English 418 Second Language Acquisition Session Ten Notes Goals/Objectives: 1) To gain an understanding of the basic definitions of Anxiety 2) To examine the evidence that states that Anxiety can be viewed both positively and negatively 3) To understand the difference between Facilitative Anxiety and Debilitative Anxiety 4) To understand the difference between Trait Anxiety and State Anxiety 5) To understand how students use/misuse Defense Mechanisms Questions/Main Ideas (Please Notes: write these down as you think Anxiety of them) All human beings, presumably, experience anxiety at one time or another Some people, however, are thought to be more anxious than others Some people have more severe reactions to anxiety-producing situations such that learning can be impaired Anxiety Background Studies: Chastain (1975): Administered an anxiety scale to American university students Then correlated the students’ scores with their final course grade in a foreign language course they were taking Anxiety Found that anxiety was a significant predictor for those studying Spanish Correlations were high, though not significant, across all other languages Question? Why would it be higher for Spanish than other languages? Anxiety Interestingly, the direction of the correlation was not always consistent In some cases the correlation was negative - the bad effect of anxiety In other cases, the correlation was positive - anxiety actually seemed to enhance performance Anxiety Chastain then makes the distinction between facilitating anxiety and debilitating anxiety Facilitating anxiety motivates the learner to ‘fight’ through the new learning task It gears the learner to mobilize emotional resources to do the task Question? What type of emotional resources do we have that we can mobilize? Anxiety Debilitating anxiety, in contrast, motivates the learner to ‘flee’ from the new learning task It stimulates the individual emotionally to adopt avoidance behaviors Gets in the way of learning Anxiety An example of the interplay: Kleinmann (1977): found that ESL students who scored high on items designed to measure facilitative anxiety (“nervousness while using English helps me do better”) employed certain structures in English that low scorers tended to avoid Anxiety IOW, those students who scored high on facilitative anxiety “were emotionally equipped to approach the structures that their peers tended to avoid” Question? Why would this be important? Anxiety A further example: Bailey (1983): did a diary study of her own competitiveness and anxiety while learning French Bailey realized that: Sometimes her drive to compete with other members of the class hindered her SLA At other times, it motivated her Anxiety Bailey’s experience suggests that it is not so much an individual’s permanent disposition to anxiety Rather, it is the strength of the anxiety one is feeling at the moment which determines whether anxiety is facilitating or debilitating Anxiety Anxiety, then, can serve both a good function and a bad function in SLA The idea is to build up just the right amount of anxiety to get onto a task To mobilize one’s cognitive (thinking) and affective (emotional) resources Once started on a task, however, the anxiety should be ‘demobilized’ Anxiety Ehrman sets up an alternative dichotomy between Trait anxiety and State anxiety Trait anxiety is a stable part of a person’s personality State anxiety is related to specific events or situations Anxiety Good teaching relies on the facilitating anxiety implicit in challenges to the student that are just a little beyond what they can do (but not too far) An appropriate level of competition between students can also facilitate anxiety or task arousal Teachers need to find that optimal amount – not too much or too little Anxiety She recommends treating all anxiety as state anxiety In this way, both teacher and student can perceive the anxiety as manageable, and not inevitable Question? Looking at the survey form, what aspects of the language classroom seem to be causing the most anxiety? Anxiety How does it play out? Sometimes you will get a direct expression of the fact: “I’m very anxious about this test” Often, however, you will need to infer the presence of anxiety through the behaviors that are used to avert it Anxiety Everyone protects their emotional equilibrium and self-esteem in a variety of ways The technical term for these is defense mechanisms Everyone uses them They are a natural part of life Anxiety Defense mechanisms can be seen as involving some sort of avoidance of discomfort, either directly or by some sort of substitution They compose a variety of behaviors, thought processes, and manipulations of feelings Generally used unconsciously Anxiety Without defense mechanisms, we would be emotionally defenseless in a world where defenses are needed Much of the time, we use defense mechanisms appropriately Anxiety They have a less functional side when they involve a degree of self-deception and reality distortion When inappropriately used, they do not produce realistic adaptation Anxiety Anxiety, it should be noted, is not always about learning Sometimes is has to do more directly with relations with others IOW, social concern can affect learning Anxiety For example: Learners can suffer anxiety about performance that is a result of feeling in the spotlight Or being judged by others Thus, defense mechanisms can sometimes involve others in inappropriate ways Anxiety To see a description of various defense mechanisms: www.csub.edu/~ecase/Defense_Mechanisms.htm Questions? How might these mechanisms play out in the language classroom? Which mechanisms would be most problematic in a language classroom? Self-Efficacy The premise: Student feelings have as much power to affect their learning success as their cognitive styles or strategies Self-esteem is important to all people, and we go to considerable lengths to defend it Self-Efficacy Self-esteem is often built on a sense of self-efficacy The perception of oneself as able or unable to learn can cause a self-fulfilling prophesy Self-Efficacy Students who perceive their own abilities as being low and who believe that ability is fixed also tend to limit their own achievements If we can understand some of the fears behind behaviors, we can deal with them more effectively Self-Efficacy Self-efficacy: The degree to which the student believes that he or she has the capacity to cope with the learning challenge Enhanced efficacy, then, is a greater expectation of good results Self-Efficacy A learner can experience a sense of self-efficacy in one domain but not in others But a sense of effectiveness in one or more areas of skill can overflow into how one feels about him- or herself in other areas Self-Efficacy Increased self-efficacy tends to increase motivation It also seems to increase the willingness to take risks Self-Efficacy Students who consider themselves poor learners are likely to want to: Learn in settings that reduce risk by reducing options Impose external structure Too much external structure reduces ability to deal with ambiguous or chaotic situations Self-Efficacy One group in which self-efficacy is often an issue: non-traditional students Feel a strong need for external structure and sequential learning May feel that they are inadequate compared to younger learners Feel afraid of holding others back Self-Efficacy Language learning activities can often constitute a particular assault on the self-esteem of people This is often especially true of the older learner who may have had success in other aspects of life or other academic subjects that require different skills Self-Efficacy Expectations of self are a subset of the beliefs a student has about learning in general Students may believe that “languages are difficult to learn” Only certain kinds of people can learn languages There is “a right way” to learn Self-Efficacy Students have to achieve 100% accuracy to do well All of these beliefs have an effect on a student’s sense of his or her ability to learn Of course, teachers also have beliefs Many of their assumptions are similar to their student’s beliefs Self-Efficacy How does it play out? Lack of self-efficacy can lead to very dependent behavior Can develop the belief that they are worse than they really are May want the teacher to be very demanding and impose a great deal of external structure Self-Efficacy Often wants the teacher to check their homework carefully Wants the teacher to guide them step-by-step in both daily activities and in homework Therefore, can blame the lack of progress on lack of strictness on the part of the teacher Self-Efficacy Such a student will need structured materials at the beginning Then should be challenged later with carefully selected and limited materials (in which success is built in) Can also be given help in developing strategies for learning Self-Efficacy However, while a sense of self-efficacy is obviously important When it leads to overconfidence or rigidity, it is not helpful A student who is convinced that they are always right and that you (the teacher) are wrong Summary/Minute Paper: is unlikely to change how learning is done Self-Efficacy Even when the task is not working out very well Like all things in language learning, a sense of moderation is best IOW, the best learner is someone who is confident, but not over-confident