1. REFRACTION THROUGH LENSES A lens is a portion of a transparent refracting medium bounded by two spherical surfaces or by one spherical surface and a plane surface. Lenses are usually made of glass. The line joining the centres of curvature of the two spherical surfaces is know n as the principal axis. If one of the surfaces is plane, the axis is a straight line normal to the surface drawn through the centre of curvature of the other surface. A plane through the axis is called the principal section of the lens. Optical centre of a lens is a point on the principal axis through which all the rays will pass, when the incident and emergent paths are parallel to each other. When the lens is thin the ray passing through the optical centre is considered to go straight without deviation. Fig. (3.1) Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES The following types of lenses are in common use (Fig. 3.1). The first three are convergent lenses and the last three are divergent lenses; 1. Double convex or bi-convex lens 2. Plano-convex lens 3. Concavo-convex lens 4. Double concave or bi-coneave lens 5. Plano-concave lens 6. Convexo-concave lens. 2. REFRACTION THROUGH A LENS Fig. 3.2 Consider a thin lens enclosing a medium of refractive index. 2 and separating it from a medium of refractive index Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES 1, on its two sides. Let R1 and R2 be the radii of curvature of the two co-axial spherical surfaces and O is a point object situated on the principal axis. An image I' is formed by refraction at the first surface and let its distance from the pole of the first surface be equal to v'. Then, 2 v 1 u 2 1 (i) R1 The rays are refracted from the second surface of the lens. The virtual image P may be regarded as the object for the second surface and the final image is formed at I which lies in the medium of refractive index 1. If the distance of the final image from the, pole of the second surface is equal to v, then, 1 v 2 v 1 2 R2 (ii) In this Case, the rays are passing from the medium of refractive, index 2 (i.e., lens) to the medium of refractive index 1. Adding (i) and (ii) Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES 1 v 1 1 1 ( 2 1 ) u R1 R 2 Dividing by l, 1 1 1 1 ( 2 1 ) v u 1 R1 R 2 If the lens is placed in air 1= 1 and (iii) 2 , where is the 1 refractive index of the material of the lens. Then, 1 1 1 1 ( 1 ) v u R1 R 2 (iv) Note: (1) It is to be remembered that these equations will hold true only for paraxial rays and for a thin lens where the thickness of the lens can be taken negligibly small as compared to u, v, R1, and R2, (2) While solving numerical problems, proper signs for u, v R1, and R2, are to be used. 3. PRINCIPAL FOCI In the formula, Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES 1 1 1 1 ( 1 ) v u R1 R 2 If u = 1 1 0 u 1 1 1 ( 1 ) v R1 R 2 (i) This value of v is known as the second principal focal length and the position of the image corresponding to the axial point object lying at infinity is termed as second Principal focus of the lens (Fig. 3.3). Fig. 3-3 In a concave lens, f2 is -ve and in a convex lens it is +vs, according to the sign convention. In the case of a concave lens F2 in virtual and in the case of a convex lens F2 is real. Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES 1 1 1 ( 1 ) f2 R1 R 2 (ii) Considering the case when the image is formed at infinity, v= 1 1 0 v From the equation, 1 1 1 1 ( 1 ) v u R1 R 2 1 1 1 ( 1 ) u R1 R 2 ... (iii) (iv) This value of u is known as the first principal focal length of the lens and is denoted by f1 (Fig 3.4). Fig. 3.4 Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES 1 1 1 ( 1 ) f1 R1 R 2 (v) Then : 1 1 1 v u f In a convex lens fl is -ve and in a concave lens fl is +vs, according to the sign convention. Moreover, when the lens is placed in air, the two focal lengths are equal in magnitude but opposite in sign. If the focal length of the lens is f then from equations (iii), ,(ii,) and (v). This is the lens equation and is applicable to a concave or convex lens. 4. LEAST POSSIBLE DISTANCE BETWEEN AN OBJECT AND ITS REAL IMAGE IN A CONVEX LENS Fig. 3.5 Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES Suppose I is the real image of a point object O formed by convex lens (Fig. 3.5). Here, u is -ve and v is +ve. Let the distance of the image from the lens he x and the distance between, O and I be d. u is -ve, v and f are +ve v = +x and u = -(d-x) From the formula 1 1 1 v u f 1 1 1 x (d x ) f 1 1 1 x (d x ) f d 1 x( d x ) f x 2 dx df 0 For a real image the roots of the quadratic equation should be real. Applying in this case the condition b 2-4ac>0 for a general, quadratic equation ax2 + bx + c = 0. d2-4df > 0 , d2 > 4 df, d > 4f Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES Thus, the distance between O and I should be more than 4f. In a special case when u = 2f, v is also equal to 2f and the minimum distance between O and I is 4f. 5. DEVIATION PRODUCED BY A THIN LENS A lens may be, considered to be, made up of large number of prisms placed one above the other. As the function of the lens is to, deviate the incident rays of light, it is necessary to find the deviation produced by a particular portion of the lens. Fig, 3.6 Let a ray of monochromatic light parallel to the principal axis be incident on a thin lens at a height h above the axis and let f be the focal length of the lens. As the ray is parallel to the principal axis, after refraction it will pass through the second focus (Fig. 3.6). The deviation suffered by the ray is given by Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES tan = h/f In the paraxial region being small, tan = h f Fig. 3-7 Next, consider a luminous point object O and its corresponding image I (Fig. 3.7). Then, deviation suffered by the ray OA incident at A. is given by OAL AIL h h 1 1 1 h h( ) u v f v u h f This shows that the deviation produced by a lens is independent of the position of the object. Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES 6. EQUIVALENT FOCAL LENGTH OF TWO THIN LENSES SEPARATED BY A FINITE DISTANCE Let fl and f2. be the focal lengths of two thin lenses L1 and L2 placed on-axially and separated by a distance d in air. Let a ray IA of monochromatic light parallel to the common aixs be incident on the first lens L1 at a height h1, above the axis. Fig. 3.8 This ray after refraction through the first lens is directed towards F1, which is the second principal focus of L1 (Fig. 3.8). Then the deviation 1, produced by the first lens is given by, 1 h1 f1 The emergent ray from the first lens is refracted by the second lens L2 at a height h2 and finally meets the axis at F. Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES Since the incident ray IA is parallel to the principal axis and after refraction through the combination meets the axis at F, F must be the second principal focus of the combination. The deviation 2, produced by the second lens is given by 2 h2 f2 The incident and the final emergent rays when produced intersect at E. It is clear that a single thin lens placed at P2, will produce the same deviation as the two constituent lenses together. The lens of focal length P2F placed at P2 is termed as the equivalent lens which can replace the two lens L1 and L2. The deviation produced by the equivalent lens is h1 . f Where, f is the focal length of the equivalent lens. 1 2 h1 h h2 1 f f1 f2 (i) s AL1F1 and BL2F are similar AL1 BL2 L1 F1 L2 F1 or h2 h1 h2 f1 f1 d h1 ( f 1 d ) f1 Substituting this value of h2. in equation (i), (ii) Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES h1 h1 h1 ( f 1 d ) f f1 f2 f1 So , f d 1 1 1 f f1 f2 f1 1 1 1 d f f1 f2 f2 f1 f f f1 f2 f1 f2 d f1 f2 Where = d- (f1+f2) and is known as the optical separation or Optical interval between the two lenses. It is numerically equal to the first distance between the second principal focus of the first lens and the first principal focus of the second lens. 7. POWER OF A LENS The power of a lens is the measure of its ability to produce convergence of a parallel beam of light. A convex lens of large focal length produces a small converging effect on the rays of light, and a convex lens of small focal length produces a large converging effect. Due to this reason, the Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES power of a convex lens is taken as +ve and a convex lens of large focal length have low power and a convex lens of small focal length has high power. On the other hand a concave lens produces divergence. Therefore, its power is taken as negative. The unit in which power of a lens is measured is called diopter (D). A convex lens of focal length one metre has a power = + 1 diopter and a convex lens of focal length 2 metres has a power = + ½ diopter. Mathematically, power 1 focal length in metres If two lenses of focal lengths fl and f2, are in contact 1 1 1 F f1 f2 P P1 P2 Where P1 and P2 are the powers of the two lenses and P is the equivalent power. When two thin lenses of focal lengths f1 and f2 are placed co-axially and separated by a distance d, the equivalent focal length f is given by; Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES 1 1 1 d f f1 f2 f2 f1 P P1 P2 dP1 P2 Where P, is the equivalent power. Example 3. 1. Calculate the focal length of a double convex lens, for which the radius of curvature of each surface is 50 cm and refractive index of glass is 1.50. Solution Here, R1= +50 cm, R2 = -50 cm, µ = 1.50 1 1 1 ( 1 )( ) f R1 R2 1 1 1 ( 1.5 1 ) ( ) f 50 50 f = 50 cm. Example 3.2: Find the focal length of a plano convex lens, the radius of the curved surface being 40 cm and =1.50. Solution Here, R1= , R2 = -40 cm, µ = 1.50 Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES 1 1 1 ( 1 )( ) f R1 R2 1 1 1 ( 1.5 1 ) ( ) f 40 f = 80 cm. 10. SPHERICAL ABERRATION IN A LENS The presence of spherical aberration in the image formed by a single lens is illustrated in Fig. (3.11). O is a point object on the axis of the lens and Ip and Im are the Fig. 3-11 images formed by the paraxial and marginal rays respectively. It is clear from the figure that the paraxial rays of light form the image at a longer distance from the lens than the marginal rays. The image is not sharp at any point on the axis. However, if the screen is placed perpendicular to the axis at AB, the image appears to be a circular patch of diameter AB. At positions on the two sides of AB, the image patch has a Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES larger diameter. This patch of diameter AB is called the circle of least confusion, which corresponds to the position of the best image. The distance Im IP, measures the longitudinal spherical aberration. The radius of the circle of least confusion measures the lateral spherical aberration. When the aperture of the lens is relatively large compared to the focal length of the lens, the come of the rays of light refracted through the different zones of the lens surface are not brought to focus at the same point on the axis. The marginal rays come to focus at a nearer point Im and the axial rays come to focus at a farther point Ip. Thus, for an object point O on the axis, the image extends over the length Im Ip. This effect is called spherical aberration and arises due to the fact that different annular zones have different focal lengths. The spherical aberration produced by a concave lens is illustrated in Fig. (3.12). Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES Fig. (3.12) The spherical aberration produced by a lens, depends on the distance of the object point and varies approximately as the square of the distance of the object ray, above the axis of the lens. The spherical aberration produced by a convex lens is positive and that produced by a concave lens is negative. 127. COMA The effect of rays from an object point not situated on the axis of the lens results in an aberration called coma. Fig. 3.13 Comatic aberration is similar to spherical aberration in that both are due to the failure of the lens to bring all rays from a point object to focus at the same point. Spherical aberration refers to object points situated on the axis whereas comatic aberration refers to object points situated off the axis. In the Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES case of spherical aberration, the image is a circle of varying diameter along the axis and in the case of comatic aberration the image is comet-shaped and hence the name coma. Fig. 3.13 illustrates the effect of coma. The resultant image of a distant point off the axis is shown in the side figure. The rays of light in the tangential plane are represented in the figure. Fig. 3.14 illustrates the presence of coma in the image due to a point object situated off the axis of the lens. Rays of light getting refracted through the centre of the lens (ray 1) meets the screen XY at the point P. Fig. 3.13 Rays 2, 2 ; 3, 3 etc., getting refracted through the outer zones of the lens come to focus at points Q, R, S, etc., nearer the lens and on the screen overlapping circular patches of gradually increasing diameter are formed. The resultant Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES image of the point is comic-shaped as indicated in the side figure. Let 1, 2, 3 etc., be the various zones of the lens [Fig. 3.14(a).] Rays of light getting refracted through them different zones give Fig. 3.14 rise to circular patches of light 1', 2’, 3' etc. The screen is placed perpendicular to the axis of the lens and at the position where the central rays come to focus [Fig. 3.14 (b)]. Like spherical aberration comatic aberration produced by a single lens can also be corrected by properly choosing the radii of curvature of the lens surfaces. Coma can be altogether eliminated for a given pair of object and image points whereas spherical aberration cannot be completely corrected. Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES Further, a lens corrected for coma will not be free from spherical aberration and the one corrected for spherical aberration will not be free from coma. Use of a stop or a diaphragm at the proper position eliminates coma. Coma is the result of varying magnification for rays refracted through different zones of the lens. For example, in Fig. 3.14, rays of light getting refracted through the outer zones come to focus at points nearer the lens. Hence the magnification of the image due to the outer zones is smaller than the inner zones and in this case coma is said to be negative. On the other hand if the magnification produced in an image due to the outer zones is greater, coma is said to be positive. According to Abbe, a German optician, coma can be eliminated if a lens satisfies the Abbe's since condition viz. 1 y 1 sin 1 2 y 2 sin 2 where 1 , y1 and 1 refer to the refractive index, height of the object above the axis and the slope angle of the incident ray of light. Similarly 2, y2 and 2 refer to the corresponding quantities in the image medium. The magnification of the image is given by Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES y 2 1 sin 1 y 1 2 sin 2 Elimination of coma is possible (i) if the lateral magnification is the same for all rays of light irrespective of the slope angle 1 and 2 thus , can be eliminated if, sin 1 is sin 2 a constant because 1/2 is constant . A lens, that satisfies the above condition is called an aplanatic lens 9. ASTIGMATISM Astigmatism, similar to coma, is the aberration in the image formed by a lens, of object points off the axis. The difference between astigmatism and coma, however, is that in coma the spreading of the image takes place in a plane perpendicular to the lens axis and in astigmatism the spreading takes place along the lens axis. Astigmatism discussed in this article is different from the one treated in defective vision. Fig. (3.15) illustrates the defect of astigmatism in the image of a point B situated off the axis. Two portions of the cone of rays of light diverging from the point B are taken. Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES Fig. 3.15 The cone of the rays of light refracted through the tangential (vertical) plane BMN comes to focus at a point P1 Nearer the lens and the cone of rays refracted through the sagittal ( horizontal) plane BRS comes to focus at the P2 away from the lens. All rays pass through a horizontal line passing through P1 called the primary image and also through a vertical line passing through P2 called the secondary image. The refracted beam has an elliptical cross-section, which ends to a horizontal line at P1 and a vertical line at P2. The cross-section of the refracted beam is circular at some point between the primary and the secondary images and this is called the circle of least confusion. If a screen is held perpendicular to the refracted beam between the points P1 and P2, the shape of the image at different positions is as shown in Fig. 3.16. Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES Fig. 3.16 The focus of the primary images of all points in the object plane gives the surface of revolution about the lens axis and is called the primary image surface. Similarly, the locus of the secondary images gives the secondary image surface. Fig. 3.17 The surface of best focus is given by the locus of the circles of least confusion. The primary and the secondary image surfaces and the surface of best focus are illustrated in Fig. (3.17). P1 and P2 are the images of the object point B. TPN and SPR are the first and the second image surfaces and KPL Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES is the surface of beat focus. The three surfaces touch at the point P on the axis. Generally, the surface of best focus is not plane but curved as shown. This defect is called the curvature of the field. The shape of the image surfaces depends on the shape of the lens and the position of the stops. If the primary image surface is to the left of the secondary image surface, astigmatism is said to be positive, otherwise negative. By using a convex and a concave lens of suitable focal lengths and separated by a distance, it is possible to minimise the astigmatic difference and such a lens combination is called an anastigmat. 10. CURVATURE OF THE FIELD The image of an extended plane object due to a single lens is not a flat one but will be a curved surface. The central portion of the image nearer the axis is in focus but the outer Fig. 3.18 (a) Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES regions of the image away from the axis are blurred. This defect is called the curvature of the field. This defect. is due to the fact that the paraxial focal length is greater than the marginal focal length. Fig. 3.18 (b) This aberration is present even if the aperture of the lens is reduced by a suitable stop, usually employed to reduce spherical aberration, coma and astigmatism. Fig. 3.18 illustrates the presence of curvature' of the field in the image formed by a convex lens. A real image formed by a convex lens curves towards the lens [Fig, 3.18(a) and a virtual image curves away from the lens [Fig. 3.18 (b)]. Fig. 3.19 represents the curvature of the field present in the image formed by a concave lens. Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES Fig. (3.19) 11. DISTORTION The failure of a lens, to form a point image due to a point object is due to the presence of spherical aberration, coma and astigmatism. The variation in the magnification produced by a lens for different axial distances results in the aberration called distortion. This aberration is not due to the lack of sharpness in the ‘image’. Distortion is of two types viz. (a) pin-cushion distortion and (b) barrelshaped distortion. In pin-cushion distortion, the magnification increases with increasing axial distance and the image of an object [Fig 3.20 (a)] appears as shown in Fig. 3.20 (b). On the other hand, if the magnification decreases with increasing axial distance, it results in barrel-shaped distortion and the image appears as shown in Fig. 3.20 (c). Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES Fig. 3.20 In the case of optical instruments intended mainly for visual observation, a little amount of distortion may be present but it must be completely eliminated in a Fig. 3.21 (a) photographic camera lens, where the magnification of the various regions regions of the object must be the same. In the Chapter 3: REFRACTION THROUGH THIN LENSES absence of stops, which limit the cone of rays of light striking the lens, a single lens is free from distortion. But, if stops are used, the resulting image is distorted. If a stop is placed before the lens the distortion is barrel-shaped [Fig. 3.21 (a)] and if a stop is placed after the lens, the distortion is pincushion type [Fig. 3.21 (b)]. To eliminate distortion, a stop is placed in between two symmetrical lenses, so that the pincushion distortion produced by the first lens is compensated by the barrel-shaped distortion produced by the second lens [Fig. 3.21 (c)]. Projection and camera-lenses are constructed in this way. Fig. 3.21 (c)