As part of its review of future approaches to quality assessment, the Higher Education
Funding Council for England (HEFCE) published a consultation document on 29 June 2015.
The document, entitled ‘ Future approaches to quality assessment in England, Wales and
Northern Ireland ’, contains a number of proposals about the way that teaching quality should be assured in future in the higher education sector, including proposals about the future operation of the external examining system.
Council has considered the consultation document and authorised the Pro-Vice-Chancellor
(Education) to respond on behalf of the University and Education Committee. To help inform the drafting of the University’s response, comments are being invited from academic colleagues across the collegiate University. Comments are particularly welcome on the proposals relating to the external examining system (paragraphs 83-87).
Consultation document
The consultation document sets out proposals for a revised approach to teaching quality assessment. The proposals are underpinned by two main aims:

to reduce the burden and cost of external quality assessment in the higher education sector; and

to strengthen the assurances that may be given to students and other stakeholders on the integrity and comparability of academic standards across the sector.
Reducing the burden of external quality assessment
The consultation document proposes to reduce the burden of external quality assessment by placing greater emphasis on the role of institutional governance in the quality assessment system (paragraphs 56-64). It proposes that the current system of external cyclical reviews, operated by the Quality Assurance Agency (QAA ) on HEFCE’s behalf to check threshold academic standards and quality, should be discontinued.
Instead, it proposes to build on the existing accountability framework operated by HEFCE in relation to financial management and risk. Under this framework, an ins titution’s governing body would be required to submit an annual statement to HEFCE confirming that it has received a report and action plan relating to the student academic experience and student outcomes, including the evidence from the institution’s own internal quality review processes. HEFCE would use the existing five-yearly assurance review to test the robustness of evidence and processes used by the institution’s governing body in reaching its annual statement.
Providing greater assurances about the comparability of academic standards
The consultation document also asserts that there is a strong student and public interest in a regulatory quality assessment system being able to demonstrate that academic output standards (i.e. degrees awarded by individual institutions) are being maintained and that they are ‘broadly comparable’ across the sector. It states expressly that it does not propose a shift away from the autonomy of degree-awarding bodies to set and maintain standards, or the development of a national curriculum or national assessment system.
1

Instead, it proposes to build on key elements of the current quality assessment system to provide clearer assurances to students and other stakeholders on the broad comparability of standards (paragraphs 78-102). In particular, the consultation document proposes ‘further modernisation or professionalisation’ of the external examining system so as to better enable external examiners to ‘provide reliable judgements about the standards set by institutions and the measurement of student achievement against these standards, such that standards are maintained over time and are reasonably comparable’. The two specific proposals for modernisation are to introduce externally run UK-wide training for external examiners, in addition to the training provided by the host institution, and to establish a national register of external examiners (paragraphs 83-87).
Your comments
To comment on the proposals, please complete the proforma overleaf and email it to hefce.consultation@admin.ox.ac.uk
by 1 September 2015.
University ’s response
The comments received will help inform the University’s response to the consultation. The response will be submitted to HEFCE by 18 September 2015 and will be published shortly afterwards on the Education Committee’s website .
Further information
Further information about the HEFCE review, including a copy of the consultation document, is available at www.hefce.ac.uk/reg/review .
2

HEFCE consultation: Quality Assessment Review
Proforma for comments
Please use this form to provide your comments relating to the HEFCE consultation.
Comments are particularly welcome on the proposals relating to the external examining system (paragraphs 83-87).
Training for external examiners (paragraphs 84-85)
84. The funding bodies are presently persuaded that it would be beneficial to the sector, and to its stakeholders, to consider further modernisation or professionalisation of the external examining system. We believe that further strengthening some aspects of the current arrangements could enhance the role of the external examining system as part of a future quality assessment system, and indeed that this would be highly desirable in its own right. It is important to note that the current quality assessment system does not provide direct assurance about the standard of awards made to students, or their broad comparability, and so the proposals to strengthen the external examining system represent a significant improvement in the assurances available to students and other stakeholders.
85. We are proposing that the training of external examiners should be strengthened. We believe that UK-wide training – separately from, and in addition to, the practical induction arrangements made by individual host institutions – would be useful and we would wish
Universities UK, GuildHE and other sector bodies to take the lead in proposing how best this can be done. The focus of the training would be to ensure that external examiners were clear about their role and had the requisite technical assessment skills. They would then be better able to provide reliable judgements about the standards set by institutions and the measurement of student achievement against these standards, such that standards are maintained over time and are reasonably comparable.
Please provide any comments on the proposals for additional training
National register of examiners (paragraphs 86-87)
86. The sector has previously discussed and set aside proposals for a register of external examiners, but we presently believe that the reputational benefits for the sector of improved training, and the appointment of external examiners by institutions from those who have undertaken training, now make this a timely and worthwhile improvement to the system. We are seeking clearer assurances for students and other external stakeholders about the integrity of academic output standards, and this would be a relatively straightforward way to improve in this area. We envisage that an external body, and not the funding bodies themselves, would carry responsibility for the training and registering of external examiners.
3

87. We are mindful that there could be unintended consequences of these proposals, particularly that placing further expectations on individual external examiners might discourage those considering becoming involved in the system, and that it would take a period of time to implement fully. However, we believe that the time commitment for training would not be too onerous and that it would be helpful to consider how online technologies might be used to facilitate this training. The Higher Education Academy research reveals that one of the least well implemented recommendations from the Finch Review is that relating to the recognition of external examining activities within an examiner’s home institution. We would also, therefore, want to explore with sector bodies and institutions how these activities might be better recognised.
Please provide any comments on the proposals for a national register of examiners
Any other comments
Do you have any comments on other aspects of the proposals relating to the external examining system?
Do you have any comments on other proposals in the HEFCE consultation document?
Please email this form to hefce.consultation@admin.ox.ac.uk
by 1 September 2015 .
4