Population Ecology either examine populations of a single species or interactions between species investigation on a single species: population numbers and distribution why are populations of pandas decreasing? what would it take to increase them how do you control aphids on a crop? what factors increase or decrease population? temp? competition? predation? Plant quality? Counting populations numbers per unit area: density births or recruitment (establishment in population) deaths immigration (input) and emigration (output) seems straitforward—but.…conceptually simple, practically difficult animals and plants pose different problems animals: mobility results in recounting, hiding, problems estimating density-mark-recapture plants: standing still helps with density, etc. but have another problem: What is an individual? counting unitary vs modular organisms: unitary--growth form is determinate--four legs, one mouth... a genetic individual is easy to identify modular--growth form is indeterminate--module may be determinate, but the whole body of the organism consists of repeated modules giving a branched structure, of indeterminate size and number of components plants are modular, and some animals such as coral,bryozoans, hydroids, and many fungi and protists module--in plants it is usually a bud, its associated stem, leaves and a reproductive part--but definition not absolute plants grow by accumlating modules--the final size of a plant is not effected as much by the size of the modules, but by the number-contrast young vs mature oak trees modules can accumulate vertically--trees--modules can be slightly independent but linked together modules can accumulate horizontially--strawberry or grass--modules can be completely independent or share resources those that grow horizontially can break to pieces, and counting genetic individuals becomes a problem-genet vs ramet a plant is a population of modules--significant implications for their ecology How do populations grow? all organisms produce more offspring than needed to replace themselves— how many on average do they produce? depends on the environment they live in and the type of organism survivorship curves Fig 10.6 example: each individual produces 2 offspring (or 4 per female) start with 10 individuals 10 x 2 = 20; 20 x 2 = 40; 40 x 2 = 80; 80 x 2 = 160; 160 x 2 = 320; 320 x 2 = 640; 640 x 2 = 1280; 1280 x 2 = 2560 plot it on a graph over time model it mathematically r the intrinsic rate of increase determines the rate of population growth r represents the potential growth rate of a species under ideal conditions— depends on number of offspring (fecundity) and generation time small organisms have short generation times and high r large organisms have longer generation times and lower r holding size constant still get variation in r –discuss later lack of resources caused by competition will slow population growth population growth involves intra specific competition define competition: interaction between individuals, brought about by shared requirement for a resource in limited supply and leading to reduced survivorship, growth, and/or reproduction population growth is density dependent competition can be intraspecific or interspecific mortality and fecundity are Density-dependent fecundity--eggs or offspring produced--says nothing about their survival-fitness data to support this statement planthoppers (fig 13.6 Molles); Isopods (fig 13.7 Molles) intraspecific competition regulates population size because mortality and birth rate depend on density--they can control population size where births = deaths you get stable numbers where births greater than deaths, numbers increase where deaths greater than births, numbers decrease stable point is called the carrying capacity If you follow increases in numbers over time from a starting point of very low density you get an S-shaped curve or sigmoid curve Fig 11.7, 11.8, 11.9, 11.10, 11.11 Molles the situations this occurs in experiments where a few individuals put into a cage with abundant resources recovery of animals after population crashes due to disease or predation there is no set carrying capacity for a population--it varies from year to year depending on resource supply, conditions competition impacts growth competition impacts numbers in a population, AND the size of individuals (ie. Fig 13.3, 13.4, 13.5 Molles) the final biomass of a population is often very similar--even when starting from different densities--ie. plant example law of constant final yield density x mean weight = constant 10 plants x 10 gm each= 100 gm 5 plants x 20 gm each= 100 gm competition's impacts on growth are asymmetric the rich get richer; the poor get poorer individual plant size becomes skewed to left as density increases the few, large individuals may be little affected by the smaller ones--but the reverse is not true--asymmetric competition territoriality is asymmetric competition among animals size differences may be present, but not as extreme as in plants--outcome is the same: few winners and many that don't reproduce at all INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION Examples of strong competition: Gause's paramecium experiments- sigmoid growth curves for P. aurelia and P. caudatum by themselves (Fig 13.15), but together P. aurelia out competed P. caudatum. P. caudatum and P. bursaria coexisted together, but close examination revealed that P.caudatum feed on bacteria suspended in medium, and P. bursaria lived on yeast that fell to bottom of the tubes. These results led to Gause's principle or the competitive exclusion principle: two species cannot occupy the same niche if two species coexist in the same habitat, it is because of niche differentiation, (realized niche) At the same time Gause was working with Paramecium, mathematician produced models of competition based on population growth--these solidified the exclusion principle as they predicted the outcome: unless competitive abilities exactly equal for the two species, the weaker one was always eliminated over time Resources and conditions define the niche of a species. Niche: description of all the conditions and resources necessary for a species to survive and reproduce. for example, for saguaro cactus, temperature is very important part of niche, but must add others: water--too little and it will die--too much and it may not be able to compete with something else. Most accepted definition is Hutchinson (1957) n-dimensional hypervolume (defined on p. 307) think of temperatures influence on a plant--one dimension add water--two dimensions add pH of soil—three dimensions Fundamental Niche is determined by physical conditions and resources Realized Niche is influenced by biotic interactions competition-interspecific predation Examples of interspecific competition: Barnacles Connell (1961) studied two species of barnacles: Chthamalus and Balanus (Cham-a-lus and Ball-a-nus) ECO--sp2003_files\balanus.ppt (and Fig 13.21) live on same rocky shores, but Chthamalus occurs higher up on shore than Balanus. Chthamalus larvae settle in both zones, but survival is low in the presence of Balanus if Chthamalus larvae are protected from Balanus, their survival is high, ie., it was not the physical conditions of lower shore that was killing Chthamalus larvae Balanus was limited to lower shore due to its sensitivity to desiccation--not competition You can see niche here. The fundamental niche (defined by physical environment) of Chthamalus included both the higher and lower intertidal area, however the reaized niche (due to interactions with other organisms- competition and predations) was only the upper tidal zone. For Balanus the fundamental niche and realized niche were similar: the lower zone. bedstraws two species: one on acidic soils, the other on basic soils in pots, alone, they could survive either soil type competitive exclusion must be occurring small granivores Dipodomys removal plots and control plots smaller granivores increase in number on Dipodomys removal plots (Fig 13.24 and 13.25) Summary of what happens when strong interspecific competition occurs: evolutionary time--niche differentiation selection against strongly competing individuals within a population (fig 13.26) for niche differentiation to occur, competition and the competitive winner must be consistant over time ecological time--competitive exclusion from part of niche that overlaps with stronger competitor restriction of fundamental niche to realized niche Do not expect natural selection under these conditions: patchy environments--species may be competitively excluded from some environmental patches in the habitat, but still exist in other patches, i.e., dung piles environmental disturbance that does not allow competitive exclusion to run to equilibrium, i.e., prairie fires Examples of strong competition in nature not muted thru niche differentiation: patchy in space or time: patches of good resources are unpredictable in space and time. A poorer competitor may be a better colonizer. A patch appears, is colonized by fast disperser (sp1), then by slower disperser. Sp.1 is a poor competitor, and is competitively excluded: competitive exclusion occurs, but only in a local gap pre-emption of space--the species to arrive first in a gap gets a head start and can outcompete other species, even if it would not be the winner if started at the same time. Different patches have different species as the first to arrive due to chance colonization. fluctuating environments: paradox of the plankton Exploitation- . predators kill & consume whole prey many prey? example yes yes lion, tiger, bear, ladybug, seed-eating mice grazers no yes cows, mosquitoes, cookie-cutter shark parasitoids yes no flies, wasps, monster in ALIEN parasitesand no tapeworm, tick, insect galls, bacteria no fungi that cause disease, dodder, Impact of predation on prey individuals. predators and parasitoids kill individuals grazers and parasites reduce growth or reproduction Parasites— impact depends on the number of parasites parasites can change behavior Herbivores- impact depends on ability of plant to compensate--when parts are eaten, other parts remain to continue growth grazers and parasites can make a prey more susceptible to other negative factors competition predation concentrated on parasitized individuals parasitized individuals arrive at breeding ground late Impact of predation on prey population impact on population is not always negative individuals not chosen by predator randomly--attack weak, old, young.... minks prey on muskrats that do not have established territoriesthese individuals already stressed, and had little chance of reproductive contribution individuals that escape may compensate--Net recruitment curve vs density if intraspecific competition holding population numbers down (i.e., K) then predator removal of individuals will be compensated for by increased food to survivers which can increase fecundity— compensation by prey population not complete exploiters can regulate population size of prey. impact of a caddisfly on algae in stream many examples when we accidently indroduce plants or animals without their predators prickly pear cactus in Australia ECO--sp2003_files\prickly pear.ppt Effect of consumption on predator too little food: death too much: full predators and many escaping prey prey population can exploit this masting in nut trees—pecans every 4 yrs; oaks; cicadas in Arkansas—13 yrs between emergences variability of plants as resources for predators—it is not how many you eat, but their quality that counts. dynamics of predator/prey populations Math models and lab models back in 30’s, but we are not looking at them; they predict oscilations Gause did test tube experiments on paramecium by adding predators Examine Fig 14.18 in Molles, Refuges are key to a prey’s ability to survive under exploitation Huffacker’s oranges predator satiation, i.e., masting and cicada examples Mutalisms examples of mutalisms plants and animals pollinators and seed dispersers defense with food and shelter payoff plants and fungi mycorrhizae-fungi and plant roots animals and fungi termites with fungi in gut animals and animals oxpeckers, honeyguides important in interactions within a community important in natural selection