Faulting (Chap. 8) Anderson’s theory: assume no shear stress parallel to Earth’s surfaceImplies one of the principal stress directions is vertical near Earth’s surface: Normal fault: 1 vertical, 2, 3 horizontal Strike-slip: 2 vertical, 1, 3 horizontal Thrust: 3 vertical, 2, 1 horizontal Experiments indicate: Faults form at ~ 30 deg. to 1. Implies normal faults dip at 60o, thrusts at 30o 1 Correct only for homogeneous rocks. Bedding and foliations control most fault orientations. Listric faults Dip decreases with depth (normal and thrust). 1 and 3 are curved due to increase in stress with depth. Faults are also curved with depth. Thrust fault paradox When pushing a thrust block (> 1km thick), block will fail internally first, before sliding because of basal friction. But many large thrusts have moved > 10 km (e.g. Blue Ridge). 2 Block will slide only if slope >30 deg. Real detachments actually <1 deg. Solutions: 1) Hubbert-Rubey hypothesis: High fluid pressure acts as “lubricant” Principal of effective stress: eff = n - Pfluid Coulomb criterion: = C + n C = 0 for basal detachment = n - Pfluid) as Pfluid n, Problem: need low permeability rock and seal (e.g.shale) Alternative hypothesis: blocks slide on weak rocks: shales, mica schists, salt (Alps). 3 Shear heating V = Q + Eearthquake + Esurfaces shear stress (N/m2) Q = heat (W/m2) V= slip velocity (1 m/s for earthquake) Eearthquake + Esurfaces = small Q= V If Q and V are known, can be estimated on faults. Units: W = Nm/s; W/m2 = N/ms V = (N/m2) x (m/s) = N/ms Pseudotachyltes; Coal metamorphism 4 No heating observed on San Andreas fault 1) shear stress is small (weak fault hypothesis) 2) groundwater removes heat (strong fault hypothesis). Earthquakes and faulting Sudden release of stored elastic energy Inactive fault: no recent earthquakes Active: earthquakes in recent past/present Fault creep: aseismic (slow rate of slip) Stick-slip: regular recurrence interval Intraplate seismicity: New Madrid system Plate boundary: Anatoli F, Alpine F, SAF. 5