NCHRP 08-36: Research for The AASHTO Standing Committee on Planning 2009-14 Research Problem Statement for NCHRP 8-36 Title Weight vs. No-Weight Vehicle Classification Problem Traffic data collection agencies collect traffic volume, classification, and weigh-in-motion data for planning and other purposes. Vehicle classification systems classify vehicles based on axle spacing or vehicle length while weigh-in-motion systems generally make use of weight data in addition to axle spacing. It is generally believed that weigh-in-motion systems can classify traffic more accurately by incorporating weight criteria into the classification algorithm. If there is a significant difference in classification results between axle spacing based algorithms versus axles spacing plus weight algorithms, this can cause concerns with data users is they see unexplained shifts in data as well as basic errors in traffic data collection. Objective 1. Identify differences in classification counts for axle spacing based algorithms versus axle spacing plus weight algorithms. 2. Use statistical processes to determine if these differences are significant. 3. Identify traffic conditions (i.e. classification volume distributions) that increase or decrease this significance. 2. Identify possible ways of making the different algorithms predict more compatible class counts for different traffic conditions. Priority Classification data is collected for the purpose of transportation planning as well as other uses. The accuracy (or inaccuracy) of this data can impact decisions that can have significant ramifications on freight planning, pavement engineering, and safety analysis. Time and Cost Estimate One Year - $85,000 Submitted on behalf of the TRB Highway Traffic Monitoring Committee (ABJ35). Ralph Gillmann Travel Monitoring Team Leader Federal Highway Administration East Building, HPPI-30 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 2/13/2016