GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME Proposal for funding for the preparation of A National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA) Country Name: Islamic Republic of Mauritania Project Title: Enabling activities to facilitate the preparation of a National Adaptation Plan of Action (NAPAs) for Mauritania GEF Implementing Agency: UNEP GEF operational focal point: El Hadrami Ould Bahneine, Direction de l'Environement et de l'Aménagement Rural Climate change focal point: Direction de l'Environement et de l'Aménagement Rural National executing agency: Ministry of Rural Development and Environment Country eligibility: (i) LDC country (ii) Date of UNFCCC ratification: 20th January 1994 GEF financing: US$ 194,665 Government contribution: In kind Estimated total budget: US$ 198,000 Estimated starting date: 1st January 2003 Duration: 18 Months Mauritania: Key Socio-Economic Indicators Population (millions) Population growth rate (%) Land area (km2) GNP per capita (US$) GDP (million US$) GDP growth rate (%) Access to water (%) Access to sanitation Forest cover (%) 2.8 2.9 1,026,000 370 935 5.2 37 33 0.3 Source: World Bank, 2002; World Bank, 2003 1 2 Introduction 1. Mauritania has a land area of about 1,030,000km2, and a population of 3 million growing rapidly at 2.9% per annum. The country is sparsely populated with a population density of 3 people per km2. The urban population is given at 58% and the rural population at 42%. About 38% of the land in Mauritania is under permanent pastures; 4% under forests and woodlands; and 58% under other uses. The average annual deforestation rate for the period 1990-2000 is estimated to be 2.7%. Economy 2. The service sector contributes 44% of Mauritania’s GDP. Agriculture contributes 25%, while the industrial sector constitutes 31% of GDP. Key industries in Mauritania include fish processing and mining of iron ore, gypsum, gold and copper. The main exports from Mauritania are iron ore, fish and fish products and gold. 3. Some of the problems facing the Mauritanian economy include decline in world demand for iron ore which is Mauritania’s largest export, overexploitation of fishing resources by foreigners and continued ethnic tension between the dominant Maur (Arab-Berber) and the minority black population. 4. Adverse effects of climate change could significantly affect the economy of Mauritania. In addition, some of the problems currently facing the economy could be further aggravated by climate change impacts. For example, worse and prolonged droughts would seriously affect the agricultural sector, as well as the fishing industry. Adaptation measures to this end will be investigated by the proposed NAPA. Agriculture 5. Mauritania’s main agricultural crop is rice. Other key agricultural products are millet, sorghum, corn, and dates. Livestock farming is also widely practiced especially by nomadic groups. Crop farming and livestock sectors account for 78% and 8% of rural employment, respectively. This significant proportion of the population would be vulnerable to any negative effects of climate change on the country’s rangelands. 6. Mauritania is one of the most drought prone Sahelian countries. Drought and desertification , together with torrential rains and storms, are some of the main problems facing the Mauritanian agricultural sector. Heavy storms destroyed over 6,000 tonnes of rice in mid-January 2002. As a result, the shortfall in rice output was estimated to be 33%. Cereal production declined drastically, estimates show an 18% decline in production in 2001/2002 due to poor weather conditions. 7. Other vulnerabilities include, increased pests and disease incidences due to abnormal wet conditions, destruction of livestock, crops, and animal feed by floods and decline in flood plain crops. Since women in Mauritania are involved in most agricultural activities, they are likely to be more vulnerable to climate change impacts on agriculture. 8. Adaptation measures include, crop diversification, intercropping in order to enrich soils, orienting cereal production toward irrigated crops that are less dependent on rain, improvement of credit and agricultural extension services, enhanced training programs and dissemination activities, more aggressive pest control programmes, rotation of planting dates, use of drought resistant crops and new high yield variety crops, promotion of productive low-water use irrigation techniques and, incorporation of guidelines on climate change in future planning. These proposed adaptation measures will be further examined and prioritised in the proposed NAPA. 3 Forestry and Biodiversity: 9. Mauritania is a Saharan and Sahelain country whose vegetation and forest resources are sparse due to repeated droughts. The country’s climate is desert, mostly hot, dry and dusty. It has a total forestland cover of about 300,000 hectares. Mauritania has one of the richest fishing grounds in the world with abundant fish and aquatic resources. Fishing is a key linchpin of the economy and employs 27,000 people. 10. Forests and biodiversity are prone to the negative effects of climate change such as increased incidences of droughts. Some tree species could be affected by prolonged droughts. Changes in temperature and salinity could result in changes in some fish species and increases or decreases in different species productivity. Sea-level rises would inundate forests and eco-systems causing loss of productive land and habitat that support Mauritania’s biodiversity. 11. Adaptation measures proposed include protection and restoration of humid zones, development of agro forestry, social aforestation, and improved ecosystem management and promotion of energy alternatives to fuel wood to ease pressure on forests. The proposed NAPA will assess the various adaptation measures that have been tabled and identify the most appropriate measures that should receive priority attention. Health and Water: 12. Life expectancy in Mauritania is about 54 years for the entire population, 50 years for the male and 53 years for the female population. The infant mortality rate is about 90 per 1000 live births, while the under-5 mortality rate is 40 per 1000 children. Skilled medical staff attend to only 58% of births in Mauritania. About 70% of the population have access to health facilities within 5km. An estimated 8% of children less than 5 years suffer from severe malnutrition. This places a big burden on women, who have to take care of the sick children. About 37% of the population have access to improved and safe water supply; while 33% of the population have access to improved sanitation. Additional key indicators for the health sector are provided in the table below: Physicians per 1000 people Hospital beds per 1000 people Child immunization rate (under 1 year) -Measles -DPT 0.1 0.7 Prevalence of under-nourishment Child malnutrition Births attended by skilled medical staff Source: World Development Indicators, 2002 13% 44% 58% 62% 40% 13. Mauritania is prone to flooding, and climate change could increase the frequency and intensity of floods in the country. Mauritania experienced serious floods in early 2002 due to torrential rains and storms which led to a serious food crisis, reducing the number of meals for many households from two meals per day to one, loss of land, homes, livestock and damage of crops. Other vulnerabilities in the water sector include reduced freshwater availability, drainage congestion and increased river erosion. Women would be more vulnerable to potable water scarcity since they would have to travel longer distances to fetch fresh potable water. 14. Adaptation measures proposed include building flood protection areas, dams and dykes, flood diversion, storage of fresh water, pump drainage and improved weather forecasting. 4 15. Vulnerabilities in health sector could result from increased temperatures, which can lead to increased incidences of malaria. In addition, changes in rainfall amounts could lead to changes in run-off, which could adversely affect availability of potable water to the population. Flooding could lead to contamination of drinking water resulting in increased cases of cholera. 16. Some of the proposed adaptation measures for the health sector include: Construction of cyclone and flood shelters for the vulnerable population with drinking water supply and sanitation facilities Establishment of water treatment facilities Access to improved health care systems Improved sanitation and use of insecticides Revamping the public health program and decentralization of medical services Improved surveillance and monitoring of diseases 17. The proposed NAPA will review the aforementioned adaptation measures to identify priority measures that should be fast-tracked for priority implementation. Poverty: 18. Mauritania has a GNP per capita of US$370. With regard to the international poverty line, 28.6% of the population is below US$1 per day. The figure jumps to 68.7% when those under US$2 per day are considered. Farmers and non-farm rural workers exhibit poverty rates above 60%, indicating that farmers are poorer than other segments of the population. Female-headed household are more vulnerable to poverty. In single parent families, incidence of poverty is three times higher among female-headed households. The vulnerability is derived from the fact that the illiteracy levels among women are higher since women receive less schooling. They therefore have numerous difficulties in finding employment. 19. The poor are more vulnerable to climate change since they do not have sufficient incomes to prepare and protect themselves from the adverse effects of climate change. In floods, the poor are usually displaced due to the temporary nature of their homes. The poor are also more susceptible to water borne diseases, since they rely on untreated water, which could get contaminated during floods. Adaptation measures for the poor have not been dealt with exhaustively in Mauritania, and will be tackled in the preparation of the proposed NAPA. Energy 20. Biomass is the main source of energy in Mauritania. Another important source is imported oil. Scarcity of biomass fuels would affect women, since they would have to travel longer distances to collect firewood. In turn, the depletion of trees as sinks could lead to more dramatic variation in temperature and precipitation resulting in a further destabilisation of the environment. 21. Some of the adaptation measures that could be proposed include more energy efficient appliances such as improved stoves both at household and institutional levels. These would directly benefit women, by reducing the amount of fuel used and therefore the time and distance for firewood collection. In addition, the appliances would reduce the exposure of women and children to smoke emissions. Another measure to reduce reliance on biomass fuels would be to promote the use of renewable energies to reduce the strain on biomass. Electricity generation in Mauritania is from two sources, fossil fuels and hydro based generation. 5 Source Hydro Fossil fuel % of total generation in 1999 17.22 82.78 Source: EIU, 2002 22. Vulnerabilities for electricity generation include destruction of electricity transmission lines by floods, torrential rains and storms. The lines would therefore require frequent repair and replacement. 23. Frequent and prolonged droughts would lead to the reduction of electricity generation from hydropower, which would result in additional generation from fossil fuels (oil). This would have direct implications on emission of greenhouse gases. The proposed NAPA will assess additional vulnerabilities and propose priority coping measures for the energy sector. Transport and Infrastructure: 24. Mauritania has 7,660km of highways of which paved highways total 866km and unpaved road, 6,794km. Mauritania’s ferry traffic operates on Senegal river waterway which measure 8,046km. Mauritania also has a number of ports and harbours. 25. Roads and associated infrastructure are vulnerable to changes in climate patterns, for example storms and flooding. Heavy rains and floods damage seasonal roads that are critical in the marketing of agricultural produce in rural areas, an activity mostly undertaken by women 26. Possible response measures include construction of specially reinforced roads, bridges, culverts and improved drainage. In addition, storms and/or very heavy rains can damage telephone (land lines) and electricity infrastructure while changes in sea level could affect ports and harbours and interfere with ocean freight. 27. The proposed NAPA will identify the most important adaptation measures for the transport and infrastructure sector. Coastal Resources and Structures 28. Mauritania has a coastline 754km long. The country has significant coastal resources, which include one of the richest fishing grounds in the world. The Mauritanian coastal resources have over the years been overexploited by foreign fish traders’ policies. The Mauritanian waters are also in the middle of controversy between the EU and opponents of the European Union’s fisheries policy. The coastal areas are also important for crop cultivation, and a significant proportion of the population lives along the coast. 29. During the rainy season, storms are common in the coastal areas of Mauritania. Climate change could increase the frequency and intensity of storms. This may result in displacement of people, loss of agricultural land and produce, and, destruction of infrastructure among others. Changes in sea level are likely to destroy the delicate coastal ecosystems, which depend on wetlands, beaches, coral reefs and mangroves. Fish, birds and mammals, which rely on coastal wetlands, would also be affected. In addition, seal level rises would affect the population that lives by the coast, as well as lead to the loss of agricultural land. Other identifiable vulnerabilities of coastal areas to climate change include: Drainage congestion Saline water intrusion Coastal erosion 30. Some of the adaptation measures for coastal areas include erecting coastal defences, construction of cross-dams and embankments to prevent saline water intrusion, and construction of cyclone and flood 6 shelters, prohibition of sand extraction from the coast, growing vegetation on the coastal dune and reconstruction of the weakened areas. On the institutional side, adaptation measures include reinforcement of the capabilities of the institution concerned with coastal management and limitation of population pressure, improved forecasting of weather patterns, proper design for drainage structures, land-use planning and change of cropping pattern and intensification of extension services. The proposed NAPA will build on these findings and identify priority measures that should be implemented in the short term. Institutional Context 31. The Government of Mauritania established the National Environment Action Plan (Plan National d’Action pour l’environment, PANE), which is charged with monitoring and evaluating environmental policies and programs. The Ministry of Rural Development and Environment coordinates all activities on climate change and the environment in the country. Objectives, and linkages to ongoing activities 32. The objectives of NAPAs are: To serve as simplified and direct channels of communication for information relating to the urgent and immediate needs for adaptation in Mauritania To facilitate capacity building for the preparation of initial national communications, and addressing urgent and immediate adaptation needs. Status of past and ongoing climate change activities 33. Mauritania has signed and ratified the following international conventions: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (UNCBD) Vienna Conventions on Ozone Depleting Substances Montreal Protocol for the control of Chlorofluorocarbons 7 Mauritania has also implemented a number of GEF projects, which are listed in the following table. Project Title Focal Area Status Assessment of capacity building Bio diversity CEO approved needs for biosafety, participation in CHM and Preparation of Second National Report Sustainable energy management Climate change Pipeline project Enabling activities for the Persistent Organic Pollutants CEO approved Stockholm convention on (POPs) persistent Organic pollutants (POPs): National implementation plan for Mauritania Rescue plan for the Cap Blanc Bio diversity Project closure Colony of the Mediterranean Monk Seal National Biodiversity Biodiversity CEO Approved conservation strategy, action plan and first national report to the CBD Strengthening the clearing house Biodiversity CEO approved mechanism focal point for the participation in the pilot phase of the CHM of the CBD Enabling activities for the Climate change CEO approved preparation of initial national communication related to the UNFCCC Decentralised wind electric Climate change Project Closure power for social and economic development (Alizes Electriqeus) Source: Project database-www.gefonline.org Table 1: 34. Under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Mauritania has completed its 1st National Communication Report. The report covered the following key issues: Greenhouse Gas Inventory Vulnerability and Adaptation Mitigation of Greenhouse Gases Climate Change Response Strategies 35. The vulnerability and adaptation assessment, which is of direct relevance to the proposed NAPA exercise, covered the following sectors: Coastal resources Cereals 8 Initial set of gaps identified from Vulnerability and Adaptation (V&A) assessments 36. Based on the vulnerability and adaptation assessments already undertaken in Mauritania, the following table presents an initial set of gaps that still remain to be addressed. These will be tackled in the NAPA preparation. The NAPA National Network will also propose additional gaps that need to be addressed. Table 2: Status of adaptation activities Sector Coverage/Initial set of gaps identified Agriculture - Criteria for prioritisation Adaptation/Coping Options Institutional Capacity Technical capacity to implement to implement - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken Financial capacity to implement Impact on cereals covered Coastal Zones and Coastal Resources Fresh Water Resources Forests and Biodiversity Human Health - Impact of inundation covered - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Impact on fresh water resources not covered - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Impact of forest t resources and biodiversity not covered - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Impact of diseases not covered - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken Fisheries - Impact on fish species not covered - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken Socio-Economy Wildlife - Social economic sector not covered Impact on wildlife species not covered - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken Tourism - Impact on tourism sector not covered - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken Building Stock - Impact on buildings, housing not covered - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken Transport - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken Eco-systems - Impact on roads (major highways and feeder roads) not covered - Impact on bridges and railways not covered - Impact on communication infrastructure not covered, e.g. telephone lines - Impact on electricity generation and electricity transmission not covered - Impact of higher day temperatures and lower night temperatures on energy requirements not covered Impact on the key eco-systems in the country not covered - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken Cultural Heritage - - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken - Not undertaken Communication Energy Impact on high-value cultural heritage assets not covered 9 Project Activities and Outputs 37. The project will involve the following key activities, which are outlined below, and which are based on the “GEF operational guidelines for expedited funding for the preparation of national adaptation programmes of action by LDCs”. Module 1: Preparatory Activities Module 2: Consultation and prioritisation Module 3: Drafting of NAPA and public review Module 4: Endorsement and Publication of NAPA Establish NAPA National network Review of studies/reports on vulnerability and adaptation to climate change Participatory Rural Appraisal Organise national stakeholders workshop Prioritisation of adaptation measures using criteria Organise sectoral workshops Organise eco-system workshops Prepare proposals for implementation of priority adaptation activities Undertake cost benefit analysis of each adaptation measure Review of the draft NAPA by public (newspaper supplements, press conferences, public hearing) Review of NAPA by Government and Civic organisations Endorsement by GEF Focal Points Publication of final NAPA document 10 Module I: Preparatory Activities Activity 1.1: Establishment, composition and mandate of the NAPA national network and identification of a lead agency 38. The main objective of this activity will be to establish a multi-disciplinary network and institutional structure charged with preparing the NAPA. 39. A NAPA National Network will be established by the executing agency, in consultation with other relevant ministries and governmental departments, as well as the private sector, including NGOs. A Project Co-ordinator to coordinate the NAPA national network will be identified and appointed. 40. The NAPA National Network will have representatives from key sectors as well as from Mauritania’s major eco-systems. Key sectors that will be represented in the national network include agriculture, health, water, tourism, transport, environment and energy. In addition, an expert representative from each of the major eco-systems of Mauritania will be included in the country network. 41. Gender equality will be considered in forming the NAPA country network. The participation of men and women is essential for several reasons. Adverse effects of climate change disproportionately affect women, who are often marginalized in national projects. Women are often knowledgeable in vital local and traditional issues, and they should be recognized as key stakeholders in consultations and decision-making. 42. Some of the key organisations that will be represented on the NAPA national network include: Ministry of Commerce, Handicrafts, & Tourism Ministry of Equipment & Transportation Ministry of Finance Ministry of Fisheries and Maritime Economy Ministry of Health and Social Affairs Ministry of Hydraulics and Energy Ministry of Interior, Post, & Telecommunications Ministry of Rural Development & Environment Ministry of Mines & Industry Secretary of State in Charge of Women’s Affairs Secretary of State Delegate to the Prime Minister in Charge of New Technologies National Environment Action Plan 43. The Director of the selected executing agency, the project co-ordinator and 6 experts from the sectors and the different eco-systems in the country will form a Project Management Team (PMT). The Project Coordinator will be supported by an assistant. The PMT will have adequate and appropriate computer and telecommunication facilities, including access to the Internet. The PMT will hold monthly meetings to monitor the progress of the project, while the project co-ordinator and assistant will be responsible for the day to day running of the project. 44. It is estimated that a total of 6 sectoral and eco-system experts will be required. These experts will ideally be individuals who have extensive experience in the sectors/eco-systems, and a good understanding of trends in the sector/ecosystem. In addition, the experts should have some understanding of climate change issues in the country. The experts will undertake assessments of vulnerabilities to climate change in their respective sectors/ecosystems, and propose possible adaptation measures, 11 priorities and associated criteria. They will prepare expert papers based on their assessments, which will be presented at the sectoral and ecosystem workshops, as well as undertake the required reviews. 45. In addition to the sectoral and eco-system experts, economists will be recruited as part of both expert teams. The economists will take a lead role in the cost benefit analysis of adaptation measures. The 3 sectoral and 3 eco-system experts will focus on the drafting of the NAPAs. The sectoral and eco-system expert teams will be designated in the following fashion: Sectoral Experts Eco-system Experts 1 sectoral expert on Agriculture, Forestry, Water 3 eco-systems of contrasting ecosystems* and Resources, and Tourism infrastructural facilities 1 sectoral expert on Transport, Infrastructure and Energy 1 sectoral expert on Health 3 economists 3 economists * The NAPA national network will propose the 3 eco-systems, which will be the focus of the NAPA. 46. By drawing on many disciplines the resulting NAPA will be more integrated and cross-cutting, capturing all the components of sustainable development. 47. The project co-ordinator and assistant will be responsible for compiling the various reports into a single comprehensive NAPA report and for overall day-to-day coordination of the project. 48. A Steering Committee will provide advice and guidance to the PMT. The Steering Committee will be composed of representatives from the following institutions: Ministry that houses the executing agency Ministry of Finance Parliamentary sub-committee on environment or natural resources as well as the budgetary process A representative of the civil society A representative of the academic community 1-2 experts from outside Mauritania to provide a comparative regional perspective Representative from the Disaster Management Bureau 49. To ensure that the National Steering Committee maintains an arms-length relationship to the PMT and NAPA national network, it is recommended that no members of the PMT and NAPA national network sits on the Steering Committee, with the exception of the Project Co-ordinator. The Steering Committee will meet every 6 months to review the progress of the project. 50. Based on the skills and capacity available in the country (as demonstrated by the progress of the preparation of the initial country communication), it is recommended that the duration of the project be 18 months. This will provide sufficient time for building the requisite skills and capacity needed for the preparation of the NAPA. 12 51. Outputs for Activity 1.1 The key output of this activity will be the establishment of the NAPA National Network, Project Management Team (PMT) and a Steering Committee. The duration for this activity will be 3 months. Activity 1.2: Review of studies/reports on vulnerability and adaptation to climate change 52. The aim of this activity will be to review all previous and on-going studies on climate change undertaken to ensure that there is no duplication, and that the current studies build on existing data and information. Special emphasis will be placed on filling the gaps identified from the previous V&A assessment in the UNFCCC National Communication and the US Country Studies Program. Some of the initial gaps have been identified in the table on page 9 (Initial set of gaps identified from Vulnerability and Adaptation (V&A) assessments). The NAPA national network will identify additional gaps and areas that could be studied. 53. The sectoral experts will gather existing international, regional and country-specific information on vulnerability and adaptation to climate change in their respective sectors. The eco-system experts will also gather relevant national, regional and international reports providing useful background information, data and case studies on Mauritania’s major eco-systems. The information will be in the form of published and un-published reports, articles, electronic media (CD-ROMs), conference papers, and draft reports. The material will be grouped under each of the sectors, and both the eco-system and sectoral experts will synthesise the material gathered for their respective sectors and eco-systems. Each expert will prepare a report on vulnerability and adaptation, which will include an annotated bibliography on all the materials and publications reviewed. 54. As it is unlikely that specialized eco-system reports on vulnerability and adaptation in Mauritania are available, the national network is expected to use sectoral reports and more general reports on each of the major country’s major eco-systems that provide information and data that is relevant to vulnerability and adaptation issues. The key documents to be reviewed will include: The initial national communication report under the UNFCCC Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessment, included in the initial national communication under the UNFCCC Draft Report Desertification Studies Biodiversity Studies US Country study on climate change The Country Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP), which includes a very detailed analysis of the most vulnerable eco-systems and areas of Mauritania. Reports from organisations that distribute food and medical aid to communities (e.g. CARE International) during emergencies Relevant national, eco-system and sectoral environmental reports. 55. As a gap-filling exercise, the sectoral and eco-system experts will organise field trips to undertake participatory rapid appraisals, with the aim of collecting additional information on vulnerabilities to climate change, coping measures currently in place and possible adaptation measures. 56. In the case of Mauritania, it is recommended that the experts undertake a PRA of the differentiated impacts of climate change on men and women. This aspect was not dealt with exhaustively in the V&A assessment undertaken as part of the initial national communication. 13 57. The Project Management Team (PMT) will engage the services of a documentation expert, to compile the various documents into an accessible, easy to use documentation resource pack, which will be available in the public domain. The documentation resource pack will be housed in the executing agency, national library and a private organisation that deals with climate change. An initial set of relevant publications and reports that could be included in the document pack are listed in Annex 5. The list of documents was used in the compilation of this proposal. 58. Outputs for Activity 1.2 The main output for this activity will be a Draft Vulnerability and Adaptation (V&A) Review Report, to be compiled by the PMT from the reports prepared by each sectoral and eco-system expert; and, a public domain documentation resource pack on climate change, vulnerability and adaptation. The documentation resource pack will comprise of: - A minimum of 10 key reports on vulnerability and adaptation to climate change - CD-ROM and diskette with abstracts of the key publications - Draft V&A Report - Relevant Eco-system and Sectoral Meeting Reports - Contact list for vulnerability and adaptation in Mauritania, including detailed names and contact addresses of all agencies represented in the NAPA network. The duration for this activity will be 2 months. Module II: Consultations and prioritisation Activity 2.1: Consultation workshop on major areas of vulnerability to climate change and key adaptation measures and development of country driven criteria for prioritisation of adaptation measures 59. The key objective of the consultation workshop will be to solicit the views of stakeholders nationally, and to develop criteria for prioritising the adaptation measures. 60. The PMT in consultation with the NAPA national network will organise an initial national level workshop, where a wide range of stakeholders will discuss the Draft Vulnerability and Adaptation (V&A) Review Report. The sectoral and eco-system experts are also expected to participate in the Workshop. The aim of the workshop will be to solicit the views of stakeholders within and outside the NAPA network, on the vulnerability of Mauritania to current climate variability and extreme weather events and on the initial set of key adaptation measures that have already taken place. Past and current practices (coping mechanisms) for adaptation to climate change and climate variability Key climate change adaptation measures Criteria for selecting priority activities 61. These workshops will also assess the adaptive capacity of Mauritania to various climate change vulnerabilities. For example, the ability of national agricultural research institutions to adapt to adverse effects of climate change by developing drought resistant and flood resistant crops, and effectively distribute them to affected areas as and when needed would be a good indicator of adaptive capacity. Similar elements will be investigated for all sectors. 14 62. One possible tool for assessing the vulnerability of various sectors to climate change as well as identifying appropriate indicators for prioritisation is the “Multi-level indicators of climate variability and climate change” proposed by Moss et al. 1999, in Vulnerability Indices: Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation published by UNEP. This method suggests key indicators for vulnerability for various sectors, as shown in the following table: Sector Food Water Settlements Health Ecosystems Vulnerability Index - Crop/farm type, Irrigation prevalence, Farm income - Ground water reserves, Soil moisture, Runoff, Drought days/area - Percentage of population in marginalized settlements, percentage of population near sea-level, Traditional biomass fuel use - Water and sanitation access, disease incidence, urban air quality - Extent of degraded soils, SO2 Emissions Fragmentation Source: UNEP Vulnerability Indices, a more comprehensive version of the table is shown in Annex 2. 63. A set of locally driven criteria will be used to select priority adaptation activities. The NAPA country team could consider the following criteria: - Level or degree of adverse effects of climate change Poverty reduction to enhance adaptive capacity Synergy with other multilateral environmental agreements Cost-effectiveness 64. Sectoral and eco-system experts as well as workshop participants will be invited to comment on the proposed criteria for prioritisation of adaptation measures as well as invited to suggest other criteria that might be more appropriate. In addition, cost benefit analysis of the various coping measures will also be undertaken. 65. Outputs for Activity 2.1 The consultation workshop will result in a more detailed inventory of areas of vulnerability to climate change in Mauritania; key adaptation measures (categorised by sector and region); and, an initial set of criteria for prioritisation of adaptation measures for Mauritania. The duration for this activity will be 3 months. Activity 2.2: Prioritisation of adaptation measures using criteria 66. The main objective of this activity will be to prioritise the various adaptation measures using the criteria developed in Activity 3. 67. Based on the criteria agreed to by the National Workshop, the eco-system experts will convene 3-day eco-system consultative seminars to consult with eco-system and district stakeholders to refine and prioritise the various adaptation measures. In parallel to the above activities, the sectoral experts will also convene 2-day workshops to prioritise the various sectoral adaptation measures. 68. The Project co-ordinator and assistant will compile the priority listings from the sectoral and eco-system seminars and develop a national level priority listing. 15 69. Outputs for Activity 2.2 The key outputs for activity 4 will be a priority listing of adaptation measures for each sector and each region as well as a national level priority listing of urgently needed adaptation measures with the requisite criteria. The duration for this activity will be 4 months. Module III: Drafting of NAPA and public review Activity 3.1: Drafting proposals for implementation of priority adaptation activities 70. This activity’s main goal will be to prepare Programmes of action for priority adaptation activities. 71. The sectoral experts in conjunction with the Project Co-ordinator and assistant will prepare proposals based on the priority activities identified in Activity 4. The proposals will describe how the adaptation measures will be implemented, while highlighting the requirements for implementing the measures. The proposals will also include a cost-benefit analysis for each of the adaptation measures, to be prepared by the economists attached to each sectoral and eco-system expert. Guidelines for the preparation of proposals are provided in Annex 6 prepared by the LDC Expert Group (LEG). 72. The NAPA project co-ordinator and assistant will coordinate the drafting and compilation of the proposals, with the day-to-day coordination responsibilities delegated to the various sectoral and ecosystem experts. 73. Outputs for Activity 3.1 Once all the sections of the proposals have been drafted and compiled and incorporated in earlier draft reports, the compilation will constitute the first Draft National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA) report. The duration for this activity will be 3 months. Activity 3.2: Public Review of the draft NAPA 74. This activity will ensure incorporation of opinions and views of the wider public in the National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA). 75. A media consultant will be contracted to take a lead in the publicizing of the NAPA. The draft NAPA will be summarized into brief 5-page summaries, and translated into Arabic, French and Pulaar which are widely used in Mauritania before being distributed to the public for review. The draft NAPA will be distributed to various interest groups (e.g. NGOs, environmental organisations, universities, etc.) in both urban and rural areas. In addition, the draft NAPA will appear in Arabic, French and Pulaar daily newspapers, which will ensure wider public readership. Press conferences involving representatives of main TV stations, national radio stations and a wide range of FM radio stations will be organised. In addition, a public hearing will be organised to solicit the views of the general public. Comments from the public review of the draft NAPA will be compiled, and incorporated into the NAPA by the PMT with assistance from the sectoral and eco-system experts. 16 76. Outputs for Activity 3.2 The output for this activity will be an updated NAPA (in both summarized and extended formats), which will have incorporated the comments received during the public review. The duration for this activity will be 1 months Module IV: Endorsement and Publishing of NAPA Activity 4.1: Review of updated NAPA by Government, civil societies, and endorsement by GEF focal point 77. The updated NAPA will be distributed to the NAPA national network, key Government ministries, the National Climate Change Committee and civil society for review. Comments received from the review by Government and civil society will be used to further improve the NAPA. 78. The updated NAPA will then be forwarded to the GEF focal point for endorsement. 79. Outputs for Activity 4.1 The two key outputs from this activity will be (i) the final NAPA (in both summarized and extended formats), and (ii) the endorsement letter from the GEF focal point in Mauritania. The duration for this activity will be 1 month. Activity 4.2: Finalizing and dissemination of the NAPA 80. The final NAPA report (in both summarized and extended formats) will be published and printed, and also translated in Arabic, French and Pulaar. The Arabic, French and Pulaar versions will be disseminated to a wide range of stakeholders and the public. Brief summaries of the reports will be reproduced in the major Arabic daily newspapers and discussed in the mass media (TV stations and radio stations). 81. Outputs for Activity 4.2 The key outputs will be the published French and Arabic versions of NAPA reports and widespread national dissemination. The duration for this activity will be 2 months. 17 Table 3: Diagrammatic Representation of the Processes/Tasks and Reports Reports Process/Tasks Background Literature review Module 1: Preparatory Activities Documentation Resource Pack Literature review Literature review Draft V&A report National Workshop to review draft criteria and priorities National Workshop Module 2: Consultation and prioritisation Review of prioritisation of activities by steering committee Sectoral & Seminars Final criteria & priorities Eco-System Drafting & Compilation First draft NAPA incorporating proposals, criteria & priorities Module 3: Drafting of NAPA and public review Updated NAPA incorporating public review Public review Module 4: Endorsement and Publication of NAPA dissemination & Government, & civil society review and GEF endorsement Final NAPA incorporating Government & civil society review and endorsement by GEF Wider Dissemination 18 Institutional Arrangements for oversight and coordination 82. The National Executing Agency will co-ordinate the project. The Executing Agency will be the UNFCCC Focal Point in Mauritania, which is the Ministry of Rural Development and Environment. The Executing Agency will have overall responsibility for the project. They will oversee the constitution of the NAPA national network. 83. The NAPA national forum will be formed at both the sectoral level and regional levels. Each major sector and region will be represented in the NAPA national network. This will allow for participation of all stakeholders, even at the district and regional levels. 84. The PMT (Project Management Team) will meet monthly and will be comprised of the Project Coordinator, Assistant and the 6 sectoral /eco-system experts plus the 6 attached economists. The PMT will be expected to meet monthly to review the progress of the project. 85. The National Steering Committee will act as an independent oversight body, and will approve the major decisions of the project. The Committee will periodically review the outputs of the PMT, sectoral and ecosystems experts, as well as proceedings of the national workshops. 86. UNEP as the implementing agency will provide technical backup and advisory support to both the executing agency and the NAPA national network. In addition, the PMT could also request for technical assistance from the LDC Expert Group (LEG). 87. The institutional structure envisaged for the project is provided in Annex 2. 19 Table 3: Timetable Activity/Month 1.1 Establishing, composition & mandate of the NAPA country network 1.2. Review of studies / reports on vulnerability to climate change and adaptation measures Sectoral Studies and Eco-system Studies PRA 2.1. National Stakeholder workshop to establish criteria for selecting priority measures 2.2. Sectoral and Ecosystem seminars to review draft V&A review reports 3.1 Drafting of proposals for implementation of priority adaptation activities 3.2. Public review of the draft NAPA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 4.1. Review of updated NAPA by stakeholders 4.2. Finalising and dissemination of the NAPA 20 Table 4: Budget (US$) Activity Stocktaking Process: (Assessments, consultations, workshops, etc.) Product: Assessment reports/strategy and action plan Total Assessment and prioritisation-Activity 2 and 3 1. Synthesis of available information on adverse effects of climate change and coping strategies Literature Review PRA Document Resource Pack 28,095 2. National Stakeholders Workshop Inventory of areas of vulnerability Key adaptation measures Initial criteria list 18,000 Participatory assessment of vulnerability to current climate variability and extreme weather events, and associated risks Identification of past and current practices for adaptation to climate change and climate variability Identification of key climate change adaptation measures Identification of criteria for selecting priority activities Total (Assessment and prioritisation) 46,095 Development of proposals for priority activities- Activity 4 and 5 1) National /sub-national consultative process for short listing potential activities Selection and identification of priority activities Sectoral workshops Ecosystem workshops 2) Prepare profiles of priority activities in the prescribed format Priority listing of adaptation measures 61,700 1st Draft NAPA 7,000 Total 68,700 Preparation, review and finalization of the NAPA- Activity 6,7 and 8 1) Public review Translation Special Supplement Press Conferences Public Hearing Posters/Advertisements 2) Final review by government and civil society representatives 3) Printing, publishing and translation of the final NAPA document Final Translation Publishing 4) Dissemination Postage Updated NAPA in summarized and extended formats 18,650 Final NAPA and endorsement letter from GEF focal point Published version of NAPA in summarized and extended format in Arabic, Pulaar and French - 20,820 1,500 Total 40,970 Technical Assistance 1) Assistance requested from LDC expert group - 2) Other technical assistance (Steering Committee) Total Review Meetings Minutes 4,350 4,350 21 Activity Stocktaking Project Coordination and Management Assessments, consultations Monitoring and Evaluation Total TOTAL Process: (Assessments, consultations, workshops, etc.) Consultations Assessment Meetings Product: Assessment reports/strategy and action plan Workshop proceedings Compilation of NAPA Progress Reports Project Evaluation Report Total 32,885 5,000 37,885 198,000 22 References Global Environment Facility, (GEF) Projects Database. Document downloaded from the GEF website (www.gefonline.org). Hassan, M. Khan R., (1989). Cookstoves in Mauritania: A Case Study. The Woodburning Stove Group, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. International Monetary Fund, (IMF). Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper Implementation Report, Islamic Republic of Mauritania. Document Downloaded from the IMF website (www.imf.org) Manibog, F. R., (1982). Mauritania: Rural and Renewable Energy Issues and Prospects. World Bank Energy Department, Washington. United Nations (2000). The Worlds Women, Trends and Statistics (2000). United Nations, New York. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (1993). The Impacts of Climate Change, UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (1999-2000). Vulnerability Indices: Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation, UNEP Policy Series. UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and World Meteorological Organization (WMO) (1990). Scientists Assessment of Climate Change, Policy Makers Summary of the report of Working Group I to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. UNEP and WMO, Inter Governmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (1999-2000). Vulnerability Indices: Climate Change Impacts and Adaptations, UNEP Policy Series, UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2002). STAP Expert Group Workshop on Adaptation and Vulnerability, 18-20 February 2002 and STAP Consultations, 21 February 2001. UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (1997). Communications from Parties not included in Annex 1 to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). UN, New York. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2001). National Communications from Parties not included in Annex 1 to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). UN, New York. The US Country Study Notes. Country Study Notes, Issue 10. The Country Study Notes, New York. World Bank (2001). Human Development Report (2001). World Bank Washington, DC. World Bank (2002). World Development Report (2002). World Bank Washington, DC. World Bank (2002). World Development Indicators (2001). World Bank Washington, DC. 23 Annex 1: Summary of Vulnerability and Adaptation assessment in Mauritania Sector Vulnerabilities Adaptation options Agriculture (Cereals) -Human and animal pressure on vegetation -Abusive cutting of trees for charcoal -Degradation of cultivated/ cultivable land resulting in serious cereal deficits -Inadequate cereal production thus over reliance on imported foods -Intensive reforestation -Mechanical and Biological Installation of dunes -Limit water losses -Increased cereal and gardening products cultivating areas -Intercropping -Encourage consumption of imported wheat and rice (Irrigated as opposed to rain fed cereals) -Protection of humid zones Coastal Resources -Inundation -Limitation of urban pressure -Reinforcements of capacities of institutions concerned with coastal resources -Reinforcement of national weather forecasting capacities -Prohibition of sand extraction from the coast -Construction of a protective dyke -Growing vegetation on coastal dune -Reconstruction of weakened areas -Putting up a permanent scientific and technical observatory 24 Annex 2: Institutional Structure for the Preparation of NAPAs UNEP/GEF Implementing Agency LDC Expert Group Executing Agency (UNFCCC Focal Point) Steering Committee Programme Management Team (PMT) Sectoral Experts Eco-system Experts Economics Experts Economics Experts NAPA National Network 25 Annex 3: Multi-level indicator of vulnerability to climate vulnerability and climate change Vulnerability Indicator for country Socio-economic factors e.g. sectoral composition of GDP, GDP/cap., Total fertility, Adult literacy, community organizations, public employees/1000 Environmental factors, e.g., pop. Density/distribution, domesticated land as % land area. Air/water quality Food vulnerability Index Coping Capacity, e.g., % pop. In subsistence agric. Extension availability, net trade in cereals Agric. Sensitivity, e.g., crop/farm type, irrigation prevalence, Farm income Water vulnerability Index Coping Capacity, e.g. Consumption per cap. % pop with modern access, type of water system Water Sensitivity, e.g., ground water reserves, soil moisture, runoff, drought days/area Settlements Vulnerability Index Coping Capacity, e.g., Investment share in GDP, Insurance mechanisms Hazards exposure, e.g., % pop. In marginalized settlements, % pop. near sea-level, trad. biomass fuel use Health Vulnerability Index Coping capacity, e.g., Public health expenditures, distance to clinic, Health risk exposure, e.g., water & sanitation access, disease incidence, urban air quality Ecosystems vulnerability index Coping capacity, e.g. conservation enforcement, % land in protected areas Ecosystem sensitivity, e.g., extent of degraded soils, SO2 emissions, fragmentation 26 Annex 4: Institutional profile for some key ministries Ministry Ministry of Rural Development and the Environment Priorities To formulate and implement rural development and environmental protection policies To reduce rural migration To promote the rural sector in economic, technical and social aspects To fight against pollution To protect the environment Ministry of Mines and Industry Ministry of Health and Social Welfare Ministry of Commerce, Handicrafts and Tourism Provision of energy to the population Formulation of a minerals policy Establishment of geological charts and implementation of studies on the minerals sector Formulation and application of regulation in the domain of research activities, extraction and transportation of mineral substances Development of mineral resources Formulation of an industrial policy Orientation and planning of industrial development Regulation and coordination of industrial activities Formulation of national policy on health Promotion of curative medicine Supply and distribution of medicine, as well as acquisition of infrastructure Provision of training of medical, paramedical and administrative personnel Ensure quality of medicine and medical material Formulate a policy for protection and social aid Assistance of socially disadvantaged persons Organisation and promotion of trade Implementation of actions aimed at developing export and import activities Ensure supply of goods and services Regulation of prices for goods and services Development of programmes for the tourism and artisan industry Regulate and coordinate artisan activities Organise tourism activities Related institutions/organizations National center for agricultural research and development National school of agricultural training and promotion National center for animal husbandry and veterinary research The Mauritania company for animal husbandry and livestock marketing National Rural Development Company Mauritania Office of Geological Research National mining and industrial company and its subsidiaries Nouakchott central electricity company National hygiene center National hospital center Neuro-psychiatric center National Institute of specialized medicine National school of public health Chamber of commerce, industry and agriculture National import and export company Mauritania insurance and reinsurance company Mauritania charter, consignment and transit company Mauritania tourism and hotel company Artisan cooperatives 27 Annex 5: Selected Background Documents on Climate Change and Adaptation in Mauritania United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) 2000 Vulnerability Indices: Climate Change impacts and Adaptation Abstract: Climate Change is the most challenging environmental problem facing the international community today. The purpose of this briefing paper is to review emerging and existing concepts of vulnerability and adaptability, and to refine them into a dependable tool for prioritising preventive actions by policy makers. This would ensure cost-effective policy decisions in a variety of countries and regions likely to experience adverse effects of climate change. The paper systematically differentiates between three domains of vulnerability considering present criticality in the absence of climate change, adaptive capacity and climate change hazards. KEYWORDS: climate change, vulnerability, adaptability, international Pages 84 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) 2002 STAP Expert Group Workshop on Adaptation and Vulnerability, 18-20 February 2002 and STAP Consultations, 21 February 2001 Abstract: This is a background document on the STAP expert group workshop on Adaptation and Vulnerability convened from 18-20 February 2002, Nairobi, Kenya. The expert group workshop examined the following specific aims and objectives with the view of providing the GEF with strategic advice on how to maximise its interventions and investments in the area of adaptation. (i) How to operationalise the guidance provided by the conference of the parties; (ii) Identify the gaps in current scientific knowledge in terms of integration adaptation concerns into mainstream development in specific sectors; (iii) How to integrate adaptation concerns into mainstream development projects in specific sectors in a scientifically sound manner; (iv) Develop guidelines for the formulation of a framework and/or approach for the GEF to fund adaptation interventions; (v) Outline the main elements of a targeted research agenda for adaptation, based on the gaps identified in (ii). KEYWORDS: UNEP, STAP, energy, GEF, international, workshop, climate change, adaptation Pages 32 Robert T.Watson, Marufu C.Zinyowera, Richard H. Moss, 1995 Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change - ScientificTechnical Analyses, Contribution of Working Group II to the Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Abstract: This chapter summarises the scientific-technical analyses of impacts, adaptations, and mitigation of climate change in particular, mitigation options in the Transportation Sector. The transport sector is one of the most rapidly growing sectors. In 1990 was responsible for about 25% of 1990 world primary energy use and 22% of CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel use. The transport sector though linked to economic development imposes burdens on society, including air pollution. The publication looks into climate change and abatement of greenhouse gas emissions from the transport sector. It also includes a section on management of forests for mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions. 28 US Country Studies Program (USCSP) (1999) Climate Change Mitigation Vulnerability and Adaptation in Developing and Transition Countries: US Country Studies Program Support for Climate Change, Studies, Plans and Technology Assessments. Abstract: This report provides an overview of the work conducted by developing countries participating in the U. S Country Studies Program (USCSP). Under this program, participating countries evaluated climate change mitigation options assessed their vulnerability to climate change, identified methods for adapting to climate change, and developed plans for responding to climate change. United Nations (UN), 1997 Communication from Parties not included in Annex 1 to the, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (1997) Abstract: The is a brief report from the UNFCCC Secretariat on the status of preparation of national communications from Parties not included in Annex 1 to the convention. A status table is prepared using information obtained from: (i) national responses received from parties to a questionnaire on the status of preparation of national communications from Parties not included in Annex I to the convention during the period of Feb-September 2001; and (ii) the Global Environment Facility, its implementing agencies and bilateral programmes. KEYWORDS: UN, Climate Change, national communications, Pages 12 United Nations (UN), 2001 National Communication from Parties not included in Annex 1 to the, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (1997) Abstract: This document summarizes and updates in synoptical form information concerning the state of advancement of activities in the areas of technical cooperation, including those known as CC; TRAIN, CC: FORUM, CC: INFO AND CC: SUPPORT, for consideration by the sixth session of the Subsidiary Body for Implementation (SBI) on which the secretariat had reported to the SBI since the second session of the Conference of the Parties (COP). The synopsis contains the following tables: Table I: “Status of preparation of national communications from Parties not included in Annex I to the convention”’; Table 2: “Secretariat Participation in regional workshops; Table 3 “ CC: TRAIN national workshops”; Table 4: “CC: TRAIN training material”; Table 5: “ CC: FORUM”; and Table 6: “ CC: INFO national website initiative”. KEYWORDS: Climate change, international, Pages 14 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 1993 The Impact of Climate Change: UNEP/GEMS Environment Library No.10 Abstract: This booklet deals with the impacts of climate change the possibility of accelerated warming resulting from the enhanced greenhouse effect and with climate vulnerability. The effects of global warming on climate cannot yet be predicted at a local level, but those countries currently at the margin of their ability to support their populations’ will almost certainly find it difficult to adapt to new environmental conditions. KEYWORDS: climate change, environment, international, energy Pages 40 29 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) 2000 Vulnerability Indices: Climate Change impacts and Adaptation Abstract: Climate Change is the most challenging environmental problem facing the international community today. The purpose of this briefing paper is to review emerging and existing concepts of vulnerability and adaptability to enable us to refine it into a dependable tool for prioritising preventive actions by policy makers. Its aim is to help make cost-effective policy decisions in a variety of countries and regions likely to experience adverse effects of climate change. It points out for example that jumping into a single composite index for policy makers may be prudent. The paper systematically differentiates between three domains of vulnerability considering present criticality in the absence of climate change, adaptive capacity and climate change hazard. KEYWORDS: climate change, vulnerability, adaptability, Pages 84 United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) 2002 STAP Expert Group Workshop on Adaptation and Vulnerability, 18-20 February 2002 and STAP Consultations, 21 February 2001 Abstract: This is a background document on the STAP expert group workshop on Adaptation and Vulnerability convened from 18-20 February 2002, Nairobi, Kenya. The expert group workshop examined the following specific aims and objectives with the view of providing the GEF with strategic advice on how to maximise its interventions and investments in the area of adaptation. (i) How to operationalise the guidance provided by the conference of the parties; (ii) Identify the gaps in current scientific knowledge in terms of integration adaptation concerns into mainstream development in specific sectors; (iii) How to integrate adaptation concerns into mainstream development projects in specific sectors in a scientifically sound manner; (iv) Develop guidelines for the formulation of a framework and/or approach for the GEF to fund adaptation interventions; (v) Outline the main elements of a targeted research agenda for adaptation, based on the gaps identified in (ii). KEYWORDS: UNEP, STAP, energy, GEF, international, workshop, climate change, adaptation Pages 32 World Meteorological Organization (WMO), 1990 Scientific Assessment of Climate Change: The Policymaker's Summary of the Report of Working Group 1 to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Abstract: Human activities may be inadvertently changing the climate of the globe through the enhanced greenhouse effect, by past and continuing emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases which will cause the temperature of the Earth's surface to increase - popularly termed the "global warming". If this occurs, consequent changes may have a significant impact on society. The purpose of the Working Group 1 report, as determined by the first meeting of IPCC, is to provide a scientific assessment of: 1) the factors which may affect climate change during the next century especially those which are due to human activity. 2) the responses of the atmosphere-oceanland-ice system. 3) Current capabilities of modelling global and regional climate changes and their predictability. 4) The past climate record and presently observed climate anomalies. KEYWORDS: environment, international, report, policy, climate Pages 26 30 Annex 6: Guidelines on the Structure of NAPA Documents Information already included in the proposal for funding the NAPA preparation process need not be repeated in the NAPA document itself. The GEF proposal-preparation process requires specific information and linkages to other enabling activities. Only essential points should be repeated here. A. Introduction and setting 1. This introductory section will include background information about the country that is relevant to the NAPA process. It will cover current characteristics, key environmental stresses, and how climate change and climate variability adversely affect biophysical processes and key sectors. Given the need for conciseness in the NAPA document, only information that is directly relevant to the content of the NAPA document should be included in this section. B. Framework for adaptation programme 2. This section will also provide an overview of climate variability and observed and projected climate change and associated actual and potential adverse effects of climate change. This overview will be based on existing and ongoing studies and research, and/or empirical and historical information as well as traditional knowledge. This section should clearly summarize hazards posed by climate and climate change, and some summary of vulnerability, based on past studies and/or from stakeholder knowledge of their situation. This section will set the context for the whole NAPA by clearly demonstrating what aspects of climate change are important for the country, based on the experience of its stakeholders. Such an approach cannot rely exclusively on academic literature, or Vulnerability and Adaptation reports, but mainly on the knowledge of practitioners at the community level who have developed coping strategies over generations. The reference above to “projected climate change” implies drawing on existing national projections, if available. 3. This section will describe the NAPA framework and its relationship to the country’s development goals, to make the framework consistent with socio-economic and development needs. In addition, it would also describe the goals, objectives and strategies of the NAPA, taking into account other plans and multilateral environmental agreements. While the NAPA identifies urgent and immediate action, it still needs to fit within development goals, plans and frameworks, especially in relation to rural citizens and economic development plans for the country. NAPAs will not attempt to implement broad national development goals; rather, NAPAs would build upon national goals and integrate into national plans. They should also promote synergies with other plans of action. Most if not all countries have elaborated their development goals, and have systems in place to implement the associated plans through economic planning, etc. It is important that the NAPA team be aware of these, because NAPAs may be expected to safeguard important systems, including infrastructure that would be critical in achieving economic goals for the country. For example, a NAPA may wish to flood-proof a single bridge that connects a major cash-crop producing area of a region. 31 4. included. Where possible, a description of the potential barriers to implementation should also be There may be potentially serious barriers to implementing NAPAs, such as a lack of policies to facilitate the implementation of the NAPA. These barriers should be identified and possibly considered as areas for intervention in the immediate term or in future. Examples of such barriers could include legal and policy-level inadequacies or inconsistencies, institutional, social, economic and cultural barriers, lack of awareness of climate change issues etc. C. Identification of key adaptation needs 5. Based on this overview and framework, past and current practices for adaptation to climate change and climate variability will be identified as related to existing information regarding the country’s vulnerability to the adverse effects of climate change, climate variability and extreme weather events, as well as long-term climate change. This section will explain how and to what extent activities may address specific vulnerabilities. This will be the synthesis of the core of the NAPA preparation process, and should clearly articulate suggested courses of action based on specific vulnerabilities. This long list of activities should be based on the assessments carried out by the NAPA team, including very substantive involvement by stakeholders. In some cases, countries may have adequate information from past studies to suggest urgent actions to address previously identified priorities. In such a case, the multi-stakeholder dialogue would emphasize the discussion of actions and selection of priority activities. 6. Given the actual and potential adverse effects of climate change described in section B.2 above, this section will identify relevant adaptation options including capacity building, policy reform, integration into sectoral policies and project-level activities. D. Criteria for selecting priority activities A country should be free to choose from these criteria as best suits their case. NAPA activities must address convincing threats of climate and climate change, and information should be provided that shows potential damages and how this damage would be avoided or reduced. NAPA activities should demonstrate fiscal responsibility (cost-effectiveness), they must be related to level of risk, and should complement important country goals, such as overcoming poverty to enhance adaptive capacity, and other environmental agreements. The prioritisation process is a two-tiered approach. Under paragraph 7 below, four general criteria will be used to select priority adaptation activities from a long list of potential activities. The criteria under paragraph 8 below will be prioritised and will subsequently be used to rank the selected NAPA activities. The criteria under paragraph 7 could be seen as of a first order; those under paragraph 8 as further detailing. Countries are encouraged to limit the number of criteria to a manageable number. 32 7. A set of locally-driven criteria will be used to select priority adaptation activities. These criteria should include, inter alia: (a) Level or degree of adverse effects of climate change; (b) Poverty reduction to enhance adaptive capacity; (c) Synergy with other multilateral environmental agreements; (d) Cost-effectiveness. 8. These criteria for prioritisation will be applied to, inter alia: (a) Loss of life and livelihood; Countries are encouraged to treat “loss of life” and “loss of livelihood” as two distinct criteria. (b) Human health; (c) Food security and agriculture; (d) Water availability, quality and accessibility; (e) Essential infrastructure; (f) Cultural heritage; (g) Biological diversity; (h) Land-use management and forestry; (i) Other environmental amenities; This could include wetlands, natural attractions, etc. (j) Coastal zones, and associated loss of land. Countries should use all or any of the above, as well as other relevant criteria for their situation. E. List of priority activities 9. This section will list priority climate-change adaptation activities that have been selected based on the criteria listed in section F.4 above. This is the outcome of the NAPA preparation process – a list of priority activities, which fit in well with the country's development goals and poverty reduction strategies, while at the same time enhancing the adaptive capacity of its vulnerable communities. 33 10. For each of the selected priority activities a set of profiles will be developed for inclusion in the NAPA document. The format of the project profile is as follows, and each should be about 2-3 pages only: Title Rationale/justification, in relation to climate change, including sectors concerned Description - Objectives and activities - Inputs - Short-term outputs - Potential long-term outcomes Implementation - Institutional arrangement - Risks and barriers - Evaluation and monitoring - Financial resources F. NAPA preparation process 11. This section will describe the NAPA development process, including the process of consultation, the methods for evaluation and monitoring, the institutional arrangements, and the mechanism of endorsement by the national government. This final section would document, briefly, the processes and major steps in developing the NAPA, paying particular attention to the important guiding principles of NAPA, namely: use of a participatory process involving stakeholders, especially local communities inclusion of multiple disciplines and inclusion of agencies responsible for implementing development plans country-drivenness contribution to overall sustainable development goals government endorsement and commitment to implementing the outcomes, and some system for accountability transparency 34