Notes on Compensation Dr. Edward L. Millner Phone: 828-1717 email: emillner@vcu.edu URL: www.people.vcu.edu/~emillner/FastTrack Primary Learning Objective: To identify compensation schemes that align employees interests with the interests of the owners of the firm. Question: What are a manager’s goals? The separation of ownership and control creates a principle-agent problem between owners and managers Managers are agents hired by owners to represent the interests of the owners in determining the courses of action taken by the firm Owners unable to monitor perfectly Managers have interests that conflict with the principles that they are hired to represent Compensation schemes have the potential of reducing or exacerbating the conflict of interests inherent in owner-manager relationships Two types of incentives may align the interests of managers and owners Internal contracts o Bonuses o Stock ownership and options External incentives o Reputation o Takeover Question: Page 219 of the text documents that fast-food restaurants owned by the company are typically less profitable than restaurants owned by the franchisee. a. Is the superior profitability of the restaurants owned by the company relative to the restaurants owned by the franchisee surprising? Why or why not? b. Does the superior profitability of the restaurants owned by the company relative to the restaurants owned by the franchisee indicate that franchisee ownership is superior for the parent company? Why or why not? c. How might the compensation scheme for managers of restaurants owned by the company be altered to improve the performance of the restaurants? Homework 1 Question: Suppose that a CEO is currently paid a bonus at the end of each fiscal year, with the size of the bonus being tied directly to the profits earned by the firm in that year. The Board of Directors is considering making the bonus a fixed amount and making it contingent upon reaching a specified level of profitability in that year. Would you recommend the implementation of the change? Why or why not? Question: A compensation scheme that pays the CEO with large quantities of stock presumably aligns the interests of the CEO closely with the interest of the owners. How might a CEO who holds large quantities of stock behave in a way that deviates from the interests of the firm? How might these problems be remedied? Question: Would paying a CEO in stock options do a better job of aligning the interests of the CEO and the firm than payment in stocks? If not, what explains the increased popularity of using stock options in the 1990’s? Question: A firm currently pays bonuses to each of four division heads, with the size of the bonus being tied directly to the profitability of each division. The Board of Directors is considering a proposal to pay only one large bonus to the head of the division showing the highest return to equity in that year. What changes in behavior would such a Tournament based compensation scheme induce? A principle-agent problem exists between managers and workers Workers are agents hired by managers to represent the interests of the managers to carry out managers directives Managers are unable to monitor perfectly Workers have interests that conflict with the principles that they are hired to represent Compensation schemes have the potential of reducing or exacerbating the conflict of interests inherent in manager-worker relationships Two types of incentives may align the interests of managers and workers Internal contracts o Profit sharing o Revenue sharing o Piece rates o Time clocks o Spot checks o Stock ownership and options External incentives o Reputation o Dismissal Homework 2