Background Statement for SEMI Draft Document 5621B NEW STANDARD: GUIDE FOR DETERMINING THE QUALITY OF ION EXCHANGE RESIN USED IN POLISH APPLICATIONS OF ULTRAPURE WATER SYSTEM Notice: This background statement is not part of the balloted item. It is provided solely to assist the recipient in reaching an informed decision based on the rationale of the activity that preceded the creation of this Document. Notice: Recipients of this Document are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patented technology or copyrighted items of which they are aware and to provide supporting documentation. In this context, “patented technology” is defined as technology for which a patent has issued or has been applied for. In the latter case, only publicly available information on the contents of the patent application is to be provided. Background Statement NOTE: We are answering all the rejects received for Document 5621A. There were many rejects and the majority of them are related, but none of them are technically persuasive. We are changing this document subtype to a Guide and not a Test Method standard because the industry is not familiar with the technique (LNS) that was used in the referenced method validation test for particle analysis at 10 nm. The previously published SEMI C79 has data verifying the accuracy of the LNS method. Advanced semiconductor manufacturing is becoming more and more susceptible to particulate and organic contamination. Ultrapure water (UPW) piping and piping components undergo rigorous cleanliness testing using the SEMI F57 standard. While ion exchange (IX) resin has a similar surface area to that of the piping material, it is not tested for its contribution to UPW contamination. Ion exchange resin used in UPW Polish loops represents a similar source of contamination to piping materials due to its location in the water-purification process. Fresh ion exchange resin is known to produce significant amounts of contamination when loaded in polishers. Different resin suppliers provide different methods of resin preparation. Therefore, the absence of standardized testing and quality analyses poses the risk of inadequate resin quality. The value of the guide has become particularly important for the industry due to obvious limitations of the existing particle metrology for both UPW quality and wafer defect monitoring. Laser Particle Counters (LPCs) used in high volume semiconductor manufacturing have reached a practical measurement limit of 25 nm, with a counting efficiency of only a few percent at this size. However, even at 25 nm, the size detection is above the half pitch of current technology semiconductor devices, rendering the metrology unable to confirm the presence of potential “killer particles” at the required sizes. The size of the particles to be controlled in UPW is also approaching the capability of the filtration used. Lack of metrology capability, marginal filtration efficiency, and extremely high concentration of the particles shedding from the virgin IX resin (see Appendix 2) substantially increase the risk to the next generation of wafer manufacturing technology. UPW ITRS has suggested a risk-mitigation strategy based on reduction of the particle challenge to the final filters. This document describes a guide prepared to standardize the recommended conditions under which the ion exchange resin quality can be evaluated. It is important to emphasize that the methodology documented in the proposed guide has numerous limitations, described below. However, the task force believes that this guide, even with its limitations, can mitigate the risk of contamination from particle and other impurities. The purpose of this document is to standardize the resin test conditions to compare the performance of different resins. Use of this guide should generate more data to allow for revisions that will improve the method. Not having such a guide or having inadequate particle metrology poses significant risk to advanced semiconductor manufacturing (based on the information from ITRS and SEMETECH) It is also important to clarify that the type of the PSDS instrument (LNS) used in the guide validation testing is now commercially available from Fluid Measurement Technologies, allowing wider accessibility to this technique. References ITRS documents: http://www.itrs.net/Links/2013ITRS/2013Tables/Yield_2013Tables.xlsx http://www.itrs.net/Links/2013ITRS/2013Chapters/2013Yield.pdf Reference SEMATECH Report: Abbas Rastegar, Arun John Kadaksham, Matt House, Byunghoon Lee, Jae Choi, Masahiro Kishimoto, Aron J. Cepler, Thomas Laursen, Takeya Shimomura: “EUV Mask and Blank Cleaning Requirements for 16 nm HP node”. SEMATECH Albany September 2010 Review and Adjudication Information* Task Force Review IX Resin TF Monday, March 30, 2015 2:00 PM to 3:00 PM (Pacific Time) SEMI Headquarters in conjunction with the NA Standards Spring 2015 Meetings City, State/Country: San Jose, CA / USA Slava Libman (Air Liquide) Leader(s): Group: Date: Time & Timezone: Location: Standards Staff: Michael Tran (SEMI NA) 408.943.7019 mtran@semi.org Committee Adjudication NA Liquid Chemicals TC Chapter Tuesday, March 31, 2015 2:00 PM to 5:00 PM (Pacific Time) SEMI Headquarters in conjunction with the NA Standards Spring 2015 Meetings San Jose, CA / USA Frank Parker / ICL Frank Flowers / PeroxyChem Michael Tran (SEMI NA) 408.943.7019 mtran@semi.org *This meeting’s details are subject to change, and additional review sessions may be scheduled if necessary. Contact the task force leaders or Standards staff for confirmation. Telephone and web information will be distributed to interested parties as the meeting date approaches. If you will not be able to attend these meetings in person but would like to participate by telephone/web, please contact Standards staff. Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 SEMI Draft Document 5621B NEW STANDARD: GUIDE FOR DETERMINING THE QUALITY OF ION EXCHANGE RESIN USED IN POLISH APPLICATIONS OF ULTRAPURE WATER SYSTEM 1 Purpose 1.1 This document describes a guide for analysis of virgin high purity ion exchange (HPIX) resin suitable for use in Ultrapure Water (UPW) polish applications. Further information regarding UPW systems can be found in SEMI F61. 1.2 The guide focuses on analysis of ion exchange resin used in UPW. This document defines parameters and test conditions that will minimize the effect of contamination from the resin on the manufacturing process. 1.3 The purpose of the guide is to avoid prolonged rinse-up of the new resin when it is loaded into ion exchange (polish) tanks. The guide results should be representative of full-scale applications. 2 Scope 2.1 This document includes instructions for virgin HPIX resin sample handling and test conditions. 2.2 The document provides an example of the performance of state-of-the-art resins; the data was obtained following this guide. However the quality criteria are expected to be determined by the end user based on the userspecific needs. 2.3 It is the intent of this guide to focus on virgin HPIX resin. The quality parameters assessed by this method include quantitative measures of particle contribution, metallic contribution, organics contribution, residue after evaporation (non-volatile residue), and broken beads content. 2.4 The guide takes the wetted-stream performance of virgin HPIX resin into consideration and reflects the current manufacturing processes of the resin manufacturers. 2.5 Leach-out test methods are referenced within this document provide values for both static and dynamic conditions. Although the static leach-out test method is sufficient to determine resin quality, the end user will decide whether to use a dynamic leach-out test method; dynamic test methods provide conditions closer to mimicking the actual mixed bed operation. Choosing either a dynamic leach test or a static leach test is determined by the end user needs. Dynamic leach tests will be used to estimate the rinse-up flush volume. Static leach tests will be used for quality assurance when baseline virgin resin quality has already been established (otherwise use the dynamic leach test to estimate the rinse-up time). 2.6 Only mixed virgin HPIX resin is used for the test within this document. When the resin is supplied in nonmixed form (anionic and cationic), a mixed sample is used for analysis. 2.7 The guide assumes that the virgin ion exchange resin tested is representative of the virgin HPIX resin to be loaded in the mixed beds tanks. The resin shelf life, storage, and delivery conditions should be taken into account when planning the testing. 2.8 This guide applies to virgin HPIX resin as well as Point-of-Use (POU) ion exchange modules intended for use in semiconductor manufacturing tools and ancillary equipment. 2.9 This guide includes recommended analytical testing that the end user can perform; the end user should determine which analyses are required and whether to conduct optional testing. NOTICE: SEMI Standards and Safety Guidelines do not purport to address all safety issues associated with their use. It is the responsibility of the users of the Documents to establish appropriate safety and health practices, and determine the applicability of regulatory or other limitations prior to use. 3 Limitations 3.1 This guide applies solely to virgin HPIX resin testing. Quality and performance of the associated equipment (ion exchange beds, piping and piping components) are not included in the guide. This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 1 Doc. 5621B SEMI LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 3.2 Virgin HPIX resin tested by following the guide is intended for use in the Polishing system of ultrapure water (UPW) systems only (located downstream the UPW tank). The specified test method conditions may exceed the needs of resin used in primary mixed beds and other less critical applications. 3.3 The guide is designed to assess contamination from the resin in an “as received” state; onsite resin handling may add contaminants. The effects of the onsite handling are beyond the scope of this document, but should be considered by the supplier or user. 3.4 Performance of pre-mixed resin vs. mixed in the lab is expected to be different. The sample should be prepared (mixed) in the same way it is done for the actual application (pre-mixed by manufacturer vs. mixed on site). 3.5 This guide is not intended to supersede customer specifications. 3.6 Virgin HPIX resin samples tested under the conditions specified by this guide may vary in their performance from the resin used in the actual UPW system. Resin inconsistency should be addressed with the resin supplier or by conducting a statistical analysis of the resin quality data. 3.7 The accuracy of the data generated by this guide is limited to the accuracy of the analytical techniques used to measure resin quality. 3.8 Tolerances in the figures used in the guide (such as flow rate, concentration, etc.) are +/-10% unless otherwise stated. 3.9 This guide application is limited to the ambient temperature UPW system. Other applications, such as Hot UPW system or different treatment solvent have not been considered in this document. 3.10 The reference data provided in Appendix 2 is representative for 2014 state-of-the-art resin quality and may not be fully representative for future state-of-the-art resin. 3.11 Limited experience and data are currently available in application of this guide. Additional reproducibility studies may need to be conducted by the end user when defining performance criteria for the resin tested. 3.12 This guide recommends a simplified option of the static leach test versus dynamic leach test, mimicking actual Polish mixed operation. Although data in Appendix 2 suggested that static leach test may be representative for the analysis of the resin performance under dynamic conditions, the choice of the method should take into account the fact of the limited amount of data collected by the date of publication of this document. 4 Referenced Documents 4.1 SEMI Standards SEMI E49 — Guide for High Purity and Ultrahigh Purity Piping Performance, Subassemblies, and Final Assemblies SEMI F40 — Practice For Preparing Liquid Chemical Distribution Components for Chemical Testing SEMI F104 — Particle Test Method Guide for Evaluation of Components Used in Ultrapure Water and Liquid Chemical Distribution Systems SEMI F57 — Specification for Polymer Materials and Components Used in Ultrapure Water and Liquid Chemical Distribution Systems SEMI F61 — Guide for Ultrapure Water Systems used in Semiconductor Processing SEMI F63 — Guide for Ultrapure Water Used in Semiconductor Processing SEMI S2 — Safety Guideline for Semiconductor Manufacturing Equipment 4.2 ASTM Standards1 ASTM D4779 — Total, Organic, and Inorganic Carbon in High Purity Water by Ultraviolet (UV) or Persulfate 1 ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, USA; Telephone: 610.832.9585, Fax: 610.832.9555, http://www.astm.org This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 2 Doc. 5621B SEMI LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 Oxidation, or Both, and Infrared Detection ASTM D5544 — Standard Test Method for On-line Measurement of Residue After Evaporation of High-Purity Water ASTM D5904 — Standard Test Method of Total Carbon, Inorganic Carbon, and Organic Carbon in Water by UV, Persulfate Oxidation and Membrane Conductivity Detection 4.3 Other Documents International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) 2 NOTICE: Unless otherwise indicated, all documents cited shall be the latest published versions. 5 Units 5.1 Parts per million (ppm) is equivalent to μg/mL or mg/L, where 1 L approximately equals 1 kg. 5.2 Parts per billion (ppb) is equivalent to ng/mL or μg/L, where 1 L approximately equals 1 kg. 5.3 Parts per trillion (ppt) is equivalent to pg/mL or ng/L, where 1 L approximately equals 1 kg. 5.4 Micrometer is a unit of length equal to one millionth of a meter, or one thousandth of a millimeter. 6 Terminology NOTE 1: General terms for UPW systems can be found in SEMI F61. 6.1 Abbreviations and Acronyms — General terms and acronyms used in this standard are listed below and may be defined in SEMI F61. 6.1.1 DMA — Differential Mobility Analyzer 6.1.2 HPIX — High Purity Ion Exchange Resin used in Polish or POU 6.1.3 HPW — High Purity Water 6.1.4 HVM — High Volume Manufacturing 6.1.5 ICP-MS — Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry 6.1.6 ITRS — International Technology Roadmap For Semiconductors 6.1.7 LC-OCD — Liquid Chromatography With Organic Carbon Detector 6.1.8 LNS — Liquid Nano-Particle Sizing System (example of PSDA used for the Validation Testing – see results in Appendix) 6.1.9 LPC — Laser Particle Counter 6.1.10 NRM — Nonvolatile Residue Monitor 6.1.11 NVR — Nonvolatile Residue (also called Residue After Evaporation or RAE) 6.1.12 PFA — Perfluoroalkoxy 6.1.13 POU – Point of Use 6.1.14 PSDA — Particle Size Distribution Analyzer 6.1.15 PVDF — Polyvinylidene Fluoride 6.1.16 SEM — Scanning Electron Microscope 6.1.17 TOC — Total Organic Carbon 6.1.18 UPW — Ultra Pure Water 6.2 Definition 2 http://www.itrs.net/ This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 3 Doc. 5621B SEMI LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 6.2.1 Background — the contaminant concentrations in the test system reported by analyzers such as PSDA, NRM, TOC, and others. Background is measured in the static leach test containers or when UPW flows through the dynamic leach test skid (after rinsed and cleaned components have reached a steady-state of background contamination). Background includes contributions from the UPW and the test equipment components. 6.2.2 Delta Measurement — the UPW contaminant analyte concentration difference between the inlet of the resin column and the outlet of the resin column. Useful when the inlet analyte concentration is too unstable during the test period to allow the proper use of an average background measurement. Delta Measurement can be achieved by using two calibrated analyzers that have had their responses matched on the same water sample. 6.2.3 Dynamic Leach Test Skid (see Figure 1) — the system providing resin-evaluation test analysis. The test skid includes piping, resin column, flow meters, pressure gauges, valves, regulators, sample ports, etc. 6.2.4 Virgin HPIX Resin — an unused high quality ion exchange resin that has not been regenerated. UPW return or drain Vent to drain P2 P1 UPW UPW Particle Sizing/Counting Monitor UPW return or drain 48" Long 1" I.D. Non-volatile Residue Monitor UPW return or drain Total Organic Carbon Monitor UPW return or drain Total effluent flow rate - 420 _ + 20 mL/min Temp UPW return or drain Vent to drain Figure 1 General Test Schematic Diagram for Dynamic Leach Test 7 Dynamic Leach Test Skid Configuration 7.1 The dynamic leach test skid should be made of high purity components, meeting SEMI F57 quality requirements. Figure 1 presents the required configuration of the skid. The ion exchange column is made of PVDF with PFA tubing connecting the column to the UPW system and analytical equipment. This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 4 Doc. 5621B SEMI LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 7.2 Minimum operating pressure should be sufficient to feed the instruments downstream of the ion exchange column, typically 25 psig (172 kPa). Install the pressure gauges and flow meters downstream or sidestream to avoid contamination. Pressure on the feed side to the column should be 207-310 kPa (30 – 45 psig) to reduce potential micro-bubble formation. The high pressure limit depends upon the materials of construction (for safety and leak prevention). 7.3 Use ultrapure, low-particle, low-TOC, low-shedding piping systems in all wetted flow paths from the UPW source to the dynamic leach test skid to ensure that adequate water quality is maintained. Consider the recommendations within SEMI E49 when designing and assembling the system. 7.4 Protect the test system from excessive vibration which could lead to high particle-background counts. 7.5 Minimum operating pressure downstream of the dynamic leach test skid should be 138 kPa (20 psig) during testing to avoid gas bubbles. 7.6 The UPW should be in compliance with the following minimum requirements: 7.6.1 Temperature: 23 5C (77 9F). 7.6.2 Resistivity: 18 MΩ•cm at 25°C (77°F). 7.6.3 TOC: < 2 ppb. 7.6.4 NVR: < 0.2 ppb. 7.6.5 Maximum recommended particle-concentration background level: <1 particle/ml (> 0.05 m). Background particle levels measured by PSDA are dictated by the resin performance expectations (see Figure A2-2, Appendix 2) 7.6.6 To ensure a stable background level, before beginning the test install and rinse the ion exchange column in an enclosed ISO Class 7 (per current revision of ISO 14644, roughly equivalent to FED STD 209E Class 10,000), or better, environment. Follow procedures necessary to maintain ISO Class 7, or better, when handling any part of the test system, or during the testing. Deviation from these conditions may be approved by the end user, while maintaining the intent of the clean environment. End users requiring more exacting testing should follow more stringent testing requirements. 7.6.7 Instrumentation, including flow meters, pressure gauges/transducers and temperature sensors, are calibrated in accordance with the manufacturers’ procedures and frequency. 7.6.8 Bubbles cause metrology errors; orient the test column and the plumbing between the components under test to limit bubble entrapment. Position the ion exchange column vertically and vent the test skid to prevent gas accumulation and bubble formation. Exception: UPW flow through the ion exchange column must be from the top to the bottom to prevent resin separation. Provisions must be included in the test stand to capture and divert bubbles before they enter the instrumentation supply lines. 8 Sample Recommendations 8.1 Test a representative ion exchange virgin resin sample from the batch under consideration. 8.2 To take a virgin resin sample from the drums at the end user location, follow this procedure: 8.2.1 Avoid construction and other maintenance activities in the area where the sample is taken. 8.2.2 Rinse the outside of the drums with high purity water before opening to remove contamination collected during transport and storage. Allow the water to drip off the drums. 8.2.3 Don clean room suit and low-zinc gloves. 8.2.4 Prepare clean bags for the resin sampling and shipping. Use double-bagged packaging (the inner bags should be qualified for lower particulates, while the outer bags should have low gas permeability). 8.2.5 Take resin from a previously unopened drum. 8.2.6 Open a representative drum and open the protective bags inside the drum. This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 5 Doc. 5621B SEMI LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 8.2.6.1 If resin prepared for testing is supplied from different batches or was stored under different conditions, you may need to test more than one sample. 8.2.6.2 If the amount of resin in a single drum is < 10% of the total amount of the resin to be used, you may need to sample more than one drum in order to obtain representative results. 8.2.7 Sample resin immediately after you open the drum. 8.2.7.1 Take the sample from the top of the drum to prevent excess liquid from being taken with the sample. 8.2.7.2 Remove approximately 5 cm (2”) of the upper resin layer. 8.2.7.3 Take 1L of the resin sample for a static leach test and 1L for a dynamic leach test. 8.2.7.4 Minimize exposure of the resin sample to ambient contamination. 8.2.7.5 Use gentle motion to avoid damaging the resin beads. 8.3 Place the resin in a prepared clean bag and seal the bag. 8.4 Wrap the resin sample in bubble wrap to protect it during shipping. 8.5 Place the resin sample in a cooler and ship to the lab using fast direct delivery (do not exceed one week in shipment). Add “FRAGILE” sticker. NOTE 1: Resin sample handling and packaging may impact the test results. Samples submitted for testing should reflect standard practices of handling and packaging by the resin manufacturer in accordance with the typical manufacturing processes. 9 Test Methodology 9.1 Leach-Out Parameters 9.1.1 This document does not provide specific quality requirements for leachable parameters. The end user must define quality requirements based upon the process-specific sensitivity to contamination, the ion exchange polish system design, and the data provided in Appendix 2. The results in Appendix 2 are based on the benchmarking study and indicate the actual range of performance of typical resins used in ion exchange polish applications. 9.1.2 Success criteria considerations for TOC and particle release. Contamination by organic compounds causes silicon oxidation, affects etching uniformity, wafer and mask cleaning, adhesion of the resist, gate oxide breakdown voltage, epitaxial growth, atomic layer deposition (ALD), chemical vapor deposition (CVD) of silicon nitride or other thin film deposition. 9.1.2.1 Loading virgin HPIX resin for applications with tight target levels for TOC and particles poses risk to the final UPW quality. 9.1.2.1.1 In HVM facility where a number of parallel polish mixed beds are used, TOC contribution of less than 0.3 ppb is considered insignificant if the resin is replaced in only one of the parallel polish tanks. The UPW from additional tanks dilutes the TOC from the tank with new virgin resin. 9.1.3 Critical particle size is specific to the end user’s manufacturing process and technology. Particles released by the virgin HPIX resin can contaminate devices and critical surfaces as well as disrupt the photolithography process, thereby decreasing yields. 9.1.4 Based upon the UPW particle concentration target (in particles per liter) and the assumption that the final filter will provide some particle retention, the end user can estimate the acceptable particle concentration for the polish tank effluent. If the resin change-out is spread over a year particle leach out from additional tanks dilutes the particle concentration from the tank being measured. 9.1.5 Metal leach consideration also depends upon the end user metal specifications. Metallic contamination can alter the electrical properties of microelectronic devices and corrode or etch microelectronic devices and critical surfaces during fabrication, causing immediate or future device failure. 9.1.6 For high purity applications susceptible to metals contamination, the end user should conduct an HCl leach using quality criteria based on Appendix 2 “best in class” performance. For less critical applications, it is recommended that UPW extraction is used with all metals to be below the detection limits, as indicated in Appendix 2. This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 6 Doc. 5621B SEMI LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 9.1.7 One week rinse time is considered the maximum acceptable time period based on the common industry practice. NOTE 2: Using the performance quality criteria, “best in class” HPIX resin is recommended where tightest quality is required (per Appendix 2). Application of stringent requirements may affect schedule and cost. 9.2 Other Parameters 9.2.1 The following recommendations are provided for estimating the whole-bead content. NOTE 2: If the virgin HPIX resin does not meet end user quality requirements, the end user should consult the resin supplier. 9.2.1.1 Whole bead content: the virgin ion exchange resin is considered acceptable for use in polish tanks if the resin contains > 90% of whole and non-cracked beads and > 95% of unbroken beads. 9.3 Particle Contribution Test 9.3.1.1 UPW is used for the particle contribution testing. The following instruments are employed: 9.3.1.2 In-situ PSDA 9.3.1.3 In-situ NRM (if most of the NVR = particles) 9.3.1.4 Grab sample LPC 9.3.1.5 Grab Sample PSDA 9.3.1.6 Grab Sample SEM 9.3.2 The Dynamic Leach Test evaluates particle contribution performance of the virgin ion exchange resin in a continuous flushing mode and provides an indication of the volume of UPW required to bring particle levels to meet the end user’s requirements. 9.4 Organic Contamination 9.4.1 The measurement of TOC is a common water quality screening method for organic materials; maximum TOC levels should be < 0.5ppb but the actual effects of the individual compounds can depend on the structure of the molecules, and the semiconductor manufacturing processes. Any organic compound in ultrapure water is a potential nutrient to increase bacterial growth. Methods other than measuring TOC, such as LC-OCD, may be required to assess the identification of individual organic contaminants. 9.4.1.1 The TOC analyzer must correctly measure the organic Carbon contained in organic compounds that also include Nitrogen, Sulfur, Phosphorus, and Chlorine in their structures. 9.4.1.2 Use LC-OCD to identify either unusual organic compounds or those compounds that are present in unusually high concentrations. Refer to the example of an LC-OCD chromatogram shown in Appendix 2. 9.4.1.3 Use the static leach test to evaluate virgin ion exchange resin quality, using Appendix 2 data for reference. 9.4.1.4 Use the dynamic leach test to evaluate the TOC rinse-up volume, this is effective when done in conjunction with particle testing. If the source UPW TOC level fluctuates during the test period, a delta measurement between the column inlet and outlet for the TOC may be required. 9.4.2 The temperature of virgin ion exchange resin during a static leach test should be 40 ± 3°C. A temperature specification is used to achieve comparable data for ion exchange resin and components and is not indicative of service temperatures. 9.4.3 Report measured values of TOC in micrograms of contamination per liter of resin tested (g/L). Detection limits (also defined in g/L) should be reported for all measured values of TOC. NOTE 3: The static leach test using UPW, even one of a15-hour duration, has limitations. The values measured using a static leach test do not directly relate to the trace contaminant values which could be present in a flowing stream of liquid. Virgin ion exchange resin quality can be defined using the correlation studies for dynamic and static leach tests shown in Appendix 2. 9.4.4 Metallic Contamination Test 9.4.4.1 Metallic contamination specifications and testing may be needed for ion exchange virgin resin samples tested. It is particularly important for UPW applications where sensitivity to trace metals is high. This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 7 Doc. 5621B SEMI LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 9.4.4.2 Virgin HPIX resin should conform to the end user’s specifications. In a UPW the static leach test, no metals should be detected in the leach solution. Refer to Appendix 2 for information on the metal extractable. 9.4.5 Use either UPW or acid for the static leach tests. 9.4.5.1 Use a static leach test with UPW for all semiconductor applications. 9.4.5.2 Use a static leach test with HCl for processes susceptible to metal contamination. 9.4.6 The temperature of virgin of ion exchange resin during a static leach test should be 40 ± 3°C for UPW and the ambient temperature (23± 2°C) for HCl. A temperature specification is used to achieve representative data for ion exchange resin and is not indicative of service temperatures. 9.4.7 Report measured values of metallic contamination in micrograms of contamination per liter of resin tested (g/L). Detection limits (also defined in ug/L) should be reported for all measured values. NOTE 4: The static leach test using UPW or HCl, even one of a 15-hour duration, has limitations. The values measured using a static leach test do not directly relate to the trace contaminant values which could be present in a flowing stream of liquid. 9.5 Broken Beads 9.5.1 Broken Beads may indicate a problem in the resin manufacturing or handling process and cause clogging in the resin beds. Virgin HPIX resin with many broken beads may also produce high particle content. Check the resin for broken or cracked beads before conducting any other tests. 9.5.2 Using deionized water and a representative sample of the virgin HPIX resin, prepare four microscope slides. Do not allow the slides to dry out. Count the number of each bead classification as described below: 9.5.2.1 Count the number of whole perfect beads, cracked but whole beads, and broken fragments (equal to or larger than half a bead) in the samples on the slides. Record the numbers until the total number of beads counted is > 100. 9.5.2.2 The total number of beads counted is defined as: Total Beads = Number of Whole Perfect Beads + Number of Cracked but Whole Beads + Number of Broken Beads / 2 (1) NOTE 6: Division of broken beads by a factor of 2 implies that the bead is split into two pieces and both are counted. Although the reality may be different, this approach provides a normalized estimate taking into account various possibilities. 9.5.2.3 Calculation and Results: (A) % Whole = Number of Whole Perfect Beads × 100 / Total Beads (2) (B) % Cracked = Number of Cracked But Whole Beads × 100 / Total Beads (3) (C) % Broken = Number of Broken Beads × 100 / Total Beads (4) Verify that: (A) % + (B) % + (C) % = 100% (5) 9.5.3 Repeat the bead count on the other three slides and calculate the average result. 9.5.4 Success Criteria: If B<10% and C<5%, the resin is acceptable for the use in polish tank. NOTE 7: Follow the sample handling recommendations in § 8 of this document. This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 8 Doc. 5621B SEMI LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 10 Leach Test Procedures 10.1 General Procedures 10.1.1 The preferred order of test method steps is shown below. The shaded cell indicates pre-screening steps. Reject any virgin HPIX resin samples that do not meet any of the pre-screening criteria. Broken Bead Content — establishes basic integrity of the resin beads ↓ Make Go/No Go Decision ↓ Particle test — assesses the leach-out potential of particles from the virgin ion exchange resin beds using a static leach test ↓ Optional particle test — assesses the time to rinse particles from the resin using a dynamic leach test. ↓ Optional particle test — assesses the elemental composition and particles dimensional characteristics using SEM ↓ Organics test — assesses the leach-out potential of organic compounds from the virgin ion exchange resin beds using a static leach test. ↓ Optional organics test – assesses the time to rinse particles from the resin using a dynamic leach test. ↓ Optional organics speciation test – speciates organics using LC-OCD (static leach test sample) ↓ Metal test — assesses the leach-out potential of metals from the virgin ion exchange resin beds using a UPW static leach test. ↓ Optional metal test— assesses the leach-out potential of metals from the virgin ion exchange resin beds using an HCl static leach test. ↓ Create Final Report Figure 2 The Test Method Process Flow 11 Test Procedure 11.1 Dynamic Leach 11.1.1 The dynamic leach test determines the projected UPW volume and time required to rinse the virgin HPIX resin (see Appendix 2 for an example of test data). 11.1.1.1 Preparations/Equipment: This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 9 Doc. 5621B SEMI LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 11.1.1.2 Column dimensions represent a full-scale polish tank 2.54 cm (1inch) diameter by 121.92 cm (4ft) bed depth. See § 7 for column details. 11.1.1.3 Column Material: refer to § 7.1. 11.1.1.4 Hydraulic conditions: Representative of full-scale polish tanks 0.049 m/s (20 gpm/ft2). NOTE 7: If the polish tank is rinsed under lower flow than the normal operation flow, the particle level may increase once the bed put on-line. 11.1.1.5 Metrology: PSDA, NRM, TOC. 11.1.1.6 Establish a test baseline by running UPW through the empty column until all the required parameters are met. TOC = test skid background level. Particles non-detect, (at the noise level) for PSDA and NVR = test skid background level. 11.1.1.7 Pack column in an ISO Class 7 or better, environment (per current revision of ISO 14644, roughly equivalent to FED STD 209E Class 10,000). 11.1.1.8 To avoid separation, do not make slurry of the resin. Do not agitate the column (pack as you load by tapping on the walls). 11.1.1.9 Column pre-flush: Install the test column in the test apparatus (see Figure 1). Direct effluent to a drain or reclaim it; to prevent bubbles from being introduced, do not allow effluent to enter the on-line metrology. To avoid hydraulic shock, slowly open the UPW valves. Slowly fill the column from the top while venting excess air from the top and bottom of the column. 11.1.1.10 When the column is full of water, increase the UPW flow rate to 1 LPM and flush for three minutes. 11.1.1.11 Reduce the flow to 0.42 LPM and start measuring effluent. 11.1.1.12 Data Collection: Run UPW through the column for three days and collect data from PSDA, NRM, TOC. 11.1.1.13 Subtract background TOC values from the test data provided a stable background is maintained throughout the test (incoming TOC does not vary by more than ± 0.1 ppb). If incoming TOC varies by more than ± 0.1 ppb, subtract the actual incoming TOC (instantaneous) from the downstream TOC data. 11.1.1.14 Prepare Report: Plot a log/log linear regression and extrapolate the time taken to achieve the success criteria. 11.1.1.15 The linear log-log slope may change as the surface rinse mechanism can be replaced with diffusion out of the resin beads. 11.2 Static Leach 11.2.1 Preparations/Equipment: 11.2.1.1 Container Material: High purity PFA to minimize background contamination. The container must be precleaned and qualified for the tests to be conducted. 11.2.1.2 The criteria for the qualification imply that all the parameters tested in the container filled with UPW should be either less than detection limits or significantly lower than the values of the test results. Background values higher than detection limits should be included in the report. 11.2.1.3 Container made from the same materials as in ¶ 10.2.1.1 filled with UPW (used for background subtraction in the report). 11.2.1.4 Container volume must be sufficient for the analyses (at least 500 mL). If optional PSDA grab sample test is chosen additional 200-250 ml volume is required for the analysis. 11.2.1.4.1 Mark the working level of the container. 11.2.1.5 Measure working volume of the container by filling it with UPW to the level to be used in the test. 11.2.1.6 Volume ratio: 2:1 of UPW to resin ratio. NOTE 8: Resin shrinks as it is mixed with UPW. This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 10 Doc. 5621B SEMI LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 11.2.1.7 UPW quality: Minimum background contribution 18+ MΩ∙cm, < 10 ppb TOC, minimum 0.1μm final filter pore size. 11.2.2 Metrology 11.2.2.1 Particles: LPC (0.3-1µm), PSDA (optional for critical applications, 10nm - 0.5 µm), SEM (optional for troubleshooting) 11.2.2.2 Organics: Analyze with a TOC meter or LC-OCD for speciation (optional). 11.2.2.3 Metals: Analyze with ICP-MS. 11.2.3 UPW Static Leach Test Procedure: 11.2.3.1 Add ~200 mL of resin to the pre-cleaned 500 mL PFA container. 11.2.3.2 Fill container with UPW. Measure the total volume of the container and the volume of UPW added to the resin. Calculate the resin volume by subtracting the UPW volumes from the total container volume. 11.2.3.3 Pre-rinse the resin: Manually shake the container; pour off as much water as possible, while being careful not to lose any of the resin. NOTE 9: Shake the container gently. 11.2.3.4 Repeat step in ¶ 11.2.3.3 ten times. 11.2.3.5 Conduct UPW static leach test: fill the container with UPW and place in an oven at 40± 3C for 15 hrs. 11.2.3.6 Remove container from oven. 11.2.3.7 Shake (using orbital shaker) at 75 rpm for one hour. 11.2.3.8 Pour off the UPW and collect samples for measuring particles by LPC, SEM (optional) and PSDA (optional), as well as metals, TOC, and organic speciation (optional). 11.2.4 Conduct HCl static leach test (optional): 11.2.4.1 Place 10g of resin in a 125mL PFA bottle with 50 ml 1:3HCl (35%) solution at ambient temperature. 11.2.4.2 Manually shake the resin/HCl solution for 10 seconds. 11.2.4.3 Leach for one hour. 11.2.4.4 Manually shake the leach solution for 10 seconds and then allow the resin to settle for 30min. 11.2.4.5 Pour off acid solution for metals analysis. 11.2.4.6 Blank solution should be prepared following the same steps of the resin extraction. The blank values should be included in the report. NOTE 10: Acid purity should be high to allow for detection of the metals at the required level of the specification. 12 Resin Quality Validation 12.1 The virgin HPIX resin supplier should define, establish, and execute a testing program for the resin based upon the definitions outlined in this document. The testing program should specify the frequency of resin testing and identify any necessary corrective action plan if the resin does not meet the quality needs of the end user. 12.2 The resin is considered to be representative of the entire batch. Samples should be randomly selected from a batch manufactured under current production processes. 13 Related Standards and Other Documents S. Huber, A. Balz, M. Abert, W. Pronk (2011). Characterization of aquatic humic and non-humic matter with sizeexclusion chromatography e organic carbon detection e organic nitrogen detection (LC-OCD-OND). Water Research, volume 45, issue 2, January 2011 This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 11 Doc. 5621B SEMI LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 14 Summary Report Form Material Description Material Manufacturer: Material Part #: Material Serial #: Section ______________________________ ______________________________ ______________________________ ______________________________ Description of Test Lab(s) Used: ________________________________________ Dates of Analysis ____________________________________ Leaching Volume (ml)_________________________________ Leaching Surface Area (m2)_____________________________ Specification Value (See #1) 11.1 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.1 11.2 9.5 Measured Value Conforms? √ (See #2) Particle Contribution Rinse Test (indicate particle target size used for PSDA) PSDA results for static leach (indicate particle target size used for PSDA) Particles Leach, #/ml resin >0.3u >0.5u >1 u Metallic Contamination (indicate type of the Leach procedure) Aluminum Arsenic Barium Boron Calcium Chromium Copper Iron Lead Lithium Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Strontium Zinc Cobalt Tin Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Contamination from Rinse Test Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Contamination from Static Test Broken Beads, % #1 Fill in the appropriate specification. #2 If a specific test is not required, write “N/A.” By my signature, I hereby sign that the above information is correct. Signature: Detection Limits - UPW or HCl Leach - Comments:______________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ ___ _______________________________ ____________ Print Name:_________________________________ _________ Date: _______________________________ This is ____________ a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document Company development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Name:_________________________________ Page 12 Doc. 5621B SEMI _____ Title: LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 APPENDIX 1 ILLUSTRATION OF PERFECT WHOLE AND CRACKED BEADS NOTICE: The material in this Appendix is an official part of SEMI [designation number] and was approved by full letter ballot procedures on [A&R approval date]. Figure A1-1 Perfect Beads Figure A1-2 Cracked Beads This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 13 Doc. 5621B SEMI LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 APPENDIX 2 VALIDATION TESTING OF THE RESIN QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE NOTICE: The material in this Appendix is an official part of SEMI [designation number] and was approved by full letter ballot procedures on [A&R approval date]. A2-1 Validation Testing for the Resin Quality Assessment Procedure A2-1.1 Prepared by Balazs and CT Associates, Inc. of the SEMI IX Task Force. A2-2 Dynamic Rinse Testing A2-2.1 Test Parameters: Particles by LNS Organics by TOC Non-volatile residue by NRM Performed by CT Associates, Inc. 1” PVDF columns Samples provided by Siemens, Lanxess, Purolite, Itochu (Mitsubishi), and Kurita The data is presented anonymous with random order of samples used the same letter assignments to suppliers were used in the dynamic and static tests UPW return or drain Vent to drain P2 P1 UPW UPW Particle Sizing/Counting Monitor UPW return or drain 48" Long 1" I.D. Non-volatile Residue Monitor UPW return or drain Total Organic Carbon Monitor UPW return or drain Total effluent rate rate - 420 mL/min UPW return or drain Vent to drain Figure A2-1 Test Apparatus This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 14 Doc. 5621B SEMI LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 Table A2-1 Background Levels Resin Sample TOC (ppb) NVR (ppt) Particles ≥ 10 nm (#/ml) A 0.69 220 1.29E+07 B 0.65 209 1.20E+07 C 0.79 262 1.22E+07 D 0.71 241 1.40E+07 E 0.68 226 1.40E+07 F 0.49 197 1.14E+07 Spool 0.66 238 1.51E+07 Average 0.67 228 1.31E+07 Standard Deviation 0.09 22 1.33E+00 Cv (%) 13.6% 9.5% 10.1% 1.9 0.18 42 2.60E+00 NOTE 11: “Spool” represents the test resin column with no resin. Cumulative Particle Concentration Added (#/mL > 10 nm) 1e+9 Resin A Resin B Resin C Resin D Resin E Resin F Spool 1e+8 1e+7 1e+6 1e+5 1 10 100 1000 Flush Volume (liters UPW) Figure A2-2 Cumulative Particle Concentration Measured in Dynamic Leach Test This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 15 Doc. 5621B SEMI LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 1e+10 Cumulative Particle Concentration (#/mL > 10 nm) Resin A Resin B Resin C Resin D Resin E Resin F Spool Ave Background 1e+9 1e+8 1e+7 1e+6 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Flush Volume (liters UPW) Figure A2-3 Cumulative Particle Concentration Measured in Dynamic Leach Test (linear coordinates) 5000 Resin A Resin B Resin C Resin D Resin E Resin F Spool Ave. Background Non-volatile residue (ppt) 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Flush Volume (liters) Figure A2-4 Non-volatile Residue Measured in Dynamic Leach Test (linear coordinates) This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 16 Doc. 5621B SEMI LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 Non-volatile residue added (ppt) 10000 Resin A Resin B Resin C Resin D Resin E Resin F Spool 1000 100 10 1 10 100 1000 Flush Volume (liters) Figure A2-5 Non-volatile Residue Measured in Dynamic Leach Test (log-log coordinates) 14 Resin A Resin B Resin C Resin D Resin E Resin F Spool Ave. Background 12 TOC (ppb) 10 8 6 4 2 0 1 10 100 1000 Flush Volume (Liters) Figure A2-6 TOC Measured in Dynamic Leach Test (linear-log coordinates) This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 17 Doc. 5621B SEMI LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 100 Resin A Resin B Resin C Resin D Resin E Resin F Spool TOC added (ppb) 10 1 0.1 0.01 1 10 100 1000 Flush Volume (Liters) Figure A2-7 TOC Measured in Dynamic Leach Test (log-log coordinates) NOTE 12: Unstable TOC values at the end of the experiments were due to the effect of the UPW temperature on the TOC leachouts from the tested resin (TOC instrument provided temperature compensation). Table A2-2 Dynamic Leach Summary Particles ≥ 10nm NVR TOC Sample ID 1E+7/ml added (liters UPW) 1E+6/ml added (liters UPW) 500 ppt added (liters UPW) 50 ppt added (liters UPW) 1 ppb added (liters UPW) 0.2 ppb added (liters UPW A 140 760 2 160 65 >1800 B 16 40 <1 <10 25 120 C 170 820 <1 <10 80 >1800 D 250 900 190 300 140 >1800 E 1020 >2000 240 >2000 215 >1800 F 190 1100 140 NA 205 1000 Spool 3 50 <1 <10 <1 <1 This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 18 Doc. 5621B SEMI Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 A2-3 Static Leach Testing A2-3.1 Test Parameters: Metals by ICPMS Particles by LPC, SEM, and LNS Organics by TOC and LC-OCD Performed by Air Liquide, Balazs o 500 ml PFA container, Volume ratio 1:1 UPW to resin thorough pre-rinse 40°C leach (15 hrs.), followed by 1hr. agitation o Samples provided by Siemens, Lanxess, Purolite, Itochu (Mitsubishi), and Kurita o The data is presented anonymous with random order of samples used Numbering of the resin in both Dynamic and Static leach tests is consistent Table A2-3 Total Organic Carbon and TOC Speciation of the Static Leach Samples Organics, ppb Resin Sample DOC HOC HMW LMW Acids LM W Neutral X1 X2 X3 TOC LC-OCD ID A 150 222 3 22 6 8 65 103 16 8 38 50 52 3 B 89 180 ND 37 C 220 295 ND 30 8 135 62 52 13 D 250 252 7 12 ND 68 30 101 39 E 190 261 12 52 5 30 35 107 26 F 250 336 ND 35 4 91 40 56 119 Baseline ND NA NOTE: HOC – hydrophobic HMW – high molecular weight LMW – low molecular weight Synthetic Compounds: o X1 – matches retention time of ethanol o X2 – matches retention time of methanol o X3 – matches retention time of TMA This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 19 Doc. 5621B SEMI LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT X3 X1 X2 Bypass 3,5 DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 Ammonium -- OCD -- UVD -- OND LMW Acids Project: Balazs_130 Biopolymers 4 Building Blocks Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 3 A rel. Signal Response 2,5 Resin 14-00938 C 2 Resin 14-00943 B Resin 14-00944 F 1,5 Resin 14-00958 E 1 Resin 14-00960 D 0,5 Resin Lot CHS 50007 0 0 50 100 150 200 Retention Time in Minutes Figure A2-8 LC-OCD Chromatogram This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 20 Doc. 5621B SEMI Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 Figure A2-9 Particle Images by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 21 Doc. 5621B SEMI Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 Cumulative Number Concentration (#/mL) 1e+9 Resin A Resin B Resin C Resin D Resin E Resin F Blank 1e+8 1e+7 1e+6 10 20 30 40 50 60 80 100 Particle Diameter (nm) Figure A2-10 Grab Sample Particle Leach Analysis by LNS Table A2-4 Grab Sample Particle Leach Analysis by LNS Cumulative Concentration x 106 (#/mL) Resin ID ≥ 10 nm ≥ 20 nm ≥ 30 nm A 121 11.6 1.32 B 65 4.5 0.27 C 125 18.0 6.42 D 87 9.7 1.29 E 225 30.0 7.02 F 3052 92.6 26.8 31 2.7 0.51 Blank This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 22 Doc. 5621B SEMI LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 Table A2-5 Grab Sample Particle Leach Results of LPC and SEM Analyses Resin ID LPC, particles per ml SEM >0.3 µm >0.5 µm >1 µm >2 µm 0.1-0.2 µm 0.2-0.5 µm 0.5-1 µm >1 µm A 56,000 17,000 2,300 460 1500 ± 100 190 ± 20 97 ± 10 ND B 290 84 7.5 0.7 97 ±10 <49 <49 <49 11,000 1,200 44000 ± 4000 3200 ± 300 630 ± 60 340 ± 30 C 930,000 140,000 D 45,000 12,000 880 97 1200 ± 100 150 ± 10 49 ± 5 49 ± 5 E 34,000 13,000 220 310 1300 ± 100 150 ± 10 49 ± 5 49 ± 5 F 41,000 6,400 550 91 1800 ± 200 290 ± 30 49 ± 5 49 ± 5 Blank 39 6.8 0.8 0.3 <49 <49 <49 <49 Table A2-6 Static Leach Metal Analysis by UPW Extraction Metals Resin Sample ID Elements Concentration, ng/ml (resin) Detection Limits, ng/ml (resin) Detected A None ND 0.002-0.08 B None ND 0.002-0.08 C Fe K Na 0.04 0.06 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.01 D None ND 0.002-0.08 E None ND 0.002-0.08 F None ND 0.002-0.08 Blank None ND 0.002-0.08 NOTE: 30 elements were tested by high resolution ICPMS; Only those above detection limits were reported; Detection limits are 1-40 ppt in H2O for the metals tested (Ag, Al, As, Au, B, Ba, Be, Bi, Ca, Cd, Ce, Co, Cr, Cs, Cu, Fe, Ga, Ge, Hg, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, Pb, Sn, Sr,Ti, W, Zr). This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 23 Doc. 5621B SEMI LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 Table A2-7 HCl Leach for Metals IX Resin Sample ID Elements RL Unit A B C D E F Aluminum (Al) 0.1 ppb (ng/g) 0.5 1.7 5.6 6 0.2 2.6 Antimony (Sb) 0.1 ppb (ng/g) * * * * * * Arsenic (As) 0.2 ppb (ng/g) 0.4 * * * * * Barium (Ba) 0.05 ppb (ng/g) 0.08 * 0.11 0.09 * * Beryllium (Be) 0.1 ppb (ng/g) * * * * * * 1 ppb (ng/g) 5 * 22 * * 2 0.1 ppb (ng/g) * * * * * * 1 ppb (ng/g) 12 2 85 8 2 19 Chromium (Cr) 0.1 ppb (ng/g) 7.1 1 3.6 4.9 7.9 10 Cobalt (Co) 0.05 ppb (ng/g) 0.19 * 0.09 * 0.05 0.23 Copper (Cu) 0.1 ppb (ng/g) 0.3 0.2 0.1 * * 0.4 Gallium (Ga) 0.1 ppb (ng/g) * * * * * * Germanium (Ge) 1 ppb (ng/g) * * * * * * Gold (Au) 1 ppb (ng/g) * * * * * * Iron (Fe) 1 ppb (ng/g) 330 2 21 4 4 110 Lead (Pb) 0.1 ppb (ng/g) * * * * * 0.1 Lithium (Li) 0.05 ppb (ng/g) * * * * 0.16 * Magnesium (Mg) 0.1 ppb (ng/g) 20 0.3 20 0.5 0.4 9 Manganese (Mn) 0.1 ppb (ng/g) 6.2 * 0.5 * * 2.1 Molybdenum (Mo) 0.1 ppb (ng/g) 0.4 0.5 0.3 2.7 * 2.2 Nickel (Ni) 0.1 ppb (ng/g) 7.6 0.2 0.9 5.1 0.7 26 1 ppb (ng/g) 14 1 11 4 * 3 Silver (Ag) 0.5 ppb (ng/g) * * * * * * Sodium (Na) 0.1 ppb (ng/g) 710 5 96 6.6 2.8 62 Strontium (Sr) 0.05 ppb (ng/g) 0.13 * 0.56 0.11 0.09 0.14 Tin (Sn) 0.1 ppb (ng/g) * * * * * * Titanium (Ti) 1 ppb (ng/g) * * * * * * Vanadium (V) 0.1 ppb (ng/g) * * * * * * 1 ppb (ng/g) * * * * * * Zirconium (Zr) 0.1 ppb (ng/g) 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.2 * * Bismuth (Bi) 0.1 ppb (ng/g) * * * * * * Mercury (Hg) 1 ppb (ng/g) * * * * * * Tungsten (W) 1 ppb (ng/g) * * * * * Boron (B) Cadmium (Cd) Calcium (Ca) Potassium (K) Zinc (Zn) This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 24 Doc. 5621B SEMI LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016 Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International 3081 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134-2127 Phone: 408.943.6900, Fax: 408.943.7943 NOTICE: SEMI makes no warranties or representations as to the suitability of the Standards and Safety Guidelines set forth herein for any particular application. The determination of the suitability of the Standard or Safety Guideline is solely the responsibility of the user. Users are cautioned to refer to manufacturer’s instructions, product labels, product data sheets, and other relevant literature, respecting any materials or equipment mentioned herein. Standards and Safety Guidelines are subject to change without notice. By publication of this Standard or Safety Guideline, SEMI takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights or copyrights asserted in connection with any items mentioned in this Standard or Safety Guideline. Users of this Standard or Safety Guideline are expressly advised that determination of any such patent rights or copyrights and the risk of infringement of such rights are entirely their own responsibility. This is a Draft Document of the SEMI International Standards program. No material on this page is to be construed as an official or adopted Standard or Safety Guideline. Permission is granted to reproduce and/or distribute this document, in whole or in part, only within the scope of SEMI International Standards committee (document development) activity. All other reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of SEMI is prohibited. Page 25 Doc. 5621B SEMI LETTER (YELLOW) BALLOT DRAFT Document Number: 5621B Date: 2/16/2016