AGENDA ITEM 8 BOROUGH OF POOLE LEARNING OVERVIEW GROUP 28 JANUARY 2004 POST OFSTED ACTION PLAN FINAL REPORT PART OF PUBLISHED FORWARD PLAN: YES STATUS – STRATEGIC 1. PURPOSE 1.1 To inform Members of progress made in implementing the Post OFSTED Action Plan. Further to give an evaluation of the impact of the plan and finally to seek Member agreement to changes in reporting on the implementation of the plan. 2. DECISION REQUIRED 2.1 To agree that the Action Plan has been fully implemented and that no further reports on its implementation should come to committee. 2.2 To agree to continue to monitor improvements in relation to the three key issues raised by the inspectors through reports on progress in implementing the Education Development Plan. 2.3 To recognise that issues raised in the Inspection Report to do with the organisation of schools in Poole should continue to be monitored by this committee through reports from the Policy Director (Education) as part of the forthcoming debate on school organisation and structure. 3. BACKGROUND 3.1 Poole Local Education Authority was inspected by OFSTED and the Audit Commission during the autumn of 2001. The report was published in January 2002. 1 3.2 The report identifies three key issues and makes 22 further recommendations on specific areas for improvement. By March 2002 the Action Plan had been completed and circulated to Members and Partners including DfES. 3.3 Learning Overview Group has received regular reports on progress in the implementation of the plan, the most recent being 1 July 2003. Each of these reports has stressed the importance of the linkage between the Action Plan and the Education Development Plan. Many of the recommendations made within the report have been addressed jointly by the Action Plan and the Education Development Plan. The Education Development Plan is reviewed annually and so strategies for raising attainment are more recent and relevant to current circumstances than the OFSTED Action Plan which is now two years old. The revised Education Development Plan for the five years beginning 2002 was graded by OFSTED as ‘good’. 3.4 Post Ofsted Inspection Action Plans are intended to address issues raised by the Inspection within a year. In our case there has been slippage because changes in personnel have led to some delay, most notably these include lengthy periods of interim arrangements to cover for Policy Director for Education and the head of School Advice and Support Services. The report to Overview Group of 1 July 2003 set the deadline of December 2003 to complete the implementation of the plan. 3.5 The final monitoring reports bringing together reports from lead officers on progress in carrying out the activities set out in the Action Plan are attached as Annex ‘A’. 4. IMPACT 4.1 The OFSTED Inspection Report identifies three key issues and recommendations attached to each are described as fundamental to improvements in the LEA. These issues are: underperformance at Key Stage 2, school organisation, and data analysis. The recommendations attached to these issues focus mainly on raising standards especially at Key Stage 2 and the requirement that the LEA should analyse the impact of school organisation and consider ways of rationalising the present complex system. The recommendations connected with data analysis and tracking especially at Key Stage 2 are fundamental features of the Educational Development Plan. Committee has already received an evaluation of progress in implementing the elements of the Education Development Plan and 2 recent tests and examination results support the view that standards are rising at Key Stage 2. In part, this is due to better data and monitoring of pupil progress. 4.2 Issues related to school organisational are more complex. A brief review of the impact of the current organisation of schools on standards was presented by the interim Policy Director for Education in a report to the Learning Overview group in March 2003. This report argued that there is no link between school organisation and standards of attainment that could be tracked through statistical analysis. Analyses of School Organisation Plans for those LEA’s with similar ages of transfer to Poole support this view. However, it is clear that our current structure will come under pressure as numbers of pupils decline. Schools and elected Members will face difficult decisions in relation to the structure and organisation of schools and here again the debate about standards will be at the heart of discussions. Therefore, although actions set out in the Post Inspection Action Plan have been carried out the issue is not closed and further reports will come to the Learning Overview Group as the debate about school organisation and standards of achievement is carried through into the coming year. 4.3 The other recommendations are grouped under four headings: i) LEA Strategy for School Improvement The report was critical of the rigour with which Members and partners scrutinise policies and practice within the LEA. We now have a new structure of committees and groups with separation between the Overview Group and Scrutiny Committee. We also have a clear forward plan for each of these groups. Cabinet decisions are now informed by decisions made within the Overview Group and there are opportunities for Members to ‘call-in’ decisions made by cabinet. School balances, criticised in the report as too high, have been substantially reduced, in part due to the action set out in this plan and in part due to the dreadful financial settlement of 2003/04. A report to Scrutiny Committee in October 2003 identified a drop in school balances in the order of 50%. ii) Support for School Improvement Here again all of the proposed actions have been taken. The report required an improvement in monitoring, challenge/support, and interventions in schools through better passage of information from advisors to Governing Bodies, and training for advisors in analysis and interpretation of data. These actions are now complete and Governors now have a clear picture of the LEA’s assessment of school performance. Plans to implement better tracking of pupil performance have been implemented with new data software in place. Targets set for primary 3 schools are close to aggregating to those of the LEA. Improvements for ICT development have now been completed. It is difficult to ascertain the impact on standards of attainment in ICT since Government proposals for national testing of progress in ICT have been delayed. iii) Strategic Management Here again actions set out within the Action Plan have all been carried out where possible, the exception being a single plan for education. The main recommendation in this section relates to the development of a single education plan to bring together all educational initiatives, timescales and targets. Since the publication of the OFSTED Report DfES have invited Poole to be a member of the first wave of authorities to draft such a plan. National discussions are underway to clarify the content of the plan. We are still required until 2005/06 to produce separate plans for education development, school organisation, asset management, behaviour support and early years and childcare development. Work on this will begin in earnest in the coming year. Actions to improve transfer between schools have all been taken and there is some evidence in test and examination results that the drop in standards experienced elsewhere when pupils transfer between key stages is less marked in Poole. Actions required in response to other parts of this section of this report have been taken especially those in relation to information communication technology. However, the requirement to remove the inequity in the current arrangements for home to school transport is still being addressed through the consultation process on discretionary payments for travel. There is only one recommendation in relation to Special Education Needs directly and that is to create special schools as centres of excellence, including outreach work to mainstream schools. A good deal has gone on in this area and there are successful programmes of outreach in place. Current plans to develop new campus special schools operating a range of services will take these developments further. iv) Access The report has some eight recommendations under the headings of access. All of these have been implemented. The only continuing area being work to improve support for behaviour. The action set out in the Post OFSTED Action Plan have been implemented but the behaviour review will build on the work that has been started. 5. CONCLUSION 5.1 The wide range of detailed recommendations set out at the end of the OFSTED Report have been fully addressed. However, some of these especially the key 4 issues relate to wider on-going strategic matters are rightly now addressed within the Education Development Plan, those related to school organisation will continue to be discussed in the coming year through the broad review and debate on the success of our current structure of schooling. 5.2 The full impact of the actions taken within the Post OFSTED Inspection Action Plan will not be apparent until we have a series of test results over years. It is recommended that the major strategic issues identified within the report should continue to be subject of reports for the Learning Overview Group. John Nash Policy Director (Education) Tel: 633202 BACKGROUND PAPERS Audit Commission/Ofsted Inspection Report – Poole LEA Post Ofsted Action Plan Report to Learning Overview Group - Post Ofsted Action Plan Update, 1 July 2003 5