Meeting With Your TV Meteorologist: A Toolkit Meeting Rationale/Background As extreme weather events become more common and more intense, Americans are turning to TV weather forecasters to understand how climate change is impacting their daily lives. Meteorologists are trusted public messengers on weather, climate, and science in general, and are more likely to have the ears of everyday Americans than any climate scientist. Unfortunately, many television meteorologists are missing the story on climate change, in large part because a shocking number deny climate science — a 2010 George Mason survey found that only 19 percent of meteorologists accept the science showing that human-induced climate change is real. The key objective of meeting with your local meteorologist is to help them understand the vital role they play in communicating climate change to the public. Meteorologists need to understand that their viewers are literally looking out the window right now, trying to understand all of this bizarre weather. Viewers want to hear about climate change and understand its connection to extreme weather. Those same viewers will support the meteorologists who get the story right, and speak out against misinformation when it’s spread through their local TV station. Setting up a meeting In seeking private meetings with TV meteorologists, it is important to include the meteorologist’s news director and general manager if possible. At a recent conference, one meteorologist relayed to us how much power news directors and general managers exert on all news coverage, including weather. On a related note, that same meteorologist also mentioned that mail, emails, and phone calls from viewers can do a lot to influence reporting. “If one person calls or writes, we assume 1,000 other people feel that way,” he told us. This meeting is a level beyond even that, so there’s no doubt it can have a big impact, especially if the right people are involved. Researching the station Before the meeting, research your local TV station. Does their reporting ever seem to have an ideological bent? Do they cover climate change on other portions of their broadcast? Which media corporation owns them? (Our TV meteorologist spreadsheet identifies common media companies that own many local stations throughout the country). Does the station have a published set of journalistic/ethical standards? If not, does the media company they are owned by? Researching your meteorologist When it comes to climate change, there are basically three categories of TV meteorologists: those who feel comfortable providing regular, accurate climate coverage (around 10% of meteorologists), another 10% who virulently and publicly deny climate change, and a majority who are “in the middle,” and avoiding talking about climate change at all. Within this majority, there are a wide range of views: we know that some of the folks “in the middle” are actually convinced climate change is not happening. But in many other cases, TV meteorologists are well-informed about climate change but afraid to speak out, or just don’t know much about climate change and, aware of the reactions it often provokes, choose to give careful, noncommittal responses when pressed for their perspective. To find out which category your meteorologist fits into, first consult the attached spreadsheet detailing the climate perspectives of meteorologists across the country. If your meteorologist is not listed in the spreadsheet, that merely means that they have not come across our radar through public statements, interviews, tweets, or interactions with viewers. Here are some basic suggestions for researching your meteorologist and their climate perspective: Google the meteorologists name +climate or + global warming, etc. Check if your meteorologist has a blog, and read through past posts to see if climate change is ever mentioned Check if your meteorologist has a twitter handle. If so, look through and see if he or she ever mentions climate change. A useful resource for this is Allmytweets.net. This site will display all the tweets from a particular twitter handle. You can use the ctrl+F function to search for terms like “global warming,” “climate change,” etc. Look up whether the American Meteorological Society (AMS) has granted your meteorologist their “Seal of Approval” or “Certified Broadcast Meteorologist” designation If you find anything noteworthy, please let us know! Meeting Resources Once you’ve researched your meteorologist/local TV station and scheduled a meeting, it’s time to compile materials to take to the meeting. Here are some that we recommend: 1) The American Meteorological Society’s 2012 Information Statement on Climate Change The American Meteorological Society is the professional association and scientific body representing 14,000 members of the meteorological field. The AMS passes information statements, “intended to provide a trustworthy, objective and scientifically up-to-date explanation of scientific issues of concern to the public at large.” In 2007, the AMS passed an information statement on climate change, agreeing with the scientific consensus. In 2012, they updated that statement, largely strengthening the core conclusions. The statement concluded: 2 “There is unequivocal evidence that Earth’s lower atmosphere, ocean, and land surface are warming; sea level is rising; and snow cover, mountain glaciers, and Arctic sea ice are shrinking. The dominant cause of the warming since the 1950s is human activities. This scientific finding is based on a large and persuasive body of research.” The full statement is available here. (A note on the AMS: In addition to supporting and publishing the work of scholars, scientists, students, and weather enthusiasts, the AMS also works to enhance the scientific credibility of TV meteorologists. In 1957, the AMS established a “Seal of Approval,” which they bestow to meteorologists who convey accurate weather information. In 2008, that program was phased out. They also developed another, slightly more rigorous certification process, called the “Certified Broadcast Meteorologist” program. Many TV stations require their TV meteorologists to have one of these designations, so most TV meteorologists are AMS members. The AMS Constitution outlines professional guidelines which AMS members are expected to uphold. The most relevant passage is Article XII, the guidelines for professional conduct. Members are expected to keep abreast of scientific developments, should base their practice on sound scientific principles, should not direct their professional activities in a manner generally perceived to be incompatible with the public welfare, and should refrain from making unwarranted claims.) 2) An explanation of the important role journalists can play in response to climate change We’ve attached a tri-fold pdf of a brochure that Forecast the Facts distributed to meteorologists at the AMS Conference on Broadcast Meteorology. The brochure explains why meteorologists have not just a responsibility to connect climate and weather for their audience, but a professional opportunity. It lays out some basic facts grounded in science. If you’d like us to send you a copy of the brochure, or see a text-only version of the brochure, please let us know. 3) Documentation of the broad scientific consensus on the issue The following are comprehensive summaries of the conclusions of climate science: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Fourth Assessment Report (from 2007) “Advancing the Science of Climate Change,” National Academy of Science’s Comprehensive Report on Climate Change (from 2010) Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change (published by science historian Naomi Oreskes in Science Magazine, 2004) 3 The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong? (Oreskes, 2007) 4) Documentation of the links between climate and weather The following are good resources for scientific literature connecting climate and extreme weather: A Decade of Weather Extremes (Coumou, Rahmstorf, Nature Climate Change, 2012) United States Global Change Research Program’s Summary of Climate Change Impacts IPCC’s Special Report on Extreme Weather Explaining Extreme Events of 2011 From A Climate Perspective (Published in the AMS Bulletin) 5) The station’s own journalistic guidelines/mission statement Station’s journalistic guidelines/mission statements can be a key leverage point in this meeting. Assuming the station exists to serve and inform the public, failing to report on local climate change impacts constitutes a dereliction of duty. Forecast the Facts has used station standards in our campaigning before: for example, when PBS’ News Hour featured climate change denier Anthony Watts on a recent segment, we called for PBS’ ombudsman to investigate why Watts was allowed to assert unchallenged misinformation on the air. A key element of our argument for why the ombudsman should investigate was the many ways in which the report seemed to violate the editorial standards that underlie PBS’ reporting. The ombudsman apparently agreed, and he ultimately outlined some of those violations in his column critiquing the segment. You can use a similar tactic by identifying the TV station’s journalistic guidelines and mission statement, and demonstrating a) how misleading reporting on climate change is not consistent with the principles they espouse, and b) why coverage which accurately conveys the scope of the climate crisis is a journalistic imperative. If the local TV station does not have publicly available guidelines, look for the guidelines of the media company that owns the station. For example, here are the reporting guidelines for one major media company: E.W. Scripps Company Statement of Policy on Ethical and Professional Conduct 4 Talking Points The following are talking points to use during the meeting: This is about journalistic responsibility. Weather reporters are journalists, and have a professional responsibility to cover the biggest weather story of our lifetime. A major component of meteorologists’ jobs is explaining why weather events are happening, and what the public can expect in the future. Their forecasts help protect people and their families, preparing them for dangerous weather from heat waves to hurricanes. Because global warming is changing the weather of their community and putting it at risk, talking about global warming is a part of their duty as a reporter. Viewers want to know about climate change. Viewers are interested and curious about climate change. Polls show that as the weather grows more extreme, Americans are taking notice. Viewers are counting on weather reporters to provide them with accurate information about weather and climate. 89% of Americans report relying on local news for information about the weather, and for many Americans, the TV meteorologist is perceived as the “station scientist,” and therefore a reliable source on climate science in particular. Public trust in local news is higher than any other news source, and this has remained true even as public trust in other media sources has declined. There are already meteorologists throughout the country reporting on climate change. One great example is Jim Gandy at WLTX in Columbia, South Carolina. Gandy reports regularly on climate change, including great reports on localized impacts like how climate change is expected to influence poison ivy growth in South Carolina. Dan Satterfield, a converted climate skeptic who reported until recently from conservative Huntsville, Alabama, has a blog where he delves into the peer reviewed literature. And Mike Nelson of Denver interacts regularly with his viewers about climate change and weather. Rather than getting backlash, these segments prove popular with viewers, and have been shown to lead to a more informed audience. Segments that integrate scientific content on local TV often serve to boost ratings, while leading to a more informed viewership. Wrap-Up Hopefully, you’ve found this toolkit useful. If you have questions or need additional supporting materials/information, please don’t hesitate to e-mail Jordan at jordan@forecastthefacts.org. We hope you’ll help us deepen our understanding of this issue by sharing what you learn from your meeting. 5