- 2009|
VL- 90|
SU- Suppl. 3|
BP- 255|
EP- 265|
DI- 10.1007/s10551-010-0420-6|
PG- 11|
SC- Business; Ethics|
GA- 622MF|
JN- JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2009, V90, N3, P255-265|
UT- ISI:000279667200002 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Tsai WP; Wu CH|
AF- Tsai Wenpin; Wu, Chia-hung|
TI- KNOWLEDGE COMBINATION: A COCITATION ANALYSIS|
SO- ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL|
LA- English|
DT- Editorial Material|
ID- HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE; ABSORPTIVECAPACITY; INNOVATION; TECHNOLOGY; ROUTINES; BARRIERS; IMPACT; FIRMS|
C1- [Tsai, Wenpin] Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA; [Wu,
Chia-hung] Natl Tsing Hua Univ, Hsinchu, Taiwan|
RP- Tsai, WP, Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA|
CD- BARLEY SR, 1986, V31, P78, ADMIN SCI QUART; BARNEY J, 1991, V17, P99,
J MANAGE; BECKER B, 1996, V39, P779, ACAD MANAGE J; BERGER P, 1966,
SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION; COHEN WM, 1990, V35, P128, ADMIN SCI QUART; CULNAN
MJ, 1990, V41, P453, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; DESS GG, 1984, V27, P467, ACAD
MANAGE J; DOUGHERTY D, 1992, V3, P179, ORGAN SCI; EDMONDSON AC, 1999, V4,
P350, ADM SCI Q; EDMONDSON AC, 2001, V46, P685, ADMIN SCI QUART; FELDMAN
MS, 2003, V48, P94, ADMIN SCI QUART; HACKMAN JR, 1995, V40, P309, ADMIN
SCI QUART; HUSELID MA, 1995, V38, P635, ACAD MANAGE J; KIESLER S, 1982,
V27, P548, ADM SCI Q; KILDUFF M, 2006, V31, P1031, ACAD MANAGE REV;
KIMBERLY JR, 1981, V24, P689, ACAD MANAGE J; KOGUT B, 1992, V3, P383,
ORGAN SCI; KOGUT B, 1996, V7, P502, ORGAN SCI; KUHN TS, 1996, STRUCTURE
SCI REVOLU; LAKATOS I, 1970, FALSIFICATION METHOD; LOUIS MR, 1980, V25,
P226, ADM SCI Q; MERTON RK, 1973, SOCIOLOGY SCI THEORE; MINER AS, 2001,
V46, P304, ADMIN SCI QUART; MULLINS NC, 1977, V42, P552, AM SOCIOL REV;
NERKAR A, 2003, V49, P211, MANAGE SCI; NERUR SP, 2008, V29, P391,
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT; PFEFFER J, 1993, V18, P599, ACAD MANAGE REV;
SALANCIK GR, 1977, V22, P427, ADM SCI Q; SCHILDT HA, 2006, V30, P399,
ENTREP THEORY PRACT; SCHUMPETER JA, 1934, THEORY EC DEV; SMALL H, 1974,
V4, P17, SCI STUD; SNOW CC, 1980, V25, P317, ADM SCI Q; TSAI WP, 2001,
V44, P996, ACAD MANAGE J; VANMAANEN J, 1995, V6, P132, ORGAN SCI|
NR- 34|
TC- 0|
PU- ACAD MANAGEMENT|
PI- BRIARCLIFF MANOR|
PA- PACE UNIV, PO BOX 3020, 235 ELM RD, BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY 10510-8020
USA|
SN- 0001-4273|
J9- ACAD MANAGE J|
JI- Acad. Manage. J|
PD- JUN|
PY- 2010|
VL- 53|
IS- 3|
BP- 441|
EP- 450|
PG- 10|
SC- Business; Management|
GA- 621RR|
JN- ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, V53, N3, P441-450|
UT- ISI:000279600500001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Greene D; Freyne J; Smyth B; Cunningham P|
AF- Greene Derek; Freyne, Jill; Smyth, Barry; Cunningham, Padraig|
TI- An Analysis of Current Trends in CBR Research Using Multiview
Clustering|
SO- AI MAGAZINE|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- LEARNING SIMILARITY MEASURES; CASE-BASES; COCITATION ANALYSIS;
REASONING SYSTEMS; AUTHOR COCITATION; CASE RETRIEVAL; KNOWLEDGE;
ARCHITECTURE; EXPLANATION; ADAPTATION|
AB- The European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) in 2008 marked
15 years of international and European CBR conferences where almost seven
hundred research papers were published. In this report we review the
research themes covered in these papers and identify the topics that are
active at the moment. The main mechanism for this analysis is a
clustering of the research papers based on both cocitation links and text
similarity. It is interesting to note that the core set of papers has
attracted citations from almost three thousand papers outside the
conference collection so it is clear that the CBR conferences are a
subpart of a much larger whole. It is remarkable that the research themes
revealed by this analysis do not map directly to the subtopics of CBR
that might appear in a textbook. Instead they reflect the applicationsoriented focus of CBR research, and cover the promising application areas
and research challenges that are faced|
C1- [Greene, Derek; Smyth, Barry; Cunningham, Padraig] Univ Coll Dublin,
Sch Comp Sci & Informat, Dublin, Ireland; [Freyne, Jill] CSIRO, ICT Ctr,
Hobart, Tas, Australia|
RP- Greene, D, Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Comp Sci & Informat, Dublin,
Ireland|
FU- Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [05/IN.1/I24, 08/SRC/I1407]|
FX- This work was part supported by Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)
Grant Nos. 05/IN.1/I24 and 08/SRC/I1407|
CD- AAMODT A, 1993, V837, P274, LECT NOTES COMPUTER; AHA DW, 1997, V1266,
P267, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; AHA DW, 1998, V1488, P262, LECT NOTES ARTIF
INT; ARCOS JL, 1993, V837, P289, LECT NOTES COMPUTER; ARMENGOL E, 1994,
P2, ADV CASE BASED REASO; BACCIGALUPO C, 2007, V4626, P433, LECT NOTES
COMPUT SC; BANDINI S, 2001, V2080, P634, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; BENTO C,
1994, V984, P33, LECT NOTES COMPUTER; BERGMANN R, 1998, V1488, P25, LECT
NOTES ARTIF INT; BERGMANN R, 2006, V4106, P271, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT;
BONZANO A, 1997, V1266, P291, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; BORNER K, 1996,
V1168, P58, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; BRADLEY K, 2004, V3155, P518, LECT
NOTES COMPUT SC; BRIDGE D, 2002, V2416, P291, LNCS LNAI; BRUNINGHAUS S,
1997, V1266, P303, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; BRUNINGHAUS S, 2001, V2080, P74,
LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; BUNKE H, 1993, V837, LECT NOTES COMPUTER; CARBONELL
J, 1991, V2, P51, SIGART B; CHEETHAM W, 2004, V3155, P106, LECT NOTES
COMPUT SC; COYLE L, 2008, UCDCSI20088; CUNNINGHAM P, 2003, V2689, P122,
LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; DFAZAGUDO B, 2001, V2080, P158, LECT NOTES
COMPUTER; DIAZAGUDO B, 2002, V2416, P73, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT;
DIMITRIADOU E, 2002, V16, P901, INT J PATTERN RECOGN; DOYLE D, 2004,
V3155, P157, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; DOYLE M, 2000, V1898, P323, LNCS LNAI;
FALTINGS B, 1997, V1266, P611, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; FLINTER S, 1995,
V1010, P421, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; GABEL T, 2004, V3155, P169, LECT NOTES
COMPUT SC; GMUR M, 2003, V57, P27, SCIENTOMETRICS; GOKER M, 2000, V1898,
P29, LNCS LNAI; GOMES P, 2000, V1898, P112, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT;
GOMEZMARTIN PP, 2005, V3620, P267, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; GRACHTEN M,
2004, V3155, P601, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; GREENE D, 2008, V5239, P18, LECT
NOTES ARTIF INT; GREENE D, 2008, P 8 INT C BIOINF BIO; GRIMNES M, 1996,
V1168, P164, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; GU MY, 2005, V3620, P296, LECT NOTES
ARTIF INT; GUPTA KM, 2002, V2416, P175, LNCS LNAI; HAMMOND KJ, 1986,
P267, P AAAI 86; HAYES C, 2005, V3620, P312, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; HE YL,
2002, V38, P491, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; HEISTER F, 1998, V1488, P221, LECT
NOTES ARTIF INT; JAERE MD, 2002, V2416, P225, LNCS LNAI; JARMULAK J,
1997, V1266, P43, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; KAMP G, 1997, V1266, P223, LECT
NOTES ARTIF INT; KOLODNER JL, 1991, V12, P52, AI MAG; KOLODNER JL, 1993,
V837, P3, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; LAMONTAGNE L, 2004, V3155, P242, LECT
NOTES COMPUT SC; LEAKE DB, 1998, V1488, P196, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; LENZ
M, 1996, V1168, P219, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; MACEDO L, 2004, V3155, P272,
LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; MACURA RT, 1995, V1010, P43, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT;
MARLING C, 2001, V2080, P702, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; MCGINTY L, 2003,
V2689, P1065, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; MCSHERRY D, 1998, V1488, P184, LECT
NOTES ARTIF INT; MCSHERRY D, 2002, V2416, P27, LNCS LNAI; MCSHERRY D,
2003, V2689, P1067, LECT NOTES COMPUTER; MCSHERRY D, 2004, V3155, P317,
LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; MONTANI S, 2000, V1898, P213, LECT NOTES COMPUTER;
MOUGOUIE B, 2003, V2689, P1064, LECT NOTES COMPUTER; MUKKAMALLA S, 2002,
V2416, P264, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; MURLOZAVILA HA, 1999, V1650, P721,
LECT NOTES COMPUTER; NAKATANI Y, 1993, V837, P313, LECT NOTES COMPUTER;
NAKHAEIZADEH G, 1993, P837, LECT NOTES COMPUTER; NEAGU N, 2001, V2080,
P74, LECT NOTES COMPUTER; NEAGU N, 2003, V1066, P1066, LECT NOTES
COMPUTER; NETTEN BD, 1995, V1010, P67, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; OPIYO ETO,
1995, V1010, P77, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; OSBORNE H, 1997, V1266, P235,
LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; OSBORNE HR, 1996, V1168, P309, LECT NOTES ARTIF
INT; PERNER P, 1999, V1650, P724, LNCS LNAI; PLAZA E, 1995, V1010, P265,
LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; PORTINALE L, 1999, V1650, P718, LNCS LNAI; RACINE
K, 1997, V1266, P553, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; REINARTZ T, 2000, V1898,
P249, LECT NOTES COMPUTER; RICHARDS B, 1994, V984, P126, LECT NOTES
COMPUTER; RISSLAND EL, 1984, P288, LECT NOTES COMPUTER; RISSLAND EL,
2006, V4106, P1, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; SCHAAF JW, 1996, V1168, P362, LECT
NOTES ARTIF INT; SCHANK RC, 1989, V40, P353, ARTIF INTELL; SCHMIDT R,
1999, V1650, P723, LECT NOTES COMPUTER; SCHOLKOPF B, 1998, V10, P1299,
NEURAL COMPUT; SEBAG M, 1993, V837, P119, LECT NOTES COMPUTER; SEITZ A,
1999, V1650, P318, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; SMYTH B, 1993, V837, P209, LNCS;
SMYTH B, 1998, V1488, P208, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; SMYTH B, 1999, V1650,
P343, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; SMYTH B, 2000, V1898, P1, LNCS LNAI; SMYTH B,
2001, V2080, P347, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; SORMO F, 2005, V3620, P492, LECT
NOTES ARTIF INT; STAHL A, 2001, V2080, P74, LECT NOTES COMPUTER; STAHL A,
2003, V2689, P1064, LECT NOTES COMPUTER; STAHL A, 2005, V3620, P507, LECT
NOTES ARTIF INT; STAHL A, 2006, V4106, P355, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT;
STANFILL C, 1986, V29, P1213, COMMUN ACM; STREHL A, 2002, V583, P617, J
MACHINE LEARNING R; SURMA J, 1998, V1488, P233, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT;
TOBUDIC A, 2003, V3620, P579, LECT NOTES COMPUTER; TROTT JR, 1997, V1266,
P178, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; VOLLRATH I, 2000, V1898, P403, LNCS LNAI;
WASSERMAN S, 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; WESS S, 1993, V837, P181, LECT
NOTES COMPUTER; WETTSCHERECK D, 1995, V1010, P347, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT;
WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WIRATUNGA N, 2004, V3155,
P806, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; WISWEDEL B, 2007, V45, P439, INT J APPROX
REASON|
NR- 107|
TC- 0|
PU- AMER ASSOC ARTIFICIAL INTELL|
PI- MENLO PK|
PA- 445 BURGESS DRIVE, MENLO PK, CA 94025-3496 USA|
SN- 0738-4602|
J9- AI MAG|
JI- AI Mag|
PD- SUM|
PY- 2010|
VL- 31|
IS- 2|
BP- 45|
EP- 61|
PG- 17|
SC- Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence|
GA- 617HL|
JN- AI MAGAZINE, 2010, V31, N2, P45-61|
UT- ISI:000279271500004 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Chen CM; Ibekwe-SanJuan F; Hou JH|
AF- Chen Chaomei; Ibekwe-SanJuan, Fidelia; Hou, Jianhua|
TI- The Structure and Dynamics of Cocitation Clusters: A MultiplePerspective Cocitation Analysis|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- INFORMATION-SCIENCE; RESEARCH FRONTS; COMBINING BIBLIOMETRICS;
SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; RELEVANCE THEORY; CONCEPT SYMBOLS; GOOGLE SCHOLAR;
KNOWLEDGE; NETWORKS; WEB|
AB- A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis method is introduced for
characterizing and interpreting the structure and dynamics of cocitation
clusters. The method facilitates analytic and sense making tasks by
integrating network visualization, spectral clustering, automatic cluster
labeling, and text summarization. Cocitation networks are decomposed into
cocitation clusters. The interpretation of these clusters is augmented by
automatic cluster labeling and summarization The method focuses on the
interrelations between a cocitation cluster's members and their citers.
The generic method is applied to a three-part analysis of the field of
information science as defined by 12 journals published between 1996 and
2008: (a) a comparative author cocitation analysis (ACA), (b) a
progressive ACA of a time series of cocitation networks, and (c) a
progressive document cocitation analysis (DCA) Results show that the
multiple-perspective method increases the interpretability and
accountability of both ACA and DCA networks|
C1- [Chen, Chaomei] Drexel Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Technol,
Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA; [Ibekwe-SanJuan, Fidelia] Univ Lyon 3, ELICO,
F-69008 Lyon, France; [Hou, Jianhua] Dalian Univ Technol, WISELAB,
Dalian, Peoples R China|
RP- Chen, CM, Drexel Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Technol, 3141 Chestnut St,
Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA|
EM- chaomei.chen@drexel.edu fidelia.ibekwe-sanjuan@univ-lyon3.fr
hqzhixing@gmail.com|
FU- National Science Foundation [IIS-0612129]|
FX- This work is supported in part by the National Science Foundation
under grant IIS-0612129. We wish to thank Eric SanJuan of the University
of Avignon, France, for implementing the Enertex sentence ranking
algorithm used in this study; Howard White, Drexel University, for his
detailed and constructive comments on an earlier draft; Dangzhi Zhao and
Andreas Strotmann of the University of Alberta, Canada, for providing
detailed factor loading results of their factor analysis for the
comparative ACA and for their comments on an earlier draft of the
article; and anonymous reviewers for their detailed reviews. Special
thanks to Zeyuan Liu and members of the WISELAB at Dalian University of
Technology, China, for their valuable feedback based on their extensive
use of earlier versions of CiteSpace|
CD- ASTROM F, 2007, V58, P947, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BARILAN J, 2008,
V74, P257, SCIENTOMETRICS; BATAGELJ V, 1998, V21, P47, CONNECTIONS;
BENHUR A, 2002, P6, PAC S BIOC; BONACICH P, 1987, V92, P1170, AM J
SOCIOL; BRANDES U, 2001, V25, P163, J MATH SOCIOL; BRIN S, 1998, V30,
P107, COMPUT NETWORKS ISDN; CARMEL D, 2009, P139, P 32 ANN INT ACM; CHEN
C, 2005, P98, P P INT C INT US INT; CHEN CM, 1999, V35, P401, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG; CHEN CM, 2004, V101, P5303, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; CHEN CM,
2006, V57, P359, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CHEN CM, 2008, V67, P234, DATA
KNOWL ENG; CHEN CM, 2009, V24, P74, IEEE INTELL SYST; CHEN Y, 2009, V3,
P209, IET COMMUN; CRONIN B, 1981, V3, P27, J INFORM SCI; DEERWESTER S,
1990, V41, P391, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; DUNNING T, 1993, V19, P61,
COMPUTATIONAL LINGUI; FERNANDEZ S, 2007, P861, P 6 MEX INT C ART IN;
FISZMAN M, 2009, V42, P801, J BIOMED INFORM; FREEMAN LC, 1977, V40, P35,
SOCIOMETRY; GARFIELD E, 1979, CITATION INDEXING IT; GARFIELD E, 2004,
V30, P119, J INFORM SCI; IBEKWESANJUAN F, 2009, P ANN M AM SOC INF S;
JACCARD P, 1901, V37, P547, B SOC VAUD SCI NAT; JANSSENS F, 2006, V42,
P1614, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; JONES KS, 1999, P2, ADV AUTOMATIC TEXT S;
KISS C, 2008, V46, P233, DECIS SUPPORT SYST; KLAVANS R, 2009, P265, P 12
INT C SCI INF I; KLEINBERG J, 2002, P91, P 8 ACM SIGKDD INT C; KUMAR R,
2003, P568, P 12 INT C WORLD WID; LANE J, 2009, V324, P1273, SCIENCE;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2005, V56, P769, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MEHO LI, 2007, V58,
P2105, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MIHALCEA R, 2004, P8, P C EMP METH NAT LAN;
MORRIS S, 2002, V43, P841, COMPUT IND ENG; MORRIS SA, 2003, V54, P413, J
AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MORRIS SA, 2008, V42, P213, ANNU REV INFORM SCI;
NEWMAN MEJ, 2006, V103, P8577, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; NG AY, 2002, V14,
P849, ADV NEUR IN; PERSSON O, 1994, V45, P31, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; RADEV
D, 2004, V22, P457, J ARTIFICIAL INTELLI; ROUSSEEUW PJ, 1987, V20, P53, J
COMPUT APPL MATH; SALTON G, 1975, V18, P613, COMMUN ACM; SCHMID H, 1999,
P13, NATURAL LANGUAGE PRO; SCHNEIDER JW, 2006, V68, P573, SCIENTOMETRICS;
SCHNEIDER JW, 2009, P443, P ISSI 2009; SCHNEIDER JW, 2009, V80, P103,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SHI JB, 2000, V22, P888, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL; SHIBATA N,
2008, V28, P758, TECHNOVATION; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; SMALL H, 1980, V36, P183, J DOC; SMALL H, 1985, V7, P391,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1985, V8, P321, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1986,
V37, P97, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1986, V10, P95, SCIENTOMETRICS;
SMALL H, 2003, V54, P394, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; SMALL HG, 1978, V8, P327,
SOC STUD SCI; TABAH AN, 1999, V34, P249, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; TEUFEL S,
2002, V28, P409, COMPUT LINGUIST; VONLUXBURG U, 2006, TUTORIAL SPECTRAL
CL; VONLUXBURG U, 2009, LIMITS SPECTRAL CLUS; WHITE HD, 1982, V38, P255,
J DOC; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2007,
V58, P536, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITE HD, 2007, V58, P583, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; WITTEN IH, 1999, DATA MINING PRACTICA; ZHAO DZ, 2008, V59,
P2070, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ZHAO DZ, 2008, V59, P916, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; ZINS C, 2007, V58, P335, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ZINS C, 2007, V58,
P479, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ZINS C, 2007, V58, P526, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; ZINS C, 2007, V58, P645, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ZUCCALA A, 2006, V57,
P1487, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 74|
TC- 2|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- JUL|
PY- 2010|
VL- 61|
IS- 7|
BP- 1386|
EP- 1409|
DI- 10.1002/asi.21309|
PG- 24|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 615QV|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2010, V61, N7, P1386-1409|
UT- ISI:000279151600007 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Thelwall M; Klitkou A; Verbeek A; Stuart D; Vincent C|
AF- Thelwall Mike; Klitkou, Antje; Verbeek, Arnold; Stuart, David;
Vincent, Celine|
TI- Policy-Relevant Webometrics for Individual Scientific Fields|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- WEB-SITE INTERLINKING; INFORMATION-SCIENCE; IMPACT FACTORS; ACADEMIC
WEB; AUTHOR COCITATION; SEARCH ENGINES; COMMUNICATION; CITATIONS; LINKS;
COLLABORATION|
AB- Despite over 10 years of research there is no agreement on the most
suitable roles for Webometric indicators in support of research policy
and almost no field-based Webometrics. This article partly fills these
gaps by analyzing the potential of policy-relevant Webometrics for
individual scientific fields with the help of 4 case studies. Although
Webometrics cannot provide robust indicators of knowledge flows or
research impact, it can provide some evidence of networking and mutual
awareness. The scope of Webometrics is also relatively wide, including
not only research organizations and firms but also intermediary groups
like professional associations, Web portals, and government agencies
Webometrics can, therefore, provide evidence about the research process
to compliment peer review, bibliometric, and patent indicators: tracking
the early, mainly prepublication development of new fields and research
funding initiatives, assessing the role and impact of intermediary
organizations and the need for new ones, and monitoring the extent of
mutual awareness in particular research areas|
C1- [Thelwall, Mike; Stuart, David] Wolverhampton Univ, Stat Cybermetr
Res Grp, Sch Comp & Informat Technol, Wolverhampton WV1 1SB, England;
[Klitkou, Antje] NIFU STEP Norwegian Inst Studies Innovat Res & Ed, N0686 Oslo, Norway; [Verbeek, Arnold; Vincent, Celine] IDEA Consult, B1210 Brussels, Belgium|
RP- Thelwall, M, Wolverhampton Univ, Stat Cybermetr Res Grp, Sch Comp &
Informat Technol, Wulfruna St, Wolverhampton WV1 1SB, England|
EM- m.thelwall@wlv.ac.uk antje.klitkou@nifustep.no
arnold.verbeek@ideaconsult.be dp_stuart@hotmail.com
Celine.vincent@ideaconsult.be|
FU- European Commission ; European Commission Services FX This article is
based on the project "The use of Webometries for the analysis of
knowledge flows within the European Research Area," funded by the
European Commission, DG Research, Unit C3 Economic analysis and
monitoring of national research policies and the Lisbon strategy PP-CTM2-2005-0001, for 126,425 Euros. We thank the European Commission
Services for its financial support. Moreover, we thank Mrs. Maud
Skaringer, the European Commission project officer, for her constructive
and valuable suggestions. We also thank Sylvan Katz, Ismael Rafols and
Mark Knell for help with the study. The opinions expressed in the article
are those of the authors and do not represent the Commission's official
position|
CD- *EUR COMM, 2008, MOR RES INT INT EUR; AGUILLO IF, 1998, P239, P ONL
INF 98 LOND; AGUILLO IF, 2006, V57, P1296, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ALMIND
TC, 1997, V53, P404, J DOC; BARILAN J, 1999, SEARCH ENGINE RESULT;
BARILAN J, 2001, V50, P7, SCIENTOMETRICS; BARILAN J, 2004, V38, P231,
ANNU REV INFORM SCI; BARJAK F, 2007, V58, P200, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
BECHER T, 2001, ACAD TRIBES TERRITOR; BEKKERS R, 2008, V37, P1837, RES
POLICY; BJORNEBORN L, 2001, V50, P65, SCIENTOMETRICS; BJORNEBORN L, 2004,
V55, P1216, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BOYACK KW, 2009, V79, P27,
SCIENTOMETRICS; CALVERT J, 2003, V30, P85, SCI PUBL POLICY; COTHEY V,
2004, V55, P1228, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; FRUCHTERMAN TMJ, 1991, V21,
P1129, SOFTWARE PRACT EXPER; FRY J, 2006, V10, CYBERMETRICS; GAIRIN JMR,
1997, V20, P175, REV ESP DOC CIENT; GARFIELD E, 1999, V161, P979, CAN MED
ASSOC J; GEISLER E, 2000, METRICS SCI TECHNOLO; HARRIES G, 2004, V30,
P436, J INFORM SCI; HEIMERIKS G, 2003, V58, P391, SCIENTOMETRICS;
HEIMERIKS G, 2006, V10, CYBERMETRICS; HOLMBERG K, 2009, V79, P157,
SCIENTOMETRICS; INGWERSEN P, 1998, V54, P236, J DOC; KAMADA T, 1989, V31,
P7, INFORM PROCESS LETT; KLING R, 2000, V51, P1306, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
KOUSHA K, 2006, V68, P501, SCIENTOMETRICS; KOUSHA K, 2007, V58, P1055, J
AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LAMIREL JC, 2004, V61, P427, SCIENTOMETRICS;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V55, P991, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MATZAT U, 2001,
THESIS U GRONINGEN N; MATZAT U, 2004, V26, P221, SOC NETWORKS; METTROP W,
2001, V57, P623, J DOC; MOED HF, 2005, CITATION ANAL RES EV; NENTWICH M,
2003, CYBERSCIENCE RES AGE; OPPENHEIM C, 2000, P405, ASIS MONOGRAPH
SERIE; ORTEGA JL, 2008, V74, P295, SCIENTOMETRICS; OTTE E, 2002, V28,
P441, J INF SCI; PRIME C, 2002, V54, P291, SCIENTOMETRICS; ROSSI F, 2006,
INT WORKSH WEB INF S; ROUSSEAU R, 1999, V2, CYBERMETRICS; SHAW D, 2001,
V6, 1 MONDAY; SMALL H, 1999, V50, P799, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMITH AG,
1999, V55, P577, J DOC; STOKES DE, 1997, PASTEURS QUADRANT BA; STUART D,
2007, V33, P231, J INF SCI; TANG R, 2003, V25, P437, LIBR INFORM SCI RES;
THELWALL M, 2001, V52, P1157, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; THELWALL M, 2001,
V27, P319, J INFORM SCI; THELWALL M, 2002, V53, P995, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; THELWALL M, 2004, V55, P149, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; THELWALL M, 2005,
V39, P81, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; VANIMPE S, 2006, V57, P422, INFORM
WISSENSCHAFT; VAUGHAN L, 2002, V54, P356, ASLIB PROC; VAUGHAN L, 2003,
V54, P1313, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; VAUGHAN L, 2005, V56, P1075, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; VAUGHAN L, 2005, V61, P467, SCIENTOMETRICS; VAUGHAN L, 2006,
V57, P1178, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WASSERMAN S, 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL;
WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V49,
P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2009, V60, P1083, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; WHITLEY R, 2000, INTELLECTUAL SOCIAL; WILKINSON D, 2003, V29, P49, J
INFORM SCI|
NR- 65|
TC- 0|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- JUL|
PY- 2010|
VL- 61|
IS- 7|
BP- 1464|
EP- 1475|
DI- 10.1002/asi.21345|
PG- 12|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 615QV|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2010, V61, N7, P1464-1475|
UT- ISI:000279151600011 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Linderman K; Chandrasekaran A|
AF- Linderman Kevin; Chandrasekaran, Aravind|
TI- The scholarly exchange of knowledge in Operations Management|
SO- JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Knowledge; Citation analysis; Co-citations interpretive methods;
Inter-disciplinary; Citation exchange among disciplines|
ID- MARKETING JOURNALS; CITATION ANALYSIS; ARTICLE IMPACT; DISCIPLINES;
QUALITY; SCIENCE; AUTHOR; POM|
AB- A number of studies have investigated the quality of journals in
Operations Management. This research steps back from these studies and
investigates the exchange of ideas within Operations Management journals
and between other management disciplines (Management, Marketing, and
Finance) during the last decade (1998-2007). Journal citation metrics
provide a measure for the exchange of scholarly ideas Operations
Management (OM) journals show a willingness to cross-pollinate ideas with
other management disciplines. But, they also tend to have a higher level
of self citations and lower level of within discipline citation exchanges
when compared to other management disciplines. As a result, Operations
Management journals may reflect methodological silos in the field that
could potentially dampen scholarly exchange. In general, increasing the
diversity of scholarly exchanges within Operations Management, and
conducting more cross-disciplinary research with other management
disciples should improve the scholarly development of Operations
Management. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved|
C1- [Linderman, Kevin] Univ Minnesota, Carlson Sch Management,
Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA; [Chandrasekaran, Aravind] Ohio State Univ,
Fisher Coll Business, Columbus, OH 43210 USA|
RP- Linderman, K, Univ Minnesota, Carlson Sch Management, Minneapolis, MN
55455 USA|
EM- linde037@umn.edu chandrasekaran.24@osu.edu|
CD- AGARWAL R, 2007, V50, P1304, ACAD MANAGE J; AGARWAL VK, 2002, V11,
P101, PRODUCTION OPERATION; BARMAN S, 1991, V10, P194, J OPERATIONS
MANAGEM; BARMAN S, 2001, V19, P367, J OPER MANAG; BAUMGARTNER H, 2003,
V67, P123, J MARKETING; BERGH DD, 2006, V27, P81, STRATEGIC MANAGE J;
BIRD A, 1998, PHILOS SCI FUNDAMENT; BOROKHOVICH KA, 2000, V55, P1457, J
FINANC; CHEN CR, 2007, V13, P1008, J CORP FINANC; CHEN H, 2005, V51,
P1015, MANAGE SCI; COE R, 1984, V27, P660, ACAD MANAGE J; COLE JR, 1973,
SOCIAL STRATIFICATIO; CONLON DE, 2006, V49, P857, ACAD MANAGE J; CRONIN
B, 1984, CITATION PROCESS ROL; CROSON R, 2003, V12, P1, PROD OPER MANAG;
DAFT RL, 2003, ORG THEORY DESIGN; DIEKS D, 1976, V6, P247, SOC STUD SCI;
FRANKE RH, 1990, V11, P243, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; GARFIELD E, 1994, V5, P3,
CURR CONTENTS; GORMAN MF, 2005, V17, P3, MANUFACTURING SERVIC; GUIDRY JA,
2004, V15, P45, MARKETING ED REV; HOPP WJ, 2004, V50, P1, MANAGE SCI;
JACOBS RF, 2006, OPERATIONS MANAGEMEN; JUDGE TA, 2007, V50, P491, ACAD
MANAGE J; LIGHTMAN S, 2000, V26, P183, J ACAD LEADERSHIP; LOCKETT A,
2005, V14, P139, J MANAGE INQUIRY; LUKKA K, 1996, V21, P755, ACCOUNT ORG
SOC; MALHOTRA MK, 1998, V16, P407, J OPER MANAG; MARTIN BR, 1983, V12,
P61, RES POLICY; MCFADYEN MA, 2004, V47, P735, ACAD MANAGE J; MCVEIGH ME,
2002, J SELF CITATION J CI; MERCHANT KA, 2003, V281, P251, ORG SOC;
MERTON RK, 1965, SHOULDERS GIANTS POS; MOWERY DC, 2002, V48, P5, MANAGE
SCI; NERUR S, 2005, V48, P71, COMMUN ACM; ONEILL J, 2000, V13, P105,
LEARN PUBL; PIERCE SJ, 1990, DISCIPLINARY WORK IN; PODSAKOFF PM, 2005,
V26, P473, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; PRICE DJD, 1963, LITTLE SCI BIG SCI;
RAMSAY I, 1998, V26, P298, AUSTR BUSINESS LAW R; RINIA EJ, 2002, V54,
P347, SCIENTOMETRICS; ROBBINS SP, 2003, ORG BEHAV; ROUSSEAU R, 1992, V48,
P79, J DOC; SARTON G, 1936, STUDY HIST SCI; SCHROEDER RG, 2007,
OPERATIONS MANAGEMEN; SCHULTZ KL, 1999, V45, P1664, MANAGE SCI; SIMON H,
1976, ADM BEHAV STUDY DECI; STEPHAN PE, 1991, V21, P351, SOC STUD SCI;
STEVENSON QJ, 2007, OPERATIONS MANAGEMEN; SWINK M, 2009, V16, P14, POMS
CHRONICLE; TAHAI A, 1999, V20, P279, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; TELLIS GJ, 1999,
V36, P120, J MARKETING RES; VANDEVEN AH, 2007, ENGAGED SCHOLARSHIP;
VASTAG G, 2002, V30, P109, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S; WU DY, 2006, V24, P839,
J OPER MANAG; WU ZH, 2005, V24, P27, J OPER MANAG; ZINKHAN GM, 1992, V19,
P282, J CONSUM RES|
NR- 57|
TC- 0|
PU- ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV|
PI- AMSTERDAM|
PA- PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0272-6963|
J9- J OPER MANAG|
JI- J. Oper. Manag|
PD- JUL|
PY- 2010|
VL- 28|
IS- 4|
BP- 357|
EP- 366|
DI- 10.1016/j.jom.2009.11.012|
PG- 10|
SC- Management; Operations Research & Management Science|
GA- 613HF|
JN- JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2010, V28, N4, P357-366|
UT- ISI:000278969300006 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- van Eck NJ; Waltman L|
AF- van Eck Nees Jan; Waltman, Ludo|
TI- Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric
mapping|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Bibliometric mapping; Science mapping; Visualization; VOSviewer; VOS;
Journal co-citation analysis|
ID- COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE FIELD; PATHFINDER NETWORKS; SCIENCE; MAPS;
GRAPHS|
AB- We present VOSviewer, a freely available computer program that we
have developed for constructing and viewing bibliometric maps. Unlike
most computer programs that are used for bibliometric mapping, VOSviewer
pays special attention to the graphical representation of bibliometric
maps. The functionality of VOSviewer is especially useful for displaying
large bibliometric maps in an easy-to-interpret way. The paper consists
of three parts. In the first part, an overview of VOSviewer's
functionality for displaying bibliometric maps is provided In the second
part, the technical implementation of specific parts of the program is
discussed. Finally, in the third part, VOSviewer's ability to handle
large maps is demonstrated by using the program to construct and display
a co-citation map of 5,000 major scientific journals|
C1- [van Eck, Nees Jan; Waltman, Ludo] Leiden Univ, Ctr Sci & Technol
Studies, Leiden, Netherlands; [van Eck, Nees Jan; Waltman, Ludo] Erasmus
Univ, Inst Econometr, Erasmus Sch Econ, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam,
Netherlands|
RP- van Eck, NJ, Leiden Univ, Ctr Sci & Technol Studies, Leiden,
Netherlands|
EM- ecknjpvan@cwts.leidenuniv.nl waltmanlr@cwts.leidenuniv.nl|
CD- AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BOLLEN J, 2009, V4,
P4803, PLOS ONE; BORG I, 2005, MODERN MULTIDIMENSIO; BORNER K, 2003, V37,
P179, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; BOYACK KW, 2005, V64, P351, SCIENTOMETRICS;
CHEN C, 2003, MAPPING SCI FRONTIER; CHEN CM, 2006, V57, P359, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; DAVIDSON GS, 2001, P23, P IEEE INF VIS 2001; DEMOYAANEGON F,
2007, V58, P2167, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; DENOOY W, 2005, EXPLORATORY
SOCIAL N; EILERS PHC, 2004, V20, P623, BIOINFORMATICS; FRUCHTERMAN TMJ,
1991, V21, P1129, SOFTWARE PRACT EXPER; GARFIELD E, 2009, V3, P173, J
INFORMETR; HUISMAN M, 2005, P270, MODELS METHODS SOCIA; KAMADA T, 1989,
V31, P7, INFORM PROCESS LETT; KLAVANS R, 2006, V57, P251, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; KLAVANS R, 2006, V68, P475, SCIENTOMETRICS; KOPCSA A, 1998, V49,
P7, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V60, P371, J DOC;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2009, V60, P348, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; PETERS HPF, 1993,
V22, P23, RES POLICY; RIP A, 1984, V6, P381, SCIENTOMETRICS; SCHVANEVELDT
RW, 1988, V15, P337, COMPUT MATH APPL; SCHVANEVELDT RW, 1990, PATHFINDER
ASS NETWO; SCOTT DW, 1992, MULTIVARIATE DENSITY; SKUPIN A, 2004, V101,
P5274, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; SMALL H, 1985, V7, P391, SCIENTOMETRICS;
VANECK NJ, SCIENTOMETR IN PRESS; VANECK NJ, 2006, V1, P6, IEEE COMPUT
INTELL M; VANECK NJ, 2007, V15, P625, INT J UNCERTAIN FUZZ; VANECK NJ,
2007, P299, ST CLASS DAT ANAL; VANECK NJ, 2008, 10 INT C SCI TECHN I;
VANECK NJ, 2009, V60, P1635, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; VANLIERE R, 2003, V9,
P206, IEEE T VIS COMPUT GR; VARGASQUESADA B, 2007, VISUALIZING STRUCTUR;
WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ZITT M, 2000, V47, P627,
SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 37|
TC- 3|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- AUG|
PY- 2010|
VL- 84|
IS- 2|
BP- 523|
EP- 538|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3|
PG- 16|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 609YT|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, V84, N2, P523-538|
UT- ISI:000278695500019 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Quirin A; Cordon O; Vargas-Quesada B; de Moya-Anegon F|
AF- Quirin Arnaud; Cordon, Oscar; Vargas-Quesada, Benjamin; de MoyaAnegon, Felix|
TI- Graph-based data mining: A new tool for the analysis and comparison
of scientific domains represented as scientograms|
SO- JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Domain analysis; Social networks; Scientograms; Graph-based data
mining; Scientogram mining; Subdue algorithm|
ID- SCIENCE-CITATION-INDEX; COCITATION NETWORKS; PATHFINDER NETWORKS;
MAPS; ALGORITHM; SPECIALTIES; LITERATURES; CATEGORIES; EVOLUTION|
AB- The creation of some kind of representations depicting the current
state of Science (or scientograms) is an established and beaten track for
many years now. However, if we are concerned with the automatic
comparison, analysis and understanding of a set of scientograms, showing
for instance the evolution of a scientific domain or a face-to-face
comparison of several countries, the task is titanically complex as the
amount of data to analyze becomes huge and complex. In this paper, we aim
to show that graph-based data mining tools are useful to deal with
scientogram analysis. Subdue, the first algorithm proposed in the graph
mining area, has been chosen for this purpose This algorithm has been
customized to deal with three different scientogram analysis tasks
regarding the evolution of a scientific domain over time, the extraction
of the common research categories substructures in the world, and the
comparison of scientific domains between different countries. The
outcomes obtained in the developed experiments have clearly demonstrated
the potential of graph mining tools in scientogram analysis. (C) 2010
Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved|
C1- [Quirin, Arnaud; Cordon, Oscar] European Ctr Soft Comp, Mieres 33600,
Spain; [Vargas-Quesada, Benjamin] Univ Granada, Commun & Informat Sci
Fac, E-18071 Granada, Spain; [Vargas-Quesada, Benjamin] CSIC, Unidad
Asociada, Grp Scimago, Granada 18071, Spain; [de Moya-Anegon, Felix]
CSIC, CCHS, IPP, Madrid 28037, Spain|
RP- Cordon, O, European Ctr Soft Comp, Edf Cient Tecnol, Mieres 33600,
Spain|
EM- arnaud.quirin@softcomputing.es oscar.cordon@softcomputing.es
benjamin@ugr.es felix_demoya@cchs.csic.es|
CD- BORGELT C, 2002, P51, IEEE INT C DAT MIN I; BORNER K, 2009, V3, P161,
J INFORMETR; BOYACK KW, 2005, V64, P351, SCIENTOMETRICS; BOYACK KW, 2008,
V2, P173, J INFORMETR; BOYACK KW, 2009, V79, P45, SCIENTOMETRICS; CHEN C,
1999, INFORM VISUALIZATION; CHEN C, 2004, INFORM VISUALIZATION; CHEN CM,
1998, V9, P267, J VISUAL LANG COMPUT; CHEN CM, 1999, V35, P401, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG; CHEN CM, 2009, V3, P191, J INFORMETR; CHITTIMORI R, 1999,
P959, 16 NAT C ART INT 11; COOK DJ, 1994, V1, P231, J ARTIFICIAL INTELLI;
COOK DJ, 2000, V15, P32, IEEE INTELL SYST APP; COOK DJ, 2006, MINING
GRAPH DATA; DEARHOLT DW, 1990, P1, STUDIES KNOWLEDGE OR; DERTHICK M,
1991, P565, 9 NAT C ART INT AN; DESHPANDE M, 2002, P11, 2 WORKSH DAT MIN
BIO; FUKUNAGA K, 1990, INTRO STAT PATTERN R; GONZALEZ JA, 2000, P86, 13
ANN FLOR ART INT; GRIFFITH BC, 1974, V4, P339, SCI STUD; GROSSMAN DA,
1998, INFORM RETRIEVAL ALG; GUERREROBOTE VP, 2009, V32, P9, REV ESPANOLA
DOCUMEN; HOLDER L, 2005, V6, P83, FUNDAMENTA INFORM SP; HOLDER LB, 1994,
P169, AAAI WORKSH KNOWL DI; HOLDER LB, 2005, V2, P943, ENCY DATA
WAREHOUSIN; HUAN J, 2003, P549, 3 IEEE INT C DAT MIN; HUAN J, 2004, P581,
10 ACM SIGKDD INT C; HUAN J, 2004, P308, 8 ANN INT C RES COMP; INOKUCHI
A, 2000, P13, 4 EUR C PRINC PRACT; JACCARD P, 1912, V11, P37, NEW PHYTOL;
JONYER I, 2001, V2, P19, J MACHINE LEARNING R; KAMADA T, 1989, V31, P7,
INFORM PROCESS LETT; KEIM DA, 2002, V8, P1, IEEE T VIS COMPUT GR; KLAVANS
R, 2006, V68, P475, SCIENTOMETRICS; KLAVANS R, 2009, V60, P455, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; KOYUTURK M, 2004, V20, P200, BIOINFORMATICS; KUKLUK J, 2007,
P44, INT C BIOINF COMP BI; KURAMOCHI M, 2001, P313, ICDM; LECLERC YG,
1989, V3, P73, INT J COMPUT VISION; LEYDESDORFF L, 2007, V71, P391,
SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2008, V59, P1810, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2009, V60, P348, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LOWERRE BT, 1976,
THESIS CARNEGIE MELL; LUCIOARIAS D, 2008, V59, P1948, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; MOYAANEGON F, 2004, V61, P129, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOYAANEGON F, 2005,
V41, P1520, INFORM PROCESSING MA; MOYAANEGON F, 2007, V58, P2167, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; NIJSSEN S, 2004, P647, 10 ACM SIGKDD INT C; PEDNAULT EPD,
1989, P1603, 11 INT JOINT C ART I; PENTLAND A, 1989, V1, P82, NEURAL
COMPUT; QUINLAN JR, 1989, V80, P227, INFORM COMPUT; QUIRIN A, 2008, V44,
P1611, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; QUIRIN A, 2008, V59, P1912, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; RAKHSHAN A, 2004, V13, P27, INT J ARTIFICIAL INT; RAO RB, 1992,
P717, 10 NAT C ART INT MEN; RISSANEN J, 1989, STOCHASTIC COMPLEXIT;
ROUSSEAU R, 1998, V34, P87, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; SALTON G, 1979, V22,
P146, IEEE T PROF COMMUN; SAMOYLENKO I, 2006, V57, P1461, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; SMALL H, 1985, V11, P147, J
INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1985, V8, P321, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANETIK N, 2002,
P458, IEEE INT C DAT MIN I; VARGASQUESADA B, 2007, VISUALIZING STRUCTUR;
WALLACE ML, 2009, V60, P240, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WASHIO T, 2003, V5,
P59, SIGKDD EXPLORATIONS; YAN X, 2002, P721, ICDM; YAN X, 2003, P286, 9
ACM SIGKDD INT C K; YAN X, 2004, P335, ACM SIGMOD INT C MAN|
NR- 69|
TC- 0|
PU- ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV|
PI- AMSTERDAM|
PA- PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 1751-1577|
J9- J INFORMETR|
JI- J. Informetr|
PD- JUL|
PY- 2010|
VL- 4|
IS- 3|
BP- 291|
EP- 312|
DI- 10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.004|
PGSCGAJNUT-
22|
Information Science & Library Science|
607YQ|
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2010, V4, N3, P291-312|
ISI:000278543600009 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Persson O|
AF- Persson Olle|
TI- Identifying research themes with weighted direct citation links|
SO- JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Weighted direct citation links; Shared inlinks and outlinks; Mapping;
Library and information science|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION-RETRIEVAL; SCIENTIFIC
LITERATURE; RESEARCH FRONTS; ALL-AUTHOR; SCIENCE; OBSOLESCENCE; NETWORKS;
PATTERNS; DESIGN|
AB- In this study direct citations are weighted with shared references
and co-citations in an attempt to decompose a citation network of
articles on the subject of library and information science. The resulting
maps have much in common with author co-citation maps that have been
previously presented. However, using direct citations yields somewhat
more detail in terms of detecting sub-domains. Reducing the network down
to the strongest links of each article yielded the best results in terms
of a high number of clusters, each with a substantial number of articles
similar in content. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved|
C1- Umea Univ, Dept Sociol, SE-90187 Umea, Sweden|
RP- Persson, O, Umea Univ, Dept Sociol, SE-90187 Umea, Sweden|
EM- Olle.Persson@soc.umu.se|
CD- *PAJEK, 2009, PAJ PROGR LARG NETW; AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; ASTROM F, 2007, V58, P947, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BATES
MJ, 1986, V37, P357, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BELKIN NJ, 1982, V38, P61, J
DOC; CHEN CM, 2001, V52, P315, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CHEN CM, 2006, V57,
P359, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CHEN HC, 1991, V27, P405, INFORM PROCESS
MANAG; EGGHE L, 2002, V55, P349, SCIENTOMETRICS; FANG Y, 2001, V50, P273,
SCIENTOMETRICS; GARFIELD E, 2004, V30, P119, J INFORM SCI; HUMMON NP,
1989, V11, P39, SOC NETWORKS; INGWERSEN P, 1996, V52, P3, J DOC; KLAVANS
R, 2009, 12 INT C INT SOC FOR; KUHLTHAU CC, 1991, V42, P361, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; LARSON RR, 1991, V42, P197, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; LINE MB,
1970, V26, P46, J DOC; LINE MB, 1974, V30, P283, J DOC; LUCIOARIAS D,
2008, V59, P1948, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MCCAIN KW, 1991, V42, P290, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; NOYONS E, 2001, V50, P83, SCIENTOMETRICS; PERSSON O,
1994, V45, P31, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PERSSON O, 2001, V50, P339,
SCIENTOMETRICS; PERSSON O, 2009, P9, CELEBRATING SCHOLARL; PORTER MF,
1980, V14, P130, PROGRAM; SANDISON A, 1971, V27, P184, J DOC; SHIBATA N,
2009, V60, P571, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1999, V50, P799, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 2006,
V68, P595, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 2009, V79, P365, SCIENTOMETRICS;
WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V49,
P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P1250, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; WILSON TD, 1999, V55, P249, J DOC; ZHAO DZ, 2006, V42, P1578, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG; ZHAO DZ, 2008, V2, P229, J INFORMETR|
NR- 37|
TCPUPIPASNJ9JIPDPYVLISBPEPDIPGSCGAJNUT-
0|
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV|
AMSTERDAM|
PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS|
1751-1577|
J INFORMETR|
J. Informetr|
JUL|
2010|
4|
3|
415|
422|
10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.006|
8|
Information Science & Library Science|
607YQ|
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2010, V4, N3, P415-422|
ISI:000278543600020 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Schubert A|
AF- Schubert Andras|
TI- A reference-based Hirschian similarity measure for journals|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Journals; Citation analysis; h-index; Similarity; Standardized impact
factor|
ID- CITATION-REPORTS; SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS; COCITATION ANALYSIS; IMPACT
FACTORS; NETWORKS; SCIENCE; INDEX; RELATEDNESS; LISTS|
AB- Hirsch's concept of h-index was used to define a similarity measure
for journals. The h-similarity is easy to calculate from the publicly
available data of the Journal Citation Reports, and allows for plausible
interpretation. On the basis of h-similarity, a relative eminence
indicator of journals was determined: the ratio of the JCR impact factor
to the weighted average of that of similar journals. This standardization
allows journals from disciplines with lower average citation level
(mathematics, engineering, etc.) to get into the top lists|
C1- [Schubert, Andras] Hungarian Acad Sci, Inst Res Policy Studies,
Budapest, Hungary|
RP- Schubert, A, Hungarian Acad Sci, Inst Res Policy Studies, Budapest,
Hungary|
EM- schuba@iif.hu|
CD- CARPENTER MP, 1973, V24, P425, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; CHEN CM, 2008,
V59, P2296, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; FAGIN R, 2003, V17, P134, SIAM J
DISCRETE MATH; HIRSCH JE, 2005, V102, P16569, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; HIRST
G, 1978, V29, P171, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; JANSSENS F, 2009, P89, DATA MIN
KNOWL DISC; KESSLER MM, 1963, V14, P10, AM DOC; KLAVANS R, 2006, V57,
P251, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; KORN A, 2009, V388, P2221, PHYSICA A;
LEYDESDORFF L, J AM SOC IN IN PRESS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V60, P371, J
DOC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V60, P159, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006,
V57, P601, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MCCAIN KW, 1991, V42, P290, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1998, V41, P389, SCIENTOMETRICS; PUDOVKIN AI,
1995, V32, P227, SCIENTOMETRICS; PUDOVKIN AI, 2002, V53, P1113, J
INF SCI TEC; SCHUBERT A, 1993, V26, P21, SCIENTOMETRICS; SCHUBERT
2009, V78, P375, SCIENTOMETRICS; VINKLER P, 1988, V14, P453,
SCIENTOMETRICS; VINKLER P, 1999, V46, P621, SCIENTOMETRICS; ZHANG
2009, V81, P821, SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 22|
TC- 1|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- JUL|
PY- 2010|
VL- 84|
IS- 1|
BP- 133|
EP- 147|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-009-0072-4|
PG- 15|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information
& Library Science|
GA- 604GI|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, V84, N1, P133-147|
UT- ISI:000278267100012 ER ||
AM SOC
A,
L,
Science
PT- J|
AU- Porter AL; Schoeneck DJ; Roessner D; Garner J|
AF- Porter Alan L; Schoeneck, David J; Roessner, David; Garner, Jon|
TI- Practical research proposal and publication profiling|
SO- RESEARCH EVALUATION|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- COMBINED COCITATION; WORD ANALYSIS; SCIENCE; INTERDISCIPLINARITY;
TECHNOLOGY; AREAS; MAP|
AB- We present means to enable profiling to situate research activities
(such as proposals or publications) within research domains, identify
cognitive and social networks, and track knowledge transfers. Here we
profile a set of 123 National Science Foundation educational research
awards. We investigate NSF award summaries, proposal references,
publications by the funded researchers, and citations to those
publications. Our integration measure and science overlay maps show that
these ROLE/REESE programs have facilitated interdisciplinary research.
NSF program managers were able to associate highly cited researchers into
key contributing communities using the co-citation maps. We explore
'before vs. after' research patterns to examine whether this research
support altered teaming and cross-disciplinary exchanges. Evaluators can
use research profiling to understand the role of particular research
endeavors and to study community evolution|
C1- [Porter, Alan L.] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Publ Policy, Technol
Policy & Assessment Ctr, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA; [Porter, Alan L.] Search
Technol Inc, R&D, Norcross, GA 30092 USA|
RP- Porter, AL, Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Publ Policy, Technol Policy &
Assessment Ctr, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA|
EM- alan.porter@isye.gatech.edu|
CD- *NAT AC, 2005, FAC INT RES; BORGMAN CL, 1990, P10, SCHOLARLY
COMMUNICAT; BOWEN CW, 2000, V77, P116, J CHEM EDUC; BOYACK KW, 2005, V64,
P351, SCIENTOMETRICS; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P252, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; CHUBIN DE, 1986,
INTERDISCIPLINARY AN; COOPER HM, 1989, INTEGRATIVE RES REV; DARDEN L,
1977, V44, P43, PHILOS SCI; DELRIO JA, 2001, V52, P1148, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; GLANZEL W, 1999, V44, P427, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLASS G, 1981,
METAANALYSIS SOCIAL; KLAVANS R, 2009, V60, P455, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
KLEIN JT, 1999, CROSSING BOUNDARIES; KOSTOFF RN, 2009, V43, ANN REV
INFORM SCI T; LEYDESDORFF L, 1993, V26, P135, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF
L, 1994, V23, P217, RES POLICY; LEYDESDORFF L, 2009, V60, P348, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; LIPSEY MW, 2001, PRACTICAL METAANALYS; LOSIEWICZ P, 2000,
V15, P99, J INTELL INF SYST; MORILLO F, 2003, V54, P1237, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; MOYAANEGON F, 2007, V58, P2167, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PORTER AL,
2002, V53, P351, SCIENTOMETRICS; PORTER AL, 2005, TECH MINING EXPLOITI;
PORTER AL, 2007, V72, P117, SCIENTOMETRICS; PORTER AL, 2008, V17, P273,
RES EVALUAT; PORTER AL, 2009, V11, P1023, J NANOPART RES; PORTER AL,
2009, V81, P719, SCIENTOMETRICS; RAFOLS I, 2009, V60, P1823, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; RAFOLS I, 2009, V81, SCIENTOMETR IN PRESS; STIRLING A, 2007, V4,
P707, J R SOC INTERFACE; VANDENBESSELAAR P, 2006, V68, P377,
SCIENTOMETRICS; VANRAAN AFJ, 1988, HDB QUANTITATIVE STU; VANRAAN AFJ,
1999, P66, PRACTISING INTERDISC; WITTEN IH, 1999, DATA MINING|
NR- 35|
TC- 0|
PU- BEECH TREE PUBLISHING|
PI- GUILDFORD|
PA- 10 WATFORD CLOSE,, GUILDFORD GU1 2EP, SURREY, ENGLAND|
SN- 0958-2029|
J9- RES EVALUAT|
JI- Res. Evaluat|
PD- MAR|
PY- 2010|
VL- 19|
IS- 1|
BP- 29|
EP- 44|
DI- 10.3152/095820210X492512|
PG- 16|
SC- Information Science & Library Science|
GA- 600LE|
JN- RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2010, V19, N1, P29-44|
UT- ISI:000277986700003 ER ||
PTAUAFTISOLADT-
J|
Ding Y|
Ding Ying|
Semantic Web: Who is who in the field - a bibliometric analysis|
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE|
English|
Article|
DE- citation analysis; impact analysis; research evaluation; semantic
web|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION-SCIENCE; NETWORK ANALYSIS;
IMPACT; TECHNOLOGY; SYSTEMS|
AB- The Semantic Web (SW) is one of the main efforts aiming to enhance
human and machine interaction by representing data in an understandable
way for machines to mediate data and services. It is a fast-moving and
multidisciplinary field. This study conducts a thorough bibliometric
analysis of the field by collecting data from Web of Science (WOS) and
Scopus for the period of 1960-2009. It utilizes a total of 44,157 papers
with 651,673 citations from Scopus, and 22,951 papers with 571,911
citations from WOS. Based on these papers and citations, it evaluates the
research performance of the SW by identifying the most productive
players, major scholarly communication media, highly cited authors,
influential papers and emerging stars|
C1- Indiana Univ, Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Herman B Wells Lib,
Bloomington, IN 47405 USA|
RP- Ding, Y, Indiana Univ, Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Herman B Wells Lib,
1320 E 10th St,LI025, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA|
EM- dingying@indiana.edu|
CD- *PINGD, 2009, WEB GROWTH PEAK 2007; *PRICEWATERHOUSECO, 2009, REP SEM
WEB; BARABASI AL, 2002, LINKED NEW SCI NETWO; BERNERSLEE T, 2001, V284,
P34, SCI AM; BIZER C, 2009, V5, P1, INT J SEMANTIC WEB I; DING Y, 2009,
V60, P2229, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; HENDLER J, 2008, V51, P60, COMMUN ACM;
HENDLER J, 2008, V23, P2, IEEE INTELLIGENT SYS; HENDLER J, 2009, V42,
P111, COMPUTER; HIRSCH JE, 2005, V102, P16569, P NATL ACAD SCI USA;
HORROCKS I, 2008, V51, P58, COMMUN ACM; HUANG CP, 2009, V72, P117, J CHIN
MED ASSOC; MEHO LI, 2007, V58, P2105, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MIKA P, 2005,
V3, P211, J WEB SEMANT; MIKA P, 2006, V68, P3, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOED HF,
2005, CITATION ANAL RES EV; NEWMAN MEJ, 2001, V98, P404, P NATL ACAD SCI
USA; OSTROM E, 2009, V325, P419, SCIENCE; PETERSON D, 2009, OB GROUNDBR
US SEM W; RETZER V, 2009, V10, P393, BASIC APPL ECOL; RIIKONEN P, 2008,
V77, P207, SCIENTOMETRICS; SHADBOLT N, 2006, V21, P96, IEEE INTELL SYST;
SORENSEN AA, 2009, V16, P451, J ALZHEIMERS DIS; THIJS B, 2009, V79, P377,
SCIENTOMETRICS; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; YAN EJ,
2009, V60, P2107, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ZHAO DZ, 2008, V59, P916, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 27|
TC- 0|
PU- SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD|
PI- LONDON|
PA- 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND|
SN- 0165-5515|
J9- J INFORM SCI|
JI- J. Inf. Sci|
PD- JUN|
PY- 2010|
VL- 36|
IS- 3|
BP- 335|
EP- 356|
DI- 10.1177/0165551510365295|
PG- 22|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 601TZ|
JN- JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2010, V36, N3, P335-356|
UT- ISI:000278088900004 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Mutalikdesai MR; Srinivasa S|
AF- Mutalikdesai Mandar R; Srinivasa, Srinath|
TI- Co-citations as citation endorsements and co-links as link
endorsements|
SO- JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- citation endorsement; co-link; co-citation; link endorsement;
relevance; topicality|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; INFORMATION-SCIENCE; WEB;
BIBLIOMETRICS; DOCUMENTS; ARTICLES; CLUSTERS; PAGES|
AB- Co-citations and co-links have long been used as measures of topical
relatedness between documents in various datasets. However, there are
some characteristic differences between co-citations in scientific
literature and co-links in hypertext due to the underlying difference in
the motivations for creating citations and links. While citations are
created for formal scholarly communication, links are created for a
variety of formal as well as informal purposes. We elaborate on these
differences, and propose interpretations of a co-citation as an
endorsement of a citation, and a co-link as an endorsement of a link Such
an interpretation is useful for focused or topical surfers to follow
citations and links that are pertinent to a topic of interest in
scientific literature and the web respectively|
C1- [Mutalikdesai, Mandar R.; Srinivasa, Srinath] Int Inst Informat
Technol, Bangalore, Karnataka, India|
RP- Mutalikdesai, MR, Int Inst Informat Technol, 26-C, Elect City 560100,
Bangalore, India|
EM- mandar@iiitb.ac.in|
FU- Infosys FX We are grateful to the anonymous referees for their
insightful comments, which have helped enormously in improving this
paper. We would also like to thank Tao Yang and Ambuj K. Singh for making
the Ask.com crawl available to us for academic and research purposes
Thanks are also due to Viswanath Gangavaram for developing EndorSeer This
work was partly supported by an Infosys PhD scholarship to the first
author|
CD- KENDALLS RANK CORREL; ABDI H, 2007, ENCY MEASUREMENT STA; ABITEBOUL
S, 2003, P 12 INT WORLD WID W; ADAMIC LA, ZIPF POWER LAWS PARE; ASTROM F,
2007, V58, P947, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BILKE S, 2001, P76, PHYS REV E;
BRODER A, 2000, V33, P309, COMPUT NETW; BUDD JM, 1999, V25, P265, J
INFORM SCI; CHAKRABARTI S, 2003, MINING WEB DISCOVERI; COTTRILL CA, 1989,
V11, P181, KNOWLEDGE; CRONIN B, 1994, V45, P537, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
CRONIN B, 2001, V27, P1, J INFORM SCI; DAVISON B, 2000, P 23 ACM SIGIR
ANN I; DEAN J, 1999, V31, P1467, COMPUT NETW; EFRON M, 2006, V9, P492,
KNOWL INF SYST; FORTUNATO S, 2009, V4, P245, INTERNET MATH; GARFIELD E,
1964, STAT ASS METH MECH D; GARFIELD E, 1971, CURRENT CONTENTS; HARTER
SP, 1993, V44, P543, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; HAVELIWALA TH, 2002, P 11 INT
WORLD WID W; HOU JY, 2003, V15, P940, IEEE T KNOWL DATA EN; JEH G, 2002,
P 8 ACM SIGKDD INT C; KLEINBERG JM, 1999, V46, P604, J ACM; KLEINBERG JM,
1999, P 5 ANN INT C COMP C; KUMAR R, 2000, P 19 ACM S PRINC DAT; LARSON
RR, 1996, P ANN M AM SOC INF S; LEMPEL R, 2001, V19, P131, ACM T INFORM
SYST; MERTON RK, 1979, SOCIOLOGY SCI THEORE; MOED HF, 2005, CITATION ANAL
RES EV; MOISE G, 2003, P 12 INT WORLD WID W; MUTALIKDESAI MR, 2009, P 15
INT C MAN DAT M; NIKOLOSKI Z, 2005, P EUR C COMB GRAPH T; OSAREH F, 1996,
V46, P148, LIBRI; PAGE L, 1998, PAGERANK CITATION RA; PARK HW, 2003, V8,
J COMPUTER MEDIATED; PERSSON O, 2001, V50, P339, SCIENTOMETRICS; PITKOW
J, 1997, P C HUM FACT COMP SY; REDDY PK, 2001, P DAT ENG WORKSH; REDDY S,
2006, P 13 INT C MAN DAT N; REDNER S, 1998, V4, P131, EUR PHYS J B; SAKA
A, 2007, P 11 INT C INF VIS Z; SCHARNHORST A, 2005, V89, P1518, CURR SCI
INDIA; SCHNEIDER JW, 2009, V80, P103, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1973, V24,
P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1985, V7, P391, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL
H, 1985, V8, P321, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1986, V37, P97, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1993, V26, P5, SCIENTOMETRICS; THELWALL M, 2004,
V40, P515, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; THELWALL M, 2004, LINK ANAL INFORM SCI;
VAUGHAN L, 2006, V57, P1178, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; VAUGHAN L, 2006, V68,
P611, SCIENTOMETRICS; VAUGHAN L, 2007, V72, P81, SCIENTOMETRICS; WHITE
HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1989, V24, P119, ANNU
REV INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; ZHAO DZ,
2006, V42, P1578, INFORM PROCESS MANAG|
NR- 57|
TC- 0|
PU- SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD|
PI- LONDON|
PA- 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND|
SN- 0165-5515|
J9- J INFORM SCI|
JI- J. Inf. Sci|
PD- JUN|
PY- 2010|
VL- 36|
IS- 3|
BP- 383|
EP- 400|
DI- 10.1177/0165551510366078|
PG- 18|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 601TZ|
JN- JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2010, V36, N3, P383-400|
UT- ISI:000278088900007 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Liu XH; Yu S; Janssens F; Glanzel W; Moreau Y; De Moor B|
AF- Liu Xinhai; Yu, Shi; Janssens, Frizo; Glanzel, Wolfgang; Moreau,
Yves; De Moor, Bart|
TI- Weighted Hybrid Clustering by Combining Text Mining and Bibliometrics
on a Large-Scale Journal Database|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- INFORMATION-SCIENCE; COMBINED COCITATION; WORD ANALYSIS; PARTITIONS;
DOCUMENTS; CONSENSUS|
AB- We propose a new hybrid clustering framework to incorporate text
mining with bibliometrics in journal set analysis. The framework
integrates two different approaches: clustering ensemble and kernelfusion clustering. To improve the flexibility and the efficiency of
processing large-scale data, we propose an information-based weighting
scheme to leverage the effect of multiple data sources in hybrid
clustering Three different algorithms are extended by the proposed
weighting scheme and they are employed on a large journal set retrieved
from the Web of Science (WoS) database. The clustering performance of the
proposed algorithms is systematically evaluated using multiple evaluation
methods, and they were cross-compared with alternative methods.
Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed weighted hybrid
clustering strategy is superior to other methods in clustering
performance and efficiency. The proposed approach also provides a more
refined structural mapping of journal sets, which is useful for
monitoring and detecting new trends in different scientific fields|
C1- [Liu, Xinhai; Yu, Shi; Janssens, Frizo; Moreau, Yves; De Moor, Bart]
Katholieke Univ Leuven, ESAT SCD, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium; [Liu, Xinhai]
Wuhan Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Informat Sci & Engn, Wuhan 430081, Hubei,
Peoples R China; [Glanzel, Wolfgang] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Ctr R&D
Monitoring, Dept Managerial Econ Strategy & Innovat, B-3000 Leuven,
Belgium; [Glanzel, Wolfgang] Hungarian Acad Sci, IRPS, Budapest, Hungary|
RP- Liu, XH, Katholieke Univ Leuven, ESAT SCD, Kasteelpk Arenberg 10, B3001 Leuven, Belgium|
EM- Xinhai.liu@esat.kuleuven.be Shi.Yu@esat.kuleuven.be
Frizo.Janssens@esat.kuleuven.be Wolfgang.Glanzel@econ.kuleuven.be
Yves.Moreau@esat.kuleuven.be Bart.DeMoor@esat.kuleuven.be|
FU- China Scholarship Council (CSC) [2006153005]; Engineering Research
Center of Metallurgical Automation and Measurement Technology, Ministry
of Education, Hubei, China [430081]; Research Council KUL: GOA AMBioRICS
[CoE EF/05/007]; Flemish Government FX Xinhai Liu and Shi Yu made equal
contributions to this article. The authors would like to thank Professor
Blaise Cronin and the anonymous reviewers for fruitful comments. The
authors also give thanks to Mr Tunde (Adeshola) Adefioye and Mr. Ernesto
Iacucci for their proofreading and acknowledge support from the China
Scholarship Council (CSC No. 2006153005), Engineering Research Center of
Metallurgical Automation and Measurement Technology, Ministry of
Education, 430081, Hubei, China; Research Council KUL: GOA AMBioRICS, CoE
EF/05/007 SymBioSys, PROMETA, several PhD/postdoc and Fellow Grants;
Flemish Government: Steunpunt O&O Indicatoren; FWO: PhD/postdoc Grants,
Projects G.0241.04 (Functional Genomics), G.0499.04 (Statistics),
G.0232.05 (Cardiovascular), G.0318.05 (subfunctionalization), G.0553 06
(VitamineD), G.0302.07 (SVM/Kernel), research communities (ICCoS, ANMMM,
MLDM); IWT: PhD Grants, GBOU-McKnow-E (Knowledge management algorithms),
GBOU-ANA (biosensors), TAD-BioScope-IT, Silicos; SBO-BioFrame, SBO-MoKa,
TBMEndometriosis, TBM-IOTA3, O & O-Dsquare; Belgian Federal Science
Policy Office: IUAP P6/25 (BioMaGNet, Bioinformaticsand Modeling: from
Genomes to Networks, 2007-2011); EU-RTD: ERNSI: European Research Network
on System Identification;FP6-NoE Biopattern; FP6-IP e-Tumours, FP6-MC-EST
Bioptrain, FP6-STREP Strokemap. EU-RTD: ERNSI: European Research Network
on System Identification;FP6-NoE Biopattern; FP6-IP e-Tumours, FP6-MC-EST
Bioptrain, FP6-STREP Strokemap|
CD- AYAD HG, 2008, V30, P160, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL; BATAGELJ V, 2003,
V2265, P77, GRAPH DRAWING SOFTWA; BICKEL S, 2004, P19, P 4 IEEE INT C DAT
M; BOYACK KW, 2009, V79, P45, SCIENTOMETRICS; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233,
J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P252, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BRIN
S, 1998, V30, P107, COMPUT NETWORKS ISDN; DEMOYAANEGON F, 2007, V58,
P2167, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; EFRON B, 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP; FRED ALN,
2005, V27, P835, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL; GLANZEL W, 2003, V56, P357,
SCIENTOMETRICS; GLENISSON P, 2005, V41, P1548, INFORM PROCESS MANAG;
GOSPODNETIC O, 2005, LUCENE ACTION; HE X, 2002, V41, P19, COMPUT STAT
DATA AN; HUBERT L, 1985, V2, P193, J CLASSIF; JAIN AK, 1988, ALGORITHMS
CLUSTERIN; JANSSENS F, 2006, V42, P1614, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; JANSSENS
F, 2007, THESIS KATHOLIEKE U; JANSSENS F, 2008, V75, P607,
SCIENTOMETRICS; JANSSENS F, 2009, V45, P683, INFORM PROCESS MANAG;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P601, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L,
2009, V60, P348, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LIU XX, 2009, P49, P 3 INT WORKSH
MATR; MARSHAKOVA IV, 1973, V2, P3, NAUCHNO TEKHNICHESKA; MIRKIN B, 2001,
V45, P219, MACH LEARN; MODHA DS, 2000, P143, P 11 ACM C HYP HYP S; NEWMAN
MEJ, 2006, V103, P8577, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; ROUSSEEUW PJ, 1987, V20,
P53, J COMPUT APPL MATH; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
SMALL HG, 1978, V8, P327, SOC STUD SCI; STREHL A, 2002, V3, P583, J
MACHINE LEARNING R; TOPCHY A, 2005, V27, P1866, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL; WANG
Y, 2002, P490, P 11 INT C INF KNOWL; ZITT M, 1994, V30, P333,
SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 34|
TC- 2|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- JUN|
PY- 2010|
VL- 61|
IS- 6|
BP- 1105|
EP- 1119|
DI- 10.1002/asi.21312|
PG- 15|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 599EF|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2010, V61, N6, P1105-1119|
UT- ISI:000277892600003 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Callahan A; Hockema S; Eysenbach G|
AF- Callahan Alison; Hockema, Stephen; Eysenbach, Gunther|
TI- Contextual Cocitation: Augmenting Cocitation Analysis and its
Applications|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- CITATION ANALYSIS; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURES; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE;
AUTHOR COCITATION; SCIENCE; ARTICLES; INDEXES; DOCUMENTATION;
INFORMATION; MOTIVATIONS|
AB- In this work, a novel method of cocitation analysis, coined
"contextual cocitation analysis," is introduced and described in
comparison to traditional methods of cocitation analysis. Equations for
quantifying contextual cocitation strength are introduced and their
implications explored using theoretical examples alongside the
application of contextual cocitation to a series of BioMed Central
publications and their cited resources. Based on this work, the
implications of contextual cocitation for understanding the granularity
of the relationships created between cited published research and methods
for its analysis are discussed. Future applications and improvements of
this work, including its extended application to the published research
of multiple disciplines, are then presented with rationales for their
inclusion|
C1- [Callahan, Alison; Hockema, Stephen] Univ Toronto, Fac Informat,
Toronto, ON M5S 3G6, Canada; [Eysenbach, Gunther] Toronto Gen Hosp, Ctr
Global eHlth Innovat, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada|
RP- Callahan, A, Univ Toronto, Fac Informat, 140 St George St, Toronto,
ON M5S 3G6, Canada|
EM- alison.callahan@gmail.com steve.hockema@utoronto.ca
geysenba@uhnres.utoronto.ca|
FU- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council FX The authors thank
Liwen Vaughan for her helpful comments on this work, as well as the
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council that funded AC's thesis
research, apart of which formed the basis for this manuscript|
CD- BAVELAS JB, 1978, V19, P158, CAN PSYCHOL REV; BORNMANN L, 2008, V59,
P1841, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BROOKS TA, 1986, V37, P34, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; CHAN KC, 2009, V49, P59, ACCOUNT FINANC; DAVIS PM, 2009, V22, P5,
LEARN PUBL; ELKISS A, 2008, V59, P51, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; EYSENBACH G,
2008, 2008 C EL PUBL ELPUB; FEELEY TH, 2008, V34, P505, HUM COMMUN RES;
GARFIELD E, 1955, V122, P108, SCIENCE; GARFIELD E, 1977, ESSAYS INFORM
SCI; GILBERT GN, 1977, V7, P113, SOC STUD SCI; GILES CL, 1998, P89,
DIGITAL LIB 98; GIPP B, 2009, P571, P 12 INT C SCIENT IN; GRIFFITH BC,
1974, V4, P339, SCI STUD; HERLACH G, 1978, V29, P308, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; KAPLAN N, 1965, V16, P179, AM DOC; KESSLER MM, 1963, V14, P10, AM
DOC; KESSLER MM, 1963, V1, P169, INFORM STOR RETR; KESSLER MM, 1965, V16,
P223, AM DOC; KIM HJ, 2000, V51, P887, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; LAWRENCE S,
1999, V32, P67, IEEE COMPUT; LEYDESDORFF L, 1987, V11, P295,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MACROBERTS MH, 1984, V14, P91, SOC STUD SCI; MARION LS,
2002, V39, P3, P ASIST ANNU; MARTYN J, 1964, V20, P236, J DOC; MCCAIN KW,
2006, V32, P277, J INF SCI; MCCAIN KW, 2009, V60, P1301, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; MORAVCSIK MJ, 1975, V5, P86, SOC STUD SCI; NAKOV PI, 2004, SIGIR
2004 WORKSH SE; NANBA H, 1999, 16 INT JOINT C ART I; NANBA H, 2005,
V3652, P391, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; NERUR SP, 2008, V29, P319, STRATEG
MANAGE J; RITCHIE A, 2006, P25, P WORKSH CAN COMP LI; SCHNEIDER JW, 2007,
V58, P1586, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; SMALL H, 1982, V3, P287,
PROGR COMMUNICATION; SMALL H, 1986, V37, P97, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL
HG, 1974, V10, P393, INFORMATION STORAGE; SMALL HG, 1978, V8, P327, SOC
STUD SCI; SMALL HG, 1979, V16, P270, P AM SOC INFORM SCI; SULLIVAN D,
1977, V7, P223, SOC STUD SCI; TAGLIACOZZO R, 1967, V6, P136, METHOD
INFORM MED; TEUFEL S, 2001, 2001 NAACL WORKSH AU; TUOMINEN K, 2002, P271,
DISCOURSE COGNITION; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
WHITE MD, 1997, V67, P122, LIBR QUART; ZHAO DZ, 2008, V59, P2070, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 48|
TC- 0|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- JUN|
PY- 2010|
VL- 61|
IS- 6|
BP- 1130|
EP- 1143|
DI- 10.1002/asi.21313|
PG- 14|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 599EF|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2010, V61, N6, P1130-1143|
UT- ISI:000277892600005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Ma ZZ; Yu KH|
AF- Ma Zhenzhong; Yu, Kuo-Hsun|
TI- Research paradigms of contemporary knowledge management studies:
1998-2007|
SO- JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Knowledge management; Research; Literature; Knowledge management|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; ORGANIZATIONAL
KNOWLEDGE; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; ACADEMIC JOURNALS; DYNAMIC THEORY; FIRM;
RANKING; TECHNOLOGY; DISCIPLINE|
AB- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the research
paradigms of contemporary knowledge management studies in the past decade
using citation and co-citation analysis Design/methodology/approach Research in any academic area often clusters into informal networks that
focus on common questions in common ways, and the accumulated knowledge
often flows between members of these networks, revealed in patterns of
citations. The research paradigms of a given field can be identified by
analyzing corresponding knowledge flows and citation and co-citation
process. The methods used in the study include citation analysis, cocitation analysis, and social network analysis Findings - The paper draws
an intellectual map of knowledge flows between knowledge management
scholars. Key research themes and concepts as well as their relationships
in the field of knowledge management are identified Research
limitations/implications - An in-depth analysis of the relationships
between knowledge management research and industrial practices should be
conducted in future in order to examine the impact of academic research
on knowledge management and the management of knowledge accumulated in
the practice Originality/value - The paper profiles knowledge management
studies in the past decade and presents a solid foundation for a better
understanding of different research paradigms in the area of knowledge
management. It helps identify the invisible network of knowledge
management studies that traces the evolution of knowledge management
research, which thus provides a new perspective on knowledge management
research|
C1- [Ma, Zhenzhong] Univ Windsor, Odette Sch Business, Windsor, ON N9B
3P4, Canada; [Yu, Kuo-Hsun] Chang Jung Christian Univ, Grad Sch Business
& Operat Management, Tainan, Taiwan|
RP- Ma, ZZ, Univ Windsor, Odette Sch Business, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4,
Canada|
EM- maz@uwindsor.ca|
CD- ACEDO FJ, 2005, V14, P619, INT BUS REV; ALAVI M, 1999, V1, P2,
COMMUNICATIONS AIS; ALAVI M, 2001, V25, P107, MIS QUART; ARGYRIS C, 1978,
ORG LEARNING THEORY; BONTIS N, 2009, V13, P16, J KNOWL MANAG; BORGATTI
SP, 2002, UCINET WINDOWS SOFTW; COHEN WM, 1990, V35, P128, ADMIN SCI
QUART; CULNAN MJ, 1986, V32, P156, MANAGE SCI; DAVENPORT TH, 1998,
WORKING KNOWLEDGE OR; DIODATO V, 1994, DICT BIBLIOMETRICS; EARL M, 2001,
V18, P215, J MANAGE INFORM SYST; ETEMAD H, 2004, V28, P776, INT J TECHNOL
MANAGE; GARFIELD E, 1979, CITATION INDEXING IT; GRANT RM, 1996, V7, P375,
ORGAN SCI; GRANT RM, 1996, V17, P109, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; HANSEN MT,
1999, V77, P106, HARVARD BUS REV; HOLSAPPLE CW, 2001, V31, P1, DECIS
SUPPORT SYST; HOLSAPPLE CW, 2001, V20, P77, EXPERT SYST APPL; HUBER G,
1991, V1, P88, ORGAN SCI; KOGUT B, 1992, V3, P383, ORGAN SCI; KOGUT B,
2000, V21, P405, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; LAVE J, 1991, SITUATED LEARNING LE;
LIEBOWITZ J, 1998, KNOWLEDGE ORG WHAT E; LIEBOWITZ J, 1999, KNOWLEDGE
MANAGEMENT; LIEBOWITZ J, 2000, BUILDING ORG INTELLI; MA ZZ, 2008, V19,
P234, INT J CONFL MANAGE; MARYMALAVI TR, 2006, V22, P191, J MANAGEMENT
INFORM; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MERTON R, 1979,
CITATION INDEXING IT; NELSON RR, 1982, EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; NONAKA I,
1994, V5, P14, ORGAN SCI; NONAKA I, 1995, KNOWLEDGE CREATING C;
PILKINGTON A, 1999, V19, P7, INT J OPER PROD MAN; PILKINGTON A, 2006,
V26, P288, TECHNOVATION; POLANYI M, 1996, TACIT DIMENSION; PONZI LJ,
2002, V55, P259, SCIENTOMETRICS; PRICE DJ, 1963, LITTLE SCI BIG SCI;
QUINN J, 1996, V14, P71, HARVARD BUS REV; RAMOSRODRIGUEZ AR, 2004, V25,
P981, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; SENGE PM, 1990, 5 DISCIPLINE; SERENKO A, 2009,
V13, P4, J KNOWL MANAG; SHARPLIN AD, 1985, V38, P139, HUM RELAT; SMALL H,
1993, V26, P5, SCIENTOMETRICS; SPENDER JC, 1996, V17, P45, STRATEGIC
MANAGE J; TSOUKAS H, 1996, V17, P11, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; TSOUKAS H, 2001,
V38, P973, J MANAGE STUD; WALSTROM KA, 2000, V38, P59, INFORM MANAGE;
WEICK KE, 1993, V38, P357, ADMIN SCI QUART; WENGER E, 1998, COMMUNITIES
PRACTICE; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998,
V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WIIG KM, 1997, V13, P1, EXPERT SYST APPL;
ZACK MH, 1999, V41, P125, CALIF MANAGE REV|
NR- 53|
TC- 1|
PU- EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED|
PI- BINGLEY|
PA- HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND|
SN- 1367-3270|
J9- J KNOWL MANAG|
JIPYVLISBPEPDIPGSCGAJNUT-
J. Knowl. Manag|
2010|
14|
2|
175|
189|
10.1108/13673271011032337|
15|
Information Science & Library Science; Management|
596PL|
JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2010, V14, N2, P175-189|
ISI:000277697200001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Graeml AR; Macada MA; Rossoni L|
AF- Graeml Alexandre Reis; Macada, Marie Anne; Rossoni, Luciano|
TI- INTELLECTUALS IN SOCIAL NETWORKS AND INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION:
Scientometric analysis of the period 1997-2006 ABSTRACT|
SO- INFORMACAO & SOCIEDADE-ESTUDOS|
LA- Portuguese|
DT- Article|
DE- Social Networks; Intellectual Networks; Scientometrics;
Bibliometrics|
ID- CO-AUTHORSHIP; SCIENCE; COLLABORATION; CITATION|
AB- The purpose of this paper is to identify and analyze the social and
intellectual networks in the field of Information Management, trying to
understand the social conditioning to knowledge construction in the area.
Having the bibliometric data from all papers published in the proceedings
of Enanpad (the major yearly management academic conference in Brazil),
from 1997 to 2006, scientometric analyses were developed about the
academic profile of the Information Management field. Thus, social
networks were built based on the authorship information and co-authorship
networks, generated from the references adopted, in the proceedings. 339
papers were included in the study, involving 9287 references that were
analyzed using UCINET 6 and PAJEK 1.22 software The social relationships
had showed the existence of a still very fragmented co-authoring network,
and the main post-graduation courses leading the structuring of the area.
Besides, from the analysis of the co-citation network it was possible to
identify what is main stream in the area and the relevant topics.
Finally, the results made possible to state that the relationship among
the researchers first, conditioned the individual intellectual
preferences, but later (2002-2006) the influence were broader,
conditioning the groups|
C1- [Rossoni, Luciano] Univ Fed Parana, Univ Posit, BR-80060000 Curitiba,
Parana, Brazil|
EM- graeml@fulbrightweb.org marie-macadar@uergs.edu.br
lrossoni@gmail.com|
CD- ACEDO FJ, 2006, V43, P957, J MANAGE STUD; AVGEROU C, 2000, V28, P567,
OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S; BARABASI AL, 2002, V311, P590, PHYSICA A; BERTERO
CO, 2005, PRODUCAO CIENTIFICA; BORNER K, 2003, V37, P179, ANNU REV INFORM
SCI; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BURT RS, 1992,
STRUCTURAL HOLES SOC; CALDAS MP, 2004, V44, P100, REV ADM EMPRESAS;
COLEMAN J, 1990, FDN SOCIAL THEORY; COLLINS R, 1983, V24, P185, SOCIOL
QUART; DEKKER D, 2007, V72, P563, PSYCHOMETRIKA; DIAS FS, 2007, V32,
ENCONTRO ASS NACL PO; DINIZ EH, 2006, V31, ENCONTRO ASS NACL PO; DURANTE
DG, 2007, V32, ENCONTRO ASS NACL PO; EMIRBAYER M, 1994, V99, P1411, AM J
SOCIOL; FIELD A, 2009, DESCOBRINDO ESTATIST; GARFIELD E, 1979, V1, P359,
SCIENTOMETRICS; GRAEML AR, 2007, V32, ENCONTRO ASS NACL PO; GRANOVETTER
MS, 1973, V78, P6, AM J SOCIOL; GUARIDO ER, 2008, THESIS U FEDERAL PAR;
HANNEMAN RA, 2005, INTRO SOCIAL NETWORK; HOPPEN N, 1998, V23, ENCONTRO
ASS NACL PR; HOPPEN N, 2005, PRODUCAO CIENTIFICA; KRACKHARDT D, 1988,
V51, P123, SOC PSYCHOL QUART; LENOIR R, 2006, V23, P25, THEOR CULT SOC;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2001, CHALLENGE SCIENTOMET; LEYDESDORFF L, 2007, V10, P1,
EUR J SOC THEORY; LIU XM, 2005, V41, P1462, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; LUDMER
G, 2002, V27, ENCONTRO ASS NACL PR; LUNARDI GL, 2005, V28, ENCONTRO ASS
NACL PR; MACADAR MA, 2007, V1, ENCONTRO ADM INFORM; MACHADODASILVA CL,
2007, V11, P33, REV ADM CONT; MELLO CM, 2009, V10, P130, REV ADM
MACKENZIE; MOODY J, 2004, V69, P213, AM SOCIOL REV; NELSON R, 1984, V24,
P150, RAE-REV ADMIN EMPRES; NEWMAN MEJ, 2001, V64, ARTN 026118, PHYS REV
E 2; NEWMAN MEJ, 2004, V101, P5200, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; NICOLAISEN J,
2006, P1, INT C MULT INF SCI T; OLIVEIRA M, 2006, V31, ENCONTRO ASS NACL
PO; RODRIGUES J, 2005, V2, P151, REV GESTAO TECNOLOGI; ROSSONI L, 2006,
THESIS U FEDERAL PAR; ROSSONI L, 2008, V43, P138, REV ADM USP; ROSSONI L,
2009, V15, P1, READ REV ELETRONICA; SMALL H, 2004, V60, P71,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL HG, 1978, V8, P327, SOC STUD SCI; TEIXEIRA F, 2002,
V27, ENCONTRO ASS NACL PR; VANRAAN AFJ, 1997, V38, P205, SCIENTOMETRICS;
VANRAAN AFJ, 1998, V43, P129, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANRAAN AFJ, 2005, V3, P1,
MEASUREMENT; WAGNER CS, 2005, V34, P1608, RES POLICY; WASSERMAN S, 1994,
SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; WATTS DJ, 1998, V440, P393, NATURE; WATTS DJ, 1999,
SMALL WORLDS DYNAMIC; WOUTERS P, 1999, P290, THESIS U AMSTERDAM A; ZIMMER
MV, 1998, V32, ENCONTRO ASS NACL PO; ZIMMER MV, 2007, V1, ENCONTRO NACL
ADM IN|
NR- 56|
TC- 0|
PU- UNIV FED PARAIBA CCSA|
PI- JOAO PESSOA PB|
PA- CIDADE UNIV, PROG POS-GRAD CIENC INFORM, JOAO PESSOA PB, 58 059-900,
BRAZIL|
SN- 0104-0146|
J9- INF SOC-ESTUD|
JI- Inf. Soc.-Estud|
PY- 2010|
VL- 20|
IS- 1|
BP- 95|
EP- 110|
PG- 16|
SC- Information Science & Library Science|
GA- 597DS|
JN- INFORMACAO & SOCIEDADE-ESTUDOS, 2010, V20, N1, P95-110|
UT- ISI:000277737000009 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Romero-Frias E; Vaughan L|
AF- Romero-Frias Esteban; Vaughan, Liwen|
TI- Patterns of web linking to heterogeneous groups of companies The case
of stock exchange indexes|
SO- ASLIB PROCEEDINGS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Competitive advantage; Intelligence; Data analysis; Worldwide web;
Business analysis|
ID- COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE; INFORMATION; COCITATION; WEBSITES; SITES|
AB- Purpose The paper seeks to extend co-link analysis to web sites of
heterogeneous companies belonging to different industries and countries,
and to cluster companies by industries and compare results from different
countries Design/methodology/approach - Web sites of 255 companies that
belong to five stock exchange indexes were included in the study. Data on
co-links pointing to these web sites were gathered using Yahoo! Co-link
data were analyzed using multidimensional scaling (MDS) to generate MDS
maps that would position companies based on their co-link counts Findings
Comparisons of results across different countries and economies showed
the following overall pattern: companies whose businesses are
information-based tend to form well-defined clusters, while companies
operating on a more traditional business model tend not to form clear
groups. A comparison between the EU zone and the USA suggests that the EU
economy is not well integrated yet Practical implications The findings
from the study suggest the possibility of using co-link analysis to
distinguish information-based industries from traditional industries
Originality/value The paper extends co-link analysis from a single
industry to heterogeneous industries with global and complex business
phenomena|
C1- [Romero-Frias, Esteban] Univ Granada, Dept Accounting & Finance,
Granada, Spain; [Vaughan, Liwen] Univ Western Ontario, Fac Informat &
Media Studies, London, ON, Canada|
RP- Romero-Frias, E, Univ Granada, Dept Accounting & Finance, Granada,
Spain|
EM- erf@ugr.es|
CD- *GOOGL, 2006, GOOGL SOAP SEARCH AP; *GOOGL, 2009, LINKS YOUR SIT;
*MSN LIV SEARCH, 2007, WE AR FLATT; BJORNEBORN L, 2004, V55, P1216, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; GARCIASANTIAGO L, 2009, V79, P681, SCIENTOMETRICS;
HEPPES D, 2009, V61, P48, ASLIB PROC; KAHANER L, 1996, COMPETITIVE
INTELLIG; PORTER ME, 1980, COMPETITIVE STRATEGY; PORTER ME, 1985,
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAG; REID E, 2003, P57, INFORM COMMUNICATION;
ROMEROFRIAS E, 2009, P206, P ISSI 2009 12 INT C; SHAW D, 2001, V6, 1
MONDAY; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; STUART D, 2006,
V15, P97, RES EVALUAT; TAN B, 2002, V33, P225, CYBERNET SYST; THELWALL M,
2004, V40, P515, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; VAUGHAN L, 2004, V40, P693, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG; VAUGHAN L, 2006, V57, P1178, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; VAUGHAN
L, 2006, V67, P291, SCIENTOMETRICS; VAUGHAN L, 2006, V68, P611,
SCIENTOMETRICS; VAUGHAN L, 2007, V31, P440, ONLINE INFORM REV; VAUGHAN L,
2008, V77, P433, SCIENTOMETRICS; VAUGHAN L, 2009, V4879, P161, LECT NOTES
COMPUT SC; VAUGHAN L, 2009, V33, P956, ONLINE INFORM REV; VAUGHAN LW,
2004, V60, P487, SCIENTOMETRICS; ZUCCALA A, 2006, V57, P1487, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC|
NR- 26|
TC- 0|
PU- EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED|
PI- BINGLEY|
PA- HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND|
SN- 0001-253X|
J9- ASLIB PROC|
JI- Aslib Proc|
PY- 2010|
VL- 62|
IS- 2|
BP- 144|
EP- 164|
DI- 10.1108/00012531011034964|
PG- 21|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 594YR|
JN- ASLIB PROCEEDINGS, 2010, V62, N2, P144-164|
UT- ISI:000277578000002 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Chen CM; Zhang J; Vogeley MS|
AF- Chen Chaomei; Zhang, Jian; Vogeley, Michael S|
TI- Making sense of the evolution of a scientific domain: a visual
analytic study of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey research|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Visual analytics; Co-citation network analysis; SDSS|
ID- VISUALIZATION; COCITATION; NETWORKS|
AB- We introduce a new visual analytic approach to the study of
scientific discoveries and knowledge diffusion. Our approach enhances
contemporary co-citation network analysis by enabling analysts to
identify co-citation clusters of cited references intuitively, synthesize
thematic contexts in which these clusters are cited, and trace how
research focus evolves over time. The new approach integrates and
streamlines a few previously isolated techniques such as spectral
clustering and feature selection algorithms. The integrative procedure is
expected to empower and strengthen analytical and sense making
capabilities of scientists, learners, and researchers to understand the
dynamics of the evolution of scientific domains in a wide range of
scientific fields, science studies, and science policy evaluation and
planning. We demonstrate the potential of our approach through a visual
analysis of the evolution of astronomical research associated with the
Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) using bibliographic data between 1994 and
2008. In addition, we also demonstrate that the approach can be
consistently applied to a set of heterogeneous data sources such as eprints on arXiv, publications on ADS, and NSF awards related to the same
topic of SDSS|
C1- [Chen, Chaomei; Zhang, Jian] Drexel Univ, Coll Informat Sci &
Technol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA; [Vogeley, Michael S.] Drexel Univ,
Dept Phys, Coll Arts & Sci, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA|
RP- Chen, CM, Drexel Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Technol, Philadelphia, PA
19104 USA|
EM- chaomei.chen@drexel.edu jz85@drexel.edu vogeley@drexel.edu|
FU- National Science Foundation (NSF) [0612129]|
FX- This work is supported in part by the National Science Foundation
(NSF) under grant number 0612129|
CD- BARABASI AL, 2002, V311, P590, PHYSICA A; CHEN CM, 2004, V101, P5303,
P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; CHEN CM, 2006, V57, P359, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
CHEN CM, 2007, P19, P 7 ACM JOINT C DIG; DEERWESTER S, 1990, V41, P391, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; DUNNING T, 1993, V19, P61, COMPUTATIONAL LINGUI; DWYER
T, 2008, V14, P1293, IEEE T VIS COMPUT GR; GIRVAN M, 2002, V99, P7821, P
NATL ACAD SCI USA; KESSLER MM, 1963, V14, P10, AM DOC; KOFFKA K, 1955,
PRINCIPLES GESTALT P; LUXBURG UV, 2006, TUTORIAL SPECTRAL CL; MORRIS SA,
2003, V54, P413, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; NG AY, 2002, V14, P849, ADV NEUR
IN; SALTON G, 1994, V37, P97, COMMUN ACM; SHI JB, 2000, V22, P888, IEEE T
PATTERN ANAL; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SNIJDERS
TAB, 2001, P361, SOCIOL METHODOL; WASSERMAN S, 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL;
WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI|
NR- 19|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- JUN|
PY- 2010|
VL- 83|
IS- 3|
BP- 669|
EP- 688|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-009-0123-x|
PG- 20|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 592YR|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, V83, N3, P669-688|
UT- ISI:000277418400006 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Bruer JT|
AF- Bruer John T|
TI- Can we talk? How the cognitive neuroscience of attention emerged from
neurobiology and psychology, 1980-2005|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Co-citation analysis; PFNET; Cognitive neuroscience; Attention|
ID- KNOWLEDGE DOMAINS|
AB- This study uses author co-citation analysis to trace prospectively
the development of the cognitive neuroscience of attention between 1980
and 2005 from its precursor disciplines: cognitive psychology, single
cell neurophysiology, neuropsychology, and evoked potential research. The
author set consists of 28 authors highly active in attentional research
in the mid-1980s. PFNETS are used to present the co-citation networks
Authors are clustered via the single-link clustering intrinsic to the
PFNET algorithm. By 1990 a distinct cognitive neuroscience specialty
cluster emerges, dominated by authors engaged in brain imaging research|
C1- James S McDonnell Fdn, St Louis, MO 63117 USA|
RP- Bruer, JT, James S McDonnell Fdn, 1034 S Brentwood Blvd,Suite 1850,
St Louis, MO 63117 USA|
EM- bruer@jsmf.org|
CD- BORNER K, 2003, V37, P179, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; BRUER JT, 2009, V4,
P1221, COGNITIVE NEUROSCIEN; CHEN CM, 2001, V34, P65, COMPUTER; DEARHOLT
DW, 1990, P1, PATHFINDER ASS NETWO; DENOOY W, 2005, EXPLORATORY SOCIAL N;
FREEMAN LC, 1991, V13, P141, SOC NETWORKS; HIRST W, 1986, P104, MIND
BRAIN DIALOGUES; LEDOUX JE, 1986, MIND BRAIN DIALOGUES; MCCAIN KW, 1990,
V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PETERSEN SE, 1988, V331, P585, NATURE;
POSNER MI, 1980, V32, P3, Q J EXP PSYCHOL; POSNER MI, 1988, V240, P1627,
SCIENCE; POSNER MI, 1990, V13, P24, ANNU REV NEUROSCI; ROBINSON DL, 1986,
P142, MIND BRAIN DIALOGUES; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; WURTZ RH, 1976, V39, P745, J NEUROPHYSIOL; WURTZ RH, 1976, V39,
P766, J NEUROPHYSIOL|
NR- 17|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- JUN|
PY- 2010|
VL- 83|
IS- 3|
BP- 751|
EP- 764|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-009-0128-5|
PG- 14|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 592YR|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, V83, N3, P751-764|
UT- ISI:000277418400012 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Small H|
AF- Small Henry|
TI- Maps of science as interdisciplinary discourse: co-citation contexts
and the role of analogy|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Interdisciplinarity; Maps of science; Co-citation contexts; Analogy;
Cue word analysis|
ID- CITATION; SIMULATION; CLUSTERS|
AB- Interdisciplinarity can be manifest in many forms: through
collaboration or communication between scientists working in different
fields or through the work of individual scientists who employ concepts
or methods across disciplines. This latter form of interdisciplinarity is
addressed here with the goal of understanding how ideas in different
fields come together to create new opportunities for discovery. Maps of
science are used to suggest possible interdisciplinary links which are
then analyzed by co-citation context analysis. Interdisciplinary links
are identified by juxtaposing a clustering and mapping of documents
against a journal-based categorization of the same document clusters
Links between clusters are characterized as interdisciplinary based on
the dissonance of their category assignments. To verify and probe more
deeply into the meaning of interdisciplinary links, co-citation contexts
for selected links from five separate cases are analyzed in terms of
prominent cue words. This analysis reveals that interdisciplinary
connections are often based on authors' perceptions of analogous problems
across scientific domains. Cue words drawn from the citation contexts
also suggest that these connections are viewed as important and ripe with
both opportunity and risk|
C1- Thomson Reuters, Philadelphia, PA 19130 USA|
RP- Small, H, Thomson Reuters, 1500 Spring Garden St, Philadelphia, PA
19130 USA|
EM- henry.small@thomsonreuters.com|
CD- *THOMS REUT, 2008, ESS SCI IND; ADAMS J, 2007, REPORT HIGHER ED FUN;
BALL P, 2008, V108, P74, CHEM REV; BOYACK KW, 2005, V64, P351,
SCIENTOMETRICS; BRONER K, 2003, V37, P179, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; CHEN CM,
2006, V57, P359, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CHEN QZ, 2008, V59, P1, MAT SCI
ENG R; DIMARCO C, 2007, WORKING NODES AM ASS; DUNBAR K, 1994, MECH
INSIGHT; FEIG M, 2006, V116, P194, THEOR CHEM ACC; FINNEY B, 1979,
REFERENCE CHARACTERI; FISCHBACH MA, 2006, V106, P3468, CHEM REV;
FRUCHTERMAN TMJ, 1991, V21, P1129, SOFTWARE PRACT EXPER; GRANOVETTER M,
1983, V1, P201, SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY; GRAY HB, 2003, V100, P3563, P NATL
ACAD SCI USA; GUNNER MR, 2006, V1757, P942, BBA-BIOENERGETICS; HESSE M,
1966, MODELS ANALOGIES SCI; HOEBEN FJM, 2005, V105, P1491, CHEM REV;
HOLYOAK KJ, 1996, MENTAL LEAPS ANALOGY; HU H, 2009, V898, P17, J MOL
STRUC-THEOCHEM; LEVISTRAUSS C, 1966, SAVAGE MIND; LU ZY, 2008, V4, P1237,
J CHEM THEORY COMPUT; MERCER RE, 2004, V3060, P77, LECT NOTES COMPUTER;
PORTER AL, 2007, V72, P117, SCIENTOMETRICS; ROY MS, 2008, V43, P5551, J
MATER SCI; SCHNEIDER JW, 2006, V68, P573, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1980,
V36, P183, J DOC; SMALL H, 1985, V8, P321, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1986,
V37, P97, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1999, V48, P72, LIBR TRENDS;
SMALL H, 2009, V79, P365, SCIENTOMETRICS; TONGERS J, 2009, V36, P140, TEX
HEART I J; VAILLANCOURT FH, 2006, V106, P3364, CHEM REV; VANLANEN SG,
2006, V9, P252, CURR OPIN MICROBIOL; WILKINS JS, 2008, V23, P659, BIOL
PHILOS|
NR- 35|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- JUN|
PY- 2010|
VL- 83|
IS- 3|
BP- 835|
EP- 849|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-009-0121-z|
PG- 15|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 592YR|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, V83, N3, P835-849|
UT- ISI:000277418400018 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Pasadeos Y; Berger B; Renfro RB|
AF- Pasadeos Yorgo; Berger, Bruce; Renfro, R. Bruce|
TI- Public Relations as a Maturing Discipline: An Update on Research
Networks|
SO- JOURNAL OF PUBLIC RELATIONS RESEARCH|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- COMMUNICATION JOURNALS; CITATION NETWORKS; MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATION;
CRISIS; ROLES; WEB|
AB- Pasadeos, Renfro and Hanily (1999) investigated the public relations
literature's most-cited works in the 1990s and identified research
networks. In the present study we expand that work by examining public
relations scholarship ten years later. We identify current authors and
their publication outlets, taxonomize most-cited works, and draw a cocitation network. Further, we compare current findings with those of ten
years earlier and speculate on the state of public relations as a
scholarly discipline|
C1- [Pasadeos, Yorgo; Berger, Bruce] Univ Alabama, Dept Advertising &
Publ Relat, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA; [Renfro, R. Bruce] Texas State
Univ, Dept Mass Commun, San Marcos, TX USA|
RP- Pasadeos, Y, Univ Alabama, Dept Advertising & Publ Relat, Box 870172,
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA|
EM- pasadeos@apr.ua.edu|
CD- *ARTH PAG SOC, 2007, AUTH ENT; ALLEN MW, 1994, V61, P44, COMMUN
MONOGR; BANKS SP, 1995, MULTICULTURAL PUBLIC; BANKS SP, 2000,
MULTICULTURAL PUBLIC; BENOIT WL, 1995, ACCOUNTS EXCUSES APO; BENOIT WL,
1997, V23, P177, PUBLIC RELAT REV; BOTAN C, 1992, V18, P149, PUBLIC RELAT
REV; BOTAN CH, 2004, V54, P645, J COMMUN; BROOM GM, 1982, V8, P17, PUBLIC
RELAT REV; BROOM GM, 1986, V12, P37, PUBLIC RELAT REV; BROOM GM, 1990,
USING PUBLIC RELATIO; BROOM GM, 1997, V9, P83, J PUBLIC RELAT RES; BROOM
GM, 2006, V18, P141, J PUBLIC RELAT RES; CANCEL AE, 1997, V9, P31, J
PUBLIC RELAT RES; CHENEY G, 1987, P165, HDB ORG COMMUNICATIO; CLINE CG,
1986, VELVET GHETTO IMPACT; COOMBS WT, 1998, V10, P177, J PUBLIC RELAT
RES; COOMBS WT, 1998, V24, P289, PUBLIC RELAT REV; CRANE D, 1972,
INVISIBLE COLL DIFFU; CULBERTSON HM, 1996, INT PUBLIC RELATIONS; CULNAN
MJ, 1986, V32, P156, MANAGE SCI; CUTLIP SM, 2000, EFFECTIVE PUBLIC REL;
DOZIER DM, 1992, P327, EXCELLENCE PUBLIC RE; DOZIER DM, 1995, V7, P3, J
PUBLIC RELAT RES; DOZIER DM, 1995, MANAGERS GUIDE EXCEL; DOZIER DM, 2000,
V12, P3, J PUBLIC RELAT RES; ESROCK SL, 2000, V26, P327, PUBLIC RELAT
REV; FERGUSON MA, 1984, CONV ASS ED JOURN MA; GANDY OH, 1982, AGENDA
SETTING INFOR; GORDON MD, 1982, V33, P55, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; GOWER KK,
2006, V18, P177, J PUBLIC RELAT RES; GRUNIG JE, 1984, MANAGING PUBLIC
RELA; GRUNIG JE, 1989, P99, PUBLIC RELATIONS THE; GRUNIG JE, 1992,
EXCELLENCE PUBLIC RE; GRUNIG JE, 1992, P159, EXCELLENCE PUBLIC RE; GRUNIG
JE, 1992, P503, EXCELLENCE PUBLIC RE; GRUNIG JE, 1995, V7, P163, J PUBLIC
RELAT RES; GRUNIG JE, 2000, V12, P23, J PUBLIC RELAT RES; GRUNIG JE,
2001, P11, HDB PUBLIC RELATIONS; GRUNIG LA, 2002, EXCELLENT PUBLIC REL;
HEARIT KM, 1994, V20, P113, PUBLIC RELAT REV; HEATH R, 1997, STRATEGIC
ISSUES MAN; HEATH RL, 1998, V24, P273, PUBLIC RELAT REV; HEATH RL, 2000,
HDB PUBLIC RELATIONS; HOFSTEDE G, 1984, CULTURES CONSEQUENCE; HOFSTEDE G,
1997, CULTURES ORG SOFTWAR; HOLTZHAUSEN DR, 2000, V12, P93, J PUBLIC
RELAT RES; HON LC, 1998, V10, P103, J PUBLIC RELATIONS R; JOHNSON MA,
1997, V9, P213, J PUBLIC RELATIONS R; KARLBERG M, 1996, V8, P263, J
PUBLIC RELATIONS R; KENT ML, 1998, V24, P321, PUBLIC RELAT REV; KI EJ,
2005, PUBL REL DIV ANN CON; KRUCKEBERG D, 1988, PUBLIC RELATIONS COM;
KUHN TS, 1970, STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; LEDINGHAM JA, 1998, V24, P55, PUBLIC
RELAT REV; LEDINGHAM JA, 2000, PUBLIC RELATIONS REL; LIEVROUW LA, 1989,
V16, P615, COMMUN RES; LINDLOF TR, 1995, QUALITATIVE COMMUNIC; MCCAIN KW,
1989, V16, P667, COMMUN RES; MCELREATH MP, 1994, V6, P69, J PUBLIC RELAT
RES; MORTON LP, 1995, V21, P337, PUBLIC RELAT REV; MURPHY P, 1991, V3,
P115, PUBLIC RELATIONS RES; NEWSOM D, 1985, THIS IS PR REALITIES; NEWSOM
D, 2000, THIS IS PR REALITIES; PASADEOS Y, 1992, V15, P48, PUBLIC RELAT
REV; PASADEOS Y, 1999, V11, P29, J PUBLIC RELAT RES; PASADEOS Y, 2008,
V85, P785, JOURNALISM MASS COMM; PRICE JDD, 1970, P3, COMUNICATION SCI
ENG; REEVES B, 1983, V10, P119, HUM COMMUN RES; RICE RE, 1988, V15, P256,
HUM COMMUN RES; RUSSELL J, 1976, V5, P29, J ADVERTISING; SALLOT LM, 2003,
V15, P27, J PUBLIC RELAT RES; SMALL H, 1998, V25, B AM SOC INFORM SCI; SO
CYK, 1988, V15, P236, HUM COMMUN RES; SPRINGSTON JK, 2001, P603, HDB
PUBLIC RELATIONS; SRIRAMESH K, 1992, P594, EXCELLENCE PUBLIC RE; SUMMERS
EG, 1984, V35, P332, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; TANKARD JW, 1984, V61, P89,
JOURNALISM QUART; TOTH EL, 1993, V5, P153, J PUBLIC RELATIONS R; TOTH EL,
1998, V24, P145, PUBLIC RELAT REV; TURK JV, 1986, P100, JOURNALISM
MONOGRAPH; USDIKEN B, 1995, V16, P503, ORGAN STUD; VASQUEZ GM, 2000, V24,
P319, COMMUNICATION YB; VERCIC D, 1996, P31, INT PUBLIC RELATIONS; WILCOX
DL, 2000, PUBLIC RELATIONS STR|
NR- 85|
TC- 0|
PU- ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD|
PI- ABINGDON|
PA- 4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXFORDSHIRE, ENGLAND|
SN- 1062-726X|
J9- J PUBLIC RELAT RES|
JI- J. Public Relat. Res|
PY- 2010|
VL- 22|
IS- 2|
BP- 136|
EP- 158|
DI- 10.1080/10627261003601390|
PG- 23|
SC- Communication|
GA- 593VC|
JN- JOURNAL OF PUBLIC RELATIONS RESEARCH, 2010, V22, N2, P136-158|
UT- ISI:000277488500002 ER ||
PTAUAFTIand
SOLADT-
J|
Upham SP; Rosenkopf L; Ungar LH|
Upham S. Phineas; Rosenkopf, Lori; Ungar, Lyle H|
Innovating knowledge communities An analysis of group collaboration
competition in science and technology|
SCIENTOMETRICS|
English|
Article|
DE- Knowledge communities; Innovation; Dynamic clustering|
ID- RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; COMBINED COCITATION; MARKET ORIENTATION;
CITATION PATTERNS; WORD ANALYSIS; SEARCH; NETWORKS; BIOTECHNOLOGY;
CONSTRUCTION; ISOMORPHISM|
AB- A useful level of analysis for the study of innovation may be what we
call "knowledge communities''-intellectually cohesive, organic interorganizational forms. Formal organizations like firms are excellent at
promoting cooperation, but knowledge communities are superior at
fostering collaboration-the most important process in innovation. Rather
than focusing on what encourages performance in formal organizations, we
study what characteristics encourage aggregate superior performance in
informal knowledge communities in computer science. Specifically, we
explore the way knowledge communities both draw on past knowledge, as
seen in citations, and use rhetoric, as found in writing, to seek a basis
for differential success. We find that when using knowledge successful
knowledge communities draw from a broad range of sources and are
extremely flexible in changing and adapting. In marked contrast, when
using rhetoric successful knowledge communities tend to use very similar
vocabularies and language that does not move or adapt over time and is
not unique or esoteric compared to the vocabulary of other communities. A
better understanding of how inter-organizational collaborative network
structures encourage innovation is important to understanding what drives
innovation and how to promote it|
C1- [Upham, S. Phineas; Rosenkopf, Lori] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch,
Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA; [Ungar, Lyle H.] Univ Penn, CIS Dept,
Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA|
RP- Upham, SP, Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA|
EM- uphams@wharton.upenn.edu rosenkopf@wharton.upenn.edu
ungar@cis.upenn.edu|
CD- ABRAHAMSON E, 1996, V21, P254, ACAD MANAGE REV; AHARONSON B, 2004,
IND CLUSTER IN PRESS; BARNEY J, 2001, V27, P625, J MANAGE; BARTEL CA,
2000, V45, P197, ADMIN SCI QUART; BOYACK KW, 2003, V54, P447, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BRAAM RR,
1991, V42, P252, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; COHEN WM, 1990, V35, P128, ADMIN
SCI QUART; COHEN WM, 2000, 7552 NAT BUR EC RES; CRANE D, 1972, INVISIBLE
COLL DIFFU; CRANE D, 1989, V22, P14, CURRENT CONTENTS ART; CULNAN MJ,
1986, V32, P1972, MANAGE SCI; DIGGLE P, 2002, ANAL LONGITUDINAL DA;
DIMAGGIO PJ, 1983, V48, P147, AM SOCIOL REV; DOWNS A, 1957, EC THEORY
DEMOCRACY; DRUCKER PF, 1985, INNOVATION ENTREPREN; DRUKKER DM, 2003, V3,
P168, STATA J; FLEMING L, 2001, V47, P117, MANAGE SCI; FLEMING L, 2001,
V30, P1019, RES POLICY; FLEMING L, 2005, BROKERAGE V IN PRESS; GARFIELD
E, 1983, P5, CURRENT CONTENTS; GARFIELD E, 1988, V22, P3, CURRENT
CONTENTS; GITTELMAN M, 2003, DOES GEOGRA IN PRESS; GITTELMAN M, 2003,
V49, P366, MANAGE SCI; GUGARATI D, 1995, BASIC ECONOMETRICS; GUIMERA R,
2005, V308, P697, SCIENCE; HARGENS LL, 2000, P497, WEB KNOWLEDGE FESTSC;
HAYNES A, 1999, V8, P28, J PRODUCT BRAND MANA; HENDERSON R, 1998, V80,
P119, REV ECON STAT; HOTELLING H, 1929, V39, P41, ECON J; HURLEY RF,
1998, V62, P42, J MARKETING; KANDYLAS V, 2005, WINNER TAKE AL UNPUB;
KATILA R, 2002, V45, P1183, ACAD MANAGE J; KATILA R, 2002, V45, P995,
ACAD MANAGE J; KATILA R, 2003, INNOVATION IN PRESS; KOGUT B, 2004,
DECISION PRIVA UNPUB; KRIPKE S, 1982, WITTGENSTEIN RULES P; KUHN T, 1962,
STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; LEVINTHAL D, 1981, V2, P307, J ECON BEHAV ORGAN;
LIEBERMAN MB, 1988, V9, P41, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; LONG JS, 1997,
REGRESSION MODELS CA; MAKADOK R, 1998, V19, P683, STRATEGIC MANAGE J;
MARCH JG, 1991, V2, P71, ORGAN SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1987, V9, P41, LIBR INFORM
SCI RES; MCCLOSKEY DN, 1998, RHETORIC EC; MERTON RK, 1965, SHOULDERS
GIANTS SHA; MERTON RK, 1972, SOCIOLOGY SCI; MEYER M, 1989, PERMANENTLY
FAILING; MIZRUCHI MS, 1999, V44, P653, ADMIN SCI QUART; MURRAY F, 2005,
EXCHANGE RELAT UNPUB; MURRAY F, 2005, NBER AC SCI ENTR C; NARIN F, 1997,
V26, P317, RES POLICY; NERKAR A, 2003, V49, P211, MANAGE SCI; PAKES A,
1984, P339, R D PATENTS PRODUCTI; PFEFFER J, 1993, V18, P599, ACAD MANAGE
REV; PHELPS J, 1996, V2, P159, J MARK COMMUN; PORTER ME, 1985,
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAG; PORTER ME, 1998, V76, P77, HARVARD BUS REV; PORTER
ME, 2004, EC DEV ADM WASH DC; POWELL WW, 1996, V41, P116, ADMIN SCI
QUART; PRICE DD, 1963, BIG SCI LITTLE SCI; ROSENKOPF L, 2001, V22, P287,
STRATEGIC MANAGE J; SCHULTZ DE, 1994, NEW MARKETING PARADI; SCHUMPETER
JA, 1934, THEORY EC DEV INQUIR; SHANE S, 2002, V48, P122, MANAGE SCI;
SLATER SF, 1995, V59, P63, J MARKETING; SMALL H, 1985, V7, P391,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1994, V30, P229, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 2003,
V54, P394, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; TRAJTENBERG M, 1990, V21, P172, RAND J
ECON; UZZI B, 2005, V111, P447, AM J SOCIOL; WATTS DJ, 1999, V105, P493,
AM J SOCIOL; WERNERFELT B, 1984, V5, P171, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT; WHITE
HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WOOLDRIDGE JM, 2002,
ECONOMETRIC ANAL CRO; YOELS WC, 1974, V15, P264, SOCIOLOGICAL Q; ZHONG S,
2003, P WORKSH CLUST HIGH|
NR- 77|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- MAY|
PY- 2010|
VL- 83|
IS- 2|
BP- 525|
EP- 554|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-009-0102-2|
PG- 30|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 581CU|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, V83, N2, P525-554|
UT- ISI:000276499500016 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Upham SP; Rosenkopf L; Ungar LH|
AF- Upham S. Phineas; Rosenkopf, Lori; Ungar, Lyle H|
TI- Positioning knowledge: schools of thought and new knowledge creation|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Innovation; Management; Schools of thought; Clustering|
ID- COCITATION ANALYSIS; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; MANAGEMENT JOURNALS;
CITATION PATTERNS; SCIENCE; HISTORY; SEARCH; OLD; SPECIALTIES;
EXPLORATION|
AB- Cohesive intellectual communities called "schools of thought'' can
provide powerful benefits to those developing new knowledge, but can also
constrain them. We examine how developers of new knowledge position
themselves within and between schools of thought, and how this affects
their impact. Looking at the micro and macro fields of management
publications from 1956 to 2002 with an extensive dataset of 113,000+
articles from 41 top journals, we explore the dynamics of knowledge
positioning for management scholars. We find that it is significantly
beneficial for new knowledge to be a part of a school of thought, and
that within a school of thought new knowledge has more impact if it is in
the intellectual semi-periphery of the school|
C1- [Upham, S. Phineas; Rosenkopf, Lori] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch,
Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA; [Ungar, Lyle H.] Univ Penn, CIS Dept,
Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA|
RP- Upham, SP, Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA|
EM- uphams@wharton.upenn.edu rosenkopf@wharton.upenn.edu
ungar@cis.upenn.edu|
CD- ABRAHAMSON E, 1996, V21, P254, ACAD MANAGE REV; AHARONSON B, 2004,
IND CLUSTER IN PRESS; AMIR S, 1985, V8, P117, SCIENTOMETRICS; BARNETT WP,
2002, V11, P289, IND CORP CHANGE; BARNEY JB, 1986, V11, P791, ACAD MANAGE
REV; BAYER AE, 1966, V39, P381, SOCIOL EDUC; BIRNBAUM PH, 1981, V24,
P487, ACAD MANAGE J; BIRNBAUM PH, 1981, V13, P5, SRA J SOC RES ADM; BRAAM
RR, 1991, V42, P233, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BURT R, SOCIAL CAPITAL UNPUB;
CASTRO P, 2001, V33, P400, ENVIRON BEHAV; CHOI SC, 2004, PRIVATE LABEL
UNPUB; COE R, 1969, V1, P23, AACSB B; COE R, 1984, V27, P660, ACAD MANAGE
J; COHEN WM, 2000, 7552 NAT BUR EC RES; COLE S, 1967, V32, P377, AM
SOCIOL REV; CRANE D, 1972, INVISIBLE COLL DIFFU; CRANE D, 1980, V10, P23,
SOC STUD SCI; CULNAN MJ, 1986, V32, P156, MANAGE SCI; CULNAN MJ, 1987,
V11, P341, MIS QUART; DOREIAN P, 1988, V39, P79, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
DOWNS A, 1957, EC THEORY DEMOCRACY; ENNIS JG, 1992, V57, P259, AM SOCIOL
REV; FLEMING L, 2001, V47, P117, MANAGE SCI; GASPER JT, 2005, ANN M PUBL
CHOIC SOC; GITTELMAN M, 2003, DOES GEOGRA IN PRESS; HOTELLING H, 1929,
V4, P1, ECON J; JOHNSON JL, 1994, V37, P1392, ACAD MANAGE J; KANDYLAS B,
2005, MIXTURE MODEL UNPUB; KANDYLAS V, 2005, WINNER TAKE AL UNPUB; KATILA
R, 2002, V45, P1183, ACAD MANAGE J; KRISHNA RV, 2001, VOTER CLUSTERI
UNPUB; KUHN T, 1962, STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; LEVINTHAL DA, 1991, V2, P140,
ORGAN SCI; LEVINTHAL DA, 1997, V43, P934, MANAGE SCI; LEVINTHAL DA, 1998,
V7, P217, IND CORP CHANGE; LONG JS, 1997, REGRESSION MODELS CA; MARCH JG,
1958, ORGANIZATIONS; MARCH JG, 1987, V33, P1404, MANAGE SCI; MARKS UG,
2001, V53, P150, SCHMALENBACH BUSINES; MCCAIN KW, 1986, V23, P194, P AM
SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1987, V9, P41, LIBR INFORM SCI RES; MCGANN AJ,
2002, V14, P37, J THEOR POLIT; MEYER MW, 1989, PERMANENTLY FAILING; MEYER
MW, 1994, V8, HDB EC SOCIOLOGY; MEYER MW, 1999, V28, P507, CONTEMP
SOCIOL; MINTZBERG H, 1994, RISE FALL STRATEGIC; MOODY J, 2001, V23, P261,
SOC NETWORKS; MORRIS MW, 2000, V45, P737, ADMIN SCI QUART; NERKAR A,
2003, V49, P211, MANAGE SCI; OSAREH F, 1996, V46, P217, LIBRI; PANTEL P,
2002, DOCUMENT CLUSTERING; PFEFFER J, 1993, V18, P599, ACAD MANAGE REV;
PODSAKOFF PM, 2005, V26, P473, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; POPESCUL A, 2000,
P173, IEEE ADV DIGITAL LIB; RAMOSRODRIGUEZ AR, 2004, V25, P981, STRATEGIC
MANAGE J; ROSENKOPF L, 2001, V22, P287, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; SHARPLIN AD,
1985, V38, P139, HUM RELAT; SMALL H, 2003, V54, P394, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; SMALL HG, 1978, V8, P327, SOC STUD SCI; SMALL HG, 1979, V1, P445,
SCIENTOMETRICS; TRAJTENBERG M, 1990, V21, P172, RAND J ECON; WILLIAMSON
OE, 1975, MARKETS HIERARCHIES; WILLIAMSON OE, 1979, V22, P233, J LAW
ECON|
NR- 64|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- MAY|
PY- 2010|
VL- 83|
IS- 2|
BP- 555|
EP- 581|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-009-0097-8|
PG- 27|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 581CU|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, V83, N2, P555-581|
UT- ISI:000276499500017 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Minguillo D|
AF- Minguillo David|
TI- Toward a New Way of Mapping Scientific Fields: Authors' Competence
for Publishing in Scholarly Journals|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- INFORMATION-SCIENCE RESEARCH; CITATION ANALYSIS; LIBRARY; SPAIN;
COMMUNICATION; VISUALIZATION; SPECIALTIES; COMMUNITIES; PARADIGMS;
DYNAMICS|
AB- The objective of this article is to introduce a socially oriented
approach to the analysis and representation of the social and
intellectual structure of scientific fields. A sociological perspective
is introduced as the theoretical basis to analyze scientific fields, and
the social network framework is adopted to develop a multidisciplinary
approach to analyze the organization of science. This approach is then
applied to study the Spanish Library and Information Science community
from 1999 to 2007. The underlying notion is that science is organized
work, in which the pursuit of impact shapes the specific scientific
organization. This generates mutual dependence and control among
researchers, which may restrict access when formally communicating with
other scientific communities. On the other hand, scholarly journals
facilitate the coordination of new knowledge and serve as platforms for
interaction among scientists. Consequently, the interaction of welldefined groups of homogenous researchers, concentrated around particular
sets of journals, leads to the formation of cohesive (sub)groups tied
together by the degree of similarity of the researchers' competence. An
empirical test suggests that this consideration can accurately reveal a
segment of the structure of the scientific field. This study therefore
introduces a new approach for mapping the structure of scientific fields
that differs from most existing methods, which are based on (co)citation|
C1- [Minguillo, David] Royal Sch Lib & Informat Sci, DK-2300 Copenhagen
S, Denmark; [Minguillo, David] Univ Granada, Commun & Documentat Fac, E18071 Granada, Spain|
RP- Minguillo, D, Royal Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Birketinget 6, DK-2300
Copenhagen S, Denmark|
EM- balbi@correo.ugr.es|
CD- *SCIMAGO, 2007, SJR SCIMAGO J COUNTR; ANEGON FD, 1998, V42, P229,
SCIENTOMETRICS; ASTROM F, 2008, V64, P721, J DOC; BORGATTI SP, 1997, V19,
P243, SOC NETWORKS; BORGATTI SP, 2002, NETDRAW GRAPH VISUAL; BORGATTI SP,
2002, UCINET 6 WINDOWS SOF; BORNER K, 2003, V37, P179, ANNU REV INFORM
SCI; BORNER K, 2007, V41, P537, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; CANO V, 1999, V50,
P675, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; CASTELLS M, 2000, RISE NETWORK SOC; CHEN C,
2003, MAPPING SCI FRONTIER; CHEN C, 2004, INFORM VISUALIZATION; CHEN CM,
2003, V54, P392, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CHEN CM, 2004, V101, P5303, P NATL
ACAD SCI U S1; CHUBIN D, 1976, V17, P448, SOCIOLOGICAL Q; CHUBIN DE,
1975, V5, P423, SOC STUD SCI; COLE S, 2000, P109, WEB KNOWLEDGE FESTSC;
CROSS R, 2004, HIDDEN POWER SOCIAL; ETZKOWITZ H, 2000, V29, P109, RES
POLICY; EVERETT MG, 2005, P57, MODELS METHODS SOCIA; FRY J, 2006, V42,
P299, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; FRY J, 2007, V33, P115, J INF SCI; GARFIELD
E, 2003, V54, P400, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; GRANOVET.MS, 1973, V78, P1360,
AM J SOCIOL; HJORLAND B, 1997, INFORM SEEKING SUBJE; HYLAND K, 2008, V42,
P297, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; JIMENEZCONTRERAS E, 2003, V32, P123, RES
POLICY; KILDUFF M, 2003, SOCIAL NETWORKS ORG; KLAVANS R, 2009, V60, P455,
J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; KLING R, 2000, V51, P1306, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
KOUFOGIANNAKIS D, 2004, V30, P227, J INFORM SCI; KUHN TS, 1962, STRUCTURE
SCI REVOLU; LAUDAN L, 1977, PROGR ITS PROBLEMS T; LEYDESDORFF L, 2007,
V58, P25, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MACROBERTS MH, 1996, V36, P435,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MORAVCSIK MJ, 1975, V5, P86, SOC STUD SCI; MORRIS SA,
2008, V42, P213, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; NICOLAISEN J, 2007, V41, P609, ANNU
REV INFORM SCI; NONAKA I, 1998, V40, P40, CALIF MANAGE REV; NOWOTNY H,
2001, RETHINKING SCI KNOWL; PALMER CL, 1996, V45, P165, LIBR TRENDS;
PALMER CL, 1999, V50, P242, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PALMER CL, 2008, V42,
P165, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; ROBINS GL, 2005, P192, MODELS METHODS SOCIA;
ROGERS E, 1995, DIFFUSION INNOVATION; SCHVANEVELDT W, 1990, PATHFINDER
ASS NETWO; SCOTT J, 2000, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; SHAW WM, 1981, V3, P235,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SIEGELMAN SS, 1998, V208, P9, RADIOLOGY; SMALL H, 2003,
V54, P394, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; VANRAAN AFJ, 1989, V15, P607,
SCIENTOMETRICS; VARGASQUESADA B, 2007, VISUALIZING STRUCTUR; WASSERMAN S,
1998, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; WATTS DJ, 1998, V393, P6684, NATURE; WENGER E,
2000, V7, P225, ORGANIZATION; WHITLEY R, 2000, INTELLECTUAL SOCIAL;
WHITLEY RD, 1983, V22, P681, SOC SCI INFORM; ZIMAN J, 1968, PUBLIC
KNOWLEDGE ESS|
NR- 58|
TC- 0|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- APR|
PY- 2010|
VL- 61|
IS- 4|
BP- 772|
EP- 786|
DI- 10.1002/asi.21282|
PG- 15|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 579KZ|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2010, V61, N4, P772-786|
UT- ISI:000276370500010 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Leydesdorff L; Salah AAA|
AF- Leydesdorff Loet; Salah, Alkim Almila Akdag|
TI- Maps on the Basis of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: The
Journals Leonardo and Art Journal Versus "Digital Humanities" as a Topic|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- PEARSONS CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT; SCIENCE; PERFORMANCE; INDICATORS;
COCITATION; HISTORY; IMPACT|
AB- The possibilities of using the Arts & Humanities Citation Index
(A&HCI) for journal mapping have not been sufficiently recognized because
of the absence of a Journal Citations Report (JCR) for this database. A
quasi-JCR for the A&HCI (2008) was constructed from the data contained in
the Web of Science and is used for the evaluation of two journals as
examples: Leonardo and Art Journal. The maps on the basis of the
aggregated journal journal citations within this domain can be compared
with maps including references to journals in the Science Citation Index
and Social Science Citation Index. Art journals are cited by (social)
science journals more than by other art journals, but these journals draw
upon one another in terms of their own references. This cultural impact
in terms of being cited is not found when documents with a topic such as
"digital humanities" are analyzed. This community of practice functions
more as an intellectual organizer than a journal|
C1- [Leydesdorff, Loet] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res, NL-1012
CX Amsterdam, Netherlands; [Salah, Alkim Almila Akdag] Virtual Knowledge
Studio Netherlands Royal Acad A, Amsterdam, Netherlands|
RP- Leydesdorff, L, Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res,
Kloveniersburgwal 48, NL-1012 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands|
EM- loet@leydesdorff.net|
CD- AGYRIS C, 1978, ORG LEARNING THEORY; AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; AKSNES DW, 2009, V1, P394, 12 INT C INT SOC SCI;
ARCHAMBAULT E, 2006, V68, P329, SCIENTOMETRICS; ARNHEIM R, 1954, ART
VISUAL PERCEPTIO; ARNHEIM R, 1969, VISUAL THINKING; BALL R, 2006, V26,
P293, INFORM SERVICES USE; BENSMAN SJ, 2007, V41, P93, ANNU REV INFORM
SCI; BOLLEN J, 2009, V4, ARTN e4803, PLOS ONE; BUSA RA, 2004, COMPANION
DIGITAL HU; BUTLER L, 2007, V34, P565, SCI PUBL POLICY; CRONIN B, 1997,
V53, P263, J DOC; EGGHE L, 2009, V60, P1027, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
GARFIELD E, 1972, V178, P471, SCIENCE; GARFIELD E, 1979, V32, P5, CURRENT
CONTENTS; GARFIELD E, 1982, V30, P5, CURRENT CONTENTS; GARFIELD E, 1982,
V30, P5, CURRENT CONTENTS; GOMBRICH EH, 1960, ART ILLUSION STUDY P;
GOODMAN N, 1988, LANGUAGE ART APPROAC; GRIFFITH BC, 1974, V4, P339, SCI
STUD; HICKS D, 2009, BIBLIOMETRIC DATABAS; HOCKEY S, 2004, P3, COMPANION
DIGITAL HU; HOWARD J, 2008, V55, A10, CHRON HIGHER EDUC; KAMADA T, 1989,
V31, P7, INFORM PROCESS LETT; KESSLER MM, 1963, V14, P10, AM DOC; LEWISON
G, 2001, V10, P89, RES EVALUAT; LEYDESDORFF L, 1993, V26, P133,
SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 1994, V31, P59, SCIENTOMETRICS;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2007, V58, P207, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; LEYDESDORFF L, 2008,
V59, P278, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2008, V17, P611, PROF
INFORM; LEYDESDORFF L, 2010, V61, P352, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LINMANS J,
SCIENTOMETR IN PRESS; MARSHAKOVA IV, 1973, V2, P3, NAUCHNO TEKHNICHESKA;
MCARTY W, 1998, LIV 20 FEBR 1998; MCCARTY W, 2003, P1224, ENCY LIB INFORM
SCI; NEDERHOF AJ, 1987, V11, P333, SCIENTOMETRICS; NEDERHOF AJ, 2006,
V66, P81, SCIENTOMETRICS; NEU J, 1985, V76, P5, ISIS; PIEZ W, 2008, V2,
P1, DIGITAL HUMANITIES Q; RABEN J, 1991, V25, P341, COMPUT HUMANITIES;
SALAH AAA, 2008, V12, P47, REV GEN PSYCHOL; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1978, V7, P113, SOC STUD SCI; UNSWORTH J,
2002, V4, P71, JB COMPUTERPHILOLOGI; VANLEEUWEN TN, 2001, V51, P335,
SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 46|
TC- 0|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- APR|
PY- 2010|
VL- 61|
IS- 4|
BP- 787|
EP- 801|
DI- 10.1002/asi.21303|
PG- 15|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 579KZ|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2010, V61, N4, P787-801|
UT- ISI:000276370500011 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Aljaber B; Stokes N; Bailey J; Pei J|
AF- Aljaber Bader; Stokes, Nicola; Bailey, James; Pei, Jian|
TI- Document clustering of scientific texts using citation contexts|
SO- INFORMATION RETRIEVAL|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Citation contexts; Document clustering; Text categorization|
ID- INFORMATION; ALGORITHMS; RETRIEVAL; ARTICLES|
AB- Document clustering has many important applications in the area of
data mining and information retrieval. Many existing document clustering
techniques use the "bag-of-words" model to represent the content of a
document. However, this representation is only effective for grouping
related documents when these documents share a large proportion of
lexically equivalent terms. In other words, instances of synonymy between
related documents are ignored, which can reduce the effectiveness of
applications using a standard full-text document representation. To
address this problem, we present a new approach for clustering scientific
documents, based on the utilization of citation contexts. A citation
context is essentially the text surrounding the reference markers used to
refer to other scientific works. We hypothesize that citation contexts
will provide relevant synonymous and related vocabulary which will help
increase the effectiveness of the bag-of-words representation. In this
paper, we investigate the power of these citation-specific word features,
and compare them with the original document's textual representation in a
document clustering task on two collections of labeled scientific journal
papers from two distinct domains: High Energy Physics and Genomics. We
also compare these text-based clustering techniques with a link-based
clustering algorithm which determines the similarity between documents
based on the number of co-citations, that is in-links represented by
citing documents and out-links represented by cited documents. Our
experimental results indicate that the use of citation contexts, when
combined with the vocabulary in the full-text of the document, is a
promising alternative means of capturing critical topics covered by
journal articles. More specifically, this document representation
strategy when used by the clustering algorithm investigated in this
paper, outperforms both the full-text clustering approach and the linkbased clustering technique on both scientific journal datasets|
C1- [Bailey, James] Univ Melbourne, Dept Comp Sci & Software Engn, NICTA
Victoria Lab, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; [Stokes, Nicola] Univ Coll
Dublin, Sch Comp Sci & Informat, Dublin 2, Ireland; [Pei, Jian] Simon
Fraser Univ, Sch Comp Sci, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada|
RP- Bailey, J, Univ Melbourne, Dept Comp Sci & Software Engn, NICTA
Victoria Lab, Melbourne, Vic, Australia|
EM- baljaber@csse.unimelb.edu.au nicola.stokes@ucd.ie
jbailey@csse.unimelb.edu.au jpei@cs.sfu.ca|
CD- AAS K, 1999, 941 NORW COMP CTR; ANGELOVA R, 2006, P778, P 15 ACM INT
C INF K; BEKKERMAN R, 2003, V3, P1183, J MACHINE LEARNING R; BERGMARK D,
2000, 20001821 CSTR CORN D; BERGMARK D, 2001, V35, P1, SIGIR FORUM;
BRADSHAW S, 2001, NWUCS017; BRADSHAW S, 2002, THESIS NW U; BRADSHAW S,
2003, P499, P 7 EUR C RES ADV TE; BRIN S, 1998, P107, P 7 INT WORLD WID
WE; CHIK FCY, 2005, V3513, P203, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; COUNCILL IG, 2008,
P LANG RES EV C LREC; DASH M, 2000, P110, P 4 PAC AS C KNOWL D; DHILLON
I, 2004, P73, SURVEY TEXT MINING; DHILLON IS, 2007, V29, P1944, IEEE T
PATTERN ANAL; DUMAIS S, 1998, P148, P 7 INT C INF KNOWL; ELKISS A, 2008,
V59, P51, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; FURNAS GW, 1987, V30, P964, COMMUN ACM;
GABRILOVICH E, 2006, P1301, P 21 NAT C ART INT; GARFIELD E, 1964, V144,
P649, SCIENCE; GILES CL, 1998, P89, P 3 ACM C DIG LIB; GLOVER EJ, 2002,
P562, P 11 INT WORLD WID W; HARTIGAN JA, 1979, V28, P100, APPL STAT;
HAVELIWALA TH, 2002, P432, P 11 INT WORLD WID W; HUNTER L, 2006, V21,
P589, MOL CELL; KAO HY, 2002, P574, P 2002 ACM CIKM INT; KLEINBERG JM,
1999, V46, P604, J ACM; KROVETZ R, 1992, V10, P115, ACM T INFORM SYST;
KULL M, 2008, V9, P1, BIODATA MINING; LAWRENCE S, 1999, V32, P67, IEEE
COMPUT; LIU J, 2006, P405, P 2006 SIAM INT C DA; LIU T, 2003, P488, P INT
C MACH LEARN I; LIU X, 2004, P186, SIGIR 2004; MADEIRA SC, 2004, V1, P24,
IEEE ACM T COMPUT BI; MANNING CD, 2008, INTRO INFORM RETRIEV; MERCER RE,
2004, P77, P BIOLINK 2004 WORKS; MORAVCSIK MJ, 1975, V5, P86, SOC STUD
SCI; NAKOV P, 2004, P81, P SIGIR 04 WORKSH SE; NANBA H, 1999, P926, P 16
INT JOINT C ART; NANBA H, 2000, P117, P AM SOC INF SCI SIG; NANBA H,
2004, P195, P RIAO 2004; NANBA H, 2005, V3652, P391, LECT NOTES COMPUT
SC; PORTER MF, 1980, V14, P130, PROGRAM; POWLEY B, 2007, P 8 RIAO INT C
LARG; RITCHIE A, 2006, P25, P WORKSH CAN COMP LI; RITCHIE A, 2008, P213,
P 17 ACM C INF KNOWL; RITCHIE A, 2008, P211, P 30 EUR C INF RETR;
ROBERTSON S, 2004, P42, P 13 ACM INT C INF K; SALTON G, 1971, SMART
RETRIEVAL SYST; SIDDHARTHAN A, 2007, P316, P ANN C N AM CHAPT A; SLONIM
N, 2000, P208, P 23 ANN INT ACM SIG; SMALL H, 1985, V7, P391,
SCIENTOMETRICS; TANG B, 2004, P17, P WORKSH FEAT SEL DA; TEUFEL S, 2002,
V28, P409, COMPUT LINGUIST; TEUFEL S, 2006, P EMNLP 06; VOORHEES EM,
1986, V22, P465, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; WANG Y, 2002, P499, P 11 INT C INF
KNOWL; WANG Y, 2004, P DAT ENG WORKSH DEW; WHITE HD, 2004, V25, P89, APPL
LINGUIST; WYSE N, 1980, P415, PATTERN RECOGN; YANG Y, 1997, P412, P 14
INT C MACH LEAR|
NR- 60|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 1386-4564|
J9- INF RETR|
JI- Inf. Retr|
PD- APR|
PY- 2010|
VL- 13|
IS- 2|
BP- 101|
EP- 131|
DI- 10.1007/s10791-009-9108-x|
PG- 31|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems|
GA- 577KG|
JN- INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, 2010, V13, N2, P101-131|
UT- ISI:000276221300001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Durisin B; Calabretta G; Parmeggiani V|
AF- Durisin Boris; Calabretta, Giulia; Parmeggiani, Vanni|
TI- The Intellectual Structure of Product Innovation Research: A
Bibliometric Study of the Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19842004|
SO- JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- CITATION ANALYSIS; COCITATION ANALYSIS; CONSUMER RESEARCH; MARKETING
JOURNALS; SCIENCE; DISCIPLINE; PARTICULARISM; PERSPECTIVE; RELEVANCE;
NETWORKS|
AB- Product innovation research has matured substantially in the last two
decades. A great deal of knowledge has been produced on various aspects
of the discipline, so it is of interest to assess the state of the art
the scientific community has reached in this discipline and the route it
has taken. This perspective is investigated through a bibliometric study
of the Journal of Product Innovation Management (JPIM), arguably the most
important specialized journal on this topic. The work reviews all journal
paper contributions in JPIM from 1984 to 2004 in determined time frames,
assesses the citations contained in these papers, identifies how the
citations are related to the various topics of production innovation
research (topic-related citation variety, topic-related citation
consistency, variation in topic-related citation pattern), and offers a
retrospective examination of the evolution of the field. The overall
analysis of citations shows that most papers in JPIM cite at least one of
the top 50 works identified by this study This testifies to the strong
impact of the most influential works on the intellectual structure of
product innovation research. The observed citation pattern suggests that
the top 50 papers gained influence in product innovation research either
because they represent a relevant contribution on a fundamental topic
that already has been authoritatively studied or because they investigate
in a relevant manner a new topic. The paper suggests that JPIM might
benefit in its aim to consolidate its position as one of the top academic
business journals if published papers increasingly drew on the most
influential works to inform their research design and explicitly stated
the theoretical underpinnings they draw on in their research design
Overall, the analysis of the subperiods (1984-1988, 1989-1993, 1994-1998,
and 1999-2004) provides evidence for the maturation of new product
innovation research. Books covering a wide range of topics are replaced
by journal papers addressing a specific topic; over time, specific topics
emerge and become influential for the discipline's intellectual
structure; papers published in JPIM augment their methodological rigor
and increasingly address contingency factors. The paper also notes that
obtaining relevance for JPIM authors constitutes a necessary condition
for being considered by management researchers at large as an influential
contribution to product innovation research|
C1- [Durisin, Boris] Bocconi Univ, SDA Bocconi Sch Management, I-20136
Milan, Italy|
RP- Durisin, B, Bocconi Univ, SDA Bocconi Sch Management, Via Bocconi 8,
I-20136 Milan, Italy|
EM- boris.durisin@sdabocconi.it|
CD- ARMSTRONG JS, 1977, V14, P396, J MARKETING RES; BALDRIDGE DC, 2004,
V25, P1063, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; BARLEY SR, 2006, V49, P16, ACAD MANAGE J;
BARTUNEK JM, 2006, V49, P9, ACAD MANAGE J; BAUMGARTNER H, 2003, V67,
P123, J MARKETING; BIEMANS W, 2007, V24, P193, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG;
BLACKBURN RS, 1981, V66, P337, J APPL PSYCHOL; BOYD BK, 2005, V26, P841,
STRATEGIC MANAGE J; BURT RS, 1977, V56, P106, SOC FORCES; COTE JA, 1991,
V18, P402, J CONSUM RES; CRANE D, 1967, V2, P195, AM SOCIOL; CRANE D,
1972, INVISIBLE COLL DIFFU; CULNAN MJ, 1987, V11, P341, MIS QUART; CULNAN
MJ, 1990, V41, P453, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; DIBENEDETTO CA, 2010, V27, P1,
J PROD INNOVAT MANAG; EISENHARDT KM, 2007, V50, P25, ACAD MANAGE J;
GARFIELD E, 1979, CITATION INDEXING; GEPHART RP, 2006, V9, P417, ORGAN
RES METHODS; GOLDMAN A, 1979, V16, P485, J MARKETING RES; HOFFMAN DL,
1993, V19, P505, J CONSUM RES; LEONG SM, 1989, V15, P492, J CONSUM RES;
LINTON JD, 2004, V21, P123, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG; MERTON RK, 1968, V159,
P56, SCIENCE; MILLER D, 1997, V6, P71, J MANAGE INQUIRY; PASADEOS Y,
1998, V27, P53, J ADVERTISING; PFEFFER J, 1977, V55, P938, SOC FORCES;
PFEFFER J, 1998, HUMAN EQUATION BUILD; PILKINGTON A, 1999, V19, P7, INT J
OPER PROD MAN; PODSAKOFF PM, 2005, V26, P473, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; PRICE
DJ, 1963, LITTLE SCI BIG SCI; RAMOSRODRIGUEZ AR, 2004, V25, P981,
STRATEGIC MANAGE J; ROGERS RC, 1989, V74, P636, J APPL PSYCHOL; RYNES SL,
2001, V44, P340, ACAD MANAGE J; RYNES SL, 2005, V48, P9, ACAD MANAGE J;
STREMERSCH S, 2007, V71, P171, J MARKETING; SUTTON RI, 1995, V40, P371,
ADMIN SCI QUART; TAHAI A, 1999, V20, P279, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; TELLIS GJ,
1999, V36, P120, J MARKETING RES; THIEME J, 2007, V24, P214, J PROD
INNOVAT MANAG; USDIKEN B, 1995, V16, P503, ORGAN STUD; VERMEULEN F, 2005,
V48, P978, ACAD MANAGE J; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
ZUCKERMA.H, 1971, V9, P66, MINERVA|
NR- 43|
TC- 0|
PU- WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC|
PI- MALDEN|
PA- COMMERCE PLACE, 350 MAIN ST, MALDEN 02148, MA USA|
SN- 0737-6782|
J9- J PROD INNOVAT MANAGE|
JI- J. Prod. Innov. Manage|
PD- MAY|
PY- 2010|
VL- 27|
IS- 3|
BP- 437|
EP- 451|
PG- 15|
SC- Business; Engineering, Industrial; Management|
GA- 573CM|
JN- JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2010, V27, N3, P437-451|
UT- ISI:000275886000009 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Uysal OO|
AF- Uysal Oezguer Oezmen|
TI- Business Ethics Research with an Accounting Focus: A Bibliometric
Analysis from 1988 to 2007|
SO- JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- citation analysis; document co-citation analysis; social network
analysis; accounting ethics|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; CITATION
ANALYSIS; DECISION-MAKING; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURES; AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE;
INFORMATION-SCIENCE; NETWORK ANALYSIS; SOCIAL NETWORKS; MANAGEMENT|
AB- This article uses bibliometric analysis to empirically examine
research on business ethics published in a broad set of journals, focused
over the period 1988-2007. We consider those journals with an emphasis on
accounting. First, we determine the citation frequencies of documents to
identify the core articles in accounting research with an ethics focus as
well as the contributions of influential fields included in the research
sphere of these journals. We also employ document co-citation analysis to
analyze the scholarly communication patterns that exist within the realm
of the specified articles. Second, we utilize social network analysis
tools to profile the centrality features of the co-citation network of
these documents|
C1- Baskent Univ, TR-06490 Ankara, Turkey|
RP- Uysal, OO, Baskent Univ, TR-06490 Ankara, Turkey|
EM- ouysal@baskent.edu.tr|
CD- ABDOLMOHAMMADI MJ, 2003, V42, P71, J BUS ETHICS; ABDOLMOHAMMADI MJ,
2006, V69, P11, J BUS ETHICS; ACEDO FJ, 2005, V14, P619, INT BUS REV;
ACEDO FJ, 2006, V43, P957, J MANAGE STUD; AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J
AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ARMSTRONG MB, 1987, V5, P27, J ACCOUNTING ED; AYRES
FL, 1999, V18, P335, J ACCOUNTING PUBLIC; BAY D, 2002, V13, P159, CRIT
PERSPECT; BAYER AE, 1990, V41, P444, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BEATTIE V,
2006, V16, P1, BUSINESS FINANCIAL H; BERNARDI RA, 2004, V19, P145, ISSUES
ACCOUNTING ED; BERNARDI RA, 2005, V10, P63, RES PROFESSIONAL RES;
BERNARDI RA, 2007, V11, P47, RES PROFESSIONAL RES; BERNARDI RA, 2008,
V82, P157, J BUS ETHICS; BORGATTI SP, 2002, NETDRAW NETWORK VISU;
BORGATTI SP, 2002, UCINET WINDOWS SOFTW; BOYCE G, 2008, V19, P255, CRIT
PERSPECT; BRICKER R, 1991, V42, P27, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BROWN LD, 1985,
V23, P84, J ACCOUNTING RES; BUCHAN HF, 2005, V61, P165, J BUS ETHICS;
CASE DO, 2000, V51, P635, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; CHANDY PR, 1994, V25,
P715, J INT BUS STUD; CHARVET FF, 2008, V29, P47, J BUS LOGIST; CHEN TT,
2007, P470, IEEE INT CONF INF VI; COHEN JR, 2006, V68, P1, J BUS ETHICS;
COOPER DJ, 2005, V14, P373, EUROPEAN ACCOUNTING; CULNAN MJ, 1986, V32,
P156, MANAGE SCI; CULNAN MJ, 1987, V11, P341, MIS QUART; DEJORDY R, 2007,
V19, P239, FIELD METHOD; DELLAPORTAS S, 2006, V16, P7, AUSTR ACCOUNTING
REV; DELLAPORTAS S, 2006, V65, P391, J BUS ETHICS; EARLEY CE, 2004, V19,
P53, ISSUES ACCOUNTING ED; ELIAS RZ, 2006, V68, P83, J BUS ETHICS;
EMERSON TLN, 2007, V71, P73, J BUS ETHICS; EOM SB, 2009, AUTHOR
COCITATION AN; EVERETT J, 2005, V16, P415, CRIT PERSPECT; FLANAGAN J,
2007, V43, P488, ABACUS; FREEMAN LC, 1979, V1, P215, SOC NETWORKS; GAA J,
1996, V8, P12, BEHAV RES ACCOUNTI S; GAA JC, 2004, V19, P1, ISSUES
ACCOUNTING ED; GARFIELD E, 1979, V1, P359, SCIENTOMETRICS; GENDRON Y,
2006, V64, P169, J BUS ETHICS; GMUR M, 2003, V57, P27, SCIENTOMETRICS;
GREER L, 2006, V15, P259, BUSINESS ETHICS EURO; GREGOIRE DA, 2006, V30,
P333, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; GRIFFITH BC, 1974, V4, P339, SCI STUD; GUNZ S,
1998, V17, P1145, J BUS ETHICS; HANNEMAN RA, 2005, INTRO SOCIAL NETWORK;
HERRON TL, 2004, V14, P499, BUS ETHICS Q; HOFFMAN DL, 1993, V19, P505, J
CONSUM RES; HUSTED BW, 2008, V82, P293, J BUS ETHICS; JACKLING B, 2007,
V22, P928, MANAGERIAL AUDITING; JOHNSON B, 2007, V63, P609, J DOC;
KREUZMAN H, 2001, V51, P525, SCIENTOMETRICS; KRUSKAL JB, 1964, V29, P1,
PSYCHOMETRIKA; LAMPE JC, 1992, V11, P33, AUDITING-J PRACT T S; LEE YD,
2008, V2, P43, J INF TECHNOL; LEITSCH D, 2006, V15, P135, ACCOUNTING ED;
LEYDESDORFF L, 1987, V11, P295, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2005, V56,
P769, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; LIBBY T, 2007, V71, P89, J BUS ETHICS; LOCKE J, 2001, V36, P223,
INT J ACCOUNTING; LOEB SE, 1988, V3, P316, ISSUES ACCOUNTING ED; LOEB SE,
2007, V11, P1, RES PROFESSIONAL RES; MACROBERTS MH, 1989, V40, P342, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; MARION LS, 2001, V52, P297, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MARONEY
JJ, 2008, V20, P89, BEHAV RES ACCOUNTING; MCCAIN KW, 1986, V37, P111, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
MCCAIN KW, 1991, V42, P290, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 2005, V65,
P131, SCIENTOMETRICS; MCPHAIL K, 2003, V35, P349, BRIT ACCOUNTING REV;
MCRAE TW, 1974, V12, P80, J ACCOUNT RES; MELE D, 2005, V57, P97, J BUS
ETHICS; MILNE MJ, 2001, DEBATING ACCOUNTING; MINTZ SM, 2007, V11, P31,
RES PROFESSIONAL RES; MOMBERS C, 1985, V7, P341, SCIENTOMETRICS; OTTE E,
2002, V28, P441, J INF SCI; PATEL C, 2007, V4, P90, INT J ACCOUNTING AUD;
PERSSON O, 1994, V45, P31, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PILKINGTON A, 2006,
CITATION COCITATION; PILKINGTON A, 2006, V26, P1255, INT J OPER PROD MAN;
PILKINGTON A, 2008, V3, P63, INT J MALAGEMENT SCI; PILKINGTON A, 2008,
V19, P83, INT J SERV IND MANAG; PILKINGTON A, 2009, V27, P185, J OPER
MANAG; PONEMON L, 1990, V7, P227, CONTEMP ACCOUNT RES; PONEMON L, 1990,
V6, P199, ISSUES ACCOUNTING ED; PRESTON AM, 1995, V20, P507, ACCOUNT ORG
SOC; RAMOSRODRIGUEZ AR, 2004, V25, P981, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; RAVENSCROFT
S, 2004, V13, P7, ACCOUNTING ED S1; REITER SA, 2004, V14, P355, BUS
ETHICS Q; REST JR, 1979, DEV JUDGING MORAL IS; ROBERTSON CJ, 2008, V80,
P745, J BUS ETHICS; SAID YH, 2008, V52, P2177, COMPUT STAT DATA AN;
SATAVA D, 2006, V64, P271, J BUS ETHICS; SCOTT J, 1991, SOCIAL NETWORK
ANAL; SIKKA P, 2007, V16, P59, ACCOUNTING ED; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; SMALL H, 1999, V50,
P799, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMITH A, 2005, V62, P209, J BUS ETHICS; TAHAI
A, 1998, V34, P341, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; THOMAS CW, 2004, V19, P27,
ISSUES ACCOUNTING ED; THORNE L, 2000, V12, P139, BEHAV RES ACCOUNTING;
TREVINO LK, 1986, V11, P601, ACAD MANAGE REV; USDIKEN B, 1995, V16, P503,
ORGAN STUD; VARGASQUESADA B, 2007, VISUALIZING STRUCTUR; VELAYUTHAM S,
2003, V14, P483, CRIT PERSPECT; WADDOCK S, 2005, V20, P145, ISSUES
ACCOUNTING ED; WAKEFIELD R, 2008, V40, P228, BRIT ACCOUNTING REV;
WALDMANN E, 2000, V9, P23, ACCOUNTING ED; WASSERMAN S, 1994, SOCIAL
NETWORK ANAL; WELLMAN B, 2006, P1429, INT HDB VIRT LEARN; WHITE HD, 1981,
V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P1250, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WILLIAMS P,
2002, V2, P1, ACCOUNTING PUBLIC IN; YOUNG FW, 1987, MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCA;
YOUNG JJ, 2009, V20, P93, CRIT PERSPECT; ZHAO DZ, 2006, V42, P1578,
INFORM PROCESS MANAG|
NR- 121|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0167-4544|
J9- J BUS ETHICS|
JI- J. Bus. Ethics|
PD- APR|
PY- 2010|
VL- 93|
IS- 1|
BP- 137|
EP- 160|
DI- 10.1007/s10551-009-0187-9|
PG- 24|
SC- Business; Ethics|
GA- 574LT|
JN- JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, V93, N1, P137-160|
UT- ISI:000275991400009 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Upham SP; Small H|
AF- Upham S. Phineas; Small, Henry|
TI- Emerging research fronts in science and technology: patterns of new
knowledge development|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Innovation; Clusters; Emerging science; Research fronts|
ID- THIN-FILM TRANSISTORS; FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTORS; COCITATION ANALYSIS;
INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; GAMMA-SECRETASE; CO-CITATION; INTERDISCIPLINARY
RESEARCH; ORGANIC ELECTRONICS; STRUCTURAL ASPECTS; BUILDING-BLOCKS|
AB- Research fronts represent the most dynamic areas of science and
technology and the areas that attract the most scientific interest. We
construct a methodology to identify these fronts, and we use quantitative
and qualitative methodology to analyze and describe them Our methodology
is able to identify these fronts as they form-with potential use by
firms, venture capitalists, researchers, and governments looking to
identify emerging high-impact technologies. We also examine how science
and technology absorbs the knowledge developed in these fronts and find
that fronts which maximize impact have very different characteristics
than fronts which maximize growth, with consequences for the way science
develops over time|
C1- [Upham, S. Phineas] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104
USA; [Small, Henry] Thomson Reuters, Philadelphia, PA USA|
RP- Upham, SP, Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA|
EM- phin.upham.wg05@wharton.upenn.edu henry.small@thomsonReuters.com|
CD- AFZALI A, 2002, V124, P8812, J AM CHEM SOC; AMIR S, 1985, V8, P117,
SCIENTOMETRICS; ARUTYUNOV VV, 1992, V1, P24, NAUCHNOTEKHNICHESKAY;
BASTEROGIL M, 2003, V68, ARTN 123514, PHYS REV D; BIRNBAUM PH, 1981, V24,
P487, ACAD MANAGE J; BIRNBAUM PH, 1981, V27, P1279, MANAGE SCI; BIRNBAUM
PH, 1981, V13, P5, SRA J SOC RES ADM; BOYACK KW, 2003, V54, P447, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; BRAAM RR, 1988, V13, P97, SCI TECHNOL; BRAAM RR, 1991,
V42, P233, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; CASTRO P, 2001, V33, P400, ENVIRON BEHAV;
CHEN CM, 2002, V39, P25, P ASIST ANNU; COLLINS R, 1997, V103, P275, AM J
SOCIOL; CRANE D, 1972, INVISIBLE COLL DIFFU; CUHLS K, 2003, V22, P93, J
FORECASTING; CULNAN MJ, 1986, V32, P156, MANAGE SCI; CULNAN MJ, 1987,
V11, P341, MIS QUART; CULNAN MJ, 1990, V41, P453, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
CUPERS P, 2001, V78, P1168, J NEUROCHEM; ERIKSEN HK, 2004, V605, P14,
ASTROPHYS J 1; FACCHETTI A, 2003, V15, P33, ADV MATER; FACCHETTI A, 2003,
V42, P3900, ANGEW CHEM INT EDIT; FALKINGHAM LT, 1998, V42, P97,
SCIENTOMETRICS; FLEMING L, 2001, V30, P1019, RES POLICY; GARFIELD E,
1965, V16, P130, NACHR DOK; GARFIELD E, 1988, V22, P3, CURRENT CONTENTS;
GARFIELD E, 2003, V54, P400, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; GITTELMAN M, 2003,
V18, P724, ORGAN SCI; GOTTSCHLICH N, 2001, V73, P2669, ANAL CHEM; HALIK
M, 2003, V15, P917, ADV MATER; HASSAN E, 2003, V54, P462, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; HIRSCHMAN AO, 1970, EXIT VOICE LOYALTY R; KUHN TS, 1970,
STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; LEEM JY, 2002, V277, P19236, J BIOL CHEM; LEISSRING
MA, 2002, V99, P4697, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; LIU RH, 2000, V9, P190, J
MICROELECTROMECH S; MCCAIN KW, 1987, V9, P41, LIBR INFORM SCI RES; MERTON
RK, 1968, SOCIAL THEORY SOCIAL; MERTON RK, 1972, SOCIOLOGY SCI; MILMAN
BL, 1993, V27, P53, SCIENTOMETRICS; MORRIS MW, 2000, V45, P737, ADMIN SCI
QUART; MURPHY AR, 2004, V126, P1596, J AM CHEM SOC; MURRAY F, 2005, NBER
AC SCI ENTR C; MUSHRUSH M, 2003, V125, P9414, J AM CHEM SOC; NARIN F,
1997, V26, P317, RES POLICY; OROMANER M, 1981, V3, P83, KNOWLEDGE
CREATION D; OSAREH F, 1996, V46, P217, LIBRI; PFEFFER J, 1978, EXTERNAL
CONTROL ORG; PODZOROV V, 2003, V83, P3504, APPL PHYS LETT; PONZI LJ,
2002, V55, P259, SCIENTOMETRICS; PRICE DD, 1961, SCI BABYLON; PRICE DD,
1963, BIG SCI LITTLE SCI; ROUSSEAU R, 2006, V1, P8, ISSI NEWSLETTER;
SHERAW CD, 2003, V15, P2009, ADV MATER; SISODIA SS, 2002, V3, P281, NAT
REV NEUROSCI; SMALL H, 1985, V7, P391, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1990,
P166, SCHOLARLY COMMUNICAT; SMALL H, 1997, V38, P275, SCIENTOMETRICS;
SMALL H, 1999, V48, P72, LIBR TRENDS; SMALL H, 2003, V54, P394, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; SMALL H, 2004, V60, P305, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL HG, 1977,
V7, P139, SOC STUD SCI; SMALL HG, 2005, V68, P595, SCIENTOMETRICS;
SULLIVAN D, 1977, V7, P223, SOC STUD SCI; TEGMARK M, 2003, V68, ARTN
123523, PHYS REV D; TRAJTENBERG M, 1990, V21, P172, RAND J ECON; WHITE
HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 67|
TC- 1|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- APR|
PY- 2010|
VL- 83|
IS- 1|
BP- 15|
EP- 38|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-009-0051-9|
PG- 24|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 567BN|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, V83, N1, P15-38|
UT- ISI:000275417400002 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Klavans R; Boyack KW|
AF- Klavans Richard; Boyack, Kevin W|
TI- Toward an objective, reliable and accurate method for measuring
research leadership|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Proceedings Paper|
CT- 10th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators|
CY- SEP 17-20, 2008|
CL- Vienna, AUSTRIA|
SP- Austrian Res Ctr GmbH|
HO- Univ Vienna|
DE- Co-citation analysis; Research leadership; National leadership;
Paradigms; Accuracy; Map of science; Science map; Competencies|
ID- SCIENCE; WORLD; CLASSIFICATION; INDICATORS; NATIONS; MAPS|
AB- We compare a new method for measuring research leadership with the
traditional method. Both methods are objective and reliable, utilize
standard citation databases, and are easily replicated. The traditional
method uses partitions of science based on journal categories, and has
been extensively used to measure national leadership patterns in science,
including those appearing in the NSF Science & Engineering Indicators
Reports and in prominent journals such as Science and Nature. Our new
method is based on co-citation techniques at the paper level. It was
developed with the specific intent of measuring research leadership at a
university, and was then extended to examine national patterns of
research leadership. A comparison of these two methods provides
compelling evidence that the traditional method grossly underestimates
research leadership in most countries. The new method more accurately
portrays the actual patterns of research leadership at the national
level|
C1- [Klavans, Richard] SciTech Strategies Inc, Berwyn, PA 19312 USA;
[Boyack, Kevin W.] SciTech Strategies Inc, Albuquerque, NM 87122 USA|
RP- Klavans, R, SciTech Strategies Inc, Berwyn, PA 19312 USA|
EM- rklavans@mapofscience.com kboyack@mapofscience.com|
CD- *NAT SCI BOARD, 2008, V1, 0801 NSB; *NAT SCI BOARD, 2008, V2, 0801A
NSB; BASSECOULARD E, 1999, V44, P323, SCIENTOMETRICS; BOYACK KW, 2009,
V79, P27, SCIENTOMETRICS; CALEROMEDINA C, 2008, V17, P71, RES EVALUAT;
FRANKLIN JJ, 1988, P325, HDB QUANTITATIVE STU; GLANZEL W, 2003, V56,
P357, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W, 2008, V74, P71, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL
W, 2009, V78, P165, SCIENTOMETRICS; HILL D, 2007, 07320 NSF DIV SCI RE;
KING DA, 2004, V430, P311, NATURE; KLAVANS R, 2006, V68, P475,
SCIENTOMETRICS; KLAVANS R, 2007, 11 INT C INT SOC SCI; KLAVANS R, 2008,
V75, P239, SCIENTOMETRICS; KLAVANS R, 2009, V60, P455, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2009, V78, P23, SCIENTOMETRICS; MARTIN S, 2008,
SAND20082936J; MAY RM, 1997, V275, P793, SCIENCE; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17,
SCI STUD; SMALL H, 1985, V8, P321, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1999, V50,
P799, J AM SOC INFORM SCI|
NR- 21|
TC- 2|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- MAR|
PY- 2010|
VL- 82|
IS- 3|
BP- 539|
EP- 553|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-010-0188-6|
PG- 15|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 563JK|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, V82, N3, P539-553|
UT- ISI:000275124700008 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Zhang L; Janssens F; Liang LM; Glanzel W|
AF- Zhang Lin; Janssens, Frizo; Liang, Liming; Glanzel, Wolfgang|
TI- Journal cross-citation analysis for validation and improvement of
journal-based subject classification in bibliometric research|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Proceedings Paper|
CT- 10th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators|
CY- SEP 17-20, 2008|
CL- Vienna, AUSTRIA|
SP- Austrian Res Ctr GmbH|
HO- Univ Vienna|
DE- Journal cross-citation; Cluster analysis; Mapping of science; Subject
classification|
ID- COCITATION ANALYSIS; SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS; SCIENCE; NETWORKS|
AB- The objective of this study is to use a clustering algorithm based on
journal cross-citation to validate and to improve the journal-based
subject classification schemes. The cognitive structure based on the
clustering is visualized by the journal cross-citation network and three
kinds of representative journals in each cluster among the communication
network have been detected and analyzed. As an existing reference system
the 15-field subject classification by Glanzel and Schubert
(Scientometrics 56:55-73, 2003) has been compared with the clustering
structure|
C1- [Zhang, Lin; Janssens, Frizo; Glanzel, Wolfgang] Katholieke Univ
Leuven, Dept MSI, Ctr R&D Monitoring, Leuven, Belgium; [Zhang, Lin;
Liang, Liming] Dalian Univ Technol, WISE Lab, Dalian, Peoples R China;
[Janssens, Frizo] Katholieke Univ Leuven, ESAT SCD, Leuven, Belgium;
[Liang, Liming] Henan Normal Univ, Inst Sci Technol & Soc, Xinxiang,
Peoples R China; [Glanzel, Wolfgang] Hungarian Acad Sci, IRPS, Budapest,
Hungary|
RP- Glanzel, W, Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept MSI, Ctr R&D Monitoring,
Leuven, Belgium|
EM- wolfgang.glanzel@econ.kuleuven.ac.be|
CD- BAEZAYATES R, 1999, MODERN INFORM RETRIE; BASSECOULARD E, 1999, V44,
P323, SCIENTOMETRICS; BATAGELJ V, 2002, V2265, P477, LECT NOTES COMPUT
SC; BOLLEN J, 2006, V69, P669, SCIENTOMETRICS; BORNER K, 2003, V37, P179,
ANNU REV INFORM SCI; BOYACK KW, 2005, V64, P351, SCIENTOMETRICS; BRAAM
RR, 1991, V42, P233, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BRIN S, 1998, V30, P107, COMPUT
NETWORKS ISDN; CARPENTER MP, 1973, V24, P425, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; DING
Y, 2000, V47, P55, SCIENTOMETRICS; GARFIELD E, 1998, 150 ANN M AAAS PHIL;
GLANZEL W, 2003, V56, P357, SCIENTOMETRICS; HATCHER E, 2004, LUCENE
ACTION; HICKS D, 1987, V17, P295, SOC STUD SCI; JAIN A, 1988, ALGORITHMS
CLUSTERIN; JANSSENS F, 2007, THESIS KATHOLICKE U; JANSSENS F, 2008, V75,
P607, SCIENTOMETRICS; JANSSENS F, 2009, V45, P683, INFORM PROCESS MANAG;
JARNEVING B, 2005, THESIS U COLL BORAS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2002, V53, P987, J
AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V60, P371, J DOC; LEYDESDORFF L,
2004, V60, P159, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P601, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2008, V60, P348, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN
KW, 1991, V42, P290, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1998, V41, P389,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MORRIS TA, 1998, V5, P448, J AM MED INFORM ASSN; NARIN F,
1972, V23, P323, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; NARIN F, 1976, EVALUATIVE
BIBLIOMET; PRICE DJD, 1965, V149, P510, SCIENCE; ROUSSEEUW PJ, 1987, V20,
P53, J COMPUT APPL MATH; TSAY MY, 2003, V57, P7, SCIENTOMETRICS; ZHANG L,
2009, V81, P821, SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 33|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- MAR|
PY- 2010|
VL- 82|
IS- 3|
BP- 687|
EP- 706|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-010-0180-1|
PG- 20|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 563JK|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, V82, N3, P687-706|
UT- ISI:000275124700018 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Chang CKN; Breitzman A|
AF- Chang Connie K. N; Breitzman, Anthony|
TI- Using patents prospectively to identify emerging, high-impact
technological clusters|
SO- RESEARCH EVALUATION|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- INDICATORS|
AB- This article describes and illustrates the usefulness of a
sophisticated methodological tool based on patents, citations, cocitations, and clustering of patents for identifying emerging, highimpact technology clusters and trends. This tool can provide a greater
understanding of how emerging, technological clusters form from previous
research conducted; the organizations involved; inventors' locations; the
core technologies being built upon and technologies currently being
pursued; and an early indication of commercial applications that may
result. This tool should be of value to program managers interested in
tracing the results of funded research projects to economic outcomes and
societal impacts; policy-makers interested in fostering regional
innovation; and evaluators who are curious how patents can be used as a
prospective tool for innovative activity. This article covers in broad
strokes the development and validation of the tool, its limitations, key
results and highlights from analyzing the top 100 emerging technological
clusters, and concluding thoughts|
C1- [Breitzman, Anthony] 1790 Analyt, Haddonfield, NJ 08033 USA|
RP- Chang, CKN, 5440 Nevada Ave NW, Washington, DC 20015 USA|
EM- connie_chang_2000@yahoo.com abreitzman@1790analytics.com|
CD- ALBERT MB, 1991, V20, P251, RES POLICY; BREITZMAN A, 2001, US,
6175824; BREITZMAN A, 2007, EMERGING CLUST UNPUB; BREITZMAN AF, 2002,
V28, P187, J INFORM SCI; CARPENTER M, 1981, V4, P160, WORLD PATENT
INFORMA; NARIN F, 1987, V16, P143, RES POLICY; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265,
J AM SOC INFORM SCI; THOMAS P, 2004, US, 6832211|
NR- 8|
TC- 0|
PU- BEECH TREE PUBLISHING|
PI- GUILDFORD|
PA- 10 WATFORD CLOSE,, GUILDFORD GU1 2EP, SURREY, ENGLAND|
SN- 0958-2029|
J9- RES EVALUAT|
JIPDPYVLISBPEPDIPGSCGAJNUT-
Res. Evaluat|
DEC|
2009|
18|
5|
357|
364|
10.3152/095820209X481066|
8|
Information Science & Library Science|
561ND|
RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2009, V18, N5, P357-364|
ISI:000274983400003 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Astrom F|
AF- Astrom Fredrik|
TI- THE VISIBILITY OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND LIBRARY SCIENCE RESEARCH IN
BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING OF THE LIS FIELD|
SO- LIBRARY QUARTERLY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; DOCUMENTATION|
AB- The relation between information science and library science has been
debated for decades, and even attempts at utilizing methods generally
acknowledged as robust for the purpose of mapping research fields have
yielded results with large variations. Therefore, a set of citation
analyses was performed, comparing the results of analyses on information
science and library science separately but also as a joint library and
information science ( LIS) field. Although there are large differences,
not the least in the author-level analyses, the patterns in the citation
data support the concept of a joint LIS field with information science
and library science being the two main subfields; many of the variations
in the analyses are caused by the interdisciplinary nature of LIS,
reflected in, for example, variations in citation practices in the
different subfields|
C1- [Astrom, Fredrik] Lund Univ Lib, Head Off, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden;
[Astrom, Fredrik] Univ Technol Sydney, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia|
RP- Astrom, F, Lund Univ Lib, Head Off, POB 134, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden|
EM- fredrik.astrom@lub.lu.se|
CD- ASTROM F, 2002, P185, EMERGING FRAMEWORKS; BUCKLAND M, 1996, V32,
P63, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; INGWERSEN P, 1992, V42, P99, LIBRI; KESSLER
MM, 1963, V14, P10, AM DOC; MCCAIN KW, 1986, V37, P111, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1991,
V42, P290, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MOYAANEGON F, 2006, V32, P63, J INF SCI;
PERSSON O, 1994, V45, P31, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PERSSON O, 2001, V50,
P339, SCIENTOMETRICS; PERSSON O, 2009, V5, P9, E ZINE ISSI S; SARACEVIC
T, 1999, V50, P1051, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SCHNEIDER JW, 2007, V58, P1586,
J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; SHERA JH, 1968, V22, P58, UNESCO B LIBRARIES;
VAKKARI P, 1994, V18, P1, ADV LIBRARIANSHIP; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE
HD, 2003, V54, P1250, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 18|
TC- 0|
PUPIPASNJ9JIPDPYVLISBPEPPGSCGAJNUT-
UNIV CHICAGO PRESS|
CHICAGO|
1427 E 60TH ST, CHICAGO, IL 60637-2954 USA|
0024-2519|
LIBR QUART|
Libr. Q|
APR|
2010|
80|
2|
143|
159|
17|
Information Science & Library Science|
556QL|
LIBRARY QUARTERLY, 2010, V80, N2, P143-159|
ISI:000274606100002 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Nolin J; Astrom F|
AF- Nolin Jan; Astrom, Fredrik|
TI- Turning weakness into strength: strategies for future LIS|
SO- JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Research work; Information science; Uncertainty management|
ID- INFORMATION-SCIENCE RESEARCH; AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; DOMAINANALYSIS; LIBRARY; INSTITUTIONALIZATION; DOCUMENTATION; PERSPECTIVE;
DISCIPLINE; USER|
AB- Purpose - LIS has been described as a fragmented field in crisis,
with an increased competition from other fields; and lacking in
development of theories. The purpose of this paper is to articulate a
strategy in which the perceived weakness can be seen as a source of
strength Design/methodology/approach - The text builds mostly on
reflections on meta-theoretical and science-organisation literature. Ten
distinct problems for the research field are identified and discussed in
order to provide a viable strategy for the future Findings - While it is
common to suggest a convergent movement toward the idealised
characteristics of the strong research discipline as a recipe against
fragmentation, a strong convergent movement is suggested that feeds off
the fragmented character of the field. What is commonly perceived as a
weakness, the multidimensional character of the field, can be translated
into a strategic resource Originality/value - The paper provides a fresh
perspective on the strategic situation of LIS|
C1- [Nolin, Jan] Univ Boras, Swedish Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Boras,
Sweden; [Astrom, Fredrik] Univ Technol Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007,
Australia; [Astrom, Fredrik] Lund Univ Lib, Lund, Sweden|
RP- Nolin, J, Univ Boras, Swedish Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Boras, Sweden|
EM- Jan.Nolin@hb.se|
CD- ASTROM F, 2004, P1, AWARE RESPONSIBLE; ASTROM F, 2006, SOCIAL
INTELLECTUAL; ASTROM F, 2007, V58, P947, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ASTROM F,
2008, V64, P721, J DOC; BECHER T, 2001, ACAD TRIBES TERRITOR; BELKIN NJ,
1990, V16, P11, J INFORM SCI; BRIER S, 2003, V1, P71, TRIPPLEC; BROOKES
BC, 1974, P42, INFORMATICS 2; BUCKLAND M, 1996, V32, P63, INFORM PROCESS
MANAG; CRONIN B, 1990, V16, P381, J INF SCI; CRONIN B, 2008, V59, P551, J
AM SOC INF SCI TEC; DALRYMPLE PW, 2001, V23, P155, LIBR INFORM SCI RES;
DEJONG T, 1996, V31, P105, EDUC PSYCHOL; DERVIN B, 1989, V39, P216, J
COMMUN; ETZIONI A, 1969, SEMIPROFESSIONS THEI; EVERTSSON L, 2002, THESIS
U UMEA UMEA; FISHER D, 1990, P98, THEORIES SCI SOC; FRICKEL S, 2005, V70,
P204, AM SOCIOL REV; FUCHS S, 1993, V71, P933, SOC FORCES; FUNTOWICZ SO,
1993, V25, P735, FUTURES; GIBBONS M, 1994, NEW PRODUCTION SCI K; HARRIS
MH, 1986, V34, P515, LIBR TRENDS; HJORLAND B, 1995, V46, P400, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; HJORLAND B, 2002, V53, P257, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; HJORLAND
B, 2002, V58, P422, J DOC; INGWERSEN P, 1992, V42, P99, LIBRI; INGWERSEN
P, 2005, TURN INTEGRATION INF; KLEIN JT, 1990, INTERDISCIPLINARITY; KUHN
T, 1970, STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; LARSEN JB, 2005, P232, EUROPEAN
CURRICULUM; MCCREADIE M, 1999, V35, P45, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; MILLER GA,
2003, V7, P141, TRENDS COGN SCI; NOLIN J, 2007, V12, INFORM RES; PALFREY
J, 2008, BORN DIGITAL UNDERST; PALMER CL, 1996, THESIS U ILLINOIS UR;
PETTIGREW KE, 2001, V52, P62, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; PINCH T, 1993, V18,
P511, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL; RAYWARD WB, 1997, V48, P289, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; RAYWARD WB, 2004, P1, HIST HERITAGE SCI TE; SARACEVIC T, 1992, P5,
CONCEPTIONS LIB INFO; SARACEVIC T, 1999, V50, P1051, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
SCHREIBER T, 2006, P9, BIBLIOTEKARERNE PROF; SUNDIN O, 2005, P293,
THEORIES INFORM BEHA; SUNDIN O, 2006, P77, BIBLIOTEKARERNE PROF; TALJA S,
2007, V12, INFORM RES; VAKKARI P, 1994, V18, P1, ADV LIBRARIANSHIP;
VAKKARI P, 1996, V21, P25, INT FORUM INFORM DOC; WARNER J, 2001, V71,
P243, LIBR QUART; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITLEY
R, 2000, INTELLECTUAL SOCIAL; WILSON TD, 2002, V43, P296, J ED LIB INFORM
SCI; WILSON TD, 2003, V29, P445, J INFORM SCI; WITZ A, 1992, PROFESSIONS
PATRIARC; WOOLGAR S, 1991, V16, P20, SCI TECHNOL; WOUTERS P, 2007, 6 C
CONC LIB INF SCI; ZHAO DZ, 2008, V59, P916, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ZWEIZIG
DL, 1976, V12, P48, DREXEL LIB Q|
NR- 57|
TC- 0|
PU- EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED|
PI- BINGLEY|
PA- HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND|
SN- 0022-0418|
J9- J DOC|
JI- J. Doc|
PY- 2010|
VL- 66|
IS- 1|
BP- 7|
EP- 27|
DI- 10.1108/00220411011016344|
PG- 21|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 557DI|
JN- JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2010, V66, N1, P7-27|
UT- ISI:000274648700002 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Rafols I; Meyer M|
AF- Rafols Ismael; Meyer, Martin|
TI- Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity:
case studies in bionanoscience|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Interdisciplinary research; Nanotechnology; Nanoscience; Diversity;
Indicators; Network analysis|
ID- CROSS-DISCIPLINARY; RESEARCH AREAS; SCIENCE; COCITATION;
NANOTECHNOLOGY; CITATION; BIONANOTECHNOLOGY; COLLABORATION; STRATEGIES;
CATEGORIES|
AB- The multidimensional character and inherent conflict with
categorisation of interdisciplinarity makes its mapping and evaluation a
challenging task. We propose a conceptual framework that aims to capture
interdisciplinarity in the wider sense of knowledge integration, by
exploring the concepts of diversity and coherence Disciplinary diversity
indicators are developed to describe the heterogeneity of a bibliometric
set viewed from predefined categories, i.e. using a top-down approach
that locates the set on the global map of science. Network coherence
indicators are constructed to measure the intensity of similarity
relations within a bibliometric set, i.e. using a bottom-up approach,
which reveals the structural consistency of the publications network. We
carry out case studies on individual articles in bionanoscience to
illustrate how these two perspectives identify different aspects of
interdisciplinarity: disciplinary diversity indicates the large-scale
breadth of the knowledge base of a publication; network coherence
reflects the novelty of its knowledge integration. We suggest that the
combination of these two approaches may be useful for comparative studies
of emergent scientific and technological fields, where new and
controversial categorisations are accompanied by equally contested claims
of novelty and interdisciplinarity|
C1- [Rafols, Ismael; Meyer, Martin] Univ Sussex, SPRU Sci & Technol
Policy Res, Brighton BN1 9QE, E Sussex, England; [Meyer, Martin]
Katholieke Univ Leuven, Steunpunt O&O Statistieken, Leuven, Belgium;
[Meyer, Martin] Helsinki Univ Technol, Helsinki, Finland|
RP- Rafols, I, Univ Sussex, SPRU Sci & Technol Policy Res, Brighton BN1
9QE, E Sussex, England|
EM- i.rafols@sussex.ac.uk|
FU- EU ; Daiwa Anglo-Japanese Foundation FX This research was supported
by an EU postdoctoral Marie-Curie Fellowship to IR, and the Daiwa AngloJapanese Foundation. We benefited from discussions with J. Glaser, L.
Leydesdorff, F. Morillo, A. L Porter, and SPRU colleagues S. Katz, R.
Kempener, W. E. Steinmueller and A. Stirling|
CD- *NAT AC, 2005, FAC INT RES; *R DEV COR TEAM, 2007, R LANG ENV STAT
COMP; AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BARJAK F, 2006,
TEAM DIVERSITY RES C; BATAGELJ V, 2008, PAJEK PROGRAM LARGE; BORDONS M,
2004, P437, HDB QUANTITATIVE SCI; BOURKE P, 1998, V26, P711, RES POLICY;
BOYACK KW, 2005, V64, P351, SCIENTOMETRICS; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; EGGHE L, 2003, V54, P193, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
HAVEMANN F, 2007, P860, 11 INT C INT SOC SCI; HELLSTEN I, 2007, V72,
P469, SCIENTOMETRICS; HOLLINGSWORTH JR, 2006, P423, INNOVATION SCI I CHA;
KISS IZ, CAN EPIDEMIC M UNPUB; KLAVANS R, 2008, MAP SCI; KLEIN JT, 2000,
P3, PRACTISING INTERDISC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2007, V58, P1303, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2007, V70, P693, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L,
2009, V60, P348, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MEYER M, 1998, V42, P195,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MORILLO F, 2001, V51, P203, SCIENTOMETRICS; MORILLO F,
2003, V54, P1237, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MOYAANEGON F, 2004, V61, P129,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MOYAANEGON F, 2007, V58, P2167, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
NESTA L, 2005, V53, P123, J IND ECON; OTTE E, 2002, V28, P441, J INF SCI;
PERSSON O, 2008, BIBEXCEL TOOL BOX PR; PORTER AL, 1985, V8, P161,
SCIENTOMETRICS; PORTER AL, 2006, V15, P187, RES EVALUAT; PORTER AL, 2007,
V72, P117, SCIENTOMETRICS; PURVIS A, 2000, V405, P212, NATURE; RAFOLS I,
2007, V20, P395, INNOVATION-ABINGDON; RAFOLS I, 2007, V70, P633,
SCIENTOMETRICS; RAFOLS I, 2009, V60, P1823, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; RAO CR,
1982, V21, P24, THEOR POPUL BIOL; ROUSSEAU R, 2000, P72, RES U
EVALUATION; SANZMENENDEZ L, 2001, V10, P47, RES EVALUAT; SCHARNHORST A,
1998, V43, P95, SCIENTOMETRICS; SCHMIDT M, 2006, P INT WORKSH WEB INF;
SCHUMMER J, 2004, V59, P425, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL HG, 1977, V7, P139, SOC STUD SCI; STIRLING A,
1998, EC ANAL DIVERSITY SP; STIRLING A, 2007, V4, P707, J R SOC
INTERFACE; VANDENBESSELAAR P, 1996, V47, P415, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
VANDENBESSELAAR P, 2001, P705, P 8 INT C SCI INF IS; VANLEEUWEN T, 2000,
V9, P183, RES EVALUAT; VANRAAN AFJ, 2002, V31, P611, RES POLICY; WEINGART
P, 2000, PRACTISING INTERDISC; ZITT M, 2005, V3, P38, MEASUREMENT
INTERDIS|
NR- 50|
TC- 3|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- FEB|
PY- 2010|
VL- 82|
IS- 2|
BP- 263|
EP- 287|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-009-0041-y|
PG- 25|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 550ER|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, V82, N2, P263-287|
UT- ISI:000274111600005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Perianes-Rodriguez A; Olmeda-Gomez C; Moya-Anegon F|
AF- Perianes-Rodriguez Antonio; Olmeda-Gomez, Carlos; Moya-Anegon, Felix|
TI- Detecting, identifying and visualizing research groups in coauthorship networks|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Scientific collaboration; Research groups; Coauthorship; Network
analysis; Information visualization|
ID- RESEARCH COLLABORATION; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; INTELLECTUAL SPACE;
PRODUCTIVITY; COCITATION; GRAPHS; SIZE|
AB- The present paper proposes a method for detecting, identifying and
visualizing research groups. The data used refer to nine Carlos III
University of Madrid departments, while the findings for the
Communication Technologies Department illustrate the method. Structural
analysis was used to generate co-authorship networks. Research groups
were identified on the basis of factorial analysis of the raw data matrix
and similarities in the choice of co-authors. The resulting networks
distinguished the researchers participating in the intra-departmental
network from those not involved and identified the existing research
groups. Fields of research were characterized by the Journal of Citation
Report subject category assigned to the bibliographic references cited in
the papers written by the author-factors. The results, i.e., the graphic
displays of the structures of the socio-centric and co-authorship
networks and the strategies underlying collaboration among researchers,
were later discussed with the members of the departments analyzed. The
paper constitutes a starting point for understanding and characterizing
networking within research institutions|
C1- [Perianes-Rodriguez, Antonio; Olmeda-Gomez, Carlos] Univ Carlos III
Madrid, SCImago Res Grp, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Madrid 28903, Spain;
[Moya-Anegon, Felix] Univ Granada, Dept Informat Sci, Granada, Spain;
[Perianes-Rodriguez, Antonio; Olmeda-Gomez, Carlos; Moya-Anegon, Felix]
Univ Granada, SCImago Res Grp, Granada, Spain|
RP- Perianes-Rodriguez, A, Univ Carlos III Madrid, SCImago Res Grp, Dept
Lib & Informat Sci, C Madrid 128, Madrid 28903, Spain|
EM- antonio.perianes@uc3m.es|
CD- *W3C, 2005, SCAL VECT GRAPH SVG; BALAKRISHNAN H, 2006, P280, P ACM SE
REG C; BEAVER DD, 1978, V1, P65, SCIENTOMETRICS; BORDONS M, 1995, P83, P
5 BIENN C INT SOC; BORDONS M, 1995, V5, P137, RES EVALUAT; BORDONS M,
1997, V40, P423, SCIENTOMETRICS; CALERO C, 2006, V66, P365,
SCIENTOMETRICS; CHEN C, 1999, P449, IEEE VISUALIZATION; CHEN C, 1999,
P18, P 1999 INT C INF VIS; CHEN C, 2001, V34, P65, IEEE COMPUT; CHEN CM,
2001, V52, P315, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; COHEN JE, 1991, V20, P395,
SCIENTOMETRICS; DING Y, 2000, V47, P55, SCIENTOMETRICS; DONETTI L, 2004,
ARTN P10012, J STAT MECH-THEO OCT; EISENBERG JD, 2002, SVG ESSENTIALS;
ETZKOWITZ H, 2003, V32, P109, RES POLICY; GALVEZ C, 2006, V69, P323,
SCIENTOMETRICS; GALVEZ C, 2007, V70, P3, SCIENTOMETRICS; GEROIMENKO V,
2005, VISUALIZING INFORM U; HARSANYI MA, 1993, V15, P325, LIBR INFORM SCI
RES; HERREROSOLANA V, 2006, V11, INFORM RES; ICHISE R, 2006, NEW
FRONTIERS ARTIFI; KAMADA T, 1989, V31, P7, INFORM PROCESS LETT; KATZ JS,
1992, THESIS U SUSSEX BRIG; KATZ JS, 1997, V26, P1, RES POLICY; LAUDEL G,
2002, V11, P3, RES EVALUAT; LIU XM, 2005, V41, P1462, INFORM PROCESS
MANAG; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MELIN G, 1996,
V36, P363, SCIENTOMETRICS; MIQUEL JF, 1989, V20, P116, RECHERCHE; MONFORT
N, 2004, MSCIS0418 PENNS STAT; MORENO JL, 1953, WHO SHALL SURVIVE FD;
MOYAANEGON F, 1998, V42, P229, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOYAANEGON F, 2004, V61,
P129, SCIENTOMETRICS; NEWMAN MEJ, 2004, V38, P321, EUR PHYS J B; NEWMAN
MEJ, 2004, V101, P5200, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; NOYONS ECM, 1999, V46,
P591, SCIENTOMETRICS; PALLA G, 2005, V435, P814, NATURE; RADICCHI F,
2004, V101, P2658, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; REICHARDT J, 2004, V93, ARTN
218701, PHYS REV LETT; SEGLEN PO, 2000, V49, P125, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMITH
D, 2000, COLLABORATIVE APPROA; SUBRAMANYAM K, 1983, V6, P33, J INF SCI;
VARGASQUESADA B, 2007, VISUALIZING STRUCTUR; VONTUNZELMANN N, 2003,
EFFECTS SIZE RES PER; VUCKOVICDEKIC L, 2003, V11, P211, ARCH ONCOL; WHITE
HD, 1997, V32, P99, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; WU F, 2004, V38, P331, EUR PHYS
J B; ZULUETA MA, 1999, V8, P111, RES EVALUAT; ZULUETA MA, 1999, V23,
P333, REV ESPANOLA DOCUMEN|
NR- 50|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- FEB|
PY- 2010|
VL- 82|
IS- 2|
BP- 307|
EP- 319|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-009-0040-z|
PG- 13|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 550ER|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, V82, N2, P307-319|
UT- ISI:000274111600007 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Gingras Y|
AF- Gingras Yves|
TI- Revisiting the "Quiet Debut" of the Double Helix: A Bibliometric and
Methodological note on the "Impact" of Scientific Publications|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF BIOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- DNA; JD Watson; Francis Crick; bibliometrics; co-citation mapping;
citation analysis; scientific impact; Jacques Monod; Francois Jacob|
ID- NETWORKS; CITATION; WATSON; CRICK; TIME; DNA|
AB- The object of this paper is two-fold: first, to show that contrary to
what seem to have become a widely accepted view among historians of
biology, the famous 1953 first Nature paper of Watson and Crick on the
structure of DNA was widely cited - as compared to the average paper of
the time - on a continuous basis from the very year of its publication
and over the period 1953-1970 and that the citations came from a wide
array of scientific journals. A systematic analysis of the bibliometric
data thus shows that Watson's and Crick's paper did in fact have
immediate and long term impact if we define "impact" in terms of
comparative citations with other papers of the time. In this precise
sense it did not fall into "relative oblivion" in the scientific
community. The second aim of this paper is to show, using the case of the
reception of the Watson-Crick and Jacob-Monod papers as concrete
examples, how large scale bibliometric data can be used in a
sophisticated manner to provide information about the dynamic of the
scientific field as a whole instead of limiting the analysis to a few
major actors and generalizing the result to the whole community without
further ado|
C1- Univ Quebec, Dept Hist, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada|
RP- Gingras, Y, Univ Quebec, Dept Hist, CP 8888,Suc Ctr Ville, Montreal,
PQ H3C 3P8, Canada|
EM- gingras.yves@uqam.ca|
CD- AHMED T, 2004, V61, P147, SCIENTOMETRICS; BORGATTI SP, 2002, NETDRAW
GRAPH VISUAL; BORGATTI SP, 2002, UCINET WINDOWS SOFTW; BOURDIEU P, 2004,
SCI SCI REFLEXIVITY; CRANE D, 1972, INVISIBLE COLL DIFFU; DECHADAREVIAN
S, 2002, DESIGNS LIFE MOL BIO; DECHADAREVIAN S, 2006, V39, P707, J HIST
BIOL; DEICHMANN U, 2004, V34, P207, HIST STUD PHYS BIO 2; ELKIN LO, 2003,
V56, P42, PHYS TODAY; FREEMAN LC, 1979, V1, P215, SOC NETWORKS; GARFIELD
E, 1979, P81, CITATION INDEXING; GARFIELD E, 2003, V22, P183, INFORM
TECHNOL LIBR; GINGRAS Y, 2007, P314, P 11 INT C INT SOC S; GINGRAS Y,
2008, V46, P75, HIST SCI 1; GMUR M, 2003, V57, P27, SCIENTOMETRICS;
LAFOLLETTE MC, 1990, MAKING SCI OUR OWN P; LARIVIERE V, 2008, V59, P288,
J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LAWRENCE PA, 2007, V17, R584, CURR BIOL; LINE MB,
1993, V41, P665, LIBR TRENDS; MADDOX B, 2002, R FRANKLIN DARK LADY;
MCCAIN KW, 2008, V59, P510, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MERTON RK, 1968, SOCIAL
THEORY SOCIAL; NELKIN D, 1994, SELLING SCI PRESS CO; OLBY R, 2003, V421,
P402, NATURE; SMALL HG, 1977, V7, P139, SOC STUD SCI; SMALL HG, 1978, V8,
P327, SOC STUD SCI; SNYDER H, 1998, V24, P431, J INFORM SCI; STRASSER BJ,
2003, V422, P803, NATURE; VANRAAN AFJ, 2004, V59, P461, SCIENTOMETRICS;
WALLACE ML, 2009, V60, P240, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WASSERMAN S, 1994,
SOCIAL NETWORKS ANAL; WINSTANLEY M, 1976, V6, P545, SOC STUD SCI;
WITKOWSKI JA, 1990, V13, P255, ESSAYS INFORM SCI; ZIPF GK, 1949, HUMAN
BEHAV PRINCIPL|
NR- 34|
TC- 1|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0022-5010|
J9- J HIST BIOL|
JI- J. Hist. Biol|
PD- FEB|
PY- 2010|
VL- 43|
IS- 1|
BP- 159|
EP- 181|
DI- 10.1007/s10739-009-9183-2|
PG- 23|
SC- Biology; History & Philosophy Of Science|
GA- 552UM|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF BIOLOGY, 2010, V43, N1, P159-181|
UT- ISI:000274319100005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Tseng HC; Duan CH; Tung HL; Kung HJ|
AF- Tseng Hsing-Chau; Duan, Chi-Hsiang; Tung, Hui-Lien; Kung, Hsiang-Jui|
TI- Modern Business Ethics Research: Concepts, Theories, and
Relationships|
SO- JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- business ethics; intellectual structure; citation analysis; cocitation analysis; social network analysis|
ID- CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE; UNETHICAL DECISION BEHAVIOR;
STAKEHOLDER THEORY; MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATIONS; COCITATION; AUTHORS;
ISSUES|
AB- The main purpose of this study is to explore and map the intellectual
structure of business ethics studies during 1997-2006 by analyzing 85,000
cited references of 3,059 articles from three business ethics related
journals in SSCI and SCI databases. In this article, co-citation analysis
and social network analysis techniques are used to research intellectual
structure of the business ethics literature. We are able to identify the
important publications and the influential scholars as well as the
correlations among these publications by analyzing citation and cocitation. Three factors emerged in this study are: (1) ethical/unethical
decision making, (2) corporate governance and firm performance, and (3)
ethical principles and code of conduct|
C1- [Tseng, Hsing-Chau; Duan, Chi-Hsiang] Chung Jung Christian Univ,
Tainan, Taiwan; [Tung, Hui-Lien] Paine Coll, Augusta, GA 30901 USA;
[Kung, Hsiang-Jui] Georgia So Univ, Statesboro, GA 30460 USA|
RP- Tseng, HC, Chung Jung Christian Univ, Tainan, Taiwan|
EM- michael.hsiang@msa.hinet.net tungh@mail.paine.edu
hjkung@georgiasouthern.edu|
CD- *AM PSYCH ASS, 1992, V47, P1597, AM PSYCHOL; BORGATTI SP, 2002,
UCINET WINDOWS SOFTW; BRENNER SN, 1977, V55, P57, HARVARD BUS REV;
BRENNER SN, 1991, STAKEHOLDER THEORY F; CARROLL AB, 1979, V4, P497, ACAD
MANAGE REV; CARROLL AB, 1989, BUSINESS SOC ETHICS; CHANDY PR, 1994, V25,
P715, J INT BUS STUD; CHONKO LB, 1985, V13, P339, J BUS RES; CRONIN B,
1984, CITATION PROCESS ROL; DONALDSON T, 1994, V19, P252, ACAD MANAGE
REV; DONALDSON T, 1995, V20, P65, ACAD MANAGE REV; DUBINSKY AJ, 1989,
V19, P83, J BUS RES; FERRELL OC, 1985, V49, P87, J MARKETING; FERRELL OC,
1989, V9, P55, J MACROMARKETING; FORD RC, 1994, V13, P205, J BUS ETHICS;
FORSYTH DR, 1980, V39, P175, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL; FREDERICK WC, 1987, V9,
RES CORPORATE SOCIAL; FREEMAN RE, 1984, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT; FRITZSCHE
DJ, 1988, V8, P29, J MACROMARKETING; GARFIELD E, 1979, CITATION INDEXING
IT; GOODPASTER KE, 1991, V1, P53, BUSINESS ETHICS Q; HAIR JF, 1998,
MULTIVARIATE DATA AN; HEGARTY WH, 1978, V63, P451, J APPL PSYCHOL;
HEGARTY WH, 1979, V64, P331, J APPL PSYCHOL; HILL CWL, 1992, V29, P131, J
MANAGE STUD; HUNT SD, 1986, V6, P5, J MACROMARKETING; JENSEN MC, 1976,
V3, P305, J FINANC ECON; JONES TM, 1991, V16, P366, ACAD MANAGE REV;
JONES TM, 1995, V20, P404, ACAD MANAGE REV; KLEIN KJ, 1994, V19, P195,
ACAD MANAGE REV; LATOUR B, 1987, SCI ACTION FOLLOW SC; LIEVROUW LA, 1989,
V16, P615, COMMUN RES; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
MITCHELL RK, 1997, V22, P853, ACAD MANAGE REV; PILKINGTON A, 2006, V26,
P288, TECHNOVATION; REIDENBACH RE, 1990, V9, P639, J BUS ETHICS; REST JR,
1986, ADV RES THEORY; ROBIN DP, 1987, V51, P44, J MARKETING; RUEGGER D,
1992, V11, P179, J BUS ETHICS; SMALL H, 1993, V26, P5, SCIENTOMETRICS;
SMALL H, 1999, V50, P799, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL HG, 1978, V8, P327,
SOC STUD SCI; TAYLOR PW, 1975, PRINCIPLES ETHICS IN; TREVINO LK, 1986,
V11, P601, ACAD MANAGE REV; TREVINO LK, 1990, V75, P378, J APPL PSYCHOL;
VICTOR B, 1988, V33, P101, ADM SCI Q; VITELL SJ, 1993, V12, P753, J BUS
ETHICS; WEBER J, 1990, V43, P687, HUM RELAT; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; WOOD DJ, 1991, V16, P691, ACAD MANAGE REV; WOOD DJ,
1991, V17, P383, J MANAGE|
NR- 51|
TCPUPIPASNJ9JIPDPYVLISBPEPDIPGSCGAJNUT-
1|
SPRINGER|
DORDRECHT|
VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
0167-4544|
J BUS ETHICS|
J. Bus. Ethics|
FEB|
2010|
91|
4|
587|
597|
10.1007/s10551-009-0133-x|
11|
Business; Ethics|
549HP|
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, V91, N4, P587-597|
ISI:000274038600009 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Charvet FF; Cooper MC; Gardner JT|
AF- Charvet Francois F; Cooper, Martha C; Gardner, John T|
TI- THE INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT: A BIBLIOMETRIC
APPROACH|
SO- JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LOGISTICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Bibliometrics; Co-Citation analysis, Logistics; Production and
operations management; Purchasing; Supply chain management|
ID- CITATION ANALYSIS; COCITATION ANALYSIS; MARKETING JOURNALS; AUTHOR
COCITATION; CONSUMER RESEARCH; INFORMATION; CLASSIFICATION; PERSPECTIVE;
DISCIPLINE; INCENTIVES|
AB- Now that supply chain management has a two-decade research history,
it is possible to examine the literature to identify whether there is any
latent intellectual structure using bibliometric tools. The study applies
a citation and co-citation approach to reveal four clusters of research
that have emerged. One cluster has strong ties to the logistics field,
with primarily conceptual articles. A second cluster finds its roots in
operations research, and consists mainly of modeling articles. The
application of multidimensional scaling, cluster analysis, and factor
analysis on co-citations demonstrated a clearly identifiable structure.
The structure is examined and implications for the future development of
supply chain research are discussed|
C1- [Charvet, Francois F.; Cooper, Martha C.] Ohio State Univ, Fisher
Coll Business, Columbus, OH 43210 USA; [Cooper, Martha C.] AF Inst
Technol, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433 USA; [Gardner, John T.] SUNY Coll
Brockport, Brockport, NY 14420 USA|
RP- Charvet, FF, Ohio State Univ, Fisher Coll Business, Columbus, OH
43210 USA|
CD- ACEDO FJ, 2005, V14, P619, INT BUS REV; ARNTZEN BC, 1995, V25, P69,
INTERFACES; AUTRY CW, 2004, V4, P27, TRANSPORT J; AVIV Y, 2001, V47,
P1326, MANAGE SCI; BARMAN S, 2001, V19, P367, J OPER MANAG; BAUMGARTNER
H, 2003, V67, P123, J MARKETING; BECHTEL C, 1997, V8, P15, INT J
LOGISTICS MANA; BHASKARAN S, 1998, V29, P633, DECISION SCI; BREWER PC,
2000, V21, P75, J BUSINESS LOGISTICS; BROWN LD, 1985, V23, P84, J
ACCOUNTING RES; CARLEY K, 1989, COMPUTER ANAL QUALIT; COOPER CL, 1997,
V18, P1, J ORGAN BEHAV; COOPER MC, 1997, V8, P1, INT J LOGISTICS MANA;
COOPER MC, 2006, 17 ANN C PROD OP MAN; COTE JA, 1991, V18, P402, J CONSUM
RES; COURTIAL JP, 1984, V9, P47, J INFORM SCI; CROXTON KL, 2001, V12,
P13, INT J LOGISTICS MANA; CULNAN MJ, 1986, V32, P156, MANAGE SCI; CULNAN
MJ, 1987, V11, P340, MIS Q; EOM SB, 2003, AUTHOR COCITATION AN; GOH C,
1997, V15, P123, J OPERATIONS MANAGEM; HOFFMAN DL, 1993, V19, P505, J
CONSUM RES; HOULIHAN JB, 1985, V15, P22, INT J PHYS DISTRIB; HULT G,
1997, V19, P37, J MARKETING ED; HUNT SD, 1990, V54, P1, J MARKETING;
KERLINGER FN, 1973, FDN BEHAV RES; KRAUSE DR, 1998, V17, P39, J OPER
MANAG; KRIPPENDORF K, 1980, CONTENT ANAL INTRO I; KRUSKAL JB, 1978,
MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCA; KUMAR V, 2004, V34, P811, INT J PHYS DISTRIB;
LAMBERT DM, 1998, V9, P19, INT J LOGIST MANAG; LAMBERT DM, 2000, V29,
P65, IND MARKET MANAG; LAMBERT DM, 2001, V12, P1, INT J LOGISTICS MANA;
LAMMING R, 1996, V16, P183, INT J OPER PROD MAN; LAMMING R, 2000, V20,
P675, INT J OPER PROD MAN; LATTIN JM, 2003, ANAL MULTIVARIATE DA; LEE H,
1999, V45, P633, MANAGE SCI; LEE HL, 1997, V43, P546, MANAGE SCI; LEE HL,
2000, V46, P626, MANAGE SCI; LOWRY PB, 2004, V5, P29, J ASSOC INF SYST;
LUMMUS RR, 1998, V39, P49, PRODUCTION INVENTORY; MABERT VA, 1998, V29,
P537, DECISION SCI; MALONI MJ, 1997, V101, P419, EUR J OPER RES; MCCAIN
KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MENTZER JT, 2001, V22, P1, J
BUSINESS LOGISTICS; MONCZKA RM, 1998, V29, P553, DECISION SCI;
MYLONOPOULOS NA, 2001, V44, P29, COMMUN ACM; NARASIMHAN R, 1998, V29,
P579, DECISION SCI; NOYONS ECM, 1999, BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING; PILKINGTON A,
1999, V19, P7, INT J OPER PROD MAN; PRITCHARD A, 1969, V25, P348, J DOC;
RAGHUNATHAN S, 1999, V30, P1053, DECISION SCI; RAGHUNATHAN S, 2001, V47,
P605, MANAGE SCI; RAINER RK, 2005, V48, P91, COMMUN ACM; RAMOSRODRIGUEZ
AR, 2004, V25, P981, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; SAHIN F, 2002, V33, P505,
DECISION SCI; SCANNELL TV, 2000, V21, P23, J BUSINESS LOGISTICS; SMALL H,
1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD;
SMIRCICH L, 1983, V28, P339, ADMIN SCI QUART; STANK TP, 2001, V22, P29, J
BUSINESS LOGISTICS; SWAMINATHAN JM, 1998, V29, P3, DECISION SCI; TAN KC,
1999, V19, P1034, INT J OPER PROD MAN; TARN JM, 2002, V102, P26, IND
MANAGE DATA SYST; THEOHARAKIS V, 2002, V13, P389, MARKET LETT; THOMAS DJ,
1996, V94, P1, EUR J OPER RES; TSAY AA, 1999, V45, P1339, MANAGE SCI;
VOKURKA RJ, 1996, V14, P345, J OPERATIONS MANAGEM; WHITE HD, 1981, V32,
P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI|
NR- 69|
TC- 3|
PU- CSCMP-COUNCIL SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT PROFESSIONALS|
PI- LOMBARD|
PA- 333 E BUTTERFIELD RD, STE 140, LOMBARD, IL 60148-5617 USA|
SN- 0735-3766|
J9- J BUS LOGIST|
JI- J. Bus. Logist|
PY- 2008|
VL- 29|
IS- 1|
BP- 47|
EP- +|
PG- 28|
SC- Management|
GA- 544CJ|
JN- JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LOGISTICS, 2008, V29, N1, P47-+|
UT- ISI:000273629300003 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Shen YC; Chang SH; Lin GTR; Yu HC|
AF- Shen Yung-Chi; Chang, Shu-Hsuan; Lin, Grace T. R; Yu, Hsiao-Cheng|
TI- A hybrid selection model for emerging technology|
SO- TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE|
LA- English|
DT- Review|
DE- Fuzzy Delphi method; Analytic hierarchy process; Patent co-citation
approach; Organic light emitting diode|
ID- ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; AUTHOR
COCITATION ANALYSIS; FUZZY DELPHI METHOD; PATENT ANALYSIS; CLUSTERANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRY; SCIENCE; SYSTEM|
AB- Technology selection, which influences the advantages of an
enterprise or a country, is a rnulticriteria decision issue that can be
improved by integrating different methods. In addition, it is more and
more difficult to identify the right technologies because the
technologies are increasing in number and complexity. This study proposes
a technology selection process integrating fuzzy Delphi method, analytic
hierarchy process (AHP), and patent co-citation approach (PCA) for
technology selection. The former effectively gathers experts' judgments
toward technology selection criteria and conducts the fuzziness existing
in their responses. The analytic hierarchy process has the strength of
identifying criteria and obtaining their relationship and their weights.
The patent co-citation approach identifies the major R&D fields of a
specific technology from patent data. Through this proposed process. the
key technology fields can be identified in the end. The organic light
emitting diode (OLED) technology in Taiwan is used to bean example to
illustrate the proposed technology selection process (C) 2009 Elsevier
Inc. All rights reserved,|
C1- [Shen, Yung-Chi; Lin, Grace T. R.; Yu, Hsiao-Cheng] Natl Chiao Tung
Univ, Grad Inst Technol Management, Hsinchu, Taiwan; [Chang, Shu-Hsuan]
Natl Changhua Univ Educ, Dept Ind Educ & Technol, Changhua, Taiwan|
RP- Shen, YC, Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Grad Inst Technol Management,
Hsinchu, Taiwan|
EM- syc.mt96g@nctu.edu.tw shc@cc.ncue.edu.tw gtrl@factualy.nctu.edu.tw
chengyu@cc.nctu.edu.tw|
CD- *IEK, 2004, OPT IND YB; *IEK, 2006, OPT IND YB; ABRAHAM BP, 2001,
V21, P245, TECHNOVATION; ARBEL A, 1999, V4, P387, J VAC SCI TECHNOL;
ARCHIBUGI D, 1996, V16, P451, TECHNOVATION; ARMACOST RL, 1999, V8, P535,
GROUP DECIS NEGOT; ASHTON WB, 1988, V31, P42, RES TECHNOL MANAGE; BAKER
NR, 1974, V21, P165, IEEE T ENG MANAGE EM; BAKOS Y, 1998, COMPUTER
REVOLUTION; BANULS VA, 2007, V74, P750, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC; BANULS VA,
2008, V28, P103, TECHNOVATION; BENGISU M, 2006, V73, P835, TECHNOL
FORECAST SOC; BERRY MMJ, 1994, V24, P341, R&D MANAGE; BREITZMAN A, 2002,
V32, P1, R&D MANAGE; BREITZMAN AF, 2002, V28, P187, J INFORM SCI; BROOKS
KW, 1979, V53, P377, N CENTRAL ASS Q; BUYUKOZKAN G, 2004, V14, P139,
INTERNET RES; CANTWELL J, 1992, TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMEN; CHANG PT, 2000,
V112, P511, FUZZY SET SYST; CHEN CH, 2005, ORGANIC ELECTROLUMIN; CHEN CH,
2007, OLED MAT DEVICES DRE; CHEN HH, 2008, V59, P242, COMPUT IND; CLARK
KB, 1989, V67, P94, HARVARD BUS REV; COCHRAN SW, 1983, V2, P111, J HUMAN
SCI; COLDRICK S, 2005, V25, P185, TECHNOVATION; CYPHERT FR, 1971, V52,
P272, PHI DELTA KAPPAN; DAILEY AL, 1990, V14, P129, COMMUNITY JUNIOR COL;
DAIM TU, 2006, V73, P981, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC; DALKEY N, 1963, V9, P458,
MANAGE SCI; DELBECQ AL, 1975, GROUP TECHNIQUES PRO; DUSSAUGE P, 1992,
STRATEGIC TECHNOLOGY; EFSTATHIADES A, 2000, V20, P93, TECHNOVATION; ERNST
H, 1997, V9, P361, SMALL BUS ECON; GARFIELD E, 1980, V40, P5, CURRENT
CONTENTS 1; GREENBERG E, 1995, CHANGE MANAGEMENT SU; GREGORY MJ, 1995,
V209, P347, P I MECH ENG B-J ENG; HACKETT GP, 1990, V31, P97, SLOAN
MANAGE REV; HAJEEH M, 2005, V174, P97, DESALINATION; HE YL, 2002, V38,
P491, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; HSU TH, 1999, V22, P229, TRANSPORT PLAN
TECHN; HUANG GQ, 1999, V19, P21, INT J OPER PROD MAN; HUANG HJ, 2008,
V36, P1052, IEEE T PLASMA SCI 1; HUANG LC, 2005, V30, P105, INT J TECHNOL
MANAGE; HUFKER T, 1994, V3, P44, J PRODUCT BRAND MANA; HWANG CL, 1987,
GROUP DECISION MAKIN; ISHIKAWA A, 1993, V55, P241, FUZZY SET SYST; JAFFE
AB, 1986, V76, P984, AM ECON REV; JAFFE AB, 2002, PATENTS CITATIONS IN;
KHALIL TM, 2000, MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOG; KHORRAMSHAHGOL R, 1988, V37, P347,
EUR J OPER RES; KLIR GJ, 1988, FUZZY SETS UNCERTAIN; KOSTOFF RN, 2001,
V48, P132, IEEE T ENG MANAGE; LAI KK, 2005, V41, P313, INFORM PROCESS
MANAG; LAMB M, 1997, IND CONCERNS TECHNOL; LEE JW, 2001, V19, P111, INT J
PROJECT MANAGE; LEE YG, 2007, V27, P57, TECHNOVATION; LEI DT, 2000, V19,
P699, INT J TECHNOL MANAGE; LEV B, 2001, INTANGIBLES MANAGEME; LIBERATORE
MJ, 1983, V29, P962, MANAGE SCI; LIU SJ, 1997, V13, P661, INT J TECHNOL
MANAGE; MALLADI S, 2005, V22, P201, TELEMATICS INFORMATI; MARTORELLA P,
1991, V19, P83, THEOR RES SOC EDUC; MCNAMARA P, 1999, V10, P291, BRIT J
MANAGE; MOGEE ME, 1997, TECHN TRANSF SOC ANN; MOGEE ME, 1999, V9, P291,
EXPERT OPIN THER PAT; MORONE J, 1989, V31, P91, CALIF MANAGE REV; MURRY
JW, 1995, V18, P423, REV HIGH EDUC; NARIN F, 1987, V16, P143, RES POLICY;
NARIN F, 1993, PAT WORLD
APR; NARIN F, 1993, P52, WHAT PATENTS
TELL YO; NARIN F, 1995, V24, P507, RES POLICY; OSBORNE J, 2003, V40,
P692, J RES SCI TEACH; PHAAL R, 2001, V21, P1116, INT J OPER PROD MAN;
PIIPO P, 1990, CONSULTING INNOVATIO; PORTER AL, 1995, V49, P237, TECHNOL
FORECAST SOC; PRASAD AVS, 1990, V38, P151, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC; RAJU US,
1995, V48, P27, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC; RAMANUJAM V, 1981, V19, P81,
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECA; RONDE P, 2001, V30, P1041, RES POLICY; RONDE P,
2003, V70, P419, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC; SAATY TL, 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY
PROCE; SCHMIDT RL, 1992, V39, P189, IEEE T ENG MANAGE; SCHRODER R, 1999,
V19, P1270, INT J OPER PROD MAN; SHARABCHIEV JT, 1989, V15, P127,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SHEHABUDDEEN N, 2006, V26, P324, TECHNOVATION; SLOANE EB,
2004, V23, P42, IEEE ENG MED BIOL; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; STACEY GS, 1990, V5, P389, INT J TECHNOL MANAGE; STEENSMA K,
1999, V10, P1, J HIGH TECHNOLOGY MA; TOLGA E, 2005, V97, P89, INT J PROD
ECON; TORKKELI M, 2002, V77, P271, INT J PROD ECON; TRAN TA, 2008, V75,
P1396, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC; UHL NP, 1983, V37, P81, NEW DIRECTIONS I
RES; VANZOLINGEN SJ, 2003, V70, P317, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC; VERSPAGEN B,
1997, V9, P47, EC SYSTEMS RES; WANG KM, 2005, V52, P119, IEEE T ENG
MANAGE; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITMAN N, 1990,
V29, P377, J NURS EDUC; WINEBRAKE JJ, 2003, V70, P359, TECHNOL FORECAST
SOC; YAP CM, 1993, V13, P449, TECHNOVATION; YU OS, 1998, INTRO
TECHNOLOGICAL|
NR- 101|
TC- 0|
PU- ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC|
PI- NEW YORK|
PA- 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, NY 10010-1710 USA|
SNJ9JIPDPYVLISBPEPDIPGSCGAJNUT-
0040-1625|
TECHNOL FORECAST SOC CHANGE|
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang|
JAN|
2010|
77|
1|
151|
166|
10.1016/j.techfore.2009.05.001|
16|
Business; Planning & Development|
539BP|
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2010, V77, N1, P151-166|
ISI:000273228700011 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Torres-Salinas D|
AF- Torres-Salinas Daniel|
TI- Bibliometric assessment of universities with Scival of Elsevier|
SO- PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION|
LA- Spanish|
DT- Article|
DE- Elsevier; Scival; Maps of science; Bibliometric indicators;
Universities; Scientific information systems|
ID- SCIENCE|
AB- Research, its management and its policies represent a major effort
for Spanish universities but few of these institutions have a scientific
information system with bibliometric indicators for decision making Aware
of this gap, Elsevier has launched Scival. It is a web platform intended
to assess institutions through maps and indicators calculated from the
Scopus database. In this article we review this new product We first
describe the scientific basis of the platform that is based on the works
of Klavan and Bojack about co-citation maps of science and the
identification of paradigms. Secondly we describe its interface and its
utilities, paying particular attention to the so-called Wheel of science.
Finally, we discuss some critical aspects of Scival|
C1- Univ Navarra, Ctr Invest Med Aplicada, E-31080 Pamplona, Spain|
RP- Torres-Salinas, D, Univ Navarra, Ctr Invest Med Aplicada, E-31080
Pamplona, Spain|
EM- torressalinas@gmail.com|
CD- CODINA L, 2005, V14, P44, PROF INFORM; JIMENEZCONTRERA.E, 2006, V15,
P373, PROF INFORM; KLAVANS R, 2006, V57, P251, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
KLAVANS R, 2006, V68, P475, SCIENTOMETRICS; KLAVANS R, 2008, IDENTIFYING
DISTINCT; MARTINEZ LJ, 2008, V17, P331, PROF INFORM; NAVARRETECORTES J,
2008, V131, P71, MED CLIN S5; VANDIEST PJ, 2001, V54, P817, J CLIN
PATHOL|
NR- 8|
TC- 0|
PU- EPI|
PI- BARCELONA|
PA- APARTADO 32 280, BARCELONA, 08080, SPAIN|
SN- 1386-6710|
J9- PROF INF|
JIPDPYVLISBPEPDIPGSCGAJNUT-
Prof. Inf|
NOV-DEC|
2009|
18|
6|
669|
674|
10.3145/epi.2009.nov.11|
6|
Information Science & Library Science|
538IU|
PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2009, V18, N6, P669-674|
ISI:000273178600011 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Greco D; Somervuo P; Di Lieto A; Raitila T; Nitsch L; Castren E;
Auvinen P|
AF- Greco Dario; Somervuo, Panu; Di Lieto, Antonio; Raitila, Tuomas;
Nitsch, Lucio; Castren, Eero; Auvinen, Petri|
TI- Physiology, Pathology and Relatedness of Human Tissues from Gene
Expression Meta-Analysis|
SO- PLOS ONE|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
AB- Background: Development and maintenance of the identity of tissues is
of central importance for multicellular organisms. Based on gene
expression profiles, it is possible to divide genes in housekeeping genes
and those whose expression is preferential in one or a few tissues and
which provide specialized functions that have a strong effect on the
physiology of the whole organism Results: We have surveyed the gene
expression in 78 normal human tissues integrating publicly available
microarray gene expression data A total amount of 1601 genes were
identified as selectively expressed in one or more tissues. The tissueselective genes covered a wide range of cellular and molecular functions,
and could be linked to 361 human diseases with Mendelian inheritance.
Based on the gene expression profiles, we were able to form a network of
tissues reflecting their functional relatedness and, to certain extent,
their development. Using co-citation driven gene network technique and
promoter analysis, we predicted a transcriptional module where the cooperation of the transcription factors E2F and NF-kappaB can possibly
regulate a number of genes involved in the neurogenesis that takes place
in the adult hippocampus Conclusions: Here we propose that integration of
gene expression data from Affymetrix GeneChip experiments is possible
through re-annotation and commonly used pre-processing methods. We
suggest that some functional aspects of the tissues can be explained by
the co-operation of multiple transcription factors that regulate the
expression of selected groups of genes|
C1- [Greco, Dario; Somervuo, Panu; Raitila, Tuomas; Auvinen, Petri] Univ
Helsinki, Inst Biotechnol, Helsinki, Finland; [Di Lieto, Antonio;
Castren, Eero] Univ Helsinki, Neurosci Ctr, Helsinki, Finland; [Nitsch,
Lucio] Univ Federico 2, Dipartimento Biol Patol Cell Mol, Naples, Italy|
RP- Greco, D, Univ Helsinki, Inst Biotechnol, Helsinki, Finland|
EM- dario.greco@helsinki.fi|
FU- Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki ; Academy of
Finland [117968]|
FX- This research was funded by the Institute of Biotechnology,
University of Helsinki, and by the Academy of Finland (grant 117968)|
CD- ABBAS AK, 2000, CELLULAR MOL IMMUNOL; ATTWOOLL C, 2004, V23, P4709,
EMBO J; BENSON DW, 1999, V104, P1567, J CLIN INVEST; CASTILLODAVIS CI,
2002, V31, P415, NAT GENET; DAI MH, 2005, V33, ARTN e175, NUCLEIC ACIDS
RES; DENISDONINI S, 2005, V154, P81, DEV BRAIN RES; DURET L, 2000, V17,
P68, MOL BIOL EVOL; EEROLA I, 2003, V73, P1240, AM J HUM GENET; FREILICH
S, 2005, V6, ARTN R56, GENOME BIOL; GAGE FH, 2000, V287, P1433, SCIENCE;
GARG V, 2003, V424, P443, NATURE; GOLDMUNTZ E, 2001, V104, P2565,
CIRCULATION; GOULD E, 2007, V8, P481, NAT REV NEUROSCI; HIRAYAMAYAMADA K,
2005, V135, P47, AM J MED GENET A A; IRIZARRY RA, 2003, V4, P249,
BIOSTATISTICS; JANEWAY CA, 2001, IMMUNOBIOLOGY; KRIVAN W, 2001, V11,
P1559, GENOME RES; LIANG S, 2006, V26, P158, PHYSIOL GENOMICS; LIPSHUTZ
RJ, 1999, V21, P20, NAT GENET S; LIU DX, 2001, V32, P425, NEURON; MEFFERT
MK, 2005, V28, P37, TRENDS NEUROSCI; OLSON EN, 2006, V313, P1922,
SCIENCE; SANDBERG R, 2007, V8, ARTN 48, BMC BIOINFORMATICS; SCHOTT JJ,
1998, V281, P108, SCIENCE; SU AI, 2004, V101, P6062, P NATL ACAD SCI USA;
SWANSON LW, 1998, V21, P323, TRENDS NEUROSCI; SWANSON LW, 2003, V985,
P174, ANN NY ACAD SCI; TIMENS W, 1997, V39, P387, MICROSC RES TECHNIQ;
TRIMARCHI JM, 2002, V3, P11, NAT REV MOL CELL BIO; VINOGRADOV AE, 2003,
V31, P5212, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES; VINOGRADOV AE, 2004, V20, P248, TRENDS
GENET; WASSERMAN WW, 1998, V278, P167, J MOL BIOL; WATANABE Y, 2002, V39,
P807, J MED GENET; WINTER EE, 2004, V14, P54, GENOME RES; YU XP, 2006,
V34, P4925, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES|
NR- 35|
TC- 6|
PU- PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE|
PI- SAN FRANCISCO|
PA- 185 BERRY ST, STE 1300, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107 USA|
SN- 1932-6203|
J9- PLOS ONE|
JI- PLoS One|
PD- APR 2|
PY- 2008|
VL- 3|
IS- 4|
AR- e1880|
DI- 10.1371/journal.pone.0001880|
PG- 6|
SC- Biology; Multidisciplinary Sciences|
GA- 370XC|
JN- PLOS ONE, 2008, V3, N4, P669-674|
UT- ISI:000260795400015 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Porter AL; Rafols I|
AF- Porter Alan L; Rafols, Ismael|
TI- Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six
research fields over time|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- BIONANOTECHNOLOGY; STRATEGIES; COCITATION; DIVERSITY|
AB- In the last two decades there have been studies claiming that science
is becoming ever more interdisciplinary. However, the evidence has been
anecdotal or partial. Here we investigate how the degree of
interdisciplinarity has changed between 1975 and 2005 over six research
domains. To do so, we compute well-established bibliometric indicators
alongside a new index of interdisciplinarity (Integration score, aka RaoStirling diversity) and a science mapping visualization method. The
results attest to notable changes in research practices over this 30 year
period, namely major increases in number of cited disciplines and
references per article (both show about 50% growth), and co-authors per
article (about 75% growth). However, the new index of interdisciplinarity
only shows a modest increase (mostly around 5% growth). Science maps hint
that this is because the distribution of citations of an article remains
mainly within neighboring disciplinary areas. These findings suggest that
science is indeed becoming more interdisciplinary, but in small steps drawing mainly from neighboring fields and only modestly increasing the
connections to distant cognitive areas. The combination of metrics and
overlay science maps provides general benchmarks for future studies of
interdisciplinary research characteristics|
C1- [Porter, Alan L.] Georgia Tech, Technol Policy & Assessment Ctr,
Atlanta, GA 30332 USA; [Porter, Alan L.] Search Technol Inc, Atlanta, GA
USA; [Rafols, Ismael] Univ Sussex, SPRU Sci & Technol Policy Res,
Brighton BN1 9RH, E Sussex, England|
RP- Porter, AL, Georgia Tech, Technol Policy & Assessment Ctr, Atlanta,
GA 30332 USA|
EM- alan.porter@isye.gatech.edu|
CD- *NAT AC COSEPUP, 2005, FAC INT RES; ABT H, 2007, V71, P105,
SCIENTOMETRICS; ABT HA, 2007, V73, P353, SCIENTOMETRICS; ADAMS J, 2007,
BIBLIOMETRIC ANAL IN; AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
BATEGELJ V, 2008, PAJEK PROGRAM LARGE; BOYACK KW, 2005, V64, P351,
SCIENTOMETRICS; BRAUN T, 2003, V58, P183, SCIENTOMETRICS; CHEN C, 2003,
MAPPING SCI FRONTIER; CRONIN B, 2001, V52, P558, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
DEMOYAANEGON F, 2007, V58, P2167, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; GIBBONS M, 1994,
NEW PRODUCTION KNOWL; GLANZEL W, 2002, V50, P461, LIBR TRENDS; GRUPP H,
1990, V18, P219, SCIENTOMETRICS; HAMILTON KS, 2005, USING BIBLIOMETRICS;
HICKS DM, 1996, V21, P379, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL; KLAVANS R, 2006, V57,
P251, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LAUDEL G, 2001, V22, P762, INT J TECHNOL
MANAGE; LEAHEY E, 2006, V20, P754, GENDER SOC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57,
P601, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2009, V60, P348, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; MORILLO F, 2001, V51, P203, SCIENTOMETRICS; MORILLO F, 2003,
V54, P1237, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MOYAANEGON F, 2004, V61, P129,
SCIENTOMETRICS; PORTER AL, 2006, V15, P187, RES EVALUAT; PORTER AL, 2007,
V72, P117, SCIENTOMETRICS; PORTER AL, 2008, V17, P273, RES EVALUAT; PRICE
DS, 1986, LITTLE SCI BIG SCI; RAFOLS I, J AM SOC IN IN PRESS; RAFOLS I,
SCIENTOMETR IN PRESS; RAFOLS I, 2007, V20, P395, INNOVATION-ABINGDON;
RAFOLS I, 2007, V70, P633, SCIENTOMETRICS; RAO CR, 1982, V21, P24, THEOR
POPUL BIOL; SALTON G, 1983, INTRO MODERN INFORM; STIRLING A, 2007, V4,
P707, J R SOC INTERFACE|
NR- 35|
TC- 5|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- DEC|
PY- 2009|
VL- 81|
IS- 3|
BP- 719|
EP- 745|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-008-2197-2|
PG- 27|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 522HX|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2009, V81, N3, P719-745|
UT- ISI:000271989600009 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Meyer M; Lorscheid I; Troitzsch KG|
AF- Meyer Matthias; Lorscheid, Iris; Troitzsch, Klaus G|
TI- The Development of Social Simulation as Reflected in the First Ten
Years of JASSS: a Citation and Co-Citation Analysis|
SO- JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION|
LA- English|
DT- Review|
DE- Citation Analysis; Co-Citation Analysis; Lines of Research;
Multidisciplinary; Science Studies; Social Simulation|
ID- ARTIFICIAL STOCK-MARKET; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; GENETICAL EVOLUTION;
MATHEMATICAL-THEORY; BOUNDED CONFIDENCE; DYNAMICS; BIBLIOMETRICS;
COMMUNICATION; REPUTATION; NETWORK|
AB- Social simulation is often described as a multidisciplinary and fastmoving field. This can make it difficult to obtain an overview of the
field both for contributing researchers and for outsiders who are
interested in social simulation. The Journal for Artificial Societies and
Social Simulation (JASSS) completing its tenth year provides a good
opportunity to take stock of what happened over this time period First,
we use citation analysis to identify the most influential publications
and to verify characteristics of social simulation such as its
multidisciplinary nature. Then, we perform a co-citation analysis to
visualize the intellectual structure of social simulation and its
development. Overall, the analysis shows social simulation both in its
early stage and during its first steps towards becoming a more
differentiated discipline|
CD- *IEEE, 1985, IEEE STAND BIN FLOAT; AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; ALBERT R, 2002, V74, P47, REV MOD PHYS; AMBLARD F, 2004,
V343, P725, PHYSICA A; ARIFOVIC J, 1996, V104, P510, J POLIT ECON; ARROW
KJ, 1962, V29, P155, REV ECON STUD; ARTHUR B, 1989, V99, P116, ECON J;
ARTHUR WB, 1988, P590, TECHNICAL CHANGE EC; ARTHUR WB, 1994, V84, P406,
AM ECON REV; ARTHUR WB, 1994, INCREASING RETURNS P; ARTHUR WB, 1997, V2,
EC EVOLVING COMPLEX; ARTHUR WB, 1997, V2, P15, EC EVOLVING COMPLEX;
AXELROD R, 1986, V80, P1095, AM POLIT SCI REV; AXELROD R, 1997,
COMPLEXITY COOPERATI; AXELROD R, 1997, SIMULATING SOCIAL PH; AXTELL R,
1996, V1, P123, COMPUTATIONAL MATH O; AXTELL R, 2000, 17 CTR SOC EC DYN;
BAK P, 1996, NATURE WORKS SCI SEL; BANDURA A, 1977, SOCIAL LEARNING THEO;
BARRETEAU O, 1999, P67, INGENIERIE SYSTEMES; BARRETEAU O, 2001, V4, J
ARTIFICIAL SOC SOC; BARRETEAU O, 2003, V6, J ARTIFICIAL SOC SIM; BENNAIM
E, 2003, V183, P190, PHYSICA D; BIG D, 2004, P 2 C EUR SOC SIM AS; BOLTON
GE, 2004, V50, P1587, MANAGE SCI; BOUSQUET F, 1998, V1416, P826, LECT
NOTES ARTIF INT; BOUSQUET F, 1999, P113, ADV ENV ECOLOGICAL M; BOUSQUET
F, 2002, P248, COMPLEXITY ECOSYSTEM; BOYD R, 1985, CULTURE EVOLUTIONARY;
BRICKER RJ, 1988, V24, P120, ABACUS-J ACCOUNT BUS; CARLEY K, 1992, V3,
P20, ORGAN SCI; CARLEY KM, 1995, V1, P39, COMPUTATIONAL MATH O; CARLEY
KM, 1998, V1, J ARTIFICIAL SOC SOC; CASTELFRANCHI C, 1998, V1, J
ARTIFICIAL SOC SOC; CAVALLISFORZA LL, 1981, CULTURAL TRANSMISSIO;
CHIARELLA C, 1992, V37, P101, ANN OPER RES; CIOFFIREVILLA C, 2002, V99,
P7314, P NATL ACAD SCI U S3; COHEN MD, 1972, V17, P1, ADM SCI Q; COHEN
PR, 1985, HEURISTIC REASONING; CONTE R, 1995, P252, ARTIFICIAL SOC COMPU;
CONTE R, 1995, COGNITIVE SOCIAL ACT; CONTE R, 1997, P1, SIMULATING SOCIAL
PH; CONTE R, 2001, V7, P183, COMPUTATIONAL MATH O; CONTE R, 2002,
REPUTATION ARTIFICIA; COWAN R, 2004, V55, P591, ANNU REV PSYCHOL; CRANE
D, 1972, INVISIBLE COLL DIFFU; CRONIN B, 1984, CITATION PROCESS ROL;
CYERT R, 1992, BEHAV THEORY FIRM; DAQUINO P, 2002, V2, P275, P INT ENV
MOD SOFTW; DAQUINO P, 2003, V6, J ARTIFICIAL SOC SOC; DAVID PA, 1985,
V75, P332, AM ECON REV; DAWES RM, 1980, V31, P161, ANNU REV PSYCHOL;
DAWKINS R, 1976, SELFISH GENE; DEFFUANT G, 2000, V3, P87, ADV COMPLEX
SYST; DEFFUANT G, 2002, V5, J ARTIFICIAL SOC SOC; DEFFUANT G, 2004, 2
ESSA C VALL SEPT 2; DENNETT D, 1995, DARWINS DANGEROUS ID; DITTMER JC,
2001, V47, P4615, NONLINEAR ANAL-THEOR; DITTRICH P, 2003, V6, J
ARTIFICIAL SOC SOC; DUNBAR R, 1998, GROOMING GOSSIP EVOL; EDMONDS B,
2003, V6, J ARTIFICIAL SOC SOC; EDMONDS B, 2005, V3415, P130, LECT NOTES
COMPUT SC; EDWARDS M, 2003, V6, J ARTIFICIAL SOC SOC; EPSTEIN JM, 1996,
GROWING ARTIFICIAL S; EPSTEIN JM, 1999, V4, P41, COMPLEXITY; ETIENNE M,
2003, V6, J ARTIFICIAL SOC SOC; FEHR E, 2003, V425, P785, NATURE;
FESTINGER L, 1954, V7, P117, HUM RELAT; FLACHE A, 1999, V5, P97,
COMPUTATIONAL MATH O; GALAN JM, 2005, V8, J ARTIFICIAL SOC SOC; GILBERT
GN, 1999, SIMULATION SOCIAL SC; GILBERT N, 1995, ARTIFICIAL SOC COMPU;
GILBERT N, 1995, P144, ARTIFICIAL SOC COMPU; GILBERT N, 1997, V2,
SOCIOLOGICAL RES ONL; GILBERT N, 1998, V1, J ARTIFICIAL SOC SIM; GMUR M,
2003, V57, P27, SCIENTOMETRICS; GODE DK, 1993, V101, P119, J POLIT ECON;
GOLDBERG DE, 1989, GENETIC ALGORITHMS S; GOLDSPINK C, 2000, V3, J
ARTIFICIAL SOC SOC; GOTTS NM, 2003, V19, P3, ARTIF INTELL REV; GOTTS NM,
2003, V34, P663, CYBERNET SYST; GRANOVETTER M, 1985, V91, P481, AM J
SOCIOL; HALES D, 2002, V5, J ARTIFICIAL SOC SIM; HALES D, 2003, V6, J
ARTIFICIAL SOC SOC; HAMILTON WD, 1964, V7, P1, J THEOR BIOL; HAMILTON WD,
1964, V7, P17, J THEOR BIOL; HANNEMAN RA, 1995, V38, P457, SOCIOL
PERSPECT; HEGSELMANN R, 2002, V5, J ARTIFICIAL SOC SOC; HEGSELMANN R,
2005, V25, P381, COMPUTATIONAL EC; HIGHAM NJ, 2002, ACCURACY STABILITY N;
HODGSON GM, 1988, EC I MANIFESTO MODER; HOLLAND JH, 1975, ADAPTATION
NATURAL A; HOLLAND JH, 1986, INDUCTION PROCESSES; HOLLAND JH, 1998,
EMERGENCE CHAOS ORDE; HOMANS G, 1950, HUMAN GROUP; HUANG CY, 2004, V7, J
ARTIFICIAL SOC SOC; HUTCHINS E, 1995, P157, ARTIFICIAL SOC COMPU;
IACOBUCCI D, 1994, P92, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; JAFFE K, 2002, V5, J
ARTIFICIAL SOC SOC; JANSSEN M, 2002, COMPLEXITY ECOSYSTEM; JOHNSON PE,
2002, V20, P174, SOC SCI COMPUT REV; KAHNEMAN D, 1979, V47, P263,
ECONOMETRICA; KAHNEMAN D, 2000, CHOICES VALUES FRAME; KAUFFMAN SA, 1993,
ORIGINS ORDER SELF O; KLAVANS R, 2006, V57, P251, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
KNUTH DE, 1998, ART COMPUTER PROGRAM; KOHLER TA, 1999, DYNAMICS HUMAN
PRIMA; KOZA J, 1992, GENETIC PROGRAMMING; KRAUSE U, 1997, P37,
MODELLIERUNG SIMULAT; KRAUSE U, 2000, P227, COMMUNICATIONS DIFFE; KREPS
DM, 1982, V27, P253, J ECON THEORY; KUPERMAN M, 2001, V86, P2909, PHYS
REV LETT; LANSING JS, 2002, V8, P279, ARTIF LIFE; LEBARON B, 1999, V23,
P1487, J ECON DYN CONTROL; LIEVROUW LA, 1989, V16, P615, COMMUN RES;
LUHMANN N, 1984, SOZIALE SYSTEME GRUN; LUNA F, 2000, EC SIMULATION SWARM;
MACY MW, 1998, V1, J ARTIFICIAL SOC SOC; MACY MW, 2002, V99, P7229, P
NATL ACAD SCI U S3; MALSCH T, 2001, V4, P155, AUTON AGENT MULTI-AG; MARCH
J, 1958, ORGANIZATIONS; MASLOW AH, 1954, MOTIVATION PERSONALI; MAUSS M,
1990, GIFT FORM REASON EXC; MCCAIN KW, 1986, V37, P111, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; MERMET L, 1992, STRATEGIES GESTION E; MEYER M, 2008, V3, P60, Z
BETRIEBSWIRT; MINAR N, 1996, SWARM SIMULATION SYS; MOED HF, 2002, V415,
P731, NATURE; MORRIS S, 2000, V67, P57, REV ECON STUD; MOSS S, 1995, V8,
P283, COMPUTATIONAL EC; MOSS S, 1998, V4, P43, COMPUTATIONAL MATH O; MOSS
S, 1998, V29, P215, CYBERNET SYST; MOSS S, 1998, V1, J ARTIFICIAL SOC
SOC; MOSS S, 2002, V5, J ARTIFICIAL SOC SIM; MOSS S, 2005, V110, P1095,
AM J SOCIOL; MULLINS NC, 1977, V42, P552, AM SOCIOL REV; NAMATAME A,
2006, V1, P1, J EC INTERACTION COO; NELSON R, 1982, EVOLUTIONARY THEORY;
NERUR SP, 2008, V29, P319, STRATEG MANAGE J; NEWELL A, 1990, UNIFIED
THEORIES COG; NEWMAN MEJ, 2002, V66, ARTN 016128, PHYS REV E 2; NOWAK A,
1996, P249, MODELLING SIMULATION; NOWAK MA, 1998, V393, P573, NATURE;
OLSON M, 1965, LOGIC COLLECTIVE ACT; ORMEROD P, 1995, DEATH EC; ORMEROD
P, 1998, BUTTERFLY EC; OSAREH F, 1996, V46, P149, LIBRI; OSAREH F, 1996,
V46, P217, LIBRI; PARKER M, 2000, SWARMF P; PARSONS T, 1951, SOCIAL
SYSTEM; POLHILL JG, 2001, V32, P85, CYBERNET SYST; POLHILL JG, 2005, V21,
P283, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW; POLHILL JG, 2005, V8, J ARTIFICIAL SOC SOC;
PONZI LJ, 2002, V55, SCIENTOMETRICS; RAMOSRODRIGUEZ AR, 2004, V25, P981,
STRATEGIC MANAGE J; RAUB W, 1990, V96, P626, AM J SOCIOL; RESNICK P,
2002, V11, ADV APPL MICROECONOM; ROTH AE, 1995, V8, P164, GAME ECON
BEHAV; SAAM NJ, 1999, V2, J ARTIFICIAL SOC SOC; SABATER J, 2002, P475, P
1 INT JOINT C AUT; SAWYER RK, 2003, V31, P325, SOCIOL METHOD RES;
SCHELLING TC, 1960, STRATEGY CONFLICT; SCHUMPETER J, 1934, THEORY EC DEV;
SHANNON CE, 1948, V27, P379, BELL SYST TECH J; SHANNON CE, 1948, V27,
P623, BELL SYST TECH J; SHLEIFER A, 2000, INEFFICIENT MARKETS; SHOHAM Y,
1992, P225, P 3 INT C PRINC KNOW; SHOHAM Y, 1992, P276, P AAAI 92;
SZNAJDWERON K, 2000, V11, P1157, INT J MOD PHYS C; THACKRAY A, 1972, V63,
P473, ISIS; TRIVERS RL, 1971, V46, P35, Q REV BIOL; TROITZSCH KG, 1997,
P40, SIMULATING SOCIAL PH; VALENTE TW, 1995, NETWORK MODELS DIFFU; VINCK
D, 1999, V40, P385, REV FR SOCIOL; WALKER A, 1995, P384, P 1 INT C MULT
SYST; WATTS DJ, 1998, V393, P6684, NATURE; WATTS DJ, 1999, SMALL WORLDS
DYNAMIC; WEIBULL JW, 1995, EVOLUTIONARY GAME TH; WEIDLICH W, 2000,
SOCIODYNAMICS SYSTEM; WEISBUCH G, 2002, V521, P225, LECT NOTES EC MATH S;
WEISBUCH G, 2004, V38, P339, EUR PHYS J B; WEISBUCH G, 2005, V353, P555,
PHYSICA A; WOOLDRIDGE M, 1995, V10, P115, KNOWL ENG REV; YOUNG P, 1998,
INDIVIDUAL STRATEGY; YOUNG P, 1999, 2 BROOK I; YOUNGER SM, 2003, V6, J
ARTIFICIAL SOC SOC; YOUNGER SM, 2004, V7, J ARTIFICIAL SOC SOC; ZEIGLER
BP, 1976, THEORY MODELLING SIM|
NR- 188|
TC- 2|
PU- J A S S S|
PI- GUILDFORD|
PA- UNIV SURREY, DEPT SOCIOLOGY, GUILDFORD GU2 7XH, SURREY, ENGLAND|
SN- 1460-7425|
J9- JASSS|
JI- JASSS|
PD- OCT|
PY- 2009|
VL- 12|
IS- 4|
BP- A224|
EP- A243|
AR- 12|
PG- 20|
SC- Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary|
GA- 522RC|
JN- JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION,
2009, V12, N4, PA224-A243|
UT- ISI:000272015000012 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Berendt B; Krause B; Kolbe-Nusser S|
AF- Berendt B; Krause, B; Kolbe-Nusser, S|
TI- Intelligent scientific authoring tools: Interactive data mining for
constructive uses of citation networks|
SO- INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- [H.2.8] Database management - database applications - data mining;
[H.3.7] information storage and retrieval - digital; libraries - user
issues; [H.3.3] Information storage and retrieval - information; search
and retrieval -search process, information filtering; [H.3.5] Information
storage and retrieval - online information services Web-based
services; [K.3.2] Computers and education - computer and information
science education - literacy; Citation analysis|
ID- INFORMATION-SCIENCE; DOCUMENT-RETRIEVAL; DIGITAL LIBRARIES;
COCITATION; CLUSTER; SEARCH|
AB- Many powerful methods and tools exist for extracting meaning from
scientific publications, their texts, and their citation links However,
existing proposals often neglect a fundamental aspect of learning: that
understanding and learning require an active and constructive exploration
of a domain. In this paper, we describe a new method and a tool that use
data mining and interactivity to turn the typical search and retrieve
dialogue, in which the user asks questions and a system gives answers,
into a dialogue that also involves sense-making, in which the user has to
become active by constructing a bibliography and a domain model of the
search term(s). This model starts from an automatically generated and
annotated clustering solution that is iteratively modified by users. The
tool is part of an integrated authoring system covering all phases from
search through reading and sense-making to writing. Two evaluation
studies demonstrate the usability of this interactive and constructive
approach, and they show that clusters and groups represent identifiable
sub-topics. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved|
C1- [Berendt, B.] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Comp Sci, Leuven, Belgium;
[Krause, B.] Univ Kassel, Inst Knowledge & Data Engn, Kassel, Germany;
[Kolbe-Nusser, S.] Humboldt Univ, Inst Informat Syst, Berlin, Germany|
RP- Berendt, B, Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Comp Sci, Leuven, Belgium|
EM- Bettina.Berendt@cs.kuleuven.be|
CD- BANIAHMAD S, 2005, V28, P21, IEEE DATA ENG B; BERENDT B, 2006, V4172,
P495, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; BICHTELER J, 1980, V31, P278, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; BIER E, 2004, P87, P 4 ACM IEEE JOINT C; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233,
J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BRADSHAW S, 2003, V2769, P499, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC;
CHEN C, 1999, P449, IEEE VISUALIZATION; CHEN C, 1999, INFORM
VISUALIZATION; CHEN C, 2003, MAPPING SCI FRONTIER; CHEN CM, 2006, V57,
P359, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CIERI C, 2002, P33, TOPIC DETECTION TRAC;
CUTTING DR, 1992, P318, P 15 ANN INT ACM SIG; FAYYAD UM, 1996, ADV
KNOWLEDGE DISCOV; FENG L, 2005, V41, P97, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; FORTUNA
B, 2005, V29, P497, INFORMATICA; FORTUNA B, 2006, V4289, P121, LECT NOTES
COMPUT SC; HALKIDI M, 2002, V31, P19, SIGMOD RECORD; HALKIDI M, 2002,
V31, P40, SIGMOD RECORD; HAVELIWALA TH, 2002, P432, P 11 INT WORLD WID W;
JANSSENS F, 2006, V42, P1614, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; JANSSENS F, 2008,
V75, P607, SCIENTOMETRICS; KESSLER MM, 1963, V14, P10, AM DOC; LEWIS JR,
1995, V7, P57, INT J HUM-COMPUT INT; LU WZ, 2007, V11, P105, KNOWL INF
SYST; LUND AM, 2001, USABILITY INTERFACE; MCNEE S, 2002, P116, P ACM 2002
C COMP SU; MILLER GA, 1956, V63, P81, PSYCHOL REV; NIELSEN J, 1990, P249,
P ACM CHI 90 C SEATT; QU Y, 2008, V44, P534, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; SMALL
H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI
STUD; SMALL H, 1980, V2, P277, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1994, V30, P229,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SPILIOPOULOU M, 2006, V4289, P132, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC;
TAN P, 2005, INTRO DATA MINING; THO QT, 2007, V43, P248, INFORM PROCESS
MANAG; TUZHILIN A, 2002, HDB DATA MINING KNOW; TWIDALE MB, 2008, V44,
P558, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; VLADUTZ G, 1984, V21, P204, P AM SOC INFORM
SCI; ZENG HJ, 2004, P210, SIGIR 04; ZHANG X, 2008, P677, P CHI 08|
NR- 41|
TC- 0|
PU- PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD|
PI- OXFORD|
PA- THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND|
SN- 0306-4573|
J9- INFORM PROCESS MANAGE|
JI- Inf. Process. Manage|
PD- JAN|
PY- 2010|
VL- 46|
IS- 1|
BP- 1|
EP- 10|
DI- 10.1016/j.ipm.2009.08.002|
PG- 10|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 518QY|
JN- INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2010, V46, N1, P1-10|
UT- ISI:000271709400001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Ding Y; Yan EJ; Frazho A; Caverlee J|
AF- Ding Ying; Yan, Erjia; Frazho, Arthur; Caverlee, James|
TI- PageRank for Ranking Authors in Co-citation Networks|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- ALGORITHM|
AB- This paper studies how varied damping factors in the PageRank
algorithm influence the ranking of authors and proposes weighted PageRank
algorithms. We selected the 108 most highly cited authors in the
information retrieval (IR) area from the 1970s to 2008 to form the author
co-citation network. We calculated the ranks of these 108 authors based
on PageRank with the damping factor ranging from 0.05 to 0.95. In order
to test the relationship between different measures, we compared PageRank
and weighted PageRank results with the citation ranking, h-index, and
centrality measures. We found that in our author co-citation network,
citation rank is highly correlated with PageRank with different damping
factors and also with different weighted PageRank algorithms; citation
rank and PageRank are not significantly correlated with centrality
measures; and h-index rank does not significantly correlate with
centrality measures but does significantly correlate with other measures.
The key factors that have impact on the PageRank of authors in the author
co-citation network are being co-cited with important authors|
C1- [Ding, Ying; Yan, Erjia] Indiana Univ, Sch Lib & Informat Sci,
Bloomington, IN 47405 USA; [Frazho, Arthur] Purdue Univ, Sch Aeronaut &
Astronaut, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA; [Caverlee, James] Texas A&M Univ,
Dept Comp Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA|
RP- Ding, Y, Indiana Univ, Sch Lib & Informat Sci, 1320 E 10th St,
Bloomington, IN 47405 USA|
EM- dingying@indiana.edu eyan@indiana.edu arthur.e.frazho.1@purdue.edu
caverlee@cs.tamu.edu|
CD- AKTAS MS, 2004, P 6 INT WORKSH KNOWL; BOLDI P, 2005, P557, P 14 INT
WORLD WID W; BRIN S, 1998, V30, P107, COMPUT NETWORKS ISDN; CHEN P, 2007,
V1, P8, J INFORMETR; FIALA D, 2008, V76, P135, SCIENTOMETRICS; FREEMAN
LC, 1979, V1, P215, SOC NETWORKS; LANGVILLE AN, 2005, V1, P335, INTERNET
MATH; LANGVILLE AN, 2006, GOOGLES PAGERANK SCI; LIU XM, 2005, V41, P1462,
INFORM PROCESS MANAG; MA N, 2008, V44, P800, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; MASLOV
S, 2008, V28, P11103, J NEUROSCI; MIHALCEA R, 2004, 20 INT C COMP LING;
MIHALCEA R, 2004, 42 ANN M ASS COMP LI; PERRA N, 2008, V78, ARTN 036107,
PHYS REV E 2; PRETTO L, 2002, P131, P 9 INT S STRING PRO; SIDIROPOULOS A,
2006, V79, P1679, J SYST SOFTWARE; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; WALKER D, 2007, V6, UNSP P06010, J STAT MECH-THEORY E; WANG
JH, 2007, V4426, P857, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; XING W, 2005, V10, P684, WEB INTELLIGENCE; YIN LC,
2006, V42, P1599, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; YU PS, 2004, P 13 INT WORLD WID
W|
NR- 23|
TC- 4|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- NOV|
PY- 2009|
VL- 60|
IS- 11|
BP- 2229|
EP- 2243|
DI- 10.1002/asi.21171|
PG- 15|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 511VP|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2009, V60, N11, P2229-2243|
UT- ISI:000271199600005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Ma RM; Dai QB; Ni CQ; Li XL|
AF- Ma Ruimin; Dai, Qiangbin; Ni, Chaoqun; Li, Xuelu|
TI- An author co-citation analysis of information science in China with
Chinese Google Scholar search engine, 2004-2006|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- PEARSONS-R|
AB- Author co-citation analysis (ACA) is an important method for
discovering the intellectual structure of a given scientific field Since
traditional ACA was confined to ISI Web of Knowledge (WoK), the cocitation counts of pairs of authors mainly depended on the data indexed
in WoK. Fortunately, Google Scholar has integrated different academic
databases from different publishers, providing an opportunity of
conducting ACA in wider a range. In this paper, we conduct ACA of
information science in China with the Chinese Google Scholar. Firstly, a
brief introduction of Chinese Google Scholar is made, including retrieval
principles and data formats. Secondly, the methods used in our paper are
given. Thirdly, 31 most important authors of information science in China
are selected as research objects. In the part of empirical study, factor
analysis is used to find the main research directions of information
science in China. Pajek, a powerful tool in social network analysis, is
employed to visualize the author co-citation matrix as well. Finally, the
resemblances and the differences between China and other countries in
information science are pointed out|
C1- [Ma, Ruimin; Dai, Qiangbin; Ni, Chaoqun; Li, Xuelu] Wuhan Univ, Sch
Informat Management, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China|
RP- Ma, RM, Wuhan Univ, Sch Informat Management, Wuhan 430072, Hubei,
Peoples R China|
EM- ruimin.ma@yahoo.com.cn|
FU- National Natural Science Foundation of China [70673071/G0309]|
FX- The authors would like to acknowledge the support of National Natural
Science Foundation of China (70673071/G0309) and enlightening comments
from reviewers. We appreciate Doctor Ronald Rousseau for his sincere
comments and selfless provision of materials|
CD- AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; AHLGREN P, 2004,
V55, P843, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; AHLGREN P, 2004, V55, P936, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; BENSMAN SJ, 2004, V55, P935, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; DENOOY W,
2005, EXPLORATORY SOCIAL N; HUANG RL, 2004, ADV TUTORIAL SPSS;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MA FC, 2006, V25,
P259, J CHINA SOC SCI TECH; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; QIU JP, 2007, INFORMATRICS; QIU JP, 2008, V27, P69, J CHINA SOC SCI
TECH; SU XL, 2006, V25, P131, J CHINA SOC SCI TECH; THELWALL M, 2005,
V39, P81, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54,
P1250, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 16|
TC- 1|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- OCT|
PY- 2009|
VL- 81|
IS- 1|
BP- 33|
EP- 46|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-009-2063-x|
PG- 14|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 507HD|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2009, V81, N1, P33-46|
UT- ISI:000270841800003 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Zuccala A; van den Besselaar P|
AF- Zuccala Alesia; van den Besselaar, Peter|
TI- Mapping review networks: Exploring research community roles and
contributions|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION; COLLABORATION|
AB- In this paper we investigate the position of a review network within
a research specialty; the network of scholars who write reviews of their
colleagues' work. This is one of the voluntary activities that
researchers perform as a prerequisite for the functioning of the
invisible college. We compare this network to other networks within the
specialty, and this allows us to distinguish various roles: stars,
influentials, members, reviewers and juniors. As scholars are
characterized by different role-configurations, the invisible college
becomes stratified. We discuss the implications for the development of a
referee factor and review factor, norms for refereeing and reviewing, and
the development of systems-based research evaluations|
C1- [Zuccala, Alesia; van den Besselaar, Peter] Rathenau Inst,
Netherlands Ctr Sci Syst Assessment, The Hague, Netherlands|
RP- Zuccala, A, Rathenau Inst, Netherlands Ctr Sci Syst Assessment, POB
95366, The Hague, Netherlands|
EM- a.zuccala@rathenau.nl|
CD- 2006, MATH REV DATABASE GU; AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; BORGATTI SP, 2002, NETDRAW GRAPH VISUAL; BORGATTI SP, 2002,
UCINET 6 WINDOWS; CRANE D, 1972, INVISIBLE COLL DIFFU; CRONIN B, 1995,
SCHOLARS COURTESY RO; CRONIN B, 2001, V57, P427, J DOC; DAVIS CH, 1993,
V44, P590, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; DESOLLA PD, 1986, LITTLE SCI BIG SCI;
GARVEY WD, 1968, P129, FDN ACCESS KNOWLEDGE; GLANZEL W, 2002, V53, P171,
SCIENTOMETRICS; GRIFFITH BC, 1990, P31, SCHOLARLY COMMUNICAT; LAUDEL G,
2001, P369, P 8 INT C SCIENT INF; LEYDESDORFF L, 2005, V56, P769, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; MELIN G, 1996, V36, P363, SCIENTOMETRICS; NEWMAN MEJ,
2004, V101, P5200, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; ROUSSEAU R, ISSI NEWSLETTER, P1,
V2; SINGH S, 1998, FERMATS ENIGMA; SMALL H, 2005, P13, P ISSI 2005; WHITE
HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2001, V52, P87, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITE HD, 2004, V55, P111, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WILSON
R, 2006, V441, P812, NATURE; ZUCCALA A, 2006, V57, P152, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC|
NR- 24|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- OCT|
PY- 2009|
VL- 81|
IS- 1|
BP- 111|
EP- 122|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-008-2136-2|
PG- 12|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 507HD|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2009, V81, N1, P111-122|
UT- ISI:000270841800008 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Zhang J; Chen CM; Li JX|
AF- Zhang Jian; Chen, Chaomei; Li, Jiexun|
TI- Visualizing the Intellectual Structure with Paper-Reference Matrices|
SO- IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS|
LA- English|
DT- Proceedings Paper|
CT- IEEE Information Visualization Conference/IEEE Visualization
Conference|
CY- OCT 11, 2009|
CL- Atlantic City, NJ|
SP- IEEE, IEEE Comp Soc, IEEE vgtc, Natl Informat Assurance Res Lab,
Kitware, NVAC, NVIDIA, VisMaster, IBM Res, HP, Microsoft Res, Natl Lib
Med, NSI, CYVIZ, Appl Vis Secure Decis, SCI, Morgan & Claypool Publ,
Palgrave Macmillan, A K Peters Ltd|
DE- Intellectual Structure; Paper-reference Matrix; FP-tree; Co-citation|
ID- CITATION CONTEXT ANALYSIS; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURES; COMMUNITY
STRUCTURE; NETWORKS; SCIENCE; SPECIALTIES; COCITATION; PATTERNS; TREE|
AB- Visualizing the intellectual structure of scientific domains using
co-cited units such as references or authors has become a routine for
domain analysis. In previous studies, paper-reference matrices are
usually transformed into reference-reference matrices to obtain co-
citation relationships, which are then visualized in different
representations, typically as node-link networks, to represent the
intellectual structures of scientific domains. Such network
visualizations sometimes contain tightly knit components, which make
visual analysis of the intellectual structure a challenging task. In this
study, we propose a new approach to reveal co-citation relationships.
Instead of using a reference-reference matrix, we directly use the
original paper-reference matrix as the information source, and transform
the paper-reference matrix into an FP-tree and visualize it in a Javabased prototype system. We demonstrate the usefulness of our approach
through visual analyses of the intellectual structure of two domains:
Information Visualization and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). The
results show that our visualization not only retains the major
information of co-citation relationships, but also reveals more detailed
sub-structures of tightly knit clusters than a conventional node-link
network visualization|
C1- [Zhang, Jian; Chen, Chaomei; Li, Jiexun] Drexel Univ, Philadelphia,
PA 19104 USA|
RP- Zhang, J, Drexel Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA|
EM- jz85@drexel.edu cc345@drexel.edu jiexun.li@drexel.edu|
CD- AGNARSSON G, 2007, GRAPH THEORY MODELIN; AGRAWAL R, 1993, P207, 1993
ACM SIGMOD INT; BATAGELJ V, 2003, ARXIVCS0309023V1; CHEN C, 2009, 12 INT
C SCIENT INF; CHEN CM, 1998, V10, P107, INTERACT COMPUT; CHEN CM, 2006,
V57, P359, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CUI WW, 2008, V14, P1277, IEEE T VIS
COMPUT GR; DWYER T, 2008, V14, P1293, IEEE T VIS COMPUT GR; EADES PD,
1992, V5, P10, B I COMBINATORICS IT; FEKETE JD, 2004, IEEE INFOVIS 2004
CO; GIRVAN M, 2002, V99, P7821, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; GREENBERG S, 2008,
P111, ACM C HUM FACT COMP; GRIFFITH BC, 1974, V4, P339, SCI STUD; HAN JW,
2004, V8, P53, DATA MIN KNOWL DISC; HEER J, 2005, P421, ACM HUMAN FACTORS
CO; JOHNSON B, 1991, P275, IEEE VISUALIZATION 9; KEIM AD, 2005, IEEE S
INF VIS INF 2; KEIM D, 2008, V4950, P154, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LIU ZC, 2008, V14,
P1173, IEEE T VIS COMPUT GR; MACAIN WK, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; MORRIS SA, 2003, V54, P413, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MORRIS SA, 2008,
V42, P213, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; ROBERTSON GG, 1991, P189, ACM C HUM FACT
COMP; ROSVALLT M, 2008, V105, P1118, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; SMALL H, 1973,
V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; SMALL
H, 1980, V36, P183, J DOC; SMALL H, 1980, V2, P277, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL
H, 1981, P AM SOC INF SCI; SMALL H, 2006, V68, P595, SCIENTOMETRICS;
STASKO JT, 2000, P57, INFOVIS; VANHAM F, 2004, IEEE S INF VIS 2004;
WATTENBERG M, 2008, V14, P1221, IEEE T VIS COMPUT GR; WHITE HD, 1981,
V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI|
NR- 35|
TC- 0|
PU- IEEE COMPUTER SOC|
PI- LOS ALAMITOS|
PA- 10662 LOS VAQUEROS CIRCLE, PO BOX 3014, LOS ALAMITOS, CA 90720-1314
USA|
SN- 1077-2626|
J9- IEEE TRANS VISUAL COMPUT GR|
JI- IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph|
PD- NOV-DEC|
PY- 2009|
VL- 15|
ISBPEPPGSCGAJNN6,
UT-
6|
1153|
1160|
8|
Computer Science, Software Engineering|
506MM|
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, 2009, V15,
P1153-1160|
ISI:000270778900040 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Janssens F; Zhang L; De Moor B; Glanzel W|
AF- Janssens Frizo; Zhang, Lin; De Moor, Bart; Glanzel, Wolfgang|
TI- Hybrid clustering for validation and improvement of subjectclassification schemes|
SO- INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Subject classification; Journal cross-citation; Mapping of science;
Hybrid clustering|
ID- COMBINING FULL-TEXT; WORD ANALYSIS; INFORMATION-SCIENCE; COMBINED
COCITATION; DOCUMENTS|
AB- A hybrid text/citation-based method is used to cluster journals
covered by the Web of Science database in the period 2002-2006. The
objective is to use this clustering to validate and, if possible, to
improve existing journal-based subject-classification schemes. Crosscitation links are determined on an item-by-paper procedure for
individual papers assigned to the corresponding journal. Text mining for
the textual component is based on the same principle; textual
characteristics of individual papers are attributed to the journals in
which they have been published. In a first step, the 22-field subjectclassification scheme of the Essential Science Indicators (ESI) is
evaluated and visualised. In a second step, the hybrid clustering method
is applied to classify the about 8300 journals meeting the selection
criteria concerning continuity, size and impact. The hybrid method proves
superior to its two components when applied separately The choice of 22
clusters also allows a direct field-to-cluster comparison, and we
substantiate that the science areas resulting from cluster analysis form
a more coherent structure than the "intellectual" reference scheme, the
ESI subject scheme. Moreover, the textual component of the hybrid method
allows labelling the clusters using cognitive characteristics, while the
citation component allows visualising the cross-citation graph and
determining representative journals suggested by the PageRank algorithm.
Finally, the analysis of journal 'migration' allows the improvement of
existing classification schemes on the basis of the concordance between
fields and clusters (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved|
C1- [Janssens, Frizo; Zhang, Lin; Glanzel, Wolfgang] Katholieke Univ
Leuven, Ctr R&D Monitoring ECOOM, Dept MSI, Louvain, Belgium; [Janssens,
Frizo] Attentio SA NV, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium; [Janssens, Frizo; De
Moor, Bart] Katholieke Univ Leuven, ESAT SCD, Louvain, Belgium; [Zhang,
Lin] Dalian Univ Technol, WISE Lab, Dalian, Peoples R China; [Glanzel,
Wolfgang] Hungarian Acad Sci, IRPS, Budapest, Hungary|
RP- Janssens, F, Katholieke Univ Leuven, Ctr R&D Monitoring ECOOM, Dept
MSI, Louvain, Belgium|
EM- frizo.janssens@esat.kuleuven.be|
CD- BADER BW, 2006, V32, P635, ACM T MATH SOFTWARE; BAEZAYATES R, 1999,
MODERN INFORM RETRIE; BATAGELJ V, 2003, P77, GRAPH DRAWING SOFTWA; BENHUR
A, 2002, P6, PAC S BIOC; BERRY MW, 1995, V37, P573, SIAM REV; BOYACK KW,
2009, V79, P45, SCIENTOMETRICS; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P252, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BRIN S, 1998,
V30, P107, COMPUT NETWORKS ISDN; CALADO P, 2006, V57, P208, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; CALLON M, 1983, V22, P191, SOC SCI INFORM; CALLON M, 1986,
MAPPING DYNAMICS SCI; DEERWESTER S, 1990, V41, P391, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
DEMOYAANEGON F, 2007, V58, P2167, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; FANO RM, 1956,
P238, DOCUMENTATION ACTION; GARFIELD E, 1975, P5, CURR CONTENTS; GARFIELD
E, 1988, V22, P3, CURRENT CONTENTS; GERACI F, 2008, V3, P413, INTERNET
MATH; GLANZEL W, 1996, V37, P195, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLENISSON P, 2005, V41,
P1548, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; GLENISSON P, 2005, V63, P163,
SCIENTOMETRICS; HALKIDI M, 2001, V17, P107, J INTELL INF SYST; HATCHER E,
2004, LUCENE ACTION; HE X, 2001, P195, P 2001 IEEE INT C DA; HE X, 2002,
V41, P19, COMPUT STAT DATA AN; HICKS D, 1987, V17, P295, SOC STUD SCI;
JAIN A, 1988, ALGORITHMS CLUSTERIN; JANSSENS F, 2006, V42, P1614, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG; JANSSENS F, 2006, P615, P 1 INT C MULT INF S; JANSSENS F,
2007, P360, P 13 ACM SIGKDD INT; JANSSENS F, 2007, THESIS KATHOLIEKE U;
JANSSENS F, 2008, V75, P607, SCIENTOMETRICS; JARNEVING B, 2005, THESIS
GOTEBORG U SW; JARNEVING B, 2007, V1, P287, J INFORMETR; KESSLER MM,
1963, V14, P10, AM DOC; KOSTOFF RN, 2001, V68, P223, TECHNOL FORECAST
SOC; KOSTOFF RN, 2005, V41, P103, CORTEX; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P601,
J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2009, V60, P348, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; MARDIA KV, 1979, MULTIVARIATE ANAL; MARSHAKOVA IV, 1973, V2, P3,
NAUCHNO TEKHNICHESKA; MODHA DS, 2000, P143, P 11 ACM C HYP HYP S; NARIN
F, 1976, EVALUATIVE BIBLIOMET; NEWMAN MEJ, 2004, V69, P2, PHYS REV E;
NEWMAN MEJ, 2006, V103, P23, PNAS US; NOYONS ECM, 1999, BIBLIOMETRIC
MAPPING; PINSKI G, 1976, V12, P297, INFORMATION PROCESSI; ROUSSEEUW PJ,
1987, V20, P53, J COMPUT APPL MATH; SALTON G, 1986, INTRO MODERN INFORM;
SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1998, V41, P125,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL HG, 1978, V8, P327, SOC STUD SCI; TREERATPITUK P,
2006, V151, P167, P 2006 INT C DIG GOV; WANG Y, 2002, P499, P 11 INT C
INF KNOWL; WEISS R, 1996, P180, P 7 ACM C HYP; ZHANG B, 2005, P667, P 28
ANN INT ACM SIG; ZHANG L, 2009, SCIENTOMETR IN PRESS|
NR- 57|
TC- 5|
PU- PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD|
PI- OXFORD|
PA- THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND|
SN- 0306-4573|
J9- INFORM PROCESS MANAGE|
JI- Inf. Process. Manage|
PD- NOV|
PY- 2009|
VL- 45|
IS- 6|
BP- 683|
EP- 702|
DI- 10.1016/j.ipm.2009.06.003|
PG- 20|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 504MW|
JN- INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2009, V45, N6, P683-702|
UT- ISI:000270622100005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Vasconcellos E; Bruno MAC; Campanario MD; Noffs SL|
AF- Vasconcellos Eduardo; Bruno, Marcos A. C; Campanario, Milton de A;
Noffs, Sergio L|
TI- A new graphic format to facilitate the understanding of technological
innovation models: the seesaw of competitiveness|
SO- TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- technological innovation models; technological innovation learning;
graphical representation of innovation models; success of technological
innovation|
ID- COCITATION ANALYSIS; SCIENCE; MANAGEMENT; VISUALIZATION; PERSPECTIVE;
PERFORMANCE; DISCIPLINE; CITATION; CULTURES; STRATEGY|
AB- Many models exist in the literature to explain the success of
technological innovation. However, no studies have been made regarding
graphic formats representing the technological innovation models and
their impact, or on the understanding of these models by non-specialists
in technology management. Thus, the main objective of this paper is to
propose a new graphic configuration to represent the technological
innovation management. Based on the literature, the innovation model is
presented in the traditional format. Next, the same model is designed in
the graphic format - named 'the see-saw of competitiveness' - showing the
interfaces among the identified factors The two graphic formats were
compared by a group of graduate students in terms of the ease in
understanding the conceptual model of innovation. The statistical
analysis shows that the seesaw of competitiveness is preferred|
C1- [Bruno, Marcos A. C.] Univ Sao Paulo, Ctr Technol Policy &
Management, NPGCT, BR-09500900 Sao Paulo, Brazil; [Vasconcellos, Eduardo;
Campanario, Milton de A.] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Econ Adm & Accounting, FEA,
BR-09500900 Sao Paulo, Brazil; [Noffs, Sergio L.] Siemens, Sao Paulo,
Brazil|
RP- Bruno, MAC, Univ Sao Paulo, Ctr Technol Policy & Management, NPGCT,
BR-09500900 Sao Paulo, Brazil|
EM- epgdvasc@gmail.com marcos.acbruno@gmail.com macampanario@uol.com.br
sergio.noffs@siemens.com|
CD- *FUND INN TECN, 2001, GEST INN TECN EMPR; *ORG EC COOP DEV, 2005,
MEAS SCI TECHN ACT O; ANDREW JP, 2003, V81, P76, HARVARD BUS REV; ANDREWS
KR, 1980, CONCEPT CORPORATE ST; BALBINOT Z, 2001, P135, MANAGEMENT
TECHNOLOG; BARNEY J, 1991, V17, P99, J MANAGE; BARTUNEK JM, 1987, V23,
P483, J APPLIED BEHAVIORAL; BASSECOULARD E, 1999, V44, P323,
SCIENTOMETRICS; BOUTELLIER R, 1998, V28, P13, R&D MANAGE; BOYACK KW,
2002, V53, P764, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BROWN J, 1990, V4, P24, ACAD
COMPUTING; BRUNO MAC, 2003, V2, P107, RIV FINANZA MARKETIN; CHEN CM,
2001, V52, P315, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CHIESA V, 1998, V28, P199, R&D
MANAGE; CHIESA V, 2005, V18, P5, EUROPEAN J INNOVATIO; CLARK KB, 1989,
V67, P94, HARVARD BUS REV; COHAN PS, 1997, TECHNOLOGY LEADERS A; CRAWFORD
RD, 1992, ERA HUMAN CAPITAL EM; DAFT RL, 1989, ORG THEORY DESIGN; DAVENI
RA, 1994, V37, P1167, ACAD MANAGE J; DRUCKER PF, 2002, V80, P95, HARVARD
BUS REV; FISCHER MJ, 1995, V18, P381, SYMB INTERACT; FRAMBACH RT, 1999,
ORG INNOVATION ADOPT; FROHMAN AL, 1982, V60, P97, HARVARD BUS REV; FUERY
K, 2003, VISUAL CULTURE CRITI; GHEMAWAT P, 1999, STRATEGY BUSINESS LA;
GLADWELL M, 2002, TIPPING POINT LITTLE; HAMEL G, 1989, V67, P63, HARVARD
BUS REV; HAMEL G, 1994, COMPETING FUTURE; ITAMI H, 1987, MOBILIZING
INVISIBLE; KODAMA F, 1992, V70, P70, HARVARD BUS REV; KOSTOFF RN, 1999,
V50, P427, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; KOTLER P, 2005, MARKETING MANAGEMENT;
LEVIE WH, 1982, V30, P195, ECTJ-EDUC COMMUN TEC; LEWIS JD, 1990,
PARTNERSHIPS PROFIT; LOSIEWICZ P, 2000, V15, P99, J INTELL INF SYST;
MAYER RE, 1989, V59, P43, REV EDUC RES; MCCAIN KW, 1998, V41, P389,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MEEK VL, 1988, V9, P453, ORGAN STUD; MINTZBERG H, 1996,
STRATEGY PROCESS CON; MIRZOEFF N, 1998, P3, VISUAL CULTURE READE;
NEDERHOF AJ, 1997, V40, P273, SCIENTOMETRICS; NOFFS SL, 2005, THESIS CTR
U NOVE JU; NOOTEBOOM B, 1989, V6, P109, INT J RES MARK; PETTIGREW AM,
1979, V24, P570, ADM SCI Q; PORTER ME, 1980, COMPETITIVE STRATEGY; PORTER
ME, 2002, P239, INNOVATION DRIVING P; PRAHALAD CK, 1990, V68, P79,
HARVARD BUS REV; PRAJOGO DI, 2006, V36, P499, R&D MANAGE; QUINN JB, 1994,
V35, P43, SLOAN MANAGE REV; RAM S, 1991, V8, P117, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG;
RIEBER LP, 2000, OMPUTERS GRAPHICS LE; ROBERTS JH, 1993, V5, P27, HDB
OPERATIONS RES M; ROGERS EM, 1995, DIFFUSION INNOVATION; ROTH WM, 2005,
CRITICAL GRAPHICACY; ROUSSEL PA, 1991, 3 GENERATION R D MAN; SCHULZE A,
2005, V23, P263, EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT; SLYWOTZKY AJ, 1997, PROFIT ZONE;
SMALL H, 1999, V50, P799, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; STALK G, 1990, COMPETING
TIME; STEELE LW, 1989, MANAGING TECHNOLOGY; THAMHAIN HJ, 2005, MANAGEMENT
TECHNOLOG; THERIN F, 1998, P207, MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOG; TWISS BC, 1974,
MANAGING TECHNOLOGIC; UTTERBACK JM, 1975, V3, P639, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S;
VEKIRI I, 2002, V14, P261, EDUC PSYCHOL REV; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; WINN W, 1991, V39, P17, ETR&D-EDUC TECH RES; WOLPERT
JD, 2002, V80, P77, HARVARD BUS REV|
NR- 69|
TC- 0|
PU- ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD|
PI- ABINGDON|
PA- 4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXFORDSHIRE, ENGLAND|
SN- 0953-7325|
J9- TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG MANAGE|
JI- Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage|
PY- 2009|
VL- 21|
IS- 5|
BP- 565|
EP- 582|
DI- 10.1080/09537320902969067|
PG- 18|
SC- Management; Multidisciplinary Sciences|
GA- 503EW|
JN- TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2009, V21, N5, P565-582|
UT- ISI:000270517100001 ER ||
PTAUAFTISOLA-
J|
Kajikawa Y; Takeda Y|
Kajikawa Yuya; Takeda, Yoshiyuki|
Citation network analysis of organic LEDs|
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE|
English|
DT- Article|
DE- Citation network; Bibliometrics; Research front; Research evaluation;
Organic light-emitting diodes|
ID- LIGHT-EMITTING-DIODES; SEMICONDUCTOR LITERATURE; ELECTROLUMINESCENT
DEVICES; COCITATION ANALYSIS; RESEARCH AREA; POLYMERS; SCIENCE; EMISSION;
TRACKING; MAP|
AB- The field of organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) is an emergent
research domain because of both scientific interest in chemistry and
condensed matter physics and industrial importance as flat panel
displays. In this paper, we analyzed a citation network of OLED papers
and used a topological clustering method to investigate the structure of
research and to detect emerging research domains. We found that most
papers belong to two main clusters: organics and polymers. These two
clusters have distinctive differences in subcluster structures and
journals where papers are published. Supposing this discrepancy to
indicate research progress, organics are in the applied research stage,
while polymers are in the basic research stage. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc All
rights reserved|
C1- [Kajikawa, Yuya; Takeda, Yoshiyuki] Univ Tokyo, Innovat Policy Res
Ctr, Inst Engn Innovat, Sch Engn,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138656, Japan|
RP- Kajikawa, Y, Univ Tokyo, Innovat Policy Res Ctr, Inst Engn Innovat,
Sch Engn,Bunkyo Ku, 2-11-16 Yayoi, Tokyo 1138656, Japan|
EM- kaji@biz-model.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp|
CD- ADACHI C, 1990, V56, P799, APPL PHYS LETT; ADAI AT, 2004, V340, P179,
J MOL BIOL; BALDO MA, 1998, V395, P151, NATURE; BALDO MA, 1999, V75, P4,
APPL PHYS LETT; BHATTACHARYA S, 1998, V43, P359, SCIENTOMETRICS;
BHATTACHARYA S, 2003, V58, P369, SCIENTOMETRICS; BRAUN D, 1991, V58,
P1982, APPL PHYS LETT; BURROUGHES JH, 1990, V347, P539, NATURE; GREENHAM
NC, 1993, V365, P628, NATURE; GREM G, 1992, V4, P36, ADV MATER; GUAN J,
2006, V65, P215, SCIENTOMETRICS; GUAN JC, 2007, V70, P107,
SCIENTOMETRICS; GUPTA BM, 2008, V75, P123, SCIENTOMETRICS; GUSTAFSSON G,
1992, V357, P477, NATURE; HUANG MH, 2003, V58, P489, SCIENTOMETRICS; HUNG
LS, 1997, V70, P152, APPL PHYS LETT; KAJIKAWA Y, 2008, V75, P1349,
TECHNOL FORECAST SOC; KAJIKAWA Y, 2008, V75, P771, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC;
KIDO J, 1995, V267, P1332, SCIENCE; KLAVANS R, 2006, V57, P251, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; NEWMAN MEJ, 2004, V69, ARTN 066133, PHYS REV E 2; NEWMAN
MEJ, 2004, V69, ARTN 026113, PHYS REV E; ROJO R, 2006, V66, P101,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SHIBATA N, 2009, V60, P571, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; SMALL
H, 2006, V68, P595, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 2009, V79, P365,
SCIENTOMETRICS; TAKEDA Y, 2009, V78, P543, SCIENTOMETRICS; TANG CW, 1987,
V51, P913, APPL PHYS LETT; TSAY MY, 2000, V49, P491, SCIENTOMETRICS; TSAY
MY, 2003, V56, P201, SCIENTOMETRICS; TSAY MY, 2003, V57, P7,
SCIENTOMETRICS; TSAY MY, 2003, V58, P529, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANSLYKE SA,
1996, V69, P2160, APPL PHYS LETT|
NR- 33|
TC- 2|
PU- ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC|
PI- NEW YORK|
PA- 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, NY 10010-1710 USA|
SN- 0040-1625|
J9- TECHNOL FORECAST SOC CHANGE|
JI- Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang|
PD- OCT|
PY- 2009|
VL- 76|
IS- 8|
BP- 1115|
EP- 1123|
DI- 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.04.004|
PG- 9|
SC- Business; Planning & Development|
GA- 500YW|
JN- TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2009, V76, N8, P11151123|
UT- ISI:000270344000009 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Kwakkel JH; Cunningham SW|
AF- Kwakkel Jan H; Cunningham, Scott W|
TI- Managing Polysemy and Synonymy in Science Mapping Using the Mixtures
of Factor Analyzers Model|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- COMBINED COCITATION; WORD ANALYSIS; MAPS; REPRESENTATIONS;
IDENTIFICATION; LITERATURES; RETRIEVAL|
AB- A new method for mapping the semantic structure of science is
described. We assume that different researchers, working on the same set
of research problems, will use the same words for concepts central to
their research problems. Therefore, different research fields and
disciplines should be identifiable by different words and the pattern of
co-occurring words. In natural language, however, there is quite some
diversity because many words have multiple meaning. In addition, the same
meaning can be expressed by using different words. We argue that
traditional factor analytic and cluster analytic techniques are
inadequate for mapping the semantic structure if such polysemous and
synonymous words are present. Instead, an alternative model, the mixtures
of factor analyzers (MFA) model, is utilized. This model extends the
traditional factor analytic model by allowing multiple centroids of the
dataset. We argue that this model is structurally better suited to map
the semantic structure of science. The model is illustrated by a case
study of the uncertainty literature sampled from data from the ISI Web of
Science. The MFA model is applied with the goal of discovering multiple,
potentially incommensurate, conceptualizations of uncertainty in the
literature. In this way, the MFA model can help in creating understanding
of the use of language in science, which can benefit multidisciplinary
research and interdisciplinary understanding, and assist in the
development of multidisciplinary taxonomies of science|
C1- [Kwakkel, Jan H.; Cunningham, Scott W.] Delft Univ Technol, Fac
Technol Policy & Management, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands|
RP- Kwakkel, JH, Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, POB
5015, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands|
EM- j.h.kwakkel@tudelft.nl s.cunningham@tudelft.nl|
CD- AKAIKE H, 1974, V19, P716, IEEE T AUTOMATIC CON; BAUIN S, 1986, P124,
MAPPING DYNAMICS SCI; BENSMAN SJ, 2005, V56, P189, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
BISHOP CM, 1998, V10, P215, NEURAL COMPUT; BORNER K, 2003, V37, P179,
ANNU REV INFORM SCI; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P252, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; CALLON M, 1986, MAPPING
DYNAMICS SCI; COLEMAN JS, 1964, INTRO MATH SOCIOLOGY; CUNNINGHAM SW,
2000, THESIS U SUSSEX BRIG; DEERWESTER S, 1990, V41, P391, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; DEMPSTER AP, 1977, V39, P1, J ROY STAT SOC B; FABAPEREZ C,
2003, V58, P623, SCIENTOMETRICS; FUNTOWICS SO, 1990, UNCERTAINTY QUALITY;
GHAHRAMANI Z, 1997, CRGTR961 U TOR DEP C; GREENACRE MJ, 1984, THEORY APPL
CORRES A; HARMAN HH, 1976, MODERN FACTOR ANAL; HEALEY P, 1986, V15, P233,
RES POLICY; HICKS D, 1987, V17, P295, SOC STUD SCI; KNIGHT FH, 1921, RISK
UNCERTAINTY PRO; KOHONEN T, 1995, SELF ORG MAPS; KUMAGAI T, 2004, V62,
P153, NEUROCOMPUTING; KWAKKEL JH, 2008, PORTL INT C MAN ENG; LEMPERT R,
2002, V20, P420, SOC SCI COMPUT REV; LIN X, 1997, V48, P40, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; MARSHAKOVA IV, 1973, V6, P3, SCI TECHNICAL INFORM; MCCAIN KW,
1989, V40, P110, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCLACHLAN GJ, 2000, FINITE MIXTURE
MODEL; MCLACHLAN GJ, 2002, V18, P413, BIOINFORMATICS; MCLACHLAN GJ, 2003,
V41, P379, COMPUT STAT DATA AN; MORGAN MG, 1990, UNCERTAINTY GUIDE DE;
NORTON JP, 2006, V6, P82, INTEGRATED ASSESSMEN; NOYONS ECM, 1999, V46,
P591, SCIENTOMETRICS; PETERS HPF, 1993, V22, P23, RES POLICY; PETERS HPF,
1993, V22, P47, RES POLICY; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P255, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; SMALL H, 1985, V11, P147, J INFORM
SCI; SMALL H, 1997, V38, P275, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1998, V41, P125,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1999, V50, P799, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SWANSON
DR, 1987, V38, P228, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; TEH YW, 2002, V15, NEURAL
INFORM PROCES; VANASSELT MBA, 2000, PERSPECTIVES UNCERTA; VANDENBESSELAAR
P, 2006, V68, P377, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANDERSLUIS JP, 1997, ANCHORING
UNCERTAINT; WALKER WE, 2003, V4, P5, INTEGRATED ASSESSMEN; YAMAMOTO H,
2005, V88, P418, IEICE T INF SYST ED; ZHOE YK, 2006, V4082, P11, LECT
NOTES COMPUTER; ZITT M, 2005, V3, P38, MEASUREMENT INTERDIS|
NR- 50|
TC- 0|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- OCT|
PY- 2009|
VL- 60|
IS- 10|
BP- 2064|
EP- 2078|
DI- 10.1002/asi.21114|
PG- 15|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 499UF|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2009, V60, N10, P2064-2078|
UT- ISI:000270250900011 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Tai ZX|
AF- Tai Zixue|
TI- The Structure of Knowledge and Dynamics of Scholarly Communication in
Agenda Setting Research, 1996-2005|
SO- JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION|
LA- English|
DT- Review|
ID- 1996 PRESIDENTIAL-ELECTION; REAL-WORLD CUES; PUBLIC-OPINION; MEDIA
AGENDA; MASS-MEDIA; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; CITATION ANALYSIS;
TELEVISION-NEWS; ENVIRONMENTAL-ISSUES; PERSONAL-EXPERIENCE|
AB- By conducting a citation analysis of bibliographic references in
combination with a network analysis of cocitation referencing in 56
journal publications in the area of agenda-setting research from 1996 to
2005, this paper aims to identify current exemplary publications and
authoritative works in the knowledge production and dissemination process
and to examine the nature of knowledge-sharing networks among the
community of scholars who contribute to the growth of common knowledge in
the study of agenda setting. The findings shed light on the intellectual
history of agenda-setting scholarship and offer insight on subspecialties
and intellectual linkages among key literature in this vigorous and everevolving field of inquiry|
C1- Univ Kentucky, Sch Journalism & Telecommun, Lexington, KY 40506 USA|
RP- Tai, ZX, Univ Kentucky, Sch Journalism & Telecommun, Lexington, KY
40506 USA|
EM- ztai2@uky.edu|
CD- ATWATER T, 1985, V62, P393, JOURNALISM QUART; BALDI S, 1995, V34,
P239, SCIENTOMETRICS; BALDI S, 1997, V27, P669, SOC STUD SCI; BALDI S,
1998, V63, P829, AM SOCIOL REV; BARDHAN NR, 2002, V7, P221, J HEALTH
COMMUN; BAYER AE, 1990, V41, P444, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BEHR RL, 1985,
V49, P38, PUBLIC OPIN QUART; BENTON M, 1976, V3, P261, COMMUN RES; BERGER
BK, 2001, V13, P91, J PUBLIC RELAT RES; BERKOWITZ SD, 1982, INTRO
STRUCTURAL ANA; BORGATTI SP, 2002, UCINET 6 WINDOWS SOF; BOYLE TP, 2001,
V78, P26, JOURNALISM MASS COMM; BRASHER H, 2003, V20, P453, POLIT COMMUN;
BROSIUS HB, 1990, V17, P183, COMMUN RES; BROSIUS HB, 1996, V23, P561,
COMMUN RES; CARROLL CE, 2003, V6, P36, CORPORATE REPUTATION; CAWKELL AE,
1977, V2, P543, ESSAYS INFORM SCI; CHAN K, 1999, V11, P135, INT J PUBLIC
OPIN R; CHANG KK, 1999, V76, P312, JOURNALISM MASS COMM; CHANG TK, 2005,
V82, P672, JOURNALISM MASS COMM; CHUBIN DE, 1975, V5, P423, SOC STUD SCI;
CLEMENS ES, 1995, V101, P433, AM J SOCIOL; COHEN BC, 1963, PRESS FOREIGN
POLICY; COZZENS SE, 1985, V7, P431, SCIENTOMETRICS; CRAFT S, 2004, V16,
P456, INT J PUBLIC OPIN R; CRANE D, 1972, INVISIBLE COLL DIFFU; DALTON
RJ, 1998, V15, P463, POLIT COMMUN; DEARING JW, 1996, AGENDA SETTING;
DEGENNE A, 1999, INTRO SOCIAL NETWORK; DEMERS DP, 1989, V16, P793, COMMUN
RES; DEMERS DP, 1996, V73, P304, JOURNALISM MASS COMM; DOWNS A, 1972,
P38, PUBLIC INTEREST; DYER SC, 1996, V8, P137, J PUBLIC RELAT RES; EATON
H, 1989, V66, P942, JOURNALISM QUART; EGGHE L, 2002, V55, P273,
SCIENTOMETRICS; ENTMAN RM, 1993, V43, P51, J COMMUN; ERBRING L, 1980,
V24, P16, AM J POLIT SCI; FICO F, 2001, V78, P437, JOURNALISM MASS COMM;
FREEMAN LC, 2004, DEV SOCIAL NETWORK A; FUNKHOUSER ET, 1996, V22, P563,
HUM COMMUN RES; FUNKHOUSER GR, 1973, V37, P62, PUBLIC OPIN QUART; GANS
HJ, 1979, DECIDING WHATS NEWS; GARFIELD E, 1955, V122, P108, SCIENCE;
GARFIELD E, 1972, V178, P4060, SCIENCE; GARFIELD E, 1979, CITATION
INDEXING IT; GHANEM S, 1996, THESIS U TEXAS AUSTI; GHANEM S, 1997, P3,
COMMUNICATION DEMOCR; GHANEM SI, 2001, V45, P277, J BROADCAST ELECTRON;
GILBERT GN, 1977, V7, P113, SOC STUD SCI; GLEDITSCH NP, 1993, V30, P445,
J PEACE RES; GOLAN G, 2001, V78, P247, JOURNALISM MASS COMM; GRIFFITH BC,
1983, P1, STOCKHOLM PAPERS LIB; GROSS K, 2003, V53, P411, J COMMUN;
HANNEMAN RA, 2005, INTRO SOCIAL NETWORK; HARDY BW, 2005, V69, P725,
PUBLIC OPIN QUART; HESTER JB, 2003, V80, P73, JOURNALISM MASS COMM; HICKS
D, 1991, V21, P459, SOC STUD SCI; HILGARTNER S, 1988, V94, P53, AM J
SOCIOL; HOLBROOK RA, 2005, V22, P277, POLIT COMMUN; HUMMON NP, 1993, V15,
P71, SOC NETWORKS; IYENGAR S, 1982, V76, P848, AM POLIT SCI REV; IYENGAR
S, 1987, NEWS MATTERS TELEVIS; IYENGAR S, 1991, IS ANYONE RESPONSIBL;
IYENGAR S, 1993, V20, P365, COMMUN RES; JASPERSON AE, 1998, V15, P205,
POLIT COMMUN; JOCHEN P, 2003, V30, P683, COMMUN RES; JOHNSON B, 2007,
V63, P609, J DOC; KIM SH, 2002, V79, P7, JOURNALISM MASS COMM; KIOUSIS S,
1999, V26, P414, COMMUN RES; KIOUSIS S, 2003, V6, P435, MASS
COMMUNICATION S; KIOUSIS S, 2004, V31, P36, COMMUN RES; KIOUSIS S, 2004,
V54, P71, J COMMUN; KIOUSIS S, 2005, V10, P3, HARV INT J PRESS-POL;
KLAPPER JT, 1960, EFFECTS MASS COMMUNI; KU GT, 2003, V80, P528,
JOURNALISM MASS COMM; KUHN TS, 1970, STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; KWANASAHAIDOO
K, 2001, V63, P521, GAZETTE INT J COMMUN; KWANSAHAIDOO K, 2003, V28, P43,
CANADIAN J COMMUNICA; LANG GE, 1981, V2, P447, MASS COMMUNICATION R;
LASORSA DL, 1990, V67, P804, JOURNALISM QUART; LEE B, 2005, V15, P57,
ASIAN J COMMUNICATIO; LEE GH, 2004, V66, P151, GAZETTE INT J COMMUN;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V60, P371, J DOC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2007, V58, P1303, J
AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LIPPMANN W, 1922, PUBLIC OPINION; LOPEZESCOBAR E,
1998, V15, P225, POLIT COMMUN; LOWERY SA, 1995, MILESTONES MASS COMM;
MACROBERTS M, 1996, V36, P3, SCIENTOMETRICS; MATERA FR, 1999, V28, P11,
WORLD COMMUNICATION; MCCAIN KW, 1986, V37, P111, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
MCCOMBS M, 1995, V59, P495, PUBLIC OPIN QUART; MCCOMBS M, 1996, P93,
INTEGRATED APPROACH; MCCOMBS M, 1997, COMMUNICATION DEMOCR; MCCOMBS M,
1997, V74, P703, JOURNALISM MASS COMM; MCCOMBS M, 1997, V24, P32, MASS
COMM REV; MCCOMBS M, 1997, V14, P433, POLIT COMMUN; MCCOMBS M, 2004,
SETTING AGENDA MASS; MCCOMBS M, 2005, V6, P543, JOURNALISM STUD; MCCOMBS
ME, 1972, V36, P167, PUBLIC OPIN QUART; MCCOMBS ME, 1992, V69, P813,
JOURNALISM QUART; MCCOMBS ME, 1993, V43, P58, J COMMUN; MCCOMBS ME, 1997,
AEJMC CONV CHIC; MCCOMBS ME, 1997, P237, DO MEDIA GOVERN POLI; MCKUEN MB,
1981, MORE NEWS MEDIA POWE; MCLEOD JM, 1974, V1, P131, COMMUN RES; MERTON
RK, 1968, V159, P56, SCIENCE; MERTON RK, 1973, SOCIOLOGY SCI THEORE; MOED
HF, 2005, CITATION ANAL RES EV; MONGE PR, 2003, THEORIES COMMUNICATI;
MORRIS SA, 2005, V56, P1250, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; NORRIS M, 2003, V59,
P709, J DOC; OKEOWO D, 1999, V28, P43, WORLD COMMUNICATION; OPPENHEIM C,
1997, V53, P477, J DOC; OTTE E, 2002, V28, P441, J INF SCI; PAISLEY W,
1984, V5, P1, PROGR COMMUNICATION; PAISLEY W, 1989, V16, P701, COMMUN
RES; PATTERSON TE, 1993, OUT ORDER; PORTER AL, 1977, V7, P257, SOC STUD
SCI; PRATT CB, 2002, V52, P889, J COMMUN; PRICE DJ, 1963, LITTLE SCI BIG
SCI; PRICE DJD, 1965, V149, P510, SCIENCE; PRICE DJD, 1970, P3,
COMMUNICATION SCI EN; REESE SD, 1989, P29, COMMUNICATION CAMPAI; RICE RE,
1988, V15, P256, HUM COMMUN RES; ROBERTS M, 1994, V11, P249, POLIT
COMMUN; ROBERTS M, 2002, V29, P452, COMMUN RES; ROBERTS MS, 1997, V2,
P62, HARV INT J PRESS/POL; ROESSLER P, 1999, V26, P666, COMMUN RES;
ROGERS EM, 1981, COMMUNICATION NETWOR; ROGERS EM, 1988, V11, P555,
COMMUNICATION YB; ROGERS EM, 1993, V43, P68, J COMMUN; ROGERS EM, 2003,
DIFFUSION INNOVATION; ROSSI J, 2000, V12, P1, EUR J NEUROSCI; SALWEN MB,
1997, V26, P1, WORLD COMMUNICATION; SATO H, 2003, V8, P23, J HEALTH
COMMUN; SCHEUFELE DA, 2000, V3, P297, MASS COMMUNICATION S; SCOTT J,
2000, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; SHADISH WR, 1995, V25, P477, SOC STUD SCI;
SHAW DL, 1992, V69, P902, JOURNALISM QUART; SHAW DL, 1999, V11, P2, INT J
PUBLIC OPIN R; SHEAFER T, 2005, V55, P347, J COMMUN; SMALL H, 1973, V24,
P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1980, V36, P183, J DOC; SMALL H,
2003, V54, P394, SCIENCE; SMALL HG, 1978, V8, P327, SOC STUD SCI; SMALL
HG, 1979, V1, P445, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMITH KA, 1987, V101, P1, JOURNALISM
MONOGRAPH; SODERLUND G, 2005, V8, P307, COMMUNICATION REV; STONE GC,
1981, V58, P151, JOURNALISM QUART; TAKESHITA T, 1995, V17, P27, KEIO
COMMUNICATION R; TANKARD J, 1991, ANN M AEJMC BOST; TANKARD JW, 1984,
V61, P89, JOURNALISM QUART; TEWKSBURY D, 2002, V14, P264, INT J PUBLIC
OPINION; TSFATI Y, 2003, V47, P157, J BROADCAST ELECTRON; TUIRE P, 2001,
V42, P493, HIGH EDUC; WALGRAVE S, 2004, V21, P479, POLIT COMMUN; WANTA W,
1993, V5, P250, INT J PUBLIC OPIN R; WANTA W, 1994, V6, P225, INT J
PUBLIC OPIN R; WANTA W, 1997, PUBLIC NATL AGENDA; WANTA W, 2004, V81,
P364, JOURNALISM MASS COMM; WASSERMAN S, 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL;
WEAVER D, 1991, V3, P53, INT J PUBLIC OPINION; WEAVER DH, 1977, P107,
EMERGENCE AM POLITIC; WEAVER DH, 1981, MEDIA AGENDA SETTING; WERDER O,
2002, V64, P219, GAZETTE INT J COMMUN; WEST R, 2002, V97, P501,
ADDICTION; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD,
1989, V24, P119, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2004, V55, P111, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; WINTER JP, 1981, V45, P376, PUBLIC OPIN QUART; YAGADE A,
1990, V67, P3, JOURNALISM QUART; YANG J, 2003, V6, P57, MASS
COMMUNICATION S; YIOUTAS J, 2003, V80, P567, JOURNALISM MASS COMM; YOUNG
M, 2004, V14, P192, ASIAN J COMMUNICATIO; ZHU JH, 1992, V69, P825,
JOURNALISM QUART; ZUCKER HG, 1978, V2, P225, COMMUNICATION YB|
NR- 176|
TC- 1|
PU- WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC|
PI- MALDEN|
PA- COMMERCE PLACE, 350 MAIN ST, MALDEN 02148, MA USA|
SN- 0021-9916|
J9- J COMMUN|
JI- J. Commun|
PD- SEP|
PY- 2009|
VL- 59|
IS- 3|
BP- 481|
EP- +|
DI- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01425.x|
PG- 37|
SC- Communication|
GA- 499PA|
JN- JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2009, V59, N3, P481-+|
UT- ISI:000270235300011 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Julien CA; Cole C|
AF- Julien Charles-Antoine; Cole, Charles|
TI- Capitalizing on Controlled Subject Vocabulary by Providing a Map of
Main Subject Headings: An Exploratory Design Study|
SO- CANADIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND LIBRARY SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE
DES SCIENCES DE L INFORMATION ET DE BIBLIOTHECONOMIE|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- ONLINE CATALOG; INFORMATION-SCIENCE; USERS; GENERATION; COCITATION;
INTERFACE; DOMAINS; ACCESS; SPACE; OPAC|
AB- Online library catalogue users often search for subjects, and these
searches often fail. Many of these failures can be attributed to an
inadequate match between the users' search terms and the words the
information retrieval systems can recognize. An interface designed to
support controlled subject heading browsing could alleviate this problem.
This is an exploratory study describing the design and development of an
interactive visual map of a collection's major subject headings and their
relations. The resulting visualization prototype is a complement to
keyword searching. It aims to facilitate subject browsing by providing
the user with a collection overview suggesting valid subject query terms
for a small specialized collection (478 bibliographic records)|
C1- [Julien, Charles-Antoine; Cole, Charles] McGill Univ, Sch Informat
Studies, Montreal, PQ H3A 1Y1, Canada|
RP- Julien, CA, McGill Univ, Sch Informat Studies, Montreal, PQ H3A 1Y1,
Canada|
EM- charles.julien@mail.mcgill.ca charles.cole@mcgill.ca|
CD- *CAT POL SUPP OFF, 2007, LIB C SUBJ HEAD PRE; ALLEN RB, 1995, P
DAGS95 EL PUBL INF; ANDERSON JD, 2006, V43, P7, CATALOGING CLASSIFIC;
BATES MJ, 1986, V37, P357, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BATES MJ, 2002, V3, P1,
NEW REV INFORM BEHAV; BATES MJ, 2003, LIB C BIC C BIBL CON; BECKS A,
2002, P ACM S APPL COMP MA; BEDERSON BB, 2003, CRAFT INFORM VISUALI;
BORNER K, 2003, V37, P179, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; BUZYDLOWSKI JW, 2002,
V2539, P133, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; CALHOUN K, 2006, CHANGING NATURE CATA;
CARD SK, 1999, READINGS INFORM VISU; CARLYLE A, 1989, V10, P37,
CATALOGING CLASSIFIC; CHANDLER A, 2006, V52, P157, LIBR RESOUR TECH SER;
CHEN C, 2004, INFORM VISUALIZATION; CHEN HC, 1998, V49, P582, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; DIBATTISTA G, 1999, GRAPH DRAWING ALGORI; DRABENSTOTT KM,
1991, V9, RASD OCCASIONAL PAPE; DRABENSTOTT KM, 1996, V32, P719, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG; DRABENSTOTT KM, 1996, V47, P519, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
DRIESSEN S, 2006, P INFOVIS LOND ENGL; DUSHAY N, 2004, V10, D LIB
MAGAZINE; EDEN B, 2007, V43, P13, LIB TECHNOLOGY REPOR; FRUCHTERMAN TMJ,
1991, V21, P1129, SOFTWARE PRACT EXPER; GRUN C, 2005, V3652, P174, LECT
NOTES COMPUT SC; HEARST MA, 1999, P257, MODERN INFORMATION R; HILDRETH
CR, 1982, P 45 ASIS ANN M WHIT; HILDRETH CR, 1989, P1, ONLINE CATALOGUE
DEV; IGLESIAS E, 2008, V26, P12, LIBR HI TECH; JULIEN CA, 2008, V54,
P229, DOCUMENTATION BIBLIO; KELLER PR, 1993, VISUAL CLUES PRACTIC; LARSON
RR, 1991, V42, P197, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; LARSON RR, 1996, V47, P555, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; LOMBARDO SV, 2000, V18, P130, LIB HI TECH; MARCHIONINI
G, 1995, INFORM SEEKING ELECT; MARKEY K, 1983, V2, P383, INFORMATION
TECHNOLO; MARKEY K, 1985, V29, P34, LIBR RESOUR TECH SER; MARKEY K, 1986,
P35, IMPACT ONLINE CATALO; MARKEY K, 2007, V13, D LIB; MATTHEWS JR, 1983,
USING ONLINE CATALOG; MATTHEWS JR, 1984, V3, P354, INFORM TECHNOL LIBR;
MCCAFFREY J, 2006, V4, NET DEV J; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; MERCUN T, 2008, V42, P243, PROGRAM-ELECTRON LIB; MI J, 2008,
V27, P5, INFORM TECHNOL LIBR; MOYAANEGON F, 2004, V61, P129,
SCIENTOMETRICS; NEWBY GB, 2002, V18, P31, J INTELL INF SYST; PAPADAKIS L,
2008, V26, P19, LIBR HI TECH; PENNELL C, 2008, NCSU ENDECA 2 1 2 YE;
RAEITHEL A, 1996, P199, CONTEXT CONSCIOUSNES; SANCHEZ JA, 2005,
EXPERIENCES STARFIEL; SARACEVIC T, 1999, V50, P1051, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
SEBRECHTS MM, 2005, V3426, P136, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; SMALL H, 2000,
P449, WEB KNOWLEDGE FESTSC; VANPULIS N, 1988, V49, P523, COLL RES LIBR;
VEERASAMY A, 1997, P ANN INT ACM SIGIR; WARE C, 2000, INFORM
VISUALIZATION; WHITE HD, 1990, P84, SCHOLARLY COMMUNICAT; WHITE HD, 1998,
V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, AM SACKL C NAT AC SC;
WIBERLEY SE, 1988, V49, P149, COLL RES LIBR; YEE KP, 2003, P CHI 2003 C
FT LAUD|
NR- 62|
TC- 0|
PU- CANADIAN ASSOC INFORMATION SCIENCE|
PI- OTTAWA|
PA- PO BOX 6174, STATION J, OTTAWA, ONTARIO K2A 1T2, CANADA|
SN- 1195-096X|
J9- CAN J INFORM LIB SCI|
JI- Can. J. Inf. Libr. Sci.-Rev. Can. Sci. Inf. Bibl|
PD- MAR-JUN|
PY- 2009|
VL- 33|
IS- 1-2|
BP- 67|
EP- 83|
PG- 17|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 502CC|
JN- CANADIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND LIBRARY SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE
DES SCIENCES DE L INFORMATION ET DE BIBLIOTHECONOMIE, 2009, V33, N1-2,
P67-83|
UT- ISI:000270430700003 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Truex D; Cuellar M; Takeda H|
AF- Truex Duane; Cuellar, Michael; Takeda, Hirotoshi|
TI- Assessing Scholarly Influence: Using the Hirsch Indices to Reframe
the Discourse|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Scholarly Influence Ranking; Citation Analysis; Hirsch Index; hindex; Contemporary Hirsch Index; hc-index; g-index; Critical
Perspective; Scientometrics; Information Systems (IS); Reification by
Repetition; Information Sciences (InfSci)|
ID- MANAGEMENT-INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; H-INDEX;
JOURNAL RANKINGS; CITATION ANALYSIS; HIGH-IMPACT; SCIENTISTS; BUSINESS;
FORUMS; PUBLICATIONS|
AB- This study is part of a program aimed at creating measures enabling a
fairer and more complete assessment of a scholar's contribution to a
field, thus bringing greater rationality and transparency to the
promotion and tenure process. It finds current approaches toward the
evaluation of research productivity to be simplistic, atheoretic, and
biased toward reinforcing existing reputation and power structures This
study examines the use of the Hirsch family of indices, a robust and
theoretically informed metric, as an addition to prior approaches to
assessing the scholarly influence of IS researchers. It finds that while
the top tier journals are important indications of a scholar's impact,
they are neither the only nor, indeed, the most important sources of
scholarly influence. Other ranking studies, by narrowly bounding the
venues included in those studies, distort the discourse and effectively
privilege certain venues by declaring them to be more highly influential
than warranted. The study identifies three different categories of
scholars: those who publish primarily in North American journals, those
who publish primarily in European journals, and a transnational set of
authors who publish in both geographies. Excluding the transnational
scholars, for the scholars who published in these journal sets during the
period of this analysis, we find that North American scholars tend to be
more influential than European scholars, on average. We attribute this
difference to a difference in the publication culture of the different
geographies. This study also suggests that the influence of authors who
publish in the European journal set is concentrated at a moderate level
of influence, while the influence of those who publish in the North
American journal set is dispersed between those with high influence and
those with relatively low influence. Therefore, to be a part of the top
European scholar list requires a higher level of influence than to be a
part of the top North American scholar list|
C1- [Truex, Duane; Takeda, Hirotoshi] Georgia State Univ, J Mack Robinson
Coll Business, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA; [Cuellar, Michael] N Carolina Cent
Univ, Durham, NC USA|
RP- Truex, D, Georgia State Univ, J Mack Robinson Coll Business, Atlanta,
GA 30303 USA|
EM- dtruex@gsu.edu mcullar@nccu.edu htakeda@cis.gsu.edu|
CD- ABT HA, 2000, V48, P65, SCIENTOMETRICS; ADAMS D, 2008, V17, P158, EUR
J INFORM SYST; ALEXANDER JK, 2007, V6, P321, J ED BUSINESS; ALPHA M,
2008, MEMORY ALPHA
0515; ATHEY S, 2000, V7, P2, COMMUNICATIONS ASS I;
BANKS MG, 2006, V69, P161, SCIENTOMETRICS; BARILAN J, 2008, V74, P257,
SCIENTOMETRICS; BASKERVILLE R, 2008, V17, P156, EUR J INFORM SYST;
BATISTA PD, 2006, V68, P179, SCIENTOMETRICS; BORNMANN L, 2005, V65, P391,
SCIENTOMETRICS; BORNMANN L, 2006, V68, P427, SCIENTOMETRICS; BOURGIN S,
1996, V37, P3, HUNG QUART; BRAUN T, 2006, V69, P169, SCIENTOMETRICS; CHUA
C, 2002, V3, P145, J ASSOC INF SYST; CLARK JG, 2007, P478, COMMUNICATIONS
ASS I; CLARK T, 2007, V44, P612, J MANAGE STUD; COLLIN SO, 1996, BRIT J
MANAGEME 0602; CUELLAR MJ, 2008, 14 AM C INF SYST TOR; CULNAN MJ, 1986,
V32, P156, MANAGE SCI; CULNAN MJ, 1987, V3, P341, MIS Q; DAVIS FD, 1989,
V13, P319, MIS QUART; DELONE WH, 1992, V3, P1, INFORMATION SYSTEMS;
DELONE WH, 2003, V19, P9, J MANAGE INFORM SYST; EASTON G, 2007, V44,
P628, J MANAGE STUD; EGGHE L, 2005, POWER LAWS INFORM PR; EGGHE L, 2006,
V69, P121, SCIENTOMETRICS; EGGHE L, 2006, V69, P131, SCIENTOMETRICS;
EGGHE L, 2007, V58, P452, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; FERRATT TW, 2007, P710,
COMMUNICATIONS ASS I; GALLIERS RD, 2007, V16, P20, EUR J INFORM SYST;
GALLIERS RD, 2007, V16, P3, EUR J INFORM SYST; GALLIVAN MJ, 2007, V16,
P36, EUR J INFORM SYST; GEARY J, 2004, V15, P95, BRIT J MANAGE; GLANZEL
W, 2006, V67, P315, SCIENTOMETRICS; HARDGRAVE BC, 1997, V40, P119, COMMUN
ACM; HARZING AW, 2007, PUBLISH PERISH; HARZING AW, 2008, V2, P115, EUR J
INT MANAG; HARZING AW, 2008, GOOGLE SCHOLAR NEW D; HIRSCH JE, 2005, V102,
P16569, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; HUANG HH, 2005, V15, P555, COMMUNICATIONS
AIS; KATERATTANAKUL P, 2003, V12, P60, EUR J INFORM SYST; KLOTZKO AJ,
2001, CLONING SOURCEBOOK; KODRZYCKI YK, 2005, P40, NEW APPROACHES RANKI;
KOROBKIN R, 1999, V26, P851, FLA ST U L REV; KOZAR KA, 2006, V17, P524,
COMMUNICATIONS AIS; LEE TA, 1999, V10, P867, CRIT PERSPECT; LIANG LM,
2006, V69, P153, SCIENTOMETRICS; LOTKA AJ, 1926, V16, P317, J WASHINGTON
ACADEMY; LOWRY PB, 2004, V5, P29, J ASSOC INF SYST; LOWRY PB, 2007, P142,
ARTN 16, COMMUNICATIONS ASS I; LYYTINEN K, 2007, V16, P317, EUR J INFORM
SYST; MACDONALD S, 2007, V44, P640, J MANAGE STUD; MARTIN N, 2007, V30,
P14, ECONTENT; MINGERS J, 1997, V25, P489, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S; MINGERS
J, 2007, V16, EUROPEAN J INFORM SY; MOLINARI JF, 2008, V75, P163,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MYLONOPOULOS NA, 2001, V44, P29, COMMUN ACM; NELSON MJ,
2006, P7, ALTERNATE METHOD RAN; NERUR S, 2005, V48, P71, COMMUN ACM;
PEFFERS K, 2003, V5, P63, J INFORMATION TECHNO; PODSAKOFF PM, 2005, V26,
P473, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; POWELL P, 2008, V17, P174, EUR J INFORM SYST;
RAINER RK, 2005, V48, P91, COMMUN ACM; SAAD G, 2006, V69, P117,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SCHUBERT A, 2007, V70, P201, SCIENTOMETRICS; SIDIROPOULOS
A, 2006, ARXIVCSDLO606066; SINGH G, 2007, V16, P319, J MANAGE INQUIRY;
STRAUB D, 2006, V7, P241, J ASSOC INF SYST; STRAUB D, 2008, V1, R3, MIS
Q; TAKEDA H, 2008, SO ASS INF SYST C RI; TEMPLETON GF, 2007, P710,
COMMUNICATIONS ASS I; VANRAAN AFJ, 2006, V67, P491, SCIENTOMETRICS;
WALSTROM KA, 1995, V38, P93, COMMUN ACM; WALSTROM KA, 2001, V39, P117,
INFORM MANAGE; WHITE HD, 1981, V3, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2003,
V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITLEY EA, 2007, V2, P99, INFORM
MANAGE; WHITMAN ME, 1999, V10, P99, INFORM SYST RES; WILLCOCKS L, 2008,
P161, EUROPEAN J INFORM SY; ZANOTTO ED, 2006, V69, P175, SCIENTOMETRICS;
ZHAO DZ, 2006, V42, P1578, INFORM PROCESS MANAG|
NR- 81|
TC- 4|
PU- ASSOC INFORMATION SYSTEMS|
PI- ATLANTA|
PA- GEORGIA STATE UNIV, 35 BROAD STREET, STE 916-917, ATLANTA, GA 30303
USA|
SN- 1536-9323|
J9- J ASSOC INF SYST|
JI- J. Assoc. Inf. Syst|
PY- 2009|
VL- 10|
IS- 7|
BP- 560|
EP- 594|
PG- 35|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 496KN|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2009, V10, N7,
P560-594|
UT- ISI:000269971700002 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Espinosa-Calvo ME; Vargas-Quesada B; Guerrero-Bote VPR; de MoyaAnegon F|
AF- Eugenia Espinosa-Calvo Ma; Vargas-Quesada, Benjamin; Rosa GuerreroBote, Vicente P; de Moya-Anegon, Felix|
TI- Comparative study of six National Scientific Dominions|
SO- REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DOCUMENTACION CIENTIFICA|
LA- Spanish|
DT- Article|
DE- Materials Science; categories; cocitation; countries; scientograms|
ID- COCITATION; CATEGORIES; INFORMATION; PATHFINDER; KNOWLEDGE;
ALGORITHM; DOMAINS|
AB- This work, analyses the area of materials science. Materials science
has existed since the earliest civilizations. The development and
evolution of societies has been intimately linked to The ability of their
members to produce and shape materials to meet their needs However,
materials; science has only recently been established as a recognised
academic discipline, a consequence of the agglomeration of different
areas of science. The citation habits and scientograms associated with
this field could therefore be related to the scientific tradition and
culture of each country. In this study, the citation networks of six of
the most developed countries in the year 2002 were examined using a new
technique That graphically represents these networks as scientograms. The
technique makes use of cocitation between topic categories of the JCR to
generate a network of categories which is graphically represented. The
scientograms obtained, which represent the citation networks of each
country examined, reflect the cultures of the different nations studied|
C1- [Eugenia Espinosa-Calvo, Ma; Rosa Guerrero-Bote, Vicente P.] Univ
Extremadura, Dept Informac Comunicac, Scimago Res Grp, E-06071 Badajoz,
Spain; [Vargas-Quesada, Benjamin] Univ Granada, Fac Bibliotecon &
Documentac, Scimago Res Grp, E-18071 Granada, Spain; [de Moya-Anegon,
Felix] CSIC, CCHS, Scimago Res Grp, IPP, Madrid, Spain|
RP- Espinosa-Calvo, ME, Univ Extremadura, Dept Informac Comunicac,
Scimago Res Grp, E-06071 Badajoz, Spain|
EM- guerrero@unex.es|
CD- *WIK, 2007, MAT SCI; BORNER K, 2003, V37, P179, ANNU REV INFORM SCI;
BRAUN T, 2000, WEB KNOWLEDGE FESTSC; COHEN JD, 1997, V4, P197, ACM T
COMPUT-HUM INT; EADES P, 1984, V42, P149, C NUMERANTIUM; FABAPEREZ C,
2003, V58, P623, SCIENTOMETRICS; FRUCHTERMAN TMJ, 1991, V21, P1129,
SOFTWARE PRACT EXPER; GARFIELD E, 1955, V122, P108, SCIENCE; GUERREROBOTE
VP, 2002, V52, P99, LIBRI; GUERREROBOTE VP, 2006, V42, P1484, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG; GUERREROBOTE VP, 2007, V71, P423, SCIENTOMETRICS; KAMADA
T, 1989, V31, P7, INFORM PROCESS LETT; KREMPEL L, 1999, INT SUNB SOC NETW
C; MARSHAKOVA V, 1973, V6, P3, NAUCHNOTEKHNICHESC 2; MARTINEZ ATG, 2008,
V20, P465, PSICOTHEMA; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
MOYAANEGON F, 2004, V61, P129, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOYAANEGON F, 2005,
INDICADORES BIBLIOME; PRICE DS, 1963, BIG SCI LITTLE SCI; SCHVANEVELDT
RW, 1990, PATHFINDER ASS NETWO; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 23|
TC- 0|
PU- CONSEJO SUPERIOR DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICAS|
PI- MADRID|
PA- VITRUVIO 8, 28006 MADRID, SPAIN|
SN- 0210-0614|
J9- REV ESP DOC CIENT|
JI- Rev. Esp. Doc. Cient|
PD- JUL-SEP|
PY- 2009|
VL- 32|
IS- 3|
BP- 9|
EP- 28|
DI- 10.3989/redc.2009.3.674|
PG- 20|
SC- Information Science & Library Science|
GA- 488LE|
JN- REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DOCUMENTACION CIENTIFICA, 2009, V32, N3, P9-28|
UT- ISI:000269350400001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Holmberg K; Huvila I; Kronqvist-Berg M; Widen-Wulff G|
AF- Holmberg Kim; Huvila, Isto; Kronqvist-Berg, Maria; Widen-Wulff,
Gunilla|
TI- What is Library 2.0?|
SO- JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Process planning; Libraries; Internet; Electronic media|
ID- JOURNAL COCITATION ANALYSIS; DIGITAL LIBRARIES; SCIENCE; NETWORKS;
WEB-2.0|
AB- Purpose - The aim of this paper is to define both theoretically and
empirically the concept of Library 2.0 Design/methodology/approach Written answers to the question "What is Library 2.0?" given by
practitioners and researchers (n = 29) interested in Library 2.0 issues
were analyzed by using co-word analysis to map the underlying elements of
the concept Findings - The study resulted in a model of Library 2.0,
containing seven building-blocks of the phenomenon: interactivity, users,
participation, libraries and library services, web and web 2.0, social
aspects, and technology and tools Research limitations/implications - The
model provides a basis for framing Library 2.0 as a research object and
to map central themes of future research Practical implications - A
comprehensive model enables both researchers and practitioners to frame
the phenomenon more clearly, evaluate existing and planned services and
their proximity to what is Library 2.0 Originality/value - Unlike earlier
proposals for a definition of the notion Library 2.0, the present study
presents an empirical and consensual crowd-sourcing approach of defining
the concept Library 2.0 and provides basis for discussing the future
evolution of the notion and its implications for library and information
science research and library practices|
C1- [Holmberg, Kim; Huvila, Isto; Kronqvist-Berg, Maria; Widen-Wulff,
Gunilla] Abo Akad Univ, Dept Informat Studies, Turku, Finland|
RP- Holmberg, K, Abo Akad Univ, Dept Informat Studies, Turku, Finland|
EM- kim.holmberg@abo.fi|
CD- ALLEN M, 2008, V13, 1 MONDAY; ANDERSON P, 2007, V39, P195, J LIBR INF
SCI; ANDERSON P, 2007, JISC TECHNOLOGY FEB; BEARMAN D, 2007, V41, P223,
ANNU REV INFORM SCI; BENSON A, 2006, V23, P18, LIBR HI TECH NEWS; BLACK
EL, 2007, LIB 2 0 INNOVATIVE T; BOYACK KW, 2005, V64, P351,
SCIENTOMETRICS; BREVIK T, 2006, LIB 2 0 MY LIB; CAHLIK T, 2000, V49,
P373, SCIENTOMETRICS; CASEY ME, 2006, LIB J
0901; CASEY ME,
2007, LIB 2 0 GUIDE PARTIC; CHAD K, 2005, DO LIB MATTER RISE L; COHEN S,
2000, V6, D LIB MAGAZINE; CONNOR E, 2007, V26, P1, MED REF SER QUART;
COOMBS KA, 2007, V27, COMPUTERS LIB; COURTIAL JP, 1994, V31, P251,
SCIENTOMETRICS; CRAWFORD W, 2006, V6, P1, CITES INSIGHTS; CURRAN K, 2006,
V12, P47, NEW REV INFORM NETWO; DING Y, 2000, V47, P55, SCIENTOMETRICS;
FARKAS MG, 2007, SOCIAL SOFTWARE LIB; FICHTER D, 2006, WEB 2 0 LIB 2 0
RADI; FOX EA, 2002, V36, P503, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; FRIASMARTINEZ E,
2007, V58, P237, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; GARFIELD E, 1979, P98, INDEXING
ITS THEORY; GIBBONS S, 2003, V9, D LIB MAGAZINE; GRIFFIN SM, 1998, D LIB
MAGAZINE
JUL; HABIB MC, 2006, ACAD LIB 2 0 DEV APP; HE Q, 1999, V48,
P133, LIBR TRENDS; HINCHCLIFFE D, 2006, SOCIAL COMPUTING MAG; HINTIKKA
KA, 2007, WEB 2 0 JOHDATUS INT; KAMADA T, 1989, V31, P7, INFORM PROCESS
LETT; KARLSEN SI, 2006, V3, P4, SCANDINAVIAN PUBLIC; LANKES RD, 2007,
V26, P17, INFORM TECHNOL LIBR; LEYDESDORFF L, 1987, V11, P291,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MADDEN M, 2006, RIDING WAVES WEB 2 0; MANESS JM, 2006,
V3, WEBOLOGY; MCCAIN KW, 1991, V42, P290, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW,
1998, V41, P389, SCIENTOMETRICS; MILLER P, 2005, V45, ARIADNE; MILLER P,
2006, V12, D LIB MAGAZINE; OREILLY T, 2005, WHAT IS WEB 2 0 DESI; OREILLY
T, 2006, LEVELS GAME HIERARCH; OREILLY T, 2006, WEB 2 0 COMPACT DEFI;
OREILLY T, 2008, NICE TAKE WEB 2 0 EX; PERSSON O, 2006, BIBEXCEL
BIBLIOMETRI; PRICE DJD, 1963, LITTLE SCI BIG SCI; SHONIWA P, 2008, V13,
P69, NEW REV INFORM NETWO; SMALL H, 1985, V11, P147, J INFORM SCI;
STEPHENS M, 2006, V42, LIB TECHNOLOGY REPOR; STEPHENS M, 2007, V33, P253,
SERIALS REV; TSAY MY, 2003, V57, P7, SCIENTOMETRICS; WALLIS R, 2007, V13,
P53, NEW REV INFORM NETWO|
NR- 52|
TC- 1|
PU- EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED|
PI- BINGLEY|
PA- HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND|
SN- 0022-0418|
J9- J DOC|
JI- J. Doc|
PY- 2009|
VL- 65|
IS- 4|
BP- 668|
EP- 681|
DI- 10.1108/00220410910970294|
PG- 14|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 488YT|
JN- JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2009, V65, N4, P668-681|
UT- ISI:000269387000007 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Small H|
AF- Small Henry|
TI- Critical thresholds for co-citation clusters and emergence of the
giant component|
SO- JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Co-citation clusters; Giant component; Critical thresholds;
Percolation; Science maps|
ID- COLLABORATION NETWORK; SCIENCE|
AB- The behavior of co-citation clusters is studied over a wide range of
similarity values, and we demonstrate the existence of critical or
percolation transitions marked by a sudden expansion of cluster size with
a small decrease in similarity which, in most cases, reflects the
emergence of a giant component on the overall graph for the dataset The
study was motivated by the question of how to set appropriate thresholds
for delineating individual research areas that identify, as far as
possible, natural boundaries, in view of the fact that a threshold or
criterion appropriate for one area may not be appropriate for another. We
explore the rate of change in cluster size as a possible boundary
indicator. The relationship of this critical behavior to maps of science
is discussed. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved|
C1- Thomson Reuters, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA|
RP- Small, H, Thomson Reuters, 3501 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19104
USA|
EM- henry.small@thomsonreuters.com|
CD- ACHLIOPTAS D, 2009, V323, P1453, SCIENCE; BOLLOBAS B, 2004, V3243,
P1, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; CALLAWAY DS, 2001, V64, ARTN 041902, PHYS REV E
1; FRUCHTERMAN TMJ, 1991, V21, P1129, SOFTWARE PRACT EXPER; GUIMERA R,
2005, V308, P697, SCIENCE; HARTIGAN JA, 1975, P199, CLUSTERING ALGORITHM;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2009, V60, P348, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; NEWMAN MEJ, 2001,
V64, ARTN 026118, PHYS REV E 2; SERRANO MA, 2006, V74, ARTN 056115, PHYS
REV E 2; SMALL H, 1999, V50, P799, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1999,
V48, P72, LIBR TRENDS; TOMASSINI M, 2007, V385, P750, PHYSICA A|
NR- 12|
TC- 0|
PU- ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV|
PI- AMSTERDAM|
PA- PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 1751-1577|
J9- J INFORMETR|
JI- J. Informetr|
PD- OCT|
PY- 2009|
VL- 3|
IS- 4|
BP- 332|
EP- 340|
DI- 10.1016/j.joi.2009.05.001|
PG- 9|
SC- Information Science & Library Science|
GA- 484VB|
JN- JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2009, V3, N4, P332-340|
UT- ISI:000269075100007 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Zhang J; Wolfram D; Wang PL|
AF- Zhang Jin; Wolfram, Dietmar; Wang, Peiling|
TI- Analysis of Query Keywords of Sports-Related Queries Using
Visualization and Clustering|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- WEB SEARCH ENGINE; INFORMATION-RETRIEVAL; LOGS; SEEKING; COCITATION;
PATTERNS; SCIENCE; CONTEXT; MODEL; IMAGE|
AB- The authors investigated 11 sports-related query keywords extracted
from a public search engine query log to better understand sports-related
information seeking on the Internet. After the query log contents were
cleaned and query data were parsed, popular sports-related keywords were
identified, along with frequently co-occurring query terms associated
with the identified keywords Relationships among each sports-related
focus keyword and its related keywords were characterized and grouped
using multidimensional scaling (MDS) in combination with traditional
hierarchical clustering methods The two approaches were synthesized in a
visual context by highlighting the results of the hierarchical clustering
analysis in the visual MDS configuration. Important events, people,
subjects, merchandise, and so on related to a sport were illustrated, and
relationships among the sports were analyzed. A small-scale comparative
study of sports searches with and without term assistance was conducted.
Searches that used search term assistance by relying on previous query
term relationships outperformed the searches without the search term
assistance. The findings of this study provide insights into sports
information seeking behavior on the Internet. The developed method also
may be applied to other query log subject areas|
C1- [Zhang, Jin; Wolfram, Dietmar] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Informat Studies,
Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA; [Wang, Peiling] Univ Tennessee, Sch Informat
Sci, Coll Commun & Informat, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA|
RP- Zhang, J, Univ Wisconsin, Sch Informat Studies, Milwaukee, WI 53201
USA|
EM- jzhang@uwm.edu dwolfram@uwm.edu peilingw@utk.edu|
FU- Institute of Museurn and Library Services National Leadership [LG-0605-0100-05]|
FX- We thank Excite@ hoine, the Universit ofTennessee,and HealthLink for
access to the query log data. This research was funded by Institute of
Museurn and Library Services National Leadership Research Grant LG-06-050100-05). Any views, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed
in this article do not necessarily represent those of the Institute of
Museum and Library Services|
CD- 2001, SPORTSBUSINESS DAILY; *PEW INT AM LIF PR, 2005, TEENS TECHN
YOUTH LE; BAEZAYATES R, 2007, 16 INT WORLD WID WEB; BEEFERMAN D, 2000,
P407, P 6 ACM SIGKDD INT C; BEITZEL SM, 2007, V58, P166, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; BORISH LJ, 1992, V7, HIST SPORT RECREATIO; CHALMERS M, 1992, P330, P
15 ANN INT ACM SIG; COOPER MD, 2001, V52, P137, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
CROFT WB, 1995, P19, P 2 INT C THEOR PRAC; DUTTON W, 2007, OXFORD
INTERNET SURV; ERNEST DJ, 2005, V33, P88, REFERENCE SERVICES R; FOWLER
RH, 1991, P142, P 14 ANN INT ACM SIG; FREE M, 2006, V9, P83, INT J
CULTURAL STUDI; GOODRUM A, 2001, V37, P295, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; HAKANEN
EA, 1995, V22, P9, J INFORMATION SCI; HALLAMBAKER PM, 2008, EXTENDED LOG
FILE FO; HIRSH SG, 1999, V50, P1265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; HOELSCHER C,
1998, P WEBNET98 WORLD C W; HUANG CK, 2003, V54, P638, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; JANSEN BJ, 2000, V3, P249, WORLD WIDE WEB; JANSEN BJ, 2005, V15,
P49, INTERNET RES; JANSEN BJ, 2007, V58, P744, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
JONES S, 1998, P261, P ECDL 98 2 EUR C DI; JOSHI KP, 1999, P63, P 2 ACM
CIKM WORKSH; KELLY D, 2006, V57, P1862, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; KOHONEN T,
2000, V11, P574, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR; KOHONEN T, 2001, V30, SPRINGER
SERIES INFO; KORFHAGE RR, 1997, INFORM STORAGE RETRI; KOSHMAN S, 2006,
V57, P1875, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; KRUSKAL JB, 1964, V29, P1,
PSYCHOMETRIKA; KRUSKAL JB, 1964, V29, P115, PSYCHOMETRIKA; MAHOUI M,
2000, P418, P 4 EUR C RES ADV TE; MCCAIN KW, 1986, V37, P111, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; PARK S, 2005, V27, P203, LIBR INFORM SCI RES; RIEH SY, 2006,
V42, P751, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; ROBERTSON GG, 1989, P10, P UIST 89 2 ANN
ACM; ROSS NCM, 2000, V51, P949, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SCHVANEVELDT RW,
1989, V24, P249, PSYCHOL LEARN MOTIV; SHI XD, 2007, V58, P1871, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; SILVERSTEIN C, 1999, V33, P6, SIGIR FORUM; SMALL H, 1973,
V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1985, V11, P147, J INFORM SCI;
SPINK A, 2001, V52, P226, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; SPINK A, 2002, V35, P107,
COMPUTER; SPINK A, 2004, V21, P44, HLTH INFORM LIB J; SPINK A, 2004, V40,
P113, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; STAPPERS PJ, 1999, P184, P CHI 99 HUM FACT
CO; THELWALL M, 2002, V54, P118, ASLIB PROC; TORGERSON WS, 1952, V17,
P401, PSYCHOMETRIKA; VAUGHAN L, 2006, V57, P1178, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
WANG PL, 2003, V54, P743, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WEN JR, 2001, P162, P 10
INT WORLD WID W; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITTLE
M, 2007, V58, P2382, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; YI K, 2006, V57, P1208, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; YORK J, 1995, P73, P S ADV INT PROC AN; ZEKI S, 1992,
V267, P69, SCI AM; ZHANG J, 1999, V50, P779, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; ZHANG
J, 2001, V37, P639, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; ZHANG J, 2008, V59, P1933, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; ZHANG J, 2008, VISUALIZATION INFORM; ZHANG J, 2009, V33,
P43, ONLINE INFORM REV|
NR- 62|
TC- 0|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- AUG|
PY- 2009|
VL- 60|
IS- 8|
BP- 1550|
EP- 1571|
DI- 10.1002/asi.21098|
PG- 22|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 475ID|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2009, V60, N8, P1550-1571|
UT- ISI:000268350900003 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- van Eck NJ; Waltman L|
AF- van Eck Nees Jan; Waltman, Ludo|
TI- How to Normalize Cooccurrence Data? An Analysis of Some Well-Known
Similarity Measures|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION;
COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE FIELD; NEURAL-NETWORK RESEARCH; CO-LINK DATA;
DISSIMILARITY COEFFICIENTS; INFORMATION-SCIENCE; WORD ANALYSIS;
PROXIMITY-MEASURES; MAPPING SCIENCE|
AB- In scientometric research, the use of cooccurrence data is very
common In many cases, a similarity measure is employed to normalize the
data However, there is no consensus among researchers on which similarity
measure is most appropriate for normalization purposes. In this article,
we theoretically analyze the properties of similarity measures for
cooccurrence data, focusing in particular on four well-known measures:
the association strength, the cosine, the inclusion index, and the
Jaccard index. We also study the behavior of these measures empirically.
Our analysis reveals that there exist two fundamentally different types
of similarity measures, namely, set-theoretic measures and probabilistic
measures. The association strength is a probabilistic measure, while the
cosine, the inclusion index, and the Jaccard index are set-theoretic
measures. Both our theoretical and our empirical results indicate that
cooccurrence data can best be normalized using a probabilistic measure.
This provides strong support for the use of the association strength in
scientometric research|
C1- [van Eck, Nees Jan] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Econ, Inst Econometr,
NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands; Leiden Univ, Ctr Sci & Technol
Studies, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands|
RP- van Eck, NJ, Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Econ, Inst Econometr, NL-3000
DR Rotterdam, Netherlands|
EM- nvaneck@ese.eur.nl lwaltman@ese.eur.nl|
CD- AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ANDERBERG MR, 1973,
CLUSTER ANAL APPL; BAULIEU FB, 1989, V6, P233, J CLASSIF; BAULIEU FB,
1997, V14, P159, J CLASSIF; BORG I, 2005, MODERN MULTIDIMENTSI; BOYACK
KW, 2005, V64, P351, SCIENTOMETRICS; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P252, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; CALLON M,
1991, V22, P155, SCIENTOMETRICS; CHUNG YM, 2001, V52, P283, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; CHURCH K, 1990, V16, P22, COMPUTATIONAL LINGUI; COX MAA, 2008,
P315, HDB DATA VISUALIZATI; COX TF, 2001, MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCA; DRASGOW
F, 1979, V14, P227, MULTIVARIATE BEHAV R; EGGHE L, 2002, V38, P823,
INFORM PROCESS MANAG; EGGHE L, 2003, V39, P771, INFORM PROCESS MANAG;
EGGHE L, 2006, V42, P106, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; EGGHE L, 2009, V60, P232,
J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; GLANZEL W, 1999, V45, P185, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL
W, 2001, V51, P69, SCIENTOMETRICS; GMUR M, 2003, V57, P27,
SCIENTOMETRICS; GOWER JC, 1985, V5, P397, ENCY STATISTICAL SCI; GOWER JC,
1986, V3, P5, J CLASSIF; GUILFORD JP, 1973, FUNDAMENTAL STAT PSY; HAMERS
L, 1989, V25, P315, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; HARDY GH, 1952, INEQUALITIES;
HEIMERIKS G, 2003, V58, P391, SCIENTOMETRICS; HINZE S, 1994, V29, P353,
SCIENTOMETRICS; HUBALEK Z, 1982, V57, P669, BIOL REV; JANSON S, 1981,
V49, P371, OECOLOGIA; JARNEVING B, 2008, V77, P485, SCIENTOMETRICS; JONES
WP, 1987, V38, P420, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; KLAVANS R, 2006, V57, P251, J
AM SOC INF SCI TEC; KLAVANS R, 2006, V68, P475, SCIENTOMETRICS; KOPCSA A,
1998, V49, P7, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; KOSTOFF RN, 1999, V50, P427, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; KOSTOFF RN, 2001, V52, P1148, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LAW J,
1992, V23, P417, SCIENTOMETRICS; LECLERC M, 1994, V31, P261,
SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 1989, V18, P209, RES POLICY; LEYDESDORFF
L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2008, V59, P77,
J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LUUKKONEN T, 1992, V17, P101, SCI TECHNOL;
LUUKKONEN T, 1993, V28, P15, SCIENTOMETRICS; MANNING CD, 1999, FDN STAT
NATURAL LAN; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW,
1991, V42, P290, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1995, V32, P153,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MORILLO F, 2003, V54, P1237, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; PALMER
CL, 1999, V50, P242, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PETERS HPF, 1993, V22, P23, RES
POLICY; PETERS HPF, 1995, V46, P9, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PETERSON MJ,
1993, V2, P47, ENVIRON VALUE; PRICE DD, 1981, V3, P47, SCIENTOMETRICS;
QIN J, 2000, V51, P166, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; RIP A, 1984, V6, P381,
SCIENTOMETRICS; RORVIG M, 1999, V50, P639, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; ROSENBERG
S, 1968, V9, P283, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL; ROSENBERG S, 1972, V22, P372, J
PERS SOC PSYCHOL; SALTON G, 1963, V10, P440, J ACM; SALTON G, 1983, INTRO
MODERN INFORM; SCHNEIDER JW, 2007, V58, P1586, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
SCHNEIDER JW, 2007, V58, P1596, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; SCHNEIDER JW, 2009,
V80, P105, SCIENTOMETRICS; SCHUBERT A, 1990, V19, P3, SCIENTOMETRICS;
SIMMEN MW, 1996, V31, P47, MULTIVAR BEHAV RES; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265,
J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1980, V2, P277, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H,
1981, V17, P39, INFORMATION PROCESSI; SMALL H, 1985, V7, P391,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1985, V8, P321, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1994,
V30, P229, SCIENTOMETRICS; SOKAL RR, 1963, PRINCIPLES NUMERICAL; TIJSSEN
RJW, 1989, V15, P283, SCIENTOMETRICS; TIJSSEN RJW, 1992, V21, P27, RES
POLICY; TIJSSEN RJW, 1993, V28, P111, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANDERKLOOT WA,
1991, V26, P563, MULTIVAR BEHAV RES; VANECK NJ, 2006, V1, P6, IEEE COMPUT
INTELL M; VANECK NJ, 2007, V15, P625, INT J UNCERTAIN FUZZ; VANECK NJ,
2008, V59, P1653, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; VANRAAN AFJ, 1993, V26, P169,
SCIENTOMETRICS; VAUGHAN L, 2006, V57, P1178, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
VAUGHAN L, 2006, V68, P611, SCIENTOMETRICS; WALTMAN L, 2007, V58, P1701,
J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WARRENS MJ, 2008, SIMILARITY COEFFICIE; WHITE HD,
1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ZEGERS FE,
1985, V50, P17, PSYCHOMETRIKA; ZITT M, 2000, V47, P627, SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 90|
TC- 10|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- AUG|
PY- 2009|
VL- 60|
IS- 8|
BP- 1635|
EP- 1651|
DI- 10.1002/asi.21075|
PG- 17|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 475ID|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2009, V60, N8, P1635-1651|
UT- ISI:000268350900009 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Blatt EM|
AF- Blatt Eli M|
TI- Differentiating, describing, and visualizing scientific space: A
novel approach to the analysis of published scientific abstracts|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- LATENT SEMANTIC ANALYSIS; WORD ANALYSIS; KNOWLEDGE; INFORMATION;
NETWORKS; COCITATION; EVOLUTION; CITATION; SCIENCE; TOPICS|
AB- This paper will develop and demonstrate a novel method for analyzing
scientific indexes called Latent Semantic Differentiation. Using two
distinct datasets comprised of scientific abstracts, it will demonstrate
the procedure's ability to identify the dominant themes, cluster the
articles accordingly, visualize the results, and provide a qualitative
description of each cluster. Combined, the analyses will highlight the
utility of the procedure for scientific document indexing, structuring
university departments, facilitating grant administration, and augmenting
ongoing research on scientific citation Because the procedure is
extensible to any textual domain, there are numerous avenues for
continued research both within the sciences and beyond|
C1- [Blatt, Eli M.] Stanford Univ, Dept Anthropol Sci, Stanford, CA 94305
USA|
RP- Blatt, EM, 350 Alabama St, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA|
EM- emblatt@stanford.edu|
FU- National Science Foundation FX I would like to thank Bill Durham for
seeing promise in my interests and ideas, and Stanford University for its
financial and intellectual support. Many thanks also to Richard
Pocklington for his guidance and council. This research was generously
supported by a Dissertation Improvement Grant from the National Science
Foundation, which supplied the necessary software and hardware for the
project, and by Thomson Scientific, which generously offered free access
to crawl their Web of Science index document index|
CD- BERRY MW, 2002, NEEL C NEW FRONT STA; BEST M, 2000, MICROEVOLUTIONARY
LA; BEST ML, 1999, V196, P389, J THEOR BIOL; BLUTE M, 2003, V7, P19, J
MEMETICS EVOLUTION; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
EROSHEVA E, 2004, V101, P5220, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; GINSPARG P, 2004,
V101, P5236, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; GRIFFITHS TL, 2004, V101, P5228, P
NATL ACAD SCI U S1; HENZINGER M, 2004, V101, P5186, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1;
HOPCROFT J, 2004, V101, P5249, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; HUI SC, 2004, V28,
P22, ONLINE INFORM REV; HULL D, 1988, SCI PROCESS; KUHN TS, 1996,
STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; LAHAM D, 1997, LATENT SEMANTIC ANAL; LANDAUER TK,
1997, V104, P211, PSYCHOL REV; LANDAUER TK, 1998, V7, P161, CURR DIR
PSYCHOL SCI; LANDAUER TK, 1998, V25, P259, DISCOURSE PROCESS; LANDAUER
TK, 2004, V101, P5214, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; LANDAUER TK, 2006, DATA
REQUIREMENTS CO; LEEUWEN TN, 2001, V51, P335, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF
L, 1998, V43, P5, SCIENTOMETRICS; MANE KK, 2004, V101, P5287, P NATL ACAD
SCI U S1; MENCZER F, 2004, V101, P5261, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; MIKA P,
2006, V68, P3, SCIENTOMETRICS; MORRIS SA, 2004, V101, P5291, P NATL ACAD
SCI U S1; NEWMAN MEJ, 2004, V101, P5200, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; SHENK M,
2006, MODELS FUTURE ANTHR; SHIFFRIN RM, 2004, V101, P5183, P NATL ACAD
SCI U S1; SKUPIN A, 2004, V101, P5274, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; SMITH EA,
2006, ANTHR SCHISMS; SODERQVIST T, 1994, V30, P243, SCIENTOMETRICS; WHITE
HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2004, V101, P5297, P
NATL ACAD SCI U S1; YANAGISAKO S, 2006, WELCOMING DEBATE EXP|
NR- 34|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- AUG|
PY- 2009|
VL- 80|
IS- 2|
BP- 385|
EP- 406|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-008-2070-3|
PG- 22|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 470ZB|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2009, V80, N2, P385-406|
UT- ISI:000268019900009 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Garcia-Martinez AT; Guerrero-Bote V; Hassan-Montero Y; Moya-Anegon F|
AF- Teresa Garcia-Martinez Ana; Guerrero-Bote, Vicente; Hassan-Montero,
Yusef; Moya-Anegon, Felix|
TI- Psychology in Spanish Science Through Journal Cocitation Analysis|
SO- UNIVERSITAS PSYCHOLOGICA|
LA- Spanish|
DT- Article|
DE- Information Visualization; Psychology Research; Spain; Science Maps;
Cocitation Analysis; Intellectual Structure|
ID- MAPS; PATHFINDER; NETWORKS; DOMAINS|
AB- The intention in this article is to represent the ongoing
intellectual structure of Psychology research (as domain of scientific
knowledge) in Spain. To this end within the domain analysis the most
suitable bibliometric method to reveal the intellectual structure of the
discipline in Spain has been selected. This method is cocitation
analysis, which is characterized by its objectivity, and in this case,
with journals as the unit of measurement. Therefore the resulting
representation permits us to group the journals according to the
similarity of subject matter marked by the uses of Spanish researcher
This shows different research lines or fronts that shape the intellectual
structure of Spanish Psychology|
C1- [Teresa Garcia-Martinez, Ana; Guerrero-Bote, Vicente] Univ
Extremadura, Dept Informac & Comunicac, Badajoz 06001, Spain; [MoyaAnegon, Felix] Ctr Ciencias Humans & Sociales, IPP, Grp Scimago, Madrid,
Spain; [Moya-Anegon, Felix] CSIC, Madrid, Spain; [Hassan-Montero, Yusef]
Univ Granada, Dept Bibliotecon & Documentac, E-18071 Granada, Spain|
RP- Garcia-Martinez, AT, Univ Extremadura, Dept Informac & Comunicac,
Plazuela Ibn Marwan S-N, Badajoz 06001, Spain|
EM- atmar@alcazaba.unex.es vicente@alcazaba.unex.es
yusef@nosolousabilidad.com felix@ugr.es|
CD- BAYER AE, 1990, V41, P444, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BONNEVIE E, 2003,
V29, P11, J INFORM SCI; BORNER K, 2003, V37, P179, ANNU REV INFORM SCI;
CHEN XY, 2001, V34, P71, CHINESE EDUC SOC; DING Y, 2000, V47, P55,
SCIENTOMETRICS; DOREIAN P, 1985, V39, P79, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
GARCIAMARTINEZ AT, 2006, INT C MULT INF SCI T; GARCIAMARTINEZ AT, 2008,
V20, P465, PSICOTHEMA; GUERREROBOTE VP, 2006, V42, P1484, INFORM PROCESS
MANAG; INGWERSEN P, 2001, V57, P715, J DOC; JARVENING B, 2001, V50, P365,
SCIENTOMETRICS; KUHN TS, 1962, STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; LEYDESDORFF L, 1987,
V11, P295, SCIENTOMETRICS; MARION LS, 2001, V52, P297, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; MCCAIN KW, 1991, V42, P290, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1991,
V61, P311, LIBR QUART; MERTON RK, 1973, SOCIOLOGY SCI THEORE; MORRIS TA,
1998, V5, P448, J AM MED INFORM ASSN; MOYAANEGON F, 1998, V42, P229,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MOYAANEGON F, 2004, V61, P129, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H,
1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; SMALL H, 1999, V50, P799, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
SMALL H, 2003, V54, P394, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; TSAY MY, 2003, V57, P7,
SCIENTOMETRICS; VARGASQUESADA B, 2007, VISUALIZING STRUCTUR; WHITE HD,
2003, V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 26|
TC- 0|
PU- PONTIFICA UNIV JAVERIANA, FAC PSYCH|
PI- BOGOTA|
PA- CARRERA 5 NUM 39-00, EDIFICIO MANUEL BRICENO, BOGOTA, 00000,
COLOMBIA|
SN- 1657-9267|
J9- UNIV PSYCHOL|
JI- Univ. Psychol|
PD- JAN-APR|
PY- 2009|
VL- 8|
IS- 1|
BP- 13|
EP- 26|
PG- 14|
SC- Psychology, Multidisciplinary|
GA- 466FO|
JN- UNIVERSITAS PSYCHOLOGICA, 2009, V8, N1, P13-26|
UT- ISI:000267646700001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Zhao YY; Cui L; Yang H|
AF- Zhao Yueyang; Cui, Lei; Yang, Hua|
TI- Evaluating reliability of co-citation clustering analysis in
representing the research history of subject|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
AB- This paper aimed to examine the reliability of co-citation clustering
analysis in representing the research history of subject by comparing the
results from co-citation clustering analysis with a review written by
authorities Firstly, the treatment of traumatic spinal cord injury was
chosen as an investigated subject to be retrieved the resource articles
and their references were downloaded from Science Citation Index CD-ROM
between 1992 and 2002. Then, the highly cited papers were arranged
chronologically and clustered with the method of co-citation clustering.
After mapping the time line visualization, the history and structure of
treatment of spinal cord injury were presented clearly. At last, the
results and the review were compared according the time period, and then
the recall and the precision were calculated The recall was 37.5%, and
the precision was 54.5%. The research history of traumatic spinal cord
injury treatment analyzed by co-citation clustering was nearly consistent
with authoritative review, although some clusters had shorter period than
which was summarized by professionals This paper concluded that cocitation clustering analysis was a useful method in representing the
research history of subject, especially for the information researchers,
who do not have enough professional knowledge. Its demerit of low recall
could be offset by combination this method with other analytic
techniques|
C1- [Zhao, Yueyang; Yang, Hua] China Med Univ, Lib Shengjing Hosp,
Shenyang 110004, Peoples R China; [Cui, Lei] China Med Univ, Dept
Informat Management & Informat Syst Med, Shenyang 110001, Peoples R
China|
RP- Zhao, YY, China Med Univ, Lib Shengjing Hosp, Shenyang 110004,
Peoples R China|
EM- zhaoyy@cmu2h.com|
CD- BRACKEN MB, 1990, V322, P1405, NEW ENGL J MED; CUI L, 1996, V1, P46,
INFORM STUDIES THEOR; LI H, 2000, V26, P81, J LIB SCI CHINA; MORRIS SA,
2003, V54, P413, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; OCHIAI A, 1957, V22, P526, B JAPAN
SOC SCIENT F; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; ZHANG WT, 2004, P242,
SPSS STAT ANAL SENIO|
NR- 7|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- JUL|
PY- 2009|
VL- 80|
IS- 1|
BP- 91|
EP- 102|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-008-2056-1|
PG- 12|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 462PM|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2009, V80, N1, P91-102|
UT- ISI:000267368100006 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Schneider JW; Larsen B; Ingwersen P|
AF- Schneider Jesper W; Larsen, Birger; Ingwersen, Peter|
TI- A comparative study of first and all-author co-citation counting, and
two different matrix generation approaches applied for author co-citation
analyses|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Proceedings Paper|
CT- ISSI Conference 2007|
CY- JUN 25-27, 2007|
CL- Madrid, SPAIN|
ID- INFORMATION-SCIENCE; PROXIMITY-MEASURES; CLASSIFICATION; RESEMBLANCE;
COEFFICIENT; NETWORKS|
AB- The present article contributes to the current methodological debate
concerning author co-citation analyses. (ACA) The study compares two
different units of analyses, i.e. first- versus inclusive all-author cocitation counting, as well as two different matrix generation approaches,
i.e. a conventional multivariate and the so-called Drexel approach, in
order to investigate their influence upon mapping results The aim of the
present study is therefore to provide more methodological awareness and
empirical evidence concerning author co-citation studies The study is
based on structured XML documents extracted from the IEEE collection.
These data allow the construction of ad-hoc citation indexes, which
enables us to carry out the hitherto largest all-author co-citation
study. Four ACA are made, combining the different units of analyses with
the different matrix generation approaches. The results are evaluated
quantitatively by means of multidimensional scaling, factor analysis,
Procrustes and Mantel statistics The results show that the inclusion of
all cited authors can provide a better fit of data in two-dimensional
mappings based on MDS, and that inclusive all-author co-citation counting
may lead to stronger groupings in the maps. Further, the two matrix
generation approaches produce maps that have some resemblances, but also
many differences at the more detailed levels. The Drexel approach
produces results that have noticeably lower stress values and are more
concentrated into groupings. Finally, the study also demonstrates the
importance of sparse matrices and their potential problems in connection
with factor analysis We can confirm that inclusive all-ACA produce more
coherent groupings of authors, whereas the present study cannot clearly
confirm previous findings that first-ACA identifies more specialties,
though some vague indication is given. Most crucially, strong evidence is
given to the determining effect that matrix generation approaches have on
the mapping of author co-citation data and thus the interpretation of
such maps. Evidence is provided for the seemingly advantages of the
Drexel approach|
C1- [Schneider, Jesper W.] Royal Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Aalborg,
Denmark; [Larsen, Birger; Ingwersen, Peter] Royal Sch Lib & Informat Sci,
Copenhagen, Denmark|
RP- Schneider, JW, Royal Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Aalborg, Denmark|
EM- jws@db.dk|
CD- AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BORG I, 2005,
MODERN MULTIDIMENSIO; BOYACK KW, 2004, V101, P5192, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1;
CHEN CM, 1999, V35, P401, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; CRONBACH LJ, 1951, V16,
P297, PSYCHOMETRIKA; EOM SB, 2003, AUTHOR COCITATION AN; GILES CL, 1998,
P89, 3 ACM C DIG LIB; GLANZEL W, 1996, V35, P167, SCIENTOMETRICS; GOWER
JC, 1971, P138, MATH ARCHAEOLOGICAL; KLAVANS R, 2006, V57, P251, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; LATTIN J, 2003, ANAL MULTIVARIATE DA; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006,
V57, P1470, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; LOK CKW, 2001, V34, P223, J ADV NURS; MALIK S, 2006,
V3977, P1, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; MANTEL N, 1967, V27, P209, CANCER RES;
MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MULAIK SA, 1972, FDN
FACTOR ANAL; NUNNALLY JC, 1978, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY; PERSSON O, 2001,
V50, P339, SCIENTOMETRICS; PRICE DD, 1981, V3, P55, SCIENTOMETRICS;
ROUSSEAU R, 2004, V55, P513, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; SCHNEIDER JW, 2007,
V58, P1586, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; SCHNEIDER JW, 2007, V58, P1596, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; SCHNEIDER JW, 2007, P696, P ISSI 2007 11 INT C;
SCHONEMANN PH, 1970, V35, P245, PSYCHOMETRIKA; SHANNON CE, 1949, MATH
THEORY COMMUNIC; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE
HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P250, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; ZHAO DZ,
2006, V42, P1578, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; ZHAO DZ, 2007, V58, P1285, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 33|
TC- 2|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- JUL|
PY- 2009|
VL- 80|
IS- 1|
BP- 103|
EP- 130|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-007-2019-y|
PG- 28|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 462PM|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2009, V80, N1, P103-130|
UT- ISI:000267368100007 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Porter AL; Youtie J|
AF- Porter Alan L; Youtie, Jan|
TI- How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology?|
SO- JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Nanotechnology research activity patterns; Nanotechnology trends;
Nanoscale science and engineering; Interdisciplinarity; Bibliometrics;
Science mapping|
ID- CONVERGING TECHNOLOGIES; SCIENCE; NANOSCALE; JOURNALS; TERMS;
COCITATION; GOVERNANCE; CATEGORIES; AREAS|
AB- Facilitating cross-disciplinary research has attracted much attention
in recent years, with special concerns in nanoscience and nanotechnology.
Although policy discourse has emphasized that nanotechnology is
substantively integrative, some analysts have countered that it is really
a loose amalgam of relatively traditional pockets of physics, chemistry,
and other disciplines that interrelate only weakly. We are developing
empirical measures to gauge and visualize the extent and nature of
interdisciplinary interchange. Such results speak to research
organization, funding, and mechanisms to bolster knowledge transfer. In
this study, we address the nature of cross-disciplinary linkages using
"science overlay maps" of articles, and their references, that have been
categorized into subject categories. We find signs that the rate of
increase in nano research is slowing, and that its composition is
changing (for one, increasing chemistry-related activity). Our results
suggest that nanotechnology research encompasses multiple disciplines
that draw knowledge from disciplinarily diverse knowledge sources. Nano
research is highly, and increasingly, integrative-but so is much of
science these days Tabulating and mapping nano research activity show a
dominant core in materials sciences, broadly defined. Additional analyses
and maps show that nano research draws extensively upon knowledge
presented in other areas; it is not constricted within narrow silos|
C1- [Porter, Alan L.] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Publ Policy, Technol
Policy & Assessment Ctr, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA; [Youtie, Jan] Georgia
Inst Technol, Enterprise Innovat Inst, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA|
RP- Porter, AL, Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Publ Policy, Technol Policy &
Assessment Ctr, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA|
EM- aporter@isye.gatech.edu jan.youtie@innovate.gatech.edu|
FU- National Science Foundation [0531194, EEC-0438684]; National
Partnership for Managing Upstream Innovation FX Significant research
assistance in data treatment, software to facilitate the analyses, and
development of visualizations was provided by Jon Garner and Webb Myers.
The authors received helpful comments and advice from Ismael Rafols and
Philip Shapira. This research was undertaken at Georgia Tech with support
by the Center for Nanotechnology in Society (Arizona State University),
supported by the National Science Foundation (Award No. 0531194) and the
National Partnership for Managing Upstream Innovation: The Case of
Nanoscience and Technology (North Carolina State University; NSF Award No
EEC-0438684). The findings and observations contained in this paper are
those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
National Science Foundation|
CD- *NAT AC COMM FAC I, 2005, FAC INT RES; *NAT SCI TECHN COU, 1999, NAN
SCI TECHN WORLDW; AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
BOYACK KW, 2005, V64, P351, SCIENTOMETRICS; CHEN C, 2003, MAPPING SCI
FRONTIER; ETO H, 2003, V58, P5, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W, 1999, V44,
P427, SCIENTOMETRICS; GRODAL S, 2008, NBER C EM IND NAN NA; HICKS DM,
1996, V21, P379, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL; KATZ JS, 1995, P 5 INT C INT SOC
SC; KHUSHF G, 2004, V1013, P124, ANN NY ACAD SCI; KLEIN JT, 1999,
CROSSING BOUNDARIES; LEYDESDORFF L, 1993, V26, P135, SCIENTOMETRICS;
LEYDESDORFF L, 1994, V23, P217, RES POLICY; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57,
P601, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2009, V60, P348, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; LOVERIDGE D, 2008, V20, P29, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG; MEYER M,
2006, 2006 TECHN TRANSF SO; MORILLO F, 2003, V54, P1237, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; MOYAANEGON F, 2004, V61, P129, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOYAANEGON F, 2007,
V58, P2167, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PORTER AL, RES EVAL IN PRESS; PORTER AL,
SCIENTOMETR IN PRESS; PORTER AL, 2002, V53, P351, SCIENTOMETRICS; PORTER
AL, 2006, V15, P187, RES EVALUAT; PORTER AL, 2007, V72, P117,
SCIENTOMETRICS; PORTER AL, 2008, V10, P715, J NANOPART RES; PORTER AL,
2008, NBER C NAN NAN CAMBR; PORTER AL, 2008, WORKSH NAT SCI FDN W; RAFOLS
I, SCIENTOMETR IN PRESS; RAFOLS I, 2007, V20, P395, INNOVATION-ABINGDON;
ROCO MC, 2002, V4, P9, J NANOPART RES; ROCO MC, 2003, CONVERGING
TECHNOLOG; ROCO MC, 2003, V14, P337, CURR OPIN BIOTECH; ROCO MC, 2004,
V50, P890, AICHE J; ROCO MC, 2006, V1093, P1, ANN NY ACAD SCI; ROCO MC,
2008, V10, P11, J NANOPART RES; SALTON G, 1983, INTRO MODERN INFORM;
SCHMIDT JC, 2008, V20, P45, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG; SCHUMMER J, 2004, V59,
P425, SCIENTOMETRICS; SCHUMMER J, 2007, V70, P669, SCIENTOMETRICS;
STIRLING A, 2007, V4, P707, J R SOC INTERFACE; VANRAAN AFJ, 1999,
PRACTISING INTERDISC; ZIEGLER AS, 2006, V1093, P339, ANN NY ACAD SCI;
ZITT M, 2005, V3, P38, MEASUREMENT INTERDIS|
NR- 45|
TC- 5|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 1388-0764|
J9- J NANOPART RES|
JI- J. Nanopart. Res|
PD- JUL|
PY- 2009|
VL- 11|
IS- 5|
BP- 1023|
EP- 1041|
DI- 10.1007/s11051-009-9607-0|
PG- 19|
SC- Chemistry, Multidisciplinary; Nanoscience & Nanotechnology; Materials
Science, Multidisciplinary|
GA- 459MO|
JN- JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2009, V11, N5, P1023-1041|
UT- ISI:000267107100001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Chen CM; Chen Y; Horowitz M; Hou HY; Liu ZY; Pellegrino D|
AF- Chen Chaomei; Chen, Yue; Horowitz, Mark; Hou, Haiyan; Liu, Zeyuan;
Pellegrino, Donald|
TI- Towards an explanatory and computational theory of scientific
discovery|
SO- JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Theory of scientific discovery; Transformative scientific
discoveries; Theory of structural holes; Intellectual brokerage;
Knowledge diffusion; Information foraging|
ID- UNDISCOVERED PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE; IMPACT RESEARCH AUTHORS; BETWEENNESS
CENTRALITY; MATHEMATICAL APPROACH; CITATION PERSPECTIVE; SOCIAL NETWORK;
NOBEL CLASS; FISH-OIL; EVOLUTION; SCIENCE|
AB- We propose an explanatory and computational theory of transformative
discoveries in science. The theory is derived from a recurring theme
found in a diverse range of scientific change, scientific discovery, and
knowledge diffusion theories in philosophy of science, sociology of
science, social network analysis, and information science. The theory
extends the concept of structural holes from social networks to a broader
range of associative networks found in science studies, especially
including networks that reflect underlying intellectual structures such
as co-citation networks and collaboration networks. The central premise
is that connecting otherwise disparate patches of knowledge is a valuable
mechanism of creative thinking in general and transformative scientific
discovery in particular. In addition, the premise consistently explains
the value of connecting people from different disciplinary specialties.
The theory not only explains the nature of transformative discoveries in
terms of the brokerage mechanism but also characterizes the subsequent
diffusion process as optimal information foraging in a problem space.
Complementary to epidemiological models of diffusion, foraging-based
conceptualizations offer a unified framework for arriving at insightful
discoveries and optimizing subsequent pathways of search in a problem
space. Structural and temporal properties of potentially high-impact
scientific discoveries are derived from the theory to characterize the
emergence and evolution of intellectual networks of a field. Two Nobel
Prize winning discoveries, the discovery of Helicobacter pylori and gene
targeting techniques, and a discovery in string theory demonstrated such
properties. Connections to and differences from existing approaches are
discussed. The primary value of the theory is that it provides not only a
computational model of intellectual growth, but also concrete and
constructive explanations of where one may find insightful inspirations
for transformative scientific discoveries. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All
rights reserved|
C1- [Chen, Chaomei; Horowitz, Mark; Pellegrino, Donald] Drexel Univ, Coll
Informat Sci & Technol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA; [Chen, Chaomei; Chen,
Yue; Hou, Haiyan; Liu, Zeyuan] Dalian Univ Technol, WISE Lab, Dalian,
Peoples R China|
RP- Chen, CM, Drexel Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Technol, Philadelphia, PA
19104 USA|
EM- chaomei.chen@cis.drexel.edu|
CD- *NSF, 2007, 130 NSF; ALBERT R, 2002, V74, P47, REV MOD PHYS;
ANTONAKIS J, 2008, V59, P956, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; AUSLOOS M, 2007, V57,
P89, EUR PHYS J B; BARABASI AL, 2002, V311, P590, PHYSICA A; BEDERSON BB,
2003, P349, CRAFT INFORM VISUALI; BETTENCOURT LMA, 2006, REPORT OFFICE
SCI TE; BETTENCOURT LMA, 2008, V75, P495, SCIENTOMETRICS; BETTENCOURT
LMA, 2009, V3, P210, J INFORMETR; BORNER K, 2004, V101, P5266, P NATL
ACAD SCI U S1; BRADSHAW GF, 1983, P971, STUDYING SCI DISCOVE; BRANDES U,
2001, V25, P163, J MATH SOCIOL; BRANNIGAN A, 1983, P417, HIST
DISTRIBUTIONS M; BRUCKNER E, 1990, V18, P21, SCIENTOMETRICS; BRUSH SG,
1994, P 1994 BIENN M PHIL; BRUSH SG, 1995, P299, NO TRUTH DETAILS; BURT
RS, 1992, STRUCTURAL HOLES SOC; BURT RS, 2001, NEW DIRECTIONS EC SO; BURT
RS, 2004, V110, P349, AM J SOCIOL; BURT RS, 2005, BROKERAGE CLOSURE IN;
CHEN C, 2003, MAPPING SCI FRONTIER; CHEN C, 2008, V28, P18, IEEE COMPUT
GRAPH; CHEN CM, 2003, V54, P435, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CHEN CM, 2004,
V101, P5303, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; CHEN CM, 2006, V57, P359, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; CHUBIN D, 1976, V17, P448, SOCIOLOGICAL Q; COLLINS R, 1998,
SOCIOLOGY PHILOS GLO; CRANE D, 1972, INVISIBLE COLL DIFFU; CZERWON HJ,
1986, V36, P1101, J PHYS; DAVIS MS, 1971, V1, P309, PHILOS SOC SCI;
DORIGO M, 1997, V1, P53, IEEE T EVOLUTIONARY; DUNBAR K, 1993, V17, P397,
COGNITIVE SCI; EVANS MJ, 1981, V292, P154, NATURE; FLEMING L, 2007, V52,
P443, ADMIN SCI QUART; FORTUNATO S, 2006, UNSP 218701, PHYS REV LETT;
FREEMAN LC, 1977, V40, P35, SOCIOMETRY; FUCHS S, 1993, P933, SOCIOLOGICAL
THEORY; GARFIELD E, 1992, V35, P3, CURR CONTENTS; GARFIELD E, 1992, V13,
P117, THEORETICAL MED; GIRVAN M, 2002, V99, P7821, P NATL ACAD SCI USA;
GLYMOUR C, 2004, P69, DAEDALUS
WIN; GOFFMAN W, 1964, V204, P225,
NATURE; GOFFMAN W, 1971, V229, P103, NATURE; GORDON MD, 1996, V47, P116,
J AM SOC INFORM SCI; GRIFFITH BC, 1972, V177, P959, SCIENCE; GUIFFRE K,
1999, V77, P815, SOC FORCES; HEINZE T, 2007, V70, P125, SCIENTOMETRICS;
HEINZE T, 2007, V70, P811, SCIENTOMETRICS; HILDERMAN RJ, 2001, KNOWLEDGE
DISCOVERY; HIRSCH JE, 2005, V102, P16569, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; HOLTON G,
1996, V84, P364, AM SCI; HUMMON NP, 1989, V11, P39, SOC NETWORKS; KLAHR
D, 1999, V125, P524, PSYCHOL BULL; KLEINBERG J, 2002, P 8 ACM SIGKDD INT
C; KOENIG MD, 2008, INNOVATION NETWORKS; KOSTOFF RN, 2008, V75, P276,
TECHNOL FORECAST SOC; KUHN TS, 1962, STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; KUHN TS, 1970,
STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; LAMBIOTTE R, 2007, V57, P89, EUROPEAN PHYS J B;
LAUDAN L, 1986, V69, P141, SYNTHESE; LEYDESDORFF L, 2007, V58, P1303, J
AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LIBENNOWELL D, 2008, V105, P4633, P NATL ACAD SCI
USA; LINDAHL BIB, 1992, V13, P97, THEOR MED; LINDSAY RK, 1999, V50, P574,
J AM SOC INFORM SCI; LIQIANG G, 2006, V38, P9, ACM COMPUT SURV; MARSHALL
BJ, 1984, V1, P1311, LANCET; MARSHALL BJ, 2005, NOBEL LECT; MAYER RE,
1995, P3, NATURE INSIGHT; MORRIS SA, 2008, V42, P213, ANNU REV INFORM
SCI; MULLINS NC, 1977, V42, P552, AM SOCIOL REV; NEWMAN MEJ, 2001, V98,
P404, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; NOWAKOWSKA M, 1973, V3, P262, THEOR DECIS;
PERKINS DN, 1995, P495, NATURE INSIGHT; PINCOCK S, 2005, V366, P1429,
LANCET; PIROLLI P, 2007, INFORM FORAGING THEO; RADDER H, 1997, V28, P633,
STUD HIST PHILOS SCI; REDNER S, 2004, ARXIVPHYSICS0407137V; SANDSTROM PE,
1999, V25, B AM SOC INFORM SCI; SCHAFFNER KF, 1992, V13, P175, THEOR MED;
SCHWARZ JH, 1982, V89, P224, PHYS REP; SHIBATA N, 2007, V58, P872, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; SHNEIDERMAN B, 2002, LEONARDOS LAPTOP HUM; SHNEIDERMAN
B, 2007, V50, P20, COMMUN ACM; SILBERSCHATZ A, 1996, V8, P970, IEEE T
KNOWL DATA EN; SIMON HA, 1981, SCI ARTIFICIAL; SIMON HA, 1981, V47, P1,
SYNTHESE; SMALHEISER NR, 1996, V46, P583, NEUROLOGY; SMALL H, 1999, V48,
P72, LIBR TRENDS; SMALL H, 2000, P449, WEB KNOWLEDGE FESTSC; SMALL H,
2006, V68, P595, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL HG, 1979, V1, P445,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SNIJDERS TAB, 2001, P361, SOCIOL METHODOL; STERMAN JD,
1985, V28, P93, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC; STOKES DE, 1997, PASTEURS QUADRANT
BA; SULLIVAN D, 1980, V2, P309, SCIENTOMETRICS; SWANSON DR, 1986, V56,
P103, LIBR QUART; SWANSON DR, 1986, V30, P7, PERSPECT BIOL MED; SWANSON
DR, 1987, V38, P228, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SWANSON DR, 1988, V31, P526,
PERSPECT BIOL MED; SWANSON DR, 1999, V48, P48, LIBR TRENDS; TAN PN, 2002,
KDD 02 EDM ALB CAN; VALENTE TW, 1996, V18, P69, SOC NETWORKS; VLACHY J,
1985, V7, P505, SCIENTOMETRICS; WAGNERDOBLER R, 1999, V46, P635,
SCIENTOMETRICS; WASSERMAN S, 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; ZUCKERMAN H,
1967, P391, NOBEL LAUREATES SCI|
NR- 106|
TC- 4|
PU- ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV|
PI- AMSTERDAM|
PA- PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 1751-1577|
J9- J INFORMETR|
JI- J. Informetr|
PD- JUL|
PY- 2009|
VL- 3|
IS- 3|
BP- 191|
EP- 209|
DI- 10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.004|
PG- 19|
SC- Information Science & Library Science|
GA- 459WT|
JN- JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2009, V3, N3, P191-209|
UT- ISI:000267144200004 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- McCain KW|
AF- McCain Katherine W|
TI- Using Tricitation to Dissect the Citation Image: Conrad Hal
Waddington and the Rise of Evolutionary Developmental Biology|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- EVO-DEVO; CONTEXT ANALYSIS; PATTERNS; COCITATION; AUTHORS; TIME;
NETWORKS; ONLINE|
AB- An author's citation image is the set of authors with whom the author
is cocited. When mapped using standard author cocitation analysis methods
based on cited name co-occurrence counts across the entire citation
database, the original context of cocitation (the focal author cocited
with others) is lost. The citation image of Conrad Hal Waddington, a
developmental biologist and evolutionary theorist, is mapped using both
cocitation and tricitation approaches over three successive decades,
1975-1984, 1985-1994, and 1995-2004. All authors are tagged with a
subject ID based on a principal components analysis of the cocitation
data. The cocitation analyses place Waddington in a general subject
context. The tricitation PFNets bring the major themes in articles citing
Waddington into clearer focus. The changing scholarly landscape in which
Waddington's work is used is demonstrated by changes in the citation
image author set. These changes are associated with a shift from a
primary focus on the mechanisms of evolutionary change (Waddington's work
on canalization/genetic assimilation) to a resurgence of interest in
Waddington's early experimental embryological work. The latter is linked
to the emergence of evolutionary developmental biology, an
interdisciplinary research area that examines the role of organismal
development in evolutionary change|
C1- Drexel Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Technol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA|
RP- McCain, KW, Drexel Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Technol, Philadelphia,
PA 19104 USA|
EM- Kate.McCain@ischool.drexel.edu|
CD- AVERSA ES, 1985, V7, P383, SCIENTOMETRICS; BARILAN J, 2006, V42,
P1553, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; BATAGELJ V, 2004, PAJEK PROGRAM LARGE;
CRONIN B, 2002, V54, P31, SCIENTOMETRICS; CRONIN B, 2007, V23, P221,
INFORM SOC; DAWKINS R, 1976, SELFISH GENE; DOLL W, 1986, V25, P10, THEOR
PRACT; EGGHE L, 2002, V55, P349, SCIENTOMETRICS; ELDREDGE N, 1972, P82,
MODELS PALEOBIOLOGY; GILBERT SF, 1996, V173, P357, DEV BIOL; GILBERT SF,
2003, V47, P467, INT J DEV BIOL; GOULD SJ, 1977, ONTOGENY PHYLOGENY; HALL
BK, 1992, EVOLUTIONARY DEV BIO; HAMBURGER V, 1951, V88, P49, J MORPHOL;
HARGENS LL, 1986, V9, P145, SCIENTOMETRICS; JACOB F, 1977, V196, P1161,
SCIENCE; LIN X, 2003, V39, P689, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; LOVE AC, 2003, V5,
P327, EVOL DEV; MARION LS, 2002, V39, P3, P ASIST ANNU; MARION LS, 2004,
THESIS DREXEL U PHIL; MAYR E, 1993, V8, P31, TRENDS ECOL EVOL; MCCAIN KW,
1984, V35, P351, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1989, V17, P127,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MCCAIN KW, 1990, P194, COMMUNICATION RES CO; MCCAIN KW,
1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 2000, COMP INT CURR RES
CI; MCCAIN KW, 2006, V32, P277, J INF SCI; MCCAIN KW, 2008, V59, P510, J
AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MCCAIN KW, 2008, WERE THERE 2 R UNPUB; MONOD J, 1971,
CHANCE NECESSITY ESS; MORRIS TA, 2001, THESIS DREXEL U PHIL; MULKAY M,
1972, SOCIAL PROCESS INNOV; MULLER GB, 2007, V8, P943, NAT REV GENET;
PALMER AR, 1986, V17, P391, ANNU REV ECOL SYST; PIGLIUCCI M, 2007, V61,
P2743, EVOLUTION; RAFF RA, 2007, V8, P911, NAT REV GENET; ROBERT JS,
2001, V23, P954, BIOESSAYS; ROBERTSON A, 1977, V23, P575, BIOGRAPHICAL
MEMOIRS; SARKAR S, 2003, V18, P209, BIOL PHILOS; SCHVANEVELDT R, 1990,
STUDIES KNOWLEDGE OR; SEGERSTRALE U, 2000, DEFENDERS TRUTH SOCI; SLACK
JMW, 2002, V3, P889, NAT REV GENET; SMALL H, 1982, V3, P287, PROGR
COMMUNICATION; SMALL HG, 1974, V10, P393, INFORMATION STORAGE; SMALL HG,
1978, V8, P327, SOC STUD SCI; STERN CD, 2000, V44, P15, INT J DEV BIOL;
SUGIMOTO CR, 2009, VISUALIZING CH UNPUB; WADDINGTON CH, 1942, SCI ETHICS;
WADDINGTON CH, 1956, PRINCIPLES EMBRYOLOG; WADDINGTON CH, 1961, ETHICAL
ANIMAL; WADDINGTON CH, 1969, APPEARANCE STUDY REL; WADDINGTON CH, 1969,
V1, THEORETICAL BIOL; WADDINGTON CH, 1971, BIOL PURPOSE ETHICS;
WADDINGTON CH, 1973, OR WORLD WAR 2 OPERA; WADDINGTON CH, 1975, EVOLUTION
EVOLUTIONI; WADDINGTON CH, 1977, TOOLS UNDERSTAND APP; WHITE HD, 2000,
P475, ASIST MONOGR SER; WHITE HD, 2000, V51, P959, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
WHITE HD, 2001, V52, P87, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITE HD, 2001, V51,
P607, SCIENTOMETRICS; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
WHITE HD, 2004, V101, P5297, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; WHITE HD, 2005, C ASS
LIB INF SCI ED; WILSON EO, 1975, SOCIOBIOLOOY NEW SYN|
NR- 64|
TC- 3|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- JUL|
PY- 2009|
VL- 60|
IS- 7|
BP- 1301|
EP- 1319|
DI- 10.1002/asi.21064|
PG- 19|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 456ZD|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2009, V60, N7, P1301-1319|
UT- ISI:000266892700001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Durisin B; Puzone F|
AF- Durisin Boris; Puzone, Fulvio|
TI- Maturation of Corporate Governance Research, 1993-2007: An
Assessment|
SO- CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW|
LA- English|
DT- Review|
DE- Corporate Governance; Journal Influence; Co-citation Analysis;
Bibliometrics|
ID- ASIAN FINANCIAL CRISIS; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE;
FIRM PERFORMANCE; BOARD COMPOSITION; EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION; STRATEGICMANAGEMENT; EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; COCITATION ANALYSIS; CONSUMER RESEARCH|
AB- Review This study seeks to investigate whether governance research in
fact is a discipline or whether it is rather the subject of multidisciplinary research. We map the intellectual structure of corporate
governance research and its evolution from 1993-2007 Based on the
analysis of more than 1,000 publications and 48,000 citations in
Corporate Goverance: An International Review (CGIR) and other academic
journals, our study identifies the most influential works, the dominant
subfields, and their evolution. Our study assesses the maturation of
corporate governance research as a discipline; it finds increasing
sophistication, depth and rigor, and consistency in its intellectual
structure There is a large body of accumulated corporate governance
research in the US, yet there is an empirical gap on cross-national
studies in the literature. Furthermore, hardly any of the top cited works
undertake their study in a cross-national setting. Thus, corporate
governance research and CGIR in its quest to contribute to a global
theory of corporate governance might benefit if articles have a crossnational methodological approach and empirical grounding in their
research design and if articles explicitly aim at stating the theoretical
underpinnings they draw on Globalists find in CGIR an outlet addressing
economics and finance (e.g., whether and how compensation or dismissal of
CEOs is related to board characteristics), management (e.g., whether and
how best practice codes adoption is related to board characteristics and
performance), and accounting (e.g., whether and how earnings
manipulations is related to board characteristics) issues globally|
C1- [Durisin, Boris; Puzone, Fulvio] Bocconi Univ, Dept Management, I20136 Milan, Italy|
RP- Durisin, B, Bocconi Univ, Dept Management, Via Guglielmo Roentgen 1,
I-20136 Milan, Italy|
EM- boris.durisin@sdabocconi.it|
CD- 1993, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, P236, V1; 1998, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, P1,
V6; *AM LAW I, 1992, PRINC CORP GOV AN RE; *CCGUK, 2000, COMB COD PRINC
CORP; AGUILERA RV, 2003, V28, P447, ACAD MANAGE REV; ALCHIAN AA, 1972,
V62, P111, AM ECON REV; ALEXANDER JC, 1994, V49, P697, J FINANC; ALI A,
2000, V38, P1, J ACCOUNTING RES; AMIHUD Y, 1981, V12, P605, BELL J ECON;
ARMSTRONG J, 1977, V3, P396, J MARKETING RES; BALDRIDGE DC, 2004, V25,
P1063, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; BALKIN DB, 1990, V13, P381, STRATEGIC
MANAGEMENT; BALL R, 2000, V29, P1, J ACCOUNT ECON; BALL R, 2003, V36,
P235, J ACCOUNT ECON; BARCLAY MJ, 1989, V25, P371, J FINANC ECON; BARLEY
SR, 2006, V49, P16, ACAD MANAGE J; BARTUNEK JM, 2006, V49, P9, ACAD
MANAGE J; BAYSINGER B, 1990, V15, P72, ACAD MANAGE REV; BAYSINGER BD,
1985, V1, P101, J LAW ECON ORGAN; BEASLEY MS, 1996, V71, P443, ACCOUNT
REV; BEATTY RP, 1994, V39, P313, ADMIN SCI QUART; BERGSTROM C, 1990, V14,
P237, J BANK FINANC; BERLE A, 1932, MODEM CORPORATION PR; BETHEL JE,
1993, V14, P15, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; BETTIS RA, 1995, V16, P7, STRATEGIC
MANAGE J; BIEMANS W, 2007, V24, P193, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG; BLACKBURN RS,
1981, V66, P337, J APPL PSYCHOL; BOEKER W, 1992, V37, P400, ADMIN SCI
QUART; BOROKHOVICH KA, 2000, V55, P1457, J FINANC; BOTOSAN CA, 1997, V72,
P323, ACCOUNT REV; BOYD BK, 1995, V16, P301, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; BOYD BK,
2005, V26, P841, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; BRICKLEY JA, 1988, V20, P267, J
FINANC ECON; BROUTHERS KD, 2003, V24, P1239, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; BURT RS,
1977, V56, P106, SOC FORCES; BUSHMAN RM, 2001, V32, P237, J ACCOUNT ECON;
BYRD JW, 1992, V32, P195, J FINANC ECON; CADBURY A, 1992, REPORT
COMMITTEE FIN; CADBURY A, 1993, V1, P5, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; CARTER CB,
2004, BACK DRAWING BOARD D; CARVER J, 1997, BOARDS MAKE DIFFEREN; CARVER
J, 2002, BOARD LEADERSHIP; CHACAR A, 2005, V26, P933, STRATEGIC MANAGE J;
CHARAN R, 1998, BOARDS WORK CORPORAT; CHARAN R, 2005, BOARDS DELIVER ADV
C; CHO CK, 2005, V13, P211, CORP GOV; CLAESSENS S, 2000, V58, P81, J
FINANC ECON; CLAESSENS S, 2002, V57, P2741, J FINANC; COASE RH, 1937, V4,
P386, ECONOMICA-NEW SER; CONYON M, 1994, V2, P87, CORP GOV; CONYON MJ,
2001, V22, P805, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; CORE JE, 1999, V51, P371, J FINANC
ECON; CORRADO CJ, 1997, V52, P2091, J FINANC; COSH AD, 1987, V11, P285,
CAMBRIDGE J ECON; COTE JA, 1991, V18, P402, J CONSUM RES; CRANE D, 1972,
INVISIBLE COLL DIFFU; CRAWFORD CM, NEW PRODUCTS MANAGEM; CROSSLAND C,
2007, V28, P767, STRATEG MANAGE J; CULNAN MJ, 1987, V11, P341, MIS QUART;
CULNAN MJ, 1990, V41, P453, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; CYERT RM, 1963, BEHAV
THEORY FIRM; DAHYA J, 2008, V87, P73, J FINANC ECON; DAILY CM, 2003, V28,
P371, ACAD MANAGE REV; DAILY CM, 2004, P15, HDB BUSINESS STRATEG; DALTON
DR, 1998, V19, P269, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; DALTON DR, 2003, V46, P13, ACAD
MANAGE J; DAVIDSON K, 1997, V20, P47, J BEHAV MED; DAVIES A, 1999,
STRATEGIC APPROACH C; DAVIS GF, 1991, V36, P583, ADM SCI Q; DAVIS GF,
1994, V39, P141, ADMIN SCI QUART; DECHOW P, 1996, V13, P1, CONTEMP
ACCOUNT RES; DEMIGUEL A, 2004, V25, P1199, STRATEGIC MANAGE J;
DEMIRGUCKUNT A, 1998, V53, P2107, J FINANC; DEMSETZ H, 1985, V93, P1155,
J POLIT ECON; DEROND M, 2005, V14, P321, J MANAGE INQUIRY; DIMAGGIO PJ,
1983, V48, P147, AM SOCIOL REV; DOIDGE C, 2007, V86, P1, J FINANC ECON;
DOKTOR R, 1991, V16, P259, ACAD MANAGE REV; DONALDSON L, 1991, V16, P49,
AUSTR J MANAGEMENT; DONALDSON L, 1994, V2, P141, CORP GOV; DUBOIS FL,
2000, V31, P689, J INT BUS STUD; DULEWICZ V, 1995, V20, P1, J GEN MANAGE;
DULEWICZ V, 1999, V7, P178, CORP GOV; DURNEV A, 2005, V60, P1461, J
FINANC; DYCK A, 2004, V59, P537, J FINANC; EISENHARDT KM, 1989, V14, P57,
ACAD MANAGE REV; ELSON C, 2007, V19, P74, J APPL CORPORATE FIN; FACCIO M,
2002, V65, P365, J FINANC ECON; FACCIO M, 2005, V60, P1345, J FINANC;
FAMA EF, 1980, V88, P288, J POLITICAL EC; FAMA EF, 1983, V26, P301, J LAW
ECON; FILATOTCHEV I, 2002, V23, P941, STRATEG MANAGE J; FINKELSTEIN S,
1989, V10, P121, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; FINKELSTEIN S, 1992, V35, P505, ACAD
MANAGE J; FINKELSTEIN S, 1994, V37, P1079, ACAD MANAGE J; FINKELSTEIN S,
1996, STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP; FINKELSTEIN S, 1998, V41, P179, ACAD MANAGE
J; FORBES DP, 1999, V24, P489, ACAD MANAGE REV; FRANKEL RM, 2002, V77,
P71, ACCOUNT REV S; GARFIELD E, 1979, CITATION INDEXING; GARRATT R, 1996,
FISH ROTS HEAD; GAY K, 2001, V9, P152, CORP GOV; GEDAJLOVIC ER, 1998,
V19, P533, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; GILSON SC, 1990, V27, P355, J FINANC ECON;
GOLDMAN A, 1979, V16, P485, J MARKETING RES; GOMPERS P, 2003, V118, P107,
Q J ECON; GRANOVETTER M, 1985, V91, P3, AM J SOCIOL; GRANT RM, CONT
STRATEGY ANAL C; GREENBURY R, 1995, REPORT STUDY GROUP C; GREGG P, 1993,
V31, P1, BRIT J IND RELAT; GROSSMAN S, 1980, V1, P42, BELL J ECON; GUO L,
2008, V25, P249, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG; HAMBRICK DC, 1984, V9, P193, ACAD
MANAGE REV; HAMPEL R, 1998, COMMITTEE CORPORATE; HEALY P, 1999, V16,
P485, CONTEMP ACCOUNT RES; HEALY PM, 2001, V31, P405, J ACCOUNT ECON;
HECKMAN JJ, 1979, V47, P153, ECONOMETRICA; HENDERSON AD, 1996, V39, P575,
ACAD MANAGE J; HENDERSON J, 2003, V24, P349, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; HERMALIN
BE, 1991, V20, P101, FINANC MANAGE; HERMALIN BE, 1998, V88, P96, AM ECON
REV; HIGGS D, 2003, REV ROLE DFFECTIVENE; HILMER FG, 1993, STRICTLY
BOARDROOM I; HIMMELBERG CP, 1999, V53, P353, J FINANC ECON; HOFFMAN DL,
1993, V19, P505, J CONSUM RES; HOLL P, 1997, V18, P483, STRATEGIC MANAGE
J; HOPE OK, 2003, V41, P235, J ACCOUNTING RES; HOSKISSON RE, 1994, V37,
P1207, ACAD MANAGE J; HUBBARD R, 1998, V19, P243, STRATEGIC MANAGE J;
JENKINS B, 1993, V1, P11, CORP GOV; JENSEN M, 1989, V5, P61, HARVARD BUS
REV; JENSEN MC, 1976, V3, P305, J FINANC ECON; JENSEN MC, 1983, V11, P5,
J FINANC ECON; JENSEN MC, 1986, V76, P323, AM ECON REV; JENSEN MC, 1990,
V98, P225, J POLIT ECON; JENSEN MC, 1993, V48, P831, J FINANC; JOHNSON
JL, 1996, V22, P409, J MANAGE; JOHNSON S, 2000, V90, P22, AM ECON REV;
JOHNSON S, 2000, V58, P141, J FINANC ECON; JONES MJ, 1996, V24, P337,
OMEGA; JUDGE W, 2007, V15, P501, CORP GOV; JUDGE W, 2007, V15, P708, CORP
GOV; JUDGE WQ, 2009, V17, R3, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; KESNER IF, 1990, V11,
P327, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; KLEIN A, 2002, V33, P375, J ACCOUNT ECON; KLEIN
W, 1998, V41, P1, ECOTOX ENVIRON SAFE; KOSNIK RD, 1987, V32, P163, ADMIN
SCI QUART; KOTLER P, MARKETING MANAGEMENT; KUHN TS, 1962, STRUCTURE SCI
REVOLU; LANG M, 1993, V31, P246, J ACCOUNT RES; LAPORTA R, 1997, V52,
P1131, J FINANC; LAPORTA R, 1998, V106, P1113, J POLIT ECON; LAPORTA R,
1999, V54, P471, J FINANC; LAPORTA R, 2000, V58, P1, J FINANC ECON;
LAPORTA R, 2000, V55, P1, J FINANC; LEE PM, 1997, V18, P879, STRATEGIC
MANAGE J; LEMMON ML, 2003, V58, P1445, J FINANC; LEONG SM, 1989, V15,
P492, J CONSUM RES; LEUZ C, 2000, V38, P91, J ACCOUNTING RES S; LEUZ C,
2003, V69, P505, J FINANC ECON; LI DH, 2006, V61, P2975, J FINANC; LINS
K, 1999, V54, P2215, J FINANC; LORSCH JW, 1989, PAWNS POTENTATES REA;
MACE ML, 1971, DIRECTORS MYTH REALI; MACMILLAN IC, 1989, V4, P289, J BUS
VENTURING; MALLIN CA, 2004, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; MARGOLIS J, 1967, V155,
P1213, SCIENCE; MARTIN KJ, 1996, V51, P1227, J FINANC; MAY KO, 1967,
V156, P890, SCIENCE; MCCAFFERTY J, 2008, P21, DIRECTORSHIP
OCT;
MCCAIN KW, 1986, V37, P111, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41,
P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCONNELL JJ, 1990, V27, P595, J FINANC ECON;
MILLER D, 1997, V6, P71, J MANAGE INQUIRY; MIZRUCHI MS, 1983, V8, P426,
ACAD MANAGE REV; MONKS RAG, 1995, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; MORCK R, 1988,
V20, P293, J FINANC ECON; MORCK R, 1989, V79, P842, AM ECON REV; MURPHY
KJ, 1985, V7, P1, J ACCOUNT ECON; MURPHY KJ, 1999, V3, P2485, HDB LABOR
EC B; MYERS SC, 1984, V13, P187, J FINANC ECON; NERUR SP, 2008, V29,
P319, STRATEG MANAGE J; NORTH DC, 1990, I I CHANGE EC PERFOR; NUNNALLY
JC, 1978, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY; OREILLY CA, 1988, V33, P257, ADMIN SCI
QUART; PAGE AL, 2008, V25, P233, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG; PAISLEY W, 1984,
V5, P1, PROGR COMMUNICATION; PALMER D, 2001, V46, P87, ADMIN SCI QUART;
PASADEOS Y, 1998, V27, P53, J ADVERTISING; PATTON A, 1987, V65, P10,
HARVARD BUS REV; PEARCE JA, 1991, V12, P135, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; PENG MW,
2004, V25, P453, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; PETTIGREW A, 1995, V48, P845, HUM
RELAT; PETTIGREW AM, 1992, V13, P163, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; PFEFFER J,
1972, V17, P218, ADM SCI Q; PFEFFER J, 1977, V55, P938, SOC FORCES;
PFEFFER J, 1978, EXTERNAL CONTROL ORG; PFEFFER J, 1998, HUMAN EQUATION
BUILD; PILKINGTON A, 1999, V19, P7, INT J OPER PROD MAN; PODSAKOFF PM,
2005, V26, P473, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; PONZI LJ, 2002, V55, P259,
SCIENTOMETRICS; PRICE DJ, 1963, LITTLE SCI BIG SCI; RAMASWAMY K, 2002,
V23, P345, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; RAMOSRODRIGUEZ AR, 2004, V25, P981,
STRATEGIC MANAGE J; RECHNER PL, 1991, V12, P155, STRATEGIC MANAGE J;
REDIKER KJ, 1995, V16, P85, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; REINER S, 2006, V17, P90,
MOL BIOL CELL; ROGERS RC, 1989, V74, P636, J APPL PSYCHOL; RUMELT RP,
1974, STRATEGY STRUCTURE E; RYNES SL, 2001, V44, P340, ACAD MANAGE J;
SCHWARTZ BN, 2005, V16, P327, CRIT PERSPECT; SHLEIFER A, 1986, V94, P461,
J POLIT ECON; SHLEIFER A, 1997, V52, P737, J FINANC; SIEMENS JC, 2005,
V58, P467, J BUS RES; SMICK DM, 2008, WORLD IS CURVED HIDD; SMITH CW,
1992, V32, P263, J FINANC ECON; SRIRAM RS, 1994, P32, ACCOUNTING ED J
SPR; SUTTON RI, 1995, V40, P371, ADMIN SCI QUART; TAHAI A, 1999, V20,
P279, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; TELLIS GJ, 1999, V36, P120, J MARKETING RES;
THOMPSON JD, 1967, ORG ACTION SOCIAL SC; THOMSEN S, 2000, V21, P689,
STRATEGIC MANAGE J; TOSI HL, 1989, V34, P169, ADMIN SCI QUART; TOSI HL,
2000, V26, P301, J MANAGE; TRICKER B, 1993, V1, P1, CORP GOV; TRICKER B,
2000, V8, P403, CORP GOV; TRICKER B, 2008, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; TRICKER
RI, 1984, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; TRICKER RI, 1994, INT CORPORATE GOVERN;
TRIESCHMANN JS, 2000, V43, P1130, ACAD MANAGE J; TURNBULL S, 1997, V5,
P180, CORP GOV; URBAN G, DESIGN MARKETING NEW; USDIKEN B, 1995, V16,
P503, ORGAN STUD; USEEM M, 1993, EXECUTIVE DEFENSE SH; VANCE SC, 1983,
CORPORATE LEADERSHIP; VASTAG G, 2002, V30, P109, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S;
VERMEULEN F, 2005, V48, P978, ACAD MANAGE J; WALSH JP, 1990, V15, P421,
ACAD MANAGE REV; WARNER JB, 1988, V20, P461, J FINANC ECON; WATTS R,
1986, POSITIVE ACCOUNTING; WEICK KE, 1989, V14, P516, ACAD MANAGE REV;
WEISBACH MS, 1988, V20, P431, J FINANC ECON; WERNER S, 2002, V33, P583, J
INT BUS STUD; WESTERLING L, 1995, V1, P283, 15 INT S BALL JER IS; WHITE
EM, 1995, V4, P327, EUR J AGRON; WHITE H, 1980, V48, P817, ECONOMETRICA;
WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WIERSEMA MF, 1992, V35,
P91, ACAD MANAGE J; WILLIAMSON OE, 1975, MARKET HIERARCHIES A; WILLIAMSON
OE, 1985, EC I CAPITALISM; WOODWARD AM, 1976, V27, P25, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; YERMACK D, 1995, V39, P237, J FINANC ECON; YERMACK D, 1996, V40,
P185, J FINANC ECON; ZAHRA SA, 1989, V15, P291, J MANAGE; ZATTONI A,
2008, V16, P1, CORP GOV|
NR- 255|
TC- 1|
PU- WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC|
PI- MALDEN|
PA- COMMERCE PLACE, 350 MAIN ST, MALDEN 02148, MA USA|
SN- 0964-8410|
J9- CORP GOV|
JI- Corp. Gov|
PD- MAY|
PY- 2009|
VL- 17|
IS- 3|
BP- 266|
EP- 291|
DI- 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00739.x|
PG- 26|
SC- Business; Management|
GA- 456BU|
JN- CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2009, V17, N3, P266291|
UT- ISI:000266814100002 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Klenk NL; Hickey GM; Maclellan JI; Gonzales R; Cardille J|
AF- Klenk N. L; Hickey, G. M; Maclellan, J. I; Gonzales, R; Cardille, J|
TI- Social network analysis: A useful tool for visualizing and evaluating
forestry research|
SO- INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW|
LA- English|
DT- Editorial Material|
DE- social network analysis; forestry research collaboration; science
management|
ID- RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP; RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT; PARTICIPATION|
AB- One of the foundational studies of social network analysis produced a
depiction of scientific collaboration by tracing a network of scientific
papers linked by co-authorships and co-citations, which has since spurred
numerous studies on the typology, organization and dynamics of scientific
research networks. This paper introduces social network analysis and its
analytical measures of network structure. It then demonstrates the
utility of social network analysis in forestry, in the evaluation of
large research networks such as the Sustainable Forest Management Network
(SFMN), and suggests other important uses of network visualization to
facilitate exploring, discovering and selecting resources in a database|
C1- [Klenk, N. L.; Hickey, G. M.] McGill Univ, Dept Nat Resource Sci, Fac
Agr & Environm Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada; [Maclellan, J. I.] York Univ,
Adaptat & Impacts Res Div, Environm Canada, Toronto, ON M3J 2R7, Canada;
[Gonzales, R.; Cardille, J.] Univ Montreal, Dept Geog, Montreal, PQ H3C
3J7, Canada|
RP- Klenk, NL, McGill Univ, Dept Nat Resource Sci, Fac Agr & Environm
Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada|
EM- nicole.klenk@mcgill.ca|
CD- BAKER JA, 2008, V84, P756, FOREST CHRON; BORGATTI SP, 2002, UCINET
WINDOWS SOFTW; BORGATTI SP, 2003, V29, P991, J MANAGE; BRASS DJ, 2004,
V47, P795, ACAD MANAGE J; BRUEMMER G, 2008, V84, P648, FOREST CHRON; BURT
RS, 1982, STRUCTURAL THEORY AC; CALLON M, 1992, V21, P215, RES POLICY;
CLARKSON PM, 1998, V11, P1, SPORTS SCI EXCHANGE; CONTRACTOR NS, 2006,
V31, P681, ACAD MANAGE REV; DURLAND MM, 2005, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; FEKETE
JD, 2008, V4950, LNCS STATE OF THE AR; FREDERICKS KA, 2005, V107, P15,
NEW DIRECTIONS EVALU; FRUCHTERMAN TMJ, 1991, V21, P1129, SOFTWARE PRACT
EXPER; FULLER MM, 2008, V21, P225, NAT RESOUR MODEL; FULLER S, 2000,
GOVERNANCE SCI; GEUNA A, 2003, SCI INNOVATION RETHI; HANNEMAN RA, 2005,
INTRO SOCIAL NETWORK; HARARI F, 1995, GRAPH THEORY; HARSHAW H, 2005, ANN
M AM SOC ASS MAR; HEER J, 2005, P33, P IEEE INFOVIS; HJORTSO CN, 2004,
V152, P667, EUR J OPER RES; KNOKE D, 1982, NETWORK ANAL; LATOUR B, 1987,
SCI ACTION FOLLOW SC; MENDOZA GA, 2003, V174, P329, FOREST ECOL MANAG;
MOTE JE, 2007, V16, P191, RES EVALUAT; NEWMAN M, 2006, STRUCTURE DYNAMICS
N; PRICE DJD, 1965, V149, P510, SCIENCE; ROGERS EM, 1981, COMMUNICATION
NETWOR; ROGERS JD, 2001, V10, P161, RES EVALUAT; SCHELHAS J, 2003, V19,
P60, SO RURAL SOCIOLOGY; SCOTT J, 2000, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; SKOV F,
2003, V62, P1, FOREST ECOLOGY FORES; SMITH GKM, 2008, V84, P748, FOREST
CHRON; STOKOWSKI PA, 1990, V12, P251, LEISURE SCI; STOKOWSKI PA, 1991,
V23, P95, J LEISURE RES; TIKKANEN J, 2003, V18, P547, SCAND J FOREST RES;
TINDALL DB, 2002, V39, P413, CAN REV SOC ANTHROP; TROCHIM WM, 2008, V29,
P8, AM J EVAL; WASSERMAN S, 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; WEST DB, 1996,
INTRO GRAPH THEORY; WIXTED B, 2008, CONCEPTUAL ISSUES EV|
NR- 41|
TC- 0|
PU- COMMONWEALTH FORESTRY ASSOC|
PI- CRAVEN ARRMS|
PA- CRIB, DINCHOPE, CRAVEN ARRMS SY7 9JJ, SHROPSHIRE, ENGLAND|
SN- 1465-5489|
J9- INT FOR REV|
JI- Int. For. Rev|
PY- 2009|
VL- 11|
IS- 1|
BP- 134|
EP- 140|
PG- 7|
SC- Forestry|
GA- 444CL|
JN- INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2009, V11, N1, P134-140|
UT- ISI:000265957800013 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Zheng HC; Yan L; Cui L; Guan YF; Takano Y|
AF- Zheng Hua-chuan; Yan, Lei; Cui, Lei; Guan, Yi-fu; Takano, Yasuo|
TI- Mapping the history and current situation of research on John
Cunningham virus - a bibliometric analysis|
SO- BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- JC-VIRUS; HUMAN POLYOMAVIRUS; CANCER; TUMORIGENESIS; LOAD|
AB- Background: John Cunningham virus (JCV) constitutes a family of
polyoma viruses, which plays important roles in the progressive
multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) and tumorigenesis. However, no
bibliometric investigation has been reported to guide the researchers and
potential readers Methods: Papers were collected from database Sciexpanded and Pubmed until May 22, 2008. The highly-productive authors,
institutes and countries, highly-cited authors and journals were ranked.
The highly-cited articles were subjected to co-citation and chronological
analysis with highly-frequent MeSH words for co-occurrence analysis
Results: Until now, 1785 articles about JCV were indexed in Sci-expanded
and 1506 in Pubmed. The main document type was original article. USA,
Japan and Italy were the largest three producers about JCV. Temple
University published 128 papers and ranked the top, followed by
University of Tokyo. Khalili K and Yogo Y became the core authors due to
more than 20 documents produced. Journal of Neurovirology published more
than 15 papers and ranked the top. Padgett BL and Berger JR were the
first two highly-cited authors. Journal of Virology and Journal of
Neurovirology respectively ranked to the first two highly-cited journals.
These top highly-cited articles were divided into 5 aspects: (1) The
correlation between JC virus and tumors; (2) Causal correlation of JCV
with PML; (3) Polyoma virus infection and its related diseases in renalallograft recipients; (4) Detection of JCV antibody, oncogene and its
encoding protein; (5) Genetics and molecular biology of JCV. The
MeSH/subheadings were classified into five groups: (1) JCV and virus
infectious diseases; (2) JCV pathogenicity and pathological appearance of
PML; (3) JCV isolation and detection; (4) Immunology of JCV and PML; (5)
JCV genetics and tumors Conclusion: JCV investigation mainly focused on
its isolation and detection, as well as its correlation with PML and
tumors Establishment of transgenic animal model using JCV T antigen would
be a hopeful and useful project in the further study|
C1- [Zheng, Hua-chuan; Guan, Yi-fu] China Med Univ, Coll Basic Med, Dept
Biochem & Mol Biol, Shenyang, Peoples R China; [Yan, Lei; Cui, Lei] China
Med Univ, Dept Med Informat & Informat Syst, Shenyang, Peoples R China;
[Takano, Yasuo] Toyama Univ, Grad Sch Med & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Diagnost
Pathol, Toyama 930, Japan|
RP- Zheng, HC, China Med Univ, Coll Basic Med, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol,
Shenyang, Peoples R China|
EM- zheng_huachuan@hotmail.com yanlei1@hotmail.com zilu85@hotmail.com
yfguan@mail.cmu.edu.cn ytakano@med.u-toyama.ac.jp|
FU- Natural Scientific Foundation of China [70473101, 30600286]; Shenyang
Outstanding Talent Foundation of China, Liaoning BaiQianWan Talents
Program ; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports and Technology of Japan
[20659109]; Smoking Research Foundation FX This study was supported by
Natural Scientific Foundation of China (No 70473101; No. 30600286),
Shenyang Outstanding Talent Foundation of China, Liaoning BaiQianWan
Talents Program, Grant-in aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry
of Education, Culture, Sports and Technology of Japan (20659109) and
Smoking Research Foundation|
CD- CHANG AA, 2006, V116, P336, LARYNGOSCOPE; DARMONI SJ, 2006, V6, P7,
BMC MED INFORM DECIS; ESTABROOKS CA, 2004, V53, P293, NURS RES; FRISQUE
RJ, 1984, V51, P458, J VIROL; GOLDER S, 2006, V23, P3, HEALTH INFO LIBR
J; KHALILI K, 2003, V22, P5181, ONCOGENE; KUTSUNA T, 2008, V452, P405,
VIRCHOWS ARCH; MARX W, 2001, V52, P59, SCIENTOMETRICS; MURAI Y, 2007,
V98, P25, CANCER SCI; NEEL JV, 1999, V83, P152, AM J MED GENET; OCHIAI A,
1957, V22, P526, B JAPAN SOC SCIENT F; OELRICH B, 2007, V52, P1238, EUR
UROL; PRIME C, 2002, V54, P291, SCIENTOMETRICS; REID EF, 2007, V65, P42,
INT J HUM-COMPUT ST; REISS K, 2003, V22, P6517, ONCOGENE; SCHILDT HA,
2006, V67, P143, SCIENTOMETRICS; TSENG YH, 2007, V43, P1216, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG; WHITE MK, 2005, V41, P2537, EUR J CANCER; ZHENG H, 2007,
V212, P306, J PATHOL; ZHENG HC, 2002, V10, P249, ACTA ACAD MED CPAPF;
ZHENG HC, 2002, V11, P1, CHIN J MED LIB INFO; ZHENG HC, 2007, V60, P787,
J CLIN PATHOL; ZUBIETE CL, 2006, V15, P251, PROF INFORM|
NR- 23|
TC- 2|
PU- BIOMED CENTRAL LTD|
PI- LONDON|
PA- CURRENT SCIENCE GROUP, MIDDLESEX HOUSE, 34-42 CLEVELAND ST, LONDON
W1T 4LB, ENGLAND|
SN- 1471-2334|
J9- BMC INFECT DIS|
JI- BMC Infect. Dis|
PD- MAR 11|
PY- 2009|
VL- 9|
AR- 28|
DI- 10.1186/1471-2334-9-28|
PG- 12|
SC- Infectious Diseases|
GA- 442JL|
JN- BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2009, V9, N1, P134-140|
UT- ISI:000265837400002 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Egghe L; Leydesdorff L|
AF- Egghe Leo; Leydesdorff, Loet|
TI- The Relation Between Pearson's Correlation Coefficient r and Salton's
Cosine Measure|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; STRONG SIMILARITY MEASURES; COOCCURRENCE
DATA; ORDERED SETS; DOCUMENTS|
AB- The relation between Pearson's correlation coefficient and Salton's
cosine measure is revealed based on the different possible values of the
division of the L-1-norm and the L-2-norm of a vector. These different
values yield a sheaf of increasingly straight lines which together form a
cloud of points, being the investigated relation. The theoretical results
are tested against the author cocitation relations among 24
informetricians for whom two matrices can be constructed, based on co-
citations: the asymmetric occurrence matrix and the symmetric cocitation
matrix. Both examples completely confirm the theoretical results. The
results enable us to specify an algorithm that provides a threshold value
for the cosine above which none of the corresponding Pearson correlations
would be negative. Using this threshold value can be expected to optimize
the visualization of the vector space|
C1- [Egghe, Leo] Hasselt Univ, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium; [Leydesdorff,
Loet] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res ASCoR, NL-1012 CX
Amsterdam, Netherlands|
RP- Egghe, L, Hasselt Univ, Campus Diepenbeek, B-3590 Diepenbeek,
Belgium|
EM- leo.egghe@uhasselt.be loet@leydesdorff.net|
CD- AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; AHLGREN P, 2004,
V55, P843, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BENSMAN SJ, 2004, V55, P935, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; BOYCE BR, 1995, MEASUREMENT INFORM S; BRANDES U, 2007,
V4372, P42, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; EGGHE L, 1990, INTRO INFORMETRICS Q;
EGGHE L, 2001, ELEMENTARY STAT EFFE; EGGHE L, 2002, V38, P823, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG; EGGHE L, 2003, V39, P771, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; EGGHE L,
2009, V60, P232, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; FRANDSEN TF, 2004, V56, P5, ASLIB
PROC; GROSSMAN DA, 1998, INFORM RETRIEVAL ALG; HARDY G, 1988,
INEQUALITIES; JACCARD P, 1901, V37, P241, B SOC VAUD SCI NAT; JONES WP,
1987, V38, P420, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; KAMADA T, 1989, V31, P7, INFORM
PROCESS LETT; KRUSKAL JB, 1978, MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCA; LEYDESDORFF L,
1986, V9, P103, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 1988, V87, P105,
INFORMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 1993, V26, P133, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF
L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V67,
P231, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2007, V58, P2411, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2007, V58, P207, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; LEYDESDORFF L,
2008, V59, P77, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LOSEE RM, 1998, TEXT RETRIEVAL
FILTE; SALTON G, 1987, INTRO MODERN INFORM; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; TAGUESUTCLIFFE J, 1995, MEASURING INFORM INF; TANIMOTO
T, 1957, IBM TECHNICAL REPORT; VANRIJSBERGEN CJ, 1979, INFORM RETRIEVAL;
WALTMAN L, 2007, V58, P1701, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WASSERMAN S, 1994,
SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P1250, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 34|
TC- 6|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- MAY|
PY- 2009|
VL- 60|
IS- 5|
BP- 1027|
EP- 1036|
DI- 10.1002/asi.21009|
PG- 10|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 436NL|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2009, V60, N5, P1027-1036|
UT- ISI:000265420700011 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Katsaros D; Akritidis L; Bozanis P|
AF- Katsaros Dimitrios; Akritidis, Leonidas; Bozanis, Panayiotis|
TI- The f Index: Quantifying the Impact of Coterminal Citations on
Scientists' Ranking|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- AUTHOR SELF-CITATIONS; COLLABORATION|
AB- Designing fair and unbiased metrics to measure the "level of
excellence" of a scientist is a very significant task because they
recently also have been taken into account when deciding faculty
promotions, when allocating funds, and so on. Despite criticism that such
scientometric evaluators are confronted with, they do have their merits,
and efforts should be spent to arm them with robustness and resistance to
manipulation. This article alms at initiating the study of the coterminal
citations-their existence and implications-and presents them as a
generalization of self-citations and of co-citation; it also shows how
they can be used to capture any manipulation attempts against
scientometric indicators, and finally presents a new index, the f index,
that takes into account the coterminal citations. The utility of the new
index is validated using the academic production of a number of esteemed
computer scientists. The results confirm that the new index can
discriminate those individuals whose work penetrates many scientific
communities|
C1- [Katsaros, Dimitrios; Akritidis, Leonidas; Bozanis, Panayiotis] Univ
Thessaly, Dept Comp & Commun Engn, Volos, Greece|
RP- Katsaros, D, Univ Thessaly, Dept Comp & Commun Engn, Volos, Greece|
EM- dkatsar@inf.uth.gr leoakr@uth.gr pbozanis@inf.uth.gr|
CD- *HIGH ED FUND COUN, 2007, US BIBL MEAS RES QUA; ADLER R, 2008, V35,
P166, AUSTR MATH SOC GAZET; CRONIN B, 2001, V52, P558, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; CRONIN B, 2003, V54, P855, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CRONIN B, 2003, V9,
P1, NEW REV ACAD LIB; FOWLER JH, 2007, V72, P427, SCIENTOMETRICS;
GARFIELD E, 1964, P189, P S STAT ASS METH ME; GYONGYI Z, 2005, V38, P28,
COMPUTER; HELLSTEN I, 2007, V72, P469, SCIENTOMETRICS; HIRSCH JE, 2005,
V102, P16569, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; HYLAND K, 2003, V54, P251, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; LAWANI SM, 1982, V33, P281, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; LEHRL S,
1988, P291, EVALUATION FORSCHUNG; PARNAS DL, 2007, V50, P19, COMMUN ACM;
PERSSON O, 2004, V60, P421, SCIENTOMETRICS; RAUTER J, 2006,
ZITATIONSANALYSE INT; REN J, 2007, V50, P81, COMMUN ACM; SCHREIBER M,
2007, V78, ARTN 30002.1-30002.6, EPL-EUROPHYS LETT; SCHUBERT A, 2006,
V67, P503, SCIENTOMETRICS; SIDIROPOULOS A, 2007, V72, P253,
SCIENTOMETRICS; VANRAAN AFJ, 2008, V59, P1631, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 21|
TC- 3|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- MAY|
PY- 2009|
VL- 60|
IS- 5|
BP- 1051|
EP- 1056|
DI- 10.1002/asi.21040|
PG- 6|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 436NL|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2009, V60, N5, P1051-1056|
UT- ISI:000265420700013 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Matias-Guiu J; Garcia-Ramos R|
AF- Matias-Guiu J; Garcia-Ramos, R|
TI- Author and authorship in medical journals|
SO- NEUROLOGIA|
LA- Spanish|
DT- Editorial Material|
DE- Authorship; Medical journals; Editors|
ID- CONFLICT-OF-INTEREST; IMPACT FACTOR; SCIENTIFIC SOCIETIES;
INSTITUTIONAL COLLABORATION; COAUTHORSHIP NETWORKS; MULTIPLE AUTHORSHIP;
BIOMEDICAL-RESEARCH; COCITATION ANALYSIS; RESEARCH INTEGRITY; RESEARCH
ARTICLES|
AB- Introduction. There is an on-going debate on questions of authorship
in the scientific publications. Adherence to the International Committee
of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for medical journals
is low, which should be cause for reflection Development. We have
reviewed the authorship criteria from ICMJE recommendations as well as
some problems on authorship as gift authors or ghost authors. We have
also analyzed the increasing number of signers on scientific papers and
its potentials causes and the responsibility of the scientific editors in
that regards. We describe the criteria from our Journal on authorship
Conclusions. Authorship criteria for our journal include demonstration of
their relevance in the development of the research and manuscript as well
as the responsibility in it. This line is not as restrictive as that of
the ICMJE criteria, whose recommendations may not be easy to adapt to the
current organization of the multidisciplinary research groups|
C1- [Matias-Guiu, J.; Garcia-Ramos, R.] Univ Complutense, Hosp Clin San
Carlos, Inst Neurociencias, Serv Neurol, E-28040 Madrid, Spain|
RP- Matias-Guiu, J, Univ Complutense, Hosp Clin San Carlos, Inst
Neurociencias, Serv Neurol, E-28040 Madrid, Spain|
CD- UNIFORM REQUIR UNPUB; 1985, BMJ, P722, V291; *CBE, 2000, V23, P111,
SCI EDUC; *INT COMM MED J ED, UN REQ MAN SUB BIOM; *INT COMM MED J ED,
1985, V291, P722, BRIT MED J; *INT COMM MED J ED, 1993, V269, P2282,
JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC; ALTMAN DG, 2005, V330, P1056, BRIT MED J; ANDERSON
MS, 2003, V9, P269, SCI ENG ETHICS; ANDREWS JE, 2003, V91, P47, J MED
LIBR ASSOC; ANGELL M, 1986, V104, P261, ANN INTERN MED; BABOR TF, 2003,
V98, P1, ADDICTION; BAERLOCHER MO, 2007, V55, P174, J INVEST MED; BATES
T, 2004, V292, P86, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC; BEKELMAN JE, 2003, V289, P454,
JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC; BERKWITS M, 1999, V27, P122, J LAW MED ETHICS; BERO
LA, 1992, V327, P1135, NEW ENGL J MED; BEVAN JC, 2002, V35, P81, ANN R
COLL PHYS SURG; BHANDARI M, 2003, V85, P1605, J BONE JOINT SURG A;
BHANDARI M, 2005, V48, P117, CAN J SURG; BHOPAL R, 1997, V314, P1009,
BRIT MED J; BODENHEIMER T, 2000, V342, P1539, NEW ENGL J MED; BORNMANN L,
2007, V58, P1100, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BORRY P, 2006, V20, P213,
BIOETHICS; BRACHORIQUELME RL, 1997, V49, P369, REV INVEST CLIN; BRICE J,
2005, V39, P83, MED EDUC; BURMAN KD, 1982, V97, P602, ANN INTERN MED;
CAELLEIGH AS, 2003, V9, P221, SCI ENG ETHICS; CAPPELL MS, 2008, V103,
P1065, AM J GASTROENTEROL; CHEW M, 2007, V100, P142, J ROY SOC MED;
COOLEDGE HN, 1983, V86, P24, HARVARD MAG; DAVIDOFF F, 2001, V165, P786,
CAN MED ASSOC J; DAVIES HD, 1996, V155, P877, CAN MED ASSOC J; DEANGELIS
CD, 2008, V299, P1833, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC; DEMELOMARTIN I, 2007, V448,
P129, NATURE; DEVINE EB, 2005, V69, P455, AM J PHARM EDUC; DIAMOND D,
1969, V280, P1484, NEW ENGL J MED; DRAZEN JM, 2002, V347, P55, NEW ENGL J
MED; DRENTH JPH, 1996, V2, P469, SCI ENG ETHICS; DRENTH JPH, 1998, V280,
P219, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC; EPSTEIN RJ, 1993, V306, P765, BRIT MED J;
ERRAMI M, 2008, V451, P397, NATURE; FIGG WD, 2006, V26, P759,
PHARMACOTHERAPY; FLANAGIN A, 1997, V20, P141, CBE VIEWS; FLANAGIN A,
1998, V280, P222, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC; FOOTE M, 2003, V9, P303,
BIOTECHNOL ANN REV; FOTION N, 1984, V100, P592, ANN INTERN MED;
FUGHBERMAN A, 2005, V20, P546, J GEN INTERN MED; GAETA TJ, 1999, V6,
P297, ACAD EMERG MED; GODLEE F, 1996, V312, P1501, BRIT MED J; GODLEE F,
1996, V59, P11, EUR SCI ED; GOLDSTEIN ML, 2005, V71, P26, PHYS REV E;
GONZALEZALCAIDE G, 2004, V8, P78, TRAST ADICT; GONZALEZALCAIDE G, 2008,
V46, P642, REV NEUROLOGIA; GOODMAN NW, 1994, V309, P1482, BRIT MED J;
GREGOIRE G, 1995, V48, P159, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL; HALPERIN SA, 2005, V173,
P1358, CAN MED ASSOC J; HEALING L, 1994, V52, P13, EUR SCI ED; HOEN WP,
1998, V280, P217, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC; HORTON R, 1996, V312, P723, BRIT
MED J; HORTON R, 1997, V350, P5, LANCET; HORTON R, 1998, V280, P298,
JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC; HORTON R, 1998, V352, P891, LANCET; HREN D, 2007,
V33, P428, J MED ETHICS; HUDSON J, 1996, V10, P153, J ECON PERSPECT; HUNT
R, 2007, SCI EDITORSS HDB; HUSSAIN A, 2001, V323, P263, BRIT MED J; HWANG
SS, 2003, V226, P16, RADIOLOGY; ILAKOVAC V, 2007, V176, P41, CAN MED
ASSOC J; JACARD M, 2002, V130, P1391, REV MED CHILE; JOHNSON NW, 1996,
V2, P244, ORAL DIS; JONES AH, 2003, V9, P243, SCI ENG ETHICS; KAISER J,
2006, V314, P405, SCIENCE; KASSIRER JP, 1991, V325, P1510, NEW ENGL J
MED; KENNEDY D, 2003, V301, P733, SCIENCE; KING JT, 2000, V47, P435,
NEUROSURGERY; KURICHI JE, 2007, V141, P267, SURGERY; KWOK LS, 2005, V31,
P554, J MED ETHICS; LAGNADO M, 2003, V183, P3, BRIT J PSYCHIAT; LAZAR R,
1995, V74, P1244, J DENT RES; LAZAR R, 2004, V93, P589, ACTA PAEDIATR;
LEVINE FJ, 2003, V9, P257, SCI ENG ETHICS; LEVSKY ME, 2007, V100, P371,
SOUTH MED J; LUNDBERG GD, 1989, V262, P2003, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC;
MARTINEZVILA E, 1998, V26, P839, REV NEUROLOGIA; MARUSIC A, 2006, V22,
P1035, CURR MED RES OPIN; MARUSIC A, 2006, V184, P596, MED J AUSTRALIA;
MARUSIC M, 2004, V10, P493, SCI ENG ETHICS; MATIASGUIU J, 1995, V23, P25,
REV NEUROL; MATIASGUIU J, 2000, V30, P35, REV NEUROLOGIA; MATIASGUIU J,
2008, V23, P342, NEUROLOGIA; MEINERT CL, 1993, V14, P255, CONTROL CLIN
TRIALS; MILLER RA, 2007, V14, P132, J AM MED INFORM ASSN; MOFFATT B,
2007, V50, P18, PERSPECT BIOL MED; MOJONAZZI SM, 2003, V421, P209,
NATURE; MORRIS SA, 2004, V101, P5291, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; MOWATT G,
2002, V287, P2769, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC; MUELLER PS, 2006, V136, P441,
SWISS MED WKLY; MUSSURAKIS S, 1993, V34, P316, ACTA RADIOL; NEWMAN A,
2006, V32, P420, J MED ETHICS; PATSOPOULOS NA, 2006, V332, P1061, BRIT
MED J; PIGNATELLI B, 2005, V31, P578, J MED ETHICS; POLOLI L, 2004, V19,
P64, J GEN INTERN MED; POWERS RD, 1988, V6, P647, AM J EMERG MED; REED
DA, 2007, V298, P1002, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC; REGALADO A, 1995, V268, P25,
SCIENCE; RELMAN S, 1979, V25, P673, CLIN PHARMACOL THER; RENNIE D, 1994,
V271, P469, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC; RENNIE D, 1997, V278, P579, JAMA-J AM
MED ASSOC; REYES H, 2000, V128, P363, REV MED CHILE; REYES H, 2002, V130,
P1083, REV MED CHILE; RIESENBERG D, 1990, V264, P1857, JAMA-J AM MED
ASSOC; ROCHON PA, 1994, V272, P108, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC; ROLAND C, 1970,
V125, P771, ARCH INTERN MED; ROSS JS, 2008, V299, P1800, JAMA-J AM MED
ASSOC; SAIDMAN LJ, 1994, V80, P491, ANESTHESIOLOGY; SCHEIN M, 2001, V129,
P655, SURGERY; SCHULMAN KA, 2002, V347, P1335, NEW ENGL J MED; SHAPIRO
DW, 1994, V271, P438, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC; SHARP D, 1999, V25, P47,
EUROPEAN SCI EDITING; SHASHOK K, 1997, V148, P1946, REV NEUROL; SHULKIN
DJ, 1993, V68, P688, ACAD MED; SLOAN RM, 1996, V167, P571, AM J
ROENTGENOL; SMITH R, 1997, V314, P992, BRIT MED J; SMITH R, 1997, V315,
P696, BRIT MED J; SMITH R, 1997, V315, P759, BRIT MED J; SMITH R, 2004,
V329, P242, BRIT MED J; TELLEZZENTENO JF, 2007, V135, P480, REV MED
CHILE; TOPOL E, 1993, V329, P673, NEW ENGL J MED; URBANO C, 2001, V4,
P243, DOCUM; VALDERRAMAZURIAN JC, 2007, V60, P117, REV ESP CARDIOL; VIVAS
N, 1991, V8, P768, FARM CLIN; WAGENA EJ, 2005, V31, P308, J MED ETHICS;
WAGER E, 2007, V9, P16, MEDGENMED; WARD B, 1994, V368, P579, NATURE;
WEEKS WB, 2004, V59, P1949, SOC SCI MED; WELKER JA, 2007, V14, P16, J AM
MED INFORM ASSN; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE
HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WINKMANN G, 2002, V127, P131,
DEUT MED WOCHENSCHR; WINKMANN G, 2002, V219, P72, KLIN MONATSBL AUGENH;
WUCHTY S, 2007, V316, P1036, SCIENCE; ZETTERSTROM R, 2004, V93, P581,
ACTA PAEDIATR|
NR- 142|
TC- 1|
PU- GRUPO ARS XXI COMUNICACION S L|
PI- BARCELONA|
PA- PASSEIG GRACIA 84, 1, BARCELONA, 08008, SPAIN|
SN- 0213-4853|
J9- NEUROLOGIA|
JI- Neurologia|
PD- JAN-FEB|
PY- 2009|
VL- 24|
IS- 1|
BP- 1|
EP- 6|
PG- 6|
SC- Clinical Neurology|
GA- 433VI|
JN- NEUROLOGIA, 2009, V24, N1, P1-6|
UT- ISI:000265233500001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Estabrooks CA; Derksen L; Winther C; Lavis JN; Scott SD; Wallin L;
Profetto-McGrath J|
AF- Estabrooks Carole A; Derksen, Linda; Winther, Connie; Lavis, John N;
Scott, Shannon D; Wallin, Lars; Profetto-McGrath, Joanne|
TI- The intellectual structure and substance of the knowledge utilization
field: A longitudinal author co-citation analysis, 1945 to 2004|
SO- IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE|
LA- English|
DT- Review|
ID- EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; APPLIED SOCIAL-RESEARCH; HEALTH-CARE;
CITATION ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER; SIMILARITY MEASURES; INVISIBLE
COLLEGE; UNITED-STATES; PRACTICE GAP; DIFFUSION|
AB- Background: It has been argued that science and society are in the
midst of a far-reaching renegotiation of the social contract between
science and society, with society becoming a far more active partner in
the creation of knowledge. On the one hand, new forms of knowledge
production are emerging, and on the other, both science and society are
experiencing a rapid acceleration in new forms of knowledge utilization.
Concomitantly since the Second World War, the science underpinning the
knowledge utilization field has had exponential growth. Few in-depth
examinations of this field exist, and no comprehensive analyses have used
bibliometric methods Methods: Using bibliometric analysis, specifically
first author co-citation analysis, our group undertook a domain analysis
of the knowledge utilization field, tracing its historical development
between 1945 and 2004. Our purposes were to map the historical
development of knowledge utilization as a field, and to identify the
changing intellectual structure of its scientific domains. We analyzed
more than 5,000 articles using citation data drawn from the Web of
Science (R) Search terms were combinations of knowledge, research,
evidence, guidelines, ideas, science, innovation, technology, information
theory and use, utilization, and uptake Results: We provide an overview
of the intellectual structure and how it changed over six decades. The
field does not become large enough to represent with a co-citation map
until the mid-1960s. Our findings demonstrate vigorous growth from the
mid-1960s through 2004, as well as the emergence of specialized domains
reflecting distinct collectives of intellectual activity and thought.
Until the mid-1980s, the major domains were focused on innovation
diffusion, technology transfer, and knowledge utilization. Beginning
slowly in the mid-1980s and then growing rapidly, a fourth scientific
domain, evidence-based medicine, emerged. The field is dominated in all
decades by one individual, Everett Rogers, and by one paradigm,
innovation diffusion Conclusion: We conclude that the received view that
social science disciplines are in a state where no accepted set of
principles or theories guide research (i.e., that they are preparadigmatic) could not be supported for this field. Second, we document
the emergence of a new domain within the knowledge utilization field,
evidence-based medicine. Third, we conclude that Everett Rogers was the
dominant figure in the field and, until the emergence of evidence-based
medicine, his representation of the general diffusion model was the
dominant paradigm in the field|
C1- [Estabrooks, Carole A.; Scott, Shannon D.; Profetto-McGrath, Joanne]
Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing, Edmonton, AB, Canada; [Derksen, Linda]
Vancouver Isl Univ, Dept Sociol, Nanaimo, BC, Canada; [Winther, Connie]
Univ Alberta, Fac Med, Dept Pediat, Edmonton, AB, Canada; [Lavis, John
N.] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada;
[Lavis, John N.] McMaster Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada;
[Wallin, Lars] Karolinska Inst, Div Nursing, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci &
Soc, Stockholm, Sweden; [Wallin, Lars] Karolinska Univ Hosp, CRU,
Stockholm, Sweden|
RP- Estabrooks, CA, Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing, 3rd Floor Clin Sci Bldg,
Edmonton, AB, Canada|
EM- carole.estabrooks@ualberta.ca linda.derksen@viu.ca
connie.winther@ualberta.ca lavisj@mcmaster.ca shannon.scott@ualberta.ca
lars.wallin@karolinska.se joanne.profetto-mcgrath@ualberta.ca|
FU- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [67228]; Social
Sciences & Humanities Research Council [410-2004-0592]|
FX- This work was supported by grants-in-aid from the Canadian Institutes
of Health Research (CIHR) (MOP #67228) and the Social Sciences &
Humanities Research Council ( grant #410-2004-0592). Drs Estabrooks and
Lavis receive career support from the CIHR. Dr Wallin received post
doctoral fellowship funding and Dr Scott received doctoral and post
doctoral funding from CIHR and AHFMR during the conduct of this study Iva
Seto served as a research assistant, completed searches and did data
cleaning under the direction of CW. She was supported by the CIHR grantin-aid MOP #67228. Richard Thornley and Dagmara Chojecki assisted with
final formatting and preparation of the manuscript. Glennis Zilm provided
final editing services. They were supported by Dr Estabrooks' Canada
Research Chair. Dr Olle Perrson, Sociology Institute, Umea University,
Umea, Sweden was a consultant on the project and advised on methods,
software training and use, and reviewed the final work for technical and
methodological accuracy. His work was supported by the CIHR grant-in-aid
MOP #67228. The experts contacted for review of 'key players' document
included (*denotes those who responded): UK: Huw Davies*, Joanne RycroftMalone*, Kieran Walshe; US: Lisa Bero, Robert Rich, Steve Shortell,
Thomas Valente*; Canada: Jean Louis Denis, Karen Golden-Biddle*, Rejean
Landry*, Jeremy Grimshaw*, Donna Ciliska*, Maureen Dobbins*. The authors
thank the reviewers for thorough reviews that strengthened the manuscript
considerably|
CD- BIBLIOMETRICS RES FI; BRIDGING KNOW DO GAP; ALLEN TJ, 1969, V14, P12,
ADM SCI Q; ALLEN TJ, 1977, MANAGING FLOW TECHNO; ALLEN TJ, 1983, V12,
P199, RES POLICY; ALLMARK P, 1995, V22, P18, J ADV NURS; BACKER TE, 1991,
V12, P225, KNOWLEDGE; BACKER TE, 2005, V10, P285, J HEALTH COMMUN; BACKER
TE, 2005, V10, P289, J HEALTH COMMUN; BAKER GR, 2004, V170, P1678, CAN
MED ASSOC J; BEAL GM, 1986, KNOWLEDGE GENERATION; BEALL J, 2007, V44,
P197, CATALOGING CLASSIFIC; BLACKMAN AW, 1974, V6, P41, TECHNOLOGICAL
FORECA; BROWN LA, 1968, DIFFUSION PROCESSES; CALLON M, 1986, P196, POWER
ACTION BELIEF; CAPLAN NS, 1975, USE SOCIAL SCI KNOWL; CETINA KK, 1999,
EPISTEMIC CULTURES; CHURCHMAN CW, 1964, V7, P31, CALIFORNIA MANAGEMEN;
CHURCHMAN CW, 1965, V11, B69, MANAGE SCI; COCHRANE AL, 1972,
EFFECTIVENESS EFFICI; COLEMAN J, 1957, V20, P253, SOCIOMETRY; COLEMAN JS,
1966, MED INNOVATION DIFFU; COLLINS HM, 1981, V19, P6, HIST SCI; COLLINS
HM, 1992, CHANGING ORDER REPLI; COONEY S, 1974, V5, P29, R&D MANAGE;
COTTRILL CA, 1989, V11, P181, KNOWLEDGE; CRANE D, 1972, INVISIBLE COLL
DIFFU; CRONIN B, 2001, V27, P1, J INFORM SCI; DUNCAN WJ, 1974, V17, P724,
ACAD MANAGE J; DUNN WN, 1988, V1, P3, KNOWLEDGE SOC; ESTABROOKS CA, 2004,
P242, MULTIDISCIPLINARY PE; FARLEY J, 1974, V48, P161, B HIST MED;
FITZGERALD L, 2003, V11, P219, HEALTH SOC CARE COMM; GANDHI AG, 2007,
V31, P43, EVALUATION REV; GIBBONS M, 1994, NEW PRODUCTION KNOWL; GIBBONS
M, 1999, V402, C81, NATURE S; GLASER EM, 1983, PUTTING KNOWLEDGE US; GMUR
M, 2003, V57, P27, SCIENTOMETRICS; GOULDNER AW, 1957, V2, P44, ADM SCI Q;
GRILICHES Z, 1957, V25, P501, ECONOMETRICA; GRIMSHAW J, 2004, V24, S31, J
CONTIN ED HLTH S1; GROL R, 2001, V286, P2578, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC; GROL
R, 2003, V362, P1225, LANCET; GUYATT G, 1992, V268, P2420, JAMA-J AM MED
ASSOC; GUYATT GH, 2000, V320, P954, BRIT MED J; GUYATT GH, 2000, V284,
P1290, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC; HAGERSTRAND T, 1952, PROPOGATION INNOVATI;
HAGERSTRAND T, 1965, V6, P43, ARCH EUR SOCIOL; HAGERSTRAND T, 1966, V16,
P27, PAPERS REGIONAL SCI; HAGERSTRAND T, 1967, INNOVATION DIFFUSION;
HAIDER M, 2004, V9, P3, J HEALTH COMMUN S1; HAMERS L, 1989, V25, P315,
INFORM PROCESS MANAG; HART WB, 2005, V29, P491, INT J INTERCULT REL;
HAVELOCK RG, 1969, PLANNING INNOVATION; HAVELOCK RG, 1971, PLANNING
INNOVATION; HAVELOCK RG, 1973, TRAINING CHANGE AGEN; HAYNES RB, 2002, V2,
ARTN 3, BMC HEALTH SERV RES; KATZ E, 1960, V65, P435, AM J SOCIOL; KATZ
E, 1963, V28, P237, AM SOCIOL REV; KOERNER ST, 2004, V2, P99, COMP
TECHNOLOGY TRAN; KOTHARI A, 2005, V71, P117, HEALTH POLICY; KUHN T, 1962,
STRUCTURE SCI COMMUN; LANG ES, 2007, V49, P355, ANN EMERG MED; LATOUR B,
1987, SCI ACTION FOLLOW SC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2005, V56, P769, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; LIEVROUW LA, 1989, V16, P615, COMMUN RES; LINDQUIST EA, 1988,
V1, P86, KNOWLEDGE SOC; LIONBERGER HF, 1960, ADOPTION NEW IDEAS P; LOMAS
J, 2000, V1, P140, ISUMA; LOOMIS ME, 1985, V17, P35, IMAGE J NURSING
SCHO; MAHAJAN V, 1979, V14, P231, TECHNOLOGICAL FORECA; MAHAJAN V, 1985,
MODELS INNOVATION DI; MANSFIELD E, 1961, V29, P741, ECONOMETRICA;
MANSFIELD E, 1963, V71, P556, J POLITICAL EC; MANSFIELD E, 1963, V77,
P290, Q J ECON; MANSFIELD E, 1963, V45, P348, REV ECON STAT; MANSFIELD E,
1968, EC TECHNOLOGICAL CHA; MANSFIELD E, 1968, IND RES TECHNOLOGICA; MARK
M, 2006, V27, P475, AM J EVAL; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 2005, V65, P131, SCIENTOMETRICS; MCGLYNN EA, 2003,
V348, P2635, NEW ENGL J MED; MERTON RK, 1957, SOCIAL THEORY SOCIAL;
MERTON RK, 1968, SOCIAL THEORY SOCIAL; MERTON RK, 1973, SOCIOLOGY SCI
THEORE; MERTON RK, 1977, P3, SOCIOLOGY SCI EUROPE; MERTON RK, 1990,
FOCUSED INTERVIEW MA; MERTON RK, 1996, P318, SOCIAL STRUCTURE SCI;
MITROFF II, 1974, SUBJECTIVE SIDE SCI; MOED HF, 2005, CITATION ANAL RES
EV; NILSSON K, 1993, V29, P366, J APPL BEHAV SCI; NOWOTNY H, 2001,
RETHINKING SCI KNOWL; NOWOTNY H, 2003, V41, P179, MINERVA; OGBURN WF,
1957, V41, P167, SOCIOL SOC RES; OKUBO Y, 1997, BIBLIOMETRIC INDICAT;
ORSZAG PR, 2007, V357, P1885, NEW ENGL J MED; PERSSON O, 2000, V79, P590,
CURR SCI INDIA; PRICE DJD, 1963, LITTLE SCI BIG SCIEN; RICH RF, 1977,
P199, USING SOCIAL RES PUB; RICH RF, 1979, V1, P6, KNOWLEDGE CREATION D;
RICH RF, 1991, V12, P319, KNOWLEDGE; ROGERS EM, 1962, DIFFUSION
INNOVATION; ROGERS EM, 1971, COMMUNICATION INNOVA; ROGERS EM, 1983,
DIFFUSION INNOVATION; ROGERS EM, 1986, KNOWLEDGE GENERATION; ROGERS EM,
1995, DIFFUSION INNOVATION; ROGERS EM, 1995, V21, P324, JOINT COMM J QUAL
IM; ROGERS EM, 2003, DIFFUSION INNOVATION; ROGERS EM, 2004, V9, P13, J
HEALTH COMMUN S1; ROGERS EM, 2005, V10, ARTN 29, INNOVATION J; RYAN B,
1943, V8, P15, RURAL SOCIOL; SACKETT DL, 2002, V55, P1161, J CLIN
EPIDEMIOL; SALTON G, 1964, INFORM STORAGE RETRI; SALTON G, 1966, V54,
P1663, P IEEE; SARTER B, 1989, V2, P74, NURS SCI QUART; SCHUSTER MA,
2005, V83, P843, MILBANK Q; SEELY B, 2003, V1, P7, COMP TECHNOL TRANSFE;
SERPA R, 1992, V17, P16, J TECHNOLOGY TRANSFE; SHAPERMAN J, 1995, V40,
P401, HOSP HEALTH SERV ADM; SHAPIN S, 1996, SOCIAL HIST TRUTH; SMALL H,
2004, V60, P71, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL HG, 1978, V8, P327, SOC STUD SCI;
SMALL HG, 1979, V1, P445, SCIENTOMETRICS; STEHR N, 1994, KNOWLEDGE SOC;
STEHR N, 2001, P494, HDB SOCIAL THEORY; STEHR N, 2001, V39, P89, SOCIETY;
SUNESSON S, 1988, V10, P140, KNOWLEDGE; SUNESSON S, 1989, V2, P42,
KNOWLEDGE SOC; TARDE G, 1903, LAWS IMITATION; VALENTE TW, 1993, V43, P30,
J COMMUN; VALENTE TW, 1995, V16, P242, SCI COMMUN; VANDENBULTE C, 2001,
V106, P1409, AM J SOCIOL; VANDEVALL M, 1975, V11, P14, J APPLIED
BEHAVIORAL; VANDEVALL M, 1976, V12, P158, J APPLIED BEHAVIORAL; WALKER G,
1999, ONLINE RETRIEVAL DIA; WEISS CH, 1977, USING SOCIAL RES PUB; WEISS
CH, 1979, V39, P426, PUBLIC ADMIN REV; WEISS CH, 1980, V1, P381,
KNOWLEDGE CREATION D; WEISS CH, 1980, SOCIAL SCI RES DECIS; WEISS CH,
1998, V19, P21, AM J EVAL; WEST E, 1999, V48, P633, SOC SCI MED; WHITE
HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1990, P84, SCHOLARLY
COMMUNICAT; WHITE HD, 1997, V32, P99, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; WHITE HD,
1998, V49, P325, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2004, V55, P111, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; YIN R, 1981, V2, P555, KNOWLEDGE CREATION D; YIN RK, 1978,
CHANGING URBAN BUREA; ZALTMAN G, 1973, INNOVATIONS ORG; ZALTMAN G, 1977,
STRATEGIES PLANNED C; ZUCCALA A, 2006, V57, P152, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
ZUCKERMAN H, 1987, V12, P329, SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 152|
TC- 1|
PU- BIOMED CENTRAL LTD|
PI- LONDON|
PA- CURRENT SCIENCE GROUP, MIDDLESEX HOUSE, 34-42 CLEVELAND ST, LONDON
W1T 4LB, ENGLAND|
SN- 1748-5908|
J9- IMPLEMENT SCI|
JI- Implement. Sci|
PD- NOV 13|
PY- 2008|
VL- 3|
AR- 49|
DI- 10.1186/1748-5908-3-49|
PG- 22|
SC- Health Care Sciences & Services; Health Policy & Services|
GA- 432TA|
JN- IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2008, V3, N1, P1-6|
UT- ISI:000265155900001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Pasadeos Y; Phelps J; Edison A|
AF- Pasadeos Yorgo; Phelps, Joseph; Edison, Aimee|
TI- SEARCHING FOR OUR "OWN THEORY" IN ADVERTISING: AN UPDATE OF RESEARCH
NETWORKS|
SO- JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY|
LA- English|
DT- Review|
ID- MASS-COMMUNICATION SCHOLARS; CONSUMER RESEARCH; ARTICLE PRODUCTIVITY;
COMPETITIVE INTERFERENCE; MEDIATING ACCEPTANCE; CITATION NETWORKS;
PLANNING-MODEL; JOURNALS; INVOLVEMENT; ATTITUDE|
AB- Extending previous research, this work examines the advertising
literature published in 2002-05, identifies research streams among mostcited works, and presents a co-citation network. Beyond what the citation
analysis suggests about advertising research today, comparing the
findings to earlier results provides insight into the intellectual
development of the field, including shifts in scholarly orientations
Although advertising scholarship is historically sound, dynamic,
increasingly diverse, and largely self-sufficient, the field has yet to
move to a level of maturity where it can work off its "own," rather than
"borrowed," theory|
C1- [Pasadeos, Yorgo; Phelps, Joseph] Univ Alabama, Coll Commun &
Informat Sci, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA|
RP- Pasadeos, Y, Univ Alabama, Coll Commun & Informat Sci, Tuscaloosa, AL
35487 USA|
CD- AAKER DA, 1996, BUILDING STRONG BRAN; ALBA JW, 1987, V13, P411, J
CONSUM RES; ANDERSON JC, 1988, V103, P411, PSYCHOL BULL; BAGOZZI RP,
1988, V16, P74, J ACADEMY MARKETING; BARON RM, 1986, V51, P1173, J PERS
SOC PSYCHOL; BARRY TE, 1990, V19, P52, J ADVERTISING; BATRA R, 1986, V13,
P234, J CONSUM RES; BEARD FK, 2002, V31, P65, J ADVERTISING; BELCH G,
1998, ADVERTISING PROMOTIO; BELCH GE, 1998, ADVERTISING PROMOTIO;
BENDAVID J, 1975, V1, P203, ANNU REV SOCIOL; BURKE RR, 1988, V15, P55, J
CONSUM RES; CHANG TK, 2005, V82, P672, JOURNALISM MASS COMM; CHEN QM,
1999, V39, P27, J ADVERTISING RES; CHO CH, 2006, V35, P143, J
ADVERTISING; CHURCHILL GA, 1979, V16, P64, J MARKETING RES; COLE JR,
1973, SOCIAL STRATIFICATIO; COTE JA, 1991, V18, P402, J CONSUM RES; COTE
JA, 1992, V3, P251, MARKET LETT; COYLE JR, 2001, V30, P65, J ADVERTISING;
CULNAN M, 1986, V32, P56, MANAGE SCI; EAGLY A, 1993, PSYCHOL ATTITUDES;
EDELL JA, 1987, V14, P421, J CONSUM RES; EDWARDS SM, 2002, P210, P 2003 C
AM AC ADV; FISHBEIN M, 1975, BELIEF ATTITUDE INTE; FORD JB, 2008, V37,
P69, J ADVERTISING; FRIESTAD M, 1971, V21, P1, J CONSUM RES; FRIESTAD M,
1994, V21, P1, J CONSUM RES; GOLDMAN A, 1979, V16, P485, J MARKETING RES;
GORDON MD, 1982, V33, P55, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; GREENBERG BS, 1989, V66,
P473, JOURNALISM QUART; GREENWALD AG, 1968, P147, PSYCHOL FDN ATTITUDE;
GREENWALD AG, 1984, V11, P581, J CONSUM RES; HA L, 1998, V42, P457, J
BROADCAST ELECTRON; HAIR JF, 1998, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN; HALEY RI, 1991,
V31, P11, J ADVERTISING RES; HAMELMAN PW, 1972, V3, P8, INTERFACES;
HAMELMAN PW, 1973, V10, P215, J MARKETING RES; HOFFMAN DL, 1993, V19,
P505, J CONSUM RES; HOFFMAN DL, 1996, V60, P50, J MARKETING; HOFFMANN DL,
1986, V60, P50, J MARKETING; HOFSTEDE G, 1980, CULTURES CONSEQUENCE;
HOLBROOK MB, 1987, V14, P404, J CONSUM RES; KAMINS MA, 1990, V19, P4, J
ADVERTISING; KASSARJIAN HH, 1977, V4, P8, J CONSUM RES; KELLER KL, 1987,
V14, P316, J CONSUM RES; KELLER KL, 1993, V57, P1, J MARKETING; KELLER
KL, 1998, STRATEGIC BRAND MANA; KENT RJ, 1994, V58, P97, J MARKETING;
KOENIG MED, 1983, V34, P136, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; KRUGMAN HE, 1965, V29,
P349, PUBLIC OPIN QUART; KRUGMAN HE, 1965, V29, P349, PUBLIC OPIN QUART;
KUHN TS, 1970, P178, STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; LEONG SM, 1989, V15, P492, J
CONSUM RES; LIEVROUW LA, 1989, V16, P615, COMMUN RES; LUTZ RJ, 1985, P45,
PSYCHOL PROCESSES AD; MACHINIS DJ, 1989, V53, P1, J MARKETING; MACINNIS
DJ, 1991, V55, P32, J MARKETING; MACKENZIE SB, 1986, V23, P130, J
MARKETING RES; MACKENZIE SB, 1986, V23, P130, J MARKETING RES; MACKENZIE
SB, 1989, V53, P48, J MARKETING; MCCAIN KW, 1989, V16, P667, COMMUN RES;
MEYERSLEVY J, 1989, V16, P39, J CONSUM RES; MITCHELL AA, 1981, V18, P318,
J MARKETING RES; MUELLER B, 1987, V27, P51, J ADVERTISING RES; NAN XL,
2004, V4, P7, MARKETING THEORY; NOVAK TP, 2000, V19, P22, MARKET SCI;
NUNNALLY JC, 1978, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY; NUNNALLY JC, 1994, PSYCHOMETRIC
THEORY; PAISLEY W, 1972, CONNIUNICATION RES B; PASADEOS Y, 1985, V14,
P52, J ADVERTISING; PASADEOS Y, 1998, V27, P53, J ADVERTISING; PASADEOS
Y, 1999, V11, P29, J PUBLIC RELAT RES; PERREAULT WD, 1989, V26, P135, J
MARKETING RES; PETTY RE, 1983, ATTITUDES PERSUASION; PETTY RE, 1983, V10,
P135, J CONSUM RES; PETTY RE, 1986, COMMUNICATION PER SU; PETTY RE, 1986,
COMMUNICATION PERSUA; PHELPS P, DISCIPLINARY IMPACT; PRICE JDD, 1965,
V149, P510, SCIENCE; RESNICK A, 1977, V41, P50, J MARKETING; RHODE DL,
2006, P31, PURSUIT KNOWLEDGE SC; RICE RE, 1988, V15, P256, HUM COMMUN
RES; ROGERS EM, 1971, COMMUNICATIONS INNOV; SCHWEITZER JC, 1988, V65,
P479, JOURNALISM QUART; SHIMP TA, 1997, ADVERTISING PROMOTIO; SHIMP TA,
2003, ADVERTISING PROMOTIO; SMALL H, 1998, ASIS ANN M; SMITH RE, 1982,
V46, P81, J MARKETING; SO CYK, 1988, V15, P236, HUM COMMUN RES; SOLEY LC,
P 1994 C AM AC ADV, P45; SOLEY LC, 1983, V60, P464, JOURNALISM QUART;
SOLEY LC, 1988, V65, P157, JOURNALISM QUART; STEUER J, 1992, V42, P75, J
COMMUN; STEWART DW, 1986, EFFECTIVE TELEVISION; STEWART DW, 1986,
TELEVISION MARKETING; SUMMERS EG, 1984, V3, P332, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
TANKARD JW, 1984, V61, P89, JOURNALISM QUART; USDIKEN B, 1995, V16, P503,
ORGAN STUD; VAUGHN R, 1980, V20, P27, J ADVERTISING RES; VAUGHN R, 1986,
V26, P57, J ADVERTISING RES; VINCENT RC, 1991, V68, P840, JOURNALISM
QUART; WRIGHT PL, 1973, V10, P53, J MARKETING RES; YALE L, 1988, V17,
P12, J ADVERTISING; YI YJ, 1990, V19, P40, J ADVERTISING; ZAICHKOWSKY JL,
1985, V12, P341, J CONSUM RES; ZAJONC RB, 1980, V35, P151, AM PSYCHOL|
NR- 107|
TC- 1|
PU- ASSOC EDUC JOURNALISM MASS COMMUNICATION|
PI- COLUMBIA|
PA- UNIV SOUTH CAROLINA COLLEGE OF JOURNALISM, COLUMBIA, SC 29208 USA|
SN- 1077-6990|
J9- JOURNALISM MASS COMMUN|
JI- Journal. Mass Commun. Q|
PD- WIN|
PY- 2008|
VL- 85|
IS- 4|
BP- 785|
EP- 806|
PG- 22|
SC- Communication|
GA- 430JP|
JN- JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2008, V85, N4, P785-806|
UT- ISI:000264985700005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Pilkington A; Meredith J|
AF- Pilkington Alan; Meredith, Jack|
TI- The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management1980-2006: A citation/co-citation analysis|
SO- JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT|
LA- English|
DT- Review|
DE- Operations management; Bibliometric techniques; Co-citation; Citation
analysis; Social network analysis|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; TOYOTA PRODUCTION SYSTEM; LOT-SIZE MODEL;
JUST-IN-TIME; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; MANUFACTURING FLEXIBILITY; STRATEGIC
PERSPECTIVE; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; PRODUCTION COMPETENCE; INFORMATIONSYSTEMS|
AB- Citation analysis combined with a network analysis of co-citation
data from three major operations management (OM) journals is used to
reveal the evolution of the intellectual structure of the OM field
between 1980 and 2006. This spans the entire time since the beginning of
research journals specific to the field. Employing a bibliometric
citation/co-citation analysis to investigate the foundations of the
discipline enables a robust, quantitative approach to uncovering the
evolution of research in OM. The study finds that the intellectual
structure of the field made statistically significant changes between the
1980s, the 1990s, and the 2000s and evolved from a pre-occupation with
narrow, tactical topics toward more strategic, macrotopics, including new
research methods and techniques. A factor analysis identifies the 12 top
knowledge groups in the field and how they change over the decades.
Illustrations of the structure of the co-citations representing the field
are generated from a spring-embedded algorithm that is an improvement
over the standard multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) approach to
illustrating the knowledge groups. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights
reserved|
C1- [Meredith, Jack] Wake Forest Univ, Babcock Grad Sch Management,
Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA; [Pilkington, Alan] Univ London, Sch
Management, Egham TW20 0EX, Surrey, England|
RP- Meredith, J, Wake Forest Univ, Babcock Grad Sch Management, POB 7659,
Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA|
EM- A.Pilkington@rhul.ac.uk jom@mba.wfu.edu|
CD- ADAM EE, 1989, V15, P181, J MANAGE; AHIRE SL, 1996, V27, P23,
DECISION SCI; AMOAKOGYAMPAH K, 1989, V8, P250, J OPERATIONS MANAGEM;
ANDERSON JC, 1988, V103, P411, PSYCHOL BULL; ANDERSON JC, 1989, V8, P133,
J OPERATIONS MANAGEM; ARMSTRONG JS, 1977, V14, P396, J MARKETING RES;
ASHER H, 1956, R291 RAND CORP; BAGCHI U, 1986, V33, P227, NAV RES LOG;
BAKER K, 1974, INTRO SEQUENCING SCH; BAKER KR, 1977, V8, P19, DECISION
SCI; BAKER KR, 1978, V24, P1710, MANAGE SCI; BAKER KR, 1981, V1, P109, J
OPER MANAG; BARNEY J, 1991, V17, P99, J MANAGE; BENBASAT I, 1987, V11,
P369, MIS QUART; BENSMAN SJ, 2004, V55, P935, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
BENTLER PM, 1980, V88, P588, PSYCHOL BULL; BERRY WL, 1972, V13,
PRODUCTION INVENTORY; BERRY WL, 1979, MASTER PROJECTION SC; BEY RP, 1981,
V12, P35, PROJECT MANAGEMENT Q; BIGGS JR, 1977, V18, P104, PRODUCTION
INVENTORY; BIGGS JR, 1979, V10, P96, DECISION SCI; BLACK SA, 1996, V27,
P1, DECISION SCI; BLACKBURN JD, 1979, V20, P42, PRODUCTION INVENTORY;
BLACKBURN JD, 1980, V11, P691, DECISION SCI; BOE WJ, 1983, V24, P94,
PRODUCTION INVENTORY; BOLLEN K, 1989, STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS; BORGATTI SP,
2002, UCINET 6 WINDOWS; BROWN RG, 1963, SMOOTHING FORECASTIN; BUFFA E,
1984, M COMPETITIVE CHALLE; BUFFA ES, 1980, V1, P1, J OPERATIONS MANAGEM;
BURBIDGE JL, 1975, INTRO GROUP TECHNOLO; BURBIDGE JL, 1977, V56, P34,
PRODUCTION ENG; CARLSON RC, 1979, V25, P754, MANAGE SCI; CHAIKEN JM,
1978, V24, P1280, MANAGE SCI; CHAN HM, 1982, V1, P65, J MANUF SYST; CHASE
R, 1978, P137, HARVARD BUSINESS NOV; CHASE RB, 1980, V1, P9, J OPERATIONS
MANAGEM; CHASE RB, 1981, V29, P698, OPER RES; CHURCHILL GA, 1979, V16,
P64, J MARKETING RES; CLARK K, 1991, PRODUCT DEV PERFORMA; CLEVELAND G,
1989, V20, P655, DECISION SCI; CONWAY RW, 1965, V16, P228, J IND ENG;
CONWAY RW, 1967, THEORY SCHEDULING; CORBETT CJ, 2001, V10, P327, PROD
OPER MANAG; COTTRILL CA, 1989, V11, P181, KNOWLEDGE; CRAIG CE, 1973, V14,
P13, SLOAN MANAGE REV; CRONBACH LJ, 1951, V16, P297, PSYCHOMETRIKA;
CROSBY P, 1979, QUALITY IS FREE; CULNAN MJ, 1986, V32, P156, MANAGE SCI;
DAVENPORT TH, 1990, V31, P11, SLOAN MANAGE REV; DAVIS EW, 1973, V5, P297,
AIIE T; DAVIS EW, 1975, V21, P944, MANAGE SCI; DAVIS SG, 1978, V29, P559,
J OPERATIONAL RES SO; DAVIS SG, 1981, V11, P41, INTERFACES; DEMATTEIS JJ,
1968, V7, P30, IBM SYST J; DEMEYER A, 1989, V10, P135, STRATEGIC MANAGE
J; DEMING W, 1986, OUT CRISIS; DILLMAN D, 1978, MAIL TELEPHONE SURVE;
DIXON J, 1990, NEW PERFORMANCE CHAL; DOERSCH RH, 1977, V23, P882, MANAGE
SCI; DOW D, 1999, V8, P1, PROD OPER MANAG; DRAZIN R, 1985, V30, P514, ADM
SCI Q; EBRAHIMPOUR M, 1985, V5, P5, INT J OPS PROD MGMT; EISENHARDT KM,
1989, V14, P532, ACAD MANAGE REV; ELMAGHRABY SE, 1990, V49, P35, EUR J
OPER RES; FEIGENBAUM A, 1961, TOTAL QUALITY CONTRO; FERDOWS K, 1990, V9,
P168, J OPERATIONS MANAGEM; FINE CH, 2000, V9, P213, PROD OPER MANAG;
FISHER M, 1997, V6, P211, PRODUCTION OPERATION; FITZSIMMONS JA, 1998,
SERVICE MANAGEMENT O; FLEISCHMANN M, 1997, V103, P1, EUR J OPER RES;
FLYNN BB, 1990, V9, P250, J OPERATIONS MANAGEM; FLYNN BB, 1994, V11,
P339, J OPERATIONS MANAGEM; FORNELL C, 1981, V18, P39, J MARKETING RES;
FORRESTER J, 1961, IND DYNAMICS; FRYER JS, 1974, V20, P1073, MANAGE SCI;
FRYER JS, 1975, V21, P507, MANAGE SCI; GAITHER N, 1981, V22, P37,
PRODUCTION INVENTORY; GAN XH, 2004, V13, P135, PROD OPER MANAG; GAN XH,
2005, V14, P80, PROD OPER MANAG; GARFIELD E, 1977, CITATION INDEXING IT;
GARVIN DA, 1987, V65, P101, HARVARD BUS REV; GERBING DW, 1988, V25, P186,
J MARKETING RES; GERWIN D, 1993, V39, P395, MANAGE SCI; GOLDRATT E, 1984,
GOAL; GROFF GK, 1979, V20, P47, PRODUCTION INVENTORY; GUIDE VDR, 2000,
V18, P467, J OPER MANAG; GUIDE VDR, 2001, V10, P142, PROD OPER MANAG;
GUPTA S, 2006, V15, P432, PROD OPER MANAG; HAIR JF, 1992, MULTIVARIATE
DATA AN; HALL R, 1983, ZERO INVENTORIES; HAMMER M, 1993, REENGINEERING
CORPOR; HASS G, 1977, V8, P148, J BANK RES; HAYES R, 1984, RESTORING
COMPETITIV; HAYES R, 1988, DYNAMIC MANUFACTURIN; HAYES RH, 1979, V57,
P133, HARVARD BUS REV; HAYES RH, 1981, V59, P56, HARVARD BUS REV; HAYES
RH, 1996, V5, P25, PRODUCTION OPERATION; HESKETT JL, 1997, SERVICE PROFIT
CHAIN; HILL AV, 1988, P24, OPERATIONS MANAG FAL; HILL AV, 1989, P24,
OPERATIONS MANAG WIN; HILL T, 1985, MANUFACTURING STRATE; HOFFMAN DL,
1993, V19, P505, J CONSUM RES; HYER N, 1984, V4, P183, J OPERATIONS
MANAGEM; JOHNSON H, 1987, RELEVANCE LOST; JORESKOG K, 1989, LISREL 7
GUIDE PROGR; KAMADA T, 1989, V31, P7, INFORM PROCESS LETT; KANET JJ,
1981, V28, P643, NAV RES LOGIST Q; KAPLAN RS, 1992, P71, HARVARD BUSINESS
JAN; KARKI R, 1996, V22, P323, J INFORM SCI; KETOKIVI MA, 2004, V22, P63,
J OPER MANAG; KOTHA S, 1989, V10, P211, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; KRAJEWSKI LJ,
1980, V10, P1, INTERFACES; LAMBRECHT M, 1978, V2, P132, EUR J OPER RES;
LAWRENCE P, 1967, ORG ENV MANAGING DIF; LEE HL, 1997, V43, P546, MANAGE
SCI; LEE SM, 1984, V4, P3, INT J OPER PROD MAN; LEONG SM, 1989, V15,
P492, J CONSUM RES; LEYDESDORFF L, 1987, V11, P291, SCIENTOMETRICS;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LYNCH R, 1991,
MEASURE UP YARDSTICK; MABERT VA, 1979, V10, P173, J BANK RES; MABERT VA,
1979, V25, P623, MANAGE SCI; MABERT VA, 1980, V8, P345, OMEGA; MABERT VA,
1982, V2, P203, J OPERATIONS MANAGEM; MALHOTRA MK, 1998, V16, P407, J
OPER MANAG; MARTINEZDEALBENIZ V, 2005, V14, P90, PROD OPER MANAG; MCAULEY
J, 1972, V51, P53, PRODUCTION ENG; MCELROY K, 1982, P20, AUTOMOTIVE IND
JAN; MCLAREN BJ, 1977, THESIS PURDUE U; MEREDITH J, 1979, V1, P14,
OPERATIONS MANAGEMEN; MEREDITH JR, 1990, V9, P146, J OPERATIONS MANAGEM;
MILLER JG, 1981, V12, P547, DECISION SCI; MILLER JG, 1994, V40, P285,
MANAGE SCI; MONDEN Y, 1981, V13, P36, IND ENG; MONDEN Y, 1983, TOYOTA
PRODUCTION SY; NEELY A, 1993, V13, P5, INT J OPER PROD MAN; NEELY A,
1995, V15, P80, INT J OPER PROD MAN; NELLEMANN DO, 1982, V23, P12,
PRODUCTION INVENTORY; NELSON RT, 1967, V13, P648, MANAGE SCI; NELSON RT,
1970, V17, P97, MANAGE SCI; NERUR SP, 2008, V29, P319, STRATEG MANAGE J;
NEW C, 1975, V16, P1, PRODUCTION INVENTORY; NOBLE MA, 1995, V26, P693,
DECISION SCI; NUNNALLY J, 1978, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY; OLEARYKELLY SW,
1998, V16, P387, J OPER MANAG; ORLICKY JA, 1975, MAT REQUIREMENTS PLA;
PAGELL M, 2004, V21, P629, J OPER MANAG; PANNIRSELVAM GP, 1999, V18, P95,
J OPER MANAG; PATTERSON JH, 1973, V20, P767, NAVAL RES LOGISTIC Q;
PATTERSON JH, 1976, V23, P95, NAVAL RES LOGIST Q; PILKINGTON A, 1999,
V19, P7, INT J OPER PROD MAN; PILKINGTON A, 2006, V26, P1255, INT J OPER
PROD MAN; PORTER M, 1980, COMPETITIVE STRATEGY; PORTER M, 1985,
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAG; POWELL TC, 1995, V16, P15, STRATEGIC MANAGE J;
PRAHALAD CK, 1990, V68, P79, HARVARD BUS REV; RAMOSRODRIGUEZ AR, 2004,
V25, P981, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; RICE JW, 1982, P1, PRODUCTION INVENTORY;
SAFIZADEH MH, 1996, V42, P1576, MANAGE SCI; SASSER WE, 1978, MANAGEMENT
SERVICE O; SCHMENNER RW, 1988, V30, P11, SLOAN MANAGE REV; SCHMENNER RW,
1998, V17, P97, J OPER MANAG; SCHONBERGER R, 1982, JAPANESE MANUFACTURI;
SCHONBERGER R, 1986, WORLD CLASS MANUFACT; SCHROER BJ, 1985, V45, P62,
SIMULATION; SCOTT J, 1991, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; SCUDDER GD, 1998, V16,
P91, J OPER MANAG; SHARPLIN AD, 1985, V38, P139, HUM RELAT; SILVER EA,
1973, V14, P64, PRODUCTION INVENTORY; SKINNER W, 1969, V47, P136, HARVARD
BUS REV; SKINNER W, 1974, V52, P113, HARVARD BUS REV; SKINNER W, 1978,
MANUFACTURING CORPOR; SKINNER W, 1985, MANUFACTURING FORMID; SKINNER W,
1996, V5, P3, PRODUCTION OPERATION; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; SOWER VE, 1997, V17, P15, INT J OPER PROD MAN; STALK G, 1988,
V66, P41, HARVARD BUS REV; STALK G, 1990, COMPETING TIME; STERMAN JD,
1989, V35, P321, MANAGE SCI; STREMERSCH S, 2007, V71, P171, J MARKETING;
SUAREZ FF, 1996, V44, P223, OPER RES; SUGIMORI Y, 1977, V15, P553, INT J
PROD RES; SWAMIDASS PM, 1987, V33, P509, MANAGE SCI; TAYLOR BW, 1977, V9,
P32, IND ENG; THIERRY M, 1995, V37, P114, CALIF MANAGE REV; THOMPSON J,
1967, ORG ACTION SOCIAL SC; VENKATRAMAN N, 1989, V14, P423, ACAD MANAGE
REV; VICKERY SK, 1993, V24, P435, DECISION SCI; VOKURKA RJ, 1996, V14,
P345, J OPERATIONS MANAGEM; VOLLMANN T, 1988, MANUFACTURING PLANNI; VOSS
CA, 1984, V12, P309, INT J MANAGEMENT SCI; WAGNER H, 1969, PRINCIPLES
OPERATION; WAGNER HM, 1958, V5, P89, MANAGE SCI; WASSERMAN S, 1994,
SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; WEMMERLOV U, 1979, V20, P15, PRODUCTION INVENTORY;
WERNERFELT B, 1984, V5, P171, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT; WHEELWRIGHT SC, 1981,
V59, P67, HARVARD BUS REV; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; WHITE HD, 1990, P84, SCHOLARLY COMMUNICAT; WHITE HD, 1998, V49,
P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHYBARK DC, 1976, V7, P595, DECISION SCI;
WIEST JD, 1977, MANAGEMENT GUIDE PER; WINTERS PR, 1960, V6, P324, MANAGE
SCI; WOMACK J, 1990, MACHINE CHANGED WORL; WRIGHT TP, 1936, V3, P122, J
AERONAUT SCI; YIN R, 1984, CASE STUDY RES DESIG|
NR- 207|
TC- 5|
PU- ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV|
PI- AMSTERDAM|
PA- PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0272-6963|
J9- J OPER MANAG|
JI- J. Oper. Manag|
PD- JUN|
PY- 2009|
VL- 27|
IS- 3|
BP- 185|
EP- 202|
DI- 10.1016/j.jom.2008.08.001|
PG- 18|
SC- Management; Operations Research & Management Science|
GA- 431FJ|
JN- JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2009, V27, N3, P185-202|
UT- ISI:000265046400001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Boyack KW; Borner K; Klavans R|
AF- Boyack Kevin W; Boerner, Katy; Klavans, Richard|
TI- Mapping the structure and evolution of chemistry research|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Proceedings Paper|
CT- 11th International Conference of the International-Society-forScientometrics-and-Informetrics|
CY- JUN 25-27, 2007|
CL- Madrid, SPAIN|
SP- Int Soc Scientometr & Informetr, CSIC, Minist Educ & Ciencia, FECYT,
Comunidad Madrid, Eugene Garfield Fdn, Thomson, Elsevier, Journal
Informetr, Scopus, Ayuntamiento Madrid, Sci Metrix, Univ Carlos III
Madrid|
ID- JOURNAL COCITATION ANALYSIS; SCIENCE-CITATION-INDEX; MAPS|
AB- How does our collective scholarly knowledge grow over time? What
major areas of science exist and how are they interlinked? Which areas
are major knowledge producers; which ones are consumers? Computational
scientometrics - the application of bibliometric/scientometric methods to
large-scale scholarly datasets - and the communication of results via
maps of science might help us answer these questions. This paper
represents the results of a prototype study that aims to map the
structure and evolution of chemistry research over a 30 year time frame.
Information from the combined Science (SCIE) and Social Science (SSCI)
Citations Indexes from 2002 was used to generate a disciplinary map of
7,227 journals and 671 journal clusters. Clusters relevant to study the
structure and evolution of chemistry were identified using JCR categories
and were further clustered into 14 disciplines. The changing scientific
composition of these 14 disciplines and their knowledge exchange via
citation linkages was computed. Major changes on the dominance,
influence, and role of Chemistry, Biology, Biochemistry, and
Bioengineering over these 30 years are discussed. The paper concludes
with suggestions for future work|
C1- [Boyack, Kevin W.] Sandia Natl Labs, Albuquerque, NM 87185 USA;
[Boyack, Kevin W.; Klavans, Richard] SciTech Strategies Inc, Berwyn, PA
19312 USA; [Boerner, Katy] Indiana Univ, SLIS, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA|
RP- Boyack, KW, Sandia Natl Labs, POB 5800,MS 1316, Albuquerque, NM 87185
USA|
EM- kboyack@mapofscience.com|
CD- BOYACK KW, 2005, V64, P351, SCIENTOMETRICS; CHEN CM, 2006, V57, P359,
J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; DAVIDSON GS, 2001, P23, P IEEE INF VIS 2001; DING
Y, 2000, V47, P55, SCIENTOMETRICS; KLAVANS R, 2006, V57, P251, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; KLAVANS R, 2006, V68, P475, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORF L,
2006, 9 INT C SCI TECHN IN; LEYDESDORFF L, 1987, V11, P295,
SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V60, P371, J DOC; LEYDESDORFF L,
2004, V60, P159, SCIENTOMETRICS; MCCAIN KW, 1998, V41, P389,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MORRIS TA, 1998, V5, P448, J AM MED INFORM ASSN;
MOYAANEGON F, 2004, V61, P129, SCIENTOMETRICS; NARIN F, 1972, V23, P323,
J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SAMOYLENKO I, 2006, V57, P1461, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; SMALL H, 1985, V8, P321, SCIENTOMETRICS; TSAY MY, 2003, V57, P7,
SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 17|
TC- 6|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- APR|
PY- 2009|
VL- 79|
IS- 1|
BP- 45|
EP- 60|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-009-0403-5|
PG- 16|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 423HR|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2009, V79, N1, P45-60|
UT- ISI:000264487900003 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Harnad S|
AF- Harnad Stevan|
TI- Open access scientometrics and the UK Research Assessment Exercise|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Proceedings Paper|
CT- 11th International Conference of the International-Society-forScientometrics-and-Informetrics|
CY- JUN 25-27, 2007|
CL- Madrid, SPAIN|
SP- Int Soc Scientometr & Informetr, CSIC, Minist Educ & Ciencia, FECYT,
Comunidad Madrid, Eugene Garfield Fdn, Thomson, Elsevier, Journal
Informetr, Scopus, Ayuntamiento Madrid, Sci Metrix, Univ Carlos III
Madrid|
ID- IMPACT|
AB- Scientometric predictors of research performance need to be validated
by showing that they have a high correlation with the external criterion
they are trying to predict. The UK Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) together with the growing movement toward making the full-texts of
research articles freely available on the web - offer a unique
opportunity to test and validate a wealth of old and new scientometric
predictors, through multiple regression analysis: Publications, journal
impact factors, citations, co-citations, citation chronometrics (age,
growth, latency to peak, decay rate), hub/authority scores, h-index,
prior funding, student counts, co-authorship scores, endogamy/exogamy,
textual proximity, download/co-downloads and their chronometrics, etc.
can all be tested and validated jointly, discipline by discipline,
against their RAE panel rankings in the forthcoming parallel panel-based
and metric RAE in 2008. The weights of each predictor can be calibrated
to maximize the joint correlation with the rankings. Open Access
Scientometrics will provide powerful new means of navigating, evaluating,
predicting and analyzing the growing Open Access database, as well as
powerful incentives for making it grow faster|
C1- Univ Quebec, Inst Cognit Sci, Chaire Rech Canada, Montreal, PQ H3C
3P8, Canada|
RP- Harnad, S, Univ Quebec, Inst Cognit Sci, Chaire Rech Canada,
Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada|
EM- harnad@ccs.soton.ac.uk|
CD- BRODY T, 2003, CITEBASE SEARCH AUTO; BRODY T, 2006, V57, P1060, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; GARFIELD E, 1955, V122, P108, SCIENCE; GILES CL, 1998,
P89, DIGITAL LIB 98; GUEDON JC, 2002, OLDENBURGS LOND SHAD; HAJJEM C,
2005, V28, P39, IEEE DATA ENG B; HARNAD S, 2003, V35, ARIADNE; HARNAD S,
2004, V10, D LIB MAGAZINE; HARNAD S, 2006, ONLINE CONTINUOUS ME; HIRSCH
JE, 2005, V102, P16569, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; KLEINBERG JM, 1999, V31, ACM
COMPUTING SURVEY; KLINE P, 2000, NEW PSYCHOMETRICS SC; LANDAUER TK, 1998,
V25, P259, DISCOURSE PROCESS; LAWRENCE S, 2001, V411, P521, NATURE; MOED
HF, 2005, CITATION ANAL RES EV; OPPENHEIM C, 1996, V9, P155, SERIALS;
PAGE L, 1999, PAGERANK CITATION RA; SHADBOLT N, 2006, CH21, OPEN ACCESS
KEY STRA|
NR- 18|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- APR|
PY- 2009|
VL- 79|
IS- 1|
BP- 147|
EP- 156|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-009-0409-z|
PG- 10|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 423HR|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2009, V79, N1, P147-156|
UT- ISI:000264487900009 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Shibata N; Kajikawa Y; Takeda Y; Matsushima K|
AF- Shibata Naoki; Kajikawa, Yuya; Takeda, Yoshiyuki; Matsushima,
Katsumori|
TI- Comparative Study on Methods of Detecting Research Fronts Using
Different Types of Citation|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- SCIENTIFIC PAPERS; NETWORKS; SCIENCE; COCITATION;
INTERDISCIPLINARITY; SPECIALTIES; RETRIEVAL; DOCUMENTS; JOURNALS;
TRACKING|
AB- In this article, we performed a comparative study to investigate the
performance of methods for detecting emerging research fronts. Three
types of citation network, co-citation, bibliographic coupling, and
direct citation, were tested in three research domains, gallium nitride
(GaN), complex network (CNW), and carbon nanotube (CNT). Three types of
citation network were constructed for each research domain, and the
papers in those domains were divided into clusters to detect the research
front. We evaluated the performance of each type of citation network in
detecting a research front by using the following measures of papers in
the cluster: visibility, measured by normalized cluster size, speed,
measured by average publication year, and topological relevance, measured
by density. Direct citation, which could detect large and young emerging
clusters earlier, shows the best performance in detecting a research
front, and co-citation shows the worst Additionally, in direct citation
networks, the clustering coefficient was the largest, which suggests that
the content similarity of papers connected by direct citations is the
greatest and that direct citation networks have the least risk of missing
emerging research domains because core papers are included in the largest
component|
C1- [Shibata, Naoki; Kajikawa, Yuya; Takeda, Yoshiyuki; Matsushima,
Katsumori] Univ Tokyo, Inst Engn Innovat, Sch Engn, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo
1138656, Japan|
RP- Shibata, N, Univ Tokyo, Inst Engn Innovat, Sch Engn, Bunkyo Ku, 2-1116 Yayoi, Tokyo 1138656, Japan|
EM- shibata@biz-model.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp kaji@biz-model.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp
takeda@biz-model.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp matsushima@iijmio-mail.jp|
CD- ADAMS J, 2005, V63, P567, SCIENTOMETRICS; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233,
J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BRAUN T, 2003, V56, P3, SCIENTOMETRICS; CHEN C,
2005, P63, P SPIE IS T VISUALIZ; EGGHE L, 2002, V55, P349,
SCIENTOMETRICS; FANG Y, 2001, V50, P273, SCIENTOMETRICS; GARFIELD E,
1972, V178, P471, SCIENCE; GARFIELD E, 2004, V30, P119, J INFORM SCI;
HOPCROFT J, 2004, V101, P5249, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; KARAZIJA R, 2004,
V61, P191, SCIENTOMETRICS; KESSLER MM, 1963, V14, P10, AM DOC; KLAVANS R,
2006, V57, P251, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; KOSTOFF RN, 1997, V23, P301, J
INFORM SCI; LEYDESDORFF L, 2007, V58, P1303, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2007, V71, P391, SCIENTOMETRICS; NEWMAN MEJ, 2004, V69,
ARTN 066133, PHYS REV E 2; PRICE DJD, 1965, V149, P510, SCIENCE;
SCHIMINOVICH S, 1971, V6, P417, INFORMATION STORAGE; SHIBATA N, 2007,
V58, P872, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; SHIBATA N, 2008, V28, P758,
TECHNOVATION; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H,
1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; SMALL H, 1997, V38, P275, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL
H, 2006, V68, P595, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANDENBESSELAAR P, 1996, V47, P415, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; WATTS DJ, 1998, V393, P440, NATURE|
NR- 26|
TC- 6|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- MAR|
PY- 2009|
VL- 60|
IS- 3|
BP- 571|
EP- 580|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20994|
PG- 10|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 415LK|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2009, V60, N3, P571-580|
UT- ISI:000263935100011 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Shimbo M; Ito T; Mochihashi D; Matsumoto Y|
AF- Shimbo Masashi; Ito, Takahiko; Mochihashi, Daichi; Matsumoto, Yuji|
TI- On the properties of von Neumann kernels for link analysis|
SO- MACHINE LEARNING|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Link analysis; Recommender system; von Neumann kernel; HITS; Topic
drift|
ID- LATENT SEMANTIC ANALYSIS; DOCUMENTS; GRAPH|
AB- We study the effectiveness of Kandola et al.'s von Neumann kernels as
a link analysis measure. We show that von Neumann kernels subsume
Kleinberg's HITS importance at the limit of their parameter range Because
they reduce to co-citation relatedness at the other end of the parameter,
von Neumann kernels give us a spectrum of link analysis measures between
the two established measures of importance and relatedness. Hence the
relative merit of a vertex can be evaluated in terms of varying tradeoffs between the global importance and the local relatedness within a
single parametric framework. As a generalization of HITS, von Neumann
kernels inherit the problem of topic drift. When a graph consists of
multiple communities each representing a different topic, HITS is known
to rank vertices in the most dominant community higher regardless of the
query term. This problem persists in von Neumann kernels; when the
parameter is biased towards the direction of global importance, they tend
to rank vertices in the dominant community uniformly higher irrespective
of the community of the seed vertex relative to which the ranking is
computed. To alleviate topic drift, we propose to use of a PLSI-based
technique in combination with von Neumann kernels. Experimental results
on a citation network of scientific papers demonstrate the
characteristics and effectiveness of von Neumann kernels|
C1- [Shimbo, Masashi; Ito, Takahiko; Matsumoto, Yuji] Nara Inst Sci &
Technol, Grad Sch Informat Sci, Nara 6300192, Japan; [Mochihashi, Daichi]
NTT Commun Sci Labs, Keihanna Sci City, Kyoto 6190237, Japan|
RP- Shimbo, M, Nara Inst Sci & Technol, Grad Sch Informat Sci, 8916-5
Takayama, Nara 6300192, Japan|
EM- shimbo@is.naist.jp tito@microsoft.com daichi@cslab.kecl.ntt.co.jp
matsu@is.naist.jp|
CD- ACHARYYA S, 2003, WORKSH LINK AN DET C; BALDI P, 2003, MODELING
INTERNET WE; BHARAT K, 1998, P 21 ANN INT ACM SIG; BOLLACKER K, 1998,
P116, P 2 INT C AUT AG; BRIN S, 1998, V30, P107, COMPUT NETWORKS ISDN;
CHEBOTAREV PY, 1997, V58, P1505, AUTOMAT REM CONTR+ 2; CHUNG FRK, 1997,
SPECTRAL GRAPH THEOR; COHN D, 2000, P167, P 17 INT C MACH LEAR;
CRISTIANINI N, 2002, V14, P367, ADV NEUR IN; DALE R, 2000, HDB NATURAL
LANGUAGE; DEERWESTER S, 1990, V41, P391, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; DHYANI D,
2002, V34, P469, ACM COMPUT SURV; FAGIN R, 2003, V17, P134, SIAM J
DISCRETE MATH; FOUSS F, 2006, P863, P INT C DAT MIN; FOUSS F, 2007, V19,
P355, IEEE T KNOWL DATA EN; HAUSSLER D, 1999, UCSCCRL9910; HOFMANN T,
1999, P50, P 22 ANN INT ACM SIG; HOFMANN T, 2000, V12, P914, ADV NEUR IN;
HOFMANN T, 2001, V42, P177, MACH LEARN; ITO T, 2005, P586, P 11 ACM
SIGKDD; ITO T, 2006, P235, P 10 EUR C PRINC PRA; JAAKKOLA TS, 1999, V11,
P487, ADV NEUR IN; KANDOLA J, 2002, NCTR2002121; KANDOLA J, 2003, V15,
P673, ADV NEURAL INFORM PR; KESSLER MM, 1963, V14, P10, AM DOC; KLEINBERG
JM, 1999, V46, P604, J ACM; KONDOR R, 2001, P21, P 18 INT C MACH LEAR;
LEMPEL R, 2001, V19, P131, ACM T INFORM SYST; LEPAIR C, 1988, P537, HDB
QUANTITATIVE STU; NADLER B, 2006, V18, P955, ADV NEURAL INFORM PR;
SAERENS M, 2004, V3201, P371, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; SHAWETAYLOR J, 2004,
KERNEL METHODS PATTE; SHIMBO M, 2006, CH12, MINING GRAPH DATA; SHIMBO M,
2007, P354, P ACM IEEE JOINT C D; SIEGEL S, 1988, NONPARAMETRIC STAT B;
SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMOLA AJ, 2003, V2777,
P144, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; WHITE S, 2003, P266, P 9 ACM SIGKDD INT C;
ZELNIKMANOR L, 2005, V17, ADV NEURAL INFORM PR; ZHOU D, 2004, P WORKSH
STAT REL LE|
NR- 40|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0885-6125|
J9- MACH LEARN|
JI- Mach. Learn|
PD- APR|
PY- 2009|
VL- 75|
IS- 1|
BP- 37|
EP- 67|
DI- 10.1007/s10994-008-5090-6|
PG- 31|
SC- Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence|
GA- 411TO|
JN- MACHINE LEARNING, 2009, V75, N1, P37-67|
UT- ISI:000263673800003 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Su YM; Yang SC; Hsu PY; Shiau WL|
AF- Su Yu-Min; Yang, Shu-Ching; Hsu, Ping-Yu; Shiau, Wen-Lung|
TI- Extending co-citation analysis to discover authors with multiple
expertise|
SO- EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Author co-citation analysis (ACA); Clustering; Complete author set;
Computing classification system (CCS)|
ID- INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE|
AB- The author co-citation analysis (ACA) method is commonly used to
group authors of reference papers. Since the traditional ACA method
analyzes only first authors of reference papers, it disregards the
contributions of other coauthors and can only group each first author
into one cluster. This study proposes an innovative ACA algorithm called
"complete author pair (CAP) algorithm", which groups complete author sets
or reference papers into clusters and thus finds authors who may have
expertise in more than one area. The CAP algorithm is implemented in two
citation data banks that collected paper references from two ACM journals
during 2002-2005. The results show that the CAP algorithm runs up to 90%
of average precision in each citation bank when comparing against ACM
CCS. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved|
C1- [Su, Yu-Min; Hsu, Ping-Yu] Natl Cent Univ, Dept Business Adm, Tao
Yuan 32001, Taiwan; [Yang, Shu-Ching] Natl Cent Univ, Inst Ind
Management, Tao Yuan 32001, Taiwan|
RP- Su, YM, Natl Cent Univ, Dept Business Adm, 300 Jhongda Rd, Tao Yuan
32001, Taiwan|
EM- 93441023@cc.ncu.edu.tw|
CD- *ACM, 2007, ACM COMP CLASS SYST; *ACM, 2007, ACM PORT; DING Y, 1999,
V25, P67, J INFORM SCI; EGGHE L, 1990, INTRO INFORM QUANTIT; HE YL, 2002,
V38, P491, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; JOHNSON AG, 1988, STATISTICS; LIN X,
2003, V39, P689, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; PERSSON O, 2001, V50, P339, SCIENTOMETRICS; WHITE HD,
1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; ZHAO D, 2006, V42, P 68 ANN M AM SOC IN|
NR- 12|
TC- 0|
PU- PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD|
PI- OXFORD|
PA- THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND|
SN- 0957-4174|
J9- EXPERT SYST APPL|
JI- Expert Syst. Appl|
PD- APR|
PY- 2009|
VL- 36|
IS- 3|
PN- Part 1|
BP- 4287|
EP- 4295|
DI- 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.03.022|
PG- 9|
SC- Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence; Engineering, Electrical &
Electronic; Operations Research & Management Science|
GA- 410NJ|
JN- EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, V36, N3, P4287-4295|
UT- ISI:000263584100016 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Marx W|
AF- Marx Werner|
TI- The anatomy of the International Journal of Materials Research in the
light of bibliometry|
SO- INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Bibliometry; Citation analysis; History of science|
ID- IMPACT FACTOR; SCIENCE; INDEX|
AB- Bibliometric methods, in particular citation analysis, are used to
evaluate the International Journal of Materials Research (IJMR) and its
two predecessor journals Zeitschrift far Metallkunde (ZfM) and
Internationale Zeitschrift fur Metallographie (IZfM). Firstly, the
coverage of the journals by the various literature databases is
discussed, and the number of articles per year is determined. The time
evolution of the publications with respect to German and English as
original languages is established and the language dependent impact is
analyzed. A ranking of the most important countries of authors is given.
Furthermore, the ensemble of ZfM and IJMR articles is analyzed with
respect to the occurrence of substances (metals, alloys, compounds) and
some subject specific terms (diffusion, microstructure,
recrystallization, mechanical properties). A listing of the twenty most
frequently cited articles and the citation time evolution (citation
history) of the top three articles are presented. Moreover, the
distribution of the citations on the articles is determined and the
amount of simultaneous citations with other journals (co-citations) is
given. The citing papers of the IJMR and ZfM articles are analyzed with
respect to the most frequently appearing countries of authors and
journals. Finally, the Journal Impact Factor (JIF), the Cited Half-Life
and the Citing Half-Life as bibliometric indicators of a journal as a
whole are analyzed. The meaning of the widely used JIF is discussed and
hints for its careful and cautious use are given|
C1- Max Planck Inst Solid State Res, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany|
RP- Marx, W, Max Planck Inst Solid State Res, Heisenbergstr 1, D-70569
Stuttgart, Germany|
EM- w.marx@fkf.mpg.de|
CD- ACHARD FC, 1788, RECHERCHES PROPRIETE; ADAM D, 2002, V415, P726,
NATURE; AMIN M, 2000, V1, P1, PERSPECTIVES PUBLISH; BORNMANN L, 2007,
V58, P1381, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BRAUN T, 2005, V19, P8, SCIENTIST;
GARFIELD E, 2006, V295, P90, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC; HAMILTON DP, 1990,
V250, P1331, SCIENCE; HIRSCH JE, 2005, V102, P16569, P NATL ACAD SCI USA;
LOHBERG K, 1981, V72, P728, Z METALLKD; MARX W, 2001, V40, P139, ANGEW
CHEM INT EDIT; MARX W, 2001, V113, P143, ANGEW CHEM; MARX W, 2003, V127,
P323, SOLID STATE COMMUN; MESTECKY P, 1998, V1, P8, MAT TODAY; PENDLEBURY
DA, 1991, V251, P1410, SCIENCE; SEGLEN PO, 1992, V43, P628, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; SEGLEN PO, 1997, V314, P498, BRIT MED J; VANRAAN AFJ, 2004,
V59, P467, SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 17|
TC- 3|
PU- CARL HANSER VERLAG|
PI- MUNICH|
PA- KOLBERGERSTRASSE 22, POSTFACH 86 04 20, D-81679 MUNICH, GERMANY|
SN- 1862-5282|
J9- INT J MATER RES|
JI- Int. J. Mater. Res|
PD- JAN|
PY- 2009|
VL- 100|
IS- 1|
BP- 11|
EP- 23|
DI- 10.3139/146.101793|
PG- 13|
SCGAJNUT-
Metallurgy & Metallurgical Engineering|
407HF|
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2009, V100, N1, P11-23|
ISI:000263353500002 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Wallace ML; Gingras Y; Duhon R|
AF- Wallace Matthew L; Gingras, Yves; Duhon, Russell|
TI- A New Approach for Detecting Scientific Specialties From Raw
Cocitation Networks|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; PEARSONS-R; INTELLECTUAL
STRUCTURE; INFORMATION-THEORY; COMPLEX NETWORKS; SCIENCE; DOCUMENTS;
ALGORITHM; MATRICES|
AB- We use a technique recently developed by V. Blondel, J.L. Guillaume,
R Lambiotte, and E. Lefebvre (2008) to detect scientific specialties from
author cocitation networks. This algorithm has distinct advantages over
most previous methods used to obtain cocitation "clusters" since it
avoids the use of similarity measures, relies entirely on the topology of
the weighted network, and can be applied to relatively large networks.
Most importantly, it requires no subjective interpretation of the
cocitation data or of the communities found. Using two examples, we show
that the resulting specialties are the smallest coherent "groups" of
researchers (within a hierarchy of cluster sizes) and can thus be
identified unambiguously. Furthermore, we confirm that these communities
are indeed representative of what we know about the structure of a given
scientific discipline and that as specialties, they can be accurately
characterized by a few keywords (from the publication titles). We argue
that this robust and efficient algorithm is particularly well-suited to
cocitation networks and that the results generated can be of great use to
researchers studying various facets of the structure and evolution of
science|
C1- [Wallace, Matthew L.; Gingras, Yves] Univ Quebec, CIRST, OST,
Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada; [Duhon, Russell] Indiana Univ, Sch Lib &
Informat Sci, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA|
RP- Wallace, ML, Univ Quebec, CIRST, OST, Case Postale 8888, Montreal, PQ
H3C 3P8, Canada|
EM- mattyliam@gmail.com gingras.yves@uqam.ca rduhon@indiana.edu|
CD- AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; AHLGREN P, 2004,
V55, P843, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BAYER AE, 1990, V41, P444, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; BENSMAN SJ, 2004, V55, P935, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BLONDEL
VD, 2008, ARTN P10008, J STAT MECH-THEO OCT; BOYACK K, 2007, P112, P 11
INT C INT SOC S; CHEN C, 2004, V101, P2303, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; CHUBIN
D, 1976, V17, P448, SOCIOLOGICAL Q; CRANE D, 1972, INVISIBLE COLL; FAN Y,
2006, ARXIVCONDMAT0607271; FAN Y, 2007, V378, P583, PHYSICA A; GINGRAS Y,
2007, P314, P 11 INT C INT SOC S; GIRVAN M, 2002, V99, P7821, P NATL ACAD
SCI USA; GMUR M, 2003, V57, P27, SCIENTOMETRICS; HSIEH MH, 2008, V30,
P146, SOC NETWORKS; KLAVANS R, 2006, V68, P475, SCIENTOMETRICS; KREUZMAN
H, 2001, V51, P525, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 1991, V13, P301, SOC
NETWORKS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2005, V56, P769, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L,
2008, V59, P77, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MARSHAKOVA IV, 1973, V6, P3, SCI
TECHNICAL INFORM; MCCAIN KW, 2008, V59, P510, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
MULLINS NC, 1972, V10, P52, MINERVA; MULLINS NC, 1977, V42, P552, AM
SOCIOL REV; NEWMAN MEJ, 2004, V69, ARTN 026113, PHYS REV E 2; NEWMAN MEJ,
2004, V70, ARTN 056131, PHYS REV E 2; PALLA G, 2005, V435, P814, NATURE;
ROSVALLT M, 2008, V105, P1118, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; SCHAEFFER SE, 2007,
V1, P27, COMPUTER SCI REV; SCHILDT HA, 2006, V67, P143, SCIENTOMETRICS;
SCHNEIDER JW, 2007, V58, P1586, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; SMALL H, 1973, V24,
P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; SMALL H,
1985, CLUSTERING SCI CITAT; SMALL H, 2006, V68, P595, SCIENTOMETRICS;
SMALL HG, 1978, V8, P327, SOC STUD SCI; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P16, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD,
2003, V54, P1250, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 40|
TC- 6|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- FEB|
PY- 2009|
VL- 60|
IS- 2|
BP- 240|
EP- 246|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20987|
PG- 7|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 404FK|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2009, V60, N2, P240-246|
UT- ISI:000263136200003 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Leydesdorff L; Rafols I|
AF- Leydesdorff Loet; Rafols, Ismael|
TI- A Global Map of Science Based on the ISI Subject Categories|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- JOURNAL-CITATION-REPORTS; SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS; INDICATORS;
INTERDISCIPLINARITY; COCITATION; DECOMPOSABILITY; CLASSIFICATION;
AGGREGATION; PERFORMANCE; RELEVANCE|
AB- The decomposition of scientific literature into disciplinary and
subdisciplinary structures is one of the core goals of scientometrics How
can we achieve a good decomposition? The ISI subject categories classify
journals included in the Science Citation Index (SCI). The aggregated
journal-journal citation matrix contained in the Journal Citation Reports
can be aggregated on the basis of these categories This leads to an
asymmetrical matrix (citing versus cited) that is much more densely
populated than the underlying matrix at the journal level Exploratory
factor analysis of the matrix of subject categories suggests a 14-factor
solution. This solution could be interpreted as the disciplinary
structure of science. The nested maps of science (corresponding to 14
factors, 172 categories, and 6,164 journals) are online at
http://www.leydesdortf.net/map06. Presumably, inaccuracies in the
attribution of journals to the ISI subject categories average out so that
the factor analysis reveals the main structures. The mapping of science
could, therefore, be comprehensive and reliable on a large scale albeit
imprecise in terms of the attribution of journals to the ISI subject
categories|
C1- [Leydesdorff, Loet] Univ Amsterdam, ASCoR, NL-1012 CX Amsterdam,
Netherlands; [Rafols, Ismael] Univ Sussex, Freeman Ctr, Brighton BN1 9QE,
E Sussex, England|
RP- Leydesdorff, L, Univ Amsterdam, ASCoR, Kloveniersburgwal 48, NL-1012
CX Amsterdam, Netherlands|
EM- loet@leydesdorff.net i.rafols@sussex.ac.uk|
CD- ADLER R, 2008, CITATION STAT REPORT; AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; ANDO A, 1963, V4, P53, INT ECON REV; BATAGELJ V, 2007,
PAJEK PROGRAM LARGE; BENSMAN SJ, 2001, V27, P238, IFLA J; BENSMAN SJ,
2008, V59, P1366, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BORDONS M, 2004, P437, HDB
QUANTITATIVE SCI; BOYACK K, 2007, MAP SCI; BOYACK K, 2007, V1, P112, P 11
INT C SCI INF M; BOYACK KW, 2005, V64, P351, SCIENTOMETRICS; BURT RS,
1982, STRUCTURAL THEORY AC; CALLON M, 1983, V22, P191, SOC SCI INFORM;
CALLON M, 1986, MAPPING DYNAMICS SCI; CARPENTER MP, 1973, V24, P425, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; CHAN LM, 1999, GUIDE LIB C CLASSIFI; DAVIDSON GS, 1998,
V11, P259, J INTELL INF SYST; DESOLLAPRICE DJ, 1965, V149, P510, SCIENCE;
DOREIAN P, 1985, V36, P28, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; EGGHE L, 2008, RELATION
PEARS UNPUB; GARFIELD E, 1971, V3, P5, CURR CONTENTS; GARFIELD E, 1972,
V178, P471, SCIENCE; GLANZEL W, 2003, V56, P357, SCIENTOMETRICS; JONES
WP, 1987, V38, P420, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; KAMADA T, 1989, V31, P7, INFORM
PROCESS LETT; KIM JO, 1975, P468, STAT PACKAGE SOCIAL; KIM JO, 1978,
FACTOR ANAL STAT MET; KLAVANS R, 2007, V1, P437, P ISSI 2007; LEYDESDORFF
L, 1986, V9, P103, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 1987, V11, P291,
SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 1989, V18, P209, RES POLICY; LEYDESDORFF
L, 2004, V60, P159, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2005, V27, P64, SCI
COMMUN; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1470, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L,
2006, V57, P601, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2007, V58, P207, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; LEYDESDORFF L, 2008, V59, P1810, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2008, V59, P278, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MARTIN BR, 1983,
V12, P61, RES POLICY; MOED HF, 1985, V14, P131, RES POLICY; MORILLO F,
2001, V51, P203, SCIENTOMETRICS; MORILLO F, 2003, V54, P1237, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; MOYAANEGON F, 2004, V61, P129, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOYAANEGON F,
2007, V58, P2167, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; NEWMAN MEJ, 2006, V103, P8577, P
NATL ACAD SCI USA; NEWMAN MEJ, 2006, V74, P36104, PHYS REV E; PORTER AL,
2006, V15, P187, RES EVALUAT; PORTER AL, 2007, V72, P117, SCIENTOMETRICS;
PUDOVKIN AI, 2002, V53, P1113, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; SALTON G, 1983,
INTRO MODERN INFORM; SIMON HA, 1961, V29, P111, ECONOMETRICA; SIMON HA,
1973, P1, HIERARCHY THEORY CHA; SIMON HA, 2002, V11, P587, IND CORP
CHANGE; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1974, V4,
P17, SCI STUD; SMALL H, 1985, V7, P391, SCIENTOMETRICS; TIJSSEN R, 1987,
V11, P347, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANLEEUWEN T, 2000, V9, P183, RES EVALUAT;
VANRAAN AFJ, 2000, P66, PRACTISING INTERDISC; ZITT M, 2005, V3, P38,
MEASUREMENT INTERDIS; ZITT M, 2005, V63, P373, SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 61|
TC- 36|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- FEB|
PY- 2009|
VL- 60|
IS- 2|
BP- 348|
EP- 362|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20967|
PG- 15|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 404FK|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2009, V60, N2, P348-362|
UT- ISI:000263136200011 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Fernandez-Alles M; Ramos-Rodriguez A|
AF- Fernandez-Alles Mariluz; Ramos-Rodriguez, Antonio|
TI- Intellectual Structure of Human Resources Management Research: A
Bibliometric Analysis of the Journal Human Resource Management, 19852005|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Review|
ID- SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS;
ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE; MANUFACTURING PERFORMANCE; SCIENCE; SYSTEMS;
CITATION; IMPACT; LITERATURES; DISCIPLINE|
AB- The multidisciplinary character of the theories supporting research
in the discipline of human resources management (HRM), the increasing
importance of a more rigorous approach to HRM studies by academics, and
the impact of HRM on the competitive advantage of firms are just some of
the indicators demonstrating the relevance of this discipline in the
broader field of the social sciences. These developments explain why a
quantitative analysis of HRM studies based on bibliometric techniques is
particularly opportune. The general objective of this article is to
analyze the intellectual structure of the HRM discipline; this can be
divided into two specific objectives. The first is to identify the most
frequently cited studies, with the purpose of identifying the key topics
of research in the HRM discipline. The second objective is to represent
the networks of relationships between the most-cited studies, grouping
them under common themes, with the object of providing a diagrammatic
description of the knowledge base constituted by accumulated works of
research in the HRM field. The methodology utilized is based on the
bibliometric techniques of citation analysis|
C1- [Fernandez-Alles, Mariluz; Ramos-Rodriguez, Antonio] Univ Cadiz, Fac
CC EE & Empresariales, Cadiz 11002, Spain|
RP- Fernandez-Alles, M, Univ Cadiz, Fac CC EE & Empresariales, Ave Duque
Najera 8, Cadiz 11002, Spain|
EM- mariluz.fernandez@uca.es rafael.ramos@uca.es|
CD- ADLER NJ, 1986, INT DIMENSIONS ORG B; ALAEZ LF, 1993, BIBLIOMETRIA
ANALISI; ARTHUR JB, 1994, V37, P670, ACAD MANAGE J; BARNEY J, 1991, V17,
P99, J MANAGE; BARTLETT CA, 1989, MANAGING BORDERS TRA; BECKER B, 1996,
V39, P779, ACAD MANAGE J; BEER M, 1985, HUMAN RESOURCE MANAG; BENNIS W,
1985, LEADERS STRATEGIES T; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; BUONO AF, 1999, HUMAN SIDE MERGERS A; CALLON M, 1993, CIENCIOMETRIA
MED AC; CASCIO WF, 1982, COSTING HUMAN RESOUR; CHANDLER AD, 1962,
STRATEGY STRUCTURE C; CULNAN MJ, 1986, V32, P156, MANAGE SCI; CULNAN MJ,
1987, V11, P341, MIS QUART; CULNAN MJ, 1990, V41, P453, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; DEAL TE, 1982, CORPORATE CULTURES R; DELANEY JT, 1996, V39, P949,
ACAD MANAGE J; DELERY J, 1996, V35, P802, ACAD MANAGE J; DING Y, 2000,
V51, P1190, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; DIODATO V, 1994, DICT BIBLIOMETRICS;
DOWLING PJ, 1990, INT DIMENSIONS HUMAN; DYER L, 1984, V23, P156, IND
RELAT; EDSTROM A, 1977, V22, P248, ADM SCI Q; FERRIS GR, 1998, V8, P235,
HUM RESOUR MANAGE R; FERRIS GR, 2004, V121, P231, ORG ANAL; FITZENZ J,
1984, MEASURE HUMAN RESOUR; FORNBRUN C, 1984, STRATEGIC HUMAN RESO;
FRIEDMAN SD, 1986, V25, P191, HUM RESOURCE MANAGE; GALBRAITH JR, 1973,
DESIGNING COMPLEX OR; GOLEMAN D, 1998, WORKING EMOTIONAL IN; HACKMAN JR,
1980, WORK REDESIGN READIN; HALL DT, 1976, CAREERS ORG; HAMEL G, 1994,
COMPETING FUTURE; HARRIS MM, 1988, V41, P43, PERS PSYCHOL; HOFFMAN DL,
1993, V19, P505, J CONSUM RES; HOFSTEDE G, 1980, CULTURES CONSEQUENCE;
HUSELID MA, 1995, V38, P635, ACAD MANAGE J; JACKSON SE, 1995, V46, P237,
ANNU REV PSYCHOL; KANTER RM, 1977, MEN WOMEN CORPORATIO; KANTER RM, 1983,
CHANGE MASTERS INNOV; KATZ D, 1966, SOCIAL PSYCHOL ORG; KERLINGER FN,
1973, FDN BEHAV RES; KOTTER JP, 1982, GEN MANAGERS; LADO AA, 1994, V19,
P699, ACAD MANAGE REV; LAWLER EE, 1981, PAY ORG DEV; LAWLER EE, 1986,
HIGH INVOLVEMENT MAN; LAWRENCE P, 1967, ORG ENV; MACDUFFIE JP, 1995, V48,
P197, IND LABOR RELAT REV; MAHONEY TA, 1986, V12, P223, J MANAGE; MARCH
JG, 1958, ORGANIZATIONS; MARCIANO VM, 1995, P223, ACAD MANAGE J; MCCAIN
KW, 1986, V37, P111, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCALL M, 1988, LESSONS
EXPERIENCE S; MCMAHAN G, 1992, HUMAN RESOURCES SUST; MEDINA JA, 2004,
V10, P149, INVESTIGACIONES EURO; MILES RE, 1978, ORG STRATEGY STRUCTU;
MILES RE, 1984, V4, P161, ORGAN DYN; NEELEY JD, 1981, V32, P217, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; NUNNALLY J, 1978, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY; OUCHI WG, 1981, THEORY
Z AM BUSINESS; OZBILGIN M, 2004, V33, P205, PERS REV; PASADEOS Y, 1998,
V27, P53, J ADVERTISING; PASCALE RT, 1981, ART JAPANESE MANAGEM; PEREZ P,
2005, 15 C AS CIENT EC DIR; PETERS T, 1987, THRIVING CHAOS HDB M; PETERS
TJ, 1982, SEARCH EXCELLENCE; PFEFFER J, 1978, EXTERNAL CONTROL ORG;
PFEFFER J, 1994, COMPETITIVE ADVANTAG; PFEFFER J, 1998, HUMAN EQUATION
BUILD; PILKINGTON A, 1999, V19, P7, INT J OPER PROD MAN; PODSAKOFF PM,
1986, V12, P531, J MANAGE; PONZI LJ, 2002, V55, P259, SCIENTOMETRICS;
PORTER ME, 1980, COMPETITIVE STRATEGY; PORTER ME, 1985, COMPETITIVE
ADVANTAG; PRAHALAD CK, 1990, V68, P79, HARVARD BUS REV; QUINN RE, 1983,
V29, P363, MANAGE SCI; QUINN RE, 1988, RATIONAL MANAGEMENT; RAMOS AR,
2000, 10 NAT C ACEDE OV SP; RAMOS AR, 2001, 11 NAT C ACEDE ZAR S;
RAMOSRODRIGUEZ AR, 2004, V25, P981, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; ROUSSEAU DM,
1989, V2, P121, EMPLOYEE RESPONSIBIL; RYNES SL, 2002, V41, P149, HUM
RESOURCE MANAGE; SAEZ JM, 1999, V23, P348, REV ESPANOLA DOCUMEN; SCHEIN
EH, 1978, CAREER DYNAMICS MATC; SCHEIN EH, 1985, ORG CULTURE LEADERSH;
SCHULER RS, 1984, V23, P241, HUMAN RESOURCE MANAG; SCHULER RS, 1987, V1,
P207, ACADEMY MANAGEMENT E; SCHULER RS, 1992, V21, P18, ORGAN DYN;
SCHULER RS, 1997, V64, P18, PERSONNEL; SCHULER RS, 2005, V16, P11, MANAGE
REV; SENGE PM, 1990, 5 DISCIPLINE ART PRA; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; SMALL H, 1985, V8,
P321, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1999, V50, P799, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
SNELL SA, 1996, V14, P61, RES PERS H; STEWART TA, 1996, V133, P105,
FORTUNE; TAHAI A, 1999, V20, P279, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; TERPSTRA DE, 1993,
V46, P27, PERS PSYCHOL; THOMPSON JD, 1967, ORG ACTION SOCIAL SC; TICHY
NM, 1982, V23, P47, SLOAN MANAGE REV; TICHY NM, 1983, MANAGING STRATEGIC
C; TICHY NM, 1986, TRANSFORMATIONAL LEA; TUNG RL, 1988, NEW EXPATRIATES
MANA; ULRICH D, 1990, ORG CAPABILITY COMPE; ULRICH D, 1991, P129, MAKING
ORG COMPETITI; ULRICH D, 1995, V34, P473, HUM RESOURCE MANAGE; ULRICH D,
1997, HUMAN RESOURCE CHAMP; USDIKEN B, 1995, V16, P503, ORGAN STUD; VROOM
VH, 1964, WORK MOTIVATION; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54,
P1250, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WRIGHT PM, 1991, V1, P203, HUMAN RESOURCE
MANAG; WRIGHT PM, 1992, V18, P295, J MANAGE; WRIGHT PM, 2002, V28, P247,
J MANAGE; YIN RK, 1984, CASE STUDY RES DESIG|
NR- 118|
TC- 2|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- JAN|
PY- 2009|
VL- 60|
IS- 1|
BP- 161|
EP- 175|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20947|
PG- 15|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 394DD|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2009, V60, N1, P161-175|
UT- ISI:000262424900015 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Holmquist C; Carter S|
AF- Holmquist Carin; Carter, Sara|
TI- The Diana Project: pioneering women studying pioneering women|
SO- SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Women entrepreneurship; Business growth; Venture capital|
ID- ENTREPRENEURSHIP SCHOLARSHIP; FEMALE ENTREPRENEUR; COCITATION
ANALYSIS; GENDER; MOTIVATIONS; PERFORMANCE; SUCCESS|
AB- The 2007 winner of the International Award for Entrepreneurship and
Small Business Research is the Diana Project team (Candida Brush, Nancy
Carter, Elizabeth Gatewood, Patricia Greene and Myra Hart). The Diana
Project builds on the vast experience of the team in the field of
entrepreneurship in general and women entrepreneurship, business growth
and venture capital in particular. The Diana Project has investigated the
supply and demand side of growth capital for women entrepreneurs The
research contributes to entrepreneurship theory as well as to practice,
filling a void in knowledge on growth-oriented women entrepreneurship. In
this article we present and discuss the research contribution of the
Diana Project, in the areas of entrepreneurship, women entrepreneurship
and venture capital. We specifically discuss the value of researching a
specific group of women entrepreneurs, those who want to grow their
businesses, that very clearly demonstrates the positive potential of
female entrepreneurship. The Diana Project has also moved research on
women's entrepreneurship forward since its framework does not treat women
entrepreneurs as "other," i.e., the project does not presuppose that
women's entrepreneurship is similar to or different from men's
entrepreneurship. It assumes that women's entrepreneurship is
entrepreneurship and studies it from that point of view|
C1- [Holmquist, Carin] Stockholm Sch Econ, Ctr Entrepreneurship &
Business Creat, S-11383 Stockholm, Sweden; [Carter, Sara] Univ
Strathclyde, Sch Business, Hunter Ctr Entrepreneurship, Glasgow, Lanark,
Scotland|
RP- Holmquist, C, Stockholm Sch Econ, Ctr Entrepreneurship & Business
Creat, POB 6501, S-11383 Stockholm, Sweden|
EM- carin.holmquist@hhs.se sara.carter@strath.ac.uk|
CD- ALDRICH H, 1989, V1, P339, ENTREP REGION DEV; ALLEN S, 1993, P1,
WOMEN BUSINESS PERSP; BAKER T, 1997, V9, P221, ENTREP REGION DEV; BIRLEY
S, 1989, V27, P7, J SMALL BUS MANAGE; BODEN RJ, 2000, V15, P347, J BUS
VENTURING; BOWEN DD, 1986, V11, P393, ACAD MANAGE REV; BRUSH CG, 1992,
V17, P5, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; BRUSH CG, 2002, V4, P305, VENTURE CAPITAL;
BRUSH CG, 2006, GROWTH ORIENTED WOME; BRUSH CG, 2007, REC FSF NUTEK AW;
BUTTNER EH, 1997, V35, P34, J SMALL BUS MANAGE; CARTER N, 2003, V5, P1,
VENTURE CAPITAL; CARTER NM, 1997, V9, P211, ENTREP REGION DEV; CARTER NM,
1997, V12, P125, J BUS VENTURING; CHAGANTI R, 1986, V24, P18, J SMALL BUS
MANAGE; CLIFF JE, 1998, V13, P523, J BUS VENTURING; CORNELIUS B, 2006,
V30, P375, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; CROMIE S, 1987, V8, P251, J OCCUP BEHAV;
DECARLO JF, 1979, V17, P22, J SMALL BUS MANAGE; DURIETZ A, 2000, V14, P1,
SMALL BUS ECON; GARTNER WB, 2006, V30, P321, ENTREP THEORY PRACT;
GATEWOOD EJ, 1995, V10, P371, J BUS VENTURING; GOFFEE R, 1983, V31, P625,
SOCIOL REV; GOFFEE R, 1985, WOMEN CHARGE EXPERIE; GREENE P, 1999, V23,
P103, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; GREENE PG, 2001, V3, P63, VENTURE CAPITAL;
GREGOIRE DA, 2006, V30, P333, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; HISRICH R, 1986, P61,
ART SCI ENTREPRENEUR; HISRICH RD, 1982, P54, FRONTIERS ENTREPRENE;
HISRICH RD, 1984, V22, P30, J SMALL BUS MANAGE; HISRICH RD, 1986, V24,
P1, J SMALL BUS MANAGE; HISRICH RD, 1986, WOMAN ENTREPRENEUR S; HISRICH
RD, 1993, V17, P30, J SMALL BUS MANAGE; HOLMQUIST C, 1997, V9, P179,
ENTREP REGION DEV; JONSONAHL H, 2002, V15, DISSERTATION SERIES; KANTER
RM, 1977, MEN WOMEN CORPORATIO; LEEGOSSELIN H, 1990, V9, P423, J BUS
ETHICS; LERNER M, 1997, V12, P315, J BUS VENTURING; MARLOW S, 1997, V9,
P199, ENTREP REGION DEV; MARLOW S, 2002, V2, P83, ENTREPRENEURSHIP INN;
MINITTI MA, 2005, GLOBAL ENTREPRENEURS; MIRCHANDANI K, 1999, V6, P224,
GENDER WORK ORGAN; MOORE DP, 1990, V9, P275, J BUS ETHICS; READER D,
2006, V30, P417, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; ROSA P, 1996, V8, P463, SMALL BUS
ECON; SCHILDT HA, 2006, V30, P399, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; SCHWARTZ EB,
1976, V5, P47, J CONTEMP BUS; SCOTT CE, 1986, V24, P38, J SMALL BUS
MANAGE; STEVENSON L, 1990, V9, P439, J BUS ETHICS; STEVENSON LA, 1986,
V24, P30, J SMALL BUS MANAGE; WATKINS JM, 1986, P220, SURVIVAL SMALL
FIRM; ZAPALSKA A, 1997, V35, P76, J SMALL BUS MANAGE|
NR- 52|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0921-898X|
J9- SMALL BUS ECON|
JI- Small Bus. Econ. Group|
PD- FEB|
PY- 2009|
VL- 32|
IS- 2|
BP- 121|
EP- 128|
DI- 10.1007/s11187-008-9151-9|
PG- 8|
SC- Business; Economics; Management|
GA- 389JO|
JN- SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2009, V32, N2, P121-128|
UT- ISI:000262088900001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Ibekwe-SanJuan F|
AF- Ibekwe-SanJuan Fidelia|
TI- The impact of geographic location on the development of a specialty
field: A case study of Sloan Digital Sky Survey in Astronomy|
SO- KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION|
LA- English|
DT- Proceedings Paper|
CT- 10th ISKO International Conference|
CY- AUG 05-08, 2008|
CL- Montreal, CANADA|
ID- INFORMATION-SCIENCE; COCITATION ANALYSIS|
AB- We analyze the scientific discourse of researchers in a specialty
field in Astronomy by examining the influence that geographic location
may have on the development of this field. Using as a case study the
Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) project, we analyzed texts from
bibliographic records along three geographic axes: US-only publications,
non-US publications and international collaboration. Each geographic
region reflected authors affiliated to research institutions in that
region International collaboration refers to papers published by both USbased and non-US based institutions. Through clustering of domain terms
used in titles and abstracts fields of the bibliographic records, we were
able to automatically identify the topology of topics peculiar to each
geographic region and identify the research topics common to the three
geographic zones. The results showed that US-only and non-US research in
SDSS shared more commonalities with international collaboration than with
one another, thus indicating that the former two focused on rather
distinct topics|
C1- Univ Jean Moulin, Dept Informat & Commun, F-69008 Lyon, France|
RP- Ibekwe-SanJuan, F, Univ Jean Moulin, Dept Informat & Commun, 4 Cours
Albert Thomas, F-69008 Lyon, France|
EM- ibekwe@univ-lyon3.fr|
CD- BORG E, 2003, V57, P396, ELT J; FELLBAUM C, 1998, WORDNET ELECT
LEXICA; GREFENSTETTE G, 1997, P500, P RIAO 97; HARRIS ZS, 1968, MATH
STRUCTURES LANG; HJORLAND B, 2002, V58, P422, J DOC; IBEKWESANJUAN F,
2002, V29, P181, KNOWL ORGAN; IBEKWESANJUAN F, 2006, V62, P229, J DOC;
JARDINE N, 1971, V7, P217, INFORMATION STORAGE; MARIA LH, 2008, V35,
P113, KNOWL ORGAN; MARTI H, 1999, P333, NATURAL LANGUAGE INF; NENADIC G,
2004, V10, P55, TERMINOLOGY; SALABELOTZ H, 1990, V2, P107, THYROIDOLOGY;
SANJUAN E, 2006, V42, P1532, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; SCHNEIDER JW, 2004,
V60, P524, J DOC; SMALL H, 1999, V50, P799, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SWALES
J, 1990, GENRE ANAL ENGLISH A; WACHOLDER N, 1998, P70, WORKSH COMP TREATM
N; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; ZITT M, 1994, V30,
P333, SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 19|
TC- 0|
PU- ERGON-VERLAG|
PI- WURZBURG|
PA- GROMBUHLSTR 7, 97080 WURZBURG, GERMANY|
SN- 0943-7444|
J9- KNOWL ORGAN|
JI- Knowl. Organ|
PY- 2008|
VL- 35|
IS- 4|
BP- 239|
EP- 250|
PG- 12|
SC- Information Science & Library Science|
GA- 389GP|
JN- KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION, 2008, V35, N4, P239-250|
UT- ISI:000262080600006 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Dastidar PG; Ramachandran S|
AF- Dastidar Prabir G; Ramachandran, S|
TI- Intellectual structure of Antarctic science: A 25-years analysis|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- COCITATION; NETWORKS|
AB- To delineate the intellectual structure of Antarctic science, the
research outputs on Antarctic science have been analyzed for a period of
25 years (1980-2004) through a set of scientometrics and network analysis
techniques. The study is based on 10,942 records (research articles,
letters, reviews, etc.), published in 961 journals/documents, and
retrieved from the Science Citation Index (SCI) database. Over the years
interest in Antarctic science has increased, as is evident from the
growing number of ratified countries and research stations. During the
period under study, the productivity has increased 3-times and there is a
13-fold increase in collaborative articles. Attempt has been made to
identify important players like scientists, organizations and countries
working in the field and to identify frontier areas of research that is
being conducted in this continent. The highest 41% scientific output is
contributed by the USA and the UK, followed by Australia and Germany.
British Antarctic Survey (BAS), UK and Alfred Wegener Institute of Polar
& Marine Research, Germany are the most productive institutes in
Antarctic science. Maximum number of research articles on Antarctic
science, have been published in the journal Polar Biology, indicating
substantial work being done on the biology of this continent. The
journals-Nature and Science are the highly-cited journals in Antarctic
science. The paper written by J. C. Farman et al., published in Nature in
1985, reporting depletion of ozone layer, is the most-cited article.
Semantic relationships between cited documents were measured through cocitation analysis. J. C. Farman and S. Solomon are co-cited most
frequently|
C1- [Dastidar, Prabir G.] Minist Earth Sci, New Delhi 110003, India;
[Ramachandran, S.] Univ Madras, Madras, Tamil Nadu, India|
RP- Dastidar, PG, Minist Earth Sci, Block 9 & 12,CGO Complex,Lodi Rd, New
Delhi 110003, India|
EM- prabirgd11@gmail.com|
CD- 2002, HDB ANTARCTIC TREATY; 2006, J SELECTION PROCESS; *ANT TREAT
SECR, 2004, 27 ANT TREAT CONS M; *CIA, 2006, WORLD FACT BOOK; *COMNAP,
2005, COMNAP REP ANT TREAT; *IAATO, 2006, IAATO OV ANT TOUR 20; *UNESCO I
STAT, 2005, HUM RES R D; BORGATTI SP, 2002, UCINET WINDOWS SOFTW;
DASTIDAR PG, 2004, V59, P15, SCIENTOMETRICS; DASTIDAR PG, 2005, V89,
P1552, CURR SCI INDIA; DASTIDAR PG, 2005, V65, P199, SCIENTOMETRICS;
DASTIDAR PG, 2007, POLAR RES IN PRESS; EGGHE L, 2002, V55, P349,
SCIENTOMETRICS; FREEMAN LC, 1979, V1, P215, SOC NETWORKS; GARFIELD E,
1990, CURRENT CONTENT 0528; GARFIELD E, 1996, V10, SCIENTIST; HANNEMAN R,
2006, INTRO SOCIAL NETWORK; LEYDESDORFF L, 2001, P15, CHALLENGES
SCIENTOME; PERSSON O, 2004, BIBEXCEL TOOL BOX SC; SMALL H, 1973, V24,
P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WASSERMAN S, 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL|
NR- 21|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- DEC|
PY- 2008|
VL- 77|
IS- 3|
BP- 389|
EP- 414|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-007-1947-x|
PG- 26|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 387KB|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, V77, N3, P389-414|
UT- ISI:000261950000002 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Jarneving B|
AF- Jarneving Bo|
TI- A variation of the calculation of the first author cocitation
strength in author cocitation analysis|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; RETRIEVAL; SCIENCE|
AB- The method of author cocitation analysis (ACA) was first presented by
White and Griffith in 1981 as a "literature measure of intellectual
structure" and its applicability for the mapping of areas of science has
since then been tested in various bibliometric science mapping studies.
In this study, an experimental method of calculating the first or single
author cocitation frequency is presented and compared with the standard
method. Applying Ward's method of clustering, the analysis revealed that
the two approaches did not produce similar results and a tentative
interpretation of deviations was that the experimental method provided
with a more detailed depiction of the specialty structure. It was also
concluded that a number of additional research questions need to be
resolved before a comprehensive understanding of the suggested method's
merits and demerits is reached|
C1- Swedish Sch Lib & Informat Sci, S-50190 Boras, Sweden|
RP- Jarneving, B, Swedish Sch Lib & Informat Sci, S-50190 Boras, Sweden|
EM- bo.jarneving@hb.se|
CD- AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; DING Y, 1999, V25,
P67, J INFORM SCI; EVERITT B, 2001, CLUSTER ANAL; HUBERT L, 1985, V2,
P193, J CLASSIF; KAUFMAN L, 1990, FINDING GROUPS DATA; KENDALL MG, 1990,
RANK CORRELATION MET; LEYDESDORFF L, 1987, V11, P295, SCIENTOMETRICS;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MCCAIN KW, 1990,
V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MOJENA R, 1977, V20, P359, COMPUT J;
PERSSON O, 1994, V45, P31, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PERSSON O, 2001, V50,
P339, SCIENTOMETRICS; RAND WM, 1971, V66, P846, J AM STAT ASSOC; ROUSSEAU
R, 2004, V55, P513, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; SCHNEIDER JW, 2007, P696, P
ISSI 2007 11 INT C; WESSA P, 2007, FREE STAT SOFTWARE; WHITE HD, 1981,
V32, P16, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P1250, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WISHART D, 2006,
CLUSTAN GRAPHICS PRI; YEUNG KY, 20000UWCSE001101 U W; ZHAO DZ, 2006, V42,
P1578, INFORM PROCESS MANAG|
NR- 22|
TC- 1|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- DEC|
PY- 2008|
VL- 77|
IS- 3|
BP- 485|
EP- 504|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-007-1943-1|
PG- 20|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 387KB|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, V77, N3, P485-504|
UT- ISI:000261950000008 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Sternitzke C; Bergmann I|
AF- Sternitzke Christian; Bergmann, Isumo|
TI- Similarity measures for document mapping: A comparative study on the
level of an individual scientist|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- COCITATION; ALGORITHM; SCIENCE|
AB- This paper investigates the utility of the Inclusion Index, the
Jaccard Index and the Cosine Index for calculating similarities of
documents, as used for mapping science and technology. It is shown that,
provided that the same content is searched across various documents, the
Inclusion Index generally delivers more exact results, in particular when
computing the degree of similarity based on citation data. In addition,
various methodologies such as co-word analysis, Subject-Action-Object
(SAO) structures, bibliographic coupling, co-citation analysis, and selfcitation links are compared. We find that the two former ones tend to
describe rather semantic similarities that differ from knowledge flows as
expressed by the citation-based methodologies|
C1- [Sternitzke, Christian] Tech Univ Ilmenau, PATON Landespatentzentrum
Thuringen, D-98684 Ilmenau, Germany; [Sternitzke, Christian; Bergmann,
Isumo] Univ Bremen, IPMI, Bremen, Germany|
RP- Sternitzke, C, Tech Univ Ilmenau, PATON Landespatentzentrum
Thuringen, PF 100 565, D-98684 Ilmenau, Germany|
EM- cs@sternitzke.com|
CD- *INV MACH CORP, ACC SPEED KNOWL WHIT; AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J
AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BARTKOWSKI A, 2004, P177, PATINFO 2004 PATENTR;
BERGMANN I, 2007, P R D MAN C BREM JUL; BLANCHARD A, 2007, V29, P308,
WORLD PATENT INFORM; BOERNER K, 2003, V37, P179, ANNU REV INFORM SCI;
BORGATTI SP, 1999, UCINET 6 WINDOWS SOF; CALLON M, 1991, V22, P155,
SCIENTOMETRICS; CLARKSON G, 2004, THESIS HARVARD BUSIN; DREBLER A, 2006,
PATENTE TECHNOLOGIEO; GOLBECK J, 2006, P172, VISUALIZING SEMANTIC; HAMERS
L, 1989, V25, P315, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; HARTER SP, 1993, V44, P543, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; JACCARD P, 1901, V37, P241, B SOC VAUD SCI NAT;
JARNEVING B, 2005, V65, P245, SCIENTOMETRICS; KAMADA T, 1989, V31, P7,
INFORM PROCESS LETT; KESSLER MM, 1963, V14, P10, AM DOC; LEYDESDORFF L,
1987, V11, P295, SCIENTOMETRICS; MARSHAKOVA IV, 1973, V6, P3, SCI
TECHNICAL INFORM; MOEHRLE MG, 2005, V35, P513, R&D MANAGE; PETERS HPF,
1995, V46, P9, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PORTER MF, 1980, V14, P130, PROGRAM;
QIN J, 2000, V51, P166, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; RAMLOGAN R, 2007, V70, P459,
SCIENTOMETRICS; RIP A, 1984, V6, P381, SCIENTOMETRICS; RUSBERGEN CV,
1979, INFORM RETRIEVAL; SALTON G, 1983, INTRO MODERN INFORM; SHARABCHIEV
JT, 1989, V15, P127, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; STERNITZKE C, 2007, V29,
P241, WORLD PATENT INFORM; TSOURIKOV VM, 2000, US, 6167370|
NR- 32|
TC- 4|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- JAN|
PY- 2009|
VL- 78|
IS- 1|
BP- 113|
EP- 130|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-007-1961-z|
PG- 18|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 387KC|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2009, V78, N1, P113-130|
UT- ISI:000261950100009 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Martinez ATG; Bote VG; Quesada BV; Moya-Anegon F|
AF- Garcia Martinez Ana Teresa; Guerrero Bote, Vicente; Vargas Quesada,
Benjamin; Moya-Anegon, Felix|
TI- Psychology in the Map of Science in Ibero America|
SO- REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE PSICOLOGIA|
LA- Spanish|
DT- Article|
DE- scientific communication; Latin American psychology; sciences; Web of
Knowledge|
ID- JOURNAL COCITATION ANALYSIS; PATHFINDER NETWORKS; CATEGORIES;
PARADIGMS; ALGORITHM; DOMAINS|
AB- The objective of this study is to compare the scientific
representation of Psychology in the different Latin-American countries.
We use a methodology of subject categories cocitation (JCR-Thomson. Cia,
Subject Category Listing) which facilitates the representation of the
scientific activity, the resulting maps permit us to focus on the
Psychology Area, whose representation will serve as information base for
the analysis of the discipline in each country scope, with international
visibility. This is an empirical view of the underlying structure in the
Psychology in the countries studied and this is interesting since the
majority of scientists have an intuitive idea of this structure which may
or may not correspond to reality. Nevertheless our representation show an
objective global view based on the Scientist formal communication
behavior. With this model an objective comparison of the Psychology
research in the eight most important Latin-American countries is carried
out|
C1- [Garcia Martinez, Ana Teresa] Univ Extremadura, Dept Informac &
Comunicac, Badajoz 06001, Spain; [Vargas Quesada, Benjamin; Moya-Anegon,
Felix] Univ Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain|
RP- Martinez, ATG, Univ Extremadura, Dept Informac & Comunicac, Plazuela
Ibn Marwan,S-N, Badajoz 06001, Spain|
EM- atmar@alcazaba.unex.es|
CD- BORNER K, 2003, V37, P179, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; CHEN C, 1999, INFORM
VISUALIZATION; CHEN CM, 1998, V10, P107, INTERACT COMPUT; CHEN CM, 1998,
V9, P267, J VISUAL LANG COMPUT; COSTA J, 1998, ESQUEMATICA VISUALIZ;
DESOLLAPRICE DJ, 1965, V149, P510, SCIENCE; DING Y, 2000, V47, P55,
SCIENTOMETRICS; EADES P, 1984, V42, P149, C NUMERANTIUM; FOWLER RH, 1990,
P165, PATHFINDER ASS NETWO; GARFIELD E, 1964, USE CITATION DATA WR;
GARFIELD E, 1985, V11, P147, J INFORMATION SCI; GUERREROBOTE VP, 2006,
V42, P1484, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; HJORLAND B, 1995, V46, P400, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; KAMADA T, 1989, V31, P7, INFORM PROCESS LETT; LEYDESDORFF L,
1987, V11, P295, SCIENTOMETRICS; MARSHAKOVA IV, 1973, V2, P3, NAUCHNO
TEKHNICHESKA; MARTINEZ ATG, 2008, V20, P465, PSICOTHEMA; MCCAIN KW, 1991,
V42, P290, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MOYAANEGON F, 2004, V61, P129,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MOYAANEGON F, 2005, V41, P1520, INFORM PROCESSING MA;
MOYAANEGON F, 2006, V15, P258, PROF INFORM; SCHVANEVELDT RW, 1990,
PATHFINDER ASS NETWO; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; SMALL H, 1980, V36, P183, J DOC; SMALL
H, 1999, V50, P799, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 2003, V54, P394, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; SOLANA VH, 1999, THESIS U GRANADA; VARGASQUESADA B,
2007, VISUALIZING STRUCTUR; WHITE HD, 2000, P25, IEEE INFOR VIS; WHITE
HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 31|
TC- 1|
PU- FOUNDATION ADVANCEMENT PSYCHOLOGY|
PI- BOGOTA D C|
PA- APARTADO AEREO 92621, BOGOTA D C, COLOMBIA|
SN- 0120-0534|
J9- REV LATINOAMER PSICOL|
JI- Rev. Latinoam. Psicol|
PY- 2008|
VL- 40|
IS- 3|
BP- 409|
EP- 424|
PG- 16|
SC- Psychology, Multidisciplinary|
GA- 384GE|
JN- REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE PSICOLOGIA, 2008, V40, N3, P409-424|
UT- ISI:000261732500002 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Miguel S; Caprile L; Jorquera-Vidal I|
AF- Miguel Sandra; Caprile, Lorena; Jorquera-Vidal, Israel|
TI- Co-term and social networks analysis for the generation of subject
maps|
SO- PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION|
LA- Spanish|
DT- Article|
DE- Social network analysis; Co-term analysis; Optics; Information
visualization; Visual interfaces; Information retrieval|
ID- INFORMATION-RETRIEVAL; PATHFINDER NETWORKS; DIGITAL LIBRARIES;
INTERFACE; CHALLENGES; COCITATION; DOMAINS; OPAC|
AB- Improvement of the interfaces and search capacities of the opacs
continues to be one of the main challenges for libraries, especially with
regard to searching by subject. The visual interfaces can help with
retrieval. This paper explores the combination of co-term analysis
techniques with social networks for the generation of subject maps of
collections. The main conclusion is that the methodology applied is
valid, and that the maps could be used for browsing and subject
retrieval. It would also be useful for improving the quality of indexing|
C1- [Miguel, Sandra] Natl Univ La Plata, Fac Humanidades & Ciencias Educ,
Dept Bibliotecol, RA-1900 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina; [Caprile, Lorena;
Jorquera-Vidal, Israel] Natl Univ La Plata, Fac Ciencias Nat & Museo, RA1900 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina|
RP- Miguel, S, Natl Univ La Plata, Fac Humanidades & Ciencias Educ, Dept
Bibliotecol, 48 E-6 & 7,5 Piso, RA-1900 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina|
EM- sandra@fcnym.unlp.edu.ar lorenacaprile@yahoo.com
jorqueravidal@gmail.com|
CD- BORNER K, 2002, V2539, P1, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; BORNER K, 2003, V37,
P179, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; BUCHELLIGUERRER.VA, 2006, BORRADO CERO
HERRAMI; BUZYDLOWSKI JW, 2002, V2539, P133, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; CALLON
M, 1986, V36, P169, ANN SOCIOLOGIQUE; CARABALLOPEREZ Y, 2007, V16,
ACIMED; CHEN CM, 1998, V9, P267, J VISUAL LANG COMPUT; DEMOYAANEGON F,
1999, CUADERNOS DOCUMENTAC; DRABENSTOTT KM, 1996, V47, P520, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; DURSTELER JC, 2003, VISUALIZACION REDES; GUERREROBOTE VP,
2002, V38, P79, INFORMATION PROCESSI; HASSANMONTERO Y, 2006, ENCONTRO
CIENCIAS TE; HASSANMONTERO Y, 2006, V15, P278, PROF INFORM; HE Q, 1999,
V48, P133, LIBR TRENDS; HERREROSOLANA V, 2006, V11, INFORM RES INT ELECT;
HILDRETH CR, 1985, V20, P233, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; JANECEK P, 2005, V5,
P42, INT J DIGITAL LIB; JATIVAMIRALLES MV, 2004, V13, P28, PROF INFORM;
KAMADA T, 1989, P7, INFORM PROCESSING LE; KORN F, 1997, MESH BROWSE TOOL
BRO; LARSON RR, 1991, V61, P133, LIB Q; LATOUR B, 1992, P151, SHAPING
TECHNOLOGY B; LIN X, 1991, P262, P 14 ANN INT ACM SIG; MARCOSMORA MC,
2003, DOCUMENTACION DIGITA; MARCOSMORA MC, 2004, DOCUMENTACION DIGITA;
MARCOSMORA MC, 2005, CHILE VISUAL LIB CAT; MATTHEWS JR, 1983, PUBLIC
ACCESS ONLINE; MI J, 2008, V27, P5, INFORM TECHNOL LIBR; MICELI JE, 2008,
V14, REDES REV HISPANA AN; MORILLOVELARDE J, 2006, P169, P 8 JORN GEST
INF MA; MOYAANEGON F, 2004, V61, P129, SCIENTOMETRICS; NOYONS ECM, 1999,
V50, P115, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PEAT HJ, 1991, V42, P378, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; PICHININI M, 1996, V4, P1, B BIBLIOTECOLOGICO P; RIOSGARCIA Y, 1991,
V14, P121, REV ESPANOLA DOCUMEN; RODRIGUEZ JA, 1995, CUADERNOS
METODOLOGI; SCHNEIDERMAN B, 1996, P336, P IEEE S VIS LANG; SENSO JA,
2006, V15, P248, PROF INFORM; SU SF, 1994, V64, P130, LIBR QUART;
VARGASQUESADA B, 2005, VISUALIZACION ANALIS; VARGASQUESADA B, 2007,
VISUALIZING STRUCTUR; VILLENRUEDA L, 2006, V15, P87, PROF INFORM;
WASSERMAN S, 1998, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; WHITE HD, 1997, V32, P99, ANNU
REV INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 45|
TC- 0|
PU- EPI|
PI- BARCELONA|
PA- APARTADO 32 280, BARCELONA, 08080, SPAIN|
SN- 1386-6710|
J9- PROF INF|
JI- Prof. Inf|
PD- NOV-DEC|
PY- 2008|
VL- 17|
ISBPEPDIPGSCGAJNUT-
6|
637|
646|
10.3145/epi.2008.nov.06|
10|
Information Science & Library Science|
379EC|
PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2008, V17, N6, P637-646|
ISI:000261378500006 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Casey DL; McMillan GS|
AF- Casey Debra L; McMillan, G. Steven|
TI- IDENTIFYING THE "INVISIBLE COLLEGES" OF THE INDUSTRIAL & LABOR
RELATIONS REVIEW: A BIBLIOMETRIC APPROACH|
SO- INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- NETWORKS|
AB- Since its inaugural issue in 1947, the Industrial and LaboyRelationsReview (ILRR) has been considered among the foremost industrial
relations Journals. Prominent among subjects treated by ILRR's articles
in the journal's early years were collective bargaining and industrial
strife, but the subject mix has changed greatly with the times. This
paper employs bibliometric techniques to compare IIRR's intellectual
bases across three recent periods: 1974-1984, 1985-1995, and 1996-2006.
Using co-citation and network analyses, the authors identify the
"invisible colleges"-research networks that refer to each other in their
publications-of ILRA Economics-oriented journals were heavily cited by
ILRR authors across the entire 33-year observation period, but there is
evidence that another field, human resource management, was of growing
importance in the most recent years|
C1- [McMillan, G. Steven] Helsinki Univ Technol, FIN-02150 Espoo,
Finland|
EM- gsm5@psu.edu|
CD- BORGATTI SP, 2002, UCINET WINDOWS SOFTW; CRANE D, 1972, INVISIBLE
COLL DIFFU; FREEMAN LC, 1979, V1, P215, SOC NETWORKS; FREGE CM, 2005,
V43, P179, BRIT J IND RELAT; GARFIELD E, 1979, V1, P359, SCIENTOMETRICS;
GMUR M, 2003, V57, P27, SCIENTOMETRICS; KAUFMAN BE, 1993, ORIGINS
EVOLUTION FI; LOTKA AJ, 1926, V16, P317, J WASHINGTON ACADEMY; MCCAIN KW,
1986, V37, P111, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MULLINS NC, 1977, V42, P552, AM
SOCIOL REV; PERSSON O, 2006, BIBEXCEL TOOL BIBLIO; PRICE DJD, 1965, V149,
P510, SCIENCE; SCOTT J, 1991, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; SMALL H, 1980, V36,
P183, J DOC; SMALL HG, 1978, V8, P327, SOC STUD SCI; TIJSSEN RJW, 1992,
THESIS RIJKSUNIVERIS; WASSERMAN S, 1997, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL|
NR- 17|
TC- 1|
PU- INDUSTRIAL LABOR RELAT REV|
PI- ITHACA|
PA- CORNELL UNIV, ITHACA, NY 14851-0952 USA|
SN- 0019-7939|
J9- IND LABOR RELAT REV|
JI- Ind. Labor Relat. Rev|
PD- OCT|
PYVLISBPEPPGSCGAJNUT-
2008|
62|
1|
126|
132|
7|
Industrial Relations & Labor|
376UH|
INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 2008, V62, N1, P126-132|
ISI:000261208000007 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Stewart A|
AF- Stewart Alex|
TI- Who Could Best Complement a Team of Family Business ResearchersScholars Down the Hall or in Another Building?|
SO- FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- CROSSING DISCIPLINARY BOUNDARIES; CO-WORD ANALYSIS; ENTREPRENEURSHIP
SCHOLARSHIP; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; STRATEGIC-MANAGEMENT; COCITATION
ANALYSIS; SCIENCE; KNOWLEDGE; NETWORKS; PERSPECTIVE|
AB- This study explores which fields might potentially collaborate in
family business research. It compares 14 research fields for their
structure of topical attention. The most convenient collaborations, such
as those between entrepreneurship, family business, and strategy
researchers, prove to be the most appropriate for some research purposes.
However, less common collaborations, particularly with scholars from law,
history, and anthropology, appear to be the most appropriate for other
projects. Family and marital therapy prove to be a less promising
collaborator than one might expect because of their strong skewing to
familial rather than commercial topics Correspondingly, entrepreneurship
also proves to be an outlier field, skewed to the commercial rather than
the familial, with surprisingly little in common with the topical
interests of family business researchers|
C1- Marquette Univ, Coleman Fdn Chair Entrepreneurship, Milwaukee, WI
53233 USA|
RP- Stewart, A, Marquette Univ, Coleman Fdn Chair Entrepreneurship,
Milwaukee, WI 53233 USA|
EM- alex.stewart@mu.edu|
CD- *NSF, 2006, INV AM FUT STRAT PLA; ABBOTT A, 1988, SYSTEM PROFESSIONS;
ADAMS H, 1988, ACAD TRIBES; ALDRICH HE, 2003, V18, P573, J BUS VENTURING;
ANDERSON AR, 2005, V18, P135, FAM BUS REV; BAKER T, 2007, V5, P297,
STRATEG ORGAN; BARTH F, 1967, P149, THEMES EC ANTHR; BEDEIAN AG, 2005,
V14, P151, J MANAGE INQUIRY; BIRD B, 2002, V15, P337, FAMILY BUSINESS
REV; BORGATTI SP, 2002, UNICET 6 WINDOWS VER; BROCKHAUS RH, 1994, V19,
P25, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; BURT RS, 1992, STRUCTURAL HOLES SOC; CALLON M,
1983, V22, P191, SOC SCI INFORM; CAMPBELL DT, 1969, P328,
INTERDISCIPLINARY RE; CARSTEN J, 2000, P1, CULTURES RELATEDNESS; CASILLAS
J, 2007, V20, P141, FAM BUS REV; COMAROFF J, 1987, P53, GENDER KINSHIP
ESSAY; CORNELIUS B, 2006, V30, P375, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; DAVIS MS, 1971,
V1, P309, PHILOS SOC SCI; DEVONS E, 1964, P158, CLOSED SYSTEMS OPEN;
DOGAN M, 1997, V49, P429, INT SOC SCI J; DYER WG, 1994, V19, P71, ENTREP
THEORY PRACT; DYER WG, 2003, V27, P401, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; ELLIS D,
1999, V50, P1095, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; EPSTEIN S, 2005, P245,
INTERDISCIPLINARY CO; FORTES M, 1969, KINSHIP SOCIAL ORDER; GARTNER WB,
2006, V30, P321, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; GREGOIRE DA, 2006, V30, P333,
ENTREP THEORY PRACT; GRIFFITHS TL, 2004, V101, P5228, P NATL ACAD SCI U
S1; HAMBRICK DC, 2008, V33, P32, ACAD MANAGE REV; HARGENS LL, 2000, V65,
P846, AM SOCIOL REV; HARRELL S, 1997, HUMAN FAMILIES; HE Q, 1999, V48,
P133, LIBR TRENDS; HENKEL M, 2004, V17, P167, HIGHER ED POLICY; HOLY L,
1996, ANTHR PERSPECTIVES K; HOY F, 1994, V19, P9, ENTREP THEORY PRACT;
JACOBS N, 2002, V58, P548, J DOC; JONES AM, 2005, V64, P276, HUM ORGAN;
KIRZNER IM, 2000, P3, DRIVING FORCE MARKET; KLEIN JT, 2005, P23,
INTERDISCIPLINARY CO; KRACKHARDT D, 1994, V17, P53, CONNECTIONS; LOCKETT
A, 2005, V14, P139, J MANAGE INQUIRY; MARCUS GE, 1992, LIVES TRUST
FORTUNES; MCCARTHY AM, 2001, V15, P26, ACAD MANAGEMENT EXEC; MCKINNON S,
2000, V15, P35, CULT ANTHROPOL; MEYER AD, 1991, V17, P821, J MANAGE;
MILLER D, 2005, MANAGING LONG RUN; MORILLO F, 2003, V54, P1237, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; NICHOLSON N, 2008, V21, P103, FAM BUS REV; ODONNELL AM,
2005, P51, INTERDISCIPLINARY CO; PIERCE SJ, 1999, V50, P271, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; PORAC JF, 1995, V40, P203, ADMIN SCI QUART; RAMOSRODRIGUEZ
AR, 2004, V25, P981, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; READER D, 2006, V30, P417,
ENTREP THEORY PRACT; SCHILDT HA, 2006, V30, P399, ENTREP THEORY PRACT;
SHARMA P, 2004, V17, P1, FAMILY BUSINESS REV; SHUGAN SM, 2003, V22, P151,
MARKET SCI; SLINGERLAND E, 2003, EFFORTLESS ACTION WU; SMALL H, 1999,
V48, P72, LIBR TRENDS; STEWART A, 1995, V11, P3, ADV STRATEG MANAGE;
STEWART A, 2003, V27, P383, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; TEIL G, 1995, V4, P47,
STANFORD HUMANITIES; THAGARD P, 2005, P317, INTERDISCIPLINARY CO;
WASSERMAN S, 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; YANAGISAKO SJ, 1987, P86, GENDER
KINSHIP ESSAY; ZAHRA S, 2004, V17, P331, FAM BUS REV; ZALD MN, 2002, V9,
P365, ORGANIZATION; ZERUBAVEL E, 1995, V62, P1093, SOC RES|
NR- 68|
TC- 2|
PU- BLACKWELL PUBLISHING|
PI- OXFORD|
PA- 9600 GARSINGTON RD, OXFORD OX4 2DQ, OXON, ENGLAND|
SN- 0894-4865|
J9- FAM BUS REV|
JI- Fam. Bus. Rev|
PD- DEC|
PY- 2008|
VL- 21|
IS- 4|
BP- 279|
EP- 293|
DI- 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00130.x|
PG- 15|
SC- Business|
GA- 374QY|
JN- FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW, 2008, V21, N4, P279-293|
UT- ISI:000261060000001 ER ||
PTAUMS;
MJ;
J|
Goyette P; Lefebvre C; Ng A; Brant SR; Cho JH; Duerr RH; Silverberg
Taylor KD; Latiano A; Aumais G; Deslandres C; Jobin G; Annese V; Daly
Xavier RJ; Rioux JD|
AF- Goyette P; Lefebvre, C; Ng, A; Brant, S. R; Cho, J. H; Duerr, R. H;
Silverberg, M. S; Taylor, K. D; Latiano, A; Aumais, G; Deslandres, C;
Jobin, G; Annese, V; Daly, M. J; Xavier, R. J; Rioux, J. D|
TI- Gene-centric association mapping of chromosome 3p implicates MST1 in
IBD pathogenesis|
SO- MUCOSAL IMMUNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- INFLAMMATORY-BOWEL-DISEASE; MACROPHAGE-STIMULATING PROTEIN; GENOMEWIDE ASSOCIATION; RECEPTOR TYROSINE KINASE; HEPATOCYTE GROWTH-FACTOR;
CROHNS-DISEASE; SUSCEPTIBILITY LOCI; BETA-CHAIN; ULCERATIVE-COLITIS;
INTESTINAL MACROPHAGES|
AB- Association mapping and candidate gene studies within inflammatory
bowel diseases (IBD) linkage regions, as well as genome-wide association
studies in Crohn's disease (CD) have led to the discovery of multiple
risk genes, but these explain only a fraction of the genetic
susceptibility observed in IBD. We have thus been pursuing a region on
chromosome 3p21-22 showing linkage to CD and ulcerative colitis (UC)
using a gene-centric association mapping approach. We identified 12
functional candidate genes by searching for literature cocitations with
relevant keywords and for gene expression patterns consistent with
immune/intestinal function. We then performed an association study
composed of a screening phase, where tagging single nucleotide
polymorphisms (SNPs) were evaluated in 1,020 IBD patients, and an
independent replication phase in 745 IBD patients. These analyses
identified and replicated significant association with IBD for four SNPs
within a 1.2 Mb linkage disequilibrium region. We then identified a nonsynonymous coding variant (rs3197999, R689C) in the macrophagestimulating 1 (MST1) gene (P-value 3.62x10(-6)) that accounts for the
association signal, and shows association with both CD and UC. MST1
encodes macrophage-stimulating protein (MSP), a protein regulating the
innate immune responses to bacterial ligands. R689C is predicted to
interfere with MSP binding to its receptor, suggesting a role for this
gene in the pathogenesis of IBD|
C1- [Goyette, P.; Lefebvre, C.; Rioux, J. D.] Univ Montreal, Dept Med,
Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada; [Goyette, P.; Lefebvre, C.; Rioux, J. D.]
Montreal Heart Inst, Res Ctr, Montreal, PQ H1T 1C8, Canada; [Ng, A.;
Xavier, R. J.] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med,
Gastrointestinal Unit, Boston, MA USA; [Ng, A.; Xavier, R. J.] Harvard
Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Ctr Computat & Integrat Biol,
Boston, MA USA; [Brant, S. R.] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Harvey M &
Lyn P Meyerhoff Inflammatory Bowel Dis, Baltimore, MD USA; [Cho, J. H.]
Yale Univ, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA; [Duerr,
R. H.] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Med Hepatol &
Nutr, Pittsburgh, PA USA; [Silverberg, M. S.] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai
Hosp, IBD Ctr, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada; [Taylor, K. D.] Cedars Sinai
Med Ctr, Inst Med Genet, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA; [Taylor, K. D.]
Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, IBD Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA; [Latiano, A.;
Annese, V.] CSS RCCS Hosp, Gastrointestinal Unit, San Giovanni Rotondo,
Italy; [Latiano, A.; Annese, V.] CSS RCCS Hosp, Endoscopy Unit, San
Giovanni Rotondo, Italy; [Aumais, G.; Jobin, G.] Hop Maison Neuve
Rosemont, Dept Gastroenterol, Montreal, PQ H1T 2M4, Canada; [Deslandres,
C.] Hop St Justine, Dept Gastroenterol, Montreal, PQ H3T 1C5, Canada;
[Daly, M. J.; Rioux, J. D.] Broad Inst MIT & Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA;
[Daly, M. J.; Xavier, R. J.] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch
Med, Ctr Human Genet Res, Boston, MA USA|
RP- Rioux, JD, Univ Montreal, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada|
EM- rioux@inflammgen.org|
FU- National Institutes of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney diseases
(NIDDK) [DK62431, DK62422/DK62429, DK62420, DK62432, DK62423, DK62413];
NIDDK [DK064869]; NIAID [AI062773]|
FX- The North American IBD Genetics Consortium is funded by multiple
grants from the National Institutes of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney
diseases (NIDDK): DK62431 (S.R.B.), DK62422/DK62429 (J.H.C.), DK62420
(R.H.D.), DK62432 (J.D.R.), DK62423 (M.S.S.), and DK62413 (K.D.T.). The
current work was funded by an NIDDK Grant (DK064869) to J.D.R and an
NIAID Grant (AI062773) to R.J.X.A.N. is the recipient of a fellowship
from the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America. We thank Catherine
Labbe for her contribution to the genotying performed as part of this
project|
CD- BARRETT JC, 2005, V21, P263, BIOINFORMATICS; BECKER C, 2003, V112,
P693, J CLIN INVEST; BINDER V, 1998, V16, P351, DIGEST DIS; BURTON PR,
2007, V447, P661, NATURE; CARAFOLI F, 2005, V272, P5799, FEBS J; CHEN YQ,
1998, V161, P4950, J IMMUNOL; CHO JH, 1998, V95, P7502, P NATL ACAD SCI
USA; CORRELL PH, 1997, V1, P69, GENES FUNCT; DANILKOVITCH A, 1999, V274,
P29937, J BIOL CHEM; DEBAKKER PIW, 2005, V37, P1217, NAT GENET; DEJAGER
PL, 2007, V8, P387, GENES IMMUN; DELANO WL, 2002, PYMOL MOL GRAPHICS S;
DUERR RH, 2000, V66, P1857, AM J HUM GENET; DUERR RH, 2002, V11, P2599,
HUM MOL GENET; DUERR RH, 2006, V314, P1461, SCIENCE; FUSS IJ, 2006, V12,
P9, INFLAMM BOWEL DIS; HAMPE J, 1999, V64, P808, AM J HUM GENET; HAMPE J,
2001, V48, P191, GUT; HAMPE J, 2007, V39, P207, NAT GENET; HAN S, 1991,
V30, P9768, BIOCHEMISTRY-US; HUE S, 2006, V203, P2473, J EXP MED; HUGOT
JP, 1996, V379, P821, NATURE; HUGOT JP, 2001, V411, P599, NATURE; IWAMA
A, 1995, V86, P3394, BLOOD; KIMURA H, 1997, V42, P1047, DIGEST DIS SCI;
KIRCHHOFER D, 2004, V279, P39915, J BIOL CHEM; KULLBERG MC, 2006, V203,
P2485, J EXP MED; LENNARDJONES JE, 1989, V170, P16, SCAND J GASTROENTE S;
LENNARDJONES JE, 1989, V170, P2, SCAND J GASTROENTE S; LEONARD EJ, 1976,
V102, P434, EXP CELL RES; LEONARD EJ, 1978, V114, P117, EXP CELL RES;
LIBIOULLE C, 2007, V3, ARTN e58, PLOS GENET; LIU QP, 1999, V163, P6606, J
IMMUNOL; MA YH, 1999, V5, P271, INFLAMM BOWEL DIS; MORRISON AC, 2004,
V172, P1825, J IMMUNOL; OGURA Y, 2001, V411, P603, NATURE; OMATA F, 2001,
V7, P215, INFLAMM BOWEL DIS; ORHOLM M, 1991, V324, P84, NEW ENGL J MED;
PAAVOLA P, 2001, V9, P328, EUR J HUM GENET; PARKES M, 2007, V39, P830,
NAT GENET; PODOLSKY DK, 1991, V325, P928, NEW ENGL J MED; PROBERT CSJ,
1993, V34, P1547, GUT; RAELSON JV, 2007, V104, P14747, P NATL ACAD SCI
USA; RIOUX JD, 2000, V66, P1863, AM J HUM GENET; RIOUX JD, 2001, V29,
P223, NAT GENET; RIOUX JD, 2007, V39, P596, NAT GENET; SATSANGI J, 1996,
V14, P199, NAT GENET; SCHREIBER S, 1998, V42, P477, GUT; SMITH PD, 2005,
V206, P149, IMMUNOL REV; SMYTHIES LE, 2005, V115, P66, J CLIN INVEST;
STAMOS J, 2004, V23, P2325, EMBO J; TAKEDA K, 1999, V10, P39, IMMUNITY;
TELLORUIZ MK, 2006, V14, P780, EUR J HUM GENET; VANBODEGRAVEN AA, 2006,
V131, P1768, GASTROENTEROLOGY; WALTZ SE, 2001, V108, P567, J CLIN INVEST;
WANG MH, 1994, V269, P13806, J BIOL CHEM; WANG MH, 1996, V97, P720, J
CLIN INVEST; YOSHIMURA T, 1993, V268, P15461, J BIOL CHEM; ZHOU YQ, 2002,
V277, P38104, J BIOL CHEM|
NR- 59|
TC- 22|
PU- NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP|
PIPASNJ9JIPDPYVLISBPEPDIPGSCGAJNUT-
NEW YORK|
75 VARICK ST, 9TH FLR, NEW YORK, NY 10013-1917 USA|
1933-0219|
MUCOSAL IMMUNOL|
Mucosal Immunol|
MAR|
2008|
1|
2|
131|
138|
10.1038/mi.2007.15|
8|
Immunology|
366HF|
MUCOSAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2008, V1, N2, P131-138|
ISI:000260470600007 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Zhao DZ; Strotmann A|
AF- Zhao Dangzhi; Strotmann, Andreas|
TI- Evolution of Research Activities and Intellectual Influences in
Information Science 1996-2005: Introducing Author Bibliographic-Coupling
Analysis|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- COCITATION ANALYSIS; RESEARCH-FRONT; DOCUMENTS; KNOWLEDGE; NETWORKS;
TIME; WEB|
AB- Author cocitation analysis (ACA) has frequently been applied over the
last two decades for mapping the intellectual structure of a research
field as represented by its authors. However, what is mapped in ACA is
actually the structure of intellectual influences on a research field as
perceived by its active authors. In this exploratory paper, by contrast,
we introduce author bibliographic-coupling analysis (ABCA) as a method to
map the research activities of active authors themselves for a more
realistic picture of the current state of research in a field. We choose
the information science (IS) field and study its intellectual structure
both in terms of current research activities as seen from ABCA and in
terms of intellectual influences on its research as shown from ACA. We
examine how these two aspects of the intellectual structure of the IS
field are related, and how they both developed during the "first decade
of the Web," 1996-2005. We find that these two citation-based authormapping methods complement each other, and that, in combination, they
provide a more comprehensive view of the intellectual structure of the IS
field than either of them can provide on its own|
C1- [Zhao, Dangzhi] Univ Alberta, Sch Lib & Informat Studies, Edmonton,
AB T6G 2J4, Canada; [Strotmann, Andreas] Univ Alberta, Sch Business,
Edmonton, AB T6G 2J4, Canada|
RP- Zhao, DZ, Univ Alberta, Sch Lib & Informat Studies, Edmonton, AB T6G
2J4, Canada|
EM- dzhao@ualberta.ca andreas.strotmann@ualberta.ca|
FU- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC),
Genome Canada ; Genome Prairie FX This study was funded in part by the
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC), Genome
Canada, and Genome Prairie The authors would like to thank Paul Pype for
his assistance with coding some of the programs used in this study. We
are particularly grateful to the anonymous reviewers of this paper for
their insightful comments and helpful suggestions|
CD- ASTROM F, 2007, V58, P947, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BASSECOULARD E,
2007, V70, P859, SCIENTOMETRICS; BORNER K, 2004, V101, P5266, P NATL ACAD
SCI U S1; BOYACK K, 2007, P112, P 11 INT C INT SOC S; CULNAN MJ, 1986,
V32, P156, MANAGE SCI; CULNAN MJ, 1987, V11, P341, MIS QUART; EGGHE L,
2002, V55, P349, SCIENTOMETRICS; GARFIELD E, 1979, CITATION INDEXING IT;
GLANZEL W, 1996, V37, P195, SCIENTOMETRICS; HAIR JF, 1998, MULTIVARIATE
DATA AN; HARTER SP, 1992, V43, P602, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; HENZINGER M,
2004, V101, P5186, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; JANSSENS F, 2006, V42, P1614,
INFORM PROCESS MANAG; JARNEVING B, 2005, V65, P245, SCIENTOMETRICS;
JARNEVING B, 2007, V1, P287, J INFORMETR; KESSLER MM, 1963, V14, P10, AM
DOC; KUUSI O, 2007, V70, P759, SCIENTOMETRICS; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41,
P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SEROTMANN A, 2008, P SIGIR 2008 WORKSH;
SHIFFRIN RM, 2004, V101, P5183, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; SMALL H, 1973, V24,
P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1999, V50, P799, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
SWANSON DR, 1987, V38, P228, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WEINBERG BH, 1974, V10,
P189, INFORM STORAGE RET; WHITE HD, 1990, P84, SCHOLARLY COMMUNICAT;
WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2000, P25, P
IEEE INT C INF VIS; WHITE HD, 2001, V52, P87, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ZHAO
D, 2007, P AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ZHAO DZ, 2006, V42, P1578, INFORM PROCESS
MANAG; ZHAO DZ, 2008, V59, P916, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 31|
TC- 6|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- NOV|
PY- 2008|
VL- 59|
IS- 13|
BP- 2070|
EP- 2086|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20910|
PG- 17|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 366LW|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2008, V59, N13, P2070-2086|
UT- ISI:000260484000005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Osareh F; McCain KW|
AF- Osareh Farideh; McCain, Katherine W|
TI- The Structure of Iranian Chemistry Research, 1990-2006: An Author
Cocitation Analysis|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- CITATION CONTEXT ANALYSIS; OWN-LANGUAGE PREFERENCE; SCIENTIFIC
PUBLICATIONS; INTELLECTUAL SPACE; SELF-CITATION; SCIENCE; PATTERNS;
BIBLIOMETRICS; QUANTITY; QUALITY|
AB- To study the structure of Iranian chemistry research, we identified
43 Iranian and international chemists who were highly cited in 7,682
Iranian chemistry publications (defined as an article with at least one
Iranian author address) indexed in Science Citation Index (SciSearch)
between 1990 and 2006, inclusive. We collected cocitation data for these
authors from the entire SciSearch file (Dialog, File 34) over the time
period. A principal components analysis identified seven interrelated
factors accounting for 78% of the variance in the cocitation matrix.
Iranian and international authors tended to load on separate factors.
Three factors-synthesis of carbonyl compounds, solvent-free synthesis of
organic compounds and oxidation of organic compounds-had an intercorrelation of vertical bar 0.3 vertical bar or higher. Physical organic
chemistry and ionophores (a mixed factor of Iranian and international
authors) connected at a lower value, while crown ethers and analytical
chemistry were essentially uncorrelated The PFNet structure maintained
the topical factor groupings and Iranian and international authors tended
to appear in separate subnetworks Geographic and institutional
influences, apparently relating in part to institutional affiliation and
in part to restricted research topics, appear to underlie the primary
structural features of Iranian chemistry in this time period|
C1- [Osareh, Farideh] Shahid Chamran Univ, Sch Educ & Psychol, Dept Lib &
Informat Sci, Ahwaz, Iran; [McCain, Katherine W.] Drexel Univ, Coll
Informat Sci & Technol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA|
RP- Osareh, F, Shahid Chamran Univ, Sch Educ & Psychol, Dept Lib &
Informat Sci, Ahwaz, Iran|
EM- fosareh@yahoo.com Kate.McCain@ischool.drexel.edu|
FU- Shahid Chamran University, Ahwaz-Iran FX Dr. Osareh was supported by
Shahid Chamran University, Ahwaz-Iran, as a visiting scholar at the
College of Information Science & Technology, Drexel University during the
course of this research. We thank Dr Anthony Addison, Drexel University
and Dr. Firouzabadi, Shiraz University, for discussions that helped us
understand the chemistry behind the citation patterns. Dr. Roger A.
McCain, Drexel University provided the publication growth rate. All
errors of fact and interpretation are, however, ours and not theirs|
CD- BOOKSTEIN A, 1999, V46, P337, SCIENTOMETRICS; HARGENS LL, 1980, V10,
P55, SOC STUD SCI; HARIRCHI G, 2007, V72, P11, SCIENTOMETRICS; KOVAC P,
2004, V1, P606, CHEM BIODIVERS; LENOBLE WJ, PHYS ORGANIC CHEM; MCCAIN KW,
1989, V17, P127, SCIENTOMETRICS; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 2006, V32, P277, J INF SCI; MEHRDAD M, 2004, V61,
P79, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOED HF, 2005, CITATION ANAL RES EV; MOIN M, 2005,
V62, P239, SCIENTOMETRICS; MULLINS NC, 1977, V42, P552, AM SOCIOL REV;
NAGPAUL PS, 1993, V27, P215, SCIENTOMETRICS; OSAREH F, 1997, V39, P253,
SCIENTOMETRICS; OSAREH F, 2000, V48, P427, SCIENTOMETRICS; OSAREH F,
2002, V52, P88, LIBRI; PERRY CA, 1998, V49, P151, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
READER D, 2006, V30, P417, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; ROWLANDS I, 1999, V44,
P533, SCIENTOMETRICS; SCHUMMER J, 1997, V39, P107, SCIENTOMETRICS;
SCHVANEVELDT RW, 1990, PATHFINDER ASS NETWO; SMALL H, 1982, V3, P287,
PROGR COMMUNICATION; SMALL HG, 1977, V7, P139, SOC STUD SCI; WHITE HD,
1982, V38, P255, J DOC; WHITE HD, 1989, V24, P119, ANNU REV INFORM SCI;
WHITE HD, 2001, V51, P607, SCIENTOMETRICS; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P423, J
AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITE HD, 2004, V55, P111, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
WILSON CS, 1999, V34, P107, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; WILSON CS, 2003, V28,
P26, INTERDISCIPL SCI REV; YALPANI M, 2005, V2, P730, CHEM BIODIVERS;
YALPANI M, 2005, V63, P531, SCIENTOMETRICS; YITZHAKI M, 1998, V41, P243,
SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 33|
TC- 1|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- NOV|
PY- 2008|
VL- 59|
IS- 13|
BP- 2146|
EP- 2155|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20923|
PG- 10|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 366LW|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2008, V59, N13, P2146-2155|
UT- ISI:000260484000011 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Astrom F|
AF- Astrom Fredrik|
TI- Formalizing a discipline The institutionalization of library and
information science research in the Nordic countries|
SO- JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Research; Scandinavia; Information science and documentation;
organizational design|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION|
AB- Purpose - The paper's objective is to analyze the social organization
of library and information Science (LIS) using the Nordic countries as
example, focusing on organizational setting, research work and relations
between LIS and academia as well as the field of professional practice
Design/methodology/approach - Based on a framework for analyzing
scientific fields, as well as its application on LIS, aspects relating to
the impact of contextual factors on research was identified and discussed
based on information front, e.g. LIS institution web sites The results
were discussed, not only in relation to the framework primarily utilized,
but also from a less disciplinary view on research organization, for
analytical contrast Findings - A close connection between academic
affiliation and research orientation was found, reflected in
organizational issues, media for communicating research and access to
resources. This relates to general issues of levels of independence front
other disciplines and lay groups, to what extent research is evaluated by
intra-disciplinary standards and to the level of consensus on terminology
and research processes Research limitations/implications - Limiting the
study to institutions in one particular geographical area, where several
institutions being at an early stage of formalization, the possibility of
reaching generalizable conclusions is limited. The strength of the
conclusions is also somewhat restrained Clue to the nature oft he
empirical material, being based on web documents with varying levels of
exhaustability in terms of data provision Originality/vallue - The
intellectual organization of LIS research is well-known, whereas social
and imstitutional aspects have been analyzed to a lesser degree; and with
the differences in age and size of Nordic LIS institutions, they provide
an interesting case of contemporary institutionalization of LIS research|
C1- Lund Univ Lib, Lund, Sweden|
RP- Astrom, F, Lund Univ Lib, Lund, Sweden|
EM- fredrik.astrom@lub.lu.se|
CD- *ROYAL SCH LIB INF, 1999, EV FORSKN DANM BIBL; *U TAMP, 2005, RES EV
U TAMP 2004 P; ASTROM F, 2002, P185, P 4 INT C CONC LIB I; ASTROM F,
2004, P1, AWARE RESPONSIBLE; ASTROM F, 2007, V58, P947, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; BACKLUND J, 2006, E COMMUNICATION 0828; CRONIN B, 1992, V44, P195,
ASLIB PROC; GIBBONS M, 1994, NEW PRODUCTION SCI K; GINMAN M, 2006, P1, E
COMMUNICATION 0801; HARBO O, 1998, P1, ED LIB NORDIC COUNTR; HARBO O,
1998, ED LIBRARIANSHIP NOR; INGWERSEN P, 2000, V56, P1, J DOC; KUHN TS,
1970, STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; PORS NO, 2000, FORSKERUDDANNELSER B; VAKKARI
P, 1993, V24, FORSKNING INOM BIBLI; VAKKARI P, 1996, V21, P25, INT FORUM
INFORM DOC; VAKKARI P, 2006, E COMMUNICATION 0927; WHITE HD, 1981, V32,
P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; WHITLEY R, 2000, INTELLECTUAL SOCIAL|
NR- 20|
TC- 4|
PU- EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED|
PI- BINGLEY|
PA- HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND|
SN- 0022-0418|
J9- J DOC|
JI- J. Doc|
PY- 2008|
VL- 64|
IS- 5|
BP- 721|
EP- 737|
DI- 10.1108/00220410810899736|
PG- 17|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 367OU|
JN- JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2008, V64, N5, P721-737|
UT- ISI:000260562100006 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Pongratz HJ|
AF- Pongratz Hans J|
TI- A Society of Entrepreneurs. The Expansion and Profanation of
"Creative Destruction" in Capitalist Economies|
SO- BERLINER JOURNAL FUR SOZIOLOGIE|
LA- German|
DT- Article|
DE- Entrepreneur; Entrepreneurship; Entreployee; "Creative Destruction";
Organizational Change; Project Work|
ID- PROJECT WORK; COCITATION|
AB- The traditional view of entrepreneurs as persons exhibiting
exceptional initiative and willingness to take risks, who achieve
considerable economic success by being innovative in markets, is
challenged in this paper. A broader definition of the concept will be
introduced: Entrepreneurs are profit-seeking sellers of commodities on
markets According to this conception, a society of entrepreneurs refers
to a society in which potentially every member throughout his or her
life, time and again, faces the need to act as an entrepreneur. The paper
will start by clarifying the concept of entrepreneurship and
distinguishing various forms of its manifestation. The second part
provides an interpretation of change in entrepreneurship based on the
thesis of its expansion and "profanation": Expanding entrepreneurship
within organizations - downward and inward - in form of projects and in
context of permanent organizational change is of crucial significance in
this respect. The "profanation" (and normalization) of entrepreneurial
action becomes manifest in the context of project structures where
employees at all levels are expected to bring forth innovative resource
combinations. The process of "creative destruction" (Schumpeter) is
inwardly directed, thus challenging the prevailing understanding of
organizations. Finally, the cultural conditions underlying such a
development of entrepreneurship are discussed Resulting behavior
uncertainties and coordination problems raise the question of how
project-type entrepreneurship might be integrated into existing
organization structures|
C1- Univ Munich, Inst Soziol, Vertretung Lehrstuhls Soziol 3, D-80801
Munich, Germany|
RP- Pongratz, HJ, Univ Munich, Inst Soziol, Vertretung Lehrstuhls Soziol
3, Konradstr 6, D-80801 Munich, Germany|
EM- hans.pongratz@lmu.de|
CD- ACHTENHAGEN L, 2006, P104, FRONTIERS ENTREPRENE; ACS ZJ, 2003, HDB
ENTREPRENEURSHIP; ALVESSON M, 1996, MAKING SENSE MANAGEM; ALVESSON M,
2003, STUDYING MANAGEMENT; ARMENAKIS AA, 1999, V25, P293, J MANAGE;
AUSTIN J, 2006, V30, P1, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; BAETHGE M, 1991, V42, P6,
SOZ WELT; BERGER B, 1991, CULTURE ENTREPRENEUR; BOLLINGER H, 2001, V54,
P685, WSI MITTEILUNGEN; BROCKLING U, 2007, UNTERNEHMERISCHE SEL; BUDE H,
1997, V51, P866, MERKUR-DEUT Z EUR D; BUHRMANN AD, 2006, V6, FORUM
QUALITATIVE SO; BUHRMANN AD, 2006, UNTERNEHMERINNENBILD; BURNHAM J, 1941,
MANAGERIAL REVOLUTIO; CALDWELL R, 2005, V58, P82, HUM RELAT; COLLINS D,
1998, ORG CHANGE SOCIOLOGI; CORNELIUS B, 2006, V30, P375, ENTREP THEORY
PRACT; DAMANPOUR F, 1991, V34, P555, ACAD MANAGE J; FAUST M, 2000,
BEFREIT ENTWURZELT F; FRANK RH, 1995, WINNER TAKE ALL SOC; GREGOIRE DA,
2006, V30, P333, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; GREY C, 2005, CRITICAL MANAGEMENT;
HODGSON DE, 2004, V11, P81, ORGANIZATION; HODGSON DE, 2006, MAKING
PROJECTS CRIT; JAEGER H, 1990, P707, GESCHICHTLICHE GRUND; KANTER RM,
1989, GIANTS LEARN DANCE; KANTER RM, 1992, CHALLENGE ORG CHANGE; KOCKA J,
1975, UNTERNEHMER DTSCH IN; LATNIAK E, 2006, 200604 IAT; LEADBEATER C,
1997, RISE SOCIAL ENTREPRE; MAIR J, 2006, SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS;
MARTINELLI A, 1994, P476, HDB EC SOCIOLOGY; MAYERAHUJA N, 2005,
ENTFESSELTE ARBEIT N; METZLER H, 2007, ZWISCHENBERICHT WISS; MINSSEN H,
2000, BEGRENZTE ENTGRENZUN; MOLDASCHL M, 2002, SUBJEKTIVIERUNG ARBE;
OESTERDIEKHOFF GW, 1993, UNTERNEHMERISCHES HA; PINCHOT G, 1985,
INTRAPRENCURING WHY; PONGRATZ H, 2003, ARBEITSKRAFTUNTERNEH; PONGRATZ H,
2004, TYPISCH ARBEITSKRAFT; PROJEKTGRUPPE AL, 1995, A LEBENSFUHRUNG ARRA;
READER D, 2006, V30, P417, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; REDLICH F, 1957, P486,
HANDWORTERBUCH SOZIA; REED MI, 1989, SOCIOLOGY MANAGEMENT; ROSE N, 1992,
VALUES ENTERPRISE CU; SAUER D, 2005, ARBEIT UBERGANG ZEIT; SCHELSKY H,
1965, P17, SUCHE NACH WIRKLICHK; SCHUMPETER JA, 1912, THEORIE
WIRTSCHAFTLI; SCHUMPETER JA, 1929, P476, HANDWORTERBUCH STAAT; SCHUMPETER
JA, 1950, KAPITALISMUS SOZIALI; SHANE SA, 2000, V26, P217, ACAD MANAGE
REV; STABER U, 2004, V13, P30, CREATIVITY INNOVATIO; STERNBERG R, 2007,
GLOBAL ENTREPRENEURS; STRAUSS A, 1988, V29, P163, SOCIOL QUART; SWEDBERG
R, 1994, P255, HDB EC SOCIOLOGY; SWEDBERG R, 2000, ENTREPRENEURSHIP SOC;
SWEDBERG R, 2000, P7, ENTREPRENEURSHIP SOC; THORNTON PH, 1999, V25, P19,
ANNU REV SOCIOL; VOSS GG, 1998, V50, P131, KOLNER Z SOZIOL SOZ; WEICK KE,
1985, PROZESS ORG; WINDOLF P, 2005, FINANZMARKT KAPITALI; YEATTS DE,
1997, HIGH PERFORMING SELF|
NR- 62|
TC- 1|
PU- LESKE VERLAG BUDRICH GMBH|
PI- LEVERKUSEN 3|
PA- POSTFACH 300 551, D-51334 LEVERKUSEN 3, GERMANY|
SN- 0863-1808|
J9- BERL J SOZIOL|
JI- Berliner J. Soz|
PD- SEP|
PY- 2008|
VL- 18|
IS- 3|
BP- 457|
EP- 475|
DI- 10.1007/s11609-008-0030-7|
PG- 19|
SC- Sociology|
GA- 367EG|
JN- BERLINER JOURNAL FUR SOZIOLOGIE, 2008, V18, N3, P457-475|
UT- ISI:000260534700006 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Raghupathi W; Nerur S|
AF- Raghupathi W; Nerur, S|
TI- Research Themes and Trends in Health Information Systems|
SO- METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Author co-citation analysis (ACA); bibliometrics; field; health
information system (HIS); sub-field|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; INTELLECTUAL
STRUCTURE; SCIENCE; BIOINFORMATICS; DISCIPLINE; CORE; JOURNALS; DATABASE;
SERIALS|
AB- Objectives: The health information systems (HIS) field is
characterized as being associated with health care and information
systems. Drawing on several disciplines, a body of knowledge has come
together that help define the core internal structure of the field. This
study attempts to identify the emerging sub-fields using the bibliometric
technique of author-cocitation analysis Methods. Co-citation data for
members of editorial boards of several health information systems
journals for the period of 1998-2006 was collected and analyzed (N =
166). We performed numerous multivariate analyses, including cluster
analysis, factor analysis and multidimensional scaling to extract the
sub-fields Results. Our findings indicate the presence of several strong
sub-fields, including HIS evaluation, communication and e-health, and
clinical DSS. In addition, we identified other sub-fields that are
distinct but still emerging, such as adoption, outcome and policy, and
use and impact of HIS. The study also confirms the existence of several
historical sub-fields and contrasts technology-oriented sub-fields with
management-oriented sub-fields. Topics on the periphery of HIS provide
links to other disciplines as well Conclusions. The study provides a
unique perspective on the field of HIS, and the results indicate
opportunities for further research that explores collaborations and
social networks among the sub-fields|
C1- [Raghupathi, W.] Fordham Univ, New York, NY 10023 USA; [Nerur, S.]
Univ Texas Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019 USA|
RP- Raghupathi, W, Fordham Univ, 113 W 60th Sreet, New York, NY 10023
USA|
EM- raghupathi@fordham.edu|
CD- ALDENDERFER MS, 1984, CLUSTER ANAL; ANDREWS JE, 2003, V91, P47, J MED
LIBR ASSOC; BAYER AE, 1990, V41, P444, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BORNER K,
2003, V37, P179, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; CRANE D, 1972, INVISIBLE COLL
DIFFU; EGGERS S, 2005, P35, MED INFORM ADV KNOWL; GORSUCH RL, 1983,
FACTOR ANAL; GREENES RA, 1987, P411, 11 ANN S COMP APPL M; HAUX R, 1997,
V44, P9, INT J MED INFORM; HAUX R, 2006, V75, P268, INT J MED INFORM;
HAUX R, 2006, V45, P651, METHOD INFORM MED; KRUSKAL JB, 1978,
MULTIDISCIPLINARY SC; KUHN KA, 2006, P43, IMIA YB MED INFORMAT; KUHN KA,
2007, V46, P450, METHOD INFORM MED; MALIN B, 2007, V14, P340, J AM MED
INFORM ASSN; MANTAS J, 2007, V46, P50, METHOD INFORM MED; MAOJO V, 2003,
V10, P515, J AM MED INFORM ASSN; MAOJO V, 2006, V45, P474, METHOD INFORM
MED; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1991,
V61, P311, LIBR QUART; MCCAIN KW, 1995, V46, P306, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
MORRIS TA, 1998, V5, P448, J AM MED INFORM ASSN; MUSEN MA, 2002, V41, P1,
METHOD INFORM MED; MUSEN MA, 2002, V41, P12, METHOD INFORM MED;
RAGHUPATHI W, 1999, V10, P18, INTELLIGENCE; SCHIFFMAN SS, 1981, INTRO
MULTIDIMENSION; SITTIG DF, 1995, V8, P1452, MEDINFO; SITTIG DF, 1996,
V84, P200, B MED LIBR ASSOC; TALMON JL, 2002, V41, P4, METHOD INFORM MED;
VISHWANATHAM R, 1998, V86, P518, B MED LIBR ASSOC; WHITE HD, 1981, V32,
P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1982, V38, P255, J DOC; WHITE HD,
1990, P84, SCHOLARLY COMMUNICAT; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI|
NR- 34|
TC- 2|
PU- SCHATTAUER GMBH-VERLAG MEDIZIN NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN|
PI- STUTTGART|
PA- HOLDERLINSTRASSE 3, D-70174 STUTTGART, GERMANY|
SN- 0026-1270|
J9- METHODS INFORM MED|
JI- Methods Inf. Med|
PY- 2008|
VL- 47|
IS- 5|
BP- 435|
EP- 442|
DI- 10.3414/ME0516|
PG- 8|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Health Care Sciences &
Services; Medical Informatics|
GA- 365ND|
JN- METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2008, V47, N5, P435-442|
UT- ISI:000260412600007 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Lee B; Jeong YI|
AF- Lee Bangrae; Jeong, Yong-Il|
TI- Mapping Korea's national R&D domain of robot technology by using the
co-word analysis|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- NETWORK; COCITATION|
AB- In this paper, we show a "Strategic Diagram" of the robot technology
by applying the co-word analysis to the metadata of Korean related
national R&D projects in 2001. The strategic diagram shows the
evolutionary trends of the specific R&D domain and relational patterns
between sub-domains. We may use this strategic diagram to support both
the strategic planning and the R&D Program|
C1- [Lee, Bangrae; Jeong, Yong-Il] Korea Inst Sci & Technol Informat,
Seoul 130741, South Korea|
RP- Lee, B, Korea Inst Sci & Technol Informat, 206-9 Cheongnyangni Dong,
Seoul 130741, South Korea|
EM- brlee@kisti.re.kr|
CD- *CYR CO LTD, NETMINER USER MANUAL; *ITEP, 2001, TECHN ROADM ROB;
AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BARRE R, 2004, P115,
HDB QUANTITATIVE SCI; BAUIN S, 1991, V22, P113, SCIENTOMETRICS; CALLON M,
1986, MAPPING DYNAMICS SCI; CALLON M, 1991, V22, P155, SCIENTOMETRICS;
COURTIAL JP, 1993, V26, P231, SCIENTOMETRICS; CUI X, 2006, V15, P505, J
SYSTEMS ARCHITECTU; DING Y, 2001, V37, P817, INFORM PROCESS MANAG;
FUJIGAKI Y, 1998, V26, P387, SCI PUBL POLICY; FUJIGAKI Y, 2002, V54, P63,
SCIENTOMETRICS; HE Q, 1999, V48, P133, LIBR TRENDS; KOSTOFF RN, 2005,
V72, P798, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC; KOSTOFF RN, 2007, V33, P21, J INF SCI;
KUMARESAN N, 1999, V28, P563, RES POLICY; LEYDESDORFF L, 1988, V87, P105,
INFORMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 1992, V25, P295, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF
L, 2004, V60, P159, SCIENTOMETRICS; MARK H, 2005, P311, MODELS METHODS
SOCIA; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; NOYONS ECM, 1998,
V49, P68, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; ROONEY N, 2006, V42, P1163, INFORM PROCESS
MANAG; WASSERMAN S, 1999, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163,
J AM SOC INFORM SCI|
NR- 25|
TC- 1|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- OCT|
PY- 2008|
VL- 77|
IS- 1|
BP- 3|
EP- 19|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-007-1819-4|
PG- 17|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 359QS|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, V77, N1, P3-19|
UT- ISI:000260003800001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- van Campenhout G; van Caneghem T; van Uytbergen S|
AF- van Campenhout Geert; van Caneghem, Tom; van Uytbergen, Steve|
TI- A comparison of overall and sub-area journal influence: The case of
the accounting literature|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- AUTHOR SELF-CITATIONS; COCITATION ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS JOURNALS;
IMPACT FACTOR; SCIENCE; QUALITY; NETWORK; INDEX; PERCEPTIONS; FINANCE|
AB- In most scientific disciplines, a number of divergent and often
highly specialized research areas are examined, which is reflected in
substantial differences among journal scopes. Using the accounting
literature as an example, we argue that this diversity in scopes should
be considered when assessing journal influence. Concretely, we examine a
citation-based structural influence measure for a sample of 41 accounting
journals. Next, we identify sub-areas in the accounting literature and we
explore journal influence in these sub-areas. Our results clearly
demonstrate the importance of distinguishing between overall and sub-area
influence. In addition, we show that sub-areas should be identified using
a fuzzy clustering procedure|
C1- [van Caneghem, Tom] European Univ Coll Brussels EHSAL, B-1000
Brussels, Belgium; [van Campenhout, Geert] Catholic Univ, Brussels,
Belgium; [van Uytbergen, Steve] Lesshis Hogeschool, Antwerp, Belgium|
RP- van Caneghem, T, European Univ Coll Brussels EHSAL, Stormstr 2, B1000 Brussels, Belgium|
EM- tom.vancaneghem@ehsal.be|
CD- AXARLOGLOU K, 2003, DIVERSITY EC ANAL J; AZAR OH, 2006, J
SOCIOECONOMICS; BALLAS A, 2003, V20, P619, CONTEMP ACCOUNT RES; BARRETT
CB, 2000, V32, P239, APPL ECON; BAUMGARTNER H, 2003, V67, P123, J
MARKETING; BAVELAS JB, 1978, V19, P158, CAN PSYCHOL REV; BEATTIE VA,
1989, V21, P267, BR ACCOUNT REV; BEED C, 1996, V18, P369, J POST
KEYNESIAN EC; BENJAMIN JJ, 1974, V49, P360, ACCOUNT REV; BONNER SE, 2006,
V31, P663, ACCOUNT ORG SOC; BORDONS M, 2002, V53, P195, SCIENTOMETRICS;
BOROKHOVICH KA, 1995, V50, P1691, J FINANC; BRICKER R, 1989, V27, P246, J
ACCOUNT RES; BRICKER RJ, 2003, V14, P417, CRIT PERSPECT; BROWN LD, 1985,
V60, P262, ACCOUNT REV; BROWN LD, 1985, V23, P84, J ACCOUNTING RES; BROWN
LD, 1994, V11, P223, CONTEMP ACCOUNT RES; CHUNG KH, 2001, V30, P99,
FINANC MANAGE; CLOGG CC, 1994, STAT MODELS ORDINAL; COUPE T, 2004, V57,
P197, KYKLOS; GARFIELD E, 1955, V122, P108, SCIENCE; GLANZEL W, 2004,
V59, P63, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W, 2006, V67, P263, SCIENTOMETRICS;
GOODMAN LA, 1991, V86, P1085, J AM STAT ASSOC; GRAY R, 2002, V26, P1,
ACCOUNTING FORUM; HALKIDI M, 2001, P ICDM C CAL US; HALKIDI M, 2002, V31,
SIGMOD RECORD; HARZING AW, 2000, J QUALITY LIST; HERRON T, 2005, V22,
P175, J ACCOUNTING ED; HICKS D, 1999, V44, P193, SCIENTOMETRICS; HULL RP,
1990, V4, P77, ACCOUNT HORIZ; JOHNSON JL, 1994, V37, P1392, ACAD MANAGE
J; JONES MJ, 1996, V24, P607, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S; KIM DW, 2005, V88,
P594, IEICE T INF SYST ED; KOVACS F, 2005, CLUSTER VALIDITY MEA; KURMIS
AP, 2003, V85, P2449, J BONE JOINT SURG A; LABAND DN, 1994, V32, P640, J
ECON LIT; LIU MX, 1993, V49, P370, J DOC; LOCKE J, 2002, V26, P45,
ACCOUNTING FORUM; LOWE A, 2005, V30, P81, ACCOUNT ORG SOC; MACROBERTS MH,
1989, V40, P342, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCRAE TW, 1974, V12, P80, J ACCOUNT
RES; MEDOFF MH, 2006, V69, P69, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOED HF, 1999, V46, P575,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MOORE WJ, 2001, V39, P663, ECON INQ; MORAVCSIK MJ, 1975,
V5, P86, SOC STUD SCI; MORRIS JL, 1990, V3, P46, ACCOUNTING ED J;
NEDERHOF AJ, 1985, V7, P23, SCIENTOMETRICS; NEDERHOF AJ, 1993, V22, P353,
RES POLICY; NEDERHOF AJ, 2006, V66, P81, SCIENTOMETRICS; OSAREH F, 1996,
V46, P149, LIBRI; PARKER L, 1998, V11, P371, ACCOUNTING AUDITING; PIETERS
R, 1999, V16, P113, INT J RES MARK; PIETERS R, 2002, V40, P483, J ECON
LIT; REINSTEIN A, 1997, V15, P425, J ACCOUNTING ED; REINSTEIN A, 2006,
V17, P457, CRIT PERSPECT; SALANCIK GR, 1986, V31, P194, ADMIN SCI QUART;
SCHILDT HA, 2006, V67, P143, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1985, V7, P391,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1985, V8, P321, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMITH G, 1984,
V4, P108, AUDITING-J PRACT TH; SMITH G, 1988, V8, P108, AUDITING-J PRACT
TH; SMITH G, 1991, V10, P84, AUDITING-J PRACT TH; SWANSON EP, 2004, V21,
P223, CONTEMP ACCOUNT RES; TAHAI A, 1998, V34, P341, INFORM PROCESS
MANAG; TSAY MY, 2003, V57, P7, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANLEEUWEN T, 2006, V66,
P133, SCIENTOMETRICS; VASTAG G, 2002, V18, P109, OMEGA; VERMUNT JK, 1997,
LEM GEN PROGRAM ANAL|
NR- 69|
TC- 1|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- OCT|
PY- 2008|
VL- 77|
IS- 1|
BP- 61|
EP- 90|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-007-1907-5|
PG- 30|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 359QS|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, V77, N1, P61-90|
UT- ISI:000260003800004 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Quirin A; Cordon O; Guerrero-Bote VP; Vargas-Quesada B; Moya-Anegon
F|
AF- Quirin Arnaud; Cordon, Oscar; Guerrero-Bote, Vicente P; VargasQuesada, Benjamin; Moya-Anegon, Felix|
TI- A quick MST-based algorithm to obtain Pathfinder networks (infinity,
n-1)|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- SCIENCE; COCITATION; MAPS|
AB- Network scaling algorithms such as the Pathfinder algorithm are used
to prune many different kinds of networks, including citation networks,
random networks, and social networks. However, this algorithm suffers
from run time problems for large networks and online processing due to
its O(n(4)) time complexity. In this article, we introduce a new
alternative, the MST-Pathfinder algorithm, which will allow us to prune
the original network to get its PFNET(infinity, n - 1) in just O(n(2).log
n) time. The underlying idea comes from the fact that the union
(superposition) of all the Minimum Spanning Trees extracted from a given
network is equivalent to the PFNET resulting from the Pathfinder
algorithm parameterized by a specific set of values (r = infinity and q =
n - 1), those usually considered in many different applications. Although
this property is well-known in the literature, it seems that no algorithm
based on it has been proposed, up to now, to decrease the high
computational cost of the original Pathfinder algorithm. We also present
a mathematical proof of the correctness of this new alternative and test
its good efficiency in two different case studies: one dedicated to the
post-processing of large random graphs, and the other one to a real world
case in which medium networks obtained by a cocitation analysis of the
scientific domains in different countries are pruned|
C1- [Quirin, Arnaud; Cordon, Oscar] European Ctr Soft Comp, Mieres,
Spain; [Guerrero-Bote, Vicente P.] Univ Extremadura, Dept Informat &
Commun, Badajoz, Spain; [Vargas-Quesada, Benjamin; Moya-Anegon, Felix]
Univ Granada, SClmago Grp, Commun & Informat Sci Fac, Granada, Spain|
RP- Quirin, A, European Ctr Soft Comp, Edf Cientif Tecnol, Mieres, Spain|
EM- arnaud.quirin@softcomputing.es oscar.cordon@softcomputing.es
guerrero@unex.es benjamin@ugr.es felix@ugr.es|
FU- Plan Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica ; Desarrollo a Innovacion
Tecnologica ; Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) [SEJ-200408358-C02-01, SEJ2004-08358-C02-02]|
FX- This work was funded by the Plan Nacional de Investigacion
Cientifica, Desarrollo a Innovacion Tecnologica 2004-2007 and the Fondo
Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) as part of research projects SEJ2004-08358-C02-01 and SEJ2004-08358-C02-02. We would like to thank the
anonymous reviewers for their interesting comments and suggestions, which
has allowed us to improve the quality of the contribution|
CD- BELLMAN R, 1965, DYNAMIC PROGR MOD CO; BORNER K, 2007, V41, P537,
ANNU REV INFORM SCI; BREIGER RL, 2004, P505, HDB DATA ANAL; BUZYDLOWSKI
J, 2002, THESIS DREXEL U; CHEN C, 2003, P67, P IEEE S INF VIS INF; CHEN
C, 2004, INFORM VISUALIZATION; CHEN CM, 1998, V10, P107, INTERACT COMPUT;
CHEN CM, 1998, V9, P267, J VISUAL LANG COMPUT; CHEN CM, 2001, V31, P518,
IEEE T SYST MAN CY C; CORMEN TH, 2001, INTRO ALGORITHMS; DEARHOLT DW,
1990, P1, PATHFINDER ASS NETWO; DEMOYAANEGON F, 2005, V41, P1520, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG; DEMOYAANEGON F, 2007, V58, P2167, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
DREYFUS S, 1965, DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; FLOYD RW, 1962, V5, P345, COMMUN
ACM; GANSNER ER, 2000, V30, P1203, SOFTWARE PRACT EXPER; GUERREROBOTE VP,
2006, V42, P1484, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; KAMADA T, 1989, V31, P7, INFORM
PROCESS LETT; KRAVITZ D, 2007, V49, P7, B ICA; KRUSKAL JB, 1956, V7, P48,
P AM MATH SOC; KUDIKYALA UK, 2005, V74, P101, J SYST SOFTWARE; MARTINO F,
2006, V4, P53, PSYCHNOLOGY; MOYAANEGON F, 2004, V61, P129,
SCIENTOMETRICS; PRIM RC, 1957, V36, P1389, BELL SYST TECH J; QUIRIN A,
2008, V44, P1397, INFORM PROCESSING MA; SALTON G, 1979, V22, P146, IEEE T
PROF COMMUN; SCHVANEVELDT RW, 1990, PATHFINDER ASS NETWO; SHOPE S, 2004,
P678, P HUM FACT ERG SOC 4; SMALL H, 1985, V11, P147, J INFORM SCI;
VARGAQUESADA B, 2007, VISUALIZING SCI STRU; WARSHALL S, 1962, V9, P11, J
ASSOC COMPUT MACH|
NR- 31|
TC- 3|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- OCT|
PY- 2008|
VL- 59|
IS- 12|
BP- 1912|
EP- 1924|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20904|
PG- 13|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 351WB|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2008, V59, N12, P1912-1924|
UT- ISI:000259455500004 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Lee WH|
AF- Lee Woo Hyoung|
TI- How to identify emerging research fields using scientometrics: An
example in the field of Information Security|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- WORD; PERFORMANCE; COCITATION; NETWORKS; AREA|
AB- In the highly competitive world, there has been a concomitant
increase in the need for the research and planning methodology, which can
perform an advanced assessment of technological opportunities and an
early perception of threats and possibilities of the emerging technology
according to the nation's economic and social status This research is
aiming to provide indicators and visualization methods to measure the
latest research trend and aspect underlying scientific and technological
documents to researchers and policy planners using "co-word analysis".
Information Security field is a highly prospective market value. In this
paper, we presented an analysis Information Security Co-word analysis was
employed to reveal patterns and trends in the Information Security fields
by measuring the association strength of terms representatives of
relevant publications or other texts produced in the Information Security
field. Data were collected from SCI and the critical keywords could be
extracted from the author keywords. These extracted keywords were further
standardized. In order to trace the dynamic changes in the Information
Security field, we presented a variety of technology mapping. The results
showed that the Information Security field has some established research
theme and also rapidly transforms to embrace new themes|
C1- Inst Informat Technol Adv, Taejon, South Korea|
RP- Lee, WH, Inst Informat Technol Adv, 58-4 Hwaam Dong, Taejon, South
Korea|
EM- leewh@iita.re.kr|
CD- ALBERT R, 2002, V74, P47, REV MOD PHYS; BHATTACHARYA S, 1998, V43,
P359, SCIENTOMETRICS; CALLON M, 1986, MAPPING DYNAMICS SCI; CHEN C, 2004,
SEARCHING INTELLECTU; DING Y, 2000, V47, P55, SCIENTOMETRICS; DING Y,
2001, V37, P817, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; FREEMAN LC, 1979, V1, P215, SOC
NETWORKS; GALVEZ C, 2007, V70, P3, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLADWELL M, 2000,
TIPPING POINT; HE Q, 1999, V48, P131, LIB TRENDS; LAW J, 1992, V23, P417,
SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2007, V71, P391, SCIENTOMETRICS; LIN CT,
2007, V70, P67, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOON YH, 2004, 1 WORKSH RES PLANN A;
MORRIS SA, 2005, V56, P1250, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; NOYONS ECM, 1998, V41,
P61, SCIENTOMETRICS; OH SJ, 2004, RECONSTRUCTION DEV D; PETERS HPF, 1993,
V22, P23, RES POLICY; TIJSSEN RJW, 2007, V71, P303, SCIENTOMETRICS; YOON
MS, 2004, METHODOLOGY S T KNOW|
NR- 20|
TC- 1|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- SEP|
PY- 2008|
VL- 76|
IS- 3|
BP- 503|
EP- 525|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-007-1898-2|
PG- 23|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 350SV|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, V76, N3, P503-525|
UT- ISI:000259374300006 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Miguel S; Moya-Anegon F; Herrero-Solana V|
AF- Miguel Sandra; Moya-Anegon, Felix; Herrero-Solana, Victor|
TI- Co-citation analysis as research method in Library Information
Science|
SO- INVESTIGACION BIBLIOTECOLOGIA|
LA- Spanish|
DT- Article|
DE- co-citation analysis; science maps; research methods; Library and
Information Science|
ID- DECISION-SUPPORT SYSTEMS; AUTHOR COCITATION; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE;
SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION; REPRESENTATION; BIBLIOMETRICS; LITERATURES;
RETRIEVAL; KNOWLEDGE; DOMAINS|
AB- The pertinence and Utility of co-citation analysis as a research
method in Library and Information Science (LIS) are shown by means of
bibliometric nd content analysis of the main works published on this
topic. The size and evolution of the literature are analysed, as well as
the documentary typology and the subject of the journals where the main
contributions are published. The most frequently used methods and
techniques for the analysis and visualization of the knowledge structures
of scientific domains are described, and the proposed models of maps are
presented. Some of the applications and possible uses of the results of
these analyses are shown, as well as their advantages and limitations|
C1- [Miguel, Sandra] Univ Nacl Plata, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina; [MoyaAnegon, Felix; Herrero-Solana, Victor] Univ Granada, E-18071 Granada,
Spain|
RP- Miguel, S, Univ Nacl Plata, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina|
EM- sandra@fcnym.unlp.edu.ar telix@ugr.es victorhs@urg.es|
CD- ANDREWS JE, 2003, V91, P47, J MED LIBR ASSOC; BAYER AE, 1990, V41,
P444, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BORGMAN CL, 2002, V36, P3, ANNU REV INFORM
SCI; BORNER K, 2003, V37, P179, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; CHEN CM, 2002, V39,
P25, P ASIST ANNU; CULNAN MJ, 1990, V41, P453, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; DING
Y, 1999, V25, P67, J INFORM SCI; EBIHARA K, 1993, P95, LIB INFORM SCI;
EOM SB, 1996, V16, P315, DECIS SUPPORT SYST; EOM SB, 1996, V47, P941, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; FABAPEREZ C, 2004, V54, P43, LIBRI; GARFIELD E, 1955,
V122, P108, SCIENCE; GMUR M, 2003, V57, P27, SCIENTOMETRICS; GUERREROBOTE
VP, 2002, V52, P99, LIBRI; HE X, 2002, P19, IEEE INT C DAT MIN;
HERREROSOLANA V, 2001, V8, P4, NEXOS; HJORLAND B, 1995, V46, P400, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; INGWERSEN P, 1999, V34, P3, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; KARKI R,
1996, V22, P323, J INFORM SCI; KESSLER MM, 1963, V14, P10, AM DOC;
KREUZMAN H, 2001, V51, P525, SCIENTOMETRICS; MARSHAKOVA IV, 1973, V2, P3,
NAUCHNO TEKHNICHESKA; MCCAIN KW, 1984, V35, P351, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
MCCAIN KW, 1986, V37, P111, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1991, V42,
P290, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1995, V32, P153, SCIENTOMETRICS;
MCNICOL S, 2003, V35, P23, J LIBR INF SCI; MIGUEL S, 2005,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MOYAANEGON F, 1998, V42, P229, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOYAANEGON
F, 2001, P10, INFORM CULTURA SOC; MOYAANEGON F, 2004, V61, P129,
SCIENTOMETRICS; PAISLEY W, 1990, V41, P459, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PERSSON
O, 1994, V45, P31, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PRICE DJD, 1965, V149, P510,
NETWORKS SCIENTIFIC; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL
H, 1980, V2, P277, SCIENTOMETRICS; SPINAK E, 1996, DICCIONARIO ENCICLOP;
SPINAK E, 2001, V9, P16, REV CUBANA PROFES S4; THO QT, 2003, P290, ASIAN
DIGITAL LIB; TSAY MY, 2003, V58, P529, SCIENTOMETRICS; WHITE HD, 1981,
V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1989, V24, P119, ANNU REV
INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1997, V32, P99, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; WHITE HD,
2004, V101, P5297, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; WILSON CS, 1999, V34, P107, ANNU
REV INFORM SCI|
NR- 45|
TC- 0|
PU- UNIV NACIONAL AUTONOMA MEXICO|
PI- MEXICO CITY|
PA- CIUDAD UNIV, CENTRO UNIV BIBLIOTECOLOGICAS, TORRE II HUMANIDADES,
PISO 11, 12 & 13, MEXICO CITY, CP 04510, MEXICO|
SN- 0187-358X|
J9- INVESTIG BIBLIOTECOL|
JI- Investig. Bibliotecol|
PD- JUL-DEC|
PY- 2007|
VL- 21|
IS- 43|
BP- 139|
EP- 155|
PG- 17|
SC- Information Science & Library Science|
GA- 343UM|
JN- INVESTIGACION BIBLIOTECOLOGIA, 2007, V21, N43, P139-155|
UT- ISI:000258880700006 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Wang WM; Cheung CF; Lee WB; Kwok SK|
AF- Wang W. M; Cheung, C. F; Lee, W. B; Kwok, S. K|
TI- Mining knowledge from natural language texts using fuzzy associated
concept mapping|
SO- INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- concept mapping; natural language processing; knowledge mining;
information retrieval; fuzzy set theory; knowledge management|
ID- WORD ANALYSIS; COCITATION; SCIENCE|
AB- Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques have been successfully
used to automatically extract information from unstructured text through
a detailed analysis of their content, often to satisfy particular
information needs. in this paper, an automatic concept map construction
technique, Fuzzy Association Concept Mapping (FACM), is proposed for the
conversion of abstracted short texts into concept maps. The approach
consists of a linguistic module and a recommendation module. The
linguistic module is a text mining method that does not require the use
to have any prior knowledge about using NLP techniques It incorporates
rule-based reasoning (RBR) and case based reasoning (CBR) for anaphoric
resolution. It aims at extracting the propositions in text so as to
construct a concept map automatically. The recommendation module is
arrived at by adopting fuzzy set theories. It is an interactive process
which provides Suggestions of propositions for further human refinement
of the automatically generated concept maps. The suggested propositions
are relationships among the concepts which are not explicitly found in
the paragraphs. This technique helps to stimulate individual reflection
and generate new knowledge Evaluation was carried out by using the
Science Citation Index (SCI) abstract database and CNET News as test
data, which are well known databases and the quality of the text is
assured. Experimental results show that the automatically generated
concept maps conform to the outputs generated manually by domain experts,
since the degree of difference between them is proportionally small. The
method provides users with the ability to convert scientific and short
texts into a structured format which can be easily processed by computer.
Moreover, it provides knowledge workers with extra time to rethink their
written text and to view their knowledge from another angle. (c) 2008
Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved|
C1- [Wang, W. M.; Cheung, C. F.; Lee, W. B.; Kwok, S. K.] Hong Kong
Polytech Univ, Knowledge Management Res Ctr, Dept Ind & Syst Engn,
Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China|
RP- Cheung, CF, Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Knowledge Management Res Ctr,
Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China|
EM- 02902421r@polyu.edu.hk mfbenny@inet.polyu.edu.hk
mfwblee@inet.polyu.edu.hk mfskkwok@inet.polyu.edu.hk|
CD- AAMODT A, 1994, V7, P39, AI COMMUN; ABITEBOUL S, 1997, P1, P 6 INT C
DAT THEOR; ALVES A, 2002, P INT S ART INT; AUSUBEL DP, 1963, PSYCHOL
MEANINGFUL V; AUSUBEL DP, 1968, ED PSYCHOL COGNITIVE; AUSUBEL DP, 1978,
ED PSYCHOL COGNITIVE; BALDWIN B, 1997, P38, OPERATIONAL FACTORS; BRAAM
RR, 1991, V42, P252, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; CALLON M, 1991, V22, P155,
SCIENTOMETRICS; CHEUNG CF, 2005, V9, P76, J KNOWLEDGE MANAGEME; CLARIANA
R, 2004, V1, P125, METHODOLOGY TECHNOLO; CUNNINGHAM H, 2002, P 40 ANN M
ASS COMP; CUTTING D, 1992, ACM SIGIR INT C RES; ELSEN MB, 1998, V95,
P14863, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; FELDMAN R, 1998, P 2 INT C PRACT ASP;
FELLBAUM C, 1998, WORDNET ELECT LEXICA; GOULI E, 2004, P 1 INT C CONC
MAPP; HIROTA K, 1998, V2, P1350, FUZZ SYST P IEEE WOR; HIROTA K, 1998,
V4, P1350, FUZZ SYST P IEEE WOR; HULTH A, 2003, P216, 2003 C EMP METH
NAT; KARYPIS G, 1999, V32, P68, IEEE COMPUT; KENNEDY C, 1996, P113, P 16
INT C COMP LING; KOLODNER JL, 1993, CASE BASED REASONING; LAPPIN S, 1994,
V20, P535, COMPUTATIONAL LINGUI; MITKOV R, 1998, P867, P 18 INT C COMP
LING; NA SH, 2007, V43, P297, INFORM PROCESSING MA; NOVAK JD, 1984,
LEARNING LEARN; NOVAK JD, 1991, V28, P117, AM EDUC RES J; NOVAK JD, 2006,
200601 IHMC FLOR I H; OKEBUKOLA PA, 1992, V12, P113, EDUC PSYCHOL; PAIK
W, 2001, US, 6263335; PRICE L, 2005, V56, P883, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
RAJARAMAN K, 2002, P669, 11 INT C INF KNOWL M; SALTON G, 1988, V24, P513,
INFORMATION PROCESSI; SANJUAN E, 2006, V42, P1532, INFORM PROCESS MANAG;
SANTORINI B, 1990, MSCIS9047 U PENNS DE; VANBOXTEL C, 1997, V8, P341, J
INTERACTIVE LEARNI; WILLERMAN M, 1991, V28, P705, J RES SCI TEACH; ZITT
M, 1994, V30, P333, SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 39|
TC- 1|
PU- PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD|
PI- OXFORD|
PA- THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND|
SN- 0306-4573|
J9- INFORM PROCESS MANAGE|
JI- Inf. Process. Manage|
PD- SEP|
PY- 2008|
VL- 44|
IS- 5|
BP- 1707|
EP- 1719|
DI- 10.1016/j.ipm.2008.05.002|
PG- 13|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 342UA|
JN- INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2008, V44, N5, P1707-1719|
UT- ISI:000258807800005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Ma ZZ; Lee Y; Yu KH|
AF- Ma Zhenzhong; Lee, Yender; Yu, Kuo-Hsun|
TI- Ten years of conflict management studies: themes, concepts and
relationships|
SO- INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- conflict management; research; curriculum development; knowledge
sharing|
ID- HANDLING INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT; AUTHOR COCITATION; PEER CONFLICT;
PERFORMANCE; RESOLUTION; DIVERSITY; STYLES|
AB- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to map the intellectual
structure of conflict management studies and to investigate the key
themes, concepts, and their relationships of conflict management
literature in the past decade Design/methodology/approach - Citation and
co-citation analysis and social network analysis were used to trace the
development path of conflict management research. The data were collected
by searching the SSCI databases, based on 556 journal articles which were
published between 1997 and 2006, and their cited references were analyzed
and profiled Findings - The paper shows that conflict management
literature focuses on three key themes: workplace conflict and conflict
management styles, cultural differences in conflict management, and
conflict management in practice. In addition, research on group conflict
and work performance has gained momentum in recent years
Originality/value - The intellectual structure of conflict management
literature has received little attention in spite that a large number of
studies have been done on conflict management. This paper will expose
researchers to a new way of profiling key themes and their relationships
in conflict management area, which will help academia and practitioners
understand better contemporary conflict management studies|
C1- [Ma, Zhenzhong] Univ Windsor, Odette Sch Business, Windsor, ON N9B
3P4, Canada; [Lee, Yender; Yu, Kuo-Hsun] Chang Jung Christian Univ, Grad
Sch Business & Operat Management, Tainan, Taiwan|
RP- Ma, ZZ, Univ Windsor, Odette Sch Business, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4,
Canada|
EM- maz@uwindsor.ca|
CD- AMASON AC, 1996, V39, P123, ACAD MANAGE J; BLAKE R, 1964, MANAGERIAL
GRID; BORGATTI SP, 2002, UCINET SOFTWARE SOCI; BURTON J, 1990, CONFLICT
PRACTICES S; DEUTSCH M, 1973, RESOLUTION CONFLZCT; FISHER RJ, 1997,
INTERACTIVE CONFLICT; HOFSTEDE G, 1980, CULTURES CONSEQUENCE; HOLSAPPLE
CW, 1993, V25, P231, INFORM MANAGE; JEHN KA, 1995, V40, P256, ADMIN SCI
QUART; JEHN KA, 1999, V44, P741, ADMIN SCI QUART; LAURSEN B, 1996, V42,
P76, MERRILL PALMER QUART; LAURSEN B, 2001, V21, P423, DEV REV; LEUNG K,
1987, V53, P898, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL; LEUNG K, 2002, V33, P286, J CROSS
CULT PSYCHOL; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MERTON R,
1979, CITATION INDEXING IT; PELLED LH, 1999, V44, P1, ADMIN SCI QUART;
PILKINGTON A, 2006, V26, P288, TECHNOVATION; PRICE D, 1963, LITTLE SCI
BIG SCI; PRUITT DG, 1986, SOCIAL CONFLICT ESCA; PUTNAM LL, 1987, P549,
HDB ORG COMMUNICATIO; RAHIM MA, 1983, V26, P368, ACAD MANAGE J; RAHIM MA,
1995, V80, P122, J APPL PSYCHOL; ROGERS EM, 1995, DIFFUSION INNOVATION;
ROTHMAN J, 1997, RESOLVING IDENTITY B; RUBIN J, 1994, SOCIAL CONFLICT
ESCA; SHANTZ CU, 1987, V58, P283, CHILD DEV; SHANTZ CU, 1992, CONFLICT
CHILD ADOLE; SMALL H, 1993, V26, P5, SCIENTOMETRICS; THOMAS KW, 1976,
P889, HDB IND ORG PSYCHOL; THOMAS KW, 1992, P651, HDB IND ORG PSYCHOL;
TINGTOOMEY S, 1991, V2, P275, INT J CONFL MANAGE; TJOSVOLD D, 1998, V47,
P285, APPL PSYCHOL-INT REV; TRIANDIS HC, 1989, V96, P506, PSYCHOL REV;
VANDEVLIERT E, 1990, V33, P199, ACAD MANAGE J; VANDEVLIERT E, 1997,
COMPLEX INTERPERSONA; WALSTROM KA, 2000, V38, P59, INFORM MANAGE; WHITE
HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI|
NR- 39|
TC- 1|
PU- EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED|
PI- BINGLEY|
PA- HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND|
SN- 1044-4068|
J9- INT J CONFL MANAGEMENT|
JI- Int. J. Confl. Manage|
PY- 2008|
VL- 19|
IS- 3|
BP- 234|
EP- 248|
DI- 10.1108/10444060810875796|
PG- 15|
SC- Communication; Management; Political Science|
GA- 339BP|
JN- INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT, 2008, V19, N3, P234248|
UT- ISI:000258553400003 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Thelwall M|
AF- Thelwall Mike|
TI- Bibliometrics to webometrics|
SO- JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE|
LA- English|
DT- Review|
DE- bibliometrics; scholarly publishing; webometrics|
ID- WEB SITE INTERLINKING; INFORMATION-SCIENCE; SEARCH ENGINES; CITATION
ANALYSIS; GOOGLE SCHOLAR; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; AUTHOR COCITATION; LOG
ANALYSIS; RSS FEEDS; H-INDEX|
AB- Bibliometrics has changed out of all recognition since 1958; becoming
established as a field, being taught widely in library and information
science schools, and being at the core of a number of science evaluation
research groups around the world. This was all made possible by the work
of Eugene Garfield and his Science Citation Index. This article reviews
the distance that bibliometrics has travelled since 1958 by comparing
early bibliometrics with current practice, and by giving an overview of a
range of recent developments, such as patent analysis, national research
evaluation exercises, visualization techniques, new applications, online
citation indexes, and the creation of digital libraries. Webometrics, a
modern, fast- growing offshoot of bibliometrics, is reviewed in detail.
Finally, future prospects are discussed with regard to both bibliometrics
and webometrics|
C1- Wolverhampton Univ, Sch Comp & IT, Wolverhampton WV1 1SB, England|
RP- Thelwall, M, Wolverhampton Univ, Sch Comp & IT, Wulfruna St,
Wolverhampton WV1 1SB, England|
EM- m.thelwall@wlv.ac.uk|
CD- *DEST, I GRANTS SCHEM; *TERT ED COMM, 2003, PERF BAS RES FUND GU;
ADAMS J, 2002, V296, P805, SCIENCE; AGUILLO IF, 2006, V57, P1296, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; ALMIND TC, 1997, V53, P404, J DOC; BARABASI AL, 1999,
V286, P509, SCIENCE; BARILAN J, 1999, CYBERMETRICS; BARILAN J, 2004, V38,
P231, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; BARILAN J, 2004, V55, P980, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; BARJAK F, 2007, V58, P200, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BARJAK F, 2008,
V59, P628, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BENCE V, 2004, V30, P347, J INFORM SCI;
BENSMAN SJ, 2007, V41, P93, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; BJORNEBORN L, 2004, V55,
P1216, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BJORNEBORN L, 2004, THESIS ROYAL SCH LIB;
BJORNEBORN L, 2006, V68, P395, SCIENTOMETRICS; BORGMAN CL, 2002, V36, P3,
ANNU REV INFORM SCI; BOYACK K, 2007, V1, P124, P ISSI 2007 CSIC MAD; BOYD
D, 2004, C HUM FACT COMP SYST; BOYD D, 2006, V11, 1 MONDAY; BRADFORD SC,
1934, V137, P85, ENGINEERING-LONDON; BRIN S, 1998, V30, P107, COMPUT
NETWORKS ISDN; BRODER A, 2000, V33, P309, COMPUT NETW; BRODY T, 2006,
V57, P1060, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BUTLER L, 2003, V32, P143, RES POLICY;
CAWKELL A, 2000, P177, ASIS MONOGRAPH SERIE; CHEN C, 2004, INFORM
VISUALIZATION; CHEN CM, 2006, V57, P359, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; COZZENS
SE, 2000, V9, P5, RES EVALUAT; CRAVEN TC, 2004, V30, P268, J INFORM SCI;
CRONIN B, 1984, CITATION PROCESS ROL; CRONIN B, 2001, V27, P1, J INFORM
SCI; CRONIN B, 2006, V57, P1275, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; DAVIS PM, 2007,
V71, P203, SCIENTOMETRICS; ESCHER T, 2007, GEOGRAPHY ONLINE SOC; GAMON M,
2005, V3646, P121, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; GARFIELD E, 1972, V178, P471,
SCIENCE; GARFIELD E, 1979, CITATION INDEXING IT; GARFIELD E, 2005, 5 INT
C PEER REV BIO; GIBBONS M, 1994, NEW PRODUCTION KNOWL; GOLDER SA, 2007, 3
INT C COMM TECHN C; GRUHL D, 2004, V43, P64, IBM SYST J; GRUHL D, 2004,
WWW2004; GRUHL D, 2005, P78, KDD 05; HARNAD S, 2007, P27, P 11 ANN M INT
SOC S; HARRIES G, 2004, V30, P436, J INFORM SCI; HEIMERIKS G, 2003, V58,
P391, SCIENTOMETRICS; HIRSCH JE, 2005, V102, P16569, P NATL ACAD SCI USA;
HUNTINGTON P, 2007, V33, P598, J INF SCI; INGWERSEN P, 1998, V54, P236, J
DOC; INTRONA L, 2000, V16, P1, INFORMATION SOC; JACSO P, 2005, V29, P208,
ONLINE INFORM REV; JONES S, 2000, V3, P152, INT J DIGITAL LIB; KE HR,
2002, V24, P265, LIBR INFORM SCI RES; KOEHLER W, INFORM RES, V9; KOUSHA
K, 2006, V68, P501, SCIENTOMETRICS; KOUSHA K, 2007, V58, P1055, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; KURTZ MJ, 2005, V56, P111, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LAWRENCE S,
1999, V400, P107, NATURE; LEYDESDORFF L, 1997, V48, P418, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V55, P991, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L,
2007, V58, P1303, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LI XM, 2005, V64, P187,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MAREK K, 2002, V52, P220, LIBRI; MARSHAKOVA IV, 1973, V2,
P3, NAUCHNO TEKHNICHESKA; MAYR P, 2005, GOOGLE WEB APIS INST; MEHO LI,
2007, V58, P2105, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MERTON RK, 1968, V159, P56,
SCIENCE; MERTON RK, 1973, SOCIOLOGY SCI THEORE; METTROP W, 2001, V57,
P623, J DOC; MEYER M, 2003, V12, P17, RES EVALUAT; MOED HF, 2005,
CITATION ANAL RES EV; NICOLAISEN J, 2007, V41, P609, ANNU REV INFORM SCI;
NORRIS M, 2007, V1, P161, J INFORMETR; OPPENHEIM C, 1978, V29, P225, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; OPPENHEIM C, 2000, P405, ASIS MONOGRAPH SERIE; OPPENHEIM
C, 2007, V58, P297, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ORTEGA JL, 2006, V32, P344, J
INF SCI; PAYNE N, 2007, LONGITUDINAL STUDY A; PAYNE N, 2007, V71, P523,
SCIENTOMETRICS; PENNOCK DM, 2002, V99, P5207, P NATL ACAD SCI USA;
PIENAAR M, 2000, V9, P27, RES EVALUAT; PRESCOTT L, 2007, HITWISE US
CONSUMER; PRICE DJD, 1976, V27, P292, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; ROBINSON S,
2006, ROLE NETWORKING RES; ROUSSEAU R, 1999, V2, CYBERMETRICS; SILVANI A,
2005, V14, P207, RES EVALUAT; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; SMALL H, 1999, V50, P799, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMITH AJ, 2002, P133,
PROTEIN SEQUENCING P; SNYDER H, 1999, V55, P375, J DOC; THACKRAY B, 2000,
P11, ASIS MONOGRAPH SERIE; THELWALL M, J AM SOC IN IN PRESS; THELWALL M,
2001, V52, P1157, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; THELWALL M, 2004, V55, P149, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; THELWALL M, 2004, LINK ANAL INFORM SCI; THELWALL M,
2006, V57, P1644, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; THELWALL M, 2007, V58, P379, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; THELWALL M, 2008, V59, P38, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; THOMAS
O, 2000, V26, P421, J INFORM SCI; VANCOUVERING E, 2004, ANN C INT ASS MED
CO; VANDERMEULEN B, 2000, V9, P11, RES EVALUAT; VAUGHAN L, 2003, V54,
P1313, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; VAUGHAN L, 2004, V40, P693, INFORM PROCESS
MANAG; VAUGHAN L, 2005, V56, P1075, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITE HD, 1981,
V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; WILKINSON D, 2003, V29, P49, J INFORM SCI; ZIPF GK, 1949, HUMAN
BEHAV PRINCIPL|
NR- 109|
TC- 2|
PU- SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD|
PI- LONDON|
PA- 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND|
SN- 0165-5515|
J9- J INFORM SCI|
JI- J. Inf. Sci|
PD- AUG|
PY- 2008|
VL- 34|
IS- 4|
BP- 605|
EP- 621|
DI- 10.1177/0165551507087238|
PG- 17|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 334XN|
JN- JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2008, V34, N4, P605-621|
UT- ISI:000258255200017 ER ||
PTAUAFTISOLADT-
J|
Hult GTM; Chabowski BR|
Hult G. Tomas M; Chabowski, Brian R|
Sourcing research as an intellectual network of ideas|
DECISION SCIENCES|
English|
Article|
ID- STRATEGIC-MANAGEMENT; OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT; COCITATION ANALYSIS;
VENDOR SELECTION; DECISION-MAKING; CITATION; PERFORMANCE; DISCIPLINE;
JOURNALS; JAPANESE|
AB- What are the current intellectual clusters in the sourcing
literature? How do these clusters relate to each other? How has sourcingrelated research changed over the last 10 years? We respond to these
questions by examining the intellectual structure of research in the
sourcing literature across 21 journals during the last decade (1998 2007)
Multidimensional scaling is used to analyze cocitation data involving
72,003 citations from 1,960 sourcing articles. The results indicate that
10 different sourcing clusters emerged in the 1998-2002 period and 6
sourcing clusters surfaced in the 2003 2007 period. Five of the
intellectual clusters in 1998-2002 disappeared in 2003-2007, five
clusters remained, and one new cluster materialized in 2003-2007 that did
not exist in the earlier period (Managerial Behavior and Upstream
Decision Making)|
C1- [Hult, G. Tomas M.] Michigan State Univ, Eli Broad Grad Sch
Management, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA; [Chabowski, Brian R.] Univ Tulsa,
Coll Business Adm, Tulsa, OK 74104 USA|
RP- Hult, GTM, Michigan State Univ, Eli Broad Grad Sch Management, E
Lansing, MI 48824 USA|
EM- hult@msu.edu|
CD- ACEDO FJ, 2006, V27, P621, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; BARNEY J, 1991, V17,
P99, J MANAGE; BROWN LD, 1985, V23, P84, J ACCOUNTING RES; CABELL DWE,
2004, CABELLS DIRECTORY PU; CARR AS, 1999, V17, P497, J OPER MANAG; CHUNG
KH, 2001, V30, P99, FINANC MANAGE; CLARK KB, 1989, V35, P1247, MANAGE
SCI; COHEN MA, 1988, V36, P216, OPER RES; COLQUITT JA, 2007, V50, P1281,
ACAD MANAGE J; CULNAN MJ, 1986, V32, P156, MANAGE SCI; CUSUMANO MA, 1991,
V12, P563, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; DYER JH, 1993, V35, P51, SLOAN MANAGE REV;
FISHBEIN M, 1975, BELIEF ATTITUDE INTE; GARFIELD E, 1979, CITATION
INDEXING IT; HAMBRICK DC, 2008, V33, P32, ACAD MANAGE REV; HARLAND CM,
2006, V26, P730, INT J OPER PROD MAN; HARZING AW, 2000, J QUALITY LIST;
JEULAND AP, 1983, V2, P239, MARKET SCI; LEE HL, 1997, V43, P546, MANAGE
SCI; LEE HL, 1997, V38, P93, SLOAN MANAGE REV; MCCAIN KW, 1986, V37,
P111, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; MONAHAN JP, 1984, V30, P720, MANAGE SCI; NERUR SP, 2008, V29, P319,
STRATEG MANAGE J; PASTERNACK BA, 1985, V4, P166, MARKET SCI; PILKINGTON
A, 1999, V19, P7, INT J OPER PROD MAN; PODSAKOFF PM, 2005, V26, P473,
STRATEGIC MANAGE J; RAMOSRODRIGUEZ AR, 2004, V25, P981, STRATEGIC MANAGE
J; SMALL H, 1999, V50, P799, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL HG, 1977, V7,
P139, SOC STUD SCI; SMALL HG, 1978, V8, P327, SOC STUD SCI; STERMAN JD,
1989, V35, P321, MANAGE SCI; THEOHARAKIS V, 2007, V25, P932, J OPER
MANAG; VENKATESH V, 2006, V37, P497, DECISION SCI; WEBER CA, 1991, V50,
P2, EUR J OPER RES; WEBER CA, 1993, V68, P173, EUR J OPER RES; WENG ZK,
1995, V41, P1509, MANAGE SCI|
NR- 37|
TC- 3|
PU- BLACKWELL PUBLISHING|
PI- OXFORD|
PA- 9600 GARSINGTON RD, OXFORD OX4 2DQ, OXON, ENGLAND|
SN- 0011-7315|
J9- DECISION SCI|
JI- Decis. Sci|
PD- AUG|
PYVLISBPEPPGSCGAJNUT-
2008|
39|
3|
323|
335|
13|
Management|
335BP|
DECISION SCIENCES, 2008, V39, N3, P323-335|
ISI:000258266100001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Martinez ATG; Bote VPG; Quesada BV; Anegon FM|
AF- Garcia Martinez Ana Teresa; Guerrero Bote, Vicente P; Vargas Quesada,
Benjamin; Moya Anegon, Felix|
TI- Psychology in the Spanish scientific domain through categories
cocitation of Journal Citation Report 1990-2005|
SO- PSICOTHEMA|
LA- Spanish|
DT- Article|
ID- INFORMATION; SCIENCE; PATHFINDER; ALGORITHM; MAPS|
AB- This work aims to reveal some aspects of the scientific domain of
Psychology, in the context of the internationally visible Spanish science
in the databases of the Citation Index of The Institute for Scientific
Information (ISI), which is represented by a map. We used the methodology
of cocitation of thematic categories (JCR-Thompson Scientific), with
which we obtained a representation of the scientific activity. The
resulting map allowed us to focus on the area of Psychology, whose
representation acts as database for the analysis of this discipline in
the scientific field with international visibility This study offers an
empirical view of the underlying structure of Spanish Psychology. This is
important because most scientists have an intuitive idea of this
structure, but this may or may not be real. This way, we present a global
vision of the entire discipline that favours its objective analysis as a
function of scientists' behaviour as it affects their patterns of
communication through the established formal channels|
C1- [Garcia Martinez, Ana Teresa] Univ Extremadura, Dept Informac &
Comunicac, Badajoz 06001, Spain; [Vargas Quesada, Benjamin; Moya Anegon,
Felix] Univ Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain|
RP- Martinez, ATG, Univ Extremadura, Dept Informac & Comunicac, Badajoz
06001, Spain|
EM- atmar@alcazaba.unex.es|
CD- ALCAIN MD, 2005, V17, P179, PSICOTHEMA; BLANCO A, 2002, V82, P25,
PAPELES PSICOLOGO; BORNER K, 2003, V37, P179, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; CHEN
C, 1999, INFORM VISUALIZATION; COSTA J, 1998, ESQUEMATICA VISUALIZ;
DESOLLAPRICE DJ, 1965, V149, P510, SCIENCE; DETEJADA PH, 2002, V82,
PAPELES PSICOLOGO; DING Y, 2000, V47, P55, SCIENTOMETRICS; FABAPEREZ C,
2003, V58, P623, SCIENTOMETRICS; FERNANDEZ J, 2002, V81, P3, PAPELES
PSICOLOGO; GARCIA JN, 2005, V17, P190, PSICOTHEMA; GARFIELD E, 1964, USE
CITATION DATA WR; GARFIELD E, 1985, V11, P147, J INFORMATION SCI;
GUERREROBOTE VP, 2002, V52, P99, LIBRI; GUERREROBOTE VP, 2006, V42,
P1484, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; HJORLAND B, 1995, V46, P400, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; IGOA JM, 2002, V81, P24, PAPELES PSICOLOGO; KAMADA T, 1989, V31, P7,
INFORM PROCESS LETT; LEYDESDORFF L, 1987, V11, P295, SCIENTOMETRICS;
MARSHAKOVA IV, 1973, P3, NTI 2; MARTIN BR, 1983, V12, P61, RES POLICY;
MCCAIN KW, 1991, V42, P290, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MOYAANEGON F, 2004, V61,
P129, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOYAANEGON F, 2005, V41, P1520, INFORM PROCESSING
MA; MOYAANEGON F, 2006, V15, P258, PROF INFORM; ORTIZRECIO G, 2003, V84,
P53, PAPELES PSICOLOGO; PEREZ MAG, 2002, V81, P11, PAPELES PSICOLOGO;
SANCHEZ E, 2002, V82, P3, PAPELES PSICOLOGO; SANZ J, 2002, V81, P54,
PAPELES PSICOLOGO; SCHVANEVELDT RW, 1990, PATHFINDER ASSOCIATI; SMALL H,
1999, V50, P799, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 2003, V54, P394, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; SOLANA VH, 1999, THESIS GRANADA U; VARGASQUESADA B, 2007,
VISUALIZING STRUCTUR; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 35|
TC- 3|
PU- COLEGIO OFICIAL DE PSICOLOGOS DE ASTURIAS|
PI- OVIEDO|
PA- ILDEFONSO S. DEL RIO, 4-1 B, 33001 OVIEDO, SPAIN|
SN- 0214-9915|
J9- PSICOTHEMA|
JI- Psicothema|
PD- AUG|
PY- 2008|
VL- 20|
IS- 3|
BP- 465|
EP- 473|
PG- 9|
SC- Psychology, Multidisciplinary|
GA- 326NG|
JN- PSICOTHEMA, 2008, V20, N3, P465-473|
UT- ISI:000257665600021 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Leydesdorff L|
AF- Leydesdorff Loet|
TI- Patent classifications as indicators of intellectual organization|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS; SCIENCE; TECHNOLOGY; INDUSTRY; NANOTECHNOLOGY;
BETWEENNESS; CENTRALITY; NETWORKS; WORDS; TERMS|
AB- Using the 138,751 patents filed in 2006 under the Patent Cooperation
Treaty, co-classification analysis is pursued on the basis of three-and
four-digit codes in the International Patent Classification (IPC, 8th
ed.). The co-classifications among the patents enable us to analyze and
visualize the relations among technologies at different levels of
aggregation. The hypothesis that classifications might be considered as
the organizers of patents into classes, and therefore that coclassification patterns-more than co-citation patterns-might be useful
for mapping, is not corroborated. The classifications hang weakly
together, even at the four-digit level; at the country level, more
specificity can be made visible. However, countries are not the
appropriate units of analysis because patent portfolios are largely
similar in many advanced countries in terms of the classes attributed
Instead of classes, one may wish to explore the mapping of title words as
a better approach to visualize the intellectual organization of patents|
C1- Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res, NL-1012 CX Amsterdam,
Netherlands|
RP- Leydesdorff, L, Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res,
Kloveniersburgwal 48, NL-1012 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands|
EM- loet@leydesdorff.net|
CD- *EUR, 2006, TRIAD PAT FAM EUR ME; *OECD, 1994, MEASUREMENT SCI TECH;
*OECD, 2005, COMP PAT STAT; *WIPO, 1970, PAT COOP TREAT; *WIPO, 2006, INT
PAT CLASS; *WIPO, 2007, WIPO PAT REP STAT WO; ADAIR WC, 1955, V6, P31, AM
DOC; AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BARABASI AL, 2002,
LINKED NEW SCI NETWO; BOYACK KW, 2005, V64, P351, SCIENTOMETRICS; BRAUN
T, 2007, MECH RES NANOSTRUCTU; BRESCHI S, 2003, V32, P69, RES POLICY;
BRESCHI S, 2004, P69, EC MANAGEMENT TECHNO; BRESCHI S, 2004, P613, HDB
QUANTITATIVE SCI; CALLON M, 1983, V22, P191, SOC SCI INFORM; CALLON M,
1986, MAPPING DYNAMICS SCI; CILLIERS P, 1998, COMPLEXITY POST MODE;
COCKBURN IM, 2002, 8980 NBER; CRISCUOLO P, 2004, R D INT KNOWLEDGE TR;
CRISCUOLO P, 2005, 0506 EINDH CTR INN S; CRISCUOLO P, 2006, V66, P23,
SCIENTOMETRICS; DIBIAGGIO L, 2005, V110, P103, REV EC IND; EJERMO O,
2005, V36, P167, GROWTH CHANGE; ENGELSMAN EC, 1993, V5, P113, TECHNOL
ANAL STRATEG; ENGELSMAN EC, 1994, V23, P1, RES POLICY; EVENSON R, 1988,
YALE CANADA PATENT F; FORAY D, 1996, P11, EMPLOYMENT GROWTH KN; FREEMAN
LC, 1977, V40, P35, SOCIOMETRY; FRUCHTERMAN TMJ, 1991, V21, P1129,
SOFTWARE PRACT EXPER; GARFIELD E, 1955, V122, P108, SCIENCE; GARFIELD E,
1957, V39, P583, J PATENT OFFICE SOC; GRUPP H, 1996, P271, INNOVATION
PATENTS T; GRUPP H, 1999, V28, P377, RES POLICY; GUAN JC, SCIENTOMETR IN
PRESS; HALL BH, 2002, P403, PATENTS CITATIONS IN; HEALEY P, 1986, V15,
P179, RES POLICY; HULLMANN A, 2006, V1, P81, NAT NANOTECHNOL; HULLMANN A,
2007, V70, P739, SCIENTOMETRICS; JAFFE AB, 2002, PATENTS CITATIONS IN;
KAMADA T, 1989, V31, P7, INFORM PROCESS LETT; KAUFFMAN SA, 1993, ORIGINS
ORDER SELF O; KUHN TS, 1962, STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; LARKEY LS, 1999, P179,
P DL 99 4 ACM C DIG; LETEN B, 2007, 0706 MSI DEP MAN EC; LEYDESDORFF L,
GLOBAL SCI IN PRESS; LEYDESDORFF L, 1987, V11, P291, SCIENTOMETRICS;
LEYDESDORFF L, 1989, V18, P209, RES POLICY; LEYDESDORFF L, 1995,
CHALLENGE SCIENTOMET; LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V55, P991, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2005, V27, P64, SCI COMMUN; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57,
P1470, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P601, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, KNOWLEDGE BASED EC M; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V67,
P231, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2007, V58, P1303, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2007, V70, P693, SCIENTOMETRICS; LUHMANN N, 1990,
WISSENSCHAFT GESELLS; LUNDVALL BA, 1992, NATL SYSTEMS INNOVAT; MAGNANI M,
2007, P163, 11 INT DAT ENG APPL; MERTON RK, 1968, V159, P56, SCIENCE;
MICHEL J, 2001, V51, P185, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOGEE ME, 1999, V9, P291,
EXPERT OPIN THER PAT; MOGOUTOV A, SCIENTOMETR IN PRESS; NARIN F, 1988,
P465, HDB QUANTITATIVE STU; NARIN F, 1992, V21, P237, RES POLICY; NELSON
RR, 1993, NATL INNOVATION SYST; NESTA L, 2005, V53, P123, J IND ECON;
PORTER AL, 2005, TECH MINING EXPLOITI; PRICE DJD, 1965, V149, P510,
SCIENCE; SALTON G, 1983, INTRO MODERN INFORM; SAMPAT BN, 2006, V35, P772,
RES POLICY; SAPSALIS E, 2006, V35, P1631, RES POLICY; SCHEU M, 2006, V28,
P204, WORLD PATENT INFORM; SCHMOCH U, 2003, LINKING TECHNOLOGY A; SPASSER
MA, 1997, V39, P77, SCIENTOMETRICS; TIJSSEN RJW, 1992, CARTOGRAPHY SCI
SCIE; TIJSSEN RJW, 1992, V21, P27, RES POLICY; TODOROV R, 1988, V15,
P593, SCIENTOMETRICS; TRAJTENBERG M, 1990, V21, P172, RAND J ECON;
VERSPAGEN B, 1994, MERIT CONCORDANCE TA; VERSPAGEN B, 1997, V9, P47, EC
SYSTEMS RES; VERSPAGEN B, 2005, MAPPING TECHNOLOGICA|
NR- 83|
TC- 5|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- AUG|
PY- 2008|
VL- 59|
IS- 10|
BP- 1582|
EP- 1597|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20814|
PG- 16|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 330DY|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2008, V59, N10, P1582-1597|
UT- ISI:000257920900004 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- van Eck NJ; Waltman L|
AF- van Eck Nees Jan; Waltman, Ludo|
TI- Appropriate similarity measures for author co-citation analysis|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT; INFORMATION-SCIENCE;
COOCCURRENCE DATA; PEARSONS R|
AB- We provide in this article a number of new insights into the
methodological discussion about author co-citation analysis. We first
argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the
similarity between authors' co-citation profiles is not very
satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be
used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three
similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The
other two similarity measures have not been used before in the
bibliometric literature. We show by means of an example that the choice
of an appropriate similarity measure has a high practical relevance
Finally, we discuss the use of similarity measures for statistical
inference|
C1- [van Eck, Nees Jan; Waltman, Ludo] Erasmus Univ, Inst Econometr,
Erasmus Sch Econ, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands|
RP- van Eck, NJ, Erasmus Univ, Inst Econometr, Erasmus Sch Econ, POB
1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands|
EM- nvaneck@few.eur.nl lwaltman@few.eur.nl|
CD- AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ANDERBERG MR, 1973,
CLUSTER ANAL APPL; BENSMAN SJ, 2004, V55, P935, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
BHATTACHARYYA A, 1943, V35, P99, B CALCUTTA MATH SOC; DUNCAN GT, 1973,
V60, P551, BIOMETRIKA; EDGINGTON ES, 1995, RANDOMIZATION TESTS; EFRON B,
1986, V1, P54, STAT SCI; EFRON B, 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP; EOM S, 2008, V2,
P53, J INFORMETR; KOWALSKI CJ, 1972, V21, P1, APPLIED STATISTICS;
KULLBACK S, 1951, V22, P79, ANN MATH STAT; LEYDESDORFF L, 1988, V87,
P105, INFORMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2005, V56, P769, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L,
2007, V58, P2411, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LIN JH, 1991, V37, P145, IEEE T
INFORM THEORY; LIU Z, 2005, V62, P385, SCIENTOMETRICS; MACKAY DJC, 2003,
INFORM THEORY INFERE; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
MCCAIN KW, 1991, V42, P290, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 2005, V65,
P131, SCIENTOMETRICS; MIGUEL S, 2007, NEW APPROACH I DOMAI; MOYAANEGON F,
2006, V32, P63, J INF SCI; PEARSON ES, 1931, V26, P128, J AM STAT ASSOC;
SCHNEIDER JW, 2007, V58, P1586, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; SNEDECOR GW, 1989,
STAT METHODS; STOUT WF, 2000, STAT MAKING SENSE DA; VANECK NJ, 2007, V15,
P625, INT J UNCERTAIN FUZZ; WALTMAN L, 2007, V58, P1701, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V49,
P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P1250, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITE HD, 2004,
V55, P843, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ZHAO DZ, 2006, V42, P1578, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG; ZUCCALA A, 2006, V57, P1487, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 36|
TC- 2|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- AUG|
PY- 2008|
VL- 59|
IS- 10|
BP- 1653|
EP- 1661|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20872|
PG- 9|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 330DY|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2008, V59, N10, P1653-1661|
UT- ISI:000257920900010 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Zhao DZ; Strotmann A|
AF- Zhao Dangzhi; Strotmann, Andreas|
TI- Comparing all-author and first-author co-citation analyses of
information science|
SO- JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- author co-citation analysis; bibliometrics; information science;
Scopus; citation analysis|
ID- WEB|
AB- Although it is generally understood that different citation counting
methods can produce quite different author rankings, and although
"optimal" author co-citation counting methods have been identified
theoretically, studies that compare author co-citation counting methods
in author co-citation analysis (ACA) studies are still rare. The present
study applies strict all-author-based ACA to the Information Science (IS)
field, in that all authors of all cited references in a classic IS
dataset are counted, and in that even the diagonal values of the cocitation matrix are computed in their theoretically optimal form. Using
Scopus instead of SSCI as the data source, we find that results from a
theoretically optimal all-author ACA appear to be excellent in practice,
too, although in a field like IS where co-authorship levels are
relatively low, its advantages over classic first-author ACA appear
considerably smaller than in the more highly collaborative ones targeted
before. Nevertheless, we do find some differences between the two
approaches, in that first-author ACA appears to favor theorists who
presumably tend to work alone, while all-author ACA appears to paint a
somewhat more recent picture of the field, and to pick out some
collaborative author clusters. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights
reserved|
C1- [Zhao, Dangzhi] Univ Alberta, Sch Lib & Informat Studies, Edmonton,
AB T6G 2J4, Canada; [Strotmann, Andreas] Univ Alberta, Sch Business,
Edmonton, AB T6G 2R6, Canada|
RP- Zhao, DZ, Univ Alberta, Sch Lib & Informat Studies, 3-20 Rutherford
S, Edmonton, AB T6G 2J4, Canada|
EM- dzhao@ualberta.ca andreas.strotmann@ualberta.ca|
CD- AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BATAGELJ V, 2007,
PAJEK PROGRAM ANAL V; EOM S, 2008, V2, P53, J INFORMETR; HAIR JF, 1998,
MULTIVARIATE DATA AN; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PERSSON O, 2001,
V50, P339, SCIENTOMETRICS; ROUSSEAU R, 2004, V55, P513, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; SCHNEIDER JW, 2007, P696, P ISSI 2007 11 INT C; WHITE HD, 1981, V32,
P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P1250, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITE HD, 2003,
V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITE HD, 2004, V60, P93,
SCIENTOMETRICS; ZHAO D, 2003, THESIS FLORIDA STATE; ZHAO DZ, 2006, V42,
P1578, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; ZHAO DZ, 2008, V59, P916, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC|
NR- 17|
TC- 4|
PU- ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV|
PI- AMSTERDAM|
PA- PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 1751-1577|
J9- J INFORMETR|
JI- J. Informetr|
PD- JUL|
PY- 2008|
VL- 2|
IS- 3|
BP- 229|
EP- 239|
DI- 10.1016/j.joi.2008.05.004|
PGSCGAJNUT-
11|
Information Science & Library Science|
327ZQ|
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2008, V2, N3, P229-239|
ISI:000257767400007 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Qiu JP; Li YJ; Li J; Ren Q|
AF- Qiu Junping; Li, Yejun; Li, Jiang; Ren, Quane|
TI- An exploratory study on substantive co-link analysis: A modification
to total co-link analysis|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION-SCIENCE; WEB ENVIRONMENT|
AB- Since the term "co-link" was put forward, many scholars have done
exploratory investigations to prove the applicability and validity of colink analysis used in mapping internet structure and mining relationships
among internet colonies. All of these studies are based on the whole
links in the web called "total co-link analysis". However, there are both
substantive and non-substantive links in the web, and the number of the
latter outweights that of the former, which makes the preconditions of
total co-link analysis untenable. In this paper, we present "substantive
co-link analysis", and believe it is more sound and valid than "total colink analysis". Then exploratory investigations on both total and
substantive co-link analysis are carried out with the sample of 20
academic blogs on Library and Information Science, the results of which
testify our assumption that "substantive co-link analysis" is more
efficient and reasonable than "total co-link analysis"|
C1- [Qiu, Junping; Li, Yejun; Li, Jiang; Ren, Quane] Wuhan Univ, Sch
Informat Management, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China|
RP- Li, YJ, Wuhan Univ, Sch Informat Management, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R
China|
EM- liyejun2006@126.com|
CD- BJORNEBORN L, 2004, SMALL WORLD LINK STR; CHEN DQ, 2003, STUDY APPL
AUTOMATIC; CHU H, 2002, V43, P110, J ED LIB INFORMATION; ECKMANN J, 2002,
CURVATURE COLINKS UN; FABAPEREZ C, 2003, V58, P623, SCIENTOMETRICS;
HEIMERIKS G, 2003, V58, P391, SCIENTOMETRICS; INGWERSEN P, 1998, V54,
P236, J DOC; LARSON R, 1996, P 59 ANN M AM SOC IN; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006,
V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; QIU JP, 2005, V107, P77, KNOWLEDGE INFORM SCI; QIU JP, 2005,
V107, P98, KNOWLEDGE INFORM SCI; QIU JP, 2007, V115, P54, INFORM
KNOWLEDGE; QIU JP, 2007, V26, J CHINA SOC IN PRESS; SMITH A, 2003, P305,
P 9 INT C SCIENT INF; THELWALL M, 2004, V40, P515, INFORM PROCESS MANAG;
THELWALL M, 2004, LINK ANAL INFORM SCI; VAUGHAN L, 2006, V68, P611,
SCIENTOMETRICS; WANG XY, 2003, V14, P1768, J SOFTWARE; WHITE HD, 1998,
V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; ZHOU Q, 2006, V50, P44, LIB INFORM
SERVICE; ZUCCALA A, 2006, V57, P1487, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 22|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- AUG|
PY- 2008|
VL- 76|
IS- 2|
BP- 327|
EP- 341|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-007-1921-7|
PG- 15|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 322UG|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, V76, N2, P327-341|
UT- ISI:000257400200008 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Quirin A; Cordon O; Santamaria J; Vargas-Quesada B; Moya-Anegon F|
AF- Quirin A; Cordon, O; Santamaria, J; Vargas-Quesada, B; Moya-Anegon,
F|
TI- A new variant of the Pathfinder algorithm to generate large visual
science maps in cubic time|
SO- INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- PFNETs; Pathfinder algorithms; cocitation analysis; information
visualization; large scientific domain visual maps; graph shortest path
algorithms|
ID- COCITATION; NETWORKS; DOMAINS; GRAPHS|
AB- In the last few years, there is an increasing interest to generate
visual representations of very large scientific domains. A methodology
based on the combined use of ISI-JCR category cocitation and social
networks analysis through the use of the Pathfinder algorithm has
demonstrated its ability to achieve high quality, schematic
visualizations for these kinds of domains. Now, the next step would be to
generate these scientograms in an on-line fashion. To do so, there is a
need to significantly decrease the run time of the latter pruning
technique when working with category cocitation matrices of a large
dimension like the ones handled in these large domains (Pathfinder has a
time complexity order of O(n(4)), With n being the number of categories
in the cocitation matrix, i.e., the number of nodes in the network)
Although a previous improvement called Binary Pathfinder has already been
proposed to speed up the original algorithm, its significant time
complexity reduction is not enough for that aim. In this paper, we make
use of a different shortest path computation from classical approaches in
computer science graph theory to propose a new variant of the Pathfinder
algorithm which allows us to reduce its time complexity in one order of
magnitude, 0(n 3), and thus to significantly decrease the run time of the
implementation when applied to large scientific domains considering the
parameter q = n - 1. Besides, the new algorithm has a much simpler
structure than the Binary Pathfinder as well as it saves a significant
amount of memory with respect to the original Pathfinder by reducing the
space complexity to the need of just storing two matrices An experimental
comparison will be developed using large networks from real-world domains
to show the good performance of the new proposal (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd.
All rights reserved|
C1- [Quirin, A.; Cordon, O.] European Ctr Soft Computing, Mieres 33600,
Spain; [Santamaria, J.] Univ Cadiz, Dept Software Engn, Cadiz, Spain;
[Vargas-Quesada, B.; Moya-Anegon, F.] Univ Granada, Lib & Informat Sci
Fac, SCImago Grp, Granada 18071, Spain|
RP- Quirin, A, European Ctr Soft Computing, Edificio Cient Tecnol, Mieres
33600, Spain|
EM- arnaud.quirin@softcomputing.es oscar.cordon@softcomputing.es
jsantam@uca.es benjamin@ugr.es felix@ugr.es|
CD- BELLMAN R, 1965, DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; BORNER K, 2003, V37, P179, ANNU
REV INFORM SCI; BOYACK KW, 2005, V64, P351, SCIENTOMETRICS; BUZYDLOWSKI
J, 2002, THESIS DREXEL U; CHEN C, 1999, INFORM VISUALIZATION; CHEN C,
2004, INFORM VISUALIZATION; CHEN CM, 1998, V10, P107, INTERACT COMPUT;
CHEN CM, 1998, V9, P267, J VISUAL LANG COMPUT; CORMEN TH, 2001, INTRO
ALGORITHMS; DEARHOLT DW, 1990, P1, PATHFINDER ASS NETWO; DIJKSTRA EW,
1959, V1, P269, NUMER MATH; DREYFUS S, 1965, DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; FLOYD
RW, 1962, V5, P345, COMMUN ACM; GUERREROBOTE VP, 2006, V42, P1484, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG; HJORLAND B, 1995, V46, P400, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; KAMADA
T, 1989, V31, P7, INFORM PROCESS LETT; LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V60, P371, J
DOC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V60, P159, SCIENTOMETRICS; LIN X, 2003, V39,
P689, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; MOYAANEGON F, 2004, V61, P129,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MOYAANEGON F, 2005, V41, P1520, INFORM PROCESSING MA;
MOYAANEGON F, 2006, V15, P258, PROF INFORM; SAMOYLENKO I, 2006, V57,
P1461, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; SCHVANEVELDT R, 1990, PATHFINDER ASS NETWO;
VARGASQUESADA B, 2007, VISUALIZING STRUCTUR; WARSHALL S, 1962, V9, P11, J
ASSOC COMPUT MACH; WATTS D, 2004, SMALL WORLDS DYNAMIC; WATTS DJ, 1998,
V393, P442, NATURE; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 29|
TC- 6|
PU- PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD|
PI- OXFORD|
PA- THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND|
SN- 0306-4573|
J9- INFORM PROCESS MANAGE|
JI- Inf. Process. Manage|
PD- JUL|
PY- 2008|
VL- 44|
IS- 4|
BP- 1611|
EP- 1623|
DI- 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.09.005|
PG- 13|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 321AP|
JN- INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2008, V44, N4, P1611-1623|
UT- ISI:000257276800014 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Sugimoto CR; Pratt JA; Hauser K|
AF- Sugimoto Cassidy R; Pratt, Jean A; Hauser, Karina|
TI- Using field cocitation analysis to assess reciprocal and shared
impact of LIS/MIS fields|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- MANAGEMENT-INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; COCITED AUTHOR RETRIEVAL; SCIENTIFIC
JOURNALS; CITATION RELATIONS; PEARSONS-R; SCIENCE; COMMUNICATION;
NETWORKS; MIS; DISCIPLINES|
AB- This study utilized bibliometric tools to analyze the relationship
between two separate, but related, fields: Library and Information
Science (LIS) and Management Information Systems (MIS). The top-ranked 48
journals in each field were used as the unit of analysis. Using these
journals, field cocitation was introduced as a method for evaluating the
relationships between the two fields. The three-phased study evaluated
(a) the knowledge imported/exported between LIS and MIS, (b) the body of
knowledge influenced by both fields, and (c) the overlap in fields as
demonstrated by multidimensional scaling. Data collection and analysis
were performed using DIALOG and SPSS programs The primary findings from
this study indicate that (a) the MIS impact on LIS is greater than the
reverse, (b) there is a growing trend for shared impact between the two
disciplines, and (c) the area of overlap between the two fields is
predominately those journals focusing on technology systems and digital
information. Additionally, this study validated field cocitation as a
method by which to evaluate relationships between fields|
C1- [Sugimoto, Cassidy R.] Univ N Carolina, Sch Lib & Informat Sci,
Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA; [Pratt, Jean A.] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Business
Informat Syst, Eau Claire, WI 54702 USA; [Hauser, Karina] Utah State
Univ, Dept Management Informat Syst, Logan, UT 84322 USA|
RP- Sugimoto, CR, Univ N Carolina, Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Chapel Hill,
NC 27514 USA|
EM- csugimoto@unc.edu prattja@uwec.edu karina.hauser@usu.edu|
CD- 2007, ULRICHS PERIODICAL D; *U S FL, 2006, WHAT IS INF SCI IS R;
AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; AHLGREN P, 2004, V55,
P843, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ASTROM F, 2007, V58, P947, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; BACON CJ, 2001, V32, P46, DATA BASE ADV INF SY; BENSMAN SJ, 2004,
V55, P936, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BORGMAN CL, 1990, P10, SCHOLARLY
COMMUNICAT; BORGMAN CL, 1992, V43, P397, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BORKO H,
1968, V19, P3, AM DOC; BROOKS TA, 1990, P235, SCHOLARLY COMMUNICAT;
CHAPMAN K, 2006, V67, P50, COLL RES LIBR; CHEON MJ, 1992, V23, P21, DATA
BASE; CRONIN B, 1990, V16, P381, J INF SCI; DOREIAN P, 1985, V36, P411, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; ELLIS D, 1999, V50, P1095, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
FARHOOMAND A, 1987, V18, P48, DATA BASE; GALLIVAN M, 2007, V16, P26,
EUROPEAN J INFORM SY; GROVER V, 2006, V7, P270, J ASSOC INF SYST;
HAMILTON S, 1983, V14, P3, DATA BASE; HIRST G, 1978, V43, P397, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; KHAZANCHI D, 2000, V31, P24, DATA BASE ADV INF SY; KLAVANS R,
2006, V57, P251, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J
AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P601, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2007, V58, P1303, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L,
2007, V58, P25, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1991, V42, P200, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN
KW, 1991, V61, P311, LIBR QUART; MCCAIN KW, 1998, V41, P389,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MORRIS TA, 2001, THESIS DREXEL U PHIL; NASIR S, 2005,
V25, P442, INT J INFORM MANAGE; NEELEY JD, 1981, V32, P217, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; NERUR S, 2005, V48, P71, COMMUN ACM; NISONGER TE, 2005, V66,
P341, COLL RES LIBR; PERSSON O, 1994, V45, P31, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
PUDOVKIN AI, 2002, V53, P1113, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; RAINER RK, 2005,
V48, P91, COMMUN ACM; RICE RE, 1988, V15, P256, HUM COMMUN RES; SAWYER S,
2007, V58, P1436, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; SERVI PN, 1980, V31, P36, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WANIA CE,
2006, 69 ANN M AM SOC INF; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P16, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1986, V5, P93,
INFORM TECHNOL LIBR; WHITE HD, 1989, V24, P119, ANNU REV INFORM SCI;
WHITE HD, 1990, P84, SCHOLARLY COMMUNICAT; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P1250, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
WHITE HD, 2004, V55, P843, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ZHOU P, 2007, V58, P223,
J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 53|
TC- 2|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- JUL|
PY- 2008|
VL- 59|
IS- 9|
BP- 1441|
EP- 1453|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20863|
PG- 13|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 319MQ|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2008, V59, N9, P1441-1453|
UT- ISI:000257168200007 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Leydesdorff L; Zhou P|
AF- Leydesdorff Loet; Zhou, Ping|
TI- Co-word analysis using the Chinese character set|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- COMBINED COCITATION; CITATION RELATIONS; SCIENCE; DATABASE; TERMS|
AB- Until recently, Chinese texts could not be studied using co-word
analysis because the words are not separated by spaces in Chinese (and
Japanese). A word can be composed of one or more characters. The online
availability of programs that separate Chinese texts makes it possible to
analyze them using semantic maps. Chinese characters contain not only
information but also meaning. This may enhance the readability of
semantic maps. In this study, we analyze 58 words which occur 10 or more
times in the 1,652 journal titles of the China Scientific and Technical
Papers and Citations Database. The word-occurrence matrix is visualized
and factor-analyzed|
C1- [Leydesdorff, Loet] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res, NL-1012
CX Amsterdam, Netherlands; [Zhou, Ping] Katholieke Univ Leuven, B-3000
Louvain, Belgium; [Zhou, Ping] Inst Sci & Tech Informat China, Beijing
100038, Peoples R China|
RP- Leydesdorff, L, Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res,
Kloveniersburgwal 48, NL-1012 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands|
EM- loet@leydesdorff.net Ping.Zhou@econ.kuleuven.be|
CD- AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BRAAM RR, 1991,
V42, P233, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P252, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; CALLON M, 1983, V22, P191, SOC SCI INFORM; CALLON M, 1986,
MAPPING DYNAMICS SCI; CHEN RS, 2007, ANN M SOC SOC STUD S; FUJIGAKI Y,
1998, V25, P387, SCI PUBL POLICY; LEYDESDORFF L, 1989, V18, P209, RES
POLICY; LEYDESDORFF L, 1997, V48, P418, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; LEYDESDORFF
L, 2005, V56, P1469, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2005, V27, P64,
SCI COMMUN; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V67, P231, SCIENTOMETRICS; PARK HW, 2004, V6, P1377,
J KOREAN DATA ANAL S; REN SL, 2005, V31, P8, EUROPEAN SCI EDITING; SALTON
G, 1983, INTRO MODERN INFORM; VANRIJSBERGEN CJ, 1977, V33, P106, J DOC;
ZHOU P, 2006, V35, P83, RES POLICY; ZHOU P, 2007, V58, P223, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC|
NR- 19|
TC- 1|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- JUL|
PY- 2008|
VL- 59|
IS- 9|
BP- 1528|
EP- 1530|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20862|
PG- 3|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 319MQ|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2008, V59, N9, P1528-1530|
UT- ISI:000257168200014 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- He Y; Guan JC|
AF- He Ying; Guan, Jiancheng|
TI- Contribution of Chinese publications in computer science: A case
study on LNCS|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- RESEARCH PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION; STRUCTURAL ASPECTS;
CITATION ANALYSIS; WORD ANALYSIS; CO-CITATION; INFORMATION|
AB- Conference proceedings are one of the key communication channels in
computer science. This paper aims to analyze the Chinese outputs in the
context of conference papers in computer science through an exploration
of the conference proceedings series book - Lecture Notes in Computer
Science (LNCS) in the period of 1997-2005. Results indicate that: 1 The
number of Chinese papers in LNCS keeps growing in the studied period; the
share of Chinese papers in LNCS in recent years is much higher than that
of Chinese SCI papers in the world; In sharp contrast with remarkable
growth of the share of Chinese papers in LNCS, the share of SCI articles
in top journals of computer science published by the scientists of
mainland China is negligible during the same period 2. Chinese
researchers are more likely to collaborate with domestic fellows; 3. In
spite of the increasing amounts of Chinese papers in LNCS, they receive
only a few citations; 4. The articles are strikingly more cited by
authors themselves and international authors' citations are more than
Chinese authors' non-self-citations in the first three years after
publication; 5. Based on the new indicator Impact Index (II) the authors
proposed, the relative impact of Chinese articles in LNCS is increasing
although the average impact of Chinese papers in LNCS is obviously less
than that of the publications in LNCS in each year during the studied
period|
C1- [Guan, Jiancheng] Fudan Univ, Sch Management, Shanghai 200433,
Peoples R China; [He, Ying] Beijing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Sch
Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China|
RP- Guan, JC, Fudan Univ, Sch Management, 670 Guoshun Rd, Shanghai
200433, Peoples R China|
EM- guanjianch@buaa.edu.cn|
CD- AMSDEN AH, 1997, V9, P343, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG; BRAAM RR, 1988, V13,
P97, SCI TECHNOL; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; CHOUNG
JY, 2003, V58, P115, SCIENTOMETRICS; DEBEAVER D, 1979, V1, P231,
SCIENTOMETRICS; DROTT MC, 1995, V46, P299, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; GARFIELD
E, 1955, V122, P108, SCIENCE; GARFIELD E, 1963, V14, P195, AM DOC;
GARFIELD E, 1970, V227, P669, NATURE; GLANZEL W, 2006, V68, P457,
SCIENTOMETRICS; GOODRUM AA, 2001, V37, P661, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; GU YN,
2002, V53, P974, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; GUAN JC, 2004, V59, P131,
SCIENTOMETRICS; GUAN JC, 2004, V61, P339, SCIENTOMETRICS; HE TW, 2003,
V57, P127, SCIENTOMETRICS; KOSTOFF RN, 2002, V53, P49, SCIENTOMETRICS; LU
QW, 2001, V30, P55, RES POLICY; MA N, 2005, V65, P343, SCIENTOMETRICS;
MOED HF, 1986, V10, P17, SCIENTOMETRICS; ROJO R, 2006, V66, P101,
SCIENTOMETRICS; RUSSELL JM, 2002, ENCY LIFE SUPPORT SY; SCHUBERT A, 1986,
V36, P126, CZECH J PHYS; SCHUBERT A, 1993, V26, P21, SCIENTOMETRICS; SONG
J, 1997, V19, P281, TECHNOL SOC; VANRAAN AFJ, 1990, P13, P EUR U I C RES
MAN; VANRAAN AFJ, 1991, V20, P439, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANRAAN AFJ, 1996,
V36, P397, SCIENTOMETRICS; ZHANG HQ, 1997, V33, P81, INFORM PROCESS
MANAG|
NR- 28|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- JUN|
PY- 2008|
VL- 75|
IS- 3|
BP- 519|
EP- 534|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-007-1781-1|
PG- 16|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 314WJ|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, V75, N3, P519-534|
UT- ISI:000256839600007 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Kwon O; Seo J; Noh K; Kim J; Kim JS; Shin SY|
AF- Kwon OhJin; Seo, Jinny; Noh, KyoungRan; Kim, JeongHo; Kim, Jin Suk;
Shin, Sung Y|
TI- Categorizing influential patents using bibliometric analysis of
patent citations network|
SO- INFORMATION-AN INTERNATIONAL INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL|
LA- English|
DT- Proceedings Paper|
CT- Conference on Convergence Technology and Information Convergence
(CTIC)|
CY- OCT, 2006|
CL- Las Vegas, NV|
DE- bibliographic coupling; co-citation analysis; influential patent
search|
AB- Recently, research for network has been actively progressing.
Internet, bio-metabolic, and coauthor networks of scientific thesis has a
decreasing distribution to power law. However, researches on network
utilizing patent information have not been very active. It suggests the
method calculating large sparse matrix by supercomputer, examining patent
network distribution by bibliographic coupling and co-citation, and
identifying influential patents. The majority of studies, which are
targeted to find Hub patents, are using the number of forward citation of
patents. Yet the most recent technological convergences among different
fields have been enforced, and the development of this fusion technology
has been rapidly progressing. Therefore the forward citation of patent
occurs in the applicable field of technologies as well as in other fields
of technology; the method to find influential patents within the
applicable field of technology is using only the number of forward
citation of patents that may cause severe distortions. This study will
explore three types of influential patents by minimizing the distortion
phenomenon accompanied by the number of patent forward citation. To serve
this purpose, the patent classification method is using bibliographic
coupling and co-citation analysis used in knowledge search|
C1- [Kwon, OhJin; Seo, Jinny; Noh, KyoungRan; Kim, JeongHo] KISTI, Seoul,
South Korea; [Kim, Jin Suk] Univ Seoul, Seoul, South Korea; [Shin, Sung
Y.] S Dakota State Univ, EE & CS Dept, Brookings, SD 57007 USA|
RP- Kwon, O, KISTI, 206-9 CheongRangri Dong, Seoul, South Korea|
EM- dbajin@kisti.re.kr jinny@kisti.re.kr infor@kisti.re.kr
aresto@kisti.re.kr jskim@venus.uos.ac.kr sung.shin@sdstate.edu|
CD- BLACKFORD S, 2001, BALS TECHNICAL FORUM; BREITZMAN AF, 2002, V28,
P187, J INFORM SCI; BRESCHI S, 2004, P1, CESPRI; GARFIELD E, 2003, SOCIAL
SCI CITATION; JAFFE AB, 1993, V108, P577, Q J ECON; JAFFE AB, 1998,
V6507, NBER WORKING PAPER S; KARKI MMS, 1997, V19, P269, WORLD PATENT
INFORMA; KESSLER MM, 1963, V14, P10, AM DOC; KIM HH, 1993, P132,
KOOMITRADE; KWON OJ, 2005, P77, 2005 IPMS ANN C; KWON OJ, 2005, P689,
KOSTI; OGAWA T, 2005, P41, FINDING BASIC PATENT; TRIPPE AJ, 2003, V25,
P211, WORLD PATENT INFORM; VANRAAN AFJ, 2005, V63, P549, SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 14|
TC- 0|
PU- INT INFORMATION INST|
PI- TOKYO|
PA- FAC ENG, HOSEI UNIV, KOGANEI, TOKYO, 184-8584, JAPAN|
SN- 1343-4500|
J9- INFORMATION|
JI- Information|
PD- MAY|
PY- 2007|
VL- 10|
IS- 3|
BP- 313|
EP- 326|
PG- 14|
SC- Engineering, Multidisciplinary|
GA- 293KT|
JN- INFORMATION-AN INTERNATIONAL INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2007, V10,
N3, P313-326|
UT- ISI:000255334900008 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Abdeltawab NF; Aziz RK; Kansal R; Rowe SL; Su Y; Gardner L; Brannen
C; Nooh MM; Attia RR; Abdelsamed HA; Taylor WL; Lu L; Williams RW; Kotb
M|
AF- Abdeltawab Nourtan F; Aziz, Ramy K; Kansal, Rita; Rowe, Sarah L; Su,
Yin; Gardner, Lidia; Brannen, Charity; Nooh, Mohammed M; Attia, Ramy R;
Abdelsamed, Hossam A; Taylor, William L; Lu, Lu; Williams, Robert W;
Kotb, Malak|
TI- An unbiased systems genetics approach to mapping genetic loci
modulating susceptibility to severe streptococcal sepsis|
SO- PLOS PATHOGENS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- GROUP-A STREPTOCOCCUS; CLASS-II; PROSTAGLANDIN E-2; IN-VIVO;
TRANSCRIPTOME ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR-BIOLOGY; UP-REGULATION; EXPRESSION;
PYOGENES; MICE|
AB- Striking individual differences in severity of group A streptococcal
(GAS) sepsis have been noted, even among patients infected with the same
bacterial strain. We had provided evidence that HLA class II allelic
variation contributes significantly to differences in systemic disease
severity by modulating host responses to streptococcal superantigens.
Inasmuch as the bacteria produce additional virulence factors that
participate in the pathogenesis of this complex disease, we sought to
identify additional gene networks modulating GAS sepsis Accordingly, we
applied a systems genetics approach using a panel of advanced recombinant
inbred mice. By analyzing disease phenotypes in the context of mice
genotypes we identified a highly significant quantitative trait locus
(QTL) on Chromosome 2 between 22 and 34 Mb that strongly predicts disease
severity, accounting for 25%-30% of variance. This QTL harbors several
polymorphic genes known to regulate immune responses to bacterial
infections. We evaluated candidate genes within this QTL using multiple
parameters that included linkage, gene ontology, variation in gene
expression, cocitation networks, and biological relevance, and identified
interleukin1 alpha and prostaglandin E synthases pathways as key networks
involved in modulating GAS sepsis severity. The association of GAS sepsis
with multiple pathways underscores the complexity of traits modulating
GAS sepsis and provides a powerful approach for analyzing interactive
traits affecting outcomes of other infectious diseases|
C1- [Abdeltawab, Nourtan F.; Kansal, Rita; Nooh, Mohammed M.; Attia, Ramy
R.; Abdelsamed, Hossam A.; Kotb, Malak] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Hlth Sci, Mid
S Ctr Biodef & Secur, Memphis, TN 38163 USA; [Abdeltawab, Nourtan F.;
Aziz, Ramy K.; Rowe, Sarah L.; Su, Yin; Gardner, Lidia; Brannen, Charity;
Nooh, Mohammed M.; Attia, Ramy R.; Abdelsamed, Hossam A.; Kotb, Malak]
Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Memphis, TN USA;
[Abdeltawab, Nourtan F.; Kansal, Rita; Rowe, Sarah L.; Nooh, Mohammed M.;
Attia, Ramy R.; Abdelsamed, Hossam A.; Kotb, Malak] VA Med Ctr, Memphis,
TN USA; [Kansal, Rita] Cairo Univ, Coll Pharm, Giza, Egypt; [Nooh,
Mohammed M.; Abdelsamed, Hossam A.; Kotb, Malak] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci
Ctr, Dept Mol Sci, Memphis, TN USA; [Taylor, William L.] Univ Tennessee,
Hlth Sci Ctr, Mol Resource Ctr, Memphis, TN USA; [Lu, Lu] Univ Tennessee,
Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Anat & Neurobiol, Memphis, TN USA|
RP- Abdeltawab, NF, Univ Tennessee, Ctr Hlth Sci, Mid S Ctr Biodef &
Secur, Memphis, TN 38163 USA|
EM- mkotb@utmem.edu|
CD- ANDERSEN PS, 1999, V10, P473, IMMUNITY; AZIZ RK, 2004, V51, P123, MOL
MICROBIOL; AZIZ RK, 2004, V54, P184, MOL MICROBIOL; AZIZ RK, 2005, V187,
P3311, J BACTERIOL; AZIZ RK, 2007, V8, P404, GENES IMMUN; BENTLEY CC,
2005, V7, P945, CELL MICROBIOL; BUCHANAN JT, 2006, V16, P396, CURR BIOL;
CHATELLIER S, 2000, V68, P3523, INFECT IMMUN; CHEN BC, 2004, V279,
P20889, J BIOL CHEM; CHESLER EJ, 2005, V37, P233, NAT GENET; CHURCHILL
GA, 1994, V138, P963, GENETICS; GARCIAPEYDRO M, 2006, V177, P3711, J
IMMUNOL; GOLDMANN O, 2004, V119, P141, INDIAN J MED RES S; GOLDMANN O,
2005, V175, P3862, J IMMUNOL; GOLDMANN O, 2007, V75, P4148, INFECT IMMUN;
GRIZZLE WE, 2002, V101, P270, INT J CANCER; HARDY CL, 2001, V53, P395,
IMMUNOGENETICS; HARRIS SG, 2002, V23, P144, TRENDS IMMUNOL; JOBIN MC,
2006, V40, P29, MICROB PATHOGENESIS; KAZMI SU, 2001, V69, P4988, INFECT
IMMUN; KIANG JG, 1998, V80, P183, PHARMACOL THERAPEUT; KIM HP, 2006, V10,
P759, EXPERT OPIN THER TAR; KLENK M, 2005, V7, P1237, CELL MICROBIOL;
KOBAYASHI SD, 2003, V100, P10948, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; KOTB M, 2002, V8,
P1398, NAT MED; KOTB M, 2003, V35, P665, SCAND J INFECT DIS; KUSTANOVA
GA, 2006, V411, P504, DOKL AKAD NAUK; LEDER L, 1998, V187, P823, J EXP
MED; LOW DE, 1997, P93, REEMERGENCE SEVERE G; MALONEY CG, 2000, V67,
P615, J LEUKOCYTE BIOL; MARRIOTT HM, 2006, V38, P1848, INT J BIOCHEM CELL
B; MEDINA E, 2001, V184, P846, J INFECT DIS; MINATO Y, 2005, V82, P302,
INT J HEMATOL; MIYAIRI I, 2007, V179, P1814, J IMMUNOL; MIYOSHIAKIYAMA T,
2005, V192, P107, J INFECT DIS; MONSALVE E, 2006, V176, P5362, J IMMUNOL;
MOSCA M, 2007, V82, P320, J LEUKOCYTE BIOL; MOUNTZ JD, 2005, V61, P128,
SCAND J IMMUNOL; NAKAGAWA I, 2004, V6, P939, CELL MICROBIOL; NOOH MM,
2007, V178, P3076, J IMMUNOL; NOORBYTEGLUND A, 2000, V30, P3247, EUR J
IMMUNOL; NORRBYTEGLUND A, 1997, V65, P5209, INFECT IMMUN; NORRBYTEGLUND
A, 2000, V49, P849, J MED MICROBIOL; NORRBYTEGLUND A, 2002, V32, P2570,
EUR J IMMUNOL; PEIRCE JL, 2003, V2, P238, GENES BRAIN BEHAV; PEIRCE JL,
2004, V5, ARTN 7, BMC GENET; ROLINK AG, 2006, V107, P50, IMMUNOL LETT;
ROSEN GD, 2001, V2, ARTN 5, BMC NEUROSCI; RUIZ N, 1998, V27, P337, MOL
MICROBIOL; SHIFMAN S, 2006, V4, P2227, ARTN e395, PLOS BIOL; SINGLETON
KD, 2006, V290, L956, AM J PHYSIOL-LUNG C; SMITH RS, 2002, V169, P2636, J
IMMUNOL; SMITH WL, 2000, V69, P145, ANNU REV BIOCHEM; SUMBY P, 2005,
V192, P771, J INFECT DIS; VANDENBRANDT J, 2004, V34, P1405, EUR J
IMMUNOL; WALKER MJ, 2007, V13, P981, NAT MED; WELCHER BC, 2002, V186,
P501, J INFECT DIS; WILLIAMS RW, 2001, V2, GENOME BIOL; WOOLARD MD, 2007,
V178, P2065, J IMMUNOL; YENARI MA, 2005, V1053, P74, ANN NY ACAD SCI|
NR- 60|
TC- 7|
PU- PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE|
PI- SAN FRANCISCO|
PA- 185 BERRY ST, STE 1300, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107 USA|
SN- 1553-7366|
J9- PLOS PATHOG|
JI- PLoS Pathog|
PD- APR|
PY- 2008|
VL- 4|
IS- 4|
AR- e1000042|
DI- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000042|
PG- 11|
SC- Infectious Diseases; Microbiology; Parasitology; Virology|
GA- 294PU|
JN- PLOS PATHOGENS, 2008, V4, N4, P313-326|
UT- ISI:000255418800004 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Jevremov T; Pajic D; Sipka P|
AF- Jevremov Tanja; Pajic, Dejan; Sipka, Pero|
TI- Structure of personality psychology based on cocitation analysis of
prominent authors|
SO- PSIHOLOGIJA|
LA- Serbian|
DT- Article|
DE- personality psychology; structure of science; bibliometric mapping;
Author Cocitation Analysis|
ID- INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; SCIENCE|
AB- Traditional Author Cocitation Analysis was applied in order to map
the personality psychology as a research field. A group of 25 authors
were selected from the Haggbloom (1999, 2002) lists of the most cited and
prominent psychologists, judged to be the main contributors to the field.
All of their cocitations identified in the three year volumes of SSCI
were downloaded to be analyzed by cluster analysis and MDS. The analysis
resulted in four clusters comprising (1) theorists of individual
differences amalgamated with authors of biological orientation with R.
Cattell positioned centrally, (2) behaviorists joined by socio-cognitive
theorists led by M.E.P. Seligman and A Bandura, and (3) the group of
psychoanalytic (dynamic) theorists with A. Adler in the middle. In fourth
cluster G. Allport, H. Murray, K Lewin, W. Mischel, and D. Buss were
found mixed together to make a rather heterogeneous group. In two-axes
representation one of the dimensions was understood as reflecting
methodological and the other one content-specific differences among the
authors, although this interpretation is not univocal. The same procedure
was repeated on citations given to the same authors in SocioFakt - the
Serbian Citation Index for Social Sciences, revealing a reduced picture
of the domain At this portrait, some important authors are missing as a
result of their low citation rate, suggesting that in the Serbian
personality psychology entire research fields don't exist|
C1- [Jevremov, Tanja; Pajic, Dejan; Sipka, Pero] Univ Novi Sad, Dept
Psychol, Novi Sad, Serbia|
RP- Jevremov, T, Univ Novi Sad, Dept Psychol, Novi Sad, Serbia|
EM- jevremov@neobee.net|
CD- COAN RW, 1973, V9, P313, J HIST BEHAV SCI; FUNDER DC, 2000, V52,
P197, PSYCHOL INQ; GARFIELD E, 1992, V41, P5, CURR CONTENTS; HAGGBLOOM
SJ, 1999, 100 MOST FREQUENTLY; HAGGBLOOM SJ, 2002, V6, P139, REV GEN
PSYCHOL; HJORLAND B, 2002, V58, P422, J DOC; KOSANOVIC B, 1996, P85,
MERENJE PSIHOLOGIJI; MAYER JD, 1997, V23, P707, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B;
MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MISCHEL W, 1973, V80,
P252, PSYCHOL REV; MURRAY HA, 1959, P7, PSYCHOL STUDY SCI; NOYONS E,
2001, V50, P83, SCIENTOMETRICS; SIMONSEN C, 2000, V54, P13, NORD J
PSYCHIAT S43; SIPKA P, 1995, V28, P195, PSIHOLOGIJA; SIPKA P, 1996, V3,
P84, CASOPIS KPISP; SNYDER H, 1995, V21, P75, J INFORM SCI; SWANN WB,
2005, V31, P155, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B; TOMASEVIC A, 2000, THESIS FILOZOFSKI
FA; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WINTER DG, 1999, P3,
HDB PERSONALITY THEO; ZUCCALA A, 2006, V57, P1487, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 21|
TC- 0|
PU- ASSOC SERBIAN PSYCHOLOGISTS|
PI- BEOGRAD|
PA- DUSINA 7-3, BEOGRAD, 11000, SERBIA|
SN- 0048-5705|
J9- PSIHOLOGIJA|
JI- Psihologija|
PY- 2007|
VL- 40|
IS- 2|
BP- 329|
EP- 343|
PG- 15|
SC- Psychology, Multidisciplinary|
GA- 289IY|
JN- PSIHOLOGIJA, 2007, V40, N2, P329-343|
UT- ISI:000255049400010 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Jankovic MP; Kaufmann M; Kindler CH|
AF- Jankovic Milan P; Kaufmann, Mark; Kindler, Christoph H|
TI- Active research fields in anesthesia: A document co-citation analysis
of the anesthetic literature|
SO- ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- CITATION ANALYSIS; BISPECTRAL INDEX; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; SCIENCE; RAT;
SCIENTOMETRICS; REMIFENTANIL; INFORMETRICS; NETWORKS; PROPOFOL|
AB- BACKGROUND: The expansion of science has resulted in an increased
information flow and in an exponentially growing number of connections
between knowledge in different research fields. In this study, we used
methods of scientometric analysis to obtain a conceptual network that
forms the structure of active scientific research fields in anesthesia
METHODS: We extracted from the Web of Science (R) (Institute for
Scientific Information) all original articles (n = 3275) including their
references (n = 79,972) that appeared in 2003 in all 23 journals listed
in the Institute for Scientific Information journal Citation Reports'
under the subject heading "Anesthesiology." After identification of
highly cited references (>= 5), pairs of co-cited references were created
and grouped into uniformly structured clusters of documents using a
single linkage and variable level clustering method. In addition, for
each such cluster of documents, we identified corresponding front papers
published in 2003, each of which co-cited at least two documents of the
cluster core. Active anesthetic research fields were then named by
examining the titles of the documents in both the established clusters
and in their corresponding front papers. These research fields were
sorted according to the proportion of recent documents in their cluster
core (immediacy index) and were further analyzed RESULTS: Forty-six
current anesthetic research fields were identified The research field
named "ProSeal laryngeal mask airway" showed the highest immediacy index
(100%) whereas the research fields "Experimental models of neuropathic
pain" and "Volatile anesthetic-induced cardioprotection" exhibited the
highest level of co-citation strength (level 9). The research field with
the largest cluster core, containing 12 homogeneous papers, was
"Postoperative nausea and vomiting." The journal Anesthesia & Analgesia
published most front papers while Anesthesiology published most of the
fundamental documents used as references in the front papers CONCLUSIONS:
Using co-citation analysis, we identified distinct homogenous clusters of
highly cited documents representing 46 active current anesthetic research
fields and determined multiple nets of knowledge among them|
C1- [Jankovic, Milan P.; Kaufmann, Mark; Kindler, Christoph H.] Univ
Basel Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland|
RP- Kindler, CH, Kantonsspital Aarau, Dept Anesthesia & Perioperat, CH5001 Aarau, Switzerland|
EM- christoph.kindler@ksa.ch|
CD- *WIK, FREE ENCY ART SCI; ADAM D, 2002, V415, P726, NATURE; ANDERSON
RE, 2003, V58, P531, ANAESTHESIA; AVERSA E, 1992, V15, P77, ESSAYS INFORM
SCI NO; BENNETT GJ, 1988, V33, P87, PAIN; BOYACK KW, 2004, V101, P5192, P
NATL ACAD SCI U S1; BRAIN AIJ, 2000, V84, P650, BRIT J ANAESTH; COLE S,
1989, V14, P9, TRENDS BIOCHEM SCI; CRAWFORD JW, 1980, V137, P52, AM J
PSYCHIAT; ELIA N, 2006, V136, S15, SWISS MEDICAL W S153; GARFIELD E,
1964, V144, P649, SCIENCE; GARFIELD E, 1987, V257, P52, JAMA-J AM MED
ASSOC; HOOD WW, 2001, V52, P291, SCIENTOMETRICS; JARNEVING B, 2001, V50,
P365, SCIENTOMETRICS; KAYSER V, 2003, V104, P169, PAIN; KREUER S, 2003,
V91, P336, BRIT J ANAESTH; LOTKA AJ, 1926, V16, P317, J WASHINGTON
ACADEMY; MARTYN J, 1964, V20, P236, J DOC; MARX W, 2001, V52, P59,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MOED HF, 2002, V415, P731, NATURE; PRICE DJD, 1965, V149,
P510, SCIENCE; SCHOCH V, SUCHMASCHINE GOOGLE; SCHWECHHEIMER H, 1999, V44,
P547, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; SMALL H, 1985, V11, P147, J INFORM SCI;
SMALL H, 1985, V7, P391, SCIENTOMETRICS; STRUYS MMRF, 2003, V99, P802,
ANESTHESIOLOGY; SUTER MR, 2003, V99, P1402, ANESTHESIOLOGY;
TAGUESUTCLIFFE J, 1992, V28, P1, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; VANRAAN AFJ, 1997,
V38, P205, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANRAAN AFJ, 2004, P19, HDB QUANTITATIVE SCI;
VANRAAN AFJ, 2006, V57, P1919, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ZIMMERMANN M, 1983,
V16, P109, PAIN|
NR- 34|
TC- 1|
PU- LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS|
PI- PHILADELPHIA|
PA- 530 WALNUT ST, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-3621 USA|
SN- 0003-2999|
J9- ANESTH ANALG|
JI- Anesth. Analg|
PD- MAY|
PY- 2008|
VL- 106|
IS- 5|
BP- 1524|
EP- 1533|
DI- 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816d18a1|
PG- 10|
SC- Anesthesiology|
GA- 291UP|
JN- ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, V106, N5, P1524-1533|
UT- ISI:000255222700033 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Chavalarias D; Cointet JP|
AF- Chavalarias David; Cointet, Jean-Philippe|
TI- Bottom-up scientific field detection for dynamical and hierarchical
science mapping, methodology and case study|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- CO-WORD ANALYSIS; INFORMATION; COCITATION; NETWORKS|
AB- We propose new methods to detect paradigmatic fields through simple
statistics over a scientific content database. We propose an asymmetric
paradigmatic proximity metric between terms which provide insight into
hierarchical structure of scientific activity and test our methods on a
case study with a database made of several millions of resources. We also
propose overlapping categorization to describe paradigmatic fields as
sets of terms that may have several different usages. Terms can also be
dynamically clustered providing a high-level description of the evolution
of the paradigmatic fields|
C1- [Chavalarias, David] Ecole Polytech, Team Complex Syst Adapt Rational
& Social Cognit, CREA, F-75005 Paris, France; [Cointet, Jean-Philippe]
INRA, TSV Social & Polit Transformat Related Life Sci &, Ivry, France|
RP- Chavalarias, D, Ecole Polytech, Team Complex Syst Adapt Rational &
Social Cognit, CREA, 1 Rue Descartes, F-75005 Paris, France|
EM- david.chavalarias@polytechnique.edu|
CD- BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P252, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BUTER R, 2002, P697,
6 INT C INF VIS IV 0; CALLON M, 1983, V22, P191, SOC SCI INFORM; CALLON
M, 1991, V22, P155, SCIENTOMETRICS; CHAVALARIAS D, 2007, P EUR C COMPL
SYST; DOYLE LB, 1961, V8, P553, J ASSOC COMPUT MACH; GARFIELD E, 2004,
V30, P119, J INFORM SCI; KUHN TS, 1970, STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; LATOUR B,
2005, REASSEMBLING SOCIAL; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; LIN X, 1991, P262, P 14 ANN INT ACM SIG; MARSHAKOVASHAIKEVICH I,
2005, V41, P1534, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; NOYONS E, 2002, P64, DEALING DATA
FLOOD M; PALLA G, 2005, V435, P814, NATURE; PALLA PPI, 2007, V9, P186,
NEW J PHYS; SALTON G, 1963, V10, P440, J ACM; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; SUN Y, 2004, V37, P162, J BIOMED INFORM; TURNER WA,
1988, HDB QUANTITATIVE STU; VANDENBESSELAAR P, 2006, V68, P377,
SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 20|
TC- 4|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- APR|
PY- 2008|
VL- 75|
IS- 1|
BP- 37|
EP- 50|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-007-1825-6|
PG- 14|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 287TO|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, V75, N1, P37-50|
UT- ISI:000254939600003 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Hou H; Kretschmer H; Liu Z|
AF- Hou Haiyan; Kretschmer, Hildrun; Liu, Zeyuan|
TI- The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- WEB; COCITATION; VISIBILITY|
AB- The structure of scientific collaboration networks in scientometrics
is investigated at the level of individuals by using bibliographic data
of all papers published in the international journal Scientometrics
retrieved from the Science Citation Index (SCI) of the years 1978-2004
Combined analysis of social network analysis (SNA), co-occurrence
analysis, cluster analysis and frequency analysis of words is explored to
reveal: (1) The microstructure of the collaboration network on
scientists' aspects of scientometrics; (2) The major collaborative fields
of the whole network and of different collaborative sub-networks; (3) The
collaborative center of the collaboration network in scientometrics|
C1- [Hou, Haiyan; Liu, Zeyuan] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Humanities &
Social Sci, Inst Sci Studies & Management Sci & Technol, Dalian 116023,
Peoples R China; [Hou, Haiyan; Kretschmer, Hildrun; Liu, Zeyuan] Dalian
Univ Technol, WISE LAB, Dalian 116023, Peoples R China; [Kretschmer,
Hildrun] COLLNET Ctr, Hohen Neuendorf, Germany|
RP- Hou, H, Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Inst Sci
Studies & Management Sci & Technol, Dalian 116023, Peoples R China|
EM- htieshan@dlut.edu.cn|
CD- BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BREAVER DD, 1978, V1,
P65, SCIENTOMETRICS; BREAVER DD, 1979, V1, P133, SCIENTOMETRICS; BREAVER
DD, 1979, V1, P231, SCIENTOMETRICS; DUTT B, 2003, V56, P81,
SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W, 2002, V50, P461, LIBR TRENDS; KRETSCHMER H,
2004, V60, P409, SCIENTOMETRICS; KRETSCHMER H, 2004, V61, P405,
SCIENTOMETRICS; NEWMAN MEJ, 2001, V98, P404, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; NEWMAN
MEJ, 2004, P337, COMPLEX NETWORKS; OTTE E, 2002, V28, P443, J INFORMATION
SCI; PRICE D, 1963, LITTLE SCI BIG SCI; SCHUBERT A, 2002, V53, P3,
SCIENTOMETRICS; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 14|
TC- 7|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- MAY|
PY- 2008|
VL- 75|
IS- 2|
BP- 189|
EP- 202|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-007-1771-3|
PG- 14|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 290AL|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, V75, N2, P189-202|
UT- ISI:000255094900001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Pilkington A; Chai KH|
AF- Pilkington Alan; Chai, Kah-Hin|
TI- Research themes, concepts and relationships - A study of
International Journal of Service Industry Management (1990-2005)|
SO- INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SERVICE INDUSTRY MANAGEMENT|
LA- English|
DT- Review|
DE- research; service industries; publications; social networks; factor
analysis|
ID- STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; MARKET
ORIENTATION; OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; UNOBSERVABLE
VARIABLES; BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS; RELATIONSHIP QUALITY; COCITATION
ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT ERROR|
AB- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the core themes
of service research by analysing citations in the International Journal
of Service Industry Management (IJSIM). It also aims to discuss changes
in the discipline's sub-fields and identifies emerging topics
Design/methodology/approach - The paper is an empirical analysis of
citations and co-citations from the IJSIM. Network and factor analysis
are used to analyse and group the data. The study is unique in performing
the analysis at the individual publication level, rather than following
the normal aggregated author co-citation analysis method Research
limitations/implications - The study examines only IJISM Future study on
other top journal such as Journal of Service Research would provide a
more complete picture on service research Findings - The study identifies
that the core ideas of service research centred on service quality and
customer satisfaction. Also identified are periphery areas which may
become more significant Originality/value - The main contribution of this
article is the use of the novel network analysis technique to analyze the
15,003 citations in the 435 articles published in IJSIM between 19902005. This is a quantitative analysis unlike previous review articles
which rely largely on the observations and reflections of pioneering
researchers|
C1- [Chai, Kah-Hin] Natl Univ Singapore, Ind & Syst Engn, Singapore,
Singapore; [Pilkington, Alan] Univ London, Sch Management, Egham, Surrey,
England|
RP- Chai, KH, Natl Univ Singapore, Ind & Syst Engn, Singapore, Singapore|
EM- iseckh@nus.edu.sg|
CD- ANDERSEN ST, 1993, V2, P125, VEG HIST ARCHAEOBOT; ANDERSON EW, 1994,
V58, P53, J MARKETING; ANDERSON EW, 2000, V3, P107, J SERV RES-US;
BABAKUS E, 1992, V24, P253, J BUS RES; BERRY L, 1991, MARKETING SERVICES
C; BERRY LL, 1981, V3, P33, J RETAIL BANKING; BERRY LL, 1995, V23, P236,
J ACAD MARKET SCI; BETTENCOURT LA, 2001, V28, P313, J CONSUM RES; BITNER
MJ, 1990, V54, P69, J MARKETING; BITNER MJ, 1990, V54, P71, J MARKETING;
BITNER MJ, 1994, P72, SERVICE QUALITY NEW; BITNER MJ, 1995, V23, P246, J
ACAD MARKET SCI; BITNER MJ, 2000, V28, P138, J ACAD MARKET SCI; BOLTON
RN, 1991, V17, P375, J CONSUM RES; BOULDING W, 1993, V30, P7, J MARKETING
RES; BOWEN DE, 1985, P127, SERVICE ENCOUNTER; BOWEN DE, 1986, V25, P371,
HUM RESOURCE MANAGE; BROWN SW, 1989, V53, P92, J MARKETING; CADOTTE ER,
1987, V24, P305, J MARKETING RES; CARMAN JM, 1990, V66, P33, J RETAILING;
CHASE RB, 1978, V56, P137, HARVARD BUS REV; CHASE RB, 1983, V29, P1037,
MANAGE SCI; CHASE RB, 2007, V25, P375, J OPER MANAG; CHURCHILL GA, 1979,
V16, P64, J MARKETING RES; CHURCHILL GA, 1982, V19, P491, J MARKETING
RES; COOPER RG, 1991, V8, P75, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG; CRONIN JJ, 1992,
V56, P55, J MARKETING; CRONIN JJ, 1994, V58, P125, J MARKETING; CRONIN
JJ, 2000, V76, P193, J RETAILING; CROSBY LA, 1990, V54, P68, J MARKETING;
CULNAN MJ, 1986, V32, P156, MANAGE SCI; CULNAN MJ, 1987, V11, P341, MIS
QUART; DABHOLKAR PA, 1994, V3, P241, ADV SERV MARKET MAN; DABHOLKAR PA,
1996, V13, P29, INT J RES MARK; DAVIS FD, 1989, V35, P982, MANAGE SCI;
DAVIS FD, 1989, V13, P319, MIS QUART; DEBRENTANI U, 1989, V6, P239, J
PROD INNOVAT MANAG; DICK AS, 1994, V22, P99, J ACAD MARKET SCI;
EISENHARDT KM, 1989, V14, P532, ACAD MANAGE REV; FISK RP, 1993, V69, P61,
J RETAILING; FORNELL C, 1981, V18, P382, J MARKETING RES; FORNELL C,
1981, V18, P39, J MARKETING RES; FORNELL C, 1992, V56, P1, J MARKETING;
GREMLER DD, 2000, V3, P82, J SERV RES-US; GRONROOS C, 1984, V18, P36, EUR
J MARKETING; GRONROOS C, 1990, SERVICE MANAGEMENT M; GUMMESSON E, 1993,
QUALITY MANAGEMENT S; GWINNER KP, 1998, V26, P101, J ACAD MARKET SCI;
HAIR J, 1992, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN; HAN JK, 1998, V62, P30, J MARKETING;
HART CWL, 1990, V68, P148, HARVARD BUS REV; HARTLINE MD, 1996, V60, P52,
J MARKETING; HARVEY C, 2005, CLASSIFICATION ACAD; HEINEKE, 2007, V25,
P364, J OPERATIONS MANAGEM; HESKETT J, 1990, SERVICE BREAKTHROUGH;
HESKETT J, 1997, SERVICE PROFIT CHAIN; HESKETT JL, 1994, V72, P164,
HARVARD BUS REV; HOCHSCHILD A, 1983, MANAGED HEART COMMER; HOFFMAN KD,
1995, V9, P49, J SERV MARK; HOLSAPPLE CW, 1994, V11, P131, J MANAGEMENT
INFORMA; JAWORSKI BJ, 1993, V57, P53, J MARKETING; JAWORSKI BJ, 1993,
V57, P57, J MARKETING; JOHNSON J, 1996, HDB PERSONALITY PSYC; JOHNSTON R,
1995, V6, P5, INT J SERV IND MANAG; JOHNSTON R, 1999, V19, P104, INT J
OPER PROD MAN; JOHNSTON R, 2005, V25, P1298, INT J OPER PROD MAN; JONES
TO, 1995, V73, P88, HARVARD BUS REV; JORESKOG K, 1986, V6, LISREL;
KEAVENEY SM, 1995, V59, P71, J MARKETING; KELLEY SW, 1990, V66, P315, J
RETAILING; KELLEY SW, 1993, V69, P104, J RETAILING; KELLEY SW, 1994, V22,
P52, J ACADEMY MARKETING; KOHLI AK, 1990, V54, P1, J MARKETING; LARSSON
R, 1989, V14, P213, ACAD MANAGE REV; LILJANDER V, 1995, V4, P141, ADV
SERV MARKET MAN; LOVELOCK CH, 1983, V47, P9, J MARKETING; LOVEMAN GW,
1998, V1, P18, J SERV RES-US; MANO H, 1993, V20, P451, J CONSUM RES;
MEUTER ML, 2000, V64, P50, J MARKETING; MILLS PK, 1986, V11, P726, ACAD
MANAGE REV; MITTAL V, 1998, V62, P33, J MARKETING; MORGAN RM, 1994, V58,
P20, J MARKETING; NARVER JC, 1990, V54, P20, J MARKETING; OLIVER R, 1997,
SATISFACTION BEHAV P; OLIVER RL, 1980, V17, P460, J MARKETING RES; OLIVER
RL, 1981, V57, P25, J RETAILING; OLIVER RL, 1993, P65, ADV MARKETING
MANAGE; OLIVER RL, 1999, V63, P33, J MARKETING; PARASURAMAN A, 1985, V49,
P41, J MARKETING; PARASURAMAN A, 1988, V64, P12, J RETAILING; PARASURAMAN
A, 1991, V67, P420, J RETAILING; PARASURAMAN A, 1994, V58, P111, J
MARKETING; PARASURAMAN A, 2000, V28, P9, J ACAD MARKET SCI; PARASURAMAN
A, 2007, V9, P291, J SERV RES-US; PILKINGTON A, 1999, V19, P7, INT J OPER
PROD MAN; PRICE LL, 1995, V59, P83, J MARKETING; REICHHELD F, 1996,
LOYALTY EFFECT HIDDE; REICHHELD FF, 1990, V68, P105, HARVARD BUS REV;
REYNOLDS KE, 1999, V75, P11, J RETAILING; REYNOLDS KE, 1999, V75, P509, J
RETAILING; RUCCI AJ, 1998, V76, P82, HARVARD BUS REV; RUST R, 1994,
SERVICE QUALITY NEW; RUST R, 2004, V6, P211, J SERV RES-US; RUST RT,
1993, V69, P193, J RETAILING; RUST RT, 1995, V59, P58, J MARKETING;
SCHEUING E, 1989, V3, P35, J SERVICES MARKETING; SCHEUING EE, 1989, V3,
P25, J SERV MARK; SCHMENNER RW, 1986, V27, P21, SLOAN MANAGE REV; SCHMIT
MJ, 1995, V48, P521, PERS PSYCHOL; SCHNEIDER B, 1980, V25, P252, ADM SCI
Q; SCHNEIDER B, 1985, V70, P423, J APPL PSYCHOL; SCHNEIDER B, 1995,
WINNING SERVICE GAME; SCHNEIDER B, 1998, V83, P150, J APPL PSYCHOL;
SHARPLIN AD, 1985, V38, P139, HUM RELAT; SHETH JN, 1995, V23, P255, J
ACAD MARKET SCI; SHOSTACK GL, 1984, V62, P133, HARVARD BUS REV; SHOSTACK
GL, 1987, V51, P34, J MARKETING; SOLOMON MR, 1985, V49, P99, J MARKETING;
STORBACKA K, 1994, V5, P21, INT J SERV IND MANAG; SURPRENANT CF, 1987,
V51, P86, J MARKETING; TAX SS, 1998, V62, P60, J MARKETING; TAYLOR SA,
1994, V70, P163, J RETAILING; TAYLOR SA, 1997, V73, P135, J RETAILING;
TEAS RK, 1993, V57, P18, J MARKETING; TSE DK, 1988, V25, P204, J
MARKETING RES; WESTBROOK RA, 1991, V18, P84, J CONSUM RES; WOOD WJ, 1983,
V3, P296, RETINA-J RET VIT DIS; YI Y, 1990, P68, REV MARKETING; YIN R,
1994, CASE STUDY RES DESIG; ZEITHAML V, 1990, DELIVERING QUALITY S;
ZEITHAML V, 1993, V21, P1, ACAD MARKETING SCI; ZEITHAML V, 1996, SERVICES
MARKETING; ZEITHAML VA, 1985, V49, P33, J MARKETING; ZEITHAML VA, 1988,
V52, P2, J MARKETING; ZEITHAML VA, 1996, V60, P31, J MARKETING|
NR- 135|
TC- 5|
PU- EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED|
PI- BINGLEY|
PA- HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY BD16 1WA, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND|
SN- 0956-4233|
J9- INT J SERVICE IND MANAGEMENT|
JI- Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manage|
PY- 2008|
VL- 19|
IS- 1|
BP- 83|
EP- 110|
DI- 10.1108/09564230810855725|
PG- 28|
SC- Management|
GA- 285MS|
JN- INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SERVICE INDUSTRY MANAGEMENT, 2008, V19, N1,
P83-110|
UT- ISI:000254781500005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Tight M|
AF- Tight Malcolm|
TI- Higher education research as tribe, territory and/or community: a cocitation analysis|
SO- HIGHER EDUCATION|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- higher education research; higher education journals; citation; cocitation; communities of practice|
ID- ARTICLES|
AB- This article builds upon existing research which has been mapping and
analysing the field of higher education research, and, in particular, on
the analysis of the articles (n = 406) in 17 specialist higher education
journals published in the English language outside of North America
during the year 2000. It extends that analysis by examining the citations
(n = 10,065) given in the articles, in particular the patterns of cocitation. This enables a clearer identification of the tribes or
communities of practice that occupy the territory of higher education
research. An attempt is be made to identify the key members of these
tribes or communities, and to chart the key relationships within and
between them|
C1- Univ Lancaster, Dept Educ Res, Lancaster LA1 4YL, England|
RP- Tight, M, Univ Lancaster, Dept Educ Res, Lancaster LA1 4YL, England|
EM- m.tight@lancaster.ac.uk|
CD- BAGILHOLE B, 2002, V23, P19, BRIT J SOCIOL EDUC; BECHER T, 1989, ACAD
TRIBES TERRRITO; BECHER T, 1999, PROFESSIONAL PRACTIC; BECHER T, 2001,
ACAD TRIBES TERRITOR; BROOKS A, 2001, GENDER RESTRUCTURED; COLLINS R,
1998, SOCIOLOGY PHILOS GLO; DESMEDT E, 2004, V24, P445, EDUC PSYCHOL;
FANGHANEL J, 2004, V29, P575, STUD HIGH EDUC; FULLER A, 2005, V31, P49,
BRIT EDUC RES J; HARGENS LL, 2000, V65, P846, AM SOCIOL REV; HENDRY C,
1996, V49, P621, HUM RELAT; HOWIE G, 2002, GENDER TEACHING RES; HYLAND K,
2000, DISCIPLINARY DISCOUR; HYLAND K, 2001, V20, P207, ENGL SPECIF PURP;
LAVE J, 1991, SITUATED LEARNING LE; TIGHT M, 2003, RES HIGHER ED; TIGHT
M, 2004, V23, P395, HIGHER ED RES DEV; TIGHT M, 2004, ROUTLEDGEFALMER
READ; TIGHT M, 2006, V38, P42, HIGH EDUC REV; TIGHT M, 2007, V53, P235,
HIGH EDUC; TROWLER P, 2000, V19, P27, HIGHER ED RES DEV; WENGER E, 2000,
V7, P225, ORGANIZATION; WHITE HD, 2004, V25, P89, APPL LINGUIST|
NR- 23|
TC- 2|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0018-1560|
J9- HIGHER EDUC|
JI- High. Educ|
PD- MAY|
PY- 2008|
VL- 55|
IS- 5|
BP- 593|
EP- 605|
DI- 10.1007/s10734-007-9077-1|
PG- 13|
SC- Education & Educational Research|
GA- 286MB|
JN- HIGHER EDUCATION, 2008, V55, N5, P593-605|
UT- ISI:000254848900006 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Miguel S; Moya-Anegon F; Herrero-Solana V|
AF- Miguel Sandra; Moya-Anegon, Felix; Herrero-Solana, Victor|
TI- New approach to institutional domain analysis: Multilevel research
fronts structure|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; DECISION-SUPPORT SYSTEMS; INTELLECTUAL
STRUCTURE; SEMICONDUCTOR LITERATURE; SCIENCE|
AB- The intellectual structure and main research fronts of the Faculty of
Natural Sciences and Museum of the National University of La Plata,
Argentina is studied, based on the cocitation analysis of subject
categories, journals and authors of their scientific publications
collected in the Science Citation index, CD-ROM version, for the period
1991-2000. The objective of this study is to test the utility of those
techniques to explore and to visualize the intellectual structure and
research fronts of multidisciplinary institutional domains. Special
emphasis is laid on the identification of multilevel structures, by means
of arrangements of subject categories cocitation analysis and journal
cocitation analysis|
C1- [Miguel, Sandra] Natl Univ La Plata, Lib Sci Dept, RA-1900 La Plata,
Argentina; [Moya-Anegon, Felix; Herrero-Solana, Victor] Univ Granada, Lib
& Informat Sci Dept, Granada, Spain|
RP- Miguel, S, Natl Univ La Plata, Lib Sci Dept, 48 E-6 & 7, RA-1900 La
Plata, Argentina|
EM- sandra@fcnym.unlp.edu.ar|
CD- ANDREWS JE, 2003, V91, P47, J MED LIBR ASSOC; BAYER AE, 1990, V41,
P444, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; CULNAN MJ, 1990, V41, P453, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; DING Y, 1999, V25, P67, J INFORM SCI; EOM SB, 1996, V16, P315, DECIS
SUPPORT SYST; EOM SB, 1996, V47, P941, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; HERREROSOLANA
V, 2001, V8, P4, NEXOS; KARKI R, 1996, V22, P323, J INFORM SCI; KREUZMAN
H, 2001, V51, P525, SCIENTOMETRICS; MARSHAKOVA IV, 1973, V11, P3,
NAUCHNOTEKNICHESCA 2; MCCAIN KW, 1984, V35, P351, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
MCCAIN KW, 1986, V37, P111, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1988, V39,
P428, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1995, V32, P153, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOYAANEGON F, 1998, V42,
P229, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOYAANEGON F, 2002, V31, P54, CIENCIA INFORMACAO;
PAISLEY W, 1990, V41, P459, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PERSSON O, 1994, V45,
P31, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
TERUGGI ME, 1988, MUSEO PLATA 1888 199; TSAY MY, 2003, V57, P7,
SCIENTOMETRICS; TSAY MY, 2003, V58, P529, SCIENTOMETRICS; WHITE HD, 1981,
V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1997, V32, P99, ANNU REV INFORM
SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI|
NR- 26|
TC- 1|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- MAR|
PY- 2008|
VL- 74|
IS- 3|
BP- 331|
EP- 344|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-007-1586-2|
PG- 14|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 281GX|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, V74, N3, P331-344|
UT- ISI:000254486000001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Zhao DZ; Strotmann A|
AF- Zhao Dangzhi; Strotmann, Andreas|
TI- Information science during the first decade of the web: an enriched
author cocitation analysis|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- PEARSONS-R; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; INTELLECTUAL SPACE; KNOWLEDGE|
AB- Using an enriched author cocitation analysis (ACA), we map
information science (IS) for 1996-2005, a decade of explosive development
of the World Wide Web, to examine its development since the landmark
study by White and McCain (1998). The Web, we find, has had a profound
impact on IS, driving the creation of new disciplines and revitalization
or obsolescence of old, and most importantly, bridging the chasm between
the "literatures" and "retrieval" IS camps. Simultaneously, the
development of IS towards cognitive aspects has intensified. Our study
enriches classic ACA in that it employs both orthogonal and oblique
rotations in the factor analysis (FA), and reports both pattern and
structure matrices for the latter, thus enabling a comparison between
these several FA methods in ACA. Each method provides interesting
information not available from the others, we find, especially when
results are also visualized in the novel manner we introduce here|
C1- [Zhao, Dangzhi] Univ Alberta, Sch Lib & Informat Studies, Edmonton,
AB T6G 2J4, Canada; [Strotmann, Andreas] Univ Alberta, Sch Business,
Edmonton, AB T6G 2J4, Canada|
RP- Zhao, DZ, Univ Alberta, Sch Lib & Informat Studies, Edmonton, AB T6G
2J4, Canada|
EM- dzhao@ualberta.ca andreas.strotmann@ualberta.ca|
CD- AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; AHLGREN P, 2004,
V55, P843, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; AHLGREN P, 2004, V55, P936, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; ASTROM F, 2007, V58, P947, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BATAGELJ V,
2007, PAJEK PROGRAM ANAL V; BENSMAN SJ, 2004, V55, P935, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; BORNER K, 2004, V101, P5266, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; BOYACK K, 2007, P
11 INT C INT SOC S; CHEN CM, 2006, V57, P359, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; EOM
SB, 1996, V47, P941, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; HAIR JF, 1998, MULTIVARIATE
DATA AN; HARTER SP, 1992, V43, P602, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; HENZINGER M,
2004, V101, P5186, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; JANSSENS F, 2006, V42, P1614,
INFORM PROCESS MANAG; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; MARSHAKOVA IV, 1973, V6, P3, SCI TECHNICAL INFORM; MCCAIN KW, 1990,
V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1990, P194, SCHOLARLY
COMMUNICAT; SCHNEIDER JW, 2007, P 11 INT C SCI INF J; SHIFFRIN RM, 2004,
V101, P5183, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1999, V50, P799, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; THELWALL M,
2005, V39, P81, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; VANECK NJ, 2006, P405, P INT WORKSH
DAT EXP; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1982,
V38, P255, J DOC; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE
HD, 2003, V54, P1250, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITE HD, 2004, V55, P843, J
AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WILKINSON DM, 2004, V101, P5241, P NATL ACAD SCI U
S1; ZHAO D, 2007, P AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ZHAO DZ, 2006, V42, P1578, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG|
NR- 32|
TC- 11|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- APR|
PY- 2008|
VL- 59|
IS- 6|
BP- 916|
EP- 937|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20799|
PG- 22|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 279OF|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2008, V59, N6, P916-937|
UT- ISI:000254363800006 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Kim J; McMillan SJ|
AF- Kim Juran; McMillan, Sally J|
TI- Evaluation of Internet advertising research - A bibliometric analysis
of citations from key sources|
SO- JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING|
LA- English|
DT- Review|
ID- WORLD-WIDE-WEB; PUBLICATION PRODUCTIVITY; SITES; INVOLVEMENT;
RESPONSES; ATTITUDE; AD; INTERACTIVITY; COMMERCIALS; NETWORKS|
AB- How has scholarly research shaped the Internet advertising field
since the mid 1990s? This study addresses that broad question with a
bibliometric analysis of academic literature on Internet advertising By
examining most-cited authors and papers, as well as co-citation patterns,
a general picture of the field can be drawn. This analysis sets a
baseline that will enable future scholars to see where the field of
Internet advertising research began and trace its shift over time|
C1- [Kim, Juran] Jeonju Univ, Sch Business Adm, Jeonju, South Korea;
[McMillan, Sally J.] Univ Tennessee, Coll Commun & Informat, Knoxville,
TN 37996 USA|
RP- Kim, J, Jeonju Univ, Sch Business Adm, Jeonju, South Korea|
CD- 2003, J CITATION REPORTS S; ALBA J, 1997, V61, P38, J MARKETING; ALBA
JW, 1987, V13, P83, J CONSUM RES; BARILAN J, 2002, V50, P371, LIBR
TRENDS; BARRY TE, 1990, V19, P52, J ADVERTISING; BATRA R, 1986, V13,
P234, J CONSUM RES; BERTHON P, 1996, V36, P43, J ADVERTISING RES;
BEZJIANAVERY A, 1998, V38, P23, J ADVERTISING RES; BLATTBERG RC, 1991,
V33, P5, SLOAN MANAGE REV; BORGMAN CL, 2000, P143, WEB KNOWLEDGE FESTSC;
BRIGGS R, 1997, V37, P33, J ADVERTISING RES; BROWN SP, 1992, V19, P34, J
CONSUM RES; BRUNER GC, 2000, V40, P35, J ADVERTISING RES; BUSH AJ, 1998,
V38, P17, J ADVERTISING RES; CAWKELL T, 2000, P177, WEB KNOWLEDGE FESTSC;
CELSI RL, 1988, V15, P210, J CONSUM RES; CHEN QM, 1999, V39, P27, J
ADVERTISING RES; CHO CC, 2005, P162, P AM ACAD ADVERTISIN; CHO CH, 1994,
V35, P143, J ADVERTISING; CHO CH, 1997, P69, P 1997 C AM AC ADV C; CHO
CH, 1999, V21, P33, J CURRENT ISSUES RES; CHO CH, 2001, V41, P45, J
ADVERTISING RES; CHO CH, 2001, P162, P AM ACAD ADVERTISIN; CLARY EG,
1998, V74, P1516, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL; COFFEY S, 1997, V37, P61, J
ADVERTISING RES; COYLE JR, 2001, V30, P65, J ADVERTISING; CRANE D, 1972,
INVISIBLE COLL DIFFU; CULNAN MJ, 1986, V32, P156, MANAGE SCI; DAHLEN M,
2001, V41, P23, J ADVERTISING RES; DEIGHTON J, 1996, V74, P151, HARVARD
BUS REV; DELLAERT BGC, 1999, V13, P41, J INTERACT MARK; DONTHU N, 1999,
V39, P52, J ADVERTISING RES; DREZE X, 1997, V37, P77, J ADVERTISING RES;
DUCOFFE RH, 1995, V17, P1, J CURRENT ISSUES RES; DUCOFFE RH, 1996, V36,
P21, J ADVERTISING RES; EIGHMEY J, 1997, V37, P59, J ADVERTISING RES;
EIGHMEY J, 1998, V41, P187, J BUS RES; ENGEL JF, 1993, V41, P57, CONSUMER
BEHAV; GALLAGHER K, 2001, V41, P57, J ADVERTISING RES; GHOSE S, 1998,
V38, P29, J ADVERTISING RES; HA L, 1998, V42, P457, J BROADCAST ELECTRON;
HAIR JF, 1998, P5, MULTIVAR DATA ANAL; HALEY RI, 1991, V31, P11, J
ADVERTISING RES; HARVEY B, 1997, V37, P11, J ADVERTISING RES; HEETER C,
1989, P53, MEDIA LIST INFORM AG; HEETER C, 2004, V1, J INTERACTIVE
ADVERT; HENTHORNE TL, 1998, V27, P53, J ADVERTISING; HOFFMAN DL, 1996,
V39, P36, COMMUN ACM; HOFFMAN DL, 1996, V60, P50, J MARKETING; HOFFMAN
DL, 1997, V13, P43, INFORMATION SOC; HOFFMANN DL, 1995, V1, J COMPUTER
MEDIATED; HOLBROOK MB, 1987, V14, P404, J CONSUM RES; HULT G, 1997, V19,
P37, J MARKETING ED; KATZ J, 1997, V7, P170, INTERNET RES; KENNEDY JR,
1971, V11, P33, J ADVERTISING RES; KORGAONKAR PK, 1999, V39, P53, J
ADVERTISING RES; KRUGMAN HE, 1965, V29, P349, PUBLIC OPIN QUART; LAVIDGE
RJ, 1961, V25, P59, J MARKETING; LECKENBY JD, 1998, V38, P7, J
ADVERTISING RES; LECKENBY JD, 2000, V1, J INTERACTIVE ADVERT; LEINER BM,
2000, BRIEF HIST INTERNET; LEONG EKF, 1998, V38, P44, J ADVERTISING RES;
LI HR, 1999, V76, P341, JOURNALISM MASS COMM; LIEVROUW LA, 1989, V16,
P615, COMMUN RES; MACKENZIE SB, 1986, V23, P130, J MARKETING RES; MADDEN
M, 2003, AM ONLINE PURSUITS C; MADDOX LM, 1997, V37, P47, J ADVERTISING
RES; MAHESWARAN D, 1990, V17, P66, J CONSUM RES; MCDONALD SC, 1997, V37,
P21, J ADVERTISING RES; MCMILLAN SJ, 2000, P71, P AM ACAD ADVERTISIN;
MEEKER M, 1997, INTERT ADVERTISING R; METHERINGHAM RA, 1964, V4, P23, J
ADVERTISING RES; MITCHELL AA, 1981, V18, P318, J MARKETING RES; MORRIS M,
1996, V46, P39, J COMMUN; MURRY JP, 1992, V18, P441, J CONSUM RES; NOVAK
TP, 2000, V19, P22, MARKET SCI; NUNNALLY JC, 1978, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY;
PAPACHARISSI Z, 2000, V44, P175, J BROADCAST ELECTRON; PASADEOS Y, 1998,
V27, P53, J ADVERTISING; PASADEOS Y, 1999, V11, P29, J PUBLIC RELAT RES;
PAVLOU PA, 2000, V1, J INTERACTIVE ADVERT; PETTY RE, 1983, V10, P135, J
CONSUM RES; PETTY RE, 1986, COMMUNICATION PERSUA; PRITCHARD A, 1969, V25,
P348, J DOC; QUELCH JA, 1996, V37, P60, SLOAN MANAGE REV; RAFAELI S,
1986, V2, P123, COMPUTERS SOCIAL SCI; RAFAELI S, 1988, P110, ADV
COMMUNICATION SC; RAFAELI S, 1997, V2, J COMPUTER MEDIATED; RATCHFORD BT,
1987, V27, P24, J ADVERTISING RES; RODGERS S, 2000, V1, J INTERACTIVE
ADVERT; RODGERS S, 2000, P AM ACAD ADVERTISIN; ROEHM HA, 1999, P27,
ADVERT CONS; ROGERS EM, 1995, DIFFUSION INNOVATION; ROSSITER JR, 1997, J
CURRENT ISSUES RES; ROSSITER JR, 1999, V21, P13, J CURRENT ISSUES RES;
SCHLINGER MJ, 1979, V19, P37, J ADVERTISING RES; SHAMDASANI PN, 2001,
V41, P7, J ADVERTISING RES; SINGH SN, 1999, V42, P91, COMMUN ACM; SMALL
H, 1980, V36, P183, J DOC; SMALL H, 1999, V50, P799, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
STAFFORD TF, 1998, P174, P 1998 AM AC ADV C P; STEUER J, 1992, V42, P73,
J COMMUN; STEVENSON JS, 2000, V40, P29, J ADVERTISING RES; TANKARD JW,
1984, V61, P89, JOURNALISM QUART; USDIKEN B, 1995, V16, P503, ORGAN STUD;
VAUGHN R, 1980, V20, P27, J ADVERTISING RES; WELLS WD, 1999, P115, P 1999
C AM AC ADV U; WHITE HD, 2004, V55, P111, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WIBERLEY
SE, 2003, V73, P121, LIBR QUART; WU GH, 1999, P254, P AM AC ADV; YOO CY,
2001, P53, P 2001 C AM AC ADV; ZAICHKOWSKY JL, 1985, V12, P341, J CONSUM
RES; ZAICHKOWSKY JL, 1994, V23, P59, J ADVERTISING; ZEFF R, 1999,
ADVERTISING INTERNET|
NR- 114|
TC- 0|
PU- M E SHARPE INC|
PI- ARMONK|
PA- 80 BUSINESS PARK DR, ARMONK, NY 10504 USA|
SN- 0091-3367|
J9- J ADVERTISING|
JI- J. Advert|
PD- SPR|
PY- 2008|
VL- 37|
IS- 1|
BP- 99|
EPDIPGSCGAJNUT-
112|
10.2753/JOA0091-3367370108|
14|
Business; Communication|
282CX|
JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2008, V37, N1, P99-112|
ISI:000254546300008 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Westhead P|
AF- Westhead Paul|
TI- Entrepreneurship: Concepts, theory and perspectives|
SO- INTERNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS JOURNAL|
LA- English|
DT- Book Review|
ID- COCITATION ANALYSIS; SCHOLARSHIP|
C1- [Westhead, Paul] Univ Durham, Sch Business, Durham DH1 3HP, England|
RP- Westhead, P, Univ Durham, Sch Business, Durham DH1 3HP, England|
CD- *DEP TRAD IND, 2004, GOV ACT PLAN SMALL B; ACS ZJ, 1996, SMALL FIRMS
EC GROWT; BIRLEY S, 1998, ENTREPRENEURSHIP; BRUSH CG, 2006, WOMEN
ENTREPRENEURSH; CASSON M, 1990, ENTREPRENEURSHIP; CASSON M, 2006, OXFORD
HDB ENTREPREN; CLARK T, 2007, V44, P612, J MANAGE STUD; CORNELIUS B,
2006, V30, P375, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; CUERVO A, 2007, ENTREPRENEURSHIP
CON; DANA LP, 2004, HDB RES INT ENTREPRE; DAVIDSSON P, 2006, NEW FIRM
START UPS I; GARTNER WB, 1989, V13, P47, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; GARTNER WB,
2001, V25, P27, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; GARTNER WB, 2006, V30, P321, ENTREP
THEORY PRACT; GREGOIRE DA, 2006, V30, P333, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; HITT MA,
2005, BLACKWELL ENCY MANAG; LOW M, 2001, V25, P17, ENTREP THEORY PRACT;
READER D, 2006, V30, P417, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; SCHILDT HA, 2006, V30,
P399, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; SHANE S, 2000, V25, P217, ACAD MANAGE REV;
SIEGEL DS, 2006, TECHNOLOGICAL ENTREP; STOREY DJ, 2000, SMALL BUSINESS
CRITI; UCBASARAN D, 2001, V25, P57, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; VENKATARAMAN S,
1997, V3, P119, ADV ENTREPRENEURSHIP; WESTHEAD P, 2000, ADV
ENTREPRENEURSHIP; WESTHEAD P, 2005, V25, P109, SMALL BUS ECON|
NR- 26|
TC- 0|
PU- SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD|
PI- LONDON|
PA- 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND|
SN- 0266-2426|
J9- INT SMALL BUS J|
JI- Int. Small Bus. J|
PD- APR|
PY- 2008|
VL- 26|
IS- 2|
BP- 251|
EP- 255|
PG- 7|
SC- Business; Management|
GA- 277OB|
JN- INTERNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS JOURNAL, 2008, V26, N2, P251-255|
UT- ISI:000254222000008 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Xiao H; Smith SLJ|
AF- Xiao Honggen; Smith, Stephen L. J|
TI- Knowledge impact - An appraisal of tourism scholarship|
SO- ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH|
LA- English|
DT- Review|
DE- knowledge impacts; sociology and anthropology of tourism; citation
analysis; scientific community|
ID- CITATION ANALYSIS; INSTITUTIONAL CONTRIBUTORS; SCIENTIFIC
LITERATURES; SOCIAL-SCIENCES; JOURNALS; AUTHENTICITY; SOCIOLOGY;
ECONOMICS; RANKING; COMMUNITIES|
AB- This paper reports on the impacts of a branch of knowledge-the
sociology and anthropology of tourism-on the scholarly community. A
convenience sample of titles is used for a citation analysis. Results
suggest that this literature has a majority of its citation impacts
within and a smaller portion outside the tourism research community The
frequency of journal citations and the relatively higher rate of cocitations and bibliographical couplings in this research area indicate a
strong and staying impact of these sources on academics Citations beyond
the Anglophone community are notable and implications and limitations of
the study also discussed|
C1- [Xiao, Honggen; Smith, Stephen L. J.] Univ Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L
3G1, Canada|
RP- Xiao, H, Univ Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada|
EM- h2xiao@ahsmail.uwaterloo.ca|
CD- BALDI S, 1998, V63, P829, AM SOCIOL REV; BALOGLU S, 1999, V23, P53, J
HOSPITATLITY TOURI; BEED C, 1996, V18, P369, J POST KEYNESIAN EC;
BENDAVID J, 1966, V31, P451, AM SOCIOL REV; BERG LD, 2004, V35, P553,
GEOFORUM; BOTTERILL D, 2001, V20, P199, LEISURE STUDIES; BROADUS RN,
1971, V23, P236, INT SOC SCI J; BRUNER EM, 1994, V96, P397, AM ANTHROPOL;
BRUNER EM, 1999, V26, P461, AM ETHNOL; BRUNER EM, 2001, V28, P881, AM
ETHNOL; BURNS P, 1999, INTRO TOURISM ANTHR; CAPLAN N, 1979, V22, P459, AM
BEHAV SCI; CARTER R, 2001, V9, P265, J SUSTAIN TOUR; COHEN E, 1972, V39,
P164, SOC RES; COHEN E, 1974, V22, P527, SOCIOL REV; COHEN E, 1979, V6,
P18, ANN TOURISM RES; COHEN E, 1979, V13, P179, SOCIOLOGY; COHEN E, 1988,
V15, P29, ANN TOURISM RES; COTE JA, 1991, V18, P402, J CONSUM RES; COTE
JA, 1992, V3, P251, MARKET LETT; COURTNEY JC, 1987, V20, P625, CAN J
POLIT SCI; CRANE D, 1969, V34, P335, AM SOCIOL REV; CRAWFORDWELCH S,
1992, V11, P15, INT J HOSP MANAGEMEN; CRONIN B, 1981, V37, P16, J DOC;
CRONIN B, 1982, V2, P65, SOC SCI INFORM STUD; DANN G, 1996, LANGUAGE
TOURISM; DANN G, 1999, P13, CONT ISSUES TOURISM; DANN G, 2001, P367, INT
HDB SOCIOLOGY; DANN G, 2005, V10, P3, TOURISM ANAL; DANN GMS, 1997, V24,
P472, ANN TOURISM RES; DARTNALL J, 1990, V1, P49, J TOURISM STUDIES;
DILLAR D, 2006, ED COLL PROFESSORS C; DUNN WN, 1983, V5, P120, KNOWLEDGE;
EASTON G, 2003, V19, P5, J MARKETING MANAGEME; ECHTNER CM, 1997, V24,
P868, ANN TOURISM RES; FAULKNER B, 1998, V37, P76, J TRAVEL RES; FAULKNER
B, 1999, V20, P3, TOURISM MANAGE; FRANKLIN A, 2001, V1, P5, TOURIST
STUDIES; GARFIELD E, 1964, V144, P649, SCIENCE; GARFIELD E, 1979,
CITATION INDEXING TH; GARFIELD E, 1979, V1, P359, SCIENTOMETRICS; GILBERT
GN, 1977, V7, P113, SOC STUD SCI; GOELDNER C, 1999, V1, P33, AS PAC TOUR
ASS 5 AN; GOLDMAN A, 1979, V16, P485, J MARKETING RES; GRABURN N, 1989,
P21, HOSTS GUESTS ANTHR T; GRABURN NHH, 1983, V10, P9, ANN TOURISM RES;
GRABURN NHH, 1991, V18, P1, ANN TOURISM RES; GRIFFITH BC, 1974, V4, P339,
SCI STUD; HALL CM, 2005, V26, P653, TOURISM MANAGE; HALL M, 2004, P3,
COMPANION TOURISM; HALL M, 2006, V4, P119, E REV TOURISM RES; HENNING G,
2005, V53, P187, TOURISM; HODGSON G, 1999, V109, P165, ECON J; HOWEY RM,
1999, V20, P133, TOURISM MANAGE; HSU C, 2005, GLOBAL TOURISM HIGHE;
HUNTER C, 1997, V24, P850, ANN TOURISM RES; JAFARI J, 1990, V1, P33, J
TOURISM STUDIES; JAFARI J, 2001, P28, HOSTS GUESTS REVISIT; JAFARI J,
2002, TOURISM LANDSCAPE KN; JOGARATNAM G, 2005, V26, P641, TOURISM
MANAGE; KESSLER MM, 1963, V14, P10, AM DOC; KOBASIC A, 1996, V44, P169,
TURIZAM; KOUSHA K, 2006, V68, P501, SCIENTOMETRICS; KOUSHA K, 2007,
GOOGLE SCHOLAR CITAT; LABAND DN, 1994, V32, P640, J ECON LIT; LANDRY R,
2001, V30, P333, RES POLICY; LANFANT M, 1980, V32, P14, INT SOC SCI J;
LANFANT MF, 1995, P24, INT TOURISM IDENTITY; LEIBOWITZ SJ, 1984, V22,
P77, J ECON LIT; LEIPER N, 2000, V27, P805, ANN TOURISM RES; LETT J,
1989, P275, HOSTS GUEST ANTHR TO; LEVY D, 1993, V119, P23, SOCIAL GEN
PSYCHOL; MACBETH J, 2005, V32, P962, ANN TOURISM RES; MACCANNELL D, 1973,
V79, P589, AM J SOCIOL; MACCANNELL D, 1976, TOURIST NEW THEORY L; MAR NJ,
1975, V32, P390, CITATION ANAL J DOCU; MARSHALL VW, 1998, V2, P171,
CANADA HLTH ACTION B; MCGRATH J, 1966, SMALL GROUP RES A SY; MCKERCHER B,
2005, V26, P649, TOURISM MANAGE; MCKERCHER B, 2006, V27, P1235, TOURISM
MANAGE; MERTON RK, 1957, V22, P635, AM SOCIOL REV; MULKAY MJ, 1977, P93,
SCI TECHNOLOGY SOC C; NASH D, 1996, ANTHR TOURISM; OPPERMANN M, 2000, V2,
P141, INT J TOURISM RES; PAGE SJ, 2003, V24, P607, TOURISM MANAGE; PAGE
SJ, 2005, V26, P663, TOURISM MANAGE; PECHLANER H, 2004, V42, P328, J
TRAVEL RES; PRICE D, 1963, LITTLE SCI BIG SCI; PRICE DJD, 1965, V149,
P510, SCIENCE; RAJU S, 2006, V37, P155, GEOFORUM; REID L, 1989, V27, P21,
J TRAVEL RES; RICH R, 1997, V10, P3, INT J KNOWLEDGE TRAN; RILEY RW,
2000, V27, P164, ANN TOURISM RES; RITCHIE JRB, 1996, V5, P49, RES J
TRAVEL TOURISM; RYAN C, 2005, V26, P657, TOURISM MANAGE; SAMDAHL DM,
1999, V31, P171, J LEISURE RES; SHELDON P, 1990, V18, P473, J TOURISM
STUDIES; SHELDON PJ, 1990, V1, P42, J TOURISM STUDIES; SIVADAS E, 2005,
V5, P339, MARKETING THEORY; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; SMITH S, 1982, V19, P5, ONTARIO
GEOGRAPHY; SMITH V, 1960, V7, P13, ANN TOURISM RES; SMITH V, 1977, P1989,
HOSTS GUESTS ANTHR T; STIGLER GJ, 1975, V83, P477, J POLITICAL EC; SWAIN
M, 1998, V25, P91, ANN TOURISM RES; TELLIS GJ, 1999, V36, P120, J
MARKETING RES; TRIBE J, 1997, V24, P638, ANN TOURISM RES; TRIBE J, 2000,
V27, P809, ANN TOURISM RES; TRIBE J, 2001, V39, P442, J TRAVEL RES; TRIBE
J, 2004, P46, QUALITATIVE RES TOUR; TRIBE J, 2006, V33, P360, ANN TOURISM
RES; TUIRE P, 2001, V42, P493, HIGH EDUC; URRY J, 1990, V24, P22,
SOCIOLOGY; URRY J, 1990, TOURIST GASE LEISURE; URRY J, 2000, SOCIOLOGY
SOC MOBILI; VANDOREN C, 1994, P308, TOURISM STATE ART; VANDOREN CS, 1984,
V6, P239, LEISURE SCI; WANG N, 1999, V26, P349, ANN TOURISM RES;
WEINSTOCK M, 1971, V5, P16, ENCY LIBRARY INFORMA; WEISS C, 1979, V29,
P426, PUBLIC ADMIN REV; WEISS CH, 1980, V1, P381, KNOWLEDGE CREATION D;
XIAO H, 2006, V10, P335, TOURISM ANAL; XIAO H, 2007, V34, P310, ANN
TOURISM RES; XIAO HG, 2005, V32, P272, ANN TOURISM RES; XIAO HG, 2006,
V33, P490, ANN TOURISM RES; ZHAO WB, 2007, V28, P476, TOURISM MANAGE;
ZINKHAN GM, 1992, V19, P1, J CONSUM RES|
NR- 128|
TC- 6|
PU- PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD|
PI- OXFORD|
PA- THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND|
SN- 0160-7383|
J9JIPDPYVLISBPEPDIPGSCGAJNUT-
ANN TOURISM RES|
Ann. Touris. Res|
JAN|
2008|
35|
1|
62|
83|
10.1016/j.annals.2007.06.008|
22|
Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism; Sociology|
276KN|
ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2008, V35, N1, P62-83|
ISI:000254140100004 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Oda T; Gemba K; Matsushima K|
AF- Oda Tetsuaki; Gemba, Kiminori; Matsushima, Katsumori|
TI- Enhanced co-citation analysis using frameworks|
SO- TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- patent strategy; patent value; patent cluster; technology transition;
life cycle; investment; RD; citation; co-citation; bibliographic data|
AB- The valuation of intangible assets, such as patents, has recently
been considered an important technique for RD strategies. This paper
proposes a citation analysis as a method of valuation on patent clusters
having patent networks. A citation analysis is a method that examines the
value of a patent on the basis of the number of citations of references.
In particular, a co-citation analysis is used for coupling patents as the
patent cluster and valuating the patent cluster. While the co-citation
analysis is of great interest as a method of valuation, this analysis has
not been fully examined and does not define any framework for a
technology transition and patent strategy. Therefore, in this paper, the
conventional co-citation analysis for evaluating the patent clusters is
enhanced and frameworks for the technology transition and patent strategy
are proposed by analysing citation routes in a co-citation analysis|
C1- [Oda, Tetsuaki; Gemba, Kiminori; Matsushima, Katsumori] Univ Tokyo,
Tokyo, Japan|
RP- Oda, T, Univ Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan|
EM- odatetsuaki@hotmail.com|
CD- CARPENTER MF, 1981, P160, WORLD PATENT INFORM; KESSLER MM, 1961, V9,
P49, INFORM THEORY IEEE T; KESSLER MM, 1963, V14, P10, AM DOC; MOGEE ME,
1990, INT PATENT DATA TECH; MOGEE, 1999, P291, EXPERT OPINION THERA;
NARIN FM, 1988, HDB QUANTITATIVE STU; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; TRAJTENBERG M, 1987, 2457 NAT BUR EC RES|
NR- 8|
TC- 1|
PU- ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD|
PI- ABINGDON|
PA- 4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXFORDSHIRE, ENGLAND|
SN- 0953-7325|
J9- TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG MANAGE|
JI- Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage|
PYVLISBPEPDIPGSCGAJNUT-
2008|
20|
2|
217|
229|
10.1080/09537320801931713|
13|
Management; Multidisciplinary Sciences|
274ZY|
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2008, V20, N2, P217-229|
ISI:000254042800005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Nerur SP; Rasheed AA; Natarajan V|
AF- Nerur Sridhar P; Rasheed, Abdul A; Natarajan, Vivek|
TI- The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An
author co-citation analysis|
SO- STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- author co-citation analysis; pathfinder analysis; information theory;
strategic management research; bibliometrics|
ID- CITATION ANALYSIS; JOURNALS; SYSTEMS; DISCIPLINE; SCIENCE|
AB- This paper complements a recent study by Ramos-Rodriguez and RuizNavarro (2004) that investigated the intellectual structure of the
strategic management field through co-citation analysis. By using authors
as the units of analysis and incorporating all the citations that are
included in the Science Citation Index and the Social Science Citation
Index, we trace the evolution of the intellectual structure of the
strategic management field during the period 1980-2000. Using a variety
of data analytic techniques such as multidimensional scaling, factor
analysis, and Pathfinder analysis, we (1) delineate the subfields that
constitute the intellectual structure of strategic management; (2)
determine the relationships between the subfields; (3) identify authors
who play a pivotal role in bridging two or more conceptual domains of
research; and (4) graphically map the intellectual structure in twodimensional space in order to visualize spatial distances between
intellectual themes. The analysis provides insights about the influence
of individual authors as well as changes in their influence over time.
Copyright (C) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd|
C1- [Nerur, Sridhar P.] Univ Texas Arlington, Dept Informat Syst & Operat
Management, Arlington, TX 76019 USA; [Rasheed, Abdul A.] Univ Texas
Arlington, Coll Business Adm, Dept Management, Arlington, TX 76019 USA;
[Natarajan, Vivek] Lamar Univ, Beaumont, TX 77710 USA|
RP- Nerur, SP, Univ Texas Arlington, Dept Informat Syst & Operat
Management, Box 19437, Arlington, TX 76019 USA|
EM- snerur@uta.edu|
CD- ANDREWS KR, 1971, CONCEPT CORPORATE ST; ANSOFF HI, 1965, CORPORATE
STRATEGY; BAUMGARTNER H, 2003, V67, P123, J MARKETING; BAYER AE, 1990,
V41, P444, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BETTIS RA, 1991, V2, P315, ORGAN SCI;
BIGGADIKE ER, 1981, V6, P621, ACAD MANAGE REV; BOYD BK, 2005, V26, P239,
STRATEGIC MANAGE J; BOYD BK, 2005, V26, P841, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; BURT,
2005, BROKERAGE CLOSURE IN; CHANDLER AD, 1962, STRATEGY STRUCTURE C;
COTTRILL CA, 1989, V11, P181, KNOWLEDGE; CRANE D, 1972, INVISIBLE COLL
DIFFU; CRONIN B, 1984, CITATION PROCESS; CULNAN MJ, 1986, V32, P156,
MANAGE SCI; CULNAN MJ, 1987, V11, P341, MIS QUART; CULNAN MJ, 1990, V41,
P453, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; DEARHOLT DW, 1990, P1, PATHFINDER ASS NETWO;
EISENHARDT KM, 1989, V14, P57, ACAD MANAGE REV; EOM SB, 1996, V47, P941,
J AM SOC INFORM SCI; GILBERT DJ, 1992, TWILIGHT CORPORATE S; HAIR JF,
1998, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN; HOSKISSON RE, 1999, V25, P417, J MANAGE;
JEMISON DB, 1981, V6, P601, ACAD MANAGE REV; JEMISON DB, 1981, V6, P633,
ACAD MANAGE REV; KOGUT B, 1991, V37, P19, MANAGE SCI; KUHN ST, 1970,
STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; MARION LS, 2001, V52, P297, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
MCCAIN KW, 1983, V5, P277, SCIENTOMETRICS; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1990, P194, SCHOLARLY COMMUNICAT; MEYER AD,
1991, V17, P821, J MANAGE; MINTZBERG H, 1985, V6, P257, STRATEGIC MANAGE
J; MINTZBERG H, 1994, RISE FALL STRATEGIC; NAG R, 2007, V28, P935,
STRATEG MANAGE J; PHELAN SE, 2002, V23, P1161, STRATEGIC MANAGE J;
PODSAKOFF PM, 2005, V26, P473, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; PONZI LJ, 2002, V55,
P259, SCIENTOMETRICS; PORTER ME, 1980, COMPETITIVE STRATEGY; PORTER ME,
1981, V6, P609, ACAD MANAGE REV; RAMOSRODRIGUEZ AR, 2004, V25, P981,
STRATEGIC MANAGE J; SCHENDEL DE, 1979, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT; SCHVANEVELDT
RW, 1990, PATHFINDER ASS NETWO; SHANNON CE, 1963, MATH THEORY COMMUNIC;
SHAW WM, 1981, V3, P235, SCIENTOMETRICS; SHAW WM, 1983, V34, P46, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; SIRCAR S, 2001, V25, P457, MIS QUART; WEBER R, 1987, V1,
P3, J INFORMATION SYSTEM; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
WHITE HD, 1990, P84, SCHOLARLY COMMUNICAT; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
WILKINSON L, 2002, V2, P119, SYSTAT 10 2 STAT|
NR- 52|
TC- 9|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD|
PI- CHICHESTER|
PA- THE ATRIUM, SOUTHERN GATE, CHICHESTER PO19 8SQ, W SUSSEX, ENGLAND|
SN- 0143-2095|
J9- STRATEG MANAGE J|
JI- Strateg. Manage. J|
PD- MAR|
PY- 2008|
VL- 29|
IS- 3|
BP- 319|
EP- 336|
DI- 10.1002/smj.659|
PG- 18|
SC- Business; Management|
GA- 274YQ|
JN- STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2008, V29, N3, P319-336|
UT- ISI:000254039100005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Vargas-Quesada B; de Moya-Anegon F; Chinchilla-Rodriguez Z; CoreraAlvarez E; Guerrero-Bote V|
AF- Vargas-Quesada Benjamin; de Moya-Anegon, Felix; Chinchilla-Rodriguez,
Zaida; Corera-Alvarez, Elena; Guerrero-Bote, Vicente|
TI- Development of the Spanish scientific landscape: ISI web of science
1990-2005|
SO- PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION|
LA- Spanish|
DT- Article|
DE- information visualization; network visualization; scientific output;
co-citation; Spain; domain analysis; network evolution; pathfinder
networks; Pfnet|
ID- ITEM SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION; PATHFINDER NETWORKS; COMBINED
COCITATION; DIGITAL LIBRARIES; WORD ANALYSIS; CITATION; MAPS;
VISUALIZATION; LITERATURES; DISCIPLINARY|
AB- This longitudinal study of the development of Spain's ISI scientific
domain examines three key time periods: 1990-1995, 1996-2000 and 20012005, with the goal of describing the basic structure and backbone of
Spanish research, as well as studying its development over time. To this
end, ISI categories are used as units of analysis, co-citation as units
of measure, and pruning algorithms to simplify the relationship between
categories in the visualizations. The results show that from the
macrostructure point of view, biomedicine and materials science research
provide the basic nucleus at first. Over the years this nucleus is
consolidated and expanded with agricultural and soil sciences research.
From the microstructure perspective, an increase is observed in the
number of interdisciplinary categories, which occupy central positions,
indicating increased interaction between disciplines that have
traditionally been more important or visible and those on the periphery,
or less well known|
C1- [Vargas-Quesada, Benjamin; de Moya-Anegon, Felix; ChinchillaRodriguez, Zaida; Corera-Alvarez, Elena] Univ Granada, E-18071 Granada,
Spain; [Guerrero-Bote, Vicente] Univ Extremadura, E-06071 Badajoz, Spain|
RP- Vargas-Quesada, B, Univ Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain|
EM- beniamin@ugr.es felix@ugr.es zchinchi@ugr.es ecorera@ugr.es
vicente@alcazaba.unex.es|
CD- *COM EUR, 2003, 3 EUR REP SCI TECHN; *SCIMAGO GROUP, ATL SCI; *THOMS
CORP, ISI WEB KNOWL; AARONSON S, 1975, V6, P22, MOSAIC; BOYACK KW, 2005,
V64, P351, SCIENTOMETRICS; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P252, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BRANDENBURG FJ,
1995, V1027, P87, LECT NOTES COMPUTER; BRAUN T, 2000, WEB KNOWLEDGE
FESTSC; BUTER RK, 2001, V51, P55, SCIENTOMETRICS; BUTLER L, ARC SUPPORTED
RES IM; BUZYDLOWSKI J, 2002, V2, P133, LECT NOTES COMPUTER; CHEN C, 2003,
P67, IEEE S INF VIS; CHEN CM, 1998, V10, P107, INTERACT COMPUT; CHEN CM,
1998, V9, P267, J VISUAL LANG COMPUT; CHEN CM, 1999, V35, P401, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG; CHEN CM, 2001, V52, P315, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CHEN CM,
2003, V54, P435, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CHEN XY, 2001, V34, P71, CHINESE
EDUC SOC; DEMOYAANEGON F, 2004, INDICADORES BIBLIOME; DEMOYAANEGON F,
2005, INDICADORES BIBLIOME; DEMOYAANEGON F, 2005, V41, P1250, INFORM
PROCESSING MA; DEMOYAANEGON F, 2006, V15, P258, PROF INFORM; DING Y,
2001, V37, P817, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; FOWLER RH, 1990, PATHFINDER
ASSOCIATI; GARCIAMUNIZ AS, 2006, V28, P442, SOC NETWORKS; GARFIELD E, 150
ANN M AAAS PHIL; GARFIELD E, 1963, V14, P289, AM DOC; GARFIELD E, 1964,
USE CITATION DATA WR; GARFIELD E, 1981, V42, P5, CURRENT CONTENTS;
GARFIELD E, 1984, V23, P3, CURRENT CONTENTS; GARFIELD E, 1988, V22, P3,
CURRENT CONTENTS; GARFIELD E, 1994, V7, P5, CURRENT CONTENTS SOC; GLANZEL
W, 1999, V44, P427, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W, 1999, V46, P431,
SCIENTOMETRICS; GOMEZ I, 2002, ACTIVIDAD CIENTIFICA; GOMEZ I, 2004,
PROYECTO OBTENCION I; GRANOVETTER M, 1973, V78, P360, AM J SOCIOL;
GRIFFITH BC, 1974, V4, P339, SCI STUD; GUERREROBOTE VP, 2002, V38, P79,
INFORMATION PROCESSI; KAMADA T, 1989, V31, P7, INFORM PROCESS LETT;
LEYDEDORFF L, 2006, V57, P616, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; LEYDESDORFF L, 2007,
V71, SCIENTOMETRICS; LIN X, 2003, V39, P689, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; MORRIS
SA, 2003, V54, P413, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MOYAANEGON F, 2004, V61, P129,
SCIENTOMETRICS; NOYONS E, 2001, V50, P83, SCIENTOMETRICS; NOYONS ECM,
1999, V50, P115, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; ORTEGA JL, 2006, V15, P270, PROF
INFORM; PRICE DJD, 1965, V149, P510, SCIENCE; SAMOYLENKO I, 2006, V57,
P461, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SEIDEN LS, 1989, V59, P72, LIB Q; SMALL H,
1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; SMALL H, 1985, V11, P147, J INFORM SCI; SMALL H,
1985, V7, P391, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1985, V8, P321, SCIENTOMETRICS;
SMALL H, 1999, V48, P72, LIBR TRENDS; SMALL H, 2003, V54, P394, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; VANRAAN AFJ, 1993, V26, P169, SCIENTOMETRICS; VARGASQUESADA
B, 2006, C INT CIEN TECN MULT; VARGASQUESADA B, 2007, VISULAZING
STRUCTURE; WASSERMAN S, 1998, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; WHITE HD, 1997, V32,
P99, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
WHITE HD, 2000, P25, IEEE INFOR VIS; WHITE HD, 2000, WEB KNWOLEDGE
FESTSC|
NR- 66|
TC- 2|
PU- EPI|
PI- BARCELONA|
PA- APARTADO 32 280, BARCELONA, 08080, SPAIN|
SN- 1386-6710|
J9- PROF INF|
JI- Prof. Inf|
PD- JAN-FEB|
PY- 2008|
VL- 17|
IS- 1|
BP- 22|
EP- 37|
DI- 10.3145/epi.2008.ene.03|
PG- 16|
SC- Information Science & Library Science|
GA- 272KK|
JN- PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2008, V17, N1, P22-37|
UT- ISI:000253858100003 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Eto M|
AF- Eto Masaki|
TI- Multivalued co-citation measure based on semantic distance between
co-cited papers in a citing paper: A case study focused on enumeration of
citations|
SO- LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE|
LA- Chinese|
DT- Article|
ID- RETRIEVAL; SCIENCE|
AB- Purpose: One typical document retrieval method is to use co-citation
The method is based on the premise that the degree of similarity among
co-cited papers is equal in a particular paper. The degree is calculated
with binary values: "co-cited" or "not co-cited". To improve upon this
method, the author proposes a multivalued co-citation measure based on
semantic distance between co-cited papers Methods: To determine the
distance between citations, the author measured two machine. parseable
relationships (location and citing words) between places where papers are
cited. In order to evaluate the proposed method, we identified two
categories of co-citation: a group with strong relationships indicating
"enumerated co-citation" (papers cited within one statement) and a group
with weak relationships showing "non enumerated co-citation".
Similarities within each group were calculated and compared using the
CiteSeer dataset and 6 major similarity indicators Results: All of the
similarity indicators showed that the degree of "enumerated co-citation"
is higher than "non enumerated co-citation" Consequently, it became clear
that the proposed co-citation measure can be used to distinguish the
strength of co-citation more precisely and that it can be applied to
large-scale document collections|
C1- Keio Univ, Grad Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Minato Ku, Tokyo, Japan|
RP- Eto, M, Keio Univ, Grad Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Minato Ku, 2-15-45
Mita, Tokyo, Japan|
EM- eto@slis.keio.ac.jp|
CD- BADRAN OM, 1984, P137, P 47 ASIS ANN M PHIL; BEIGBEDER M, 2004, V55,
P1282, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BICHTELER J, 1980, V31, P278, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; BRADSHAW S, 2003, P499, P 7 EUR C RES ADV TE; CALLON M, 1983, V22,
P191, SOC SCI INFORM; CHAPMAN J, 1981, P97, P NATIONAL ONLINE M; COUTO T,
2006, P75, P 6 ACM IEEE CS JOIN; CRONIN B, 1984, CITATION PROCESS ROL;
GARZONE M, 2000, P337, P C CAN SOC COMP STU; KESSLER MM, 1963, V14, P10,
AM DOC; KNAPP SD, 1984, V8, P43, ONLINE; KRAMPEN G, 2007, V71, P191,
SCIENTOMETRICS; LAI KK, 2005, V41, P313, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; LE M,
2006, P265, P 10 PAC AS C KNOWL; LIU H, 2004, MONTYLINGUA VERSION;
MCBRYAN OA, 1997, P79, P 1 INT WORLD WID WE; OCONNOR J, 1982, V18, P125,
INFORMATION PROCESSI; PAO ML, 1993, V29, P95, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; PHAM
SB, 2003, V2903, P759, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; PRESLAV NI, 2004, P SGIR
2004 WORKSH S; RITCHIE A, 2006, P25, P WORKSH CAN COMP LI; RUFF I, 1979,
V9, P81, SOC STUD SCI; SALTON G, 1971, V27, P98, J DOC; SALTON G, 1983,
INTRO MODERN INFORM; SCHNEIDER JW, 2006, V68, P573, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL
H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1980, V36, P183, J DOC;
SPIEGELROSING I, 1977, V7, P97, SOC STUD SCI; TEUFEL S, 2006, P103, P EMP
METH NAT LANG; VOOS H, 1976, V1, P19, J ACAD LIBR|
NR- 30|
TC- 0|
PU- MITA SOC LIBRARY INFORMATION SCIENCE|
PI- TOKYO|
PA- KEIO UNIV 2-15-45 MITA, SCHOOL LIBRARY INFO SCIENCE, MINATO-KU,
TOKYO, 108-8345, JAPAN|
SN- 0373-4447|
J9- LIBR INFORM SCI|
JI- Libr. Inf. Sci|
PY- 2007|
IS- 58|
BP- 49|
EP- 67|
PG- 19|
SC- Information Science & Library Science|
GA- 274UM|
JN- LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2007, V17, N58, P49-67|
UT- ISI:000254027700003 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Bar-Ilan J|
AF- Bar-Ilan Judit|
TI- Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century - A review|
SO- JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Review|
DE- informetrics; bibliometrics; scientometrics; webometrics|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; JOURNAL-CITATION-REPORTS; UNIVERSITY WEB
SITES; SCIENCE-AND-TECHNOLOGY; INDUSTRY-GOVERNMENT RELATIONS; INFORMAL
SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION; LATENT SEMANTIC ANALYSIS; SEARCH ENGINE
COVERAGE; ACCESS RESEARCH PAPERS; COMBINING FULL-TEXT|
AB- This paper reviews developments in informetrics between 2000 and 2006
At the beginning of the 21st century we witness considerable growth in
webometrics, mapping and visualization and open access. A new topic is
comparison between citation databases, as a result of the introduction of
two new citation databases Scopus and Google Scholar. There is renewed
interest in indicators as a result of the introduction of the h-index.
Traditional topics like citation analysis and informetric theory also
continue to develop. The impact factor debate, especially outside the
informetric literature continues to thrive. Ranked lists (of journal,
highly cited papers or of educational institutions) are of great public
interest. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved|
C1- Bar Ilan Univ, Dept Informat Sci, IL-52900 Ramat Gan, Israel|
RP- Bar-Ilan, J, Bar Ilan Univ, Dept Informat Sci, IL-52900 Ramat Gan,
Israel|
EM- barilaj@mail.biu.ac.il|
CD- 2002, NATURE, P101, V415; *ESS SCI IND, 2005, ONL HELP; *SCOP, 2007,
ELS PROUD ANN TOD LA; ACS ZJ, 2002, V31, P1069, RES POLICY; ADAM D, 2002,
V415, P725, NATURE; ADAMS J, 2005, V63, P567, SCIENTOMETRICS; AGUILLO IF,
2006, V57, P1296, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; AKSNES DW, 2003, V12, P159, RES EVALUAT; AKSNES DW,
2003, V56, P235, SCIENTOMETRICS; AKSNES DW, 2004, V13, P33, RES EVALUAT;
AKSNES DW, 2006, V57, P169, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ALBERT R, 2002, V74,
P47, REV MOD PHYS; ALLEN MP, 2006, V94, P206, J MED LIBR ASSOC; ANDERSON
K, 2001, V6, J ELECT PUBLISHING; ANTELMAN K, 2004, V65, P372, COLL RES
LIBR; ARCHAMBAULT E, 2006, V68, P329, SCIENTOMETRICS; ARUNACHALAM S,
2000, V79, P621, CURR SCI INDIA; ARZBERGER P, 2004, V303, P1777, SCIENCE;
BAEZAYATES R, 2005, V9, CYBERMETRICS; BAILONMORENO R, 2005, V63, P209,
SCIENTOMETRICS; BAKKALBASI N, 2006, V3, ARTN 7, BIOMED DIGIT LIBR;
BALCONI M, 2004, V33, P127, RES POLICY; BANKS MG, 2006, V69, P161,
SCIENTOMETRICS; BARABASI AL, 2002, V311, P590, PHYSICA A; BARILAN J,
1997, V39, P29, SCIENTOMETRICS; BARILAN J, 2000, V51, P432, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; BARILAN J, 2000, V24, P439, ONLINE INFORM REV; BARILAN J,
2000, V49, P257, SCIENTOMETRICS; BARILAN J, 2001, V50, P7,
SCIENTOMETRICS; BARILAN J, 2002, V53, P308, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BARILAN
J, 2002, V28, P455, J INF SCI; BARILAN J, 2002, V50, P371, LIBR TRENDS;
BARILAN J, 2004, V38, P231, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; BARILAN J, 2004, V55,
P980, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BARILAN J, 2004, V59, P29, SCIENTOMETRICS;
BARILAN J, 2005, V9, CYBERMETRICS; BARILAN J, 2005, V41, P966, INFORM
PROCESSING MA; BARILAN J, 2006, V42, P1553, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; BARILAN
J, 2006, V2, P3, ISSI NEWSLETTER; BARJAK F, 2006, V57, P1350, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; BARJAK F, 2006, V68, P343, SCIENTOMETRICS; BARRAT A, 2004,
V101, P3747, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; BARRETT CB, 2000, V32, P239, APPL ECON;
BASU A, 2000, V48, P381, SCIENTOMETRICS; BATISTA PD, 2006, V68, P179,
SCIENTOMETRICS; BAUER K, 2005, V11, DLIB MAGAZINE; BAUMGARTNER H, 2003,
V67, P123, J MARKETING; BEAVER DD, 2001, V52, P365, SCIENTOMETRICS;
BEAVER DD, 2004, V60, P399, SCIENTOMETRICS; BEHRENS TR, 2001, V30, P179,
RES POLICY; BELLER FK, 2000, V40, P50, GYNAKOL GEBURT RUNDS; BENSMAN SJ,
2001, V52, P714, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BENSMAN SJ, 2004, V55, P935, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; BENSMAN SJ, 2005, V56, P189, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
BHATTACHARYA S, 2003, V58, P369, SCIENTOMETRICS; BJORNEBORN L, 2001,
P133, P 12 ACM C HYP HYP; BJORNEBORN L, 2001, V50, P65, SCIENTOMETRICS;
BJORNEBORN L, 2004, V55, P1216, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BJORNEBORN L, 2004,
THESIS ROYAL SCH LIB; BLANCHARD D, 2002, V35, P343, PREV MED; BLOCH S,
2001, V35, P563, AUST NZ J PSYCHIAT; BOLDT J, 2000, V44, P842, ACTA
ANAESTH SCAND; BOLLACKER KD, 2000, V15, P42, IEEE INTELL SYST APP; BOLLEN
J, 2006, V69, P669, SCIENTOMETRICS; BONACCORSI A, 2003, V58, P49,
SCIENTOMETRICS; BONITZ M, 2001, V51, P37, SCIENTOMETRICS; BONNEVIE E,
2003, V29, P11, J INFORM SCI; BOOKSTEIN A, 2006, V4296, P1422, INFORM
PROCESSING MA; BORDONS M, 2002, V53, P195, SCIENTOMETRICS; BORGMAN CL,
2000, V56, P412, J DOC; BORGMAN CL, 2002, P3, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; BORNER
K, 2003, P179, VISUALIZING KNOWLEDG; BORNER K, 2004, V101, P5266, P NATL
ACAD SCI U S1; BORNMANN L, 2005, V14, P15, RES EVALUAT; BORNMANN L, 2005,
V63, P297, SCIENTOMETRICS; BORNMANN L, 2005, V65, P391, SCIENTOMETRICS;
BORNMANN L, 2006, V68, P427, SCIENTOMETRICS; BOYACK KW, 2002, V53, P764,
J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BOYACK KW, 2003, V54, P447, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
BOYACK KW, 2004, V101, P5192, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; BOYACK KW, 2005, V64,
P351, SCIENTOMETRICS; BOZEMAN B, 2004, V33, P599, RES POLICY; BRAUN T,
2000, V100, P23, CHEM REV; BRAUN T, 2000, P251, WEB KNOWLEDGE FESTSC;
BRAUN T, 2001, V51, P499, SCIENTOMETRICS; BRAUN T, 2003, V56, P3,
SCIENTOMETRICS; BRAUN T, 2005, V19, P8, SCIENTIST; BRAUN T, 2005, V64,
P113, SCIENTOMETRICS; BRAUN T, 2006, V69, P169, SCIENTOMETRICS; BRIN S,
1998, V30, P107, COMPUT NETWORKS ISDN; BRODER A, 2000, V33, P309, COMPUT
NETW; BRODY T, 2006, V57, P1060, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BROWN C, 2001,
V52, P187, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BROWN C, 2003, V54, P362, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; BUCHANAN RA, 2006, V67, P292, COLL RES LIBR; BUELACASAL G, 2002,
V14, P837, PSICOTHEMA; BUELACASAL G, 2003, V15, P23, PSICOTHEMA; BURRELL
QL, 2001, V52, P3, SCIENTOMETRICS; BURRELL QL, 2002, V53, P309,
SCIENTOMETRICS; BURRELL QL, 2005, V41, P1317, INFORM PROCESS MANAG;
BURRELL QL, 2005, V56, P704, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BURRELL QL, 2005, V65,
P381, SCIENTOMETRICS; BUTLER L, 2002, V419, P877, NATURE; BUTLER L, 2003,
V32, P143, RES POLICY; BUTLER L, 2006, V66, P327, SCIENTOMETRICS; CAHLIK
T, 2000, V49, P373, SCIENTOMETRICS; CALLAHAM M, 2002, V287, P2847, JAMA-J
AM MED ASSOC; CHAN LCY, 2002, V6, CYBERMETRICS; CHEN CM, 2001, V52, P315,
J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CHEN CM, 2002, V53, P678, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
CHEN CM, 2003, V56, P704, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; CHEN CM, 2003, MAPPING SCI
FRONTIER; CHEN CM, 2004, INFORM VISUALIZATION; CHEN CM, 2004, V101,
P5303, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; CHEN CM, 2006, V57, P359, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; CHEN XY, 2001, V34, P71, CHINESE EDUC SOC; CHOMPALOV I, 2002, V31,
P749, RES POLICY; CHU H, 2005, V27, P8, LIBR INFORM SCI RES; COATS AJS,
2005, V105, P123, INT J CARDIOL; COCCIA M, 2004, V34, P267, R&D MANAGE;
COELHO PMZ, 2003, V36, P1605, BRAZ J MED BIOL RES; COLQUHOUN D, 2003,
V423, P479, NATURE; COTHEY V, 2004, V55, P1228, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
COTHEY V, 2006, V10, CYBERMETRICS; CRONIN B, 2000, ASIS MONOGRAPH SERIE;
CRONIN B, 2000, V56, P440, J DOC; CRONIN B, 2001, V52, P558, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; CRONIN B, 2001, V27, P1, J INFORM SCI; CRONIN B, 2002, V53,
P1267, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CRONIN B, 2002, V54, P34, SCIENTOMETRICS;
CRONIN B, 2003, V54, P855, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CRONIN B, 2004, V55,
P160, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CRONIN B, 2006, V57, P1275, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; CURTI M, 2001, V86, P1015, HAEMATOLOGICA; DANELL R, 2000, V49, P23,
SCIENTOMETRICS; DANELL R, 2003, V58, P205, SCIENTOMETRICS; DAVENPORT E,
2000, P517, WEB KNOWLEDGE FESTSC; DAVIS P, 2002, V2, P155, PORTAL-LIBR
ACAD; DAVIS PM, 2001, V52, P309, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; DAVIS RM, 2002,
V8, P513, SCI ENG ETHICS; DEBACKERE K, 2005, V34, P321, RES POLICY;
DEERWESTER S, 1990, V41, P391, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; DENOOY W, 2005,
EXPLORATORY SOCIAL N; DIETZ JS, 2000, V49, P412, SCIENTOMETRICS; DING Y,
2000, V51, P1190, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; DING Y, 2000, V47, P55,
SCIENTOMETRICS; DING Y, 2001, V37, P817, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; DODGSON M,
2000, V8, P101, RES EVALUAT; DONOHUE JM, 2000, V28, P17, OMEGA-INT J
MANAGE S; DORE JC, 2001, V52, P763, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; DUBOIS FL,
2000, V31, P689, J INT BUS STUD; DURRANT R, 2003, V12, P75, TOB CONTROL
S2; DUY J, 2006, V32, P512, J ACAD LIBR; EGGHE L, 2000, V51, P1004, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; EGGHE L, 2000, V51, P145, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; EGGHE L,
2000, V51, P158, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; EGGHE L, 2000, V26, P329, J INFORM
SCI; EGGHE L, 2000, V47, P237, SCIENTOMETRICS; EGGHE L, 2000, V48, P345,
SCIENTOMETRICS; EGGHE L, 2001, V52, P261, SCIENTOMETRICS; EGGHE L, 2002,
V27, P29, CAN J INFORM LIB SCI; EGGHE L, 2002, V53, P789, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; EGGHE L, 2002, V35, P1149, MATH COMPUT MODEL; EGGHE L, 2002,
V54, P51, SCIENTOMETRICS; EGGHE L, 2002, V55, P349, SCIENTOMETRICS; EGGHE
L, 2002, V59, P233, SCIENTOMETRICS; EGGHE L, 2003, V54, P603, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; EGGHE L, 2004, V60, P497, SCIENTOMETRICS; EGGHE L, 2004,
V61, P103, SCIENTOMETRICS; EGGHE L, 2005, V41, P1311, INFORM PROCESS
MANAG; EGGHE L, 2005, V56, P669, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; EGGHE L, 2005,
V56, P935, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; EGGHE L, 2005, POWER LAWS INFORM PR;
EGGHE L, 2006, V42, P106, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; EGGHE L, 2006, V69,
P1221, SCIENTOMETRICS; EGGHE L, 2006, V69, P131, SCIENTOMETRICS;
ETZKOWITZ H, 2000, V29, P109, RES POLICY; EYSENBACH G, 2006, V4, P692,
ARTN e157, PLOS BIOL; FANG Y, 2001, V50, P273, SCIENTOMETRICS; FARKAS I,
2002, V314, P25, PHYSICA A; FASSOULAKI A, 2000, V84, P266, BRIT J
ANAESTH; FASSOULAKI A, 2002, V46, P902, ACTA ANAESTH SCAND; FENTON JE,
2000, V25, P40, CLIN OTOLARYNGOL; FORGIONNE GA, 2001, V38, P421, INFORM
MANAGE; FRANDSEN TF, 2005, V56, P58, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; FRANDSEN TF,
2006, V62, P58, J DOC; FRANKLIN J, 2003, V4, ARTN 6, BMC MUSCULOSKELET
DI; GADD E, 2003, V59, P243, J DOC; GADD E, 2003, V29, P333, J INFORM
SCI; GADD E, 2003, V35, P171, J LIBR INF SCI; GARDNER S, 2005, V22, P42,
LIB HI TECH NEWS; GARFIELD E, 2000, V41, P368, CROAT MED J; GARFIELD E,
2001, V411, P522, NATURE; GARFIELD E, 2003, V54, P400, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; GARFIELD E, 2004, V30, P119, J INFORM SCI; GARFIELD E, 2006, V295,
P90, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC; GARFIELD E, 2007, FREE FULL TEXT ACCES; GAUGHAN
M, 2002, V11, P17, RES EVALUAT; GILES CL, 2004, V101, P17599, P NATL ACAD
SCI USA; GIRVAN M, 2002, V99, P7821, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; GLANZEL W,
2001, V50, P199, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W, 2001, V51, P69,
SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W, 2002, V50, P461, LIBR TRENDS; GLANZEL W, 2002,
V53, P171, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W, 2002, V55, P335, SCIENTOMETRICS;
GLANZEL W, 2003, V56, P357, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W, 2003, V58, P415,
SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W, 2003, V58, P571, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W,
2004, V59, P281, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W, 2004, V59, P63,
SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W, 2005, V1, P15, ISSI NEWSLETTER; GLANZEL W,
2006, V67, P315, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W, 2006, V68, P457,
SCIENTOMETRICS; GLENISSON P, 2005, V41, P1548, INFORM PROCESS MANAG;
GLENISSON P, 2005, V63, P163, SCIENTOMETRICS; GMUR M, 2003, V57, P27,
SCIENTOMETRICS; GODIN B, 2000, V9, P43, PUBLIC UNDERST SCI; GODIN B,
2000, V29, P273, RES POLICY; GODIN B, 2003, V32, P679, RES POLICY; GODIN
B, 2005, MEASUREMENT STAT SCI; GODIN B, 2006, V33, P59, SCI PUBL POLICY;
GODIN B, 2006, V68, P109, SCIENTOMETRICS; GOLDSTEIN ML, 2004, V41, P255,
EUR PHYS J B; GOLDSTEIN ML, 2005, V71, UNSP 6108-1-6108-6, PHYS REV E;
GOODRUM AA, 2001, V37, P661, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; GRIGGS RA, 2002, V29,
P203, TEACH PSYCHOL; GUTIERREZ J, 2001, V25, P53, PROG HUM GEOG; HALL BH,
2005, V36, P16, RAND J ECON; HARHOFF D, 2003, V32, P1343, RES POLICY;
HARNAD S, 2000, V79, P629, CURR SCI INDIA; HARNAD S, 2001, V410, P1024,
NATURE; HARNAD S, 2004, V10, DLIB MAGAZINE; HARNAD S, 2004, V30, P310,
SERIALS REV; HARRIES G, 2004, V30, P436, J INFORM SCI; HARTER SP, 2000,
V51, P940, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; HE SY, 2002, V53, P953, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; HE YL, 2002, V38, P491, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; HEIMERIKS G, 2003,
V58, P391, SCIENTOMETRICS; HEIMERIKS G, 2006, V10, CYBERMETRICS;
HENDERSON J, 2005, V172, P1549, CAN MED ASSOC J; HERRING SD, 2002, V63,
P334, COLL RES LIBR; HICKS D, 2000, V27, P310, SCI PUBL POLICY; HICKS D,
2001, V30, P681, RES POLICY; HIRSCH JE, 2005, V102, P16569, P NATL ACAD
SCI USA; HITCHCOCK S, 2000, P143, P 5 ACM C DIG LIBR; HITCHCOCK S, 2002,
V8, DLIB MAGAZINE; HO YS, 2004, V59, P171, SCIENTOMETRICS; HOFFMANGOETZ
L, 2003, V8, P475, J HEALTH COMMUN; HOLDEN PA, 2005, V4, P1, VADOSE ZONE
J; HOLMES A, 2001, V6, INFORM RES; HOOD WW, 2001, V52, P1242, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; HOOD WW, 2001, V52, P291, SCIENTOMETRICS; HOOD WW, 2003,
V54, P1091, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; HOOD WW, 2003, V58, P587,
SCIENTOMETRICS; HUANG Z, 2003, V5, P333, J NANOPART RES; HUANG Z, 2004,
V6, P325, J NANOPART RES; HUBER JC, 2001, V50, P323, SCIENTOMETRICS;
HUBER JC, 2002, V53, P209, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; HULLMANN A, 2003, V58,
P507, SCIENTOMETRICS; HYLAND K, 2001, V20, P207, ENGL SPECIF PURP; HYLAND
K, 2003, V54, P251, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; INGWERSEN P, 1998, V54, P236, J
DOC; INGWERSEN P, 2001, V46, P524, CHINESE SCI BULL; INONU E, 2003, V56,
P137, SCIENTOMETRICS; IOANNIDIS JPA, 2005, V294, P218, JAMA-J AM MED
ASSOC; JACSO P, 2001, V37, P590, CORTEX; JACSO P, 2005, V89, P1537, CURR
SCI INDIA; JACSO P, 2005, V29, P208, ONLINE INFORM REV; JACSO P, 2006,
V30, P297, ONLINE INFORM REV; JANSSEN MA, 2006, V16, P240, GLOBAL ENVIRON
CHANG; JANSSENS F, 2006, V42, P1614, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; JARVELIN K,
2000, V56, P250, J DOC; JIN BH, 2005, P362, P ISSI 2005; JIN P, 2003, V1,
P8, J TRANSL MED; KAPLAN NR, 2000, V51, P324, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
KATERATTANAKUL P, 2003, V46, P111, COMMUN ACM; KELLY CD, 2006, V21, P167,
TRENDS ECOL EVOL; KING DA, 2004, V430, P311, NATURE; KING JT, 2000, V47,
P435, NEUROSURGERY; KJAERGARD LL, 2002, V55, P407, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL;
KLEIJNEN JPC, 2000, V36, P551, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; KNOTHE G, 2006, V57,
P1830, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; KOEHLER W, 2001, V51, P117, SCIENTOMETRICS;
KOEHLER W, 2002, V53, P162, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; KOSTOFF RN, 1995, US,
5440481; KOSTOFF RN, 2000, V37, P727, J AIRCRAFT; KOSTOFF RN, 2000, V40,
P19, J CHEM INF COMP SCI; KOSTOFF RN, 2001, V52, P1148, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; KOSTOFF RN, 2002, V53, P49, SCIENTOMETRICS; KOUSHA K, 2006, V68,
P501, SCIENTOMETRICS; KRETSCHMER H, 2004, V61, P405, SCIENTOMETRICS;
KURMIS AP, 2003, V85, P2449, J BONE JOINT SURG A; KURTZ MJ, 2005, V41,
P1395, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; KURTZ MJ, 2005, V56, P111, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; KURTZ MJ, 2005, V56, P36, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LAFOUGE T, 2001,
V27, P39, J INFORM SCI; LANDAUER TK, 2004, V101, P5214, P NATL ACAD SCI U
S1; LANDRY R, 2001, V30, P333, RES POLICY; LANGE LL, 2001, V52, P457,
SCIENTOMETRICS; LANKHORST GJ, 2001, V15, P115, CLIN REHABIL; LARSON R,
1996, P71, P 59 ANN M AM SOC IN; LASCAR C, 2001, V62, P422, COLL RES
LIBR; LAWRENCE S, 2000, V34, P26, IEEE COMPUT; LAWRENCE S, 2001, V411,
P521, NATURE; LEE KP, 2002, V287, P2805, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC; LETA J,
2002, V53, P325, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEWISON G, 2001, V52, P29,
SCIENTOMETRICS; LEWISON G, 2002, V53, P229, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEWISON G,
2004, V60, P145, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEWISON G, 2005, V14, P5, RES EVALUAT;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2000, V4, CYBERMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2000, V47, P265,
SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2001, CHALLENGE SCIENTOMET; LEYDESDORFF L,
2001, V5, CYBERMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2001, V52, P1262, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2002, V53, P987, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L,
2002, V53, P131, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2003, V59, P84, J DOC;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2003, V58, P191, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2003, V58,
P445, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V55, P999, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V60, P371, J DOC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V60,
P159, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2005, V56, P769, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2005, V27, P64, SCI COMMUN; LEYDESDORFF L, 2005, V63,
P617, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P601, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L,
2006, V57, P1170, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; LI XM, 2003, V27, P407, ONLINE
INFORM REV; LI XM, 2003, V57, P239, SCIENTOMETRICS; LI XM, 2005, V64,
P151, SCIENTOMETRICS; LIANG L, 2006, V69, P163, SCIENTOMETRICS; LIANG LM,
2001, V10, P105, RES EVALUAT; LIANG LM, 2001, V52, P471, SCIENTOMETRICS;
LIANG LM, 2005, V56, P1045, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LIN X, 2003, V39, P689,
INFORM PROCESS MANAG; LIU NC, 2005, V30, P127, HIGHER ED EUROPE; LIU NC,
2005, V64, P101, SCIENTOMETRICS; LOK CKW, 2001, V34, P223, J ADV NURS;
LOSIEWICZ P, 2000, V15, P99, J INTELL INF SYST; LU DW, 2005, V53, P720, J
AM ACAD DERMATOL; LUNDBERG GD, 2003, V178, P253, MED J AUSTRALIA; MABE M,
2001, V51, P147, SCIENTOMETRICS; MABE MA, 2002, V54, P149, ASLIB PROC;
MAHLCK P, 2000, V49, P81, SCIENTOMETRICS; MAN JP, 2004, V19, P811, EUR J
EPIDEMIOL; MARUSIC M, 2001, V42, P113, CROAT MED J; MARX W, 2001, V52,
P59, SCIENTOMETRICS; MAURSETH PB, 2002, V104, P531, SCAND J ECON; MAYR P,
2005, V56, P41, INFORMATION WISSENSC; MAYR P, 2007, V11, CYBERMETRICS;
MCCAIN KW, 2000, V51, P1321, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCKIBBON KA, 2004, V2,
P33, BMC MED; MCMILLAN GS, 2000, V29, P1, RES POLICY; MCMILLAN GS, 2000,
V12, P467, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG; MEADOWS J, 2005, V33, P90, INTERLEND DOC
SUPPLY; MEHO LI, 2000, V51, P123, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MEHO LI, 2005,
V56, P1314, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MELIN G, 2000, V29, P31, RES POLICY;
METTROP W, 2001, V57, P623, J DOC; MEYER M, 2000, V29, P409, RES POLICY;
MEYER M, 2000, V48, P151, SCIENTOMETRICS; MEYER M, 2000, V49, P93,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MEYER M, 2002, V54, P193, SCIENTOMETRICS; MEYER M, 2003,
V58, P321, SCIENTOMETRICS; MEYER MS, 2001, V51, P163, SCIENTOMETRICS;
MICHEL J, 2001, V51, P185, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOED HF, 1985, V14, P131, RES
POLICY; MOED HF, 1995, V46, P461, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MOED HF, 1996,
V381, P166, NATURE; MOED HF, 2000, V47, P323, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOED HF,
2002, V50, P498, LIBR TRENDS; MOED HF, 2002, V415, P731, NATURE; MOED HF,
2002, V53, P281, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOED HF, 2004, HDB QUANTITATIVE SCI;
MOED HF, 2005, CITATION ANAL RES EV; MONTEMURRO MA, 2001, V300, P567,
PHYSICA A; MOODY J, 2004, V69, P213, AM SOCIOL REV; MORILLO F, 2001, V51,
P203, SCIENTOMETRICS; MORILLO F, 2003, V54, P1237, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
MORRIS SA, 2003, V54, P413, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MOWERY DC, 2001, V30,
P99, RES POLICY; MOWERY DC, 2002, V31, P399, RES POLICY; MURRAY F, 2002,
V31, P1389, RES POLICY; MUST U, 2006, V66, P241, SCIENTOMETRICS; NEDERHOF
AJ, 1987, V11, P333, SCIENTOMETRICS; NEDERHOF AJ, 2001, V51, P241,
SCIENTOMETRICS; NEUBERGER J, 2002, V14, P209, EUR J GASTROEN HEPAT;
NEUHAUS C, 2006, V6, P127, PORTAL-LIBR ACAD; NEWMAN MEJ, 2001, V98, P404,
P NATL ACAD SCI USA; NEWMAN MEJ, 2001, V64, PHYS REV E; NEWMAN MEJ, 2003,
V45, P167, SIAM REV; NEWMAN MEJ, 2003, V25, P83, SOC NETWORKS; NEWMAN
MEJ, 2004, V69, PHYS REV E; NICHOLLS PT, 1989, V40, P379, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; NISONGER TE, 2000, V61, P263, COLL RES LIBR; NISONGER TE, 2002, V54,
P257, SCIENTOMETRICS; NISONGER TE, 2004, V65, P152, COLL RES LIBR; NORRIS
M, 2003, V59, P709, J DOC; NORUZI A, 2005, V55, P170, LIBRI; NOYONS E,
2001, V50, P83, SCIENTOMETRICS; ODLYZKO A, 2002, V15, P7, LEARN PUBL;
ONYANCHA OB, 2005, V41, P1573, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; OPPENHEIM C, 2000,
P405, ASIS MONOGRAPH SERIE; OPPENHEIM C, 2000, V56, P361, J DOC; ORTEGA
JL, 2006, V32, P344, J INF SCI; OTTE E, 2002, V28, P441, J INF SCI; PAASI
A, 2005, V37, P769, ENVIRON PLANN A; PALADUGU R, 2002, V26, P1099, WORLD
J SURG; PARK HW, 2003, V8, J COMPUTER MEDIATED; PATEL V, 2001, V178,
P406, BRIT J PSYCHIAT; PATSOPOULOS NA, 2005, V293, P2362, JAMA-J AM MED
ASSOC; PAYNE D, 2004, V5, SCIENTIST; PERITZ BC, 2002, V54, P269,
SCIENTOMETRICS; PERKEL JM, 2005, V19, P24, SCIENTIST; PERSSON O, 2001,
V50, P339, SCIENTOMETRICS; PERSSON O, 2004, V60, P421, SCIENTOMETRICS;
PETTIGREW KE, 2001, V52, P62, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; PICHAPPAN P, 2002,
V54, P285, SCIENTOMETRICS; PIETERS R, 2002, V40, P483, J ECON LIT; PINSKI
G, 1976, V12, P297, INFORMATION PROCESSI; PORTER AL, 2002, V53, P351,
SCIENTOMETRICS; PRICE DJ, 1986, LITTLE SCI BIG SCI; PRIME C, 2002, V54,
P291, SCIENTOMETRICS; PUDOVKIN AI, 2002, V53, P1113, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; RAHMAN M, 2002, V347, P1211, NEW ENGL J MED; RAHMAN M, 2003, V19,
P249, INT J TECHNOL ASSESS; RAHMAN M, 2003, V117, P274, PUBLIC HEALTH;
RAMASCO JJ, 2004, V70, PHYS REV E; RAMIREZ AM, 2000, V47, P3,
SCIENTOMETRICS; RAMOSRODRIGUEZ AR, 2004, V25, P981, STRATEGIC MANAGE J;
RAY J, 2000, V109, P131, AM J MED; REDMAN J, 2001, V34, P375, J APPL
CRYSTALLOGR 3; REN SL, 2002, V53, P389, SCIENTOMETRICS; RINIA EJ, 2001,
V30, P357, RES POLICY; RINIA EJ, 2001, V51, P293, SCIENTOMETRICS; RINIA
EJ, 2002, V54, P347, SCIENTOMETRICS; ROESSNER D, 2000, V8, P125, RES
EVALUAT; ROGERS LF, 2002, V178, P541, AM J ROENTGENOL; ROSENBERG G, 2005,
V41, P103, SOCIAL WORK HLTH CAR; ROTHMAN J, 2003, V27, P105, SOC WORK
RES; ROUSSEAU B, 2000, V4, CYBERMETRICS; ROUSSEAU R, 1997, V1,
CYBERMETRICS; ROUSSEAU R, 2001, V57, P349, J DOC; ROUSSEAU R, 2002, V50,
P418, LIBR TRENDS; ROUSSEAU R, 2002, V55, P317, SCIENTOMETRICS; ROUSSEAU
R, 2004, V55, P513, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ROUSSEAU R, 2005, V61, P194, J
DOC; ROUSSEAU R, 2005, V63, P431, SCIENTOMETRICS; ROWLANDS I, 2002, V54,
P77, ASLIB PROC; RUIZPEREZ R, 2002, V90, P411, J MED LIBR ASSOC; SAAD G,
2006, V69, P117, SCIENTOMETRICS; SAHA S, 2003, V91, P41, J MED LIBR
ASSOC; SANDSTROM PE, 2001, V51, P573, SCIENTOMETRICS; SCHARNHORST A,
2006, V10, CYBERMETRICS; SCHLEGL C, 2004, V56, P1155, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; SCHOEPFLIN U, 2001, V50, P301, SCIENTOMETRICS; SCHUBERT A, 2002,
V53, P3, SCIENTOMETRICS; SCHUMMER J, 2004, V59, P425, SCIENTOMETRICS;
SEGLEN PO, 2000, V49, P125, SCIENTOMETRICS; SHINN T, 2002, V32, P599, SOC
STUD SCI; SINAI M, 2007, BRANDON HILL SELECTE; SMALL H, 2003, V54, P394,
J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; SMALL H, 2004, V60, P71, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H,
2006, V68, P595, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMITH A, 2002, V54, P363,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SOLARI A, 2000, V47, P605, SCIENTOMETRICS; SOMBATSOMPOP
N, 2004, V60, P235, SCIENTOMETRICS; SOMBATSOMPOP N, 2005, V56, P676, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; SOTERIADES ES, 2005, V331, P192, BRIT MED J; SOTERIADES
ES, 2006, V20, P19, FASEB J; SPROTT DE, 2002, V21, P105, J PUBLIC POLICY
MARK; STEELE TW, 2000, V51, P476, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; STEGMANN J, 2001,
V50, P483, SCIENTOMETRICS; STEGMANN J, 2003, V56, P111, SCIENTOMETRICS;
SWANSON DR, 2001, V52, P797, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; TAGUESUTCLIFFE J,
1992, V28, P1, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; TANG R, 2002, V39, P417, P ASIST
ANNU; TANG R, 2003, V25, P437, LIBR INFORM SCI RES; THELWALL M, 2000,
V56, P185, J DOC; THELWALL M, 2001, V5, CYBERMETRICS; THELWALL M, 2001,
V52, P1157, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; THELWALL M, 2001, V57, P177, J DOC;
THELWALL M, 2001, V27, P319, J INFORM SCI; THELWALL M, 2001, V27, P393, J
INFORM SCI; THELWALL M, 2002, V54, P118, ASLIB PROC; THELWALL M, 2002,
V12, P124, INTERNET RES; THELWALL M, 2002, V53, P995, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; THELWALL M, 2002, V58, P66, J DOC; THELWALL M, 2002, V28, P483, J
INFORM SCI; THELWALL M, 2002, V26, P413, ONLINE INFORM REV; THELWALL M,
2002, V53, P95, SCIENTOMETRICS; THELWALL M, 2002, V55, P363,
SCIENTOMETRICS; THELWALL M, 2003, V8, INFORM RES; THELWALL M, 2003, V54,
P490, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; THELWALL M, 2003, V54, P594, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; THELWALL M, 2003, V54, P706, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; THELWALL M, 2003,
V59, P205, J DOC; THELWALL M, 2003, V29, P1, J INFORM SCI; THELWALL M,
2003, V27, P333, ONLINE INFORM REV; THELWALL M, 2003, V56, P417,
SCIENTOMETRICS; THELWALL M, 2003, V58, P158, SCIENTOMETRICS; THELWALL M,
2004, V40, P125, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; THELWALL M, 2004, V55, P149, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; THELWALL M, 2004, V30, P240, J INFORM SCI; THELWALL M,
2004, LINK ANAL INFORM SCI; THELWALL M, 2005, V39, P81, ANNU REV INFORM
SCI; THELWALL M, 2006, V57, P1303, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; THELWALL M,
2006, V57, P60, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; THOMAS O, 2000, V26, P421, J INFORM
SCI; THOMPSON JW, 2002, V52, P121, LIBRI; THORSTEINSDOTTIR OH, 2000, V49,
P145, SCIENTOMETRICS; TIJSSEN RJW, 2000, V47, P389, SCIENTOMETRICS;
TIJSSEN RJW, 2001, V30, P35, RES POLICY; TIJSSEN RJW, 2002, V31, P509,
RES POLICY; TIJSSEN RJW, 2002, V54, P381, SCIENTOMETRICS; TIJSSEN RJW,
2004, V33, P709, RES POLICY; TRAYHURN P, 2002, V88, P1, BRIT J NUTR;
TSALLIS C, 2000, V13, P777, EUR PHYS J B; TSAY MY, 2000, V49, P491,
SCIENTOMETRICS; TSAY MY, 2005, V93, P450, J MED LIBR ASSOC; UGOLINI D,
2003, V56, P345, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANDALEN HP, 2001, V50, P455,
SCIENTOMETRICS; VANDENBESSELAAR P, 2000, V47, P169, SCIENTOMETRICS;
VANDENBESSELAAR P, 2001, V51, P441, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANFLEET DD, 2000,
V26, P839, J MANAGE; VANLEEUWEN TN, 2000, V9, P155, RES EVALUAT;
VANLEEUWEN TN, 2001, V51, P335, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANLEEUWEN TN, 2002, V53,
P249, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANLEEUWEN TN, 2003, V57, P257, SCIENTOMETRICS;
VANLEEUWEN TN, 2005, V63, P357, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANLOOY B, 2003, V57,
P355, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANRAAN AFJ, 1996, V36, P397, SCIENTOMETRICS;
VANRAAN AFJ, 2000, P301, ASIS MONOGRAPH SERIE; VANRAAN AFJ, 2000, V8,
P81, RES EVALUAT; VANRAAN AFJ, 2000, V47, P347, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANRAAN
AFJ, 2001, V50, P347, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANRAAN AFJ, 2001, V50, P59,
SCIENTOMETRICS; VANRAAN AFJ, 2002, V31, P611, RES POLICY; VANRAAN AFJ,
2004, V59, P467, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANRAAN AFJ, 2005, V62, P133,
SCIENTOMETRICS; VANRAAN AFJ, 2005, V63, P549, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANRAAN
AFJ, 2005, V64, P111, SCIENTOMETRICS; VANRAAN AFJ, 2006, V67, P491,
SCIENTOMETRICS; VANTEIJLINGEN E, 2002, V37, P506, J ADV NURS; VAUGHAN L,
2002, V54, P356, ASLIB PROC; VAUGHAN L, 2003, V54, P1313, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; VAUGHAN L, 2003, V54, P29, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; VAUGHAN L,
2004, V28, P17, CAN J INFORM LIB SCI; VAUGHAN L, 2004, V40, P677, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG; VAUGHAN L, 2004, V40, P693, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; VAUGHAN
L, 2005, V41, P347, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; VAUGHAN L, 2005, V56, P1075, J
AM SOC INF SCI TEC; VAUGHAN L, 2006, V57, P1178, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
VAUGHAN L, 2006, V67, P291, SCIENTOMETRICS; VAUGHAN L, 2006, V68, P611,
SCIENTOMETRICS; VAUGHAN LW, 2004, V60, P487, SCIENTOMETRICS; VAUGHAN LW,
2004, V61, P467, SCIENTOMETRICS; VERBEEK A, 2002, V54, P399,
SCIENTOMETRICS; VESSEY I, 2002, V19, P129, J MANAGE INFORM SYST; VINKLER
P, 2001, V50, P539, SCIENTOMETRICS; VINKLER P, 2002, V53, P267,
SCIENTOMETRICS; VINKLER P, 2004, V55, P431, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; VONELM
E, 2004, V291, P974, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC; VREELAND RC, 2000, V92, P9, LAW
LIBR J; WAGNER CS, 2005, V34, P1608, RES POLICY; WAGNERDOBLER R, 2001,
V52, P503, SCIENTOMETRICS; WALLACE LS, 2003, V27, P75, AM J HEALTH BEHAV;
WALTER G, 2003, V178, P280, MED J AUSTRALIA; WARNER J, 2000, V26, P453, J
INFORM SCI; WEALE AR, 2004, V4, BMC MED RES METHODOL; WEBSTER TJ, 2001,
V20, P235, ECON EDUC REV; WEINGART P, 2005, V62, P117, SCIENTOMETRICS;
WEST R, 2002, V97, P501, ADDICTION; WETTERER JK, 2006, V67, P351,
SCIENTOMETRICS; WHITE HD, 2000, P475, ASIST MONOGR SER; WHITE HD, 2001,
V52, P87, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITE HD, 2001, V51, P607,
SCIENTOMETRICS; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P1250, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITE
HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITE HD, 2004, V25, P89, APPL
LINGUIST; WHITE HD, 2004, V55, P111, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITEHOUSE G,
2001, V74, P1, BRIT J RADIOL; WILKINSON D, 2003, V29, P49, J INFORM SCI;
WILSON CS, 1999, V34, P107, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; WINKMANN G, 2002, V127,
P131, DEUT MED WOCHENSCHR; WLEKLINSKI JM, 2005, V29, P22, ONLINE; WOLFRAM
D, 2006, V67, P301, SCIENTOMETRICS; WOOLF SH, 2000, V19, P79, AM J PREV
MED; WORMELL I, 2000, V48, P203, SCIENTOMETRICS; WORMELL I, 2000, V48,
P237, SCIENTOMETRICS; WOUTERS P, 1999, CITATION CULTURE; WREN JD, 2005,
V330, P1128, BRIT MED J; YOON B, 2004, V15, P37, J HIGH TECHNOLOGY MA;
YOSHIKANE F, 2003, V54, P521, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; YU G, 2005, V64,
P235, SCIENTOMETRICS; ZHAO DZ, 2002, V54, P449, SCIENTOMETRICS; ZHAO DZ,
2005, V41, P1403, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; ZHAO DZ, 2006, V42, P1578, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG; ZHOU DN, 2001, V48, P479, IEEE T ENG MANAGE; ZHOU P, 2006,
V35, P83, RES POLICY; ZITT M, 2000, V47, P627, SCIENTOMETRICS; ZITT M,
2003, V56, P259, SCIENTOMETRICS; ZITT M, 2003, V57, P295, SCIENTOMETRICS;
ZITT M, 2005, V63, P373, SCIENTOMETRICS; ZITT M, 2006, V42, P1513, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG; ZUCCALA A, 2006, V57, P1487, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ZUCCALA
A, 2006, V57, P152, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 610|
TC- 25|
PU- ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV|
PI- AMSTERDAM|
PA- PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 1751-1577|
J9- J INFORMETR|
JI- J. Informetr|
PY- 2008|
VL- 2|
IS- 1|
BP- 1|
EP- 52|
DI- 10.1016/j.joi.2007.11.001|
PG- 52|
SC- Information Science & Library Science|
GA- 270LL|
JN- JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2008, V2, N1, P1-52|
UT- ISI:000253722200001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Eom S|
AF- Eom Sean|
TI- All author cocitation analysis and first author cocitation analysis:
A comparative empirical investigation|
SO- JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- author cocitation analysis; all author ACA; first author ACA|
ID- SYSTEMS; SCIENCE|
AB- The majority of author cocitation analysis (ACA) have relied on the
Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) citation databases. ISI
convention allows only the retrieval of papers that cite works of which
the author is first or sole author. Non-primary authors (authors whose
name appear in second or later position) will not be counted when
assembling a cocitation frequency matrix. Therefore, this has been a
methodological issue in ACA study. This paper empirically examines the
impact of the ISI convention on the results of ACA. Previous research has
addressed and shed light on some parts of methodological issues, but
failed to address issues such as to what extent the use of different
approach has resulted in different outcomes in terms of actual
intellectual structure of a given academic discipline. Using our data and
cociation matrix generation systems, we compare the differences in the
process and outcomes of using different cocitation matrices. Our study
concludes that all author based ACA is better than first author based ACA
to capture all influential researchers in a field. It also identifies
more research subspecialties. Finally, all Author based ACA and first
author based ACA produce little differences in stress values of MDS
outputs. Published by Elsevier Ltd|
C1- SE Missouri State Univ, Dept Accounting & MIS, Cape Girardeau, MO
63701 USA|
RP- Eom, S, SE Missouri State Univ, Dept Accounting & MIS, MS 5815, Cape
Girardeau, MO 63701 USA|
EM- sbeom@semo.edu|
CD- CULNAN MJ, 1986, V32, P156, MANAGE SCI; ELAM JJ, 1986, P239, DECIS
SUPPORT SYST; EOM HB, 1990, V20, P65, INTERFACES; EOM SB, 1993, V10, P19,
DECIS SUPPORT SYST; EOM SB, 1996, V47, P941, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; EOM SB,
2003, INTRO SAS APPROACH; HAIR JF, 1987, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN; KRUSKAL
JB, 1990, MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCA; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCINTIRE
JS, 2007, THESIS U MISSOURI; PERSSON O, 2001, V50, P339, SCIENTOMETRICS;
SCHNEIDER JW, 2007, 11 INT C SCI INF; SPRAGUE RH, 1989, P403, DECIS
SUPPORT SYST; WALTMAN L, 2007, V58, P1701, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; YOUNG
FW, 1986, ALSCAL PROCEDURE; ZHAO DZ, 2006, V42, P1578, INFORM PROCESS
MANAG|
NR- 17|
TC- 2|
PU- ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV|
PI- AMSTERDAM|
PA- PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 1751-1577|
J9- J INFORMETR|
JI- J. Informetr|
PY- 2008|
VL- 2|
IS- 1|
BP- 53|
EP- 64|
DI- 10.1016/j.joi.2007.09.001|
PG- 12|
SC- Information Science & Library Science|
GA- 270LL|
JN- JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2008, V2, N1, P53-64|
UT- ISI:000253722200002 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Gartner WB|
AF- Gartner William B|
TI- Entrepreneurship - Hop|
SO- ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE|
LA- English|
DT- Proceedings Paper|
CT- 52nd World Conference of the International-Council-for-SmallBusiness|
CY- 2007|
CL- Turku, FINLAND|
SP- Int Council Small Business|
ID- COCITATION ANALYSIS; SCHOLARSHIP|
AB- This is a "mash-up" of some ideas on entrepreneurship scholarship
using rhymes. The challenge was to compare and contrast special issue
articles along national lines. The pondering of each country's imperative
comes out through this "hip-hop" perspective. Please be assured when you
read this that these rhymes are serious. There are important issues that
scholars' interest must pay, so do not let this format get in the way,
using this poem as a start, of exploring entrepreneurship as science and
art. Ideas from each country are beyond differences in methods
quantitative and quality: Issues philosophical, rhetorical, historical,
and current are the basis for the entrepreneurship field's ferment|
C1- Clemson Univ, Spiro Inst Enterpreneurial Leadership, Clemson, SC
29634 USA|
RP- Gartner, WB, Clemson Univ, Spiro Inst Enterpreneurial Leadership, 345
Sirrine Hall, Clemson, SC 29634 USA|
EM- gartner@clemson.edu|
CD- ALDRICH H, 1986, V8, P165, RES ORGAN BEHAV; BIRCH D, 1979, JOB
GENERATION PROCE; BLACKBURN RA, 2008, V32, P267, ENTREP THEORY PRACT;
BRUSH CG, 2008, V32, P249, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; CLARKE A, 1966, PAY YOU
BACK INTERES; CORNELIUS B, 2006, V30, P375, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; DAVIS
MS, 1971, V1, P309, PHILOS SOC SCI; DEWEY J, 1910, WE THINK; ELIOT TS,
1943, 4 QUARTETS; GARTNER WB, 2001, V25, P27, ENTREP THEORY PRACT;
GARTNER WB, 2004, V7, P199, ADV ENTREPRENEURSHIP; GARTNER WB, 2006, V30,
P321, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; GARTNER WB, 2006, V2, P73, ENTREPRENEURSHIP
RES; GARTNER WB, 2006, P325, PSYCHOL ENTREPRENEUR; GREGOIRE DA, 2006,
V30, P333, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; HJORTH D, 2008, V32, P313, ENTREP THEORY
PRACT; JAMES W, 2007, PRAMATISM NEW NAME S; JOYCE J, 1914, DUBLINERS;
KUHN TS, 1962, STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; LANGER EJ, 1989, MINDFULNESS; LANGER
EJ, 1997, POWER MINDUFL LEARNI; LASCH F, 2008, V32, P339, ENTREP THEORY
PRACT; LATOUR B, 1987, SCI ACTION; LATOUR B, 1999, PANDORAS HOPE ESSAYS;
LOW M, 2001, V25, P17, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; OLIVER M, 2004, BLUE IRIS
POEMS ESSA; PRICE DJD, 1976, V27, P292, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; READER D,
2006, V30, P417, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; SCHILDT HA, 2006, V30, P399, ENTREP
THEORY PRACT; SCHMUDE J, 2008, V32, P289, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; SCHUMACHER
EE, 1974, SMALL BEAUTIFUL STUD; SCHUMPETER J, 1934, THEORY EC DEV; SHANE
S, 2000, V25, P217, ACAD MANAGE REV; STINCHCOMBE AL, 1965, P142, HDB ORG;
WAHLBIN C, 2005, COMMENTARY FAIL FORW; WEICK KE, 1999, V8, P134, J MANAGE
INQUIRY; ZIPF GK, 1949, HUMAN BEHAV PRINCIPL|
NRTCPUPIPASNJ9JIPDPYVLISBPEPPGSCGAJNUT-
37|
3|
BLACKWELL PUBLISHING|
OXFORD|
9600 GARSINGTON RD, OXFORD OX4 2DQ, OXON, ENGLAND|
1042-2587|
ENTREP THEORY PRACT|
Entrep. Theory Pract|
MAR|
2008|
32|
2|
361|
368|
8|
Business|
266ZQ|
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2008, V32, N2, P361-368|
ISI:000253477900007 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Jarneving B|
AF- Jarneving Bo|
TI- Bibliographic coupling and its application to research-front and
other core documents|
SO- JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- bibliographic coupling; science mapping; cluster analysis|
ID- SCIENTIFIC LITERATURES; SCIENCE; INFORMATION; COCITATION|
AB- Based on previous findings and theoretical considerations, it was
suggested that bibliographic coupling could be combined with a cluster
method to provide a method for science mapping, complementary to the
prevailing co-citation cluster analytical method. The complete link
cluster method was on theoretical grounds assumed to provide a suitable
cluster method for this purpose. The objective of the study was to
evaluate the proposed method's capability to identify coherent research
themes. Applying a large multidisciplinary test bed comprising more than
600,000 articles and 17 million references, the proposed method was
tested in accordance with two lines of mapping. In the first line of
mapping, all significant (strong) links connecting 'core documents'
(strongly and frequently coupled documents) in clusters with any other
core document was mapped. This resulted in a depiction of all significant
artificially broken links between core documents in a cluster and core
documents extrinsic to that cluster. The second line of mapping involved
the application of links between clusters only They were used to
successively merge clusters on two subsequent levels of fusion, where the
first generation of clusters were considered objects for a second
clustering, and the second generation of clusters gave rise to a final
cluster fusion. Changes of cluster composition on the three levels were
evaluated with regard to several variables Findings showed that the
proposed method could provide with valid depictions of current research,
though some severe restrictions would adhere to its application. (c) 2007
Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved|
C1- Swedish Sch Lib & Informat Sci, S-50190 Boras, Sweden|
RP- Jarneving, B, Swedish Sch Lib & Informat Sci, S-50190 Boras, Sweden|
EM- bo.jarneving@hb.se|
CD- ALDENDERFER MS, 1984, P44, QUANTITATIVE APPL SO; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42,
P233, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; EVERITT BS, 2001, CLUSTER ANAL; FANO RM, 1956,
DOCUMENT ACTION; FRANKLIN JJ, 1988, HDB QUANTITATIVE SCI; GLANZEL W,
1995, P 5 INT C SCI INF; GLANZEL W, 1996, V37, P195, SCIENTOMETRICS;
GRIFFITH BC, 1974, V4, P339, SCI STUD; JANSSENS F, 2006, V1, P615,
INSCIT2006 CURRENT R; JARNEVING B, 2001, V50, P365, SCIENTOMETRICS;
KESSLER MM, 1958, EXPT COMMUNICATION C; KESSLER MM, 1960, EXPT
COMMUNICATION C; KESSLER MM, 1962, EXPT STUDY BIBLIOGRA; KESSLER MM,
1963, V14, P10, AM DOC; KESSLER MM, 1963, V1, P169, INFORM STOR RETR;
KESSLER MM, 1965, V16, P223, AM DOC; LAMIREL JC, 2004, V60, P445,
SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 1987, V11, P295, SCIENTOMETRICS;
MARSHAKOVA V, 1973, V2, P3, NAUCHNO TEKHNICHESKA; MARTYN J, 1964, V20,
P236, J DOC; MUBEEN MA, 1995, V42, P41, ANN LIB SCI DOCUMENT; OBERSKI
JEJ, 1988, HDB QUANTITATIVE STU; OTTE E, 2002, V28, P441, J INF SCI;
PERSSON O, 1994, V45, P31, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PETERS HPF, 1995, V46,
P9, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SEN SK, 1983, V30, P78, ANN LIB SCI DOCUMENT;
SHARABCHIEV YT, 1988, NAUCNO TECHNICESKAJA; SHARADA BA, 1993, V40, P25,
ANN LIB SCI DOCUMENT; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; SMALL H, 1983, STOCKHOLM PAPERS LIB;
SMALL H, 1985, V7, P391, SCIENTOMETRICS; VLADUTZ G, 1984, V47, P204, P
ASIS ANNU MEET; WEINBERG BH, 1974, V10, P189, INFORM STORAGE RET|
NR- 34|
TC- 4|
PU- ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV|
PI- AMSTERDAM|
PA- PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 1751-1577|
J9- J INFORMETR|
JI- J. Informetr|
PY- 2007|
VL- 1|
IS- 4|
BP- 287|
EP- 307|
DI- 10.1016/j.joi.2007.07.004|
PG- 21|
SC- Information Science & Library Science|
GA- 272BF|
JN- JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2007, V1, N4, P287-307|
UT- ISI:000253831900004 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Jarneving B|
AF- Jarneving Bo|
TI- Complete graphs and bibliographic coupling: A test of the
applicability of bibliographic coupling for the identification of
cognitive cores on the field level|
SO- JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- bibliographic coupling; science mapping; research fronts|
ID- SCIENTIFIC LITERATURES; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; COMBINED COCITATION;
WORD ANALYSIS; SCIENCE|
AB- The method of bibliographic coupling in combination with the complete
link cluster method was applied for mapping of the field of organic
chemistry with the purpose of testing the applicability of a proposed
mapping method on the field level. The method put forward aimed at the
generation of cognitive cores of documents, so-called 'bibliographic
cliques' in the network of bibliographically coupled research articles
The defining feature of these cliques is that they can be considered
complete graphs where each bibliographic coupling link ties an unordered
pair of documents. In this way, it was presumed that coherent groups of
documents in the research front would be found and that these groups
would be intellectually coherent as well. Statistical analysis and
subject specialist evaluations confirmed these presumptions. The study
also elaborates on the choice of observation period and the application
of thresholds in relation to the size of document populations. (c) 2007
Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved|
C1- Univ Coll Boras, Swedish Sch Library & Informat Sci, Boras, Sweden|
RP- Jarneving, B, Univ Coll Boras, Swedish Sch Library & Informat Sci,
Boras, Sweden|
EM- bo.jarneving@hb.se|
CD- BATAGELJ V, 2003, V41, P871, ANAL VISUALIZATION L; BIGLAN A, 1973,
V57, P195, J APPL PSYCHOL; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P252, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; EVERITT BS, 2001,
CLUSTER ANAL; FRANKLIN JJ, 1988, HDB QUANTITATIVE STU; GLANZEL W, 1995,
P167, P 5 BIENN C INT SOC; GLANZEL W, 1996, V37, P195, SCIENTOMETRICS;
GRIFFITH BC, 1974, V4, P339, SCI STUD; HUBERT L, 1985, V2, P193, J
CLASSIF; JARNEVING B, 2001, V50, P365, SCIENTOMETRICS; JOHNSBAUGH R,
1997, DISCRETE MATH; KAUFMAN L, 2005, FINDING GROUPS DATA; KESSLER MM,
1960, AN EXPT COMMUNICATIO; KESSLER MM, 1962, EXPT STUDY BIBLIO CO;
KESSLER MM, 1963, V14, P10, AM DOC; KESSLER MM, 1963, V1, P169, INFORM
STOR RETR; KESSLER MM, 1965, V16, P223, AM DOC; MARTYN J, 1964, V20,
P236, J DOC; MCCAIN KW, 1986, V37, P111, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW,
1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MILLER GA, 1969, V6, P169, J MATH
PSYCHOL; MUBEEN MA, 1995, V42, P41, ANN LIB SCI DOCUMENT; NOYONS ECM,
1999, BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING; OTTE E, 2002, V28, P441, J INF SCI; PERSSON
O, 1994, V45, P31, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PETERS HPF, 1995, V46, P9, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; PRATT AD, 1977, V28, P285, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; RAND WM,
1971, V66, P846, J AM STAT ASSOC; RIP A, 1988, HDB QUANTITATIVE STU; SEN
SK, 1983, V30, P78, ANN LIB SCI DOCUMENT; SHARABCHIEV YT, 1988, NAUCNO
TECHNICESKAJA; SHARADA BA, 1993, V40, P25, ANN LIB SCI DOCUMENT; SMALL H,
1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD;
SMALL H, 1985, V7, P391, SCIENTOMETRICS; TIJSSEN RJW, 1992, CARTOGRAPHY
SCI SCIE; VLADUTZ G, 1984, V47, P204, P ASIS ANNU MEET; WHITE HD, 1981,
V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; YEUNG KY, 2001, UWCSE001101 U WASH D|
NR- 40|
TC- 1|
PU- ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV|
PI- AMSTERDAM|
PA- PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 1751-1577|
J9- J INFORMETR|
JI- J. Informetr|
PY- 2007|
VLISBPEPDIPGSCGAJNUT-
1|
4|
338|
356|
10.1016/j.joi.2007.08.001|
19|
Information Science & Library Science|
272BF|
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2007, V1, N4, P338-356|
ISI:000253831900006 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Castro-Prieto MR; Olvera-Lobo MD|
AF- Castro-Prieto Maria Rosa; Olvera-Lobo, M. D|
TI- Intellectual affinities through social network analysis terminology|
SO- META|
LA- French|
DT- Article|
DE- social network analysis; cocitation analysis; terminologyy;
scientific production|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; SCIENCE; CITATION; RETRIEVAL; SPACES|
AB- When transmitting scientific knowledge, authors weave a web of
intellectual affinities through the works they cite that portrays trends
and developments in research in their discipline. In the present article,
we aim to establish an intellectual panorama of Terminology-in which we
depict the outstanding developments in research and the most influential
authors. To do so, we analyze periodical publications that have appeared
over a wide period of time. Author Citation Analysis (ACA) and the visual
representation of the relationships between authors through social
networks (specifically, pathfinder networks) is based on the premise that
links are necessarily established between the authors cited in any
specific work so that greater frequency of co-ocurrence indicates a
stronger affinity between authors. Among other findings, our results show
that the group of most frequently cited authors represents less than 1%
of the total and that only 12% of authors have published three or more
articles. Moreover, we can confirm that research in Terminology is
developing in three clearly differentiated directions: theoretical
foundations, Natural Language Processing and Socioterminology|
C1- Univ Granada, Granada, Spain|
RP- Castro-Prieto, MR, Univ Granada, Granada, Spain|
EM- mcastro@ugr.es|
CD- BATAGELJ V, 1996, NETWORKS PAJEK PROGR; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; CASTROPRIETO MR, 2003, P515, 1 C INT AS IB EST TR;
CASTROPRIETO MR, 2003, P159, TERMINOLOGIA TRADUCC; CASTROPRIETO MR, 2006,
THESIS U GRANADA; CHEN CM, 1999, V35, P401, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; CHEN
CM, 2001, V52, P315, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; DEDIOS MJM, 1997, V47, P235,
ANALES ESPANOLES PED; DING Y, 2001, V37, P817, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; EOM
SB, 1996, V16, P315, DECIS SUPPORT SYST; FREEMAN LC, 2000, V33, P131,
ANALISIS REDES SOCIA; GARFIELD E, 1994, V3, P3, CURR CONTENTS;
LEYDESDORFF L, 1998, V43, P5, SCIENTOMETRICS; MARSHAKOVA V, 1973, V6, P3,
NAUCHNOTEKHNICHESC 2; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
PRICE DJS, 1963, LITTLE SCI BIG SCI; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; SMALL H, 1985, V8, P321,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1997, V38, P275, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1998,
V41, P125, SCIENTOMETRICS; WASSERMAN S, 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; WHITE
HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1982, V38, P255, J
DOC; WHITE HD, 1986, V5, P93, INFORM TECHNOL LIBR; WHITE HD, 1998, V49,
P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI|
NR- 26|
TC- 0|
PU- PRESSES UNIV MONTREAL|
PI- MONTREAL|
PA- PO BOX 6128, SUCCURSALE A, MONTREAL, QUEBEC H3C 3J7, CANADA|
SN- 0026-0452|
J9- META|
JI- Meta|
PD- DEC|
PY- 2007|
VL- 52|
IS- 4|
BP- 816|
EP- 838|
PG- 23|
SC- Language & Linguistics|
GA- 260RU|
JN- META, 2007, V52, N4, P816-838|
UT- ISI:000253028800011 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Trochim WM; Marcus SE; Masse LC; Moser RP; Weld PC|
AF- Trochim William M; Marcus, Stephen E; Masse, Louise C; Moser, Richard
P; Weld, Patrick C|
TI- The evaluation of large research initiatives - A participatory
integrative mixed-methods approach|
SO- AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- center grants; concept mapping; evaluating research; federal
evaluation; logic models|
ID- CITATION ANALYSIS; RESEARCH IMPACT; COCITATION ANALYSIS;
BIBLIOMETRICS; SCIENCE; CONCEPTUALIZATION; SCIENTOMETRICS; JOURNALS|
AB- Over the past few decades there has been a rise in the number of
federally funded large scientific research initiatives, with increased
calls to evaluate their processes and outcomes. This article describes
efforts to evaluate such initiatives in one agency within the U.S federal
government. The authors introduce the Evaluation of Large Initiatives
(ELI) project, a preliminary effort to explore how to accomplish such
evaluation. They describe a pilot effort of this project to evaluate the
Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Center (TTURC) initiative of the
National Cancer Institute. They present a summary of this pilot
evaluation including the methods used (concept mapping, logic modeling, a
detailed researcher survey, content analysis and systematic peerevaluation of progress reports, bibliometric analysis and peer evaluation
of publications and citations, and financial expenditures analysis) and a
brief overview of results. Finally, they discuss several important
lessons and recommendations that emerged from this work|
C1- [Trochim, William M.] Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA; [Marcus,
Stephen E.; Weld, Patrick C.] Natl Canc Inst, Bethesda, MD USA; [Masse,
Louise C.] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada|
RP- Trochim, WM, Cornell Univ, 249 MVR Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA|
EM- wmt1@cornell.edu|
CD- *I MED, 2004, NIH EXTR CTR PROGR; *NATL AC SCI NATL, 1996, ASS NATL
SCI FDN SCI; *NATL CANC I, 2007, GREAT SUM SYST THINK; *NIH, 1999, EV RED
RES PROGR RES; *NIH, 2006, FY 2007 PRES BUDG RE; *OFF MAN BUDG, 1993,
GOVT PERF RES ACT 19; *OFF MAN BUDG, 2007, EXP GOV; *OFF MAN BUDG, 2007,
PROGR ASS NSFS FED F; *OFF MAN BUDG, 2007, PROGR ASS RAT TOOL P; *US DEP
HHS, 2007, I CLIN TRANSL SCI AW; *US GEN ACC OFF, 2000, NIH RES IMPR NEED
MO; *US GEN ACC OFF, 2005, OMB PART REV INCR AG; *W K KELL FDN, 2001, LOG
MOD DEV GUID US; ANDERBERG MR, 1973, CLUSTER ANAL APPL; BRAINARD J, 2002,
V48, A25, CHRONICLE HIGHE 0329; BRAINARD J, 2002, V48, CHRONICLE HIGHER
ED; COMPTON DW, 2002, V93, ART CRAFT SCI EVALUA; COOK TD, 1979, QUASI
EXPT DESIGN AN; COXON APM, 1999, SORTING DATA COLLECT; DAVISON ML, 1983,
MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCA; EVERITT B, 1980, CLUSTER ANAL; FUNKHOUSER ET, 1996,
V22, P563, HUM COMMUN RES; GARFIELD E, 1955, V122, P108, SCIENCE;
GARFIELD E, 1994, V25, P3, CURR CONTENTS; GARFIELD E, 1994, V29, P3, CURR
CONTENTS; GODLEE F, 1997, V74, ADV MIXED METHOD EVA; GODLEE F, 1999, PEER
REV HLTH SCI; GREENE JC, 1989, V11, P255, EDUC EVAL POLICY AN; HOOD WW,
2001, V52, P291, SCIENTOMETRICS; KANE M, 2006, CONCEPT MAPPING PLAN;
KOSTOFF RN, 1994, V18, P31, EVALUATION REV; KOSTOFF RN, 1994, V45, P189,
TECHNOL FORECAST SOC; KOSTOFF RN, 1995, V24, P869, RES POLICY;
KRIPPENDORF K, 2004, CONTENT ANAL INTRO I; KRUSTAL JB, 1978,
MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCA; LANE NF, 1995, V20, P98, INTERDISCIPLINARY SC;
MCCULLOUGH J, 1992, DRAFT REPORT NSF PRO; MOLASGALLART J, 2006, V27, P64,
AM J EVAL; NASS SJ, 2003, LARGE SCALE BIOMEDIC; NYE M, 1996, BIG SCI
PURSUIT MODE; OSAREH F, 1996, V46, P149, LIBRI; OSAREH F, 1996, V46,
P217, LIBRI; RASMUSSEN N, 2002, V40, P115, MINERVA; ROSENBERG S, 1975,
V10, P489, MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIO; ROSENFIELD PL, 1992, V35, P1343, SOC SCI
MED; SCHOEPFLIN U, 2001, V50, P301, SCIENTOMETRICS; SEGLEN PO, 1997,
V314, P498, BRIT MED J; SKOIE H, 1999, V45, P433, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMITH
R, 2001, V323, P528, BRIT MED J; STOKOLS D, 2003, V5, S21, NICOTINE TOB
RES; TROCHIM WMK, 1985, V9, P575, EVALUATION REV; TROCHIM WMK, 1986, V9,
P289, EVAL PROGRAM PLANN; WEBER RP, 1990, V49, BASIC CNTENT ANAL; WELLER
SC, 1988, SYTEMATIC DATA COLLE; WHITMORE E, 1998, V80, UNDERSTANDING
PRACTI; WILLIAMS B, 2006, SYTEMS CONCEPTS EVAL|
NR- 56|
TC- 18|
PU- SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC|
PI- THOUSAND OAKS|
PA- 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA|
SN- 1098-2140|
J9- AM J EVAL|
JI- Am. J. Eval|
PD- MAR|
PY- 2008|
VL- 29|
IS- 1|
BP- 8|
EP- 28|
DI- 10.1177/1098214007309280|
PG- 21|
SCGAJNUT-
Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary|
263FO|
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2008, V29, N1, P8-28|
ISI:000253203200001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Rosvallt M; Bergstrom CT|
AF- Rosvallt Martin; Bergstrom, Carl T|
TI- Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure|
SO- PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- clustering; compression; information theory; map of science;
bibiometrics|
ID- MODULARITY; COCITATION; DOMAINS|
AB- To comprehend the multipartite organization of large-scale biological
and social systems, we introduce an information theoretic approach that
reveals community structure in weighted and directed networks. We use the
probability flow of random walks on a network as a proxy for information
flows in the real system and decompose the network into modules by
compressing a description of the probability flow. The result is a map
that both simplifies and highlights the regularities in the structure and
their relationships. We illustrate the method by making a map of
scientific communication as captured in the citation patterns of >6,000
journals. We discover a multicentric organization with fields that vary
dramatically in size and degree of integration into the network of
science. Along the backbone of the network-including physics, chemistry,
molecular biology, and medicine-information flows bidirectionally, but
the map reveals a directional pattern of citation from the applied fields
to the basic sciences|
C1- Univ Washington, Dept Biol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA; [Bergstrom, Carl
T.] Santa Fe Inst, Santa Fe, NM 87501 USA|
RP- Rosvallt, M, Univ Washington, Dept Biol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA|
EM- rosvall@u.washington.edu|
CD- *I SCI INF, 2004, J CIT REP; ARENAS A, 2007, V9, ARTN 176, NEW J
PHYS; BRIN S, 1998, V30, P107, COMPUT NETWORKS ISDN; CLAUSET A, 2004,
V70, ARTN 066111, PHYS REV E 2; DONATH W, 1972, V15, P938, IBM TECHNICAL
DISCLO; ENRIGHT AJ, 2002, V30, P1575, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES; ERIKSEN KA,
2003, V90, ARTN 148701, PHYS REV LETT; GIRVAN M, 2002, V99, P7821, P NATL
ACAD SCI USA; GRUNWALD P, 2005, ADV MINIMUM DESCRIPT; GUIMERA R, 2005,
V433, P895, NATURE; GUIMERA R, 2007, V76, ARTN 036102, PHYS REV E 2;
HUFFMAN DA, 1952, V40, P1098, P IRE; LEICHT EA, ARXIV07094500; MOYAANEGON
F, 2004, V61, P129, SCIENTOMETRICS; NEWMAN MEJ, 2003, V45, P167, SIAM
REV; NEWMAN MEJ, 2004, V69, ARTN 026113, PHYS REV E 2; NEWMAN MEJ, 2004,
V69, ARTN 066133, PHYS REV E 2; NEWMAN MEJ, 2006, STRUCTURE DYNAMICS N;
PALLA G, 2005, V435, P814, NATURE; PRICE DJD, 1965, V149, P510, SCIENCE;
RISSANEN J, 1978, V14, P465, AUTOMATICA; ROSVALL M, 2007, V104, P7327, P
NATL ACAD SCI USA; SALESPARDO M, 2007, V104, P15224, P NATL ACAD SCI USA;
SHANNON CE, 1948, V27, P379, BELL SYST TECH J; SHANNON CE, 1949, MATH
THEORY COMMUNIC; SHIFFRIN RM, 2004, V101, P5183, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1;
SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1999, V50, P799,
J AM SOC INFORM SCI; TUFTE ER, 2006, BEAUTIFUL EVIDENCE; WAKITA K, 2007,
ARXIVCS0702048; ZIPF GK, 1949, HUMAN BEHAV PRINCIPL; ZIV E, 2005, V71,
ARTN 046117, PHYS REV E 2|
NR- 32|
TC- 65|
PU- NATL ACAD SCIENCES|
PI- WASHINGTON|
PA- 2101 CONSTITUTION AVE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20418 USA|
SN- 0027-8424|
J9- PROC NAT ACAD SCI USA|
JI- Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A|
PD- JAN 29|
PY- 2008|
VL- 105|
IS- 4|
BP- 1118|
EP- 1123|
DI- 10.1073/pnas.0706851105|
PG- 6|
SC- Multidisciplinary Sciences|
GA- 258NF|
JN- PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA, 2008, V105, N4, P1118-1123|
UT- ISI:000252873900007 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Morgan XC; Ni S; Miranker DP; Iyer VR|
AF- Morgan Xochitl C; Ni, Shulin; Miranker, Daniel P; Iyer, Vishwanath R|
TI- Predicting combinatorial binding of transcription factors to
regulatory elements in the human genome by association rule mining|
SO- BMC BIOINFORMATICS|
LA- English|
DT- Review|
ID- NF-KAPPA-B; NECROSIS-FACTOR-ALPHA; PROTEIN INTERACTION NETWORK;
CU/ZN-SUPEROXIDE-DISMUTASE; ZINC-FINGER PROTEIN; BREAST-CANCER CELLS;
GENE-EXPRESSION; PROMOTER ACTIVITY; FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS; COACTIVATOR
PROTEINS|
AB- Background: Cis-acting transcriptional regulatory elements in
mammalian genomes typically contain specific combinations of binding
sites for various transcription factors. Although some cisregulatory
elements have been well studied, the combinations of transcription
factors that regulate normal expression levels for the vast majority of
the 20,000 genes in the human genome are unknown. We hypothesized that it
should be possible to discover transcription factor combinations that
regulate gene expression in concert by identifying over-represented
combinations of sequence motifs that occur together in the genome. In
order to detect combinations of transcription factor binding motifs, we
developed a data mining approach based on the use of association rules,
which are typically used in market basket analysis. We scored each
segment of the genome for the presence or absence of each of 83
transcription factor binding motifs, then used association rule mining
algorithms to mine this dataset, thus identifying frequently occurring
pairs of distinct motifs within a segment Results: Support for most pairs
of transcription factor binding motifs was highly correlated across
different chromosomes although pair significance varied. Known true
positive motif pairs showed higher association rule support, confidence,
and significance than background Our subsets of high-confidence, highsignificance mined pairs of transcription factors showed enrichment for
co-citation in PubMed abstracts relative to all pairs, and the predicted
associations were often readily verifiable in the literature Conclusion:
Functional elements in the genome where transcription factors bind to
regulate expression in a combinatorial manner are more likely to be
predicted by identifying statistically and biologically significant
combinations of transcription factor binding motifs than by simply
scanning the genome for the occurrence of binding sites for a single
transcription factor|
C1- [Morgan, Xochitl C.; Iyer, Vishwanath R.] Univ Texas Austin, Inst
Cellular & Mol Biol, Austin, TX 78712 USA; [Morgan, Xochitl C.; Iyer,
Vishwanath R.] Univ Texas Austin, Ctr Syst & Synthet Biol, Austin, TX
78712 USA; [Ni, Shulin; Miranker, Daniel P.] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Comp
Sci, Austin, TX 78712 USA|
RP- Iyer, VR, Univ Texas Austin, Inst Cellular & Mol Biol, Austin, TX
78712 USA|
EM- morganx@mail.utexas.edu shulinn@gmail.com miranker@cs.utexas.edu
vishy@mail.utexas.edu|
CD- *R DEV COR TEAM, 2005, R FDN STAT COMP; AGRAWAL R, 1994, P487, VLDB;
ANDRIAMANALIJAONA R, 2003, V48, P1569, ARTHRITIS RHEUM; ARMELINCORREA LM,
2005, V24, P550, MATRIX BIOL; BARSKI OA, 2004, V83, P119, GENOMICS;
BARTHEL R, 2003, V23, P526, MOL CELL BIOL; BARTHOLDY B, 2004, V327, P1,
GENE; BECKER C, 2001, V167, P2608, J IMMUNOL; BEER MA, 2004, V117, P185,
CELL; BERMAN BP, 2002, V99, P757, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; BERMAN BP, 2004,
V5, ARTN R61, GENOME BIOL; BERTRANDPHILIPPE M, 2004, V279, P24530, J BIOL
CHEM; BIESIADA E, 1999, V19, P2577, MOL CELL BIOL; BRAGANCA J, 2003,
V278, P16021, J BIOL CHEM; BRAZMA A, 1997, V5, P65, P INT C INT SYST MOL;
BRITOSBRAY M, 1997, V17, P5127, MOL CELL BIOL; CARROLL JS, 2006, V38,
P1289, NAT GENET; CHU BY, 2005, V392, P589, BIOCHEM J 3; COCKERILL PN,
1996, V7, P917, CELL GROWTH DIFFER; COHN MA, 2001, V29, P3335, NUCLEIC
ACIDS RES; CROWLEY EM, 1997, V268, P8, J MOL BIOL; DAS D, 2004, V101,
P16234, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; DASILVA CA, 2003, V17, P2334, FASEB J;
DAVIDSON EH, 2001, V12, P261, GENOMIC REGULATORY S; DEBIEVE F, 2002, V8,
P262, MOL HUM REPROD; DEBOSSCHER K, 2003, V24, P488, ENDOCR REV; DEMETER
J, 2007, V35, D766, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES; DRYER RL, 2005, V175, P4499, J
IMMUNOL; EBERT SN, 1998, V70, P2286, J NEUROCHEM; ELEMENTO O, 2005, V6,
ARTN R18, GENOME BIOL; FAGGIOLI L, 2004, V1692, P17, BBA-MOL CELL RES;
FALVO JV, 2000, V20, P2239, MOL CELL BIOL; FRECH K, 1998, V1, P29, SILICO
BIOL; FRITH MC, 2001, V17, P878, BIOINFORMATICS; FURLONG EEM, 1996, V16,
P5933, MOL CELL BIOL; GENTLEMAN R, 2005, V19, P473, STAT BIOL HLTH; GOBIN
SJP, 2003, V101, P3058, BLOOD; GOLUBOVSKAYA V, 2004, V1678, P111, BBAGENE STRUCT EXPR; GORDON SJ, 2003, V170, P5549, J IMMUNOL; GORGOULIS VG,
2003, V22, P1567, EMBO J; GU JM, 2000, V275, P12481, J BIOL CHEM; HALFON
MS, 2002, V12, P1019, GENOME RES; HAN LP, 2006, V348, P799, BIOCHEM BIOPH
RES CO; HART GT, 2006, V7, ARTN 120, GENOME BIOL; HERMOSO MA, 2004, V24,
P4743, MOL CELL BIOL; HERRMANN F, 2003, V55, P379, IMMUNOGENETICS; HERTZ
GZ, 1999, V15, P563, BIOINFORMATICS; HERZOG B, 2000, V351, P385, BIOCHEM
J 2; HOFFMEISTER A, 2002, V277, P22314, J BIOL CHEM; HOLZMANN C, 2001,
V92, P85, BRAIN RES MOL BRAIN; HORNG JT, 2002, V9, P621, J COMPUT BIOL;
HORNG JT, 2003, V7, P93, IEEE T INF TECHNOL B; HROMAS R, 1996, V211,
P159, CURR TOP MICROBIOL; HUBE F, 2003, V109, P207, THROMB RES; IKEDA Y,
2001, V276, P34259, J BIOL CHEM; INOUE A, 2004, V32, P649, J MOL
ENDOCRINOL; JOHNSON BV, 2004, V24, P7914, MOL CELL BIOL; KAMMANDEL B,
1999, V205, P79, DEV BIOL; KANEKO M, 2006, V312, P2028, EXP CELL RES;
KANG NY, 2004, V18, P157, MOL CELLS; KAROLCHIK D, 2003, V31, P51, NUCLEIC
ACIDS RES; KAWADA H, 2005, V124, P1206, J INVEST DERMATOL; KEL A, 1999,
V288, P353, J MOL BIOL; KEL AE, 2001, V309, P99, J MOL BIOL; KELMARGOULIS
OV, 2002, V30, P332, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES; KHAN S, 2006, V20, P2199, MOL
ENDOCRINOL; KIM HT, 1994, V201, P1526, BIOCHEM BIOPH RES CO; KIM JC,
1998, V273, P26130, J BIOL CHEM; KIM JW, 2005, V2, P47, NAT METHODS;
LAFERLA K, 2002, V16, P1811, FASEB J 1; LAHLIL R, 2004, V24, P1439, MOL
CELL BIOL; LAVROVSKY Y, 1994, V91, P5987, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; LEE TI,
2002, V298, P799, SCIENCE; LEHNER B, 2004, V5, ARTN R63, GENOME BIOL;
LEMEE S, 2005, V302, P129, EXP CELL RES; LENHARD B, 2003, V2, P13, J
BIOL; LIBERMANN TA, 1999, V274, P24671, J BIOL CHEM; LIFANOV AP, 2003,
V13, P579, GENOME RES; LIN CS, 2001, V280, P684, BIOCHEM BIOPH RES CO;
LIWEBER M, 2003, V15, P145, SEMIN IMMUNOL; MAHAPATRA NR, 2006, V99, P119,
J NEUROCHEM; MAIER H, 2004, V5, P1069, NAT IMMUNOL; MAITRA S, 2000, V20,
P1911, MOL CELL BIOL; MALAKOOTI J, 2002, V282, G491, AM J PHYSIOL-GASTR
L; MANOLI I, 2005, V19, P1359, FASEB J; MARKSTEIN M, 2002, V99, P763, P
NATL ACAD SCI USA; MESSINA DN, 2004, V14, P2041, GENOME RES; MINC E,
1999, V274, P503, J BIOL CHEM; MOON SK, 2004, V198, P417, J CELL PHYSIOL;
MURA C, 2004, V18, P1922, FASEB J; NEISH AS, 1992, V176, P1583, J EXP
MED; PAZDRAK K, 2004, V127, P1096, GASTROENTEROLOGY; PERROTTI D, 1995,
V15, P6075, MOL CELL BIOL; PHILIPSEN S, 1990, V9, P2159, EMBO J; POCOCK
J, 2003, V170, P6280, J IMMUNOL; PRUITT KD, 2005, V33, D501, NUCLEIC
ACIDS RES; RAMANI AK, 2005, V6, ARTN R40, GENOME BIOL; REBEIZ M, 2002,
V99, P9888, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; RHODES DR, 2005, V23, P951, NAT
BIOTECHNOL; RIVERAPOMAR R, 1995, V376, P253, NATURE; ROJO AI, 2004, V24,
P7324, J NEUROSCI; ROTHENBERG EV, 1996, V93, P9358, P NATL ACAD SCI USA;
RUAL JF, 2005, V437, P1173, NATURE; SCHAFER H, 1998, V436, P139, FEBS
LETT; SCHWEIZER M, 2002, V30, P1070, BIOCHEM SOC T 6; SEKAR N, 2004,
V287, E128, AM J PHYSIOL-ENDOC M; SEO SJ, 1996, V178, P177, GENE; SHAH R,
2006, V119, P61, HUM GENET; SHANNON MF, 1997, V17, P301, CRIT REV
IMMUNOL; SHARAN R, 2004, V32, W253, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES S2; SHI QA, 1999,
V19, P1363, J INTERF CYTOK RES; SMALL S, 1992, V11, P4047, EMBO J; STELZL
U, 2005, V122, P957, CELL; SZLOSAREK PW, 2003, V4, P565, LANCET ONCOL;
TANG HB, 2006, V281, P3943, J BIOL CHEM; TRONCHE F, 1997, V266, P231, J
MOL BIOL; TSAI EY, 2000, V20, P6084, MOL CELL BIOL; TUPLER R, 2001, V409,
P832, NATURE; WAGNER A, 1997, V25, P3594, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES; WASSERMAN
WW, 1998, V278, P167, J MOL BIOL; WICKREMASINGHE MI, 2004, V279, P27199,
J BIOL CHEM; WINGENDER E, 1996, V24, P238, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES; WOLF SS,
2001, V382, P1083, BIOL CHEM; WONG DL, 1998, V61, P154, BRAIN RES MOL
BRAIN; WU CX, 2004, V317, P1096, BIOCHEM BIOPH RES CO; XIAO S, 2001, V31,
P3339, EUR J IMMUNOL; XU ZJ, 2001, V167, P6975, J IMMUNOL; YAHATA T,
2002, V80, P601, GENOMICS; YANG HP, 2001, V285, P476, BIOCHEM BIOPH RES
CO; YU XP, 2005, V280, P35184, J BIOL CHEM; ZHENG Y, 2007, V445, P936,
NATURE; ZHOU TY, 2002, V30, P4145, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES|
NR- 132|
TC- 5|
PU- BIOMED CENTRAL LTD|
PI- LONDON|
PA- CURRENT SCIENCE GROUP, MIDDLESEX HOUSE, 34-42 CLEVELAND ST, LONDON
W1T 4LB, ENGLAND|
SN- 1471-2105|
J9- BMC BIOINFORMATICS|
JI- BMC Bioinformatics|
PD- NOV 15|
PY- 2007|
VL- 8|
AR- 445|
DI- 10.1186/1471-2105-8-445|
PG- 14|
SC- Biochemical Research Methods; Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology;
Mathematical & Computational Biology|
GA- 253XT|
JN- BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2007, V8, N4, P1118-1123|
UT- ISI:000252551600001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Leydesdorff L|
AF- Leydesdorff Loet|
TI- On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data:
Salton's cosine versus the Jaccard index|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- SIMILARITY MEASURES; PEARSONS-R; COLLABORATION; SCIENCE|
AB- The debate about which similarity measure one should use for the
normalization in the case of Author Co-citation Analysis (ACA) is further
complicated when one distinguishes between the symmetrical co-citationor, more generally, co-occurrence-matrix and the underlying asymmetrical
citation-occurrence-matrix. In the Web environment, the approach of
retrieving original citation data is often not feasible. In that case,
one should use the Jaccard index, but preferentially after adding the
number of total citations (i.e., occurrences) on the main diagonal.
Unlike Salton's cosine and the Pearson correlation, the Jaccard index
abstracts from the shape of the distributions and focuses only on the
intersection and the sum of the two sets. Since the correlations in the
co-occurrence matrix may be spurious, this property of the Jaccard index
can be considered as an advantage in this case|
C1- Amsterdam Sch Commun Res, NL-1012 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands|
RP- Leydesdorff, L, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res, Kloveniersbrugwal 48, NL1012 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands|
EM- loet@leydesdorff.net|
CD- AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; AHLGREN P, 2004,
V55, P843, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BENSMAN SJ, 2004, V55, P935, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; BORGATTI SP, 2002, UCINET WINDOWS SOFTW; EGGHE L, 1990,
INTRO INFORMETRICS A; GLANZEL W, 2001, V51, P69, SCIENTOMETRICS; HAMERS
L, 1989, V25, P315, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; JACCARD P, 1901, V37, P241, B
SOC VAUD SCI NAT; JONES WP, 1987, V38, P420, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; KAMADA
T, 1989, V31, P7, INFORM PROCESS LETT; KENNY DA, 2006, DYADIC DATA ANAL;
LEYDESDORFF L, 1988, V87, P105, INFORMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2005, V56,
P769, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2007, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; LIPKUS AH, 1999, V26,
P263, J MATH CHEM; LUUKKONEN T, 1993, V28, P15, SCIENTOMETRICS; MICHELET
B, 1988, THESIS U PARIS 7 PAR; SALTON G, 1983, INTRO MODERN INFORM;
SCHNEIDER JW, 2007, V58, P1586, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; SMALL H, 1973, V24,
P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; TANIMOTO TT, 1957, IBM TECHNICAL REPORT;
VANRIJSBERGEN CJ, 1977, V33, P106, J DOC; WAGNER CS, 2005, V1, P185, INT
J TECHNOLOGY GLO; WALTMAN L, 2007, V58, P1701, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54,
P1250, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITE HD, 2004, V55, P843, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; ZITT M, 2000, V47, P627, SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 29|
TC- 6|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- JAN 1|
PY- 2008|
VL- 59|
IS- 1|
BP- 77|
EP- 85|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20732|
PG- 9|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 252CR|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2008, V59, N1, P77-85|
UT- ISI:000252423000008 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- McMillan GS|
AF- McMillan G. Steven|
TI- Mapping the invisible colleges of R&D Management|
SO- R & D MANAGEMENT|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; TECHNOLOGY; JOURNALS|
AB- R&D Management has consistently been considered one of the top
technology and innovation management journals since its inaugural issue
in 1970. The purpose of this paper is to use bibliometric techniques to
examine R&D Management in four time periods, 1986-1990, 1991-1995, 19962000, and 2001-2005 in order to reveal changes in its intellectual base.
Bibliometric research has illuminated the knowledge domains of several
technology and innovation management journals including R&D Management
Linton and Thongpapanl, but there has not previously been a comprehensive
detailed analysis focused only on R&D Management. Using co-citation
analysis, this paper identifies the invisible colleges (research
networks) associated with publications in R&D Management. The results
indicate that Cohen and Levinthal's absorptive capacity model dominates
the final two periods. The conclusions suggest how the absorptive
capacity model might be more effectively utilized in future R&D
Management research|
C1- Penn State Abington, Abington, PA 19001 USA|
RP- McMillan, GS, Penn State Abington, 1600 Woodland Rd, Abington, PA
19001 USA|
EM- gsm5@psu.edu|
CD- BALL DF, 2006, V36, P205, R&D MANAGE; BARNEY J, 1986, V41, P1231,
MANAGE SCI; BORGATTI SP, 2002, UCINET WINDOWS SOFTW; CRANE D, 1972,
INVISIBLE COLLEGES D; GARFIELD E, 1979, V1, P359, SCIENTOMETRICS; GMUR M,
2003, V57, P27, SCIENTOMETRICS; KOGUT B, 1992, V3, P383, ORGAN SCI; LANE
PJ, 2001, V22, P1139, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; LANE PJ, 2006, V31, P833, ACAD
MANAGE REV; LINTON JD, 2004, V21, P123, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG; LOTKA AJ,
1926, V16, P317, J WASHINGTON ACADEMY; MCCAIN KW, 1986, V37, P111, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; MULLINS NC, 1977, V42, P552, AM SOCIOL REV; PERSSON O,
2006, BIBEXCEL TOOL BIBLIO; PRICE DJD, 1965, V149, P510, SCIENCE; SMALL
H, 1980, V36, P183, J DOC; SMALL HG, 1978, V8, P327, SOC STUD SCI;
TIJSSEN RJW, 1992, CARTOGRAPHY SCI SCIE; WASSERMAN S, 1997, SOCIAL
NETWORK ANAL|
NR- 19|
TC- 0|
PU- BLACKWELL PUBLISHING|
PI- OXFORD|
PA- 9600 GARSINGTON RD, OXFORD OX4 2DQ, OXON, ENGLAND|
SN- 0033-6807|
J9- R D MANAGE|
JI- R D Manage|
PD- JAN|
PY- 2008|
VL- 38|
IS- 1|
BP- 69|
EP- 83|
PG- 15|
SC- Business; Management|
GA- 244JY|
JN- R & D MANAGEMENT, 2008, V38, N1, P69-83|
UT- ISI:000251863400005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- de Moya-Anegon F; Vargas-Quesada B; Chinchilla-Rodriguez Z; CoreraAlvarez E; Munoz-Fernandez FJ; Herrero-Solana V|
AF- de Moya-Anegon Felix; Vargas-Quesada, Benjamin; Chinchilla-Rodriguez,
Zaida; Corera-Alvarez, Elena; Munoz-Fernandez, Francisco J; HerreroSolana, Victor|
CA- SCImago Grp|
TI- Visualizing the marrow of science|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- ITEM SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION; AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATIONSCIENCE; PATHFINDER NETWORKS; CITATION; GRAPHS; RETRIEVAL; MAPS|
AB- This study proposes a new methodology that allows for the generation
of scientograms of major scientific domains, constructed on the basis of
cocitation of Institute of Scientific Information categories, and pruned
using PathfinderNetwork, with a layout determined by algorithms of the
spring-embedder type (Kamada-Kawai), then corroborated structurally by
factor analysis. We present the complete scientogram of the world for the
Year 2002. It integrates the natural sciences, the social sciences, and
arts and humanities. Its basic structure and the essential relationships
therein are revealed, allowing us to simultaneously analyze the
macrostructure, microstructure, and marrow of worldwide scientific
output|
C1- Univ Granada, Fac Lib & Informat Sci, E-18071 Granada, Spain|
RP- de Moya-Anegon, F, Univ Granada, Fac Lib & Informat Sci, E-18071
Granada, Spain|
EM- felix@ugr.es benjamin@ugr.es|
CD- *SCIMAGO GROUP, 2004, ATL SCI; *THOM CORP, 2005, ISI J CIT REP; *THOM
CORP, 2005, ISI WEB SCI; BOYACK KW, 2005, V64, P351, SCIENTOMETRICS;
BRANDENBURG FJ, 1995, V1027, P87, LECT NOTES COMPUTER; CHEN C, 1999, P51,
P 10 ACM C HYP HYP R; CHEN CM, 1998, V9, P267, J VISUAL LANG COMPUT; CHEN
CM, 1999, V35, P401, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; CHEN GT, 2003, V37, P179,
RAIRO-OPER RES; COHEN JD, 1997, V4, P197, ACM T COMPUT-HUM INT; DING Y,
1999, V25, P67, J INFORM SCI; EADES P, 1984, V42, P149, C NUMERANTIUM;
ELSEVIER BV, SCOPUS; EVERETT MG, 1999, V21, P397, SOC NETWORKS; FOWLER
RH, 1990, PATHFINDER ASSOCIATI; FRUCHTERMAN TMJ, 1991, V21, P1129,
SOFTWARE PRACT EXPER; GARFIELD E, 1986, V9, P324, ESSAYS INFORM SCI;
GARFIELD E, 1994, V7, P5, CURRENT CONTENTS SOC; GLANZEL W, 1999, V44,
P427, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W, 1999, V46, P431, SCIENTOMETRICS;
HJORLAND B, 1995, V46, P400, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; KAMADA T, 1989, V31,
P7, INFORM PROCESS LETT; KREMPEL L, 1999, P36, P SECT STAT GRAPH AL;
KRUSKAL JB, 1978, MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCA; LEWISBECK MS, 1994, FACTOR ANAL
RELATED; LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V60, P371, J DOC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V60,
P159, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; MOYAANEGON F, 1998, V42, P229, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOYAANEGON F, 2004,
V61, P129, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOYAANEGON F, 2005, V41, P1520, INFORM
PROCESSING MA; SALTON G, 1979, V22, P146, IEEE T PROF COMMUN; SALTON G,
1994, V37, P97, COMMUN ACM; SAMOYLENKO I, 2006, V57, P1461, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; SCHVANEVELDT RW, 1990, PATHFINDER ASSOCIATI; SMALL H, 1985, V11,
P147, J INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 2000, P449, WEB KNOWLEDGE FESTSC; TUFTE ER,
1994, ENVISIONING INFORM; TUFTE ER, 2001, VISUAL DISPLAY QUANT;
VARGASQUESADA B, 2007, VISUALIZING STRUCTUR; WASSERMAN S, 1998, SOCIAL
NETWORK ANAL; WHITE HD, 2001, V51, P607, SCIENTOMETRICS; WHITE HD, 2003,
V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 43|
TC- 13|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- DEC|
PY- 2007|
VL- 58|
IS- 14|
BP- 2167|
EP- 2179|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20683|
PG- 13|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 237MH|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2007, V58, N14, P2167-2179|
UT- ISI:000251377600002 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Leydesdorff L|
AF- Leydesdorff Loet|
TI- Should co-occurrence data be normalized? A rejoinder|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Letter|
ID- SCIENCE; COLLABORATION; COCITATION|
C1- Univ Amsterdam, ASCoR, NL-1012 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands|
RP- Leydesdorff, L, Univ Amsterdam, ASCoR, Kloveniersburgwal 48, NL-1012
CX Amsterdam, Netherlands|
EM- loet@leydesdorff.net|
CD- AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BORGATTI SP, 2002,
UCINET 6 WINDOWS; BURT RS, 1982, STRUCTURAL THEORY AC; KAMADA T, 1989,
V31, P7, INFORM PROCESS LETT; KREFT IGG, 1988, V22, P127, QUAL QUANT;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V60, P159, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57,
P1616, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2007, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
LUUKKONEN T, 1993, V28, P15, SCIENTOMETRICS; MICHELET B, 1988, THESIS U
PARIS 7 PAR; ROBINSON WS, 1950, V15, P351, AM SOCIOL REV; SCHNEIDER JW, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WALTMAN
L, 2007, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WASSERMAN S, 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL;
ZITT M, 2000, V47, P627, SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 16|
TC- 3|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- DEC|
PY- 2007|
VL- 58|
IS- 14|
BP- 2411|
EP- 2413|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20691|
PG- 3|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 237MH|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2007, V58, N14, P2411-2413|
UT- ISI:000251377600027 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Bourguet D; Delmotte F; Franck P; Guillemaud T; Reboud X; Vacher C;
Walker AS|
AF- Bourguet Denis; Delmotte, Francois; Franck, Pierre; Guillemaud,
Thomas; Reboud, Xavier; Vacher, Corinne; Walker, Anne-Sophie|
CA- REX Consortium|
TI- Structure of the Scientific Community Modelling the Evolution of
Resistance|
SO- PLOS ONE|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
AB- Faced with the recurrent evolution of resistance to pesticides and
drugs, the scientific community has developed theoretical models aimed at
identifying the main factors of this evolution and predicting the
efficiency of resistance management strategies. The evolutionary forces
considered by these models are generally similar for viruses, bacteria,
fungi, plants or arthropods facing drugs or pesticides, so interaction
between scientists working on different biological organisms would be
expected. We tested this by analysing co-authorship and co-citation
networks using a database of 187 articles published from 1977 to 2006
concerning models of resistance evolution to all major classes of
pesticides and drugs. These analyses identified two main groups. One
group, led by ecologists or agronomists, is interested in agricultural
crop or stock pests and diseases. It mainly uses a population genetics
approach to model the evolution of resistance to insecticidal proteins,
insecticides, herbicides, antihelminthic drugs and miticides. By
contrast, the other group, led by medical scientists, is interested in
human parasites and mostly uses epidemiological models to study the
evolution of resistance to antibiotic and antiviral drugs. Our analyses
suggested that there is also a small scientific group focusing on
resistance to antimalaria drugs, and which is only poorly connected with
the two larger groups. The analysis of cited references indicates that
each of the two large communities publishes its research in a different
set of literature and has its own keystone references: citations with a
large impact in one group are almost never cited by the other. We fear
the lack of exchange between the two communities might slow progress
concerning resistance evolution which is currently a major issue for
society|
C1- [Vacher, Corinne] INRA, UMR Biodiversite Genes & Communautes BioGeCo
1210, F-33140 Villenave Dornon, France; [Walker, Anne-Sophie] INRA, UMR
BIOGER CPP 1290, F-78026 Versailles, France; [Bourguet, Denis] INRA, UMR
Ctr Biol & Gest Populat CBGP, F-34988 Montferrier Sur Lez, France;
[Delmotte, Francois] INRA, UMR Sante Vegetale, F-33140 Villenave Dornon,
France; [Franck, Pierre] INRA, UR Plantes & Syst Culture Horticoles 1115,
F-84000 Avignon, France; [Guillemaud, Thomas] INRA, UMR ROSE 1112, F06903 Sophia Antipolis, France; [Reboud, Xavier] INRA, UMR Biol & Gest
Adventices 1210, F-21065 Dijon, France|
RP- Vacher, C, INRA, UMR Biodiversite Genes & Communautes BioGeCo 1210,
F-33140 Villenave Dornon, France|
EM- cvacher@bordeaux.inra.fr|
FU- Departement Sante des Plantes et Environnement (SPE) of the Institut
National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) FX Financial support for this
study was provided by the Departement Sante des Plantes et Environnement
(SPE) of the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)|
CD- *R DEV COR TEAM, 2006, R LANG ENV STAT COMP; ANDERSON RM, 1991,
INFECT DIS HUMANS DY; AUBER D, 2002, P488, GRAPH DRAWING; AUSTIN DJ,
1999, V354, P721, PHILOS T ROY SOC B; BONHOEFFER S, 1997, V94, P12106, P
NATL ACAD SCI USA; BONHOEFFER S, 1997, V94, P6971, P NATL ACAD SCI USA;
BRANDES U, 2001, V25, P163, J MATH SOCIOL; CHAMBERS HF, 2001, V7, P178,
EMERG INFECT DIS; CLARKE T, 2003, V425, P225, NATURE; COMINS HN, 1977,
V64, J THEOR BIOL; CSARDI G, 2006, IGRAPH IGRAPH CLASS; DALESSANDRO U,
2001, V6, P845, TROP MED INT HEALTH; FINCH R, 2006, V12, P3, CLIN
MICROBIOL IN S8; FREEMAN LC, 1979, V1, P215, SOC NETWORKS; GEORGHIOU GP,
1986, P14, PESTICIDE RESISTANCE; GIRVAN M, 2002, V99, P7821, P NATL ACAD
SCI USA; GUBBINS S, 1999, V266, P2539, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO; GUILLEMOT D,
1999, V2, P494, CURR OPIN MICROBIOL; HASTINGS IM, 2001, V6, P883, TROP
MED INT HEALTH; HASTINGS IM, 2004, V20, P512, TRENDS PARASITOL; HEMINGWAY
J, 2000, V45, P371, ANNU REV ENTOMOL; KOELLA JC, 2003, V2, MALARIA J;
LEVIN BR, 1997, V24, S9, CLIN INFECT DIS S1; LEVIN BR, 2001, V33, S161,
CLIN INFECT DIS S3; LEVIN BR, 2002, V60, P58, NETH J MED S; LEVY SB,
2004, V10, S122, NAT MED S; MARRONE PG, 1999, V28, P149, OUTLOOK AGR; MAY
RM, 1988, V318, P129, PHILOS T R SOC B; MAYNARDSMITH J, 1993, V90, P4384,
P NATIONAL ACADEMY S; MAYNARDSMITH J, 1998, EVOLUTIONARY GENETIC; MIELKE
PW, 2001, PERMUTATION METHODS; NEUHAUSER C, 2001, P153, HDB STAT
GENETICS; NORRBY SR, 2005, V5, P115, LANCET INFECT DIS; NOWAK MA, 1997,
V184, P203, J THEOR BIOL; OKSANEN J, 2006, VEGAN COMMUNITY ECOL; PAGE
RDM, 1996, V12, P357, COMPUT APPL BIOSCI; PARADIS E, 2004, V20, P289,
BIOINFORMATICS; PECK SL, 2001, V9, P286, TRENDS MICROBIOL; PRADO PI,
2004, V73, P1168, J ANIM ECOL; SIMON JC, 2003, V79, P151, BIOL J LINN
SOC; STEWART FM, 1998, V53, P152, THEOR POPUL BIOL|
NR- 41|
TC- 0|
PU- PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE|
PI- SAN FRANCISCO|
PA- 185 BERRY ST, STE 1300, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107 USA|
SN- 1932-6203|
J9- PLOS ONE|
JI- PLoS One|
PD- DEC 5|
PY- 2007|
VL- 2|
IS- 12|
AR- e1275|
DI- 10.1371/journal.pone.0001275|
PG- 9|
SC- Biology; Multidisciplinary Sciences|
GA- V10JD|
JN- PLOS ONE, 2007, V2, N12, P2411-2413|
UT- ISI:000207459400022 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Morris SA; Van der Veer Martens B|
AF- Morris Steven A; Van der Veer Martens, Betsy|
TI- Mapping research specialties|
SO- ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Review|
ID- JOURNAL COCITATION ANALYSIS; CO-WORD ANALYSIS; CITATION CONTEXT
ANALYSIS; AUTHOR COCITATION; SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION; INFORMATIONSCIENCE; SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION; INTELLECTUAL SPACE; SOCIAL-STRUCTURE;
ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE|
C1- Oklahoma State Univ, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA; Univ Oklahoma, Sch Lib
& Informat Studies, Norman, OK 73019 USA|
RP- Morris, SA, Oklahoma State Univ, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA|
CD- AHLGREN P, 2004, V55, P843, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ALLEN B, 1997, V27,
P937, SOC STUD SCI; ANDREWS JE, 2003, V91, P47, J MED LIBR ASSOC; BALDI
S, 1997, V27, P669, SOC STUD SCI; BARBER B, 1952, SCI SOCIAL ORDER;
BARILAN J, 2001, V50, P7, SCIENTOMETRICS; BASU A, 2006, INT WORKSH WEB
INF S; BATAGELJ V, 2003, EFFICIENT ALGORITHMS; BATAGELJ V, 2003, P77,
GRAPH DRAWING SOFTWA; BAZERMAN C, 1988, SHAPING WRITTEN KNOW; BEAN CA,
2001, P115, RELATIONSHIPS ORG KN; BEAVER DD, 1978, V1, P65,
SCIENTOMETRICS; BEAVER DD, 1979, V1, P133, SCIENTOMETRICS; BEAVER DD,
1979, V1, P231, SCIENTOMETRICS; BEGHTOL C, 2001, P99, RELATIONSHIPS ORG
KN; BEGHTOL C, 2003, V30, P64, KNOWL ORGAN; BELLARDO T, 1980, V2, P231,
LIBR RES; BENDAVID J, 1960, V65, P557, AM J SOCIOL; BENDAVID J, 1966,
V31, P451, AM SOCIOL REV; BERNAL JD, 1939, SOCIAL FUNCTION SCI; BERTIN J,
2001, V10, P5, INFORMATION DESIGN J; BESSELAAR P, 2006, V68, P377,
SCIENTOMETRICS; BEZDEK JC, 1981, PATTERN RECOGNITION; BLOOR D, 1991,
KNOWLEDGE SOCIAL IMA; BLOOR D, 1997, V22, P373, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL;
BONNEVIENEBELONG E, 2006, V66, P411, SCIENTOMETRICS; BORGMAN CL, 2002,
V36, P3, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; BORNER K, 2003, V37, P179, ANNU REV INFORM
SCI; BORNER K, 2004, V101, P5266, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; BOYACK KW, 2002,
V53, P764, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BOYACK KW, 2003, V54, P447, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BROOKS TA, 1985,
V36, P223, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BROOKS TA, 1986, V37, P34, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; BROWN CM, 1999, V50, P929, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BUDD J, 1991,
V21, P87, SCIENTOMETRICS; BUDD JM, 1999, V25, P265, J INFORM SCI; BUDD
JM, 2001, V22, P300, SCI COMMUN; BURRELL OL, 2002, V53, P232, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; BURRELL QL, 2002, V53, P309, SCIENTOMETRICS; CALERO C, 2006,
V66, P365, SCIENTOMETRICS; CALLON M, 1983, V22, P191, SOC SCI INFORM;
CALLON M, 1986, P103, MAPPING DYNAMICS SCI; CALLON M, 1991, V22, P155,
SCIENTOMETRICS; CAMPBELL DT, 1969, P328, INTERDISCIPLINARY RE; CASE DO,
2000, V51, P635, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; CASE DO, 2002, LOOKING INFORM
SURVE; CETINA KDK, 1981, MANUFACTURE KNOWLEDG; CHEN CM, 1999, V35, P401,
INFORM PROCESS MANAG; CHEN CM, 2001, V52, P315, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
CHEN CM, 2002, V53, P678, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CHEN CM, 2003,
VISUALIZING EVOLVING; CHEN CM, 2004, V101, P5303, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1;
CHEN CM, 2004, V59, P199, SCIENTOMETRICS; CHEN CM, 2006, V57, P359, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; CHEN PP, 1976, V1, P1, ACM T DATABASE SYST; CHUBIN D,
1976, V17, P448, SOCIOLOGICAL Q; CHUBIN DE, 1975, V5, P423, SOC STUD SCI;
CHUBIN DE, 1985, V7, P221, SCIENTOMETRICS; COLE JR, 1972, V178, P368,
SCIENCE; COLE JR, 1975, P139, IDEA SOCIAL STRUCTUR; COLE JR, 1989, V28,
P51, SOC SCI INFORM; COLE S, 1967, V32, P377, AM SOCIOL REV; COLE S,
1970, V76, P286, AM J SOCIOL; COLE S, 1973, SOCIAL STRATIFICATIO; COLE S,
1983, V89, P111, AM J SOCIOL; COLE S, 1993, MAKING SCI NATURE SO; COLE S,
2000, P109, WEB KNOWLEDGE FESTSC; COLLINS HM, 1974, V4, P165, SCI STUD;
COLLINS HM, 1998, V104, P293, AM J SOCIOL; COLLINS R, 1968, V41, P123,
SOCIOL EDUC; COLLINS R, 1989, V14, P107, SCI TECHNOL; COLLINS R, 1998,
SOCIOLOGY PHILOS GLO; COULTER N, 1998, V49, P1206, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
COURTIAL JP, 1989, V19, P301, SOC STUD SCI; COURTIAL JP, 1994, V31, P251,
SCIENTOMETRICS; COURTIAL JP, 1998, V49, P98, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; COX A,
2005, V31, P527, J INF SCI; COZZENS SE, 1985, V7, P431, SCIENTOMETRICS;
COZZENS SE, 1989, V15, P437, SCIENTOMETRICS; COZZENS SE, 1989, SOCIAL
CONTROL MULTI; CRANE D, 1969, V34, P335, AM SOCIOL REV; CRANE D, 1969,
V16, P433, SOC PROBL; CRANE D, 1970, V22, P28, INT SOC SCI J; CRANE D,
1972, INVISIBLE COLL DIFFU; CRANE D, 1976, V19, P719, AM BEHAV SCI; CRANE
D, 1980, V10, P23, SOC STUD SCI; CRAWFORD S, 1971, V22, P301, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; CRONIN B, 1984, CITATION PROCESS ROL; CRONIN B, 2004, V60,
P41, SCIENTOMETRICS; CRONIN B, 2005, HAND SCI ACAD WRITIN; DEMEY M, 1982,
COGNITIVE PARADIGM; DIAMOND AM, 1984, V6, P189, SCIENTOMETRICS; DIAMOND
AM, 1985, V8, P815, SCIENTOMETRICS; DIAMOND AM, 1986, V21, P200, J HUM
RESOUR; DIAMOND AM, 2000, P321, WEB KNOWLEDGE FESTSC; DING Y, 2000, V47,
P55, SCIENTOMETRICS; DING Y, 2001, V37, P817, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; DUDA
RO, 2001, PATTERN CLASSIFICATI; EDGE D, 1979, V17, P102, HIST SCI; EGGHE
L, 1990, INTRO INFORMETRICS Q; EGGHE L, 2000, V51, P1004, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; ENNIS JG, 1992, V57, P259, AM SOCIOL REV; EOM SB, 1996, V47, P941, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; EOM SB, 2003, AUTHOR COCITATION AN; ETZKOWITZ H, 1983,
V21, P198, MINERVA; ETZKOWITZ H, 1989, V36, P14, SOC PROBL; ETZKOWITZ H,
2000, V29, P109, RES POLICY; FEITELSON DG, 2004, V60, P44, J DOC; FISHER
CS, 1966, V3, P137, ARCH HIST EXACT SCI; FISHER CS, 1967, V8, P216, EUR J
SOCIOL; FLECK L, 1979, GENESIS DEV SCI FACT; FORREST BC, 2003,
CREATIONISMS TROJAN; FREUDENTHAL G, 1984, V14, P285, SOC STUD SCI; FUCHS
S, 1986, V4, P126, SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY; FUCHS S, 1993, V71, P933, SOC
FORCES; FUCHS S, 1999, V30, P21, AM SOCIOL; FULLER S, 1989, COGNITIVE
TURN SOCIO; FURNER J, 2003, P42, P 13 ASIST SIG CR CL; GARFIELD E, 1955,
V122, P108, SCIENCE; GARFIELD E, 1964, USE CITATION DATA WR; GARFIELD E,
1968, P169, FDN ACCESS KNOWLEDGE; GARFIELD E, 1979, CITATION INDEXING IT;
GARFIELD E, 1994, V41, P3, CURR CONTENTS; GARFIELD E, 2003, V22, P183,
INFORM TECHNOL LIBR; GARFIELD E, 2004, V60, P51, SCIENTOMETRICS; GARFIELD
E, 2004, V34, P845, SOC STUD SCI; GARVEY WD, 1967, V157, P1011, SCIENCE;
GASTON J, 1970, V35, P718, AM SOCIOL REV; GASTON J, 1973, ORIGINALITY
COMPETIT; GEISON G, 1993, V8, P226, OSIRIS; GHONIEM M, 2005, V4, P114,
INFORM VISUALIZATION; GIBBONS M, 1994, DYNAMICS SCI RES CON; GIERYN TF,
1983, V48, P781, AM SOCIOL REV; GIERYN TF, 1999, CULTURAL BOUNDARIES;
GILBERT GN, 1977, V7, P113, SOC STUD SCI; GORDON AD, 1999,
CLASSIFICATION; GRANOVETTER M, 1973, V6, P1360, AM J SOCIOL; GREEN R,
2001, P3, RELATIONSHIPS ORG KN; GRIFFITH BC, 1972, V177, P959, SCIENCE;
GRIFFITH BC, 1974, V4, P339, SCI STUD; HAGSTROM WO, 1965, SCI COMMUNITY;
HARGENS LL, 1980, V10, P56, SOC STUD SCI; HARGENS LL, 1984, V49, P685, AM
SOCIOL REV; HARGENS LL, 2000, V65, P846, AM SOCIOL REV; HARGENS LL, 2004,
V60, P63, SCIENTOMETRICS; HE Q, 1999, V48, P131, LIB TRENDS; HEDGES LV,
1987, V42, P443, AM PSYCHOL; HETZLER E, 2004, V24, P22, IEEE COMPUT
GRAPH; HJORLAND B, 2001, V35, P249, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; HJORLAND B,
2005, V61, P5, J DOC; HOLLOWAY T, 2007, V12, P30, COMPLEXITY; HOLTON G,
1993, SCI ANTISCIENCE; HOLZNER B, 1968, REALITY CONSTRUCTION;
HOYNINGENHUENE P, 1993, RECONSTRUCTING SCI R; HURT CD, 1992, V24, P471,
SCIENTOMETRICS; HWANG KJ, 2005, V26, P390, SCI COMMUN; HYLAND K, 2004,
DISCIPLINARY DISCOUR; JACOB EK, 2004, V52, P515, LIBR TRENDS; JARNEVING
B, 2001, V50, P365, SCIENTOMETRICS; JARNEVING B, 2005, V65, P245,
SCIENTOMETRICS; JIN B, 2007, INT C SCIENT INF MAD; JONES WP, 1987, V38,
P420, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; KARKI R, 1996, V22, P323, J INFORM SCI; KATZ
JS, 1997, V26, P1, RES POLICY; KAUFER DS, 1993, COMMUNICATION DISTAN;
KESSLER MM, 1963, V14, P10, AM DOC; KIM KM, 1994, EXPLAINING SCI CONSE;
KIM KM, 1996, V26, P3, PHILOS SOC SCI; KINCHY A, 2003, V33, P869, SOC
STUD SCI; KNORR KD, 1975, DETERMINANTS CONTROL; KNORRCETINA K, 1982, V12,
P101, SOC STUD SCI; KNORRCETINA K, 1991, V23, P105, HIST POLIT ECON;
KOSTOFF RN, 2001, V52, P1148, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; KRAUZE TZ, 1972, V2,
P369, SCI STUD; KRETSCHMER H, 2006, V15, P117, RES EVALUAT; KRUSKAL JB,
1978, MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCA; KUHN TS, 1970, STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; KUHN TS,
2000, P224, ROAD STRUCTURE PHILO; LATOUR B, 1986, LAB LIFE CONSTRUCTIO;
LATOUR B, 1987, SCI ACTION FOLLOW SC; LATOUR B, 2005, REASSEMBLING
SOCIAL; LAUDAN L, 1986, V69, P141, SYNTHESE; LAUDEL G, 2002, V11, P3, RES
EVALUAT; LAW J, 1992, V23, P417, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEAZER GH, 1999, V43,
P191, LIBR RESOUR TECH SER; LEWIS GL, 1980, V10, P285, SOC STUD SCI;
LEYDESDORFF L, 1990, V15, P305, SCI TECHNOL; LEYDESDORFF L, 1994, V31,
P59, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 1996, V23, P279, SCI PUBL POLICY;
LEYDESDORFF L, 1997, V48, P418, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; LEYDESDORFF L, 1998,
V25, P195, SCI PUBL POLICY; LEYDESDORFF L, 2001, CHALLENGE SCIENTOMET;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2001, SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY; LEYDESDORFF L, 2005, V56, P769,
J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P601, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LIEVROUW LA,
1990, SCH COMMUNICATION BI; LIEVROUW LA, 1992, V5, P6, KNOWLEDGE POLICY;
LIU Z, 2005, V62, P385, SCIENTOMETRICS; LOTKA AJ, 1926, V16, P317, J
WASHINGTON ACADEMY; LUBETZKY S, 1969, PRINCIPLES CATALOGIN; LUUKKONEN T,
1997, V38, P27, SCIENTOMETRICS; MACROBERTS MH, 1989, V40, P342, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; MAHLCK P, 2000, V49, P81, SCIENTOMETRICS; MAI JE, 2004, V31,
P39, KNOWL ORGAN; MARION L, 2004, THESIS DREXEL U PHIL; MARKEY K, 2007,
V13, D LIB; MARTENS BV, 2006, V57, P3300, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MARTYN J,
1964, V20, P236, J DOC; MARTYN J, 1975, V31, P290, J DOC; MASTERMAN M,
1970, P59, CRITICISM GROWTH KNO; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1991, V42, P290, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW,
1998, V41, P389, SCIENTOMETRICS; MCCAIN KW, 2002, P552, P ANN M AM SOC
INF S; MCCAIN KW, 2005, V65, P131, SCIENTOMETRICS; MELIN G, 1996, V36,
P363, SCIENTOMETRICS; MELLOR F, 2003, V33, P509, SOC STUD SCI; MERTON RK,
1957, V22, P635, AM SOCIOL REV; MERTON RK, 1968, V159, P56, SCIENCE;
MERTON RK, 1973, P267, SOCIOLOGY SCI THEORE; MERTON RK, 1988, V79, P606,
ISIS; MICHAELSON AG, 1993, V15, P217, SOC NETWORKS; MIKSA FL, 1998, DDC
UNIVERSE KNOWLE; MOED HF, 2005, CITATION ANAL RES EV; MORAVCSIK MJ,
1975, V5, P86, SOC STUD SCI; MORAVCSIK MJ, 1979, V1, P161,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MORRIS SA, 2003, V54, P413, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MORRIS
SA, 2004, V101, P5291, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; MORRIS SA, 2005, 10 INT C
INT SOC SCI; MORRIS SA, 2005, V56, P1250, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MORRIS
SA, 2005, THESIS OKLAHOMA STAT; MUKERJI C, 1998, V68, P258, SOCIOL INQ;
MULKAY MJ, 1971, V1, P207, SCI STUD; MULKAY MJ, 1975, V23, P509, SOCIOL
REV; MULKAY MJ, 1975, V9, P187, SOCIOLOGY; MULKAY MJ, 1976, P153,
PERSPECTIVES EMERGEN; MULKAY MJ, 1976, V24, P125, SOCIOL REV; MULLINS NC,
1972, V10, P51, MINERVA; MULLINS NC, 1973, THEORIES THEORY GROU; MULLINS
NC, 1977, V42, P552, AM SOCIOL REV; MYERS G, 1990, WRITING BIOL TEXTS S;
NARANAN S, 1971, V27, P83, J DOC; NARIN F, 1975, EVALUATIVE BIBLIOMET;
NEBELONGBONNEVIE E, 2006, V62, P30, J DOC; NEUHAUS C, 2006, V6, P127,
PORTAL-LIBR ACAD; NEWMAN MEJ, 2000, 0012064 SFI; NEWMAN MEJ, 2001, V98,
P404, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; NEWMAN MEJ, 2001, V64, ARTN 016131, PHYS REV E
2; NEWMAN MEJ, 2001, V64, P16132, PHYS REV E; NEWMAN MEJ, 2004, V101,
P5200, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; NICHOLAS D, 1978, LIT BIBLIOMETRICS;
NICOLAISEN J, 2003, P12, P ANN M AM SOC INF S; NOWOTNY H, 2001,
RETHINKING SCI KNOWL; NOYONS E, 2001, V50, P83, SCIENTOMETRICS; OEHLER K,
1989, V14, P258, SCI TECHNOL; OLSON HA, 1998, V47, P233, LIBR TRENDS;
OPPENHEIM C, 1978, V29, P225, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PAISLEY WJ, 1968, V1,
P1, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; PAO ML, 1992, V28, P99, INFORM PROCESS MANAG;
PERSSON O, 1994, V45, P31, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PERSSON O, 1995, V33,
P351, SCIENTOMETRICS; PERSSON O, 2001, V50, P339, SCIENTOMETRICS; PETERS
HPF, 1991, V20, P235, SCIENTOMETRICS; PORTER AL, 1991, FORECASTING
MANAGEME; PRICE DJD, 1963, LITTLE SCI BIG SCI; PRICE DJD, 1965, V149,
P510, SCIENCE; PRICE DJD, 1966, V21, P1011, AM PSYCHOL; PRICE DJD, 1970,
P3, COMMUNICATION SCI EN; PRICE DJD, 1986, P56, LITTLE SCI BIG SCI;
RAVETZ JR, 1971, SCI KNOWLEDGE ITS SO; READER D, 2006, V30, P417, ENTREP
THEORY PRACT; REDNER S, 1998, V4, P131, EUR PHYS J B; REID E, 2005,
V3495, P322, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; RHEINGOLD N, 1980, V10, P475, SOC STUD
SCI; RIP A, 1984, V6, P381, SCIENTOMETRICS; ROGERS EM, 1993, V43, P68, J
COMMUN; ROSE SK, 1996, V1, P34, LANGUAGE LEARNING DI; ROSENGREN KE, 1968,
SOCIOLOGICAL ASPECTS; ROUSE J, 1993, V1, P1, CONFIGURATIONS; ROUSSEAU R,
2004, V55, P513, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; SALTON G, 1989, AUTOMATIC TEXT
PROCE; SANDSTROM PE, 2001, V51, P573, SCIENTOMETRICS; SARACEVIC T, 1975,
V26, P321, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SAWYER RK, 2001, V107, P551, AM J SOCIOL;
SCHNEIDER JW, 2005, V3507, P226, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; SCHNEIDER JW,
2006, V68, P573, SCIENTOMETRICS; SCHVANEVELDT RW, 1989, V24, P249,
PSYCHOL LEARN MOTIV; SCOTT EC, 1985, V60, P21, Q REV BIOL; SEGLEN PO,
1992, V43, P628, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SEGLEN PO, 2000, V49, P125,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SHEPARD H, 1954, V19, P456, AM SOCIOL REV; SHEPARD HA,
1956, V23, P48, PHILOS SCI; SHIN T, 1999, V3, P149, SOC SCI INFORM; SHINN
T, 2002, V32, P599, SOC STUD SCI; SHRUM W, 1984, V14, P63, SOC STUD SCI;
SIIRTOLA H, 2005, V4, P32, INFORM VISUALIZATION; SIMON B, 2002, UNDEAD
SCI SCI STUDI; SINDING C, 1996, V26, P43, SOC STUD SCI; SMALL H, 1973,
V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; SMALL
H, 1980, V36, P183, J DOC; SMALL H, 1980, V2, P277, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL
H, 1985, V7, P391, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1986, V37, P97, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1989, V16, P642, COMMUN RES; SMALL H, 1997, V38,
P275, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1998, V41, P125, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H,
1999, V50, P799, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 2004, V60, P71,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 2006, V68, P395, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL HG, 1974,
V10, P393, INFORMATION STORAGE; SMALL HG, 1978, V8, P327, SOC STUD SCI;
SMALL HG, 1979, V1, P445, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL HG, 1985, P287, PROGR
COMMUNICATION; SMIRAGLIA RP, 2001, V28, P192, KNOWL ORGAN; SMIRAGLIA RP,
2002, V33, P1, CATALOGING CLASSIFIC; SMIRAGLIA RP, 2002, V50, P530, LIB
TRENDS; SMITH LC, 1981, V30, P83, LIBR TRENDS; SOLOMON M, 1994, V2, P287,
P PHIL SCI ASS; STAHL WA, 2002, WEBS REALITY SOCIAL; STEWART JA, 1983,
V62, P166, SOC FORCES; STOKES TD, 1989, V19, P101, SOC STUD SCI; STORER
NW, 1966, SOCIAL SYSTEM SCI; SUBRAMANYAM K, 1983, V6, P33, J INF SCI;
SVENONIUS E, 2004, V52, P571, LIBR TRENDS; SWALES JM, 1990, GENRE ANAL
ENGLISH A; SWALES JM, 2004, RES GENRES EXPLORATI; SWANSON DR, 1986, V56,
P103, LIBR QUART; SWANSON DR, 1987, V38, P228, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
TAYLOR RS, 1986, VALUE ADDED PROCESSE; TENOPIR C, 2005, V56, P786, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; THELWALL M, 2005, V39, P81, ANNU REV INFORM SCI;
THOMPSON P, 2005, V16, P54, J DATABASE MANAGE; TILLETT BB, 1991, V35,
P150, LIBR RESOUR TECH SER; TILLETT BB, 2001, P19, LIBR RESOUR TECH SER;
TOULMIN SE, 1970, P39, CRITICISM GROWTH KNO; TSAY MY, 2003, V57, P7,
SCIENTOMETRICS; TUCKMAN BW, 1977, V2, P419, GROUP ORGAN STUD; TUFTE ER,
2001, VISUAL DISPLAY QUANT; VALENTE TW, 1995, V16, P242, SCI COMMUN;
VANDENBESSELAAR P, 1996, V47, P415, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WEINBERG BH,
1974, V10, P189, INFORM STORAGE RET; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1982, V38, P255, J DOC; WHITE HD, 1989, V24, P119,
ANNU REV INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1990, P84, SCHOLARLY COMMUNICAT; WHITE HD,
1997, V32, P99, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2001, V52, P87, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITE HD,
2004, V25, P89, APPL LINGUIST; WHITE HD, 2004, V55, P843, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; WHITLEY R, 1972, V18, P61, SOCIOL REV MONOGR; WHITLEY R, 1976,
V6, P471, SOC STUD SCI; WHITLEY R, 2000, INTELLECTUAL SOCIAL; WILSON P,
1968, 2 KINDS POWER ESSAY; WOOLGAR SW, 1976, P233, PERSPECTIVES EMERGEN;
WOUTERS PD, 1999, THESIS U AMSTERDAM; WRAY KB, 2005, V35, P151, SOC STUD
SCI; YITZHAKI M, 2004, V55, P832, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ZEHR SC, 1999,
P3, COMMUNICATING UNCERT; ZHAO DZ, 2002, V54, P449, SCIENTOMETRICS; ZIMAN
JM, 1968, PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE ESS; ZIMAN JM, 1969, V224, P318, NATURE; ZIMAN
JM, 1984, INTRO SCI STUDIES PH; ZUCCALA A, 2006, V57, P156, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; ZUCKERMA.H, 1971, V9, P66, MINERVA; ZUCKERMAN H, 1970, V40,
P235, SOCIOL INQ; ZUCKERMAN H, 1977, SCI ELITE NOBEL LAUR|
NR- 370|
TC- 4|
PU- INFORMATION TODAY INC|
PI- MEDFORD|
PA- 143 OLD MARLTON PIKE, MEDFORD, NJ 08055-8750 USA|
SN- 0066-4200|
J9- ANNU REV INFORM SCI TECH|
JI- Annu. Rev. Inform. Sci. Technol|
PY- 2008|
VL- 42|
BP- 213|
EP- 295|
PG- 83|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 227RM|
JN- ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, V42, N12,
P213-295|
UT- ISI:000250675500007 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Cronin B; Meho LI|
AF- Cronin Blaise; Meho, Lokman I|
TI- Timelines of creativity: A study of intellectual innovators in
information science|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- UNDISCOVERED PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE; SEARCH PROCESS; SEEKING STRATEGIES;
AUTHOR COCITATION; RETRIEVAL; DESIGN; MODEL; SELECTION; USERS; TEXT|
AB- We explore the relationship between creativity and both chronological
and professional age in information science using a novel bibliometric
approach that allows us to capture the shape of a scholar's career. Our
approach draws on D.W. Galenson's (2006) analyses of artistic creativity,
notably his distinction between conceptual and experimental innovation,
and also H.C. Lehman's (1953) seminal study of the relationship between
stage of career and outstanding performance. The data presented here
suggest that creativity is expressed in different ways, at different
times, and with different intensities in academic information science|
C1- Indiana Univ, Sch Lib & Informat Studies, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA|
RP- Cronin, B, Indiana Univ, Sch Lib & Informat Studies, Bloomington, IN
47405 USA|
EM- bcronin@indiana.edu meho@indiana.edu|
CD- INFORM SCI, V49, P1319; ADKINS D, 2006, V28, P374, LIBR INFORM SCI
RES; BATES MJ, 1977, V28, P161, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BATES MJ, 1979, V30,
P205, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BATES MJ, 1979, V30, P280, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; BATES MJ, 1986, V37, P357, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BATES MJ, 1989, V13,
P407, ONLINE REV; BATES MJ, 1990, V26, P575, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; BATES
MJ, 1993, V63, P1, LIBR QUART; BATES MJ, 1998, V49, P1185, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; BATES MJ, 2005, V10, INFORM KNOWLEDGE EVO; BELKIN NJ, 1976,
V27, P197, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BELKIN NJ, 1978, V34, P55, J DOC; BELKIN
NJ, 1980, V5, P133, CANADIAN J INFORMATI; BELKIN NJ, 1982, V38, P61, J
DOC; BELKIN NJ, 1983, V5, P153, J INF SCI; BELKIN NJ, 1984, V4, P111, SOC
SCI INFORM STUD; BELKIN NJ, 1985, INTERACTION INFORM S; BELKIN NJ, 1987,
V22, P109, ANN REV INFORMATION; BELKIN NJ, 1987, V27, P127, INT J MAN
MACH STUD; BELKIN NJ, 1990, V16, P11, J INFORM SCI; BELKIN NJ, 1992, V35,
P29, COMMUN ACM; BELKIN NJ, 1993, V29, P325, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; BELKIN
NJ, 1995, V9, P379, EXPERT SYST APPL; BELKIN NJ, 1995, V31, P431, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG; CRONIN B, 1981, V37, P16, J DOC; CRONIN B, 1982, V38,
P212, J DOC; CRONIN B, 1984, CITATION PROCESS ROL; CRONIN B, 1990, V16,
P381, J INF SCI; CRONIN B, 1994, V45, P61, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; CRONIN B,
1998, J AM SOC; CRONIN B, 2001, V27, P1, J INFORM SCI; CRONIN B, 2006,
V578, P1275, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; FIDEL R, 1983, V34, P163, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; FIDEL R, 1984, V35, P211, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; FIDEL R, 1985,
V9, P61, ONLINE REV; FIDEL R, 1986, V37, P37, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; FIDEL
R, 1991, V42, P490, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; FIDEL R, 1991, V42, P501, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; FIDEL R, 1991, V42, P515, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; FIDEL R,
1999, V50, P24, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; GALENSON DW, 2003, 2 LIFE CYCLES
HUMAN; GALENSON DW, 2003, LIFE CYCLES MODERN A; GALENSON DW, 2004, V37,
P123, HIST METHOD; GALENSON DW, 2005, 11501 NAT BUR EC RES; GALENSON DW,
2005, WHO GREATEST LIVING; GARFIELD E, 1992, V13, P117, THEORETICAL MED;
KANTOR PB, 1964, V12, P52, PHYS REV LETT; KANTOR PB, 1984, OBJECTIVE
PERFORMANC; KUHLTHAU CC, 1988, V10, P257, LIBR INFORM SCI RES; KUHLTHAU
CC, 1988, V28, P232, RQ; KUHLTHAU CC, 1990, V12, P5, LIBR INFORM SCI RES;
KUHLTHAU CC, 1991, V42, P361, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; KUHLTHAU CC, 1993,
V49, P339, J DOC; KUHLTHAU CC, 1993, SEEKING MEANING PROC; LEHMAN HC,
1953, AGE ACHIEVEMENT; MARCHIONINI G, 1988, V21, P70, COMPUTER;
MARCHIONINI G, 1988, V28, P8, EDUC TECHNOL; MARCHIONINI G, 1989, V40,
P54, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MARCHIONINI G, 1992, V43, P156, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; MARCHIONINI G, 1995, INFORM SEEKING ELECT; MCGUIGAN C, 2006, P58,
THROUGH LENS NEWSWEE; MEHO LI, 2005, V56, P1314, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
SARACEVIC T, 1975, V26, P321, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SARACEVIC T, 1988,
V39, P161, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SARACEVIC T, 1988, V39, P177, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; SARACEVIC T, 1988, V39, P197, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SARACEVIC
T, 1990, V27, P47, P ASIS ANNU MEET; SARACEVIC T, 1996, COLIS 2 INT C COP
RO; SARACEVIC T, 1996, V33, P3, P 59 ANN M AM SOC IN; SMALL HG, 1978, V8,
P327, SOC STUD SCI; SMITH A, 2002, CORRELATION RAE RATI; SOERGEL D, 1974,
INDEXING LANGUAGE TH; SOERGEL D, 1985, ORG INFORM PRINCIPLE; SRACEVIC T,
1970, INTRO INFORM SCI; SRACEVIC T, 1977, V38, P17, COLL RES LIB; SWANSON
DR, 1960, V132, P1099, SCIENCE; SWANSON DR, 1977, V47, P128, LIBRARY Q;
SWANSON DR, 1986, V56, P103, LIBR QUART; SWANSON DR, 1986, V30, P7,
PERSPECT BIOL MED; SWANSON DR, 1987, V38, P228, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
SWANSON DR, 1988, V39, P92, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SWANSON DR, 1988, V31,
P526, PERSPECT BIOL MED; SWANSON DR, 1990, V78, P29, B MED LIBR ASSOC;
SWANSON DR, 1997, V91, P183, ARTIF INTELL; TENOPIR C, 1985, V9, P149,
ONLINE REV; TENOPIR CKD, 2000, ELECT J REALITIES SC; WHITE HD, 1981, V32,
P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1982, V38, P255, J DOC; WHITE HD,
1989, V24, P119, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1994, P41, HDB RES
SYNTHESIS; WHITE HD, 1997, V32, P99, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998,
V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHTIE HD, 1990, P84, SCHOLARLY
COMMUNICAT|
NR- 94|
TC- 9|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- NOV|
PY- 2007|
VL- 58|
IS- 13|
BP- 1948|
EP- 1959|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20667|
PG- 12|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 228PE|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2007, V58, N13, P1948-1959|
UT- ISI:000250741100003 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Benson M; Hov DAS; Clancy T; Hovig E; Rudemo M; Cardell LO|
AF- Benson M; Hov, D. A. Steenhoff; Clancy, T; Hovig, E; Rudemo, M;
Cardell, L. O|
TI- Connectivity can be used to identify key genes in DNA microarray
data: a study based on gene expression in nasal polyps before and after
treatment with glucocorticoids|
SO- ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- network theory; PubGene|
ID- NETWORK|
AB- Conclusions. The presented analysis of nasal polyposis using
connectivity based on the PubGene literature co-citation network
demonstrates that this tool can be used to identify key genes in DNA
microarray studies of human polygenic diseases. Objectives. DNA
microarray studies of complex diseases may reveal differential expression
of hundreds of genes. According to network theory and studies of yeast
cells, genes that are connected with several other genes appear to have
key regulatory roles. This study aimed to examine if this principle can
be translated to DNA microarray studies of human disease, using nasal
polyposis as a base for the analysis. Materials and methods. The
connectivity of differentially expressed genes from a previously
described microarray study of nasal polyposis before and after treatment
with glucocorticoids was determined. This was done using the literature
co-citation network PubGene. Results. In all, 166 genes were
differentially expressed; 39 of these were previously defined as
inflammatory and considered important for nasal polyposis The
connectivity of all differentially expressed genes was analysed using the
PubGene literature co-citation network. Seventy-four of the 166 genes
were connected to other genes. By contrast, the average number of
connected genes among 100 sets of 166 randomly chosen genes was 31.5. A
small number of the differentially expressed genes were highly connected,
while most genes had few or no connections. This indicated a scale-free
network. The most connected gene was interleukin-8, an inflammatory gene
of known importance for nasal polyposis. Twenty-eight of the 74 connected
genes were inflammatory (38%), compared with 11 of the 92 unconnected
genes (12%), p < 0.0001 Since most evidence suggests that nasal polyps
are inflammatory in their nature, this supports the hypothesis that
connected genes have more disease relevance than unconnected genes|
C1- Queen Silvia Childrens Hosp, Pediat Allergy Res Grp, Gothenburg,
Sweden; PuBGene, Oslo, Norway; Norwegian Radium Hosp, Oslo, Norway;
Chalmers, Gothenburg, Sweden; Malmo Univ Hosp, Malmo, Sweden|
RP- Cardell, LO, Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Lab Clin & Expt
Allergy Res, SE-20402 Malmo, Sweden|
EM- Lars-Olaf.Cardell@oron.mas.lu.se|
CD- AKATSUKA Y, 2003, V197, P1489, J EXP MED; BARABASI AL, 2004, V5,
P101, NAT REV GENET; BENSON M, 2004, V34, P1001, CLIN EXP ALLERGY; BENSON
M, 2004, V113, P1137, J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUN; BOLARD F, 2001, V56, P333,
ALLERGY; DAS P, 2003, V24, P969, NEUROBIOL AGING; DELRIO G, 2001, V509,
P230, FEBS LETT; FEATHERSTONE DE, 2002, V24, P267, BIOESSAYS; JENSSEN TK,
2001, V28, P21, NAT GENET; JEONG H, 2001, V411, P41, NATURE; WILKINSON
DM, 2004, V101, P5241, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1|
NR- 11|
TC- 3|
PU- TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS|
PI- OSLO|
PA- PO BOX 12 POSTHUSET, NO-0051 OSLO, NORWAY|
SN- 0001-6489|
J9- ACTA OTO-LARYNGOL|
JI- Acta Oto-Laryngol|
PY- 2007|
VL- 127|
IS- 10|
BP- 1074|
EP- 1079|
DI- 10.1080/00016480701200277|
PG- 6|
SC- Otorhinolaryngology|
GA- 212IE|
JN- ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2007, V127, N10, P1074-1079|
UT- ISI:000249588700011 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Schneider JW; Borlund P|
AF- Schneider Jesper W; Borlund, Pia|
TI- Matrix comparison, part 1: Motivation and important issues for
measuring the resemblance between proximity measures or ordination
results|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT; SIMILARITY
MEASURES; MAPPING SCIENCE; ASSOCIATION; INFORMATION; SPECIALTIES;
CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER; CHOICE|
AB- The present two-part article introduces matrix comparison as a formal
means of evaluation in informetric studies such as cocitation analysis In
this first part, the motivation behind introducing matrix comparison to
informetric studies, as well as two important issues influencing such
comparisons, are introduced and discussed. The motivation is spurred by
the recent debate on choice of proximity measures and their potential
influence upon clustering and ordination results. The two important
issues discussed here are matrix generation and the composition of
proximity measures. The approach to matrix generation is demonstrated for
the same data set, i.e., how data is represented and transformed in a
matrix, evidently determines the behavior of proximity measures. Two
different matrix generation approaches, in all probability, will lead to
different proximity rankings of objects, which further lead to different
ordination and clustering results for the same set of objects. Further, a
resemblance in the composition of formulas indicates whether two
proximity measures may produce similar ordination and clustering results.
However, as shown in the case of the angular correlation and cosine
measures, a small deviation in otherwise similar formulas can lead to
different rankings depending on the contour of the data matrix
transformed. Eventually, the behavior of proximity measures, that is
whether they produce similar rankings of objects, is more or less dataspecific. Consequently, the authors recommend the use of empirical matrix
comparison techniques for individual studies to investigate the degree of
resemblance between proximity measures or their ordination results. In
part two of the article, the authors introduce and demonstrate two
related statistical matrix comparison techniques the Mantel test and
Procrustes analysis, respectively. These techniques can compare and
evaluate the degree of monotonicity between different proximity measures
or their ordination results. As such, the Mantel test and Procrustes
analysis can be used as statistical validation tools in informetric
studies and thus help choosing suitable proximity measures|
C1- Royal Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Dept Informat Studies, DK-9000 Aalborg,
Denmark|
RP- Schneider, JW, Royal Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Dept Informat Studies,
Sohngaardsholmsvej 2, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark|
EM- jws@db.dk pb@db.dk|
CD- AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ANDERBERG M, 1973,
CLUSGER ANAL APPL; ASTROM F, 2002, P185, P 4 INT C CONC LIB I; AUSTIN MP,
1976, V42, P11, VEGETATIO; BARONIURBANI C, 1976, V25, P251, SYST ZOOL;
BELLMAN RE, 1961, ADAPTIVE CONTROL PRO; BENSMAN SJ, 2004, V55, P935, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; BOYACK KW, 2005, V64, P351, SCIENTOMETRICS; CARROLL JB,
1961, V26, P347, PSYCHOMETRIKA; COX TF, 2000, MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCA; COX
TF, 2005, INTRO MULTIVARIATE D; CRONBACH LJ, 1953, V50, P456, PSYCHOL
BULL; DIETZ EJ, 1983, V32, P21, SYST ZOOL; EGGHE L, 1990, INTRO INFORM
QUANTIT; ELLISON GTH, 1993, V3, P1, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR; EVERITT BS,
1979, V35, P169, BIOMETRICS; EVERITT BS, 1997, ANAL PROXIMITY DATA;
FASHAM MJR, 1977, V58, P551, ECOLOGY; FEGER H, 1993, CATERGORIES
CONCEPTS; GMUR M, 2003, V57, P27, SCIENTOMETRICS; GORDON AD, 1987, V150,
P119, J ROY STAT SOC A GEN; GOWER JC, 1971, P138, MATH ARCHAEOLOGICAL;
GOWER JC, 1986, V3, P5, J CLASSIF; HUBALEK Z, 1982, V57, P669, BIOL REV;
JACCARD P, 1901, V37, P241, B SOC VAUD SCI NAT; JACKSON DA, 1989, V133,
P436, AM NAT; JONES PE, 1967, V18, P153, AM DOC; JONES WP, 1987, V38,
P420, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; KENKEL NC, 1986, V67, P919, ECOLOGY; KLAVANS
R, 2006, V57, P251, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; KRAUZE TK, 1979, V1, P419,
SCIENTOMETRICS; KRUSKAL JB, 1978, MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCA; KRZANOWSKI WJ,
1994, MULTIVARIATE ANAL 1; LATTIN J, 2003, ANAL MULTIVARIATE DA; LEGENDRE
P, 1998, NUMERICAL ECOLOGY; LEYDESDORFF L, 1987, V11, P281,
SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2005, V56, P769, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, V57, P1470, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L,
2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MANTEL N, 1967, V27, P209, CANCER
RES; MANTEL N, 1970, V26, P547, BIOMETRICS; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCGILL M, 1979, EVALUATION FACTORS A; MORRIS SA, 2005,
V56, P1250, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MULAIK SA, 1972, FDN FACTOR ANAL;
NICOLAISEN J, 2004, THESIS DEP INFORM ST; NOMA E, 1982, V4, P297,
SCIENTOMETRICS; OBERSKI JEJ, 1988, P431, HDB QUANTITATIVE STU; OCHIAI A,
1957, V22, P526, B JAPAN SOC SCIENT F; PERSSON O, 1994, V45, P31, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; PIELOU EC, 1984, INTERPRETATION ECOLO; PRICE DD, 1981,
V3, P55, SCIENTOMETRICS; SALTON G, AUTOMATIC INFORM ORG, P68; SALTON G,
1963, V10, P440, J ACM; SCHNEIDER JW, 2007, V58, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
SCHONEMANN P, 1966, V31, P1, PSYCHOMETRIKA; SCHONEMANN PH, 1970, V35,
P245, PSYCHOMETRIKA; SCOTT DW, 1992, MULTIVARIATE DENSITY; SMALL H, 1973,
V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; SMALL
H, 1980, V2, P277, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1985, V7, P391,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1985, V8, P321, SCIENTOMETRICS; SNEATH P, 1973,
NUMERICAL TAXONOMY P; TANIMOTO TT, 1958, ELEMENTARY MATH THEO; WANG ZW,
1992, P ACM SIGIR C RES DE; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITE HD, 2003,
V54, P250, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WILLIAMS WT, 1971, V14, P157, COMPUT J;
YULE GU, 1912, V75, P579, J R STAT SOC|
NR- 71|
TC- 10|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- SEP|
PY- 2007|
VL- 58|
IS- 11|
BP- 1586|
EP- 1595|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20643|
PG- 10|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 205SO|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2007, V58, N11, P1586-1595|
UT- ISI:000249135100005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Schneider JW; Borlund P|
AF- Schneider Jesper W; Borlund, Pia|
TI- Matrix comparison, part 2: Measuring the resemblance between
proximity measures or ordination results by use of the mantel and
procrustes statistics|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- NONPARAMETRIC MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS; COCITATION ANALYSIS; REGRESSION;
SCIENCE; ASSOCIATION; INFORMATION; EXTENSIONS; MODEL|
AB- The present two-part article introduces matrix comparison as a formal
means for evaluation purposes in informetric studies such as cocitation
analysis. In the first part, the motivation behind introducing matrix
comparison to informetric studies, as well as two important issues
influencing such comparisons, matrix generation, and the composition of
proximity measures, are introduced and discussed. In this second part,
the authors introduce and thoroughly demonstrate two related matrix
comparison techniques the Mantel test and Procrustes analysis,
respectively. These techniques can compare and evaluate the degree of
monotonicity between different proximity measures or their ordination
results. In common with these techniques is the application of
permutation procedures to test hypotheses about matrix resemblances The
choice of technique is related to the validation at hand. In the case of
the Mantel test, the degree of resemblance between two measures forecast
their potentially different affect upon ordination and clustering
results. In principle, two proximity measures with a very strong
resemblance most likely produce identical results, thus, choice of
measure between the two becomes less important. Alternatively, or as a
sup plement, Procrustes analysis compares the actual ordination results
without investigating the underlying proximity measures, by matching two
configurations of the same objects in a multidimensional space. An
advantage of the Procrustes analysis though, is the graphical solution
provided by the superimposition plot and the resulting decomposition of
variance components. Accordingly, the Procrustes analysis provides not
only a measure of general fit between configurations, but also values for
individual objects enabling more elaborate validations. As such, the
Mantel test and Procrustes analysis can be used as statistical validation
tools in informetric studies and thus help choosing suitable proximity
measures|
C1- Royal Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Dept Informat Studies, DK-9000 Aalborg,
Denmark|
RP- Schneider, JW, Royal Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Dept Informat Studies,
Sohngaardsholmsvej 2, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark|
EM- jws@db.dk pb@db.dk|
CD- BORGATTI SP, 2002, V14, P88, FIELD METHOD; BORGATTI SP, 2002, UCINET
WINDOWS SOFTW; BRAAM RR, 1988, P15, INFORMETRICS 87 88; CARROLL JD, 1970,
V35, P283, PSYCHOMETRIKA; CLIFORD HT, 1975, INTRO NUMERICAL CLAS; COX TF,
2000, MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCA; DANIEL WW, 1978, APPL NONPARAMETRIC S;
DELEEUW J, 1977, P133, RECENT DEV STAT; DIETZ EJ, 1983, V32, P21, SYST
ZOOL; DOUGLAS ME, 1982, V99, P777, J THEOR BIOL; DRIVER HE, 1932, V31,
P211, U CALIFORNIA PUBLICA; FRIEDLAENDER JS, 1971, V23, P253, AM J HUM
GENET; GMUR M, 2003, V57, P27, SCIENTOMETRICS; GOWER JC, 1971, P138, MATH
ARCHAEOLOGICAL; GOWER JC, 1975, V40, P33, PSYCHOMETRIKA; GOWER JC, 2004,
PROCUSTES PROBLEMS; GREEN BF, 1952, V17, P429, PSYCHOMETRIKA; HAMERS L,
1989, V25, P315, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; HUBERT L, 1976, V29, P190, BRIT J
MATH STAT PSY; HUBERT LJ, 1977, V16, P233, J MATH PSYCHOL; HUBERT LJ,
1978, V31, P179, BRIT J MATH STAT PSY; HUBERT LJ, 1985, V50, P449,
PSYCHOMETRIKA; HUBERT LJ, 1987, ASSIGNMENT METHODS C; HURLEY JR, 1962,
V7, P258, BEHAV SCI; JACCARD P, 1901, V37, P241, B SOC VAUD SCI NAT;
JACKSON DA, 1989, V67, P766, CAN J ZOOL; JACKSON DA, 1995, V2, P297,
ECOSCIENCE; KLAVANS R, 2006, V57, P251, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; KRACKHARDT
D, 1987, V9, P171, SOC NETWORKS; KRZANOWSKI WJ, 2000, PRINCIPLES
MULTIVARI; LAPOINTE FJ, 1992, V41, P378, SYST BIOL; LEGENDRE P, 1998,
NUMERICAL ECOLOGY; MANLY BFJ, 1997, RANDOMIZATION BOOTST; MANTEL N, 1967,
V27, P209, CANCER RES; MANTEL N, 1970, V26, P547, BIOMETRICS; MCCAIN KW,
2005, V65, P131, SCIENTOMETRICS; MIELKE PW, 1978, V34, P277, BIOMETRICS;
MOSIER CI, 1939, V4, P149, PSYCHOMETRIKA; NAGPAUL PS, 2003, V56, P403,
SCIENTOMETRICS; OCHIAI A, 1957, V22, P526, B JAPAN SOC SCIENT F; PIELOU
EC, 1984, INTERPRETATION ECOLO; ROHLF FJ, 1990, V39, P40, SYST ZOOL;
SALTON G, 1963, V10, P440, J ACM; SAMOYLENKO I, 2006, V57, P1461, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; SCHNEIDER JW, 2004, THESIS DEP INFORM ST; SCHNEIDER JW,
2007, V58, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SCHONEMANN P, 1966, V31, P1,
PSYCHOMETRIKA; SCHONEMANN PH, 1970, V35, P245, PSYCHOMETRIKA; SIBSON R,
1978, V40, P234, J ROY STAT SOC B MET; SIEGEL AF, 1982, V38, P341,
BIOMETRICS; SIEGEL S, 1988, NONPARAMETRIC STAT B; SMOUSE PE, 1986, V35,
P627, SYST ZOOL; SNEATH P, 1973, NUMERICAL TAXONOMY P; SNEATH PHA, 1967,
V151, P65, J ZOOL LOND; SOKAL RR, 1962, V11, P33, TAXON; SOKAL RR, 1979,
V28, P227, SYST ZOOL; TENBERGE JMF, 1977, V42, P267, PSYCHOMETRIKA; WHITE
HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P250, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2004, V55, P111, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WOLFRAM
D, 2003, APPL INFORMETRICS IN; ZUCCALA A, 2006, V57, P152, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC|
NR- 62|
TC- 4|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- SEP|
PY- 2007|
VL- 58|
IS- 11|
BP- 1596|
EP- 1609|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20642|
PG- 14|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 205SO|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2007, V58, N11, P1596-1609|
UT- ISI:000249135100006 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Waltman L; van Eck NJ|
AF- Waltman Ludo; van Eck, Nees Jan|
TI- Some comments on the question whether co-occurrence data should be
normalized|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
AB- In a recent article in JASIST, L. Leydesdorff and L. Vaughan (2006)
asserted that raw cocitation data should be analyzed directly, without
first applying a normalization such as the Pearson correlation. In this
communication, it is argued that there is nothing wrong with the widely
adopted practice of normalizing cocitation data. One of the arguments put
forward by Leydesdorff and Vaughan turns out to depend crucially on
incorrect multidimensional scaling maps that are due to an error in the
PROXSCAL program in SPSS|
C1- Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Econ, Inst Econometr, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam,
Netherlands|
RP- Waltman, L, Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Econ, Inst Econometr, POB 1738,
NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands|
EM- lwaltman@few.eur.nl nvaneck@few.eur.nl|
CD- AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L,
2006, V57, P1616, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE NJ, 1998, V1, P3, DRUG RESIST UPDATE|
NR- 4|
TC- 9|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- SEP|
PY- 2007|
VL- 58|
IS- 11|
BP- 1701|
EP- 1703|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20647|
PG- 3|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 205SO|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2007, V58, N11, P1701-1703|
UT- ISI:000249135100015 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Whitley EA; Galliers RD|
AF- Whitley Edgar A; Galliers, Robert D|
TI- An alternative perspective on citation classics: Evidence from the
first 10 years of the European Conference on Information Systems|
SO- INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- citations; classics; European research tradition; social theorists;
Information systems research|
ID- COCITATION ANALYSIS; KEY ISSUES; MANAGEMENT; DISCIPLINE; JOURNALS;
MIS; PATTERNS; SCHOLARS; FORUMS; FIELD|
AB- We present an alternative perspective to the many citation classics
papers that have appeared in the IS literature by presenting citation
data from the first 10 years of the European Conference on IS (ECIS,
1993-2002), identifying the most frequently cited texts in this sample We
compared the ECIS citation classics with those presented by others and
suggest that the ECIS data highlight the ways in which the IS field is
more nuanced than previously reported. We thus provided insights how the
field has developed internationally. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights
reserved|
C1- Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Management, Informat
Syst & Innovat Grp, London WC2A 2AE, England; Bentley Coll, Waltham, MA
02452 USA|
RP- Whitley, EA, Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept
Management, Informat Syst & Innovat Grp, Houghton St, London WC2A 2AE,
England|
EM- e.a.whitley@lse.ac.uk rgalliers@bentley.edu|
CD- *ECIS, 2007, ENDN LIBR ECIS C; *ISR, 2002, P13, MEAS EC NET ORG;
*MISQ, 1999, V23, MIS Q; ACKOFF R, 1967, V14, P147, MANAGE SCI; AVGEROU
C, 1999, V8, P136, EUR J INFORM SYST; BANKER RD, 2004, V50, P281, MANAGE
SCI; BARKI H, 1993, V17, P209, MIS QUART; BARRETT M, 2004, P293, INFORM
SYSTEMS RES R; BASKERVILLE RL, 2002, V26, P1, MIS QUART; BENBASAT I,
2003, V27, P183, MIS QUART; BRANCHEAU JC, 1987, V11, P23, MIS QUART;
BRANCHEAU JC, 1996, V20, P225, MIS QUART; CALLON M, 1986, P196, POWER
ACTION BELIEF; CHAN HC, 2006, V57, P1263, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CHECKLAND
PB, 1981, SYSTEMS THINKING SYS; CHECKLAND PB, 1990, SOFT SYSTEMS METHODO;
CHEN WS, 2004, V14, P197, INFORM SYST J; COLLINS HM, 1992, CHANGING ORDER
REPLI; CULNAN MJ, 1986, V32, P156, MANAGE SCI; CULNAN MJ, 1987, V11,
P341, MIS QUART; DENNIS AR, 2006, V30, P1, MIS QUART; DESOLA PD, 1963,
LITTLE SCI BIG SCI; DOKE ER, 1987, V27, P30, J COMPUTER INFORMATI; EARL
MJ, 1989, MANAGEMENT STRATEGIE; EVARISTO JR, 1997, V28, P32, DATA BASE
ADV INF SY; GALLIERS RD, 2003, V11, DISCIPLINE DIVIDED G; GALLIERS RD,
2006, EXPLORIBG INFORM SYS; GALLIERS RD, 2007, V16, P20, EUR J INFORM
SYST; GALLIVAN MJ, 2007, V16, P36, EUR J INFORM SYST; GILLENSON ML, 1991,
V15, P447, MIS QUART; GLASS RL, 2005, V48, P25, COMMUN ACM; GRAY P, 1999,
V1, COMMUNICATIONS AIS; GROVER V, 2006, V7, J AIS; HAMILTON S, 1982, V5,
P339, INFORMATION MANAGEME; HAMILTON S, 1982, V6, P61, MIS Q; HARDGRAVE
BC, 1997, V40, P119, COMMUN ACM; HIRSCHHEIM R, 2003, V4, P237, J ASSOC
INF SYST; INTRONA LD, 2000, V16, P169, INFORM SOC; INTRONA LD, 2003, V12,
P235, EUR J INFORM SYST; JARVENPAA SL, 1989, V35, P285, MANAGE SCI; JONES
M, 2000, P C ORG SOC PERSP IN; KATERATTANAKUL P, 2003, V12, P60, EUR J
INFORM SYST; KING JL, 2006, V17, P841, COMMUNICATIONS AIS; KOZAR KA,
2006, V17, P524, COMMUNICATIONS AIS; LARSEN TJ, 2005, V15, P357, INFORM
SYST J; LOWRY PB, 2004, V5, P29, J ASSOC INF SYST; LUCAS HC, 1975, INFORM
SYSTEMS FAIL; MACKENZIE D, 1999, P419, SOCIAL SHAPING TECHN; MASON RO,
1973, V19, P475, MANAGE SCI; MYLONOPOULOS NA, 2001, V44, P29, COMMUN ACM;
NONAKA I, 1995, KNOWLEDGE CREATING C; OH W, 2005, V22, P265, J MANAGE
INFORM SYST; ORLIKOWSKI WJ, 2001, V12, P121, INFORM SYST RES; ORLIKOWSKI
WJ, 2001, V25, P145, MIS QUART; PALVIA P, 2004, V14, P526, COMMUNICATIONS
AIS; PALVIA P, 2007, V44, P1, PROFILE INFORM SYSTE; PORTER M, 1985, V4,
P149, HARVARD BUS REV; PORTER ME, 1980, COMPETITIVE STRATEGY; ROGERS EM,
1995, DIFFUSION INNOVATION; SAUNDERS C, 2006, V30, R3, MIS Q; SHAPIN S,
1985, LEVIATHAN AIR PUMPY; VALACICH JS, 2006, V17, P107, INFORM SYST RES;
VOGEL DR, 1984, V15, P3, DATA BASE; WADE M, 2006, V7, J AIS; WALSHAM G,
1995, V6, P376, INFORM SYST RES; WALSHAM G, 2006, V15, P320, EUR J INFORM
SYST; WALSTROM KA, 1995, V38, P93, COMMUN ACM; WALSTROM KA, 2000, V38,
P59, INFORM MANAGE; WHITLEY EA, 2004, V13, P317, COMMUNICATIONS AIS; XU
J, 2006, P INT C INF SYST MIL; YIN RK, 1989, CASE STUDY RES DESIG; ZUBOFF
S, 1988, AGE SMART MACHINE FU|
NR- 72|
TC- 5|
PU- ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV|
PI- AMSTERDAM|
PA- PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0378-7206|
J9- INFORM MANAGEMENT|
JI- Inf. Manage|
PD- JUL|
PY- 2007|
VL- 44|
IS- 5|
BP- 441|
EP- 455|
DI- 10.1016/j.im.2007.04.004|
PG- 15|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science; Management|
GA- 202CG|
JN- INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2007, V44, N5, P441-455|
UT- ISI:000248878900001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Kimpel MW; Strother WN; McClintick JN; Carr LG; Liang TB; Edenberg
HJ; McBride WJ|
AF- Kimpel Mark W; Strother, Wendy N; McClintick, Jeanette N; Carr,
Lucinda G; Liang, Tiebing; Edenberg, Howard J; McBride, William J|
TI- Functional gene expression differences between inbred alcoholpreferring and -non-preferring rats in five brain regions|
SO- ALCOHOL|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- alcohol-preferring P rat; alcohol-non-preferring NP rat; microarrays;
gene expression; nucleus accumbens; amygdala; frontal cortex;
hippocampus; caudate-putamen|
ID- QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; CEREBRAL GLUCOSE-UTILIZATION; NEUROTROPHIC
FACTOR CNTF; P-RATS; NP RATS; INNATE DIFFERENCES; ETHANOL OXIDATION;
OPIOID RECEPTORS; AXON GUIDANCE; WISTAR RATS/|
AB- The objective of this study was to determine if there are innate
differences in gene expression in selected CNS regions between inbred
alcohol-preferring (iP) and -non-preferring (iNP) rats. Gene expression
was determined in the nucleus accumbens (ACB), amygdala (AMYG), frontal
cortex (FC), caudate-putamen (CPU), and hippocampus (HIPP) of alcoholnaive adult mate iP and iNP rats, using Affymetrix Rat Genome U34A
microarrays (n = 6/strain). Using Linear Modeling for Microarray Analysis
with a false discovery rate threshold of 0.1, there were 16 genes with
differential expression in the ACB, 54 in the AMYG, 8 in the FC, 24 in
the CPU, and 21 in the HIPP. When examining the main effect of strain
across regions, 296 genes were differentially expressed Although the
relatively small number of genes found significant within individual
regions precluded a powerful analysis for over-represented Gene Ontology
categories, the much larger list resulting from the main effect of strain
analysis produced 17 over-represented categories (P < .05), including
axon guidance, gliogenesis, negative regulation of programmed cell death,
regulation of programmed cell death, regulation of synapse structure
function, and transmission of nerve impulse Co-citation analysis and
graphing of significant genes revealed a network involved in the
neuropeptide Y (NPY) transmitter system Correlation of all significant
genes with those located within previously established rat alcohol QTLs
revealed that of the total of 313 significant genes, 71 are located
within such QTLs. The many regional and overall gene expression
differences between the iP and iNP rat lines may contribute to the
divergent alcohol drinking phenotypes of these rats. (c) 2007 Elsevier
Inc. All rights reserved|
C1- Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Inst Psychiat Res, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA;
Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA; Indiana
Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA;
Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Med Genom, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA; Indiana
Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA; Indiana Univ, Sch
Med, Dept Med & Mol Genet, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA|
RP- Kimpel, MW, Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Inst Psychiat Res, 791 Union Dr,
Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA|
EM- mkimpel@iupui.edu|
CD- *I LAB AN RES, 1996, GUID CAR US LAB AN; *R FDN STAT COMP, 2006,
LANGUAGE ENV STAT CO; ARAGON CMG, 1991, V15, P165, ALCOHOL CLIN EXP RES;
ARAGON CMG, 1992, V44, P93, BIOCHEM PHARMACOL; ASHBURNER M, 2000, V25,
P25, NAT GENET; BARRETT T, 2005, V33, D562, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES; BELL RL,
2001, V25, P644, ALCOHOL CLIN EXP RES; BELL RL, 2004, V28, A143, ALCOHOL
CLIN EXP R S; BENJAMINI Y, 1995, V57, P289, J R STAT SOC B; BICE P, 1998,
V9, P949, MAMM GENOME; BLUHER S, 2004, V53, P2787, DIABETES; BONCI A,
2003, V24, P172, TRENDS PHARMACOL SCI; CARR LG, 1998, V22, P884, ALCOHOL
CLIN EXP RES; CARR LG, 2003, V27, P1710, ALCOHOL CLIN EXP RES; CHANG C,
2006, V16, P854, CURR BIOL; CHOI DS, 2002, V22, P9905, J NEUROSCI; CICERO
TJ, 1979, V2, P533, BIOCH PHARMACOLOGY E; COHEN G, 1980, V4, P366,
ALCOHOL CLIN EXP RES; CULLEN KM, 1994, V2, P253, ALCOHOL ALCOHOLISM S;
DEAN C, 2003, V6, P708, NAT NEUROSCI; DIGIOVANNI S, 2005, V19, P153,
FASEB J; EDENBERG HJ, 2005, V4, P20, GENES BRAIN BEHAV; EDGAR R, 2002,
V30, P207, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES; EHLERS CL, 1992, V106, P359,
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY; EHLERS CL, 1998, V22, P1778, ALCOHOL CLIN EXP RES;
EHLERS CL, 1999, V93, P227, NEUROSCIENCE; FOROUD T, 2002, V32, P57, BEHAV
GENET; FOROUD T, 2003, V13, P155, PSYCHIAT GENET; FULUS JF, 2005, V39,
P883, PSYCHIAT POL; FURUYA S, 2000, V97, P11528, P NATL ACAD SCI USA;
GATTO GJ, 1987, V28, P105, PHARMACOL BIOCHEM BE; GATTO GJ, 1987, V28,
P111, PHARMACOL BIOCHEM BE; GATTO GJ, 1994, V11, P557, ALCOHOL; GENTLEMAN
RC, 2004, V5, ARTN R80, GENOME BIOL; GENTLEMAN RC, 2004, P171, P COMPSTAT
2004 S; GENTRY J, 2006, R PACKAGE VERSION 1; GILL K, 1996, V13, P347,
ALCOHOL; HAINS BC, 2003, V23, P8881, J NEUROSCI; HARRIS MA, 2004, V32,
D258, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES; HODGE CW, 1999, V2, P997, NAT NEUROSCI; HUSSAIN
NK, 2005, V307, P1207, SCIENCE; HWANG BH, 2004, V38, P359, NEUROPEPTIDES;
IRIZARRY RA, 2003, V4, P249, BIOSTATISTICS; KERNS RT, 2005, V25, P2255, J
NEUROSCI; KUJAPANULA J, 2003, V160, P963, J CELL BIOL; LIANG TB, 2003,
V100, P4690, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; LIN SM, 2004, V20, P3659,
BIOINFORMATICS; LIU HY, 2002, V277, P26046, J BIOL CHEM; LONG H, 2004,
V42, P213, NEURON; LUMENG L, 1977, V3, P537, ALCOHOL ALDEHYDE MET; LUMENG
L, 1982, V16, P125, PHARMACOL BIOCHEM BE; LYNCH AM, 2002, V15, P1779, EUR
J NEUROSCI; MALDONADO R, 2003, P1, J NEURAL TRANSM-SUPP; MCBRIDE WJ,
1993, V2, P463, ALCOHOL ALCOHOLISM S; MCBRIDE WJ, 1993, V10, P387,
ALCOHOL; MCBRIDE WJ, 1994, V49, P7, PHARMACOL BIOCHEM BE; MCBRIDE WJ,
1997, V14, P141, ALCOHOL; MCBRIDE WJ, 1998, V16, P317, ALCOHOL; MCBRIDE
WJ, 1998, V12, P339, CRIT REV NEUROBIOL; MIGUELHIDALGO JJ, 2002, V52,
P1121, BIOL PSYCHIAT; MULLIGAN MK, 2006, V103, P6368, P NATL ACAD SCI
USA; MURPHY JM, 2002, V32, P363, BEHAV GENET; NADLER JJ, 2006, GENETICS;
PAVLIDIS P, 2001, V2, P10, GENOME BIOL; PAXINOS G, 1998, RAT BRAIN
STEREOTAXI; PESOLD C, 1999, V96, P3217, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; PIERCE RC,
2001, V12, P95, REV NEUROSCIENCE; RADCLIFFE RA, 2004, V28, P1796, ALCOHOL
CLIN EXP RES; RAO MS, 1992, V150, P281, DEV BIOL; RODD ZA, 2004, V28,
P535, ALCOHOL CLIN EXP RES; RODD ZA, 2006, PHARMACOGENOMICS J; SCHOLTENS
D, 2005, P230, BIOINFORMATICS COMPU; SCHRAM PPJM, 2003, V5, ARTN 27, NEW
J PHYS; SCHROEDER JP, 2005, V36, P179, ALCOHOL; SHIN EY, 2002, V277,
P44417, J BIOL CHEM; SLAWECKI CJ, 2001, V62, P736, J STUD ALCOHOL; SMITH
DG, 2001, V25, P1309, ALCOHOL CLIN EXP RES; SMYTH GK, 2004, V3, ARTN 1,
STAT APPL GENET MOL; STANKOFF B, 2002, V22, P9221, J NEUROSCI; STEWART
RB, 2004, V28, A89, ALCOHOL CLIN EXP R S; STROTHER WN, 2001, V25, P31,
ALCOHOL; STROTHER WN, 2005, V35, P119, ALCOHOL; SZABO G, 1995, V287, P35,
EUR J PHARMACOL; TERENINARIGALDIE E, 2003, V13, P543, PHARMACOGENETICS;
THOMPSON H, 2006, V296, P476, DEV BIOL; WALLER MB, 1983, V19, P683,
PHARMACOL BIOCHEM BE; WALLER MB, 1986, V24, P617, PHARMACOL BIOCHEM BE;
WIRTH MJ, 1998, V75, P283, REGUL PEPTIDES; WITZMANN FA, 2003, V3, P1335,
PROTEOMICS; WONG DT, 1993, V46, P173, PHARMACOL BIOCHEM BE; WORST TJ,
2005, V80, P529, J NEUROSCI RES; XU Y, 2001, V25, P810, ALCOHOL CLIN EXP
RES; ZAPALA MA, 2005, V102, P10357, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; ZHOU FC, 1991,
V8, P425, ALCOHOL; ZHOU FC, 1994, V18, P571, ALCOHOL CLIN EXP RES; ZHOU
FC, 1994, V11, P397, ALCOHOL; ZHOU FC, 1995, V12, P403, ALCOHOL; ZIMATKIN
SM, 1996, V31, P167, ALCOHOL ALCOHOLISM|
NR- 98|
TC- 14|
PU- ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC|
PI- NEW YORK|
PA- 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, NY 10010-1710 USA|
SN- 0741-8329|
J9- ALCOHOL|
JI- Alcohol|
PD- MAR|
PY- 2007|
VL- 41|
IS- 2|
BP- 95|
EP- 132|
DI- 10.1016/j.alcohol.2007.03.003|
PG- 38|
SC- Substance Abuse; Pharmacology & Pharmacy; Toxicology|
GA- 174QU|
JN- ALCOHOL, 2007, V41, N2, P95-132|
UT- ISI:000246958400004 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Astrom F|
AF- Astrom Fredrik|
TI- Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of
LIS journal articles, 1990-2004|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- INFORMATION-SCIENCE; CITATION PROCESSES; AUTHOR COCITATION;
STOCHASTIC-MODEL; VISUALIZATION|
AB- Based on articles published in 1990-2004 in 21 library and
information science (LIS) journals, a set of cocitation analyses was
performed to study changes in research fronts over the last 15 years,
where LIS is at now, and to discuss where it is heading. To study
research fronts, here defined as current and influential cocited
articles, a citations among documents methodology was applied; and to
study changes, the analyses were time-sliced into three 5-year periods.
The results show a stable structure of two distinct research fields:
informetrics and information seeking and retrieval (ISR). However,
experimental retrieval research and user oriented research have merged
into one ISR field; and IR and informetrics also show signs of coming
closer together, sharing research interests and methodologies, making
informetrics research more visible in mainstream LIS research
Furthermore, the focus on the Internet, both in ISR research and in
informetrics-where webometrics quickly has become a dominating research
area-is an important change. The future is discussed in terms of LIS
dependency on technology, how integration of research areas as well as
technical systems can be expected to continue to characterize LIS
research, and how webometrics will continue to develop and find
applications|
C1- BIVIL, Dept Cultural Sci, S-22362 Lund, Sweden|
RP- Astrom, F, BIVIL, Dept Cultural Sci, Biskopsgatan 7, S-22362 Lund,
Sweden|
EM- fredrik.astrom@kult.lu.se|
CD- ASTROM F, 2002, P185, EMERGING FRAMEWORKS; BJORNEBORN L, 2001, V50,
P65, SCIENTOMETRICS; BURRELL QL, 2003, V54, P372, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
CHEN CM, 2004, V101, P5303, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; FEITELSON DG, 2003,
V60, P44, J DOC; GARFIELD E, 1994, V41, P3, CURR CONTENTS; GLANZEL W,
1994, V30, P49, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W, 1995, V31, P69, INFORM PROCESS
MANAG; GLANZEL W, 1997, V40, P481, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W, 2004, V59,
P63, SCIENTOMETRICS; INGWERSEN P, 2005, TURN INTEGRATION INF; MORRIS SA,
2003, V54, P413, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MORRIS SA, 2004, RES TOPICS
REFERENCE; MORRIS TA, 1998, V5, P448, J AM MED INFORM ASSN; PERSSON O,
1994, V45, P31, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PERSSON O, 2001, V50, P339,
SCIENTOMETRICS; PERSSON O, 2005, P24, P ISSI 2005 10 INT C; PERSSON O,
2006, BIBEXCEL TOOLBOX BIB; PRICE DJD, 1965, V149, P510, SCIENCE;
SARACEVIC T, 1999, V50, P1051, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; THOMSON ISI, 2003, J
CITATION REPORTS J; THOMSON ISI, 2005, WEB SCI; WHITE HD, 1981, V32,
P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; YASHIN YI, 2001, V56, P200, J ANAL CHEM+; ZHAO D, 2003, THESIS
FLORIDA STATE|
NR- 26|
TC- 18|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- MAY|
PY- 2007|
VL- 58|
IS- 7|
BP- 947|
EP- 957|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20567|
PG- 11|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 170QH|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2007, V58, N7, P947-957|
UT- ISI:000246678500003 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Zhao DZ; Strotmann A|
AF- Zhao Dangzhi; Strotmann, Andreas|
TI- Can citation analysis of Web publications better detect research
fronts?|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION; INTELLECTUAL
STRUCTURE; INFORMATION-SCIENCE; BIBLIOMETRICS; INTERNET; SPACE|
AB- We present evidence that in some research fields, research published
in journals and reported on the Web may collectively represent different
evolutionary stages of the field, with journals lagging a few years
behind the Web on average, and that a "two-tier" scholarly communication
system may therefore be evolving. We conclude that in such fields, (a)
for detecting current research fronts, author co-citation analyses (ACA)
using articles published on the Web as a data source can outperform
traditional ACAs using articles published in journals as data, and that
(b) as a result, it is important to use multiple data sources in citation
analysis studies of scholarly communication for a complete picture of
communication patterns. Our evidence stems from comparing the respective
intellectual structures of the XML research field, a subfield of computer
science, as revealed from three sets of ACA covering two time periods:
(a) from the field's beginnings in 1996 to 2001, and (b) from 2001 to
2006. For the first time period, we analyze research articles both from
journals as indexed by the Science Citation Index (SCl) and from the Web
as indexed by CiteSeer. We follow up by an ACA of SCI data for the second
time period. We find that most trends in the evolution of this field from
the first to the second time period that we find when comparing ACA
results from the SCI between the two time periods already were apparent
in the ACA results; from CiteSeer during the first time period|
C1- Univ Alberta, Sch Lib & Informat Studies, Edmonton, AB T6G 2J4,
Canada; Univ Alberta, Sch Business, Edmonton, AB T6G 2J4, Canada|
RP- Zhao, DZ, Univ Alberta, Sch Lib & Informat Studies, Edmonton, AB T6G
2J4, Canada|
EM- dzhao@ualberta.ca andreas.strotmann@ualberta.ca|
CD- 1999, CLEVER PROJECT HYPER; *I SCI INF, 2004, IMP OP ACC J CIT STU;
*I SCI INF, 2004, THOMS SCI J SEL PROC; *OP CIT PROJ, 2001, MIN SOC LIF
EPR ARCH; *WORLD WID WEB CON, 2001, EXT MARK LANG XML AC; AHLGREN P,
2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BARILAN J, 2001, V50, P7,
SCIENTOMETRICS; BORGMAN CL, 2000, V56, P412, J DOC; BORGMAN CL, 2002,
V36, P3, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; CRONIN B, 1998, V49, P1319, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; CRONIN B, 2001, V27, P1, J INFORM SCI; EDGE D, 1979, V17, P102, HIST
SCI; EGGHE L, 2000, V26, P329, J INFORM SCI; GARFIELD E, 1979, CITATION
INDEXING IT; GOODRUM AA, 2001, V37, P661, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; HAIR JF,
1998, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN; HARTER SP, 1992, V43, P602, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; HARTER SP, 1996, P299, P ASIS MID M; KLING R, 2000, V51, P1306, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; KREUZMAN H, 2001, V51, P525, SCIENTOMETRICS; LARSON R,
1996, P71, P 59 ANN M AM SOC IN; LAWRENCE S, 1999, V32, P67, IEEE COMPUT;
LINDSEY D, 1980, V10, P145, SOC STUD SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1986, V37, P111, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
MCCAIN KW, 1990, P194, SCHOLARLY COMMUNICAT; MCCAIN KW, 2000, V51, P1321,
J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PERSSON O, 2001, V50, P339, SCIENTOMETRICS; POULTNEY
RW, 1996, V27, P24, EUROPHYSICS NEWS; PRICE DJD, 1961, SCI BABYLON;
ROUSSEAU R, 1997, V1, CYBERMETRICS; THELWALL M, 2005, V39, P81, ANNU REV
INFORM SCI; VANRAAN AFJ, 2001, V50, P59, SCIENTOMETRICS; WHITE HD, 1981,
V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1982, V38, P255, J DOC; WHITE
HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P1250, J
AM SOC INF SCI TEC; YOUNGEN G, 1997, CITATION PATTERN PHY; ZHAO D, 2003,
P378, P 9 INT C SCI INF AU; ZHAO D, 2003, THESIS FLORIDA STATE; ZHAO D,
2004, P72, P ASIST ANNU MEET; ZHAO D, 2004, P CAN ASS INF SCI 20; ZHAO D,
2006, P AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ZHAO DZ, 2002, V54, P449, SCIENTOMETRICS;
ZHAO DZ, 2005, V41, P1403, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; ZHAO DZ, 2006, V42,
P1578, INFORM PROCESS MANAG|
NR- 46|
TC- 2|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- JUL|
PY- 2007|
VL- 58|
IS- 9|
BP- 1285|
EP- 1302|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20617|
PG- 18|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 183ND|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2007, V58, N9, P1285-1302|
UT- ISI:000247578600005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Malin B; Caley K|
AF- Malin Bradley; Caley, Kathleen|
TI- A longitudinal social network analysis of the editorial boards of
medical informatics and bioinformatics journals|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- SET; SERIALS|
AB- Objective: The goal of this research is to learn how the editorial
staffs of bioinformatics and medical informatics journals provide support
for cross-community exposure. Models such as co-citation and coauthor
analysis measure the relationships between researchers; but they do not
capture how environments that support knowledge transfer across
communities are organized Methods: In this paper, we propose a social
network analysis model to study how editorial boards integrate
researchers from disparate communities. We evaluate our model by building
relational networks based on the editorial boards of approximately 40
journals that serve as research outlets in medical informatics and
bioinformatics. We track the evolution of editorial relationships through
a longitudinal investigation over the years 2000 through 2005 Results:
Our findings suggest that there are research journals that support the
collocation of editorial board members from the bioinformatics and
medical informatics communities. Network centrality metrics indicate that
editorial board members are located in the intersection of the
communities and that the number of individuals in the intersection is
growing with time Conclusions: Social network analysis methods provide
insight into the relationships between the medical informatics and
bioinformatics communities. The number of editorial board members
facilitating the publication intersection of the communities has grown,
but the intersection remains dependent on a small group of individuals
and fragile|
C1- Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biomed Informat, Eskind Biomed Lib,
Nashville, TN 37232 USA; Carnegie Mellon Univ, Sch Comp Sci, Inst
Software Res, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA|
RP- Malin, B, Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biomed Informat, Eskind
Biomed Lib, 4th Floor, Nashville, TN 37232 USA|
EM- b.malin@vanderbilt.edu|
CD- ALTMAN RB, 1998, P53, P AMIA S; ANDREWS JE, 2003, V91, P47, J MED
LIBR ASSOC; CARLEY KM, 1997, V75, P25, ANN OPER RES; COATES T, 2002, P 5
INT C VIRT COMM; FREEMAN LC, 1977, V40, P35, SOCIOMETRY; HERSH W, 2007,
V46, P80, YB MED INFORM; KOHANE IS, 2002, P 2002 AMIA ANN S; MALIN B,
2005, LIDADP20 CARN MELL U; MARTINSANCHEZ F, 2003, TECHNICAL INFORM SER;
MINTZBERG H, 1973, NATURE MANAGERIAL WO; MORRIS TA, 1998, V5, P448, J AM
MED INFORM ASSN; MORRIS TA, 2000, P590, P AM MED INF ASS ANN; ROMANELLI
E, 1991, V17, P79, ANNU REV SOCIOL; SHORTLIFFE T, 2001, V34, P2, J BIOMED
INFORM; SITTIG DF, 1995, V8, P1452, P MEDINFO 95; SITTIG DF, 1996, V84,
P200, B MED LIBR ASSOC; SITTIG DF, 1999, V87, P43, B MED LIBR ASSOC;
THOMPSON JD, 1967, ORG ACTION; VISHWANATHAM R, 1998, V86, P518, B MED
LIBR ASSOC; WASSERMAN S, 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL|
NR- 20|
TC- 4|
PU- ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC|
PI- NEW YORK|
PA- 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, NY 10010-1710 USA|
SN- 1067-5027|
J9- J AMER MED INFORM ASSOC|
JI- J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc|
PD- MAY-JUN|
PY- 2007|
VL- 14|
IS- 3|
BP- 340|
EP- 348|
DI- 10.1197/jamia.M2228|
PG- 9|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Computer Science,
Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science & Library Science;
Medical Informatics|
GA- 170NS|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2007, V14,
N3, P340-348|
UT- ISI:000246670800011 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Casillas J; Acedo F|
AF- Casillas Jose; Acedo, Francisco|
TI- Evolution of the intellectual structure of family business
literature: A bibliometric study of FBR|
SO- FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; LIMITATIONS; PARADIGMS; SYSTEMS; SCIENCE;
POLICY; FIRMS|
AB- This article aims at identifying the characteristics of the family
business as a differentiated field within management. For that aim, we
use author co-citation analysis (ACA) to identify different research
trends within the field, studying all the papers published in the Family
Business Review from its foundation in 1988 through to the December 2005
issue. Results show that despite the literature being fragmented and
showing a lack of consensus, we are facing, in Kuhn's words, a
development of the research frontier by enlarging the number of
approaches used for understanding the family business|
C1- Univ Seville, Seville, Spain|
RP- Casillas, J, Univ Seville, Seville, Spain|
CD- ACEDO FJ, 2001, V9, P327, INT J ORG ANAL; ACEDO FJ, 2005, V14, P619,
INT BUS REV; ACEDO FJ, 2006, V27, P621, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; BIRD B, 2002,
V15, P337, FAMILY BUSINESS REV; BOROKHOVICH KA, 1994, V4, P110, FINANCIAL
PRACTICE E; BRICKER RJ, 1987, THESIS CASE W RESERV; CALLON M, 1995,
CIENCIOMETRIA ESTUDI; CHRISMAN JJ, 2003, COLEMAN FDN WHITE PA; COLE JR,
1975, P139, IDEA SOCIAL STRUCTUR; COLE S, 1983, V89, P111, AM J SOCIOL;
CORBETTA G, 2004, V28, P355, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; CULNAN MJ, 1986, V32,
P156, MANAGE SCI; CULNAN MJ, 1990, V41, P453, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; DYER
WG, 1998, V11, P287, FAMILY BUSINESS REV; EOM SB, 1996, V16, P315, DECIS
SUPPORT SYST; GARFIELD E, 1963, V14, P289, AM DOC; GUSTAFSON DP, 1974,
V47, P440, J BUS; HABBERSHON TG, 1999, V12, P1, FAMILY BUSINESS REV; HAIR
JF, 1999, ANAL MULTIVARIANTE; HANDLER W, 1989, V2, P257, FAMILY BUSINESS
REV; HEISCHMIDT KA, 1993, P152, J ED BUSINESS
JAN; HICKS D, 1987, V17,
P295, SOC STUD SCI; HICKS D, 1988, V18, P375, SOC STUD SCI; KUHN T, 1970,
STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; LAKATOS I, 1970, P91, CRITICISM GROWTH KNO; LOCKE
J, 2001, V36, P223, INT J ACCOUNTING; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; MENARD HW, 1971, SCI GROWTH CHANGE; MOYAANEGON F, 1998,
V42, P229, SCIENTOMETRICS; NEUBAUER F, 1998, FAMILY BUSINESS ITS; PRICE
JDD, 1965, V149, P510, SCIENCE; RAMOSRODRIGUEZ AR, 2004, V25, P981,
STRATEGIC MANAGE J; RATNATUNGA J, 1997, V12, P197, J BUS VENTURING;
READER D, 2006, V30, P417, ENTREP THEORY PRACT; ROWLANDS I, 1999, V44,
P533, SCIENTOMETRICS; SCHILDT HA, 2006, V30, P399, ENTREP THEORY PRACT;
SCHULZE WS, 2001, V12, P99, ORGAN SCI; SHARMA P, 1996, REV ANNOTATED
BIBLIO; SHARMA P, 1997, V10, P1, FAMILY BUSINESS REV; SHARMA P, 2004,
V17, P1, FAMILY BUSINESS REV; SMALL H, 1974, V2, P28, ESSAYS INFORMATION
S; SMALL H, 2003, V54, P394, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITE HD, 1981, V32,
P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1990, P84, SCHOLARLY COMMUNICAT;
WORTMAN MS, 1994, V7, P3, FAMILY BUSINESS REV; ZAHRA S, 2004, V17, P331,
FAM BUS REV|
NR- 46|
TC- 4|
PU- BLACKWELL PUBLISHING|
PI- OXFORD|
PA- 9600 GARSINGTON RD, OXFORD OX4 2DQ, OXON, ENGLAND|
SN- 0894-4865|
J9- FAM BUS REV|
JI- Fam. Bus. Rev|
PD- JUN|
PY- 2007|
VL- 20|
IS- 2|
BP- 141|
EP- 162|
PG- 22|
SC- Business|
GA- 179BZ|
JN- FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW, 2007, V20, N2, P141-162|
UT- ISI:000247265600005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- White HD|
AF- White Howard D|
TI- Combining bibliometrics, information retrieval, and relevance theory,
Part 1: First examples of a synthesis|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; SCIENCE; VISUALIZATION; LITERATURES;
PHILOSOPHY; LANGUAGE; SPACE; TIME; IDF; IR|
AB- In Sperber and Wilson's relevance theory (RT), the ratio Cognitive
Effects/Processing Effort defines the relevance of a communication. The
tf*idf formula from information retrieval is used to operationalize this
ratio for any item co-occurring with a user-supplied seed term in
bibliometric distributions. The tf weight of the item predicts its effect
on the user in the context of the seed term, and its idf weight predicts
the user's processing effort in relating the item to the seed term. The
idf measure, also known as statistical specificity, is shown to have
unsuspected applications in quantifying interrelated concepts such as
topical and nontopical relevance, levels of user expertise, and levels of
authority. A new kind of visualization, the pennant diagram, illustrates
these claims. The bibliometric distributions visualized are the works
cocited with a seed work (Moby Dick), the authors cocited with a seed
author (White HD, for maximum interpretability), and the books and
articles cocited with a seed article (S.A. Harter's "Psychological
Relevance and Information Science," which introduced RT to information
scientists in 1992). Pennant diagrams use bibliometric data and
information retrieval techniques on the system side to mimic a relevancetheoretic model of cognition on the user side. Relevance theory may thus
influence the design of new visual information retrieval interfaces.
Generally, when information retrieval and bibliometrics are interpreted
in light of RT, the implications are rich: A single sociocognitive theory
may serve to integrate research on literature-based systems with research
on their users, areas now largely separate|
C1- Drexel Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Technol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA|
RP- White, HD, Drexel Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Technol, Philadelphia, PA
19104 USA|
EM- whitehd@drexel.edu|
CD- *RED ROCK SOFTW, 2005, DELT VERS 5 6 COMP S; BEAN CA, 2001, P115,
RELATIONSHIPS ORG KN; BELEW RK, 2000, FINDING OUT COGNITIV; BLAIR DC,
1992, V35, P200, COMPUT J; BLAKEMORE D, 1992, UNDERSTANDING UTTERA;
BORLUND P, 2003, V54, P913, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BRADFORD SC, 1950,
DOCUMENTATION; BROOKES BC, 1973, V22, P18, LIBR TRENDS; BROOKES BC, 1980,
V5, P199, CANADIAN J INFORMATI; BROOKES BC, 1980, V31, P248, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; BROWN G, 1983, DISCOURSE ANAL; BUCKLAND MK, 1969, V25, P52, J
DOC; BUDD JM, 2004, V52, P447, LIBR TRENDS; CASE DO, 2005, P289, THEORIES
INFORM BEHA; CHEN Z, 2005, P 38 HAW INT C SYST; COSIJN E, 2000, V31,
P191, INFORM PROCESSING MA; COTTRILL CA, 1989, V11, P181, KNOWLEDGE;
CRANE D, 1972, INVISIBLE COLL DIFFU; DEBEAUGRANDE R, 1981, INTRO TEXT
LINGUISTI; ELLIS D, 1998, V18, P225, INFORM SERVICES USE; FURNER J, 2002,
V53, P747, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; GARFIELD E, 1979, CITATION INDEXING IT;
GARFIELD E, 2003, V54, P400, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; GOATLEY A, 1997,
LANGUAGE METAPHORS; GREEN R, 1995, V46, P646, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
GREISDORF H, 2000, V3, P67, INFORMING SCI; GROSSMAN DA, 1998, INFORM
RETRIEVAL ALG; HALLIDAY MAK, 1976, COHESION ENGLISH; HARDY AP, 1982, V18,
P289, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; HARTER SP, 1992, V43, P602, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; HJORLAND B, 2000, V51, P209, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; JONES KS, 1997,
P305, READINGS INFORM RETR; JURAFSKY D, 2000, SPEECH LANGUAGE PROC; KARKI
R, 1996, V22, P323, J INFORM SCI; KOESTLER A, 1964, ACT CREATION STUDY C;
MANN T, 1993, LIB RES MODELS GUIDE; MANNING CD, 2000, FDN STAT NATURAL
LAN; MIZZARO S, 1997, V48, P810, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MORRIS SA, 2003,
V54, P413, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; NELSON MJ, 1985, V36, P283, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; POOLE HL, 1985, THEORIES MIDDLE RANG; POSNER RA, 2001, PUBLIC
INTELLECTUALS; ROBERTSON S, 2004, V60, P503, J DOC; RUTHVEN I, 1996,
P380, P 9 FLOR ART INT RES; SARACEVIC T, 1975, V26, P321, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; SARACEVIC T, 1996, P201, INFORM SCI INTEGRATI; SARACEVIC T, 1997,
V31, P16, SIGIR FORUM; SCHAMBER L, 1994, V29, P3, ANNU REV INFORM SCI;
SMALL HG, 1978, V8, P327, SOC STUD SCI; SPARCKJONES K, 1972, V28, P11, J
DOC; SPARCKJONES K, 2004, V60, P521, J DOC; SPERBER D, 1986, RELEVANCE
COMMUNICAT; SPERBER D, 1995, RELEVANCE COMMUNICAT; SPERBER D, 1996, V19,
P530, BEHAV BRAIN SCI; SWANSON DR, 1977, V47, P128, LIBRARY Q; WALTON DN,
1989, INFORMAL LOGIC HDB C; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; WHITE HD, 1989, V24, P119, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1994, P41,
HDB RES SYNTHESIS; WHITE HD, 1997, V32, P99, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; WHITE
HD, 2000, P475, WEB KNOWLEDGE FESTSC; WHITE HD, 2001, V52, P87, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; WHITE HD, 2001, V51, P607, SCIENTOMETRICS; WHITE HD, 2002,
CHI 2002 DISC ARCH W; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
WHITE HD, 2004, V101, P5297, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; WHITE HD, 2004, V60,
P93, SCIENTOMETRICS; WHITE HD, 2007, V56, P583, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
WILDEMUTH BM, 2004, V55, P246, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WILLIAMS ST, 1963,
P207, 8 AM AUTHORS REV RES; WILSON D, 1986, P19, ENCONTRO LINGUISTAS;
WILSON D, 1994, P35, LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDI; WILSON D, 2002, V14, P249,
LINGUISTICS; WILSON P, 1968, 2 KINDS POWER ESSAY; YANG KD, 2005, V39,
P33, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; YUS F, 1998, V30, P305, J PRAGMATICS; YUS F,
2006, RELEVANCE THEORY ONL|
NR- 77|
TC- 7|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- FEB 15|
PY- 2007|
VL- 58|
IS- 4|
BP- 536|
EP- 559|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20543|
PG- 24|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 166LF|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2007, V58, N4, P536-559|
UT- ISI:000246379600008 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Galliers RD; Whitley EA|
AF- Galliers Robert D; Whitley, Edgar A|
TI- Vive les differences? Developing a profile of European information
systems research as a basis for international comparisons|
SO- EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS|
LA- English|
DT- Review|
DE- European Conference on Information Systems; European information
systems research topics; citations|
ID- COCITATION ANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT; MIS; TECHNOLOGY; JOURNALS; ISSUES;
DISCIPLINE; SCHOLARS; HISTORY; FORUMS|
AB- The information systems ( IS) community is truly international, yet
there is often a sense that different elements of the community have
different profiles in terms of their research and publication
expectations. This paper contributes to this discussion by developing a
profile of European IS research that can be used as a basis for
international comparisons. It reflects on European research on IS as
presented during the first 10 years of the European Conference on
Information Systems ( ECIS). Based on an analysis of all papers published
in the ECIS proceedings during the period 1993 - 2002, the paper presents
the key characteristics of the ECIS conferences, together with a profile
of European IS research activity as presented at ECIS. In particular, it
highlights the key references and sources used by researchers presenting
papers at ECIS. It articulates the research areas presented at ECIS and
explores the claim that European IS draws more on social theories than
elsewhere. Its contribution in presenting a profile of European research
in the IS field lies in identifying particular characteristics of the
European style of research that can be compared to that undertaken in
other parts of the world|
C1- Bentley Coll, Waltham, MA 02452 USA; Univ London London Sch Econ &
Polit Sci, Dept Management, Informat Syst Grp, London WC2A 2AE, England|
RP- Galliers, RD, Bentley Coll, 175 Forest St, Waltham, MA 02452 USA|
EM- rgalliers@bentley.edu|
CD- AUSTIN JL, 1962, DO THINGS WORDS W JA; AVGEROU C, 1999, V8, P136, EUR
J INFORM SYST; BANKER RD, 2004, V50, P281, MANAGE SCI; BARRETT S, 1982,
V6, P93, MIS Q; BENBASAT I, 1987, V11, P369, MIS QUART; BENBASAT I, 2003,
V27, P183, MIS QUART; BERGER P, 1966, SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION; BUCKINGHAM RA,
1987, BRIT COMPUTER SOC MO; BURRELL B, 1979, SOCIOLOGICAL PARADIG;
CAMINER D, 1998, LEO INCREDIBLE STORY; CASH JI, 1985, V63, P134, HARVARD
BUS REV; CHAN HC, 2006, V57, P1263, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; CHECKLAND PB,
1981, SYSTEMS THINKING SYS; CHEN WS, 2004, V14, P197, INFORM SYST J;
CLAVER E, 2000, V37, P181, INFORM MANAGE; COASE RH, 1937, V4, P386,
ECONOMICA-NEW SER; COPELAND DG, 1988, V12, P353, MIS QUART; CULNAN MJ,
1986, V32, P156, MANAGE SCI; CULNAN MJ, 1987, V11, P341, MIS QUART;
DAVENPORT TH, 1990, V31, P11, SLOAN MANAGE REV; DAVENPORT TH, 1993,
PROCESS INNOVATION R; DAVIDOW W, 1992, VIRTUAL CORPORATION; DAVIS FD,
1989, V13, P319, MIS QUART; DAVIS GB, 1980, P206, P 1 INT C INF SYST P;
DELONE WH, 1992, V3, P60, INFORMATION SYSTEMS; EARL MJ, 1989, MANAGEMENT
STRATEGIE; EARL MJ, 1993, V17, P1, MIS QUART; EASON KD, 1988, INFORM
TECHNOLOGY OR; EISENHARDT KM, 1989, V14, P532, ACAD MANAGE REV; EVARISTO
JR, 1997, V28, P32, DATA BASE ADV INF SY; FARBEY B, 1992, V7, P109, J
INFORMATION TECHNO; FERRY G, 2003, COMPUTER CALLED LEO; GALLIERS R, 1990,
P327, INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GALLIERS RD, 1991, V1, P55, EUROPEAN J
INFORMATI; GALLIERS RD, 1991, V1, P89, J INFORMATION SYSTEM; GALLIERS RD,
1993, V8, P92, J INFORM TECHNOL; GALLIERS RD, 1997, P143, KEY ISSUES
INFORMATI; GALLIERS RD, 2002, P3, 10 EUR C INF SYST GD; GALLIERS RD,
2003, V11, ARTN 5, COMMUNICATIONS AIS; GALLIERS RD, 2003, STRATEGIC
INFORM MAN; GALLIVAN MJ, 2007, V16, P36, EUR J INFORM SYST; GIDDENS A,
1984, CONSTITUTION SOC; GILLENSON ML, 1991, V15, P447, MIS QUART; GLASER
BG, 1967, DISCOVERY GROUNDED T; GLASS RL, 2005, V48, P25, COMMUN ACM;
HABERMAS J, 1986, V1, THEORY COMMUNICATIVE; HAMILTON S, 1980, P220, P 1
INT C INF SYST P; HAMILTON S, 1982, V6, P61, MIS Q; HAMMER M, 1990, V68,
P104, HARVARD BUS REV; HAMMER M, 1993, REENGINEERING CORPOR; HARDGRAVE
BC, 1997, V40, P119, COMMUN ACM; IIVARI J, 1999, P57, RETHINKING
MANAGEMEN; IM KS, 1998, V29, P12, DECISION LINE; IM KS, 1998, V29, P8,
DECISION LINE; JACKSON WM, 1989, V11, P15, INTERFACES; JARVENPAA SL,
1991, V15, P205, MIS QUART; JOHNSTON HR, 1988, V12, P153, MIS Q; JONES M,
2000, P15, ORG SOCIAL PERSPECTI; LATOUR B, 1987, SCI ACTION FOLLOW SC;
LEE AS, 1989, V13, P32, MIS Q; MALONE TW, 1987, V30, P484, COMMUN ACM;
MCFARLAN FW, 1984, V62, P64, HARVARD BUS REV; MYLONOPOULOS NA, 2001, V44,
P29, COMMUN ACM; NEWMAN M, 1992, V16, P249, MIS QUART; NIEDERMAN F, 1991,
V15, P475, MIS Q; NOLAN RL, 1979, V57, P115, HARVARD BUS REV; NONAKA I,
1994, V5, P1, ORGAN SCI; NONAKA I, 1995, KNOWLEDGE CREATING C; NORD JH,
1995, V29, P29, INFORM MANAGE; NUNAMAKER JF, 1980, P217, P 1 INT C INF
SYST P; NURMINEN M, 1997, V9, P47, SCANDINAVIAN J INFOR; NURMINEN M,
1999, V11, P5, SCANDINAVIAN J INFOR; ORLIKOWSKI WJ, 1991, V2, P1,
INFORMATION SYSTEMS; ORLIKOWSKI WJ, 1992, V3, P3, ORGAN SCI; ORLIKOWSKI
WJ, 1993, V9, P237, INFORMATION SOC; ORLIKOWSKI WJ, 1993, V17, P309, MIS
QUART; POLANYI M, 1966, TACIT DIMENSION; POLANYI M, 1973, PERSONAL
KNOWLEDGE P; PORTER M, 1985, V4, P149, HARVARD BUS REV; PORTER ME, 1980,
COMPETITIVE STRATEGY; ROCKART JF, 1979, V57, P81, HARVARD BUS REV; ROGERS
EM, 1995, DIFFUSION INNOVATION; SCOTTMORTON M, 1991, CORPORATION 1990S
IN; SEARLE JF, 1969, SPEECH ACTS ESSAY PH; SENGE PM, 1990, 5 DISCIPLINE
AGE PRA; SOMOGYI EK, 1987, V2, P30, J INFORMATION TECHNO; STRAUSS AL,
1990, BASICS QUALITATIVE R; SWATMAN PMC, 1992, V8, P169, INFORMATION SOC;
SWATMAN PMC, 1994, V3, P141, J STRATEGIC INF SYST; VENKATRAMAN N, 1994,
V35, P73, SLOAN MANAGE REV; VESSEY I, 2002, V19, P129, J MANAGE INFORM
SYST; VOGEL DR, 1984, V15, P3, DATA BASE; WALSHAM G, 1993, INTERPRETING
INFORM; WALSTROM KA, 1995, V38, P93, COMMUN ACM; WALSTROM KA, 2000, V38,
P59, INFORM MANAGE; WHITLEY EA, 2007, IN PRESS INFORM MANA; WILLCOCKS L,
1992, V2, P243, J INFORMATION SYSTEM; WILLIAMSON OE, 1975, MARKETS
HIERARCHIES; WILLIAMSON OE, 1985, EC I CAPITALISM FIRM; XU J, 2006, P 27
INT C INF SYST; YIN RK, 1989, CASE STUDY RES DESIG; ZUBOFF S, 1988, AGE
SMART MACHINE FU|
NR- 102|
TC- 7|
PU- PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD|
PI- BASINGSTOKE|
PA- BRUNEL RD BLDG, HOUNDMILLS, BASINGSTOKE RG21 6XS, HANTS, ENGLAND|
SN- 0960-085X|
J9- EUR J INFOR SYST|
JI- Eur. J. Inform. Syst|
PD- FEB|
PY- 2007|
VL- 16|
IS- 1|
BP- 20|
EP- 35|
DI- 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000662|
PG- 16|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 156LT|
JN- EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2007, V16, N1, P20-35|
UT- ISI:000245650500004 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Gallivan MJ; Benbunan-Fich R|
AF- Gallivan Michael J; Benbunan-Fich, Raquel|
TI- Analyzing IS research productivity: an inclusive approach to global
IS scholarship|
SO- EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- IS faculty; research productivity; global scholarship|
ID- MANAGEMENT-INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; CITATION ANALYSIS; MIS RESEARCH;
EMPIRICAL-ASSESSMENT; COCITATION ANALYSIS; JOURNALS; QUALITY;
PERCEPTIONS; TECHNOLOGY; FORUMS|
AB- An increasing number of studies have appeared that evaluate and rank
journal quality and the productivity of IS scholars and their
institutions. In this paper, we describe the results of one recent study
identifying the 'Top 30' IS Researchers, revealing many unexamined
assumptions about which IS publication outlets should be included in any
definition of high- quality, scholarly IS journals Drawing from the
argument that all categories and classification schemes are grounded in
politics, we critique the process by which the recent study in question (
and several earlier studies) have derived the set of journals from which
they count researcher publications Based on a critical examination of the
widespread inclusion of practitioner outlets, and the consistent
exclusion of European scholarly IS journals, we develop our own arguments
for which journals should be included in such evaluations of researcher
productivity. We conduct our own analysis of IS researcher productivity
for the period 1999 - 2003, based on articles published in a
geographically balanced set of 12 IS journals, and then we compare our
results with those from the recent study in question and their
predecessors. Our results feature a more diverse set of scholars - both
in terms of location ( specifically, the country and continent in which
the researchers are employed) and gender. We urge future studies of IS
research productivity to follow our practice of including high- quality
European journals, while eschewing practitioner-oriented publications (
such as Harvard Business Review and Communications of the ACM). We also
advocate that such studies count only research contributions ( e. g.,
research articles), and that other genres of non- research articles such as book reviews, ` issues and opinions' pieces and editorial
introductions - not be conflated with counts of research contributions|
C1- Georgia State Univ, CIS Dept, Robinson Coll Business, Atlanta, GA
30303 USA; CUNY Bernard M Baruch Coll, SCIS Dept, Zicklin Sch Business,
New York, NY 10010 USA|
RP- Gallivan, MJ, Georgia State Univ, CIS Dept, Robinson Coll Business,
Atlanta, GA 30303 USA|
EM- mgallivan@gsu.edu|
CD- ATHEY S, 2000, V3, P1, COMMUNICATIONS ASS I; AVGEROU C, 1999, V8,
P136, EUR J INFORM SYST; BARMAN S, 2001, V19, P367, J OPER MANAG; BARNES
SJ, 2005, V48, P110, COMMUN ACM; BENBASAT I, 1987, V11, P369, MIS QUART;
BHARATI P, 2002, V45, P21, COMMUN ACM; CASH JI, 1985, V63, P134, HARVARD
BUS REV; CHECKLAND PB, 1981, SYSTEMS THINKING SYS; CHEN WS, 2004, V14,
P197, INFORM SYST J; CHENG CH, 1994, V9, P7, IEEE EXPERT; CHUA C, 2002,
V8, COMMUNICATIONS AIS; CHUA C, 2003, V3, J AIS; CLAVER E, 2000, V37,
P181, INFORM MANAGE; COOPER RB, 1993, V29, P113, INFORM PROCESS MANAG;
CULNAN MJ, 1986, V32, P156, MANAGE SCI; CULNAN MJ, 1987, V11, P341, MIS
QUART; DAIGLE RJ, 2000, V1, P106, INT J ACCOUNTING INF; DAVENPORT T,
1992, PROCESS INNOVATION R; DENNIS AR, 2006, V30, P1, MIS QUART; DOKE ER,
1987, V28, P30, J COMPUTER INFORMATI; EARL MJ, 1989, MANAGEMENT
STRATEGIE; EOM SB, 1994, V25, P35, DATA BASE; EVARISTO JR, 1997, V28,
P32, DATA BASE ADV INF SY; FORGIONNE GA, 2001, V38, P421, INFORM MANAGE;
FOUCAULT M, 1977, P109, TRUTH POWER POWER KN; GALLIERS RD, 2002, EUROPEAN
C INFORM SY; GALLIERS RD, 2003, V11, P108, COMMUNICATIONS ASS I; GALLIVAN
MJ, 2006, IN PRESS J ASS INFOR; GIDDENS A, 1990, CONSEQUENCES MODERNI;
GILL TG, 2001, V32, P14, DATA BASE ADV INF SY; GILLENSON ML, 1991, V15,
P447, MIS QUART; GIOIA DA, 2002, V1, P107, ACAD MANAGEMENT LEAR; GOH C,
1997, V15, P123, J OPERATIONS MANAGEM; GOH CH, 1996, V24, P337, OMEGA-INT
J MANAGE S; HAMMER M, 1990, V68, P104, HARVARD BUS REV; HAMMER M, 1993,
REENGINEERING CORPOR; HARDGRAVE BC, 1997, V40, P119, COMMUN ACM;
HOLSAPPLE CW, 1993, V25, P231, INFORM MANAGE; HOLSAPPLE CW, 1994, V11,
P131, J MANAGEMENT INFORMA; HOLSAPPLE CW, 1994, V22, P69, OMEGA-INT J
MANAGE S; HOLSAPPLE CW, 1995, V14, P359, DECIS SUPPORT SYST; HOLSAPPLE
CW, 2003, V12, P351, COMPUTER SUPPORTED C; HSIEH CT, 2001, V101, P120,
IND MANAGE DATA SYST; HU Q, 2000, V13, P15, INFORM RESOURCES MAN; HUANG
HH, 2005, V15, P555, COMMUNICATIONS AIS; IM KS, 1998, DECISION LINE;
INTRONA LD, 2004, P103, INFORM SYSTEMS RES R; JACKSON WM, 1989, V11, P15,
INTERFACES; KATERATTANAKUL P, 2003, V46, P111, COMMUN ACM; KATERATTANAKUL
P, 2003, V12, P60, EUR J INFORM SYST; KLEIJNEN JPC, 2000, V36, P551,
INFORM PROCESS MANAG; KOONG KS, 1989, V30, P1, J COMPUTER INFORMATI;
LARSEN TJ, 2005, V15, P357, INFORM SYST J; LEE AS, 1989, V13, P33, MIS
QUART; LENDING D, 1992, V24, P5, DATABASE; LOWRY PB, 2004, V5, P29, J
ASSOC INF SYST; MALONE TW, 1987, V30, P484, COMMUN ACM; MARKUS ML, 1988,
V34, P583, MANAGE SCI; MARKUS ML, 1999, V23, P35, MIS QUART; MEHO LI,
2005, V56, P314, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MYLONOPOULOS NA, 2001, V44, P29,
COMMUN ACM; NORD JH, 1995, V29, P29, INFORM MANAGE; ORLIKOWSKI WJ, 1991,
V2, P1, INFORMATION SYSTEMS; ORLIKOWSKI WJ, 2001, V12, P174, INFORM SYST
RES; PORTER M, 1985, V12, P12, HARVARD BUS REV; RAINER RK, 2005, V48,
P91, COMMUN ACM; REMUS W, 1989, V43, P5, MIS INTERRUPT; REMUS W, 1991,
V50, P2, MIS INTERRUPT; SCHWARTZ RB, 2004, V47, P98, COMMUN ACM; STAKE
JE, 2004, RANKINGS ARE DANGERO; SUCHMAN L, 1994, V2, P177, COMPUTER
SUPPORTED C; SUOMI R, 1993, V24, P339, INFORM MANAGE; TROWER JK, 1995,
P23, P 1 AM C INF SYST; VOGEL DR, 1984, V16, P3, DATA BASE; WALCZAK S,
1999, V40, P88, J COMPUT INFORM SYST; WALSHAM G, 1993, INTERPRETING
INFORM; WALSHAM G, 1995, V6, P376, INFORM SYST RES; WALSTROM KA, 1995,
V38, P93, COMMUN ACM; WALSTROM KA, 2000, V38, P59, INFORM MANAGE; WHITLEY
EA, 2005, ALTERNATIVE PERSPECT; WHITMAN ME, 1999, V10, P99, INFORM SYST
RES; WHITMAN ME, 2003, HDB IS RES; YIN RK, 1994, CASE STUDY RES DESIG|
NR- 83|
TC- 8|
PU- PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD|
PI- BASINGSTOKE|
PA- BRUNEL RD BLDG, HOUNDMILLS, BASINGSTOKE RG21 6XS, HANTS, ENGLAND|
SN- 0960-085X|
J9- EUR J INFOR SYST|
JI- Eur. J. Inform. Syst|
PD- FEB|
PY- 2007|
VL- 16|
IS- 1|
BP- 36|
EP- 53|
DI- 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000667|
PG- 18|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 156LT|
JN- EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2007, V16, N1, P36-53|
UT- ISI:000245650500005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Singliar T; Hauskrecht M|
AF- Singliar Tomas; Hauskrecht, Milos|
TI- Noisy-OR component analysis and its application to link analysis|
SO- JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- component analysis; vector quantization; variational learning; link
analysis|
ID- BELIEF NETWORKS; INFERENCE; MODELS|
AB- We develop a new component analysis framework, the Noisy-Or Component
Analyzer (NOCA), that targets high-dimensional binary data. NOCA is a
probabilistic latent variable model that assumes the expression of
observed high-dimensional binary data is driven by a small number of
hidden binary sources combined via noisy-or units. The component analysis
procedure is equivalent to learning of NOCA parameters. Since the
classical EM formulation of the NOCA learning problem is intractable, we
develop its variational approximation. We test the NOCA framework on two
problems: (1) a synthetic image-decomposition problem and (2) a cocitation data analysis problem for thousands of CiteSeer documents. We
demonstrate good performance of the new model on both problems. In
addition, we contrast the model to two mixture-based latent-factor
models: the probabilistic latent semantic analysis (PLSA) and latent
Dirichlet allocation (LDA). Differing assumptions underlying these models
cause them to discover different types of structure in co-citation data,
thus illustrating the benefit of NOCA in building our understanding of
high-dimensional data sets|
C1- Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Comp Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA|
RP- Singliar, T, Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Comp Sci, 5329 Sennott Sq,
Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA|
EM- TOMAS@CS.PITT.EDU MILOS@CS.PITT.EDU|
CD- ATTIAS H, 1999, V11, P803, NEURAL COMPUT; BARTHOLOMEW D, 1999, V7,
KENDALLS LIB STAT; BISHOP CM, 1999, P371, LEARNING GRAPHICAL M; BISHOP
CM, 1999, V1, P509, P 9 INT C ART NEUR N; BLEI DM, 2003, V3, P993, J MACH
LEARN RES; BUNTINE W, 2002, P 13 EUR C MACH LEAR; COHN D, 2000, P167, P
17 INT C MACH LEAR; COHN D, 2001, V13, NEURAL INFORMATION P; COOPER GF,
1992, V9, P309, MACH LEARN; COVER T, 1991, ELEMENTS INFORMATION; DEMPSTER
AP, 1977, V39, P1, J ROY STAT SOC B; DIEZ F, 2003, INT J INTELLIGENT SY;
GHAHRAMANI Z, 1995, V8, P472, P C ADV NEUR INF PRO; GHAHRAMANI Z, 1997,
V29, P245, MACH LEARN; HECKERMAN D, 1993, P 9 C UNC AI UAI 93; HOFMANN T,
1999, P50, P 22 ANN INT ACM SIG; HOFMANN T, 1999, P UNC ART INT STOCKH;
JAAKKOLA T, 1996, V8, P528, ADV NEUR IN; JAAKKOLA TS, 1999, V10, P291, J
ARTIF INTELL RES; JOLLIFFE I, 1986, PRINCIPAL COMPONENT; JORDAN MI, 1999,
V37, P183, MACH LEARN; KEARNS M, 1998, P304, P 14 C UNC ART INT; LU XH,
2004, P PAC S BIOC; MACKAY DJC, 1995, V6, P469, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL;
MISKIN J, 2000, THESIS U CAMBRIDGE; ROSS D, 2002, V16, P ADV NEUR INF
PROC; SAUL LK, 1996, V4, P61, J ARTIF INTELL RES; SCHEIN A, 2003, P 9 INT
WORKSH ART I; SCHWARZ G, 1978, V6, P461, ANN STAT; SHWE MA, 1991, V30,
P241, METHOD INFORM MED; SINGLIAR T, 2005, P370, P SIAM INT C DAT MIN;
TIPPING M, 1997, NCRG97010 AST U; VOMLEL J, 2003, P291, P 6 WORKSH UNC
PROC|
NR- 33|
TC- 3|
PU- MICROTOME PUBLISHING|
PI- BROOKLINE|
PA- 31 GIBBS STREET, BROOKLINE, MA 02446 USA|
SN- 1532-4435|
J9- J MACH LEARN RES|
JI- J. Mach. Learn. Res|
PD- OCT|
PY- 2006|
VL- 7|
BP- 2189|
EP- 2213|
PG- 25|
SC- Automation & Control Systems; Computer Science, Artificial
Intelligence|
GA- 152VQ|
JN- JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2006, V7, N1, P2189-2213|
UT- ISI:000245390500009 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Bailon-Moreno R; Jurado-Alameda E; Ruiz-Banos R; Courtial JP;
Jimenez-Contreras E|
AF- Bailon-Moreno Rafael; Jurado-Alameda, Encarnacion; Ruiz-Banos,
Rosario; Courtial, Jean Pierre; Jimenez-Contreras, Evaristo|
TI- The pulsing structure of science: Ortega y Gasset, Saint Matthew,
fractality and transfractality|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- SCIENTIFIC NETWORKS; MODEL; DYNAMICS; TRANSLATION; COCITATIONS;
AUTISM|
AB- By a new fractal/transfractal geometry of the Unified Scientometric
Model, it is possible to demonstrate that science presents an oscillating
or pulsing dynamic. It goes alternatively through two types of phases.
Some phases are fractal, with crystalline networks, where the Matthew
effect clearly manifests itself with regard to the most notable actors
and those that provide the best contributions. The other phases are
transfractal, with deformed, amorphous networks, in which the actors,
considered mediocre, present greater capacity to restructure the network
than the more renowned actors. The result after any transfractal
deformation is a new crystalline fractal network Behind this vision lies
the Kuhn paradigms. As examples, the scientific fields of surfactants and
autism have been analysed|
C1- Univ Granada, Fac Ciencias, Dept Ingn Quim, E-18701 Granada, Spain;
Univ Granada, Fac Bibliotecon & Documentac, Dept Bibliotecon &
Documentac, E-18071 Granada, Spain; Univ Nantes, Lab Psychol Educ Cognit
Dev, F-44035 Nantes, France|
RP- Bailon-Moreno, R, Univ Granada, Fac Ciencias, Dept Ingn Quim, Campus
Fuentenueva, E-18701 Granada, Spain|
EM- bailonm@ugr.es|
CD- BAILONMORENO R, 2003, THESIS U GRANADA GRA; BAILONMORENO R, 2005,
V63, P231, SCIENTOMETRICS; BAILONMORENO R, 2005, V63, P259,
SCIENTOMETRICS; BOOKSTEIN A, 1990, V41, P376, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; CALLON
M, 1986, MAPPING DYNAMICS SCI; CALLON M, 1995, C OUV CTR SOC THEOR; COLE
JR, 1972, V178, P368, SCIENCE; COURTIAL JP, 1997, V40, P333,
SCIENTOMETRICS; COURTIAL JP, 1999, V9, P579, THEOR PSYCHOL; GARFIELD E,
1972, V178, P471, SCIENCE; GASSET JOY, 2003, REBELION MASAS; JULIA G,
1968, OEUVRES GASTON JULIA; KUHN TS, 1962, STTRUCTURE SCI REVOL; LATOUR
B, 1983, P141, SCI OBSERVED PERSPEC; LATOUR B, 1993, NUNCA HEMOS SIDO
MOD; LATOUR B, 1995, VIDA LAB CONSTRUCCIO; LATOUR, 1992, CIENCIA ACCION
COMO; LORENZ EN, 1963, V20, P130, J ATMOS SCI; LOTKA AJ, 1926, V16, P317,
J WASHINGTON ACADEMY; MANDELBROT B, 1953, P486, COMMUN THEORY; MANDELBROT
BB, 1951, V232, P2003, COMPTES RENDUS; MANDELBROT BB, 1951, V232, P1638,
CR HEBD ACAD SCI; MANDELBROT BB, 1954, V11, P424, WORD; MANDELBROT BB,
1977, FTRACTAL GEOMETRY NA; MERTON RK, 1968, V159, P56, SCIENCE; PRICE
DJD, 1961, SCI BABYLON; PRICE DJD, 1976, V27, P292, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
RIP A, 1984, V6, P381, SCIENTOMETRICS; RUIZBANOS R, 1997, THESIS U
GRANADA; RUIZBANOS R, 1999, P193, ACT 4 C ISKO ESP EOC; RUIZBANOS R,
1999, V44, P217, SCIENTOMETRICS; RUIZBANOS R, 1999, V44, P235,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SIERPINSKI W, 1916, V162, P629, CR HEBD ACAD SCI; VANRAAN
AFJ, 1990, V347, P626, NATURE; VANRAAN AFJ, 1990, V20, P439,
SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 35|
TC- 1|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- APR|
PY- 2007|
VL- 71|
IS- 1|
BP- 3|
EP- 24|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-007-1600-8|
PG- 22|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 143AK|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2007, V71, N1, P3-24|
UT- ISI:000244692200001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Fogaras D; Racz B|
AF- Fogaras Daniel; Racz, Balazs|
TI- Practical algorithms and lower bounds for similarity search in
massive graphs|
SO- IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Web search; similarity measures; graph algorithms; probabilistic
algorithms|
AB- To exploit the similarity information hidden in the hyperlink
structure of the Web, this paper introduces algorithms scalable to graphs
with billions of vertices on a distributed architecture. The similarity
of multistep neighborhoods of vertices are numerically evaluated by
similarity functions including SimRank [1], a recursive refinement of
cocitation, and PSimRank, a novel variant with better theoretical
characteristics. Our methods are presented in a general framework of
Monte Carlo similarity search algorithms that precompute an index
database of random fingerprints, and at query time, similarities are
estimated from the fingerprints. We justify our approximation method by
asymptotic worst-case lower bounds: We show that there is a significant
gap between exact and approximate approaches, and suggest that the exact
computation, in general, is infeasible for large-scale inputs. We were
the first to evaluate SimRank on real Web data. On the Stanford WebBase
[2] graph of 80M pages the quality of the methods increased significantly
in each refinement step until step four|
C1- Google Inc, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA; Budapest Univ Technol &
Econ, H-1518 Budapest, Hungary; Hungarian Acad Sci, Automat Res Inst, H1518 Budapest, Hungary|
RP- Fogaras, D, Google Inc, 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy, Mountain View, CA
94043 USA|
EM- daniel.fogaras+tkde@gmail.co bracz+ip5@math.bme.hu|
CD- ABELLO J, 1998, P332, P 6 EUR S ALG; BAEZAYATES R, 1999, MODERN
INFORM RETRIE; BARYOSSEF Z, 2000, P535, P 26 INT C VER LARG; BARYOSSEF Z,
2002, THESIS U CALIFORNIA; BARYOSSEF Z, 2004, P328, P 13 INT C WORLD WID;
BRODER AZ, 1997, P21, P COMPR COMPL SEQ SE; BRODER AZ, 2000, V60, P360, J
COMPUTER SYSTEM SC; CHAKRABARTI S, 1998, P307, P ACM SIGMOD INT C M; CHEN
YY, 2002, P549, P 11 INT C INF KNOWL; COHEN E, 1997, V55, P441, J COMPUT
SYST SCI; DEAN J, 1999, V31, P1467, COMPUT NETW; FOGARAS D, 2004, P557, P
CLUST INF WEB WORK; FOGARAS D, 2005, V2, P333, INTERNET MATH; HAVELIWALA
TH, 1999, 199931 STANF U; HAVELIWALA TH, 2002, P432, P 11 INT WORLD WID
W; HAVELIWALA TH, 2003, 200335 STANF U; HENZINGER M, 1999, V50, P107,
DIMACS SERIES DISCR; HENZINGER MR, 2000, P295, P 9 INT WORLD WID WE;
HIRAI J, 2000, P277, P 9 INT WORLD WID WE; INDYK P, 1998, P604, P 30 ANN
ACM S THEOR; JEH G, 2002, P538, P 8 ACM SIGKDD INT C; KLEINBERG JM, 1999,
V46, P604, J ACM; LIBENNOWELL D, 2003, P556, P 12 INT C INF KNOWL; LU W,
2001, P11, P 2001 C CTR ADV STU; PAGE L, 1998, 199966 STANF U; PALMER CR,
2002, P81, P 8 ACM SIGKDD INT C; RUSMEVICHIENTON.P, 2001, P121, P AAAI
FALL S US UNC; XUE GR, 2005, P114, P 28 ANN INT ACM SIG|
NR- 28|
TC- 1|
PU- IEEE COMPUTER SOC|
PI- LOS ALAMITOS|
PA- 10662 LOS VAQUEROS CIRCLE, PO BOX 3014, LOS ALAMITOS, CA 90720-1314
USA|
SN- 1041-4347|
J9- IEEE TRANS KNOWL DATA ENG|
JI- IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng|
PD- MAY|
PY- 2007|
VL- 19|
IS- 5|
BP- 585|
EP- 598|
DI- 10.1109/TKDE.2007.1008|
PG- 14|
SC- Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence; Computer Science,
Information Systems; Engineering, Electrical & Electronic|
GA- 145VZ|
JN- IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2007, V19, N5,
P585-598|
UT- ISI:000244895200001 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Kuusi O; Meyer M|
AF- Kuusi Osmo; Meyer, Martin|
TI- Anticipating technological breakthroughs: Using bibliographic
coupling to explore the nanotubes paradigm|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- SCIENCE; COCITATION; INDICATORS; DOCUMENTS|
AB- There is general consensus that the field of nanotechnology will be
very important in the future. An open question is, however, which
technological approaches or paradigms will be important in the field The
paper assumes that the carbon nanotube will be a key element of an
emerging technological paradigm in nanotechnology. This study employs a
bibliometric method - bibliographic coupling - to identify important
nanotubes-related 'leitbilder' - a concept meaning 'guiding images' that
provide a basis for different professions and disciplines to work in the
same direction. Until recently, bibliographic coupling has been applied
rarely for purposes of research evaluation, not to mention technology
foresight. Our case study seems to suggest that bibliographic coupling is
particularly suitable for anticipating technological breakthroughs.
Bibliographic coupling analysis of recent nanotube-related patents
focused our attention to recent patents owned by Nantero Inc. Nantero's
main focus is the development of NRAM - a high-density nonvolatile random
access memory. The NRAM leitbild seems to be an important emerging
leitbild. It connects technical opportunities and promising applications
relating to the memories in devices such as cell phones, MP3 players,
digital cameras, as well as applications in networking arena|
C1- VATT Govt Inst Econ Res, Helsinki 00101, Finland; Univ Sussex, SPRU,
Brighton, E Sussex, England; Katholieke Univ Leuven, Steunpunt O&O
Indicatoren Vlaamse Gemeenschap, Louvain, Belgium; Helsinki Univ Technol,
Inst Strategy & Int Business, FIN-02150 Espoo, Finland|
RP- Kuusi, O, VATT Govt Inst Econ Res, Arkadiankatu 7,PL 1279, Helsinki
00101, Finland|
EM- osmo.kuusi@vatt.fi|
CD- ANSOFF I, 1984, IMPLANTING STRATEGIC; BROWN W, 2001, US, 6297063;
DOSI G, 1982, V11, P147, RES POLICY; DOSI G, 1988, TECHNICAL CHANGE EC;
EGGHE L, 2002, V55, P349, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W, 1996, V37, P195,
SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W, 2003, BIBLIOMETRICS RES FI; HICKS D, 1987,
V17, P295, SOC STUD SCI; KATZ JS, 2001, SCI FORESIGHT PROJEC; KESSLER MM,
1963, V14, P10, AM DOC; KUUSI O, 1999, THESIS HELSINKI; KUUSI O, 2002,
V69, P625, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC; LUZZI D, 2005, US, 6863857; MARSHAKOVA
IV, 1973, V2, P3, NAUCHNO TEKHNICHESKA; MARZ L, 1994, INTEDISZIPLINARE
TEC; MAU A, 2005, US, 6811957; MERKERK R, 2005, NEW TECHNOLOGY FORES;
MEYER M, 2000, V49, P93, SCIENTOMETRICS; MEYER M, 2004, V10, P155, HYLE
INT J PHILOSOPH; PERSSON O, 1994, V45, P31, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; RUECKES
T, 2000, V289, P94, SCIENCE; RUECKES T, 2004, US, 6835591; SCHMOCH U,
1993, V26, P193, SCIENTOMETRICS; SCHMOCH U, 1997, V38, P103,
SCIENTOMETRICS; SEN SK, 1983, V30, P78, ANN LIB SCI DOCUMENT; SHARABCHIEV
JT, 1988, V2, P25, NAUCHNO TEKHNICHESKA; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1982, V3, P287, PROGR COMMUNICATION; SMALL H,
1998, V41, P125, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL HG, 1978, V8, P327, SOC STUD SCI;
VLADUTZ G, 1984, P204, P 47 ASIS ANN M; VONWARTBURG I, 2005, V34, P1591,
RES POLICY|
NR- 32|
TC- 3|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- MAR|
PY- 2007|
VL- 70|
IS- 3|
BP- 759|
EP- 777|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-007-0311-5|
PG- 19|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 140MO|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2007, V70, N3, P759-777|
UT- ISI:000244509600011 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Bassecoulard E; Lelu A; Zitt M|
AF- Bassecoulard Elise; Lelu, Alain; Zitt, Michel|
TI- Mapping nanosciences by citation flows: A preliminary analysis|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- MODERN SCIENCE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; INTERDISCIPLINARITY; COCITATION;
COLLABORATION; INDICATORS; PATTERNS|
AB- This article presents a citation-based mapping exercise in the
nanosciences field and a first sketch of citation transactions (a measure
of cognitive dependences). Nanosciences are considered to be one of the
"convergent" components shaping the future of science and technology.
Recurrent questions about the structure of the field concern its
diversity and multi- or inter-disciplinarity. Observations made from
various points of view confirm a strong differentiation of the field,
which is scattered in multiple galaxies with moderate level of exchanges.
The multi-disciplinarity of themes and super-themes detected by mapping
also appears moderate, most of the super-themes being based on physics
and chemistry in various proportions. Structural analysis of the list of
references in articles suggests that the moderate multi-disciplinarity
observed at the aggregate level partly stems from an actual interdisciplinarity at the article level|
C1- INRA, F-44316 Nantes 3, France; INRA, Jouy En Josas, France; Univ
Franche Comte, LASELDI, F-25030 Besancon, France; Observ Sci & Tech,
Paris, France|
RP- Bassecoulard, E, INRA, BP 71627, F-44316 Nantes 3, France|
EM- bassecou@nantes.inra.fr|
CD- BACHMANN G, 1998, INNOVATIONSSCHUB NAN; BENZECRI JP, 1981, PRATIQUE
ANAL DONNEE; BONACCORSI A, 2005, V13, LEM PAPERS SERIES; BRAUN T, 1997,
V38, P321, SCIENTOMETRICS; CRONIN B, 2004, V60, P41, SCIENTOMETRICS;
DARBY MR, 2003, V9825, NBER; DOMENGES D, 1979, V35, P3, ANN INSEE;
ESCOFIER B, 1978, V26, P29, REV STAT APPL; FOGELBERG H, 2003, P29, 6 STS
GOET U; FRANKS A, 1987, V20, P1442, J PHYS E; FREITAG D, 2005, P 9 C COMP
NAT LANG; GARFIELD E, 1967, V2, P235, J LIBRARY HISTORY; GLANZEL W, 1996,
V37, P195, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W, 2003, NANOTECHNOLOGY ANAL; HEINZE
T, 2004, V1, P427, NANOTECHNOLOGY LAW B; HEINZE T, 2006, NEW FORMS
GOVERNANCE; KAHANE B, 2006, PRIM NAN WORKSH MARC; KESSLER MM, 1963, V14,
P10, AM DOC; KOSTOFF RN, 2006, V8, P301, J NANOPART RES; LAREDO P, 2002,
4 TRIPL HEL C COP; LEGENDRE P, 2001, V129, P271, OECOLOGIA; LELU A, 1994,
P241, NEW APPROACHES CLASS; LELU A, 2003, V6, P14, INFORM SCI DECISION;
LEONTIEF W, 1996, V8, P81, EC SYSTEMS RES; LEYDESDORFF L, 1998, V43, P5,
SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2007, UNPUB US LOSING GROU; MALSCH I,
1997, 17710EN EUR JRC I PR; MARCOTORCHINO JF, 1986, P275, CLASSIFICATION
TOOL; MARSHAKOVA IV, 1973, V2, P3, NAUCHNO TEKHNICHESKA; MATUSITA K,
1955, V26, P631, ANN MATH STAT; MEYER M, 1998, V42, P195, SCIENTOMETRICS;
MEYER M, 2001, NANOTECHNOLOGY EXPER; MEYER M, 2007, V70, P779,
SCIENTOMETRICS; MORILLO F, 2001, V51, P203, SCIENTOMETRICS; NOYONS EC,
2003, 20020001 ECPPN CT; PORTER A, 2006, REFINING SEARCH TERM; ROCO MC,
2002, CONVERGING TECHNOLOG; SCHMID G, 2003, V35, P1, EUROPAEISCHE AKAD
GR; SCHUMMER J, 2004, V59, P425, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1973, V24,
P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; TOMOV DT, 1996, V37, P267, SCIENTOMETRICS;
VANLEEUWEN T, 2000, V9, P183, RES EVALUAT; ZITT M, 1994, V30, P333,
SCIENTOMETRICS; ZITT M, 2003, V57, P93, SCIENTOMETRICS; ZITT M, 2005, V3,
P38, MEASUREMENT INTERDIS; ZITT M, 2006, V42, P1513, INFORM PROCESS
MANAG|
NR- 46|
TC- 10|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- MAR|
PY- 2007|
VL- 70|
IS- 3|
BP- 859|
EP- 880|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-007-0315-1|
PG- 22|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 140MO|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2007, V70, N3, P859-880|
UT- ISI:000244509600015 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Lu WZ; Janssen J; Milios E; Japkowicz N; Zhang YZ|
AF- Lu Wangzhong; Janssen, J; Milios, E; Japkowicz, N; Zhang, Yongzheng|
TI- Node similarity in the citation graph|
SO- KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- networked information spaces; document similarity metric; citation
graph; digital libraries|
ID- COCITATION|
AB- Published scientific articles are linked together into a graph, the
citation graph, through their citations. This paper explores the notion
of similarity based on connectivity alone, and proposes several
algorithms to quantify it. Our metrics take advantage of the local
neighborhoods of the nodes in the citation graph. Two variants of linkbased similarity estimation between two nodes are described, one based on
the separate local neighborhoods of the nodes, and another based on the
joint local neighborhood expanded from both nodes at the same time. The
algorithms are implemented and evaluated on a subgraph of the citation
graph of computer science in a retrieval context. The results are
compared with text-based similarity, and demonstrate the complementarity
of link-based and text-based retrieval|
C1- Dalhousie Univ, Fac Comp Sci, Halifax, NS B3H 1W5, Canada; Dalhousie
Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Halifax, NS B3H 3J5, Canada; Univ Ottawa, Sch
Informat Technol & Engn, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada|
RP- Milios, E, Dalhousie Univ, Fac Comp Sci, 6050 Univ Ave, Halifax, NS
B3H 1W5, Canada|
EM- eem@cs.dal.ca|
CD- *ACM SPEC INT GROU, 2002, HYP 2002 C ACM; AN Y, 2001, CS200102 DALH U
FAC; AN Y, 2004, V6, P664, KNOWL INF SYST; BAEZAYATES R, 1999, MODERN
INFORMATION R; BRIN S, 1998, P107, P 7 INT WORLD WID WE; CHEN CM, 1999,
V35, P401, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; CORTES C, 2001, P105, P 4 INT C ADV INT
DA; DAVIS R, 2002, INFORMATION ARCHITEC; DEAN J, 1999, P389, P 8 INT
WORLD WID WE; DIESTEL R, 2000, GRAPH THEORY; DODGE M, 2002, ATLAS
CYBERSPACES IN; FALOUTSOS C, 1995, P 1995 ACM SIGMOD IN; FRANTZI K, 2000,
V3, P117, INT J DIGITAL LIB; GARFIELD E, 1955, V122, P108, SCIENCE;
GARFIELD E, 1972, V178, P4060, SCIENCE; KAUFMAN L, 1990, FINDING GROUPS
DATA; KLEINBERG JM, 1999, V46, P5, JACM; KUMAR S, 1999, IEEE INT C VER
LARG; LAWRENCE S, 1999, V32, P67, IEEE COMPUT; LU W, 2001, CS200103 DALH
U FAC; MANNING C, 1999, FDN STAT NATURAL LAN; MILIOS E, 2003, P275, P 6 C
PAC ASS COMP L; NG A, 2001, P 24 ANN INT ACM SIG; SMALL H, 1973, V24,
P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1986, V37, P97, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
TJADEN G, 2002, KNOWLEDGE ENTERPRISE; TREASURY U, 2001, FINANCIAL CRIMES
ENF; VANRIJSBERGEN C, 1999, INFORMATION RETRIEVA|
NR- 28|
TC- 4|
PU- SPRINGER LONDON LTD|
PI- GODALMING|
PA- SWEETAPPLE HOUSE CATTESHALL ROAD, GODALMING GU7 3DJ, SURREY, ENGLAND|
SN- 0219-1377|
J9- KNOWL INF SYST|
JI- Knowl. Inf. Syst|
PD- JAN|
PY- 2007|
VL- 11|
IS- 1|
BP- 105|
EP- 129|
DI- 10.1007/s10115-006-0023-9|
PG- 25|
SC- Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence; Computer Science,
Information Systems|
GA- 124SR|
JN- KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2007, V11, N1, P105-129|
UT- ISI:000243390700005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Reid EF; Chen HC|
AF- Reid Edna F; Chen, Hsinchun|
TI- Mapping the contemporary terrorism research domain|
SO- INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- terrorism; visualization; bibliometrics; co-citation analysis;
intellectual structure|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS|
AB- A systematic view of terrorism research to reveal the intellectual
structure of the field and empirically discern the distinct set of core
researchers, institutional affiliations, publications, and conceptual
areas can help us gain a deeper understanding of approaches to terrorism.
This paper responds to this need by using an integrated knowledge-mapping
framework that we developed to identify the core researchers and
knowledge creation approaches in terrorism. The framework uses three
types of analysis: (a) basic analysis of scientific output using
citation, bibliometric, and social network analyses, (b) content map
analysis of large corpora of literature, and (c) cocitation analysis to
analyse linkages among pairs of researchers We applied domain
visualization techniques such as content map analysis, block-modeling,
and co-citation analysis to the literature and author citation data from
the years 1965 to 2003. The data were gathered from ten databases such as
the ISI Web of Science. The results reveal: (1) the names of the top 42
core terrorism researchers (e.g., Brian Jenkins, Bruce Hoffman, and Paul
Wilkinson) as well as their institutional affiliations; (2) their
influential publications; (3) clusters of terrorism researchers who work
in similar areas; and (4) that the research focus has shifted from
terrorism as a low-intensity conflict to a strategic threat to world
powers with increased focus on Osama Bin Laden. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd.
All rights reserved|
C1- Univ Arizona, MIS Dept, Artificial Intelligence Lab, Tucson, AZ 85721
USA|
RP- Reid, EF, Clarion Univ Pennsylvania, Dept Lib Sci, 840 Wood St,
Clarion, PA 16214 USA|
EM- ednareid@eller.arizona.edu|
CD- *IDSS, 2003, CONFL NONTR SEC; *ISI, 2003, CIT THRESH; *ISI, 2003,
DOES ISI ID HIGHL CI; *NAM, 2004, NAM BAS; *RIIA, 2005, P8, SEC TERR UK;
ANDREWS JE, 2003, V91, P47, J MED LIBR ASSOC; BERGEN P, 1998, HOLY
WARRIOR IS THIS; BORGMAN CL, 2002, ANN REV INFORMATION; BOYACK KW, 2003,
MAPPING KNOWLEDGE DO; BOYACK KW, 2004, V101, P5192, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1;
CHEN C, 2001, V34, P65, IEEE COMPUT; CHEN HC, 2004, V37, P50, COMPUTER;
CHUA C, 2002, V3, P146, J ASS INFORMATION SY; CRENSHAW M, 2000, V21,
P405, POLIT PSYCHOL; CRONIN B, 1982, V38, P212, J DOC; CRONIN B, 2002,
HIGH FIDELITY MAPPIN; DEFLEM M, 2004, P1, TERRORISM COUNTER TE; DUGAN L,
2005, V3495, P340, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; EGGERS S, 2005, MED INFORMATICS
KNOW; ELLIS JO, 2004, P520, 2 S INT SEC INF ISI; FERLIGOJ A, 1996, V4,
P63, J COMPUTING INFORMAT; GARFIELD E, 1992, V19, P321, SCI PUBL POLICY;
GARFIELD E, 2002, 5 ANN M ASSIST; GORDON A, 1999, V11, P141, TERRORISM
POLITICAL; GORDON A, 2004, V27, P79, STUDIES CONFLICT TER; GORDON A,
2005, V62, P403, SCIENTOMETRICS; GURR T, 1972, WHY MEN REBEL; HOLLYWOOD
J, 2004, OUT ORDINARY FINDING; HUANG Z, 2004, V6, P325, J NANOPART RES;
HUGHES G, 2003, AGE NEWSPAPER; JENKINS BM, 2002, RAND REV; KE W, 2004,
ANAL VISUALIZATION 4; KENNEDY LW, 2003, DEV FDN POLICY RELEV; KNEZO GJ,
2003, P61, HOMELAND SECURITY CO; KOKU E, 2001, V44, P1752, AM BEHAV SCI;
LAQUEUR W, 1977, HIST TERRORISM; LIN X, 2001, AUTHORLINK INSTANT A;
MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, J AM SOC INFORMATION; MERARI A, 1991, V3, P88,
TERRORISM POLITICAL; NGUYEN NQ, 2000, V26, P1092, DERMATOL SURG; PARK HW,
2003, V8, JCMC; REID DT, 1997, V33, P1, IEEE J QUANTUM ELECT; REID E,
2004, V3073, P125, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; REID E, 2005, V3495, P322, LECT
NOTES COMPUT SC; REID EOF, 1983, THESIS U SO CALIFORN; SCHMID A, 1988,
POLITICAL TERRORISM; SCHMID A, 2005, POLITICAL TERRORISM; SHIFFRIN RM,
2004, MAPPING KNOWLEDGE DO; SILKE A, 2001, V13, P1, TERRORISM POLITICAL;
SILKE A, 2004, P186, RES TERRORISM TRENDS; SUN Z, 2005, V3495, P37, LECT
NOTES COMPUT SC; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE
HD, 2001, JOINT INT C ASS COMP; WILKINSON P, 1986, P37, TERRORISM INT
ORDER; WILKINSON P, 1986, TERRORISM LIBERAL ST; WILKINSON P, 2003,
TERRORISM IMPLICATIO; ZAHN MA, 2004, P111, TERRORISM COUNTER TE|
NR- 57|
TC- 8|
PU- ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD|
PI- LONDON|
PA- 24-28 OVAL RD, LONDON NW1 7DX, ENGLAND|
SN- 1071-5819|
J9- INT J HUM-COMPUT STUDIES|
JI- Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud|
PD- JAN|
PY- 2007|
VL- 65|
IS- 1|
BP- 42|
EP- 56|
DI- 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.08.006|
PG- 15|
SC- Computer Science, Cybernetics; Ergonomics; Psychology,
Multidisciplinary|
GA- 117SK|
JN- INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2007, V65, N1, P4256|
UT- ISI:000242893400005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Balaban AT; Klein DJ|
AF- Balaban Alexandru T; Klein, Douglas J|
TI- Is chemistry 'The Central Science'? How are different sciences
related? Co-citations, reductionism, emergence, and posets|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- SCIENTIFIC LITERATURES; UNDERSTANDING LIFE; BIOLOGY|
AB- According to a widely used introductory chemistry text by T. E. Brown
et al.,(1) chemistry is 'The Central Science'. But scientometric cocitation analyses indicate that biochemistry seems presently to be more
interconnected to other sciences. On the other hand, mathematics is
considered by many to permeate all sciences and hence might compete as
the choice for centrality. A critical commentary and argument leads to a
proposal for an alternative partially ordered hierarchical *'framework"
map of sciences. This argument is supplemented by a scientometric
approach based on university Course requirements for different curricula,
so as to support our partially ordered map. This alternative "framework"
mapping then is seen to indicate a special position for chemistry, as
where significant branching begins|
C1- Texas A&M Univ, Galveston, TX 77551 USA|
RP- Balaban, AT, Texas A&M Univ, 5007 Ave U, Galveston, TX 77551 USA|
EM- balabana@tamug.edu|
CD- *I SCI INF, 1984, ISI ATL SCI BIOCH MO; AARONSON S, 1975, V6, P22,
MOSAIC; AHRDY Y, 2001, CLASSICAL QUANTUM CO; BIRKHOFF G, 1948, LATTICE
THEORY; BOYACK KW, 2005, V64, P351, SCIENTOMETRICS; BROWN TE, 2006, CHEM
CENTRAL SCI; COMTE A, 1830, COURS PHILOS POSITIV; COULSON CA, 1960, V32,
P170, REV MOD PHYS; DELBRUCK M, 1985, MIND MATTER; DIRAC PAM, 1929, V123,
P714, P R SOC LOND A-CONTA; DIRAC PAM, 1963, V208, P45, SCI AM; ECCLES
JC, 1977, SELF ITS BRAIN; ELLIS GFR, 2005, V59, P49, PHYS TODAY; GARFIELD
E, CITATION INDEXING IT, P98; GRAY JJ, 2004, J BOLYATI NONEUCLIDE;
GRIFFITH BC, 1974, V4, P339, SCI STUD; HAMMETT LP, 1940, PHYSICAL ORGANIC
CHE; HILBERT D, 1930, P959, NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN; HOLLAND J, 1998,
EMERGENCE CHAOS ORDE; JOHNSON G, 2003, SHORTCUT THROUGH TIM; JOHNSSON S,
2002, EMERGENCE CONNECTED; KLAVANS R, 2006, V57, P251, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; KLEIN DJ, 2006, UNPUB FDN CHEM; KNUTH D, 1976, V194, P1234, SCIENCE;
KORNBERG A, 1982, P1, MED SCI SOC; KORNBERG A, 1987, V26, P6888,
BIOCHEMISTRY-US; KORNBERG A, 1991, V37, P1895, CLIN CHEM; KORNBERG A,
1995, V53, P125, INT J QUANTUM CHEM; KORNBERG A, 1996, V3, P3, CHEM BIOL;
LAUGHLIN RB, 2005, DIFFERENT UNIVERSE; LUZIN N, 1998, V105, P59, AM MATH
MON; MARSHAKOVA IV, 1973, V6, P3, NAUCHNO TEKHNICHES 2; MINKOWSKI H,
1909, V10, P104, PHYS Z; MONASTYRSKY M, 2005, V112, P832, AM MATH MON;
MOORE JW, 2002, CHEM MOL SCI; MORGAN CL, 1923, EMERGENT EVOLUTION;
MOYAANEGON F, 2004, V61, P129, SCIENTOMETRICS; NAGEL E, 1961, STRUCTURE
SIC; NEGGERS J, BASIC POSETS; NYE MJ, 1993, CHEM PHILOS THEORETI; PENROSE
R, 2005, ROAD REALITY; RIEMANN B, 1993, CONCEPTS SPACE; SCERRI ER, 1997,
V47, P229, ERKENNTNIS; SCERRI ER, 1998, V75, P1384, J CHEM EDUC; SERVOS
JW, 1990, PHYS CHEM OSTWALD PA; SIMON H, 1981, SCI ARTIFICIAL; SMALL H,
1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD;
SMALL H, 1999, V50, P799, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; TROTTER WT, 1992,
COMBINATORICS PARTIA; VANBRAKEL J, 1997, V111, P273, SYNTHESE;
VANREGENMORTEL MHV, 2004, V5, P1016, EMBO REP; VIZGIN VP, 2003, V108,
P264, AM MATH MON; WEYL H, 1923, RAUM Z MATERIE; WILSON EO, 1998,
CONSILIENCE UNITY KN|
NR- 55|
TC- 4|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- DEC|
PY- 2006|
VL- 69|
IS- 3|
BP- 615|
EP- 637|
PG- 23|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 114NF|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, V69, N3, P615-637|
UT- ISI:000242672200010 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Mothe J; Chrisment C; Dkaki T; Dousset B; Karouach S|
AF- Mothe Josiane; Chrisment, Claude; Dkaki, Taoufiq; Dousset, Bernard;
Karouach, Said|
TI- Combining mining and visualization tools to discover the geographic
structure of a domain|
SO- COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS|
LA- English|
DT- Proceedings Paper|
CT- Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval|
CY- JUL 25-29, 2004|
CL- Sheffield, ENGLAND|
SP- SIGIR|
DE- information mining; data analysis; domain knowledge; knowledge
discovery; information visualization; geographical maps|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; SCIENCE|
AB- Science monitoring is a core issue in the new world of business and
research. Companies and institutes need to monitor the activities of
their competitors, get information on the market, changing technologies
or government policies. This paper presents the Tetralogie platform that
is aimed at allowing a user to interactively discover trends in
scientific research and communities from large textual collections that
include information about geographical location. Tetralogie consists of
several agents that communicate with each other on users' demands in
order to deliver results to them. Metadata and document content are
extracted before being mined. Results are displayed in the form of
histograms, networks and geographical maps; these complementary types of
presentations increase the possibilities of analysis compared to the use
of these tools separately. We illustrate the overall process through a
case study of scientific literature analysis and show how the different
agents can be combined to discover the structure of a domain The system
correctly predicts the country contribution to a field in future years
and allows exploration of the relationships between countries. (c) 2005
Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved|
C1- Inst Rech Informat Toulouse, F-31062 Toulouse 04, France|
RP- Mothe, J, Inst Rech Informat Toulouse, 118 Route Narbonne, F-31062
Toulouse 04, France|
EM- mothe@irit.fr|
CD- AHLBERG C, 1994, P313, P CHI 94; ANDRIENKO N, 2000, P137, P 3 AGILE C
GEOGR IN; AUSSENACGILLES N, 2004, P129, P RIAO AV FRANC 26 2; BOYACK KW,
2004, P965, P IEEE INF VIS 2004; BUTER RK, 2002, P697, P 6 INT C INF FIS;
BUTTENFIELD B, 2000, GEOSPATIAL DATAMININ; CHEN C, 2002, HDB SOFTWARE ENG
KNO; CHRISMENT C, 1997, V5, P367, ISI; CHRISMENT C, 2004, P WORKSH GEOGR
INF R; DIDAY E, 1974, P534, 2 INT JOINT C PATT R; DORE JC, 2001, V52,
P763, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; FORGY E, 1965, V21, BIOMETRICS; FRAKES W,
1992, INFORM RETRIEVAL ALG; FRUCHTERMAN TMJ, 1991, V21, P1129, SOFTWARE
PRACT EXPER; GAHEGAN M, 2002, V26, P267, COMPUTERS ENV URBAN; GEROIMENKO
V, 2002, VISUALIZING SEMANTIC; HAN J, 1994, P157, AAAI 94 WORKSH KNOWL;
HAN J, 1995, P19, P 4 INT C INF KNOWL; HAN J, 1997, P553, P ACM SIGMOD
INT C M; HEARST MA, 1999, P ANN M ASS COMP LIN; KAROUACH S, 2003, THESIS;
KLEINBERG J, 1998, P668, P 9 ANN ACM SIAM S D; KLEINBERG J, 1999, V31,
ACM COMPUTING SURVEY; LEYDESDORFF L, 1995, CHALLENGE SCIENTOMET;
MACEACHREN AM, 1999, CONSTRUCTING KNOWLED; MACQUEEN J, 1967, V1, P281, P
5 BERK S MATH STAT; MOTHE J, 2003, V54, P650, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
SKUPIN A, 2003, V30, P99, CARTOGR GEOGR INF SC; SKUPIN A, 2004, V101,
P5274, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; TRUONG QD, 2004, VISUALISATION INFORM;
VERBEEK A, 2003, V58, P241, SCIENTOMETRICS; VNARIJSBERGERN K, 1979,
INFORM RETRIEVAL; WEIGEND AS, 1999, V1, P193, INFORMATION RETRIEVA; WHITE
HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; WIDOM J, 1995, INT C IFN KNOWL MAN; ZEMBOWICZ R, 1996,
CH13, ADV KNOWLEDGE DATA M; ZITT M, 1994, V30, P333, SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 38|
TC- 6|
PU- ELSEVIER SCI LTD|
PI- OXFORD|
PA- THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON,
ENGLAND|
SN- 0198-9715|
J9- COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN SYST|
JI- Comput. Environ. Urban Syst|
PD- JUL|
PY- 2006|
VL- 30|
IS- 4|
BP- 460|
EP- 484|
DI- 10.1016/j.conpenvurbsys.2005.09.004|
PG- 25|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Engineering,
Environmental; Environmental Studies; Geography; Operations Research &
Management Science|
GA- 113TI|
JN- COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS, 2006, V30, N4, P460-484|
UT- ISI:000242619900006 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Pilkington A; Fitzgerald R|
AF- Pilkington Alan; Fitzgerald, Robert|
TI- Operations management themes, concepts and relationships: a forward
retrospective of IJOPM|
SO- INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT|
LA- English|
DT- Review|
DE- operations management; publications; factor analysis|
ID- MANUFACTURING STRATEGY; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; QUALITY MANAGEMENT;
PERFORMANCE-MEASUREMENT; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; COCITATION ANALYSIS;
AUTHOR COCITATION; CITATION ANALYSIS; PRODUCTION SYSTEM; LEAN PRODUCTION|
AB- Purpose-The purpose of this paper to investigate the major themes of
operations management by analysing citations in IJOPM. It aims to discuss
changes in the discipline's sub-fields and identifies emerging topics
Design/methodology/approach-The paper is an empirical analysis of
citations and co-citations from IJOPM. Network and factor analysis are
used to analyse and group the data Findings-The study demonstrates that
the persistent central ideas of operations management concern
manufacturing strategy, with specific interests in strategy typologies,
best practices, and the resource-based view. Other central themes are
performance measurement, the case study method, and process management.
The plotting of subfield trajectories shows that recent studies are
seeking a more subtle understanding of operations management by
considering its practice in relation to strategy, context and resources.
Emerging subjects within the field include supply chain management, lean
management systems, theory building from quantitative data and
sustainable resource limits to capability Originality/value-The study is
unique in performing the analysis at the individual publication level
rather than following the normal aggregated author co-citation analysis
(ACA) method. The potential problems with citation/co-citation studies
are discussed|
C1- Univ London Royal Holloway & Bedford New Coll, Sch Management, Egham
TW20 0EX, Surrey, England|
RP- Pilkington, A, Univ London Royal Holloway & Bedford New Coll, Sch
Management, Egham TW20 0EX, Surrey, England|
EM- a.pilkington@rhul.ac.uk|
CD- ADAM EE, 1989, V15, P181, J MANAGE; ANDERSON JC, 1989, V8, P133, J
OPERATIONS MANAGEM; ANDERSON JC, 1994, V19, P472, ACAD MANAGE REV;
ANDERSON U, 1989, V8, P1, AUDITING-J PRACT TH; ANSARI A, 1990, JUST TIME
PURCHASING; ARGYRIS C, 1978, ORG LEARNING; AZZONE G, 1991, V11, P77, INT
J OPER PROD MAN; BAKER K, 1974, INTRO SEQUENCING SCH; BARNEY J, 1991,
V17, P99, J MANAGE; BLACKBURN J, 1991, TIME BASED COMPETITI; BORGATTI SP,
2002, UCINET WINDOWS SOFTW; CHASE R, 1989, PRODUCTION OPERATION; CHENG
CH, 1999, V46, P4, IEEE T ENG MANAGE; CHILDE SJ, 1994, V14, P22, INT J
OPER PROD MAN; CHRISTOPHER M, 1992, LOGISTICS SUPPLY CHA; CLARK K, 1991,
PRODUCT DEV PERFORMA; COTTRILL CA, 1989, V11, P181, KNOWLEDGE; CRONBACH
LJ, 1951, V16, P297, PSYCHOMETRIKA; CROSBY P, 1979, QUALITY IS FREE;
CULNAN MJ, 1986, V32, P156, MANAGE SCI; DAVENPORT T, 1993, PROCESS
INNOVATION R; DAVENPORT TH, 1990, V31, P11, SLOAN MANAGE REV; DEMEYER A,
1989, V10, P135, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; DEMING W, 1986, OUT CRISIS; DIERICKX
I, 1989, V35, P1504, MANAGE SCI; DIXON J, 1990, NEW PERFORMANCE CHAL;
DREJER A, 2000, V16, P45, SCANDINAVIAN J MANAG; DRUCKER PF, 1990, P94,
HARVARD BUSINESS MAY; EISENHARDT KM, 1989, V14, P532, ACAD MANAGE REV;
FEIGENBAUM A, 1961, TOTAL QUALITY CONTRO; FERDOWS K, 1990, V9, P168, J
OPERATIONS MANAGEM; FINE CH, 1985, V15, P28, INTERFACES; FITZGERALD L,
1991, PERFORMANCE MEASUREM; FLYNN BB, 1990, V9, P250, J OPERATIONS
MANAGEM; FLYNN BB, 1994, V11, P339, J OPERATIONS MANAGEM; FLYNN BB, 1995,
V38, P1325, ACAD MANAGE J; FLYNN BB, 1995, V26, P659, DECISION SCI; FLYNN
BB, 1997, V17, P671, INT J OPER PROD MAN; FORRESTER J, 1961, IND
DYNAMICS; GARCIA R, 2002, V19, P110, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG; GARVIN DA,
1987, V65, P101, HARVARD BUS REV; GERWIN D, 1987, V7, P38, INT J OPER
PROD MAN; GERWIN D, 1993, V39, P395, MANAGE SCI; GHALAYINI AM, 1996, V16,
P63, INT J OPER PROD MAN; GIFFI C, 1990, COMPETING WORLD CLAS; GLASER B,
1967, DISCOVERY GROUNDED T; GOLDMAN S, 1995, AGILE COMPETITORS VI; GRANT
RM, 1991, V33, P114, CALIF MANAGE REV; GUNN T, 1987, MANUFACTURING
COMPET; HAIR JF, 1995, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN; HAIR JF, 1998, MULTIVARIATE
DATA AN; HALL G, 1993, V71, P119, HARVARD BUS REV; HALL R, 1983, ZERO
INVENTORIES; HALL R, 1987, ATTAINING MANUFACTUR; HAMEL G, 1989, V67, P63,
HARVARD BUS REV; HAMEL G, 1994, COMPETING FUTURE; HAMMER M, 1990, P104,
HARVARD BUSINESS JUL; HAMMER M, 1993, REENGINEERING CORPOR; HARRINGTON H,
1991, BUSINESS PROCESS IMP; HART S, 1995, V25, P986, ACAD MANAGE REV;
HAYES R, 1988, DYNAMIC MANUFACTURIN; HAYES RH, 1978, V56, P105, HARVARD
BUS REV; HAYES RH, 1979, V57, P133, HARVARD BUS REV; HAYES RH, 1984,
RESTORING OUR COMPET; HAYES RH, 1985, P111, HARVARD BUSINESS NOV; HAYES
RH, 1994, P77, HARVARD BUSINESS JAN; HAYES RH, 1996, V5, P25, PRODUCTION
OPERATION; HILL T, 1985, MANUFACTURING STRATE; HINES P, 1994, CREATING
WORLD CLASS; IM JH, 1989, V9, P5, INT J OPER PROD MAN; IMAI M, 1986,
KAIZEN; JAIKUMAR R, 1986, V64, P69, HARVARD BUS REV; JOHANSSON H, 1993,
BUSINESS PROCESS REE; JOHNSON H, 1987, RELEVANCE LOST; JURAN J, 1951,
QUALITY CONTROL HDB; KAPLAN R, 1996, BALANCED SCORECARD; KAPLAN RS, 1983,
V58, P686, ACCOUNT REV; KAPLAN RS, 1992, P71, HARVARD BUSINESS JAN;
KAPLAN RS, 1996, P75, HARVARD BUSINESS JAN; KARKI R, 1996, V22, P323, J
INFORM SCI; KEEGAN DP, 1989, V71, P45, MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTIN; KOTHA S,
1989, V10, P211, STRATEGIC MANAGE J; KRAFCIK JF, 1988, V30, P41, SLOAN
MANAGE REV; KRAJEWSKI LJ, 1987, V33, P39, MANAGE SCI; KRAJEWSKI LJ, 1993,
OPERATIONS MANAGEMEN; LAMMING R, 1993, PARTNERSHIP STRATEGI; LAW A, 1991,
SIMULATION MODELLING; LEONG GK, 1990, V18, P109, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S;
LINTON JD, 2004, V21, P123, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG; LYNCH R, 1991, MEASURE
YARDSTICK CO; MASKELL B, 1991, PERFORMANCE MEASUREM; MCCUTCHEON DM, 1993,
V11, P239, J OPERATIONS MANAGEM; MEREDITH JR, 1989, V8, P297, J
OPERATIONS MANAGEM; MILES M, 1994, QUALITATIVE DATA ANA; MILLER JG, 1994,
V40, P285, MANAGE SCI; MINTZBERG H, 1979, STRUCTURING ORG; MONDEN Y,
1983, TOYOTA PRODUCTION SY; NEELY A, 1995, V15, P4, INT J OPER PROD MAN;
NEELY A, 1996, GETTING MEASURE YOUR; NEELY A, 1997, V17, P1132, INT J
OPER PROD MAN; NEELY A, 1999, V19, P205, INT J OPER PROD MAN; NELSON R,
1982, EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; NISHIGUCHI T, 1994, STRATEGIC IND SOURCI;
NUNNALLY J, 1978, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY; OAKLAND J, 1989, TOTAL QUALITY
MANAGE; OHNO T, 1988, TOYOTA PRODUCTION SY; OLIVER N, 1992, JAPANISATION
BRIT IN; PENROSE E, 1959, THEORY GROWTH FIRM; PILKINGTON A, 1998, V41,
P31, CALIF MANAGE REV; PILKINGTON A, 1999, V19, P7, INT J OPER PROD MAN;
PINE BJ, 1993, MASS CUSTOMIZATION N; PIORE M, 1984, 2 IND DIVIDE; PORTER
M, 1980, COMPETITIVE STRATEGY; PORTER M, 1985, COMPETITIVE ADVANTAG;
PORTER M, 1995, P120, HARVARD BUSINESS SEP; POWELL TC, 1995, V16, P15,
STRATEGIC MANAGE J; PRAHALAD CK, 1990, V68, P79, HARVARD BUS REV; PRESSON
O, 2003, BIBEXCEL TOOLBOX BIB; SARAPH JV, 1989, V20, P810, DECISION SCI;
SCHMENNER RW, 1988, V10, P11, SLOAN MANAGE REV; SCHONBERGER R, 1982,
JAPANESE MANUFACTURI; SCHONBERGER R, 1986, WORLD CLASS MANUFACT;
SCHONBERGER R, 1990, BUILDING CHAIN CUSTO; SCHONBERGER R, 1991,
OPERATIONS MANAGEMEN; SELZNICK P, 1957, LEADERSHIP ADM; SENGE P, 1990, 5
DISCIPLINE; SETHI AK, 1990, V2, P289, INT J FLEX MANUF SYS; SHARPLIN AD,
1985, V38, P139, HUM RELAT; SHINGO S, 1981, STUDY TOYOTA PRODUCT; SKINNER
W, 1969, V47, P136, HARVARD BUS REV; SKINNER W, 1974, V52, P113, HARVARD
BUS REV; SKINNER W, 1978, MANUFACTURING CORPOR; SKINNER W, 1985,
MANUFACTURING FORMID; SLACK N, 1991, MANUFACTURING ADVANT; SLACK N, 1995,
OPERATIONS MANAGEMEN; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
STALK G, 1988, V66, P41, HARVARD BUS REV; STALK G, 1990, COMPETING TIME;
STALK G, 1992, P57, HARVARD BUSINESS MAR; SUGIMORI Y, 1977, V15, P553,
INT J PROD RES; SWAMIDASS PM, 1987, V33, P509, MANAGE SCI; SWINK M, 1995,
V15, P4, INT J OPER PROD MAN; TEECE DJ, 1997, V18, P509, STRATEGIC MANAGE
J; VOLLMANN TE, 1984, MASTER PRODUCTION SC; VOSS C, 1992, MANUFACTURING
STRATE; VOSS CA, 1987, V7, P46, INT J OPER PROD MAN; VOSS CA, 1995, V15,
P5, INT J OPER PROD MAN; WASSERMAN S, 1997, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL;
WERNERFELT B, 1984, V5, P171, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT; WHEELESS LL, 1984,
V5, P1, CYTOMETRY; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
WILLIAMSON O, 1975, MARKETS HIERARCHIES; WOMACK J, 1990, MACHINE CHANGED
WORL; WOMACK J, 1996, LEAN THINKING BANISH; WOMACK JP, 1994, V72, P93,
HARVARD BUS REV; YIN R, 1984, CASE STUDY RES DESIG; YOUSSEF MA, 1992,
V24, P18, IND ENG|
NR- 157|
TC- 14|
PU- EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED|
PI- BRADFORD|
PA- 60/62 TOLLER LANE, BRADFORD BD8 9BY, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND|
SN- 0144-3577|
J9- INT J OPER PROD MANAGE|
JI- Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage|
PY- 2006|
VL- 26|
IS- 11-12|
BP- 1255|
EP- 1275|
DI- 10.1108/01443570610705854|
PG- 21|
SC- Management|
GA- 104MU|
JN- INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2006,
V26, N11-12, P1255-1275|
UT- ISI:000241963300006 ER ||
PT- S|
AU- Abrouk L; Gouaich A|
AF- Abrouk Lylia; Gouaich, Abdelkader|
ED- Mizoguchi, R; Shi, Z; Giunchiglia, F|
TI- Automatic annotation using citation links and co-citation measure:
Application to the water information system|
SO- SEMANTIC WEB - ASWC 2006 PROCEEDINGS|
SE- LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE|
LA- English|
DT- Proceedings Paper|
CT- 1st Asian Semantic Web Conference|
CY- SEP 03-07, 2006|
CL- Beijing, PEOPLES R CHINA|
SP- European Semant Syst Initiative, DIP, DERI INNSBRUCK, EAST WEB,
Saltlux, Knowledge Web, Sogou, World Wide Web|
AB- This paper describes an approach to automatically annotate documents
for the Euro-Mediterranean Water Information System. This approach uses
the citation links and co-citation measure in order to refine annotations
extracted from an indexation method. An experiment of this approach with
the CiteSeer database is presented and discussed|
C1- LIRMM, F-34392 Montpellier 5, France; EMWIS, Euro Mediterranean
Informat Syst, F-06560 Valbonne, France|
RP- Abrouk, L, LIRMM, 161 Rue Ada, F-34392 Montpellier 5, France|
EM- abrouk@lirmm.fr gouaich@lirmm.fr|
CD- AGUIAR F, 2002, THESIS ECOLE SUPRIEU; ARASU A, 2001, EXPT ALGORITHMS;
BRIN S, 1998, V7, P107, P 7 INT C WORLD WID; BUYUKKOKTEN O, 1999, WEBDB;
GARFIELD E, 1993, P15, ESSAYS INFORM SCI NO; GHITA S, 2005, UNPUB L3S
TECHNICAL; GIBSON D, 1998, UK C HYPERTEXT; KESSLER M, 1963, P10, AM DOC;
KLEINBERG JM, 1999, P139, J ACM; KUMAR R, 1999, COMPUTER NETWORKS; LAURI
P, 1997, P2836, INT J INFORM SCI DEC; MARCHIORI M, 1997, 6 INT WWW C SANT
CLA; MARCHIORI M, 1998, P1, P 7 INT WORLD WID WE; MIHALCEA R, 2004, P 20
INT C COMP LING; PHELAN D, 2002, DESCENDANT BASED LIN; PRIMECLAVERIE C,
2003, JOURNES FRANCOPHONES; PRIMECLAVERIE C, 2004, THESIS ECOLE SUPRIEU;
STRIBLING J, 2005, INT WORKSH PEER PEER; VANDAELE V, 2004, P JADT 2004
JOURNES|
NR- 19|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN|
PI- BERLIN|
PA- HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY|
SN- 0302-9743|
BN- 3-540-38329-8|
J9- LECT NOTE COMPUT SCI|
PY- 2006|
VL- 4185|
BP- 44|
EP- 57|
PG- 14|
SC- Computer Science, Theory & Methods|
GA- BFE30|
JN- SEMANTIC WEB - ASWC 2006 PROCEEDINGS, 2006, V4185, N11-12, P44-57|
UT- ISI:000241446800005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Leydesdorff L; Vaughan L|
AF- Leydesdorff Loet; Vaughan, Liwen|
TI- Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science:
Extending ACA to the Web environment|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; PEARSONS-R|
AB- Co-occurrence matrices, such as cocitation, coword, and colink
matrices, have been used widely in the information sciences. However,
confusion and controversy have hindered the proper statistical analysis
of these data. The underlying problem, in our opinion, involved
understanding the nature of various types of matrices. This article
discusses the difference between a symmetrical cocitation matrix and an
asymmetrical citation matrix as well as the appropriate statistical
techniques that can be applied to each of these matrices, respectively
Similarity measures (such as the Pearson correlation coefficient or the
cosine) should not be applied to the symmetrical cocitation matrix but
can be applied to the asymmetrical citation matrix to derive the
proximity matrix. The argument is illustrated with examples. The study
then extends the application of co-occurrence matrices to the Web
environment, in which the nature of the available data and thus data
collection methods are different from those of traditional databases such
as the Science Citation Index. A set of data collected with the Google
Scholar search engine is analyzed by using both the traditional methods
of multivariate analysis and the new visualization software Pajek, which
is based on social network analysis and graph theory|
C1- Univ Lausanne, Sch Econ HEC, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; Univ
Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res, NL-1012 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands;
Univ Western Ontario, Fac Informat & Media Studies, London, ON N6A 5B7,
Canada|
RP- Leydesdorff, L, Univ Lausanne, Sch Econ HEC, CH-1015 Lausanne,
Switzerland|
EM- loet@leydesdorff.net lvaughan@uwo.ca|
CD- *SPSS INC, 1993, SPSS PROF STAT 6 1; AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC; AHLGREN P, 2004, V55, P843, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
AHLGREN P, 2004, V55, P936, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BENSMAN SJ, 2004, V55,
P935, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BORG I, 1997, MODERN MULTIDIMENSIO; BURT RS,
1982, STRUCTURAL THEORY AC; BURT RS, 1995, STRUCTURAL HOLES SOC; COSTA D,
2005, CONDMAT0505185; COX TF, 2001, MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCA; DAVISON ML,
1983, MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCA; ENGELSMAN EC, 1991, MAPPING TECHNOLOGY F;
GARFIELD E, 1979, CITATION INDEXING IT; JONES WP, 1987, V38, P420, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; KAMADA T, 1989, V31, P7, INFORM PROCESS LETT; KIM JO,
1978, FACTOR ANAL STAT MET; KRUSKAL JB, 1978, MUTLIDIMENSIONAL SCA;
LEYDESDORFF L, 1987, V11, P291, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 1989, V18,
P209, RES POLICY; SCOTT J, 1991, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; SIEGEL S, 1988,
NONPARAMETRIC STAT B; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
SMALL H, 1985, V7, P391, SCIENTOMETRICS; THELWALL M, 2005, V39, P81, ANNU
REV INFORM SCI; VAUGHAN L, 2003, V54, P1313, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
VAUGHAN L, 2005, V56, P1075, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; VAUGHAN L, 2005, P534,
P ISSI 2005 10 INT C; WASSERMAN S, 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; WHITE HD,
1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P1250, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITE HD,
2004, V55, P843, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WOUTERS P, 2004, V9, FIRST MONDAY|
NR- 33|
TC- 56|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- OCT|
PY- 2006|
VL- 57|
IS- 12|
BP- 1616|
EP- 1628|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20335|
PG- 13|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 100SK|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2006, V57, N12, P1616-1628|
UT- ISI:000241688800005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Stock M; Stock WG|
AF- Stock Mechtild; Stock, Wolfgang G|
TI- Intellectual property information: A comparative analysis of main
information providers|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- MARKUSH STRUCTURE STORAGE; RETRIEVAL CAPABILITY; PATENT INFORMATION;
DATABASES; ONLINE; COCITATION; INTERNET; IMAGES; MAP|
AB- After modeling expert user needs with regard to intellectual property
information, we analyze and compare the main providers in this specific
information area (Thomson DIALOG, Esp@cenet by the European Patent
Office, Questel-Orbit, and STN International) in terms of system content
and system functionality. The key question is whether the main providers
are able to satisfy these expert user needs. For patent information, some
special retrieval features such as chemical structure search (including
Markush search), patent family references and citations search,
biosequence search, and basic informetric functionality such as ranking,
mapping, and visualization of information flows are realized. Considering
the results of information science research the practice of patent
information shows unexhauste improvement opportunities (e.g., the
application of bibliographic patent coupling and co-patent-citation for
mapping patents, patent assignees, and technology specialties). For
trademark search, users need multiple truncated search (realized) as well
as phonetic search and image retrieval (not realized yet)|
C1- Univ Dusseldorf, Dept Informat Sci, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany|
RP- Stock, M, Zum Muhlenfeld 18, D-50170 Kerpen, Germany|
EM- MechtildStock@aol.com Stock@phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de|
CD- *PAT TRAD DEP LIBR, 2004, ONL PAT TRAD RES VER; BERKS AH, 2001, V23,
P5, WORLD PATENT INFORM; BORNE P, 2003, MMS MERGED MARKUSH S; BREITZMAN
AF, 2002, V28, P187, J INFORM SCI; CHEN C, 2003, MAPPING SCI FRONTIER;
CORTELAZZO G, 1994, V27, P1005, PATTERN RECOGN; DERRIKS G, 2005, P159,
PATINFO 2005 PATENTR; DICKENS DT, 1994, V16, P28, WORLD PATENT INFORM;
DICKENS DT, 2005, P201, PATINFO 2005 PATRENT; DOU HJM, 2004, V26, P297,
WORLD PATENT INFORM; DUFRESNE G, 2002, V20, P1269, NAT BIOTECHNOL; EAKINS
JP, 1998, V5, P53, IEEE MULTIMEDIA; EAKINS JP, 2003, V2728, P28, LECT
NOTES COMPUT SC; EBE T, 1991, V31, P31, J CHEM INF COMP SCI; ENGEL T,
2003, P15, CHEMOINFORMATICS; FALL CJ, 2005, V27, P135, WORLD PATENT
INFORM; FATTORI M, 2003, V25, P335, WORLD PATENT INFORM; FISANICK W,
1990, V30, P145, J CHEM INF COMP SCI; GASTEIGER J, 2003, P169,
CHEMOINFORMATICS TXB; GASTEIGER J, 2003, CHEMOINFORMATICS; GENTH P, 2002,
P35, CONTENT MANAGEMENT D; GEORGY U, 2002, V24, P29, CONTENT CONTEXT;
GLADDEN N, 2002, P93, PATINFO 2002 BASIS M; HALL BH, 2005, V36, P16, RAND
J ECON; HALL M, 1999, V25, P335, J INFORM SCI; HALLERBERG M, 2000, V2,
P87, ZEI STUD EU ECON LAW; HIRATA K, 1992, P56, ADV DATABASE TECHNOL;
HUANG MH, 2003, V58, P489, SCIENTOMETRICS; HUSSAIN M, 2002, V2383, P147,
LECT NOTES COMPUT SC; JACOBS JR, 1982, V7, P473, BYTE; JAIN AK, 1998,
V31, P1369, PATTERN RECOGN; KASZKIEL M, 1997, P178, P 20 ANN INT ACM SIG;
KESSLER MM, 1963, V14, P10, AM DOC; KIM YS, 1998, V16, P931, IMAGE VISION
COMPUT; KOCHEV N, 2003, P291, CHEMOINFORMATICS TXB; KULP CS, 1984, V7,
P56, DATABASE; LAGEMAAT WG, 2005, P151, PATINFO 2005 PATENTR; LAMBERT N,
1999, V39, P448, J CHEM INF COMP SCI; LAMBERT N, 2001, V9, P48, SEARCHER;
LAMBERT N, 2004, P 2004 INT CHEM INF; LEYESDORFF L, 2001, V5,
CYBERMETRICS; MCKIERMAN G, 2001, P57, PATENT TRADEMARK INF; MELVIN TC,
2002, V8, P55, J BUSINESS FINANCE L; MOGEE ME, 1999, V9, P291, EXPERT
OPIN THER PAT; NARIN F, 1994, V30, P147, SCIENTOMETRICS; NARIN F, 1999,
TECH LINE BACKGROUND; NICHOLAS D, 1995, P383, ONLINE INFORMATION 9; OKAWA
A, 2000, V43, P205, JSME INT J C-MECH SY; PILCH W, 2005, P19, PATINFO
2005 PAT PAT; RAVELA S, 1998, RETRIEVAL TRADEMARK; RAVELA S, 1999, MULTI
MODAL RETRIEVA; RENAUD D, 1990, PROCEDE SYSTEME STOC; RHODES S, 1996,
V18, P205, WORLD PATENT INFORM; SCHOCHGRUEBLER U, 1998, V20, P21, WORLD
PATENT INFORM; SHIVELY E, 2004, V26, P57, WORLD PATENT INFORM; SIMMONS
ES, 2003, V25, P195, WORLD PATENT INFORM; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; STOCK M, 2003, V11, P22, PASSWORD; STOCK M, 2003, V12,
P14, PASSWORD; STOCK M, 2003, V4, P22, PASSWORD; STOCK M, 2003, V5, P42,
PASSWORD; STOCK M, 2004, V1, P20, PASSWORD; STOCK M, 2004, V2, P16,
PASSWORD; STOCK M, 2005, V25, P163, INFORM SERVICES USE; STOCK M, 2005,
V2, P18, PASSWORD; STOCK WG, 1991, P376, WISSENSBASIERTE INFO; STOCK WG,
1992, V43, P301, NACHR DOK; STOCK WG, 2000, INFORMATIONSWIRTSCHA;
THOMPSON NJ, 1989, V13, P15, ONLINE; WANG CC, 2002, V16, P603, INT J
PATTERN RECOGN; WILLETT P, 1998, V38, P983, J CHEM INF COMP SCI; XU G,
2002, V24, P95, WORLD PATENT INFORM; YOO H, 2005, V27, P203, WORLD PAT
INFORM|
NR- 73|
TC- 0|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- NOV|
PY- 2006|
VL- 57|
IS- 13|
BP- 1794|
EP- 1803|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20498|
PG- 10|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 100SL|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2006, V57, N13, P1794-1803|
UT- ISI:000241688900009 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Tho QT; Hui SC; Fong ACM|
AF- Tho Quan Thanh; Hui, S. C; Fong, A. C. M|
TI- A citation-based document retrieval system for finding research
expertise|
SO- INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- clustering; indexing; data mining; information retrieval; knowledge
discovery; ontology generation|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; WEB; DATABASE|
AB- Current citation-based document retrieval systems generally offer
only limited search facilities, such as author search. In order to
facilitate more advanced search functions, we have developed a
significantly improved system that employs two novel techniques: Contextbased Cluster Analysis (CCA) and Context-based Ontology Generation
frAmework (COGA). CCA aims to extract relevant information from clusters
originally obtained from disparate clustering methods by building
relationships between them. The built relationships are then represented
as formal context using the Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) technique. COGA
aims to generate ontology from clusters relationship built by CCA. By
combining these two techniques, we are able to perform ontology learning
from a citation database using clustering results. We have implemented
the improved system and have demonstrated its use for finding research
domain expertise. We have also conducted performance evaluation on the
system and the results are encouraging. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights
reserved|
C1- Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Comp Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore|
RP- Fong, ACM, Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Comp Engn, Blk N4,02-32,Nanyang
Ave, Singapore 639798, Singapore|
EM- PA0218164B@ntu.edu.sg asschui@ntu.edu.sg acmfong@gmail.com|
CD- BOLLACKER KD, 2000, V15, P42, IEEE INTELL SYST APP; CHANDRASEKARAN P,
2001, P AAAI 14 ANN INT FL; CIOS KJ, 1998, DATA MINING METHODS; CROWDER
R, 2002, V2569, P179, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT; DING Y, 1998, V23, P25, INT
FORUM INFORM DOC; GANTER B, 1999, FORMAL CONCEPT ANAL; HARNAD S, 2000,
V79, P629, CURR SCI INDIA; HE Y, 2002, V16, P283, APPL ARTIF INTELL; HE
YL, 2002, V38, P491, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; LAWRENCE S, 1999, V32, P67,
IEEE COMPUT; MCDONALD DW, 2000, P231, P ACM C COMP SUPP CO; MITCHELL T,
1997, MACHINE LEARNING; TERWEEN L, 1997, V40, COMMUNICATIONS ACM;
VANRIJSBERGEN C, 1979, INFORM RETRIEVAL|
NR- 14|
TC- 4|
PU- PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD|
PI- OXFORD|
PA- THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND|
SN- 0306-4573|
J9- INFORM PROCESS MANAGE|
JI- Inf. Process. Manage|
PD- JAN|
PY- 2007|
VL- 43|
IS- 1|
BP- 248|
EP- 264|
DI- 10.1016/j.ipm.2006.05.015|
PG- 17|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 098RC|
JN- INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2007, V43, N1, P248-264|
UT- ISI:000241539500017 ER ||
PT- S|
AU- Berendt B; Dingel K; Hauser C|
AF- Berendt Bettina; Dingel, Kai; Hauser, Christoph|
ED- Gonzalo, J; Thanos, C; Verdejo, MF; Carrasco, RC|
TI- Intelligent bibliography creation and markup for authors: A step
towards interoperable digital libraries|
SO- RESEARCH AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY FOR DIGITAL LIBRARIES|
SE- LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE|
LA- English|
DT- Proceedings Paper|
CT- 10th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for
Digital Libraries|
CY- SEP 17-22, 2006|
CL- Alicante, SPAIN|
SP- DELOS Network Excellence Digital Libraries, Grp Santander, Minist
Educ & Ciencia, Patronato Municipal Turismo Alicante, Red Investigac
Bibliotecas Digitales, Fdn Biblioteca Miguel Cervantes, Univ Alciante,
Dept Lenguajes & Sistemas Informat, UNED|
DE- user interfaces for digital libraries; collection building;
management and integration; system architectures; integration and
interoperability|
ID- COCITATION|
AB- The move towards integrated international Digital Libraries offers
the opportunity of creating comprehensive data on citation networks.
These data are not only invaluable pointers to related research, but also
the basis for evaluations such as impact factors, and the foundation of
smart search engines. However, creating correct citation-network data
remains a hard problem, and data are often incomplete and noisy. The only
viable solution appear to be systems that help authors create correct,
complete, and annotated bibliographies, thus enabling autonomous citation
indexing to create correct and complete citation networks. In this paper,
we describe a general system architecture and two concrete components for
supporting authors in this task. The system takes the author from
literature search through domain-model creation and bibliography
construction, to the semantic markup of bibliographic metadata. The
system rests on a modular and extensible architecture: VBA Macros that
integrate seamlessly into the user's familiar working environment, the
use of existing databases and information-retrieval tools, and a Web
Service layer that connects them.(1)|
C1- Humboldt Univ, Inst Informat Syst, D-10178 Berlin, Germany|
RP- Berendt, B, Humboldt Univ, Inst Informat Syst, D-10178 Berlin,
Germany|
CD- BERENDT B, 2003, P ETD 2003; BERENDT B, 2005, P106, P KNOWL COLL VOL
CON; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; CHEN C, 2003,
MAPPING SCI FRONTIER; LAWRENCE S, 1999, V32, P67, IEEE COMPUT; SMALL H,
1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD;
SMALL H, 1980, V2, P277, SCIENTOMETRICS; YONG KN, 2005, CITATION PARSING
USI|
NR- 9|
TC- 1|
PU- SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN|
PI- BERLIN|
PA- HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, D-14197 BERLIN, GERMANY|
SN- 0302-9743|
BN- 3-540-44636-2|
J9- LECT NOTE COMPUT SCI|
PY- 2006|
VL- 4172|
BP- 495|
EP- 499|
PG- 5|
SC- Computer Science, Theory & Methods|
GA- BFD07|
JN- RESEARCH AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY FOR DIGITAL LIBRARIES, 2006, V4172,
N1, P495-499|
UT- ISI:000241101500052 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Ortega L; Antell K|
AF- Ortega Lina; Antell, Karen|
TI- Tracking cross-disciplinary information use by author affiliation:
Demonstration of a method|
SO- COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- CORE JOURNAL NETWORKS; INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; COCITATION MAPS;
SCIENCES; PATTERNS; MULTIDISCIPLINARY; MANAGEMENT; CONTEXT; FIELDS;
IMPACT|
AB- In this paper, we report the results of a bibliometric study in which
we track cross-disciplinary citation behavior in the sciences. We
hypothesize that cross-disciplinary citation in the sciences increased
over the time period 1985-2000. Unlike most previous studies in this
area, we assign discipline to a paper by its first author's affiliation,
and we hypothesize that assigning papers to disciplines based on firstauthor affiliation would yield results consistent with previous findings
on cross-disciplinary citation rates in the sciences Using the output of
scientists in Biological Sciences, Chemistry, and Physics departments at
12 large research universities in 1985, 1990, 1995, and 2000 as our data
set, we measure the cross-disciplinary citation rates of each discipline
and compare our results to the findings of previous studies in this area|
C1- Univ Oklahoma, Chem Math Lib, Norman, OK 73019 USA; Univ Oklahoma
Libs, Reference & Outreach Serv, Norman, OK USA|
RP- Ortega, L, Univ Oklahoma, Chem Math Lib, Norman, OK 73019 USA|
EM- lortega@ou.edu kantell@ou.edu|
CD- *NAT SCI FDN, 1998, P39, SCI ENG IND; *NAT SCI FDN, 2004, P39, GRANT
PROD GUID; *NAT SCI FDN, 2004, P43, SCI ENG IND; ACKERSON LG, 1999, V39,
P49, REF USER SERV Q; ACKERSON LG, 2003, V64, P471, COLL RES LIB; ALVAREZ
P, 1996, V47, P458, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; CHOI JM, 1988, V6, P65, BEHAV
SOC SCI LIBR; DOBSON C, 1996, V22, P279, J ACAD LIBR; EARLE P, 1969, V21,
P237, ASLIB P; EDWARDS S, 1999, V25, P11, SERIALS REV; GERHARD KH, 2000,
V25, P51, COLLECTION MANAGEMEN; GLANZEL W, 1999, V44, P427,
SCIENTOMETRICS; HARGENS LL, 1986, V9, P145, SCIENTOMETRICS; HERUBEL JPVM,
1994, V13, P49, BEHAV SOC SCI LIBR; HOUGHTON JW, 2003, P39, CHANGING RES
PRACTIC; HUGHES J, 1995, V19, P403, LIBR ACQUIS PRACT TH; HURD JM, 1992,
V53, P283, COLL RES LIBR; HURD JM, 1999, V60, P31, COLL RES LIBR; KHAWAM
YJ, 1992, V14, P57, LIBR INFORM SCI RES; KING DW, 1981, P60, SCI J US
THEIR PRODU; KUSHKOWSKI JD, 1998, V54, P477, J DOC; MCCAIN KW, 1986, V23,
P194, P AM SOC INFORM SCI; MCCAIN KW, 1991, V61, P311, LIBR QUART; MCCAIN
KW, 1992, V29, P3, P ASIS ANNU MEET; MCCAIN KW, 1995, V46, P306, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; MEADOWS AJ, 1976, V1, P259, INTERDISCIPLINARY SC; MORILLO F,
2001, V51, P203, SCIENTOMETRICS; MORILLO F, 2003, V54, P1237, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; MORSE DE, 1996, V190, P260, BIOL BULL; PIERCE SJ, 1999, V50,
P271, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PORTER AL, 1985, V8, P161, SCIENTOMETRICS; QIU
L, 1992, V2, P169, RES EVALUAT; RINIA EJ, 2002, V54, P347,
SCIENTOMETRICS; ROY R, 1977, V55, P28, CHEM ENG NEWS; SANZMENENDEZ L,
2001, V10, P17, RES EVALUAT; SCHUMMER J, 2004, V59, P425, SCIENTOMETRICS;
SHKOLNIK L, 1991, V52, P349, COLL RES LIB; STEELE TW, 2000, V51, P476, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; TENOPIR C, 2000, P242, ELECT J REALITIES SC;
VANLEEUWEN T, 2000, V9, P183, RES EVALUAT; WALTERS WH, 2003, V54, P1305,
J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 41|
TC- 4|
PU- ASSOC COLL RESEARCH LIBRARIES|
PI- CHICAGO|
PA- 50 E HURON ST, CHICAGO, IL 60611 USA|
SN- 0010-0870|
J9- COLL RES LIBR|
JI- Coll. Res. Libr|
PD- SEP|
PY- 2006|
VL- 67|
IS- 5|
BP- 446|
EP- 462|
PG- 17|
SC- Information Science & Library Science|
GA- 087TP|
JN- COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 2006, V67, N5, P446-462|
UT- ISI:000240765600004 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Bollen J; de Sompel HV|
AF- Bollen Johan; de Sompel, Herbert Van|
TI- Mapping the structure of science through usage|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- SOCIAL DESIRABILITY BIAS; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; COMBINED COCITATION;
PUBLICATION DELAYS; DIGITAL LIBRARY; WORD ANALYSIS; CITATION; IMPACT;
NETWORKS; JOURNALS|
AB- Science has traditionally been mapped on the basis of authorship and
citation data. Due to publication and citation delays such data
represents the structure of science as it existed in the past. We propose
to map science by proxy of journal relationships derived from usage data
to determine research trends as they presently occur. This mapping is
performed by applying a principal components analysis superimposed with a
k-means cluster analysis on networks of journal relationships derived
from a large set of article usage data collected for the Los Alamos
National Laboratory research community. Results indicate that meaningful
maps of the interests of a local scientific community can be derived from
usage data. Subject groupings in the mappings corresponds to Thomson ISI
subject categories. A comparison to maps resulting from the analysis of
2003 Thomson ISI Journal Citation Report data reveals interesting
differences between the features of local usage and global citation data|
C1- Los Alamos Natl Lab, Res Lib, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA|
RP- Bollen, J, Los Alamos Natl Lab, Res Lib, POB 1663, Los Alamos, NM
87545 USA|
EM- jbollen@lanl.gov|
CD- ADAMS J, 2005, V63, P567, SCIENTOMETRICS; AGRAWAL R, 1993, P207, ACM
SIGMOD INT C MAN; BAEZAYATES RA, 1999, MODERN INFORM RETRIE; BOLLEN J,
2002, V8, D LIB MAGAZINE; BOLLEN J, 2005, V41, P1419, INFORM PROCESS
MANAG; BOYACK KW, 2002, V53, P764, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BOYACK KW, 2004,
V1, P101, P NATL ACAD SCI US S; BOYACK KW, 2005, V64, P351,
SCIENTOMETRICS; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BRAAM RR,
1991, V42, P252, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BRIN S, 1997, P265, P ACM SIGMOD
INT C M; BRODY T, 2005, EARLIER WEB USAGE ST; CHAN PK, 1999, V1836, LNAI;
CHEN CM, 2001, V34, COMPUTER; CRAMER H, 1946, MATH MODELS STAT; EGGHE L,
2000, V51, P158, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; EVERETT JE, 1991, V42, P405, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; HE SY, 2002, V53, P953, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; JOLLIFFE
IT, 2002, PRINCIPAL COMPONENT; KESSLER MM, 1963, V14, P10, AM DOC; KIM
DH, 2004, P 6 ACM INT WORKSH W; KING MF, 2000, V17, P79, PSYCHOL MARKET;
KOHONEN T, 1995, SELF ORG MAPS; KURTZ MJ, 2005, V56, P111, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; KURTZ MJ, 2005, V56, P36, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L,
2004, V60, P371, J DOC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V60, P159, SCIENTOMETRICS;
LIU X, 2004, P404, P 2004 JOINT ACM IEE; LIU XM, 2005, V41, P1462, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG; LUWEL M, 1998, V41, P29, SCIENTOMETRICS; MCCAIN KW, 1991,
V42, P290, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MOBASHER B, 2001, P9, WEB INFORMATION
DATA; NAGPAUL PS, 2002, V54, P213, SCIENTOMETRICS; NEDERHOF AJ, 1985,
V15, P263, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL; NEWMAN MEJ, 2001, V64, ARTN 016132, PHYS
REV E 2; NEWMAN MEJ, 2001, V64, P1, PHYS REV E; RINIA EJ, 2001, V51,
P293, SCIENTOMETRICS; SALTON G, 1988, V24, P513, INFORMATION PROCESSI;
SARWAR B, 2001, P285, P 10 INT WORLD WID W; SHANNON CE, 1948, V27, P379,
BELL SYST TECH J; SHESKIN DJ, 2004, PARAMETRIC NONPARAME; SMALL H, 1973,
V42, P676, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SPATH H, 1980, CLUSTER ANAL ALGORIT;
SPILIOPOULOU M, 1999, V14, P113, COMPUT SYST SCI ENG; SRIVASTAVA J, 2000,
V1, P12, SIGKDD EXPLORATIONS; TUFEKCI S, 2003, V24, P109, COMPUT IND ENG;
VANDESOMPEL H, 2001, V7, D LIB MAGAZINE; VANDESOMPEL H, 2003, V9, D LIB
MAGAZINE; VANDESOMPEL H, 2004, V10, D LIB MAGAZINE; WAGNER CS, 2003, 9
INT C SCIENT INF; WOUTERS P, 1997, V38, P39, SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 51|
TC- 7|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- NOV|
PY- 2006|
VL- 69|
IS- 2|
BP- 227|
EP- 258|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-006-0151-8|
PG- 32|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 083SE|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, V69, N2, P227-258|
UT- ISI:000240477700003 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Egghe L; Rousseau R|
AF- Egghe L; Rousseau, R|
TI- Lorenz theory of symmetric relative concentration and similarity,
incorporating variable array length|
SO- MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Lorenz; symmetric relative concentration; similarity; pearson
correlation coefficient; Spearman correlation coefficient|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; PEARSONS-R; REQUIREMENTS|
AB- This paper extends the Lorenz theory, developed in [L. Egghe, R
Rousseau, Symmetric and asymmetric theory of relative concentration and
applications, Scientometrics 52 (2) (2001) 261-290], so that it can deal
with comparing arrays of variable length. We show that in this case we
need to divide the Lorenz curves by certain types of increasing functions
of the array length N We then prove that, in this theory, adding zeros to
two arrays increases their similarity, a property that is not satisfied
by the Pearson correlation coefficient Among the many good similarity
measures satisfying the developed Lorenz theory, we deduce the
correlation coefficient of Spearman, hence showing that this measure can
be used as a good measure of symmetric relative concentration (or
similarity). (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved|
C1- Hasselt Univ, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium; Univ Antwerp, IBW, B-2610
Antwerp, Belgium; IWT, KHBO, B-8400 Oostende, Belgium|
RP- Egghe, L, Hasselt Univ, Campus Diepenbeek,Gebouw D, B-3590
Diepenbeek, Belgium|
EM- leo.egghe@uhasselt.be ronald.rousseau@khbo.be|
CD- AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; AHLGREN P, 2004,
V55, P843, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; AHLGREN P, 2004, V55, P936, J AM SOC INF
SCI TEC; BENSMAN SJ, 2004, V55, P935, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; EGGHE L,
1990, INTRO INFORMETRICS Q; EGGHE L, 2001, V52, P261, SCIENTOMETRICS;
EGGHE L, 2002, V35, P1149, MATH COMPUT MODEL; EGGHE L, 2006, V42, P106,
INFORM PROCESS MANAG; LIEBETRAU AM, 1983, QUANTITATIVE APPL SO; MYLES GD,
1995, PUBLIC EC; ROUSSEAU R, 2001, P72, RES U EVALUATION; SHOUKRY MM,
2004, MEASURES INTEROBSERV|
NR- 12|
TC- 0|
PU- PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD|
PI- OXFORD|
PA- THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND|
SN- 0895-7177|
J9- MATH COMPUT MODELLING|
JI- Math. Comput. Model|
PD- OCT|
PY- 2006|
VL- 44|
IS- 7-8|
BP- 628|
EP- 639|
DI- 10.1016/j.mcm.2006.02.001|
PG- 12|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Computer Science,
Software Engineering; Mathematics, Applied|
GA- 078EW|
JN- MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2006, V44, N7-8, P628-639|
UT- ISI:000240086000004 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Zubiete CL|
AF- Zubiete Carlos Leal|
TI- An application of co-citation based visualisation techniques in the
field of film studies|
SO- PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION|
LA- Spanish|
DT- Article|
DE- filmic citation; co-citation; film genre theory; intertextuality;
information visualisation|
AB- The application of information visualisation techniques to
quantitative citation analysis in scientific documents has proved very
useful in revealing hidden structures and research trends in several
disciplines A similar approach is proposed in the field of Film Studies
based on the concept of << filmic citation >>, understood as an allusion
to a different audiovisual text that blends seamlessly into the flow of
the cinematographic narrative. Thus, this technique allows the detection
of patterns of influence between audiovisual texts. A visual
representation of the co-citation data for Classic Holywood films
extracted from the IMDb database illustrates the utility of this
technique for Film Studies and, particularly, Film Genre Studies|
EM- carlos.leal.ext@juntadeandalucia.es|
CD- ALTMAN R, 2003, V3, P243, FILM GENRE READER; CARROLL N, 1998, P240,
INTERPRETING MOVING; COURSODON JP, 1996, V8, P225, HIST GEN CINE;
GARFIELD E, 1981, V42, P5, CURRENT CONTENTS; GENETTE G, 1989,
PALIMPSESTOS LIT SEG; IAMPOLSKI M, 1996, TEORIA INTERTEXTUALI; SMALL H,
1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; STAIGER J, 2003, V3, P185, FILM GENRE READER;
STAM R, 2001, TEORIAS CINE INTRO; WALTER JA, 2004, V29, P273, INFORM
SYST; WHITE HD, 1998, V49, P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI|
NR- 11|
TC- 1|
PU- EPI|
PI- BARCELONA|
PA- APARTADO 32 280, BARCELONA, 08080, SPAIN|
SN- 1386-6710|
J9- PROF INF|
JI- Prof. Inform|
PDPYVLISBPEPPGSCGAJNUT-
JUL-AUG|
2006|
15|
4|
251|
257|
7|
Information Science & Library Science|
072TR|
PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2006, V15, N4, P251-257|
ISI:000239696400002 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- de Moya-Anegon F; Vargas-Quesada B; Chinchilla-Rodriguez Z; CoreraAlvarez E; Gonzalez-Molina A; Munoz-Fernandez FJ; Herrero-Solana V|
AF- de Moya-Anegon Felix; Vargas-Quesada, Benjamin; Chinchilla-Rodriguez,
Zaida; Corera-Alvarez, Elena; Gonzalez-Molina, Antonio; Munoz-Fernandez,
Francisco Jose; Herrero-Solana, Victor|
TI- Visualizing and analyzing the Spanish science structure: ISI Web of
science 1990-2005|
SO- PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION|
LA- Spanish|
DT- Article|
DE- information visualization; domain analysis; scientific output;
cocitation; Spain|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; CITATION; NETWORKS; DOMAINS; GRAPHS;
MAPS|
AB- This article presents the structure of Spanish science from 1990 to
2005. Based on ISI subject-category co-citation, including natural
sciences, social sciences and arts & humanities, and combining both
social network analysis (SNA) and pruning algorithms such as pathfindernetworks (Pfnet) and other information layout algorithms like Kama-dadaKawai's, the basic structure of Spanish science is shown through its
essential relations. The results are bibliometric-maps (scientograms)
revealing the macrostructure, microstructure and the backbone of Spanish
science and making possible its analysis and explanation|
EM- felix@ugr.es benjamin.vargas@uah.es zchinchi@ugr.es ecorera@ugr.es
agmo@ugr.es franjo@ugr.es victorhs@ugr.es|
CD- *COM EUR, 2003, 3 EUR REP SCI TECHN; *GRUP SCIM, ATL SCI; BORGATTI
SP, 1999, V21, P375, SOC NETWORKS; BORNER K, 2003, V37, P179, ANNU REV
INFORM SCI; BOYACK KW, 2005, V64, P351, SCIENTOMETRICS; BRANDENBURG FJ,
1995, P87, LECT NOTES COMPUTER; BUSH V, 1945, V176, P101, ATLANTIC
MONTHLY; CHEN CM, 1998, V10, P107, INTERACT COMPUT; COSTA J, 1998,
ESQUEMATICA VISUALIZ; CROSBY AW, 1997, MEASURE REALITY QUAN; DEMOYAANEGON
F, 2005, V41, INFORM PROCESSING MA; DING Y, 1999, V25, P67, J INFORM SCI;
EADES P, 1984, V42, P149, C NUMERANTIUM; EISEMBERG JD, 2002, SVG
ESSENTIALS; FRUCHTERMAN T, 1991, V21, SOFTWARE PRACTICE EX; GARFIELD E,
1964, USE CITATION DATA WR; GARFIELD E, 1994, V7, P5, CURRENT CONTENTS
SOC; GEROIMENKO V, 2005, VISUALIZING INFORM U; HJORLAND B, 1995, V46,
P400, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; KAMADA T, 1989, V31, P7, INFORM PROCESS LETT;
KLOVDAHL AS, 1981, V3, P197, SOC NETWORKS; KOHONEN T, 1985, V73, P IEEE;
KOHONEN T, 1997, SELF ORG MAPS; LEWISBECK MS, 1994, FACTOR ANAL RELATED;
LEYDESDORFF L, IN PRESS J AM SOC IN; LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V60, P371, J
DOC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V60, P159, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOYAANEGON F, 1998,
V42, P229, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOYAANEGON F, 2004, V61, P129, SCIENTOMETRICS;
SALTON G, 1979, V22, P146, IEEE T PROF COMMUN; SAMOYLENKO I, IN PRESS J
AM SOC IN; SCHVANEVELDT RW, 1990, PATHFINDER ASS NETWO; SMALL H, 1985,
V11, P147, J INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 2000, WEB KNOWLEDGE FESTSC; TUFTE ER,
1994, ENVISIONING INFORM; VARGASQUESADA B, 2005, THESIS GRANADA;
WASSERMAN S, 1998, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM
SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 38|
TC- 1|
PU- EPI|
PI- BARCELONA|
PA- APARTADO 32 280, BARCELONA, 08080, SPAIN|
SN- 1386-6710|
J9- PROF INF|
JI- Prof. Inform|
PD- JUL-AUG|
PY- 2006|
VL- 15|
IS- 4|
BP- 258|
EP- 269|
PG- 12|
SC- Information Science & Library Science|
GA- 072TR|
JN- PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2006, V15, N4, P258-269|
UT- ISI:000239696400003 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Ortega JL; Aguillo I|
AF- Ortega Jose Luis; Aguillo, Isidro|
TI- Co-link analysis: a theoretical approach|
SO- PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION|
LA- Spanish|
DT- Article|
DE- Webometrics; co-link analysis; information visualisation; maps of
science; multidimensional scaling; search engines|
ID- AUTHOR COCITATION ANALYSIS; SIMILARITY; SPACE|
AB- This work provides a theoretical and practical walk-through of Colink Analysis, one of the classic techniques for information
visualisation that serves as a tool for constructing Maps of Science in
Webometrics An analysis is offered of the steps to be followed, the most
suitable data resources, the different kinds of matrices, and how these
have to be processed. The results permit distinguishing between the
different steps taken and the differences in processing these matrices.
The study finds that asymmetrical matrices provide more information than
symmetrical ones, that there is greater discrimination with the cosine
than with the correlation, and that crawlers obtain more accurate
information than search engines|
C1- Cindoc CSIC, Grp Invest Cibermetria, Madrid 28002, Spain|
RP- Ortega, JL, Cindoc CSIC, Grp Invest Cibermetria, Joaquin Costa,22,
Madrid 28002, Spain|
EM- jortega@cindoc.csic.es isidro@cindoc.csic.es|
CD- AGUILLO I, 2005, 9 JORN ESP DOC; AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; ANEGON FM, 2005, V41, P1520, INFORM PROCESSING MA; ARROYO N,
2004, METHODS HERRAMIENTAS; BARILAN J, 1998, V1, CYBERMETRICS; BARILAN J,
2005, V9, P1, CYBERMETRICS; BENSMAN SJ, 2004, V55, P935, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; BOUDOURIDES M, 2000, TRIPL HEL C; CHAKRABARTI S, 2002, MINING WEB
KNOWLEDGE; COTHEY V, 2004, V55, P1228, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; FABAPEREZ C,
2004, FUNDAMENTOS TECNICAS; GAIRIN JMR, 1997, V20, P175, REV ESP DOC
CIENT; HERREROSOLANA V, 2004, V33, CIENCIA INFORM; JACCARD P, 1912, V11,
P37, NEW PHYTOL; JIMENEZ AC, 1993, V2, B DIGITAL FH; KRUSKAL JB, 1964,
V29, P1, PSYCHOMETRIKA; LARSON R, 1996, P71, P 59 ANN M AM SOC IN; LARSON
RRR, 2005, TERM WEIGHTING RANKI; LEYDESDORFF L, 2005, V56, P769, J AM SOC
INF SCI TEC; LEYDESDORFF L, 2006, IN PRESS J AM SOC IN; MCCAIN KW, 1990,
V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; ORTEGA JL, 2006, J INFORM SCI; PRIEGO
JLO, 2005, P 10 INT C INT SOC; PRIEGO JLO, 2006, IN PRESS J AM SOC IN;
PRIME C, 2002, V54, P291, SCIENTOMETRICS; RORVIG M, 1999, V50, P639, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; ROUSSEAU R, 1997, V1, P1, CYBERMETRICS; ROUSSEAU R, 1998,
P2, CYBERMETRICS; SALTON G, 1971, AUTOMATIC DOCUMENT P; SALTON G, 1975,
V18, P613, COMMUN ACM; SMALL H, 1974, V4, P17, SCI STUD; SMALL H, 2003,
V54, P394, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; SMALL HG, 1978, V8, P327, SOC STUD SCI;
SNEATH P, 1973, NUMERICAL TAXONOMY; SPARCKJONES K, 1972, V28, P111, J
DOC; THELWALL M, 2001, P1, CYBERMETRICS|
NR- 36|
TC- 2|
PU- EPI|
PI- BARCELONA|
PA- APARTADO 32 280, BARCELONA, 08080, SPAIN|
SN- 1386-6710|
J9- PROF INF|
JI- Prof. Inform|
PD- JUL-AUG|
PY- 2006|
VL- 15|
IS- 4|
BP- 270|
EP- 277|
PG- 8|
SC- Information Science & Library Science|
GA- 072TR|
JN- PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2006, V15, N4, P270-277|
UT- ISI:000239696400004 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Grimes GR; Wen TQ; Mewissen M; Baxter RM; Moodie S; Beattie JS;
Ghazal P|
AF- Grimes G. R; Wen, T. Q; Mewissen, M; Baxter, R. M; Moodie, S;
Beattie, J. S; Ghazal, P|
TI- PDQ Wizard: automated prioritization and characterization of gene and
protein lists using biomedical literature|
SO- BIOINFORMATICS|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- INFORMATION|
AB- PDQ Wizard automates the process of interrogating biomedical
references using large lists of genes, proteins or free text. Using the
principle of linkage through co-citation biologists can mine PubMed with
these proteins or genes to identify relationships within a biological
field of interest. In addition, PDQ Wizard provides novel features to
define more specific relationships, highlight key publications describing
those activities and relationships, and enhance protein queries. PDQ
Wizard also outputs a metric that can be used for prioritization of genes
and proteins for further research|
C1- Univ Edinburgh, Scottish Ctr Genomic Technol & Informat, Edinburgh
EH16 4SB, Midlothian, Scotland; Natl E Sci Ctr, eDIKT Programme,
Edinburgh EH8 9AA, Midlothian, Scotland; Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh
Parallel Comp Ctr, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, Midlothian, Scotland|
RP- Grimes, GR, Univ Edinburgh, Scottish Ctr Genomic Technol & Informat,
49 Little France Crecent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, Midlothian, Scotland|
EM- Graeme.Grimes@ed.ac.uk|
CD- BAIROCH A, 2005, V33, P154, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES; KOROTKIY M, 2004, V20,
P1980, BIOINFORMATICS; MAGLOTT D, 2005, V33, D54, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES;
MARCOTTE E, 2001, V2, P363, BRIEF BIOINFORM; PEARSON H, 2001, V411, P631,
NATURE; RUBINSTEIN R, 2005, V6, ARTN 12, BMC BIOINFORMATICS; WHEELER DL,
2005, V33, D39, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES|
NR- 7|
TC- 7|
PU- OXFORD UNIV PRESS|
PI- OXFORD|
PA- GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND|
SN- 1367-4803|
J9- BIOINFORMATICS|
JI- Bioinformatics|
PD- AUG 15|
PY- 2006|
VL- 22|
IS- 16|
BP- 2055|
EP- 2057|
DI- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl342|
PG- 3|
SC- Biochemical Research Methods; Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology;
Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Mathematical &
Computational Biology; Statistics & Probability|
GA- 075QL|
JN- BIOINFORMATICS, 2006, V22, N16, P2055-2057|
UT- ISI:000239900200021 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Kim H; Park HW; Thelwall M|
AF- Kim Hyo; Park, Han Woo; Thelwall, Mike|
TI- Comparing academic hyperlink structures with journal publishing in
Korea - A social network analysis|
SO- SCIENCE COMMUNICATION|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- webometrics; cybermetrics; Web indicators; social network analysis;
Korea|
ID- WEB IMPACT FACTORS; SCIENCE; COMMUNICATION; COLLABORATION;
UNIVERSITIES; ORGANIZATION; INFORMATION; INDICATORS; COCITATION;
PATTERNS|
AB- This article describes the structure of academic hyperlinks embedded
in universities' Web sites hosted in Korea and examines the relationship
between the structure of this hyperlink network and the journal
publishing of universities. Studying the two phenomena together helps in
understanding the changing process of communication created and sustained
through traditional and emerging communication media. Four groups with
distinctive features were identified. One group (A) was composed of
members who had the highest efficiency in terms of the structural whole
concept, and they had received the highest number of hyperlinks with
other universities. The first group (A) showed high numbers of out-links
toward two other groups (C and D). However, one group (C) had a
relatively significant number of links to other members in the same group
(within-group links), while the other group (D) did not. Analysis
confirmed that hyperlink creation and reception correlate with
authorship, indicating that expanding one's research identity via
hyperlinks might be an indicator of the productiveness of researchers and
research institutes|
C1- Yeungnam Univ, Dept Media, Gyongsan, South Korea; Ajou Univ, Suwon
443749, South Korea; Wolverhampton Univ, Stat Cybermetr Res Grp, Sch Comp
& Informat Technol, Wolverhampton, W Midlands, England|
RP- Park, HW, Yeungnam Univ, Dept Media, Gyongsan, South Korea|
EM- hanpark@ynu.ac.kr|
CD- *INT EL UN, 2004, DIG ACC IND; *KOR NETW INF CTR, 2004, SURV COMP INT
SAG; *NERD, 2002, KNOWL PROD NEW DIG N; ARUNACHALAM S, 2000, V79, P621,
CURR SCI INDIA; BARILAN J, 2004, V59, P391, SCIENTOMETRICS; BARNETT RE,
1993, V2, P1, RIGHTS RETAINED PEOP; BJORNSSON H, 2001, V50, P1, JOKULL;
BORGATTI SP, 2002, UCINET WINDOWS; BORGMAN CL, 2001, V36, ACAD
COMMUNICATION B; BRIN S, 1998, V30, P1, COMPUTER NETWORKS IS; CAWKELL T,
2000, P177, WEB KNOWLEDGE FESTSC; CRONIN B, 2001, V27, P1, J INFORM SCI;
FINHOLT T, 1990, V1, P41, ORGAN SCI; FINHOLT TA, 2002, V36, P73, ANNU REV
INFORM SCI; FREEMAN LC, 1979, V1, P215, SOC NETWORKS; GARFIELD E, 1964,
V144, P649, SCIENCE; GARFIELD E, 1974, V2, P136, ESSAYS INFORM SCI;
GIDDENS A, 1979, CENTRAL PROBLEMS SOC; GIDDENS A, 1979, CONTRAL PROBLEMS
SOC; GIDDENS A, 1986, CONSTITUTION SOC OUT; GLANZEL W, 1995, V4, P24, SCI
SCI SCI; GLANZEL W, 2001, V50, P199, SCIENTOMETRICS; HARRIES G, 2004,
V30, P436, J INFORM SCI; HAYTHORNTHWAITE C, 1998, V49, P1101, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; HEIMERIKS G, 2003, V58, P391, SCIENTOMETRICS; INGWERSEN P,
1998, V54, P236, J DOC; KOKU E, 2001, V44, P1750, AM BEHAV SCI; KRAUT RE,
1990, P149, INTELLECTUAL TEAMWOR; LEYDESDORFF L, 1989, V18, P209, RES
POLICY; LEYDESDORFF L, 2000, V4, CYBERMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2005, V27,
P64, SCI COMMUN; MARSHAKOVA IV, 1973, V2, P3, NAUCHNO TEKHNICHESKA;
MARSHAKOVA IV, 1973, V2, P3, NAUCHNO TEKHNICHESKA; MERTON RK, 1973,
SOCIOLOGY SCI THEORE; NENTWICH M, 2003, CYBERSCIENCE RES AGE; NEWMAN MEJ,
2000, STRUCTURE SCI COLLAB; NEWMAN MEJ, 2000, STRUCTURE SCI COLLOB; PARK
HW, IN PRESS NEW MEDIA S, V8; PARK HW, 1974, V2, P136, ESSAYS INFORM SCI;
PARK HW, 2002, V7, FIRST MONDAY; PARK HW, 2003, ANN C INT COMM ASS M;
PARK HW, 2003, V8, J COMPUTER MEDIATED; PARK HW, 2005, V65, P3,
SCIENTOMETRICS; PERRY CA, 1998, V49, P151, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SCOTT J,
1991, V17, P181, ANNU REV SOCIOL; SCOTT J, 1991, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL;
SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1999, V50, P799,
J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMITH A, 2002, V54, P363, SCIENTOMETRICS; THELWALL
M, 2002, V28, P485, J INF SCI; THELWALL M, 2002, V26, P413, ONLINE INFORM
REV; THELWALL M, 2003, V8, INFORM RES; THELWALL M, 2003, V56, P417,
SCIENTOMETRICS; THELWALL M, 2003, V58, P153, SCIENTOMETRICS; THELWALL M,
2004, V55, P149, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; THELWALL M, 2004, LINK ANAL INFORM
SCI; VAUGHAN L, 2005, V41, P347, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; WALSH JP, 2002,
P433, DISTRIBUTED WORK; WALSH JP, 2003, PROBLEMS SCI COLLABO; WASSERMAN
S, 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL; WHITE HC, 1976, V81, P730, AM J SOCIOL;
WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WILKINSON D, 2003, V29,
P59, J INFORMATION SCI|
NR- 63|
TC- 3|
PU- SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC|
PI- THOUSAND OAKS|
PA- 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA|
SN- 1075-5470|
J9- SCI COMMUN|
JI- Sci. Commun|
PD- JUN|
PY- 2006|
VL- 27|
IS- 4|
BP- 540|
EP- 564|
DI- 10.1177/1075547006288037|
PG- 25|
SC- Communication|
GA- 070YM|
JN- SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2006, V27, N4, P540-564|
UT- ISI:000239563000004 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Leydesdorff L; Bensman S|
AF- Leydesdorff Loet; Bensman, Stephen|
TI- Classification and powerlaws: The logarithmic transformation|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- INFORMATION-SCIENCE; BRADFORD LAW; QUANTITATIVE ASPECTS; INTELLECTUAL
SPACE; AUTHOR COCITATION; CO-WORDS; INDICATORS; FREQUENCY; COLLABORATION;
DISTRIBUTIONS|
AB- Logarithmic transformation of the data has been recommended by the
literature in the case of highly skewed distributions such as those
commonly found in information science. The purpose of the transformation
is to make the data conform to the lognormal law of error for inferential
purposes. How does this transformation affect the analysis? We factor
analyze and visualize the citation environment of the Journal of the
American Chemical Society (JACS) before and after a logarithmic
transformation. The transformation strongly reduces the variance
necessary for classificatory purposes and therefore is counterproductive
to the purposes of the descriptive statistics. We recommend against the
logarithmic transformation when sets cannot be defined unambiguously. The
intellectual organization of the sciences is reflected in the curvilinear
parts of the citation distributions while negative powerlaws fit
excellently to the tails of the distributions|
C1- Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res, NL-1012 CX Amsterdam,
Netherlands; Louisiana State Univ Lib, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA|
RP- Leydesdorff, L, Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res,
Kloveniersburgwal 48, NL-1012 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands|
EM- loet@leydesdorff.net notsjb@lsu.edu|
CD- AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; AITCHISON J, 1957,
LOGNORMAL DISTRIBUTI; ANSCOMBE FJ, 1948, V35, P246, BIOMETRIKA; BARABASI
AL, 2002, LINKED NEW SCI NETWO; BARABASI AL, 2002, V311, P590, PHYSICA A;
BARTLETT MS, 1947, V3, P39, BIOMETRICS; BENFORD F, 1938, V78, P551, P AM
PHILOS SOC; BENSMAN SJ, 1996, V40, P145, LIBR RESOUR TECH SER; BENSMAN
SJ, 1998, V42, P147, LIBR RESOUR TECH SER; BENSMAN SJ, 2000, V51, P816, J
AM SOC INFORM SCI; BENSMAN SJ, 2001, V27, P238, IFLA J; BOX GEP, 1964,
V26, P211, J R STAT SOC B; BRADFORD SC, 1934, V137, P85, ENGINEERINGLONDON; BRAY JH, 1985, MULTIVARIATE ANAL VA; BROOKES BC, 1977, V33, P180,
J DOC; BROOKES BC, 1979, V29, P5, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BROOKES BC, 1979,
V30, P233, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BROOKES BC, 1980, V2, P209, J INF SCI;
BROOKES BC, 1980, V2, P269, J INFORM SCI; BROOKES BC, 1984, V20, P37,
INFORM PROCESS MANAG; CANCHO FR, 2001, V8, P165, J QUANTITATIVE LINGU;
CHAN LM, 1999, GUID LIN C CLASS; DROTT MC, 1978, V29, P238, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; EGGHE L, 2003, V13, P478, PROG NAT SCI; ELLIOTT JM, 1977,
V25, FRESHWATER BIOL ASS; ENGELSMAN EC, 1991, MAPPING TECHNOLOGY 1;
EVERITT BS, 1998, CAMBRIDGE DICT STAT; FELLER W, 1943, V14, P389, ANN
MATH STAT; GARFIELD E, 1971, V17, P5, CURR CONTENTS; GARFIELD E, 1972,
V178, P471, SCIENCE; GARFIELD E, 1983, CITATION INDEXING IT; HOYLE MH,
1973, V41, P203, INT STAT REV; JONES WP, 1987, V38, P420, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; JORESKOG KG, 1975, V70, P631, J AM STAT ASSOC; KAMADA T, 1989, V31,
P7, INFORM PROCESS LETT; KATZ JS, 1999, V28, P501, RES POLICY; KATZ JS,
2000, V27, P23, SCI PUBL POLICY; KEYNES JM, 1921, TREATISE PROBABILITY;
KIM JO, 1978, FACTOR ANAL STAT MET; LEYDESDORFF L, IN PRESS J AM SOC IN;
LEYDESDORFF L, 1885, V57, P601, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; LEYDESDORFF L, 1987,
V11, P291, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 1989, V18, P209, RES POLICY;
LEYDESDORFF L, 1993, V26, P133, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 1995,
CHALLENGE SCIENTOMET; LEYDESDORFF L, 1997, V48, P418, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; LEYDESDORFF L, 2002, V53, P131, SCIENTOMETRICS; LOTKA AJ, 1926, V16,
P317, J WASHINGTON ACADEMY; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; MERTON RK, 1968, V159, P56, SCIENCE; MICHELET B, 1988, THESIS U
PARIS 7; PENNOCK DM, 2002, V99, P5207, P NATL ACAD SCI USA; PRICE DD,
1978, V29, P204, J ASIS; PRICE DJD, 1976, V27, P292, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
PRICE L, 2005, V56, P883, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; QUENOUILLE MH, 1950,
INTRO STAT; SALTON G, 1983, INTRO MODERN INFORM; SIMON HA, 1973, P1,
HIERARCHY THEORY CHA; VANRIJSBERGEN CJ, 1977, V33, P106, J DOC; VAUGHAN
L, 2005, P534, P ISSI 2005 10 INT C; WAGNER CS, 2005, V34, P1608, RES
POLICY; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1982,
V38, P255, J DOC; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P1250, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; WHITE
HD, 2004, V55, P843, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ZADEH LA, 1965, V8, P338,
INFORM CONTR; ZIPF GK, 1935, PSYCH BIOL LANGUAGE; ZIPF GK, 1949, HUMAN
BEHAV PRINCIPL; ZITT M, 2000, V47, P627, SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 69|
TC- 17|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- SEP|
PY- 2006|
VL- 57|
IS- 11|
BP- 1470|
EP- 1486|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20467|
PG- 17|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 072KK|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2006, V57, N11, P1470-1486|
UT- ISI:000239672100007 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Zuccala A|
AF- Zuccala Alesia|
TI- Author cocitation analysis is to intellectual structure as web colink
analysis is to ... ?|
SO- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
ID- SITES; LINKS; INFORMATION; SIMILARITY; SCIENCE; WEBOMETRICS;
CITATION; SPACE|
AB- Author Cocitation Analysis (ACA) and Web Colink Analysis (WCA) are
examined as sister techniques in the related fields of bibliometrics and
webometrics. Comparisons are made between the two techniques based on
their data retrieval, mapping, and interpretation procedures, using
mathematics as the subject in focus. An ACA is carried out and
interpreted for a group of participants (authors) involved in an Isaac
Newton Institute (2000) workshop-Singularity Theory and Its Applications
to Wave Propagation Theory and Dynamical Systems-and compared/contrasted
with a WCA for a list of international mathematics research institute
home pages on the Web. Although the practice of ACA may be used to inform
a WCA, the two techniques do not share many elements in common. The most
important departure between ACA and WCA exists at the interpretive stage
when ACA maps become meaningful in light of citation theory, and WCA maps
require interpretation based on hyperlink theory. Much of the research
concerning link theory and motivations for linking is still new;
therefore further studies based on colinking are needed, mainly map-based
studies, to understand what makes a Web colink structure meaningful|
C1- Wolverhampton Univ, Sch Comp & Informat Technol, Wolverhampton WV1
1EQ, England|
RP- Zuccala, A, Wolverhampton Univ, Sch Comp & Informat Technol, Wulfruna
St, Wolverhampton WV1 1EQ, England|
EM- a.zuccala@wlv.ac.uk|
CD- AHLGREN P, 2003, V54, P550, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; ALMIND TC, 1997,
V53, P404, J DOC; BARILAN J, 1999, SEARCH ENGINE RESULT; BARILAN J, 2005,
V41, P973, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; BJORNEBORN L, 2001, V50, P65,
SCIENTOMETRICS; BJORNEBORN L, 2004, THESIS ROYAL SCH LIB; CHU H, 2003, 9
INT C SCI INF; CRONIN B, 1984, CITATION PROCESS; CRONIN B, 1994, V45,
P537, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; EDGE D, 1977, V2, P13, SOC SOCIAL STUDIES S;
GARFIELD E, 1965, P189, STAT ASS METHODS MEC; HARRIES G, 2004, V30, P436,
J INFORM SCI; HARTER SP, 1986, ONLINE INFORM RETRIE; KIM HJ, 2000, V51,
P887, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; LARSON R, 1996, P71, P 59 ANN M AM SOC IN;
LEYDESDORFF L, 1998, V43, P5, SCIENTOMETRICS; LEYDESDORFF L, 2005, V56,
P769, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MCCAIN KW, 1990, V41, P433, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; ORTEGAPRIEGO JL, 2005, P197, P 10 INT C INT SOC S; PERRY CA, 1998,
V49, P151, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; PERSSON O, 2001, V50, P339,
SCIENTOMETRICS; POLANCO X, 2001, CLUSTERING MAPPING W; ROUSSEAU R, 1997,
SITATIONS EXPLORATOR; ROUSSEAU R, 1999, DAILY TIME SERIES CO; ROUSSEAU R,
2004, V55, P513, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; SANDSTROM PE, 1998, THESIS INDIANA
U BLO; SMALL H, 1993, V26, P5, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMITH A, 2004, WEB LINKS
ANALOGUES; SNYDER H, 1999, V55, P375, J DOC; THELWALL M, 2001, V52,
P1157, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; THELWALL M, 2002, V28, P483, J INFORM SCI;
THELWALL M, 2002, V55, P363, SCIENTOMETRICS; THELWALL M, 2003, 151 INF
RES; THELWALL M, 2004, V40, P515, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; THELWALL M, 2004,
LINK ANAL INFORM SCI; VAUGHAN L, 2003, V54, P29, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC;
VAUGHAN L, 2005, P534, P ISSI 2005 10 INT C; WHITE HD, 1981, P261,
CONCEPTS JUDGEMENT D; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
WHITE HD, 1982, V38, P255, J DOC; WHITE HD, 1986, V5, P93, INFORM TECHNOL
LIBR; WHITE HD, 1990, P84, SCHOLARLY COMMUNICAT; WHITE HD, 1998, V49,
P327, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P1250, J AM SOC INF SCI
TEC; ZUCCALA A, 2004, THESIS U TORONTO TOR|
NR- 45|
TC- 13|
PU- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC|
PI- HOBOKEN|
PA- 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 USA|
SN- 1532-2882|
J9- J AM SOC INF SCI TECHNOL|
JI- J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol|
PD- SEP|
PY- 2006|
VL- 57|
IS- 11|
BP- 1487|
EP- 1502|
DI- 10.1002/asi.20468|
PG- 16|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 072KK|
JN- JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, 2006, V57, N11, P1487-1502|
UT- ISI:000239672100008 ER ||
PTAUAFTIand
SOLADTCTCY-
J|
Van Den Besselaar P; Heimeriks G|
Van Den Besselaar Peter; Heimeriks, Gaston|
Mapping research topics using word-reference co-occurrences: A method
an exploratory case study|
SCIENTOMETRICS|
English|
Proceedings Paper|
10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics|
JUL, 2005|
CL- Stockholm, SWEDEN|
SP- Int Soc Scientometr & Informetr|
HO- Karolinska Inst|
ID- COMBINED COCITATION; SCIENCE|
AB- Mapping of science and technology can be done at different levels of
aggregation, using a variety of methods. In this paper, we propose a
method in which title words are used as indicators for the content of a
research topic, and cited references are used as the context in which
words get their meaning. Research topics are represented by sets of
papers that are similar in terms of these word-reference combinations In
this way we use words without neglecting differences and changes in their
meanings. The method has several advantages, such as high coverage of
publications. As an illustration we apply the method to produce knowledge
maps of information science|
C1- Rathenau Inst, Sci Syst Assessment Ctr, NL-2509 CJ The Hague,
Netherlands; Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res, Amsterdam,
Netherlands; IPTS, Seville, Spain|
RP- Van Den Besselaar, P, Rathenau Inst, Sci Syst Assessment Ctr, POB
95366, NL-2509 CJ The Hague, Netherlands|
EM- p.vandenbesselaar@rathenau.nl|
CD- BHATTACHARYA S, 1998, V43, P359, SCIENTOMETRICS; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42,
P233, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P252, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; CALLON M, 1986, MAPPING DYNAMICS SCI; CEHN C, 2003, MAPPING SCI
FRONTIER; COURTIAL JP, 1994, V31, P251, SCIENTOMETRICS; COZZENS SE, 1993,
P219, SCI TECHNOLOGY POLIC; HEIMERIKS G, UNPUB STRUCTURE DEV; HEIMERIKS
G, 2005, THESIS U AMSTERDAM; HEIMERKS G, 2005, P575, P ISSI 2005 STOCKH
K; KESSLER MM, 1963, V14, P10, AM DOC; KING J, 1987, V13, P261, J INFORM
SCI; KOPCSA A, 2000, V49, P7, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; LEYDESDORFF L, 1997,
V48, P418, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; MARSHAKOVA IV, 1973, V6, P3, SCI
TECHNICAL INFORM|
NR- 15|
TC- 11|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- DEC|
PY- 2006|
VL- 68|
IS- 3|
BP- 377|
EP- 393|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-006-0118-9|
PG- 17|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 067KK|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, V68, N3, P377-393|
UT- ISI:000239300600005 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Persson O|
AF- Persson Olle|
TI- Exploring the analytical potential of comparing citing and cited
source items|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Proceedings Paper|
CT- 10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics|
CY- JUL, 2005|
CL- Stockholm, SWEDEN|
SP- Int Soc Scientometr & Informetr|
HO- Karolinska Inst|
ID- COLLABORATION; INDICATORS; CITATIONS; NETWORKS|
AB- Comparing properties of citing and cited source items opens a wide
variety of analytical possibilities. In a study of citations among papers
in the journal Scientometrics a number of analytical themes are
identified. The analysis shows: the way in which a citation graph can be
decomposed into different subparts; country specific citation patterns;
the effects of self-citations and domestic citations; the mapping of
cited author relationships using direct citation and co-citation links;
and time slicing effects on impact ranking of countries and papers|
C1- Umea Univ, Dept Sociol, Inforsk, SE-90187 Umea, Sweden|
RP- Persson, O, Umea Univ, Dept Sociol, Inforsk, SE-90187 Umea, Sweden|
EM- olle.persson@soc.umu.se|
CD- CHEN CM, 2004, V101, P5303, P NATL ACAD SCI U S1; GARG KC, 2003, V56,
P169, SCIENTOMETRICS; GLANZEL W, 2004, V59, P63, SCIENTOMETRICS; HARGENS
LL, 2000, V65, P846, AM SOCIOL REV; LUUKKONEN T, 1993, V28, P15,
SCIENTOMETRICS; PERSSON O, 2001, V50, P339, SCIENTOMETRICS; PRICE DJD,
1965, V149, P510, SCIENCE; SCHUBERT A, 1986, V9, P281, SCIENTOMETRICS;
SCHUBERT A, 1989, V16, P3, SCIENTOMETRICS; SCHUBERT A, 1990, V19, P3,
SCIENTOMETRICS|
NR- 10|
TC- 0|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- DEC|
PY- 2006|
VL- 68|
IS- 3|
BP- 561|
EP- 572|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-006-0130-0|
PG- 12|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 067KK|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, V68, N3, P561-572|
UT- ISI:000239300600016 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Schneider JW|
AF- Schneider Jesper W|
TI- Concept symbols revisited: Naming clusters by parsing and filtering
of noun phrases from citation contexts of concept symbols|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Proceedings Paper|
CT- 10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics|
CY- JUL, 2005|
CL- Stockholm, SWEDEN|
SP- Int Soc Scientometr & Informetr|
HO- Karolinska Inst|
ID- COMPUTER RECOGNITION; CITING STATEMENTS; WORD ANALYSIS; KNOWLEDGE;
BIBLIOMETRICS; COCITATION; RETRIEVAL|
AB- The present study presents a semi-automatic method for parsing and
filtering of noun phrases from citation contexts of concept symbols The
purpose of the method is to extract contextual, agreed upon, and
pertinent noun phrases, to be used in visualization studies for naming
clusters (concept groups) or concept symbols. The method is applied in a
case study, which forms part of a larger dissertation work concerning the
applicability of bibliometric methods for thesaurus construction The case
study is carried out within periodontology, a specialty area of
dentistry. The result of the case study indicates that the method is able
to identify highly important noun phrases, and that these phrases
accurately describe their parent clusters. Hence, the method is able to
reduce the labour intensive work of manual citation context analysis,
though further refinements are still needed|
C1- Royal Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Dept Informat Studies, DK-9000 Aalborg,
Denmark|
RP- Schneider, JW, Royal Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Dept Informat Studies,
Sohngardsholmvej 2, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark|
EM- jws@db.dk|
CD- ANICK P, 1997, P314, P 20 ANN INT ACM SIG; BATAGELJ V, 1998, V21,
P47, CONNECTIONS; BORNER K, 2003, V37, P179, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; BRAAM
RR, 1991, V42, P233, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; GARFIELD E, 1974, P5, CURR
CONTENTS; HE Q, 1999, V48, P133, LIBR TRENDS; INGWERSEN P, 1997, V48,
P205, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; JONES KS, 1971, AUTOMATIC KEYWORD CL; MCCAIN
KW, 1989, V17, P127, SCIENTOMETRICS; MORAVCSIK MJ, 1975, V5, P86, SOC
STUD SCI; NOYONS ECM, 1999, BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING; OCHIAI A, 1957, V22,
P526, B JAPAN SOC SCIENT F; OCONNOR J, 1982, V18, P125, INFORMATION
PROCESSI; OCONNOR J, 1983, V19, P361, INFORMATION PROCESSI; REESPOTTER
LK, 1989, V25, P677, INFORMATION PROCESSI; SCHNEIDER JW, 2004, V60, P524,
J DOC; SCHNEIDER JW, 2004, THESIS ROYAL SCH LOB; SCHVANEVELDT RW, 1990,
PATHFINDER ASSOCIAT; SMALL H, 1980, V2, P277, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H,
1982, V3, P287, PROGR COMMUNICATION; SMALL H, 1986, V37, P97, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; SMALL HG, 1978, V8, P327, SOC STUD SCI; SMALL HG, 1979, V16,
P270, P AM SOC INFORM SCI; SOERGEL D, 1974, INDEXING LANGUAGES T;
VOUTILAINEN A, 1993, P48, P WORKSH VER LARG CO; WHITE HD, 1989, V24,
P119, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; WHITE HD, 1997, V32, P99, ANNU REV INFORM SCI;
WILSON CS, 1999, V34, P107, ANNU REV INFORM SCI|
NR- 28|
TC- 7|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- DEC|
PY- 2006|
VL- 68|
IS- 3|
BP- 573|
EP- 593|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-006-0131-z|
PG- 21|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 067KK|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, V68, N3, P573-593|
UT- ISI:000239300600017 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Small H|
AF- Small Henry|
TI- Tracking and predicting growth areas in science|
SO- SCIENTOMETRICS|
LA- English|
DT- Proceedings Paper|
CT- 10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics|
CY- JUL, 2005|
CL- Stockholm, SWEDEN|
SP- Int Soc Scientometr & Informetr|
HO- Karolinska Inst|
ID- SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY; MATHEMATICAL APPROACH; CITATION-INDEX;
LITERATURES; COCITATION|
AB- We explore the possibility of using co-citation clusters over three
time periods to track the emergence and growth of research areas, and
predict their near term change. Data sets are from three overlapping sixyear periods: 1996-2001, 1997-2002 and 1998-2003. The methodologies of
co-citation clustering, mapping, and string formation are reviewed, and a
measure of cluster currency is defined as the average age of highly cited
papers relative to the year span of the data set. An association is found
between the currency variable in a prior period and the percentage change
in cluster size and citation frequency in the following period. The
conflating factor of "single-issue clusters" is discussed and dealt with
using a new metric called in-group citation|
C1- Thomson Sci, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA|
RP- Small, H, Thomson Sci, 3501 Market, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA|
EM- henry.small@thomson.com|
CD- CALLON M, 1983, V22, P191, SOC SCI INFORM; CRANE D, 1972, INVISIBLE
COLL DIFFU; FRUCHTERMAN TMJ, 1991, V21, P1129, SOFTWARE PRACT EXPER;
GARFIELD E, 1972, V178, P471, SCIENCE; GARFIELD E, 2004, V30, P119, J
INFORM SCI; GOFFMAN W, 1971, V229, P103, NATURE; GRIFFITH BC, 1972, V177,
P959, SCIENCE; GRIFFITH BC, 1974, V4, P339, SCI STUD; LEYDESDORFF L,
2004, V60, P159, SCIENTOMETRICS; MEADOWS AJ, 1971, V1, P95, SCI STUD;
MERTON RK, 1963, V4, P237, EUR J SOCIOL; PRICE DJ, 1961, SCI BABYLON;
PRICE DJ, 1970, COMMUNICATION SCI EN; SMALL H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; SMALL H, 1985, V7, P391, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL H, 1990, P166,
SCHOLARLY COMMUNICAT; SMALL H, 2004, V60, P71, SCIENTOMETRICS; SMALL HG,
1977, V7, P139, SOC STUD SCI; SWANSON DR, 1997, V91, P183, ARTIF INTELL;
TABAH AN, 1992, V28, P61, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; WAGNERDOBLER R, 1999,
V46, P635, SCIENTOMETRICS; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI|
NR- 22|
TC- 27|
PU- SPRINGER|
PI- DORDRECHT|
PA- VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS|
SN- 0138-9130|
J9- SCIENTOMETRICS|
JI- Scientometrics|
PD- DEC|
PY- 2006|
VL- 68|
IS- 3|
BP- 595|
EP- 610|
DI- 10.1007/s11192-006-0132-y|
PG- 16|
SC- Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Information Science
& Library Science|
GA- 067KK|
JN- SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, V68, N3, P595-610|
UT- ISI:000239300600018 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Thelwall M; Thelwall S; Fairclough R|
AF- Thelwall Mike; Thelwall, Saheeda; Fairclough, Ruth|
TI- Automated Web issue analysis: A nurse prescribing case study|
SO- INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- Web; Automated Web issue analysis; link analysis; nurse prescribing;
medical informatics|
ID- WORLD-WIDE-WEB; SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION; INFORMATICS EDUCATION; TOPIC
IDENTIFICATION; HEALTH INFORMATION; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; SITE INTERLINKING;
QUALITY; COCITATION; WEBSITES|
AB- Web issue analysis, a new automated technique designed to rapidly
give timely management intelligence about a topic from an automated
large-scale analysis of relevant pages from the Web, is introduced and
demonstrated. The technique includes hyperlink and URL analysis to
identify common direct and indirect sources of Web information. In
addition, text analysis through natural language processing techniques is
used identify relevant common nouns and noun phrases. A case study
approach is taken, applying Web issue analysis to the topic of nurse
prescribing. The results are presented in descriptive form and a
qualitative analysis is used to argue that new information has been
found. The nurse prescribing results demonstrate interesting new
findings, such as the parochial nature of the topic in the UK, an
apparent absence of similar concepts internationally, at least in the
English-speaking world, and a significant concern with mental health
issues. These demonstrate that automated Web issue analysis is capable of
quickly delivering new insights into a problem. General limitations are
that the success of Web issue analysis is dependant upon the particular
topic chosen and the ability to find a phrase that accurately captures
the topic and is not used in other contexts, as well as being languagespecific. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved|
C1- Wolverhampton Univ, Sch Comp & Informat Technol, Wolverhampton WV1
1SB, W Midlands, England; Wolverhampton Univ, Sch Hlth, Wolverhampton WV1
1SB, W Midlands, England|
RP- Thelwall, M, Wolverhampton Univ, Sch Comp & Informat Technol,
Wulfruna St, Wolverhampton WV1 1SB, W Midlands, England|
EM- m.thelwall@wlv.ac.uk s.thelwall@wlv.ac.uk r.fairclough@wlv.ac.uk|
CD- BARILAN J, 2004, WEB DYNAMICS; BERNSTAM EV, 2005, V74, P13, INT J MED
INFORM; BJORNEBORN L, 2004, V55, P1216, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; BORGMAN CL,
2002, V36, P3, ANNU REV INFORM SCI; BURD A, 2004, V29, P185, MED INFORM
INTERNET; CAMM J, 2005, V78, P124, COMMUNITY PRACTITION; CHAKRABARTI S,
1999, 8 INT WORLD WID WEB; CHAKRABARTI S, 2002, STRUCTURE BROAD TOPI;
CHAKRABARTI S, 2003, MINING WEB ANAL HYPE; CLIFTON C, 2004, V16, P949,
IEEE T KNOWL DATA EN; COBURN A, 2005, LINGUA TAGGER PARTS; CURRO V, 2004,
V29, P95, MED INFORM INTERNET; DORUP J, 2002, V27, P281, MED INFORM
INTERNET; FLAKE GW, 2000, 6 INT C KNOWL DISC D; FOOT KA, 2003, V8, J
COMPUTER MEDIATED; GARRIDO M, 2003, P165, CYBERACTIVISM ONLINE; GOURNAY
K, 2002, V17, P22, NURSING STANDARD; HALES A, 2002, V8, P12, NURSING NZ;
HARRIES G, 2004, V30, P436, J INFORM SCI; HERNANDEZBORGES AA, 2003, V28,
P183, MED INFORM INTERNET; HOVENGA EJS, 2004, V73, P101, INT J MED
INFORM; HUGHES F, 2004, V2, P131, NURSE PRESCRIBING; KOSALA R, 2000, V2,
P1, SIGKDD EXPLORATIONS; LANCASTER FW, 1985, V36, P389, J AM SOC INFORM
SCI; LATTER S, 2004, V13, P26, J CLIN NURS; LAWRENCE S, 1999, V400, P107,
NATURE; LEYDESDORFF L, 1989, V18, P209, RES POLICY; MERTON RK, 1973,
SOCIOLOGY SCI THEORE; METTROP W, 2001, V57, P623, J DOC; MILESBOARD T,
2002, P76, P ACM HYP 2002; MITKOV R, 2003, OXFORD HDB COMPUTATI; MULLAY
S, 2003, V1, P104, NURSE PRESCRIBING; MURPHY J, 2004, V73, P205, INT J
MED INFORM; NOLAN P, 2004, V1, NURSE PRESCRIBER; OZMUTLU S, 2005, V29,
P34, ONLINE INFORM REV; PARK HW, 2003, V25, P49, CONNECTIONS; PHILLIPS
BJ, 2005, V30, P14, NURSE PRACTITIONER; PLONCZYNSKI D, 2003, V1, P170,
NURSE PRESCRIBING; ROSSETER R, 2000, NURSE PRACTITIONERS; ROUSSEAU R,
1999, V2, CYBERMETRICS; RU YB, 2005, V29, P249, ONLINE INFORM REV; SMALL
H, 1973, V24, P265, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; SMITH A, 2004, V2, P127, NURSE
PRESCRIBING; SMITH AG, 1999, V55, P577, J DOC; STUART D, 2005, ISSI 2005;
TANG R, 2003, V25, P437, LIBR INFORM SCI RES; THELWALL M, IN PRESS J AM
SOC IN; THELWALL M, 2002, V53, P995, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; THELWALL M,
2003, V56, P417, SCIENTOMETRICS; THELWALL M, 2004, LINK ANAL INFORM SCI;
VAUGHAN L, 2004, V40, P693, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; WEARE C, 2000, V18,
P272, SOC SCI COMPUT REV; WHITE HD, 1981, V32, P163, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
WHITLEY R, 2000, INTELLECTUAL SOCIAL; WILKINSON D, 2003, V29, P49, J
INFORM SCI; WILLHELMSSON S, 2003, V12, P643, J CLIN NURS; WORMELL I,
2000, V48, P237, SCIENTOMETRICS; ZENG QT, 2004, V73, P45, INT J MED
INFORM|
NR- 58|
TC- 0|
PU- PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD|
PI- OXFORD|
PA- THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND|
SN- 0306-4573|
J9- INFORM PROCESS MANAGE|
JI- Inf. Process. Manage|
PD- DEC|
PY- 2006|
VL- 42|
IS- 6|
BP- 1471|
EP- 1483|
DI- 10.1016/j.ipm.2006.03.011|
PG- 13|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 062TI|
JN- INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2006, V42, N6, P1471-1483|
UT- ISI:000238967100008 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Guerrero-Bote VP; Zapico-Alonso F; Espinosa-Calvo ME; Crisostomo RG;
de Moya-Anegon F|
AF- Guerrero-Bote Vicente P; Zapico-Alonso, Felipe; Espinosa-Calvo, Maria
Eugenia; Gomez Crisostomo, Rocio; de Moya-Anegon, Felix|
TI- Binary Pathfinder: An improvement to the Pathfinder algorithm|
SO- INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- PFNETs; social networks; citation analysis; information
visualization|
ID- COCITATION; NETWORKS|
AB- The Pathfinder algorithm is widely used to prune social networks. The
pruning maintains the geodesic distances between nodes. It has shown
itself to be very useful in the analysis of, amongst others, citations in
BIS (bibliometrics, informetrics, and scientometrics). It has even been
proposed for the online display of the search results in an information
retrieval system. However, its great time and space complexity limits its
use in real-time applications and in networks of any considerable size
The present work describes an improved algorithm with considerably
reduced time and space complexity. Its lower execution costs thus
increase its applicability both in real time and to large networks. (c)
2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved|
C1- Univ Extremadura, Fac Lib & Informat Sci, Antiguo Hosp Militar,
Badajoz 06071, Spain; Univ Granada, Lib & Informat Sci Fac, Granada
18071, Spain|
RP- Guerrero-Bote, VP, Univ Extremadura, Fac Lib & Informat Sci, Antiguo
Hosp Militar, Plaza Ibn Marwan S-N, Badajoz 06071, Spain|
EM- guerrero@unex.es fzapalo@alcazaba.unex.es meespcal@alcazaba.unex.es
mrgomcri@alcazaba.unex.es felix@ugr.es|
CD- BUZYDLOWSKI JW, 2000, THESIS DREXEL U; CHEN C, 1999, INFORM
VISUALIZATION; CHEN CM, 1998, V10, P107, INTERACT COMPUT; CHEN CM, 2001,
V34, P65, COMPUTER; CHEN GT, 2003, V37, P179, RAIRO-OPER RES; DEARHOLT
DW, 1990, P1, PATHFINDER ASS NETWO; LIN X, 2003, V39, P689, INFORM
PROCESS MANAG; MOYAANEGON F, 2004, V61, P129, SCIENTOMETRICS; MOYAANEGON
F, 2005, V41, P1520, INFORM PROCESSING MA; SCHVANEVELDT RW, 1988, V15,
P337, COMPUT MATH APPL; SCHVANEVELDT RW, 1999, PATHFINDER ASS NETWO;
WHITE HD, 2003, V54, P423, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC|
NR- 12|
TC- 10|
PU- PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD|
PI- OXFORD|
PA- THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND|
SN- 0306-4573|
J9- INFORM PROCESS MANAGE|
JI- Inf. Process. Manage|
PD- DEC|
PY- 2006|
VL- 42|
IS- 6|
BP- 1484|
EP- 1490|
DI- 10.1016/j.ipm.2006.03.015|
PG- 7|
SC- Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library
Science|
GA- 062TI|
JN- INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2006, V42, N6, P1484-1490|
UT- ISI:000238967100009 ER ||
PT- J|
AU- Zitt M; Bassecoulard E|
AF- Zitt Michel; Bassecoulard, Elise|
TI- Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation
method: An application to nanosciences|
SO- INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT|
LA- English|
DT- Article|
DE- information retrieval; lexical query; citation network; nanosciences;
scientific area delineation; bibliometrics|
ID- INFORMETRIC DISTRIBUTIONS; WORD ANALYSIS; SCIENCE; COCITATION;
NANOTECHNOLOGY; LAWS; SPECIALTIES; PATENTS; SYSTEMS|
AB- Relevance of bibliometric indicators on scientific areas critically
depends on the quality of their delineation. Macro-level studies, often
based on a selected list of journals, accept a high degree of fuzziness.
Micro-level studies rely on sets of individual articles in order to
reduce noise and enhance precision of retrieval. The most usual
information retrieval process is based on lexical queries with various
levels of sophistication. In the experiment on Nanosciences reported
here, this process was used as a first step, to delineate a 'seed' of
literature. It has strong limitations, especially for emerging or
transversal fields. In a second step, the alternative approach of
citation linkages, was used to expand the bibliography starting from
lexical seed. The extension process presented is ruled by three
parameters, two deal with the cited side (threshold on citation score,
and specificity towards the field), one with the citing side (threshold
on the number of relevant references) interplaying in the 'referencing
structure' function (RSF) introduced in a previous work This type of
combination proves effective for delineating the transversal field of
Nanosciences. Further improvements of the method are discussed. (c) 2006
Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved|
C1- Observ Sci & Tech, F-75015 Paris, France|
RP- Zitt, M, Observ Sci & Tech, 93 Rue Vaugirard, F-75015 Paris, France|
EM- zitt@nantes.inra.fr bassecou@nantes.inra.fr|
CD- BACHMANN G, 1998, INNOVATIONSSCHUB NAN; BASSECOULARD E, 2004, P665,
HDB QUANTITATIVE SCI; BONACCORSI A, 2002, I SCI C SIEN IT; BOOKSTEIN A,
1990, V41, P368, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BOOKSTEIN A, 1990, V41, P376, J AM
SOC INFORM SCI; BRAAM RR, 1991, V42, P233, J AM SOC INFORM SCI; BRAUN T,
1997, V38, P321, SCIENTOMETRICS; BRIN S, 1998, V30, P1, COMPUTER NETWORKS
IS; CALLON M, 1983, V22, P191, SOC SCI INFORM; DARBY MR, 2003, 9825 NBER;
EGGHE L, 1990, INTRO INFORMETRICS Q; EGGHE L, 1990, V16, P17, J INFORM
SCI; EGGHE L, 2000, V26, P329, J INFORM SCI; EGGHE L, 2005, V56, P669, J
AM SOC INF SCI TEC; FOGELBERG H, 2003, P29, BRINGING VISABILITY; FRANKS
A, 1987, V20, P1442, J PHYS E; GARFIELD E, 1967, V2, P235, J LIBRARY
HISTORY; GLAENZEL W, 2003, NANOTECHNOLOGY ANAL; KATZ JS, 1999, V28, P501,
RES POLICY; KESSLER MM, 1963, V14, P10, AM DOC; KOSTOFF RN, 2001, V52,
P1148, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; LAREDO P, 2002, 4 TRIPL HEL C COP;
LEYDESDORFF L, 2004, V55, P991, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC; MALSCH I, 1997,
17710EN EUR JRC; MARSLAND AM, 2001, V6, P3, SKIN THERAPY LETT; MEYER M,
2000, V29, P409, RES POLICY; MEYER M, 2001, NANOTECHNOLOGY EXPER; MOED
HF, 1989, V15, P95, J INF SCI; MURUGESAN P, 1978, V29, P141, J AM SOC
INFORM SCI; NARANAN S, 1970, V227, P631, NATURE; NOYONS EC, 2003, MAPPING
EXCELLENCE S; NOYONS ECM, 1999, BIBLIOMETRIC MAPPING; PAO ML, 1993, V29,
P95, INFORM PROCESS MANAG; PINSKI G, 1976, V12, P297, INFORMATION
PROCESSI; RIP A, 1988, P253, HDB QUANTITATIVE STU; ROCO MC, 2002,
CONVERGING TECHNOLOG; ROUSSEAU R, 1990, V41, P197, J AM SOC INFORM SCI;
ROUSSEAU R, 1997, V1, P7, CYBERMETRICS; SALTON G, 1983, INTRO MODERN
INFORM; SCHMID G, 2003, V35, P1, EUROPAEISCHE AKAD GR; SCHUMMER J,