A Healthy Environment The Environmental Committee found that the solutions to environmental challenges can be found in three areas: management and communication, data and monitoring, and action projects. The committee divided potential projects into four categories: water quality, fisheries, beaches and barrier islands, and wetlands and critical habitats. The committee worked on creating a method of screening and prioritizing projects, but the method may need refinement. VULNERABILITIES Management/coordination/communication: Weak coordination of response to disasters, whether manmade or natural Lack of credible communication Inadequate use of local expertise Lack of influence by local officials; lack of participation in the decision-making process Sidebar: Management/Communications Local officials and the Coast Guard have very different assessments of the oil spill response. Local officials express enormous frustration at being ignored by the Coast Guard and BP. However, the Coast Guard, with its reliance on a top-down chain of command that has no room for a “local officials” box in the organizational chart, considers the response to be a great success and a great example of the public sector and the private sector working together in a crisis. Data/monitoring: Not enough data about the ecosystem, including currents, water temperature, salinity, dissolved-oxygen levels, etc. Data is not available in one central, real-time, user-friendly place Ecosystem: Already stressed; little ability to absorb further stresses resulting from a natural or manmade disaster. Mabus Report: “The spill has exacerbated the effects of a multitude of storms and years of environmental decline.” Infrastructure problems on land contribute to stresses on the marine ecosystem. Sidebar: Infrastructure Effects Badly planned infrastructure on land can degrade the marine ecosystem. For example, impermeable parking lots (asphalt, concrete) create runoff that washes oil from vehicles and other pollutants, plus sediment, into the Bay and Gulf. But road surfaces should be impermeable, because dirt roads also contribute to sediment runoff problems. FIXES Management/coordination/communication: Create a Coastal Environmental Management Council with decision-making authority. Make the council part of or affiliated with one of several current agencies/groups: Fisheries Management Council, South Alabama Regional Planning Commission, Mobile Bay National Estuary Program, Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium, Emergency Management Agency, Marine Resources Division of the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Assign the following duties to the council: Draw input/members from all community sectors, including user groups, nongovernmental organizations and elected officials. Create a Comprehensive Community Vision—begin to eliminate the division between Mobile and Baldwin counties. Prioritize projects for implementation. Act as a communications clearinghouse. Receive dedicated funding from a Restoration/Resiliency Trust Fund (funded by oil and gas royalties) and direct funds to other agencies/groups. NOTE: This is similar to the Gulf Coast Recovery Council proposed in the Mabus Report. Pull-out quotes: Mabus Report: “Local governments and citizen stakeholders must play a critical role in the Gulf Coast Recovery Council. The Gulf Coast Recovery Council must be allocated the resources to maintain adequate intergovernmental outreach, public affairs and communications personnel to be effective while remaining lean and efficient.” “The Gulf Coast Recovery Council should seek out participation from a wide variety of stakeholders, involve the private and nonprofit sectors, be transparent and accountable to taxpayers, and maintain the confidence of the public.” Data/monitoring: Develop an Integrated Ocean Observation System (IOOS). Create a comprehensive system integrating data from the Gulf of Mexico and associated waters, such as Mobile Bay. Centralize data collection and synthesis at NOAA’s National Coastal Data Development Center (NCDDC) at the Stennis Space Center in Mississippi. Continuously gather and monitor data on currents, water temperature, salinity, dissolved-oxygen levels, and any other characteristics of interest/use to the scientific community and public. Use existing data sources and add additional monitoring as needed. Include data from oil and gas rigs. Sidebar: List of data Web sites: Other states have a variety of data available publicly over the Internet. We’ll do a list of representative Web sites to give people an idea of what the Environmental Committee envisions. Create a user-friendly, real-time, interactive interface, similar to weather maps, so data can be used by general public (fishermen, boaters, surfers, etc.) as well as the scientific community. Develop a consistent way of providing an ongoing, comprehensive assessment of backbays, estuaries, wetlands, coastal watersheds and other important ecosystems. Establish a Coastal Authority Area Board (similar to what Alabama had from 1979 to 1985) that would: Possibly have regulatory authority. (NOTE: ADEM objects to this provision.) Advise policymakers. Have a role in a unified command structure during a coastal emergency. Consistently monitor ecosystems. Continuously update data. Graphic: NEP Web site screen shot Establish a Coastal Trust Fund to act as a supplemental funding source for projects that need a little extra money to be completed, projects that want to start immediately while their main funding works its way through the pipeline, etc. Mabus Report: “An idea that has arisen on numerous occasions is the need for an independently funded, nongovernmental recovery effort. This would be an opportunity for local and regional leadership to tackle issues not funded through the Oil Pollution Act or other existing sources.” Fund projects directly as needed, and make funding available to communities for local projects. Partner with other Gulf Coast states. Establish a board of trustees to oversee the fund. Secure permanent funding from oil and gas royalties. Develop resiliency metrics, protocols, processes, and procedures. Establish community rating systems. Establish a state clearinghouse for data, including geographic information system (GIS), remote sensing, flood maps, etc. Establish a Coastal and Inland Flooding Observation and Warning Project (CI-FLOW), based on North Carolina’s similar project, that would include a flow model for storm surges, rainfall and predicted sea-level rise. Create a Wild Seafood Institute to continuously test and monitor Gulf seafood. Possibly test and monitor aquaculture as well. PROJECTS Water quality Goal: Improve water quality so that it meets or exceeds Clean Water Act standards. Objectives: Reduce sediment, pathogens, fertilizer/nutrients and other non-point source pollution. Manage volume and flow of water through restoration of watersheds. Improve infrastructure so that it does not contribute to degradation of water quality. Fisheries Goal: Preserve and promote genetic diversity and yield of marine species. Objectives: To be added; not yet discussed. Aquaculture will have to be mentioned here. Beaches and barrier islands. Mabus Report: “This is a region that was already struggling with urgent environmental challenges, such as the loss of coastal barrier islands and marshes that protect coastal communities from frequent hurricanes.” Goal: Increase the reach, extent and protection of barrier islands and Gulf beaches. Objective: Protect, restore and renourish shorelines. Wetlands and critical habitats Goal: Preserve and restore wetlands and other critical habitats to sustain ecosystem services, function and value. Objective: Acquire, protect, restore and enhance wetlands and critical habitats. Project selection criteria: Project addresses at least 2 of the following long-term recovery goals: Prevention of, recovery from and restoration following oil spills Coastal resiliency Preservation/restoration of fish and wildlife Restoration of human use losses Project has a Gulf-wide or regional (Mobile Bay) benefit rather than benefiting just a local area. Project addresses the root cause of a problem or loss, not simply symptoms of the underlying problem(s). Project addresses long-term restoration of our coastal way of life rather than just alleviating short-term hardships. Project is technologically feasible, environmentally sound and economically feasible. NOTE: The committee also discussed including enforcement of green building and energy-efficiency standards for all projects. Pull-out quotes from the Mabus Report: “Promoting of a clean energy economy: Residents of the Gulf coast have expressed a desire to transition to a clean-energy economy. A number of efforts from both the public and private sector have helped prime the pump for additional investments in clean energy.” “The state of Alabama has focused on a variety of restoration and conservation activities in its coastal areas. It cites tax revenues generated through tourism activity in the coastal counties as an important contribution to the state economy. Barrier‐ island restoration is a priority for the state. The health of Mobile Bay, particularly the Mobile‐ Tensaw River Delta, has been a major focus of state efforts. The Mobile River basin drains an area of nearly 44,000 square miles across Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Georgia into Mobile Bay. Through the Forever Wild Program, and other programs, the state has invested in land protection around the delta and is working to address hydrologic connections, water quality, and nutrient pollution in the bay. ARBOR The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers created a possible approach to sorting out all the action projects that have been proposed for coastal Alabama. The Alabama coastal Recovery, Beneficial use, and Operation Response plan, or ARBOR, includes projects proposed by a variety of sources. ALABAMA COASTAL RECOVERY, BENEFICIAL USE, AND OPERATION RESPONSE PLAN (ARBOR) GOALS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Prevention, Recovery, Restoration, of Oil Spills Establish Management Process for Prioritizing Update and Enforce Drilling Well Safety Regulations Investigate use of Dispersants Develop Pro-active Emergency Response Plans 6. Strategically Position Response Resources 7. Involve Local Elected Officials 8. Develop Oil Spill Control Plan within 5 Miles of Event 9. Hurricane and Storm Damage Reduction 10. Preservation of Fish and Wildlife 11. Ecosystem Restoration and Protection (Marine, Estuarine, Hydrologic, etc) 12. Restoration, Management and Improvement of State-Owned Lands 13. Seafood Safety 14. Reduction of Saltwater Intrusion 15. Restoration of Local Freshwater Hydrologic Connectivity on Coastal Watersheds 16. Prevention of Shoreline Erosion 17. Restoration of Human Use Losses 18. Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Infrastructure 19. Historic and Cultural Resources 20. Other water related resources PROJECTS Phase I (Construction Can Be Initiated Within 6 Months) * Mon Louis Island Shoreline Protection and other Living Shoreline Protection (5) Brookley Field Emergent Tidal Marsh Structures (3) Dauphin Island Parkway Restoration (3) Grand Bay NERR Swift Tract Restoration (3) Shell Belt Road Restoration (5) Bon Secour Shoreline Protection (5) Back Bay Shoreline (5) Restoration in Gulf Shores and Orange Beach Shoreline (5) Seed, Collection, Storage, Propagation and Restoration for impacted areas (3) Seafood Safety and Testing (3) Restoration of Infrastructure at Ft. Morgan from Response Activities (3) Sand Island Beach Restoration (3) Three-Mile Creek Hydrologic Restoration (3) Upper Mobile Bay Habitat and Hydrologic Restoration (3) Oyster Beds Restoration (3) Wetland Breakwater Construction in Mobile Bay using Dredged Material (2,5) PHASE II (Construction can begin in 1-2 years after Planning, Engineering, and Design) * Coastal Alabama Comprehensive Beach Restoration (5) Restoration of Gulf State Park (6) Restoration of State-owned Parks (6) Improved Hydrologic Habitat Restoration (U.S. Highway 90 Causeway) (3) Little Sand Island Expansion of Wetlands using Dredged Material (3) Goat Island Expansion using Dredged Material (3) Restoration of Historic Benthics and SAV Beds adjacent to Brookley AFB Airport (3) Restoration of Wetlands South of I-10 and Causeway using Dredged Material (3) *Numbers in parenthesis denote goal numbers PHASE III (Long Term—Construction Can Begin Within 3 Years and Beyond) * Sanitary Sewer Improvement (Ex. Bayou La Batre’s seafood industry wastewater discharge upgrades) (6) Ongoing Seafood Safety (3) Large Restoration of Impaired Freshwater/Saltwater Hydrologic Connections (3) Coastal Alabama Local Stormwater Improvements (6) Priority Land Acquisition (6) Long-term Monitoring of all Coastal Watersheds and Aquifers (7) Comprehensive Living Shoreline Protection Comprehensive (5) Barrier Island Restoration (1,2,3,4,5,6) Development of “Greener” Transportation Alternatives (Ex. Reduce Dependency on Oil) (1) OTHER * Establishment of a Beneficial Use Group (2,3,4,5,6) Better Oversight involving the Public (1,2,3,4,5,6) Ongoing Education and Outreach (1,2,3,4,5,6) Research Management (1,2,3,4,5,6) Establishment and Identification of Baseline Data (Ongoing) (1,2,3,4,5,6) Establishment, Identification and Centralization of Data (Ongoing) (1,2,3,4,5,6) Integration of Sea Level Rise and Climate Change Effects (1,2,3,4,5,6) Implementation of Regional Sediment Management Principles and Beneficial Use (1,2,3,4,5,6) Establishment of Lines of Lines Defense (2) *Numbers in parenthesis denote goal numbers. A Project Prioritization Approach This is an approach created by LaDon Swann (Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium), Roberta Swann (Mobile Bay National Estuary Program), and George Crozier (Dauphin Island Sea Lab). Alabama Recovery Commission: Environmental Committee Sustainability Outcomes Priority Areas/Goals Environment Economy Society Sustainable Coastal Development Water quality and Water Quality meets A well-train workforce Healthy community that Work Group Recommendations (these have been sent to us) Priority Areas/Goals quantity sufficient to support healthy aquatic communities and designated human uses. Improved understanding of the value of our coastal resources to support informed balanced decision making. Sustainability Outcomes Environment Economy Society or exceeds Clean leading to green jobs. is not afraid of Water Act Standards swimming in the water Improved and modernized or eating seafood. infrastructure. Coastal communities use a variety of tools and technologies to Consistent, adopt policies to protect enforceable, the sustainable regional land and ecosystem footprint water use needed to sustain management that coastal and marine ensures smart ecosystems and growth for implement community sustainable designs that are development. compatible with carrying capacity of coastal ecosystem and water resources. Living Resources Native species are maintained within sustainable levels to support a resilient environment. Increase/restore productive Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) along the Alabama coastline. A healthy domestic seafood industry Incorporation of ecosystem-based Diverse and productive nature-based tourism. A safe seafood supply that meets public demand at affordable prices. People of all ages understand coastal and ocean environments and the need for stewardship of healthy ecosystems. An informed public that Work Group Recommendations (these have been sent to us) Priority Areas/Goals that harvests, produces, processes and markets seafood responsibly and efficiently. Environment management strategies as the basis for sustainable living resource management. Natural and human threats to the longterm viability of wild fish populations are minimized. Sustainability Outcomes Economy Fishermen are knowledgeable and employ sustainable fishing techniques. Society understands vulnerability of coastal resources. Work Group Recommendations (these have been sent to us) Preserve cultural heritage. Alternative sources of seafood production with acceptable environmental impacts. Adequate habitat diversity to support non-consumptive uses. Resilient Coastal Communities Functional and productive ecosystems. Community capacity to prepare for and respond to hazardous events. Recognition of the Priority habitats provide essential ecosystem services. Coastal interests have access to new approaches to improve the effectiveness of coastal ecosystems. Coastal habitats provide economic support through protection, habitat diversity and recreation. Cost-benefit analysis and ecosystem services assessments support economic investments. Implement Community Resiliency Index and Critical Infrastructure. Coastal communities benefit from improved risk communication related to living, working and doing business along the Expand the number of municipalities using FEMA’s Community Rating Systems (http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/crs.shtm). Priority Areas/Goals impacts of climate change. Sustainability Outcomes Economy Environment Society Alabama coast. Work Group Recommendations (these have been sent to us) Management, Coordination, Communication Integrate efforts of public and private partners to establish common understandings that balance multiple interests. The full range of coastal interests effectively provide input for critical coastal decisions, policy and management actions. Cost-effective investment of assets. The community recognizes the need to balance multiple uses and optimize environmental sustainability. Create a Coastal Environmental Management Council (CEMC) with decision making authority. Responsibilities will include: 1. Ensure the Council is well populated with all community sectors – user groups/NGOs/governments/elected officials. Ensure the Council members feed into Area Contingency Planning and other appropriate established Committees 2. Create a Comprehensive Community Vision – begin to eliminate line between Mobile and Baldwin Counties 3. Prioritize projects for implementation 4. Act as a Communications Clearinghouse 5. Funded by and directs funds from a Restoration/Resiliency Trust Fund (Oil & Gas Royalties Fund). Priority Areas/Goals Environment Sustainability Outcomes Economy Society Work Group Recommendations (these have been sent to us) 6. Monitoring and Data Collection Data collection and monitoring supports a comprehensive ecosystem-based framework for management of Gulf resources. The multi-species approach to management technology. Improved reliability of model projections and application. Utilize data and adaptive tools and techniques to maximize investment. Capability to understand the effects of human activities and environmental changes on coastal resources. Access to data, models and training in a usable form that supports management decisions. Develop an Integrated Ocean Observation System (IOOS) Create a comprehensive system integrating data from the Gulf of Mexico and associated waters, such as Mobile Bay Centralize data collection and synthesis at NOAA’s National Coastal Data Development Center (NCDDC) at the Stennis Space Center in Mississippi o Continuously gather and monitor data on currents, water temperature, salinity, dissolvedoxygen levels, and any other characteristics of interest/use to the scientific community and public o Include data from oil and gas rigs o Add additional monitoring as needed Display data in real time Create an easy-to-understand interactive interface, like weather maps, so data can be used by general public (fishermen, boaters, surfers, etc.) as well as the scientific community 2. Develop a consistent way of providing an Priority Areas/Goals Environment Sustainability Outcomes Economy Society Work Group Recommendations (these have been sent to us) ongoing, comprehensive assessment of backbays, estuaries, wetlands, coastal watersheds, and other important ecosystems Establish a Coastal Authority Area Board (similar to what Alabama had from 1979 to 1985) o Would have regulatory authority o Would advise policymakers o Would have a role in a unified command structure during a coastal emergency Consistently monitor ecosystems Continuously update data 3. Establish a Coastal Trust Fund Fund projects as needed; make funding available to communities for local projects Partner with other Gulf Coast states Establish a board of trustees to oversee Secure permanent funding from oil and gas royalties 4. Develop resiliency metrics, protocols, processes, and procedures Establish a state clearinghouse for data, including geographic information system (GIS), remote sensing, flood maps, etc. Priority Areas/Goals Environment Sustainability Outcomes Economy Society Work Group Recommendations (these have been sent to us) Establish a Coastal and Inland Flooding Observation and Warning Project (CI-FLOW), based on North Carolina’s similar project (www.nssl.noaa.gov/ciflow), that would include a flow model for storm surges and rainfall