PSY 103 Introduction to Psychology Remembering, Feeling, and Thinking Worksheet Part I: Motivation, Emotion, and Behavior Explain the relationships between motivation, emotion, and behavior. How does emotion affect motivation? Give an example of a specific behavior and the motivators and emotions that can be behind that behavior. Your response should be at least 300 hundred words. Motivation can be cleared as the heavy energy behind all the proceedings of a person. The influence of a person’s wants and requirements both have a tough contact on the way of their behavior. Motivation is based on your sentiments and success-related goals. When you feel like the humankind is in opposition to you and you would somewhat stay in bed and flounder, rather than go out there and face the world once more; your motivation is not going to be at an all time tall. The need of motivation then causes you to stay in that small world of decadence for as long as you feel down and miserable. Our motivation relies vastly upon just how glad we really are. If you feel awful about yourself, you will not have a lot motivation to alter things as you will not feel PSY103r6 PSY 103 Introduction to Psychology commendable of the change. Drives and requirements can produce emotions, also. Imagine the example of the individual swimming underwater who comes up beneath a raft. The desire for air will create not only a great effort to reach the edge of the raft, but also severe fear. Extreme hunger or thirst is also probable to effect in emotional responses such as grief, anger or fear. As these examples point out there has some of the times no distinct separation among motivation and emotion. Generally, though, we can believe of aspiration as arising from some internal source such as lack of a biological nourishment (food for example) and of developing some kind of goal-directed behaviour (such as searching for food). Then again, we can think of feeling as being an internal state typically produced by an external stimulus and not in essence leading to any particular behaviour. In point of fact, a given feeling can lead to numerous diverse sorts of behaviour, even within the same individual. Part II: Theories of Emotion Summarize the four major theories of emotion. Identify which theory of emotion you think is the most valid. What makes this theory more valid to you than the others? Identify which theory of emotion you think is least valid. What makes this theory less valid? Your reponse should be at least 300 hundred words. The four main theories of emotion are: the James-Lange theory, the Cannon-Bard theory, the Schacter-Singer theory, and the Lazarus theory. The initial of these theories is the James-Lange theory posited individually by William James and Carl Lange. The James-Lange theory says that an incident first causes mental stimulation and also a physical reaction. It is not until then that the person understands the physical reaction as a feeling. For instance, we feel apologetic because we weep, irritated because we strike, or frightened because we shiver. On the whole what this is saying is that the physical features (e.g. fast heart rate, etc.) emerge before the sentiments are apparent. So until we physically react to a state (e.g. promotion), we do not recognize or know the sensations near it ("I am excited"). The next theory of emotion is the Cannon-Bard theory developed initially by Walter Cannon and afterward extended upon by physiologist Phillip Bard. The Cannon-Bard theory squabbles the following sequence of trials: emotion-provoking stimuli are received by the senses, which are passed on at once to the intellectual cortex, which then give the alert mental experience of the feeling, which are transmitted to the understanding nervous system, which then generates the mental state of stimulation. Explicitly, you undergo by both the physical phase and the sensitivity of the feeling at the same time, not one caused by the other. For illustration, you see the bear (stimulus) and at the same time sense terror and a thumping heart kick in together. This seems to make more sense than the James-Lange theory. What do you think? PSY103r6 PSY 103 Introduction to Psychology The third theory is that of Schachter-Singer, which is referred to as a two-stage theory. They say that for a feeling to take place there should first be a mental stimulation, and second there must be a clarification for the stimulation. So, there have to be some sort of awareness-getter and the motive why it got that exact person's interest. For instance, getting a promotion - the person would first sense the physiological stimulation linked with enthusiasm e.g. amplified heart beat, etc. and second, the promotion would be the clarification for the stimulation and it get the interest of the person. The fourth theory to think for this segment is the Lazarus theory, which most greatly highlights the cognitive part of emotion. This is the theory that an emotion-provoking stimulus triggers a cognitive evaluation, which is followed by the sentiment and mental stimulation. It seems that every theory holds a crumb of truth, so maybe they each clarify some emotional conditions. They are more holistic this way. Each theory has been tested and has some supporting proof. But no theory can actually be verified. The more support a theory has, the more expected it is suitable. Maybe the Cannon-Bard theory seems to fit for most of my know ledges. Their theory states that the emotion and the physical stimulation happen simultaneously as each other. They can happen simultaneously or in fact one lacking the other. Part II: Thinking, Intelligence, and Creativity Describe thinking, intelligence, and creativity in your own words. How are thinking, intelligence, and creativity related? Does one’s creativity illustrate anything about his or her thinking processes or level of intelligence? Why or why not? Your response must be at least 300 words. A. Thinking Of the top of my head: Thinking is the act of psychological or brain doings concerned in dilemma work out and decision; occupied in the formulation of a normal train of ideas; prejudiced by past learning and experience, as humans are thinking beings. Another definition of thinking to consider is: Intelligence is psychological doings, not mostly perceptual, by which one catchs some feature of an object or circumstances based on past learning and experience. B. Intelligence It is one's inborn capability to figure out; to realize and profit from experience PSY103r6 PSY 103 Introduction to Psychology 1. The ability to obtain and relate knowledge. 2. The sense of thinking and motive. 3. Better powers of mind. Intelligence is: 1.The skill to understand, learn, and assume things out fast 2. The group of furtive information, esp. for military purposes 3. A faction or subdivision collecting military information C. Creativity It is the supremacy or skill to discover: creativeness, ingeniousness, cleverness, creation, ingenuity, uniqueness 1. Having the skill or supremacy to produce: Human beings are creative animals. 2. Productive; creating. 3. distinguished by innovation and lucidity; inventive: creative writing Therefore, it seems that the three concepts of thinking, intelligence and creativity are unified. We need a convinced amount of brainpower, our inborn skill to think, before we can either think or be creative. We have to be capable of using our mental capabilities (thinking) in order to be innovative. And, in order to be creative, we need to have thinking/mental abilities. And, the more we imagine and make, our cleverness can, to some scale, enhance. Though, intelligence is found to be fairly stable over time. Is this how you see the relationship between the three concepts? D. Does one's creativity illustrate anything about his or her thinking processes or level of intelligence? Why or why not? If you are in agreement with the above explanation, creativity does demonstrate our thinking procedures, for the reason that in order to make something we require utilizing our mental capabilities that involves the creation of new ideas or concepts, or new associations of the imaginative mind among existing ideas or concepts. There is a optimistic connection among creativity and intelligence. In other words, the more imaginative the person is, the superior the level of intelligence that person has. So, we require some level of intelligence in order to be imaginative, but it might be hard to really access the precise level of intelligence based on one's creativity, as it is only one feature of intelligence. Nonetheless, highly imaginative people are also highly intelligent. Creativity is usually used to refer to the act of producing fresh ideas, PSY103r6 PSY 103 Introduction to Psychology approaches or actions, while modernization is the procedure of both generating and applying such imaginative ideas in some specific technique. PSY103r6