TAREA DE
SIMULACIÓN AVANZADA
EDUARDO MARROQUIN PRADO
Saltillo, Coah. México
17 de Nov. De 2003
LAB 5
1. Consider the operation of a fast food restaurant where customers arrive
for ordering lunch. The following is a log of the time (minutes) between
arrivals of 40 successive customers. Use Stat::Fit to analyze the data and
fit an appropriate continuous distribution to the data. What are the
parameters of the distribution?
11
9
12
8
11
11
13
12
8
10
12
14
7
17
16
8
9
13
15
10
15
14
12
10
11
14
9
16
7
12
15
13
7
16
14
13
7
10
11
15
Adjusting the data to Stat::Fit, the two better fitted distribution are
shown below.
For the triangular distribution, the parameters are: a=6, b=18.1 and
c=10.9.
For the uniform distribution, the parameters are a=7 y b=17.
2. The servers at the above restaurant took the following time (minutes) to
serve food to these 40 customers: Use Sata::Fit to analyze the data and
fit an appropriate continuous distribution to the data. What are the
parameters of this distribution?
11
9
12
10
11
11
13
12
8
10
12
14
11
17
13
8
10
13
12
10
15
14
12
10
11
14
9
16
7
12
15
13
11
13
14
13
12
10
11
15
Adjusting the data to Stat::Fit, the two better fitted distribution are
shown below.
For the beta distribution, the parameters are: =2.67 and =2.84.
For the Weibull distribution, the parameters are : =2.55 and =5.6.
3. The following is the number of incoming calls (each hour for 80
successive hours) to a calla center set up for serving customers of a
certain Internet service provider. Use Stat::Fit to analyze the data fit an
appropriate discrete distribution to the data. What are the parameters of
this distribution?
12
9
12
10
11
9
12
10
11
10
12
13
12
8
11
13
12
8
10
8
11
14
11
17
12
14
11
17
13
17
13
10
13
12
8
10
13
12
10
12
12
14
12
10
15
14
12
10
11
10
16
9
16
7
14
9
16
7
12
7
11
13
11
13
15
13
11
13
14
13
10
12
10
11
13
12
10
11
15
11
Adjusting the data to Stat::Fit, there is only one discrete distribution
which better adjust the data. It is the binomial distribution with n=22 and
p=0.532.
The fitted distribution is shown below.
4. Observations were taken on the times to serve online customers at
stockbroker’s site (STOCK.com) on the Internet. The times (in seconds)
are shown below, sorted in ascending order. Use Stat::Fit and fit an
appropriate distribution to the data. What are the parameters of this
distribution.
1.39
3.59
7.11
8.34
11.14
11.97
13.53
16.87
17.63
19.44
21.47
22.55
28.04
28.97
29.05
35.26
37.65
38.21
38.32
39.17
39.49
39.99
44.42
42.53
47.08
51.53
55.11
55.75
55.85
56.96
58.78
60.61
63.38
65.99
66
76.55
73.81
74.14
79.79
81.66
82.1
83.52
85.9
88.04
88.4
88.47
92.63
93.11
93.74
98.82
Adjusting the data to Stat::Fit, the two better fitted distribution are
shown below.
For the uniform distribution, the parameters are: a=1 and b=98.8.
For the beta distribution, the parameters are : =1.06 and =1.13.
LAB 6
1. Visitors arrive at Kid’s World entertainment park according to an
exponential interarrival time distribution with mean 2.5 minutes. The
travel time from the entrance to the ticket window is normally distributed
with mean of three minutes and standard deviation of 0.5 minute. At the
ticket window, visitors wait in a single line until one of six cashiers is
available to serve them. The time for the purchase of tickets is normally
distributed with mean of five minutes and standard deviation of one
minute. After purchasing tickets, the visitors go to their respective gates
to enter the park.
Create a simulation model, with animation, of this system. Run the
simulation model for 200 hours to determine.
a) The average and maximum length of the ticketing queue.
b) The average number of customers completing ticketing per hour.
c) The average utilization of the cashiers.
d) Do you recommended that management add more cashiers?
Running the simulation model (LAB6.1) the results are the following:
a) The average and maximum length of the ticketing queue are
0.0088 and 1 visitors
b) The average number of customers completing ticketing per hour
are 16.07.
c) The average utilization of the cashiers are: 50%, 45% and 37%
for cashier 1, 2 and 3.
Running the model LAB6.1. The results are according to the following
graph of locations utilization, where we can see how the aisle o the road
from the entrance to the ticket window, becomes a queue.
.
d) Do you recommended that management add more cashiers?
Not, this is not a good recommendation since only three cashiers are
used and the other three are idle.
2. A consultant recommended that six individual queues be formed at the
ticket window (one for each cashier) instead of the common queue.
Create a simulation model, with animation, of this system. Run the
simulation model for 200 hours to determine.
I did not built the corresponding model since for any queue system, no
matter how the interarrivals and service time are, it is better to attend
the costumers by a single line instead of independent lines.
3. At the Southern California Airline’s traveler check-in facility, three types of
customers arrive: passengers with e-ticket (Type E), passenger with
paper ticket (Type T), and passengers that need to purchase ticket (Type
P)
The interaarrival distribution and the service times for these passengers
are given in the table. Create a simulation model, with animation, of this
system. Run the simulation model for 2000 hours. If each type of
passenger is served by separate gate agents, determine the following:
a) The average and maximum length of the three queues.
b) The average number of the customers of each type completing
check-in procedures per hour.
c) The average utilization of the gate agents.
d) Would you recommended one single line for check-in for all three
types of travelers? Discus the pros and cons for such a change.
Running the simulation model LAB6.3 shown in the appendix, we got the
following fesults:
LAB6.3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------General Report
Output from C:\ProMod4\models\LAB6.3.MOD
Date: Nov/13/2003 Time: 11:40:29 AM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scenario
: Normal Run
Replication : 1 of 1
Simulation Time : 2000 hr
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------LOCATIONS
Location
Name
-------Linea1
Linea2
Linea3
Check1
Check2
Check3
Average
Scheduled
Total
Minutes
Hours Capacity Entries Per Entry
--------- -------- ------- --------2000
999999 21826 2.131121
2000 999999 11301 14.263030
2000 999999 7542 18.006205
2000
1
21826 2.996429
2000
1
11299 8.000688
2000
1
7542 11.966399
Average Maximum Current
Contents Contents Contents % Util
--------------------------0.387615
9
0
0.00
1.34322
15
2
0.00
1.13169
11
0
0.00
0.545
1
0
54.50
0.753331
1
1
75.33
0.752088
1
1
75.21
a) The average and maximum length of the three queues are:.
Linea1 average 0.387615 and maximum content 9
Linea2 average 1.34322
and maximum content 15
Linea3 average 1.13169
and maximum content 11
b. The average number of the customers of each type
completing check-in procedures per hour.
For Check1 the average number per hour is =
(21826/2000)= 10.9
For Check2 the average number per hour is =
(11299 /2000)= 5.64
For Check3
the average number per hour is =
(7542/2000)= 3.77
c. The average utilization of the gate agents.
For Check1
54.50%
For Check2
75.33%
For Check3
75.21%
d. Would you recommended one single line for check-in for all
three types of travelers? Discus the pros and cons for such
a change.
No, this recommendation is not a good decision given that for sigle
lines the average time per customer is higher that only one line for
all the system.
4. Raja & Rani, a fancy restaurant in Santa Clara, Hold a maximum of 100
diners. Customers arrive according to an exponential distribution with a
mean of 35 minutes. Customers stay in the restaurant according to a
triangular distribution with a minimum of 30 minutes, a maximum of 60
minutes, and a mode of 45 minutes. Create a simulation model, with
animation, of this system.
a) Beginning empty, how long is it before the restaurant fills?
b) What is the total number of diners entering the restaurant before
it fills?
c) What is the utilization of the restaurant?
5. United Electronics manufactures small custom electronic assemblies.
There are four stations through which the part must be processed:
assembly, soldering, painting, and inspection. Orders arrive with and
exponential interarrival distribution (mean 20 minutes). The process time
distributions are shown in the table.
The soldering operation can be performed on three jobs at a time.
Painting can be done on four jobs at a time. Assembly and inspection are
performed on one job at a time. Create a simulation model, with
animation, of this system. Simulate this manufacturing system for 100
days, eight hours each day. Collect and print statistics on the utilization of
each station, associated queues, and the total number of jobs
manufactured during each eight-hour shift (average).
All the statistics are shown in the appendix LAB6.5. However, in order to
answer part of the question I show in the following graph the utilization
of the location. It can be seen that the painting process which is the most
consuming time, has the higher utilization.
The following table show the average length of the queues and the
average time/ part in the queue:
Parameter
Average Time/Part
Average Queue Length
Assembly
11.44
0.64
Soldering
0.86
0.045
Painting
2.34
0.11
Inspection
2.92
0.12
The total number of jobs manufactured for a 8 hour shift is, on the
average: 18:27.
6. Consider the Exercise 5 with the following enhancements. Ten percent of
all finished assemblies are sent back to soldering for rework after
inspection, five percent are sent back to assembly for rework after
inspection, and one percent of all assemblies fail to pass and are
scrapped.
Create a simulation model, with animation, of this system. Simulate this
manufacturing system for 100 days, eight hours each day. Collect and
print statistics on the utilization of each station, associated queues, total
number of jobs assembled number of assemblies sent for rework to
assembly and soldering, and the number of assemblies scrapped during
each eight-hour shift (average).
The percentages of utilization of the locations area: 72.95% for
Assembly, 65.67% for Soldering, 65.87% for Painting and 39.26 for
Inspection.
The following table show the average length of the queues and the
average time/ part in the queue:
Parameter
Average Time/Part
Average Queue Length
Assembly
13.13
0.78
Soldering
2.53
0.14
Painting
4.66
0.27
Inspection
4.79
0.23
The total of assemblies finished per shift are: 17.49.
7. Small appliances are assembled in four stage (Centers 1,2, and 3 and
Inspection) at Pomona Assembly Shop. After each assembly step the
appliance is inspected or tested and if a defect is found, it must be
corrected and then checked again. The assemblies arrive at a constant
rate of one assembly per minute. The times to assemble, test, and
correct defects are normally distributed. The mean and standard
deviation of the times to assemble, inspect, and correct defects, as well
as the likelihood of an assembly error, are shown in the following table. If
an assembly is found defective, the defect is corrected and it is inspected
again. After a defect is corrected, the likelihood of another defect being
found is the same as during the first inspection. We assume in this model
that an assembly defect is eventually corrected and then it is passed on
to the next station.
Simulate for one year (2000 hours) and determine the number of good
appliances shipped in a year.
The corresponding simulation model is LAB6.7. The statistics of the run
are shown in appendix LAB6.7 where we can see that the total
production is 24,000 parts. It can be shown also in the variable for
counting the production of the model.
8. Salt Lake City Electronics manufactures small custom communication
equipment. To different job types are to be processed with the following
manufacturing cell. The necessary data are given in the table. Simulate
the system for 100 days, eight hours each day, to determine the average
number of jobs waiting for different operations, number of jobs of each
type finished each day, average cycle time for each type of job, and the
average cycle time for all jobs.
9. Six dump trucks at the DumpOnMe facility in Riverside are used to haul
coal from the entrance of a small mine to the railroad. Figure L6.39
provides a schematic of the dump truck operation. Each truck is loaded
by one of two loaders. After loading, a truck immediately moves to the
scale to be weighed as soon as possible. Both the loaders and the scale
have a firs-come, firs-served waiting line (or queue) for trucks. Travel
time from a loader to the scale is considered negligible. After being
weighed, a truck begins travel time (during which time the truck unload),
and then after ward returns to the loader queue. The distributions of
loading time, weighed time, and travel time are shown in the table.
a) Create a simulation model, with animation, of this system.
Simulate for 100 days, eight hours each day.
b) Collect statistics to estimate the loaded and scale utilization
(percentage of time busy).
c) About how many trucks are loaded each day on average?
10. At the Pilot Pen Company, a molding machine produces pen barrels of
three different colors-red, blue, and green- in the ratio of 3:2:1.
The molding time is triangular (3,4,6) minutes per barrel. The barrels go
to a filling machine where ink of appropriate color is filled at the rate of
20 pens per hour (exponentially distributed). Another molding machine
makes caps of three different colors-red, blue, and green-in the ratio of
3:2:1. The molding time is triangular (2,3,4) minutes per cap. At the next
station, caps and filled barrels of matching colors are joined together.
Simulate for 300 hours. Find the average number of pens produced per
hour. Collect statistics on the utilization of the molding machine and the
joining equipment.
11. Customers arrive at the NoWaitBurger hamburger stand with an
interarrival time that is exponentially distributed with a mean of one
minute. Out of 10 customers five buy a hamburger and a drink, three buy
a hamburger, and two buy just a drink. One server handless the
hamburger while another handless the drink. A person buying both items
needs to wait in line for both serves. The time it takes to serve a
customer is normally distributed with a mean of 70 seconds for each
item. Simulate for100 days, eight hours each day. Collect statistics on the
number of customers served each day, size of the queue, and utilization
of the servers. What changes would you suggest to make the system
more efficient?
For answering this problem I used two model. One for the original
problem statement, LAB6.11.a and other for looking to efficient the
system, LAB6.11.b. The changes for this model is to use three lines, one
attended for Clerk1 who served only customers buying hamburgers and
drinks the other two lines are attended for Clerk2 for the customers who
bay Hamburger or Drink. The results of the two models are shown in the
following table.
Parameter
Average Cycle Time/ Customer
Average Waiting in Queue/Customer(Q1)
Average Waiting in Queue/Customer(Q2)
Average Waiting in Queue/Customer(Q3)
Percentage of Utilization Clerk1
Percentage of Utilization Clerk2
Percentage of Occupation/Customer
Customers Attended /Day
Model
LAB6.11.a
1059 sec.
1754
358
49
98.22
74.25
12.02
445
Model
LAB6.11.b
1234
2398
51
44
98.56
57.55
9.7
438
The number shown, less waiting time, more customers attended , etc,
that the change proposed do not make better than the actual system.
Other change that efficient the system, in terms of the service to the
customers, is to reduce the attending time of the clerks.
12. Workers who work at the Detroit TooINDie plant must check out tools
from a tool crib. Workers arrive according to an exponential distribution
with a mean time between arrivals of five minutes. At present, three tool
crib clerks staff the tool crib. The time to serve a worker is normally
distributed with a mean of 10 minutes and a standard deviation of two
minutes. Compare the following servicing methods. Simulate for a 24hour period and collect data.
a) Workers form a single queue, choosing the next available tool crib
clerk.
b) Workers enter the shortest queue (each clerk has his-her own
queue).
c) Workers chose one of three queues at random.
For this system I built the model LAB6.12 for a single line. After, the model as
modified to take into account three lines whit different routing rule.
For question a I used the FIRST Available Rule.
For question b I used the MOST Rule.
For question c I used the RANDOM Rule.
The following table shown the results of running the three models:
Parameter
Av. Waiting Time/Customer
Av. Waiting Time/Customer (Q1)
Av. Waiting Time/Customer (Q2)
Av. Waiting Time/Customer (Q3)
Av. Waiting Time/Customer Clerk1
Av. Waiting Time/Customer Clerk2
Av. Waiting Time/Customer Clerk3
Model
LAB6.a
0.6 min.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
10.02 min.
9.9 min.
10.27 min.
Model
LAB6.b
N.A.
7.88 min.
5.75 min.
4.44 min.
10.22 min.
9.82 min.
10.13 min.
Model
LAB6.c
N.A.
7.44 min.
10.11 min.
11.20 min.
9.9 min.
10.18 min.
10.14 min.
Av. Cycle Time/Customer
Percentage of Utilization Clerk1
Percentage of Utilization Clerk2
Percentage of Utilization Clerk3
10.71 min.
71
59
49
16.47 min.
93
69
44
19.79 min.
63
58
75
First of all, comparing the one single line model with the other three
independent lines models, looking at the average cycle time per customer or the
waiting time per customer, we found that the first one is better than the others.
Comparing, the three lines models, the model using the MOST available capacity
location routing rule, LAB6.12.b, is better. Just compare the cycle time of 16.47
min given by the model LAB6.12.b vs. the cycle time of 19.79 min given by the
model LAB6.12.c.
LAB6.3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------General Report
Output from C:\ProMod4\models\LAB6.3.MOD
Date: Nov/13/2003 Time: 11:40:29 AM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scenario
: Normal Run
Replication : 1 of 1
Simulation Time : 2000 hr
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOCATIONS
Average
Location Scheduled
Total Minutes Average Maximum Current
Name
Hours Capacity Entries Per Entry Contents Contents Contents % Util
-------- --------- -------- ------- --------- -------- -------- -------- -----Linea1
2000 999999 21826 2.131121 0.387615
9
0 0.00
Linea2
2000 999999 11301 14.263030 1.34322
15
2 0.00
Linea3
2000 999999 7542 18.006205 1.13169
11
0 0.00
Check1
2000
1 21826 2.996429 0.545
1
0 54.50
Check2
2000
1 11299 8.000688 0.753331
1
1 75.33
Check3
2000
1 7542 11.966399 0.752088
1
1 75.21
LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Multiple Capacity)
%
|
Location Scheduled
% Partially % | %
Name
Hours Empty Occupied Full | Down
-------- --------- ----- --------- ---- | ---Linea1
2000 75.99
24.01 0.00 | 0.00
Linea2
2000 49.75
50.25 0.00 | 0.00
Linea3
2000 51.87
48.13 0.00 | 0.00
LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Single Capacity/Tanks)
Location Scheduled
% % %
Name
Hours Operation Setup Idle
-------- --------- --------- ----- ----- ------Check1
2000
54.50 0.00 45.50
Check2
2000
75.33 0.00 24.67
Check3
2000
75.21 0.00 24.79
%
% %
Waiting Blocked Down
------- ---0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
FAILED ARRIVALS
Entity Location Total
Name Name Failed
------ -------- -----TypeE Linea1
0
TypeT Linea2
0
TypeP Linea3
0
ENTITY ACTIVITY
Average Average Average Average Average
Current Minutes Minutes Minutes Minutes Minutes
Entity Total Quantity
In In Move Wait For
In
Name Exits In System System Logic Res, etc. Operation Blocked
------ ----- --------- --------- -------- --------- --------- --------TypeE 21826
0 5.127549 0.000000 0.795273 3.062429 1.269848
TypeT 11298
3 22.263362 0.000000 0.000000 8.067096 14.196266
TypeP 7541
1 29.973494 0.000000 0.000000 12.033981 17.939513
ENTITY STATES BY PERCENTAGE
%
%
Entity In Move Wait For
%
%
Name
Logic Res, etc. In Operation Blocked
------ ------- --------- ------------ ------TypeE
0.00
15.51
59.72 24.77
TypeT
0.00
0.00
36.23 63.77
TypeP
0.00
0.00
40.15 59.85
LAB6.5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------General Report
Output from C:\ProMod4\models\LAB5.mod
Date: Nov/17/2003 Time: 12:47:58 AM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scenario
: Normal Run
Replication : Average
Period
: Final Report (0 sec to 8 hr Elapsed: 8 hr)
Simulation Time : 8 hr
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------LOCATIONS
Location
Name
---------Arrive
Arrive
QueueA
(Average)
QueueA
(Std. Dev.)
Assembly
(Average)
Assembly
(Std. Dev.)
QueueS
(Average)
QueueS
(Std. Dev.)
S1
S1
Dev.)
S2
S2
Dev.)
S3
S3
Dev.)
QueueP
(Average)
QueueP
(Std. Dev.)
P1
P1
Dev.)
P2
P2
Dev.)
P3
P3
Dev.)
P4
P4
Dev.)
Average
Scheduled
Total Minutes Average Maximum Current
Hours Capacity Entries Per Entry Contents Contents Contents % Util
--------- -------- -------- --------- --------- --------------- -----8
999999 24.89 0.000000
0
1
0 0.00 (Average)
0
0
4.7288 0.000000
0
0
0 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
8 999999 24.89 11.449830 0.641063 3.41
0.75 0.00
0
0
8
1
0
0 4.23077 0.264583 0.119889
8
4.7288 7.974494 0.549325 1.51154 1.34371
24.14 13.298290 0.669068
999999
0
1
0.00
0.65 66.91
0 0.479372 11.99
23.49 0.866597 0.0451497
1.19
0.02
0.00
0 4.21995 0.914846 0.0510483 0.394277 0.140705
0.00
8
0
1
9.97 34.714640 0.716218
0 1.35926 3.460856 0.0862923
1
8
0
1
7.92 35.004934 0.574425
0 1.61858 3.636963 0.116566
1
8
0
1
0
1
0.47 40.22 (Average)
0 0.501614 15.60 (Std.
0.61 57.44 (Average)
0 0.490207 11.66 (Std.
5.58 34.519376 0.402229
2.0898 5.325566 0.156005
8
999999
0
0
0.69 71.62 (Average)
0 0.464823 8.63 (Std.
21.7 2.343168 0.116409
1.7
0.11
0.00
4.0936 2.326466 0.132562 0.659047 0.345096
0.00
8
0
1
6.8 51.495696 0.727376
0 0.765414 3.634435 0.0785386
1
0.82 72.74 (Average)
0 0.386123 7.85 (Std.
8
0
1
5.98 51.528591 0.638995
0 1.03455 4.518899 0.107292
1
0.79 63.90 (Average)
0 0.40936 10.73 (Std.
8
0
1
4.94 51.743745 0.528009
0 1.39856 5.349709 0.146482
1
0.6 52.80 (Average)
0 0.492366 14.65 (Std.
8
0
1
3.87 52.060951 0.416191
0 1.60589 6.956317 0.172565
1
0.49 41.62 (Average)
0 0.502418 17.26 (Std.
QueueI
(Average)
QueueI
(Std. Dev.)
Inspection
(Average)
Inspection
Dev.)
8
999999
18.89 2.928281 0.121818
1.87
0.22
0
0 3.86618 2.835096 0.136124 0.77401 0.561024
8
1
0
0 3.76334 1.590489 0.0787391
0.00
18.67 7.556816 0.292458
1
0.00
0.4 29.25
0 0.492366
LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Multiple Capacity)
%
|
Location Scheduled
% Partially % | %
Name
Hours Empty Occupied Full | Down
-------- --------- ------ --------- ---- | ---Arrive
8 100.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
Arrive
0 0.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueA
8 66.03
33.97 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueA
0 16.43
16.43 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueS
8 95.64
4.36 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueS
0 4.81
4.81 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueP
8 90.26
9.74 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueP
0 9.55
9.55 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueI
8 90.88
9.12 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueI
0 6.42
6.42 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Single Capacity/Tanks)
Location Scheduled
% % %
%
% %
Name
Hours Operation Setup Idle Waiting Blocked Down
---------- --------- --------- ----- ----- ------- ------- ---Assembly
8
66.91 0.00 33.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
Assembly
0
11.99 0.00 11.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
S1
8
71.62 0.00 28.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
S1
0
8.63 0.00 8.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
S2
8
57.44 0.00 42.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
S2
0
11.66 0.00 11.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
S3
8
40.22 0.00 59.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
S3
0
15.60 0.00 15.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
P1
8
72.74 0.00 27.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
P1
0
7.85 0.00 7.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
P2
8
63.90 0.00 36.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
P2
0
10.73 0.00 10.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
P3
8
52.80 0.00 47.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
P3
0
14.65 0.00 14.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
7.87 (Std.
P4
P4
Inspection
Inspection
8
0
41.62 0.00 58.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
17.26 0.00 17.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
8
29.25 0.00 70.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
0
7.87 0.00 7.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
FAILED ARRIVALS
Entity Location Total
Name Name Failed
------ -------- -----Part Arrive
0 (Average)
Part Arrive
0 (Std. Dev.)
ENTITY ACTIVITY
Average Average Average Average Average
Current Minutes Minutes Minutes Minutes Minutes
Entity Total Quantity
In In Move Wait For
In
Name
Exits In System
System Logic Res, etc. Operation Blocked
------ ------- --------- ---------- -------- --------- ---------- --------Part
18.27
6.62 127.826108 0.000000 0.000000 112.015587 15.810522
(Average)
Part 3.75743 2.7699 11.797136 0.000000 0.000000 3.530039 11.191192 (Std.
Dev.)
ENTITY STATES BY PERCENTAGE
%
%
Entity In Move Wait For
%
%
Name
Logic Res, etc. In Operation Blocked
------ ------- --------- ------------ ------Part
0.00
0.00
88.23 11.77 (Average)
Part
0.00
0.00
6.98 6.98 (Std. Dev.)
LAB6.6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------General Report
Output from C:\ProMod4\models\LAB6.6.MOD
Date: Nov/17/2003 Time: 12:58:14 AM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scenario
: Normal Run
Replication : Average
Period
: Final Report (0 sec to 8 hr Elapsed: 8 hr)
Simulation Time : 8 hr
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOCATIONS
Average
Location Scheduled
Total Minutes Average Maximum Current
Name
Hours Capacity Entries Per Entry Contents Contents Contents % Util
---------- --------- -------- ------- --------- -------- -------- -------- -----Arrive
8
1 26.31 0.000000
0
1
0 0.00 (Average)
Arrive
0
0 4.87769 0.000000
0
0
0 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueA
8 999999 26.31 13.135939 0.789522
3.52
0.92 0.00
(Average)
QueueA
0
0 4.87769 9.572013 0.697158 1.67862 1.56786 0.00
(Std. Dev.)
Assembly
8
1 26.3 13.311732 0.72951
1
0.72 72.95 (Average)
Assembly
0
0 4.43243 0.229793 0.124646
0 0.451261 12.46 (Std.
Dev.)
QueueS
8 999999 25.58 2.537776 0.147603
1.56
0.25 0.00
(Average)
QueueS
0
0 4.37435 2.812353 0.180566 0.640707 0.609272 0.00
(Std. Dev.)
Soldering
8
3 27.46 34.445471 1.96996
3
2.18 65.67 (Average)
Soldering
0
0 4.70207 1.763748 0.349082
0 0.857292 11.64 (Std.
Dev.)
QueueP
8 999999 25.28 4.663645 0.275974
2.17
0.5 0.00
(Average)
QueueP
0
0 4.42235 4.312990 0.291102 1.00559 0.870388 0.00
(Std. Dev.)
Painting
8
4 24.78 51.042634 2.63468
4
3.34 65.87 (Average)
Painting
0
0 3.98882 2.242909 0.43565
0 0.95579 10.89 (Std.
Dev.)
QueueI
8 999999 21.44 4.792255 0.229366
2.13
0.39 0.00
(Average)
QueueI
(Std. Dev.)
Inspection
Inspection
Dev.)
Scrap
Scrap
Store
Store
0
0 3.54287 4.241065 0.223092 0.883691 0.790026
8
0
1 21.05 8.867622 0.392612
0 3.40343 2.049844 0.120159
8 999999 0.15 0.000000
0
0 0.35887 0.000000
8 999999 17.34 0.000000
0
0 3.03588 0.000000
0.00
1
0.52 39.26 (Average)
0 0.502117 12.02 (Std.
0
0.15
0 0.00 (Average)
0 0.35887
0 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
0
1
0 0.00 (Average)
0
0
0 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Multiple Capacity)
%
|
Location Scheduled
% Partially % | %
Name
Hours Empty Occupied Full | Down
--------- --------- ------ --------- ----- | ---QueueA
8 59.85
40.15 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueA
0 19.19
19.19 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueS
8 87.86
12.14 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueS
0 11.73
11.73 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
Soldering
8 8.81
54.28 36.91 | 0.00 (Average)
Soldering
0 5.92
13.73 16.88 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueP
8 80.62
19.38 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueP
0 15.81
15.81 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
Painting
8 11.82
49.99 38.19 | 0.00 (Average)
Painting
0 3.16
17.47 18.71 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueI
8 83.96
16.04 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueI
0 11.21
11.21 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
Scrap
8 100.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
Scrap
0 0.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
Store
8 100.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
Store
0 0.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Single Capacity/Tanks)
Location Scheduled
% %
%
%
% %
Name
Hours Operation Setup Idle Waiting Blocked Down
---------- --------- --------- ----- ------ ------- ------- ---Arrive
8
0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
Arrive
0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
Assembly
8
72.95 0.00 27.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
Assembly
0
12.47 0.00 12.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
Inspection
8
34.39 0.00 60.74 0.00 4.87 0.00 (Average)
Inspection
0
9.40 0.00 12.02 0.00 5.23 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
FAILED ARRIVALS
Entity Location Total
Name Name Failed
------ -------- -----Part Arrive
0 (Average)
Part Arrive
0 (Std. Dev.)
ENTITY ACTIVITY
Average Average Average Average Average
Current Minutes Minutes Minutes Minutes Minutes
Entity Total Quantity
In In Move Wait For
In
Name Exits In System
System Logic Res, etc. Operation Blocked
------ ------ --------- ---------- -------- --------- ---------- --------Part 17.49
8.82 145.191634 0.000000 4.458791 122.900501 17.832342
(Average)
Part 3.0268 3.75346 19.738890 0.000000 5.261344 9.364318 10.927411 (Std.
Dev.)
ENTITY STATES BY PERCENTAGE
%
%
Entity In Move Wait For
%
%
Name
Logic Res, etc. In Operation Blocked
------ ------- --------- ------------ ------Part
0.00
2.83
85.56 11.61 (Average)
Part
0.00
3.11
8.06 5.73 (Std. Dev.)
LAB6.7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------General Report
Output from C:\ProMod4\models\LAB7.mod
Date: Nov/16/2003 Time: 04:19:03 PM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scenario
: Normal Run
Replication : 1 of 1
Simulation Time : 2000 hr
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------LOCATIONS
Average
Location Scheduled
Total Minutes
Average Maximum Current
Name
Hours Capacity Entries Per Entry Contents Contents Contents % Util
-------- --------- -------- ------- --------- ----------- -------- -------- -----Arrive
2000 999999 24001 0.000000
0
1
0 0.00
Ass1
2000
1 24001 0.701020
0.14021
1
1 14.02
Ins1
2000
1 26667 0.200305 0.0445129
1
0 4.45
Cor1
2000
1 2667 0.200410 0.00445412
1
0 0.45
Ass2
2000
1 24000 0.751316 0.150263
1
0 15.03
Ins2
2000
1 25249 0.199760 0.0420311
1
0 4.20
Cor2
2000
1 1249 0.150327 0.00156465
1
0 0.16
Ass3
2000
1 24000 0.799959 0.159992
1
0 16.00
Ins3
2000
1 24730 0.150268 0.0309677
1
0 3.10
Cor3
2000
1
730 0.099484 0.000605192
1
0 0.06
Stock
2000 999999 24000 0.000000
0
1
0 0.00
Store
2000
1
0 0.000000
0
0
0 0.00
LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Multiple Capacity)
%
|
Location Scheduled
% Partially % | %
Name
Hours Empty Occupied Full | Down
-------- --------- ------ --------- ---- | ---Arrive
2000 100.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00
Stock
2000 100.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00
LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Single Capacity/Tanks)
Location Scheduled
% %
%
%
% %
Name
Hours Operation Setup Idle Waiting Blocked Down
-------- --------- --------- ----- ------ ------- ------- ---Ass1
2000
14.02 0.00 85.98 0.00 0.00 0.00
Ins1
2000
4.45 0.00 95.55 0.00 0.00 0.00
Cor1
Ass2
Ins2
Cor2
Ass3
Ins3
Cor3
Store
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
0.45 0.00 99.55
15.03 0.00 84.97
4.20 0.00 95.80
0.16 0.00 99.84
16.00 0.00 84.00
3.10 0.00 96.90
0.06 0.00 99.94
0.00 0.00 100.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
FAILED ARRIVALS
Entity Location Total
Name Name Failed
------ -------- -----Part Arrive
0
ENTITY ACTIVITY
Average Average Average Average Average
Current Minutes Minutes Minutes Minutes Minutes
Entity Total Quantity
In In Move Wait For
In
Name Exits In System System Logic Res, etc. Operation Blocked
------ ----- --------- -------- -------- --------- --------- -------Part 24000
1 2.873002 0.000000 0.000000 2.873002 0.000000
ENTITY STATES BY PERCENTAGE
%
%
Entity In Move Wait For
%
%
Name
Logic Res, etc. In Operation Blocked
------ ------- --------- ------------ ------Part
0.00
0.00
100.00 0.00
VARIABLES
Average
Variable
Total Minutes Minimum Maximum Current Average
Name
Changes Per Change Value Value Value Value
------------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- ------- ------Part Per Year 24000 4.999889
0 24000 24000 11999.9
LAB6.8
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------General Report
Output from C:\ProMod4\models\LAB6.8.MOD
Date: Nov/16/2003 Time: 06:32:40 PM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scenario
: Normal Run
Replication : Average
Period
: Final Report (0 sec to 8 hr Elapsed: 8 hr)
Simulation Time : 8 hr
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOCATIONS
Average
Location Scheduled
Total Minutes
Average Maximum Current
Name
Hours Capacity Entries Per Entry Contents Contents Contents %
Util
----------- --------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------- -------- -------- -----Arrive1
8 999999
75 0.000000
0
5
0 0.00 (Average)
Arrive1
0
0
0 0.000000
0
0
0 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueA1
8 999999
150 280.695209
87.7173 120.76 95.09 0.01
(Average)
QueueA1
0
0
0 19.766918
6.17716 5.33924 2.80366 0.00
(Std. Dev.)
Assembly1
8
1 54.91 8.763523 0.999917
1
1 99.99
(Average)
Assembly1
0
0 2.80366 0.449480 1.78531e-15
0
0 0.00
(Std. Dev.)
QueueS1
8 999999 53.91 175.958953
19.7685 40.29 40.17 0.00
(Average)
QueueS1
0
0 2.80366 8.378575
1.47165 2.99931 2.95438 0.00
(Std. Dev.)
S1
8
1 13.74 34.596103 0.984449
1
1 98.44 (Average)
S1
0
0 1.0695 2.669630 0.00264208
0
0 0.26 (Std.
Dev.)
QueueP1
8 999999 12.74 65.941946
1.7803
3.63
2.92 0.00
(Average)
QueueP1
0
0 1.0695 20.052607 0.640333 1.08855 1.22003 0.00
(Std. Dev.)
P1
8
1
9.82 44.593302 0.908627
1
1 90.86 (Average)
P1
0
0 0.657206 2.856355 0.0187881
0
0 1.88 (Std.
Dev.)
QueueI1
(Average)
QueueI1
Dev.)
Inspection1
Inspection1
Dev.)
Arrive2
Arrive2
8
8.82
0.065937 0.00121156
1
0.01
0
0 0.657206
0.000633 9.08164e-05
0
0.1
8
0
1
8.81 0.000000
0 0.662029 0.000000
8
0
999999
999999
75 0.000000
0
0 0.000000
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0.00 (Average)
0.00 (Std.
0
0 0.00 (Average)
0.00 (Std. Dev.)
LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Multiple Capacity)
%
|
Location Scheduled
% Partially % | %
Name
Hours Empty Occupied Full | Down
-------- --------- ------ --------- ---- | ---Arrive1
8 100.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
Arrive1
0 0.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueA1
8 0.00 100.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueA1
0 0.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueS1
8 3.05
96.95 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueS1
0 0.36
0.36 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueP1
8 21.80
78.20 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueP1
0 8.84
8.84 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
QueueI1
8 99.88
0.12 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
QueueI1
0 0.01
0.01 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
Arrive2
8 100.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
Arrive2
0 0.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Single Capacity/Tanks)
Location Scheduled
% %
%
%
% %
Name
Hours Operation Setup Idle Waiting Blocked Down
----------- --------- --------- ----- ------ ------- ------- ---Assembly1
8
99.99 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
Assembly1
0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
S1
8
98.44 0.00 1.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
S1
0
0.26 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
P1
8
90.86 0.00 9.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
P1
0
1.88 0.00 1.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
Inspection1
8
0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
Inspection1
0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
FAILED ARRIVALS
0.00 (Std.
0
3
0
0.00
Entity Location Total
Name Name Failed
------ -------- -----Parte1 Arrive1
0 (Average)
Parte1 Arrive1
0 (Std. Dev.)
Parte2 Arrive2
0 (Average)
Parte2 Arrive2
0 (Std. Dev.)
ENTITY ACTIVITY
Average Average Average Average Average
Current Minutes Minutes Minutes Minutes Minutes
Entity Total Quantity
In In Move Wait For
In
Name
Exits In System
System Logic Res, etc. Operation Blocked
------ -------- --------- ---------- -------- --------- --------- ---------Parte1
5.17
69.83 217.225750 0.000000 0.000000 98.040432 119.185318
(Average)
Parte1 0.403395 0.403395 17.814737 0.000000 0.000000 5.365111 16.980916
(Std. Dev.)
Parte2
3.64
71.36 401.033407 0.000000 0.000000 82.412344 318.621063
(Average)
Parte2 0.703814 0.703814 17.842516 0.000000 0.000000 6.015702 19.267259
(Std. Dev.)
ENTITY STATES BY PERCENTAGE
%
%
Entity In Move Wait For
%
%
Name
Logic Res, etc. In Operation Blocked
------ ------- --------- ------------ ------Parte1 0.00
0.00
45.37 54.63 (Average)
Parte1 0.00
0.00
3.69 3.69 (Std. Dev.)
Parte2 0.00
0.00
20.60 79.40 (Average)
Parte2 0.00
0.00
1.88 1.88 (Std. Dev.)
VARIABLES
Average
Variable
Total Minutes Minimum Maximum Current Average
Name
Changes Per Change Value Value Value Value
---------- -------- ---------- ------- -------- -------- -------Total Job1
5.17 66.761178
0
5.17
5.17 2.81837 (Average)
Total Job1 0.403395 5.945749
0 0.403395 0.403395 0.171004 (Std. Dev.)
Total Job2
3.64 126.760062
Total Job2 0.703814 19.400069
0
3.64
3.64 0.587893 (Average)
0 0.703814 0.703814 0.159661 (Std. Dev.)
LAB6.11.a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------General Report
Output from C:\ProMod4\models\LAB11.a.MOD
Date: Nov/16/2003 Time: 01:55:08 AM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scenario
: Normal Run
Replication : Average
Period
: Final Report (0 sec to 8 hr Elapsed: 8 hr)
Simulation Time : 8 hr
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------LOCATIONS
Average
Location Scheduled
Total
Seconds Average Maximum Current
Name
Hours Capacity Entries Per Entry Contents Contents Contents % Util
-------- --------- -------- ------- ----------- --------- -------- -------- -----Arrive
8 999999 477.6 0.000000
0
1.03
0 0.00 (Average)
Arrive
0
0 22.5545 0.000000
0 0.171447
0 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
HandD
8 999999 241.15 1754.140135 15.1085 33.02 28.25 0.00
(Average)
HandD
0
0 17.3708 907.085855 8.6405 15.0628 16.9464 0.00
(Std. Dev.)
H
8 999999 142.54 358.636432 1.80611
7.49
1.82 0.00
(Average)
H
0
0 11.3835 122.357207 0.741175 2.34626 2.03197 0.00 (Std.
Dev.)
D
8 999999 93.91 49.608401 0.162746
2.95
0.2 0.00
(Average)
D
0
0 9.94946 7.671334 0.0353061 0.687184 0.471405 0.00 (Std.
Dev.)
Clerk1
8
1 353.62 80.019063 0.982164
1
0.99 98.22
(Average)
Clerk1
0
0 8.93837 1.611320 0.0176794
0
0.1 1.77 (Std.
Dev.)
Clerk2
8
1 305.86 69.912714 0.742485
1
0.64 74.25
(Average)
Clerk2
0
0 8.79051 0.299301 0.0216684
0 0.482418 2.17 (Std.
Dev.)
LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Multiple Capacity)
%
|
Location Scheduled
% Partially % | %
Name
Hours Empty Occupied Full | Down
-------- --------- ------ --------- ---- | ---Arrive
8 100.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
Arrive
0 0.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
HandD
8 6.43
93.57 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
HandD
0 5.50
5.50 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
H
8 29.69
70.31 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
H
0 7.44
7.44 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
D
8 86.02
13.98 0.00 | 0.00 (Average)
D
0 2.47
2.47 0.00 | 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Single Capacity/Tanks)
Location Scheduled
% % %
%
% %
Name
Hours Operation Setup Idle Waiting Blocked Down
-------- --------- --------- ----- ----- ------- ------- ---Clerk1
8
85.87 0.00 1.78 0.00 12.34 0.00 (Average)
Clerk1
0
2.16 0.00 1.77 0.00 1.73 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
Clerk2
8
74.25 0.00 25.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Average)
Clerk2
0
2.17 0.00 2.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Std. Dev.)
FAILED ARRIVALS
Entity Location Total
Name
Name Failed
-------- -------- -----Customer Arrive
0 (Average)
Customer Arrive
0 (Std. Dev.)
ENTITY ACTIVITY
Average Average Average Average Average
Current
Seconds Seconds Seconds Seconds Seconds
Entity Total Quantity
In In Move Wait For
In
Name
Exits In System
System Logic Res, etc. Operation Blocked
-------- ------- --------- ----------- -------- ---------- ---------- ---------Customer 445.7
31.9 1059.947725 0.000000 830.552937 107.284489
122.110299 (Average)
Customer 9.70525 16.9911 428.010894 0.000000 424.199628
6.665223 (Std. Dev.)
1.847473
ENTITY STATES BY PERCENTAGE
%
%
Entity In Move Wait For
%
%
Name
Logic Res, etc. In Operation Blocked
-------- ------- --------- ------------ ------Customer 0.00
74.54
12.02 13.44 (Average)
Customer 0.00
10.47
5.27 5.22 (Std. Dev.)
LAB6.12.a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------General Report
Output from C:\ProMod4\models\LAB12.a.mod
Date: Nov/17/2003 Time: 01:41:22 AM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scenario
: Normal Run
Replication : 1 of 1
Simulation Time : 24 hr
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOCATIONS
Average
Location Scheduled
Total Minutes Average Maximum Current
Name
Hours Capacity Entries Per Entry Contents Contents Contents % Util
-------- --------- -------- ------- --------- -------- -------- -------- -----Queue
24 999999
260 0.601554 0.108614
1
0 10.64
Clerk1
24
1
103 10.022359 0.716877
1
1 71.69
Clerk2
24
1
87 9.902644 0.598285
1
1 59.83
Clerk3
24
1
70 10.277486 0.4996
1
1 49.96
LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Multiple Capacity)
%
|
Location Scheduled
% Partially % | %
Name
Hours Empty Occupied Full | Down
-------- --------- ----- --------- ---- | ---Queue
24 89.14
10.86 0.00 | 0.00
LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Single Capacity/Tanks)
Location Scheduled
% % %
%
% %
Name
Hours Operation Setup Idle Waiting Blocked Down
-------- --------- --------- ----- ----- ------- ------- ---Clerk1
24
71.69 0.00 28.31 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clerk2
24
59.83 0.00 40.17 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clerk3
24
49.96 0.00 50.04 0.00 0.00 0.00
FAILED ARRIVALS
Entity Location Total
Name Name Failed
------ -------- -----Worker Queue
33
ENTITY ACTIVITY
Average Average Average Average Average
Current Minutes Minutes Minutes Minutes Minutes
Entity Total Quantity
In In Move Wait For
In
Name Exits In System System Logic Res, etc. Operation Blocked
------ ----- --------- --------- -------- --------- --------- -------Worker 257
3 10.711887 0.000000 0.000000 10.123545 0.588342
ENTITY STATES BY PERCENTAGE
%
%
Entity In Move Wait For
%
%
Name
Logic Res, etc. In Operation Blocked
------ ------- --------- ------------ ------Worker 0.00
0.00
94.51 5.49
LAB6.12.b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------General Report
Output from C:\ProMod4\models\LAB12.b.MOD
Date: Nov/17/2003 Time: 02:05:14 AM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scenario
: Normal Run
Replication : 1 of 1
Simulation Time : 24 hr
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------LOCATIONS
Average
Location Scheduled
Total Minutes Average Maximum Current
Name
Hours Capacity Entries Per Entry Contents Contents Contents % Util
-------- --------- -------- ------- --------- -------- -------- -------- -----Arrive
24 999999
296 0.000000
0
1
0 0.00
Queue1
24 999999
132 7.889568 0.72321
3
1 7.29
Queue2
24 999999
101 5.756465 0.403752
3
0 4.04
Queue3
24 999999
63 4.445683 0.194499
2
0 0.00
Clerk1
24
1
131 10.226573 0.930334
1
1 93.03
Clerk2
24
1
101 9.891921 0.693808
1
0 69.38
Clerk3
24
1
63 10.133762 0.443352
1
1 44.34
LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Multiple Capacity)
%
|
Location Scheduled
% Partially % | %
Name
Hours Empty Occupied Full | Down
-------- --------- ------ --------- ---- | ---Arrive
24 100.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00
Queue1
24 38.03
61.97 0.00 | 0.00
Queue2
24 63.12
36.88 0.00 | 0.00
Queue3
24 81.65
18.35 0.00 | 0.00
LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Single Capacity/Tanks)
Location Scheduled
% % %
%
% %
Name
Hours Operation Setup Idle Waiting Blocked Down
-------- --------- --------- ----- ----- ------- ------- ---Clerk1
24
93.03 0.00 6.97 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clerk2
24
69.38 0.00 30.62 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clerk3
24
44.34 0.00 55.66 0.00 0.00 0.00
FAILED ARRIVALS
Entity Location Total
Name Name Failed
------ -------- ------
Worker Arrive
0
ENTITY ACTIVITY
Average Average Average Average Average
Current Minutes Minutes Minutes Minutes Minutes
Entity Total Quantity
In In Move Wait For
In
Name Exits In System System Logic Res, etc. Operation Blocked
------ ----- --------- --------- -------- --------- --------- -------Worker 293
3 16.481328 0.000000 0.000000 11.286345 5.194983
ENTITY STATES BY PERCENTAGE
%
%
Entity In Move Wait For
%
%
Name
Logic Res, etc. In Operation Blocked
------ ------- --------- ------------ ------Worker 0.00
0.00
68.48 31.52
LAB6.12.c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------General Report
Output from C:\ProMod4\models\LAB12.b.MOD
Date: Nov/17/2003 Time: 01:46:27 AM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scenario
: Normal Run
Replication : 1 of 1
Simulation Time : 24 hr
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------LOCATIONS
Average
Location Scheduled
Total Minutes
Average Maximum Current
Name
Hours Capacity Entries Per Entry Contents Contents Contents % Util
-------- --------- -------- ------- --------- ----------- -------- -------- -----Arrive
24 999999
282 0.000018 3.47222e-06
1
0 0.00
Queue1
24 999999
92 7.445859 0.475708
4
0 4.80
Queue2
24 999999
83 10.199675 0.587898
6
0 5.88
Queue3
24 999999
107 11.206224 0.832685
6
0 0.00
Clerk1
24
1
92 9.900793 0.632551
1
1 63.26
Clerk2
24
1
83 10.180747 0.586807
1
1 58.68
Clerk3
24
1
107 10.143028 0.753683
1
0 75.37
LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Multiple Capacity)
%
|
Location Scheduled
% Partially % | %
Name
Hours Empty Occupied Full | Down
-------- --------- ------ --------- ---- | ---Arrive
24 100.00
0.00 0.00 | 0.00
Queue1
24 66.70
33.30 0.00 | 0.00
Queue2
24 67.42
32.58 0.00 | 0.00
Queue3
24 53.79
46.21 0.00 | 0.00
LOCATION STATES BY PERCENTAGE (Single Capacity/Tanks)
Location Scheduled
% % %
%
% %
Name
Hours Operation Setup Idle Waiting Blocked Down
-------- --------- --------- ----- ----- ------- ------- ---Clerk1
24
63.26 0.00 36.74 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clerk2
24
58.68 0.00 41.32 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clerk3
24
75.37 0.00 24.63 0.00 0.00 0.00
FAILED ARRIVALS
Entity Location Total
Name Name Failed
------ -------- -----Worker Arrive
0
ENTITY ACTIVITY
Average Average Average Average Average
Current Minutes Minutes Minutes Minutes Minutes
Entity Total Quantity
In In Move Wait For
In
Name Exits In System System Logic Res, etc. Operation Blocked
------ ----- --------- --------- -------- --------- --------- -------Worker 280
2 19.794539 0.000000 0.000000 12.504414 7.290125
ENTITY STATES BY PERCENTAGE
%
%
Entity In Move Wait For
%
%
Name
Logic Res, etc. In Operation Blocked
------ ------- --------- ------------ ------Worker 0.00
0.00
63.17 36.83