RNOH Patients’ Group Visit: Re-visit to Alan Bray Ward Date: 11th September 2008, 10.00am-11.30am Forum members: Angela O’Halloran & Ruth Marcus Staff interviewed: Lynne Gunn Clinical Nurse Manager Background Alan Bray is an intensive care (ITU) and high dependency unit (HDU). There are 12 beds (six HDU and six ITU beds). This division of beds depends on patient care needs, thus it is interchangeable. The ward’s patient mix is; male, female and children, and two isolation rooms. The ward has 1:1 nursing for ITU patients and 1:2 patient for HDU. Many patients are on ventilation. Patients are mostly post-operative, or have been transferred from other wards due to deterioration in their condition. There are also a number patients transferred from other hospital HDU or ITU, who require specialist medical input from RNOH. Post-operative patients are usually on the ward for 24/48 hours, and then return to their original ward. Some patients stay longer usually because they require ventilation. The ward has a mixture of elective and emergency care. Most patients are catherized, or use a bedpan and therefore there is no need for patient toilet facilities on the ward. Many patients are on a very light diet, and do not eat much for the first 24hours; some patients are on a gastric feed. Steamplicity meals are available to those who can manage a larger meal. The Manager was satisfied with staffing levels, and uses bank staff to cover sickness / annual leave. In the last report it was noted that there was a shortage of paediatric nurses, but Lynne informed us that she had sufficient input, as there were only a small number of children admitted to the ward. They have a regular rote of paediatric nurses from Coxen and the Adolescent Units who undertake a months training on the ward. The Manager can always request further input from Coxen and the Adolescent Units if needed. The Manager was pleased that two of her nurses were attending university courses to increase their paediatric training. Infection levels on the ward are low and monitored closely. Each bed has its own gel, gloves and aprons (different colour for each bed) and new sinks have been installed. All patients from other hospitals are screened before admission to the main ward. The side rooms are used for patients with an infection or awaiting the results of screening, and are deep cleaned before the next patient’s admission. The Manager was concerned that the security entry system was continually out of order despite request to the maintenance department. The doors were open during our visit. Observations One small waiting room for relatives, which had a sofa and two reclining chairs (which were provided by the Buttercup Fund.) There is a hot drinks machine (20p per drink). A water dispenser is due to be installed. The resource room décor had improved since our last visit. It is used for staff training and team meetings as well a confidential area to discuss the patient’s condition with their family. One very small staff room 1 Two staff changing rooms (one female, one male), which had lockers for staff belongings. Photos of staff on a wall on the corridor, very useful for patients/visitors to identify the team. One fridge for patients and microwaves allocated for Steamplicity meals. Most equipment are in labelled trays in storage room and all linen in a locked cupboard One sluice room, which had bedpans and bottles because they were unable to install a macerator machine for disposable bedpans due to poor drains. The ward was redecorated and had a deep clean at Easter (the ward was closed for 10 days) and appeared cleaner and more cheerful than at our last visit. There are DVDs and DVD players available for patient use. Storage space is limited, and an IT/ HDU store was cluttered with many pieces of essential medical equipment as well as housing all the hospital’s emergency crash team requirements. A porta-cabin just outside the ward would solve these problems Patient interviews Mrs C This patient was admitted for an elbow operation the previous day, and was self-administering her pain relief. She also had RA and osteoporosis, and had previous admissions for neck surgery and broken femur. She expected to be in the HDU for the next few days then will be transferred back to her ward. She was very pleased with her treatment by both medical and nursing staff. Mrs K Mrs K had an operation the previous day for a replacement hip operation, and had been in RNOH last year for a back operation. She had an epidural as she had a heart attack last year. She was very satisfied with her care at RNOH. She was not in any pain and was eating well. Mrs K was due to be transferred back to her ward later that day. She was full of praise for the doctors, anaesthetist and nursing staff. Conclusion The Manager and her staff appear to provide a very high standard of care in a ward that deals with critical patient care. She seems a fair, but firm manager who seems to have the respect of her staff. Infection control is a very high priority, and considering the limitations of space and the age of the buildings they provide excellent care. Recommendations 1 The security doors require urgent attention. 2 Storage space is a high priority due to the large amount of specialised equipment required by an IT/HDU. Could the feasibility of a porta-cabin be investigated by the Trust. 3 It is hoped that the rebuild plans have provided adequate ward space and storage facilities. 4 Poor drains are preventing the installation of a macerator bedpan machine. Some of the other wards do not have this problem. Can the maintenance department investigate the drain problem? Ruth Marcus/ Angela O’ Halloran 11th September 2008 2