Supplementary Results to Electrostatic couplings in OmpA ion channel gating suggest a mechanism for pore opening by Heedeok Hong, Gabor Szabo and Lukas K. Tamm Duplication of double mutant cycles with different sets of mutants. Several interactions were measured with two independent double mutant cycles (Figure 3 in main text). A change of Glu52 to an Ala gave the same interaction energy as the more conservative change to a Gln in both the Glu52–Arg138 and Glu52–Lys82 interaction. Similarly, the two double mutant cycles with Glu128Ala and Glu128Gln replacements that probed the Glu128−Arg138 interaction yielded essentially the same values. We also attempted the duplicate measurement of the Tyr8–Glu52 interaction by replacing Glu52 with an Ala instead of a Gln. However, we encountered difficulties with quantitatively refolding the Y8A/E52A double mutant. Contrary to all other mutants presented in this work, which refolded to 90-100%, this particular mutant refolded to only ~70%. Stability measurements of this mutant therefore yielded only lower limits, which however resulted in an interaction energy by mutant cycle analysis that was still consistent with the energy measured with the Gln-containing mutant cycle. Analysis of m-values in double mutant cycles. As shown in Table 1, the m-values are broadly distributed over a range of 1.8~3.1 kcal/mol M-1. Repeated unfolding measurements of each protein indicate that this distribution is real and does not originate from experimental errors. The experimental m-values of many proteins have been correlated with the hydrophobic surface area that is exposed upon unfolding1. For a set of mutant proteins with approximately the same native structures, the variation of mvalues may be attributed to changes in the denatured state ensembles rather than to structural perturbations of the folded state2. Double mutant cycle analysis assumes that the folded and denatured states are not grossly perturbed and that the interacting pairs of the folded state should not interact in the denatured state. Therefore, one might suspect that the broad m-value variation observed in this study could be affected by perturbations of the native or denatured states. However, a thorough analysis of the m-value changes in each double mutant cycle shows that the m-value effects are additive and effectively cancel out. For example, the m-value changes by m=−0.4 from wild-type to K92A mutant. The same change (m=−0.4) is observed in the parallel step from E52Q to E52Q/K82A in the double mutant cycle (Fig. 3 and Table 1). The parameter that describes the non-additivity of m-values for single and the corresponding double mutants is defined as m=mXY-00-(mXY-X0+mXY-0Y), (S1) 1 where mXY-00 designates a difference in m-value between wild-type and a double mutant, and mXY-X0 and mXY-0Y corresponds to the difference between wild-type and each single mutant3. In our eight double mutant cycles, the m’s vary in a narrow range from −0.2 to 0.4 (Supplementary Fig. 7). We estimate the uncertainty in m to be <±0.2 from propagation of the errors of the individual m-values. Therefore, the changes in m-values are approximately additive, implying that the energies measured from our double mutant cycles indeed represent the pairwise side-chain interaction energies. This notion is further supported by the observation that the same interacting energies are obtained when the same residue pairs are probed with different mutant cycles (Fig. 3). In addition, all residues whose interactions are probed in this work are far apart from each other in sequence, and therefore are unlikely to interact in the denatured states. References 1. 2. 3. Myers, J.K., Pace, C.N. & Scholtz, J.M. Denaturant m values and heat capacity changes: relation to changes in accessible surface areas of protein unfolding Protein Sci 4, 2138-48 (1995). Shortle, D. Staphylococcal nuclease: a showcase of m-value effects. Adv Protein Chem 46, 217-47 (1995). Green, S.M. & Shortle, D. Patterns of nonadditivity between pairs of stability mutations in staphylococcal nuclease. Biochemistry 32, 10131-9 (1993). 2