Nanostructure influence on the photorefractivity and photoconductivity of the organic systems N.V. Kamanina*, S.A.Serov, N.A.Shurpo, Yu.A.Zubtsova, A.V.Shmidt Vavilov State Optical Institute, 12 Birzhevaya Line, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia, *e-mail: nvkamanina@mail.ru A.V. Prokhorenkov, E.A.Tsareva State Electrotechnical University, St. Petersburg, 197376, Russia ABSTRACT Study and optimization of new 3D materials useful for optoelectronic application have been considered. The increase of the photorefractive parameters and photoconductive characteristics of the organics, including conjugated polymers, electrooptic monomers and liquid crystals doped with nanoobjects have been revealed. The second harmonic of nanosecond pulsed Nd-laser at wavelength of 532 nm has been used. The energy density has been chosen in the range of 0.1-0.5 J×cm-2. The amplitude-phase thin gratings have been recorded at spatial frequency of 90-100 and 150 mm-1 under Raman-Nath diffraction conditions. It has been testified that that the nonlinear optical characteristics (nonlinear refraction n2 and cubic nonlinearity χ(3)) of the organics thin films sensitized with fullerenes, nanotubes or quantum dots can be increased up to 2-3 orders of magnitude in comparison with the same parameters for pure organics and balk materials traditionally used for nonlinear optics. 1. Introduction Conjugated polymers, monomers, and liquid crystals are of good model and promising media to test new properties via nanoobjects sensitization [1-4]. Both fullerenes and quantum dots with high electron affinity energy as well as the carbon nanotubes with large charge of odd electrons from the core of nanotubes, can be considered as effective nanoobjects to dope the media mentioned above. The incorporation of new sensitizers in the organic matrixes is perspective way to increase their charge carrier mobility [5] and local volume polarizability [6] saving good resolution estimated via record of thin amplitude-phase holographic gratings. As a result of this process, the increase in dark and photoconductivity can be observed and the correlation between the photoconductive and the photorefractive parameters can be found. The current paper is devoted to investigation of these features as characteristic of nanostructured conjugated organic systems. 2. Experimental conditions The experiments have been performed with thin films of conjugated monomer, polymer and liquid crystals sensitized with fullerenes, nanotubes or quantum dots. 2cyclooctylamino-5-nitropyridine (COANP), polyimide (PI), N-(4-nitrophenyl)-(L)prolinol (NPP), nematic liquid crystal (NLC) have been considered as organic matrixes. Fullerenes concentration was varied in the range of 0.1-1.0 wt.%. The concentration of carbon nanotubes was in the range of 0.01-0.1 wt.%; the ones of quantum dots was close to 0.003 wt.%. The films have been developed using centrifuge deposition. The thickness of the films was 2-5 micrometers. The LC cell thickness was 5-10 micrometers. The nanostructuref LC films have been placed onto glass substrates covered with transparent conducting layers based on ITO contacts. The nanostructured monomer or polymer films have been deposited on the substrate 2-45 with ITO contact. For the electric measurements, gold contact has been put to the polymer upper side. The bias voltage applied to the photosensitive polymer layers has been varied from 0 to 50 V. The current–voltage characteristics have been measured under the illumination conditions from dark to light. Voltmeter-electrometer В7—30 and Characteriscope—Z, type TR-4805 has been used for these photoconductive experiments. The photorefractive characteristics have been studied using four-wave mixing technique analogous to paper [7]. The second harmonic of pulsed Nd-laser at wave length of 532 nm has been used. The laser energy density has been chosen in the range of 0.1-0.5 J×cm-2. The nanosecond laser regime (the pulse width was 10-20 ns) has been applied. The amplitude-phase thin gratings have been recorded under Raman-Nath diffraction conditions at spatial frequency of 90-150 mm-1. 3. Results and discussion Table 1 presents the current-voltage characteristics of some pure and nanosensitized compounds. The current–voltage characteristics of pure and fullerene-containing COANP, PIs, and NPP were measured for the samples with various concentrations of fullerene C70 or C60 additives in the organic matrixes under the conditions of dark and light illumination. In Table 1 the basic accent is given on current–voltage characteristics under light irradiation. Table 1 Bias volta Pure PI ge, V Current, A, under light irradiation PI+0.2 wt.% C70 Pure COANP COANP+ 1.0 wt.% C70 Pure NPP NPP+ 1.0 wt.% C60 0 2.7710-12 4.3310-12 5 2.9810-11 5.010-11 0.510-12 0.810-12 0.1410-11 0.410-9 10 6.9610-11 1.110-10 0.610-12 0.810-12 0.5410-11 0.1710-8 15 1.0110-10 2.310-10 0.1610-11 0.210-11 0.5710-11 0.2510-8 20 1.4410-10 3.710-10 0.2610-11 0.3610-11 0.610-11 0.310-8 30 2.510-10 8.010-10 0.310-11 0.2110-10 0.810-11 0.3710-8 40 3.810-10 1.410-9 0.4210-11 0.4510-10 0.210-10 0.4810-8 50 5.710-10 2.410-9 0.4610-11 0.810-10 0.3510-10 0.710-8 One can see from the Table 1 that the increase in the current response can be observed after fullerene sensitization at the same bias voltage. Two orders of magnitude difference in the current has been observed. This fact is connected with the charge transfer complex (СTС) formation between donor part of the organic molecule and fullerene. To support the CTC formation, the mass-spectrometry analysis has been made. The mass spectroscopy data point to the CTC formation between fullerene and triphenylamine and between fullerene and the HN group in the C70-PI and C70COANP systems, respectively [8]. Photoconductive measuring shows that an increase in photoconductivity by at least two orders of magnitude is observed for all fullerenedoped films. Therefore, photoconductivity and mass spectrometry data confirm the complex formation in the studied structures. Moreover, some photorefractive parameter, namely two photon absorption coefficient increases in the fullerene-doped COANP and PI [8]. 2-46 It should be noticed that for PI-C70 systems СTС formation can be predicted to be increased by irradiation of laser beam at 532 nm. Really, the laser irradiation at 532 nm excites CTC between fullerene and triphenylamine (donor fragment of PI molecule), for which the following condition is met: hCTCID–EA–W (1) Here hCTC is the photon energy exciting CTC, ID is the donor ionization potential, EA is the electron affinity of the acceptor, and W was the polarization energy of bonds. For the C70-PI system hCTC was about 2.35 eV at ID=6.5 eV (for triphenylamine), EA=2.65 eV (for fullerene), and W1.5 eV, that is close to the laser wavelength of 532 nm. It should be mentioned, that for fullerene-doped PI irradiating laser energy density Win of 0.5-0.6 Jcm-2 corresponds to 350-400 kcalmol-1 at molecular mass of PI units of 750. The rotation threshold is 100-700 kcalmol-1 [9] This effect is likely to result in a better arrangement of PI donor fragment (triphenylamine) and fullerene planes, and hence in efficient CT between them [10]. Table 2 presents the current-voltage characteristics of pure and nanotubes-sensitized PI compounds. It should be mentioned, that this fact can be explained by the additional complex mechanisms responsible for the electron moving in the conjugated organics with nanotubes. The additional odd electron from the core of the nanotubes should be taken into consideration. Table 2 Type of the PI system Contacts polarity Bias voltage, V Current, A Pure PIs Au (-), ITO (+) Au (+), ITO (-) 0.5 1 10 0.5 1 10 0.5-1 2.210-13 610-13 5.810-11 1.110-12 1.110-12 610-11 Close to 10-4 - 10-3 Pure PIs Au (+), ITO (-) PIs with carbon nanotubes PIs with carbon nanotubes Au (-), ITO (+) 0.5-1 Close to 10-4 - 10-3 The data of Table 2 testifies that the drastic increase in the current response can be observed after carbon nanotubes sensitization of PI structures. More than six orders of magnitude difference in the current has been observed at the same value of bias voltage. Some procedure to estimate the charge currier mobility for the pure, fullerene- and nanotubes-doped PI has been made. It should be noticed that for PI conjugated systems we have drown the attention mostly on the role of charge carrier mobility rather than on their concentration. This is explained by the fact that in this type of organics the conductivity activation energy coincides with the mobility activation energy; plotted in the double logarithmic scale, the values of conductivity and mobility (measured at equal temperatures and electric field strengths) fit to the same straight line inclined at 45° relative to the coordinate axes. The charge carrier mobility has been estimated via the Child–Langmuir current–voltage relationship by the method proposed in paper [11]. The charge carrier mobility of pure and fullerenedoped samples have been estimated via following equation: 2-47 µ=1013Id3/εV2, (2) where I is the density of the current, V –is value of bias voltage, d – is thickness of the films, ε is dielectric permittivity. The results of these calculations showed that the introduction of fullerenes leads to a tenfold increase in the mobility. Under these conditions, the carrier mobility in a fullerene-doped PI film has been ~0.310–4 cm2V-1s-1, while the carrier mobility of pure PI films ranges has been placed in the interval from 10–7 to 0.510–5 cm2V-1s-1. The values of mobility have been estimated at a bias voltage of 10 V, a film thickness of d = 2 µm, a dielectric constant of ε ~ 3.3, a fullerene concentration of about 0.2 wt % C70. Using this method the charge carrier mobility of the nanotubes-doped PI films has been found and placed in the range of 0.510–4 0.9510–4 cm2V-1s-1. Thus, at smaller nanoobjects concentration, the charge carrier mobility has been found a little bit larger for nanotube-doped structures in comparison with fullerene-doped ones. It should be noticed that the photoconductive parameters coincide with the photorefractive ones. Really, for polyimide matrixes the basic results regarded to the laser-induced change of refractive index, n, under condition of different nanoobjects sensitization and at varied spatial frequency, Λ, are shown in Table 3. Table 3 Structure Pure PI PI +quantum dots based on CdSe(ZnS) PI+С70 PI +nanotubes n Nanoobjects content,wt% 0 0.003 Energy density, Jcm-2 0.6 0.2-0.3 Λ mm-1 90 100 10-4-10-5 2.010-3 0.2 0.1 0.5-0.6 0.3-0.5 90 100-150 4.6810-3 5.5-5.710-3 Ref. [12] current [12] [12] From the laser-induced changes of the refractive index, the nonlinear refraction n2 and the third order susceptibility (3) were determined via procedure [13]. They were, respectively: ~10-7 cm2kW-1 and ~10-9 esu for thin conjugated films of the nanoobjects-doped organic structures; ~10-6 cm2kW-1 and ~10-8 esu for thin films of the nanoobjects-doped polymer-dispersed liquid crystals. The model explaining improving of nonlinear optical and of dynamicс features of the nanoobjects-doped organic structures via increase in dipole moment and local volume polarizability were early presented in the paper [6]. It should be mentioned that nonlinear optical parameters of nanoobjects-doped structures are larger than those obtained for traditional nonlinear inorganic systems and for pure organics. Moreover, the data testify that nonlinear characteristics of the materials studied are close to those for Si-based structures and larger than the ones for classical inorganic widely used crystal of LiNbO3, that provoke the organics structures with nanoobjects to be used in extended area of optical and non-linear optical applications. 4. Conclusions Influence of the nanoobjects based on fullerenes, carbon nanotubes and quantum dots on photorefractive and photoconductive parameters of the PI, COANP, NPP, liquid crystals, materials have been observed and discussed. The correlation between 2-48 photorefractivity and photoconductivity has been considered as the feature of nanoobjects-sensitized organics. As the results of investigations, the area of applications of the materials can be found in the optoelectronics and laser optics, for example, for holography, for telecommunication systems, for gas storage and solar energy accumulation, as well as in nonlinear optical field and search for 3D-media. 5. Acknowledgement The authors would like to thank their colleagues, namely, Dr. V.I.Studeonov, P.Ya.Vasilyev (Vavilov State Optical Institute) and Prof. N.M.Shmidt (Ioffe PhysicalTechnical Institute, St.-Petersburg) for their help in this study. The work is supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Researches (grant #10-03-00916, 2010-2012) and by Vavilov State Optical Institute (grant named “Perspectiva”, 2010). It should be noticed that the students, namely, Alexey Prokhorenkov and Ekaterina Tsareva have been involved in this study. References [1] McBranch DW, Maniloff ES, Vacar D, Heeger AJ: “Ultrafast holography and transient-absorption spectroscopy in charge-transfer polymers”. Proceed. SPIE 1997 3142, 161. [2] Silence SM, Walsh CA, Scott JC, Moerner WE: “C60 sensitization of a photorefractive polymer”. Appl.Phys.Lett. 1992 61 (25) 2967. [3] Xiaowen Jiang, Yuezhen Bin, Masaru Matsuo: “Electrical and mechanical properties of polyimide–carbon nanotubes composites fabricated by in situ polymerization”. Journal: Polymer 2005 46 (18) 7418. [4] Robertson J: “Realistic applications of CNTs”. Materialtoday 2004 Oct. 46. [5] Mikhailova MM, Kosyreva MM, Kamanina NV: “On the increase in the charge carrier mobility in fullerene-containing conjugated organic systems”. Tech.Phys. Lett. 2002 28 (6) 450. [6] Kamanina NV: “Fullerene-dispersed liquid crystal structure: dynamic characteristics and self-organization processes”. Physics-Uspekhi 2005 48 (4) 419. [7] Kamanina NV, Vasilenko NA: “Influence of operating conditions and of interface properties on dynamic characteristics of liquid-crystal spatial light modulators”. Opt. Quantum Electron. 1997 29 (1) 1. [8] Kamanina NV, Plekhanov AI: “Mechanisms of optical limiting in fullerenedoped -conjugated organic structures demonstrated with polyimide and COANP molecules”. Optics and Spectroscopy 2002 93 (3) 408. [9] Bershtein V , Egorov V , DSC in Physical Chemistry of Polymers, Chemistry: Leningrad 1990. [10] Cherkasov YA, Kamanina NV , Alexandrova EL , Berendyaev VI, Vasilenko NA , Kotov BV: “Polyimides: New properties of xerographic, thermoplastic, and liquid-crystal structures”. Proceed. SPIE 1998 3471 254. [11] Gutman F, Lyons LE, Organic Semiconductors, Wiley: New York, 1967. [12] Kamanina NV, Uskokovic DP: “Refractive Index of Organic Systems Doped with Nano-Objects”. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 2008 23 552. [13] Akhmanov SA, Nikitin SYu, Physical Optics, Moscow University Press: Moscow, 1997. 2-49