1007-18P WHO WILL BE YOUR KING? (Deuteronomy 17:14-20) SUBJECT: F.C.F: PROPOSITION: INTRODUCTION: A. We’re continuing to study God’s commentary on his own law, the Ten Commandments. And we are in the section on the fifth commandment, which is repeated in Deuteronomy 5:16: “‘Honor your father and your mother, as the LORD your God commanded you, that your days may be long, and that it may go well with you in the land that the LORD your God is giving you.” And we’ve already seen the fact that this commandment is about more than simply parents and children; that it speaks to every relationship of human authority. Last time we considered priests and judges and the responsibility to judge justly. And then God turns to address the subject of kings. B. In some ways this is a bit anachronistic. There were no kings in Israel at this time, and there wouldn’t be any kings for hundreds of years. After Moses, Joshua led God’s people in to settle the Promised Land. And after Joshua, the nation became somewhat disconnected into their various tribes. God raised up some judges to deliver the people when they rebelled and fell into hard times. But there was no real unified, central government until the time of Samuel and then the first king Saul. Yet God prepared his people for the time when they would ask for a king. Not even the king was above the law, and so God set down rules for the kings. I. QUALIFICATIONS FOR KINGS. Look at verses 14-15: 14 “When you come to the land that the LORD your God is giving you, and you possess it and dwell in it and then say, ‘I will set a king over me, like all the nations that are around me,’ 15 you may indeed set a king over you whom the LORD your God will choose. One from among your brothers you shall set as king over you. You may not put a foreigner over you, who is not your brother.” A. Prior to their asking for a human king so they could be “like all the nations” around them, God was their king. They were not supposed to be like all the nations around them. They were to live with God 1 as their king. B. But when the time came for them to reject God as their king and prefer a human king, God had already given the qualifications and stipulations for those kings, in order to prevent the serious errors that were temptations to those who were so elevated. 1. First, the king had to be one of the Israelites, and not a foreigner. This was for two reasons. For one thing, a foreigner was disqualified because he would not be a part of the covenant people of God. Why would they want a pagan who is not committed to Israel’s God to rule over them? Having a foreigner ruling over them would be a sign of God’s judgment for their disobedience. But the other reason was so that they understood that the king was just a man like the rest of them. Kings tended to see themselves as above the rest, more than mere man, royalty and even divinity. Pharaoh had been considered a god. Many of the pagans worshiped their kings as gods. It was to be understood that Israel’s king was a mere man, subject to God as were the rest of them. Eventually the line of kingship was narrowed down to one man’s family, the line of king David. David was always to have a son seated on the throne of Israel. 2. And Israel’s kings were not to amass a large collection of horses. “16 Only he must not acquire many horses for himself or cause the people to return to Egypt in order to acquire many horses, since the LORD has said to you, ‘You shall never return that way again.’” Some of you may be horse lovers and may be wondering what God has against horses, and that answer is nothing at all. But the king was not to keep a large collection of horses for himself. Horses and their chariots were the “heavy artillery” of a large standing army, and the king was not to keep a large army on the ready. If God’s people obeyed him, they would not need a standing army because God would protect them and establish them in the land. The horses would become a snare of temptation to Israel’s king. Having a large standing army would be a status symbol leading to pride. And it would also lead to a false sense of security, which is expressed in Psalm 20:7: “Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God.” You cannot, apparently, trust in both. God hates pride and trusting in your own strength. And by the way, 40 years before this they ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 1007-18P were terrified of Pharaoh’s horses and chariots as they bore down on them, and yet those horses were powerless against Israel’s God. 3. And the king was not to have multiple wives nor to amass wealth. “17 And he shall not acquire many wives for himself, lest his heart turn away, nor shall he acquire for himself excessive silver and gold.” These were considered some of the perks and privileges of royalty, symbols of personal glory and splendor. God would have his king looking to him as his great treasure, humble and undistracted. One of the reasons the kings would have multiple wives was so that they could have many offspring and ensure their continued line. Rather, God was their inheritance and their great reward. 4. Finally, the king was to be subject to and obedient to the law of God. “18 “And when he sits on the throne of his kingdom, he shall write for himself in a book a copy of this law, approved by the Levitical priests. 19 And it shall be with him, and he shall read in it all the days of his life, that he may learn to fear the LORD his God by keeping all the words of this law and these statutes, and doing them, 20 that his heart may not be lifted up above his brothers, and that he may not turn aside from the commandment, either to the right hand or to the left, so that he may continue long in his kingdom, he and his children, in Israel.” The king was to have his own copy of God’s Word which he was to read and study and learn the fear of the Lord, obeying his law. That way he could not only lead the people rightly, but he could also serve as a living model and example of a man of God for all the people to see. II. THE DISAPPOINTMENT OF KINGS. A. Is this a great time to be alive? Do you think this is a great time to be given your 70-80 years? Can you think of a better time? Can you think of a worse time? B. I think it had to be difficult living in Israel under its kings, for they were all terrible disappointments. Samuel was the last judge of Israel. He was a kind of transition between the period of the judges and the period of the monarchy. Samuel was attached to the tabernacle as a young boy, you recall, because his mother, Hannah, could not have children 2 and vowed to give her firstborn to God if he would give her a son. When he was old enough, Samuel, the child of promise, was sent to live in the tabernacle and serve there. Eli was the high priest at the time, but his sons were wicked and worthless, and God was about to have a regime change. Eli and his two sons all died on the same day, and Samuel found himself as the judge of Israel. C. In 1 Samuel 8, the people came to ask for a king. Samuel was old and failing and his sons did not serve the Lord as he did, so they feared a crisis of leadership. 1. God instructed Samuel to give them what they wanted and chose a promising young man, handsome and tall, a natural leader, named Saul. Saul was a disappointment, who did not follow the Lord with his whole heart. 2. So God chose David instead whom he called “a man after my own heart.” And David did very well, but, well, there was that episode of adultery and murder with Bathsheba, and he did have multiple wives, and so he was a disappointment. 3. Solomon, his son, followed him, and extended the borders of the kingdom and built the temple. Yet how well did he do? Well, let’s see, he amassed many horses, a standing army, strike one. He also had many wives, 700 to be precise (I wonder if he remembered all of their birthdays?) as well as 300 concubines, strike two. And he did turn away from the Lord and led the people into idolatry, strike three. Is there anybody else worthy of consideration? Not really. Most of the other kings were bad, some really, really bad, with few redeeming characteristics. I could mention a few of the brighter lights. 4. There was the king named Azariah or Uzziah, the longest reigning king of Judah, fifty-two years. He was a breath of fresh air and was a very good king, though, at the end of his life he grew proud and insisted on offering incense on the altar, which was reserved only for the priests. As a result the Lord struck him with the curse of leprosy, and he died a leper. 5. And there was Hezekiah, also a good king who shepherded Judah through some very difficult days of invasion by the Assyrian armies. But he also faltered near the end of his life giving away state secrets to the Babylonians and raising a terrible son ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 1007-18P named Manasseh who became the worst king in Judah’s history. It must have been utterly disillusioning to live in Israel under these failed kings, looking for a leader who was good to the core, but finding time and again a man with feet of clay, every last one of them a disappointment. III. LONGING FOR A TRUE KING. A. And what Israel discovered was that all these kings could not help but be disappointments because they were never what God had fully intended in the first place. GOD was to be their king. He was the only King who could never disappoint them. B. And what they eventually found was the God himself came in Jesus Christ to be their King forever. He is the leader we are longing for. He is the true Man of God who will not disappoint us because he is God the King in human flesh. Is he qualified? Does he fit the qualifications God established for a true king? 1. Well, yes, he was an Israelite, from the tribe of Judah, from the house and line of David. Both Matthew and Luke include his genealogy which they trace back to David. In fact, he was the true Israelite. He came out of Egypt as they did. He was in the wilderness, not 40 years but 40 days, as they were. He faced temptation as did Adam, not in a posh garden but in a stark desert, and he was victorious. So he was truly a king from among his brothers. 2. And did he amass a great army and possess horses and chariots in which he trusted? No, not at all. When he was tempted, he trusted not in superior might but in the Word of God. He simply responded, “It is written.” So he supremely did not trust in horses or chariots, but trusted in the name of the Lord our God. 3. Did he have multiple wives? And did he acquire for himself excessive silver and gold? No, he had only one wife, his bride, and “gave himself up for her that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word, so that he might present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing….” (Eph. 5:26-27). And not only did he not acquire silver and gold for himself, but his grace was such “that though he was rich, yet for your sake he became poor, so 3 that you by his poverty might become rich.” (2 Cor. 8:9) 4. And finally, did he read and study God’s Word? Did he study the Word “all the days of his life, that he may learn to fear the LORD his God by keeping all the words of this law and these statutes, and doing them, 20 that his heart may not be lifted up above his brothers, and that he may not turn aside from the commandment, either to the right hand or to the left, so that he may continue long in his kingdom, he and his children, in Israel”? He is the only one who did. CONCLUSION Sinfully, the people of Israel rejected God as their king. They wanted a human king so they could be like the nations around them. And that’s what they got: human kings who disappointed them, just like the nations around them! All of the kings of Israel were disappointments. They caused God’s people to long for something more. My friends, Jesus Christ the Son of God is that something more. God came as a man to be their king once again. He is the one who cannot disappoint us. And that calls us to submit to his authority. With gladness to own him as our king, to study his Word and way, and walk before him in humble obedience and love. To look to him alone for our protection and provision, our guidance and grace. ____________________________________________________________________________________________