Case Analysis Handout
Donald H. Schepers
BUS 9100 / MGT 9721
Great blunders, like large ropes, have many fibers. (Victor Hugo)
Case analysis at the MBA level should go beyond the “what is in the mind of the
professor” analysis. Case analysis should engage you in skill development:





disassembling and decomposing the various elements of a particular event;
prioritizing the elements, judging the most to least important;
analyzing the event and its constituent parts according to a clear analytical
framework (e.g., SWOT, Porter’s 5 Forces, Sethi’s life cycle framework);
critiquing management and/or government action as recorded in the event; and
providing decision / recommendations (if appropriate).
Case analysis is not recounting the event. Rather, case analysis interprets the event using
an analytical framework. You need to separate the core issues and the data supporting
those issues from the noise, and support your analysis with the data and strong
argumentation.
READING THE CASE
Approach the case as an active reader, and be prepared to read it through at least twice. I
recommend you set aside your highlighter and read with a pen or pencil, making notes in
the margins as to what information is where. Do a first read of the case quickly but
thoroughly, making marginal notations as you find information. These notes will help
you move quickly through the case in subsequent readings and your final analysis. For
example, you might make the notations S/W/O/T in the margins to be able to quickly
relocate all the pieces for a SWOT analysis.
Your second and third reads should be much faster than your first. Now you are trying to
pick up the notes you have made and assemble them into coherent sets of data for
analysis. You may find some things you missed, but these should be few (and you will
get better at this).
Cases are not written in a sequential fashion. Rather, there are bits of information located
in various places. One task you have at this point is to connect information to other
pieces of information. Data on financial issues, or business pressures, will be located in
various segments of the case. Your notes should help you connect these pieces of
information.
Think beyond the material. Meanings are often not readily apparent. A firm might be in
a mature industry, for example. What does that mean? What are the implications of
being in a mature industry? How do those implications impact the behavior of the firm in
this case? Does that restrict the possible solution set of decisions? Or a firm might be a
1
slow grower in a fast-moving, highly volatile industry. Can the firm pick up the pace? If
not, what are the possible outcomes two or three steps down the road? Play out scenarios
to think through the implications of possible decision sets.
If there is financial data, make sure you tear it apart and understand the linkages between
the finances and the case. Finances can support or contradict other facts in the case, and
can often help you think beyond the material as it is presented. You may find the
financial ratio analysis (attached) helpful in this regard.
REASONING THE CASE
There was an experiment done with MBA students. A case was given to a large class.
The accounting students approached it as an accounting problem, the HR students as an
HR problem, the finance students as a finance problem, and… you get the picture. Try
not to be trapped by your own expertise. That expertise is helpful, but also blinding. At
this point, you should ask yourself two questions (at least):
What kind of a problem is this?
What is the best approach to take in reasoning to a conclusion (i.e., what set of analytical
tools might I use)?
Your notes should help determine which tools might be most helpful. You will normally
use more than one framework in developing your analysis of the case. Make sure you are
clear why each is important. Otherwise, you will be less able to argue your point
effectively.
PREPARING YOUR WORK
If you are preparing to be a discussant in class (i.e., this is not a written assignment for
you), you should have your notes and analysis on a sheet or two of paper. By the time
you sit down for class, the “I’ll remember this” promise often has faded in the blur of
other classes or the workday. You have already spent a couple of hours (at least) at this,
and 15-20 minutes more to formalize some notes will make your participation more
effective.
 Make notes that highlight the tools you think are important, and the data that you
use in each of those tools.
 Draw a SWOT grid, or a Porter’s 5 Forces, or an issue life cycle, and fill it out
with the important points you want to contribute.
 Note the data you have connected in the case, and the thoughts you have on
further issues outside the case.
 Roughly outline your argument to your conclusion about the case.
If you are preparing a written assignment, you have to take those points just noted and
put them on paper in such a way that I see a convincing argument to your conclusion.
There are often a variety of solution possibilities to a case, and what matters therefore are
2
two things: that your conclusion responds to the major issues in the case, and that you
have argued clearly and cogently to that conclusion. Each is important.
To respond to the major issues, you must first have judged correctly on what those are,
and relegated other issues to a minor place. Clearly state what you believe is important,
and why you have come to that conclusion.
You must also argue to your conclusion. This will typically involve clear analytical
argumentation. Make sure you build your argument so that, as I read it, I can see each
step moving to your conclusion. Having the time to put your work aside and re-read it a
day or so later is helpful in discovering places where your argument may not be so clear.
Two questions are very helpful before you finally decide on a course of action. What is
the greatest weakness of your conclusion and argument? And what alternatives might
there be to your conclusion? Probing these questions thoughtfully will firm up your
position, or perhaps cause you to change your mind. Including the best alternative (along
with its strengths and weaknesses) in your final write-up is often very helpful in
demonstrating the strength of your solution.
If you are using tools such as SWOT, 5 Forces, financial analysis, etc., do not put the
whole item in the text. Add your SWOT grid (for example) as an appendix to your
document. If you have items in the appendix, refer to them in parenthesis in the text of
the paper. If you have items in the appendix that are not referred to in the text, either get
rid of them or place the reference where it belongs.
LENGTH OF WRITTEN ASSIGNMENTS
Some assignments may only be a page in length, others will be longer. If the assignment
is a page, think of it as an executive summary. State the conclusion and the meat of your
argument in one page. This is a brutal but often helpful way to separate the truly
important from the rest.
If the assignment is longer, begin with an Executive Summary (no longer than 3-4
paragraphs for a 6 page paper), and then write the text of your argument. The summary
should still be the roadmap: make sure the first page has your conclusion, along with the
meat of the argument. The other pages are for elaborating your analysis. End with a very
brief concluding paragraph noting your conclusion and the major points that led you to it.
EVALUATING YOUR WORK
How will you know if you are right or wrong? This question is the continual
preoccupation of students and the eternal frustration of professors. Remember, cases
have a variety of solutions, and your solution may be quite different from mine. That is
not the criteria for evaluation. My categories are as follows:
3
Really, really wrong: There are two forms here. First, you reiterate the case with the
occasional editorial comment, stating why something (in your opinion) was really bad (or
perhaps really good). I know what happened in the case, and occasional editorial
comments do not assist me in assessing your ability to analyze critically. The second
form involves not taking a stand or forming solid judgments. Wherever the case leaves
off (e.g., the CEO must decide a course of action, or the CFO is preparing a board
presentation), ask yourself what must be done and take a stand. Be decisive.
Mildly wrong: You are clear in your opinion of who/what performed well and/or poorly;
you have made a decision, given advice, or in general, answered the case question. The
typical problem here lies in argumentation, and as a consequence, your resolution may
well be incomplete. Your argument fails in its logic, or recommendations appear at the
end without clear linkage to analysis or argumentation. It is not enough to present data,
you must interpret it by stating how the data supports your point. You also cannot
‘conveniently’ leave out contravening facts. If something does not support your point,
you need to reconcile it in your analysis. At minimum, you need to state the fact and that
you find it difficult to reconcile it with your analysis. And you cannot come to
conclusions without arguing to those points.
On target: Your judgments are clear and well-defended. Your analysis is robust, and able
to deal with the facts of the case. Your analysis incorporates a sound framework. Your
recommendations follow from (and are strictly limited by) the scope of your analysis.
And your writing is clear.
But what if I don’t agree with you? Note that in none of the above categories did I
stipulate agreement with me. I am looking for clarity, cogency, analytical rigor, robust
argumentation, and strong writing.
I can’t fit it all into the page limit. You have to pick your battles. Managers live and die
on judging and prioritizing. This is also where concise writing is an important skill.
Make your point and move on. Use simple, declarative sentences: they are often the most
efficient and clear means of communication.
Okay, I kinda get it, now what sections do you want? I do not have a specific “case
format”. I would, however, recommend you develop a professional style, beginning with
an Executive Summary outlining your basic analysis and any conclusion you may have
drawn, and then break down the elements of the case in supporting pages. Here are some
general points you should be clear on before you start writing, but these are not sections
of case writing. They are points for consideration so that your writing is clear.
Identify the unit of analysis
Does the problem arise from the action of one or a group of individuals? Is it a corporate
problem, an industry problem, or a government problem? This is sometimes referred to
as the “bad apples vs. bad barrel” dilemma. There can be both bad apples and bad barrels
at the same time. Picking one as the main avenue for analysis (again, that pesky
prioritization issue) will assist you in gaining clarity in your work.
4
Identify the cause for concern
This is key to understanding the case: the “why should anyone care?” question. What is
the main issue in the case? If it is a strategy case, what is happening in terms of the
strategy? Has it gone off-track, or was there never a strategy to begin with? If it is a
business and society case, what social good, in your opinion, is being threatened? How is
it being threatened? How important is it that there be protection? Answering these
questions will give you a better grasp on the key questions that need to be examined.
You will also be able to assess relevant stakeholders. Finally, you will be able to
condition your argument regarding a “best solution” on the cost/benefit ratio for the
solution you propose.
Be warned – simplistic answers are often misleading, if not outright wrong. For example,
when Ford made and marketed the Pinto, people died in fiery crashes. You might
contend that the social issue is that Ford made a bad car and people died. Not quite.
Companies make both bad and good products, and people die under both conditions. No
car maker makes a perfectly safe product. If they did, consumers could not afford it.
Rather, one interpretation might be that Ford knowingly imposed a fatal risk on
consumers, balancing corporate profit ($50 million) against a minimal ($6.45) per car fix,
without informing consumers of the risk. If the fix had been available even as an option
on the car, with a short paragraph explaining the risk, Ford might have been absolved.
Instead, Ford made the decision for consumers.
Lesson: identifying the key issue takes (and is worthy of) much thought. The more
carefully you identify the key issue, the easier (and better) the rest of your work.
The Two Basic Case Types
Decision format cases
These are cases where an individual (or group of individuals) are left at the end at some
particular decision moment. Begin your case analysis with your decision, and then argue
its justification. Your justification should include insights from class materials and
discussions. This is not a simple gut-check, though that is often the first moment of
decision. What concerns need to be in the mind of the decision maker in the case, and
how might those best be resolved?
Research format cases
These are cases where there is no decision, but rather the case consists of the recounting
of an event. Typically, these cases are well-known events, with known outcomes (e.g.,
Enron and its demise). The question then becomes the analysis of the corporate actions
and strategies up to and after the event.
5