UK NATIONAL COLLABORATIVE USHER STUDY Institute of Child Health, UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, UCL Moorfields Eye Hospital Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute UCL Ear Institute Glossary A few of the terms used in this report are quite technical. Here is a list terms to help guide you through the report. Q. What is DNA? DNA is a molecule that is responsible for the overall structure and function of an organism by the production of specific proteins. It is an ‘instruction booklet’ involving many codes (genetic information) that is read and followed. Each parent passes on their genetic information via DNA to their children. Q. What is a gene? A gene is a section of DNA that codes for a specific protein or part of a protein that is responsible for/involved in a specific function. You inherit genes from each parent. Each individual has approximately 25,000 genes. A faulty version of a gene may cause a medical condition because the protein that is produced may be faulty or may not be produced at all. It is like a dominoes effect. Q. What is a candidate gene? A candidate gene is a gene which has not yet been confirmed to have a role in the specific topic of interest but may have the potential to do so. In the case of this study, the candidate gene SLC4A7 has not been classed as an Usher gene, however, the researchers of this NCUS study believe it may have a potential role in Usher syndrome; hence why it is called a candidate gene October 2012 Page 2 of 25 Q. What is a protein? Proteins are machines that make all living cells function. Cells produce protein from the information they receive from genes in the DNA sequence; which we inherit from our parents. There are different types of proteins that all have different functions, which are coded by different genes. Q. What is a polymorphism? A polymorphism is a change in a DNA sequence that is common in a specific population of people. It is not disease causing (not pathogenic). Q. What is a mutation? A mutation is when there is a change (variant) in the DNA sequence, causing a change in the ‘instructions’ being given out for producing proteins. Mutations can have 3 consequences. One result could be a neutral effect, whereby the mutation still produces a functional protein. Another result could be a beneficial effect, whereby the mutation actually improves the proteins function (these two effect can be classes as a polymorphism (see below)). The final result could be a detrimental one, whereby the mutation could produce a protein that does not function properly or stops the production of the specific protein, which may result in a genetic disorder (the variant is pathogenic (see below)). Q. What is pathogenicity? Pathogenicity is the ability to cause disease. October 2012 Page 3 of 25 Q. What is a variant? Changes in the DNA sequence are called variants. Variants can be pathogenic or they could be neutral (this is when they would be called polymorphisms). Q. What is haplotype analysis? Haplotype analysis is a test to identify sections of DNA that are similar to each other. Q. What is a genotype? A genotype is the description of an individual’s set of genes. In the case of Usher syndrome, it is the molecular diagnosis, such as a mutation in one of the Usher genes. Q. What is a phenotype? A phenotype is the description of an individual’s observable physical and behavioural characteristics. In the case of Usher syndrome, it is the clinical features of an individual such as the severity of deafness or RP. Q. What is a genotype-phenotype correlation? A genotype-phenotype correlation is the relationship between the two previous descriptions. The link between the presence of a mutation(s) and the resulting pattern of changes it has on normal function of an individual. An example of a genotype-phenotype correlation is sex determination. Whether an individual is female or male is determined by the set of genes that individual has inherited from his/her parents. If an individual has 2 X genes (XX) then October 2012 Page 4 of 25 that individual will be a female. If the individual has 1 X and 1 Y gene (XY) then that individual will be a male. Q. What does remote location in the DNA sequence mean? Remote location means that the specific DNA sequence is found in a region of the DNA that is not involved in the production of a protein. Variations in such regions may not be detrimental to actual protein production and function, which is why the variants found in ‘remote locations’ were not further analysed in this study. Q. What is next generation sequencing? Next generation sequencing is the name given to methods that are able to read a big chunk of an individual’s genetic information in one go but at a low cost compared to older methods. This is important as researchers would be able to look for mutations in new genes that may not have been identified by older methods. October 2012 Page 5 of 25 Background The National Collaborative Study (NCUS) was initiated in 2003 at Moorfields Eye Hospital in collaboration with Sense. It was funded by a Big Lottery Fund grant allocated to Sense. The Institute of Child Health (the clinical and molecular genetics department as well as the audiovestibular medicine department), Institute of Ophthalmology, the UCL Ear Institute as well as the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute were also part of this study. The aim of the study was to evaluate the genetic cause of Usher Syndrome in the UK; specifically looking at the contribution of Usher genes as well as a new candidate gene to the development of Usher syndrome. Usher syndrome is a condition characterised by changes in hearing, vision and sometimes balance. The NCUS also looked at non-Usher cases such as Alstrom syndrome to see if Usher genes also had a role in individuals not clinically diagnosed with Usher Syndrome. The findings of this study were presented in a paper called ‘Comprehensive sequence analysis of nine Usher syndrome genes in the UK National Collaborative Usher Study’ by Stabej et al (2012). This report will summarise the main findings of this study. October 2012 Page 6 of 25 Clinical assessments Participants: A total of 188 individuals, all from various ethnic backgrounds, and their families (456 family members including parents and siblings) were recruited for the NCUS study. 172 of these were individuals with Usher syndrome. It is important to have suitable people to compare results with (these individuals are called controls). In this case, DNA sequences from people of various ethnic backgrounds, as well as known polymorphisms, were collected to compare with the DNA sequence from the 188 individuals and their families. This ensures that any change in the DNA sequence detected could actually be disease causing rather than a change commonly found in individuals without Usher syndrome. Controls: There were 3 groups of controls used for this study. The 1st was the use of DNA samples from 381 unrelated blood donors from different ethnic backgrounds. The 2nd was the use of 48 control DNA samples containing known polymorphisms from the Fondation Jean Dausset-CEPH (the Center for the Study of Human Polymorphisms). Lastly, DNA from 57 individuals of a Pakistani origin was also used. Q. What is a polymorphism? A polymorphism is a change in a DNA sequence that is common in a specific population of people. It is not disease causing (not pathogenic). October 2012 Page 7 of 25 Clinical classification of Usher syndrome Vision, hearing and balance of each individual were assessed; the results of each were then used to determine which subtype of Usher syndrome the individual had. A brief summary of each test clinically used for assessment is available in the appendix of this document. There are 3 main clinical subtypes for Usher syndrome. Type 1 is characterised by: Profound congenital hearing loss on audiometry Absent vestibular (balance) function on formal testing Retinitis pigmentosa present during vision assessment Type 2 Usher syndrome is characterised by: Sloping moderate to severe congenital sensorineural hearing loss on audiometry Normal vestibular (balance) function on formal testing Retinitis pigmentosa present during vision assessment Type 3 Usher syndrome is characterised by: Progressive sensorineural hearing loss Variable vestibular (balance) function Retinitis pigmentosa present during vision assessment Cases that do not fit into any of the above subtypes are classed as Atypical Usher syndrome. October 2012 Page 8 of 25 Genetic assessment What genes were sequenced? The NCUS study sequenced all 9 known Usher genes as well as the candidate gene. The nine Usher genes were: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. MYO7A USH1C CDH23 PCDH15 USH1G USH2A GPR98 WHRN CLRN1 The candidate gene sequenced was: SLC4A7 DNA samples were taken from each individual’s blood samples by standard methods. Once collected, the DNA samples from the 188 individuals, as well as the 48 CEPH controls, were sequenced for the 9 Usher genes as well as the candidate gene SLC4A7. Assessment of pathogenicity Q. What is pathogenicity? Pathogenicity is the ability to cause disease. Q. What is a variant? Changes in the DNA sequence are called variants. Variants can be pathogenic or they could be neutral (this is when they would be called polymorphisms). October 2012 Page 9 of 25 Q. What is a polymorphism? Polymorphism is a change in a DNA sequence that is common in a specific population of people. It is not disease causing (not pathogenic). A change in DNA sequence is graded according to the guidelines provided by the Clinical and Molecular Genetics Society. The grades used to classify variants are: UV4: probably pathogenic UV3: Likely pathogenic UV2: Uncertain pathogenicity UV1: probably neutral variants Neutral variants October 2012 Page 10 of 25 Genetic evaluation Analysis of variants A total of 774 variants were recorded from the 188 NCUS individuals. 319 variants were not further analysed due to their remote location in the DNA sequence. Q. What is a variant? Changes in the DNA sequence are called variants. Variants can be pathogenic or they could be neutral (this is when they would be called polymorphisms). Q. What does remote location in the DNA sequence mean? Remote location means localization in a region of the DNA that is not involved in the production of a protein. Variations in such regions may not be detrimental to actual protein production and function, which is why the variants found in ‘remote locations’ were not further analysed in this study. The remaining 455 of the variants were then classified using the grading system mentioned above. The results were as follows: 115 variants were pathogenic 15 variants were UV4 11 variants were UV3 18 variants were UV2 201 variants were UV1 95 variants were neutral October 2012 Page 11 of 25 Diagnosis Based on clinical assessment, a total of 47 individuals were diagnosed with Usher syndrome type 1, 121 were diagnosed with Usher syndrome type 2 and 4 were diagnosed with Usher syndrome type 3. A further 11 were diagnosed with atypical Usher syndrome; 4 individuals had typical RP but atypical hearing loss, whilst the other 7 had both atypical RP and atypical hearing loss. There were also 5 individuals who did not have Usher syndrome; 1 had autosomal-recessive RP, 1 had Alstrom syndrome, 1 had sector RP and hearing loss and a further 2 had an unknown syndrome. Total participants in NCUS study and their diagnosis (N=188) 6% 3% 2% 25% USH1 USH2 USH3 Atypical USH Non-USH 64% October 2012 Page 12 of 25 Genetic features in Usher syndrome type 1 families There are 5 genes associated with Usher type 1; shown below. These genes are referred to as USH1 genes. MYO7A (USH1B) USH1C (USH1C) CDH23 (USH1D) PCDH15 (USH1F) USH1G (USH1G) The overall diagnosis in the Usher type 1 families is illustrated below. 88% had pathogenic variants in 1 of the 5 USH1 genes. No mutation in any of the Usher genes was found in 4% of the participants. 2% of the participants carried a variant with uncertain pathogenicity, whilst a further 6% had mutations suspected to be associated with USH1 genes due to haplotype analysis. Q. What is haplotype analysis? Haplotype analysis is a test to identify sections of DNA that are similar to each other. October 2012 Page 13 of 25 Molecular diagnosis in Usher type 1 families (N=47) 2% 4% 6% Pathogenic variant Suspected involvement of USH1 genes Unclear UV2 variant 88% October 2012 No mutation detected in the 10 sequenced genes Page 14 of 25 The pie chart below shows which Usher genes were responsible for the mutations found in 88% of the Usher type 1 participants in this group. Percentage of pathogenic variants linked to the 9 Usher genes (N=41) 10% MYO7A 12% USH1C CDH23 PCDH15 17% 61% A mutation in MYO7A was the most common cause of Usher type 1 in this group as it accounted for 61% of the cases. The second most common cause of Usher type 1 was a mutation in the USH1C gene. Mutations in CDH23 and PCDH15 were responsible for 12% and 10%, respectively, of Usher type 1 cases. No mutations were associated with the USH1G gene, the remaining Usher genes or the candidate gene. October 2012 Page 15 of 25 Genetic features in Usher syndrome type 2 families There are 3 genes associated with Usher type 2; these are referred to as USH2 genes. These are: USH2A GPR98 WHRN The overall diagnosis in the Usher type 2 families is illustrated below. A total of 86% of the Usher type 2 families had mutations associated with 1 of the 9 Usher genes; 79% had mutations in the USH2A gene, whilst 7% had mutations in the GPR98 gene. However, mutations associated with the 3rd Usher type 2 gene, WHRN, were not found in this cohort. A further 9 (7%) had no mutations linked with any of the Usher genes or the candidate gene. The mutations identified in the remaining individuals could not be confirmed as being associated with an Usher gene; they have been classed as ‘uncertain’ instead. Mutant genes identified in USH2 families (N=121) 7% USH2A 7% 7% GPR98 No mutation detected in the 10 sequenced genes Uncertain 79% October 2012 Page 16 of 25 Genetic features in Usher syndrome type 3 families There is only 1 gene currently associated with Usher type 3; this is referred to as a USH3 gene. It is: CLRN1 The pie chart below illustrates the diagnosis in the families clinically diagnosed with Usher type 3. There were only 4 families clinically diagnosed with this subtype of Usher syndrome, demonstrating its rareness in the UK population. Within this cohort of families, only 2 individuals had mutations in the CLRN1 gene. Mutations identified in a 3rd person were not found to be associated with any of the Usher genes nor the candidate gene. A 4th person was clinically diagnosed with Usher type 3 due to the phenotype exhibited, however, the mutations identified may be linked to CDH23 or WHRN, which are USH1 and USH2 genes, respectively. Mutant genes identified in USH3 families (N=4) 25% CLRN1 50% 25% October 2012 Uncertain No mutation detected in the 10 sequenced genes Page 17 of 25 Genetic features in atypical Usher syndrome families A total of 11 individuals were clinically diagnosed with atypical Usher syndrome. From this subgroup, 4 people exhibited typical RP but atypical hearing loss. They were not found to have a mutation in any of the 9 Usher genes or the candidate gene. A further 7 people from this subgroup exhibited atypical RP as well as atypical hearing loss. Only 2 individuals had a mutation in one of the Usher genes whilst the remaining 5 had no mutations in any of the Usher genes nor the candidate gene. This demonstrates the lack of genotype-phenotype correlation. Q. What is a genotype? A genotype is the description of an individual’s set of genes; this is actual physical material (DNA) that is passed on by the individual’s parents. In the case of Usher syndrome, it is the molecular diagnosis, such as a mutation in one of the Usher genes. Q. What is a phenotype? A phenotype is the description of an individual’s observable physical and behavioural characteristics. In the case of Usher syndrome, it is the clinical features of an individual such as the severity of deafness or RP. October 2012 Page 18 of 25 Q. What is a genotype-phenotype correlation? A genotype-phenotype correlation is the relationship between the two previous descriptions. The link between the presence of a mutation(s) and the resulting pattern of changes it has on normal function of an individual. An example of a genotype-phenotype correlation is sex determination. Whether an individual is female or male is determined by the set of genes that individual has inherited from his/her parents. If an individual has 2 X genes (XX) then that individual will be a female. If the individual has 1 X and 1 Y gene (XY) then that individual will be a male. Overall, 82% of the 11 atypical individuals did not have a mutation in any of the Usher genes nor the candidate gene. The remaining 18% did. Atypical Usher syndrome cases: detection of mutation in one of ten sequenced genes 18% Mutation detected No mutation detected 82% October 2012 Page 19 of 25 Genetic features in non-Usher syndrome families There were 5 individuals who did not have Usher syndrome. From this subgroup, 1 had autosomal-recessive RP. When screened, the person was found to have two known USH2A mutations. In the case of 1 person who was clinically diagnosed with Alstrom syndrome, genetic screening did not show mutations in any of the 9 Usher genes nor the candidate gene. Another person was clinically diagnosed with sector RP and hearing loss. Genetic screening revealed two USH1C mutations. The final 2 people from this group were diagnosed with an unknown syndromic disorder. However, they tested negative for the Usher genes and the candidate gene. October 2012 Page 20 of 25 Non-Usher syndrome cases: detection of a mutation in one of the ten sequenced genes 40% 60% October 2012 Mutation detected No mutation detected Page 21 of 25 Overall Out of the 188 individuals studied, 86% of the mutations identified were linked to the 9 Usher genes. There were no mutations associated with the candidate gene, SLC4A7. This study has highlighted that type 2 Usher is the most common form of Usher syndrome in the UK, and that a mutation in 1 of the 3 genes, USH2A, is the most common cause of this subtype of Usher. Also, type 3 appears to be very rare in the UK. The remaining 14% of Usher syndrome cases may be due to mutations in undiscovered genes or may be due to mutations in one of the already identified Usher genes that were not detected by the method of genetic screening used in this study. Percentage of cases whereby a mutation in one of the ten sequenced genes was detected 14% Mutation detected No mutation detected 86% October 2012 Page 22 of 25 Mutations in USH2A and GPR98 are the most common cause of Usher syndrome regardless of ethnic background and across the whole spectrum in general in the UK. October 2012 Page 23 of 25 Future directions Researchers at the Institute of Ophthalmology now plan to send all the mutation negative samples off to undergo next generation sequencing. Q. What is next generation sequencing? Next generation sequencing is the name given to methods that are able to read a big chunk of an individual’s genetic information in one go but at a low cost compared to older methods. This is important as researchers would be able to look for mutations in new genes that may not have been identified by older methods. This will determine whether mutations in new genes may be responsible for Usher syndrome in the mutation negative patients. This team of researchers are now also investigating the genotype-phenotype correlation in mutation positive patients; this will allow them to observe the natural progression of retinitis pigmentosa in individuals that have Usher syndrome, including its effect on the individual’s central vision. Understanding the genotype-phenotype will enable doctors to know what age is best to treat retinitis pigmentosa with gene therapy (if and when it is approved as a treatment for retinitis pigmentosa), ensuring successful treatment. October 2012 Page 24 of 25 Reference Polona Le Quesne Stabej, Zubin Saihan, Nell Rangesh, Heather B Steele-Stallard, John Ambrose, Alison Coffey, Jenny Emmerson, Elene Haralambous, Yasmin Hughes, Karen P Steel, Linda M Luxon, Andrew Webster, Maria Bitner-Glindzicz. Comprehensive sequence analysis of nine Usher syndrome genes in the UK National Collaborative Usher Study. J Med Genet 2012; 49:27-36. This document was produced by: Yemi Tadesse Research Officer, Sense Telephone: 02070149369 Email: yemi.tadesse@sense.org.uk Sense, 101 Pentonville Road, London, N1 9LG. Please do contact me if you have any queries. October 2012 Page 25 of 25