Peer Assisted Learning Resource Pack A guide for Practice Educators London Cluster Placements Team January 2012 0 Welcome to the London Cluster Peer Assisted Learning Resource Pack This resource pack has been developed by the London Cluster Placements Team to support Practice Educators to incorporate peer assisted learning activities into clinical placements offered to dietetic students. It is anticipated that Practice Educators will select the most relevant activities to support the stage of the student’s placement, the student’s key areas for skill development and the resources available in their clinical setting. It is also anticipated that activities will be adapted to meet specific student or service requirements. If you are accessing this pack electronically, you can navigate to a specific section from the contents page by hovering over the page number with your mouse, pressing Ctrl and then pressing the left click on your mouse. If you have any queries about the resources in this pack, please contact a member of the London Cluster Placements Team on either: dietetics@londonmet.ac.uk or dietetics@kcl.ac.uk 1 Contents Contents ............................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Introduction to Peer Assisted learning (PAL) ....................................................... 4 1.2. Using PAL for dietetic placements learning activities .......................................... 4 1.3. Essential components to a successful PAL activity ............................................. 5 1.3.1. Planning.............................................................................................................. 5 1.3.2. Facilitated debrief sessions ................................................................................. 6 1.3.3. Feedback ............................................................................................................ 7 Peer feedback ................................................................................................................... 7 Supervisor feedback ......................................................................................................... 7 1.3.4. Using PAL activities as evidence towards assessment ....................................... 8 1.4. Frequently asked questions ................................................................................ 8 1.4.1. Supporting students who are not getting on with each other ............................... 8 1.4.2. Supporting students who are progressing at different rates................................. 9 2. Induction......................................................................................................................... 10 2.1. Expectations and Orientation ............................................................................ 10 2.2. Policies and procedures .................................................................................... 11 2.3. Role of the Dietitian/ Dietetic Assistant.............................................................. 11 2.4. Meal Production Activity .................................................................................... 12 2.5. Meal Service Activity ......................................................................................... 13 2.6. Ward Orientation............................................................................................... 13 2.7. Dietetic Shadowing ........................................................................................... 15 2.8. Doctor and Nurse Observation activity .............................................................. 17 3. Assessment - Anthropometry ......................................................................................... 18 3.1. Commonly used anthropometric variables ........................................................ 19 3.2. Estimating anthropometric measurements ........................................................ 19 3.3. Choosing appropriate anthropometric variables to use ..................................... 20 3.4. Gathering anthropometric data ......................................................................... 20 4. Assessment - Biochemistry ............................................................................................ 21 4.1. Identifying relevant biochemical parameters ..................................................... 22 4.2. Identifying abnormal biochemistry ..................................................................... 22 4.3. Biochemistry and dietetic interventions ............................................................. 23 4.4. Assessing biochemistry .................................................................................... 23 2 5. Assessment - Clinical ..................................................................................................... 24 5.1 Medical notes familiarisation activity – part 1 of 2 ............................................. 24 5.2. Medical notes familiarisation activity – Part 2 of 2 ............................................. 25 5.3. Medication familiarisation activity ...................................................................... 26 5.4. Familiarisation with unfamiliar clinical conditions ............................................... 28 6. Assessment - Dietary ..................................................................................................... 29 6.1. Compilation of oral nutrition support and enteral feed ready reckoner ............... 29 6.2. Differing approaches to gathering dietary information ....................................... 29 6.3. Qualitative and quantitative assessments of dietary intake ............................... 30 6.4. Food record charts/food diaries ........................................................................ 30 7. Assessment - Environmental .......................................................................................... 32 7.1. Individuals ......................................................................................................... 32 7.2. Groups .............................................................................................................. 33 7.3. Populations ....................................................................................................... 33 8. Nutrition and dietetic diagnosis ....................................................................................... 34 8.1. Identifying nutritional priorities ........................................................................... 34 8.2. Identifying dietetic diagnosis statements ........................................................... 34 9. Intervention, planning and implementation ..................................................................... 35 9.1. Identifying dietetic management goals .............................................................. 35 9.2. Implementing dietetic management goals ......................................................... 36 9.2.1. Devising implementation plans ......................................................................... 36 9.2.2. Implementing the dietetic care process ............................................................. 36 10.Monitoring and evaluation .............................................................................................. 37 10.1. Identifying appropriate follow-up arrangements................................................. 37 10.2. Identifying appropriate outcome measures ....................................................... 37 10.3. Reviewing dietetic interventions ........................................................................ 38 3 1. Introduction 1.1. Introduction to Peer Assisted learning (PAL) Peer Assisted Learning has been defined by a number of different people: “To get knowledge through study, experience, observation or teaching of an equal” (Lincoln et al, 1993) “Peers helping each other to learn” (Crouch et al, 2001) “Individuals with equal status actively help and support each other in learning tasks” (Ladyshewsky 2006) The Oxford dictionary defines a peer as “an equal in civil standing or rank or equal in any respect” Ladyshewsky (2006) states that PAL is “a natural way of learning or completing tasks if the same task has been set for more than one person” and that it is a “way of pooling resources and reducing duplication of effort”. In essence PAL is a way of increasing knowledge and skills by working in partnership with someone else. There is a substantial amount of medical and allied health professional research in using PAL to enhance student learning (Cate & Durning 2007, Field et al 2007, Roberts et al 2009a & b) but little in the way of practical guidance. 1.2. Using PAL for dietetic placements learning activities Students are usually allocated to placements in even numbers so as they are able to work in pairs. PAL activities can be used to facilitate induction into a new clinical area and support the development of key skills in assessment, identifying nutrition and dietetic diagnoses, planning and implementing interventions and reviewing, monitoring and evaluating dietetic interventions. PAL activities can also support the development of key professional skills such as communication skills, team working and reflective practice skills. Sections 2 – 10 of this resource pack include suggestions for PAL activities to support skill development in a range of areas. 4 1.3. Essential components to a successful PAL activity 1.3.1. Planning Pairing students We suggest that you either pair students randomly or if appropriate take transport arrangements into account. If you are basing students at sites that are some distance from each other than it would make sense to pair students according to who lives nearest the site at which they will be based. If the students will be required to make frequent visits to community clinics then it may be sensible to pair drivers or car owners with non-drivers. It is not advisable to allow students to select their own pairings as there may be one person in the group that everyone would prefer not to work with. Randomly allocating partners avoids making this obvious. Although it can be useful to take learning styles into account when planning activities for students and might therefore seem sensible to put students with similar learning styles together, often students with complementary learning styles make good pairs. The activists’ tendency to jump in and have a go can be tempered by the reflector who might prefer to watch someone else before performing the activity themselves. The problem with this type of complementary pairing is that it can then be difficult to move the students beyond their comfort zone and encourage them to develop a more rounded learning style. It is important that the students are encouraged to be explicit with their peer about their individual learning style to support their effective peer working. Planning for activities It is essential to plan a PAL activity to ensure that the exercise meets its aims and objectives and facilitates a valuable learning experience. Core components of a PAL activity will include: An opportunity to brief the students in relation to the expectations of the activity Time for the students to complete the activity, including designated time for peer discussion and reflection Opportunity for a facilitated debrief with a supervisor and individualised feedback (see section 1.3.2 for further information) Sections 2 – 10 of this resource pack include a series of briefing sheets for Practice Educators for a range of PAL activities. These briefing sheets have been designed to support you in planning PAL activities and include details of the aims and objectives of the activity and the resources required for the students to successfully complete the activity. It is 5 envisaged that activities may need to be modified to suit individual learning environments and so this resource pack is meant to support practice educators to develop tailored PAL activities rather than be a definitive list of activities that can be used. 1.3.2. Facilitated debrief sessions Debrief sessions can take two formats, debriefs following individual PAL activities and student led facilitated group discussions. Debriefs following individual PAL activities It is important that students have the opportunity to debrief from a PAL activity to consolidate learning and identify specific learning needs. Debrief sessions should be arranged as part of the planning of a PAL activity and should happen as near to the activity as possible. It may be helpful to prepare specific questions to direct the debrief session or you may want to ask the students to lead the direction of the session. It is particularly important that all students have the opportunity to participate in the debrief session. Students should be encouraged to be prepared to speak about the entire activity and not just the section they complete to promote a more holistic learning experience. Student led facilitated group sessions Student led facilitated group sessions also provide an important opportunity for students to meet and share their learning experiences. If you are only working with two students, it may be most appropriate to timetable these sessions at times when they are working more independently of each other to facilitate ongoing peer support and shared learning. In cases where there are only two students attached to one placement site other members (e.g. Band 5 Dietitians) could also be encouraged to attend these sessions and present a case they have seen in order to facilitate a greater breadth and depth of learning. Although student led, a facilitator (usually a member of the placement team) should also be present to support the students get the most out of these sessions. Although the format of the sessions can vary, and should be directed by the students, it would be common for each student to prepare a case presentation of a patient that they have seen during the previous week. In the early stages of their training, students can present a case that they saw whilst shadowing a dietitian but as they progress they can report on cases in which they took a more active part in the consultation. Once a case has been presented the other members in the group are encouraged to ask questions, in early sessions the facilitator may need to lead the questioning but the students should actively participate and take on the leading of these group sessions. It may also be appropriate for 6 students to present a reflection on a learning experience during the previous week. Student participation in these sessions can also be recorded by the facilitating dietitian using the proforma “observation of student in tutorials” (Appendix 1). This sheet can be used as a basis for giving the student feedback, or used by the student as evidence of meeting learning outcomes in the portfolio. 1.3.3. Feedback Constructive feedback is crucial to student learning. When completing PAL activities, feedback is specifically important to ensure that each student is aware of their own progress and individual learning objectives. This helps to remove feelings of competition between paired students, and helps students to understand what they were expected to learn from a particular activity. Peer feedback Students on a PAL placement have the opportunity to learn from feedback given by their peer. The clinical observation form (Appendix 2) can be used by both practice educators and peers to provide structured feedback following a consultation. Peers may also find it helpful to use this form as a reminder of the skills they should be looking out for and of the things that it is useful to have feedback on. Peers may initially find it difficult to give constructive feedback, using the form provides a structured way of facilitating this. It is worth spending some time during the induction period to ensure that peers understand the importance of giving each other constructive feedback and feel comfortable doing this. If they are unable to give each other useful feedback then many of the learning opportunities will be lost. All of the students have also had opportunities to give each other feedback at University. Feedback should be given as near to the event that it refers to as possible as this is when it is most constructive and helpful. Supervisor feedback Although there are many benefits of peer feedback, supervisor feedback is vital to support skill development and the development of competence against the placement learning outcomes. Individualised feedback Individualised, supervisor feedback can be given as part of a debrief session but should also be based on episodes of direct observation of the students practice in a range of settings. Students should be observed completing tasks at a minimum frequency of 2 – 3 times/week. There may be more periods of direct observation at the start of the placement but it is important that the level of observation does not drop as the placement progresses as 7 feedback based on direct observation remains crucial throughout the placement to support the development of key skills. Daily feedback & reflection A half hour facilitated feedback session should also be timetabled into the programme at the end of every day, to encourage students to reflect on the days learning. This session can be done with both students as a pair. A record of this feedback can be kept in a student held log book to ensure that the content of this feedback and subsequent action plans are not forgotten about. Weekly review meeting A student led weekly review meeting should also be timetabled into each students programme. This session is designed to review the week’s progress and discuss objectives for the coming week. This session presents an opportunity to see students individually and can be used to hand over to a new supervisor if appropriate. 1.3.4. Using PAL activities as evidence towards assessment Collaborative pieces of work can be used as pieces of formative assessment to facilitate feedback and action planning however they should not be used towards an individual student’s summative assessment. However, individual pieces of work that have been collated to form a larger project (e.g. a clinical audit or a health promotion project) can be used as evidence. Documentation of reflective discussion and the facilitator-completed review of a student’s contribution towards a feedback session can also be used as evidence to support summative assessment. 1.4. Frequently asked questions 1.4.1. Supporting students who are not getting on with each other Students should behave in a professional manner just like everyone else in the department. We are not able to choose our work colleagues or members of the MDT, students should be reminded that they need to “get on” with everyone and form professional working relationships. It may be helpful to arrange a mediation process to allow each member of the pair to express their difficulties in a safe environment. Each student should have an equal time to speak and also a right to reply. It is also important that a practice educator is present to facilitate discussion between the students. Questions such as “What would you like to see happen?” “What would help you to work together?” and “Is there anything that you could do differently in future?” may be helpful. Often discussing issues openly rather than allowing things to fester can promote understanding between a pair and allow them to overcome their differences and work together more easily. 8 1.4.2. Supporting students who are progressing at different rates It is important to ensure that each student has equal time with the dietitian available to them. Each student should have his or her own supervisor to ensure that weekly feedback and goal setting is done individually. It is also important to avoid any comparison of students’ performance. Build confidence by asking questions that you know the less confident student can answer. It is important to stretch both students, individual team members may be able to provide opportunities for students individually. 9 2. Induction 2.1. Expectations and Orientation Aim: The aim of this activity is to ensure that students are aware of the basic arrangements for the functioning of the department and what is expected of them. Objectives: By the end of this activity, students should be able to: Identify key staff members Obtain refreshment and locate the toilets, Understand their programme and what is expected of them. Find key locations in the base building(s) Activity Cover the following induction information with both students: 1. Introduction to the department 2. Who’s who, who sits where, hours of work, breaks, refreshments, toilets, fire exits 3. Student programme 4. Expectations – give students half an hour in their peer pair to come up with their expectations of placement. Discuss with Practice Educator and talk through department’s expectations of the student. Both sign expectations agreement 5. Arrange security passes, computer log-ins etc. 6. Orientation activity – give the students a questionnaire that they can only find the answers to by visiting key locations in the Trust/ Building/ Area – send them to complete this together then debrief afterwards. Were there any surprises? Any places they couldn’t find? 10 2.2. Policies and procedures Aim: To familiarise students with the key policies and procedures that are relevant to dietetic practice within the organisation where their placement is taking place. Objectives: By the end of this activity, the students will be able to: Identify key policies that are relevant to dietitians working in your area Give a summary of the key points which affect dietitians. Describe how those points influence the day-to-day practice of dietitians. Activity Give the students access to the policies and procedures that affect dietitians working in your area. The students need to divide the policies between them and read the ones that they have been allocated, taking notes of key points that are relevant to dietitians as they do so. Each student will then present a summary of the key points of the policies they have covered, and how they affect the day-to-day work of a dietitian, to their partner and supervisor 2.3. Role of the Dietitian/ Dietetic Assistant Aim: To introduce the students to the different roles of the dietetic assistant and dietitian and to the differences in their communication styles. Objectives: By the end of this activity the students should be able to: Identify 3 key differences between the role of the dietitian and that of the dietetic assistant. Identify 3 similarities or areas of overlap between the 2 roles Identify 3 differences in the communication styles used. Activity Both students should observe the Dietitian/Dietetic Assistant undertaking a consultation and take notes on it, using the clinical observation checklist. The students should compare notes on the different aspects they observed and discuss any queries with the Dietitian/ Dietetic Assistant. As well as thinking about the different styles they have observed, the students should think about the differences between the two in terms of their professional roles and boundaries. 11 2.4. Meal Production Activity Aim: The aim of this activity is for the students to become familiar with the meal production system in use in your area along with its strengths and limitations. Objectives: By the end of this activity the students will be able to: Describe the meal production system used in your area. Describe how portion control is managed in your area. Describe the nutritional guidelines used in the development of the menu for your area. Know how to order a “Special diet” and describe the range of meals and snacks available for patients. List the strengths and weaknesses of this type of meal production system. Activity: Both students should go to the catering department and have a briefing from the catering manager about the catering system in use, including costs, restrictions, benefits of this system etc. One student should then spend time with a designated member of staff in the main meal production unit, taking note of how the meals are prepared to be sent to each ward or area and any strengths or weaknesses that they can identify. The second student should spend time with the “diet cook” or equivalent, learning how special meals are ordered, prepared and sent to the correct patient, again noting any strengths and weaknesses of the system. The students will then debrief with a facilitator, each sharing what they have found with the other. 12 2.5. Meal Service Activity Aim: The aim of this activity is for the students to begin to understand how meals are served to patients and the strengths and limitations of the system in use in your area. Objectives: By the end of this activity, the students should be able to: Describe the meal service systems in use in your area Describe the differences between the meals provided to two different areas List key strengths and limitations of each of the systems. Activity: The students should each observe/ help with meal service in one area, each having different systems in use e.g. an adult ward and a paediatric ward or a general ward and a dialysis unit, or a nursing home and a school. The students should take note of how the food is served, how the portions are controlled and how the correct food reaches the correct person. They should note the strengths and limitations of the system. The two students should then meet up to compare notes and determine the advantages and disadvantages of the systems they observed in the places in which they were observed. The students should then debrief with a facilitator. 2.6. Ward Orientation Aim: to provide an introduction to the dietitian practice educator as a professional role model for students, and to give students some insight into the skills and knowledge they will develop over the placement. Objectives: By the end of this activity the student will be able to: Describe the type of ward and the patients most frequently referred to the dietitian Describe the referral process Describe the discharge process and how dietitians are informed about discharges Locate key areas in the ward Locate key sources of information 13 Activity: The students will need to be taken to different wards and make brief notes on the following: Key ward staff – note their names and titles The ward name and what types of patients are admitted to this ward? Which patients are likely to be seen by the dietitian and why? Is there a referral process for dietetic input? The average patient length of stay The discharge process? How is the dietitian informed of discharges? Location of: o Bed list o Nursing handover list (if available) o Medical Records o Equipment for measuring anthropometry o Enteral feeding pumps and giving sets o Reference books eg BNF o End of bed charts o Ward pantry/ kitchen o Computers o Meeting rooms or areas Brief training from dietitian in EPR and CRS The students will need to be prepared to discuss their findings with each other and a facilitator 14 2.7. Dietetic Shadowing Aim: The aim of this activity is to observe how the dietitian interacts with the different people they come into contact with in their work area. Objectives: By the end of this activity, the student will be able to: Describe the dietitian’s main aims in the consultation Describe the patient’s main aims for the consultation Describe the people the dietitian liaised with before and after the consultation Identify the differences in the dietitian’s communication style, depending on whom he/she is communicating with. Describe any professionalism issues that arose in connection with this consultation. Activity: The students should observe a dietitian undertaking a consultation and should take notes on the following: Did the dietitian talk to anyone else before seeing the patient? Was it helpful? Why/ Why not? How did the dietitian greet the patient? What were the dietitian’s main aims for the consultation? What did the patient want to get out of the consultation? How do you know this? What information did the dietitian collect? What strategies did they use to collect the information? What information would have been useful, but was unavailable? What decision did the dietitian make in managing this patient? Propose a rationale for the decision. Look at the medical notes/ dietetic record card after the dietitian has made the entry for the patient. Did the dietitian use any abbreviations? Are all of these in line with department guidelines? Did the dietitian liaise with anyone after the consultation? Do you feel this communication was helpful to: the other person, the patient, yourself and how do you know this? How did the dietitian’s communication with the patient differ from that with the nurse/doctor/consultant, other dietitian? How would you describe the dietitian’s manner i.e. formal, informal, chatty, or serious? Was this appropriate? How do you know? 15 Are you aware of any issues relating to: o Anti-discriminatory practice. o Practice in line with the Statement of Conduct. o Professionalism. o Team working. Did you learn anything from this consultation? Why? Did anything trouble you about this consultation? Why? The students should then meet up to discuss their findings with each other, having the opportunity to raise any queries or concerns with a facilitator. 16 2.8. Doctor and Nurse Observation activity Aim: The aim of this activity is for the students to observe how a doctor/ nurse communicate with each other, both within their own profession and between the different professions. Objectives: By the end of this activity, the students should be able to: Identify the key information handed over between nurses at handover. Identify the key information communicated between doctors and nurses with regard to patient care Identify the format which doctors use to describe patients to each other Describe key differences between the way doctors and nurses communicate about patients, compared to the way dietitians communicate Activity: Students should attend the ward at nursing handover time and gain permission to listen in as nurses give each other handover about the patients. They should note the format used, the information shared and any information that was omitted that the student thinks might have been important. Students should attend the ward when the junior doctor visits the ward and gain permission to listen in as nurses give doctors handover about the patients. They should note the format used, the information shared/ requested and any information that was omitted that the student thinks might have been important. Students should attend the ward when a consultant ward round is in progress and gain permission to listen in as the junior doctors give their senior colleagues handover about the patients. They should note the format used, the information shared/ requested and any information that was omitted that the student thinks might have been important. The students should reflect on what they have learned in the 3 sessions and identify the differences between the way that doctors and nurses’ communication with each other and the way that dietitians communicate. They should share their reflections with their peer/ facilitator. 17 3. Assessment - Anthropometry Aim: The aim of these activities are to develop the student’s understanding of and ability to gather and interpret anthropometric measurements when assessing individual patients. Objectives: By the end of these activities the student will be able to: Identify how anthropometric variables are collected and recorded in dietetic notes. Outline the possible problems in obtaining anthropometric data and seek solutions or alternatives. Carry out measurements of anthropometric variables with patients Interpret anthropometric measurements within the context of a clinical condition. Explain how a patient’s anthropometric data may affect the dietetic intervention. Overview of the activity Students should ideally work in pairs. These tasks can be worked through sequentially to build on assessment skills, or depending on learning focus, parts could be carried out in isolation. 18 3.1. Commonly used anthropometric variables Students should list the most commonly used anthropometric variables and take half the list each. For each variable students should identify: o How it is measured (along with any reference tables used etc.) o Equipment available for measurement o Normal range of results and standard units Students should come together along with a supervising dietitian and present their findings to each other, adding to their notes as they bring together their knowledge. Discussion should include: 3.2. o Possible causes of abnormal results o Possible practical problems with measuring each variable o Possible solutions or alternatives o Possible limitations of variable and how it may affect interpretation Findings should be discussed with their supervisor. Estimating anthropometric measurements Students are given the same list of 5 – 10 patients who are currently being seen by the Dietitian Students should (separately) estimate the weight and height of each patient. Students should come back together at an agreed time with a supervising dietitian to compare estimates with each other, and actual measurements. Discussion should also focus on when it is appropriate to estimate anthropometric measurements and strategies to develop skills in this area 19 3.3. Choosing appropriate anthropometric variables to use Students are each allocated a patient who is currently under the care of a dietitian. Students should ideally be allocated patients with different clinical conditions. Each student should identify which anthropometric variables were used within the assessment and note how they were recorded and interpreted by the dietitian. Students should come back together at an agreed time with a supervising dietitian and discuss: 3.4. o Which anthropometric variables were and were not used and why? o How the variables were recorded. o How the measurements were interpreted by the dietitian. Findings should be discussed with their supervisor. Gathering anthropometric data In pairs, autonomously if possible, students should practice performing some or all of the following anthropometric measurements: o Height o Weight o Waist Circumference o Mid upper arm circumference (MUAC) o Hand grip strength o Skinfolds Students can either: o Both take measurements from the same patient and compare, or; o Take it in turns to measure while the other student observes, encourages, supports and feeds back afterwards. Students should gather a basic clinical background (e.g. reason for admission, past medical history, age) to aid interpretation of findings during discussion. Students should come back together at an agreed time with a supervising dietitian and discuss: o In each case, how the patient’s anthropometric data can be interpreted in the context of their clinical background. o Problems encountered in performing measurements. o How difficulties can be overcome in the clinical setting. o If and why measurements taken by each student from the same patient varied. Findings should be discussed with their supervisor. 20 4. Assessment - Biochemistry Aim: The aim of these activities is to develop the student’s understanding of and ability to interpret biochemical parameters when assessing individual patients. Objectives: By the end of these activities the student will be able to: Identify how biochemical parameters are collected and recorded in dietetic notes. Outline the possible causes for abnormal measurements of dietetically relevant biochemical parameters. Interpret a set of blood results in the context of a clinical condition. Explain how key dietetically relevant biochemical parameters are important as part of a patient assessment. Explain how a patient’s biochemistry results may affect the dietetic intervention. Overview of the activity Students should ideally work in pairs. This task can be worked through sequentially to build on assessment skills, or depending on learning focus, parts could be carried out in isolation. 21 4.1. Identifying relevant biochemical parameters Students should obtain a list of biochemical markers commonly used by the dietitian and take half the list each. For each parameter students should identify: o Reference range and standard units used within the trust o Possible causes of high or low results o Possible consequences of high or low results Students should come together along with a supervising dietitian and present their findings to each other, adding to their notes as they share their knowledge. Any questions raised should be noted down and researched further. Students should then use this information along with other resources available to together construct a table summarising the above information as a biochemistry ‘ready reckoner’ for their folders. 4.2. Identifying abnormal biochemistry Students are given a patient’s blood results (one each) to look at individually and identify parameters outside of the reference range. Students go to the ward together and for their own patients, gather a brief clinical history using medical notes, bed end observation charts and any other relevant sources of information. Students should come back together at an agreed time with a supervising dietitian and present their patient to each other, then discuss: o Which biochemical parameters were outside the normal reference range? o What are the possible causes of this given the patient’s clinical condition? o Any clinical signs that would point to a particular cause? (e.g. vomiting, diarrhoea) 22 4.3. Biochemistry and dietetic interventions Students are each allocated a patient who is currently under the care of a dietitian. Students should ideally be allocated patients with different clinical conditions. (Better patients for this task might include those whose dietetic treatment is more directly related to specific biochemical parameters, for example renal patients, enterally or parenterally fed patients, lipid-lowering). Each student should gather a brief clinical history using medical notes, bed end observation notes and any other relevant sources of information, and make a note of the dietetic interventions. Each student should note how the dietetic interventions made by the dietitian relate to the biochemistry results for that patient. Students should come back together at an agreed time with a supervising dietitian and present their patient to each other, then discuss: o How the dietetic intervention relates to the patient’s biochemistry. o How the biochemical information was recorded by the dietitian in both the medical notes and/or dietetic notes as appropriate. o Which parameters were recorded and which were omitted? o 4.4. Assessing biochemistry Students are allocated a patient each. The patient can be either a new referral or a patient currently under the dietitian’s care but the students should not have access to the actual dietetic intervention plan. Students gather a brief clinical history using medical notes, bed end observation notes and any other relevant sources of information. Students collect and record relevant biochemical results, noting whether they are inside or outside the reference range. Students should come back together at an agreed time with a supervising dietitian and present their patient to each other, then discuss: o Which biochemical parameters were important/ relevant to note? o What are the possible causes of any abnormalities? o How might these findings affect your dietetic intervention plan? o What additional biochemical parameters would be useful to consider? 23 5. Assessment - Clinical 5.1 Medical notes familiarisation activity – part 1 of 2 Aim: The aim of this activity is to introduce students to the format and content of medical records as well as the variation that may occur between different health care providers. Objectives: By the end of this activity the students will be able to: Understand the different ways that entries are recorded within and between professions (including the use of different formats such as SOAP or BDAP) Become familiar with abbreviations used (often contextual e.g. Ca could mean cancer or calcium depending on the context), Begin to develop skills in identifying and collecting relevant information for dietetic assessments. Activity: Students should ideally work in pairs Each student should have an opportunity to explore a set of patient notes for patients that have been seen by the dietitian, individually, and gain experience trying to gather dietetically useful information on the patient (based on written records only). This can take some time for students at the start of their training, as they are not familiar with language, abbreviations and organisation of medical notes (which may differ from ward to ward, and trust to trust). It may be useful to use structured headings to guide the information gathering, for example the ‘ABCDE’ (Anthropometry, Biochemistry, Clinical, Dietary, Ethnic/Social/ Economic) assessment model. If the students are at a later stage to their placement then it may be useful to give a specific time-frame in which to carry out this activity to develop their time management skills After the specific time period, the students will swap patient notes and review the second set of notes. The students should then compare the information they each gleaned individually to highlight any discrepancies/ differences. The students should note down any terms or abbreviations they don’t understand and look them up later. The information that has been gathered will be used in the next activity so keep it in an accessible place. 24 Specific notes for Practice Educator Identify appropriate patients’ medical records for students to review on the ward or in the clinic. Appropriate patients may have had some dietetic input in the past, but should not be overly complicated (e.g. patients on ITU may not be appropriate). Ensure the activity is scheduled for a time when the medical records for the identified patients are available (e.g. not at a time when ward rounds are scheduled). The record does not have to be a patient currently admitted. It may be more practical to request the record of a known patient not currently admitted. Students can undertake this activity on a ward, in a clinic environment or in the dietetic office (depending on where the records are) 5.2. Medical notes familiarisation activity – Part 2 of 2 Aim: This activity aims to provide students with an introduction to the dietetic records used by dietitians, and will help them to reflect on the usefulness of the information they gathered in Part 1. Objectives: On completion of this activity, the students should be able to: Identify a ‘good’ dietetic record as compared to a ‘not so good’ record Discuss issues of confidentiality and the need to ensure information is not easily identifiable Begin to develop a framework for gathering useful information for dietetic assessment. Activity: Students should continue to work in pairs Using the information they have gathered from the Part 1 medical notes activity, the students will each complete a dietetic record card for each patient. At the end of the activity, make the actual dietetic records available to the students so they can compare what they have done to an actual dietetic record. Ideally, if you have time, look over their completed record cards and provide direct feedback, but note that this is not essential. 25 Each student will prepare a brief (max 5 minutes) presentation on each patient; they must both be able to present on either of the cases. They should prepare the presentations together. Ensure they have de-identified any notes they have made on patients before leaving the hospital. Specific notes for Practice Educators Provide the students with blank dietetic record cards. Pull the actual dietetic records for the two patients that students have used for Part 1, and give these to the students towards the end of the activity. Allocate some time in your diary, if possible, to provide direct feedback to the students on the record cards they have completed. The activity should have a formal debrief session for all students to discuss Parts 1 and 2. The students can also each present one of their cases in the group session, which will begin to develop their skills in case presentation and handover. 5.3. Medication familiarisation activity Aim: This activity aims to provide students with a working knowledge of commonly prescribed medications and their potential relevance to dietetic assessment and intervention. Objectives: On completion of this activity, the students should be able to: List commonly prescribed medications under the following categories: o Painkillers o Antibiotics o Laxatives o Cholesterol lowering medications o Diabetes medications o Antiemetics Identify specific medications that directly impact on dietetic therapy Identify medication plans from drug charts Understand how the pharmacist liaises with the dietitian 26 Activities: Working in pairs, students should divide the following list of commonly prescribed medications between them. Students should then independently look up common medications under each of these categories and identify any side effects that might impact on dietetic intervention: o Painkillers o Antibiotics o Laxatives o Cholesterol lowering medications o Diabetes medications o Antiemetics Students should then meet and feedback their findings to each other. Their findings should then be collated to form a ‘crib sheet’ to be used by both students for future reference. This crib sheet should be shown to the dietetic supervisor to ensure that the information collected is complete and accurate. The students should be allocated two separate wards covered by separate pharmacists. The student should be encouraged to introduce themselves to the pharmacist and ascertain their role and how they work with the dietitian. During this conversation, the student should ask the pharmacist to identify specific medications with an impact on diet therapy. Students should then be encouraged to find out when these medications would be prescribed, relevant side effects and specific impact on diet therapy. Students should then meet and compare their findings with the support of a facilitator. In pairs, students should have the opportunity to review a number of drug charts, identifying the layout, how to ascertain regular and one-off medications and clarifying commonly used abbreviations (e.g. od, bd, tds, qds, po). Students should then be given two drug charts to review, in addition to the patients’ medical notes to identify key background information (e.g. diagnosis, previous medical history). After a set time they should present a summary of the patients including the rationale for their current medication plan to their peer and supervising dietitian. 27 5.4. Familiarisation with unfamiliar clinical conditions Aim: This activity aims to support students to develop their knowledge of unfamiliar clinical conditions Objectives: On completion of this activity, the students should be able to: Provide a brief description of the physiological and biochemical abnormalities associated with the condition Understand the key treatment strategies associated with the condition Identify how the condition might impact on the patients’ nutritional status Identify any specific diet therapy associated with the condition Activity: In anticipation for the weekly facilitation session, students should be encouraged to take responsibility to explore specific conditions that they have come across during the week, considering the following points: Description of the physiological and biochemical abnormalities associated with the condition Key treatment strategies associated with the condition How the condition might impact on the patients’ nutritional status Any specific diet therapy associated with the condition Students should work together to design a format to present this information in a clear and concise manner Students should present their findings verbally at the weekly facilitation session in the presence of a supervising dietitian. 28 6. Assessment - Dietary 6.1. Compilation of oral nutrition support and enteral feed ready reckoner Aim: To familiarise the students with the range of oral nutrition support options and enteral feeding products available in your area and their macronutrient contents. Objectives: By the end of this activity, students will have a ready reckoner that enables them to quickly assess the energy, protein and fluid provided by a given volume of product. Activity: The students should be given access to the nutritional composition of the menu, diet bay items, feed store as well as data sheets for the products they will be using most frequently. They should share the task between them, e.g one take ONS and one take Enteral Feeds. The students will need to agree on a format for the ready reckoner and then each will prepare their part and then share it with their partner. If there are many more products in one area than the other, they may need to help each other out. They should share their ready reckoner with their supervising dietitian to ensure that the information they have collected is relevant and accurate. 6.2. Differing approaches to gathering dietary information Aim: To familiarise the students with two commonly used methods for gathering dietary information from patients. Objectives: By the end of this activity, students will be able to: Gather dietary assessment data using the 24 hour recall and typical day approaches Identify the benefits and limitations of each of these approaches in a variety of settings Activity Each student to be assigned two patients (these do not necessarily need to be patients who have been referred to a dietitian – they just need to be happy to talk to the students about 29 their eating habits). Each student should complete one 24 hour recall and one typical day diet history while being observed by their peer. The observing student should then provide specific feedback to their peer in respect to their questioning style, body language and quality of information collected considering two positive aspects of their practice and two areas for development. The students should present the summary of their feedback to the supervising dietitian with suggestions as to how they could work to improve their skills. 6.3. Qualitative and quantitative assessments of dietary intake Aim: To develop the student’s skills in completing qualitative and quantitative assessments of dietary intake Objectives: By the end of this activity, students will be able to: Complete qualitative and quantitative assessments of dietary intake Identify strategies to ensure that accurate assessments are completed Activity Using all four of the dietary assessments completed in activity 6.2, both students should independently complete both qualitative and quantitative dietary assessments of the information collected. The students should then compare their assessments and identify any errors in their assessments. The students should then collate their findings and present their assessments to their supervising dietitian. 6.4. Food record charts/food diaries Aim: To familiarise the students with the dietary recording tools used by the department Objectives: By the end of this activity, students will be able to: Know the tools used by the department to collect written dietary intake data in a variety of settings Understand the limitations of using these tools Activity The students should be given access to the tools used by the department to collect written dietary intake data and should complete these tools independently over a 48 hour period. The students should then meet to discuss suitable changes that could be made to the tools to support the collection of more accurate dietary information in as user friendly a way as possible. The students should then present their recommendations to their supervising dietitian 30 31 7. Assessment - Environmental Aim: The aim of these activities is to develop the skills of the student in collecting and assessing information to support this section of the dietetic care process in individuals, groups and populations. Objectives: By the end of these activities the student will be able to: Identify sources of information regarding the Environmental/ Emotional aspects of the assessment process. Collect relevant information from the range of sources available. Use the information collected to assist in the formulation of a dietetic diagnosis and treatment plan for individuals, groups and populations. Overview of the activity Students should ideally work in pairs Parts of this activity may happen at different times e.g. the information gathering regarding the group or population are likely to happen prior to the actual delivery of the project/ group session, so careful notes should be taken and kept in a safe place for comparison. After the activity: The students should compare the information that they gathered to identify any similarities or differences and reflect on why the discrepancies arose. They should discuss with their partner any information that you feel was a) omitted but should have been gathered, b) gathered but was not relevant c) you can’t agree on. They should discuss their findings with their supervisor. 7.1. Individuals One student should gather all of the relevant Environmental information from the medical notes/ nursing notes/ referral letter/ care staff. The second student should interview the patient, with their partner observing, using an appropriate communication style, to elicit information regarding the environmental aspects of the patient’s history. 32 e.g. For ward patients: the students should gather relevant information on who the patient lives with, what kind of accommodation they have, cooking facilities, financial status, what social support, whether they are a smoker, any concerns about their mental health/ emotional state, previous dietary interventions, physical activity level, readiness to change, barriers to change, language skills. 7.2. Groups In the planning stage of a group education session, the first student should gather all of the relevant Environmental information from appropriate sources e.g. referral letters, staff who usually run the sessions, care staff etc. The second student should gather the relevant environmental information from the group participants in an appropriate style, during the group session. This can only happen once the students are confident enough to reflect in action as they may need to modify some aspects of the session, depending on what they discover. e.g. For a group, the students should gather relevant information on the socio- economic status of the group, previous health/ dietary education, physical activity levels, social support networks, language skills, readiness to change, barriers to change. 7.3. Populations In the planning stage of a health promotion activity, the first student should gather all of the relevant environmental information from appropriate sources e.g. request letters, staff who usually run the sessions, care staff etc. The second student should gather the relevant Environmental/ Emotional information from the target population in an appropriate style, during the project. This can only happen once the students are confident enough to reflect in action as they may need to modify some aspects of the project depending on what they discover. e.g. For a population, the students should gather relevant information on the socioeconomic status of the group, previous health/ dietary education, physical activity levels, social support networks, language skills, readiness to change, barriers to change. 33 8. Nutrition and dietetic diagnosis 8.1. Identifying nutritional priorities Aim: The aim of this activity is to support students to use the assessment information collected to identify key clinical priorities considering both the medical and patient perspective Objectives: By the end of this activity, students will be able to: Identify the key clinical ‘problem’ justifying their decision with appropriate rationale Identify possible key patient priorities Activity Each student should complete a thorough assessment on two patients. Using these four assessments, students should work independently initially to identify the key nutritional problem and possible patient priorities based on the information they collected. Students should then share there suggested and agree the key nutritional problem for each case. Students should then work together to provide a rationale for their decision. The students should then present their conclusions and rationale to their supervising dietitian. The focus of this feedback will be on the students’ ability to justify their decisions. Discussion should also take place as to how nutritional priorities and patient priorities can be managed simultaneously. 8.2. Identifying dietetic diagnosis statements Aim: The aim of this activity is to support students to use the assessment information collected to identify a nutrition and dietetic diagnosis comprising of the key clinical problem, the aetiology of this problem and how this problem is manifesting itself Objectives: By the end of this activity, students will be able to: Devise nutrition and dietetic diagnosis statements Justify their decisions to a peer and their supervisor Activity Each student should complete a thorough assessment on at least two patients. Having undertaken this assessment, the students should work independently to devise a nutrition and dietetic diagnosis statement under the headings ‘problem’, ‘aetiology’ and ‘signs and 34 symptoms’. The students should then meet and present their assessments and nutrition and dietetic diagnosis statements to each other. The student who is not presenting should be encouraged to probe the other student with regards to their justification for the statements they make. The students will then be asked to present two of the four cases that have been considered – each student should be equipped to present any of the cases that they have discussed with their peer. 9. Intervention, planning and implementation 9.1. Identifying dietetic management goals Aim: The aim of this activity is to support students to use the assessment information collected and nutrition and dietetic diagnosis to identify possible dietetic management goals Objectives: By the end of this activity, students will be able to: Identify appropriate dietetic management goals Identify possible barriers to patients implementing these goals 9.1.1. Identifying dietetic management goals – stage 1 Students should observe a dietitian complete an assessment on a patient. The students should make notes during the assessment. Once the assessment is completed, the students should leave the consultation and work together to formulate a nutrition and dietetic diagnosis and possible dietetic management goals. The students should also be encouraged to list the possible barriers that might exist to achieving these goals. Once the consultation is complete, the students should present their suggestions to the supervising dietitian who can also explain what goals were agreed in the consultation and why these were agreed. 9.1.2. Identifying dietetic management goals – stage 2 Each student should complete an assessment for a new and follow up patient. The students should then work independently to devise appropriate dietetic management goals for the 4 patients. The students should then compare their suggestions to agree what they are going to feedback to their supervising dietitian (including the rationale for their decisions). The students should then have the opportunity to feedback to their supervising dietitian. 35 9.2. Implementing dietetic management goals Aim: The aim of this activity is to support students to identify appropriate implementation plans to enable patients to meet their dietetic management goals Objectives: By the end of this activity, students will be able to: Recognise that there may be more than one way to meet dietetic management goals Suggest suitable actions plans for achieving dietetic management goals Identify factors that would need to be taken into consideration to ensure the implementation of specific action plans 9.2.1. Devising implementation plans Having identified suitable dietetic management goals for 4 patients, students should work independently to develop a possible action plan for achieving these goals. Students should then meet together with their supervisor to discuss their recommendations including the steps that would need to be taken to implement their action plan. 9.2.2. Implementing the dietetic care process Each student should be given one new and one follow up patient to assess, plan and implement dietetic care. The students should complete these consultations while being observed by their peer. At the end of the consultation, the peer should provide specific feedback on the following aspects of the consultation: Has the student considered the knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the client/carer? Has the student negotiated SMART goals with the client/family? Has the student selected appropriate resources to support implementation of the dietetic management goals? How has the student assisted the client to overcome barriers to change? Has the student responded to the clients questions appropriately and correctly? How has the student responded to verbal and non-verbal cues? The student who completed the consultation may want to reflect on their own performance using the above prompt questions, prior to the feedback session with their peer. The students should then work together to identify 1 strength of each others practice, one area for development and devise an action plan to support this development. This summary should be fed back to the supervising dietitian. 36 10. Monitoring and evaluation Aim: The aim of this activity is to support students develop their skills in reviewing, monitoring and evaluating dietetic interventions Objectives: By the end of this activity, students will be able to: Gather reassessment data and evaluate this against previously documented goals Negotiate and agree changes to the dietetic care plan based on accurate interpretation of information collected Evaluate clients/carer’s understanding of the agreed changes/nutritional care plan and answers questions appropriately Provide relevant written information Arrange appropriate follow-up 10.1. Identifying appropriate follow-up arrangements The students should work together to review dietetic records from patients that have been seen by their supervising dietitian. If possible, the follow up arrangements should be removed from these records. The students should agree an appropriate follow up plan for each patient including a justification for why this plan has been suggested. The students should then feedback their conclusions to their supervising dietitian and compare their proposed follow up plans with the actual follow up arrangements. 10.2. Identifying appropriate outcome measures Each student should take two patients who they have identified dietetic management goals for and consider relevant outcome measures under the following categories: Symptom change/Patient Reported Measures Physical Biochemical Psychological Behaviour Change Patient Focused The students should feedback their conclusions to their peer and then work together to identify how these outcomes will be measured/assessed. The students should feedback their findings to their supervising dietitian 37 10.3. Reviewing dietetic interventions Each student should be given two follow up patients to review, monitor and evaluate dietetic interventions. The students should complete these consultations while being observed by their peer. At the end of the consultation, the peer should provide specific feedback on the following aspects of the consultation: Has the student gathered reassessment data and evaluated this against previously documented goals? Has the student appropriately negotiated and agreed changes to the dietetic care plan based on accurate interpretation of information collected? How has the student evaluated the clients/carer’s understanding of the agreed changes/nutritional care plan and have they answered questions appropriately? Has relevant written information been provided? Has an appropriate follow up plan been arranged? The student who completed the consultation may want to reflect on their own performance using the above prompt questions, prior to the feedback session with their peer. The students should then work together to identify 1 strength of each others practice, one area for development and devise an action plan to support this development. This summary should be fed back to the supervising dietitian. 38 11. Appendix 1 – Observation of students in tutorials Assessment of Participation of Tutorials This form is to be completed by the group facilitator for each student for each of the tutorials. A copy is to be given to the portfolio manager and lead assessor. Student Name: Tutorial: Date: Tick the most appropriate comment in each section Attendance Attended session on time Attended but late Missed session, tutor notified Missed session, tutor not notified Preparation Evidence of extensive reading and preparation Evidence of adequate preparation Evidence of some preparation No evidence of preparation Participation Provided regular questions/comments/new information Provided some questions/comments/new information Sporadic questions/comment/new information No meaningful participation Communication Skills Consistently communicated effectively Generally communicated effectively Did not communicate effectively Presentation skills Demonstrated developed presentation skills Demonstrated developing presentation skills Demonstrated poor presentation skills Interpersonal Skills (GROUP) Supported participation of others and demonstrated respect for others opinions Allowed others to participate and demonstrates respect for others opinions Provided minimal interaction or support to other participants Learning skills Demonstrated self-directed learning 39 Demonstrated some self-directed learning Did not demonstrate self-directed learning Critical thinking Regularly offered critical analysis/interpretation of ideas Sometimes offered critical analysis/interpretation of ideas Little evidence of agreement or disagreement with ideas No evidence of agreement or disagreement with ideas Other Demonstrated reflection on discussion and own learning and/or introduction of innovative ideas and/or relating discussion to broader themes or context Facilitated the group process, actively encouraged others to participate Additional comments/evidence Dietitian Signature 40 12. Appendix 2 – Clinical Observation Form Date: Week No: Type of Patient: New/Follow-up In/out Patient Adult/Child Other information (e.g. working through interpreter) Summary: Current Strengths: Key areas to focus on to develop skills: This has been discussed with my supervising dietitian Signed student: ________________________________ Signed Dietitian: ________________________________ Date:____________ 41 STAGE OF CONSULTATION COMMENTS e.g. areas that went well, areas that didn’t go well, aspects I need to improve on. 1. Opening Welcomes client, introduces self, ensures patient comfortable, and establishes rapport. Clarifies patient expectations and format of consultation. 2. Data collection - communication Demonstrates good communication skills. Communicates at an appropriate level, eye contact, volume of speech, appropriate language. Listens attentively. Recognises and responds to nonverbal cues. Collects, records and interprets relevant information from client, other health care professionals and carers/ relatives e.g.. Diet history Weight Height Fluid balance Uses appropriate questioning style to elicit relevant information. Recognises and notes factors that will affect clients compliance eg: Motivation to change Lifestyle Finance Provides information and responds to client’s concerns. Maintains the direction of the interview. 42 Ensures suitable room layout and privacy. 3. Data collection – documentation Collects, records and interprets relevant quantitative information (from referral letter, medical notes, nursing notes, computer databases) including: Medical Biochemical Pharmacological Nutritional Social Psychological Cultural Financial Personal information 4. Formulates and justifies dietetic diagnosis Correctly identifies the dietetic problems, their causes and presenting symptoms. Can prioritise the problems and justify this prioritisation. 5. Develops dietetic management goals. Uses information from assessment to devise dietetic management goals that are: Acceptable and practical for the client/carer Evidence based 6. Designs and implements action plan to achieve dietetic goals Develops goals which are SMART Negotiates goals with client/ carers/ staff Formulates plan for monitoring and review Communicates the plan using effective strategies 43 7. Review, monitoring and evaluation of dietary intervention Gathers reassessment data and evaluates against previously documented goals Negotiates and agrees changes to dietetic care plan based on accurate interpretation of information collected. Evaluates client’s/carer’s understanding of the agreed changes/nutritional care plan and answers questions. Provides relevant written information. Arranges appropriate follow-up. 8. Closing Summarises and closes consultation. 9. Documentation and feedback Informs dietetic supervisor of actions taken. Writes concise, legible notes in appropriate documents. 10. Reflections Keeps to appointment time. Monitors and reviews client at suitable time intervals without prompting (if applicable). Practices within the Standards of Performance, Conduct and Ethics: Maintains confidentiality Complies with departmental referral procedures. Uses generic names for products or mentions several brand names. Words and actions (spoken/written) do not discriminate against clients with respect to: race, religion, age, sexual orientation, learning disability or physical disability. 44 Acknowledges own limitations within consultation and seeks advice when appropriate. Identifies any critical incidents in consultation and reflects appropriately. Evaluates own practice and identifies areas for improvement. Demonstrates reflection ‘in action’ and uses this to change plan during consultation when appropriate. 45