Fighting Through Pain: Treating Migraines

advertisement
Handout for “Fighting Through The Pain”
Please note: Slides for this presentation are protected under copywrite laws and are
not to be reproduced or distributed. Only selected slides are available.
Fighting Through Pain: Treating Migraines
Anne H. Calhoun, MD
Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Neurology
University of North Carolina
Identifying Migraine
Prevalence, Pitfalls, and Diagnostic Criteria
IF YOU CANNOT HEAR THE PRESENTATION
THROUGH YOUR COMPUTER, Listen by telephone by
dialing (605) 772-3434, organizer access code 608-643-499
Objectives
Identifying Migraine
Prevalence, Pitfalls, and Diagnostic Criteria
Identifying Migraine: Prevalence
Age and Gender Prevalence of Migraine in Adults
Migraine Prevalence (%)
30
Females
Males
25
20
15
10
5
0
0 20
30
40
50
60
70
80
100
Age (y)
Age and Gender Prevalence of
Migraine in Adults
Lipton et al. Headache. 2001;41:646-657.
Identifying Migraine: Prevalence
Referred Pain / Autonomic Sxs
IHS Criteria: Migraine without Aura




≥5 attacks lasting 4-72 hours
Any two:
– Moderate-to-severe intensity
– Pulsatile
– Unilateral
– Exacerbated by activity
Either:
– Nausea
– Photophobia & phonophobia
Not attributed to other disorder
IHS Criteria: Migraine without Aura
International Headache Society. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(suppl 1):24-36;139-151.
IHS Criteria: Migraine with Aura
When to Refer
Identifying the patient whose headaches need further evaluation
Pharmacists & Headache Care
Pharmacists are asked to recommend treatment for headache 53,000 times a day
“Excuse Me, Can You Recommend
Something for My Headache?”
1. How often do your headaches prevent normal function?
2. How many days per month are you completely headache-free?
Q#1: How Often Do Headaches Prevent Normal Function?
Q#1: How Often Do Headaches Prevent
Normal Function?
>50% disabling &/or
>20% with vomiting:
Refer to physician
“Disabling” means:
• Cannot perform daily tasks
• Missed work/school/family activities
• ≥50% reduction in ability to perform chores
• Vomiting
• Sleep required for improvement
>50% disabling &/or >20% with vomiting:
Refer to physician
<15 days/month?
◦Patient has a chronic daily headache subtype
◦There is a high probability of medication overuse headache
(Do not recommend more analgesics)
Refer to physician
Treat at least 3 attacks
◦With inadequate relief in ≥2 out of 3 attacks, try a distinctly different OTC product
Acute Therapy for Migraine
Non-specific and Migraine Specific Medications
Acute Migraine Medications:
The Available Options
Nonspecific treatments
◦NSAIDs
◦Combination analgesics
◦Opioids
◦Neuroleptics/antiemetics
◦Isometheptene
Specific treatments
◦Triptans
◦Ergotamine/dihydroergotamine (DHE)
Acute Migraine Management:
Evidence-Based Guidelines
NSAIDs as first-line therapy
Triptans (or DHE) indicated for those
who fail to tolerate or respond to NSAIDs
No evidence to support the use of IV corticosteroids or intranasal lidocaine
Little evidence to support the use of isometheptene combinations in migraine
Opioids should be “reserved for use when other medications cannot be used”
The Triptans—Specifically Indicated for Migraine
Triptans Are Highly Selective
Triptan Effects are Minimal
Triptan Binding Shows Craniovascular Selectivity
5-HT1B receptors are
denser in meningeal arteries
than in coronary arteries
Triptans stimulate meningeal 5-HT1B receptors more potently than those in the heart
Triptans are unlikely to cause serious cardiovascular (CV) events in healthy patients
Available Triptan Formulations
Almotriptan
◦Oral 6.25, 12.5 mg
Eletriptan
◦Oral 20, 40 mg
Frovatriptan
◦Oral 2.5 mg
Naratriptan
◦Oral 1, 2.5 mg
Achieving optimal results
What your clients can do to improve outcome with their medications
4 Reasons for Sub-optimal Response to a Triptan
1. Chronic Daily Headache
Analgesic Overuse Can Complicate Patient Profile
2. Hormonally Mediated Migraine
Hormonal Treatment of MRM
Naratriptan Mini Prophylaxis
Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, 3-arm study
◦Naratriptan 1 mg bid for 5 days
◦Naratriptan 2.5 mg bid for 5 days
◦Placebo bid for 5 days
Naratriptan 2.5 mg bid was not effective
Naratriptan 1 mg bid reduced the median number of MRM attacks in 4 months from 4
to 2 (p=0.01)
Frovatriptan Mini Prophylaxis
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study
◦Frovatriptan 2.5 mg QD for 6 days
◦Frovatriptan 2.5 mg BID for 6 days
◦Placebo for 6 days
Incidence of MRM during the 6-day PMP was
◦67% for placebo
◦52% for frovatriptan 2.5 mg QD
◦41% for frovatriptan 2.5 mg BID
Both frovatriptan regimens reduced
◦Severity of MRM
◦Duration of MRM
◦Use of rescue medication
Impact of MRM
3. Patient Delayed Treatment
Central Sensitization
Central Sensitization
Central Sensitization
4. Headache Awakened Patient
•
Sleep complaints were common in
a sample of 1283 migraineurs
• >50% reported insomnia
• 71% were regularly awakened by
headaches
• 50% reported that sleep disturbances
triggered migraine
• 38% were “short sleepers” (≤6 hrs per night)
• Compared to those who slept longer, short sleepers
experienced:
• More frequent and more severe headaches
• More headaches on awakening
4. Headache Awakened Patient
Kelman L, Rains JC. Headache and sleep: examination of sleep patterns and complaints in a large
clinical sample of migraineurs. Headache. Jul 2005;45(7):904-910.
4. Headache Awakened Patient
Study Design
In Summary . . .
Questions & Answers
Download