University of Colorado Denver Department of Communication Difference Matters and Organizational Communication: Power in the Ivory Tower CMMU 5250 001 Spring 2009 W 5:30 – 8:20 CN 213 Professor: Dr. Brenda J. Allen Office Hours: W 2:30 pm – 4:00 pm, and by appointment NC 5014J: 303-556-6713 Brenda.J.Allen@ucdenver.edu Department Website: http://cudenver.edu/clas/communication Course Description This course will apply perspectives on power to investigate higher education-asorganization. We will engage in a variety of activities to explore the ideas that: we are all located in intersectional systems and relations of work and power, and our routine organizational communication in higher education contexts (re)produces those systems and relations. Rather than view communication as one factor of modern organizational life, we will approach our study from the perspective that communication constitutes organizations. Moreover, we will emphasize the idea that power pervades all communication. However, we will not view “power” as a four letter word! Instead, we will actively explore positive consequences of power, as well as ways that we can empower ourselves and others to accomplish our personal and professional goals. Therefore, a primary premise of the course will be: Those who constitute an organization are responsible for creating and changing communication systems associated with an organization. Although members of an organization have different levels of power for socially constructing its communication systems, everyone has at least some capacity to change those systems. This course will review concepts, theories, and research about power in organizational communication studies and other disciplines to develop a comprehensive framework for understanding power dynamics by studying higher education. We will consider these dynamics as related to various micro-, meso-, and macro-level contexts, from our specific course and classroom to the department, the college, the university, the community, the discipline of communication, and beyond. To investigate these and other issues, the course will draw on expertise and experiences of all class members to conceptualize, design, implement, and evaluate course activities. During the course, we will study higher education as political process and product and consider how relations of power develop contextually rather than universally. All members will engage in open collective self-analysis (as teachers, students, and as a classroom community). We will focus on theoretical and practical issues regarding relationships between communication processes in higher education contexts and socially constructed aspects of identity, including gender, race, sexual identity, social class, ability, age, and religion, and their intersections. Intersections of these social identities matter because most individuals simultaneously occupy privileged and nonprivileged social identity groups. Therefore, I will stress the ideas that social identities are complex and multifaceted, and that intersections of social identity matter. The course will focus on how systems of power and privilege help shape perceptions of salient social identity groups within the United States, and how individuals and groups resist and transform those systems. We also will investigate the role of discourse in constructing social identity throughout the history of the United States. To study these issues, we will rely on social construction, a theoretical perspective which basically contends that humans create reality through interaction. We also will study interpersonal interactions between and among members of social identity groups in various educational contexts, language related to social identity groups, and media depictions of social identity groups. Throughout the course, we will explore ways that discourse produces, maintains, and/or resists systems of power and inequality, especially as related to social identity and higher education. The course also will delve into communication issues relevant to ways that we learn about social identities from such sources as our families, the media, and organizations. To explore these matters, we will take a critical approach, which means looking for power dynamics, including ways that people comply with dominant ways or resist power to change conditions in society. We also will self-consciously delve into our personal perceptions, perspectives, and experiences as related to course materials. In addition, we will discuss implications of our studies for social change. We will analyze and discuss work from several disciplines, including communication, sociology, organizational behavior, ethnic studies, psychology, education, disability studies, and philosophy. Although we will consider diverse types of organizations, such as corporations, non-profits, and media conglomerates, we will focus on higher education. We will explore how communication helps to create and sustain understandings of ourselves in relationship to different and similar others in society and in organizational contexts, especially in higher education. We will engage the term ‘organization’ as a noun and a verb by investigating how communication occurs in organizations as well as how it functions to organize social and organizational relationships. Required Readings Allen, B.J. (2004). Difference matters: Communicating social identity. IL: Waveland. Additional readings on Blackboard. https://blackboard.cudenver.edu/ Please be sure to post your current email address in your profile for the course. Recommended Resources Williams, J. M. (2002). Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace (7th ed.). New York: Longman. [available through online sources and local bookstores; OK to get an earlier edition] Check Blackboard for additional resources. Please send me any resources you’d like to post. Assignments and Evaluation TBD Point Scale Letter Grade 1000-950 A 900-949 ABelow 735 C870-899 B+ 835-869 B 800-834 B770-799 C+ 735-769 C Grading System for Graduate Courses A = Excellent A- = Very good B+ = Good B = Satisfactory Grades below B WILL NOT BE COUNTED toward the M.A. or M.S. degree Department Mission Statement: To create a learning environment in which students develop the skills, knowledge, and abilities necessary to use communication to create a more civil and humane world. By civil and humane the department means a way of communicating that is rooted in an acceptance and appreciation of others and that involves communicating in ways that express respect for and acknowledgement of others regardless of their station in life, wealth or lack of it, politics, religion, ethnicity, race, or any other quality. Department of Communication Incomplete Policy: Incomplete grades are not given to students simply because they are receiving lower grades than they would like. To be eligible for an incomplete grade, students must have completed 75% of the course assignments with passing grades and have special circumstances outside their control that preclude completion of the course. If the student does not complete the work for the course within 12 months, the grade reverts to an F. Plagiarism Policy: If a finding of plagiarism has been made by the instructor and by other members of the communication graduate faculty, the student may be assigned a failing grade in the course. At the discretion of the graduate faculty, the student may be asked to leave the graduate program. Religious Holiday Accommodations Faculty in the University of Colorado system have both a legal and moral obligation to provide reasonable accommodations to students who must be absent from classes because of religious holidays. Faculty are expected to develop course-consistent accommodations for students who miss class or graded assignments in order to observe religious holidays. Faculty are encouraged to (1) avoid examinations during major religious holidays and (2) ask students to privately identify all course conflicts at the beginning of the semester. Disability Accommodations Faculty in the University of Colorado system have both a legal and moral obligation to provide reasonable accommodations to students with disabilities. To be eligible for accommodations, students must be registered with the UCDHSC Office of Disability Resources and Services (AR 177, 303-556-3450, 303-556-4766 TDD). The DRS staff has experience to assist faculty in determining reasonable accommodations to coordinate these accommodations. CLAS Incomplete (I) Policy The faculty in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences passed the following policy relating to the awarding of Incomplete grades. This CLAS policy is consistent with the CU-Denver campus policy. Incomplete grades are not granted for low academic performance. To be eligible for an Incomplete grade, students must (1) successfully complete 75 percent of the course, (2) have special circumstances (verification may be required) that preclude the student from attending class and completing graded assignments, and (3) make arrangements to complete missing assignments with the original instructor. A CLAS Course Completion Agreement is strongly suggested. The CLAS Course Completion Agreement is available from the CLAS Advising Office, NC 2024. Academic Ethics Policies Students must adhere to the Academic Honor Code and Policies as stated in the UCDHSC Catalog (also available on our department website, under Student Resources) Spring 2009 CLAS Academic Policies The following policies pertain to all students and are strictly adhered to by the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (CLAS). Every student MUST check and verify their schedule prior to the published drop/add deadlines. Failure to verify a schedule is not sufficient reason to justify a late add or drop later in the semester. It is the student’s responsibility to make sure that their schedule is correct prior to the appropriate deadlines. CLAS students must use their email.cudenver.edu email address. Email is the official method of communication for all University of Colorado Denver business. All email correspondence will take place using your UCDHSC email address. Go to http://www.cudenver.edu/registrar to update and/or change your email address. Students are NOT automatically added to a course off a wait list after wait lists are dropped. If a student is told by a faculty member that they will be added off the wait list, it is the responsibility of the student to complete the proper paperwork to add a course. Students are not automatically notified if they are added to a class from a waitlist. Again, it is the responsibility of the student to verify their schedule prior to any official dates to drop or add courses. Students must complete and submit a drop/add form to make any schedule changes. Students are not automatically dropped from a class if they never attended, stopped attending or do not make tuition payments. Late adds will be approved only when circumstances surrounding the late add are beyond the student’s control and can be documented independently. This will require a petition and documentation from the student. Late adds will only be approved if the student has not taken any exams, quizzes, or has not completed any other graded assignments. Independent verification of this from the professor of record will be required. Please note that the signature of a faculty member on an add form does not guarantee that a late add petition will be approved. Petitions are available in NC 2024. Late drops will be approved only when circumstances surrounding the late drop have arisen after the published drop deadlines, are beyond the student’s control, and can be documented independently. This will require a petition and documentation from the student. Pre-existing circumstances (circumstances that existed prior to the published drop deadlines) regarding illness, work, family, or other confounding issues will not be considered adequate reason to drop or withdraw from courses after the published University and/or College drop deadlines. Please note that the signature of a faculty member does not guarantee that a late drop petition will be approved. Petitions are available in NC 2024. Undergraduate students wishing to graduate in spring of 2009 must meet with their academic advisor by the end of the drop/add period to obtain a graduation application. This application must be completed and submitted by 5 PM on February 4, 2009. You can obtain an application ONLY after meeting with your academic advisor. There are no exceptions to this policy or date. Graduate students wishing to graduate in spring semester 2009 must complete their Intent to Graduate form and have a Request for Admissions to Candidacy on file with the CLAS Dean’s office no later than 5 PM, February 4, 2009. Students are responsible for completing financial arrangements with financial aid, family, scholarships, etc. to pay their tuition. Students will be responsible for all tuition and fees for courses they do not officially drop using proper drop/add procedures and forms. Students who drop after the published drop/add period will not be eligible for a refund of the COF hours or tuition. Important Dates January 20, 2009: First day of Class January 25, 2009: Last day to be added to a wait list using the SMART system. January 25, 2009: Last day to add a course using the SMART system. January 27-February 4, 2009: Students are responsible for verifying an accurate spring 2009 course schedule via the SMART registration system. Students are NOT notified of their wait-list status by the university. All students must check their scheduled prior to February 4, 2009 for accuracy. January 26, 2009: LAST DAY TO DROP WITHOUT DROP CHARGE. January 26, 2009: Wait Lists are dropped. Any student who was not added to a course automatically from the wait list by this date and time MUST complete a drop/add form to be added to the class. Students are NOT automatically added to the class from the wait list after this date and time. If your name is not on the official student roster, you are not registered for the course. January 27, 2009: First day instructor may approve request to add a student to a full course with a Schedule Adjustment Form. February 4, 2009 at 5 PM: Last day to add structured courses without a written petition for a late add. This is an absolute deadline and is treated as such. This deadline does not apply to independent study, internships, project hours, thesis hours, dissertation hours, and late-starting modular courses. February 4, 2009 at 5 PM: Last day to drop a spring 2009 course with a tuition adjustment minus the drop charge and no transcript notation. Drops after this date will appear on your transcript. This is an absolute deadline and is treated as such. February 4, 2009 at 5 PM: Last day to completely withdraw from all spring 2009 courses with a tuition adjustment and no transcript notation. Drop charge applies. Drops after this date will appear on your transcript. This is an absolute deadline and is treated as such. February 4, 2009 at 5 PM: Last day to request pass/fail option for a course. February 4, 2009 at 5 PM: Last day to request a no credit option for a course. February 4, 2009 at 5 PM: Last day to register for a Candidate for Degree. February 4, 2009 at 5 PM: Last day to petition for a reduction in thesis or dissertation hours. February 4, 2009 at 5 PM: Last day to apply for spring 2009 graduation. You must make an appointment and see your academic advisor before this date to apply for graduation. April 6, 2009 at 5 PM: Last day for non CLAS students to drop or withdraw from all classes without a petition and special approval from the student’s academic Dean. This is treated as an absolute deadline. March 23-29, 2009: Spring Break. April 20, 2009 at 5 PM: Last day for CLAS students to drop or withdraw from all classes without a petition and special approval from the student’s academic Dean. Students still need signatures from the faculty and Dean. This is treated as an absolute deadline. After April 20, 2009 all schedule changes require a petition. Petitions are available in NC 2024. No schedule changes will be granted once finals week has started. There are NO exceptions to this policy. Class Schedule [tentative] January 20 Introductions and Course Overview January 27 Course Orientation Readings: Allen, Difference Matters [DM] ch. 1 & 2; Johnson, Ch. 1 & 2 Gramsci [online: www.theory.org.uk/ctr-gram.htm] February 4 Course Orientation [continued] Readings: Zamudia, Rios, & Jaime February 11 Social Class Matters Readings: DM, Ch. 5; Yeskel; Martin; February 18 Gender Matters February 25 Race Matters Readings: DM, Ch. 3; Castagno & Lee; March 4 Sexuality Matters March 11 Ability Matters March 18 Age Matters March 25 SPRING BREAK April 1 April 8 April 15 April 22 April 29 May 6 Course Readings Allen, B.J. (2005). Social constructionism. In: S. May & D. Mumby (Eds.) Engaging organizational communication theory and research: Multiple perspectives (pp. 35-53). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Ashcraft, K. L., & Allen, B. J. The racial foundation of organizational communication. Communication Theory 13: 5-33. Magnus, S. A., & Mick, S. S. (2000). Medical schools, affirmative action, and the neglected role of social class. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1197-1201. Castagno, Angelina E. & Lee, Stacey J. (2007). Native Mascots and Ethnic Fraud in Higher Education: Using Tribal Critical Race Theory and the Interest Convergence Principle as an Analytic Tool. Equity & Excellence in Education, 40 (1), 3-13. Johnson, Allan G. (2006). _Privilege, Power, and Difference (Second Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill. Martin, Jonathan (2008). Pedagogy of the Alienated: Can Freirian Teaching Reach WorkingClass Students?. Equity & Excellence in Education, 41 (1), 31-44. Mumby, D. (2001). Power and politics. In: F.M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.) The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 585-623). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Nesbit. T. (2005). Social class and adult education. In: T. Nesbit (Ed.) Class concerns: Adult education and social class (pp. 5-14). San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Russ, T.L., Simonds, C.J., and Hunt, S.K. (2002). Coming out in the classroom…an occupational hazard? The influence of sexual orientation on teacher credibility and perceived student learning. Communication Education, 51, 311-324. Segura, D. (2003). Navigating between two worlds: The labyrinth of Chicana intellectual production in the academy. Journal of Black Studies, 34, 28-51. Tovares, R. (2002). Mascot matters: Race, history, and the University of North Dakota's "fighting Sioux" logo. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 26, 76-94. Yep, G. A. (2002). My three cultures: Navigating the multicultural identity landscape. In: Readings in intercultural communication: Experiences and contexts (pp.60-66). Boston: McGraw-Hill. Yeskel, Felice (2008). Coming to Class: Looking at Education through the Lens of Class Introduction to the Class and Education Special Issue. Equity & Excellence in Education, 41 (1), 1-11. Zamudio, Margaret, Rios, Francisco & Jaime, Angela M. (2008). Thinking Critically about Difference: Analytical Tools for the 21st Century. Equity & Excellence in Education, 41 (2), 215-229.