STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO NO. 32-33-34, SECTOR 17-C, CHANDIGARH
Visit us @ www.infocommpunjab.com
Jiwan Garg,
Sh. Om Parkash Garg,
# B-1/473-A,
Old Bombay Palace,
Jakhal Road, Sunam,
Distt – Sangrur 148028
…Appellant
Versus
1.
Public Information Officer
O/o District & Sessions Judge,
Sangrur.
2.
First Appellate Authority,
O/o District & Sessions Judge,
Sangrur.
…Respondents
AC- 416/2012
ORDER
Present :
Mr. Jiwan Garg, appellant, in person.
Mr. Dharam Pal, PIO, for the Respondents.
----The Respondent seeks adjournment to file the reply. Also
Respondent points out that information relating to Point No.1 to Point No. 8 of
Part 1 of the RTI application is with the Punjab and Haryana High Court and
accordingly the RTI application
to that extent
is to be transferred to the
concerned PIO of Punjab and Haryana High Court. The PIO is directed to
transfer it
at the earliest under intimation to the applicant and also to the
Commission.
Also, the appellant
urged that
he be provided
copies of the
documents which he was permitted to inspect by the PIO.
The Respondent is directed to provide the same within a week,
free of cost, to the appellant.
With these directions, the case is adjourned to 04.09.2012 at
10.30 A.M.
Announced in the open court.
Copies of the order be sent to the parties.
Place : Chandigarh.
Dated: 25.07.2012.
Sd/(Surinder Awasthi)
State Information Commissioner.
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO NO. 32-33-34, SECTOR 17-C, CHANDIGARH
Visit us @ www.infocommpunjab.com
Balbir Aggarwal,
10904, Basant Road,
Industrial Area B,
Near Gurdwara,
Ludhiana – 141003.
…Appellant
Versus
1.
Public Information Officer
O/o Principal Secretary,
Local Govt. Punjab, Chandigarh.
2.
Public Information Officer
O/o Principal Secretary,
Local Govt. Punjab, Chandigarh.
…Respondents
AC- 394/2012
ORDER
Present :
Mr. Balbir Aggarwal, Appellant, in person.
Mr. Gurcharan Singh, Steno-typist, for the respondents.
---The Respondent submits that the RTI application of the
information-seeker has been transferred to the Financial Commissioner
Revenue, Punjab, vide letter dated 6.06.2012.
This case is clubbed with AC No.391 of 2012 and AC No.393 of
2012 as the other similar RTI applications have been transferred to the same
public authority who had transferred the same to the PIO o/o Deputy
Commissioner, Ludhiana. The PIO o/o Deputy Commissioner, Ludhiana is
arrayed as Respondent party in this case.
Therefore, the case is adjourned to 06.08.2012 at 10.30 A.M. to
be heard via Video Conference Facility available at NIC in the office of
Deputy Commissioner, Ludhiana.
Announced in the open court.
Copies of the order be sent to the parties.
Sd/Place : Chandigarh.
(Surinder Awasthi)
Dated: 25.07.2012.
State Information Commissioner.
Cc:
1.
Public Information Officer,
o/o Financial Commissioner, Revenue, Punjab,
Chandigarh.
2.
Public Information Officer,
o/o Deputy Commissioner, Ludhiana.
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO NO. 32-33-34, SECTOR 17-C, CHANDIGARH
Visit us @ www.infocommpunjab.com
Balbir Aggarwal,
10904, Basant Road,
Industrial Area B,
Near Gurdwara,
Ludhiana – 141003.
…Appellant
Versus
1.
Public Information Officer
O/o Director Local Govt., Pb.,
SCO 131-32, Sector-17C,
Chandigarh.
2.
Public Information Officer
O/o Director Local Govt., Pb.,
SCO 131-32, Sector-17C,
Chandigarh.
…Respondents
AC- 391/2012 and AC-393/2012
ORDER
Present :
Mr. Balbir Aggarwal, appellant, in person.
Mr. Atul Sharma, PIO and Mr. Mukesh Garg, V.O., for the
Respondents.
---The Respondent-PIO, vide letter dated 16.07.2012, submits that
the RTI applications in both these cases have been transferred vide letter No.
39-44, dated 11.01.2012 to the Financial Commissioner, Revenue, Punjab and
Principal Secretary Health and Family Welfare, Punjab, to provide information
directly to the Appellant. Also Financial Commissioner, Revenue (FCR) had
transferred the applications to the Deputy Commissioner, Ludhiana. The letter is
taken on record. Now since the applications stand transferred to the Deputy
Commissioner, Ludhiana, PIO o/o Deputy Commissioner, Ludhiana is impleaded
as Respondent party and is directed to furnish the requisite information within a
week to the appellant under intimation to the Commission.
As such, these two appeal cases are clubbed together and will be
heard on 06.08.2012 at 10.30 A.M. via Video Conference Facility available
at NIC in the office of Deputy Commissioner, Ludhiana.
Announced in the open court.
Copies of the order be sent to the parties.
Place : Chandigarh.
Dated: 25.07.2012.
Sd/(Surinder Awasthi)
State Information Commissioner.
-2Cc:
1.
Public Information Officer,
o/o Financial Commissioner, Revenue, Punjab,
Chandigarh.
2.
Public Information Officer,
o/o Deputy Commissioner, Ludhiana.
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO NO. 32-33-34, SECTOR 17-C, CHANDIGARH
Visit us @ www.infocommpunjab.com
Narpinder Singh
s/o Sh. Jagir Singh,
VPO Chuharchak,
Tehsil & Distt. Moga.
…Appellant
Versus
1.
Public Information Officer
O/o Deputy Commissioner,
Moga.
2.
First Appellate Authority,
O/o Commissioner,
Ferozepur Division,
Ferozepur.
…Respondents
AC- 754/2012
ORDER
Present :
Mr. Narpinder Singh, appellant, in person.
None for the Respondents.
----The Respondent is absent today without intimation.
In the last hearing when appellant was absent and had sought
adjournment,
the Respondent had claimed that the information has been
supplied to the appellant.
Today, the appellant concedes that he has received the
information fully. However, he asserted that no action has been taken to remove
the encroachments. The Commission cannot give any directions to this effect.
Since the information stands provided, the case is disposed of
and closed.
Announced in the open court.
Copies of the order be sent to the parties.
Place : Chandigarh.
Dated: 25.07.2012.
Sd/(Surinder Awasthi)
State Information Commissioner.
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO NO. 32-33-34, SECTOR 17-C, CHANDIGARH
Visit us @ www.infocommpunjab.com
Tarsem Lal,
S/o Sh. Kashmiri Lal,
Basti Tanka Wali,
Street No -17,
House no -83,
Chowk Ladu Mal Wala,
Gora Dairy,
Ferozepur Cantt.
…Appellant
Versus
1.
Public Information Officer,
O/o Deputy Commissioner,
Ferozepur.
2.
Public Information Officer,
O/o Deputy Commissioner,
Ferozepur.
…Respondents
AC- 488/2012
ORDER
Present :
None for the appellant.
None for the Respondents.
---The Respondent-PIO-cum- Additional Deputy Commissioner has,
vide letter No.PIC/12/202, dated 24.07.2012, intimated that in compliance with
the order of the State
Commission, dated
05.07.2012, payment of
compensation amounting to Rs.4000/- (Rupees Four thousand only) has been
made to the appellant through Bank Draft No.338645, dated 24.07.2012 and
has annexed a photo copy of the receipt, dated 24.7.2012, obtained from the
appellant. This is taken on record.
Since the information stands provided, the case is disposed of
and closed.
Announced in the open court.
Copies of the order be sent to the parties.
Place : Chandigarh.
Dated: 25.07.2012.
Sd/(Surinder Awasthi)
State Information Commissioner.
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO NO. 32-33-34, SECTOR 17-C, CHANDIGARH
Visit us @ www.infocommpunjab.com
Navneet Kumar,
S/o Sh. Baldev Raj,
C/o Bittu General Store,
Vill- Babowal,
Jail Road,
PO & Distt – Gurdaspur -143521
1.
…Appellant
Versus
Public Information Officer,
O/o District Education Officer (SE),
Moga.
2.
Public Information Officer,
o/o Director Public Instruction (SE),Punjab,
Sector 17-D, Chandigarh.
3.
First Appellate Authority,
o/o District Education Officer (SE),
Moga.
Present :
…Respondents
AC No. 111/2012
ORDER
None for the appellant.
None for the Respondents.
---Despite
clear and specific
issued vide order dated 29.06.2012,
directions to the PIO o/o DPI(SE)
none has appeared
today.
One last
opportunity is given to the PIO-Respondent to supply the requisite information to
the appellant and comply with the order dated 29.06.2012.
The case is adjourned to 08.08.2012 at 10.30 A.M.
Announced in the open court.
Copies of the order be sent to the parties.
Place : Chandigarh.
Dated: 25.07.2012.
Sd/(Surinder Awasthi)
State Information Commissioner.
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO NO. 32-33-34, SECTOR 17-C, CHANDIGARH
Visit us @ www.infocommpunjab.com
Navneet Kumar,
S/o Sh. Baldev Raj,
C/o Bittu General Store,
Village- Babowal,
Jail Road,
Tehsil & Distt – Gurdaspur.
1.
----Appellant
Versus
Public Information Officer
O/o District Education Officer (SE),
Moga.
2.
Public Information Officer,
o/o Director Public Instruction (SE),Punjab,
Sector 17-D, Chandigarh.
3.
First Appellate Authority,
O/o District Education Officer (SE),
Moga.
…Respondents
AC- 158/2012
ORDER
Present :
None for the appellant.
None for the Respondents.
----Despite
clear and specific
issued vide order dated 29.06.2012,
directions to the PIO o/o DPI(SE)
none has appeared
today.
One last
opportunity is given to the PIO-Respondent to supply the requisite information to
the appellant and comply with the order dated 29.06.2012.
The case is adjourned to 08.08.2012 at 10.30 A.M.
Announced in the open court.
Copies of the order be sent to the parties.
Place : Chandigarh.
Dated: 25.07.2012.
Sd/(Surinder Awasthi)
State Information Commissioner.
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION PUNJAB
SCO NO. 32-33-34, SECTOR 17-C, CHANDIGARH
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
Sh. Balraj Kumar Sharma,
# 20 A,
Street no. 4,
Dashmesh Nagar – A,
Tripuri Patiala, Pb.
…..Appellant
Vs
1.
Public Information Officer,
O/o Deputy Commissioner Patiala
2.
Public Information Officer,
District Development and
Panchayat Officer,
Patiala.
3.
First Appellate Authority,
O/o Deputy Commissioner Patiala
…..Respondents
AC- 455/2012
ORDER
Present:
None for the appellant.
Mr. Harkeet Singh, BDPO, on behalf of the respondent.
The appellant is absent without intimation to the Commission. In
compliance to the earlier order dated 03.07.2012, the representative of the
respondent no. 2 submitted that the requisite information i.e. action taken report
on appellant’s complaint dated 16.08.2011 has been furnished to the appellant. A
copy of the same is submitted during the hearing alongwith a forwarding letter
which is taken on record.
Since the information stands supplied, the case is disposed of and
closed.
Announced in the open court.
Copies of the order be sent to the parties.
Place : Chandigarh.
Dated: 25.07.2012.
Sd/(Surinder Awasthi)
State Information Commissioner.
Contd…2/-
-2P.S.
After the order has been dictated in the open court, the appellant,
Mr. Balraj Kumar Sharma, appeared in person. He was read out the order. The
case stands disposed of and closed.
Place : Chandigarh.
Dated: 25.07.2012.
Sd/(Surinder Awasthi)
State Information Commissioner.
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO NO. 32-33-34, SECTOR 17-C, CHANDIGARH
Visit us @ www.infocommpunjab.com
Sh. Kewal Krishan
S/o Sh. Rattan Lal
C/o Sh. Sher Singh Paprala, Advocate,
Shed / Booth No. 24, District Courts,
Patiala.
Versus
Public Information Officer
O/o Senior Supdt. of Police,
Patiala
…Complainant
… Respondent
CC- 1657/2012
ORDER
RTI application filed
:
24.04.2012
PIO’s response
:
Nil
Complaint received in
SIC
:
18.06.2012
Ground for complaint
:
No response, denial of information
Information sought:A case FIR No 12 dated Jan.11/2012 u/s 406,420,465,468,471 120B IPC
was registered in PS Sadar ,Patiala regarding selling of Tralla bearing regd. No
PB 11 AD 9950 on the basis of forged documents and regarding fraud etc. NOC
was sent to Ajmer (Rajasthan ) regarding the said vehicle and at present the said
vehicle is being used in Ajmer (Rajasthan) .
The complainant seeks an attested copy of the said letter sent by the
SSP. If such a letter has not been sent, the reasons thereof.
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing :
Present:
Mr. Kewal Krishan, complainant in person.
Mr. Sukhdev Singh, HC & Mr. Hakam Singh, HC on behalf of the
respondent.
Contd…2/-
-2The respondent submits a letter bearing no. 1089-93 dated
09.07.2012 stating that the requisite information which was sought by the
complainant has been provided to the satisfaction of the complainant. A copy of
the same is taken on record.
Mr. Kewel Krishan, the complainant present states that he has
received the requisite information as per his RTI application.
Decision:
Since the information stands provided, the case is disposed of
and closed.
Announced in the open court.
Copies of order be sent to the parties.
Place : Chandigarh.
Dated: 25.07.2012.
(Surinder Awasthi)
State Information Commissioner.
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO NO. 32-33-34, SECTOR 17-C, CHANDIGARH
Visit us @ www.infocommpunjab.com
Sh. Jasbir Singh
Village Bolapur,
Jhabewal,
P.O. Ramgarh,
Distt. Ludhiana.
…Complainant
Versus
Public Information Officer
O/o Senior Supdt. of Police,
Fatehgarh Sahib
… Respondent
CC- 1659/2012
ORDER
RTI application filed
:
30.04.2012
PIO’s response
:
Nil
Complaint received in
SIC
:
19.06.2012
Ground for complaint
:
Denial of Information as there was no
response from the PIO till date.
Information sought:Seeks details of road accidents in the district since Jan 2011 and their
details. Also, information on the number of deaths and the names and addresses
of the deceased.
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing :
Present:
Mr. Jasbir Singh, complainant, in person.
Mr. Ranjit Singh,ASI on behalf of the respondent.
The respondent submits he has supplied the requisite information
to the complainant. The complainant also confirms that he has received the
requisite information to his satisfaction and requests to close the case.
Decision:
Contd…2/-
-2Since the information stands provided, the case is disposed of
and closed.
Announced in the open court.
Copies of order be sent to the parties.
Place : Chandigarh.
Dated: 25.07.2012.
Sd/(Surinder Awasthi)
State Information Commissioner.
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO NO. 32-33-34, SECTOR 17-C, CHANDIGARH
Visit us @ www.infocommpunjab.com
Sh. Sohan Lal
s/o Sh. Ram Rattan,
House No. 191, Bank Street,
Nai Abadi,
Nabha (Distt. Patiala)
…Complainant
Versus
Public Information Officer
O/o Deputy Supdt. of Police,
Nabha.
… Respondent
CC- 1679/2012
ORDER
RTI application filed
:
25.04.2012
PIO’s response
:
No response
Complaint received in
SIC
:
19.06.2012
Ground for complaint
:
Denial of information despite numerous
reminders and representation.
Information sought:The complainant has sought information from the DSP, Nabha on July
5/2011 regarding his will but it had not been furnished. So, the complainant filed
an application under RTI to SSP, Patiala to know the status of his complaint.
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing :
Preset:
Mr. Sohan Lal, complainant in person.
Mr. Gurinder Singh Bal, SHO, O/o Kotwali Nabha and Mr. Hakam
Singh, HC, O/o RTI Branch, SSP Patiala.
The respondent states that he has supplied the information through
registered post on 26.05.2012. The complainant insists that he has not received
requisite mail. The respondent submits a copy of the requisite information again
during the hearing.
Contd…2/-
-2The complainant states he needs time to peruse the same which is
granted. Complainant is advised to peruse the information and point out
deficiencies, if any, within three days. A copy of the same is to be provided
to the commission.
Also, the respondent is directed to remove the deficiencies before
the next date of hearing.
Decision:
The case is adjourned to 07.08.2012 at 10.30 AM.
Announced in the open court.
Copies of order be sent to the parties.
Place : Chandigarh.
Dated: 25.07.2012.
(Surinder Awasthi)
State Information Commissioner.
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO NO. 32-33-34, SECTOR 17-C, CHANDIGARH
Visit us @ www.infocommpunjab.com
Sh. Naresh Dilawar,
H. No. 3440, Sector 35-D,
Chandigarh.
…Complainant
Versus
Public Information Officer
O/o Senior Supdt. of Police,
Mohali.
… Respondent
CC- 1683/2012
ORDER
RTI application filed
:
14.05.2012
PIO’s response
:
Nil
Complaint received in
SIC
:
18.06.2012
Ground for complaint
:
Denial of information
Information sought:Seeks zimni orders (case-file) of the case diary of FIR No.127 dated
Sept.17/2008 u/s 420/34IPC later on added section 465/467/468/471 IPC PS
Dera Bassi on the complaint of Kewal Garg. Also, the complainant seeks attested
copy of the statement of Kewal Garg made on September recorded during
investigation.
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:Present:
Mr. Naresh Dilawar, complainant, in person.
Mr. Darshan Singh, ASI and Mr. Darshan Singh on behalf of the
respondent.
The complainant states that he has not received the information till
date.
The respondent requests for an adjournment to provide the
requisite information, which is granted.
Contd…2/-
-2Decision: The case is adjourned to 30.07.2012 at 10.30 AM.
Announced in the open court.
Copies of order be sent to the parties.
Place : Chandigarh.
Dated: 25.07.2012.
(Surinder Awasthi)
State Information Commissioner.
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO NO. 32-33-34, SECTOR 17-C, CHANDIGARH
Visit us @ www.infocommpunjab.com
Sh. Kala Singh
s/o Sh. Darbara Singh,
VPO Kadiala,
Tehsil Sunam,
Distt. Sangrur.
…Complainant
Versus
Public Information Officer
O/o Senior Supdt. of Police,
Sangrur.
… Respondent
CC- 1684/2012
ORDER
RTI application filed
:
22.05.2012
PIO’s response
:
31.05.2012
Complaint received in
SIC
:
20.06.2012
Ground for complaint
:
incomplete information provided.
Information sought
:
Seeks information related to one Karnail
Singh, HC No 1375 at Sangrur police
Station.
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing :
Present:
None for the complainant.
Mr. Malkit Singh, S.I. on behalf of the complainant.
The complainant is absent without intimation to the Commission.
The respondent states that he has provided the requisite information to the
complainant and mainitained that the remaining information is personal, which
cannot be provided.
Decision:
Since the information stands provided, the case is disposed of
and closed.
Contd…2/-
Announced in the open court.
Copies of order be sent to the parties.
Place : Chandigarh.
Dated: 25.07.2012.
(Surinder Awasthi)
State Information Commissioner.
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO NO. 32-33-34, SECTOR 17-C, CHANDIGARH
Visit us @ www.infocommpunjab.com
Sh. Babar Khan
s/o Sh. Kaka Khan,
House No. 6-C, Officers Colony,
Near Shiv School,
Ropar.
…Complainant
Versus
Public Information Officer
O/o Senior Supdt. of Police,
Patiala
… Respondent
CC- 1672/2012
ORDER
RTI application filed
:
20.04.2012
PIO’s response
:
Nil
Complaint received in
SIC
:
19.06.2012
Ground for complaint
:
No response from PIO which deems to
have denied information.
Information sought:Seeks action taken report on his own complaint dated August 12/2005
against Naib Tehsildar Rajbinder Singh Dhanoa . Grade II, who had alleged to
have passed a decree in favour of one Gurmail Singh r/o village Rosal.
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing :
Present:
None for the complainant.
Mr. Hakam Singh, HC on behalf of the respondent.
Respondent submits that the record related with requisite
information has been destroyed as per the SSP instructions. He submits a letter
dated 24.07.2012 to this effect a copy of which has already been given to the
complainant. Since the record related to the requisite information has been
destroyed, the information can’t be supplied to the information seeker.
Contd…2/-
-2Decision:
In light of the above observation, the case is disposed of and
closed.
Announced in the open court.
Copies of order be sent to the parties.
Place : Chandigarh.
Dated: 25.07.2012.
(Surinder Awasthi)
State Information Commissioner.