INTERANNUAL AND DECADAL VARIATIONS IN CROSSSHORE MIXING IN THE GULF OF ALASKA
Vincent Combes and Emanuele Di Lorenzo
School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology
Atlanta, Georgia
Submitted to Journal of Physical Oceanography
December 17, 2007
Corresponding author:
Vincent Combes
School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
Georgia Institute of Technology
311 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0340
voice: 404-894-1749, fax: 404-894-5638
email: Vincent.Combes@eas.gatech.edu
Abstract
The marine ecosystem of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) is one of the richest on the planet.
The center of the GOA is characterized by high nutrient concentration and low-chlorophyll-a
suggesting that availability of micronutrients such as iron control the biological productivity. The
primary source of iron in the GOA is river runoff along the coastal boundary. Recent
observational studies suggest that advection of iron-rich coastal water in the center of the GOA is
the primary mechanism controlling open ocean productivity. Specifically there is evidence that
the development of large-scale eddies along the coastal GOA entrain iron-rich waters that are
then transported into the ocean interior. These results suggest that interannual and decadal
modulations of primary productivity in the GOA may be understood by studying the statistics of
eddy induced cross-shore transport. This study investigates the cross-shore transport statistics in
the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) using a free-surface, hydrostatic, eddy-resolving primitive equation
model forced with time dependent atmospheric forcing over the period 1965-2004. The statistics
of coastal waters dispersion into the Alaskan Gyre are computed using a model passive tracer,
which is continuously released at the coast. The passive tracer can thus be considered a proxy for
coastal biogeochemical quantities such as iron, oxygen or chlorophyll-a, which are critical for
explaining the GOA ecosystem dynamics. We find that while mean tracer advection is directed
towards the coast consistent with the dominant downwelling regime of the GOA, it is the mean
eddy fluxes that contribute to offshore advection into the gyre interior along the entire GOA. On
seasonal timescales we find a stronger offshore dispersion of the passive tracer in September at
the end of the seasonal development of the coastal eddy field along the Alaska Current and the
Alaskan Stream. On interannual and longer timescales, the offshore dispersion of the passive
tracer in the Alaskan Stream is principally explained by intrinsic eddy variability and does not
correlate with large scale forcing. In contrast along the eastern boundary in the Alaska Current
region, stronger offshore dispersion of the passive tracer coincide with periods of stronger
downwelling conditions, which trigger the development of stronger eddies. These period of
stronger downwelling are driven by changes in large-scale wind forcing, mainly intensifications
of the Aleutian low during the positive phases of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). Indeed
there is a significant offshore spread of the passive tracer from the eastern boundary after the
dramatic 1976-77 climate shift when the phase of the PDO changes abruptly to positive.
1. Introduction
The waters of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) and the Bering Sea provide more than half of the
total annual fish catch for the United States. In the interior, the central Gulf of Alaska reveals a
high-nutrient/low-chlorophyll (HNLC) region with iron limitation (Harrison et al, 1999). There is
evidence that eddies, generated at the coast, impact iron distribution and therefore play a role in
maintaining low-chlorophyll concentration. The mesoscale eddies generated along the Alaska
Current (eastern GOA basin) transport nutrients (Whitney and Robert, 2002; Ladd et al., 2005)
and iron (Johnson et al., 2005) to the interior. More specifically, Batten and Crawford (2005)
observe higher concentrations of plankton within the core of the eddies, collected by a
Continuous Plankton Recorder between 2000 and 2001. Even though the correlation between
eddy variability and changes in ecosystem has not yet been fully established, the ecosystems have
been noticed to respond to large-scale atmospheric variability (Mantua et al., 1997; Litzow et al.,
2006).
The region is extremely productive at all trophic levels despite observations showing
downwelling conditions along the coast (Stabeno et al., 2004). On decadal time scale, the Pacific
Decadal Oscillation (PDO) is the leading mode of North Pacific variability and modulates
changes in downwelling. Okkonen et al (2001) and Combes and Di Lorenzo (2007) show
stronger mesoscale eddies activity, during years in which wind forcing promotes strong
downwelling. This suggests that interannual and decadal modulations of the GOA open ocean
ecosystems may be explained by exploring the statistics of eddy induced cross-shore transport.
This study investigates the seasonal and interannual variations in cross-shore mixing in
the GOA, by looking at the distribution and variability of a passive tracer injected at the coast.
The tracer allows us to track coastal water masses and can be used as a proxy for coastal
quantities such as iron. The goal of this study is to characterize the statistics of dispersion of the
passive tracer and to understand how changes in atmospheric winds modify the distribution and
dispersion of coastal water masses.
2. Data: Model and Observation
The model experiment is performed using the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS,
Haidvogel et al., 2007; Shchepetkin and Mc Williams, 2005). ROMS is a free surface,
hydrostatic, eddy-resolving primitive equation ocean model that uses terrain-following
coordinates in the vertical. ROMS has already been used successfully to study mesoscale
processes in the North Pacific (Marchesiello et al., 2003; Di Lorenzo et al., 2005b; Curchitser et
al., 2005; Curchitser et al., 2005).
The domain covers the coast from the Vancouver Island to the Aleutian Peninsula (Fig.
1a). The grid has an average spatial resolution of ~11km and uses 42 levels in the vertical, with
higher resolution at the upper ocean layer. This resolution is able to capture large eddies in the
eastern and western side of the basin. The initial conditions and open boundaries are obtained
from an outer experiment (Curchister et al., personal communication), which is conducted with
the same grid resolution on a larger domain that covers the entire Northeast Pacific coast. This
outer grid uses boundary conditions from a hindcast simulation using the Community Climate
System Model (CCSM; Collins et al, 2005) version of the Parallel Ocean Program (POP; Smith
and Gent 2002). The surface forcing functions are the same for all model configurations and are
obtained from the Common Ocean-Ice Reference Experiments (CORE), developed by Large and
Yeager (2004).
On average, the ocean circulation in the GOA is characterized by a large scale cyclonic
Alaskan gyre, with the broad Alaska Current on the eastern basin and a stronger Alaskan Stream
along the Aleutian Islands (western basin). The model mean circulation, illustrated in Fig. 1a, is
consistent with this view and shows a surface current velocity up to 0.4 ms-1 south of the
Aleutian Peninsula. Contours of Sea Surface Height (white lines on Fig. 1a) also show that the
surface currents are principally in geostrophic balance with a strong cross-shore SSH gradient
south of the Aleutian Peninsula. Finally, a map of the SSH standard deviation (Fig. 1b) indicates
high variability all along the coast, where intense eddy variability is observed (Alaska Stream:
Crawford, 2000; Alaska Current: Tabata, 1982; Di Lorenzo et al., 2005).
To add confidence in the degree of realism of the eddy variability in the model simulation,
we compare the model Eddy Kinetic Energy (EKE) to the one derived from the AVISO satellite
maps (Fig. 1c-d). The satellite EKE is calculated from the Sea Level Anomaly (available at
http://www.jason.oceanobs.com), as defined by Ladd (2007) by EKE =
1 é '2
U g + Vg'2 ù
where
ú
û
2 êë
U g' and V g' are the geostrophic velocity anomalies. Consistent with Ladd (2007), high values of
EKE along the Alaska Current and the Alaskan Stream are evident both in the model and the
satellite data. Along the Alaskan Stream, eddy activity is constrained to the shelf break. On the
eastern GOA basin, we notice the signature of three major eddy groups associated with a region
of high EKE, usually named according to the location of their formation, Yakutat, Sitka and
Haida. The eddies observed along the Alaskan Stream and along the Alaska current show
different dependencies with the atmospheric forcing reflecting different generation mechanisms.
While eddies along the Alaskan Stream (western eddies) are not directly affected by the
atmospheric forcing, the development of mesoscale eddies on the eastern GOA basin is
modulated by changes in wind-induced downwelling (Combes and Di Lorenzo, 2007).
3. Tracer experiment setup
The transport pathways and statistics associated with the mesoscale circulation in the
model are characterized using a passive tracer advection-diffusion equation with a decay term.
¶P
P
+ u.Ñ P = Ñ 2P + Q(x , y , z) where P is the passive tracer concentration, Q a time
¶t

independent source term and  is the decay timescale. The source term is such that the passive
tracer has a is set to 1 over a region from the coast to 50 km offshore and from the surface to 50
m depth. This decay term is introduced to track the dispersion patterns of the passive tracer from
its source within the timescale set by  . This term is needed to avoid an infinite growth of
passive tracer concentrations in the model domain. The timescale  is set to 4 years, which is the
average timescale that eddies survive in the gyre after their generation at the coast.
4. Results
We begin by testing if the passive tracer approach realistically tracks the dispersion of
coastal waters associated with eddies generated at the coast. We focus on one model snapshot
during August 1998 (Fig, 2a). This El Niño year is characterized by strong mesoscale eddies in
the eastern basin (Melsom et al, 1999), in particular the large anticyclones Haida and Sitka
eddies, which are well reproduced by the model hindcast (white lines on Fig. 2a). Consistent with
observations (Crawford 2005), the core of the Haida and Sitka eddies correspond to local maxima
in passive tracer concentrations. This confirms that the model adequately reproduces the offshore
transport of coastal water, here represented by the passive tracer, associated with the eastern
eddies.
The westward transport by the modeled eastern eddies for August 1998 is evident in
vertical section across the Haida eddy core (black transect Fig. 2a) of tracer concentration (Fig.
2c), Temperature (Fig. 2d) and Salinity (Fig.2e). In agreement with observational studies
(Crawford, 2002; Tabata, 1982), Haida eddies (and Sitka not shown here) are characterized by an
anticyclonic rotation, represented in Fig 2a by a positive SSH anomaly. These eddies show a
warmer and less saline core than the surrounding water (Fig 2d-e), with a local maximum in
temperature around 100m depth. The vertical section of the passive tracer (Fig. 2c) shows that the
excess of heat and fresh water in the eddy core is advected from coastal region. This also
suggests that other important biochemical quantities can be advected from the coast into the gyre
interior, both at the surface and in the subsurface. In the model experiments, the passive tracer is
initially set to 1 within a volume that extends 50km from the coast and 50m below the surface.
Therefore the presence of a coastal passive tracer (Fig. 2c) below 50m confirms the results by
Combes and Di Lorenzo (2007), who suggest that eastern eddies develop and propagate offshore
following a downwelling event at the coast. Finally, Fig 2b quantifies the excess of heat inside
this particular Haida eddy. Identical to Crawford (2004), the excess of heat in the first 500m is
calculated as the excess of heat within a volume associated with a Gaussian function (red fitted
curve in Fig 2b). Consistent with the results of Crawford (2005), the excess of heat is estimated at
around 100 108 J between the surface and 500m deep.
Confident that the model realism is adequate to investigate the cross-shore transport
statistics, we consider the transport of the passive tracer across a transect that follows the coast
along the edge of the region of high SSH standard deviation (Fig 1b, black line). The cross-shore
exchange across this transect is defined as the advection of the surface passive tracer (T ) by the
component of the surface velocity normal to the transect (U ), where a positive value of the
passive tracer flux UT is directed towards the gyre interior. The temporal evolution of the total
surface flux across this transect, as visualized by a Hovmuller diagram from 1965-2004 (Fig. 3a),
shows significant interannual variability and little spatial coherence along the transect indicating
that different forcing mechanisms locally control the offshore transport. We now decompose the
total flux into: UT = UT + U 'T + UT '+ U 'T ' , where (U ,T ) are the seasonal monthly means
used to compute the anomalies (U ',T ') . The time average of the flux terms UT = UT + U 'T '
(Fig 3b), show that the mean total advection is mainly explained by its seasonal mean (UT ). The
negative value of UT along the transect corresponds to an inshore advection and is consistent
with previous papers showing a downwelling condition at the coast. Fig 3b also shows that the
mean off-shore advection is associated with the mean eddy-flux (U 'T ' ). The seasonality of the
advection of surface passive tracer is illustrated in Fig 3c at five locations along the transect.
September in general corresponds to a month of strong off-shore advection (positive values)
following the seasonal development of the eddy field, while early spring shows an in-shore
advection of tracer (negative values) across the transect.
The spatial patterns of the surface passive tracer seasonal variability can be summarized
by the March and September means (Fig. 4a and b). The along-shore surface current (white
vectors on Fig. 4) in the eastern basin (Alaska Current) shows a clear seasonal variation. The
Alaska Current is stronger in winter (December-March) and weaker in summer (JuneSeptember), showing a similar seasonal variability to that observed (Strub and James, 2002) and
modeled (Combes and Di Lorenzo, 2007). A strong seasonal variability of the surface passive
tracer is evident both in the southern edge of the Alaskan Stream and off the Vancouver Island,
consistent with the advection of tracer across the transect (Fig 3). South of the Alaskan Peninsula,
the surface passive tracer is advected southward with a maximum advection in September. Off
the Vancouver Island the passive tracer is advected toward the interior of the GOA basin in
September (Fig 4b), whereas in March (Fig 4a), the surface passive tracer is confined along the
coast. The seasonal patterns of the passive tracer closely track the ones observed in satellite
Chlorophyll-a (Fig 4c and Fig 4d), confirming that offshore transport is the primary mechanism
controlling the seasonal Chlorophyll maxima in the offshore waters of the GOA.
The interannual variability of the flux terms (Fig 5), shows that the dominant term is
anomalous advection acting on the mean tracer concentration with important contribution also
from the eddy flux (U 'T ' ). This results is consistent along all the locations on the transect, both
along the Alaska Current (Fig 5a) and along the Alaskan Stream (Fig 5b). To explore the
interannual variability of the cross-shore mixing, we examine the time series of tracer
concentration anomalies, where the anomalies are defined by removing the seasonal cycle.
Okkonen et al (2001) show that eddy variability is quite non-deterministic in the western basin
(Alaskan Stream) while in the eastern basin (Alaska Current) eddy variability is modulated by
changes in the surface winds. In particular Okkonen et al (2001) and Combes and Di Lorenzo
(2007) show strong mesoscale eddies activity during years in which wind forcing promotes
strong downwelling.
In the western basin where SSH standard deviation is high (153.28ºW, 55.11ºN), Fig. 6a
shows the time series of tracer anomaly from 1965 to 2004 and exhibits a strong interannual
variability. Fig. 6b (lag 0) shows a composite analysis of the SSH during times when the tracer
concentration anomalies are greater than 90 (red line on Fig. 6a). The sequence of maps of SSH
at different lag with respect to the time when the tracer anomaly is high, shows the formation and
propagation of an anticyclonic eddy-like feature, meaning that high anomalous coastal passive
tracer found along the western basin is mainly associated with eddy variability. This feature
advects along the Alaskan Stream water originated in the North Gulf of Alaska both at the
surface but also in the vertical.
Previous studies have suggested that variability in oceanic circulation and eddies
generated on the eastern GOA is modulated by changes in the wind stress (Melsom et al, 1999;
Combes and Di Lorenzo, 2007). On a decadal time scale, along the Alaska Current, changes in
wind stress are associated with changes in the PDO index. The PDO index is negative from 1950
to 1976 and principally positive from 1977 to 2000, when the positive phase of the PDO is
associated with an enhancement of the Aleutian low pressure system over the North Pacific.
The changes in tracer concentration are computed as the difference between the passive
tracer distribution in the period 1977–82 and in the period 1971–76. The eastern GOA shows a
significant change in tracer distribution following the 76-77 climate shift (Fig 7a). Fig 7a shows
an increase of passive tracer advection to the interior of the gyre when the Aleutian low pressure
is strengthening. The advection is more pronounced west of the Sitka region and west of the
Queen Charlotte Island, where Sitka and Haida eddies are generated. Changes in atmospheric
forcing also produce a change of the surface costal current. An intensification of the surface
current is found in the eastern basin, associated with the 76-77 climate shift, leading to a stronger
advection of passive tracer. On the other side of the basin, interannual variability in the tracer
concentration (shown previously) does not seem to respond to changes of surface forcing
associated with the climate shift.
To further clarify the relationship between tracer distribution and PDO, we quantify the
PDO effect by correlating the tracer concentration with the PDO index (Fig7b). Fig 7b shows the
spatial distribution of tracer 2 months after the PDO affects the ocean surface. The map shows
principally two regions of high correlation between the tracer and PDO. These regions are located
on the path of the Haida and Sitka eddies which advect the passive tracer trapped in their core.
For a better look at the correlation between the SSH, tracer concentration and PDO index, Fig 7c
and 7d compared these three time series respectively at the location where Sitka and Haida
develop. These plots corroborate the hypothesis that decadal variability of the tracer is mainly
explained by the PDO in the eastern basin. The increase of mean passive tracer after the 1976-77
climate shift is also clearly observed on these plots.
5. Conclusion
The passive tracer experiment, analyzed in this study, provides a way of looking at the
evolution and distribution of coastal water masses. The general features of the model circulation
of the GOA shows consistent results with observational data, in particular both model and
satellite data reveal high EKE regions along the Alaskan Stream, the North Gulf Of Alaska and in
the eastern basin where Haida and Sitka eddies develop. Eddies advect in their core warm
temperature and fresh water. The tracer analysis shows that this excess of heat and freshwater
have for origin the coastal region. This also suggest that, in addition to warm and fresh water,
eddies may also transport important biochemical quantities such as oxygen, chlorophyll-a and
nutrient, essential for productivity.
The results show that while mean tracer advection is directed towards the coast consistent
with the dominant downwelling regime of the GOA, it is the mean eddy fluxes that contribute to
offshore advection into the gyre interior along the entire GOA. The passive tracer distribution in
the GOA also exhibits a strong seasonal variability both in the eastern and western basin. On the
seasonal timescales, passive tracer is clearly advected toward the interior of the gyre in
September. Significant tracer is transported westward, off the Vancouver Island (eastern basin),
and southward, south of the Aleutian Peninsula (western basin).
On interannual timescales, the cross-shore mixing along the Alaskan Stream is mainly
associated with intrinsic eddy variability. In contrast along the eastern boundary in the Alaska
Current region, stronger offshore dispersion of the passive tracer coincide with periods of
stronger downwelling conditions, which trigger the development of stronger eddies. For instance,
the 1976-77 climate shift, corresponding to an intensification of the Aleutian low pressure and
therefore corresponding to period of stronger downwelling, indicates stronger advection of
coastal passive tracer in the eastern basin (Fig. 6a) in particular in the path of coastal eastern
eddies, such as Haida and Sitka eddies.
Our results indicate that coastal water, and therefore biochemical quantities, are both
vertically (upwelling and downwelling) and spatially (advection by surface current or eddies)
mixed in the Gulf of Alaska. This cross-shore and vertical mixing are essential for the
productivity in the basin. Relation between eddy transport and biota has already been observed in
the western basin (Okkonen et al., 2003) and eastern basin (Mackas and Galbraith, 2002). Even if
the direct link between productivity and mesoscale eddies has not been fully explored, large-scale
atmospheric changes such as the 1976-77 climate shift (studied above) seem to impact and
modify species distribution (Mantua et al., 1997; Litzow et al., 2006).
References
Batten, S. D. and W. R. Crawford, 2005: The influence of coastal origin eddies on oceanic plankton distributions in
the eastern Gulf of Alaska. Deep-Sea Research Part Ii-Topical Studies In Oceanography, 52, 991-1009.
Capotondi, A., M. A. Alexander, et al. (2005). "Low-frequency pycnocline variability in the northeast Pacific."
Journal Of Physical Oceanography 35(8): 1403-1420.
Combes, V., E. Di Lorenzo, 2007: Intrinsic and forced interannual variability of the Gulf of Alaska mesoscale
circulation. Progress In Oceanography, 75, 266-286.
Crawford, W. R., J. Y. Cherniawsky, and M. G. G. Foreman, 2000: Multi-year meanders and eddies in the Alaskan
Stream as observed by TOPEX/Poseidon altimeter. Geophysical Research Letters, 27, 1025-1028.
Crawford, W. R., 2002: Physical characteristics of Haida Eddies. Journal of Oceanography, 58, 703-713.
Crawford, W. R., 2005: Heat and fresh water transport by eddies into the Gulf of Alaska. Deep-Sea Research Part IiTopical Studies In Oceanography, 52, 893-908.
Crawford, W. R., P. J. Brickley, T. D. Peterson, and A. C. Thomas, 2005: Impact of Haida Eddies on chlorophyll
distribution in the Eastern Gulf of Alaska. Deep-Sea Research Part Ii-Topical Studies In Oceanography, 52, 975-989.
Cummins, P. F. and G. S. E. Lagerloef, 2004: Wind-driven interannual variability over the northeast Pacific Ocean.
Deep-Sea Research Part I-Oceanographic Research Papers, 51, 2105-2121.
Curchitser, E. N., D. B. Haidvogel, A. J. Hermann, E. L. Dobbins, T. M. Powell, and A. Kaplan, 2005: Multi-scale
modeling of the North Pacific Ocean: Assessment and analysis of simulated basin-scale variability (1996-2003).
Journal Of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 110.
Di Lorenzo, E., M. G. G. Foreman, and W. R. Crawford, 2005: Modelling the generation of Haida Eddies. Deep-Sea
Research Part Ii-Topical Studies In Oceanography, 52, 853-873.
Di Lorenzo, E., A. J. Miller, N. Schneider, and J. C. McWilliams, 2005b: The warming of the California current
system: Dynamics and ecosystem implications. Journal Of Physical Oceanography, 35, 336-362.
Haidvogel D., Arango G. H., Cornuelle B., Curchitser E., Di Lorenzo, E, Fennel K., Hedstrom K., Levin J., Miller A.
J., Moore A. M., Shchepetkin A., Warner J., Wilkin J., Zavala J. and Zhang, 2007: Regional Ocean Forecasting in
Terrain-Following Coordinates. Journal of Computational Physics, in press.
Haidvogel, D. B., H. G. Arango, K. Hedstrom, A. Beckmann, P. Malanotte-Rizzoli, and A. F. Shchepetkin, 2000:
Model evaluation experiments in the North Atlantic Basin: simulations in nonlinear terrain-following coordinates.
Dynamics Of Atmospheres And Oceans, 32, 239-281.
Harrison, P. J., P. W. Boyd, D. E. Varela, and S. Takeda, 1999: Comparison of factors controlling phytoplankton
productivity in the NE and NW subarctic Pacific gyres. Progress In Oceanography, 43, 205-234.
Johnson, W. K., L. A. Miller, N. E. Sutherland, and C. S. Wong, 2005: Iron transport by mesoscale Haida eddies in
the Gulf of Alaska. Deep-Sea Research Part Ii-Topical Studies In Oceanography, 52, 933-953.
Ladd, C., P. Stabeno, and E. D. Cokelet, 2005: A note on cross-shelf exchange in the northern Gulf of Alaska. DeepSea Research Part Ii-Topical Studies In Oceanography, 52, 667-679.
Ladd, 2007
Lagerloef, G. S. E., 1995: Interdecadal Variations in the Alaska Gyre. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 25, 22422258.
Large, W., and S. Yeager, 2004. Diurnal to decadal global forcing for ocean and sea-ice models: the data sets and
flux climatologies. NCAR Technical Note: NCAR/TN-460+STR. CGD Division of the National Center for
Atmospheric Research.
Litzow, M. A., K. M. Bailey, F. G. Prahl, and R. Heintz, 2006: Climate regime shifts and reorganization of fish
communities: the essential fatty acid limitation hypothesis. Marine Ecology-Progress Series, 315, 1-11.
Mackas, D. L. and M. D. Galbraith, 2002: Zooplankton distribution and dynamics in a North Pacific eddy of coastal
origin: 1. Transport and loss of continental margin species. Journal Of Oceanography, 58, 725-738.
Mantua, N. J., S. R. Hare, Y. Zhang, J. M. Wallace, and R. C. Francis, 1997: A Pacific interdecadal climate
oscillation with impacts on salmon production. Bulletin Of The American Meteorological Society, 78, 1069-1079.
Melsom, A., Meyers, S.D., Hurlburt, H.E., Metzger, E.J., O'Brien, J.J., 1999: ENSO effects on Gulf of Alaska
eddies. Earth Interactions 3 (1), (available at http://earthinteractions.org/).
Miller, A. J., D. Cayan, B. T., G. N., and O. J., 1994: The 1976-77 climate shift of the Pacific ocean. Oceanography,
7.
Miller, A. J., E. Di Lorenzo, D. J. Neilson, H. J. Kim, A. Capotondi, M. A. Alexander, S. J. Bograd, F. B. Schwing,
R. Mendelssohn, K. Hedstrom, and D. L. Musgrave, 2005: Interdecadal changes in mesoscale eddy variance in the
Gulf of Alaska circulation: Possible implications for the Steller sea lion ecline. Atmosphere-Ocean, 43, 231-240.
Okkonen, S.R., Jacobs, G.A., Metzger, E.J., Hurlburt, H.E., Shriver, J.F., 2001. Mesoscale variability in the
boundary currents of the Alaska Gyre. Continental Shelf Research 21, 1219–1236.
Okkonen, S. R., T. J. Weingartner, S. L. Danielson, D. L. Musgrave, and G. M. Schmidt, 2003: Satellite and
hydrographic observations of eddy-induced shelf-slope exchange in the northwestern Gulf of Alaska. Journal of
Geophysical Research-Oceans, 108.
Shchepetkin, A. F. and J. C. McWilliams, 2005: The regional oceanic modeling system (ROMS): a split-explicit,
free-surface, topography-following-coordinate oceanic model. Ocean Modelling, 9, 347-404.
Smith, R. D., and P. R. Gent, 2002: Reference manual for the Parallel Ocean Program (POP), ocean component of
the Community Climate System Model (CCSM2.0 and 3.0).Tech. Rep. LA-UR-02-2484, Los Alamos National
Laboratory.[Available online at http://www.ccsm.ucar.edu/models/ccsm3.0/pop.]
Stabeno, P. J., N. A. Bond, A. J. Hermann, N. B. Kachel, C. W. Mordy, and J. E. Overland, 2004: Meteorology and
oceanography of the Northern Gulf of Alaska. Continental Shelf Research, 24, 859-897.
Strub, P. T. and C. James, 2002: Altimeter-derived surface circulation in the large-scale NE Pacific Gyres. Part 1.
seasonal variability. Progress in Oceanography, 53, 163-183.
Tabata, S., 1982: The Anticyclonic, Baroclinic Eddy Off Sitka, Alaska, in the Northeast Pacific-Ocean. Journal of
Physical Oceanography, 12, 1260-1282.
Whitney, F. and M. Robert, 2002: Structure of Haida eddies and their transport of nutrient from coastal margins into
the NE Pacific Ocean. Journal Of Oceanography, 58, 715-723.
Figure Caption List
Fig 1: (a) Mean Surface current, with mean Sea Surface Height (white contours), (b) Sea Surface
Height Standard deviation. (c) Model Eddy Kinetic Energy, (d) AVISO Eddy Kinetic Energy
Fig 2: (a) Tracer concentration and Sea Surface Height (white contours) for August 1998.
Vertical section of (c) Tracer, (d) Temperature and (e) Salinity. (b) is the Excess of Heat across
the eddy (the red curve is the fitted Gaussian of the model Temperature)
Fig 3: (a) Hovmuller diagram of the tracer advection (UT). (b) shows UT , UT and U 'T ' along
the transect. (c) shows the seasonal variability of UT at locations 50, 100, 150, 200 and 250 on
the transect.
Fig 4: Surface Passive Tracer with surface current (white arrows) for March and August
Fig 5: Components of UT along the Alaska Current (a) and along the Alaskan Stream (b)
Fig 6: (a) Sea Surface Height (SSH) anomaly at (153.28ºW , 55.11ºN: western basin).
(b) SSH composite maps for SSHa > 90 (red line on a-)
Fig 7: (a) Tracer distribution associated with the 76-77 Climate shift. (b) shows the correlation
between the PDO index and Tracer concentration (lag 2 months). Comparison between the Tracer
(blue), SSH (green) and PDO index (red) at Sitka (c) and Haïda (d)