Jean Piaget 1
Running Head: JEAN PIAGET
Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky’s Theories on Cognitive Development
KSP 605
Base Group #4
Shirley Nieto
Fritz Dahmus
Jessica Grewe
Jean Piaget 2
According to Meece (2002), Piaget and Vygotsky were two prominent scholars of
cognitive development theories. Piaget was a biology, psychology and philosophy
scholar while Vygotsky first received a degree in law, then a degree in psychology. Even
with two very different backgrounds, both scholars took a constructivist approach to their
research in cognitive development as they believed, “children must construct their own
understandings of the world in which they live” (p. 121). This idea has been debated and
discussed for years. Piaget and Vygotsky were two prominent scholars within the realm
of cognitive development. Their theories of cognitive development have been influential
in the development of theories of education.
In Jean Piaget’s research, his main goal was to answer the question, “How does
knowledge grow?” (Silverthorn, 1999). He did this through genetic epistemology which
is the study of cognitive development in children. According to Meece (2002), there are
four major cognitive stages in a child’s cognitive development: sensorimotor,
preoperations, concrete operations and formal operations. A child’s thought process is
different from other developmental stages and each of the stages has its own importance.
Piaget believed that a child could not skip a stage because each one is necessary in the
process of cognitive development. In accordance with Meece (2002) and
funderstanding.com (2006) the four stages are described as such:

Sensorimotor stage (birth - 2 years old)--The child, through physical
interaction with his or her environment, builds a set of concepts about reality
and how it works. This is the stage where a child does not know that physical
objects remain in existence even when out of sight (object permanence).
Jean Piaget 3

Preoperational stage (ages 2-7)--The child is not yet able to conceptualize
abstractly and needs concrete physical situations.

Concrete operations (ages 7-11)--As physical experience accumulates, the
child starts to conceptualize, creating logical structures that explain his or her
physical experiences. Abstract problem solving is also possible at this stage.
For example, arithmetic equations can be solved with numbers, not just with
objects.

Formal operations (beginning at ages 11-15)--By this point, the child's
cognitive structures are like those of an adult and include conceptual
reasoning. (p. 1)
In Piaget’s research, these four stages are rather concrete. But, many current researchers
do not completely agree with the exactitude and universality of these stages.
Piaget also refers to three different types of knowledge. Physical knowledge is
“knowing the attributes of objects such as their number, color, size and shape” (Meece,
2002, p. 122). Logio-mathematical knowledge “involves the mental construction of
relationships” (p. 122). Social knowledge “is derived in part through interactions with
others” (p. 123).
Piaget focused on classification and relations, spatial relationships, time,
movement, chance, number, conservation and measurement in concrete stages (Genetic
Epistemology, 2006). Lev Vygotsky was more concerned with how a child interacts with
his culture and society (Meece, 2002). Piaget viewed knowledge as “individually
constructed” while Vygotsky viewed cognitive development as “socially co-constructed
between people as they interact” (p. 155).
Jean Piaget 4
Vygotsky believed that “children are born with elementary mental abilities such
as perception, attention and memory” (Meece, p. 156). As children develop and interact
socially with their culture and society, these innate characteristics are further developed.
According to Vygotsky, one of the most important parts of cognitive development is
language. Within this theory, language occurs in three stages: social speech, egocentric
speech and inner speech. Social speech is just that: speech for the purposes of
communicating. Egocentric speech is more intellectual and children use this by speaking
out loud to themselves. Inner speech is used by children to think in their heads about the
problem or task at hand, instead of verbalizing their thoughts in order to decide what to
do next.
According to the website funderstanding.com, the zone of proximal development
explains that, “a difference exists between what [a] child can do on [his or] her own and
what the child can do with help [from knowledgeable peers or adults]” (p. 1). For
example, a young child may not be able to put together a complex puzzle by himself, but
with the help of an older child or another adult, the young child could put together the
puzzle correctly.
Both Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s theories of cognitive development provide
foundations for constructivist approaches to teaching and learning (Meece, 2002). Each
of their theories concern qualitative changes within a child’s cognitive process. They also
have the same goal within the classroom, creating for students a community of learning.
Even though both theories have a common goal, each of them has a different approach
when dealing with children and education. For instance, Piaget’s theory can help
Jean Piaget 5
educators understand how children react and learn according to their age while
Vygotsky’s theory can help understand the role of society in children’s education.
Piaget was a scholar of natural science who happened to discover a way to explain
how children acquire knowledge as they develop in age. Piaget’s theory can be directly
related to his traditional background as he tries to explain the major transformations that
children go through while acquiring knowledge. Piaget strongly believed that each age
group varied significantly not only in the individual and group aspect, but also in the
cultural aspect as well. The stages that he created are the following: Sensorimotor,
Preoperations, Concrete Operations, and Formal Operations. All of these stages are met
when children manipulate objects. This manipulation allows the creation of mental
representation of the world and it allows two-way interaction with the environment.
Essentially, the goal is to allow a child the ability to create and understand his world in a
logical way.
All of these stages result from the children’s manipulation of objects that lets
them create a mental representation of the world and act on and influence the
environment they live in (and vice versa), so that learners gradually forego illogical ways
of thinking.
Piaget’s theory is about including spontaneous experimentation in a single and
group basis, so that students can build their own understanding based on the experiences
that they have. By setting up this system, the children are not only limited to the
classroom setting, but they are more alert of their surroundings. This method leads them
to learn about self-correction, self-instruction, and self-motivation because of its “hand
on experience” approach. According to Piaget, the growth of knowledge is a progressive
Jean Piaget 6
construction. Children’s logic and modes of thinking are initially entirely different from
those of adults (Jean Piaget Society, 2006), believing that the acquisition of knowledge is
a process of continuous self-construction (Silverthorn, 1999).
In order to adopt the cognitive development following Piaget’s theory, the
educator should organize the class time with spontaneous mental activities to let learners
develop their own ideas and to construct a healthy learning environment. To achieve this,
Piaget encourages teachers to provide a role for social interaction and communication by
presenting appropriate materials, drills, so that children can actively learn how to
confront their physical and social world by living their own experiences.
According to Marcy Driscoll (1994), there are three basic instructional principles
on which Piagetian theorists generally agree:
Principle 1: The learning environment should support the activity of the child
(i.e., an active, discovery-oriented environment)
Principle 2: Children’s interactions with their peers are an important source of
cognitive development (i.e., peer teaching and social negotiation) (Driscoll,
1994).
Principle 3: Adopt instructional strategies that make children aware of conflicts
and inconsistencies in their thinking (i.e., conflict teaching and Socratic dialog)
All of these principles are meant to be used in such a way that children can relate and
continue to build upon previously acquired knowledge. It is important and necessary that
teachers play the role of facilitators and encourage dialog among students about things
that they have discovered themselves, so that learning become an automatic and
enjoyable process.
Jean Piaget 7
Piaget has inspired major curriculum reforms, some of his major contributions to
education are (Meece, 2002):

Knowledge must be actively constructed by the child.

Educators should help children learn how to learn.

Learning activities should be matched to the child’s level of conceptual
development.

Peer interactions play an important role in the child’s cognitive development (p.
169).
Although this method seems beneficial, the financial cost and time-consumption that is
involved during the set-up cause this method to be less influential.
When compared with Piaget’s theory, Vygotsky’s theory places a stronger
emphasis on social interactions. According to Vygotsky, knowledge is not individually
constructed, but co –constructed between people. For Vygotsky, language and
communication play the most important role of cognitive development – his primary
concern dealing with nature, evaluation and the transmission of human culture.
Vygotsky identified three stages in children’s use of language:

Language is primarily used for communication (social speech).

Children begin to use egocentric or private speech to regulate their own thinking.

Children use inner speech or verbal thoughts to guide their thinking and actions.
For Piaget’s theory, language did not play such an important role in children’s
development; however for Vygotsky’s theory speech is an extremely important
developmental phenomenon as he believed that “children learn through conversations
with adults as the need to communicate with them presses the child to seek for the adult
Jean Piaget 8
meanings of things that are said” (Mason Timothy, 2006). So learning becomes a result
of mature thinking and behavior due to socio-cultural experiences. For instance,
Vygotsky encourages collaborative process of learning between teachers and students in
the going of social events in the classroom.
Vygotsky’s term Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) was used to refer the
difference between what children can do on their own, and what they could do with the
assistance of others (Meece, 2002). The ZPD indicates what a child's level of mental
development is at a particular time (Galant, 2006). Vygotsky assumed that interactions
with adults and peers in the zone of proximal development help children move to higher
levels of mental functioning (Meece, 2002).
Vygotsky believed that interactions with adults and peers in this zone helped
children move to higher levels of mental functioning within the classroom. Vygotsky’s
approach challenges traditional teaching methods, as he emphasizes the significance of
cooperative thinking that take place in the decision making process. This involves having
students paired together or in small groups in which the teacher’s task is to focus on
maintaining student’s motivation in order to pursue the instructional goal.
Vygotsky’s theory is about guided discovery by having the teacher offer,
“intriguing questions to students and having them discover the answers through testing
hypotheses. The students are engaged in the discovery process; however, they are still
receiving assistance from a more knowledgeable source” (Sample, 2006).
According to Meece (2002), some of the major Educational Contributions of Vygotsky’s
theories are:

Role of private speech in cognitive development.
Jean Piaget 9

The importance of guided participation and scaffolding.

The role of peer interactions in cognitive development (p. 159-161).
This method is helpful because it encourages constant peer review. However, if
not handled properly, it can bring up a common problem that students and teachers
frequently face. This disadvantage would be when groups rely on one member to do all
the work.
Meece (2002) explains that Piaget’s cognitive development theory is based on a
child’s innate ability to productively think on their own. This cognitive ability allows
them to move to the next cognitive stage as they mature biologically and adapt to their
environment. Children assimilate and accommodate their current schema, or mental
constructs, to fit the new information presented in the classroom. Cognitive development
and social interaction feeds intellectual activity and learning. The classroom methods of
instruction should match the level of cognitive development, facilitating the advancement
to the next stage of cognitive development.
The level of cognitive development for early childhood learners (2-7 years) is
described by Piaget as the preoperational stage (Meece, 2002). At this stage intuition and
language develop. Examples of instructional tools Piaget would recommend to describe
objects they are experiencing include: concrete props, symbols, and visual aids such as
drawings, usage of models or examples, lessons about the children’s world and their
experiences, less paper-and-pencil tasks and more “hands on” learning, back-and-forth
conversations with peers to develop skills for the next stage, and field trips.
According to Piaget, logical and mental operations are part of the cognitive
development of children in the elementary school years (7-11 years). A child’s thinking
Jean Piaget 10
becomes less rigid and more dynamic during this stage. Piaget called this stage the
concrete operations stage (Meece, 2002). Huitt (1997) mentions these instructional tools
that follow this theory: concrete props such as three dimensional science models, lab
work with minimal steps, brief and well organized lectures, relate existing instruction into
previously learned material, word problems in math, and problems which require logic
and analysis to solve. The Math Forum at Drexel University (2006) explained math
education using a Piagetian theory:
Students need to construct their own understanding of each mathematical
concept, so that the primary role of teaching is not to lecture, explain, or
otherwise attempt to 'transfer' mathematical knowledge, but to create
situations for students that will foster their making the necessary mental
constructions. A critical aspect of the approach is a decomposition of each
mathematical concept into developmental steps following a Piagetian
theory of knowledge based on observation of, and interviews with,
students as they attempt to learn a concept (para.1).
Piaget’s final stage in his theory of cognitive development covers the 12 year old
and up group. This stage is called the formal operations stage. Huitt & Hummel (2003)
describe this stage as characterized by a shift in thinking from the real to the involvement
of abstractions and reflections. In this stage, intelligence is demonstrated through the
logical use of symbols related to abstract concepts. Early in the period there is a return to
egocentric thought. “Only 35% of high school graduates in industrialized countries obtain
formal operations; many people do not think formally during adulthood” (page 1). Huitt
(1997) suggests classroom practices such as these to best use Piaget’s theory: concrete
Jean Piaget 11
operations stage type graphs on a more complicated scale, ask students to explore
hypotheticals as they explore other worlds or complicated issues, encourage students to
describe opposing viewpoints, have students describe how the solved the problem, teach
broad but curriculum related concepts, and use materials and ideas relevant to the
students to broaden their perspectives.
Meece (2002) explains that Vygotsky did not believe an individual’s
thinking structure as innate, but cultural and social in origin and influence. Social
and cultural interactions with knowledgeable peers and adults fuel cognitive
development while improving the elementary thinking skills of the child
(perception, attention, memory) to a higher level. Vygotsky might suggest
Reciprocal Teaching in the classroom. This involves guided participation by a
knowledgeable adult; with the students eventually taking over the learning
activity.
Egocentric speech was favored by Vygotsky. This is the “thinking aloud”
speech children sometimes use to work through a problem. Vygotsky would not
only encourage students to use this speech, but would demonstrate its use in
practical settings. Collaborative learning activities would also be emphasized in
the Vygotsky classroom. Learning is facilitated with meaningful discussions
among students in a collaborative learning setting. Especially valuable are
discussions with knowledgeable peers. Knowledgeable peers and teachers elevate
a student beyond the student’s current capabilities, a place the student would not
have achieved otherwise.
Jean Piaget 12
It is absolutely possible to incorporate parts of both Piaget and Vygotsky’s
theories in the classroom. Both theorists take a constructivist point of view and also
believe that students are not passive in their knowledge (Meece, 2002). It is important
for the teacher to be “important organizers, stimulators, guides, and supporters of
learning” (p. 168). Piaget’s theory suggests that students need a curriculum that supports
their cognitive development by learning concepts and logical steps. He also suggests that
children are only capable of learning specific material in specific stages of cognitive
development. Vygotsky would suggest more peer and cultural interactions in the
classroom (funderstanding.com, 2006). He also believes that knowledgeable adults can
help children learn even if they are not at the specific stage as Piaget suggests (Meece
2002). It is possible that while children are learning about concepts and logic, they can
also interact with their peers and other adults by working on projects that relate the two
together. It seems as though children may show some signs of specific development at
specific times, but with help they can also excel at tasks they may not be able to do
without help of others. Piaget and Vygotsky have differing views on cognitive
development, but it is possible to incorporate parts of both theories when thinking about
teaching strategies. Teachers must take into consideration the social and cultural
background of the student before preparing the lesson plan. Using Piaget’s theory, the
student must be at the correct stage of development in order use and understand the
knowledge at hand. But, Vygotsky says that even if the child is not at the correct stage of
development then a knowledgeable adult or teacher could influence the child and help
him get to a level beyond what his level would otherwise indicate.
Jean Piaget 13
References
Drexel University. (2006). Math Forum. Retrieved November 5, 2006 from
http://mathforum.org/mathed/constructivism.html
Driscoll, Marcy P. (1994). Psychology of learning for instruction. Needham, Ma: Allyn
& Bacon
Galant. Vygotsky's Cultural/Cognitive Theory of Development. Retrieved November 3rd,
2006 from http://web.cortland.edu/andersmd/VYG/ZPD.HTML
Genetic Epistemology. (2006). Retrieved October 31, 2006, from
http://tip.psychology.org/piaget.html
Huitt, W. (1997). Cognitive development: Applications. Educational Psychology
Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved November 5, 2006
from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/cogsys/piagtuse.html.
Huitt, W., & Hummel, J. (2003). Piaget's theory of cognitive development. Educational
Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved
November 5, 2006 from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/cogsys/piaget.html
Jean Piaget Society. Retrieved November 5th, 2006 from
http://www.piaget.org
Mason, Timothy. Didactics - 16 : The Psychology of Development III. Retrieved
November 5th, 2006 from
http://www.timothyjpmason.com/WebPages/LangTeach/Licence/CM/OldLectures/L
16_PiagetVygotsky.htm
Meece, J. (2002). Child & adolescent development for educators (2nd ed.). New York
New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nicholl, 1998. VYGOTSKY. Retrieved October 30th, 2006. from
http://web.archive.org/web/20011222124039/www.massey.ac.nz/~alock/virtual/trish
vyg.htm
Piaget. (2006). Retrieved October 31, 2006, from
http://www.funderstanding.com/piaget.cfm
Sample, Ima. (2006). Comparing Piaget and Vygotsky. Retrieved October 31st, 2006
from
http://www.education.uiowa.edu/resources/tep/eportfolio/07p075folder/Piaget_Vygo
tsky.htm
Jean Piaget 14
Silverthorn, 1999. Jean Piaget’s Theory of Development. Retrieved November 4th, 2006
from
http://chd.gmu.edu/immersion/knowledgebase/theorists/constructivism/Piaget.htm
Vygotsky and Social Cognition. (2006). Retrieved October 31, 2006, from
http://www.funderstanding.com/vygotsky.cfm
Woolfolk, Anita. (2004). Educational psychology. (9th ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon
Zahorik, John A. (1997). Encouraging - and challenging - students’ understandings. New
York New York: McGraw-Hill.