IDE 120 Evaluations
Section
Day
3F
Monday
3E
Monday
3J
Monday
3A
Tuesday
3B
Tuesday
3C
Wednesday
3D
Wednesday
3G
Thursday
3H
Thursday
Time
1:00-3:00
3:00-5:00
5:00-7:00
1:00-3:00
3:00-5:00
1:00-3:00
3:00-5:00
1:00-3:00
3:00-5:00
TA 1
Josh Bettis
Krishna Kolan
Linda Trang
Josh Bettis
Josh Bettis
Linda Trang
Chris Bramlett
Krishna Kolan
Krishna Kolan
TA 2
Katie Ragan
Sean Smith
Katie Ragan
Paul Cardwell
Chris Bramlett
Tim Peters
Tim Peters
Mike Eckert
Mike Eckert
Rating scale: 4 - Excellent, 3 - Superior, 2 - Average
1 - Inferior, 0 - Failing,
NA - Not Applicable
Evaluation of TA 1
1. Interest and enthusiasm for the subject matter…….....
4
3
2
1
0
NA
2. Ability to solve problems that arise in the lab……...... 4
3
2
1
0
NA
3. Willingness to answer questions..................................
4
3
2
1
0
NA
4. Availability after scheduled laboratory class...............
4
3
2
1
0
NA
5. Punctuality and attendance...........................................
4
3
2
1
0
NA
6. Knowledge of material.................................................
4
3
2
1
0
NA
7. Consistency and fairness of grading............................. 4
3
2
1
0
NA
8. Promptness in returning graded assignments................ 4
3
2
1
0
NA
9. Overall evaluation of graduate teaching assistant......... 4
3
2
1
0
NA
4
3
2
1
0
NA
2. Ability to solve problems that arise in the lab……...... 4
3
2
1
0
NA
3. Willingness to answer questions..................................
4
3
2
1
0
NA
4. Availability after scheduled laboratory class...............
4
3
2
1
0
NA
5. Punctuality and attendance...........................................
4
3
2
1
0
NA
6. Knowledge of material.................................................
4
3
2
1
0
NA
7. Consistency and fairness of grading............................. 4
3
2
1
0
NA
8. Promptness in returning graded assignments................ 4
3
2
1
0
NA
9. Overall evaluation of teaching assistant.......................
3
2
1
0
NA
Evaluation of TA 2
1. Interest and enthusiasm for the subject matter…….....
4
… more questions on back …
IDE 120 Evaluations, continued
As part of a continuing process to make this laboratory more meaningful and more effective we
are requesting your honest response to the following items.
1. Overall, this laboratory requires
________ more
________ about the same
________ less
work than other one-credit-hour laboratory classes which I have taken.
2. Laboratory presentation and reporting requirements were
________ more
________ about the same
________ less
than that required in other one-credit-hour laboratory classes which I have taken.
3. Experiments reinforced the lecture material from the IDE 110 (mechanics of materials)
course
________ usually
________ sometimes
________ seldom.
4. The laboratory lectures in conjunction with the mechanics of materials course gave adequate
theoretical background to understand the experiments
________ usually
________ sometimes
________ seldom.
5. The laboratory web pages are designed to supplement the mechanics of materials text and to
serve as a bridge to the experiments. I would rate the web pages as:
________ very effective
________ average
________ ineffective.
6. Overall, as an educational experience I would rate this course
________ better
________ about the same
________ worse
than other one-credit-hour laboratory courses which I have taken.
7. Please provide any constructive comments that you wish to make toward improving this
laboratory course.
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________