GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY PROPOSAL FOR A PDF BLOCK B GRANT Country People's Republic of China Focal Area Biodiversity Operational Programmes Coastal, Marine, and Freshwater Ecosystems Project Title Biodiversity Management in the Coastal Area of the China’s South Sea (BMCACSS) GEF US$ 320,000 Funding PDF: Chinese Government HKUST Total US$ 102,000 US$ 13,250 US$ 435,250 Full Project: GEF Co-financing: Requesting Agency US$ 4-6 million To be secured from UNDP, Chinese government, and bilateral donors United Nations Development Programme Block B Block A Grant: PDF Duration Nine Months Council Submission: December 2000 None requested SUMMARY: PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND DESCRIPTION The objective is to protect globally significant marine and coastal biodiversity along China’s tropical and sub-tropical southeast coast between its border with Vietnam and latitude 28 oN, corresponding with the border of Fujian and Zhejiang provinces. The proposed PDF-B will assist China in selecting 4-6 project sites representing different coastal and marine ecosystems, undertaking biological and socio-economic assessments, quantifying threats to biodiversity, and designing a GEF Alternative strategy to protect the biodiversity at the sites. The GEF full project will ensure the protection of biodiversity conservation at the project sites by incorporating conservation activities into an integrated coastal-zone management framework. Based on this approach, the sites will serve as models for institutionalizing biodiversity conservation into coastal zone management throughout south-east China. A full participatory approach is to be adopted to achieve the project objectives. A central government agency (the State Oceanic Administration) will be responsible for coordinating the project, but sitebased conservation activities will be implemented through local government agencies, based on consultations with local communities. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST) will be the technical institution to provide SOA with necessary technical/ scientific support to the project. . BACKGROUND China is a “mega-biodiversity’ country, having about one-tenth of the total number of species in the world. In terms of coastal and marine biodiversity, the highest levels are found in the tropics and sub1 tropics along the South China Sea coast. From a global perspective of biogeography, the Southeast coast of China is part of the Indo-West Pacific Region which hosts the world's highest marine diversity, radiating out from biodiversity centres near Indonesia and the Philippines (Norse, 1993; ADB, 1995). The main coastal ecosystems in southeast China include tropical and subtropical forests, grasslands, marshes, and important marine systems. Estuarine waters are the home for the Chinese white dolphin (Sousa chinensis). The seagrass beds off Hainan and Guangxi are the only remaining habitat in the region for the sea cow (Dugong dugong), while shallow waters and sandy beaches support the "living fossil" horseshoe crab species, Tachypleus tridentatus. The beaches serve as nesting grounds for several species of turtles including the loggerhead and green turtles. Between Fujian and Hainan, about 200 species of reef building corals have been recorded from coastal fringing reefs. The reefs are bestdeveloped around Hainan where they provide critically important habitat to thousands of fish and other invertebrate species. On islands such as Hainan and Nei Ling Ding (Guangdong) dwindling coastal forests provide habitat for rapidly decreasing populations of primate species. The high species diversity in China is associated with high levels of endemism. More than 8,000 species of endemic plants and animals have been identified so far in China. It is estimated that over 3000 species of wild plants, 700 species of fungi and 500 species of wild animals are already exploited for their value as food, medicine or other economic uses. Less well known is that marine organisms also have a high economic potential, e.g. extracts from coral reef organisms found in China recently have been developed into anti-cancer drugs with multi-million dollar sales. Compounds found in the blood of the horseshoe crab are now used in medical test kits. However, China’s coastal and marine biodiversity is under threat. For the past ten years, the southeast coast of China has experienced unprecedented economic growth, social change and population growth. This continues today and is threatening the health of ecosystems (terrestrial and marine) which include a significant portion of the world's biodiversity. This area faces many problems including poorly planned land use, pollution, over-fishing and other forms of resource extraction. In some localities, these threats to coastal ecosystems have already caused serious damage. For example, several species of lobster, sea cucumbers and grouper have been extirpated at some points along the coast, while other species, such as the Indo-Pacific Humpbacked dolphin are seriously threatened (Hodgson, 1996). Coral reefs continue to be exploited directly for building material, as well as other species for direct consumption. Sandy beaches have been mined and built on, removing the nesting areas for sea turtles. Such environmental problems incur a high socioeconomic cost, with coastal-resource conflicts among tourism, fisheries and manufacturing industries, among others. In some of the worst affected stretches of the coast of Guangdong, stocks of commercial fish species have declined to the point that inshore fishing is no longer a viable occupation. Fishermen are forced to go farther and to try to locate new stocks, often of less valuable fish. Infrastructure, industry and tourism development is proceeding, creating additional forms of pollution that damage fisheries and aquaculture. Despite this rather bleak overall picture, the nature and intensity of threats are such that many sites that are home to globally significant biodiversity are still in a condition amenable to interventions to sustainably remove the threats. In this project, a number of sites will be selected representing different tropical and sub-tropical marine and coastal ecosystems, and through the activities of this PDF-B, strategies will be designed to conserve the globally significant biodiversity on these sites. As discussed below, this project builds on the lessons learned from related GEF projects, especially 2 the East Asia Seas (EAS) International Waters project. The Government of China has already demonstrated a strong commitment to replicate the approach pioneered through the EAS project to address a range of coastal and marine problems, but lacks experience of integrating biodiversity conservation into management goals for highly populated coastal areas such as those of S.E. China. This project will provide models to overcome this problem. NATIONAL POLICIES & INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS Responsibilities for land-use management and planning lie with the provincial arms of various government agencies, and are discharged through offices in a hierarchy of administrative sub-divisions, including at prefecture, county and township levels. At the national level, the State Oceanic Administration (SOA) is mainly responsible for looking after China’s marine affairs as a whole, and specifically for formulating and implementing marine-related laws and regulations; law enforcement; marine environmental surveillance and protection; sea area and coastal management; and research. Fisheries management is the responsibility of the Ministry of Agriculture, but at the provincial and local levels fisheries management is often integrated with local SOA administrations. While the State Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) sets national-level conservation policy, marine biodiversity conservation on site is largely the responsibility of SOA. China has taken specific steps to conserve marine biodiversity. This includes the establishment of 5 national, 10 provincial and about 30 county nature reserves along the South China Sea cost. However, according to China’s Biodiversity Action Plan, the existing conservation system is plagued by various problems, including: Incomplete national network of nature reserves Irrational establishment of nature reserves Unclear lines of authority Conflicts between economic development and conservation Lack of funds and low management skill levels Lack of law enforcement Several of these concerns have led to the recent adoption of integrated coastal zone management (ICZM) as an approach to conservation and development of coastal and marine resources, especially in regions where high population levels result in frequent conflicts between development and conservation. One of the earliest efforts to promote ICZM in China was at Xiamen, Fujian province, where the first phase of the UNDP/GEF regional East Asia Seas project established an ICZM demonstration site in 1993. In Hangzhou Bay, Zhejiang province, the World Bank's 1994 Hangzhou Bay Environment Study also helped to establish a baseline for ICZM. Based on experience generated by the Xiamen demonstration site, and as part of the GoC’s efforts to promote ICZM, a UNDP project entitled “Capacity Building for Integrated Coastal Management in Northern South China Sea” was initiated in 1997, and is being implemented by SOA. The project focuses on three demonstration sites, namely Hailing Bay, Guangdong province; Fangchenggang, Guangxi province; and Qinglan Bay, Hainan province. The objectives of the project are: 1. To establish appropriate administrative and management arrangements for a sustainable integrated coastal management institutional framework at the three sites; 2. To strengthen the capacities of local governments and communities with respect to the concept and methodologies of sustainable integrated coastal management; 3. To develop and implement integrated coastal management strategies for the three sites; and 3 4. To disseminate project findings. Thus, the project, which is scheduled for completion in late 2000, contributes to an overall Chinese effort to establish ICZM. These Chinese activities contribute to the attainment of the sustainable development baseline for the demonstration sites, but do not address conservation of biodiversity as a specific project component. The UNDP/GEF project under development on Wetland Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use in China has an objective to implement a wetlands management demonstration program for priority wetland complexes in China. Yancheng Coastal Marsh site is the only coastal site included in that project, with its primary aim of protecting saltmarshes and nesting birds. The Yancheng Coastal Marsh site is located in the northern part of Jiangsu province, approximately 1000km along the coast or 700km due north (equivalent to 4.5 latitude) of the northernmost site proposed for this project, and represents a mudflat/wetland habitat in the temperate zone. Along China’s long coastline, there are many different types of marine habitats, including rocky shores, muddy shores, muddy-sand shores, sandy-mud shores, sandy shores, coral reef, estuary and lagoon habitats. The biodiversity, the species to be protected, the community structures, the physical/chemical parameters, the environmental stress and threats at different geographic regions vary drastically. Research on coastal zone management issues has been strongly supported through various agencies, including the SOA’s own multi-disciplinary research institutions and other organisations such as the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. (HKUST). Much of this research has focused on pollution monitoring and control. For example, HKUST has undertaken research projects on an Integrated Observation System for the Pearl River Estuary, “red tide” studies in Pearl River Estuary and Hong Kong waters, and the “Pearl River Estuary Pollution Project” (PREPP), which includes a comprehensive coastal pollution study, and began in early 1999. THREATS TO BIODIVERSITY Most of the threats to biodiversity on China’s south-east coast, such as poorly planned land use, pollution, over-fishing and other forms of resource extraction, can be directly related to conflict between economic development and conservation. Past efforts to manage coastal areas by the Chinese government have characterised as follows: Production took priority over protection. Until recent years, efforts focused on how to increase production and maximize short-term economic gain, with little effort to long term sustainability. The government, at both the national and provincial levels, has now recognized that such an approach was shortsighted and compromised future quality and productivity of biological resources in coastal areas. Consultation took priority over participation. The Chinese administration effectively consults the most remote and marginalised sections of society, but has rarely promoted participatory approaches to planning and conservation. Along the coast, this has been effective in fostering economic development, by ensuring that all elements of society are consulted and informed of developments. However, as local communities are usually not able to participate in resource planning and management, their concerns and knowledge has not been integrated into local plans and programmes. 4 In addition to these generic forms of threat resulting from over-emphasis on economic development, specific localized threats include: Inappropriate fishing techniques (dynamite, poison, electricity). Regulations covering fishing methods are already in pace in most provinces, but may not be enacted or enforced. For example, Decree number 9 of the Guangdong People’s government prohibits fishing using dynamite, poison, or electricity, and management regulations for marine areas have been drafted, but are not yet implemented. Mining of coral and sand for construction purposes. Again, while local regulations may be in place, they are not yet effectively enforced. At Qinglan Bay, Hainan province, one of the three demonstration sites for the UNDP integrated coastal management project, the municipal government has issued regulations prohibiting the extraction and sale of sea and river sand, coral, and turtle products. Despite this, degradation of coral reefs due to removal of coral and sedimentation damage continues to cause local coastal erosion, and the erosion and build-up of sand bars. Cutting of mangrove forests. Wood harvesting from mangroves, mainly for fuelwood, has been another localized problem in some areas, especially in Guangxi and Hainan provinces. As well as directly impacting the biodiversity dependent on mangrove habitats, removal of mangrove forest also contributes to coastal erosion. PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND ACTIVITIES The goal of the full project will be to complement China’s national policy to promote sustainable development by protecting globally important marine and coastal biodiversity in the tropical and sub-tropical coastal regions of south-east China. The objectives of the full project are to protect globally significant biodiversity at 4-6 significant demonstration sites in south-east China by: 1. Developing and implementing institutional procedures to incorporate biodiversity conservation into integrated coastal zone management frameworks, 2. Increasing the capacity of local governments to address biodiversity conservation through the application of participatory approaches to resource use planning and management; 3. Providing a framework for adaptive co-management of coastal resources through improved monitoring, assessment, and sharing of data and information 4. Promoting replication of models of biodiversity conservation through ICZM for application at other sites on the south-east coast of China; Achieving these objectives will be greatly facilitated by the close relationship of this project to other existing GEF and non-GEF projects. For example, the UNDP project on Capacity Building for Integrated Coastal Management in Northern South China Sea has, as one of its objectives, capacity building for ICZM. Therefore, the basic concepts of ICZM are already established in several locations, and the capacity building component of this project is consequently simplified, being limited to specific biodiversity conservation issues. Similarly lessons learnt from the EAS International Waters GEF demonstration site at Xiamen will contribute to meeting objectives 2, 3, and 4. Finally, the research work already undertaken by, among others, SOA research institutions and HKUST, on pollution monitoring and data management will contribute to meeting objective 3. 5 Most of the project activities will be site-specific, at the 4-6 selected project sites. However, some of the activities needed to achieve objectives 2, 3, and 4, will be broader in scope. In order to achieve objective 1 (incorporating biodiversity conservation into integrated coastal zone management), activities at the site level will include: The creation of local ICZM committees for each site. Specific proposals for composition of the committees and institutional linkages to existing organs of government will be developed during the PDF-B. Implementation of a set of detailed site-specific activities based on the outline strategy to be designed during the PDF-B. This will include, where appropriate, the strengthening of the protected areas system, including the designation of new protected areas, and strengthening of protected area management. For objective 2 (Increasing capacity to address biodiversity conservation through participatory approaches), site-based activities will include: Implementation of a system to ensure public participation in the planning process. Specific proposals will be developed during the PDF-B and, if appropriate, may vary from site to site, depending on local socio-economic conditions. Community representative may be incorporated into the local ICZM committees, for example. Training of ICZM committee members and other government representatives in participatory approaches to planning and management. Training of representatives of specialized agencies in biodiversity conservation management. Participants in the training courses, which will include both formal and informal training methods, will include representatives from other sites where similar approaches are needed, thus promoting replication. To achieve objective 3 (Framework for adaptive co-management through improved monitoring, assessment, and data sharing), site-based activities will include: Implementation of a GIS-based information management system designed under the PDF-B. In order to promote adaptive management, this system will provide information not only on status of biodiversity and threats, but also on responses to previous management interventions; Application of a monitoring system designed during the PDF-B, involving collection of specified change data and, where needed, more intensive assessment of critical areas/species/threats These site-based activities will be complemented by incorporation of compatible data from other, non-project locations. Project activities will not include primary data collection on such sites, but incorporation of the data into a central, shared database, will facilitate the design of adaptive management responses and promote adoption of the approach at other sites, thus contributing to objective 4. Finally, for objective 4 (Promoting replication at other sites), the following activities will be undertaken: Establishment of working linkages with related international and national projects. Design and implementation of outreach programs, public consultation, publication and broadcast of educational material for dissemination to government and the public. 6 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PDF-B ACTIVITIES BY COMPONENT The principal objective of the proposed PDF-B activities is to design a project that will serve to demonstrate models to integrate biodiversity conservation in ICZM and conserve globally important biodiversity at 4-6 sites The project will maximise cost-effectiveness and demonstration value, and will incorporate lessons learned from other ICZM projects and GEF projects in China. SOA will establish a project office and appoint national staff to work on the project. An international and a national GEF Formulation specialist will be recruited. A detailed workplan will be prepared, and detailed TOR for all experts, consultants and subcontractors developed. With these project implementation arrangements in place, the proposed PDF-B activities are: Component 1. Selection of Sites: Based on existing information, potential conservation sites have been identified and are listed in Annex 2, and their locations are shown on the map in Annex 3. These sites have been selected on the basis of globally significant biodiversity, a preliminary understanding of local commitment and an expectation that the particular suite of threats on these sites are amenable to GEF-style interventions. One of the initial PDF-B activities will be to select from among these candidate site the 4-6 sites expected to be included in the Full Project. SOA will consult with the local governments on site selection. The final site selection will be made by SOA and UNDP based on the above consultations and documentation and recommendations prepared by HKUST and other experts.. The following selection criteria will be taken into account: Confirmation of local commitment (government and communities) to conserve the globally significant biodiversity on site Overlap with existing efforts to promote ICZM, for example, as through the UNDP project entitled “Capacity Building for Integrated Coastal Management in Northern South China Sea” Contribution to a set of project sites representing a diversity of ecosystems and different suites of threats Nature and intensity of threats can be addressed through interventions of a magnitude governed by the expected resources of the project Overall, the complete set of project sites maximise cost-effectiveness in terms of demonstration value Deliverables: Finalised site selection for the full project, endorsed by local governments and community leaders. Component 2. Stakeholder consultations: Preliminary consultations have already established the agreement in principle of local authorities and communities for each of the candidate sites. Following final site selection, a two-stage consultation process will be initiated. The first stage will consist of local workshops at each site to secure broad-based assessments of the issues to be addressed, status of and threats to biodiversity, and community development goals. This will complement existing information on biodiversity and threats, but where necessary, primary data collection will supplement information collected during the workshops (see below). As PDF activities are nearing completion, and the full project strategy is at an advanced stage of development, a second-round of stakeholder consultations will be held, during which local endorsement of proposed full project activities will be sought, and refinements made to such activities where consensus is found to be lacking. A Participation Plan will also be prepared for the full project in consultation with stakeholders, and will guide the choice of conservation strategy and design of interventions. Deliverables: 1] Social Feasibility Study, comprising a comprehensive stakeholder assessment, and 7 recommendations regarding full project activities. 2] Participation plan, listing activities to enable participatory processes, defining implementation responsibilities, and providing performance indicators (a summary of this information would be prepared for the proposal). 3] Finalised ICZM committee structure and membership. 4] Identification of training requirements. Component 3. Biological and socio-economic assessments: The Chinese government has carried out many scientific studies on the condition of coastal and marine resources, but data analysis and interpretation has been limited. An initial desk review will be carried out on biodiversity status at each project site, the existing legal framework (local and national), threats, cultural constraints and socio-economic conditions. The review will seek to build on and identify gaps in the BAP and the 1996 World Wide Fund for Nature China and World Bank-GEF publication, "A Biodiversity Review of China." Much valuable information will also be secured from the initial stakeholder consultations, but there are certain to be areas where existing information is inadequate, or conflicting in nature. In such cases, for each site targeted biological and socio-economic data collection will be undertaken. Although data collection will be directed by technical experts, it will be participatory in nature since an additional important output will be the design of a monitoring system for adaptive management, and this requires that on-going data collection and handling is undertaken by local personnel Deliverables: 1] Justification of biodiversity importance of each of the sites, based on indicators of global significance (a summary of this information will be prepared as an attachment to the project brief); 2] Threats Analysis for each of the sites, indicating root causes; 3] Design of monitoring system for adaptive management; 4] Establishment of database to facilitate data exchange and analysis. Component 4. GEF Project Formulation A full proposal for GEF funding would be prepared, based on the results of components 1-3. The project brief would be circulated to STAP for review, and presented to the GEF Secretariat and Executive Council for approval as part of the GEF Work Programme. Recommendations made by STAP, GEF Sec/ Executive Council and other Implementing Agencies would be addressed. Finally, the Brief would be converted into a UNDP project document, with detailed Terms of Reference for Technical Inputs, an Inputs Budget, Work Plan, details of risks and mitigation measures and other information, as per standard UNDP requirements. The process of preparing the Project Brief would require: Consensus building regarding site selection criteria, priorities, strategy, outputs and activities of the full project, based upon consultation with stakeholders, and a project formulation workshop to construct a logical framework of objectives, activities, outputs, and indicators. More detailed investigation and quantification of threats at the site level. Definition of institutional frameworks, stakeholders roles and responsibilities, and implementation modalities for the full project. An incremental cost analysis of the project to differentiate between baseline and incremental activities. PDF funds would be used to collect information on the baseline scenario, identify and cost incremental activities necessary to conserve biodiversity, and foster joint programming of baseline and incremental activities. Confirmation of co-financing for project components not eligible for GEF funding. Deliverables. Co-financing would have been secured to secure the sustainable development baseline. A consensus regarding the project strategy would have been obtained. The main body of the Brief would clearly present the following information: A summary of the global significance and unique biological and ecological attributes of each of the project sites, and the global benefits that would accrue from conservation intervention (from components 1, 2, and 3) 8 Details of the ecological, social and economic attributes of the sites (from components 2 and 3) A description of the threats facing each site and their root causes (from components 2 and 3) A clear strategy for mitigating threats and their underlying causes An account of the realistic baseline (this comprises activities in the arena of coastal and marine management, that would occur irrespective of GEF inputs, that have a bearing on the resolution of threats) Identification of the sustainable development baseline (comprising additional activities required to address threats that may be justified in the domestic interest) Identification and justification of the incremental costs of activities needed to generate global conservation benefits, over and above the sustainable development baseline. Details of monitoring and evaluation measures (from Component 5) Details of execution and implementation measures, with an accompanying organigramme The following annexes would be attached to the Brief: Incremental Cost assessment describing global and domestic benefits, and justifying incremental costs for each output Logical Framework Assessment, with quantifiable indicators to measure impact, a list of sources of verification, and an outline of the assumptions and risks that underpin the project Details of the biodiversity values of each of the chosen sites, to supplement information provided in the main body of the Brief (from Components 1, 2 and 3) Assessment of the risks affecting project implementation and outline of mitigation measures Summary of the Stakeholder Assessment and Social Feasibility Study, defining the roles and responsibilities of different groups in design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation (from Component 2) Maps of the project area (provinces and sites) List of reference materials Component 5. Development of Monitoring and Evaluation Plan: Impact and output indicators would be selected, and baseline data obtained as a basis for measuring project outcomes. An M&E Plan would be developed, clearly articulating the objectives of monitoring, and specifying the periodicity of monitoring and evaluation activities, and how they will be orchestrated. Deliverables: 1] M&E Plan, with clear performance indicators ELIGIBILITY China has ratified the Convention on Biological Diversity, and is eligible for GEF financing under paragraph 9(b) of the GEF Instrument. The project will meet the eligibility criteria listed under the Coastal, Marine, and Freshwater Ecosystems Operational Programme. INCREMENTAL COSTS The GEF would finance activities relating to the business of conservation, that could not be justified in terms of China’s own sustainable development interests. Co-financing would be secured to complement gaps in the baseline to finance sustainable development activities. The GEF would finance activities relating to the integration of biodiversity conservation into ICZM, and demonstrations of ways and means of overcoming barriers to sustainable use of biodiversity. NATIONAL LEVEL SUPPORT In 1995, China launched a Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) in assistance from UNDP and the World 9 Bank. A major target of the BAP for China is to establish an overall biodiversity conservation programme in the nation to conserve natural resources, endangered species and creating a climate for sustainable development. BAP will be used to the fullest extent possible to guide the proposal writing, with adjustments for any recent changes. In addition, China's approach to fulfilling its UNCED Agenda 21 obligations with respect to coastal resource management has been clearly spelled out in the Chinese government's 1996 publication, "China Ocean Agenda 21." BMCACSS has been developed to also closely match the objectives of sustainable development, biodiversity conservation, marine environmental protection and ICM as given in Ocean Agenda 21. Support for ICM has never been higher in China as people at all levels of government and in NGOs and academic institutions have recognized the urgent need for the ICM process to begin immediately to stem the tide of biodiversity loss. The timing of this project is excellent. In 1997, China's top leaders, such as President Jiang Zemin and Premier Li Peng, made clear public statements about the need for rational utilization of resources and environmental protection. China is also taking many initiatives to increase inter-departmental coordination. This is notably true for coastal zone management. In addition, several southern provinces, including Guangdong, Guangxi and Hainan, have recently established new departments to plan and manage coastal resources. These recent developments strongly increase the chances of this project's success. It should be noted that previous efforts have been constrained due to the lack of capacity to implement a full participatory approach. China’s commitment to participation in this project is a key to its success. The Government of China is contributing to the costs of the PDF-B, and a significant level of co-financing in expected for the full project. MAINSTREAMING INTO IA COUNTRY PROGRAMME Based on extensive consultation with government and other donors, UNDP/PRC identified support to ICZM as one of its major thrusts in the environmental area. This has resulted in the UNDP project providing technical support to the development and application of ICZM concepts in China that has been referred to elsewhere in this proposal. Through this project and other activities, UNDP is thus contributing associated financing to the full project in assisting the government to attain the sustainable development baseline. UNDP is also assisting the GoC in conserving coastal and marine biodiversity through related GEF-funded projects such as the East Asia Seas project and the Yellow Sea Large Marine Ecosystem project (under PDF-B implementation). JUSTIFICATION FOR PDF GRANT The prospects for success of the full project rest to a large extent upon a PDF investment in project design. Significant resources are needed to establish the co-operation and co-ordination mechanisms needed to ensure successful conservation outcomes and to secure the commitment of local government authorities and local communities to the project’s goals. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS PDF activities would be implemented over a period of 12 months commencing in January 2000. Subject to approval of the Project brief, Terms of Reference for subcontractors, consultants and 10 technical work would be finalised and a detailed Work Plan prepared. The project is expected to be executed by UN Office for Project Services (UNOPS). SOA will be responsible for national implementation and for inter-ministerial and local coordination. UNDP-China will assume responsibility for project monitoring and maintaining lines of communication with UNDP-GEF, SOA, and others as needed. Given that HKUST has given previous support to project formulation over several years, and is continuing to provide certain co-financing for specified items to the project, HKUST will serve as a subcontractor for related scientific and technical matters on this project, the details of which will be specified during formulation of the project work plan and TOR. SOA and UNDP will be responsible for selecting project sites. After the sites are determined, an Advisory Group will be established to provide guidance on full project design, in line with national/local policies, plans and conservation strategies and with GEF eligibility criteria. The Advisory Group will be chaired by SOA, with representatives from UNDP, local sites and technical support agencies, such as HKUST, etc. ITEMS TO BE FINANCED The total project cost is US$ 435,250, broken down as follows: GEF1 Activity and budget ( US$) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Site selection Stakeholder consultations Social feasibility study Participation plan Identification of training requirements Biological and socio-economic assessments Threats analysis Design of monitoring system and database Formulation of full project brief Total 25,000 85,000 17,000 16,000 17,000 76,000 17,000 5,000 62,000 320,000 GoC financing: Manpower (staff salary): Travel costs: Facility costs: Equipment costs: Other supplies costs: Total: $ 25,000 $ 45,000 $ 15,000 $ 10,000 $ 7,000 $102,000 HKUST co-financing for Block B phase Manpower (senior staff salary) 1 $ 2,600 All figures include 8% OPS support costs. Total OPS Support costs are $24,000 11 Travel Costs (for senior staff) Design of Monitoring System and Data Base Biological and Socio-Economic Assessment Identification of Training Requirements Total $ 2,000 $ 4,000 $ 2,600 $ 2,050 $13,250 SPECIAL FEATURES This project will adopt a full participatory approach both for the design of the project during PDF/B phase and also during the implementation of the full project. This will ensure that the biodiversity conservation strategies formulated reflect the local needs and the implementation of the strategies could be sustained. Given this full participatory approach is at an early stage of practice in China, it could be a useful demonstration to other areas for future adoption in the biodviversity conservation initiatives during the development process. Experience and lessons learned at the sites could also be analyzed to help further implementation of this approach meet specific conditions in China. Workplan Activity Steering Committee meetings Site selection Desk Data Review Initial stakeholder consultations Biological and socio-economic surveys Database and GIS design Second round of stakeholder consultations ICA Donor support for co-financing Project brief finalized and endorsed 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 References ADB 1995. Biodiversity Conservation in the Asia Pacific Region. Proceed. Regional Conference 66-8 June 1994. Asian Development Bank, Manila and The World Conservation Union, Gland. 508 pp. CHUA, T.E. and SCURA, L.F. 1992. Integrative Framework and Methods for Coastal Area Management. International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management, Manila, Philippines. 169 pp. HODGSON, G. 1991. An alternative to paper parks. pp. 158-165 In: S.K. Yap and S.W. Lee (eds) In Harmony with Nature. Proc. International Conference on Conservation of Tropical Biodiversity 12-16 June 1990. Malayan Nature Society. 656 pp. HODGSON, G. 1996. Prospects for Marine Conservation in Hong Kong and Southern China. Paper presented at the First International Symposium on Marine Conservation, Hong 12 Kong, 26-27 October 1996. HODGSON, G. and E.P.M. YAU. in press. Physical and biological controls of coral communities in Hong Kong. H.A. Lessios (ed) Proc. 8th Intl. Coral Reef Symposium, June 24-29, 1996, Panama City, Panama. KENCHINGTON, R. A. 1990. Managing Marine Environments. Taylor and Francis, New York. 246 pp. NORSE, E.A. 1993. Global Marine Biodiversity. A strategy for building conservation into decision making. Island Press, Washington, D.C. USA 383 pp. UNEP 1995. Global Programme of Action for the Protection of the Marine Environment from Land-Based Activities. UNEP (OCA)/LBA/IG.2/7 13 Annex 1. List of abbreviations used in the text ADB BAP BMCACSS CCAR GIS GoC HKUST ICLARM ICZM IESD IMO NEPA NSFC PRC PREPP RMB SAR SOA Asian Development Bank Biodiversity Action Plan Biodiversity Management in the Coastal Area of the China South Sea Center for Coastal and Atmospheric Research Geographic Information System Government of China Hong Kong University of Science and Technology International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management Integrated Coastal Zone Management Institute for Environment and Sustainable Development International Maritime Organization National Environment Protection Agency Natural Science Foundation of China People’s Republic of China Pearl River Estuary Pollution Project Renmimbi (National currency) Special Administrative Region State Oceanic Administration 14 Annex 2. Candidate Sites Site Name Area 1 Marine Nature Reserve at Nanzhi Islands, Zhejiang Province 20 km2 2 Jiulong Jiang Estuary, Zhangzhou, Fujian Province 150 km2 Brief description of biodiversity Threats Characteristics of this site National marine reserve with highest biodiversity Most pristine marine habitat in China 403 species of molluscs and 174 species of seaweed, each making up >20% of total species in China, respectively Isolated islands, about 56 km away from shoreline of mainland Characteristics of this site On the south bank of Jiulong Jiang Estuary (largest estuary in this province), opposite to a demo site of ICZM project in Xaimen The northern bounder of mangrove distribution in China Major habitat for Chinese dolphin, white egrets, Branchiostoma belcheri, and marine chordats that are under protection Development of mariculture system nearby Poor management scheme Potential threats industralization Zhangzhou city Rapid development mariculture Over harvesting of economically important species Sewage discharge of local communities Major protected (#), endemic and endangered species (*) Sousa chinensis* Egretta alba modestus# Etgretta g, garzetta# Egretta i. intermedia# Branchiostoma belcheri# Balanoglossus carnosus# 3 Dong-shan-Nanao, Fujiang province 60 km2 Characteristics of this site Northern boundary of coral distribution in China Very rich in species diversity One of major breeding ground of several endemic species of fishes Nesting ground of marine birds and wading ground of migratory birds Major protected (#), endemic and endangered species (*) Sousa chinensis* 15 Limited management Incompetent management staff Limited public awareness of biodiversity protection Fishing activities Potential development of mariculture system Pollutant discharge from river from of of 4 Daya Bay, Guangdong province 35 km2 Tachypleus tridentatus# Platalea leucorodia Linnaeus# Egretta i. intermedia# Egretta alba# Amusium japonicum formosum Pinctada chemnitzi Characteristics of this site Semi-closed bay area One of the field stations for Chinese eco-net, with history records on ecosystem changes Breeding and nursing ground of many marine fishes, sea urchins, pearl oysters Very rich in biodiversity and biomass of economically important species Wintering ground for some migratory birds Over 800 marine species reported from this bay Rapid development prawn culture industry of Sedimentation due evacuation of soil construction purpose to for Untreated sewage discharge of local residents Uncontrolled collection and catching of economically important species Rapid increase population along coastal zone Rapid urbanization Sedimentation due to land reclaimation Defrestration due to high demand of land for urban development Discharge of demonstic and Major protected (#), endemic, and endangered species (*) Tachypleus tridentatus* Pinctada martensi Pinna sp. To be completed in future 5 Inner Deep Bay including Futian Natural Reserve in Shenzheng, Guangdong Province and Mai Po RAMAS site in Hong Kong SAR 405 km 2 Characteristics of this site Innner deep bay having Futian Natural reserve on its north shore and Mai Po RAMAS site on its south shore While Mai Po in Hong Kong is under careful management, both sites are under threats of rapid urbanization and industrilization of Shenzheng city Both sites are the wintering and wading ground for many migratory birds including several endangered bird species such as Black-faced spoonbill Platalea minor. Over 25% of existing population of this species relies on inner Bay as wintering ground >100 species of birds found in Deep Bay and highest bird 16 in the count in the deep bay is >20,000 Highest public awareness Highest funding support from local & regional government on environmental protection and resource management Highest economical and population growth industrial sewage Major protected (#), endemic, and endangered species (*) Sousa chinensis Osbeck* Platalea minor* Egretta alba modestus# Egretta g garzetta# Butorides striatus connectens# Numernius arguata Limosa lapponica Tringa nebularia Calidris ruficollis Pluvialis squatarola Arenaria interpres Recurvirostra avosetta Grandidierella sp. nov. Kamaka sp. nov. Melita sp. nov. Victoriopisa sp. nov. Talorchestia sp. nov. Discapseudes sp. nov. Dometorina rostrata Luxton 1993 Limnodrilodies biforis Erseus 1990 Limnodriloides fraternus Erseus 1990 Rhizodrilus russus Erseus 1990 Pseudopythina maipoensis Morton & Scott 1989 Procephalothrix orientalis Gibson 1990 6 Sanko Mangrove reserve, Hopou, Gaungxi 80 km2 Characteristics of this site Very rich mangrove habitat housing 82 species of fish, 106 species of birds, 61 species of shrimps and crabs, >90 species of molluscs, 258 species of insects, > 120 species 17 Pouching Illegal cutting of mangrove trees Poor management of plankton, 13 species of mangrove trees Major site for Peral oyster farming in China Only habitat for sea cow and sea turtles in China framework Reclamation for onshore farming system Mariculture farming Major protected (#), endemic and endangered species(*) Dugong dugon Muller* Chelonia mydas Eretmochelys im#bricata# Dermochelys coriacea# Pteria martensii# Tachypleus gigas Tachypleus sp. Carcinoscopius rotundicauda*# 7 Dongzhai, Haikou, Hainan Province 34 km2 Characteristics of this site 93 species of mangrove shrimps and fishes 4 species of snakes 4 species of mammals many species of birds many species of invertebrates largest mangrove reserve in the country Endemic and endangered species all the species in this reserve under protection 8 DaZhou Island, Wanning, Hainan Province 70 km 2 Characteristics of this site Only existing nesting ground of Collocalia fuciphaga in China, only one nest was found in 1990 due to over exploitation of nests (famous healthy food and Chinese medicine in China) Eight endemic and endangered species of tropic and subtropics plants on islands Local fishing ground 18 Illegal Defrestration mangrove trees Pollution due to untreated sewage discharge by local communities near the reserve Insufficient management Poor strategies Over exploitation of bird nests and endemic trees Overfishing Potential development of fish farming industry Discharge of untreated sewage from local residents of management Pouching Dynamite fishing Characteristics of this sites First and the only national coral reef reserve of China Northern boundary of large coral reef distribution in the world Sole tropic site being designated as national marine reserve Very rich fauna: including >100 coral and > fish species as well as > 500 invertebrates Sufficient desire of local government and local communities for better conservation Remaining coverage of coral reef at the sites dropped from 100% to 30-40% from 1970’s -1990’s Major protected, endemic and endangered species Ptychodera flava Glossobalanus morteenseni Pinctada maxima Pictada margaritifera Pinctata nigra Pteria chinensis Pteria brevialata Pteria penguin Haliotis ovina Haliotis asinina All coral reef species Refuse and sewage from rapidly-developed tour industry along shore line Dynamite fishing Pollutants from Sanya city Pouching illegal fishing practice Exploration and evacuation of coral reef for construction materials Insufficient management Major endemic and endangered species(*) Collocalia fuciphaga* Ximenia americana L.* Croton laui Merr. Et Meto* Scolopia hainanensis Sleum* Scolopia henryi Sleum* Four other plant species * 9 Sanya National Coral reef Reserve 30 km 2 19 20 21