Supplementary Table 1 - Word file (465 KB )

advertisement
Online supplementary table 1: overview of all DNA methylation markers in bladder cancer (reported up to April 2012).
% methylated
in tumours
43 (20/47)
52 (36/69)
57 (31/55)
36 (35/98)
35 (34/98)
35 (34/98)
29 (28/98)
16 (16/98)
15 (15/98)
58 (57/98)
88 (86/98)
63 (62/98)
27 (26/98)
100 (98/98)
69 (35/51)
13 (7/55)
17 (9/55)
11 (6/55)
4 (2/55)
29 (16/55)
13 (7/55)
48 (26/55)
Study
Genes
Bornman 20011
Habuchi 20012
Lee 20013
Maruyama 20014
e-cadherin
DBCCR1
RASSF1A
CDH1
RASSF1A
APC
CDH13
FHIT
RARB
DAPK
RARB
e-cadherin
P16
DAPK, RARB, e-cadherin, P16
e-cadherin
MLH1
MGMT
P16
VHL
DAPK
GSTP1
e-cadherin
MLH1, MGMT, P16, VHL, DAPK, GSTP1,
73 (40/55)
e-cadherin
CDH1
47 (23/49)
APC, RASSF1A, P14
100 (45/45)
Chan 20025
Ribeiro-Filho 20026
Tada 20027
Horikawa 20038
Dulaimi 20049
Satyanarayana 2004
10
% methylated
in normal
66 (6/9)
NA (NA/21)
100 (15/15)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
100 (7/7)
43 (3/7)
100 (7/7)
100 (7/7)
43 (3/7)
12 (6/51)
NA (NA/5)
NA (NA/5)
NA (NA/5)
NA (NA/5)
NA (NA/5)
NA (NA/5)
NA (NA/5)
Stage
Grade
Prog1 Sur2
0.02
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.05
0.04
0.04
Rec3
Method4
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
0.001 MSP
MSP
MSP
NA (NA/5)
MSP
NA
100 (5/5)
MSP
MSP
LAMA3, LAMB3, LAMC2
55 (70/128)
100 (10/10)
0.0001 0.0001
MSP
LAMB3
LAMC2
NA (NA/128)
NA (NA/128)
NA (NA/10)
NA (NA/10)
0.01
MSP
MSP
1
0.017
0.002
Catto 200511
Catto 200511
Friedrich 200512
Kim 2005 13
Marsit 200514
200615
Hoque
Christoph 200616
Christoph 200617
Marsit 200618
Neuhausen 200619
Urakami 200620
Boireau 200721
Wu 200722
Yates 200723
RARB
e-cadherin
RASSF1A
TIMP3
RUNX3
SFRP1
SFRP2
SFRP4
SFRP5
SFRP1, SFRP2, SFRP4, SFRP5
TIMP3
DAPK1
APAF1
DAPK1
APAF1
CASP-8
IGFBP3
p16
RASSF1A
PRSS3
SFRP1
APC
RASSF1A
DAPK1
RARB2
CDKN2A
SFRP1,SFRP2, SFRP4, SFRP5, WIF1,
DKK3
CLDN4
LOXL1
LOXL4
LOXL1, LOXL4
RASSF1A,
e-cadherin,
TNFSR25,
EDNRB, APC
25 (23/94)
60 (61/101)
54 (57/106)
NA (NA/105)
73 (91/124)
18 (64/355)
52 (185/355)
9 (32/355)
37 (131/355)
62 (220/355)
175 (121/175)
77 (62/80)
100 (80/80)
74 (81/110)
100 (110/110)
3.6 (4/110)
66 (73/110)
31 (109/351)
32 (112/351)
33 (116/351)
55 (53/96)
45 (43/96)
35 (34/96)
29 (28/96)
19 (18/96)
2 (2/96)
NA
NA
NA
NA
100 (20/20)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
25 (0/25)
8 (2/20)
11 (2/20)
20 (4/20)
15 (3/20)
100 (20/20)
10 (2/20)
NA
NA
NA
NA (NA/19)
NA (NA/19)
NA (NA/19)
NA (NA/19)
NA (NA/19)
NA (NA/19)
77 (42/54)
67 (36/54)
NA (NA/39)
70 (45/64)
40 (26/64)
92 (59/64)
NA (NA/39)
67 (8/12)
100 (12/12)
67 (8/12)
97 (93/96)
75 (23/30)
2
0.04
0.04
0.01
0.04
0.01
0.05
0.01
0.04
0.001
0.002
0.01
0.04
0.0001
0.04
0.05
MSP
MSP
0.05
MSP
0.05
0.036 Q-MSP
0.02 MSP
Q-MSP
Q-MSP
Q-MSP
Q-MSP
0.0003
Q-MSP
0.001
Q-MSP
MSP
MSP
0.04 Q-MSP
0.05 Q-MSP
Q-MSP
0.002 Q-MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP, BS-SEQ
MSP
BS-SEQ
BS-SEQ
BS-SEQ
0.05
Q-MSP
Aleman 200824
Aleman 200825
Brait 200826
Jarmalaite 200827
Kim 200828
Shi 200829
Cebrian 200830
Wolff 200831
Mori 200932
Ali Hosseini 201033
Costa 201034
201035
Lin
Lin 201036
Marsit 201037
Matsumoto 201038
Alvarez-Mugica
SOX9
PMF1
CCNA1
MINT1
CRBP
CCND2
PGP9.5
CALCA
AIM1
p16, RARB, RASSF1A, DAPK,MGMT
RUNX3
DBC2
Myopodin
RUNX3
RASSF1A
EDNRB
BCL2
COL1A2
P14ARF, P16INK4a
GDF15, TMEFF2, VIM
TMEFF2
e-cadherin, P16, P14, RASSF1A
e-cadherin
P16
P14
RASSF1A
56.4 (57/101)
83 (421/507)
57 (53/93)
31 (29/93)
39 (36/93)
33 (31/93)
41 (38/93)
28 (26/93)
54 (50/93)
62 (36/58)
72 (85/118)
59 (44/75)
69 (322/466)
39 (133/342)
37 (127/342)
30 (103/342)
28 (96/342)
NA (NA/67)
51.25 (41/80)
100 (50/50)
NA (NA/50)
90 (51/57)
48 (24/50)
64 (32/50)
36 (18/50)
62 (31/50)
90 (9/10)
NA (NA/10)
100 (26/26)
100 (26/26)
96 (25/26)
100 (26/26)
100 (26/26)
88 (23/26)
100 (26/26)
NA (NA/2)
NA
86 (49/57)
NA (NA/20)
NA (NA/10)
NA (NA/10)
NA (NA/10)
NA (NA/10)
NA (NA/10)
NA
100 (20/20)
NA (NA/20)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HOXB2
NA (NA/582)
NA
KRT13
NA (NA/582)
NA
0.0001
FRZB
NA (NA/582)
NA
0.01
FHL1
Myopodin
NA (NA/70)
NA (NA/170)
NA (NA/10)
NA
3
0.032
0.025
0.001
0.025
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.05
0.007
0.02
0.013 0.05
0.0005 0.037
0.026
0.05
0.008
0.005
0.05
0.0001 0.01
0.03
0.028
0.01
MSP
MSP
Q-MSP
Q-MSP
Q-MSP
Q-MSP
Q-MSP
Q-MSP
Q-MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
Q-MSP, MS-SNP
Q-MSP, MS-SNP
Q-MSP, MS-SNP
Q-MSP, MS-SNP
Q-MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
MSP
Microarray,
Pyroseq
Microarray,
Pyroseq
Microarray,
Pyroseq
Q-MSP
MSP
201039
Owen 201040
Renard 201041
Serizawa 201142
Sobti 201043
Toki 201044
Cabello 201145
Chung 201146
Duarte-Periera
201147
Reinert 201148
Vinci 201149
Xuan 201150
Kandimalla 201251
Kim 201252
Lin 201236
8 TSG
NID2
TWIST1
FGFR3, APC, RASSF1A, SFRP2
RASSF1A
DAPK
CRBP1
BRCA1
RARB
WT1
THSB1
VHL
MGMT
A2BP1
NPTX2
SOX11
PENK
NKX6-3
DBC1
MYO3A
CA10
NA (NA/76)
73 (66/91)
68 (62/91)
90 (91/101)
NA (NA/101)
38 (39/103)
43 (28/65)
NA (NA/31)
NA (NA/31)
NA (NA/31)
NA (NA/31)
NA (NA/31)
NA (NA/31)
62 (16/26)
88 (23/26)
77 (20/26)
92 (24/26)
69 (18/26)
69 (18/26)
65 (17/26)
85 (22/26)
NA
100 (39/39)
100 (NA/NA)
NA
NA
92 (44/48)
100 (16/16)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
OPCML
60 (55/91)
96 (24/25)
ZNF154
POU4F2
HOXA9
EMOES
TBX4
BCL2, TERT, DAPK
CD99
TBX2, TBX3, GATA2, ZIC4
RASSF1A
H-Cadherin
85 (89/105)
92 (97/105)
92 (97/105)
88 (92/105)
NA (NA/NA)
91 (98/108)
32 (26/82)
NA (NA/65)
34 (102/301)
35 (47/133)
100 (14/14)
100 (14/14)
100 (14/14)
100 (14/14)
NA
60 (63/105)
100 (10/10)
NA
NA
100 (43/43)
4
0.01
Q-MSP
MSP
MSP
Q-MSP
Q-MSP
MSP
COBRA
MS-MLPA
MS-MLPA
MS-MLPA
MS-MLPA
MS-MLPA
MS-MLPA
Pyroseq
Pyroseq
Pyroseq
Pyroseq
Pyroseq
Pyroseq
Pyroseq
Pyroseq
0.01
0.017
0.025
0.022
0.03
0.022
Q-MSP
0.05
0.05
0.01
0.05
0.05
0.026 0.001
0.0006 0.01
0.003
0.004
0.00 0.007
0.01
MS-HRM
MS-HRM
MS-HRM
MS-HRM
MS-HRM
Q-MSP
MSP
BS-SNP
MSP
MSP
Yan 201253
RUNX3
59 (110/186)
NA
0.05
0.009 0.006
0.04 MSP
- Methylation Specific PCR; Q-MSP - Quantitative MSP; BS-SEQ - Bisulfite Sequencing; MS-SNP Methylation Specific Single Nucleotide Primer Extension; COBRA - Combined Bisulfite Restriction Analysis; MS-MLPA - Methylation Specific Multiplex Ligationdependent Probe Amplification; MS-HRM - Methylation Specific High Resolution Melting; BS-SNP - Bisulfite Specific SNP. NA - Not Available
1Prog-Progression 2Sur-Survival 3Rec-Recurrence 4MSP
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Bornman, D.M., Mathew, S., Alsruhe, J., Herman, J.G. & Gabrielson, E. Methylation of the E-cadherin gene in bladder
neoplasia and in normal urothelial epithelium from elderly individuals. Am J Pathol 159, 831-5 (2001).
Habuchi, T. et al. Hypermethylation at 9q32-33 tumour suppressor region is age-related in normal urothelium and an early and
frequent alteration in bladder cancer. Oncogene 20, 531-7 (2001).
Lee, M.G. et al. Frequent epigenetic inactivation of RASSF1A in human bladder carcinoma. Cancer Res 61, 6688-92 (2001).
Maruyama, R. et al. Aberrant promoter methylation profile of bladder cancer and its relationship to clinicopathological features.
Cancer Res 61, 8659-63 (2001).
Chan, M.W. et al. Hypermethylation of multiple genes in tumor tissues and voided urine in urinary bladder cancer patients. Clin
Cancer Res 8, 464-70 (2002).
Ribeiro-Filho, L.A. et al. CpG hypermethylation of promoter region and inactivation of E-cadherin gene in human bladder
cancer. Mol Carcinog 34, 187-98 (2002).
Tada, Y. et al. The association of death-associated protein kinase hypermethylation with early recurrence in superficial bladder
cancers. Cancer Res 62, 4048-53 (2002).
Horikawa, Y. et al. Hypermethylation of an E-cadherin (CDH1) promoter region in high grade transitional cell carcinoma of the
bladder comprising carcinoma in situ. J Urol 169, 1541-5 (2003).
Dulaimi, E., Uzzo, R.G., Greenberg, R.E., Al-Saleem, T. & Cairns, P. Detection of bladder cancer in urine by a tumor
suppressor gene hypermethylation panel. Clin Cancer Res 10, 1887-93 (2004).
Sathyanarayana, U.G. et al. Molecular detection of noninvasive and invasive bladder tumor tissues and exfoliated cells by
aberrant promoter methylation of laminin-5 encoding genes. Cancer Res 64, 1425-30 (2004).
Catto, J.W. et al. Promoter hypermethylation is associated with tumor location, stage, and subsequent progression in
transitional cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 23, 2903-10 (2005).
Friedrich, M.G. et al. Prognostic relevance of methylation markers in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder carcinoma. Eur
J Cancer 41, 2769-78 (2005).
Kim, W.J. et al. RUNX3 inactivation by point mutations and aberrant DNA methylation in bladder tumors. Cancer Res 65, 934754 (2005).
5
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
Marsit, C.J. et al. Epigenetic inactivation of SFRP genes and TP53 alteration act jointly as markers of invasive bladder cancer.
Cancer Res 65, 7081-5 (2005).
Hoque, M.O. et al. Quantitation of promoter methylation of multiple genes in urine DNA and bladder cancer detection. J Natl
Cancer Inst 98, 996-1004 (2006).
Christoph, F. et al. Methylation of tumour suppressor genes APAF-1 and DAPK-1 and in vitro effects of demethylating agents in
bladder and kidney cancer. Br J Cancer 95, 1701-7 (2006).
Christoph, F. et al. Regularly methylated novel pro-apoptotic genes associated with recurrence in transitional cell carcinoma of
the bladder. Int J Cancer 119, 1396-402 (2006).
Marsit, C.J. et al. Examination of a CpG island methylator phenotype and implications of methylation profiles in solid tumors.
Cancer Res 66, 10621-9 (2006).
Neuhausen, A., Florl, A.R., Grimm, M.O. & Schulz, W.A. DNA methylation alterations in urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Biol Ther
5, 993-1001 (2006).
Urakami, S. et al. Combination analysis of hypermethylated Wnt-antagonist family genes as a novel epigenetic biomarker panel
for bladder cancer detection. Clin Cancer Res 12, 2109-16 (2006).
Boireau, S. et al. DNA-methylation-dependent alterations of claudin-4 expression in human bladder carcinoma. Carcinogenesis
28, 246-58 (2007).
Wu, G. et al. LOXL1 and LOXL4 are epigenetically silenced and can inhibit ras/extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling
pathway in human bladder cancer. Cancer Res 67, 4123-9 (2007).
Yates, D.R. et al. Promoter hypermethylation identifies progression risk in bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res 13, 2046-53 (2007).
Aleman, A. et al. Identification of DNA hypermethylation of SOX9 in association with bladder cancer progression using CpG
microarrays. Br J Cancer 98, 466-73 (2008).
Aleman, A. et al. Identification of PMF1 methylation in association with bladder cancer progression. Clin Cancer Res 14, 823643 (2008).
Brait, M. et al. Aberrant promoter methylation of multiple genes during pathogenesis of bladder cancer. Cancer Epidemiol
Biomarkers Prev 17, 2786-94 (2008).
Jarmalaite, S. et al. Promoter hypermethylation in tumour suppressor genes shows association with stage, grade and
invasiveness of bladder cancer. Oncology 75, 145-51 (2008).
Kim, E.J. et al. Methylation of the RUNX3 promoter as a potential prognostic marker for bladder tumor. J Urol 180, 1141-5
(2008).
Shi, Y. et al. DBC2 gene is silenced by promoter methylation in bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 26, 465-9 (2008).
Cebrian, V. et al. Discovery of myopodin methylation in bladder cancer. J Pathol 216, 111-9 (2008).
6
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
Wolff, E.M. et al. RUNX3 methylation reveals that bladder tumors are older in patients with a history of smoking. Cancer Res
68, 6208-14 (2008).
Mori, K. et al. CpG hypermethylation of collagen type I alpha 2 contributes to proliferation and migration activity of human
bladder cancer. Int J Oncol 34, 1593-602 (2009).
Ali Hosseini, S., Sobti, R.C., Malekzadeh, K., Singh, S.K. & Joshi, K. Frequency of P16INK4a and P14ARF genes methylation
and its impact on bladder cancer cases in north Indian population. Dis Markers 28, 361-8 (2010).
Costa, V.L. et al. Three epigenetic biomarkers, GDF15, TMEFF2, and VIM, accurately predict bladder cancer from DNA-based
analyses of urine samples. Clin Cancer Res 16, 5842-51 (2010).
Lin, H.H. et al. Increase sensitivity in detecting superficial, low grade bladder cancer by combination analysis of
hypermethylation of E-cadherin, p16, p14, RASSF1A genes in urine. Urol Oncol 28, 597-602 (2010).
Lin, Y.L., Liu, X.Q., Li, W.P., Sun, G. & Zhang, C.T. Promoter methylation of H-cadherin is a potential biomarker in patients with
bladder transitional cell carcinoma. Int Urol Nephrol 44, 111-7 (2012).
Marsit, C.J. et al. Identification of methylated genes associated with aggressive bladder cancer. PLoS One 5, e12334 (2010).
Matsumoto, M. et al. CpG hypermethylation of human four-and-a-half LIM domains 1 contributes to migration and invasion
activity of human bladder cancer. Int J Mol Med 26, 241-7 (2010).
Alvarez-Mugica, M. et al. Myopodin methylation is associated with clinical outcome in patients with T1G3 bladder cancer. J Urol
184, 1507-13 (2010).
Owen, H.C. et al. Low frequency of epigenetic events in urothelial tumors in young patients. J Urol 184, 459-63 (2010).
Renard, I. et al. Identification and validation of the methylated TWIST1 and NID2 genes through real-time methylation-specific
polymerase chain reaction assays for the noninvasive detection of primary bladder cancer in urine samples. Eur Urol 58, 96104 (2010).
Serizawa, R.R. et al. Integrated genetic and epigenetic analysis of bladder cancer reveals an additive diagnostic value of
FGFR3 mutations and hypermethylation events. Int J Cancer 129, 78-87 (2011).
Sobti, R.C. et al. Hypermethylation-mediated partial transcriptional silencing of DAP-kinase gene in bladder cancer. Biomarkers
15, 167-74 (2010).
Toki, K. et al. CpG hypermethylation of cellular retinol-binding protein 1 contributes to cell proliferation and migration in bladder
cancer. Int J Oncol 37, 1379-88 (2010).
Cabello, M.J. et al. Multiplexed methylation profiles of tumor suppressor genes in bladder cancer. J Mol Diagn 13, 29-40 (2011).
Chung, W. et al. Detection of bladder cancer using novel DNA methylation biomarkers in urine sediments. Cancer Epidemiol
Biomarkers Prev 20, 1483-91 (2011).
Duarte-Pereira, S. et al. Prognostic value of opioid binding protein/cell adhesion molecule-like promoter methylation in bladder
carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 47, 1106-14 (2011).
7
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
Reinert, T. et al. Comprehensive genome methylation analysis in bladder cancer: identification and validation of novel
methylated genes and application of these as urinary tumor markers. Clin Cancer Res 17, 5582-92 (2011).
Vinci, S. et al. Quantitative methylation analysis of BCL2, hTERT, and DAPK promoters in urine sediment for the detection of
non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a prospective, two-center validation study. Urol Oncol 29, 150-6
(2011).
Xuan, Y., Kim, S. & Lin, Z. Protein expression and gene promoter hypermethylation of CD99 in transitional cell carcinoma of
urinary bladder. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 137, 49-54 (2011).
Kandimalla, R. et al. Genome-wide analysis of CpG island methylation in bladder cancer identified TBX2, TBX3, GATA2, and
ZIC4 as pTa-specific prognostic markers. Eur Urol 61, 1245-56 (2012).
Kim, J.S. et al. Ras Association Domain Family 1A: A Promising Prognostic Marker in Recurrent Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder
Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer (2012).
Pepe, M.S. et al. Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 93, 1054-61 (2001).
8
Download