MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal

advertisement
MOAC and Systems Biology Doctoral Training Centres’
Mini projects 2007
DRAFT
UNRATIFIED DOCUMENT
BP=Biophysics/biophysical chemistry; B=biology; T=mathematics/computing; E=experimental
SB need to say what systems is, what techniques to study and whether it is possible to perturb the system.
Comment
Decision
MOAC
B
SB
BP
T
E
T
Suggest not SB. Is it?

2. Tim Bugg and Jian-Jun Li Chemical
Genetics of Plant Apocarotenoid Natural
Products
Need to justify why it is a good SB
project


3. Tim Bugg and Sandeep Sandhu
Analysis of Bacterial Cell Wall Biosynthesis
Need to justify why it is a good SB
project


4. Kerry Burton Bioinformatics
characterisation of fungal sequences
regulating protein expression and localization
Kerry should talk to Sascha Ott.
Need to justify why it is a good SB
project
7. Katherine Denby Analysis of
transcription factors with a role in plant
defence
Need to justify why it is a good SB
project
8. Ann Dixon and Graham Ladds GPCR
SIGNALLING: MAPPING KEY PROTEINPROTEIN INTERACTIONS IN THE
MEMBRANE
Need to justify why it is a good SB
project


9. Lorenzo Frigerio Imaging the
intracellular targeting of vacuolar membrane
proteins in living cells
Need to justify why it is a good SB
project.


1. Steven Brown and Ann Dixon SOLIDSTATE NMR AS A STRUCTURAL PROBE OF
MEMBRANE PROTEINS

10. Maj Hulten Crossover Hotspots and Genetic Experimental and theoretical projects. Projects

need to be defined clearly.
Interference: Mathematical Modelling of a Wave Phenomenon




& Measurement of Crossover positions by immunofluorescence


11. Steve Jackson and David Wild
Modelling transcriptional networks involved in
flower induction
Need to justify why it is a good SB
project
12. Graham Ladds DEVELOPMENT OF
FLUORESCENT YEAST STRAINS FOR
INVESTIGATIONS INTO POPULATION
VARIABILITY
Need to justify why it is a good SB
project


13. Andrea Massiah & Brian Thomas
Investigation into floral input pathway activity
during vegetative phase maturation
Need to justify why it is a good SB
project


14. Richard Napier (plus Dan Mitchell and
Hugo van den Berg) Recording Real-time
changes in hormone concentration
Need to justify why it is a good SB
project. Note: Linked to 23


15. Joanne Oates (Ann Dixon and Matt
Clarify experimental part
Hicks) GLYCOPHORIN A MEMBRANE

INSERTION AND FOLDING BY LINEAR
DICHROISM

16. Martyn Rittman & Alison Rodger
Measurement of DNA persistence length

17. Alison Rodger Understanding flow in
linear dichroism experiments
What are membrane markers? Need
more details
18. David Roper The role of PBPs in
Peptidoglycan Biosynthesis
Need to justify why it is a good SB
project. Bit ambitious.

19. David Scanlan and Claudia Blindauer
Towards an understanding of multiple
paralogues for metal-handling genes in a
coastal cyanobacterium
Is this two projects? Rewrite as two.

20. Hendrik Schaefer Bioinformatic and
transcriptional analysis of a marine
methylotroph
Part 1 too risky without genome.
Second part wet lab part OK. What will
the student actually do.

21. A Shmygol Decoding Ca2+ signals in
human myometrium: confocal imaging and
numerical simulation of the Ca2+ release
events targeting plasma membrane ion
channels.
Is it too ambitious? Is it two projects?
Need to be rewritten as separate
projects. Or just experimental.

22. Corinne Smith Protein-protein
interactions 2: quantitative assessment of
protein-protein interactions
Linked to 26. Is it really feasible? Are
constructs available. What will student
actually do? Focus down. Justify SB
23. Hugo Van den Berg Simulating Realtime changes in hormone concentration from
Biacore data
Need to justify why it is a good SB
project. Linked to 14
24. Hugo van den Berg and David
Whitworth Modelling the photoprotective
response in Myxococcus xanthus
Linked with 27
25. Dave Whitworth Predicting Biomolecular
Interactions: Comparative Prokaryotic
Genomics
Justify why systems biology
26. Dave Whitworth & Corinne Smith
Protein-protein interactions 1: Protein
expression, purification and activity assays
See 22


27. Dave Whitworth Assaying the
photoprotective response in Myxococcus
xanthus.
Justify why systems biology


28. David Wild Reconstructing gene
regulatory networks with nonlinear state
space models
Justify why systems biology














29. David Wild A Bayesian approach to
biological information retrieval
30. David Wild Fast Bayesian clustering for
microarray data
31. David Wild Integrating transcriptome and
metabolome changes in response to
pathogen infection
Justify why systems biology
Justify why systems biology


Clarify FT-IR
32. David Wild (WSB) and Philip McTernan
(CSRI). Delineating molecular mechanisms
contributing to mitochondrial dysfunction in
obesity and diabetes
Justify why systems biology
33. Vicky Buchanan-Wollaston Analysis
and modelling of microarray time course data
34. Matthew Turner Protein crystallisation at
surfaces in the presence of electric fields
35. Sascha Ott Finding Transcription Factor
Binding Sites in Co-expressed Promoters
36. Sascha Ott Modelling and Predicting
Transcription Factor Binding Sites
37. Sascha Ott Nucleosome Positioning
38. Sascha Ott In Silico Detection of
Regulatory Modules
39. Laura Baxter Identification of the host
targets of pathogenicity effector proteins
40. Julie V. Macpherson Development of
diamond and single walled carbon nanotube
electrodes for neurosensing applications






Linked with PRU. Justify why systems
biology. Ideally PRU first
Justify why systems biology



Justify why systems biology


Justify why systems biology





What is the student actually be going to
do? What protein?

42. Unwin Protein crystallisation at surfaces
in the presence of electric fields
Linked with 34.
43. Colin Robinson Translocation of
proteins by a novel TATAC-type bacterial
protein transporter
44. Erwin George and Martin Eigel
Simulation of spatio-temproal protein
distribution with GDF
44. Markus Kirkilionis Distribution of
proteins in cells
Justification of SB
M2. Steven Brown SOLID-STATE NMR: A
PROBE OF OXYGEN-CONTAINING
HYDROGEN BONDS
M3. Ewen Buckling Chromosomes

Justify why systems biology
41. Rand/Carre Analysis of dynamic changes
in gene expression under the control of the
circadian clock
M1. Stefan Bon Nanoparticles

Write as two projects. Theory first






Needs clarification. Why consumables?
Why SB?


Justification of SB needed. Is it doable?
What will the student do. Why
consumables?
What is biological application? Budget it
too high.




Need to clarify where samples are
coming from and what the student will
actually be doing.

M4. Tom Drewello Bio-templates for the
formation of nano-sized silver and gold
particles by electrospray
Budget too high

M5. Jonathan Duffy Glass transition of
sugars confined in nanopores
What will the stunt actually do?
Clairification of relevance to biology.

M6. Matthew Hicks PCR kinetics in real time
What will the student actually do in 8
weeks???


M7. Martyn Lochner Synthesis and
electrophysiological characterisation of
granisetron derivatives
M9. Magnus Richardson Determinants of
firing patterns of cerebellar neurones. Part II:
theory
Follows M10
M10. Mark Wall Determinants of firing
patterns of cerebellar neurones. Part I:
experiment
Precedes M9
M16. P. M. Rodger Structure
Structure/function studies on ALDC, part 3;
modelling
M17. Sascha Ott Modelling the Distribution
of Crossovers
M18. Corinne Smith Natively unfolded
proteins
M19. Magnus Richardson Neuronal
interactions with electromagnetic fields
S1. Rebecca Allen Identification of the host
targets of pathogenicity effector proteins
S2. Vicky Buchanan-Wollaston Analysis of
stress related signalling pathways in
Arabidopsis leaf development
S3. Vicky Buchanan-Wollaston Functional
analysis of genes that regulate plant stress
responses in Arabidopsis
S4. Chandler, Ryabov, Bittner-Eddy Gene
expression profiles in the honey bee
S5. Peter J. Eastmond Defining sugarsignalling pathways in Arabidopsis seedlings
using whole genome micro-arrays
S6. Magnus Richardson Effects of synaptic
amplitude distributions on neuronal firing
rates
S7. Magnus Richardson Extracting




M11. V. Zammit & Dr Ann Dixon Proteinprotein interactions involved in Carnitine
palmitoyltransferase 1 oligomerisation
M12. Professor M. Wills Structure
Structure/function studies on ALDC, part 1;
Chemistry
M13. Andrew Millard Development of
comparative genomic hybridisation with a
micro-array of the cyanophage S-PM2
M14. Andrew Millard Characterisation of
genes in the “ORFanage” region in the
cyanophage S-PM2
M15. V.Fulop Structure Structure/function
studies on ALDC, part 2; biology


Linked with M15 and M16


Linked with M12 and M16. What will
student do? What if crystals won’t
grow? Risk evaluation. What if M12
does not work.
Linked with M12 and M15, but can
stand alone.





Justify why SB

Justify why SB

Justify why SB

Justify why SB

Justify why SB

Justify why SB. MAKE SURE THE
CORRECT PROJECT GETS
INSERTED!!!!!
Reject

Wit
neuronal structure from image data
hdr
aw
n
S8. Konstantinos Thalassinos
Identification of post translational
modifications of proteins using mass
spectrometry
Justify why SB. Need to say what the
student will do. Needs rewriting.
S9. Matthew Turner Understanding animal
behaviour
S10. David Grammatopolous and David
Rand Insights of the corticotrophin-releasing
hormone (CRH)-MAPK signalling pathway
using a systems biology approach
Justify why SB. What will student
actually do?
Consumables budget???



MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
1
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: SOLID-STATE NMR AS A STRUCTURAL PROBE OF MEMBRANE PROTEINS
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing*
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Dr. Steven Brown (SB) and Dr. Ann Dixon (AD)
Department: Physics (SB) and Chemistry (AD) __________
Building, Room: Room 439 (SB) and Room C503 (AD)
E-mail address: s.p.brown@warwick.ac.uk, ann.dixon@warwick.ac.uk Phone number: 024765 74359 (SB)
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week):
Name:
Department: _____________________________________
Building, Room:
E-mail address: __________________________________
Phone number:
Project Outline.
Introduction. A key element of a cell is its lipid membrane; as well as sequestering the contents of the cell, the
membrane, and in particular membrane proteins that are embedded in the membrane, regulate how the cell
interacts with its environment. For example, the import and export of specific molecules to the cell as well as the
action of hormones attaching to membrane-bound protein receptors cause given chemical reactions to occur inside
the cell.
While membrane proteins account for 30% of proteins encoded by the human genome, only 92 membrane protein
structures have been successfully solved (as compared with the over 30,000 structures for soluble proteins).
Indeed, discoveries related to membrane protein structures have led to three Nobel prizes since 1987. This
discrepancy in the number of known structures is due to experimental difficulties, as membrane proteins are difficult
to produce in sufficient quantities for structural analysis, difficult to crystallise for X-ray studies, and often produce
large aggregates which can exceed the size limit for solution-state NMR spectroscopy. Solid-state NMR (SS-NMR)
is a powerful probe of molecular structure, offering atomic-scale resolution [1]. A landmark in the application of
solid-state NMR to structural biology was the determination in 2002 by Castellani et al. of the structure of the 62residue soluble protein, the -spectrin Src-homology (SH3) domain [2]. Solid-state NMR is well suited to the study
of membrane proteins in their natural phospholipid bilayer environment, and advanced solid-state NMR
methodology has also been applied to membrane proteins.
Aims. This project will focus on developing sample preparation and SS-NMR methods for a well-characterised
membrane protein, Glycophorin A (GpA). GpA contains a single transmembrane domain (Fig. 1a) that inserts into
membrane bilayers as a stable -helix and drives protein dimerisation (Fig. 1b) [3]. The GpA dimer has been
extensively studied, and we have a wealth of knowledge regarding the amino acids that stabilise its folding. One
sequence motif that is critical for the correct folding of GpA is the Gly-x-x-x-Gly motif (GG4), where Glycine
residues located every four amino acids localise to the same face of the helix and pack tightly against the other
helix (Fig. 1b) [4]. These Gly residues can be isotopically labelled, allowing us to investigate the stability of the
GpA dimer in membranes by SS-NMR.
*
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective Course
Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September 2007.
Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
Brief Outline of work. Peptides corresponding to the
transmembrane domain of GpA, containing 15N labels
on Gly79 and Gly83 (Fig 1a), will be purchased and
purified using reversed-phase HPLC. Once purified,
the peptides will be solubilised in a variety of lipid
formulations. The stability and correct folding of GpA
dimers will be analysed using one and twodimensional SS-NMR spectrometry. Peptide
purification and solubilisation will be carried out in the
Department of Chemistry. Solid-state NMR
experiments will be performed in the Department of
Physics.
References: [1] S. P. Brown, & L. Emsley. Solid-State NMR, in Handbook of Spectroscopy, Vo-Dinh and Gauglitz (eds), Wiley
(2003). [2] F. Castellani, B. van Rossum, A. Diehl, M. Schubert, K. Rehbein, and H. Oschkinat, Nature 420, 98 (2002). [3]
Lemmon, M.A., J.M. Flanagan, J.F. Hunt, B.D. Adair, B.-J. Bormann, C.E. Dempsey, and D.M. Engelman, J. Biol. Chem., 267,
7683 (1992). [4] Russ, W.P. and D.M. Engelman, J. Mol. Biol., 296(3), 911 (2000).
Consumables budget†: £ 200.00 for lipids and other consumables.
†
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover consumables
for all three of their mini-projects
2
Chemical Genetics of Plant Apocarotenoid Natural Products
a
b
Prof. Tim Bugg and Dr. Jian-Jun Li , Department of Chemistry, University of Warwick
[collaboration with Dr. Andrew Thompson & Dr. Martin Sergeant, Warwick HRI]
a
b
email T.D.Bugg@warwick.ac.uk, Room C513, ext. 73018;
email J-J.Li@warwick.ac.uk, Room C201, ext. 73822
Apocarotenoids are plant natural products formed by oxidative cleavage of carotenoids such as betacarotene and lycopene. Several of the apocarotenoids have important biological properties, for example
abscisic acid is used as a signalling hormone for drought response and growth. Through a BBSRC-funded
SCIBS grant, TDHB and AJT are studying the family of carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases (CCDs),
which catalyse the cleavage reactions [1], and have developed selective inhibitors for members of this
family of enzymes.
The aim of this project is to develop analytical methods for detection of apocaretonoid natural products
arising from 7,8-oxidative cleavage, and then to examine whether treatment of the producing plant with
CCD inhibitors affects the production of natural products. The project will be in two stages:
1. Development of methods for isolation & analysis of
apocarotenoids. The apocarotenoids crocin and crocetin
are produced a) in the red stigmas of the saffron crocus
(Crocus sativus); b) in the fruit of Gardenia jasminoides
[2]. The by-product of oxidative cleavage, safranal, is
also found in the volatiles of Crocus sativus [3].
Methods for extraction of the natural products, and
analysis by HPLC and GC-MS, will be developed,
using dried plant material.
2. System Perturbation. The apocarotenoid biosynthesis pathway will then be perturbed by addition of a
7.8-selective CCD inhibitor to the growing plant, prior to flowering/fruiting. The plant tissue will then
be collected, and analysed for the distribution of natural products.
7,8-oxidative cleavage
OH
7
CHO
OHC
8
HO
CHO
zeaxanthin
HO
COOR
ROOC
CHO
crocin R = (Glc)2
crocetin R = H
safranal
References.
1.
2.
3.
M.E. Auldridge, D.R. McCarty & H.J. Klee, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 2006, 9, 315-321.
S. Pfister, P. Meyer, A. Steck & H. Pfander, J. Agric. Food Chem., 1996, 44, 2612-2615.
M. d’Auria, G. Mauriello, & G.L. Rana, Flavour Fragrance J., 2004, 19, 17-23.
Timetabling. Suitable for MAOC mini-project slot 1,2 or 3; Systems Biology slot 1 or 2. During May-June would
be best for plant flowering times, but other times are possible.
Consumables. £100 for HPLC solvents, consumables.
3
Analysis of Bacterial Cell Wall Biosynthesis
Biophysical Chemistry Mini-Project: Professor Tim Bugga and Sandeep Sandhub , Department of Chemistry,
University of Warwick [Collaboration with Prof. C. Dowson, Dr. D. Roper, Dr. A.J. Lloyd, Department of
Biological Sciences; Dr. M. Chappell, Department of Engineering]
a
Room C513, email T.D.Bugg@warwick.acuk, tel 02476-573018; broom C201, email S.Sandhu.1@warwick.ac.uk,
tel 02476-573822
Bacterial cell wall peptidoglycan biosynthesis is the site of action of many clinically important antibiotics,
including the beta-lactam family of penicillins and cephalosporins, and the vancomycin group of glycopeptide
antibiotics [1]. TDHB’s group, in collaboration with Prof. C. Dowson and Dr. D. Roper (Biological Sciences), have
considerable experience of studying enzymes on this pathway [2], and are able to produce the intermediates and
enzymes for all the cytoplasmic steps (first 6 steps), and the first three steps of the lipid-linked cycle. The aim of
the Biophysical Chemistry mini-project is to measure the levels of each intermediate and each enzyme in bacterial
cells; the data from this mini-project will then be used to set up a quantitative model of the whole pathway.
UDP-MurNAc-L-Ala-D-Glu-L-Lys
D-Ala
DdlB
ATP
D-Ala-D-Ala MurF
ATP
UDP-MurNAcpentapeptide
CYTOPLASM
UMP
MraY
MurE
MurD
MurC
L-Lys
ATP
D-Glu
ATP
L-Ala
ATP
D-Ala
D-Ala
L-Lys
D-Glu
L-Ala
MurNAc
P
P
P
P
CELL SURFACE
P
P
peptidoglycan
cross-linking
MurG
UDPGlcNAc
UDPMurNAc
D-Ala
D-Ala
L-Lys
D-Glu
L-Ala
MurNAc GlcNAc
P
P
P
P
MurNAc GlcNAc MurNAc GlcNAc
L-Ala
L-Ala
D-Glu
D-Glu
L-Lys Ser-Ala
L-Lys Ser-Ala
D-Ala
D-Ala
D-Ala
D-Ala
MurB
MurA
NADPH
FADH2
PEP
MurM/N
Ala-tRNA
Ser-tRNA
transglycosylase
UDPGlcNAc
D-Ala
D-Ala
L-Lys Ser-Ala
D-Glu
L-Ala
MurNAc GlcNAc
P
P
P
P
MurNAc GlcNAc
L-Ala
D-Glu
L-Lys Ser-Ala
D-Ala
D-Ala
Outline: (discipline – biophysical chemistry; techniques – UV/vis/fluorescence, analytical chemistry)
Cell extract and membranes will be prepared from Escherichia coli at several time points during logarithmic and
stationary growth phases. The concentration of each of the cytoplasmic intermediates (present in soluble cell
extract) will be determined by anion exchange FPLC, by comparison with authentic standards, through UV/vis
absorption at 260 nm ( = 10,000 cm-1). The concentration of each lipid-linked intermediate (isolated by n-butanol
extraction of the membrane fraction) will be determined by modification with Sanger’s reagent (2,4dinitrofluorobenzene), and detection by reverse phase HPLC at 400 nm, eluting in 20-100% methanol. In vitro
assays will also be set up, using the E. coli membranes and authentic undecaprenyl phosphate, in order to generate
larger quantities of material for HPLC detection. The activities of each of the biosynthetic enzymes (MurA-F,
MraY, MurG) will be determined by UV/vis continuous assays (MurA-F) and fluorescence assays (MraY, MurG).
These data will be used in subsequent mini-projects, to set up a quantitative model for peptidoglycan biosynthesis.
References [1] “Bacterial Peptidoglycan Biosynthesis and its Inhibition”, T.D.H. Bugg, in “Comprehensive Natural Products
Chemistry”, (ed. M. Pinto), Vol. 3, pp. 241-294, Elsevier, 1999. [2] P.E. Brandish, M. Burnham, J.T. Lonsdale, R. Southgate,
M. Inukai, and T.D.H. Bugg, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 7609 (1996); N.I. Howard and T.D.H. Bugg, Bio-Org. Med. Chem., 11, 3083
(2003); J.J. Li and T.D.H. Bugg, Chem. Commun., 182 (2004); A.J. Lloyd, P.E. Brandish, A.M. Gilbey, and T.D.H. Bugg, J.
Bacteriol., 186, 1747 (2004).
Timetabling: Suitable for 8-week MOAC student in slot 1 or 2; or Systems Biology student in slot 1.
Consumables budget: £100 (for assay reagents & growth media)
4
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
th
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14 February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Bioinformatics characterisation of fungal sequences regulating protein expression and
localization
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
√ Dry Project
√ Mathematics/computing
Project timing‡
MOAC Mini Project
√ Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
√ Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
√ Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Kerry Burton
Department: Warwick HRI __________________________
Building, Room:
E-mail address: kerry.burton@warwick.ac.uk ____________
Phone number: 75137
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week):
Name:
Department: _____________________________________
Building, Room:
E-mail address: __________________________________
Phone number:
Project outline:
Therapeutic proteins are used in medicine to treat diseases, cancers and inherited conditions. Research to reduce
manufacturing costs is assessing the applicability of agricultural organisms. The fungus Agaricus bisporus has cost
advantages and has been shown to produce the demonstration proteins Green Fluorescent Protein and Cyanovirin-N. A
University of Warwick spin-out company, Prospero Therapeutics Ltd, was formed in 2006 to commercialise the project
and it is now seeking equity investment funding to develop the production of two therapeutic proteins.
Two approaches are being used to elevate protein yields; the exploitation of gene promoter elements and protein leader
sequences. Several high-level promoter sequences have been identified from Agaricus bisporus. Evidence suggests
these can be tissue specific, developmentally regulated and are capable of enhancing GFP expression. Information on
protein leader sequences, which can direct nascent protein into intracellular locations and affect stability and rate of
degradation, is more limited in Agaricus bisporus
In this project the student will use a comparative genomics approach to identify additional promoters and leader
regulatory sequences from filamentous fungi. This will be achieved through bioinformatic analyses of genome
sequences from several closely related fungi: Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Postia placenta, Coprinopsis cinereus and
Cryptococcus neoformans for leader sequences of proteins of known intracellular location. Agaricus bisporus has a
genome of 34 Mb which equates to ca. 10,000 genes; currently only 10% of the ORFs are available as sequences.
Using a wide range of molecular biology algorithms the basidiomycete genome sequences will be screened for promoter
and leader sequences. Genes encoding known proteins with well-defined intracellular locations will be examined to
identify putative leader sequences. Analagous sequences from different fungi will be compared to identify consensus
motifs/similarities that define intracellular location and/or promote gene transcription.
Timeframes are flexible, and as such the project will suit both 8-week MOAC and 12-week Systems Biology.
References: : [1] Burns, C., Gregory, K.E., Kirby, M., Cheung, M.K., Riquelme, M., Elliott, T.J., CHALLEN, M.P., Bailey, A.M., and Foster,
G.D. (2005) Efficient GFP expression in the mushroom Agaricus bisporus and Coprinus cinereus requires introns. Fungal Genetics and
Biology 42, 191–199 / [2] Zhang, C., Odon, V., Kim, H.K., CHALLEN, M., Burton, K. Hartley, D. and Elliott, T. (2004) Mushrooms for
Molecular Pharming. Mushroom Science 16, 611-617.
Consumables budget§: £ nil
‡
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective Course
Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September 2007.
Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
§
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover consumables
for all three of their mini-projects
7
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
th
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14 February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Analysis of transcription factors with a role in plant defence
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing**
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Katherine Denby
Department: Warwick HRI and Systems Biology _________
Building, Room: TPB133 (HRI), Coventry House 327
E-mail address: k.j.denby@warwick.ac.uk ______________
Phone number: 75097/50251
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week):
Name:
Department: _____________________________________
Building, Room:
E-mail address: __________________________________
Phone number:
Project outline:
I am interested in elucidating the gene regulatory networks controlling defence against the fungal pathogen
Botrytis cinerea in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. High-resolution time course expression profiling
experiments are underway to provide data for inferring large-scale network models but in this project we will
focus on identifying specific local networks. This information will be used in building network models and to
guide future experimental work.
Initial work has identified several Arabidopsis transcription factors (TFs) whose expression is significantly
upregulated during B. cinerea infection. For 4 of these, we have transgenic lines overexpressing the TF with
His and myc tags fused to the protein. These lines enable us to study the effect of increased levels of the TF
and the tags allow for easy analysis of protein levels. In this project, the susceptibility of these lines to B.
cinerea will be tested compared to wildtype plants. This will involve determination of lesion development, as
well as measurement of fungal growth within the plants. The degree of overexpression of TFs will be
assessed through immunoblotting with anti-His or anti-myc antibodies and homozygous lines identified with
PCR. Microarray experiments will be carried out to determine gene expression profiles, and hence potential
target genes, for one or more of the TF overexpressing lines.
References: AbuQamar et al. (2006) Expression profiling and mutant analysis reveals
complex regulatory networks involved in Arabidopsis response to Botrytis infection.
Plant Journal 48:28-44
Consumables budget††: £ 400 (my two dry projects have budgets of £0!!)
**
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective Course
Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September 2007.
Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
††
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover consumables
for all three of their mini-projects
8
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
th
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14 February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: GPCR SIGNALLING: MAPPING KEY PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS IN THE MEMBRANE
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing‡‡
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
MOAC Mini Project
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Dr. Ann Dixon (AD) and Dr. Graham Ladds (GL)
Department: Chemistry (AD) and Warwick Medical School (GL)
Building, Room: Room C503 (AD), Room M119 (GL)
E-mail address: ann.dixon@warwick.ac.uk
Phone number: 024761 50037
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name: Prof. Alison Rodger
Department: Chemistry _____________________________
Building, Room:
E-mail address: a.rodger@warwick.ac.uk _______________
Phone number: 024765 74696
Project outline:
Introduction. G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of membrane bound receptors, with
over 2000 members in vertebrates.1 Because they control the biological activity of messenger molecules such as
hormones, growth factors, and neurotransmitters,
GPCRs control many physiological processes linked to
disease. For this reason, they are the targets of a large
number of drugs. All GPCRs contain a central domain
composed of seven transmembrane helices (Fig.1).
Apart from this shared feature, the GPCR family
contains a very diverse range of sequences and
functions. GPCR signalling is further complicated by
the fact that these proteins can form oligomeric
complexes with other GPCRs (Fig.1),2,3 but the
mechanism of this association is unknown. Therefore,
to understand GPCR signalling we must not only study
their structure and interactions with ligands, but also
their interactions with one another.
Aims of Project. The mechanism of GPCR interaction will be investigated for two yeast GPCRs known to interact
and form oligomers. For both proteins, amino acid mutations in transmembrane domain I (TM1) have been shown
to prevent oligomerisation, either by destabilising intermolecular TM1-TM1 interactions or intramolecular
interactions between TM1 and neighbouring TM domains (e.g TM2 and TM7). We will study the self-association of
truncated versions of each protein (Fig.2) in an attempt to map the sites of protein-protein interaction.
Assay. Protein self-association will be examined using the TOXCAT assay. TOXCAT measures the relative
strength of non-covalent associations between TM helices in a natural membrane bilayer. 4 The concept behind the
assay is shown in Fig.2. In TOXCAT, a protein containing one, three, five, or all seven GPCR TM domains will be
expressed in the inner membrane of E. coli. Association of the TM domain results in activation of a reporter gene
(CAT) whose activity is related to the strength of association.
‡‡
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective Course
Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September 2007.
Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
Brief Outline of work. In the first stage, the
ability of individual GPCR TM domains to selfassociate will be assessed using the TOXCAT
assay. At this stage, synthetic primers encoding
the entire TM domain will be used to create the
constructs (no PCR required). This approach is
used routinely in AMD's laboratory and is rapid
and simple. In the second stage, truncations
containing groups of three and five TM domains
will be investigated for their ability to selfassociate using the TOXCAT assay. Polymerase
chain reaction (PCR) and modern cloning
techniques will be required to amplify these
longer regions, but it is anticipated that no more
than four of these constructs will be required
(TM1-3, TM1-5, TM3-5, and TM3-7).
I. TOXCAT assay used to analyse individual GPCR TM domains: Long DNA primers encoding individual TM
domains will be purchased and inserted into TOXCAT plasmid DNA, and the assay performed.
II. TOXCAT analysis of multiple TM regions: Truncations containing groups of three and five TM domains will
be prepared using PCR, inserted into TOXCAT plasmid DNA, and the assay performed.
This project will provide students with a basic knowledge of modern cloning techniques as well as methods for
handling and analysing membrane proteins.
References: [1] Bockaert, J., Pin, J.P., EMBO, 1999 (18) 1723-1729. [2] Overton, M.C., Chinault, S.L., Blumer, K.J.,
J. Biol. Chem., 2003 (278) 49369-49377. [3] Thevenin, D., Lazarova, T., Roberts, M.F., Robinson, C.R., Protein
Sci., 2005 (14) 2177-2186. [4] Russ, W.P., Engelman, D.M., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A, 1999 (96) 863-868.
Consumables budget§§: £150-200 for media, enzymes and consumables needed for cloning and assay.
§§
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover consumables
for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
9
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Friday 9th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Imaging
the intracellular targeting of vacuolar membrane proteins in living cells
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
√ Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
√ Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing***
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/3 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/3 to 18/05/2007)
√ Slot 2 (18/06 to 07/09/2007)
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 07/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Lorenzo Frigerio
Department: Biological Sciences
____________________ Building, Room: B122
E-mail address: l.frigerio@warwick.ac.uk _______________ Phone number: 02476 523181
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision
support to the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week):
Name:
Department: _____________________________________
Building, Room:
E-mail address: __________________________________
Phone number:
Project outline:
Vacuoles are the hallmark of plant cells and the intracellular endpoint of the plant secretory pathway. Very little is
known about the process that targets membrane proteins to the tonoplast (vacuolar membrane). We have generated a
panel of fluorescent protein[1] fusions to the major tonoplast aquaporins, the tonoplas intrinsic proteins (TIPs)[2]. We
intend to study the proces of TIP targeting in living leaf and seed cells. Besides the TIP-GFP reporters, which are useful
to mark the steady-state localisation of the proteins, we now have fusions between different TIPs and a photoactivatable
form of GFP (PA-GFP)[3]. PA-GFP can be activated with a short burst of 405 nm light whereupon it matures into
‘normal’ GFP.
The project makes use of TIP-PA-GFP fusions to study the trafficking of TIPs to the tonoplast by optical pulse-chase.
The fusions will be co-expressed with a set of standard xFP reporters to mark the main organelles of the plant secretory
pathway. The main aim is to establish a reliable protocol for the activation of TIP-PA-GFP in the endoplasmic reticulum
(ER), the port of entry of the secretory pathway. This will require: 1) the localisation and 3D imaging of the ER network
both in leaf and developing seed cells. 2) The identification of a small region of interest within the ER network, which
will be repeatedly activated. As protein diffusion at the ER membrane is extremely rapid, this will lead to the
photoactivation of the whole ER surface within minutes[4]. 3) Loss of fluorescence from the ER and the appearance of
TIP-activated GFP at different organelles of the secretory pathway will be monitored over time throughout the cell
volume.
A successful photoactivation experiment will provide invaluable information on a number of parameters: the route
followed by the protein to reach the PSV; the timing of the transport event; the half-life of the protein. Such parameters
have so far proven very difficult to determine using standard biochemical methods or immunocytochemistry.
The project is multidisciplinary as it combines basic molecular biology, plant genetics, advanced light imaging and
image processing.
References:
(1) Brandizzi, F., Fricker, M., Hawes, C. (2002) Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3: 520-30. (2) Jauh, G.-Y., Phillips, T.E., Rogers, J.C.
(1999) Plant Cell 11: 1867-1882. (3) Patterson, G.H., Lippincott-Schwartz, J. (2002) Science 297: 1873-7. (4) Runions, J.,
Brach, T., Kuhner, S., Hawes, C. (2006) J Exp Bot 57:43-50
***
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective Course
Director. Therefore, the final deadline for submission of reports is 18 September 2007.
Consumables budget†††: £ 200
Systems Biology Doctoral Training Centre 12-week Miniprojects
10
Type of project: Theoretical and/or practical
Supervisor’s name: Maj Hultén
Crossover Hotspots and Genetic Interference:
Mathematical Modelling of a Wave Phenomenon
&
Measurement of Crossover positions by immunofluorescence
BACKGROUND TO THE PROJECT
 The formation of crossovers (also called chiasmata and leading to recombination) between maternal and
paternal chromosomes is a fundamental biological process, obligatory for the reductional cell division, halving
the chromosome number in gametes (sperm and eggs in mammals). It is well known that crossovers are not
randomly distributed along the length of chromosomes, but accumulate near their ends (crossover hotspots)
and at long intervals (crossover/chiasma/genetic interference). This pattern is evolutionary conserved from
yeast to humans.
 Crossover maps, showing crossover positions can be assessed by family linkage analysis, tracing DNA alleles
between generations, but also directly visualised and analysed by microscopy (Review in Hulten 2005; see also
popular version http://www.biologia.uniba.it/eca/NEWSLETTER/NS-18/_NS-18.html).
 The first hypothesis for the underlying mechanism on the non-random crossover positioning was produced in
1916 by Muller, but this is still an outstanding biological enigma - and in spite of decades of work there is yet
no appropriate hypothesis explaining the mechanism underlying the occurrence of crossover hotspots and
interference (Browning 2003; review in Hillers 2004).
 We have a large crossover database (illustrations included) and material for microscopy images available for
analysis by the students.
AIMS OF THIS PROJECT
 The aim of the theoretical project is to investigate different mathematical approaches to illustrate the
crossover patterns as documented in the computerised database. We suggest that this pattern (which varies
slightly between individual sperm- and egg-forming cells) might be explained by the way the chromosome pairs
are suspended within the cell nucleus, in combination with vibration of the nuclear membrane, at the time
when crossovers are formed. It is hoped that the student will be able to establish a statistically significant
mathematical model that can be published in a renowned peer-reviewed journal.
 The practical project will involve preparation of microscopy slides for immune-fluorescence microscopy and
measurements of crossover positions along the length of individual chromosomes together with statistical
analysis.
METHODS TO BE USED
 In the theoretical project the student will apply different established mathematical models to test the
goodness of fit to the computerised data, under the assumption that the crossover patterns may be
recognised as the result of a vibration wave phenomenon. This could be caused by vibration of the nuclear
membrane to which the chromosomes are attached during the time period when crossovers are formed.
 We are still collecting more raw data, and in the practical project the student would be involved in
preparation of microscopy slides as well as recording crossover positions and measuring their positions
immuno-fluorescence images.
REFERENCES
 Browning S (2000) Genetics 155:1955-1960
 Hillers KJ (2004) Current Biology 14, 24, R1036
†††
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover consumables
for all three of their mini-projects
 Hultén et al (2005) In Encyclopedia of Genetics, Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics (online edition),
Jorde, L.. B., Little, P. F. R.., Dunn, M. J. and Subramaniam, S. (Eds) John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Chichester. DOI:
10.1002/047001153X.g102206, and references therein
TYPE OF PROJECT
 This project is available as both a miniproject 1 and 2.
Systems Biology Doctoral Training Centre 12-week Miniprojects
11
TYPE OF PROJECT : THEORETICAL
SUPERVISOR’S NAME: Steve Jackson & David Wild
TITLE OF PROJECT : Modelling transcriptional networks involved in flower induction
BACKGROUND TO THE PROJECT
The power of microarrays are that they provide genome-wide transcription profiles which enable
broader, more global questions to be asked about whole systems rather than the usual tight focus on one
or two genes. The amount of information arising from just a simple experiment, however, can be vast and
is often not fully analysed/utilised. Good bioinformatics and modelling approaches are therefore essential
to make use of all the data and to interpret the results.
Timecourse analysis of gene expression in Arabidopsis leaves has been done before on a limited
scale, however we are aiming to build the first complete transcription profile of the events going on in a
particular leaf throughout its development. This will enable the identification of transcriptional networks
controlling specific processes that occur at different stages of development of the leaf (eg. leaf expansion,
floral induction, senescence). High quality microarray data has been obtained and some preliminary
analysis has been done which shows the expected transcriptional profiles of specific key genes. We are
now in a position to explore the huge amount of information contained in this unique set of data.
AIMS OF THIS PROJECT
We have data from plants grown in different photoperiodic conditions, in florally inductive long
days (LD), non-inductive short days (SD), and from plants that were transferred from SD to LD to induce
flowering at a specific time. The aims of this miniproject will be to interrogate these datasets and identify
genes that are up-regulated in this leaf upon flower induction. Clusters of genes involved in specific
pathways will be identified and modelling will be used to identify control networks and nodal control
genes.
METHODS TO BE USED
Genes whose expression is significantly modulated over time will be determined by the method of
Tai and Speed (2004). Time series clustering of gene expression profiles will be performed using the
Bayesian approach of Heard et al. (2005), which has the advantage over other clustering methods in that
there is no pre assigned number of clusters. Gene ontology annotation of the clusters will be used to guide
the selection of subsets of genes for network inference. We will use the state space modelling approach of
Rangel et al. (2004) and Beal et al. (2005) to infer candidate gene regulatory networks involved in
flowering and identify candidate nodal (control) genes.
TIMING OF PROJECT
This project is available for June.
REFERENCES
Beal, MJ, Falciani, F, Ghahramani, Z, Rangel, C, Wild, DL. (2005). Bioinformatics 21:349-356.Heard, NA, Holmes, CC,
Stephens, DA. 2006. JASA 101:18-29.
Heard NA, Holmes CC, Stephens DA, Hand DJ, Dimopoulos G. (2005). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov
22;102(47):16939-44
Rangel, C., Angus, J., Ghahramani, Z., Lioumi, M., Sotheran, E., A., Gaiba, A.,.Wild, D.L. and Falciani, F. Bioinformatics,
20(9):1361-1372 (2004).
Tai, YC and TP Speed. Annals of Statistics Vol. 34 (5).
Supervisor1: DR. GRAHAM LADDS, Room M119, Warwick Medical School,  024765 28361
graham.ladds@warwick.ac.uk
Discipline:
Experimental Biology / Biochemistry
12
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
DEVLOPEMENT OF FLUORESCENT YEAST STRAINS FOR INVESTIGATIONS INTO
POPULATION VARIABILITY
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Biological systems are composed of physical constituents that constrain their performance. However, some aspects
of system performance, including cell-to-cell variation, are often regulated by active mechanisms. The study of
variation in the behaviour of genetically identical cells hopes to address these issues. Recently it has become
apparent that the use of fluorescent protein reporters can aid the study of cell-to-cell variation in gene expression.
For example, variation in gene expression among genetically identical bacteria has been studied by measuring the
correlation in expression of two different fluorescent reporter genes under the control of the same promoter [1].
Similarly Colman-Lerner and co-workers have reported an
Figure 1
investigation into cell-to-cell variation within the pheromoneresponse pathway of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
[2]. This response-pathway is built upon the use of a G proteincoupled receptor (GPCR) which upon stimulation by a mating
pheromone activates a G protein complex and induces a cell cycle
arrest by activation of a MAP kinase cascade. However, while the S.
cerevisiae pheromone-signalling cascade is a useful system to
investigate it differs wildly from mammalian GPCR signalling
networks. For example, within S. cerevisiae it is the G subunits
which perpetuate the response following GPCR activation, whereas
in higher eukaryotes it is the G subunit which fulfils this function
[3].
The fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe has a
pheromone-cascade closely resembling that of mammalian cells and is shown in Figure 1. In Sz. pombe it is the
G subunits which perpetuate the response bring about a cells entry into meiosis [3].
●
Aims of the project. To data there has not been a study into cell-to-cell variation within the Sz. pombe
pheromone-signalling cascade. Building upon the ideas expressed by
Colman-Lerner et al., we have developed a Sz. pombe strain which
incorporates a pheromone-inducible Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP)
reporter. To date we have only performed a preliminary analysis of
this reporter which indicates that it is induced by pheromone (Figure
2). Our aim is generate Sz. pombe strains which are ideal for use in
cell-to-cell variation experiments. Such strain will enable us to
augment our existing computational model of the pheromone0 M Ligand
10-6M Ligand
response pathway by introducing stochastic differential equations to
account for population variability [4].
Figure 2
●
Brief description of the work proposed. In the first stage we will perform time-course experiments using
confocal microscopy and flow cytometry to determine the strength and duration of the response using the GFP
reporter strain. These studies will be accompanied by the use of immuno-blotting techniques of cell lysates to
enable a detailed biochemical analysis of GFP reporter production. During the analysis and characterisation of the
GFP reporter we propose to begin the production of our second fluorescent marker which will involve the use of
molecular biology techniques to generate a construct suitable for integration into a host yeast strain. This project
will enable the student to become familiar with all aspects of yeast genetics, molecular biology and utilise state-ofthe-art fluorescent techniques to explore cell-to-cell viability. This project will complement the ongoing work by a
second year MOAC PhD student currently working within my laboratory and is suitable for both MOAC and SB
students.
●
References: [1] Elowitz et al., 2002 Science 297, 1183-1186; [2] Colman-Lerner et al., (2005) Nature 437, 699706; [3] Ladds et al., 2004 Trends Biotechnol 23: 367-373. [4] Smith et al., - In preparation.
Timetabling: This project can be run in any of the project slots.
Consumables budget: £300.00-£350.00 for media, running costs of fluorescent microscope, antibodies, enzymes
and consumables needed for cloning and assays.
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
(cover sheet for above)
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: DEVLOPEMENT OF FLUORESCENT YEAST STRAINS FOR INVESTIGATIONS INTO
POPULATION VARIABILITY
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing‡‡‡
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Dr Graham Ladds
Department: Warwick Medical School _________________ Building, Room: M119 Biological Sciences _______
E-mail address: Graham.ladds@warwick.ac.uk __________
Phone number: 02476 528361 _____________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name: Professor John Davey ________________________
Department: Biological Sciences _____________________
Building, Room: M119 Biological Sciences ___
E-mail address: J.Davey@warwickac.uk _______________
Phone number: 02476 524204 _____________
Project outline:
See attached one page outline
References:
Consumables budget§§§: £ 300
‡‡‡
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective Course
Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September 2007.
Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
§§§
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover consumables
for all three of their mini-projects
Systems Biology Doctoral Training Centre 12-week Miniprojects
TYPE OF PROJECT: LABORATORY
SUPERVISOR’S NAME AND DEPARTMENT:
HRI
13
Dr Andrea Massiah & Prof Brian Thomas, Warwick
TITLE OF PROJECT
Investigation into floral input pathway activity during vegetative phase maturation
BACKGROUND TO THE PROJECT
During the early period of vegetative growth following germination, plants are often incapable of
responding to an environmental stimulus, such as photoperiod, and initiating flowering. The mechanisms
that result in reproductive incompetence during this period, the juvenile phase, are not understood. The
question is raised as to whether lack of reproductive competence in the juvenile phase is due to inactivity
of floral induction pathways that are established in the adult phase of vegetative growth. In comparison
to wildtype Arabidopsis thaliana plants, the recessive hasty (hst-1) mutant displays a loss-of-function
phenotype of a shortened juvenile phase, as assessed using juvenile and adult leaf morphological
characteristics. The mutant shows accelerated flowering when grown in long day photoperiods and
constant light (1, 2) and the reduction in flowering time is attributed to the alteration in juvenile phase
length. This mutant provides an opportunity to investigate the association of floral input pathways with
the juvenile phase.
AIMS OF THIS PROJECT
The aim of the project is to obtain expression profiles of key genes involved in the promotion of
flowering (GIGANTEA, CONSTANS, FLOWERING LOCUS T, FD, SUPPRESSOR OF
OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS 1), repression of flowering (GIBBERELLIC ACID INSENSITIVE)
and floral meristem identity (LEAFY, APETALA 1) during the development of the hasty mutant and
wildtype plants through to flowering. In parallel the plants will be assayed for competence to respond to
daylength as a floral inductive stimulus and for leaf morphological characteristics. This comparative
analysis will test the relationship between the expression of floral input pathways and the duration of the
juvenile phase, as well as testing whether juvenility as determined by reproductive competence can be
distinguished from juvenility in leaf morphology.
METHODS TO BE USED




Transfer experiments between short day and long day photoperiods with flowering time
assessments to determine juvenile phase length (weeks 1 – 8)
mRNA extraction and cDNA synthesis (weeks 3 – 4)
Primer design (week 1) and quantitative real-time RT-PCR (weeks 5 – 10)
Phenotypic analysis of trichome distribution on the abaxial surface of leaves (week 3)
REFERENCE(S)
1. Tefler, A. and Poethig, R.S. (1998) HASTY: a gene that regulates the timing of shoot maturation in
Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 125: 1889-1898
2. Bollman, K.M., Aukerman, M. J., Park, M., Hunter, C., Berardini, T. Z. and Poethig, R. S. (2003)
HASTY, the Arabidopsis ortholog of exportin 5/MSN5, regulates phase change and
morphogenesis. Development 130: 1493-1504
TIMING OF PROJECT
Project available as miniproject 2
14
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
th
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14 February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Recording Real-time changes in hormone concentration _____________________________
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
X Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
X Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing****
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
XSlot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
X Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Richard Napier (plus Dan Mitchell –Warwick Medical School - and Hugo van den Berg, Maths)
Department: Warwick HRI (Medicine and Maths) ________
Building, Room: Office TP141, (but worek to be done in virus lab
in Biological Sciences)
E-mail address: Richard.napier@warwick.ac.uk __________
Phone number: 75094 ___________________
Project outline:
Background: Biologists need sensors that allow them to measure concentrations - and changes in concentration - of
small signalling molecules (such as hormones) in real time, in living cells. We have developed a dynamic biosensor
based on surface plasmon resonance (SPR, Biacore) recordings. The sensor molecule is an antibody making the
technology applicable for diverse biological, industrial or environmental monitoring tasks. In order to deal with constantly
changing sample concentrations – real-time real-life analysis - we need to develop ways to analyse and model the data
outputs (mini-project 1). This project will utilise these routines to record, evaluate and interpret hormonal responses to
exemplify and validate the analytical methodology as well as collect data on rapid hormonal fluxes for salient plant and
animal signalling systems.
Aims and Methods: The project will use data from the Biacore and explore how hormone fluxes can be evaluated in
real time in living organisms (plants) and tissues/serum (animals). The experiments will be designed to utilise the
analysis subroutine developed in the related mini-project. This is based on the displacement of a specific antibody from
the chip surface by free analyte (hormone) sampled using a microdialysis probe. The kinetic displacement data will be
converted to real-time concentration data by the subroutine and the system explored to establish suitable flow rates, chip
loadings etc. Once optimised, the student can chose either plant or animal model for collecting novel data on hormone
movement.
Weeks 1 and 2: Familiarisation with the Biacore system (Biological Sciences, Virus lab). Antibodies, antigens, chips and
solutions are available. Familiarisation with the Biacore Bia-Evaluation software. Week 3 – 4 Microdialysis will be taught
and established, particularly the system requirements for interfacing the probes with the Biacore. Weeks 5- 12. Testing
for hormonal concentration changes. Discussion with the student will identify a favoured biological test system from a
shortlist for which antibody and antigen (analyte) are available. Eg, for students preferring to sample from plants auxin
and ABA, for those opting for a mammalian system the release of the pro-inflammatory signalling peptide C3a (Dr Dan
Mitchell (Warwick Medical School) will supervise). The chip will be loaded on all four channels. Channel 1 is the control,
2 -4 are analytical and will be loaded at different densities in order to explore the dynamic range of the system. Baseline
data will be recorded and the system stimulated to initiate a response which will be recorded on all channels in real time.
Sample flow rates and other parameters will be tested for their effects on signal and sensitivity. Outputs will be compared
to prior knowledge (literature or local) and concentration records validated by standard ex-vivo techniques (ELISA,
HPLC).
Ideally, but not essentially, linked to mini-project ‘Simulating Real-time changes in hormone concentration from Biacore
data‘. It also has potential for development as a PhD.
Consumables budget††††: £ 300 (Biacore chips and coupling reagents)
****
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective Course
Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September 2007.
Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
††††
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
15
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
th
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14 February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: GLYCOPHORIN A MEMBRANE INSERTION AND FOLDING BY LINEAR DICHROISM
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing‡‡‡‡
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Dr. Joanne Oates (Dr. Ann Dixon) and Dr. Matt Hicks (Prof. Alison Rodger)
Department: Chemistry _____________________________
Building, Room: Room C503 (AD)
E-mail address: ann.dixon@warwick.ac.uk
Phone number: 024761 50037
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week):
Name: __________________________________________
Department: _____________________________________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: ___________________________________
Phone number: _________________________
Project outline.
Background. Correct insertion, folding, and interactions of proteins in biological membranes are critical steps in a
wide variety of biological processes. Surprisingly, very little detail is available addressing the mechanisms or
kinetics of these essential processes. Thus far, the intensive study of -helical membrane proteins such as
Glycophorin A (GpA, Fig. 1a) and Bacteriorhodopsin has supported a widely-accepted model for protein folding and
interactions in membranes, namely the two-stage model of membrane protein folding (Fig. 1b) [1]. In this model,
folding is described as occurring in two thermodynamically distinct stages: in stage 1, unfolded protein partitions
into the membrane and forms stable -helices across the bilayer; in stage 2, individual -helices associate laterally
in the membrane to form the functional state of the protein. Clearly, this model is incredibly simplistic and does not
allow for probable folding intermediates, such as the example shown in Figure 1b (denoted 1a), where a partially
folded structure first forms on the surface of the bilayer before insertion.
This overall lack of detailed information on membrane protein
folding is due to the challenges one faces when attempting to
acquire meaningful biophysical data for these very hydrophobic
systems. Membrane proteins are notoriously difficult to work with
in solution, and are typically studied in detergents and solvent
mixtures with the hopes that these mimic the membrane bilayer
environment. Such a hope is not always well-founded and,
ideally, we would like to investigate their properties in membrane
bilayers.
However, at present very few techniques can
accommodate measurements in bilayers. At Warwick, we have
targeted development of a technique that shows huge promise
for working with bilayer systems: linear dichroism (LD) [2]. In LD
we flow orient liposomes, and from the LD measurement one can
monitor insertion and protein conformation simultaneously - this
is one of the major advantages of LD over other (e.g.
fluorescence-based) methods.
To date, technical developments have been made using model
‡‡‡‡
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective Course
Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September 2007.
Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
peptide and protein systems such as the antibacterial peptide gramicidin [3] and the light-harvesting membrane
protein bacteriorhodopsin [4]. There is great potential to develop LD methods in order to obtain information on the
kinetics of protein insertion, the stability of a particular protein fold, the orientation of proteins and co-factors in
membranes and possibly protein-protein interactions in the membrane.
Aims of Project. We will analyse the well-characterised membrane protein Glycophorin A (GpA) in liposomes,
using LD in conjunction with complementary biophysical and biochemical techniques. GpA contains a single
transmembrane domain (Fig. 1a) that is known to insert into bilayers as a stable -helix and consequently drive
dimerisation of the full-length protein (Fig. 1b) [5]. GpA has been extensively studied and a great deal is known
about the amino acids that interact to stabilise the GpA dimer.
Much of the work on GpA thus far has been carried out in detergent micelles. Micelles are commonly used to
solubilise membrane proteins, but they lack a bilayer structure and contain a high degree of curvature. This high
curvature creates a lateral pressure that can affect the stability of protein folds and the degree to which membrane
proteins interact. Liposomes (which we will use in this study), on the other hand, contain a bilayer structure and
have a much lower degree of curvature, providing an environment that more accurately represents a natural
membrane. We will look at the influence of lipid type on the formation and stability of GpA, a factor implicated in a
number of other experimental systems [6]. Investigations of GpA will enable a detailed assessment of the
advantages of liposomes as a valuable tool in the future study of less well-characterised transmembrane proteins
of biological interest. Additionally the potential of LD to unravel the more complex issues of membrane protein
folding will be addressed.
Brief Outline of Work. A peptide corresponding to the transmembrane domain of GpA will be purified using
reversed-phase HPLC. Once purified, the peptide will be inserted into liposomes of varying lipid composition. Lipid
membranes occur naturally in animals, bacteria and plants; the composition of these membranes varies with
cellular location, cell type and between species. This is important, for example in antibacterial peptides - because
bacterial membranes have more negatively charged lipids than human membranes. In this study we will use
different proportions of phophatidyl choline which has an overall neutral charge, and phosphatidyl serine which has
an overall negative charge. In addition to this we will explore the effect of cholesterol, which makes membranes
more rigid by filling the gaps between the hydrocarbon chains. Time allowing it may also be possible to explore the
effects of the degree of saturation of the fatty acyl chains of the lipids by using different proportions of dimyristoyl
phosphatidyl choline (saturated) and palmitoyloleoyl phosphatidyl choline (one acyl chain unsaturated). Liposomes
can be prepared in different ways, we will prepare them using a method comprising of freeze-thaw cycles and
extrusion through filters with a pore size of 100 or 200 nm to give unilamellar liposomes of a uniform size. The
secondary structure of the peptide will be measured using circular dichroism, and the oligomeric state will be
assessed using chemical cross linking followed by SDS-PAGE analysis. Finally, LD measurements will be used to
evaluate the insertion and conformation of the GpA TM peptide.
References.
[1] Popot, J.L. and D.M. Engelman, Biochemistry, 29, 4031 (1990).
[2] Dafforn, T. R., and Rodger, A. (2004) Current Opinion In Structural Biology 14, 541-546.
[3] Rodger, A., Rajendra, J., Marrington, R., Ardhammar, M., Norden, B., Hirst, J. D., Gilbert, A. T. B., Dafforn, T. R., Halsall, D.
J., Woolhead, C. A., Robinson, C., Pinheiro, T. J. T., Kazlauskaite, J., Seymour, M., Perez, N., and Hannon, M. J. (2002)
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 4, 4051-4057.
[4] Rajendra, J., Damianoglou, A., Hicks, M., Booth, P., Rodger, P. M., and Rodger, A. (2006) Chemical Physics 326, 210-220.
[5] Lemmon, M.A., J.M. Flanagan, J.F. Hunt, B.D. Adair, B.-J. Bormann, C.E. Dempsey, and D.M. Engelman, J. Biol. Chem.,
267, 7683 (1992).
[6] Hong, H. and L.K. Tamm, PNAS, 101, 4065, (2004)
Consumables budget§§§§. £150-200 for lipids and consumables needed for peptide purification.
§§§§
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
16
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
th
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14 February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Measurement of DNA persistence length __________________________________________
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing*****
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Martyn Rittman _____________________________
Department: MOAC _______________________________
Building, Room: Chemistry dept, B608 _______
E-mail address: m.rittman@warwick.ac.uk ______________
Phone number: 23293 ___________________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week):
Name: Alison Rodger ______________________________
Department: MOAC/chemistry _______________________
Building, Room: Chemistry dept, B607 _______
E-mail address: a.rodger@warwick.ac.uk _______________
Phone number: ________________________
Project outline:
DNA persistence length is a widely accepted concept that measures flexibility of DNA. A recent review (in preparation),
however, has highlighted difficulties in experimental measurement and conflicts within the definition or even the
underlying concepts of persistence length.
The project proposed would entail carrying out measurements of DNA persistence length using stopped flow linear
dichroism spectroscopy (SFFLD). To do this the DNA is passed through a narrow tube at a high rate to orient it, then
stopped and allowed to relax back into a randomly ordered state. LD measures orientation by recording the difference
between absorption of parallel and perpendicularly polarised light that has passed through a sample. For the case of
DNA we expect to see relaxation curves for which a half-life can be measured and fitted to several known models.
Once the principle has been established it will be possible to extend the concept. The dependence of persistence length
on any one of a number of factors can be investigated, for example DNA base sequence, temperature, salt concentration
or DNA length.
Experience will be gained in handling biomolecule samples, biophysical instrumentation, modelling data, and literature
searching. It will require sufficient mathematical expertise to understand the origins of polymer modelling as relates to the
definitions of persistence length.
It is not linked with any other project.
References: See Martyn Rittman or Alison Rodger for draft copy of the review in preparation.
Consumables budget†††††: £ ______
*****
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective Course
Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September 2007.
Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
17
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
th
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14 February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Understanding flow in linear dichroism experiments _________________________________
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing‡‡‡‡‡
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
By negotiation
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
By negotiation
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name:
Alison Rodger _____________________________
Department: Chemistry _____________________________
Building, Room: B607 ____________________
E-mail address: a.rodger@warwick.ac.uk _______________
Phone number: 74696 ___________________
Project outline:
Flow linear dichroism (LD) is a useful technique for determining relative orientations of sub-units of long molecular
systems of molecules attached to something else (such as liposomes) which can be flow oriented. However, to use the
data quantitatively we need to understand how the molecules are oriented. We have recently been looking for molecular
markers to determine the degree of orientation. An alternative approach is to use models of flow and collect data at
different flow rates. For membrane proteins, long DNAs and fibrous proteins linear dichroism is becoming a key structural
technique, in part because others such as X-ray crystallography and NMR do not provide the level of information we
require to understand the structure and function of biomolecular systems.
This project will involve designing experiments to provide LD data using DNA, liposomes and fibrous proteins as a
function of flow rate and viscosity and relating those data back to flow models available in the literature. Comparison with
results achieved via the molecular marker approach will be undertaken.
Experience will be gained in handling biomolecule samples, biophysical instrumentation, modelling data, and literature
searching.
It is not linked with any other project.
References: CH921 lectures
Rodger and Nordén, Circular dichroism and linear dichroism, OUP 1997
Consumables budget§§§§§: £ 150 ___
†††††
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
‡‡‡‡‡
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective Course
Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September 2007.
Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
§§§§§
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
18
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title:
The role of PBPs in Peptidoglycan Biosynthesis
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
X Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
X Wet Project
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing******
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
X Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
X Slot 2 (25/06 to
14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Dr David Roper _____________________________
Department: Biological Sciences _____________________
Building, Room: B126 ____________________
E-mail address: david.roper@warwick.ac.uk ____________
Phone number: 024 7652 8369 ____________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name: __________________________________________
Department: _____________________________________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: __________________________________
Phone number: ________________________
Project outline:
The role of PBPs in Peptidoglycan Biosynthesis
(see project description)
References:
Consumables budget††††††: £ 250 __
The role of PBPs in Peptidoglycan Biosynthesis
******
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective Course
Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September 2007.
Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
††††††
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
Biochemical Mini-Project: Dr David I RoperA, & Professor C.G.DowsonB Department of Biological Sciences,
University of Warwick
[Collaboration with Professor T.D.H Bugg, Department of Chemistry, & Dr M. Chappel, Department of
Engineering]
A
Room B126, email david.roper@warwick.ac.uk tel 024 7652 8369
B
Email C.G.dowson@warwick.ac.uk tel 024 7652 3534
Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is a serious
medical issue that complicates chemotherapy of
infectious
disease
treatments
and
adds
significantly to healthcare costs[1,2]. Although
problems or resistance are common to many
groups of bacteria they are particularly acute for
noscomial infections caused by Gram positive
bacteria[1,2]. Although several areas of bacterial
metabolism can be exploited for antimicrobial
intervention, peptidoglycan synthesis is an
invaluable and validated target area in this respect.
The collaborating groups of Roper, Bugg and
Dowson and considerable experience, expertease
and track record in analysis of this process3-7. At
present we have a good understanding of the
cytoplasmic processes that lead to the formation of
the peptidoglycan precursor UDP-MurNacPentapeptide. Less is known about the subsequent
membrane bound and cell surface processes that
are required to produce the mature form of
peptidoglycan which is extensively crosslinked by
a group of enzymes known and the PBPs
(Penicillin Binding Proteins)8.
We are addressing this area with an
interdisciplinary approaching involving scientists
from the physical, engineering and mathematical
sciences.
The PBPs encompasses a large number of
enzymes spread throughout the bacterial species,
they are as the name implies, the target of the beta-lactam antibiotics including penicillin and therefore constitute a
validated and well known drug target. There collective action is to catalyse transglycoslyase and transpeptidase
reactions that link individual peptidoglycan monomers together to produce a three dimensional network. In most
organism the function of a subset of PBPs has been shown to be essential, highlighting their utility as drug targets.
These are mostly bifunctional proteins, catalyzing the polymerization of both sugar and peptide moieties of the
peptidoglyan substrates using separate and independent enzymatic domains. Thus far only the extracellular
portions of these proteins have been studied at the molecular level and these studies and been largely restricted to
the transpeptidase domain of bifunctional PBPs: very little is known about the transglycoslyases. These PBPs
contain and anchoring trans-membrane tail which probably has a functional role as well. We have developed a high
expression system for membrane proteins which allows rapid cloning and expression in a form that can be purified
by highly selective affinity chromatography which has thus far not been applied to the study of PBPs9.
The project will require
1. Cloning a selection of absolutely required PBPs from E.coli, S.pneumoniae and S.aureus into a high
expression vector system for membrane proteins developed in our laboratory.
2. Expression and purification studies of these proteins into detergent micelles for subsequent study.
3. Functional characterization of PBP catalysis using prepared peptidoglycan intermediates.
Relationship to other projects
This project is related to “Systems Analysis of Bacterial Cell Wall Biosynthesis” (Prof T.Bugg, Chemistry)
Students are strongly encouraged to complete both projects.
Timetabling: Suitable for 8-week MOAC student in slot 1 or 2; or Systems Biology student in slot 1.
Consumables budget: £500 (for molecular biology reagents & growth and purification media)
References:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Levy, B.L. & Marshall, B. 2004 Nature Med. 10, S122;
Walsh C.T. 2000 Nature 406, 65;
Bugg TDH (1999) Comp Nat Prod Chem 3, 241;
Schouten, J.A., et al (2006) Molecular Biosystems 2 484-491.
Bugg, T.D.H. et al (2006) Infectious Disorders - Drug Target. 6,(2), 85-106
Kishida,H. et al, (2006) Biochemistry, 45, 783-792
Besong, G.E.,et al .(2005) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 44(39):6403-6.
Di Guilmi A.M. et al (2002) Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 2002, 3, 63-75
Henderson, P.J.F. et al (2005). Biochem Soc Trans 33: 867-872.
19
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
th
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14 February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Towards an understanding of multiple paralogues for metal-handling genes in a coastal cyanobacterium
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing‡‡‡‡‡‡
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
MOAC Mini Project
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Dr. David Scanlan and Dr. Claudia Blindauer ______
Department: Biological Sciences and Chemistry _________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: D.J.Scanlan@warwick.ac.uk, c.blindauer@warwick.ac.uk
Phone number: 28363 (D. Scanlan) or 28264 (C. Blindauer)
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name: __________________________________________
Department: _____________________________________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: __________________________________
Phone number: ________________________
Project outline:
Towards an understanding of multiple paralogues for metal-handling genes in a coastal cyanobacterium
Every living organism requires certain metal ions for survival, and a number of mechanisms for uptake, storage, and excretion
have evolved to ensure an adequate supply with these nutrients.
An intriguing family amongst the plethora of metal-handling proteins are the metallothioneins. These are small (usually 5-10
kDa), cysteine-rich proteins with the capability to bind high amounts of the essential Zn(II) and/or Cu(I), as well as the toxic
Cd(II).
Recent research has revealed that a significant number of both freshwater and marine
G28
cyanobacterial strains contain genes for metallothioneins [1]. The structure of the
prototype of these proteins, SmtA from Synechococcus PCC 7942, has been determined
[2], and it has been shown that bacterial MTs differ significantly in structure, metal binding
29
Y31
24
thermodynamics, and dynamics from eukaryotic MTs. To a large extent, these differential
properties are owed to the presence of a zinc finger fold (shown in cyan and red in the
A37
7
7
figure) and the participation of two histidine residues in metal ion binding.
9
18
16
H49
32
A 36
14
C
47
B
11
D
54
H40
Multiple sequence alignment of all available bacterial MTs reveal that variations occur in
the region around the two histidine residues, and it is predicted that these variation will
have a substantial impact on the metal binding properties of the expressed protein.
52
In most cases, cyanobacterial genomes appear to contain only one gene for
metallothionein, but the coastal strain Synechococcus CC9311 has no less than four
different genes (see below for predicted protein sequences):
‡‡‡‡‡‡
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective Course
Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September 2007.
Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
Syn.
Syn.
Syn.
Syn.
Syn.
PCC 7942
CC9311
CC9311
CC9311
CC9311
9
14
32 36 40
49
52
MTSTTLVKCACEPCLCNVDPSKAIDRNGLYYCSEACADGHTGGSKGCGHT---GCNCHG
MTVTVVKCACSSCTCEVSSSSAISRNGHSYCSDACASGH-RNNEPC-HDAAGACGCNC
MATSNQVCACDPCSCAVSVESAVQKDGKVYCSQPCADGH-SGSDEC-C---KSCDC
MNEVLLLCDCSLCKRSVEESRSIRIGGQHFCSESCAKGH-PNMEPC-DGERDGCNCG...
MTTNLVRCDCPPCTCSIEEATAAMYGNKLFCSEACATAH-INQEPSNSAEHTECSC
This was recognised recently by Paulsen [3], together with similar observations for other metal-handling genes. It has been
postulated that this species in its coastal habitat might either have a greater need for metals, or a greater need to respond to
excess metal levels, or that the cells experience episodic metal concentrations. In this context, it is interesting to note that the
four paralogues are very likely to have different metal clusters, and hence metal content: One has ligands similar to
Synechococcus PCC7942 SmtA, another lacks His49, but has a Cys in position 48, and the two others are expected to bind
less than four zinc ions, with one of them lacking both His49 and Cys16 (site C), and another missing Cys47, which bridges
sites B and C.
We hypothesise that different MTs, with different metal binding properties, are expressed in response to changes in the
environment. It is therefore highly desirable to explore the relationship between the biophysical properties of the four
homologues and their expression pattern under different conditions.
In a first step, it is planned to
produce expression constructs for each of the four genes
express the respective proteins in E. coli
purify the expression products by FPLC.
Genomic DNA, isolated from cultured Synechococcus CC9311, will be available in Dr. Scanlan's lab, and the genes of interest
will be amplified by PCR. Subsequently, they will be cloned into PET29a, following an established procedure [1]. Methods for
expression and purification are also established in-house.
The expressed proteins will be subjected to an initial characterisation by
elemental analysis (atomic absorption spectroscopy and inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry) for identifying
which metals are bound
mass spectrometry, which will allow the determination of the number of bound metal ions
1H NMR experiments will be carried out. These experiments will
if time and protein yields permit,
a) establish how well the proteins are folded, and b) give qualitative information on pertinent differences between the
homologues.
We consider this pilot study as an ideal precursor for a subsequent interdisciplinary Ph.D. project, which would include culturing
Synechococcus CC9311 in defined media with differing trace element composition, establishing differential expression of metalhandling genes, and ultimately linking environmental factors, expression patterns, and biophysical properties, including metal
thermodynamics and dynamics and structure of expressed proteins.
References:
1.
Blindauer CA, Razi, MT, Campopiano, DJ, Sadler, PJ, (2007) J Biol Inorg Chem, available online:
http://www.springerlink.com/content/h46631w453431m63/?p=3296037ac21f4eac8ecbf7f45d57d59e&pi=0
2.
Blindauer CA, Harrison MD, Parkinson JA, Robinson AK, Cavet JS, Robinson NJ, Sadler PJ (2001) Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA 98, 9593-9598
3.
Palenik B, Ren Q, Dupont CL, Myers GS, Heidelberg JF, Badger JH, Madupu R, Nelson W , Brinkac LM, Dodson RJ,
Durkin AS, Daugherty SC, Sullivan SA, Khouri H, Mohamoud Y, Halpin R, Paulsen IT (2006) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
103:13555-13559
Consumables budget§§§§§§: £ 300
Important notes:
The work proposed above would either be suitable for a 12-week "wet" Systems Biology project, carried out in both Biological
Sciences and Chemistry Departments, or for two MOAC projects, with the Molecular Biology parts carried out in Biological
Sciences in Dr. Scanlan's group, and the Biophysical part in Chemistry in Dr. Blindauer's lab. The required work-load can be
adapted according to available time and progress, for example by restricting the studies to less than four proteins. The
Biophysical Chemistry part depends on the successful outcome of the Molecular Biology part. However, should the production
of DNA constructs fail completely, Dr. Blindauer has expression constructs for several other bacterial MTs available, and the
biophysical part of the project could then be carried out with these.
§§§§§§
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
20
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Bioinformatic and transcriptional analysis of a marine methylotroph ______________________
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
Dry Project
Mathematics/computing
Project timing*******
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name:
Hendrik Schaefer____________________
Department:
Biological Sciences __________________
Building, Room: BioSci, B-177 ____________
E-mail address: H.Schaefer@warwick.ac.uk ___________
Phone number: 02476-574208 ____________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week):
Name:
J Colin Murrell ______________________
Department:
Biological Sciences __________________
Building, Room: BioSci ___________________
E-mail address: J.C.Murrell@warwick.ac.uk ____________
Phone number: 02476-523553 _____________
Project outline:
Methyl bromide and dimethylsulfide are two significant atmospheric trace gases that play important roles in ozone
depletion and climate regulation, respectively. Recently, marine methylotrophic bacteria were isolated that degrade these
compounds.
Methylophaga sp. DMS010 is an obligate methylotroph able to degrade the climate-cooling gas dimethyl sulfide (Schäfer,
Appl Environ Microbiol., in press) Strain DMS010 also grows on a range of other C 1-compounds (methanol, methylated
amines). The genome of strain DMS010 is currently being sequenced and it is expected that a draft genome sequence
will be available early in 2007 (February/March). This project will combine bioinformatics analyses and experimental
work. The genome sequence of Methylophaga sp. DMS010 will be searched for genes encoding enzymes of primary
one-carbon compound degradation (such as methanol dehydrogenase etc.), formaldehyde dissimilation and assimilation
pathways and those of sulfur compound degradation. Subsequently, the expression of some key genes of C 1 and sulfur
metabolism during growth on methanol and dimethylsulfide (the biomass is already available, but the student could
perform culture work if interested) will be investigated using reverse transcriptase (RT-) PCR using gene specific primers.
This will aid in identification of the central metabolic pathways of this important marine methylotrophic bacterium.
Alternatively (e.g. should the genome sequence not yet be available), a methyl bromide degrading isolate can be studied.
Roseovarius sp. 217 (Schäfer et al., 2005, Env Microbiol 7, 839-853) appears to degrade methyl bromide by an as-yetuncharacterised pathway. A draft genome sequence for this organism is available and has facilitated the identification by
mass spectrometry of polypeptides that were induced during growth on methyl bromide. On the basis of SDS-PAGE and
mass spectrometry analyses a potential degradation pathway is suggested. Due to the toxicity of methyl bromide the
biomass yield on this substrate is small, making it impossible to perform the relevant enzyme assays with methyl bromide
grown cultures. Therefore, a transcriptional approach will be used here. The transcriptional regulation of candidate genes
will be investigated by reverse transcriptase PCR using gene specific primers to be designed based on the genome
sequence.
References:
the which degrade methyl halides and dimethylsulfide, atmospheric trace gases that play important roles in ozone
depletion and climate regulation.
Draft genome sequences
for:these
isolates
Consumables
budget†††††††
£ 200
__ are available
*******
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective Course
Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September 2007.
Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
†††††††
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
Supervisor: Dr. A. Shmygol.
Associate Professor of Reproductive Medicine
Room 00108,Clinical Sciences Research Institute, Warwick Medical School.
Tel.: (024)76968702
Discipline: Experimental Biology /Mathematical modelling.
Co-supervisor: TBA
Project Title:
21
Decoding Ca2+ signals in human myometrium: confocal imaging and numerical
simulation of the Ca2+ release events targeting plasma membrane ion channels.
Project outline: Calcium is a ubiquitous intracellular signal, controlling a vast variety of cellular
processes including muscle contraction, neurotransmitter release, gene expression, etc [1]. Many
hormones and neuromediators elicit their regulatory action on target cells by releasing Ca2+ from the
intracellular stores, i.e. endo-/sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). Such release is mediated by the “second
messenger” molecules, namely inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP3), which is produced inside the cell in
response to agonist binding to the surface membrane receptors (usually belonging to the GPCR family)
[2]. InsP3 interacts with the InsP3-sensitive Ca2+ channels clustered on the membrane of the SR. A wavelike increase in the intracellular Ca2+ propagating throughout the entire cell is called “global Ca2+ signal”
as opposed to localized, non-propagating Ca2+ signalling events called “Ca2+ sparks” and “Ca2+ puffs”.
The global Ca2+ signals trigger contraction of smooth muscle cells and may be involved in the activation
of gene expression. The localized Ca2+ release events are believed to target the clusters of Ca2+-activated
ion channels on the surface membrane of the cell. Depending on the type of ion channels targeted, this
may increase or decrease cellular excitability therefore facilitating or hampering the generation of global
Ca2+ signals. The localized Ca2+ signalling events can only be visualised and studied in detail by using a
high-resolution confocal microscopy. Progress in confocal microscopy of living cells suggests that Ca2+
sparks and puffs are composed of even smaller events called “Ca2+quarks” and “Ca2+ blips” [3]. The
recruitment of the elementary Ca2+ release sites upon increase in the InsP3 level is stochastic and involves
small-scale binding-diffusion processes. As a result, the amplitude of the local Ca2+ signalling events has
a graded size, ranging from elementary blips, which involve the opening of only one release channel to
moderately larger puffs, which result from the concerted opening of a few channels within the same
cluster [4]. The resultant Ca2+ signal therefore depends on many factors including the size of the clusters
and their distribution, strength of the stimulatory input and the filling state of the store [5]. Since it is
often difficult to directly observe the elementary release events and virtually impossible to measure the
binding of Ca2+ to cytoplasmic buffers and Ca2+ up-take by neighbouring organelles (e.g. mitochondria)
on such a small scale, the study of localized Ca2+ signalling requires in-silico experimentation based on
mathematical modelling. Numerical simulation of the multiple molecular complexes involved in Ca2+
signalling will help to discern the limiting steps in the whole process and will provide experimentally
testable predictions. To date, most of the research on Ca2+ signalling has been conducted on immortalized
cell lines [2-5]. Although these are convenient model systems for studying the phenomenology of Ca2+
signalling, it is often difficult to extrapolate the conclusions made on cell lines to cells in human body.
For this reason, the researchers in medical sciences are shifting their attention to biopsies taken from
patients undergoing surgical procedures in order to understand physiology and especially
pathophysiology of Ca2+ signalling.
Uterine myocytes are among the best endowed with sarcoplasmic reticulum (see [6] for recent
review), yet many details of the Ca2+ signalling in these cells remain unknown.
This project will address the problem of how the InsP3 mediated Ca2+ signals are decoded into
changes in membrane excitability in human uterine myocytes.
Hypothesis
The Ca2+ signal decoding in human myometrial cells is achieved via differential Ca2+ sensitivity of
potassium and chloride channels and via spatio-temporal properties of localized Ca2+ signals.
Aims
1. To build an investigative model of localized Ca2+ release events coupled to clusters of Ca2+
activated ion channels based on spatial distribution of the InsP3 and ryanodine receptors and Caactivated chloride and potassium channels in human myometrial cells and spatio-temporal
properties of localized Ca2+ signalling events.
2. Using numerical simulation experiments on the model, to investigate the role of the Ca2+ release
channels clustering, micro-scale Ca2+ diffusion and buffering in the preferential activation of Ca2+dependent chloride channels.
Methods
Data sources: The student will utilize experimental data from a number of different sources. The ion
channel expression and distribution data, as well as parameters of myometrial Ca2+ signals are currently
investigated by the Warwick Parturition Group. The student will have an opportunity to take part in this
“wet-lab” research. Our own data will be supplemented by current data in the literature on human
myometrium, rat myometrium, and where no other data is available approximations from cardiac/other
smooth muscles will be made.
Modelling: The student will construct biophysically detailed models of the localized SR Ca2+ release
events and activation of Ca2+ dependent ion channels based on spatial distribution of ion channels within
the myometrial cell. The model will incorporate the time and the space dimensions and will allow to
investigate the role of ion channels clustering and to estimate diffusional distances between the source of
Ca2+ release and the target cluster of Ca2+-dependent chloride and/or potassium channels. The model will
be developed from experimental data, as much as possible using data obtained from our previous and ongoing studies but also using data from the literature (concerning the Ca2+ buffering kinetics and buffer
densities within the microdomains). The models will help to determine conditions under which the
localized Ca2+ release event can preferentially target one or another type of Ca2+-activated ion channels.
References:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
E. Carafoli (2002). Calcium signalling: A tale for all seasons. PNAS, 99, 3, pp. 1115-1122.
M. J. Berridge (1993) Inositol trisphosphate and calcium signalling. Nature, 361, pp.315-325.
M. D. Bootman & M.J. Berridge (1995). The elemental principles of calcium signalling. Cell, 83, pp 675-678.
S. Swillens, G. Dupont, L. Combettes & P. Campeil (1999). From calcium blips to calcium puffs: theoretical analysis
of the requirements for interchannel communications. PNAS, 96, pp. 13759-13755.
M. D. Bootman, M.J. Berridge & P. Lipp (1997). Cooking with calcium: the recipes for composing global signals
from elementary events. Cell, 91, pp367-373.
A. Shmygol & S. Wray (2004). Functional architecture of the SR calcium store in uterine smooth muscle. Cell
Calcium, 35, pp.501-508.
Project title:
Protein-protein interactions 2: quantitative assessment of protein-protein interactions.
22
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
√ Wet Project
(8 weeks)
√ Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
√ Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/06/2007)
√ Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
√ Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Corinne Smith ______________________________
Department: Biological Sciences _____________________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: corinne.smith@warwick.ac.uk ___________
Phone number: 22461 ___________________
Project outline:
This project is one of a pair of linked projects (Biology - Dave Whitworth / Biophysical chemistry Corinne Smith), although either project could be undertaken in isolation if necessary.
In the first of the linked projects, expression vectors will be engineered for production of seven
regulatory proteins (three PhoR homologs and four PhoB homologs). In this project the resulting proteins
will be tested for their ability to participate in biomolecular interactions. In homologous systems, PhoBs can
homodimerise, PhoRs can homodimerise and PhoRs can interact with PhoBs. In addition to these proteinprotein interactions, PhoBs can bind to DNA. Candidate target DNA sequences can be easily generated in
vitro by PCR of the promoter regions upstream of Pho regulon genes.
PhoB homodimerisation, PhoR-PhoB interaction and PhoB-DNA interaction are usually dependent
on the phosphorylation state of the involved proteins. Phosphorylation of PhoR and PhoB can be altered at
will through the addition of specific phosphate-donating molecules. Typically, PhoBs can be phosphorylated
by adding acetylphosphate (AcP), while PhoRs can be phosphorylated in vitro by the addition of ATP.
The project aims to characterise the affinity and/or kinetics of interactions for all pairwise
combinations of PhoR/PhoB and PhoB/DNA, and then test whether the association parameters are affected
by phosphorylation state. In this way it will be possible to characterise the connectivity of the Pho regulon
interaction map, and provide values for many of the key parameters affecting dynamical behaviour.
Initially, one homologue each of PhoR and PhoB will be purified and characterised by estimating
their state of association using light scattering and by assessing the secondary structure content using circular
dichroism. The parameters for monitoring binding interactions between PhoR/PhoB and PhoB/ DNA using
isothermal titrating calorimetry (ITC) will then be determined. Obtaining binding constants for the interaction
between PhoB-PhoR and PhoB-DNA together with characterisation of the PhoB association state will
complete the first stage of the project. If time permits, the project will be expanded to investigate all seven
PhoB and PhoR homologues by setting up an affinity column assay using, for example, 6His-PhoR bound to
a nickel column, and then washing over a mixture of all 4 PhoBs. The proteins which bind will then be
identified using SDS page and subsequent mass spectrometry analysis of each band on the gel. The results of
the affinity assay will provide a basis for further ITC studies to determine the binding constants for all
possible pairwise interactions of the PhoB/PhoR homologues.
References:
Consumables budget: £ 200 - Ni columns, PAGE consumables etc.
23
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
th
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14 February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title:
Simulating Real-time changes in hormone concentration from Biacore data
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
X Dry Project
X Mathematics/computing
Project timing‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
MOAC Mini Project
X Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
X Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
X Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Hugo van den Berg (and Richard Napier)
Department: Maths (Warwick HRI) ___________________
Building, Room: Maths Institute, (TP 141)
E-mail address: H.A.van-den-Berg@warwick.ac.uk (Richard.napier @...Phone number: 23698 (75094) _______
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name: __________________________________________
Department: _____________________________________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: __________________________________
Phone number: ________________________
Project outline:
Background: Biologists need sensors that allow them to measure concentrations - and changes in concentration - of small
signalling molecules (such as hormones) in real time, in living cells. We have developed a dynamic biosensor based on
surface plasmon resonance (SPR, Biacore) recordings. The sensor molecule is a recombinant antibody for which we know
the kinetic constants and we have detailed calibration data. However, at present the Biacore analysis software is designed
for batch mode measurements, treating each sample as a discrete record. In order to deal with constantly changing sample
concentrations – real-time real-life analysis - we need to develop a protocol to analyse and model the data outputs.
AIMS and METHODS: The project will explore how data from the Biacore can be evaluated in real time to allow recordings
of continually changing hormone concentrations in living organisms. The kinetic displacement data can be readily
linearised, but account needs to be made of baseline (control channel) subtraction, small time delays between channels and
the changing signal to noise ratios over the decay curve of antibody displacement. You will find the time period over which a
statistically-robust rate can be determined and develop routines for iterative, incremental calculation of concentration from
these conditions. These forward calculations will be compared to routines of, for example, reverse fit which will model the
dissociation over iterative increments of the data and test fit, deriving the concentrations of analyte and presenting the data
in real time. The routine found to work best will be prepared as a software subprogramme to work with the Biacore. The
system will be tested using artificial analyte gradients. Weeks 1 and 2: Familiarisation with the Biacore system (Biology
Dept, Flu lab). We have antibodies and biotinylated antigens, chips and solutions available for this. The chip will be loaded
on two channels (channel 1 as control, 2 as analytical), a set of calibration sensorgrams taken. Weeks 3 - 12. Using the
sensorgrams and the known kinetic constants for the antibody-antigen pair, the mathematical handling of the Biacore output
will be explored and challenged. A dynamic model of binding kinetics in the Biacore chamber will be constructed to allow
the reconstruction of the input signal (concentration in the analyte line) from the observed SPR signal.
§§§§§§§
Consumables
: £ 150 (Biacore chip and reagents)
TIMING OFbudget
PROJECT
Available as miniproject 1 or 2, but because it is linked to mini-project ‘ Recording Real-time changes
in hormone concentration‘ - it is ideally done as project 1 leading on to exemplification and
exploitation in 2 . It also has potential for development as a PhD.
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective
Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September
2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
§§§§§§§
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
Modelling the photoprotective response in Myxococcus xanthus
Project type: THEORETICAL
Supervisor: Hugo van den Berg (Systems Biology)
Co-supervisor: David Whitworth (Biology)
24
hugo@maths.warwick.ac.uk +23698
Cells of the microorganism Myxococcus xanthus soon perish when they are
illuminated by bright light: the energy in the light is transferred to oxygen by a component in the
respiratory chain, and this very reactive (singlet) oxygen plays havoc with the cellular machinery. To
avert these lethal effects, M. xanthus expresses the crt-genes which encode enzymes that catalyse the
biosynthesis of carotenoids, lipid-like molecules which act as photoprotective pigments by absorbing the
energy from the singlet oxygens and dissipate it as heat.
The expression of the crt-genes is regulated by a sensor in the membrane. In particular, the protein
carQ, which is normally bound to carR, another membrane component, is liberated in the presence of
singlet oxygen (which leads to the destruction or inactivation of carR). The free carQ is a transcription
factor for one of the crt-genes (crtI). The remaining crt-genes lie together on the crtEBDC operon, which
is constitutively inhibited by carA, a protein that controls the expression of crtEBDC through negative
feedback. The protein carA lies on the crtEBDC operon but has, in addition, a leaky constitutive expression.
Besides stimulating crtI expression, carQ also serves an autotranscription factor, stimulating its own
expression in a positive feedback loop. The sequestering protein carR is found on the same operon. A third
protein on this operon, carS, disinhibits the expression of the crtEBDC operon: carS down-modulates the
tonic feedback inhibition exerted by carA on the crtEBDC promoter.
Three promoters are thus involved in the photoprotection response: carQRS, crtI, and crtEBCD. A time
course of the activity of each of these promoters following a photo-irradiation challenge can be measured
in a system where one of these promoters has been artificially coupled to the gene encoding LacZ, which
is used as a reporter of promoter activity. The central problem is to reconstruct the regulatory dynamics of the
photoprotection response from these LacZ time courses. A mathematical model might help to determine
which experimental perturbations give the most information about this dynamics; mathematical modelling
also helps to interpret the experimental findings.
BACKGROUND TO THE PROJECT
AIMS The
objectives of this project are to develop a mathematical model of the photoprotective response
in M. xanthus and explore its role in suggesting & interpreting experiments. The project is offered in
conjunction with an experimental project in which the student will have the opportunity to carry out some
of the protocols suggested by his or her analysis of the mathematical model.
RESEARCH METHODS Analysis
of non-linear dynamics; numerical solution of initial value problems;
system identification tools.
TIMING OF PROJECT Both
IMPORTANT NOTE While
periods are negotiable, but see note below.
this project can be pursued in its own right, it is a companion to an experimental
project offered by Dr David Whitworth. A student choosing to do both a theoretical and an experimental
project on this subject is advised to take the theoretical project first, in order to benefit optimally from the
opportunities offered by the laboratory environment.
Project title:
25
Predicting Biomolecular Interactions: Comparative Prokaryotic Genomics
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
√ Dry Project
√ Mathematics/computing
Project timing
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
√ Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
√ Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
√ Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor:
Name: Dave Whitworth ___________________________
Department: Biological Sciences ____________________
Building, Room: B008 ___________________
E-mail address: d.e.whitworth@warwick.ac.uk __________
Phone number: 74738 __________________
Supervisor’s advisor:
Name: David Hodgson / Peter Cock __________________
Department: Biological Sciences / MOAC ______________
Building, Room: _______________________
E-mail address: p.j.a.cock@warwick.ac.uk _____________
Phone number: 50059 __________________
Project outline:
One of the biggest challenges of computational biology is to be able to correlate genome sequence
with function. While it is currently possible to predict functional classes for most gene products, the role of
particular proteins within the cell is often obscure - particularly with respect to the specificity of reactions
catalysed, or position within the interaction network.
We have been developing computational approaches to predict interactions between conserved
proteins, based entirely on their sequence. Using a database of paired proteins thought to interact, it is possible
to identify residues involved in conferring specificity to a biomolecular interaction using a variety of
approaches (information theory, evolutionary tracing, co-variation analysis, etc.). When this information has
been acquired, interactions can then be predicted using a generalised linear model (GLM) and validated. The
ability to make predictions is vitally important in those (common) cases where multiple candidates for
interaction partners exist. Suitable interactions for study include the -factor/anti--factor, PhoB/pstS, factor/DNA, and HisKA/HisKA interactions.
The project will involve developing a database of interacting protein pairs (or DNA-protein pairs).
Initial searches will use RPS-BLAST to screen all completed bacterial genomes for proteins containing
particular Pfam domains, while DNA regions of interest will be isolated based on proximity to conserved
genes. While the results of these searches will be interesting in their own right, hits will then be filtered by a
variety of user-proscribed rules - based on biological understanding of the systems of interest. For instance,
most -factor genes are found adjacent to those of their partner anti--factors, while PhoBs are known to bind
DNA upstream of the pstS gene. Multiple sequence alignments will then be derived, enabling the degree and
nature of conservation at particular sequence positions to be determined. Specificity-conferring residues will
be identified, and mapped onto solved structures where available. A GLM will be then be developed to model
the interacting biomolecules, enabling predictions of partnerships. Predictions will be made for key systems,
and results compared to available literature.
The project will involve a lot of coding, and so would be good for someone with programming knowhow, but it would also be appropriate for someone wanting to develop their programming skills.
References:
Consumables budget: < £ 50 - Stationary, software and media…
Project title:
26
Protein-protein interactions 1: Protein expression, purification and activity assays.
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
(8 weeks)
√ Experimental biology
 Biophysical chemistry
Systems Biology Mini Project
√ Wet Project
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
√ Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
√ Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
√ Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Dave Whitworth ____________________________
Department: Biological Sciences _____________________
Building, Room: B008 ____________________
E-mail address: d.e.whitworth@warwick.ac.uk ___________
Phone number: 74738 ___________________
Supervisor’s advisor:
Name: Corinne Smith ______________________________
Department: Biological Sciences _____________________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: corinne.smith@warwick.ac.uk ___________
Phone number: 22461 ___________________
Project outline:
This project is one of a pair of linked projects (Biology - Dave Whitworth / Biophysical chemistry Corinne Smith), although either project could be undertaken in isolation if necessary.
Protein-protein interactions are of fundamental importance for biomolecular network formation and
resulting dynamic behaviour. This project aims to quantify the interactions between seven two-component
system proteins known to act within the Pho regulon of Myxococcus xanthus.
In most bacteria the uptake of phosphate is mediated by a low-affinity high-capacity transporter (Pit).
However, upon phosphate limitation, expression of a high affinity transporter (Pst) is induced. Pst induction
is regulated by a two-component signal transduction system (PhoBR). PhoR is a sensor kinase which
indirectly senses phosphate availability. When phosphate levels drop PhoR interacts with and phosphorylates
the response regulator PhoB. PhoB-P then activates transcription of the pstSCAB operon (encoding Pst).
In the complex social predator Myxococcus xanthus the Pho regulon includes at least three PhoR
homologs and four PhoB homologs, in addition to Pst and Pit transporters. Three phoB genes are adjacent to
phoR genes, implying functional association. Two-hybrid interaction assays suggest that as well as the three
PhoR-PhoB interactions predicted from the genome, other signalling interactions occur between paired-gene
systems, resulting in a complicated network architecture. Towards a complete description of the Pho system,
we wish to quantify the interaction affinity for all pairwise combinations of PhoR and PhoB homologs.
During this project a series of protein expression vectors will be constructed using standard
molecular biology techniques (PCR, DNA sequencing, restriction enzyme digestions, DNA ligation, bacterial
transformation, agarose gel electrophoresis, DNA extractions etc.). The expression vectors will be engineered
to express proteins as fusions to a 6His tag, for one-step column purification. We currently have clones which
express interacting domains (transmitter and receiver domains) of the PhoR and PhoB homologues as GST
fusions, and the cloned regions of these constructs will be sub-cloned into an appropriate 6His vector. Whole
length protein fusions will also be expressed by PCR-cloning of full length proteins (for those proteins
without transmembrane helices). Once expression vectors have been constructed protein expression will be
induced in E. coli. Localisation and solubility of expressed protein will be determined by cell fractionation.
Expression conditions will be varied to maximise the amount of soluble protein produced, and fusion proteins
will be purified using nickel columns. Some of the purified fusion proteins will then have their 6His tags
removed with appropriate protease digestions. In the paired project expressed proteins will then be tested for
biomolecular interactions using a variety of assay techniques.
References:
Consumables budget: £ 200 - expression vectors, cloning enzymes and reagents, Ni spin columns...
Project title:
27
Assaying the photoprotective response in Myxococcus xanthus.
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
√ Experimental biology
 Biophysical chemistry
(8 weeks)
Systems Biology Mini Project
√ Wet Project
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
√ Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
√ Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
√ Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor:
Name: Dave Whitworth ___________________________
Department: Biological Sciences ____________________
Building, Room: B008 ___________________
E-mail address:
Phone number: 74738 __________________
p.j.a.cock@warwick.ac.uk ____________
Supervisor’s advisor:
Name: David Hodgson _____________________________
Department: Biological Sciences _____________________
Building, Room: _______________________
E-mail address: d.a.hodgson@warwick.ac.uk __________
Phone number: 23559 __________________
Project outline:
The Car regulon of Myxococcus xanthus controls a light-protective, light-induced behaviour. Light causes cellular
production of the reactive oxygen species singlet oxygen. In response, enzymes (crt) are expressed which generate a
class of compounds called carotenoids. Carotenoids quench singlet oxygen, protecting cells from further illumination.
Expression of the crt genes is
LIGHT
controlled by four regulatory (car) genes.
One regulator is encoded in an operon with
1O
PPIX
the crt genes (carA), and the gene product
2
CarR
represses the crtEBDC promoter. The other
(Photosensitiser
(TOXIC)
protoporphyrin IX)
three regulators are found together in the
CarQ
carQRS operon. CarQ is a sigma factor,
CarR is an anti-CarQ factor while CarS is
an anti-CarA factor. CarQ stimulates
transcription of carQRS and crtI, while
CarS
carQ carR carS
CarR is light (singlet oxygen) – sensitive.
This system is inactive in the dark with
crtEBDC being repressed by CarA,
CarA
however in the light, repression of crtEBDC
expression is relieved and crtI expression is
stimulated, resulting in production of
photoprotective carotenoids.
crtI
crtEBDC/carA operon
The promoters within the Car regulon
can be assayed using a genetic construct
called a promoter probe. Promoter probes
Carotenoids
are integrated into the chromosome and
position a promoterless lacZ gene under
the control of the promoter of choice. Promoter probes are available for all three Car regulon promoters, in a variety of
genetic backgrounds. Typically, promoter activity assays have been performed by exposing a dark-adapted culture to
continuous bright light at T=0. Samples are periodically removed for protein and LacZ assays.
The project will entail generating time-courses of LacZ expression from promoter probe-containing strains of M.
xanthus. Irradiation schemes will be varied, as will nutrient availability and genetic background. Carotenoids can be also
be extracted from samples, providing additional insights into the dynamics of the Car regulon.
IMPORTANT NOTE: While this project can be pursued in its own right, it is a companion to a theoretical
project offered by Dr Hugo van den Berg. A student choosing to do both theoretical and experimental
projects on this subject is advised to take the theoretical project first, to benefit optimally from the
opportunities offered by the laboratory environment.
References:
Browning, Whitworth and Hodgson 2003 Mol Microbiol 48: 237-251
Whitworth and Hodgson 2001 Mol Microbiol 42: 809-819
Consumables budget: ~ £150 – Growth media, assay components, enzyme substrates...
28
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
th
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14 February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Reconstructing gene regulatory networks with nonlinear state space models
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
X Dry Project
X Mathematics/computing
Project timing********
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
X Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
X Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: David Wild
Department Systems Biology
Building,Room Coventry House , 332.
E-mail address D.L.Wild@warwick.ac.uk _______________ Phone number: 50242
Project outline:
A major challenge in systems biology is the ability to model complex regulatory interactions. In
previous work we have described the use of Linear-Gaussian state-space models (SSMs), also
known as Linear Dynamical Systems (LDS) or Kalman filter models to ‘reverse-engineer’ regulatory
networks from high-throughput data sources, such as microarray gene expression profiling (Rangel
et al., 2004; Beal et al. 2005). SSM models are a subclass of dynamic Bayesian networks used for
modeling time series data and have been used extensively in many areas of control engineering
and signal processing. Although the linear Gaussian state-space model has provided a natural
starting point for our modelling approach, we wish to explore nonlinearities in the dynamics and
output processes of the model, focusing on incorporating nonlinearities that reflect the underlying
biological mechanisms. Another valid criticism of the simple linear-Gaussian dynamical system
model is that its parameters are stationary— the dynamics and output mechanisms are assumed to
be the same at any point in time along the gene expression time course. We therefore propose to
investigate time varying models which may more faithfully reflect these aspects of true biological
processes. This project will focus on simulation studies based on synthetic mRNA data generated
from a model which contains definite non-linearities in the dynamics of the hidden factors (arising
from the oligomerization of transcription factors). The Matlab Rebel toolkit of functions and scripts
(http://choosh.ece.ogi.edu/rebel/), designed to facilitate sequential Bayesian inference (estimation)
in general state space models will be used, so some facility with Matlab programming is essential .
References: Beal, MJ, Falciani, F, Ghahramani, Z, Rangel, C, Wild, DL. (2005). Bioinformatics 21:349-356. Rangel, C., Angus,
J., Ghahramani, Z., Lioumi, M., Sotheran, E., A., Gaiba, A.,.Wild, D.L. and Falciani, F. Bioinformatics, 20(9):1361-1372 (2004).
********
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective Course
Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September 2007.
Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
29
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
th
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14 February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: A Bayesian approach to biological information retrieval
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
X Dry Project
X Mathematics/computing
Project timing††††††††
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
X Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
X Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: David Wild
Department Systems Biology
Building,Room Coventry House , 332.
E-mail address D.L.Wild@warwick.ac.uk _______________ Phone number: 50242
Collaborator
Name: Zoubin Ghahramani
Department:: Engineering, University of Cambridge
E-mail address:zoubin@eng.ca.ac.uk Phone number: 01223-764-093
Project outline:
Humans readily learn new concepts after observing a few examples and show extremely good
generalization to new instances. In contrast, search tools on the internet exhibit little or no learning and
generalization. Recent work by Ghahramani and Heller (2006) shows that information retrieval can be
firmly grounded in a Bayesian statistical model of human learning and generalization. Given a set of items,
the system finds other items that belong to the same concept. For example, given Monday, Wednesday, it
should return the days of the week; given three Jim Carrey movies, it should return other Jim Carrey
movies; given a couple of proteins with some function, it should return other proteins with a similar
biological function. Implementations of the algorithm exist for binary data (such as images) and discrete
categorical data. The aim of this project is to extend this approach to data types of relevance to
bioinformatics problems. Depending on the interests of the student, the project could develop in one of two
directions. The first would be a more empirical data analysis project which would involve extending the
method to the problem of protein fold recognition (recognizing proteins that have similar tertiary structures
based on a database of known protein structures). This problem was recently cast in the framework of
information retrieval by Chen and Baldi (2006), who have made a suitable data set available. The second
direction would be more analytical and involve extending the theory to the problem of sequence similarity
searching, based on a first or second order Markov chain model of biological sequences (di- or tri- peptides
or nucleotides). This would involve extending the existing implementation for sparse binary data, which
relies on the Bernoulli-Beta conjugate pair of distributions to the Multinomial-Dirichlet conjugate pair, with
the goal of producing a prototype software implementation.
References: J. Cheng and P. Baldi, (2006) “A machine learning information retrieval approach to
protein fold recognition”, Bioinformatics, 22, 1456–1463
Z. Ghahramani and K.A. Heller, (2006) "Bayesian Sets", In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2005).
Consumables budget‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡: travel between Warwick and Cambridge for collaborative meetings with Prof. Ghahramani
††††††††
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective
Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September
2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
30
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Fast Bayesian clustering for microarray data
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
X Dry Project
X Mathematics/computing
Project timing§§§§§§§§
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
X Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
X Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: David Wild
Department Systems Biology
Building,Room Coventry House , 332.
E-mail address D.L.Wild@warwick.ac.uk _______________ Phone number: 50242
Collaborator
Name: Zoubin Ghahramani
Department:: Engineering, University of Cambridge
E-mail address:zoubin@eng.ca.ac.uk Phone number: 01223-764-093
Project outline:
The use of clustering methods has rapidly become one of the standard computational approaches of
understanding microarray gene expression data. In clustering, the patterns of expression of different
genes across time, treatments, and tissues are grouped into distinct clusters (perhaps organized
hierarchically) in which genes in the same cluster are assumed to be potentially functionally related or
to be influenced by a common upstream factor. Such cluster structure can be used to aid the elucidation
of regulatory networks. However, commonly used clustering methods either require the number of
clusters to be predefined, or rely on the setting of some heuristic score threshold to distinguish members
of a particular cluster from non-members, making the determination of the number of clusters arbitrary
and subjective. In previous work (de la Cruz et al., 2007), we have described a novel approach to the
problem of automatically clustering gene expression profiles, based on the theory of infinite mixtures.
However, this work, like most Bayesian approaches, is based on sampling using Markov Chain Monte
Carlo (MCMC) methods. While MCMC has useful theoretical guarantees, its applicability to vast postgenomic datasets is limited by its speed. In this project, we propose to apply a fast novel algorithm for
agglomerative hierarchical clustering (Heller and Ghahramani, 2005), which is based on evaluating the
marginal likelihoods of a probabilistic model, and may be interpreted as a bottom-up approximate
inference method for a Dirichlet process (i.e. countably infinite) mixture model. The project will
involve adapting the method to the problem of clustering gene expression profiles from a variety of
experimental data sets.
References: de la Cruz, B.J., Rasmussen, C.E., Ghahramani, Z., Wild, D.L. A Bayesian Approach to Modeling Uncertainty in
Gene Expression Clusters Submitted. K.A. Heller and Z. Ghahramani (2005) "Bayesian Hierarchical Clustering", In Proceedings
of the Twenty-second International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2005). K.A. Heller, Z. Ghahramani, D. Wild (2006),
“Efficient Bayesian Hierarchical Clustering for Gene Expression Data”, Valencia Bayesian Statistics Meeting 8, Benidorm,
Spain.
Consumables budget*********: travel between Warwick and Cambridge for collaborative meetings with Prof. Ghahramani
§§§§§§§§
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective
Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September
2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
*********
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
31
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Integrating transcriptome and metabolome changes in response to pathogen infection
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
X Dry Project
X Mathematics/computing
Project timing†††††††††
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
X Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
X Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: David Wild _________________________________
Department: Systems Biology _______________________
Building, Room: Coventry House __________
E-mail address: d.l.wild@warwick.ac.uk ________________
Phone number: ________________________
Second supervisor:
Name: Katherine Denby ____________________________
Department: Warwick HRI and Systems Biology _________
Building, Room: TPB133, Coventry House 326
E-mail address: k.j.denby@warwick.ac.uk ______________
Phone number: 50251 ___________________
Project outline:
The aim of this project is to integrate gene expression data and metabolite profiles of Arabidopsis leaves
infected with Botrytis cinerea (a fungal pathogen) to identify novel associations between gene expression and
metabolite levels. Such associations may be based on function (eg. a gene encodes an enzyme involved in
synthesis of a particular metabolite) or regulation (eg. a gene encodes a transcription factor regulating
expression of a biosynthetic pathway producing a particular metabolite). The data for this project will be a
time series of 24 samples taken every 2 hours following B. cinerea infection. One leaf from each plant is
harvested for expression profiling and three other similar sized leaves will be used for measuring metabolites.
Metabolite profiles will be generated using FT-IR (which gives fingerprints without identifying particular
compounds) and ESI-MS. In this miniproject genes whose expression is significantly modulated over time
and between biological conditions (control and pathogen infected) will be determined by the method of Tai
and Speed (2004). Time series clustering of gene and metabolites profiles will be performed using the
Bayesian approach of Heard et al. (2005), which has the advantage over other clustering methods in that
there is no pre-assigned number of clusters. Gene ontology annotation of the clusters will be used to guide
the selection of subsets of genes and metabolites for network inference. We will use the state space
modelling approach of Rangel et al. (2004) and Beal et al. (2005) to integrate gene expression and
metabolomic data and to infer candidate joint gene and metabolite regulatory networks.
References
Beal, MJ, Falciani, F, Ghahramani, Z, Rangel, C, Wild, DL. (2005). Bioinformatics 21:349-356.
Heard, NA, Holmes, CC, Stephens, DA. 2006. JASA 101:18-29. Rangel, C., Angus, J., Ghahramani, Z., Lioumi, M.,
Sotheran, E., A., Gaiba, A.,.Wild, D.L. and Falciani, F. Bioinformatics, 20(9):1361-1372 (2004). Tai, YC and TP
Speed. Annals of Statistics Vol. 34 (5).
Consumables budget‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡: £ 0 ___
†††††††††
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective
Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September
2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
Systems Biology Doctoral Training Centre 12-week Miniprojects
32
TYPE OF PROJECT (LABORATORY OR THEORETICAL): Both
SUPERVISOR’S NAME: David Wild (WSB) and Philip McTernan (CSRI).
TITLE OF PROJECT: Delineating molecular mechanisms contributing to mitochondrial dysfunction in obesity and diabetes.
BACKGROUND TO THE PROJECT
Obesity is by far the single most important risk factor for type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Whilst there is
genetic deposition for this it is clear that environmental factors play a significant role in its aetiology.
However, the mechanisms for this link between obesity and its metabolic dysfunction remain unclear.
Studies suggest that mitochondrial dysregulation may have an important impact on diabetic risk. The
integrity of mitochondria (the power house of the cell) in (fat) adipose tissue in obesity and T2DM has
recently been investigated in animal models but to date no data is available in humans. The primary
defect(s) causing bioenergetic dysfunction may reside in nonbioenergetic pathways such as signalling
between mitochondria and nucleus or in overall mitochondrial biogenesis or degradation pathways
impacted by inflammation and our current studies in adipose tissue taken form obese patients suggest that
the expression of genes related to energy metabolism in the mitochondria appear to decrease with a
similar pattern observed in adipose tissue Abd Sc AT from T2DM subjects. As such these data suggest
that as well as adipose tissue being important in regulating other organ systems these studies suggest a
role for mitochondria in human adipose tissue which appear dysregulated in obesity and diabetes. In
clinical practice, pathological phenotypes are often labelled with ordinal scales rather than binary, e.g. the
Gleason grading system for tumor cell differentiation or the BMI scale for obesity. However, in the
literature of microarray analysis, these ordinal labels have been rarely treated in a principled way. In
preliminary work (Chu et al. (2005)) we have developed a gene selection algorithm based on Gaussian
processes to discover consistent gene expression patterns associated with ordinal clinical phenotypes. The
technique of automatic relevance determination is applied to represent the significance level of the genes
in a Bayesian inference framework. The usefulness of this algorithm for ordinal labels has been
demonstrated by the gene expression signature associated with the Gleason score for prostate cancer data.
These results also demonstrated how multi-gene markers that may be initially developed with a diagnostic
or prognostic application in mind are also useful as an investigative tool to reveal associations between
specific molecular and cellular events and features of tumor physiology. This algorithm can also be
applied to microarray data with binary labels with results comparable to other methods in the literature.
AIMS OF THIS PROJECT
Microarray gene expression data for adipose tissue obtained from lean, obese and T2DM subjects, as well as data from matched paired fat
depots from BMI and gender matched subjects already exists. The goal of this project is to identify and validate functionally relevant gene
regulatory networks important to the pathobiology of obesity and type 2 diabetes. To accomplish this goal, our project has the following
specific aims:
 Identify gene expression signatures that reliably differentiate these data sets and identify and validate the regulatory networks to which
the genes comprising these signatures belong.
 Validate the expression of the genes identified in the microarray studies, using a variety of lab based molecular biology techniques
Hypothesis
We hypothesize that mitochondrial genes related to energy homeostasis are differentially expressed in obesity and T2DM and that
Methods
Subjects:. All samples have appropriate approval from the local ethical committee guidelines, with individual consent given. Anthropomet
data has been collected including age, height, weight, waist, systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements.
Data: Microarray data will be collected from a lean non-diabetic cohort (BMI: 22.2±(SD)2.1 Kg/m2 age: 39.8±(SD)8.7 yrs), an obese nondiabetic cohort (BMI: 30.1± 2.81Kg/m2 age: 47.3±11.5 yrs) and a T2DM cohort (BMI: 59.9±7.5 Kg/m2 age: 37.15± 7.8 yrs) of human
adipose tissue (AT). Paired fat samples will also be collected from BMI and gender matched subjects.
Bioinformatics Analysis (Miniproject 1): Data will be analysed using the algorithms described above in 2 separate studies: paired sample
for Sc versus Om AT (binary labels) and Abd Sc AT for lean, obese and T2DM samples (ordinal labels) to obtain gene expression signatur
which reliably differentiate the data sets. The statistical machine learning models will be trained and rigorously cross validated and the gen
expression signatures validated using independent data sets. Gene Ontology analysis, coupled with the use of pathway databases, will be
applied to identify the functional role and putative pathways of the genes identified.
Validation (Miniproject2): Real time PCR will be undertaken to follow up the genes which have been identified as altered by microarray d
along with Western blot techniques which will examine the expression of mitochondrial proteins important in energy metabolism. Taken
together these will be used to validate the expression of the genes identified in the microarray studies. This work will involve undertaking
based molecular biology techniques within a team of researchers working in this field as part of the Diabetes & Metabolism team based at
CSRI Warwick Medical School
REFERENCES
1. Kusminski CM, Harte AL, Fisher ff. M, Creely SJ, da Silva NF, Baker AR, Kumar S, McTernan PG (2006) The in vitro effects of resist
innate immune signaling pathway in isolated human subcutaneous adipocytes. JCEM, Oct 24; [Epub ahead of print].
2. Chu W., Ghahramani, Z., Falciani, F. and Wild, D.L. Biomarker Discovery in Microarray Gene Expression Data with Gaussian
Processes. Bioinformatics , 21: 3385-3393 (2005).
TIMING OF PROJECT
Both
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
33
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Analysis and modelling of microarray time course data
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Wet Project
 Dry Project
Mathematics/computing
Project timing§§§§§§§§§
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisors (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Vicky Buchanan-Wollaston____________________
Department: Warwick HRI and Systems Biology _________
Building, Room: TPB128 at HRI;
at WSB __
E-mail address: Vicky.b-wollaston@warwick.ac.uk _______
Phone number: 75136/50249 ______________
Name: Katherine Denby ____________________________
Department: Warwick HRI and Systems Biology _________
Building, Room: TPB133 (HRI), 325 at WSB __
E-mail address: k.j.denby@warwick.ac.uk ______________
Phone number: 75097 (HRI), 50251 (WSB) __
Name: Andrew Mead ______________________________
Department: Warwick HRI and Systems Biology _________
Building, Room: DLE189 (HRI)______________
E-mail address: andrew.mead@warwick.ac.uk __________
Phone number: 750202 (HRI) _____________
Project outline:
Leaf senescence is a key step in plant development during which nutrients from the leaf are mobilized for use in
further growth or for seed development. The process of leaf senescence is controlled by internal or external factors and
can be very variable, depending on environmental conditions or the phase of development (Buchanan-Wollaston et al,
2005; Lim et al, 2007).
At Warwick HRI we have recently carried out detailed time course experiments where the same leaf (leaf 7) has
been harvested at set time points during development and the plant material subjected to microarray analysis. In one
experiment the plants were grown in long days – in this case leaf 7 is one of the largest leaves and senescence is
instrumental in mobilization of nutrients to developing seeds. In the other experiment plants were grown in short days –
these plants flowered much later with many more leaves with leaf 7 shaded by bigger leaves and senescing well before
any seed was developing. Thus senescence is being induced by different signals in the two experiments and a
comparison of the gene expression patterns will be very informative as to the signaling pathways involved.
The student will use the extensive data sets for the 2 experiments (176 2-colour slides for long day and 152 2colour slides for the short day) and will use analytical tools to identify and compare differentially expressed gene sets.
They will use and compare a number of analytical software tools for this analysis including GeneSpring, Timecourse, and
Splinecluster, and follow the gene clusters with functional analysis using programs such as MapMan and AraCyc. In this
way, genes and pathways that are common or specific to each type of senescence will be identified.
Four individual leaves were harvested at each time point and array data is available for 4 technical replicates for
each leaf. As the leaf ages there are many other variables that affect the progression of senescence and the biological
replicates become more diverse, possibly reflecting a difference in the biological age of the leave, despite being
harvested at the same physical times. The student will investigate statistical modeling approaches that will allow the
estimation of the true biological age of leaves whilst predicting a smooth gene expression response over biological time.
This will involve the use of multivariate statistical methods (possibly including principal component analysis, cluster
analysis, discriminant analysis) together with iterative regression model fitting.
References:
Buchanan-Wollaston V, et al.(2005) Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals significant differences in gene expression and signalling
pathways between developmental and dark/starvation induced senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant J 42: 567-585.
Lim et al. (2007) Leaf senescence Ann Rev Plant Biol 58:115–136
Consumables budget**********: £ _____
§§§§§§§§§
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective
Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September
2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
**********
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
34
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Protein crystallisation at surfaces in the presence of electric fields ______________________
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Matthew Turner ____________________________
Department: Physics / Systems Biology _______________
Building, Room: Physical Sciences, PS142___
E-mail address: m.s.turner@warwick.ac.uk _____________
Phone number: x22257 __________________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week):
Name: __________________________________________
Department: _____________________________________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: __________________________________
Phone number: ________________________
Project outline:
Aggregation at surfaces is ubiquitous in nature. Solutions of proteins usually crystallise by a first order process,
also known as "nucleation and growth". Such aggregates include the protein fibrils or clumps characteristic of
Alzheimer's, Huntingdon's or Sickle cell disease. In such cases supersaturated solutions can persist for long
periods. At these high concentrations the equilibrium state would involve coexistence between molecules in
both a solid and a suspended phase but the system doesn't have an easy (fast) way to reach this equilibrium
state. The solid phase is often observed to first form at surfaces, e.g. of the containing vessel or of pre-existing
aggregates, as these provide the appropriate nucleation substrate. A simple model for the formation of a solid
phase at a surface would involve several stages. The first of these would involve the nucleation of the first
critical (stable) patch of molecules in the solid phase at the surface. This, in turn, depends on the microscopic
free energy barriers that must be overcome and hence also on the concentration of proteins. The energy
barriers can be traced to the sub-optimal packing associated with a small (sub-critical) aggregate. The
concentration dependence can be related to the rate of many body collisions, these being necessary to form the
critical aggregate. The second stage would be the growth of these patches by diffusive-limited accretion to the
surface. The effect of surface fields on the proteins can be dealt with by using a suitable Fokker-Planck
equation.
Coordinating with experimental work in the lab of Prof Unwin we plan to construct a simple model for the
surface-induced aggregation of small protein molecules. This is to be extended to treat the effect of electric
fields on the alignment and distribution of these molecules. For example, in the simplest case, dipolar molecules
must pay an activation energy to align into the configurations required to form the crystal.
Finally, the successful student will consider the implications for the size and shape of such surface aggregates
as well as possible extensions to the crystallisation of membrane proteins near electrodes.
References: 1. R. J. Hunter, Foundations of Colloid Science (Oxford University Press, USA; 2nd edition, 2001)
2. D.H. Everett, Basic Principles of Colloid Science, (The Royal Society of Chemistry, London, 1988).
Consumables budget: £ 50
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
35
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Finding Transcription Factor Binding Sites in Co-expressed Promoters
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing††††††††††
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Sascha Ott ________________________________
Department: Warwick Systems Biology Centre __________
Building, Room: Coventry House, Room 327 __
E-mail address: s.ott@warwick.ac.uk __________________
Phone number: 024-761-50258 ____________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week):
Name: Katherine Denby ____________________________
Department: Warwick HRI and Systems Biology _________
Building, Room: TPB133 (HRI), Coventry House 326 (WSB)
E-mail address: k.j.denby@warwick.ac.uk ______________
Phone number: 75097/50251 ______________
Name: Vicky Buchanan-Wollaston ____________________
Department: Warwick HRI and Systems Biology _________
Building, Room: TPB (HRI), Coventry House (WSB)
E-mail address: vicky.b-wollaston@warwick.ac.uk ________
Phone number: 02476 575136 _____________
Project outline:
We are interested in elucidating the gene regulatory networks controlling plant senescence and defence in the model
plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Large-scale network models are being inferred from high-resolution time course expression
data but in this project we will focus on identifying specific local networks. This information will be used to retrain our
network models and to guide future experimental work.
We are investigating plant gene expression in response to senescence (aging of the leaf) and infection by a fungal
pathogen, Botrytis cinerea. Initial work has identified several Arabidopsis transcription factors (TFs) whose expression is
significantly upregulated during these processes. Transgenic lines overexpressing the individual TFs have been
generated and gene expression profiles obtained. The aim of this miniproject is to use this expression data to identify
target genes and potential binding sites of these TFs.
The first goal will be to identify sets of genes that are differentially regulated in the overexpressing lines compared to
wildtype and hence, potential TF targets. These groups of genes may be further refined by co-expression in large sets of
publicly available expression data, co-expression in senescence and B. cinerea infection expression data and/or analysis
of function (eg. in same biochemical pathway). Once sets of co-expressed genes have been identified, we will evaluate
the promoter regions for overrepresentation of (consensus) sequences known to bind particular TFs. As these promoters
might harbour yet undescribed binding sites as well, we will also use motif finding methods such as MEME or NMica to
find overrepresented sequences in these tightly co-regulated groups of genes.
This project may be linked with the experimental project “Identification of Transcription Factors with a Role in Plant
Defence”.
Consumables budget‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡: £ 0 __
††††††††††
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective
Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September
2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
36
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Modelling and Predicting Transcription Factor Binding Sites
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing§§§§§§§§§§
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Sascha Ott ________________________________
Department: Warwick Systems Biology Centre __________
Building, Room: Coventry House, Room 327 __
E-mail address: s.ott@warwick.ac.uk __________________
Phone number: 024-761-50258 ____________
Co-supervisor
Name: John Reid _________________________________
Department: Crystallography Dept., Birkbeck, University of London
Building, Room: Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX
E-mail address: j.reid@mail.cryst.bbk.ac.uk _____________
Phone number: 020-7631 6814 ____________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week):
Name: David Wild _________________________________
Department: Warwick Systems Biology Centre __________
Building, Room: Coventry House, Room 332 __
E-mail address: d.l.wild@warwick.ac.uk ________________
Phone number: 024-761-50242 ____________
Project outline:
The event of transcription factors (TFs) binding to certain recognition sequences in the promoters of regulated genes is at
the core of the transcriptional regulation of genes. For hundreds of TFs we have descriptions of the sequences they
recognise in the form of consensus sequences and position weight matrices. Furthermore, information about which pairs
of TFs (composite pairs) have a preference to bind to neighbouring sites at what distance is being accumulated in the
TransCompel database. A frequent task in Systems Biology is to predict which TF might bind to a given piece of DNA
sequence based on existing knowledge. In this project we seek to enhance the predictive power and usefulness of
existing software by a) increasing the number of weight matrices used, b) evaluating the effective number of weight
matrices taking into account highly similar database entries, c) integrating data on composite elements into the
predictions, and/or d) evaluate the impact of different models of background DNA on the prediction accuracy.
The student will build on software that was developed by John Reid and has proved useful and effective in guiding
experimentalists to new hypotheses which they test in experiments. Feeding further information (from the Jaspar and
Matbase databases) into this tool, expanding the mathematical model by incorporating composite elements, and
determining the best way of modelling background DNA will lift this analysis software to a new level. Furthermore,
evaluating the overlaps between similar weight matrices will facilitate the integration of sequence data with other data
sets (such as microarray data, ChIP-on-chip data) in future work. Having a good command of TF binding site prediction
will facilitate PhD projects in the field of gene regulatory networks.
(David Wild will be away from mid-May to June, so some advisor meetings might have to be rescheduled accordingly.)
Consumables budget***********: £ 70 (two return tickets to London)
§§§§§§§§§§
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective
Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September
2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
***********
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
37
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Nucleosome Positioning
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing†††††††††††
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Sascha Ott ________________________________
Department: Warwick Systems Biology Centre __________
Building, Room: Coventry House, Room 327 __
E-mail address: s.ott@warwick.ac.uk __________________
Phone number: 024-761-50258 ____________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name: David Wild _________________________________
Department: Warwick Systems Biology Centre __________
Building, Room: Coventry House, Room 332 __
E-mail address: d.l.wild@warwick.ac.uk ________________
Phone number: 024-761-50242 ____________
Project outline:
Nucleosomes play a central role in the organisation of DNA within the nucleus of
eukaryotic cells. About 146 bases of DNA can wrap around a nucleosome circling it about
1.75 times (see structure “1AOI” in PDB). Nucleosomes influence the accessibility of DNA
and, therefore, its function. Recently significant progress was made in the in silico
detection of preferred nucleosome positions. The aim of this project is to use available
software tools for the prediction of nucleosome positions in order to address a number of
questions of DNA organisation: What are – on average – the preferred positions of
nucleosomes within promoters? How about (mammalian) bidirectional promoters or the
recently discovered 3’-UTR-promoters? Does expression strength relate to this question?
Do different functional classes of promoters show distinct patterns of preferred nucleosome positioning? Do
enhancer regions tend to be unoccupied by nucleosomes? Are there patterns of nucleosome positioning that are
evolutionarily conserved between species? Do exon/intron-boundaries affect nucleosome positioning? How about
matrix attachment regions? Are there dependencies between transcription factor binding sites and nucleosome
positions?
The student will tackle some of the above questions and possibly other aspects of nucleosome occupancy as the
project develops. The software to be used includes Segal et al.’s nucleosome predictor as well as a predictor by
Morozov et al. that is based on molecular modelling.
(David Wild will be away from mid-May to June, so some advisor meetings might have to be rescheduled accordingly.)
References:
“A genomic code for nucleosome positioning”, E. Segal et al., Nature 442:750-2.
Consumables budget‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡: £ 0 __
†††††††††††
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective
Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September
2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
38
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: In Silico Detection of Regulatory Modules
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing§§§§§§§§§§§
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Sascha Ott ________________________________
Department: Warwick Systems Biology Centre __________
Building, Room: Coventry House, Room 327 __
E-mail address: s.ott@warwick.ac.uk __________________
Phone number: 024-761-50258 ____________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name: David Wild _________________________________
Department: Warwick Systems Biology Centre __________
Building, Room: Coventry House, Room 332 __
E-mail address: d.l.wild@warwick.ac.uk ________________
Phone number: 024-761-50242 ____________
Project outline:
A current challenge in Bioinformatics is the detection (and annotation) of (cis-)regulatory modules (ReMos or CRMs) in DNA
sequences around target genes. These regions are characterised by conservation across those species that conserved the
function of a ReMo in the transcriptional regulation of a gene to some extent. This conservation can, in a vast number of cases,
be detected as sequence conservation, the conservation of certain binding sites across species, and/or the enrichment of
transcription factor binding site sequences in a small stretch of DNA.
Numerous methods for this task have been proposed. While any method should be capable of detecting ReMos that show a
high or even extreme degree of sequence conservation, the task becomes challenging for ReMos that give only a weak (but
still significant) signal of sequence conservation. Meeting this challenge is of particular interest as ReMos of low sequence
conservation could form the majority of regulatory regions, especially if distant species such as mouse and chicken are
compared. The target of this project is to evaluate the potential of existing methods to detect weakly conserved ReMos.
The project will progress as follows. First the student will compile a set of experimentally verified ReMos in mouse using
existing databases and web-pages. Then various methods will be used to detect the orthologous loci of these ReMos in various
species ranging from mammals to very distant species such as fish. As the correct loci in those species will be unknown a
priori, we will apply each method to randomly generated DNA as well as background DNA to evaluate the likelihood to achieve
a given score by chance. We will only accept predictions as correct if their associated score is sufficiently unlikely to be found
by chance. We will compare the results of several methods of ReMo-detection and evaluate the robustness of some methods
under varying parameter settings. The emphasis will be on sequence conservation-based methods, but binding site-based
approaches may also be considered.
Time permitting the student could implement and evaluate their own ideas to detect ReMos in silico. As the detection of ReMos
is of fundamental importance there are various possibilities to deepen the work started in this project in future research.
Skills in computer programming are necessary to pursue this project. If you are interested in this project but unsure whether
your programming skills are sufficient, please discuss it with me (Sascha) anytime.
(David Wild will be away from mid-May to June, so some advisor meetings might have to be rescheduled accordingly.)
References:
“Evaluation of regulatory potential and conservation scores for detecting cis-regulatory modules in aligned mammalian genome sequences”, D.C.
King et al., Genome Research, 2005.
Consumables budget************: £ 0 ___
§§§§§§§§§§§
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective
Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September
2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
************
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
39
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Identification of the host targets of pathogenicity effector proteins _______________________
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
Wet Project
X Dry Project
X Mathematics/computing
Project timing††††††††††††
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
X Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
X Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
X Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Dr. Laura Baxter ____________________________
Department: WarwickHRI ___________________________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: Laura.baxter@warwick.ac.uk ___________
Phone number: ________________________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name:Prof. Jim Beynon ____________________________
Department: Warwick HRI/ Warwick Systems Biology _____
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: jim.beynon@warwick.ac.uk _____________
Phone number: 02476575141 _____________
Project outline:
Plants and animals have innate immune systems that prevent the majority of organisms from invading. To overcome this
innate immunity some organisms have developed a suite of effector proteins that suppress the host resistance
mechanisms. We know these organisms as pathogens. Our group studies the interaction between the downy mildew
parasite Hyaloperonospora parasitica and the model plant Arabidopsis. We have cloned two effector proteins by
traditional means and have been analyzing their role in the invasion process. To complement this we are part of a team
that have sequenced the genome of the pathogen and are in the process of annotation. As part of these studies we are
working with the Sanger Centre to sequence 30,000 ESTs (expressed sequence tags). These are cDNAs that represent
expressed gene sequences. These will be used for genomic annotation purposes to define the open reading frames on
the assembled sequence contigs.
In this project you will join the annotation team in the analysis of the EST dataset. You will take a set of ESTs and carry
out the following analyses: determine whether they are full length, asses relationship with genome sequence, ascertain
intron structure, define the nature of the proteins coded by the ESTs, carry out clustering of the functions of the encoded
proteins, define functional domains within the proteins and define intron/exon splice junction sites. Finally you will add
the annotated ESTs to the genome sequence and carry out manual annotation of this new genome.
This project will involve the use of a range of bioinformatic software to analyse a unique data set and contribute to our
analysis and understanding of the genome of this plant pathogen.
References: Allen, R.L., Bittner-Eddy, P.D., Grenville-Briggs, L.J., Meitz, J.C., Rehmany, A.P., Rose, L.E. and Beynon, J.L.
(2004) Host-parasite co-evolutionary conflict between Arabidopsis and downy mildew. Science 306, 1957-1960
Birch, P.R.J., Rehmany, A.P., Pritchard, L., Kamoun, S. and Beynon, J.L. (2006) Trafficking Arms: Oomycete Effectors Enter
Host Plant Cells. Trends in Microbiology 14, 8-11.
Consumables budget‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡: £ 0
††††††††††††
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective
Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September
2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
40
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title:
Development of diamond and single walled carbon nanotube electrodes for neurosensing applications
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
X Wet Project
(8 weeks)
X Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing§§§§§§§§§§§§
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
X Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
X Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Julie V. Macpherson _________________________
Department: Chemistry _____________________________
Building, Room: A106 ____________________
E-mail address: j.macpherson@warwick.ac.uk___________
Phone number: 02476 573886 _____________
Project outline:
Chemical signaling underlies every function of the nervous system, from the imperceptible, such as the
control of the heart, to higher cognitive functions including, for example, emotions, learning and memory.
Neurotransmitters and neuromodulators mediate communication between neurons and between neurons and
non-neural cells such as glia and muscle. Many neurotransmitters are electroactive i.e. can be detected by
an electrode, and recording the current response at an electrode is one of the main ways for detecting their
activity. By making the electrode as small as possible it is also possible to spatially map the response of the
neurotransmitter, in imaging applications. Traditionally carbon fibres or graphitic electrode materials are used
for sensing due to their biocompatibility, however, they can suffer from limited detection sensitivity due to the
high background signals which can mask the signal of interest and interference signals arising from other
species in the media. Very recently we have been developing a new breed of carbon based materials,
namely single walled carbon nanotubes (in a network arrangement) 1 and conducting diamond as electrode
materials.2 To date these electrodes have not been tested for neurotransmitter detection. However, given
their high sensitivity due to their low background currents and resistance to fouling, we expect these
materials to be extremely promising in the field of neurology.
During this project we will explore the capability of these materials for neurotransmitter detection, initially will
we focus on the catecholamines, hormones released by the adrenal glands in situations of stress such as
psychological stress or low blood sugar levels, including dopamine, epinephrine (adrenalin) and
norephinephrine. We will assess detection levels, long term stability, and response in the presence of
interfering media, similar to that found in the human body. If time allows we will look at the development of
small electrodes made from these materials and the possibilities for imaging in-vivo in conjunction with Prof.
Nick Dale (neuroscientist, Biological Sciences, Warwick).3
References: [1]. T.M. Day, N. R. Wilson and J. V. Macpherson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 16724; [2]. A.L.
Colley, U. D’Haenens Johansson, M. E. Newton, P. R. Unwin, C. G. Williams, N. R. Wilson and J. V.
Macpherson, Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 2539; [3]. N. Dale, S. Hatz, F. Tian and E. Llaudet, Trends in Biotech.
2005, 23, 420.
Consumables budget*************: £ ____
§§§§§§§§§§§§
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective
Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September
2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
*************
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
Parts A and B
41
ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC CHANGES IN GENE EXPRESSION UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE CIRCADIAN
CLOCK
Joint experimental-theoretical miniprojects. Experimental supervisor: Isabelle Carré. Theoretical supervisor: David Rand
This project aims to apply novel statistical tools to the analysis of dynamic changes in gene expression. These tools will be to
extract information about the transcription factor activities mediating 24 hour oscillations in LHY gene expression under the
control of the circadian clock.
Circadian clocks are biological oscillators that function with a period of approximately 24 hours. These oscillators are
normally entrained (synchronised) to the day-night cycle caused by the rotation of the earth, yet their rhythms persist in the
laboratory in the absence of environmental time cues. In plants, the circadian clock controls many aspects of physiology and
metabolism and is thought to allow preparation of the organism in anticipation of predictable changes in light and temperature
conditions. Some of the genes that compose the circadian clock have been identified in Arabidopsis thaliana, a commonly used
model system for plant molecular genetics. The LHY gene functions together with two other components known as CCA1 and
TOC1 as part of a negative transcriptional-translational feedback loop which is thought to mediate oscillatory behaviour.
Transcription of the LHY gene exhibits circadian rhythmicity, peaking at dawn, as well as light-inducibility. In order to
understand how TOC1 and other clock-associated genes modulate transcription of LHY, we have constructed transgenic plants
carrying luciferase (luc) reporter constructs under the control of the LHY promoter. Luciferase is an enzyme from firefly which
emits light when supplied with its substrates, luciferin, oxygen and ATP. Thus, it is possible to monitor activity of the LHY
promoter in these plants in real time, by monitoring the number of photons emitted using specialised cameras.
In order to identify regions within the promoter, that contribute to the rhythmic pattern of LHY transcription, a number of
altered LHY:luc fusion constructs have been created, which carry deletions or point mutations within specific sequences. Two
sequence motifs have been identified, that are essential for rhythmic transcription of LHY, as well as a region that is important
for accurate waveform of the oscillation. We wish to map the effects of different upstream regulators of LHY onto different
regions of the promoter. The “wild-type” LHY:luc transcript has been introduced into a number of mutant backgrounds.
The first aim of this project will be to acquire new luciferase data from these mutant plants for analysis using the
mathematical methods so as to compare expression patterns in mutant backgrounds to the mutated LHY:luc reporter constructs
analysed above. The second aim of this project will be to apply mathematical tools to extrapolate information about
transcription factor binding from the patterns of rhythmic transcription of the wild-type or mutated promoter fragments. It is
expected that the student will use the MCMC approach developed by Alex Morton, Baerbel Finkenstadt and David Rand.
There is a significant suite of software available and therefore it is expected that a student with the appropriate skills will be
able to progress quickly.
(a) Luminescence counts of CAB::luc expression for two wt Arabidopsis seedlings in 16L:8D cycles imaged approximately every 35 minutes.
(b) (top) Mean data, processed and detrended. (middle) Transcription rate of the CAB gene together with 95% confidence limits. (c) Gradient
of the transcription rate with 95% confidence limits.
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
M1
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Nanoparticles
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
X Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing†††††††††††††
MOAC Mini Project
X Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
X Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
X Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name:Dr.ir. Stefan Bon
Department: Chemistry _____________________________
Building, Room: A422
E-mail address: S.Bon@warwick.ac.uk ________________
Phone number: 74009
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week):
Name:
Department: _____________________________________
Building, Room:
E-mail address: __________________________________
Phone number:
Project outline:
The aim of this miniproject is the design nanoparticles that have a Janus (two face) type of morphology. One side of the
particle will by hydrophobic in nature, the other side of the particle hydrophilic. Such particles will be able to undergo
assembly, like conventional surfactants. We are interested to see how these particles behave on a water-oil interface, or
whether these particles can aggregate into vesicular type of supracolloidal structures.
The particles will be prepared via (mini)emulsion polymerization of styrene/divinyl benzene in stage one, which will create
a network. Entropic driven phase separation of the second monomer vinylbenzyl chloride can lead to a peanut-shaped
particle, one lob styrene rich, the other vinylbenzyl chloride rich. The latter can be quaternized with tertiary amines to
yield a hydrophilic structure.
You will learn how to perform miniemulsion polymerization. How to characterize particles size distributions with dynamic
light scattering, FEGSEM, (cryo)-TEM and AFM.
Self-assembly of particles will be studied with confocal microscopy, wet-AFM and (cryo)-TEM.
More info on our work on supracolloidal polymer chemistry: Supracolloidal structures through liquid-liquid interface driven
assembly and polymerization Patrick J. Colver, Tao Chen and Stefan A. F. Bon*, Macromol.Symp. 2006, 245-246, 34-41.
(online feb. 7. 2007). Organic/inorganic Hybrid Hollow Spheres Prepared from TiO2-stabilised Pickering Emulsion
Polymerization Tao Chen, Patrick J. Colver and Stefan A. F. Bon* accepted by Advanced Materials, 2007. ASAP soon
available. Colloidosomes as Micronsized Polymerization Vessels to create Supracolloidal Interpenetrating Polymer
Network Reinforced Capsules Stefan A.F. Bon,* Séverine Cauvin and Patrick J. Colver, Soft Matter, 2007, 3, 194-199.
References:
Consumables budget‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡: £ 1500
†††††††††††††
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective
Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September
2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
M2
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: SOLID-STATE NMR: A PROBE OF OXYGEN-CONTAINING HYDROGEN BONDS
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing§§§§§§§§§§§§§
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Dr. Steven Brown)
Department: Physics ______________________________
Building, Room: Room 439
E-mail address: s.p.brown@warwick.ac.uk
Phone number: 74359
Project Outline.
Oxygen-containing hydrogen bonds, e.g., OH…N or OH…O play key roles in determining the shape and hence
function of biomolecules, e.g., proteins, nucleic acids, saccharides. Solid-state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)
is a powerful site-specific probe of molecular-level structure that is being increasingly applied to provide answers to
questions in structural biology, e.g., applications to amyloid fibrils associated with prion disease,1 Alzheimer's
disease,2 and Parkinson's disease3 as well as the toxin-induced conformational changes in a potassium ion
channel.4
This project will develop 17O-1H solid-state NMR methods for looking at oxygen-containing hydrogen bonds.
Oxygen is a challenge for NMR, since the only NMR-active isotope of oxygen, 17O, is, first, spin I = 5/2 and hence
the spectra are broadened by the strong quadrupolar interaction and, second, the low natural abundance (0.037 %)
necessitates the preparation of 17O-labelled samples. Nevertheless, the combination of high magnetic field (14T
and above) with methodological developments is making biological structural applications of 17O solid-state NMR
possible. This project involves adapting a 23Na-1H high-resolution solid-state NMR experiment5 for application to
17O-labelled biomolecules. Solid-state NMR experiments will be complemented by computer simulations of the
NMR experiment using standard packages that are based on the quantum-mechanical description of the NMR
experiment.
References:
1
C. Ritter, M.-L. Maddelein, A. B. Siemer, T. Lührs, M. Ernst, B. H. Meier, S. J. Saupe, and R. Riek, Nature 435,
844 (2005).
2
A. T. Petkova, R. D. Leapman, Z. Guo, W.-M. Yau, M. P. Mattson, and R. Tycko, Science 307, 262 (2005).
3
H. Heise, W. Hoyer, S. Becker, O. C. Andronesi, D. Riedel, and M. Baldus, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102,
15871 (2005).
4
A. Lange, K. Giller, S. Hornig, M. F. Martin-Eauclaire, O. Pongs, S. Becker, and M. Baldus, Nature 440, 959
(2006).
5
A. Lupulescu, S. P. Brown, and H. W. Spiess, J. Magn. Reson. 154, 101 (2002).
Consumables budget**************: £ 150 for solid-state NMR cryogen costs
§§§§§§§§§§§§§
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective
Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September
2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
**************
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
M3
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Chromosomes
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing††††††††††††††
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Ewen Buckling
Department: Biological Sciences _____________________
Building, Room:
E-mail address: e.f.buckling@warwick.ac.uk ____________
Phone number:
Biological Sciences M014
024 76522444
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week):
Name: Maj Hulten
Department: Biological Sciences _____________________
Building, Room: Biological Sciences B121
E-mail address: maj.hulten@warwick.ac.uk _____________
Phone number: 02476 528 9076
Project outline:
Crossovers between maternal and paternal chromosomes are laid down at meiotic cell divisions
during the formation of sperm and eggs. This ensures the appropriate segregation so that sperm
and eggs will contain the normal chromosome number.
The distribution of crossovers along the length of chromosomes can be identified by linkage
analysis, tracing DNA markers/alleles between generations, but also directly by microscopy
analysis. This allows an overview of crossover positions in individual cells that cannot be obtained
in any other way. A large data set on crossover positions is already available in humans, but there
is a lack of the corresponding data in mice.
The first step of the project will be to produce preparations containing the relevant cells from mice.
Cells will then be examined by immuno-fluorescence microscopy, highlighting the positions of
crossovers using an antibody for a protein that is involved in the last step in their formation.
Suitable images of cells will be stored on the computer and computer-assisted measurements then
performed of crossover positions along the length of individual chromosomes.
This new dataset in mice would be particularly valuable for computer modelling of the non-random
crossover positions, which is conserved during evolution. All mouse chromosomes have their
movement centre (centromere) near one end, which simplifies this challenge. In spite of decades of
work there is no adequate mathematical model for the non-random crossover distribution.
This project can be linked to the theoretical project on crossovers.
Consumables budget‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡: £ 0
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
M4
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Bio-templates for the formation of nano-sized silver and gold particles by electrospray
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
* Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
* Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Tom Drewello
Department: Chemistry _____________________________
Building, Room: Chemistry, C516
E-mail address: T.Drewello@warwick.ac.uk _____________
Phone number: 24934
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name:
Department: _____________________________________
Building, Room:
E-mail address: __________________________________
Phone number:
Project outline:
Bio-templates for the formation of nano-sized silver and gold particles by electrospray.
The project is concerned with the use of amino acids, peptides and DNA fragments as templates for
the formation of nano-sized silver and gold clusters applying electrospray ionisation mass
spectrometry. Recent research in our group has shown that when a silver salt solution is
electrosprayed together with certain biological molecules, the latter can function as a reducing agent
whereby silver cations are reduced and aggregation occurs, so that silver clusters of nano-size
dimensions are formed. Both the use of a biological template and the formation of nano-sized silver
clusters are topics of enhanced research interest at present and this project combines both areas.
Your task will be to learn to work with an electrospray mass spectrometer (ion trap), to investigate
different biological molecules evaluating their use as templates for the silver cluster production and
to extent your work on to the formation of gold clusters applying what you have learnt form your
studies on silver.
The project is ideal for an 8 week period and an experienced PhD student will support your efforts.
References:
§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective
Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September
2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
Consumables budget***************: £ 300
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
M5
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Glass
transition of sugars confined in nanopores
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
X Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing†††††††††††††††
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
X Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name:
Department:
Dr Jonathan Duffy
Physics _____________________________ Building, Room: Room P457
E-mail address:
j.a.duffy@warwick.ac.uk _____________
Phone number:
22410
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name:
Department: _____________________________________
Building, Room:
E-mail address: __________________________________
Phone number:
Project outline:
The goal of this project is to study the properties of sugar solutions confined in nanoporous hosts. The ability
of sugar solutions to form glassy states rather than crystalline solids is important in biology, medicine and the
food industry. The phase behaviour of material adsorbed into nanometre-sized pores poses an interesting
fundamental problem in physics and chemistry as well as being of immense technological importance. For
example, it is well known that the freezing point of a confined liquid is often depressed to a lower
temperature than for the bulk liquid. Hysteresis between the freezing and melting temperatures is normally
associated with this confinement. Furthermore, confinement can have a significant effect on glass-forming
liquids, such as changing the temperature of the glass transition, and modifying the nature of the confined
material. Such differences can be attributed to “finite size” effects: in systems of such small effective size, it
is no longer possible to consider them in the same manner as a macroscopic system. By using porous glass,
we can create a “large” sample (several mm3) containing very many material-filled pores. Whilst porous
glass samples are already available, it is hoped that samples with different pore sizes could be grown as part
of the project, in order to study size effects systematically. We will also investigate size effects by use of
mono-, di-, and tri-saccharide samples.
References:
Consumables budget‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡: £ 250
***************
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
†††††††††††††††
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective
Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September
2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
M6
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: PCR kinetics in real time
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Matthew Hicks
Department: MOAC _______________________________
Building, Room: Chemistry dept, B608
E-mail address: matthew.hicks@warwick.ac.uk __________
Phone number: 23293
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name: Alison Rodger
Department: MOAC/chemistry _______________________
Building, Room: Chemistry dept, B607
E-mail address: a.rodger@warwick.ac.uk _______________
Phone number: 23234
Project outline:
Development of a novel method for detecting PCR products in real time
The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is used to amplify DNA. This has many uses including diagnosis of disease,
forensic applications in crime detection and manipulation of DNA for molecular biology applications. Standard PCR
detects the product upon completion of the reaction. However, real time PCR (RT-PCR) measures the amount of
amplified DNA in the sample during the reaction. This is useful because the rate of amplification is exponential and
therefore dependent upon the amount of starting material. Here we present a novel method for RT-PCR detected by flow
linear dichroism (fLD). PCR is most commonly carried out using a thermocycler that changes temperature rapidly.
However, we have taken an alternative approach and used transport of the sample between regions of a capillary that are
held at different temperatures. This has the advantage of a fast change between the different temperatures required
during the PCR cycle. After the elongation phase of the PCR, the sample is pumped through a quartz flow cell. This
aligns (by shear flow) any amplimer in the reaction, because it is relatively long (i.e. has a high aspect ratio). The
deoxynucleotide triphosphates and the primers are not aligned. For an aligned sample there is a differential absorbance
of light polarized parallel and perpendicular to the sample orientation axis. This phenomenon is called linear dichroism
(LD). Since the amplimer is the only molecule that will align in the PCR the increase in the LD signal is proportional to
the amount of amplimer present. This method does not require any dyes or markers to be added to the sample and the
measurement is non-destructive. This means that the sample can be recovered and used for any other downstream
applications, for example DNA sequencing or other molecular biology applications.
Experience will be gained in handling biomolecule samples, biophysical instrumentation and literature searching.
References:
Real-time PCR tutorial: http://pathmicro.med.sc.edu/pcr/realtime-home.htm
Rodger and Nordén, Circular dichroism and linear dichroism, OUP 1997
Consumables budget****************: £ 150
§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective
Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September
2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
****************
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
M7
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Synthesis and electrophysiological characterisation of granisetron derivatives
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing††††††††††††††††
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Dr Martin Lochner
Department: Chemistry _____________________________
Building, Room: Engineering A421__________
E-mail address: m.lochner@warwick.ac.uk _____________
Phone number: x50170 __________________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name: Prof Alison Rodger __________________________
Department: Chemistry/MOAC _______________________
Building, Room: Chemistry B607/MOAC _____
E-mail address: a.rodger@warwick.ac.uk _______________
Phone number: x23234/x74696 ____________
Project outline:
Introduction – Granisetron (1) is a high-affinity inhibitor of the ligand-gated serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine) type-3
receptor (5-HT3R). The 5-HT3R is a transmembrane protein that is involved in signal transmission in the central and
peripheral nervous system. The binding site for granisetron is not well characterised and there is an ongoing debate in
the literature about the exact binding location and orientation of this inhibitor. In order to shed light into this we are
interested in synthesising photoaffinity probes based on the granisetron structure (e.g. 2) and with this to be able to map
the binding site.
N Me
O
NH
N Me
N Me
N N
O
F3C
O
NH
O
4
5
N
N
MeO
N
Me
N
Me
6
1: granisetron
2
7
NH
3
N2
N1
Me
3a: 4-OMe
3b: 7-OMe
Project objectives – The photoactive group is rather bulky (see example 2) and we would like to establish which
positions of the granisetron skeleton will tolerate chemical modifications without dramatic loss of binding affinity. We are
currently underway to synthesise granisetron derivatives with a methoxy group at C5 and C6 (9 synthetic steps from
commercially available starting material). 1-3 The objective of the mini project is to synthesise granisetron derivatives 3a
and/or 3b with a methoxy group at C4 and C7 and to test these compounds on the 5-HT3R (in collaboration with Dr A. J.
Thompson, Biochemistry Dept., Cambridge).4 This small structure-activity relationship exercise on the aromatic ring of
granisetron will be very valuable in guiding futures syntheses of photoaffinity probes such as 2.
Training provided – The proposed mini projects includes training in modern synthetic organic chemistry. We have
experience with this chemistry and it is straightforward. Once the compounds are obtained they can be tested on the
biological target which will provide an insight to electrophysiology to the student.
References: (1) P. Schumann et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 1153 (2) G. Luo et al., J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 5392 (3)
P. Fludzinksi et al., J. Med. Chem. 1987, 30, 1535 (4) A. J. Thompson et al., Br. J. Pharmacol., 2007, in press.
Consumables budget‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡: £ 150
††††††††††††††††
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective
Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September
2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
M8
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Measurement of DNA persistence length __________________________________________
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Martyn Rittman _____________________________
Department: MOAC _______________________________
Building, Room: Chemistry dept, B608 _______
E-mail address: m.rittman@warwick.ac.uk ______________
Phone number: 23293 ___________________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name: Alison Rodger ______________________________
Department: MOAC/chemistry _______________________
Building, Room: Chemistry dept, B607 _______
E-mail address: a.rodger@warwick.ac.uk _______________
Phone number: ________________________
Project outline:
DNA persistence length is a widely accepted concept that measures flexibility of DNA. A recent review (in
preparation), however, has highlighted difficulties in experimental measurement and conflicts between definitions of
persistence length.
LD260
The project proposed would entail carrying out measurements of DNA persistence length using stopped flow linear
dichroism spectroscopy (LD). To do this the DNA is passed through a
0.3
narrow tube at a high rate to orient it, then stopped and allowed to relax
back into a randomly ordered state. LD measures orientation by recording
0.25
1ml.sec-1
the difference between absorption of parallel and perpendicularly polarised
7ml.sec-1
0.2
light that has passed through a sample. For the case of stopped flow DNA,
we expect to see relaxation curves for which a half-life can be measured and
0.15
fitted to several known models (as shown in the Figure).
0.1
The dependence of persistence length on any one of a number of factors
can be investigated, for example DNA base sequence, temperature, salt
concentration or DNA length.
0.05
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Time / seconds
References: Linear dichroism of biomolecules, which way is up?, Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2004 Oct;14(5):541-6;
DNA persistence length revisited, Biopolymers. 2001-2002;61(4):261-75.
Consumables budget*****************: £ 150
§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective
Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September
2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
*****************
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
M9
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Determinants of firing patterns of cerebellar neurones. Part II: theory
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing†††††††††††††††††
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Dr Magnus Richardson _______________________
Department: Warwick Systems Biology Centre __________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: magnus.richardson@warwick.ac.uk ______
Phone number: 024 761 50250 ____________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name: Dr Mark Wall _______________________________
Department: Biological Sciences _____________________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: mwall@bio.warwick.ac.uk ______________
Phone number: 024 765 73772 ____________
Project outline:
Neurones may be divided into two classes, depending on the effect their synapses have on target cells.
Excitatory cells increase the voltage of post-synaptic neurones, whereas inhibitory cells decrease postsynaptic voltages and are therefore thought to reduce the firing rate of target cells. However, there is
increasing evidence that the role of inhibition is more subtle and that the principal effect of inhibition may be
the patterning of the output of excitatory cells.
The cerebellum is a densely populated and connected part of the nervous system - the principal excitatory
neurones, the Purkinje cells, have a highly branched structure and receive upwards of 100,000 synapses. In
the laboratory of Dr Mark Wall, experiments have been performed in cerebellar slices that examined the
change in the firing patterns of Purkinje cells as the inhibitory balance is altered pharmacologically. A
surprising result seen in these preliminary experiments was that inhibition rarely just reduced the firing rate
of Purkinje cells, but acts rather to modulate their firing patterns, which passed between tonic firing and
bursting states. The standard spike-sorting analysis software packages do not provide a means for
experimentalists to analyse the higher-order statistics of such spike trains.
In these linked experiment-theory mini-projects the student will measure firing patterns of cerebellar cells
experimentally and then model their own and existing data. Theoretical methods could include construction
of solvable and biophysically-detailed cell models and coupled microcircuits. The higher-order statistics of
the spike trains will be analysed to infer the modulatory effect of inhibition on Purkinje cell firing patterns.
References:
Consumables budget‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡: £ 0 (theoretical project)
†††††††††††††††††
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the
respective Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28
September 2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
M10
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Determinants of firing patterns of cerebellar neurones. Part I: experiment
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Dr Mark Wall _______________________________
Department: Biological Sciences _____________________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: mwall@bio.warwick.ac.uk ______________
Phone number: 024 765 73772 ____________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week):
Name: _________________________________________
Department: _____________________________________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: __________________________________
Phone number: ________________________
Project outline:
Neurones may be divided into two classes, depending on the effect their synapses have on target cells.
Excitatory cells increase the voltage of post-synaptic neurones, whereas inhibitory cells decrease postsynaptic voltages and are therefore thought to reduce the firing rate of target cells. However, there is
increasing evidence that the role of inhibition is more subtle and that the principal effect of inhibition may be
the patterning of the output of excitatory cells.
The cerebellum is a densely populated and connected part of the nervous system - the principal excitatory
neurones, the Purkinje cells, have a highly branched structure and receive upwards of 100,000 synapses. In
the laboratory of Dr Mark Wall, experiments have been performed in cerebellar slices that examined the
change in the firing patterns of Purkinje cells as the inhibitory balance is altered pharmacologically. A
surprising result seen in these preliminary experiments was that inhibition rarely just reduced the firing rate
of Purkinje cells, but acts rather to modulate their firing patterns, which passed between tonic firing and
bursting states. The standard spike-sorting analysis software packages do not provide a means for
experimentalists to analyse the higher-order statistics of such spike trains.
In these linked experiment-theory mini-projects the student will measure firing patterns of cerebellar cells
experimentally and then model their own and existing data. The experimental methods used will depend on
the student's interests, but may include preparation of cerebellar slices, extracellular measurements of spike
trains and the potential for performing some intracellular patch-clamp recordings.
References:
Consumables budget******************: £ 450 (or as near to that as the requirements for the third slot allows)
§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the
respective Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28
September 2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
******************
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
M11
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Mapping protein-protein interactions involved in Carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 oligomerisation
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing††††††††††††††††††
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Prof. Victor Zammit (VZ) and Dr. Ann Dixon (AD) ___
Department: Warwick Medical School (VZ) and Chemistry (AD) Building, Room: Chemistry C503 (AD) ______
E-mail address: V.A.Zammit@warwick.ac.uk, ann.dixon@warwick.ac.uk Phone number: 024 7696 8583 (VZ)
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week):
Name: _________________________________________
Department: _____________________________________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: __________________________________
Phone number: ________________________
Project outline:
Introduction. Carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 (CPT 1) is an enzyme whose activity is important for key functions
in the cell, such as fuel selection for tissues, and is involved in appetite control and development of diabetes.
CPT 1 occurs in two isoforms, both of which are integral membrane proteins ([1]; see Fig. 1a) and have very high
sequence similarity (~65%). Despite this high similarity, these two proteins are found in different tissues (CPT 1A
in the liver and kidneys, CPT 1B in muscle) and have markedly different sensitivity to their inhibitor malonyl-CoA, a
molecule that is very important in the mounting of a response to diabetes by the liver [2].
In contrast to the very high sensitivity of CPT 1B to malonyl-CoA, CPT 1A
has a very low and variable sensitivity to the inhibitor, which suggests that
the molecule is quite flexible and may undergo large conformational
changes as part of its biological function [3]. CPT 1A has also recently been
found to exist as trimers and possibly higher order oligomers (Fig. 1b),
however the molecular basis for this oligomerization is unknown. Also
unknown is whether CPT 1B is oligomeric, and therefore whether the
inherent differences in malonyl-CoA sensitivity could be linked to differences
in oligomeric state.
Aims of Project. The first aim of this project is to determine which domains
of CPT 1A (e.g. N-terminal, transmembrane (TM), loop (L), C-terminal: see
Fig. 1a) drive the oligomerisation of this protein. Inspection of the
sequences of the TM domains of CPT 1A and CPT 1B highlights the
presence of several GxxxG motifs, motifs that are known to drive the
oligomerisation of TM -helices [4]. Therefore, the TM domains may play a
role in oligomerisation of these proteins. The N- and C-terminal domains
may also play a role, as may the loop region connecting the two TM
domains, and all of these domains will be examined independently for their
effect on oligomerisation of wild-type CPT1A. The second aim of this
project is to determine whether or not wild-type CPT 1B also forms
oligomers.
††††††††††††††††††
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the
respective Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28
September 2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
Brief Outline of Work. Oligomerisation of wild-type CPT 1A and various mutants will be assessed using native
gel electrophoresis followed by Western blots to detect monomeric and oligomeric forms of CPT 1A and B, using
specific antibodies. This project will make use of constructs which have already been prepared in the laboratory of
Prof. Victor Zammit, therefore no cloning will be required. To address whether TM1 or TM2 determines oligomeric
state, constructs have been prepared where each TM domain in CPT 1A is independently substituted with the
corresponding TM from CPT 1B. A similar construct has been prepared to analyse the role of the loop region.
Deletion mutants of the N- and C-terminal domains of CPT 1A have also been prepared and will be tested for their
ability to self-associate. Finally, a construct containing wild-type CPT 1B will also be tested.
The DNA of each construct will be expressed in yeast, where it is transcribed and the corresponding protein is
translated and inserted in the mitochondrial outer membrane. As yeast do not express endogenous CPT, the
properties of the expressed protein can be studied without background interference. Yeast mitochondria will be
prepared and their proteins separated under ‘native’ conditions that preserve the inter-molecular interactions that
are involved in the formation of oligomers.
This project will provide students with a basic knowledge of modern protein analysis techniques as well as several
methods for handling and detecting membrane proteins, and elucidating their structure-function relationships.
References:
[1] Fraser, F., Corstorphine, C. G., and Zammit, V. A. (1997) Biochem J 323, 711-718
[2] Zammit. V A (1994) Diabetes 2, 132 – 155
[3] Zammit, V.A., rice, N.T., Fraser, F., and Jackson, V. N. (2004) Biochem Soc Trans 29, 287 – 290
[4] Russ, W.P. and D.M. Engelman, J. Mol. Biol., 296(3), 911 (2000).
Consumables budget‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡: £ 150-200 for antibodies and consumables needed for electrophoresis.
________________________
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
M12
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Structure
Structure/function studies on ALDC, part 1; Chemistry.
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
X Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
MOAC Mini Project
Systems Biology Mini Project
X Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Professor M. Wills
Department:
Chemistry __________________________ Building, Room: Chemistry room C504
E-mail address: m.wills@warwick.ac.uk ________________ Phone number: (024 765)23260
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week): n/a
Project outline:
Context: This mini-project proposal is the first of three directed towards the study of the mechanism of
action of the enzyme ADLC. The objective of this mini-project will be to prepare two substrate and transition
state analogues for co-crystallisation with the isolated enzyme. The second mini-project will be the X-ray
crystal structure analysis of ALDC bound to the analogues (Professor V. Fulop). The third mini-project will
involve a molecular modelling study of the enzyme, (Professor P. M. Rodger).
Acetolactate decarboxylase (ALDC) catalyses the decarboxylation of (S)--acetolactate [(S)-2hydroxy-2-methyl-3-oxobutanoate]
1
and
(S)--acetohydroxybutyrate
[(S)-2-ethyl-2-hydroxy-3oxobutanoate] 2 (Scheme 1),1,2 the biosynthetic precursors of valine 3 and isoleucine, 4 (Scheme 1). The
products of decarboxylation of 1 and 2 are (R)-acetoin 5 and (R)-3-hydroxypentan-2-one 6 respectively. The
enzyme catalyses also the decarboxylation of the corresponding (R)-enantiomers. Decarboxylation of both
enantiomers of -acetolactate leads to a single (R)-enantiomer of 5, by the mechanism shown in Scheme 2,
by first decarboxylating the (S)-enantiomer 1 with overall inversion of configuration at the -centre and then
by catalysing a tertiary ketol rearrangement of the (R)-enantiomer 7 with migration of the carboxylate group
to give 8.3-4
The full length (260 amino acid residues) of ALDC from Bacillus brevis has been cloned, expressed
and purified by Novozymes A/S (Denmark) to homogeneity and provided to us for crystallization trials.5 A
major question concerns the location of the active site. It will be necessary to synthesise substrate or product
analogues that can be co-crystallised for X-ray structural studies. Specific synthetic targets to be made in this
project are shown in Figure 1. Analogues 9 should bind but cannot undergo decarboxylation. The use of
product analogue diols of type 10 will also be explored.
NH2
R
Scheme 1
Scheme 2
Me
O Me
8
CO2S
O
CO2-
Me
R S OH
Me
3 R = Me
4 R = Et
CO2-
1 R = Me
2 R = Et
Me
O
ADC
R
OH
Me
O
O
CO2ALDC
- CO2
Me
R R
OH
5 R = Me
6 R = Et
H+
H
7
Figure 1: Potential analogues
OH
OH
for co-crystallisation
CO2H
R2
R1
R1
with ADC. (R1=Me or Et and
9
R
OH
10 J.P. and Størmer, F.C. (1970). Eur. J. Biochem. 14,
References1).
Dolin,
M.I.
and
Gunsalus,
I.C.
(1951).
J.
Bact.
62,
199-214.
2).
Løken,
2
OH
R2=Me or Et)
133-137. 3). Crout, D.H.G. and Rathbone, D.L. (1988). J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 98-99. 4). Crout, D.H.G., Rathbone, D.L. and Lee,
E.R. (1990). J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1367-1369. 5) Najmudin, S., Andersen, J. T., Patkar, S. A., Borchert, T. V., Crout, D. H. G. and
Fülöp, V. (2003). Acta. Cryst. D59, 1073-1075.
Consumables budget: £ 200 for reagents.
§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the
respective Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28
September 2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
M13
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Development of comparative genomic hybridisation with a micro-array of the cyanophage S-PM2 ____
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing*******************
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Andrew Millard _____________________________
Department: Biological Sciences _____________________
Building, Room: c126 ____________________
E-mail address: a.d.millard@warwick.ac.uk _____________
Phone number: 22572 ___________________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week):
Name:Nick Mann _________________________________
Department: Biological Sciences _____________________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: N.H.Mann@warwick.ac.uk _____________
Phone number: 44 (0)24 7652 3526 ________
Project outline: Development of comparative genomic hybridisation with a micro-array of the cyanophage S-PM2.
The virus S-PM2 infects marine cyanobacterium Synechococcus. This cyanobacterium and the related Prochlorococcus dominate the oligotrophic
regions of the world’s oceans, where their co-occurring viruses (cyanophages) are equally abundant (Wommack & Colwell, 2000) . Cyanophages are
known to play an important role in the microbial loop as they divert the flow of nutrients, they influence the population structure of their hosts.
A total of 6 cyanophages have had their genomes sequenced, however, only 2 isolated on Synechococcus have had their genomes sequenced, one of
these is S-PM2 [1]. A third cyanophage S-WHM1 has had its genome partially sequenced (approximately 80 %, this lab). Analysis of this partial
genome reveals many genes in common with S-PM2, yet there are a number of genes that are novel to each organism. A fundamental question is what
are core “cyanophage genes”. Analysis of the genome sequence of cyanophages by Sullivan et al 2005 has identified some core genes which were
common to three cyanophage genomes. A far larger number of genomes is needed to draw any firm conclusions.
The time and cost to sequence the genome of a large number of cyanophages is prohibitive. An alternative technique is to use comparative genomic
hybridisation (CGH) to identify genes common to all cyanophages. A custom array microarray has already been successfully designed and used to
monitor gene expression of S-PM2. This array can also be used for CGH studies.
The aim of the project is to develop the technique of CGH using S-PM2 and S-WHM1. As the probes were designed against the S-PM2 sequence,
genomic DNA from this phage will be used as a control and S-WHM1 DNA will be used as the test to determine whether the array can be used in
CGH. As the partial sequence of S-WHM1 is known, it will be possible to determine if probes designed against S-PM2 can also detect homologous
genes in S-WHM1.
The project would involve purification of cyanophage isolates S-PM2 and S-WHM1 using CsCl gradients followed by the extraction of DNA. Phage
DNA will be labeled with the fluorescent dyes Cy3 and Cy5. Hybridisation of Cy labeled genomic DNA to the array will allow quantification of the
binding of probes to the target genomic DNA.
This will allow the identification of genes in S-WHM1 that are also present in S-PM2. The procedure will be optimised to determine the quantity of
DNA that is needed for hybridisation. Data analysis will then determine the signal threshold values needed to distinguish the actual presence of that
gene from the background noise. There will then be the opportunity to test the CGH on other phages for which no genomic information is available.
References: Wommack, K. E. and R. R. Colwell (2000). "Virioplankton: viruses in aquatic ecosystems." Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64(1): 69-114.
Mann, N. H., M. R. J. Clokie, A. Millard, A. Cook, W. H. Wilson, P. J. Wheatley, A. Letarov and H. M. Krisch (2005). "The Genome of S-PM2, a
"Photosynthetic" T4-Type Bacteriophage That Infects Marine Synechococcus Strains." Journal Of Bacteriology 187: 3188-3200.
Consumables budget†††††††††††††††††††: £ £300
1.
Mann, N.H., et al., The Genome of S-PM2, a "Photosynthetic" T4-Type Bacteriophage That
Infects Marine Synechococcus Strains. Journal Of Bacteriology, 2005. 187: p. 3188-3200.
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
M14
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
†††††††††††††††††††
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
Project title: Characterisation of genes in the “ORFanage” region in the cyanophage S-PM2 ________________________
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Andrew Millard _____________________________
Department: Biological Sciences _____________________
Building, Room: c126 ____________________
E-mail address: a.d.millard@warwick.ac.uk _____________
Phone number: 22572 ___________________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name:Nick Mann _________________________________
Department: Biological Sciences _____________________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: N.H.Mann@warwick.ac.uk _____________
Phone number: +44 (0)24 7652 3526 _______
Project outline: Characterisation of genes in the “ORFanage” region in the cyanophage S-PM2
Cyanophages are viruses that are capable of infecting cyanobacteria. Cyanobacteria of the genera
Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus are dominant in the world’s ocean and are responsible for
greater than 60% primary production in some regions. Cyanophages are known to influence carbon
cycling, host population dynamics and host evolution. A number of cyanophages have now been
isolated and characterised to increase the understanding of cyanophage/cyanobacterial interactions.
The cyanophage S-PM2 is the most well characterised cyanophage, the genome has been
completely sequenced and oligonucleotide array has also been produced to study phage gene
expression during infection of its host Synechococcus WH7803. The results of genome annotation
revealed a number of small contiguous ORFs that are database orphans [Mann et al, 2005]. The
results of microarray analysis to monitor gene expression during infection revealed that the genes in
the “ORFanage” region are expressed during the infection cycle [Millard et al unpublished results].
The cloning of groups 5 gene genes into an expression vector, under the control of an arabinose
inducible promoter has revealed that the expression of some these are toxic when expressed in
E.coli. [Mahon, unpublished data]. The aim of this work is to further investigate the gene within the
orfanage region and determine exactly which gene produces proteins that are toxic to E.coli and to
determine if they are also toxic when expressed in Synechococcus. This will involve the use of the
following techniques: PCR, cloning, SDS-PAGE
References: N.M Mann, MRJ Clokie, A Millard, A Cook, WH Wilson, PJ Wheatley, A Letarov, HM Krisch (2005). The
Genome of S-PM2, a "Photosynthetic" T4-Type Bacteriophage That Infects Marine Synechococcus Strains . J.
Bacteriol. 187, 3188-3200.
Consumables budget§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§:
£ £300
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the
respective Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28
September 2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
M15
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Structure
Structure/function studies on ALDC, part 2; biology.
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
X Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing********************
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
X Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name:Professor V.Fulop
Department: Biol Sci _______________________________ Building, Room: Biol SCi ,
E-mail address: vilmos@globin.bio.warwick.ac.uk _ Phone number: (024
Room B128
765)72628
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
n/a
Project outline:
Acetolactate decarboxylase (ALDC) has the unique ability to decarboxylate both enantiomers of acetolactate to give a
single enantiomer of the decarboxylation product, (R)-acetoin. The enzyme decarboxylates the normal substrate (S)-acetolactate. It then catalyses tertiary ketol rearrangement of the (R)-enantiomer with the migration of the carboxylate
group. Because this degenerate rearrangement proceeds via a transition state with a syn arrangement of the oxygen
functions, the product is (S)--acetolactate which is then decarboxylated in the normal way. The enzyme also catalyses
the decarboxylation of (S)--acetohydroxybutyrate. (S)--Acetolactate and (S)--acetohydroxybutyrate, the products
of decarboxylation of -ketocarboxylates are the biosynthetic precursors of the amino acids valine and isoleucine .
Details of the overexpression, purification and crystallization of -acetolactate decarboxylase are given in
Najmudin et al. (2003). We recently solved the crystal structure of the enzyme from a SAD experiment to give a partial
model to 2.3Å. The structure was completed using higher resolution data (2.0Å) in 3 different crystal forms and the
resolution at the moment is being extended to 1.1Å. -Acetolactate decarboxylase is a 2 domain α/β protein with no
significant structural homology to any other protein. The N-terminus domain comprises a 7 β-strand mixed β-sheet,
which is extended into second molecule of the dimer related by 2-fold symmetry to give a 14 β-strand β-sheet. The Cterminus domain is a β-cylinder comprising 5 anti-parallel β-strands and a long α-helix. It provides the three highly
conserved histidines, which coordinate the metal ion (Zn). The coordination of the metal is completed by a conserved
glutamate from the C-terminus and two water molecules. The likely catalytic site is completed by the highly conserved
arginine, threonine and a further glutamate in the vicinity of the metal.
The project shall require the preparation two substrate and transition state analogues for co-crystallization
experiments. The synthetic chemistry, first part of the project, will be supervised by Professor M. Wills in the
Department of Chemistry. The second mini-project (this one) will be aimed at the X-ray crystal structure analysis of
analogues bound to the enzyme. The third mini-project will involve a molecular modelling study of the enzyme, in order
to help elucidate its mechanism and will be supervised by Professor P. M. Rodger, Department of Chemistry. The three
mini-projects thus provide a coherent series of studies with training in synthetic chemistry, enzyme crystallography and
molecular modelling. It is anticipated that the student will go on to use this blend of skills in further independent
research work. The project has potential to lead to a full PhD programme by systematic
mutagenesis/kinetics/crystallography complemented by modeling substrate entry and turnover at the catalytic site using
computational techniques.
.
References: : Najmudin, S., Andersen, J.T., Patkar, S.A., Borchert, T.V., Crout, D.H.G. & Fülöp, V. (2003). Purification,
crystallisation and preliminary X-ray crystallographic studies on acetolactate decarboxylase. Acta Cryst. D59, 1073-1075
Consumables budget: £ 200
********************
for reagents.
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective
Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September
2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
M16
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Structure
Structure/function studies on ALDC, part 3; modelling.
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
 Experimental biology
MOAC Mini Project
 Biophysical chemistry
(8 weeks)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
X Mathematics/computing
Project timing††††††††††††††††††††
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
X Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Professor P. M. Rodger
Department: Chemistry _____________________________ Building, Room: Chemistry room B110.
E-mail address: :
p.m.rodger@warwick.ac.uk
______ Phone number: (024
765)2 3239
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
n/a
Project outline:
Context
This mini-project is the last of a three-component project directed towards the study of the mechanism of action of the
enzyme Acetolactate decarboxylase (ADLC). The first two mini-projects involved the preparation of two substrates and
then gathered experimental data on the subsequent kinetics of ADLC and the ADLC-substrate crystal structure. In this,
the third, phase, molecular modelling methods will be used to characterise the nature of the substrate-ligand interaction,
and hence will seek to elucidate the mechanism by which ADLC catalyses the decarboxylation of acetolactate, and its
unusual chiral specificity.
Background
The background to the project has been described in the descriptions of the first two mini projects (M. Wills, and V.
Fülöp) Briefly, ALDC has the unique ability to decarboxylate both enantiomers of acetolactate to give a single
enantiomer of the decarboxylation product, (R)-acetoin. The crystal structure of ALDC has recently been solved at
Warwick, which opens up the possibility of obtaining an understanding at the atomic level of the way in which ALDC
recognises potential substrates, and predisposes decarboxylation to occur in such an enantiomerically specific manner.
Aims of the Project: molecular characterisation of substrate-enzyme interaction
Various molecular modelling methods will be used to characterise the interaction of the two substrates prepared in the
first mini-project with ADLC. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations will be performed on the uncomplexed ADLC,
using the published crystal structure as a starting point. Simulations on the ADLC/substrate complex will be performed
in two ways. Firstly, MD simulations will be performed using the crystal structures obtained in the second mini-project.
Secondly, Monte Carlo (MC) simulations will be performed to identify possible binding sites for the substrates within
the unbound ADLC, and then these used to initiate further MD simulations. In all cases, the simulations will be analysed
to characterise the energetics of binding, to identify any specific recognition motifs in the enzyme/substrate interaction,
and to determine the extent of enzyme relaxation induced by the substrate.
Najmudin, S., Andersen, J.T., Patkar, S.A., Borchert, T.V., Crout, D.H.G. & Fülöp, V. (2003).
Purification, crystallisation and preliminary X-ray crystallographic studies on acetolactate decarboxylase.
Acta Cryst. D59, 1073-1075
References
Consumables budget:
††††††††††††††††††††
£50 for data archiving media.
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the
respective Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28
September 2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
M17
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Modelling the Distribution of Crossovers
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Sascha Ott ________________________________
Department: Warwick Systems Biology Centre __________
Building, Room: Coventry House, Room 327 __
E-mail address: s.ott@warwick.ac.uk __________________
Phone number: 024-761-50258 ____________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name: David Wild _________________________________
Department: Warwick Systems Biology Centre __________
Building, Room: Coventry House, Room 332 __
E-mail address: d.l.wild@warwick.ac.uk ________________
Phone number: 024-761-50242 ____________
Project outline:
The formation of crossovers between maternal and paternal chromosomes is a fundamental
biological process. Crossovers are known to occur more frequently near the ends of chromosomes
than in central regions and the position of the centromere is thought to influence the positions of
crossovers as well. Crossovers can be observed directly by immunostaining, or indirectly by tracing
alleles through generations. As the direct observations show co-occurring crossovers along a
chromosome they could harbour more information than the data obtained by indirect methods. The
aim of this project is to evaluate competing models of crossover distributions using an unpublished
dataset of direct observations in Maj Hulten’s lab.
The dataset gives approximate crossover positions, chromosome lengths, and centromere
positions of several thousand cases. Most of the data is from human chromosomes, but a smaller
part of the data is from mouse. The first step of the project is to formulate mathematical models of
crossover-distributions that reflect the different hypotheses that experimentalists have. The second
step is to fit each model to the data and evaluate the support the data gives to each hypothesis.
Time permitting the results obtained from this unpublished dataset can be compared to results that
can be obtained using indirect observations only.
This project can be linked to the experimental project on crossovers.
(David Wild will be away from mid-May to June, so some advisor meetings might have to be rescheduled accordingly.)
References:
Consumables budget§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§: £ 0
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the
respective Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28
September 2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
M18
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: ___________________________________________________________________________
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
X Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing*********************
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
X Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
X Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name:Dr Corinne Smith ____________________________
Department: Biological Sciences _____________________
Building, Room: B129 ____________________
E-mail address: Corinne.smith@warwick.ac.uk __________
Phone number: 02476 522461 ____________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name: __________________________________________
Department: _____________________________________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: __________________________________
Phone number: ________________________
Project outline:
It has been accepted dogma that a protein must adopt a compact ordered tertiary structure in order to have function.
Recently this view has been challenged and the importance of natively unfolded proteins in biology is becoming
recognised (Dunker, Lawson et al. 2001; Dunker, Brown et al. 2002; Tompa 2002). We have highlighted the role of
natively unfolded domains in the field of endocytosis where some key endocytic proteins were shown to be deficient
in traditionally folded structure and to harbour important binding motifs within their unstructured linker regions
(Dafforn and Smith 2004). This project will focus on a detailed biophysical characterisation of 6 peptides which relate
to unfolded regions of three important endocytic proteins, auxilin, clathrin and beta-adaptin, together with peptides
with well-known extended structures such as those relating to the collagen sequence and poly-proline.
Trifluoroethanol is widely used to induce helical structure in peptides and some native unfolded domains have been
observed to be resistant to such induction. To our knowledge, this property has never been systematically studied.
The aim of this project is therefore to test whether response to trifluoroethanol is a good measure of the
degree of ‘unfoldedness’ of natively unfolded protein domains. Initially, the secondary structure of the selected
peptides will be analysed using circular dichroism and the effect of temperature on their conformation monitored.
Then trifluoethanol will be titrated into each peptide and the effect on conformation observed. Analysis of these
results using the method of Luo and Baldwin,(1997) will then be carried out and compared to results obtained for
more conventional folded regions.
Should time permit, the study can be extended to investigate whether the presence of a binding motif within
a peptide alters its conformational properties in comparison with peptides from regions of sequence close by which
do not contain a binding motif. This will help answer the question of whether the binding motifs found in extended
regions in endocytic proteins influence the folding properties of these regions.
References:
Dafforn, T. R. and C. J. Smith (2004). "Natively unfolded domains in endocytosis: hooks, lines and linkers." EMBO
Rep 5(11): 1046-52.
Dunker, A. K., C. J. Brown, et al. (2002). "Intrinsic disorder and protein function." Biochemistry 41(21): 6573-82.
Dunker, A. K., J. D. Lawson, et al. (2001). "Intrinsically disordered protein." J Mol Graph Model 19(1): 26-59.
*********************
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective
Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September
2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
Luo and Baldwin, (1997) ‘Mechanism of helix induction by trifluoroethanol: A framework for extrapolating the helixforming properties of trifluoroethanol /water mixtures back to water. Biochemistry 36 8413
Scheele, U., J. Alves, et al. (2003). "Molecular and functional characterization of clathrin- and AP-2-binding
determinants within a disordered domain of auxilin." J Biol Chem 278(28): 25357-68.
Tompa, P. (2002). "Intrinsically unstructured proteins." Trends Biochem Sci 27(10): 527-33.
Consumables budget†††††††††††††††††††††: £ 300
†††††††††††††††††††††
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
M19
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Neuronal interactions with electromagnetic fields
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Dr Magnus Richardson _______________________
Department: Warwick Systems Biology Centre __________
Building, Room: 339 _____________________
E-mail address: magnus.richardson@warwick.ac.uk ______
Phone number: 024 761 50250 ____________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name: __________________________________________
Department: _____________________________________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: ___________________________________
Phone number: _________________________
Project outline:
Neurones are electrically active cells; they interact with externally applied electromagnetic fields,
such as in therapeutic deep-brain stimulation, and also generate their own fields, which though
individually weak, can be measured through the scalp by EEG when large populations of neurons
fire in synchrony.
The standard method for modelling the electrophysiology of neurones - cable theory - treats each
element of the cell, the dendrites and axons for example, as small coupled resistors. Though this is
a powerful method for modelling the response of isolated neurones, it ignores electromagnetic
interactions and so cannot be used to model the effects of external stimulation or how the
neurone's own field affects the conductive extra-cellular medium and neighbouring cells.
In this project the student will develop more complete neurone models that capture their
electromagnetic interaction with the environment. Simplified models could include spherical and
cylindrical geometries, relevant to cell bodies and dendrites. These analytical results will be
compared to finite-element numerical simulations, which are also to be constructed by the student.
The project would suit someone with a background in mathematics or physics and with an interest
in neuroscience.
References:
Consumables budget§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§: £ 0 (theoretical project)
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the
respective Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28
September 2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to cover
consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
S1
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Identification of the host targets of pathogenicity effector proteins _______________________
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
X Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing**********************
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Dr. Rebecca Allen ___________________________
Department: WarwickHRI ___________________________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: Rebecca.allen@warwick.ac.uk __________
Phone number: ________________________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name:Prof. Jim Beynon ____________________________
Department: Warwick HRI/ Warwick Systems Biology _____
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: jim.beynon@warwick.ac.uk _____________
Phone number: 02476575141 _____________
Project outline:
Plants and animals have innate immune systems that prevent the majority of organisms from invading. To overcome this
innate immunity some organisms have developed a suite of effector proteins that suppress the host resistance
mechanisms. We know these organisms as pathogens. Our group studies the interaction between the downy mildew
parasite Hyaloperonospora parasitica and the model plant Arabidopsis. We have cloned two effector proteins by
traditional means and have been analyzing their role in the invasion process. To complement this we are part of a team
that have sequenced the genome of the pathogen and are in the process of annotation. We have used protein motif
searching scripts to identify the effector complement of the genome. From this analysis we have decided to target 60
effector proteins for further analysis.
We now wish to know what their role is in planta. We would predict that they target plant proteins that are involved in
immune responses and attempt to suppress their function. Therefore, we are using the yeast-2-hybrid screen to identify
the interacting proteins. From these studies we will construct models of the protein interaction networks involved in host
immunity.
The project will involve cloning a particular effector into a yeast-2-hybrid bait vector and carrying out a screen for
interacting proteins in a prey library. Interacting proteins will be identified by using a range of reporter genes. Positive
clones will be purified and sequenced to identify the nature of the potentially interacting protein. Informatic analyses will
then be carried out to assess the potential relevance of the interacting proteins to host/pathogen interactions.
References: Allen, R.L., Bittner-Eddy, P.D., Grenville-Briggs, L.J., Meitz, J.C., Rehmany, A.P., Rose, L.E. and Beynon, J.L.
(2004) Host-parasite co-evolutionary conflict between Arabidopsis and downy mildew. Science 306, 1957-1960
Birch, P.R.J., Rehmany, A.P., Pritchard, L., Kamoun, S. and Beynon, J.L. (2006) Trafficking Arms: Oomycete Effectors Enter
Host Plant Cells. Trends in Microbiology 14, 8-11.
Consumables budget††††††††††††††††††††††: £ 100
**********************
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective
Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September
2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
††††††††††††††††††††††
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to
cover consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
S2
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Analysis of stress related signalling pathways in Arabidopsis leaf development ____________
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Vicky Buchanan-Wollaston____________________
Department: Warwick HRI and Systems Biology _________
Building, Room: TPB128 at HRI;
at WSB __
E-mail address: Vicky.b-wollaston@warwick.ac.uk _______
Phone number: 75136/50249 ______________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name: __________________________________________
Department: _____________________________________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: __________________________________
Phone number: ________________________
Project outline:
Stress responses in plants are dependent on a complex network of signaling pathways controlled by a variety of
plant hormones. The two hormones, jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) are key in the expression of many stress
response genes but their influence is often conflicting, with increased expression of genes involved in SA signalling
resulting in reduced expression of JA response genes and vice versa (e.g. Lorenzo 2005).
SA and JA are also important in regulating gene expression during developmental leaf senescence (e.g.
Buchanan-Wollaston et al., 2005, Lim et al 2007). At Warwick HRI, we have been investigating the effects of mutants in
the SA and JA signaling pathways on the progression of leaf senescence. We have also investigated the effects of
spraying the hormones on leaves at different stages of development. Microarray and chlorophyll fluorescence analysis
has been applied and there are considerable data sets available that have not been fully analysed.
In this project the student will choose to investigate either SA or JA signaling, and identify mutants and
treatments accordingly. Experiments will be designed following analysis of the data sets that are already available. This
will include a detailed evaluation of the microarray data that has been generated to decide on the most effective growth
experiment and microarray analysis to undertake. The student will grow Arabidopsis plants (wild type and mutants) and
treat a proportion of these with hormones at different time points. They will carry out phenotype analysis, chlorophyll
assays, chlorophyll fluorescence measurements etc. At the same time, leaf material will be collected for RNA isolation
and microarray analysis. The effects of the mutations and/or treatments on phenotype during senescence will be
assessed and a small array experiment (up to 16 slides) will be carried out on one treatment/mutant comparison at a
single timepoint.
The student will gain experience in plant growth, phenotype analyses including chlorophyll fluorescence
measurements, microarray hybridization and will analyse extensive microarray data, both from their own experiments and
also from the previous experiments already carried out. Comparison of results with available data on the signaling
pathways and senescence will allow hypotheses to be drawn on the timing and effect of the SA or JA signal in
senescence.
References:
Buchanan-Wollaston V, et al.(2005) Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals significant differences in gene expression and signalling
pathways between developmental and dark/starvation induced senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant J 42: 567-585.
Lim et al. (2007) Leaf senescence Ann Rev Plant Biol 58:115–136
Lorenzo and Solano(2005) Current Opinion in Plant Biology 8:532–540
Consumables budget§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§: £ 450
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the
respective Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28
September 2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to
cover consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
S3
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Functional analysis of genes that regulate plant stress responses in Arabidopsis __________
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Wet Project

Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing***********************
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Vicky Buchanan-Wollaston____________________
Department: Warwick HRI and Systems Biology _________
Building, Room: TPB128 at HRI;
at WSB __
E-mail address: Vicky.b-wollaston@warwick.ac.uk _______
Phone number: 75136/50249 ______________
Project outline:
Environmental stress has a severe effect on plant growth and plants often respond by entering premature
senescence. Signalling pathways that control gene expression during leaf senescence have many overlapping features
with pathways that are expressed during plant stress responses (Buchanan-Wollaston et al, 2005; Lim et al., 2007; van
der Graaff et al, 2006).
At Warwick HRI we have identified a number of regulatory factors that show enhanced expression during plant
senescence and have generated knock out and overexpressing transgenic Arabidopsis lines for many of these. Many of
these genes are also increased in expression in response to a variety of different stresses including low nitrogen,
drought, high light, osmotic stress etc. The aim of this project is to investigate the effects of a selection of the mutations
on the plant stress response.
Plants will be grown (wild type, knock out and overexpression mutants (3-6 different genes)) under a variety of
experimental stress conditions. High light and drought treatments will be applied in the glasshouse, low N conditions will
be applied on agar plates etc. measurements will be taken to compare the effects of the stress on physiological
parameters in the wild type and the mutants. These measurements will include chlorophyll fluorescence using the CF
imager, chlorophyll and protein assays and protein gels to measure RUBISCO levels etc. This data will indicate the links
between each gene studied and different stress responses.
Microarray analysis (up to 16 slides) will be carried out on one stress and mutant combination (this will be a 4
way comparison; mutant v wild type and stress v unstressed). The mutant and stress to be studied will be selected
following the analysis described above. The data will show the effect of the mutation on gene expression in untreated
plants, the effect of the stress on gene expression in wild type plants and the differential expression in the mutant
compared to the wild type following the stress treatment. Data will be analysed using GeneSpring and differentially
expressed genes will be examined for changes in significant pathways using programs such as GOstat, MapMan etc.
Publicly available data will be mined to investigate the potential role of the selected gene in plant development and stress
response.
References:
Buchanan-Wollaston V, et al.(2005) Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals significant differences in gene expression and signalling
pathways between developmental and dark/starvation induced senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant J 42: 567-585.
Lim et al. (2007) Leaf senescence. Ann Rev Plant Biol 58:115–136
Van der Graaff et al, 2006 Transcription Analysis of Arabidopsis Membrane Transporters and Hormone Pathways during
Developmental and Induced Leaf Senescence Plant Physiology, 141: 776–792
Consumables budget†††††††††††††††††††††††: £ 450
***********************
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the respective
Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28 September
2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
†††††††††††††††††††††††
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to
cover consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
S4
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Gene expression profiles in the honey bee: a model for studying the interaction of innate
immunity and socially mediated defences against microbial diseases
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
√
Wet Project
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
√ Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Dr David Chandler / Dr Eugene Ryabov / Dr Peter Bittner-Eddy
Department: Warwick HRI __________________________ Building, Room: WHRI TPB 49
E-mail address: dave.chandler@warwick.ac.uk __________ Phone number: 02476 575 041
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week):
Name:
Department: _____________________________________
Building, Room:
E-mail address: __________________________________
Phone number:
Project outline:
There is a rapidly developing interest in the use of insects as model eukaryote animal hosts for infectious
diseases. This is driven by the parallels between the innate immune response of insects and of vertebrates,
together with the practical advantages of insects as experimental tools.
We are interested in the European honey bee (genome sequence published at end of 2006) as a potential
model system for studying the genomics of disease resistance in highly social organisms, including humans.
Honey bees are one of a select number of organisms with a highly evolved and complex social structure.
The high density populations in honey bee colonies provide ideal conditions for the spread of microbial
diseases, and hence there should be a strong selection pressure on the bee innate immune system.
However, the honey bee genome encodes relatively few proteins associated with immune pathways. It has
been postulated that this shortfall is compensated by socially-mediated defences. However, the role of most
of the innate-immunity components remains to be validated, along with understanding how gene expression
varies in different tissues and in response to different pathogens. These need to be addressed as a matter of
priority before social defences can be understood.
For this project, we want you to assess the potential of the honey bee as a model system, using gene
expression profiling. Bees will be challenged with pathogenic microorganisms, and expression of innate
immunity genes will be evaluated using a microarray and quantitative RT-PCR. We want you to investigate
how expression profiles vary in different tissues and with different types of pathogen. This exciting project
will give you the opportunity to contribute in a meaningful way to a newly developing field.
References:
Consumables budget§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§: £ 250
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the
respective Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28
September 2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to
cover consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
S5
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Defining sugar-signalling pathways in Arabidopsis seedlings using whole genome micro-arrays.
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
X Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing************************
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
X Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
X Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Peter J. Eastmond ___________________________
Department: Warwick HRI __________________________
Building, Room: TPB 134 _________________
E-mail address: p.j.eastmond@warwick.ac.uk ___________
Phone number: 75096 ___________________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name: __________________________________________
Department: _____________________________________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: __________________________________
Phone number: ________________________
Project outline:
Background: Plants sense the supply of sugars produced by photosynthesis and adapt their metabolism
and development accordingly. Research into “sugar-signaling” in Arabidopsis thaliana suggests that
perception probably occurs via multiple mechanisms, but to date the only sensor that has been identified is
hexokinase1 (HXK1)/GIN2 (Rolland et al., 2006). This enzyme catalyses the phosphorylation of glucose to
glucose-6-phosphate and has recently been shown to perform a dual role as a glucose receptor (Moore et
al., 2003; Cho et al., 2006). Whole genome micro-array experiments on Arabidopsis seedlings have shown
that the transcript abundance of many genes either increase or decrease (within 30 min) following a change
in sugar availability (Blasing et al., 2005; Osuna et al., 2007). On a genome-wide scale it remains to be
determined which of these early response genes react to a HXK-mediated signal and which are regulated by
alternate sugar-signaling pathways.
Aims: The aim of this project is to perform whole genome micro-array experiments on Arabidopsis seedlings
under sugar-deprived and excess conditions, and use the gin2-1 mutant (and treatment with the sugar
analogue 2-deoxyglucose) to distinguish which sugar-responsive genes (and therefore processes) are
regulated by a HXK-mediated signal and which are regulated independently.
Methods: Wild type and gin1-2 mutant seedlings will be starved of sugars and then re-supplied with glucose
(or 2-deoxyglucose) using conditions similar to those described by Osuna et al., (2007). RNA will be
extracted and micro-array experiments will be performed using CATMA arrays (http://www.catma.org/). Data
will be analysed using GeneSpring and MapMan software. Responses of selected genes will be confirmed
using real-time RT-PCR.
References: Rolland et al., (2006) Annu Rev Plant Biol. 57, 675. Moore et al., (2003) Science 300, 332. Cho
et al., (2006) Cell 127, 579. Blasing et al., (2005) Plant Cell 17, 3257. Osuna et al., (2007) Plant J. 49, 463.
References:
Consumables budget††††††††††††††††††††††††: £ 400
************************
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the
respective Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28
September 2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
††††††††††††††††††††††††
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to
cover consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
S6
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Neuronal interactions with electromagnetic fields
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Dr Magnus Richardson _______________________
Department: Warwick Systems Biology Centre __________
Building, Room: 339 _____________________
E-mail address: magnus.richardson@warwick.ac.uk ______
Phone number: 024 761 50250 ____________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name: __________________________________________
Department: _____________________________________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: ___________________________________
Phone number: _________________________
Project outline:
Neurones are electrically active cells; they interact with externally applied electromagnetic fields,
such as in therapeutic deep-brain stimulation, and also generate their own fields, which though
individually weak, can be measured through the scalp by EEG when large populations of neurons
fire in synchrony.
The standard method for modelling the electrophysiology of neurones - cable theory - treats each
element of the cell, the dendrites and axons for example, as small coupled resistors. Though this is
a powerful method for modelling the response of isolated neurones, it ignores electromagnetic
interactions and so cannot be used to model the effects of external stimulation or how the
neurone's own field affects the conductive extra-cellular medium and neighbouring cells.
In this project the student will develop more complete neurone models that capture their
electromagnetic interaction with the environment. Simplified models could include spherical and
cylindrical geometries, relevant to cell bodies and dendrites. These analytical results will be
compared to finite-element numerical simulations, which are also to be constructed by the student.
The project would suit someone with a background in mathematics or physics and with an interest
in neuroscience.
References:
Consumables budget§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§: £ 0 (theoretical project)
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the
respective Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28
September 2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to
cover consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
S7
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Extracting neuronal structure from image data
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing*************************
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Dr Magnus Richardson _______________________
Department: Warwick Systems Biology Centre __________
Building, Room: 339 _____________________
E-mail address: magnus.richardson@warwick.ac.uk ______
Phone number: 024 761 50250 ____________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name: __________________________________________
Department: _____________________________________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: ___________________________________
Phone number: _________________________
Project outline:
The structure of neurones is closely related to their function. They typically comprise a highly branched
dendritic tree attached to the cell body (the input structures) and an axon that branches to make contacts
with other neurones (the output structure). Because the electrical response properties of neurones are highly
influenced by their shape, accurate geometric reconstructions of neurones are crucial components for the
construction of detailed models of neuronal microcircuits and networks.
Experimentalists typically have access to the structure of neurones via the infrared microscope images they
use in the process of making intracellular recordings. Though these images are of low resolution, they
nevertheless contain much information on the structure of cells and surrounding tissue.
In this project the student will explore whether advanced image analysis techniques can be used to extract
more information from these images. One candidate method is super-resolution in which a number of low
resolution images are combined to produce a higher-resolution composite image in which finer details of
neuronal structure might be seen. The project would be ideal for someone with a background in
mathematics, physics or computer science.
References:
Consumables budget†††††††††††††††††††††††††: £ 0 (theoretical project)
*************************
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the
respective Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28
September 2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
†††††††††††††††††††††††††
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to
cover consumables for all three of their mini-projects
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
S8
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14th February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Identification of post translational modifications of proteins using mass spectrometry _________
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Dr. Konstantinos Thalassinos _________________
Department: Biological Sciences _____________________
Building, Room: C115 ___________________
E-mail address: k.thalassinos@warwick.ac.uk __________
Phone number: 024761 50439 ____________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name: Prof. Jim Scrivens __________________________
Department: Biological Sciences _____________________
Building, Room: C113 ___________________
E-mail address: j.h.scrivens@warwick.ac.uk ____________
Phone number: 02476 74189 _____________
Project outline:
Introduction - Post translation modifications (PTMs), are chemical modifications of protein products which occur after
translation of the mRNA product. PTMs are extremely important and greatly enhance the diversity and functionality of
proteins; can determine the cellular localisation of a protein, its interaction with other proteins, its turnover and whether
it is active or inactive. Mass spectrometry has become an important method for the characterisation of PTMs (in
particular phosphorylation and glycosylation) due to the sensitivity, speed of analysis and the ability to characterise
complex mixtures.
Methods - In order to characterise a post translationaly modified protein one needs to determine the nature, the site or
sites and the extent of modification. Phosphorylation involves the covalent attachment of a phosphate group in
phosphor-mono-ester linkage to the side chain oxygen of serine, threonine or tyrosine. Characterisation using mass
spectrometry involves enzymatic digestion of the protein to give a mixture of peptides and phosphopeptides. The
phosphopeptides are then separated using chromatographic techniques and the resulting modified peptides characterised
using a combination of MALDI mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometric approaches. One of the challenges in
phosphopeptide analysis is the fact that phosphorylated peptides often exhibit lower intensities than their nonphosphorylated counterparts. Various enrichment protocols have been developed and these will be tested.
Aims - This project is designed to establish methods for the enrichment and characterisation of phosphorylated proteins
and implement them, initially on standard material, and then on systems of biological interest.
Techniques to be used - Gel electrophoresis, affinity chromatography, MALDI-MS, ESI-MS/MS and appropriate
software to interpret the experimental data.
References: 1) Annan, R. S. and Carr, S. A. (1997). The essential role of mass spectrometry in characterizing protein
structure: mapping posttranslational modifications. J Protein Chem 16: 391-402.
2) Neubauer, G. and Mann, M. (1999). Mapping of phosphorylation sites of gel-isolated proteins by nanoelectrospray
tandem mass spectrometry: potentials and limitations. Anal Chem 71: 235-42.
3) Areces, L. B., Matafora, V. and Bachi, A. (2004). Analysis of protein phosphorylation by mass spectrometry. Eur J
Mass Spectrom (Chichester,
Eng) 10: 383-92.
§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
Consumables budget
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡
: £ 500
Students may choose to take up to 2 weeks holiday during the duration of their projects by arrangement with all affected supervisors and the
respective Course Director. If students choose to do this then their relevant project(s) will be extended accordingly. The absolute final deadline for reports is 28
September 2007. Supervisors may refuse to mark the last project before 1 October so do not rely on this option.
MOAC / Systems Biology mini-project proposal
S9
th
Submit one page only to Monica Lucena (MOAC2@warwick.ac.uk) by Wednesday 14 February, 2007, 5pm).
Project title: Understanding animal behaviour ________________________________________________
§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
Please estimate the consumables required for the proposed project. Please note that each student will be allocated a total budget of £450 to
cover consumables for all three of their mini-projects
Project suitable as: (tick all that apply)
MOAC Mini Project
 Experimental biology
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Wet Project
(8 weeks)
 Biophysical chemistry
(12 weeks)
 Dry Project
 Mathematics/computing
Project timing
MOAC Mini Project
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 18/05/2007)
Systems Biology Mini Project
 Slot 2 (21/05 to 13/07/2007)
 Slot 1 (26/03 to 22/05/2007)
 Slot 2 (25/06 to 14/09/2007)
 Slot 3 (16/07 to 14/09/2007)
Supervisor (the person who will be doing the day to day supervision of the mini-project):
Name: Matthew Turner ____________________________
Department: Physics / Systems Biology _______________
Building, Room: Physical Sciences, PS142___
E-mail address: m.s.turner@warwick.ac.uk _____________
Phone number: x22257 __________________
Supervisor’s advisor (for non-permanent members of staff or those on probation: academic who agrees to provide supervision support to
the supervisor and also agrees to meet the student briefly at least once a week) :
Name: __________________________________________
Department: _____________________________________
Building, Room: ________________________
E-mail address: __________________________________
Phone number: ________________________
Project outline:
The behaviour of groups of animals can sometimes be described by appropriate continuum models. Such
models describe the variation of average quantities such as density and sometimes orientation, velocity or
behavioural state. These are then treated as fields that vary in time and space but, within this approach, no
attempt is made to trace the location or identity of individual animals. The models are typically constructed as
coupled differential or integro-differential equations. The resulting equations are usually local in space and time
since each animal can only sense nearby events and is only affected by its recent experiences. The inter-animal
interactions then govern changes in the behaviour of the society in a way that can be analogous to, e.g. phase
transitions in physics.
Modern farming practices present a highly controlled environment in which many animals are kept under
precisely controlled environmental conditions. These therefore represent ideal experimental systems for the
refinement and application of such models. Farmers typically wish to maximise some quantity, such as the rate
of increase in weight of their livestock. However, this depends on their collective behaviour, including their
motility and resulting feeding patterns. The farmer is also subject to constraints, such as legislation specifying the
maximum average density. How should the farmer stock his animals ? Should he sometimes seek to engineer
non-uniform density ? Should feed always be provided continuously and should the feedings stations always be
distributed homogenously ?
The successful student will undertake the following:
1. Literature search and a comparison and criticism of existing approaches to modelling animal behaviour.
2. Construction and analysis of a simple model for the behaviour, and development, of farmed chickens.
3. A study of possible approaches for comparison of such a model with experimental data, extracted by video
using animal recognition software.
References:
1. Topaz C.M., Bertozzi A.L. Swarming patterns in a two-dimensional kinematic model for biological groups, SIAM J. App. Math. 65 (1):
152-174, 2004.
2. Stephens D.W. and Krebs J.R. 1986. Foraging theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Consumables budget: £ 50
Download