GEOMORPHOLOGY – FALL 2007 SOIL CLASSIFICATION ASSIGNMENT NAME __________________________ Materials must be neat, organized, and submitted on time to receive full-credit. (Please staple or clip papers together) Part I – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Classification of Soil Samples (15 points) Using the USDA triangle diagram, classify the following hypothetical soil samples based on the relative percentages of sand, silt, and clay. Note that each component (sand, silt, or clay) is plotted parallel to the side of the triangle counter-clockwise from its scale, as shown in the example. See example in Powerpoint presentation Example: 20% sand, 50% clay, 30% silt. ____________________ Sample 1: 50% sand, 20% clay, 30% silt. ____________________ Sample 2: 10% sand, 45% clay, 45% silt. ____________________ Sample 3: 30% sand, 70% clay. ____________________ Sample 4: 20% gravel, 40% sand, 40% silt. ____________________ Part II – Grain Sized Analysis and Classification of Coarse-grained Soils using the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) (40 points) Refer to the graph showing grain size distribution analyses of Czechoslovakian sediments. For samples 1, 3 and 4, do the following: Identify the D10 and D60, which are the particle sizes at which 10 and 60 percent, respectively, of the sample is finer. Calculate the uniformity coefficient (Cu), which is Cu = D60 / D10 . Calculate the coefficient of concavity (Cc ), which is Cc = (D30)2 / [ (D10) (D60) ] 1 State which sample, 1, 3 or 4, is most uniform (i.e., less variation in grain size). ____________________________________________________ State which sample likely has a higher value of porosity and why. ____________________________________________________ Classify the samples according to the USCS (classification charts on following pages). Assume that the fine-grained fraction in sample 4 is plastic. Sample 1 Cu _____________ Cc _______________ Poorly graded or Well graded (circle one) USCS Classification _______________ 2 Sample 3 Cu _____________ Cc _______________ Poorly graded or Well graded (circle one) USCS Classification _______________ Sample 4 Cu _____________ Cc _______________ Poorly graded or Well graded (circle one) USCS Classification _______________ Note: No.4 sieve = 4.75mm (commonly used gravel-sand break) No. 10 sieve = 2.0mm (another commonly used gravel-sand break) No. 200 sieve = 0.075mm (sand-silt break) For classifying the above samples per the USCS, use the No. 10 (2mm) as the gravel-sand break, not the No. 4 (4.75mm) listed in the charts below. 3 SC C 4 5 Part III –Classifying soils according to NRCS Soil Orders (20 points) See the general descriptions of the 12 soil orders recognized by NRCS at http://soils.ag.uidaho.edu/soilorders/index.htm. Use these descriptions together with Chapter 3 of your text to classify the soils shown and described on the following pages. Order for Soil 1 ________________________________ Order for Soil 2 ________________________________ Order for Soil 3 ________________________________ Order for Soil 4 ________________________________ 6 SOIL 1 Color/Texture: brown, silty clay Relatively unweathered w/ poorly developed horizons Developed on floodplain, alluvial layering still evident. Note absence of “B” horizon and buried “A” horizon. 7 SOIL 2 Color/Texture: red, silty clay. Developed on basalt flow. Thick, highly weathered and leached. Well developed “B” horizon w/abundant hematite, limonite and bauxite. 8 SOIL 3 Color/Texture: brown/gray, pebbly and silty clay. Developed on glaciated landscape Moderately weathered w/evidence of leaching (“E” horizon) at base of “A” horizon. Dense clay accumulation in “Bt” horizon. 9 SOIL 4 Color/Texture: brown/gray, sandy silt. Shallow profile developed on dry, basalt plains and terraces. Slightly to moderately weathered with secondary mineral accumulation in “Bt” horizon and hard caliche in “Bk” horizon. 10