SCOTTISH QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY – SEPTEMBER 2012 CURRICULUM EVENTS – UNIT STANDARDS
SUBJECT:
RELIGIOUS, MORAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES
UNIT:
MORALITY AND BELIEF
National 4
Outcome 1
The learner will:
National 5
Outcome 1
The learner will:
1
Apply knowledge and understanding of contemporary 1
moral questions and responses, by:
Apply knowledge and understanding of contemporary
moral questions and responses, by:
1.1
Describing a contemporary moral question, in
straightforward terms
1.1
Explaining a contemporary moral question, in detail and
with reference to relevant theoretical or abstract ideas
1.2
Describing a religious and a non-religious response to the
question, in straightforward terms
1.2
Explaining a religious and a non-religious response to the
question, in detail and with reference to relevant
theoretical or abstract ideas
Outcome 2
The learner will:
Outcome 2
The learner will:
2
Express reasoned views about religious and nonreligious responses to contemporary moral
questions, by:
2
Express detailed and reasoned views about religious
and non-religious responses to contemporary moral
questions, by:
2.1
Describing one possible consequence of a religious and a
non-religious response to a contemporary moral question,
in straightforward terms
2.1
Explaining one possible consequence of a religious and a
non-religious response to a contemporary moral question,
in detail and with reference to relevant theoretical or
National 4
2.2
2.3
Describing a possible strength and a possible weakness
of a religious and a non-religious response to a
contemporary moral question, in straightforward terms
Expressing a viewpoint on the question and responses,
with a straightforward justification
National 5
2.2
2.3
abstract ideas
Explaining a possible strength and a possible weakness of
a religious and a non-religious response to a contemporary
moral question, in detail and with reference to relevant
theoretical or abstract ideas
Expressing a detailed and reasoned viewpoint on the
question and responses, with reference to supporting
evidence and contrasting viewpoints