St. George’s University Psychological Services Center (PSC) (473.439.2277, Building E, Second Floor, www.sgu.edu/psc) Guidelines for Learning Disability/ADHD Assessment The following guidelines are designed to help individuals understand the necessary components of the documentation used to validate a learning disability or Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). They are particularly important for students who will be requesting academic accommodations at St. George’s University in standardized testing situations. The guidelines follow the recommendations of Educational Testing Services, the Association of Higher Education and Disability and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Documentation Requirements 1. A Qualified Professional Must Conduct the Evaluation The name, title and professional credentials of the evaluator, including information about license or certification as well as the area of specialization, employment and state in which the individual practices must be clearly stated. Only licensed clinical, counseling, educational, neuro, or school psychologists and physicians with comprehensive training and relevant experience in the assessment of learning problems with adults and adolescents are qualified to assess learning disabilities. Reports should be on letterhead, typed, dated and signed. 2. Testing Must be Current Documentation submitted for accommodations cannot be older than three (3) years. 3. Documentation Must be Comprehensive Documentation must include the following: Relevant academic and learning process history in elementary, secondary and postsecondary education must be investigated and documented. A summary of a comprehensive diagnostic interview by a qualified evaluator. A combination of self-report, interviews with others and historical documentation (transcripts and standardized scores). A description of the presenting problem. A developmental history with relevant medical history. An academic history including prior standardized testing and classroom performance. Assessment Guidelines 2 Relevant family history including primary language of the home and student's current level of fluency of English. Relevant psychosocial history. Relevant employment history. A discussion of dual diagnosis and alternative or co-existing mood, behavioral, neurological and or personality disorders. All findings should be integrated with information about emotional, social and personality functioning. A history of relevant medication use that may affect the individual's learning. An exploration of possible alternatives that may mimic a learning disability, if one is not present. 4. Assessment The assessment must provide clear and specific evidence that a learning disability or ADHD exists, thus the evaluation and any resulting diagnosis must consist of, and be based on, a comprehensive battery that does not rely on any one test or subtest. Minimally, the following domains must be addressed: Aptitude/Cognitive Ability - Including all subtests and standard scores reported. Academic Achievement - Including subtests and standard scores as well as current levels of academic functioning in relevant areas such as reading decoding and comprehension, mathematics and oral and written language. - Information Processing Short-term memory Verbal and nonverbal memory Auditory and visual perception/processing Processing speed Executive functioning - Additional Assessments Testing observations Psychiatric/neurological assessment to establish differential diagnosis Personality-emotional functioning 5. Documentation Must Include a Specific Diagnosis Nonspecific diagnoses do not constitute a disability (e.g. slow learner, academic problems, testing anxiety). 6. Actual Standardized Instrument Test Scores Must be Provided Scores and/or percentile ranks. Profile of strengths and weaknesses must be related to functional limitations. Assessment Guidelines 3 Tests must be reliable, valid and standardized for use with an adolescent/adult population. 7. Each Recommended Accommodation Must Include a Rationale Each report must include specific recommendations as well as a detailed rationale for each. 8. An Interpretative Summary Must be Provided The clinical summary should include: Evidence that the evaluator ruled out alternative explanations for academic problems. Identification of patterns in cognitive ability, achievement and information processing are used to determine the presence of a learning disability. An indication of the substantial limitation to learning. A clear explanation of why specific accommodations are needed. Recommended Assessment Instruments Aptitude/Cognitive Ability Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (III or IV) Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test Stanford-Binet Academic Achievement Scholastic Abilities Tests for Adults Stanford Test of Academic Skills Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement Wechsler Individual Achievement Test II Or specific achievement tests such as: Nelson-Denny Reading Test Stanford Diagnostic Mathematics Test Test of Written Language Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests - Revised Information Processing Acceptable instruments include, but are not limited to: Wechsler Memory Scale III or IV Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Assessment Guidelines Computerized Performance Tests (e.g., Conners’ CPT, TOVA) Information subtest on the WAIS-R or Woodcock Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability Wide Range Assessment of Learning-2 Behavioral Dyscontrol Scale Other tests of sustained attention Other Rating Scales Various measures could be used, including: Brown ADD Scales – self/parent reports Wender Utah Rating Scales – self/parent reports Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scale – self/parent reports Behavior Rating of Executive Functions Personality Assessment Inventory For additional information, please see the disabilities webpage at www.sgu.edu/psc. You can also contact SGU's Psychological Services Center by phoning 473.439.2277 or visiting the second floor of Building E on the True Blue Campus. Revised: 9.30.09 4