Supplementary Material Template-free synthesis of single-/double-walled TiO2 nanovesicles: potential photocatalysts for engineering application Gongde Chen, He Cheng, Weixin Zhang*, Zeheng Yang, Maoqin Qiu, Xiao Zhu, and Min Chen School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Anhui Key Laboratory of Controllable Chemical Reaction & Material Chemical Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui 230009, PR China * Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to W. Zhang at wxzhang@hfut.edu.cn. Experimental Section Sample preparation All chemicals used in this study were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd, China, and used as-received without further purification. Anatase TiO2 nanovesicles were prepared by controllable hydrolysis Ti(SO4)2 in the presence of the H2O2 and urea. Typically, 5 mL of H2O2 (30 wt%) was mixed with 30 mL of Ti(SO4)2 aqueous solution (0.1 mol/L). Then, 3 g of urea (≥99.0 wt%) was dissolved into the solution above and the mixed solution was subsequently transferred into a 60 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave. After being heated in an oven at 170 oC for 2 or 16 h, the products were collected, washed with distilled water and ethanol for three times, respectively, and dried in the oven at 60 oC overnight. Characterization The samples were characterized by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) in a Rigaku D/max-γB X-ray diffractometer with a Cu kα radiation source (λ= 0.154178 nm) operated at 40 kV and 80 mA. The scanning rate was 4o/min, and the step width was 0.02o. The morphologies and structures of the samples were characterized using field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) (FEI Sirion-200) and high resolution TEM (HRTEM) (JEM-2100F) at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra were recorded at room temperature on a fluorescence spectrophotometer (Hitachi F-4500) with a Xenon lamp (150 W) as the excitation source. Both entrance and exit slits were 5.0 nm and the scanning speed was 1200 nm/min. Diffuse reflectance UV-visible spectra within a wavelength range of 200-800 nm were recorded on a Shimadzu 2550 UV-visible spectrometer and BaSO4 powder was used as the internal standard. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms were recorded on a Quantachrome NOVA 2200e surface area and pore size analyzer at liquid nitrogen temperature. All samples were degassed at 120 oC for 4 h prior to measurements. The specific surface area of the samples was calculated by following the multi-point BET (Brunauer-Emmett-Teller) procedure, and the average pore diameter was determined by the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method using the desorption isothermal. Photocatalytic activity measurement The photocatalytic activities of the samples with regard to RhB in aqueous solution were evaluated under a UV light irradiation at a distance of 10 cm. A high-pressure Hg lamp (predominant wavelength λ=365 nm, 300 W) was used as the light source. Typically, 0.05 g of samples were dispersed in 100 mL of RhB aqueous solution with an initial concentration of 1×10-5 or 2×10-5 mol/L, and then magnetically stirred in the dark for 4 h to reach adsorption equilibrium. The suspension was then exposed to a 300 W of high-pressure Hg lamp. A 2 mL of solution was drawn from the system at a certain time interval. After removal of the catalyst by centrifugation, residual RhB concentration was determined through detecting its characteristic emission peak intensity at 586 nm on a Hitachi F-4500 fluorescence spectrophotometer or characteristic adsorption peak intensity at 553 nm on a Shimadzu 2550 UV-visible spectrometer. Characterization of Hydroxyl Radicals Hydroxyl radicals (·OH) produced on the surface of TiO2 photocatalysts were detected by a photoluminescence (PL) technique. Terephthalic acid was used as the probe molecule due to its easy reaction with ·OH to produce 2-hydroxyl-terephthalic acid, which has a high fluorescent signal at around 425 nm when excited by 315 nm light23-25. The PL intensity of 2-hydroxyl-terephthalic acid was proportional to the amount of ·OH produced on the surface of TiO2 photocatalysts. The experimental procedure was similar to the photocatalytic experiment except that RhB solution was replaced by the basic terephthalic acid solution (5×10-4 mol/L) with NaOH (2×10-3 mol/L). The withdrawn solution after centrifugation was measured on a Hitachi F-4500 fluorescence 116 213 204 105 211 s2 200 a 103 112 004 Intensity (a.u.) 101 spectrophotometer with the excitation wavelength of 315 nm. s1 20 30 70 -1 ) -1 0.04 0.03 b 3 dV/dD (cm g nm 180 3 Volume absorbed (cm g -1 ) 210 40 50 60 2Theta (degrees) 150 120 0.02 0.01 0.00 0 20 40 60 80 100 Pore diameter (nm) 90 60 s1 s2 30 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Relative pressure (P/P0) 1.0 Figure S1. (a) XRD patterns and (b) N2 absorption-desorption isothermal curves of the samples prepared by a hydrothermal treatment of Ti(SO4)2 with the assistance of H2O2 and urea for (s1) 2 h and (s2) 16 h. The insets show the corresponding pore size distribution calculated by the BJH method. a b 2 μm c 200 nm d 2 μm 200 nm Figure S2. FESEM images of anatase TiO2 samples prepared by a hydrothermal treatment of Ti(SO4)2 with the assistance of H2O2 and urea for (a, b) 2 h and (c, d) 16 h. H 2 Ti 5 O 11 ·3H 2 O Nanosheet Assembly Nanoparticles Ti(SO4)2 Nucleation Growth H2O2 15 min Urea 30 min Ripening Hydrothermal Reaction 170 °C Ripening 16 h Double-walled Anatase TiO 2 Nanovesicle Ripening 2h Single-walled Anatase TiO 2 Nanovesicle 1h Anatase TiO 2 / H 2 Ti 5 O 11 ·3H 2 O Core-shell Structure Figure S3. Schematic illustration of the formation process for single- and double-walled anatase TiO2 nanovesicles. Intensity (a.u.) b 10 20 30 40 50 2Theta (degrees) a 60 70 a b 100 nm Figure S4. XRD patterns and TEM images of the samples prepared by a hydrothermal treatment of Ti(SO4)2 with the assistance of H2O2 and urea for (a) 0.5 h and (b) 1 h. 1.0 C/C0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 a b 0.0 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 Time (min) Figure S5. The adsorption curves of RhB solution (initial concentration: 1×10-5 mol/L) over (a) single- and (b) double-walled anatase TiO2 nanovesicles. Detection of hydroxyl radicals Active species ·OH radicals generated on the surface of single- and double-walled anatase TiO2 nanovesicles and commercial anatase TiO2 nanoparticles were probed by terephthalic acid solution. As shown in Fig. S6, the PL intensity at around 425 nm increases with the irradiation time, indicating that the amount of ·OH radicals generated on the surface of photocatalysts increases with the time. The sequence of the samples based on the PL intensity detected from high to low is double-walled anatase TiO2 nanovesciles, single-walled anatase TiO2 nanovesciles, and commercial anatase TiO2 nanoparticles in turn. The result indicates that double-walled anatase TiO2 nanovesciles are able to produce more ·OH radicals than single-walled ones possibly because the former possess higher crystallinity than the latter, which leads to lower recombination rate for electron-hole pairs on the former than the latter. They both generate more ·OH radicals than commercial anatase TiO2 nanoparticles, which may result from their enhanced light absorption capacity. 8000 PL intensity (a.u.) 7000 a 6000 5000 3000 60 min 40 min 20 min 2000 10 min 4000 0 min 1000 0 350 400 450 500 550 Wavelength (nm) 600 8000 PL intensity (a.u.) 7000 6000 b 60 min 40 min 20 min 5000 4000 10 min 3000 0 min 2000 1000 0 350 400 8000 PL intensity (a.u.) 7000 450 500 550 Wavelength (nm) 600 c 6000 5000 4000 60 min 40 min 20 min 3000 2000 10 min 1000 0 350 0 min 400 450 500 550 Wavelength (nm) 600 Figure S6. Fluorescence spectral changes of terephthalic acid solution under UV light irradiation in the presence of (a) single-walled anatase TiO2 nanovesicles, (b) double-walled anatase TiO2 nanovesicles, and (c) commercial anatase TiO2 nanoparticles. Light absorption properties 1.4 a b c Absorbance (a.u.) 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 200 300 400 500 600 Wavelength (nm) 700 800 Figure S7. Diffuse reflectance UV-vis absorption spectra of the samples: (a) single-walled anatase TiO2 nanovesicles, (b) double-walled anatase TiO2 nanovesicles, and (c) commercial anatase TiO2 nanoparticles. Fig. S7 shows the diffusion reflectance UV-vis absorption spectra of anatase TiO2 nanovesicles and commercial anatase TiO2 nanoparticles. As presented, the absorption edges of the three samples are almost the same because they have the same intrinsic energy band gap. Furthermore, single-walled anatase TiO2 nanovesicles exhibit very similar absorption spectrum to double-walled anatase TiO2 nanovesicles. They both exhibit superior light absorption capacity to commercial anatase TiO2 nanoparticles within the wavelength range from 200 to 335 nm. 20 30 40 50 2Theta (degree) 60 70 200 nm -1 3 180 -1 210 ) 240 dV/dD (cm g nm 3 Volume absorbed (cm g -1 ) 10 b anatase rutile # Intensity (a.u.) a 150 120 90 c 0.0050 0.0045 0.0040 0.0035 0.0030 0.0025 0.0020 0.0015 0 60 20 40 60 80 Pore diameter (nm) 100 30 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Relative pressure (P/P0) Figure S8. (a) XRD pattern and (b) TEM image and (c) N2 absorption-desorption isothermal curves of P25. The inset shows the corresponding pore size distribution calculated by the BJH method. Life cycle assessment Life cycle experiments were conducted to assess the durability of single- and double-walled anatase TiO2 nanovesicles, and the corresponding results are presented in Fig. S9. The spent photocatalysts were collected, cleaned by deionized water, and dried for use after each run. The photocatalysts repeated to degrade RhB solution (1×10-5 mol/L, 100 mL) under UV light irradiation for 5 times. As observed, RhB degradation ratio decreases gradually with the increase of run cycles. After five cycles, RhB degradation ratio can still reach 81.0 and 82.8% over single- and double-walled anatase TiO2 nanovesicles, respectively. The results indicate that they possess good stability as photocatalysts. 1.0 a C/C0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 2nd run 3rd run 1st run 0 1.0 3 4th run 6 9 Time (h) 5th run 12 15 b C/C0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 2nd run 3rd run 1st run 0 3 4th run 6 9 Time (h) 5th run 12 15 Figure S9. Life cycle performances of (a) single- and (b) double-walled anatase TiO2 nanovesicles in the photocatalytic degradation of RhB solution (1×10-5 mol/L) under UV light irradiation. Table 1 Crystallite Sample single-walled anatase TiO2 nanovesicles double-walled anatase TiO2 nanovesicles commercial anatase TiO2 nanoparticles15 Degussa P25-TiO2 c size (nm)a Particle size (nm) Wall Thickness (nm) Specific surface area (m2/g) Average pore size (nm) Pore volume (cm3/g) 10.4 400-500b ca. 100 170.1 3.76 0.215 39.9 400-500b ca. 30 (inner) ca. 50 (outer) 106.2 7.59 0.290 49.8 ca. 100 N/A 8.9 4.80 0.050 22.6 ca. 30 N/A 36.4 3.19 0.341 a : Crystallite size was calculated by Scherrer formula based on the peak width at half height of the diffraction peak assigned to (101) plane of anatase TiO2. b c : The average size of single nanovesicle unit obtained from Fig. 1 and Fig. S2. : The textural properties of P25 was obtained from Fig. S8.