Supplementary Information (doc 58K)

advertisement
1
Supplemental material
2
Table S1
3
Details of primer sequences, PCR conditions, the targeted regions and analyzed CpG
4
positions of the pyrosequencing assays for the imprinted loci PLAGL1, IGF2R DMR2,
5
GRB10, H19 3CTCF binding site and 6 CTCF binding site, IGF2, MEG3, NDN, SNRPN,
6
NESP and NESPAS. Primer sequences of the MS-PCR experiments for the DLK1/MEG3 IG-
7
DMR.
8
9
10
Table S2
Details on the 10 evaluable pyrosequencing assays used for DNA methylation analysis.
1
Locus
Chromosomal
region
Methylated
allele
Targeted
region
Reference
PLAGL1
6q24
maternal
Putative ICR
overlapping
ZAC/HYMAI
Arima et al 34
GRB10
7p12
maternal
DMR
Hikichi et al 35
IGF2
11p15
maternal
DMR0 within
intron 2
Liu et al 36
H19
11p15
paternal
6CTCF and
3CTCF binding sites
Takai et al 37
NESP
20q13
paternal
DMR
Liu et al 38
NESPAS
20q13
maternal
DMR
Liu et al 38
NDN
15q11
maternal
promoter CpG island
Lau et al 39
SNRPN
15q11
maternal
DMR overlapping
exon 1
Zeschnigk et al 40
MEG3
14q32
paternal
promoter DMR
Temple et al 9
IGF2R
6q25
maternal
DMR2 in intron 2
Smrzka et al 41
11
12
Table S3
13
Raw data on pyrosequencing results of the analyzed patients born SGA and the controls.
14
Methylation values are provided in % methylation per studied CpG position. For each of the
15
10 evaluated loci single CpG positions and their corresponding position in bp (hg19) is
16
displayed. SGA= small for gestational age. MC= commercial in vitro methylated DNA
17
(positive control). Pool= pooled DNA from 20 healthy donors (10 males, 10 females). UC=
18
whole genome amplification DNA (illustra GenomiPhi V2 DNA Amplification Kit, GE
19
Healthcare, Freiburg, Germany) used as negative control during assay optimization (i.e. in
20
independent control series). N/A= not analyzable.
21
For all established assays except IGF2R (see below) we calculated the thresholds for hyper-
22
and hypomethylation as follows:
23
First, per locus the mean methylation value of the tested CpGs (called “mean(locus)”) was
24
determined in all samples and for all loci. Second, the mean methylation level of the
25
“mean(locus)” and its standard deviation (SD) was calculated over all 50 controls analyzed
26
per locus (called “mean(locus/controls)”). Each assay specific “normal methylation range”
27
(=NMR) was then defined as “mean(locus/controls)” +/- 3SD. Next we compared the
28
“mean(locus)” values for the patient samples to the respective locus-specific NMR. If the
29
“mean(locus)” in a sample exceeded the locus-specific NMR the locus was called
2
30
“hypermethylated” in this sample. If the “mean(locus)” in a sample was below the locus-
31
specific NMR the locus was called “hypomethylated” in this sample. Finally, for such “hyper-
32
“ and “hypomethylated” loci we determined for each single CpG in this locus whether its
33
methylation level was outside the NMR of the same CpG in the 50 controls.
34
Hypermethylation of the IGF2R DMR2 in healthy probands has repeatedly been reported in
35
the recent literature
36
defined differently. Thus, the methylation results for IGF2R of the commercially available
37
fully methylated controls (MC) carried through all IGF2R experiments was used as reference.
38
We built “mean(IGF2R/MC)” by calculating the mean methylation value over all 3 tested
39
CpG positions and all MC samples analyzed in the same runs with patient and control
40
samples. In the next step the hypermethylation cutoff for IGF2R was defined as
41
“mean(IGF2R/MC)” – 3 SD. In an alternative approach we excluded the fully methylated
42
samples in the control group with the method explained above (2 samples met the criteria)
43
and calculated in a second step “mean(IGF2R/controls)” +/- 3SD from the remaining control
44
samples. With this approach, that raises the test sensitivity, the identical cases turned out to be
45
classified “hypermethylated” in the patient cohort, while 3 additional cases were labeled
46
“hypermethylated” in the control cohort. No hypomethylated samples were detected with the
47
latter approach.
48
49
50
51
52
3
12,22
. Therefore, the hypermethylation cutoff for this assay needed to be
Download